The site owner should not be responsible for checking that all search engines are not stealing content
The webmaster, however, should be responsible for having a fucking clue(tm) how the web works, such as what the robots.txt file. If he doesn't he's a 'tard, they should get rid of him and employ someone else. It's not like there's a a shortage.
And indexing is not stealing content. Stop exaggerating, you hysterical ninny.
I know a couple of girls who came to this country to study interior designing [...] this further reduces the number of ppl that can be hired in professions like software, ece etc.
Sometime in the late 90s I heard as a rumour circulating that the whole H1 quota was gone a few months into the year because it had been taken up by Rumanian porn stars and similar trollops. Might have been an urban myth, though.
If you're going to drink cheap Scotch (or indeed low-grade hooch of any kind) the simplest and most effective way to lose the manky taste is surely this.
The guy flipping you off in this picture [dca.net] then tells you that you are blind drunk and have no taste left. He's substituted gasoline without telling you.
Re:Speaking of filters...
on
Hacking Vodka
·
· Score: 1
As for drinking it, several cultures (India, Cameroon, Thailand, Japan I know for sure) have traditions regarding drinking unfiltered urine. Not saying it's a good idea though.
There was some politician - Boutros Boutros Ghali I think- who was famous for it. But maybe he was taking the piss.
On a similar note, can anyone tell me why many/most/nearly all Germans replace v-sounds with w-sounds when they speak English, despite having every reason to do the exact opposite?
A company should have a specific and narrowly defined purpose (which was the original intention of the Articles of Incorporation until lawyers came up with the idea of being very generic in those articles). Going outside those defined goals or making them too generic should be illegal
If the primary existence of the Earth was as a collective consensus among humans, yes.
And if my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle.
You're comparing apples and oranges here.
And every argument you make is hypothetical.
Language does not exist as an objective reality
No matter how many people use "it's" as a posessive - sorry other people, I'm sure you do - it isn't correct. It matters not one iota if it becomes the accepted standard in the 2037 OED, here and now it is wrong. Period.
So, you lose.
You presume to lecture us on logic and/or metaphysics then resort to proof by assertion. What will you delight us with next? Perhaps an ad-hominem, it's what I'd expect from a stupid twat like you.
And indexing is not stealing content. Stop exaggerating, you hysterical ninny.
If you're going to drink cheap Scotch (or indeed low-grade hooch of any kind) the simplest and most effective way to lose the manky taste is surely this.
I put it to you, sir, that it would not.