Slashdot Mirror


Hacking Vodka

enrico_suave writes "A group of geeks aimed to find out whether running cheap vodka through a brita water filter would make it drinkable. They claim after several passes through the filter the cheap vodka surpassed the premium Ketel One in drinkability tests. I think they should have done the test 'double blind' although drinking Vladmir Vodka probably could make you go blind anyways... =)"

570 comments

  1. Common knowledge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I believe this has actually been known for a long time.

    Here is the canonical list of the top ten things that taste better once filtered through a Brita pitcher six times, in decreasing order of improvement, according to the Brita FAQ:

    • Orange juice
    • Coca Cola
    • Vodka
    • Cooking oil
    • Urine
    • Gasoline
    • Blood
    • Vinegar
    • Water
    • Semen
    Surprisingly, pus did not make the list....
    1. Re:Common knowledge? by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Where does vomit rank on this scale? At the bottom under "all of the above"?

    2. Re:Common knowledge? by BlakeLupa · · Score: 2, Informative

      I do belive drinking gasoline will still give you stomach cancer not matter how may times you run it through a filter. Just incase anyoen was thinking of trying it.

    3. Re:Common knowledge? by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      It's still gonna kill you, but it'll taste better while it does it.

    4. Re:Common knowledge? by Rie+Beam · · Score: 5, Funny

      Curious - as to who was the first person to say "This semen would taste better run though a Brita water filter"?

    5. Re:Common knowledge? by Necrobruiser · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just incase anyoen was thinking of trying it.

      Stop telling people not to drink gasoline. We'll all be better off once the people who would drink gasoline, drink gasoline. ;)

      --
      "I planned within my means and got a fixed rate mortgage, so where's MY bailout?" -cafepress
    6. Re:Common knowledge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      It was a close race. Your sister beat your mom by just a smidge.

    7. Re:Common knowledge? by Jason1729 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is no way gasoline will give you stomach cancer.

      It will kill you long before a cancer could develop.

    8. Re:Common knowledge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      reminds me of the Sam Kinison quote "What the fuck, How bored was this guy at the party. What, were out of booze, were out of pot, There's no more coke. Wait, doesn't your little brother have a Hamster up in his room. What if we taped him up and shove him in my ass, thats gotta feel different. "

    9. Re:Common knowledge? by JPriest · · Score: 5, Funny

      Exactly, hacking vodka is actually pretty common practice the next morning.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    10. Re:Common knowledge? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      What, you don't like the taste of cherry pie filling?

    11. Re:Common knowledge? by cmeans · · Score: 1
      We will try anything to make it sound better than it probably is...

    12. Re:Common knowledge? by BlakeLupa · · Score: 1

      Depends on how much you drink :-P

    13. Re:Common knowledge? by runderwo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I carry a little flask around with me. Sometimes I take a discreet sip when I think nobody is looking.

    14. Re:Common knowledge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Methanol is not the only thing that contributes to hangovers. Drinking vodka will give you a hangover. Trust me.

    15. Re:Common knowledge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vodka won't give you a hang over? are you nuts? Drink a liter of vodka and reply back to this tomorrow morning with your findings.

    16. Re:Common knowledge? by pturing · · Score: 5, Informative

      it also depends on what vodka you are drinking. If it comes in a plastic bottle, expect to get sick. Good vodka is relatively free of the other little organic molecules that cause most of your problems.

      Of course, if you're drinking enough of it then your problem is dehydration. If you have a pain in your side and/or your urine isn't colorless, then your probably need to drink more water, whether you've been drinking alcohol or not.

    17. Re:Common knowledge? by JThundley · · Score: 4, Funny

      Somebody from CookingWithCum.com would. It's a real web site!

    18. Re:Common knowledge? by fux0rbob · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      the Russians?

      In Soviet Russia, semen filters you!

      --
      w00t w00t watch wh0 y0u sh00t!
    19. Re:Common knowledge? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Somebody from CookingWithCum.com would. It's a real web site!

      OMG... it's almost as weird and contrived as "Cooking with Dr. Pepper".

      Almost.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    20. Re:Common knowledge? by Thomas+Miconi · · Score: 3, Funny

      We'll all be better off once the people who would drink gasoline, drink gasoline

      God, now they're trying to slashdot the Darwin Awards !

      Thomas-

    21. Re:Common knowledge? by suraklin · · Score: 1

      actually the biggest reason for hangover is dehydration.

    22. Re:Common knowledge? by Moderatbastard · · Score: 1
      methanol that gives you a hangover.
      Right. The dehydration has nothing to do with it at all, then?
      --
      1/3 of jokes get modded OT. If you get the joke, mod 1 in 3 insightful/interesting/underrated to restore karma balance.
    23. Re:Common knowledge? by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

      since it's low on the list, I shouldn't bother putting water in my Brita????

    24. Re:Common knowledge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > > Somebody from CookingWithCum.com would. It's a real web site!
      >
      > OMG... it's almost as weird and contrived as "Cooking with Dr. Pepper".
      >
      >Almost.

      "In total there are 84 users online :: 1 Registered, 0 Hidden and 83 Guests".

      Wonder WTF it feels like to be that 1 registered user right now. Probably pretty scary.

    25. Re:Common knowledge? by khrtt · · Score: 1

      The stuff in vodka that gives you hangovers is fusel oils. Those are heavy alcohols, much heavier than ethanol. Methanol doesn't give hangovers - it just makes you blind and then kill you, but you won't get a hangover. Fortunately, these is very little of it in vodka.

    26. Re:Common knowledge? by khrtt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sometimes I take a discreet sip when I think nobody is looking.

      Are you a small car?

    27. Re:Common knowledge? by kevingolding2001 · · Score: 3, Funny
      The stuff in vodka that gives you hangovers is fusel oils.

      I had to read to this three times before my slightly alcohol-addled brain stopped seeing it as "...that give you hangovers is fossil fuels".

    28. Re:Common knowledge? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Well only if they drink enough of it AND drink it before they have kids.

      If they attempted to light up a cigarette after such a drink, it could minimize the dosage required for the desired effect.

      --
    29. Re:Common knowledge? by Tongo · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, I'm sober and thought that it said that. I did just wake up though....

    30. Re:Common knowledge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That can't be real, it just can't be.

      Oh my God, it is.

      I'm flabbergasted [sp?].

    31. Re:Common knowledge? by FallenAngel_Ca · · Score: 1

      Im wondering who actually took the time to strain half of those, more specifically cooking oil, urine,gasoline, blood, and semen :| and more distrubing, who the hell taste-tested em

    32. Re:Common knowledge? by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

      Why should a charcoal filter filter out fusel oils and not ethanol?

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    33. Re:Common knowledge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do belive drinking gasoline will still give you stomach cancer

      That did surprise me when I read it, because I couldn't think of a good chemical mechanism that would explain (relatively) unreactive alkanes to react with human tissue. So for those of you who went along that same path of inquiry, the short answer is that it is toxic and/or carcinogenic because of the additives like Pb and/or C6H6, not the CH3-C(CH3)2-CH(CH3)-CH2CH3 (or equivalent) itself.

    34. Re:Common knowledge? by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      I think if you drank a liter of vodka you will have greater problems than headache and nausea.

      Vodka can cause hangovers, but good vodka is the least worst offender of all varieties of alcohol with regards to the next morning.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    35. Re:Common knowledge? by Lurkey+Turkey · · Score: 1
      Surprisingly, pus did not make the list....

      Pus goes to the top of the list after seven filterings...

    36. Re:Common knowledge? by stor · · Score: 1

      Wonder WTF it feels like to be that 1 registered user right now. Probably pretty scary.

      I'd dare say that a registered used of cookingwithcum.com knows no fear.

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    37. Re:Common knowledge? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Stop telling people not to drink gasoline. We'll all be better off once the people who would drink gasoline, drink gasoline. ;)
      You're clearly not sitting next to one, then. One who's a smoker ...
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    38. Re:Common knowledge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.feu-nrmf.ph/norbert/misc/keech/misc/kee ch_brandy.html

      Try it u will love It

    39. Re:Common knowledge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here is the canonical list of the top ten things that taste better once filtered through a Brita pitcher six times, in decreasing order of improvement, according to the Brita FAQ:
      • Orange juice
      • Coca Cola
      • Vodka
      • Cooking oil
      • Urine
      • Gasoline
      • Blood
      • Vinegar
      • Water
      • Semen

      Not suprisingly, someone lied (imbelished) on the internet. The FAQ does not reference this list, but does reference juices:

      How else can I use Brita water?
      Brita is great with coffee, tea, frozen juices and powdered drinks. It's also great for preparing cooked foods and mixing infant formula
    40. Re:Common knowledge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly it's a hybrid, either a Civic, Prius, Insight or that new Ford SUV.

  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. no no no by nocomment · · Score: 2, Funny

    drinking Vladmir Vodka probably could make you go blind

    That's Ffud that made all those hillbillies go blind.

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    1. Re:no no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the hillbillies went blind from FUDD.

    2. Re:no no no by cshark · · Score: 4, Informative

      Na' Vodka's kids stuff. If you are really serious about drinking yourself blind, get yourself a nice bottle of ARAK, and drink it in one sitting. A good bottle will be up to and around 70-80% alcohol. It's big in the middle east. They drink it on the weekends, the rest of the time... it's Window cleaner.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    3. Re:no no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Stop it!

      Thats quite enough FUD for one thread.

    4. Re:no no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grave's pure grain alcohol, 190 proof. I don't think anyone drinks it for long, either you wise up or die.

    5. Re:no no no by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      Might as well go with Everclear.. few shots and you'll be envying bats.. at least for the next 30 seconds that you're conscious.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    6. Re:no no no by forevermore · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For those who don't know, Arak is the Israeli (and Lebanese and Syrian) word for the anise liquor known in Greece as Uozo and in Turkey as Raki. There are variations of this drink around the world (from South America to India), and though people may argue that one is better than the other, they're all basically the same idea (I hear that Syrian Arak is the best of the bunch). And I agree, much better than vodka. Especially for the science nerd in all of us as we marvel at the totally clear liquid turning milky white as the water from melting ice mixes with the alcoholic beverage.

      --
      Do you really need reason for beer? Wingman Brewers
    7. Re:no no no by daniil · · Score: 1

      If you are really serious about drinking yourself blind, help yourself to some methyl alcohol. Blindness is pretty much guaranteed. And so is death.

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    8. Re:no no no by Ravadill · · Score: 1

      There's also Arak from indonesia, which is made from fermented palm sugar. Tastes a lot different to Uozo, it's generally drunk mixed with cola.

    9. Re:no no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the term 'arak' is common from mongolia to croatia (rakya in croatia).. i've heard that it stems from arabic/turkish word meaning sweat - my guess is the term refers to distillation process, which can be seen as "sweating." araks from different regions are made with different stuff, but common to them all seems that they are distilled spirit, rather than fermented beer/wine.

    10. Re:no no no by mickq · · Score: 1

      Arak is kids stuff too.

      My favourite drink is Spirytus Rektyfikowany.

      Its made in Poland by the State Liquor Monopoly.

      Its 96% pure.

      It doesnt pretend to be a civilised drink. Its just a great way to get hammered. Effectively its pure alchohol. They dont put in any additives.

      500ml is 38 standard drinks.

      Thanksfully someone thought it should be imported into Australia, so we get to share the Polish spirit!

  4. Old Stuff.. by Klar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Martin Sargent from Unscrewed did this on his show a while back.. he seemed to enjoy the taste :)

    1. Re:Old Stuff.. by loquacious+d · · Score: 1

      Martin Sargent is an idiot and an alcoholic.

      But you knew that.

  5. water filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hookah Vodka!

    1. Re:water filter by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      No no. It's spelled Hoka. Not sure it's vodka, but it's said to have a kick.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  6. Better than a Volcano by glowimperial · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally a great science project that the kids can do at home.

    1. Re:Better than a Volcano by pHatidic · · Score: 5, Funny

      Last year some kids I know 'liberated' a distillation column from the chem labs and took some normal vodka and distilled it into 190 proof "super-vodka". A couple shots of that and I was hallucinating and kept running out of my dorm room every half hour because for some reason I thought my bike was being stolen. I still get that warm tingly feeling in my liver just thinking about it.

    2. Re:Better than a Volcano by caveat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hells bells, if they were ransacking the chem labs, they should have just taken some anhydrous ethanol. Back when I was in school, we used to order it by the 5-gallon tub ($20.99!), and since it was USP-grade, it was technically safe to drink...nobody ever noticed a liter gone here or there.

      Of course, since alcohol doesn't really want to exist in that 100% pure state, it had a nasty habit of dehydrating your tender tissues on the way down, as well as having the unholiest burn of any drink I've ever had (it actually had sort of an oily texture/mouth feel, instead of the usual watery sensation), but oh man did it ever fux0r one up. Cheers!

      --

      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    3. Re:Better than a Volcano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wow, I would highly unrecommend drinking anhydrous alcohol, due to the benzine in it. Distillation alone will not remove all the water from the alcohol, so benzine is typically used to get rid of the rest (don't ask me how, I have no idea what the chemistry behind it is).

      Benzine is an awful toxin and carcinogen...not so much something you want to ingest.

      190 proof grain alcohol is pretty cheap...and you're really not gonna notice a difference, in either taste (they both taste like...burning) or in effect (that last 5% makes almost no difference).

      You might want those taste buds later on in life anyway...

    4. Re:Better than a Volcano by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Everclear.
      190 proof corn ethanol (95%)
      2 shots in an 8 oz glass.
      fill glass with Gateraid.
      drink.
      you will be drunk befor the glass is gone.
      at the end of the glass you've had about 5 shots of regular booze.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    5. Re:Better than a Volcano by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      You might be.
      I was in the habit of drinking 375+ ml of Everclear in a quart of OJ every night.
      Popsicles made a good chaser.
      I've still got a closet full of 1.75 liter empties.
      I shudder to remember those nights.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    6. Re:Better than a Volcano by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      And you drank it? wow. This is an incredibly stupid thing to do unless it was brand new. Distillation apparatus are notoriously difficult to completely clean and judging from the nightmarishly toxic things I've seen to go into them I would never EVER drink something that touched one.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    7. Re:Better than a Volcano by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My old housemate Sasha from Moscow used to take a little ethanol from the lab every now and then. One time he made me a meal of mushrooms he'd gathered, which I was afraid to eat, and to drink there was ethanol diluted with a little water and flavored with a pinch of salt. "Too bad we don't have some glycerin to make it smooth" he lamented. He then told me about a friend back home who collected various liquids from the lab, and when there was enough he distilled them into a concoction. "The effect was very unusual", he added.

      --
      You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
    8. Re:Better than a Volcano by ErikZ · · Score: 2, Informative


      Huh. I used the name Benzine for one of my DnD characters. I got it off the soda I was drinking.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    9. Re:Better than a Volcano by Gunnery+Sgt.+Hartman · · Score: 3, Informative

      My chemistry professor said he once had some students break into the lab and distill some ethanol that was sitting on the shelf. The students failed to realize that what they were distilling was not just ethanol, but denatured ethanol. The denaturing agent was methanol--the shit that fucks you up. One student died and the other student went blind from their stupidness.

      --
      [ ]
    10. Re:Better than a Volcano by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      did you use a straw to overcome your drinking problem? =)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    11. Re:Better than a Volcano by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Methinks you haven't drunk enough alcohol.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    12. Re:Better than a Volcano by istewart · · Score: 1

      I heard secondhand that one of the chem. professors at my school once got a call from the FBI in the middle of the night, asking him to report to the lab immediately. Once he got there, he learned that there were two dead custodians laying on the floor. Apparently they had found a jug of distilled methanol and made the wrong guess.

    13. Re:Better than a Volcano by nofx_3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Everclear is great becuase it burn easliy which means... VAPOR SHOTS!!! Lite a shotglass of everclear on fire, then turn your palm so it faces the ground and shove the glass up onto your palm. The fire will burn up the oxygen and quickly burn out but the glass will stick to your hand, pretty neat party trick. Then you take the shot, and while the shotglass is still warm stick it back against your plam, wait a few seconds and the remaining alcohol coating the inside of the glass will vaporize, now take the vapor shot, the vapor will go straight to your head and really mess you up good, try it its fun.

      -kaplanfx

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    14. Re:Better than a Volcano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      why?

      just take ye olde college issue hotplate, one deep bowl, a stainless steel or copper bowl that fist over the top of the bigger one in a tight-ish seal, an even smaller bowl that will fit inside the first one inverted with room to spare between it and the second one, and a cup.

      first bowl goes on the hot plate.

      third one is inverted on the bottom of it.

      buy cheap booze and pour into bottom of first bowl.

      set cup on top of inverted second bowl

      cover with the second bowl and add ice to it.

      turn on heat and wait.

      the cheap beer/wine/vodka will give up the precious which will condense on the cover and drip into the cup.

