If he can get in. Windows update broke the security system, and now the door won't open from the outside.
(Actually had that happen when a developer decided to install updates on the security system, which has no direct contact with the internet (no gateway + firewalled traffic).
As of right now the project is very geared towards Ubuntu. I just posted on Fedora Projects G+ page about supporting it, but I feel like they're going to say there isn't enough manpower on the TDE team to keep up with newer backend requirements (systemd, firewalld, etc).
TDE ran fantastic when I used it last on an older laptop (P3 1.2GHz, 1GB RAM, Fedora 16). I think the team needs some more manpower, since it's slow to support newer operating systems (F17 is the last supported FC, for example), and needs a lot of documentation (I'd build from source if they had some instructions, but it's a mess).
Actually, I'd be completely behind this. But, my development skills rank around "not so good" so I do better at testing and what not, which I'd be willing to do for a project like that if it was making progress.
Disagree - the "Desktop Environments" - KDE, GNOME, Unity, XFCE, RazorQT, and LXDE, are geared towards being a "Desktop." Some do this in a much better manner then others (GNOME isn't doing so good IMO). Perhaps you're thinking of "Window Managers," which are a part of a DE.
I've had Windows drivers die on update - the best one that comes to mind for me was my Toshiba laptop (2006). Had WiFi issues with XP SP3 when that came out, and WiFi, GPU and Power Managment really hit the fan in Vista for a short while, and then again in Windows 7 (wouldn't work with the Vista drivers, due to some issue with Toshiba's installers. Had to go through some hoops to get everything working).
For long term stability in Linux, I'm using RHEL. RHEL 5 still supports the software I need it to run, RHEL 6 works well too. I'm considering moving some systems to Solaris to avoid some things that are going to be in RHEL 7....
Which would wonderful to see that level of cooperation, and some great things could result. RazorQT is very close to what i want from a DE, and LXDE works pretty well too (I'm a fan of QT over GTK).
Slashdot Mirror
Shouldn't it be:
General Failure reading drive A
Abort, Retry, Fail?
You forgot Bastille Day on Jul 14...
Where I work we're also the helpdesk team (and network, and phones, and...)
If he can get in. Windows update broke the security system, and now the door won't open from the outside.
(Actually had that happen when a developer decided to install updates on the security system, which has no direct contact with the internet (no gateway + firewalled traffic).
Oracle is good at one thing: making Larry Elison money. Microsoft isn't sure what they're good at.
When I was using the free edition, I blocked the nag screen using local policy...
Add me to the list for advocating Avira. Been using them since 2007.
Ummm...what? He's running an outdated kernel - came out a while ago.
As of right now the project is very geared towards Ubuntu. I just posted on Fedora Projects G+ page about supporting it, but I feel like they're going to say there isn't enough manpower on the TDE team to keep up with newer backend requirements (systemd, firewalld, etc).
Not among myself, my friends, or my clients.
TDE ran fantastic when I used it last on an older laptop (P3 1.2GHz, 1GB RAM, Fedora 16). I think the team needs some more manpower, since it's slow to support newer operating systems (F17 is the last supported FC, for example), and needs a lot of documentation (I'd build from source if they had some instructions, but it's a mess).
If you really want CDE it's open source now....
Delta RPMs for one.
Actually you're not required to have turn signals. You are required to signal your intention though (hand signals work).
I don't use Ubuntu.
Actually, I'd be completely behind this. But, my development skills rank around "not so good" so I do better at testing and what not, which I'd be willing to do for a project like that if it was making progress.
Disagree - the "Desktop Environments" - KDE, GNOME, Unity, XFCE, RazorQT, and LXDE, are geared towards being a "Desktop." Some do this in a much better manner then others (GNOME isn't doing so good IMO). Perhaps you're thinking of "Window Managers," which are a part of a DE.
I wasn't thinking that far back. More like 2006 era, KDE 3 days, etc. Although I never had much issue with editing xfree86.conf personally.
Depends on what you do. I have to support RHEL. I am not looking forward to RHEL 7 in the least bit.
We still have WindowMaker and AfterStep...
Really? The downfall of desktop Linux is trying to emulate Windows. Much better off when it was more UNIX-y
I've had Windows drivers die on update - the best one that comes to mind for me was my Toshiba laptop (2006). Had WiFi issues with XP SP3 when that came out, and WiFi, GPU and Power Managment really hit the fan in Vista for a short while, and then again in Windows 7 (wouldn't work with the Vista drivers, due to some issue with Toshiba's installers. Had to go through some hoops to get everything working).
For long term stability in Linux, I'm using RHEL. RHEL 5 still supports the software I need it to run, RHEL 6 works well too. I'm considering moving some systems to Solaris to avoid some things that are going to be in RHEL 7....
So use Compiz
I agree - k3b has been perfect in my opinion since the KDE 3 days. Why break it now?
Which would wonderful to see that level of cooperation, and some great things could result. RazorQT is very close to what i want from a DE, and LXDE works pretty well too (I'm a fan of QT over GTK).