That's really over simplifying the situation. There are other concerns beside the one you mentioned, such as how many cars are being sold that are 10mpg vs 33 mpg? Which one is easier to increase the mileage on? Do the people who buy the 10mpg cars care about gas mileage?
There's nothing inherently dangerous about speeding, aka, driving faster than the posted limit. Driving recklessly, on the other hand, has killed a lot of people.
Speed limits are about as effective as minimum drinking ages and drug prohibition. They aren't. Tons of people use drugs, any kid that wants alcohol gets it, and people still drive recklessly.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that the president of the United States cannot just take anyone's assets, be it a domestic or foreign company. He's the chief executive, not the Dictator of Justice.
Really? You're using yourself as the standard for births? If there was a problem as straight forward as you are saying, the practice would already be to wait before clamping. Reality is that you were the exception, not the rule. There's no evidence that keeping you attached to mom would have done anything.
(Computer science doesn't necessarily cover rdbms in depth.)
That said, it's entirely possible to learn how to build a SQL database + web application on the job, like I have, and be able to make it work well, but have no idea what the official lingo is for much of the process.
The owner loses their right to be the sole distributor. It's actually a fairly substantial loss for someone who makes their money off copyrighted material.
Bah...the market overlap between netbooks and tablets (that would cause competition) is tiny. People who buy netbooks want a small laptop. People buy the iPad want an entertainment device. The iPad happens to be coming in ot the market at a point where it's becoming saturated with netbooks. The drop in demand in natural, and is unlikely to have anything to do with the iPad.
These weren't released as anonymous patches, they were bundled with other security updates. If you don't think you need to install security patch marked as "important", you should look into a career other than IT.
Read the article before you go spouting off about Microsoft.
>The truth is that it's business as usual for not just Microsoft, but for most software makers, said Storms. "Vendors commonly find bugs themselves in released code and will distribute the fixes inside a bundle of other patches," he noted. "Many times there simply is no benefit to anyone to disclose the bug."
You realize that this article is all about some security firm that thinks the patched problems were more important than Microsoft did, right? They think the updates should have been marked "Critical", while Microsoft thinks they were "Important". I'd go with MS on this one instead of some attention whoring security firm.
This is such a non-story. MS found a few bugs that they patched and this security company happens to think that they were more critical than Microsoft did.
Slashdot Mirror
That's really over simplifying the situation. There are other concerns beside the one you mentioned, such as how many cars are being sold that are 10mpg vs 33 mpg? Which one is easier to increase the mileage on? Do the people who buy the 10mpg cars care about gas mileage?
Traffic camera tickets don't affect your driving record.
There's nothing inherently dangerous about speeding, aka, driving faster than the posted limit. Driving recklessly, on the other hand, has killed a lot of people.
Speed limits are about as effective as minimum drinking ages and drug prohibition. They aren't. Tons of people use drugs, any kid that wants alcohol gets it, and people still drive recklessly.
One of these things is not like the others! Can you tell which one it is?
Speeding
Jaywalking
Murder
Failure to signal before turning
Public intoxication
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that the president of the United States cannot just take anyone's assets, be it a domestic or foreign company. He's the chief executive, not the Dictator of Justice.
Um, the OS can be upgrade on Windows mobiles phones. My phone came with Windows Mobile 5 and I got an upgrade to 6 when it came out.
Really? You're using yourself as the standard for births? If there was a problem as straight forward as you are saying, the practice would already be to wait before clamping. Reality is that you were the exception, not the rule. There's no evidence that keeping you attached to mom would have done anything.
Honestly he shouldn't build a complex solution where a simple on will suffice. Batch files are fine for what he's doing.
It doesn't help that arrogant employers refuse to entertain the idea that their employees may need to learn a few things on the job.
(Computer science doesn't necessarily cover rdbms in depth.)
That said, it's entirely possible to learn how to build a SQL database + web application on the job, like I have, and be able to make it work well, but have no idea what the official lingo is for much of the process.
You actually don't have to know a lot about computers to be a system admin or a programmer.
The owner loses their right to be the sole distributor. It's actually a fairly substantial loss for someone who makes their money off copyrighted material.
>When you steal something you deprive the previous owner of their copy.
Ok, so when you illegally download a movie or song, you are stealing the copyright holder's right to distribute it.
Interestingly, real property rights are also privileges created by the state, or, in the absence of a state, by force.
Bah...the market overlap between netbooks and tablets (that would cause competition) is tiny. People who buy netbooks want a small laptop. People buy the iPad want an entertainment device. The iPad happens to be coming in ot the market at a point where it's becoming saturated with netbooks. The drop in demand in natural, and is unlikely to have anything to do with the iPad.
These weren't released as anonymous patches, they were bundled with other security updates. If you don't think you need to install security patch marked as "important", you should look into a career other than IT.
>Is an h264-enabled web browser a core application? An h264-enabled video player? Etc., etc.
You appear not to understand how codecs work.
>They're signing up now when this thing isn't even GPL compatible. Do you have any diea what that means?
It means nothing.
Read the article before you go spouting off about Microsoft.
>The truth is that it's business as usual for not just Microsoft, but for most software makers, said Storms. "Vendors commonly find bugs themselves in released code and will distribute the fixes inside a bundle of other patches," he noted. "Many times there simply is no benefit to anyone to disclose the bug."
>Sysadmins need to know exactly what bugs are being fixed in each patch so they can decide on appropriate priorities for deployment.
If it's a security update, you apply it. If you don't, and you get owned, it's your fault.
You realize that this article is all about some security firm that thinks the patched problems were more important than Microsoft did, right? They think the updates should have been marked "Critical", while Microsoft thinks they were "Important". I'd go with MS on this one instead of some attention whoring security firm.
This is such a non-story. MS found a few bugs that they patched and this security company happens to think that they were more critical than Microsoft did.
I'd hardly call Flash old and useless. Have you watched a video or animation in HTML5? The quality just isn't the same as Flash.
>Mainly the fact that they need to get their cutesy screen-saver into a distribution repo to actually gain a significant level of deployment.
Or they could, you know, just send a link to a deb or rpm in an email, because most people wouldn't think twice about it not being in a repo.