      If you want to filter it for smoothness you can tweak a small fish tank (NEW) as the holding tank and use a large tanks charcoal filtering unit to cycle the contents a few times.

      But mostly noone will do that so I suggest you take the now improved booze and add it directly to koolaid mix or tang

    15. Re:Better than a Volcano by hazem · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I love how out of puritanical fear that people will get drunk (and probably have sex) we put something that will instead make them blind or dead. What a country.

    16. Re:Better than a Volcano by my_fake_account · · Score: 1

      Why would a college chemistry student not know this?

      Why?

    17. Re:Better than a Volcano by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      In some states, you can just purchase "grain alcohol." We drank this sort of stuff in college, though perhaps against better advice.

    18. Re:Better than a Volcano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Spoken like someone who has never taught college chemistry.

    19. Re:Better than a Volcano by Jormundgandr · · Score: 1

      Many science labs now get their anyhdrous ethanol mixed with a small amount of gasoline. Not too attractive. But then, 190 proof vodka isn't really either.

      --
      -sig removed for tax purposes-
    20. Re:Better than a Volcano by prockcore · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Everclear is great becuase it burn easliy which means... VAPOR SHOTS!!! Lite a shotglass of everclear on fire, then turn your palm so it faces the ground and shove the glass up onto your palm.

      Here's an alternative that they actually serve at a bar. It's called a Flaming Waterfall.

      Put a shot of Bacardi 151 and a shot of Sambuka into a brandy snifter.

      Light on fire. Pour burning mixture into a pint glass, be sure to raise the snifter high enough so entire bar can see. Place snifter upside-down onto pint glass, putting out the fire.

      Then lift up the snifter, inhale the fumes, and take the shot.

      I'm sure many bars have their own version of this, but Malloneys in Tucson, AZ is where I've always had them.

    21. Re:Better than a Volcano by isometrick · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps you mean sodium benzoate or potassium benzoate, which are used as preservatives. Benzine is, AFAIK, poisonous.

    22. Re:Better than a Volcano by isometrick · · Score: 1

      Err ... benzene :)

    23. Re:Better than a Volcano by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      Eh, you're probably right. I didn't get to play him long. The worst die rolls of anything I've ever played.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    24. Re:Better than a Volcano by Sai+Babu · · Score: 1

      Why is there no benzene taste to anhydrous alcohol?
      It was easy to taste it in the Perrier.
      Unfortunately I had guzzled half the bottle before noticing.
      Not much chance of that with the anhydrous alcohol.
      This event on a cross country Delta flight.
      The taste stays with you for days.
      It's not something one would forget.
      Anhydrous alchohol used to show up at military surplus auctions. Back when everything that wasn't munitions or classified went to auction. These days you can't even buy perfectly good surplus paint and you can forget anything with a luminous dial.

    25. Re:Better than a Volcano by Gi77+B4t35 · · Score: 0

      I know something I wouldn't do, no matter how much vodka I drank, and that's shag the girl in TFA. What a fucking burglar's dog. Anyone drunk enough to want to bonk that moose should hope he isn't able to.

    26. Re:Better than a Volcano by Imabug · · Score: 2, Funny

      this will work with many other alcohols too. On a houseboating trip, one of my friends in a fit of inebriated creativity came up with a variant of this trip where he stuck the flaming shot glass to his ass. We called it a "Butt-buca", since the drink it was being done with was Sambuca.

      Once, while showing the trick off at a house party, my friend left it on too long an it got stuck to his ass. We were all laughing so hard at him running around yelling "It's stuck! It's stuck! Get it off!" none of us could help him (we were all rolling around on the ground in pain from busting a gut laughing). And those of us who were still able to stand didn't want to get anywhere near his ass to extract the shot glass.

      --
      "For I am a Bear of Very Little Brain, and Long Words Bother Me"
    27. Re:Better than a Volcano by owenb · · Score: 3, Funny

      I shudder to remember those nights

      You misspelled 'struggle'.

    28. Re:Better than a Volcano by khrtt · · Score: 1

      It's not the concentration of the ethanol that gets you drunk, it's the amount. And why bother making your own, when any half-decent chem lab would have a few gallons of 95% ethanol ready to borrow? And if you do bother with the rectification column, why not make moonshine, instead of distilling vodka that has already been purified? Silly kids, you

    29. Re:Better than a Volcano by khrtt · · Score: 1

      I know someone who had to get a new plastic esophagus after drinking a glass of unhydrous ethanol. Chears:-)

    30. Re:Better than a Volcano by jeef_zula · · Score: 1

      it's too bad they didn't realize the methanol was in it. all they had to do was discard the first couple ml's from distilling since the boiling point of methanol is much lower than the ethanol.

    31. Re:Better than a Volcano by SamSim · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is only tangetially related but I thought I'd post it anyway. At the start of (well, a week or so into) every new academic year at my college, all of the current mathematicians (such as me) band together, spend a reasonable proportion of the mathematicians' society's annual budget on vodka and assorted other alcoholic drinks, and have an amicable get-together in somebody's room to welcome the newcomers. In 2002 I was among those newcomers. There were about fifteen of us altogether.

      I had the good fortune to retire to my room relatively early that night, because some time later in the evening, I'm told, a second-year called Dom got out a fondue set. The details of what happened after that are a little confused, but basically, somebody else also got out a small lump of greenish cheese which he had bought at the dining hall some weeks previously and never mustered the courage to eat. Alcohol did its sinful work, and the idea arose to melt the cheese. Into half a bottle of vodka.

      Apparently (and understandably), nobody was able to manage more than a few sips of this crime against humanity of a drink without dire ill effects. The vast majority of the cheese vodka went undrunk and the bottle sort of hung around for the rest of the term... and the next term... and the next, gradually being handed from person to person as each one tried to get rid of it without actually drinking any of it or sacreligiously throwing it away.

      That was in October 2002. Towards the end of June 2003, it was decided that enough was enough. The cheese vodka had had its day. It was buried in what I'm told was a rather tearful ceremony in Botolph Court, being a rather grubby area of grass in the middle of some of our student accommodation. Apparently they emptied some tea over the grave; tea being another major interest of a significant number of mathematicians at our college.

      Fast-forward to October 2003 and the next official mathmo drinks. I was now among the second-years welcoming the first-years, and obviously we told them our various anecdotes of years gone by. We got to the cheese vodka story. Alcohol once again did its sinful work, and the idea popped into the collective head to go back to Botolph Court and dig it up again.

      Which we did.

      It was crawling up the side of the bottle to get out.

      It comes pretty close to the all-time Worst Idea In Alcoholic History. Not quite up there with "let's drink Lenin's embalming fluid", but pretty darned close. I think *name removed*, one of the first-years, was the only person who tried any of the one-year-old matured cheese vodka. She managed a record-breaking whole capful. She was alternately paralytic and unpleasantly violent for the rest of the evening. Eventually I was one of the ones who helped carry her back to her room, by which time she was already being seriously considered for that year's Most Drunken Mathmo award, usually given in summer.

      The cheese vodka is now missing, presumed poured down a sink somewhere, but I suspect that in the fullness of time it will resurface like an old supervillain.

    32. Re:Better than a Volcano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the experiments in my high-school chemistry class was distillation. Fortunately, the teacher (Samuel Barr Houser, USN(ret.), RIP) had a gallon of hard cider stashed in the back room, so we all distilled some of that. It was one of the most enthusiastically performed chem experiments I've seen.

    33. Re:Better than a Volcano by Log+from+Blammo · · Score: 1

      At Delaware, they denatured the anhydrous ethanol with phenolphthalein (the acid-base indicator). It wouldn't kill you, or make you blind, but horrible explosive diarrhea for three days would definitely make even the drinkiest drunk a stockroom teetotaler.

      --
      "This quote is a product of the Frobozz Magic Quote Company."
    34. Re:Better than a Volcano by k_187 · · Score: 1

      No, the best part of everclear is what you can do with an empty bottle. When its empty, fill it back up with water, then wait until you have friends over again. Warn a buddy before hand, and tell him to dare you to chug the bottle. When everyone is watching, have friend do this, and while you are doing so have them taunt you. This usually has the effect of making one laugh, but as you are chugging water, it will be difficult and will probably turn your face red and cause crying. This is similar to what happens when you chug everclear. When finished, look over the faces of your amazed friends, and assure them that you won't have to go to the hospital. Seriously, its fun.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    35. Re:Better than a Volcano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One student died and the other student went blind from their stupidness.
      Stupidity.

      Don't die, Gunnery!

    36. Re:Better than a Volcano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been there, done that..
      Ours was played out as a disgruntled friend that had finally had enough of life and was finally going to end it all right there.

    37. Re:Better than a Volcano by Forbman · · Score: 1

      it's not physically possible to distill all of the water out of EtOH (has to do with phase change overlaps, vapor pressure/temperatures, etc. between water and EtOH).

      You can always buy a bottle of Everclear (194 proof, 97% EtOH, about as close to economical pure distilled EtOH that you can get).

      The benzene, I would think, binds with either the EtOH or H2O, to mess up the relative densities between the two, so that the EtOH can be more easily separated. That of course would leave some residual benzene in the EtOH... which, like was said, is probably not good to ingest...

    38. Re:Better than a Volcano by caveat · · Score: 1

      Or you could try the AWOL Machine, a party machine that vaporizes liquor so you can take some hits. Sounds fun, but I have yet to try it.

      --

      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    39. Re:Better than a Volcano by jlseagull · · Score: 1

      Oh, does it ever burn easily. We buy our Everclear in West Virginia, where they sell it at gas stations.

      I'm notorious for getting hammered, then clearing people drunkenly out of the center of a room with a mischevious smile: "Just move, you'll see."

      Here's your party trick:

      I take a huge swig of Everclear, and light the Zippo I've modified with an extra-long wick so it has a 6" flame right in front of my mouth. About this time, some insightful soul will go "Oh, shit!" and dive for the floor.

      Instead of blowing across the pool of Everclear in the bottom of one's mouth like the inexperienced might do, instead I go for effect - I build up a good head of air in my lungs and say "PUHH!" This results in an explosive, spectacular WHUMP as 1.5 oz of aerosolized 190 proof ethanol ignites and burns in about 0.5 seconds. Results vary, but the best one I have a picture of has a fireball about 12-14' long and 5' wide.

      I've had people say "Dude, that was really cool! I didn't see it, but I felt the heat on my back from across the room!"

      My buddy is kind of pissed because last weekend I set his ceiling fan on fire. :(

      --
      'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
    40. Re:Better than a Volcano by fbform · · Score: 1

      they should have just taken some anhydrous ethanol. Back when I was in school, we used to order it by the 5-gallon tub ($20.99!), and since it was USP-grade, it was technically safe to drink...nobody ever noticed a liter gone here or there.

      I notice that your username is an interesting coincidence.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    41. Re:Better than a Volcano by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      Yep Yep, its called a devils fireball I believe, and its been known to cause accidental burndowns of school dorms and apartments across the nation. I've only seen it performed once myself, and things seemed to go well, but after seeing a mighty couch fire get out of control and burn down three apartment buildings I tend not to play with uncontained fire as much. Once during a vapor shot evening, a friend droped a lit shot glass on the floor, luckily it was linoleum and didn't catch too fast, we were able to put it out. Personally the worst I have done are some minor heat burns to my hand, nothing a little aloe and a few days doesn't take care of.

      -kaplanfx

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    42. Re:Better than a Volcano by Deanasc · · Score: 1

      I knew a russian chemist who regailed us with stories of taking the purified ethanol and infusing it with carbon dioxide. He insisted we could get drunk faster if it was carbonated.

      --
      I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    43. Re:Better than a Volcano by PSandusky · · Score: 1

      I've heard that as a justification for why people get drunk a little faster with something like champagne.

      Some Food Network or Discovery Channel "Science of Christmas" bit, I think.

      --
      "What's the use in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes?" --Fourth Doctor, "Robot"
    44. Re:Better than a Volcano by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Ah, the infamous "Russian Suction". It will work with most spirits over about 40% ABV, especially if you pre-warm the glass. Brings back some memories - not all of them though ...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  7. Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great. Looks like someone's nine years of freshman chemistry hasn't been a complete waste.

    1. Re:Fantastic! by Zenmonkeycat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nope, just two semesters of freshman chemistry; then you get two semesters of organic chemistry, and two full years of "A History of Russia: Depressing, Frozen Tundra Where Health Goes to Die."

      --

      *****
      Dear Mary,
      I yearn for you tragically,
      A.T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.

  8. Hey, I often run Vodka through a filtration system by physicsphairy · · Score: 5, Funny

    But it sure doesn't make it taste any better.

  9. Re:not surprising... by Tyndmyr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not to mention, killing some of the impurities'll probably help with the hangover. As for myself, Ive progressed to the point where I can occasionally afford vodka from a glass bottle.

    --
    Support more choices in goverment-Vote 3rd party.
  10. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Vladimir filters YOU!

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No. In Soviet Russia WE filter and drink everything that burns. And the Communist Party and Soviet Government try to stop us - mostly in vain.

      Recipe 1. Take a long steel rod, cool it to the temperature -50 deg.C or below and let the purified liquid flow along it Every impurity will be frozen. Even the home freezer can produce up th 40% alcohol from the fermented potato without any distillation (Warning! Distillation was the legally prohibited action in Soviet times and freezing was not. Check your local laws).

      Recipe 2. Add some potassium permanganate to the liquid. It will oxidize the most impurities and become a brown goo which can be filtered out. I dislike this method since it gives the bad metal taste. I prefer the more scientific method:

      Recipe 3. Use the pressure cooker and about 1 meter of spiral made of copper tube (About 1 cm diameter is ok). There is also cyclone filter made of a glass can between cooker and spiral to catch unwanted foam and a thermometer in it. Connect it all with PVC tubes. Then:

      Fill the cooker with a raw product, add some lime (CaO) and distil. Cool the spiral with running water. The theory is that the most impurities in a grain alcohol are ethers and they are converted by alkali to salts and alcohols, and alcohols smell alcohol and can be distilled off. Don't forget that the first 2-5 per cent of product must be discarded since they are mostly acetone, and the last parts must be discarded since they are water and the higher alcohols. The thermometer will help you find the correct proportion.

      Then filter the product through the coal filter for water. Distil again. Filter through ANOTHER filter (Use the first filter for the next experiment:-) ). Distil again. You get 95% pure alcohol and may dissolve it to standard 40% if you want.

  11. Vodka testing? by TWX · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sounds like a science experiment that I could actually participate in.

    I wonder why they never featured this one on Bill Nye The Science Guy or on Beakman's World. I don't think that Lester, the self-proclaimed, "Man in a Rat Suit" would have been much different, even if he were the hands-on evaluator...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  12. Obligatory Bad Joke by Zephiris · · Score: 4, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, Vodka filters you!

    --

    "A Goddess rarely smiles for she is forced by others to be an island unto herself." - Zephiris
    1. Re:Obligatory Bad Joke by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

      It was funny, but sadly, an AC told the joke a few seconds before the grandparent. The AC, predictably, did not get modded up.

    2. Re:Obligatory Bad Joke by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, the lame jokes get fed up of YOU! HA HA!

    3. Re:Obligatory Bad Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, that, unlike most comments related to Soviet Russia, is actually pretty poignant. There was enough vodka per capita in the USSR that the drinker could be considered an impurity in the drink.

    4. Re:Obligatory Bad Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, vodka drinks you!

    5. Re:Obligatory Bad Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was enough vodka per capita in the USSR that the drinker could be considered an impurity in the drink.

      Utter bullshit.

    6. Re:Obligatory Bad Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but I imagine a Brita water filter would have difficulty filtering out a USSR citizen...

    7. Re:Obligatory Bad Joke by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      Funniest Slashdot Soviet Russia joke ever! How ironic!

  13. Gray Kangaroo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hmm.. this sounds quite a bit like the Gray Kangaroo filtration system that you can buy on the internet.

    They want $41 for it, which is too expensive for me. But in my undergraduate days, I would definitely have considered it. Though you can probably use a Brita filter like these folks have and save a few bucks.

    1. Re:Gray Kangaroo by plasticpixel · · Score: 1

      Yes it is. TechTV did a segment on it a year ago. I thought I came to Slashdot for current stuff?

    2. Re:Gray Kangaroo by dbIII · · Score: 1
      the Gray Kangaroo filtration system ... They want $41 for it,
      If it's a grey kangaroo, shouldn't it only be a Euro?

      Got to get the bad animal puns in when you can.

    3. Re:Gray Kangaroo by Gi77+B4t35 · · Score: 0
      If it's a grey kangaroo, shouldn't it only be a Euro?
      You're not getting Austria confused with Australia, are you?
  14. Some calculations... by bergeron76 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's see:
    Cheap vodka: $10 (US assumptions)
    Name brand filter: $30
    Total vodka purity: $40
    As compared to: Good vodka - $34.99

    Hrmm, I guess it probably made sense when they did the experiment.

    Seriously though, it's neat to see hacks like this. It should also be noted that the chick in the middle of this picture is kinda cute. But does anyone know what the pills are in the bottom left corner of that picture?

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    1. Re:Some calculations... by FunOne · · Score: 5, Funny

      It should also be noted that the chick in the middle of this picture is kinda cute.


      How much vodka have you had tonight?

      --
      FunOne
    2. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I hope you know that's a man in the middle of that picture.

      Also, those pills are no fun. Lithium (for bipolar disorder.)

    3. Re:Some calculations... by thatnerdguy · · Score: 0

      Are you sure that's a chick?

      It's either a manly looking woman or girly looking guy. Either way, not my cup of tea.

      --
      I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes
    4. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      How do you get $30 for one filter?

      A three pack of filters is around $17.

      Heck, the pitchers themselves are only around $10....

      Seems like a good deal to me, especially if you could use the filter more than once (likely two times at least, if you only filter four passes, possibly three times or more).

    5. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats a chick?

    6. Re:Some calculations... by Rev+Saxon · · Score: 1

      "..It should also be noted that the chick in the middle of this picture is kinda cute..."

      Im pretty sure that its a guy....

      --
      I am that much more enlightened and proportionally disillusioned
    7. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't a chick in the middle of that picture. Perhaps you now have some explaining to do.

    8. Re:Some calculations... by harleyb · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dude, that isn't a chick.

    9. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You better be joking, cause that's a guy, and an ugly one at that.

    10. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ted? Is that you?

    11. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wtf that last thing about the picture better have been a joke. Or did you forget what a girl looks like.

      Damn ./ ruining people's minds.

    12. Re:Some calculations... by Piranhaa · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, it's neat to see hacks like this. It should also be noted that the chick in the middle of this picture [dca.net] is kinda cute. But does anyone know what the pills are in the bottom left corner of that picture? Well common now, what kind of question is that. The guy in the middle is a hippy, they're partying (kind of... maybe in their own ways), and they're nerds... Needs I say more?

    13. Re:Some calculations... by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      Good vodka, $35? Good god, man, what are you drinking??

      I've found that Monopolowa ($15/liter, sometimes cheaper) is a SUPERB potato vodka. Great, clean taste, and I've never had a hangover drinking a fifth or even a liter of it at a time. Ever. Sometimes price is NOT a determining factor in quality, and I think this is one of those times. Grey Goose and the others are "okay", but none of them come even close to the price/quality of that fine Austrian Monopolowa. Too bad they changed the label from the generic looking one to one with more...class?

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    14. Re:Some calculations... by Lord+Apolon · · Score: 1

      1) The filter can be re-used many a time. So it's cheaper in the long run. 2) That's a girl?! *faints* SOMEONE forgot to run their vodka through the filter...

    15. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's no man! She's my MOTHER!

    16. Re:Some calculations... by nebenfun · · Score: 1

      wait a sec...
      that's a chick!?!?

      I'd better run out and get a Brita filter. Obviously, my current vodka isn't cutting it......

    17. Re:Some calculations... by cacepi · · Score: 5, Funny

      It should also be noted that the chick in the middle of is kinda cute.

      She is. I know the first thing I look for in a girl is a 5-'O-clock shadow.

      That's a dude, dude.

    18. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chick? I thought that was just an ugly dude!

    19. Re:Some calculations... by spectasaurus · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm pretty sure the pills are estrogen. Or testosterone. Either way, I'm pretty sure they're for your sweety in the middle.

    20. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See that "shot-glass" in the lower right?

    21. Re:Some calculations... by austad · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sir. I don't pretend to know what you have been drinking. However, it is reasonable to assume that you have drank it all.

      --
      Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    22. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just for the record, you're an complete and utter bastard for making my click the link.

      I shall now go and watch straight, heterosexual porn.

      Damn you.

    23. Re:Some calculations... by JW+Troll · · Score: 1

      DUDE -- that is NO CHICK. Have another drink quick before you pass out.

      --
      just like the humble blood clot... turboporsche@telus.net
    24. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not nearly as hot as that John Romero chick!

      Where did she go, anyhow?

    25. Re:Some calculations... by iabervon · · Score: 1

      Actually, they spent $15 for the filter, $11.09 for 1.75L of the cheap vodka, and $11.99 for .35L of the Ketel One. That's $14.09/L for filtered and $34.25/L for Ketel One. You do get a discount on large bottles, but not that much of one (although the 1.75L bottle of Ketel One I have doesn't have a price tag any more). Even at $30 for a filter, you're talking $23.48/L.

      On the other hand, this isn't a cheap source of small quantities of vodka (assuming that you don't keep the filter around for next time).

    26. Re:Some calculations... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      You might want to consider the gay test at Spark.com.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    27. Re:Some calculations... by wahsapa · · Score: 0

      if this doesnt deserve a 5 on the informative scale i don't know what does

    28. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except you can reuse the filter and a lot of people already have britas.

    29. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a man, man....

    30. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, their transcriptionist and/or minder is cuter yet, and might have two X chromosomes to rub together.

    31. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wholeheartedly agree, it's actually only 19.99/1.75ltr..

      I got some chillin'.

    32. Re:Some calculations... by goneutt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let's see...
      50 pounds of sugar $18
      Three 5 gallon pails $9
      Three packs high test yeast $12
      Pot Still ~$25

      About $10 per gallon 40% for the first 5 gallons, About $6 per gallon each additional run. The trick is to know what nasties boil at what temperatures, redistilling, then resting the 'shine for a few days with a bit of stone carbon to polish. Not bad.

      Obligatory reference
      "What's so bad about being drunk"
      "Ask a glass of water"

      --
      Bacardi + slashdot = negative karma.
    33. Re:Some calculations... by NitsujTPU · · Score: 2, Funny

      /. RULES! That comment is "informative."

    34. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, this thread has been hilarious and that had me spitting out my drink. Thanks for the laugh.

    35. Re:Some calculations... by CGP314 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It should also be noted that the chick in the middle of this picture is kinda cute.

      I dunno, I think I like the chick from Hanson better.


      -Colin

    36. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She'd frighten a police horse.

    37. Re:Some calculations... by turtledawn · · Score: 1

      that... person... looks exactly like my ex-boyfriend, if said ex-boyfriend lost some weight and was drunk off his ass. This is hilarious.

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    38. Re:Some calculations... by Pleione · · Score: 1

      Dude looks like a lady.

    39. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And they would make great gifts! Instead of baking pies this Christmas, I'm gonna buy a pitcher, some filters, a few 1.75l bottles of Kavlana vodka ($9 each), and some moonshine jars. I'll print labels saying "Cletus's Premium Vodka" and stick them on the jars.

      But seriously, I already own/use a Brita water filter and my best friend likes to drink vodka-cranberries. I might bring my filter and a cheap bottle of vodka to our next DVD-watching party. I'm not kidding.

    40. Re:Some calculations... by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      You can re-use the filter many times, and I think (It's not proven, so beware) the hydrogen peroxide can be used to regenerate the coal since it oxidates all impurities and gives no byproducts except water and oxygen.

    41. Re:Some calculations... by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      Add here some Nitrogen-containing substances to better feed the yeast. I tried Potassium orotate (it's a non-steroid anabolic sold in Russia without prescription), and heard about successful use of Ammonium hydroxide.

      And the second. When you distil first time your task is to fully extract all the alcohols with all their impurities. During the following distillations you don't need to know what boils at what temperature since the temperature simply quickly rises while you boil the "head" - acetone, then keeps more or less stable while you boil the desired ethanol, and then quickly rises again while you boil water and higher alcohols. The higher the percentage of alcohol the sharper is temperature rise, so I distil 4 times. See my previous post about the technology
      here
      The lime process is applied to the raw product after the 1st distillation.

    42. Re:Some calculations... by Rotund+Prickpull · · Score: 0

      She'd frighten a police horse. ... and a guide-dog. Maybe even its owner.

    43. Re:Some calculations... by nosleep_tolkachi · · Score: 1

      "But does anyone know what the pills are in the bottom left corner of that picture?" Maybe the charcoal antihangover pills he talks about? they're too big to be a common illicit.

    44. Re:Some calculations... by nordicfrost · · Score: 1

      Pardon me for the nickpicking, but I believe the correct term is: "Dude, that's a dude, dude"

    45. Re:Some calculations... by Kwil · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's just that someone is hoping to get a "+1 Funny" MetaMod

      --

      That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

    46. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's a man, man

    47. Re:Some calculations... by yarbo · · Score: 1

      he's taken, check the ring on his right hand

    48. Re:Some calculations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's a guy in the middle

    49. Re:Some calculations... by stor · · Score: 1

      She is. I know the first thing I look for in a girl is a 5-'O-clock shadow.

      Colonel FlashHeart: Love the beard! Gives me something to hold on to!

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    50. Re:Some calculations... by bjb · · Score: 1
      Obligatory Family Guy quote...

      Quagmire: No, thats THREE Thai stewardesses...

      (long pause from Brian, as he realizes that apparently one of them was a guy).

      Quagmire: What? No.. oh god, OH GOD!

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
  15. beer too? by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 3, Funny

    What else can be improved using the brita? Beer maybe? Soup even?

    I am so curious now :-)

    Anyone else want to do trials and report the results? My mom would probably get upset.

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
    1. Re:beer too? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny
      Anyone else want to do trials and report the results?

      I poured in a Fat Tire and got a Bud Light. The second pass end up like a Corona, and I didn't have the heart to subject it to a third run.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:beer too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The morning after a strenuous party at my college, I found in the courtyard a discarded Brita pitcher and a gatorade bottle full of a brownish mix of, apparently, coffee, beer and discarded cigarettes.

      What would you have done?

      Anyway, the filter was absolutely ruined after running about 10 oz. of the sludge, but it came through almost clear, with only a tinge of brown. Impressive.

    3. Re:beer too? by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 1

      I think a 3rd run would probably make Natural Lite...

      --
      -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
    4. Re:beer too? by kimanaw · · Score: 5, Funny
      Please, don't abuse beer in this fashion.

      Beer has been attacked from all sides of late, whether its MADD or Atkins. Need I remind you that it was "liquid bread" that built the pyamids, and that modern democracy was born in the pewter mugs of beer swilling patriots ?

      As a homebrewer, I beg, nay, demand that you love and care for your beer as it is. There are many good homes where your unfiltered beer would be welcomed. If you are either unable or unwilling to support your beer, please, please send it to a good home with someone who will love and cherish your beer without questioning its color or purity. May I suggest the Hospice of St. Arnolds ?

      --
      007: "Who are you?"
      Pussy: "My name is Pussy Galore."
      007: "I must be dreaming..."
    5. Re:beer too? by Pfhor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a resident of PA who can only drink Fat Tire when as close as the far east distribution center of new belgium as St. Louis, I sir crie sacrilage at wasting such a precious natural resource as a Fat Tire!

      or their tripples, or their wheat ales, or just about anything NBB makes.

    6. Re:beer too? by omarKhayyam · · Score: 1

      Being a Chicagoan who is similarily deprived of Fat Tire, I share your outrage.

    7. Re:beer too? by jmharvey · · Score: 1

      Hmm... pewter mugs...

      I wonder if Beer abosorbs less lead than water. Maybe that's what they mean by, "Guinness is good for you."

    8. Re:beer too? by kilocomp · · Score: 1

      Just to make you feel better, I live in Fort Collins (where Fat Tire is made) and it is on tap everywhere.

    9. Re:beer too? by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

      Props to a fellow Natty Light drinker!

      Breakfast of champions...

    10. Re:beer too? by Pleione · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sorry, but Fat Tire is crap. It tastes like burnt rubber or something. Newcastle Brown is where it's really at.

    11. Re:beer too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Flagstaff Arizona and its on tap everywhere.

      I bought a keg of it at a local grocery store this summer.

    12. Re:beer too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try their 1554, if you like dark beers.

      - just an ac

    13. Re:beer too? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I have a vague recollection of seeing one of those horrid infomercial things once, where they demonstrated a water filter by pouring beer in and getting water out. My thoughts were 1) good idea but wrong way round and 2) if that was Bud, it's not got much work to do.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:beer too? by jlipkin · · Score: 1

      New York Press, an NYC weekly free paper, did a similar test a few years ago. They poured beer through a Brita, and reported that it tasted like Zima. Go figure!

  16. Not much of a test by Genevish · · Score: 4, Funny

    The question is, did they taste it after each pass through the filter? That would explain the result... ("Thish is farckn great!!")

    1. Re:Not much of a test by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

      holy sh%t thanks for the laugh !! no mod points :(

    2. Re:Not much of a test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, but they didn't drink much per pass, as one of the people commented.

  17. Try the premium Pur brand by pgpckt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They should try it with the premium Brita Pur filters, not just the regular Brtia kind. Those are supposed to get out even more bad stuff, and perhaps in less passes? Maybe a three way test: Brita v. Regular Pur v. Super Pur.

    http://www.purwater.com/yourwater/pitchers.shtml

    --
    Lawrence Lessig is my personal hero.
    1. Re:Try the premium Pur brand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? Brita and Pur are competeting companies, why did you call it BRITA PUR FILTERS?

    2. Re:Try the premium Pur brand by zeromemory · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some chemistry major friends of mine decided to test a bunch of water filters by passing water with a known contaminant through the filters and testing the filtered water with an atomic absorption spectrometer.

      Basically, they found that there was no difference between regular and premium Pur filters. However, they found out that the Brita filters were the best overall. I'd link to the results, but they only exist in dead-tree form.

      Oh, a cool thing to do is to crack open one of the filters and look inside. One thing my friends noticed about the cheaper (and usually less effective) filters is that they were mostly full of ion-exchange filler rather than activated carbon.

  18. Caammaan by neoform · · Score: 1

    Like they don't filter their vodka for impurities.. well, unless they add impurities to give it character or something.

    --
    MABASPLOOM!
    1. Re:Caammaan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DO add something to it, but in the last several years I have still been unable to find out what it is. Nobody will say, and the FDA is no help. Something to thicken it up a little so it does not climb your lips too much. Try drinking pure alcohol and see the difference! Probably just corn sweetener or something like that.

      Oh yea, I just happen to be alergic to what ever they add to it, so I have to ask; does anybody out there have a good cheap still? Haven't had a drink in years and I think its about time... but I'm not quite to the point of "dying for one" yet.

    2. Re:Caammaan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nobody will say, and the FDA is no help.

      Someone should market a special brand of vodka just for you, without that "secret" additive, but with a label made of tin foil so you can peel it off and make a nice party hat for yourself...

  19. Double Blind Study by serutan · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you really want a double blind study mix Vladimir and Pepe Lopez Gold tequila.

    1. Re:Double Blind Study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really really want a double blind study try mixing it with some methanol.

    2. Re:Double Blind Study by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that make it a triple blind?

  20. Hooch+Brita = Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've done something similar with very different results.

    Once, me and a friend of mine decided it would be interesting to make a still. To make a potentially long story short, we produced a number of test batches from a sizeable amount of Corona.

    Let me go on to say that nothing that tastes good has EVER come out of our still. So, in an attept to do some "activated carbon filtering", just like we read on the vodka bottles, we ran some through the Brita filter.

    And got water.

    1. Re:Hooch+Brita = Water by thhamm · · Score: 1

      >sizeable amount of Corona
      >... we ran some through the Brita filter.

      >And got water.

      life is full of miracles. :)

    2. Re:Hooch+Brita = Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this had been recorded, had you rewound the tape, you'd think Brita was some sort of gravity-defying Jesus.

  21. Re: Chick by fossa · · Score: 1

    Um, he's joking about the chick. Remember Hanson? I mean, come on...

  22. totally offtopic by calibanDNS · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Where do you keep the nuclear wessels?

    -----
    Obligatory free iPod link

    1. Re:totally offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're .. a telepath. Work it out.

  23. Priceless by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1, Funny

    Internet connection: $40/mo
    Leat ass computer: $1500
    Making a gay comment on slashdot unanonymously: priceless!

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
    1. Re:Priceless by ZeroPost · · Score: 1

      Hmm...
      I've never seen it spelled "Leat" before...

    2. Re:Priceless by ignorant_newbie · · Score: 1

      wasn't that the first name of the planetologist from dune ?

    3. Re:Priceless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      liet kynes

    4. Re:Priceless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT. HND.

  24. Ladies and Gentlemen by Adrilla · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've just become a home scientist.
    PS: Science makes the room spin.

    --

    "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
  25. Does this work for Rubbing Alcohol? by dantheman82 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I tried this five times with rubbing alcohol? How many times before I can get it at vodka level of drinkability?

    --
    This sig donated to Pater. Long live /.
    1. Re:Does this work for Rubbing Alcohol? by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know; but, methanol seems to taste better after processing with one of those filters. I ... hey, waitaminute ... someone's been fiddling with the brightness on my monitor. Who turned out the lights???

    2. Re:Does this work for Rubbing Alcohol? by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      That's one hell of a filter if it will make Ethanol out of Methanol. I'd say never. You wouldn't want to poison yourself.

    3. Re:Does this work for Rubbing Alcohol? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative

      About as many times as it takes to split all of the methanol parts into H-OH + HCH and for them to magically and completely recombine into ethanol and some excess water. Up until that point, it will kill you. Good luck!

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    4. Re:Does this work for Rubbing Alcohol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually "rubbing alcohol" isn't methanol; it's isopropyl alcohol: H3C-CH(OH)-CH3. Methanol is CH3OH. But, you're right--no filter can turn either of those into ethanol, C2H5OH.

    5. Re:Does this work for Rubbing Alcohol? by zeromemory · · Score: 1

      Rubbing alcohol is isopropyl alcohol. Unless your filter happens to be a reactor or contain some free radicals, you'll never get ethanol (drinking alcohol) out of it.

    6. Re:Does this work for Rubbing Alcohol? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      Here in Australia, rubbing alcohol is isopropanol, (CH3)2CHOH.

      I don't know what kind of buzz it gives, but 250 mL at 100% w/v will kill you.

    7. Re:Does this work for Rubbing Alcohol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      erm...rubbing alcohol is isopropyl alcohol, not methanol.

    8. Re:Does this work for Rubbing Alcohol? by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      QUICKLY drink more Genuine Russian Vodka.

      Specific antidote against methanol is ethanol.

  26. Re:not surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not surprising considering that vodka is alcohol and water, and the better tasting the water, the better the vodka is, so ya, cleaning out some the impuritys from the water would make it taste better.

    What about cheaper spirts that contain formaldehyde?

  27. Hydrochloric Acid by Piranhaa · · Score: 1

    I once heard a guy run HCL(aq) through the filter then drank it... I don't know if he survived though :/

    1. Re:Hydrochloric Acid by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      If it didn't kill him outright, then it probably wouldn't have any ill effect at all. Considering that HCL is the primary content of your stomach, I'd say that the odds of a small amount of it diluted past the point that it would burn your esophagus should be completely harmless. Note that IANA gastroenterologist, so if you try it and die painfully I assume no blame. :)

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:Hydrochloric Acid by Lproven · · Score: 1

      The HCl in your stomach is very dilute stuff compared to lab acid - even "dilute" lab acid. Plus it has to go through your mouth and oesophagus first, destroying them on the way...

      --
      Liam P. ~ "Intelligence is a lethal mutation." (me)
    3. Re:Hydrochloric Acid by austad · · Score: 1

      I could have sworn sulfuric acid was what is in your stomach, not hydrochloric.

      --
      Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    4. Re:Hydrochloric Acid by tftp · · Score: 1

      You are probably confusing Humans with Aliens.

    5. Re:Hydrochloric Acid by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      HCl (aq) at 3 < pH < 7 will not do irreversable damage going down (or coming up) your body. HCl (aq) at pH < 3 risks compromising the filter housing...

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    6. Re:Hydrochloric Acid by Babbster · · Score: 1

      Having taken a whiff of fumes given off by boiling hydrochloric acid (that day, I was the world's dumbest 10th grader and did it on purpose because I wanted to smell it directly), it's not a test I would recommend. Just the little bit I took in burned my trachea somethin' fierce and was painful for three days.

    7. Re:Hydrochloric Acid by Babbster · · Score: 1

      PS: Yes, it's substantially the same as the acids in your stomach, but that certainly doesn't make it safe. Acid reflux (commonly referred to as heartburn) is no joke. Given time it can mess up the upper GI tract permanently - and that's the "all natural" stuff.

  28. Re:Soup? by rubberbando · · Score: 1

    Soup even?

    Uh...maybe if the soup is just a broth type soup, otherwise it will become a broth type soup on the 1st pass... :-P

    --
    DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
  29. News? by SimonShine · · Score: 2, Funny

    A group of geeks tried to filter alcohol. High school, anyone?

    --
    Take off every 'ZIG' !!
    1. Re:News? by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding, they'd be heroes!

  30. Vodka taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ive always wondered what makes some vodkas better than others. is it really true that the more pure the drink the better it tastes?

    if thats true then surely the best would be lab ethanol mixed with distilled water?

  31. Imbecile! by robogun · · Score: 1

    That's ethanol cut with wood alcohol (methanol) you'll go blind!

  32. Not much of a test at all by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 1

    The question is, did they taste it after each pass through the filter?

    Actually, yes, that's exactly what they did. RTFA.

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  33. Re:Hey, I often run Vodka through a filtration sys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well so do I, and it does so! Give me your vodka, and you can judge.

  34. Coke vs. Pepsi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Coke works fine but in college we tried pepsi and it just sat in the top for over a day before we poured it out. Almost none went through.
    Makes me think twice whenever I'm offered pepsi now.

    1. Re:Coke vs. Pepsi by nystagman · · Score: 1

      Makes me think twice whenever I'm offered pepsi now. This should make you think even harder: http://pepsispice.blogspot.com/

      --
      Theory and practice are the same in theory, but different in practice.
  35. Re: Martin Sargent by Cryptnotic · · Score: 0

    That guy is my hero.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  36. Some [Long Term] calculations... by Mulletproof · · Score: 3, Informative

    Let's see... It still makes sense when you consider you can use the same filter several times. Most are rated in the gallons filtered before they need a change* whereas your "good" vodka is going to start adding up pretty quickly on a bottle to bottle basis. After the initial expense, I'm saving $20 to every bottle you buy.

    *A brita pitcher filter can filter 40 gallons before changing

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Some [Long Term] calculations... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Note that water != vodka.

      More experimentation needs to be done to determine if filtering vodka destroys the filter more quickly than filtering tapwater.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  37. I object! by gooman · · Score: 3, Funny

    You kids and your high technology.
    Why back in my day we used our kidneys and liver to filter our alcohol and we liked it!

    --
    "Kittens give Morbo gas!"
  38. Re:not surprising... by afidel · · Score: 3, Informative

    For a vodkaphile on a budget nothing beats pearl vodka, it's smoother than Grey Goose and costs only ~$20/750ml. Hell I'm not on a budget anymore but I still see no reason to waste $30 per bottle =) Itgoest through A "five-time distillation and six-time filtration process" which makes it exceptionally smooth.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  39. In case of Slashdotting, mod up (article text) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Well the staff here at OMGIB are thrilled with the swell of traffic that this experiment has generated. We're working on more half assed applications of second rate science for the practical slacker as we speak.

    Several questions have popped up on a regular basis in the comment thread, so I'll try to knock them out here one by one:

    Um, why didn't you guys do the test double-blind?
    Scienticians often are forced to take short-cuts to make giant king sized leaps of advancement in the field of boozahology. You'll also notice that the crackers weren't sterile, the glasses were barely clean, and there was a conspicuous lack of any saftey gear. Sometimes, you just have to stare down the barrel of progress and hope there's not one sitting in the chamber.

    Isn't it possible that you just ended up drunk and only thought it tasted better
    Our taste tests were only about a quarter of a shot each. It took about 20 minutes to complete an entire filtration cycle and we we had some food during the test. I know I only had about 2 shots worth of vodka during the experiment.

    Did you try and use the filter for water after the vodka experiment?
    The last thing I need in life is to catch a buzz off my morning coffee. Replacement filters are rather cheap as someone in the comment thread mentioned, but I'm sure that a few pitchers of water would take any vodka soaked into the filter out.

    I think you forgot to prime your brita filter with water before you used it.
    Actually, we did. It was soaked and a few pitchers of water were run through according to the directions on the package. It was in our notes, but we wrote everything up from the notes at the bar.

    Why didn't you . . .
    Well although we plan on revisiting this experiment, we're on to make other breakthroughs of loose cannon science. We encourage all of the aspiring scienticians reading this to try this for themselves and email us your results. Send them over to ohmygoditburns@gmail.com and share your findings.
    Comments Off
    11/5/2004
    Practical Applications of the Philosopher's stone. For drunks.
    Filed under:

    * Science

    -- adam @ 5:08 pm

    Purpose:
    In the alchemical tradition, creation of the Philosopher's stone is the ultimate end to man's needs. The stone has the power to cure disease, prolong life, and possesses the added benefit of being able to transmute metals, as in lead into gold.
    As scienticians, we believe that such an object exists, and that it can be used for our own dastardly purposes.
    Our theory is that a simple brita water filter can be used to make bad vodka, into good. In our case this meant turning a Vladimir(TM), into a Ketel One(TM). At $11.09 for 1.75 liter (Ketel is 11.99 for the 350 ml), Vladimir is a steal. It is, however, painful to drink, has a repugnant aftertaste, posesses a bouquet reminiscent of rubbing alcohol. Our working theory was that these terrible qualities were caused by a lack of proper filtration, and that running our Vlad through a charcoal filter would remove some of the impurities causing these odors and flavors.

    Materials

    1. Bottle of cheap and/or nasty vodka. The cheapest price per volume was selected from the liquor store. In our case, this turned out to be "Vladimir Vodka(TM)".

    Materials

    2. Bottle of control (control, ahh fancy scientician word) vodka. A bottle of Ketel One(TM) was grabbed at the last second while on the checkout line.
    3. Science Crackers! These were essential in cleansing our palates between tastings. NOT to be overlooked! For this, we used your easily obtainable standard (err, premium) science crackers.

    4. One standard Brita filter. I believe this cost roughly $15 at the supermarket. It probably should be used after the experiment to filter water.
    Science Brita
    5. Shot glasses. The shot glasses should be of different type, so as to be more easily able to distinguish between the filtered, and the control vodka.

  40. Brita as placebo? by weighn · · Score: 1

    there must be a placebo effect at work here.
    anyone know how I can cram crappy eccies thru one of those things?

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  41. Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd need to get drunk to hang out with those ugly fucks.

  42. The SloshDot vodka-tasthing proshedure by davidwr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Drink glass of expensive vokda. Good stuff!
    Drink 1st glasss of cheap vodka. Yuck ptooey!
    Filter 2nd glass of crap. Almost tolera*hic*tolerable.
    Filter 3rd glass of crap. Filter it again. Barely tolerablable.
    Filther 4th glass of the stuff. Filther it again and spill some. Get help to filther it a 3rd time. Drink it. Could be better but gimme some more.
    Ask friend to filter next glass a few times and give it back to me. I don't know how many time, just do it. Hey, not bad.
    Hand glassh to fr*hic*friend and say do it again. This time more fhilther. Fhilther make junk tathe good. *hic*.
    Get glass from friend. Hey, this is great!
    Pass out.
    Wake up the next day and post on Sloshdot.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:The SloshDot vodka-tasthing proshedure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Don't read the entire article.
      2. Post a stupid comment that 400 other people who didn't read the article posted.
      3. Sit back, cross your arms, look around your mom's basement, and let the warm momentary glow of smugness descend upon you.
      4. Cry yourself to sleep while biting your pillow.

      Hey, anyone notice that this site was all over the interweb for 2 weeks, before it hit /. ?

    2. Re:The SloshDot vodka-tasthing proshedure by PSandusky · · Score: 1

      Definitely Sloshdot. Yep.

      --
      "What's the use in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes?" --Fourth Doctor, "Robot"
  43. Personally I only drink from a MiG-25 by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Anything else just isn't real. Americans and their bottles. Sissies.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Personally I only drink from a MiG-25 by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Heh, I wondered if anyone was going to bring that up. That was one of my fav stories from the wings series.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  44. no no no again... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    If you really want to go blind (it's up to you) forget about ethanol and try methanol. Just make sure you've got a white stick handy.

    1. Re:no no no again... by pturing · · Score: 2, Informative

      and once you get to the emergency room, they will treat you for methanol poisoning of course. The treatment for methanol poisoning is actually 'ethanol therapy', which means getting you really drunk on normal ethanol until the methanol is gone

  45. I learned something today by dupper · · Score: 0

    Everyday objects become approximately 5 to 7x funnier when qualified as lab tools. Now please excuse me while I go calibrate the ol' science pole.

  46. i'm sick of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm sick and tired of seeing things on this website (drug, alcohol references)... things that are of the crowd of people who ridiculed those of us when we were much younger, those of us who view this website . How dare we allow this into our domain.

  47. after drinking about a 5th of vodka by night_flyer · · Score: 1

    I hack it up all over the floor

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    1. Re:after drinking about a 5th of vodka by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you lightweight

  48. Brita filters aren't just physical filters by Lproven · · Score: 1

    They will also soften hard water, presumably by chelating some of the metal salts out. This means they contain various reactive chemicals as well as a simple physical filter like fine kaolin china.

    If that stuff's reactive, what's it going to do with 35% ethanol/water solution? It might react with the ethanol, or even /dissolve/ in the ethanol. You could be drinking all sorts of nasty chemicals dissolved in the resulting fluid.

    I don't care what it tastes like, I wouldn't go near the result, even on a bet...

    --
    Liam P. ~ "Intelligence is a lethal mutation." (me)
    1. Re:Brita filters aren't just physical filters by TellarHK · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, as it's just activated carbon the one thing you don't want to run through it is any sizeable amount of bleach. Granular Activated Carbon filtration will remove some small amount of hardness from water, as well as nasty odors and other impurities.

      What might be good, would be to use what's known as an "Extruded" carbon cartridge like the ones you get in the water treatment industry. Essentially a porous solid block that has 5 micron holes in it. Hacking one of these together might be a good idea for a college project. Hmm.

    2. Re:Brita filters aren't just physical filters by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Funny

      If that were the case, you'd think there'd be a "don't use this to filter alcohol" warning label...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Brita filters aren't just physical filters by Graff · · Score: 1
      What might be good, would be to use what's known as an "Extruded" carbon cartridge like the ones you get in the water treatment industry. Essentially a porous solid block that has 5 micron holes in it. Hacking one of these together might be a good idea for a college project. Hmm.

      Heh, I was one of the chemists who worked on developing extruded carbon cartridges. They really are extruded - no need to use the quotes.

      Without going into too much detail because there are all sorts of trade secrets, patents, and contractual agreements that I would be breaking, I can tell you that an extruded filter is simply granular activated carbon mixed with some sort of binder and then passed through an extrusion die while it is still malleable. The trick is the size of the carbon particles, the type of binder, and the amount of pressure needed to extrude the blocks of carbon.

      IIRC when I left that company (about 5 years ago) we were making something like 75% of the extruded activated carbon filters on the market. It was all OEM, we were selling to Brita, Ecowater, PUR, Doulton, Apec, and many other companies that would re-package and resell the filters as their own.

      You can read a bit more on the technology behind the production of extruded carbon filters at the company website.
    4. Re:Brita filters aren't just physical filters by Graff · · Score: 1
      If that stuff's reactive, what's it going to do with 35% ethanol/water solution? It might react with the ethanol, or even /dissolve/ in the ethanol. You could be drinking all sorts of nasty chemicals dissolved in the resulting fluid.

      The stuff is not reactive at all. What Brita uses is a mix of granular activated carbon and a man-made zeolite. I know this because I am a chemist who worked with Brita in developing and improving their water filtration systems.

      There is nothing dangerous about those filters and running ethanol through them is not likely to cause any problems. In fact, the alcohol industry uses basically the same system to purify grain alcohol, but on an industrial scale.

      Here is a write-up of the benefits of doing a "polishing" step just like the guys in the Slashdot article. It's an interesting read.
    5. Re:Brita filters aren't just physical filters by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      most water treatment plants do not use the blocks. far too small amounts of water can be pulled through that when you are looking at making 6-100 million gallons of water a day. the typical treatment process is powdered activated carbon. it is turned into a slurry and pumped into the intake well of the facility so that it has the longest time to have physical contact with the water until it is removed in the last 2 stages that remove the physical particles in the precipitation phase with aluminum sulphate and finally the sand filtration bed before going in the fresh storage tanks before being pumped to the city.

      only very very small filtration facilities, typically portable ones use the extruded blocks.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Brita filters aren't just physical filters by Lproven · · Score: 1

      Well, it does say WATER filter in big letters all over all the packaging!

      --
      Liam P. ~ "Intelligence is a lethal mutation." (me)
    7. Re:Brita filters aren't just physical filters by Lproven · · Score: 1

      Oh really? Well, that's good news!

      I'm impressed that something so simple manages to scrub so much dissolved calcium carbonate out of the water, then. How does that work? Merely curious - but do have at least 'A' level chemistry, for what it's worth...

      In the past, I've used Calgon for this job, but not for drinking water. (My mum used to work for Allbright & Wilson - we got it free.)

      --
      Liam P. ~ "Intelligence is a lethal mutation." (me)
    8. Re:Brita filters aren't just physical filters by Graff · · Score: 1
      Whups, the last link that I meant to have in there didn't work for some reason. Here it is:
      Here is a write-up of the benefits of doing a "polishing" step just like the guys in the Slashdot article. It's an interesting read.
    9. Re:Brita filters aren't just physical filters by Graff · · Score: 1
      I'm impressed that something so simple manages to scrub so much dissolved calcium carbonate out of the water, then. How does that work? Merely curious - but do have at least 'A' level chemistry, for what it's worth...

      If you go to the site on zeolites that I linked to then you can see an explaination there:
      In common with other zeolites, clinoptilolite has a cage-like structure consisting of SiO4 and AlO4 tetrahedra joined by shared oxygen atoms. The negative charges of the AlO4 units are balanced by the presence of exchangeable cations - notably calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium and iron. These ions can be readily displaced by other substances, for example heavy metals and ammonium ions. This phenomenon is known as cation exchange, and it is the very high cation exchange capacity of clinoptilolite which provides many of its very useful properties.

      Think of it like an egg carton. Suppose you remove the eggs from the carton, you would then have all these spots where objects of the proper size and shape could fit into and stick.

      What you generally do with a zeolite (either natural or man-made) is you treat it with an agent that opens up those "holes", typically a concentrated solution of ordinary salt (sodium chloride). This is because sodium takes the place of the calcium and magnesium ions in the zeolite matrix (the high concentration "forces" the sodium ions to replace the other ions). Those sodium ions are less tightly held and can be replaced by calcium and magnesium the next time you run hard water through the zeolite. The sodium ions that get released produce less "hardness" than the calcium or magnesium ions would have.
    10. Re:Brita filters aren't just physical filters by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Heh, good point.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    11. Re:Brita filters aren't just physical filters by Lproven · · Score: 1

      Ahhh. All becomes clear. Thankyou for the explanation!

      --
      Liam P. ~ "Intelligence is a lethal mutation." (me)
  49. Re:not surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm... coffee is water and some oil from ground and burnt coffee beans. Do you think filtering coffee makes it taste better, by removing the impurities from the water.

  50. if you're going to compare by BoomTechnology · · Score: 1

    Compare it to Kalashnikov vodka -- made by the guy who invented the AK-47. It's "best drunk with friends" according to http://www.madville.com/link.php?id=78017&t=11 Screw using a Brita filter. The name says it all right there. I demand vodka made from a grade-A true Russian badass!!!

    --
    Now then, Dmitri, you know how we've always talked about the possibility of something going wrong with the Bomb...
    1. Re:if you're going to compare by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      I've seriously considered saving up the $200 for a bottle of the stuff, not for the vodka itself so much as the bottle.

      After all, how often do you see a liquor bottle shaped like an AK-47? :)

    2. Re:if you're going to compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a german design that he ripped off. By the way, that's why the US said f'off when he bitched obout them buying knockoff AK-47's for Iraq.

  51. I wondered what the hell that stuff was... by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Funny
    From the article:
    At $11.09 for 1.75 liter...Vladimir is a steal. It is, however, painful to drink, has a repugnant aftertaste, posesses a bouquet reminiscent of rubbing alcohol.
    I was in St. Louis at a conference several months ago; after the closing dinner, a group of us descended on the local blues scene hoping to find some good live music.

    We found it--there was a nice patio and a great band. As the evening wore on, we progressed from beer to shooters. A round of vodka seemed a good idea at one point. It smelled like isopropanol (I'm a chemist, I know my alcohols) and tasted as bad as one would expect. To this day, I have wondered what the hell it was we drank, so that I could avoid ever encountering it again. I fear unfamiliar vodkas in unfamiliar bars.

    Now, I know it was Vladimir. I can rest easy. Thank you Slashdot!

    --
    ~Idarubicin
    1. Re:I wondered what the hell that stuff was... by poppen_fresh · · Score: 1

      Being a college student in St. Louis, it's probably safe to assume that what you were drinking was Dimitrov Vodka (spelling?). It's the local isopropyl-in-a-vodka-bottle they sell to unsuspecting college students for about $6 for 1.75 L.

    2. Re:I wondered what the hell that stuff was... by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the joys of cheap vodka. One minute you're sitting in a friend's dorm room watching Army of Darkness. Next minute it's 8am. You're on the floor. In your underwear. Next to an empty bottle of Popov. Covered head-to-toe with crude drawings of male genitalia.

      Good times.

    3. Re:I wondered what the hell that stuff was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Vladimir is a steal. It is, however, painful to drink, has a repugnant aftertaste, posesses a bouquet reminiscent of rubbing alcohol.

      But I thought Russia made the best vodka. Russian vodkas like Vladimir and Popov should be great, right?

    4. Re:I wondered what the hell that stuff was... by nosleep_tolkachi · · Score: 1

      It was probably Popov, a more common well-liquor for bars.

    5. Re:I wondered what the hell that stuff was... by mekkab · · Score: 1

      I'll second the Popov possibility since it was a bar.
      Excluding bars, I've also had Ruble Vodka which I would use after accidents (cycling, rollerblading, being drunk). 1 shot taken orally, 1 shot taken topically on my cuts and scrapes, repeat.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  52. Now the real question by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it cheaper to do this than buy Finlandia? For those that haven't tried it, Fin is basically tastless. No real taste, no aftertaste. It's probably the best mixing vodka for that reason. It's not as nice to sip as something like Kettle One because the taste of those more expensive Vodkas is one of the reasons to drink them, however it's also not as expensive.

    I suppose it would depend on how well the filter held up. If the single filtration kills it, well then it'll be more expensive. If it works for a few times though it could be a fairly cheap alternative.

    Something that would be interesting to see a real experiement on is the difference in before/after compositions. Find out what, if anything, is actually getting filtered out. Maybe I should try and talk the chemical engineers at work into trying it. :)

    1. Re:Now the real question by badasscat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is it cheaper to do this than buy Finlandia?

      I can't imagine it is, given the prices they quote for Vladimir Vodka, and knowing as I do how much Brita filters cost (about $7 each, or $15 or so for three). Filtering vodka is basically going to ruin your filter; filter vodka six times and you may as well just throw it out. So basically you're paying $20 for a cheap bottle of vodka that you're trying to get to taste good, whereas where I live a bottle of Finlandia, Stoli, or Absolut is around 18 bucks. No, none of those are great vodkas, but they're good enough to drink as is, and as you say, Finlandia's already pretty much like water mixed with alcohol anyway.

      I suppose this whole thing falls under the label of "plausible, but impractical". I'm sure you can get rid of the aftertaste in bad vodka by filtering it, but given the total cost and the marketplace alternatives, there's just not much point to it.

    2. Re:Now the real question by Smitty825 · · Score: 1

      Where I live, it costs about $18 for a 750mL bottle of Finlandia, Stoli or Absolut. However, it costs about $10 for 1.75L of cheap Vodka. So, you get twice as much "good" stuff for the same price!

      That being said, my Vokda of choice is still Chopin

      --

      Doh!
    3. Re:Now the real question by Peyna · · Score: 1

      You forgot the cost of the brita filters that you're going to waste.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:Now the real question by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "given the prices they quote for Vladimir Vodka, and knowing as I do how much Brita filters cost (about $7 each, or $15 or so for three)."

      How do you figure he forgot the cost of the filters?

    5. Re:Now the real question by Peyna · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the parent comment, not the grandparent comment. Perhaps you should actually read the comment I replied to?

      --
      What?
    6. Re:Now the real question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this plus2?

      gp post was obviously responding to the ggp (my perspective), not the gggp post - ggp said nothing of the filters.

      -j

    7. Re:Now the real question by shaitand · · Score: 1

      My apologies, the parent was below my threshold. Your tone could use a bit of calibration though.

      Perhaps we could attach electrodes to your testicles and run a bitch of current through each time we shove a bit of coal up your arse and discover a diamond when go to retrieve it. When we finally retrieve coal your tone should be about right.

  53. Re: Chick by austad · · Score: 2, Informative

    Remind me of a shirt that read "I fucked the girl in Hanson."

    You used to be able to get it from tshirthell.com, but they discontinued it. They have a lot of other very nicely offensive shirts though. :)

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  54. From the linked article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They stated that they paid $30 for the pitcher.

    1. Re:From the linked article by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "One standard Brita filter. I believe this cost roughly $15 at the supermarket. It probably should be used after the experiment to filter water."

      No they stated $15, and if you read you'll find that when they say filter here, they mean the pitcher and the included filter.

  55. Is that Jeff Spicoli in the last pic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.members.dca.net/~adam/brita/IMG_0044.JP G

    Dude, you hear that? That's my head? I'm so wasted!

  56. alcohol proof consistentsy by Umojan · · Score: 1

    Well, this is all well and good, but does the alcohol percentage of the filtered vodka remain consistant. Now, I know some filters use carbon to purify water. And, i couldn't find a source to prove it, but i'm pretty sure they use carbon for alcohol poisoning before they pump the stomach. So, does brita use carbon filtering?

    1. Re:alcohol proof consistentsy by Umojan · · Score: 1

      brita uses carbon from coconut shells: "The activated carbon utilized is made from coconut shells that have been subjected to a special heating process that produces a large surface area capable of maximum adsorption." So, it proabbly does lower proof.

  57. Science pole! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From which episode of The Simpsons comes the science pole quote? I've googled it to no avail!

  58. Time by ThumbSuck · · Score: 1

    8:43 - we take out first sip.

    Either they're using 12h clock or they're solid pros. Vodka in the morning...mm.m..

  59. Gallons of what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they are designed to filter water.. who knows how much vodka they can handle. actually, now that i think about it they might actually do other things than filter with other substances, though i think they are mostly just charcoal

  60. Ketel One & achewood by syynnapse · · Score: 1
    am i only onw who thought ketel one was super cheap vodka because of achewood?

    also: my favorite (as a college student) vodka is Takka. ultra cheap and in comes in a drunk proof plastic bottle! i mean, it tastes like you think rubbing alcohol might, but i don't have high standards.

    --

    System.out.println(syynnapse.getSig());

  61. activated carbon + alcohol beverage = water (?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    activated carbon removes organics from water or any solute passed through/over it; that is a fact. a brita filter works mainly on this principle and not a 'physical' filter (like a hepa filter). a brita removes organic carbons (like ethanol), water 'hardness' (carbonate, calcite....) with resin pellets-an electron exchange, chlorine, some heavy metals and of course relatively large particulates (if you are using a brita to filter microbes you are in for some stomach trouble). last i checked ethanol is soluble in both water and gasoline (for example) because of its molecular structure (ie, it is technically an organic molecule but is soluble in water due to it's structure). which means, at least some of the ethanol will affix to the ativated carbon. therefore it should be noted that filtering the vodka would also reduce the alcohol content. i would be interested in an experiment that also tested the alcohol remaining in the vodka. it is quite possible that after 4 passes the carbon had reached it's capacity for adsorbing (not a typo) contaminants (ie ethanol). so long as 'smooth' was not confused with adjectives such as 'water-like' or 'pure', some alcohol probably remained but i do not think you could do this experiment without some reduction. depending on who you are any change in alcohol content might be considered significant! also, once a 'contaminant' is affixed to the carbon pretty much only a whole lot of heat+flame are the only things that would remove/recharge it.

    i should also mention that if my typing is off it is because i did not filter my wine before i drank it tonight =)

    1. Re:activated carbon + alcohol beverage = water (?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the comments on that site.. i wanted real numbers too but the dumbass gets all cocky whenever someone asks and says "we didnt loose much liquid so it must not have lost much alcohol".. the tiny amount of liquid they lost could have been most of the alcohol

    2. Re:activated carbon + alcohol beverage = water (?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hu? I recently visited the Jack Daniells http://www.jackdaniels.com/ distillery in Lynchburg, and guess what? Their whiskey is "mellowed" by running it through giant towers of charchol (aka carbon) I doubt your have your facts straight.

    3. Re:activated carbon + alcohol beverage = water (?) by boomer_rehfield · · Score: 1

      Or they make JD stronger knowing the filter will remove some of the alcohol..... (I don't claim to know... just throwing that out there... )

      --
      Carpe Canem - Seize the Dog
    4. Re:activated carbon + alcohol beverage = water (?) by GeorgeH · · Score: 1

      That's what I was wondering, whether it removed alcohol in addition to craptaste. Guess I'll have to stick to the expensive stuff.

      On the plus side, I won't mix up the vodka pitcher and the water pitcher in the fridge.

      --
      Why can't I moderate something "Wrong" or at least "Grossly Misinformed"?
    5. Re:activated carbon + alcohol beverage = water (?) by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Most liquors are a lot stronger while in production than the final proof you see in the bottle when it reaches the store. With vodka, they'll usually add water to get it to the appropriate level; I'm sure they have other methods with Whiskey, not unlike what you described.

      --
      What?
  62. Extends life of the filter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you do this, you can wait longer until you need to replace the filter.

    The vodka will surely kill any nasty bugs that have been collected in there.

  63. Filtering acid would do nothing by Galahad2 · · Score: 1

    Even the best filters can only barely take out viruses -- considering that hydrogen ions (the thing that makes acid an acid) are five orders of magnitude (or so) smaller volume, the filter wouldn't do anything to the pH. I doubt it would even affect the molarity of the chlorine ions. I mean, come on. If a filter was fine enough to remove hydrogen, it would also stop water.

    1. Re:Filtering acid would do nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forget that you can have materials that promote ion adsorption. hence, water softening "filters", where they're just really beads of ion exchange resins.

      man, slashdot is full of wannabe poser "scientists"

  64. Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great! now I have something to do over christmas break!

  65. Re:Wadka! by spdt · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ahhhh!!!!!111oneone This is the exact same annoying thing as people thinking asians say "lice" instead of "rice"!

    Now that I've calmed myself, I must inform as many as possible that it is the exact opposite. The Russian language does NOT have a true W sound, and they would NOT pronounce it "wadka". "Vodka" is exactly how it is truly pronounced.

    I have no problem with people making fun of different countries' customs, but please, at least do it correctly.

  66. Rotten eggs? by totoanihilation · · Score: 3, Informative

    "I could have sworn sulfuric acid was what is in your stomach, not hydrochloric."

    Well, if it was, you'd probably burp a smell of rotten eggs.
    I think natural selection took care of eliminating the species that developed sulfuric-acid-based gastric fluids ;)

    1. Re:Rotten eggs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Sulfuric acid and sulfates don't smell anything like rotten eggs. You're mistaking it for hydrogen sulfide. And no, sulfates will not be turned into hydrogen sulfide in the stomach.

    2. Re:Rotten eggs? by totoanihilation · · Score: 1

      Well, I have to admit that I am most definitely not a chemist! My post was meant to be a joke... Oh well...

      On the other hand, there's got to be an evolutionary reason why HCl made it into our stomachs, as opposed to H2SO4...

    3. Re:Rotten eggs? by scheme · · Score: 1
      On the other hand, there's got to be an evolutionary reason why HCl made it into our stomachs, as opposed to H2SO4..

      It's because some cells already have a bunch of proton pumps that transfer protons across a membrane for other reasons. Add in a chloride pump to balance out the charge and you have a fairly easy to make method of making acid based on readily available materials in the body (H2O, NaCl). SO4 isn't something that is normally found in the body so it would require more effort to use H2SO4.

      --
      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
  67. Pepsi Green! by jcuervo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ladies and gentlemen, I give you... Pepsi Green!

    I was going to mod down that AC troll, but eh, I figured this was more important. ;-)

    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  68. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  69. those chicks by rasz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Have you seen those chicks on the pics ? No wonder they drink vodka.

  70. Well... by temojen · · Score: 1

    Considering that the brita filters use activated charcoal, which removes organic chemicals, one of the things it'd be filtering out is the alcohol.

    1. Re:Well... by arivanov · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not really, less hydrophilic substances will displace it. This will definitely improve the hangover and drinking properties, because it is the high molecular weight alcohols, ketones and aldehides which are the primary cause of hangover (not methanol as many people think). So adsorbing them out should definitely help. Not that I drink vodka anyway. In fact in Russia only the drunks on the street drink it. Why - see here:httpwwwamazoncomexecobidostgdetail-B0001P29Q2 qid1100944430sr8-6refsr8xsapi6xgl74002-1004512-908 0059vglancesdvdn507846

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:Well... by arivanov · · Score: 1
      Sorry, link got hacked. Here it is: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail /-/dvd/B0001P29Q2/pictures/14/002-1004512-9080059# more-pictures

      If you have not seen it, it is a definitely must see. If you see it after you have laughed your guts out on the floor compare the now (bunch of idiots drinking vodka from the bottle) and then (nobody drinking becides two people who are discussing politics in french and slowly sipping some coniac from time to time).

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    3. Re:Well... by DarkAce911 · · Score: 1

      Nope. In my part of the world, Moonshiners are running their hooch thru activated charcoal filters to improve the taste. Not that I would know anything about that, Officer.

      Darkace911

    4. Re:Well... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Exactly, but the Water-Alcohol you want will saturate the filter pretty quickly, and move into equalibrium, after that it only adsorbes trace chemical you don't want anyways. So you'll only loose a little bit, if your realy hung-up on a little bit then you should probably consider joining AA.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  71. Re:not surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    wow, the ignorance.

    the water in vodka, is probably from distillation, so therefore, it's already pretty damn "pure".

    it's the other organic compunds that have boiling points equal to or less than ethanol/water that also go into the distillate and fuck you up with the nastyness.

  72. Speaking of filters... by H0NGK0NGPH00EY · · Score: 5, Funny
    I think this would be a good place to post an email exchange that my best friend had with random representative (whoever answers the emails sent to the help address) at PUR.

    > From: Willett, J.R.
    > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 3:16 PM
    > Subject: PUR
    >
    > Hi
    >
    > I received a PUR Water Filtration Pitcher (Plus LX, Platinum Edition) as a
    > Christmas present, and I have a question about what things it can't
    > filter.
    >
    > I have been very satisfied with its performance in removing chlorine from
    > tapwater, however I am wondering what the limits are in its filtering
    > capabilities. Could it, for instance, remove ammonia from an ammonia-water
    > solution? In other words, could I use it in the desert to recycle urine
    > into
    > drinking water? The box says a lot about what it can filter, but not much
    > about what it can't filter. It only says that the water must be sterile,
    > and
    > everyone knows that urine is completely sterile on leaving the body. Upon
    > leaving the urinary tract, it provides an ideal environment for growing
    > bacteria, but it is completely sterile inside you. The reason we don't
    > habitually drink our own urine is because the water in our urine carries
    > bodily poisons with it, including ammonia. If, however, your pitcher can
    > remove these poisons, I can see how my PUR Water Filtration Pitcher could
    > come in handy when water is scarce.
    >
    > Although my roommate has offered to sample my filtered urine, I thought I
    > would ask you people first, before I pee in my PUR pitcher.
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > -J.R. Willett
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Beckenbach.Mark [mailto:Beckenbach.Mark@purwater.com]
    Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 9:38 AM
    To: 'Willett, J.R.'
    Subject: RE: PUR

    Hello J.R.,
    Gee-Whiz, I must admit that I read your e-mail with some skepticism. Upon
    further reflection I came to the conclusion that you could indeed run human
    urine through our filters. If you do this it could very well hasten your
    way to death, but you can filter urine. We don't normally test urine or the
    body's by-products associated with it. Drinking urine is a bit out of the
    main stream, if you'll pardon the pun. The filter may have some effect on
    the potency of the ammonia. If you're in an emergency situation with out
    water, drinking urine will only make your day worse. The ammonia in urine
    isn't what's going to ruin an already pisser of a day, its the salts. By
    constantly reintroducing those salts into your system, you are increasing
    the amount of salt in your system, and decreasing the amount of usable
    fluids. This salt will draw water from other tissues in your body, as will
    your kidneys. Your kidneys need the extra water to flush the salts out.
    It's a viscous circle. As your kidneys are shutting down, the poisons in
    your body will increase; thereby playing havoc with your heart. The lack of
    electrolytes in your in your brain can cause the synapses to misfire
    eventually causing you to get delirious and run screaming into the desert
    waving your hands over your head chasing Elvis.
    All levity aside, I am not a physician. However I do understand our
    products and have a thorough understanding of human physiology. My
    recommendation is not to do it. Carry a bladder of water in your trunk.
    Being prepared is the best way to keep from having to drink pee.
    Mahalo,
    Mark

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Willett, J.R.
    Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 10:17 AM
    Subject: RE: PUR

    Mark,

    Thankyou for your timely reply in this matter. Not only have you saved us from what could have been a disasterous science experiment, but you have provided a tremendous amount of amusement to several college students with perhaps too much time on their hands to wonder about such things.

    I assume that if the filter cannot rem

    --
    Do not read this sig.
    1. Re:Speaking of filters... by wretched22 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your best friend was the author? Were you by chance the thirsty roommate?

    2. Re:Speaking of filters... by sculpy · · Score: 1

      So I take it that the PUR filter isn't as good as a kidney...

      --
      --John
    3. Re:Speaking of filters... by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I think this would be a good place to post an email exchange that my best friend had with random representative (whoever answers the emails sent to the help address) at PUR"

      You know, in a day and age where companies are way too PC or diplomatic when they respond to emails like these, it's really quite refreshing to read an email like that. Kudos, PUR.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Speaking of filters... by Wiser87 · · Score: 1

      :D Thank you for sharing that! That was one of the funniest things I've read in a long time!

    5. Re:Speaking of filters... by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, when I give people classes in basic survival skills, and they see my water purifier, they always ask if I could piss in it and drink it. This happens every time without fail.

      Basically, the guy is spot on. When you are dehydrating, your body gets really stingy with water, and your urine will be only about 5% water. And yes, the other shit in the urine will require more water to process than you get from the processed urine.

    6. Re:Speaking of filters... by jerde · · Score: 4, Informative

      >your urine will be only about 5% water

      Urine is almost entirely water, with a little bit of other substances dissolved in it. I doubt it's ever more than 5% solutes by weight, in 95% water.

      --
      INsigNIFICANT
    7. Re:Speaking of filters... by RedBear · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just FYI, in case you ever go ocean trekking, you actually can buy a hand-operated desalination pump for your survival raft to make fresh water from saltwater. It's considerably more difficult than removing particulates, chemicals and bacteria from fresh water. I can't find a link to where you can actually order one, but I wouldn't be surprised if a desalination pump cost several hundred or even a couple grand. Requires some sort of reverse osmosis, I think.

      I work for an organization that does marine safety training, and my boss related to me a story about a couple who survived something like 68 days in a liferaft in the middle of the ocean with nothing but a little food and a hand-operated desalinator. Not sure of the date but it was some years ago, so they've been around for a while.

    8. Re:Speaking of filters... by Pleione · · Score: 1

      I guess using PUR filters for my homemade stillsuit is out then.

    9. Re:Speaking of filters... by Dogtanian · · Score: 5, Funny

      the other shit in the urine will require more water to process than you get from the processed urine.

      Dude, if you have shit in your urine, you should see a doctor *pronto*.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    10. Re:Speaking of filters... by Inda · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you wish to survive on urine you must evaporate the water off first.

      Dig a large hole.

      Piss in said hole or in a small container and place that in the hole.

      Place a clean empty contain in the hole. Use this to collect your 'fresh' water.

      Cover the hole with polythene; tranparent is best. Weigh it down at the corners to stop it falling in.

      Place a small stone in the centre of the polythene to form an angle for the condenced water to run down. Your clean empty container should be under this.

      Other green plants can be added to the hole to increase moisure.

      I tried this 20 years during a hot sunny day in the UK - hardly desert conditions, I know. I had almost half a cup of water of drinking water at the end of the day. I was was not brave enough to try it without water purification tablets though.

      It would buy you an extra day or so and better than drinking your own piss without doubt.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    11. Re:Speaking of filters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, nothing could prepare them for the giant man-eating sea monkeys on day 69.

    12. Re:Speaking of filters... by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Been reading the "Dune", I see...

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    13. Re:Speaking of filters... by seven+of+five · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... after evaporating off the water, THEN you drink the pee?

    14. Re:Speaking of filters... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > I was was not brave enough to try it without
      > water purification tablets though.

      Why? Were you afraid you would catch a disease from yourself?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    15. Re:Speaking of filters... by valkoinen · · Score: 0

      There are sunlight-operated stills that are a kind of small inflatable dome tent with transparent top. Sunlight heats the salt water in the bottom, which evaporates the (relatively) clean water to the ceiling and condenses it into drinkable water.

      The capacity for filtering is not too great but it would keep you alive in a tight spot. If I remember right some emergency rafts have this kind of units. I don't see how this would not work in a desert too,.

    16. Re:Speaking of filters... by mbourgon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ya know, I read this exact plan in an old Hardy Boys novel. That being said, I believe it said there was enough moisture in the sand to do this, and nothing about whizzing in the hole.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    17. Re:Speaking of filters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is possible, if you have a rectovesical fistula, medical for 'connection between your intestines and bladder'. Pneumaturia, or air in the urine, is another possible sign of this condition, which can arise from Crohn's disease, a type of inflammation of the intestines and other portions of the gastrointestinal tract.

    18. Re:Speaking of filters... by SamSim · · Score: 1

      INFORMATIVE?!

    19. Re:Speaking of filters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it is good advice. I mean, I'd certainly go to the doctor if turds started flying out of the wrong hole, wouldn't you?

    20. Re:Speaking of filters... by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      the other shit in the urine

      Christ. I don't want to know how your insides are plumbed...

    21. Re:Speaking of filters... by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Used a headlight from a jeep, yeah -- _The Mark On The Door_.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    22. Re:Speaking of filters... by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Mostly because the desert isn't usually known for having vast quantities of impure water available for filtration.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    23. Re:Speaking of filters... by arctan1701 · · Score: 1

      you can order them here: PUR 06 and here: PUR 35 the 06 is more for emergency use at only 1 oz/min while the 35 is marketed as a continuous use water source. though at only 1.2 gal/hr i don't think that i would use it all the time nor for more than 2 people

    24. Re:Speaking of filters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to confirm, from "Anatomy & Physiology: Unity of Form and Function, Saladin, 3rd Ed.":

      "Urine averages 95% water and 5% solutes by volume. Normally, the most abundant solute is urea, followed by sodium chloride, potassium chloride, and lesser amounts of creatinine, uric acid, phosphates, sulfates, and traces of calcium, magnesium, and sometimes bicarbonate."

      As for drinking it, several cultures (India, Cameroon, Thailand, Japan I know for sure) have traditions regarding drinking unfiltered urine. Not saying it's a good idea though.

      Phil E.

    25. Re:Speaking of filters... by ALpaca2500 · · Score: 1

      Ya know, I read this exact plan in an old Hardy Boys novel.

      i saw them do it on Mr. Wizard. but with real dirty water, not urine...

    26. Re:Speaking of filters... by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      Which is possible, if you have a rectovesical fistula, medical for 'connection between your intestines and bladder'. Pneumaturia, or air in the urine, is another possible sign of this condition, which can arise from Crohn's disease, a type of inflammation of the intestines and other portions of the gastrointestinal tract.

      I don't have mod points, but I'll quote you. I was going to say the same thing.

    27. Re:Speaking of filters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for drinking it, several cultures (India, Cameroon, Thailand, Japan I know for sure)

      The Germans too, if their porn in any way resembles real life.

    28. Re:Speaking of filters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have shit in your urine, your gut could have developed a "fistula" and you're also passing wind through your urinary tract as well. You'll be getting bladder infections all the time due to the shit going through, laden with bacteria of various descriptions, and end up on some serious steroids and painkillers while the doctors get around to treating you , although this can take a few months (in the UK anyway)- this will probably involve being put under, then having an op to remove that part of your bowel... and a 6 week recovery period.

      Happening to a very dear friend of mine right now.

      So yeah, go see someone.

      (Not sure if there's any other reasons why you'd have shit in your urine - other than them both being passed normally and then being united outside of the body).

    29. Re:Speaking of filters... by Deanasc · · Score: 1

      This is really boosted from the "Anarchist Cookbook". Don't give it another thought.

      --
      I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    30. Re:Speaking of filters... by Deanasc · · Score: 1

      I bought one just before Y2K and then returned it right after society didn't collapse. WestMarine will sell you one. You can get an electric one that can be converted to a hand pump or just get a hand pump one.

      --
      I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    31. Re:Speaking of filters... by StormKrow · · Score: 1

      LOL That's the most clever "dumb question" I've ever heard.

      --
      Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!
    32. Re:Speaking of filters... by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1
      As for drinking it, several cultures (India, Cameroon, Thailand, Japan I know for sure) have traditions regarding drinking unfiltered urine. Not saying it's a good idea though.
      There was some politician - Boutros Boutros Ghali I think- who was famous for it. But maybe he was taking the piss.
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    33. Re:Speaking of filters... by tjlsmith · · Score: 1

      Why didn't they do this on ships?

      I read about sailors on ships at sea in the 1700's running out of water and suffering thirst. I have always wondered, why didn't they crack it off from sea water?

      Am I missing the obvious here, or was it them?

      --
      Mumia Abu-Jamal is *laughably guilty*. Check the evidence.
    34. Re:Speaking of filters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe they lacked plastic sheets ;-)

  73. Anhydrous ethanol is usually spiked by fejes · · Score: 5, Informative

    Spiked with Methanol,that is, which makes you go blind. One thing I know from working in Chemistry labs is that you should never touch alcohol coming from a lab. (If you don't believe me, squirt a bit into a Gas Chromatography column, and notice that there are two peaks, not one.)

    --
    The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
    1. Re:Anhydrous ethanol is usually spiked by The+Bender · · Score: 1

      It is possible to get ethanol with (5%) MeOH, but it's very far from the norm. Mostly used in high-schools, other low-trust situations, and small outfits that can't be bothered to get on top of the regulatory paperwork. It often also has colour and a foul flavour added.
      You won't find any serious chemisry lab that uses impure ethanol, since the cost is the same (assuming you have the proper parerwork) and nobody wants to be chucking mixtures into their reactions. Trust me, I've been a research chemist in academia and industry for the last 10 years.
      If you want to be worried about something in it, go for the trace impurities of god-knows-what. I know people who have ingested large amounts of lab EtOH and not suffered. Mind you, I wouldn't touch the stuff myself. Many stories abound about how back in Soviet Russia, lab alcohol was used as a form of currency by scientists lucky enough to have access to it.

    2. Re:Anhydrous ethanol is usually spiked by caveat · · Score: 1

      Correct, we also had 55-gallon drums of "Denatured Ethanol (5% Methanol)". Those were definitely NOT drinkable, and even cheaper than the USP EtOH (about $40 for 55 gallons, vs. $21 for 5 gallons) since it didn't have an excise tax as a drinkable product. Sheesh, a lot fo you people obviously did a fair bit of chemistry in college, don't you know what USP means?

      --

      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    3. Re:Anhydrous ethanol is usually spiked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What scares me are the large numbers of people who use lab glassware for cooking/eating out of. People grabbing a beaker for a drinking mug etc.

      It's just not right...or sensible. And we trust these people to be bright enough to carry out proper controls in their work :)

    4. Re:Anhydrous ethanol is usually spiked by PSandusky · · Score: 1

      Maybe they do, but they're not so hyped up on posting about it everywhere the same as you are?

      --
      "What's the use in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes?" --Fourth Doctor, "Robot"
    5. Re:Anhydrous ethanol is usually spiked by caveat · · Score: 1

      They obvioously don't, otherwise there wouldn't be thirty-seven replies all with the same "you can't drink pure ethanol, it's all spiked with benzene/MEK/methanol/whatever!" Anyway, like I said in a previous post, I'm going to beat that USP horse long past dead and decomposed.

      --

      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  74. Re:Wadka! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    Yet in germanic countries they pronounce it as wodka (at least the Norwiegan I have been hanging out with does) so it is not a totally random misconseption, because people dsay it.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  75. Beware of certain filters by LS · · Score: 4, Informative

    A company called gray kangaroo makes alcohol filters that do precisely what is being described here. Take this with a grain of salt, since the source is biased (they are trying to sell filters), but their FAQ claims the following:


    How is the Gray Kangaroo different than a commercially available water filter?

    GK uses more filter material than a standard personal water filter. It also uses filter material which is optimized for liquor. Water filters use a variety of filter materials, some of them improve liquor while others (which eliminate chlorine, lead and other hazards in tap water) do nothing for liquor and only waste space. Also some filters use plastics which are dissolved by hard liquor and end up making your drink taste like crazy glue. Most importantly the GK is designed to easily filter liquor multiple times and built to be rugged enough to be used by a group of heavy drinkers.


    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  76. Shoulda thought of this back in college by Erythros · · Score: 1

    Take previously purchased cheap Vodka.
    Filter Through Brita Filter
    Taste Test
    Repeat 3-4 times.
    Filter Vodka Through Kidneys.
    Fill Cup
    Pass through Brita Filter.
    Give to Sh1thead Roommate.
    Record and publish taste test results on slashdot.

  77. Re:Hey, I often run Vodka through a filtration sys by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    He's using his liver and pancreas to filter his vodka, so I wouldn't want to drink it after it's been through his filtration system. For you, it might be a golden opportunity, however.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  78. Burnt Toast Filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US metho consuming folk reckon any plastic drink container packed with burnt toast, does a pretty good job, getting yeasty overtones, just like a good French champaign. Fishtank filters, and bagged activated carbon, can be added between bread layers, or for someting better, a whole activated carbon fishtank filter is the bees knees. Use plastic to cover fish tank filters, or the angels share (evaporation)can be horrendous. Metho costs $2.75 a litre in Australia(95% ethanol, fusels added).

  79. Vostok Antarctica Vodka and the Brita by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    While in Vostok Antarctica I had multiple opportunities to sample the Vodka produced by my Russian hosts.

    Initially I was very doubtful of the mixture. It was concentrated from a "vegtable peelings mash" by means of fractional freezing. They concentrated the alcohol by means repeated freezing and thawing. Concentration was done by fractional freezing. Basically they placed the mash outside (where it was -60C or worse) to let the ice freeze, brought it back inside and removed the ice that has formed on the top ... or so I was told.

    They did this because the use of a traditonal boiler/still was "not allowed" by the bureaucratic powers at the base. The bureaucratic powers claimed it was a waste of base fuel.

    BTW: My hosts knew that fractional freezing also cost base fuel, but they got away with it either because the bureaucratic powers didn't understand physics, or because they turned a "blind eye" to whole thing. :-)

    So speaking of blindness, I was initially hesitant to sample their finished product. Someone informed me that to refuse a sample would be an insult. I didn't want to offend our hosts so I finally agreed to have a shot. When I was served, I noticed that they poured the vodka out of a Brita water filter. When I inquired about the reason I was told that it made the finished product "better". Apparently they have been doing vodka water filtration for years "in the land way down under''.

    The Vostok Vodka was excellent. It was a bit hyper concentrated (beyond the normal Vodka proof), but very fine none the less. The next time you find yourself in Vostok Antarctica you should give their vodka a try! :-)

    1. Re:Vostok Antarctica Vodka and the Brita by rich3rd · · Score: 2, Informative
      let the ice freeze, brought it back inside and removed the ice that has formed on the top

      Before prohibition, fractional distillation was also commonly used throughout the U.S. to concentrate fermented cider into "applejack". John Chapman, AKA Johnny Appleseed, was all about the cider. In fact, before modern refrigeration techniques, all cider was alcoholic; the term "hard cider" would have been redundant. As apples are heterozygous, trees grown from seed bear fruit quite unlike like that of the parent tree (varieties prized for their fruit are all cloned from the same original tree). Therefore, most of the trees Chapman planted would have borne "spitters", which are good for little else but cider. This excellent book (Pollan, Michael: The Botany of Desire) covers the whole apples-alcohol-Chapman enigma, as well as a few other plants that have shaped, and been shaped by, humans in their pursuits of various desires.

    2. Re:Vostok Antarctica Vodka and the Brita by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing, that whereever mankind goes, the first thing they ask themself is "How do we get some alcohol here? Can we destill this $newfoundplant/waste?"

      It will be fun to see the creative ways the first men on mars will find to get themselfes some drinks.

    3. Re:Vostok Antarctica Vodka and the Brita by khrtt · · Score: 1

      My hosts knew that fractional freezing also cost base fuel..

      Fractional freezing would cost fuel..

      Boiling would NOT cost fuel!! Since you run your boiler inside, and use the same fuel that's used for heating the living quarters anyways, in the balance, no heat is wasted.

    4. Re:Vostok Antarctica Vodka and the Brita by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In some places people are so desparate that if they come across some halucinogen, that one person will take it, then each subsequent person will drink the piss of that person in order to get high as well.

    5. Re:Vostok Antarctica Vodka and the Brita by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eh? what about the extra ice that comes from outside the room?

    6. Re:Vostok Antarctica Vodka and the Brita by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you'd think they'd be smart enough to chuck the ice back outside before it melted. or better yet, just leave the barrel of hooch outside and go out to periodically remove the ice layer. it's not rocket science.

  80. Re:Hey, I often run Vodka through a filtration sys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, you give me vodka. I filter. You judge.

  81. Rubbing alcohol isn't methanol by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    It's isopropyl alcohol. Certianly not something you want to drink, but far less dangerous. Methanol causes an irreversable swelling of the optic nerve, leading to blindness and possibly death. Isopropyl is far less dangerous. It's highly likely to make you vomit and give you diarrhea and generally make oyu feel like shit, but unless you drink a lot of it, it's very unlikely to kill you. You'd probably have to dirnk as much of it as you do ethanol to kill yourself.

    It's more unplesant than it is really dangerous. The other types of alcohol are much worse.

  82. More like this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wake up the next day and post on Sloshdot.

    Wake up the next day feeling like total sh*t and stay in bed until at least about 11PM until you absolutely must try to put some kind of food in your stomach and hope it stays down.

    Pass out again and have delerious feverish nightmares as your body struggles to rid itself of all the acetaldehyde now circulating in your bloodstream while trying to digest the food you ate while (you sort-of) sleep with a pounding headache.

    Wake up the 2nd after (did it get dark two or three times since you drank? ...can't really remember quite yet). By now you think you actually might still live thru the ordeal and begin to recover. Take two more acetaminophen tablets and eat something for breakfast.... about a half hour later when your blood sugar finally stabilizes to a somewhat functional level, THEN you might feel like turning on the computer to post to Slashdot.

  83. JUST Finished trying this by Thai-Pan · · Score: 4, Informative

    What a wacky coincidence. I saw this experiment posted up on a message board and just tried it with some friends this evening. They left not 10 minutes ago.

    Started off with a 750ml bottle of "Medallion Quality". You don't expect much from a bottle that large that costs in the range of $11 Canadian. Needless to say, it was putrid. Bordering undrinkable. You'd have to be drunk to start with to consume the stuff. Smells reminiscent of rubbing alcohol, tastes like turpentine with an aftertaste not unlike a bowling alley shoe. As my buddy described it, "It feels like a clown is raping my mouth."

    We were sure to prime the filter first. It ships with some chemicals in the charcoal, so run a few pitchers of water through.

    After 3 filters of the vodka, the odour was drastically reduced. Flavour was not hugely improved, but the aftertaste was lessened and it didn't burn as much going down.

    6 filters, the odour is down even more. Taste is much improved. Now comparable to a decent cheap vodka, probably a little better than regular Smirnoff. Goes down not too bad, aftertaste still not great.

    10 filters. Odour is near gone. Tastes smooth. Would be undetectable mixed with grapefruit juice.

    20 filters. SMOOTH. Goes down like water. Zero odour. Perfect. Easily as good as an upper end vodka like Canadian Iceberg, but not as delicate as the really pricy brands. Definitely a good taste. Pleasant enough to drink straight without shooting it.

    Of course we kept a control sample. I did not fully appreciate how good the 20-filtered drink was until I tasted the control sample again. It was truly terrible. While I suggest doing this just to try it, I will not again put that stuff in my mouth unfiltered.

    I have heard mixed reports about how well different vodkas turn out. Some are better than others, Medallion had tremendous benefit from the filtering. The taste of the original and final product are not even remotely close.

    Also heard complaints about murky vodka. Our first filter result was slightly murky and blue/greyish from chemicals left in the filter. Repeated filtering made it disappear again. I can't help but wonder if those chemicals were doing me any physical harm, but they could not possibly be doing any worse than the original vodka anyways. It's all in the name of SCIENCE!

    All in all, this experiment was fun and definitely worth trying. It takes long enough that I wouldn't expect it to be a decent timesaving measure. However, it was fun to do and we will probably repeat the experiment again next Friday with that godawful Russian Prince vodka.

    1. Re:JUST Finished trying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Exactly which brand, model filter did you use? Because I just tried this with a liter of Dimitroff vodka running it through a brita pitcher 12 times and a waterpik R-2C carbon filter 8 times. I can't say for certain if there's been any change. It certainly is not like ketel one at this point.

      I suspect that the filteration is proportional to the time that the liquid stays in contact with the carbon as these people said it took them 15 minutes per filteration and it only took me 1-2 minutes.

    2. Re:JUST Finished trying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      was just carbon dust, nothing to worry about.

    3. Re:JUST Finished trying this by Shadwell · · Score: 1

      How does a clown raping your mouth feel?

      Funny.

    4. Re:JUST Finished trying this by Thai-Pan · · Score: 1

      Genuine Brita filter, regular Brita 12 cup pitcher. My first filter took nearly 10 minutes, near the end, it was only 2-3 minutes per filter.

      I don't know what to suggest, maybe trying another vodka? I will repeat this again another time with another putrid vodka. The filtered Medallion Quality is above average at this point.

      I think it would be naive to assume that the filtration process is the only thing that separates cheap vodka from good vodka. No doubt the distilling process and ingredients play the largest role. I'd postulate that it's obvious the vodkas which respond best to this are made from decent ingredients but it's the process itself that lacks in its ability to filter out various chemicals added during the distilling process. Medallion is a local vodka made for Superstore, so I would think it's made from some sort of locally available commodities. Alberta is known for its grain farms, so it would be the obvious choice, and the grains wouldn't be of poor quality.

    5. Re:JUST Finished trying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur...that some some cheap vodkas will respond to filtration and some won't. someone needs to assemble a list of cheap vodkas that can be improved.

    6. Re:JUST Finished trying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here, let me show you.

  84. Probably not much by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    The thing is, really pure Vodka is pretty much just alcohol and water. It doesn't really have a taste. OTher alcohols, not so much. Beer, whiskey, etc all have a lot of other stuff that gives them their flavour. It's fairly likely that the filter will remove a good bit of that, leaving you with something that it just kind of weak and not good at all.

    In fact it would probably screw up good Vodkas. One of the things that makes Grey Goose, Kettle One, etc worth the money is their distinct and pleasing tastes. It's likely that this process would remove most of that.

  85. Having done this by icebattle · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I recently completed my first batch of home distilled vodka and, frankly, it was great. The yield was excellent, and my home made still worked fine. I even have some pics of the rig.

    I ran half of the completed product through a carbon filter, and it seemd to improve the smoothness. Maybe. We had a few merry evenings with the stuff, and no nasty hangovers.

    I'll be kicking off the next batch soon. Long live SuperYeast!

    1. Re:Having done this by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      i was going to email you, but your email address is hidden on /.

      i too live in NZ where it's legal to distill vodka ;)..... would you be willing to email me your pics of the build? the websites out there just aren't doing it for me.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  86. I can attest to this! by spin2cool · · Score: 3, Funny

    After reading this site last week, myself and a couple of friends decided to take the "Brita Challenge". To my complete amazement it worked better than I ever could have hoped.

    I hate vodka typically, and the 9-dollar "Kamchakta" vodka that we bought burned like a mofo, and smelled like ass. After filtering it several times, it loses all of those impurities (that some might call 'flavor'), and is much more palatable.

    Our findings were that 4 filtrations were plenty, and that it took much less time than the other site claims. We were able to filter a 1.75 L bottle of vodka 6 times in well under an hour.

    We surmise that if you stuck 3 or 4 filters together in one long pipe, you could have one hell of a filtration system, and do it quickly too. With a little bit of advertising on collegehumor.com, you could be a thousandare, easy!!

    To recap:
    1) Filter Cheap Vodka
    2) ????
    3) Profit!!!

    1. Re:I can attest to this! by Spunk · · Score: 1

      Gray Kangaroo beat you to it.

  87. Sorry, but wrong. by warrax_666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Methanol makes you go blind and very likely dead (unless you only drink a tiny amount and get treated immediately), Ethanol gives you a hangover.

    --
    HAND.
    1. Re:Sorry, but wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I hope you also know that the proper treatment after drinking a little bit of methanol is to drink a whole lot of ethanol immediately.

      IANAMD, so I want to emphasize that this is best done in an hospital.

    2. Re:Sorry, but wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent down. misinformation.

    3. Re:Sorry, but wrong. by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 1
      You must be new here...

      when has misinformation ever waranted being modded down? ;-)

    4. Re:Sorry, but wrong. by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      That's still a very iffy treatment, because everyone's body processes ethanol in different amounts.

      So, basically, they just keep giving you booze and asking how woozy you are. I think they want you before 'completely smashed', but after 'not okay to drive'.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  88. Re:Wadka! by badasscat · · Score: 1

    Ahhhh!!!!!111oneone This is the exact same annoying thing as people thinking asians say "lice" instead of "rice"!

    Well, some of them do. I should know, I'm married to one that has this problem and has worked hard to get rid of her accent.

    It does depend on the Asian country, but you're also stereotyping and generalizing by lumping all "Asians" together. The Japanese language does not have either a proper "R" or a proper "L" sound - the language is just not set up that way - but all of the words that get romanized with r's in them both sound and are physically produced with an oral motion closer to what we make with an "L". When you say "arigato", for example, you pronounce it closer to a quick "ah-lee-gah-toh" than "ah-ree-gah-toh", the latter just sounding like a horrible American accent in Japanese. So yes, "rice" does sound like "lice" in English if a native Japanese person is not careful, especially considering that the modern Japanese word for "rice" is actually "raisu", which is just the English "rice" pronounced with Japanese pronunciation. Of course, most Japanese people know the deal with r's and l's, and they learn very early on that they need to be careful and have it drilled into them incessantly by their teachers - and that's probably one reason why you think the R/L thing is a misconception, because many of them do overcome it very early on. But it isn't a misconception, and not every Japanese person develops the right habits early in their English lessons.

    Koreans, Chinese, probably most other Asian countries don't have this problem at all. But the Japanese do. It's not a myth.

    I have no problem with people making fun of different countries' customs, but please, at least do it correctly.

    Well, you could take your own advice. Asians don't all speak the same language, you know, so they don't all have the same accent. Japanese, Chinese and Korean are not even in the same language family (depending on which linguist you believe), just to use three examples. They're completely different languages that evolved from different sources (though there's also been some cross-pollenation over the years, and some, though clearly not a majority, of linguists do believe Korean and Japanese are both Altaic languages).

    I have no problem with your general point and I'm sure you're right about the pronunciation of "vodka", I just think you're being a little hypocritical, calling somebody out for incorrectly over-generalizing when you're doing the exact same thing yourself.

  89. Re:is usually spiked by deglr6328 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anhydrous ethanol used for industrial processes may be "spiked" (denatured) with methanol to discourage consumption but this is never the case with reagent grade "absolute" ethanol. When a chemist needs ethanol for an experiment and ONLY ethanol, that better be all that's in the bottle.

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  90. Re:Hey, I often run Vodka through a filtration sys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Golden opportunity??

    More like "golden SHOWER" opportunity! LOL!!!

  91. Props. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I note that it's dated nearly five years ago. Good luck getting an actual email to someone working at a company. It's one-way communication, folks, a push medium. Damn kids these days and their outdated unidirectional media paradigms.

    Still, props to the company and to the guy working for it for giving an actual response. And a helpful one, at that. Nifty!

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  92. Whiskey? by petrus4 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I used to drink Wild Turkey a few years back, but stopped partially due to how harsh it was. (At least the cheapest version of it)

    I found myself wondering if this method would work for that, or if it is better suited for something which is primarily water based, like vodka?

    1. Re:Whiskey? by Engineer+Andy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was wondering the same, but for scotch. The lower grade stuff is all but undrinkable (for lower grade, read anything that isn't single malt) to me. If I could run a bottle of johnny walker red through it and get anywhere near single malt taste, going through a cartridge for a bottle would be a cheap investment.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World" 1 John 4:14
    2. Re:Whiskey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      As stated elsewhere, the things that give whiskey its flavor are likely to get filtered out along with the baddies, and the result will likely be quite bland.

    3. Re:Whiskey? by The-Bus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That, simply, is impossible. Good Vodka tastes good because it has very little impurities. The best are some of the "cleanest" vodkas.

      Scotch, on the other hand, is all ABOUT the impurities. Witness something like the Laphroaig, which (and this is the producer talking) asks you to drink it and "release the pungent, earthy aroma of blue peat smoke" -- Macallan speaks of an "after taste of heavily toasted oak wood" in their 1971 30-yr old run -- clearly, they are not concerned with impurities. Some even produce "unchilfiltered" Scotch which has actual shards of Scotchy goodness floating around in the bottle.

      That being said, some blended Scotch is OK, but not anything like single-malt. As much as I enjoy Scotch, I also like to drink JD and Crown Royal, which I'm sure means someone will take my Scotchy badge away from me.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    4. Re:Whiskey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two issues I have with your post:
      1. Regular Wild Turkey is a reasonably good bourbon. Their distillery isn't as picturesque as that of Maker's Mark, but they've had a decent product on the market for a great many years.
      2. The cheapest version of Wild Turkey is the 80 proof. I can see no reason to buy it, since it's essentially the 101, only watered-down.

      And now, the same post, distilled into a flame:
      1. Is not!
      2. Wimp!

    5. Re:Whiskey? by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      If you're going to drink cheap Scotch (or indeed low-grade hooch of any kind) the simplest and most effective way to lose the manky taste is surely this.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    6. Re:Whiskey? by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Heh. I was already thinking much the same thing.

      My preferred drink is jack-n-coke, even though I gave up soda two years ago in all other forms. I'm perpetually on the lookout for a decent substitute. For the time being however, I'm off to the laundry room for another 12oz. Coke.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  93. Re:is usually spiked by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

    oops. linky

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  94. Re:not surprising... by K8Fan · · Score: 1
    For a vodkaphile on a budget nothing beats pearl vodka, it's smoother than Grey Goose and costs only ~$20/750ml

    "Home Theater" magazine has a regular food and drink column, and one time they did a blind taste test of vodkas. To their shock and horror, cheap-ass Gordon's in the plastic jug came out on top of all the pricy vodkas. Armed with this knowledge and an empty Stoli bottle, I was able to fool a friend who was a vodka snob. He never knew his was drinking the cheap stuff.

    --
    "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  95. Re:Hey, I often run Vodka through a filtration sys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMGLOL that is so funny I just spit Coke all over my keyboard!!!

  96. Re:Wadka! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    This is the exact same annoying thing as people thinking asians say "lice" instead of "rice"!

    I hate to burst your PC bubble, but sometimes, not only do they say it that way, they also spell it that way. Sorry. There are stereotypes, and then there's reality.

  97. Re:not surprising... by Orthanc_duo · · Score: 1

    Filtering the water before making the coffee certainly does. I suspect that filtering after making the coffee would filter out a lot of good stuff.

    That said, if you drink your coffee with milk or sugar it realy isn't going to be a noticible improvement

  98. A better science experiment. by DJTodd242 · · Score: 1

    Substituting Beer for water.

    It didn't go very well.

    1. Re:A better science experiment. by rich3rd · · Score: 1

      For some reason (probably alcohol related), I read that as "Beef", and pictured a Brita(TM) pitcher packed with ground chuck... "Yep, turns plain old chuck into top sirloin after six or seven filterings!"

  99. Nope, was right, do your research by pturing · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, you can process methanol in the small amounts that you get it in liquor. Unfortuanetely, it metabolizes to formaldehyde and formic acid, which are among the major factors in hangovers.

    See, for example:
    http://www.studentbmj.com/back_issues/06 02/educati on/ed3.html
    http://www.talkaboutsupport.com/group /alt.support. disorders.neurological/messages/4240.html

    1. Re:Nope, was right, do your research by TheLink · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Unfortuanetely, it metabolizes to formaldehyde and formic acid, which are among the major factors in hangovers."

      Not to mention these stuff is what makes you go blind.

      So usually they give you something else to metabolize to reduce the creation and thus concentration of the nasties.

      --
    2. Re:Nope, was right, do your research by say · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In Norway, quite a few people died recently from drinking illegal vodka, which turned out to be methanol. The guy who sold it got quite a few years in the slammer.

      --
      Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
  100. Benzene has almost the same boiling pt. as ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why it is hard to separate just by distilling.

  101. Ignobel? by Megane · · Score: 1

    Wow, these guys definitely deserve a nomination for an Ignobel Prize in Chemistry. This is exactly the sort of stuff our world needs: better living through chemistry.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  102. Re:not surprising... by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

    The key to vodka, IMO, is getting it cold enough. Almost any vodka is perfectly good if it's cold. The only exception I've run into so far was Seagram's, which was just horrible, even mixed - let alone straight (which is how I generally prefer vodka).

  103. Absinthe by ScottBob · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Especially for the science nerd in all of us as we marvel at the totally clear liquid turning milky white as the water from melting ice mixes with the alcoholic beverage.

    And then there's Suisse La Bleue absinthe, which also turns milky white when mixed with water (the milky effect is called louche). Absinthe remains banned in the U.S. due to the persistent myth that the wormwood in absinthe is poisonous and causes hallucinations. It doesn't, wormwood is not, nor ever was on any DEA controlled substance list. It's banned by the FDA, which prohibits the manufacture, import and resale of any foodstuffs that contain wormwood in the U.S. The FDA hangs on to the myth that one of the chemicals in wormwood, called thujone, is bad, nevermind there is thujone in spices such as sage and tarragon. At least the European Union is forward thinking, because as of this year, absinthe is once again legal all across the European Union, with Switzerland and it's much sought after clear absinthe called Suisse La Bleue (once produced in clandestine labs) being the most recent to re-legalize. For more info, go see La Fee Verte Absinthe House.

    Here in the U.S., available anise based pastis such as Pernod, Ricard, Herbsaint and Absente all exhibit the same louche effect (albeit green, due to coloring in the liqueur)when mixed with water. The colder the water, the more pronounced the milkiness.

    1. Re:Absinthe by nightgeometry · · Score: 1

      You kind of mention it, but the louche effect is almost completely gone if you use warm water.

      I don't really know any chemistry, but i am a Pastis nerd, so it is interesting to me:)

      --
      The best is the enemy of the good
    2. Re:Absinthe by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      absinthe is once again legal all across the European Union

      Off the top of my head (this is Slashdot, I'm damned if I'm going to research my incoherent ramblings- besides which, IIRC I didn't read this online), the absinthes now "legal" in Europe contain only a fraction of the amount of psychoactive substances that the old-school absinthes contained before they were banned.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    3. Re:Absinthe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Pastis nerd" -- is there such a thing, hé, fada?

  104. Re:not surprising... by The-Bus · · Score: 1

    I see your Pearl and raise you a Tito's Vodka. Micro-batch pot distilled in Texas, this is some of the smoothest damn vodka I have ever had, and it is sometimes cheaper than Absolut. It comes in a regular glass bottle with a sticker that says "Tito's" -- no hand-painted anything, no fuss, just some of the best vodka you have ever tasted.

    And it's distilled six times.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  105. A few related links... by pturing · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the guy who brought you the AK-47: Kalashnikov Vodka

    a friend of mine recently put up a discussion of vodka on his lj, and it's worth a look
    Vodka 101
    Here's the short version:
    1. Don't drink anything that comes in a plastic bottle
    2. If you must drink domestic Vodka, make it Skyy
    3. Priviet is awesome if you can find it, and not very expensive

  106. Neurontin 300mg by tid242 · · Score: 1
    But does anyone know what the pills are in the bottom left corner of that picture?

    Looks to me like Neurontin (gabapentin) 300mg Caps...

    Of course there're more than just 1 kind of yellow capsule, it's what lept immediately into my mind though...

    -tid242

    --

    With a few exceptions, secrecy is deeply incompatible with democracy and with science. --Carl Sagan

  107. Reminds me of a joke.... by MachDelta · · Score: 1
    ...as follows:
    I had eighteen bottles of whiskey in the cellar and my wife insisted I empty the contents of each bottle down the sink, or else... After careful consideration, I reluctantly agreed and finally proceeded with the unpleasant task.

    I withdrew the cork from the first bottle and poured the contents down the sink with the exception of one glass, which I drank. Then, I withdrew the cork from the second bottle and did likewise with it, with the exception of one glass, which I drank.

    I then withdrew the cork from the third bottle and poured the whiskey down the sink which I drank. I pulled the cork from the fourth bottle down the sink and poured the bottle down the glass, which I drank. I pulled the bottle from the cork of the next and drank one sink out of it, and threw the rest down the glass.

    I pulled the sink out of the next glass and poured the cork down the bottle. Then, I corked the sink with the glass, bottled the drink and drank the pour. When I had everything emptied, I steadied the house with one hand, counted the glasses, corks, bottles, and sinks with the other, which were twenty-nine, and as the houses came by I counted them again, and finally I had all the houses in one bottle, which I drank.

    I'm not under the affluence of incohol as some tinkle peep I am. I'm not half as thunk as you might drink. I fool so feelish I don't know who is me, and the drunker I stand here, the longer I get. I'm not drunk you shilly sit!
    :)
  108. Re:is usually spiked by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    I believe that 100% ethanol (everclear) is usually cut with methanol since you can't distill alcohol ot 200 proof. If you want to drink alcohol, you're better off with 195 proof.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  109. Re:Benzene has almost the same boiling pt. as etha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not really. At 95% ethanol / 5% water, the mixture forms an azeotrope which boils at 78 degrees and cannot be separated by distillation alone. You mix benzene to form a different azeotrope that allows for distilling away the water - but you get a little bit of benzene left over after all the water is gone, since benzene / ethanol will form an another azeotrope, although benzene concentration will be low enough for most cases. Now, anhydrous ethanol for laboratory use probably doesn't contain anything but few ppm of benzene. Industrial grade anhydrous ethanol will either be adultrated with methanol or a bittering agent to prevent people from buying gallons of ethanol and bootlegging them. AFAIK, injesting methanol will lead to blindness, where as benzene will damage liver. (ever read about moonshine causing blindness?)

  110. correction by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    Cut with benzene. Not methanol.
    Benzene is worse, though there may not be much of it.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    1. Re:correction by caveat · · Score: 1

      Everclear is 95% alcohol, 5% water - that combination boils at a lower temp than pure alcohol. If anybody sold something cut with benzene or methanol as a drinkable product, the FDA would roast their balls over a slow fire.

      --

      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    2. Re:correction by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      The BATF. The FDA has no jurisdiction over booze.

      The reason for denaturing industrial ethanol is to make it non-potable and therefor untaxed. The usual agent is something that makes you vomit but is not toxic. Adding benzene or methanol would be a bad idea as you know someone is going to try to drink it. There used to be a myth among winos that denatured alcohol could be made drinkable by filtering it through bread.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  111. Cheap Vodka by obender · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm suprised that after all this posts there's no mention of Satellite Vodka, the cheapest way to put yourself into orbit.
    For basic ingredients you need human excrement and an old winter coat, the type used by building site workers, convicts and the military in Eastern Europe.
    Usually the crap was collected in a hole in the ground. Put the coat in and let it rot for a few weeks. The process makes the polyethilene in the coat padding decompose into etylic alcohol. You can then collect it from the surface. Some filter it afterwards.
    On building sites they used to use a porcelain toilet seat that was plugged and filled.
    I dare you get a cheaper recipee than this.

  112. Re:Wadka! by spdt · · Score: 1
    you're also stereotyping and generalizing by lumping all "Asians" together
    It is not I who is doing the stereotyping.
    This is the exact same annoying thing as people thinking asians say "lice" instead of "rice"!
  113. Re:not surprising... by flacco · · Score: 1
    and it is sometimes cheaper than Absolut.

    gee, in the 80's absolut was considered one of the better vodkas.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  114. Re:not surprising... by Kynde · · Score: 1

    For a vodkaphile on a budget nothing beats pearl vodka, it's smoother than Grey Goose and costs only ~$20/750ml. Hell I'm not on a budget anymore but I still see no reason to waste $30 per bottle =) Itgoest through A "five-time distillation and six-time filtration process" which makes it exceptionally smooth.

    Five-time distillation?
    Now, that's an outright lie if I've ever seen one.

    --
    1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
  115. Treatment for methanol poisoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alas, these days its fomepizole, not ethanol.

  116. Re:not surprising... by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    I doubt the quality has changed dramatically since then; it's just that the market has evolved and moved on. I recall reading some article that said the vodka market was growing at 300% per year, and was by far the fastest growing sector of distilled liquors. It's no wonder Absolut has fallen behind the times.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  117. Re:not surprising... by GnuAge · · Score: 2, Informative

    The U.S. government, which as we all know, is always right, defines vodka in its regulations as "neutral spirits distilled from any material, at or above 190 proof, reduced to not more than 110 proof and not less than 80 proof and after such reduction in proof...(with vegetable charcoal for at least 8 hours)...as to be without distinctive character, aroma, or taste."

    In other words, vodka has already been filtered far more effectively than a Brita could manage & there ain't a lick of difference between the cheapest swill on the market and the most expensive imported luxury "little water", other than the fact that the expensive stuff comes in a glass bottle (which I think would be less likely to impart flavor). When liquor comes off a column still that highly fractionated it has no distinctiveness, regardless whether it is made from rye and potatoes or from byproducts of oil refinery or wood pulp (which, BTW, does happen). Generally, at least in the U.S. market, vodka is subsequently cut with distilled water, which also lacks much character. Unless there is something seriously wrong with the manufacturer's equipment (in which case the taste is probably the least of your worries), vodka is vodka.

    High end vodkas are a perfect example of a Veblen Good, a commodity whose demand increases as its prices increases because of the band wagon effect, snob appeal and people's erroneous assumption that if something is more expensive it must be better. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veblen_good

    Vodka is just an ethanol delivery vehicle. It is best consumed in large gulps straight out of the freezer, as it is in Russia, to minimize the nasty flavor inherent in ethanol and maximize its medicinal properties.

    Unlike these folks, I have done double blind tests on repeated occasions with vodka and drinks made with vodka and NO ONE has ever been able to distinguish the Stoly from the 'Park & Shop' vodka. With one exception. We were making vodka & tonics once and a friend accidentally swallowed the lemon wedge in his haste to consume the vodka. He said that particular belt was somewhat less good, even though it was made from the expensive vodka.

    Personally, my days of 'drinking-for-effect' are largely numbered (unless my liver enzyme levels decrease), so I stick to single malt Scotch whisky and an occasional Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster to clear the cobwebs out of my skull.

  118. Re:not surprising... by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Funny

    just some of the best vodka you have ever tasted

    Indeed! I would describe it as having a delightful initial nose of ethanol, a pleasant burning as it goes down, and finishing smoothly with a subtle aftertaste of ethanol punctuated by a complex ethanol-infused bouquet.

  119. Industrial Alcohol == Less Tax for UK Gov by Dogtanian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I love how out of puritanical fear that people will get drunk (and probably have sex) we put something that will instead make them blind or dead. What a country.

    They do that in Britain too; although here it has a lot more to do with the fact that spirits are taxed to the gills... quote:-

    "The excise tax today, literally today, on a 70 cl bottle of Sainsbury's vodka in Aberdeen is 84 per cent."

    Needless to say, you don't get charged that if you pop over to B&Q for some luridly-coloured purple alcohol.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  120. Re:Hey, I often run Vodka through a filtration sys by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    He's using his liver and pancreas to filter his vodka, so I wouldn't want to drink it after it's been through his filtration system. For you, it might be a golden opportunity, however. (Parent's emphasis)

    Golden. Ho ho ho ho ho.... cough.

    Seriously, I saw some stuff called "Bacardi Oro" in Asda yesterday, and I just figured out how they make it.

    No, I won't be buying it anytime soon.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  121. PUR Does make a desalinator by Ebisu_11 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I guess the PUR rep did know a thing or two, since PUR does make a hand pump for desalinating sea water. PUR Desalinator
    They mention that a couple lived for 66 days on a liferaft with one of these.

  122. Re:Hey, I often run Vodka through a filtration sys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMGLOL that is so funny I just spit Coke all over my keyboard!!!

    Actually, the joke was already obvious in the original post. It appears that you, and the poster you replied to, were the only two people not to get it.

  123. "It feels like a clown is raping my mouth." by N8F8 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Exactly how does your friend know how it feels to have a clown raping his mouth?

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:"It feels like a clown is raping my mouth." by tuxette · · Score: 1
      I suddenly have a better understanding of why some people are afraid of clowns...

      *shudder*

      --
      People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
  124. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  125. Samogon by dimss · · Score: 1

    The best vodka is home-made one. We russians call it 'samogon'. We use activated coal and some chemicals to filter samogon. Filtering cheap mass production vodka is much more complex process because sometimes cheap vodka is made of synthetic ethanol, which contains really weird byproducts (up to 1% of polyethylene!).

    I believe that brita filters are more advanced devices than charcoal filters. I should try it with samogon.

    1. Re:Samogon by anno1602 · · Score: 1

      I believe that brita filters are more advanced devices than charcoal filters.

      I don't want to disappoint you, but brita filters are exactly that: Activated charcoal filters.
  126. It is probably to protect the company. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Kudos, PUR.

    You know that email was probably the easiest and cheapest way the company could have protected itself from a potential future lawsuit. By giving no response to the email it could have confirmed to some people that this wouldn't cause any major damage. Thus they will try it. Getting Sick or Dead. Thus Suing and/or Family Suing PUR for neglect to point out safety concerns of product.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:It is probably to protect the company. by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously, drinking desalted urine is actually an acceptable method for dealing with a lack of water. And a bit of salt water isn't going to kill you unless you are already dehydrated. And these guys wern't planning on experimenting while dehydrated.

    2. Re:It is probably to protect the company. by edbarrett · · Score: 1
      Seriously, drinking desalted urine is actually an acceptable method for dealing with a lack of water.

      After the Neal Stephenson interview a while ago, I went and read Skeletons on the Zahara just because I like a good shipwreck story. The characters involved were reduced to, um, "recycling" for quite a while. That being said, I would really rather not hear about it anymore. Can we stop this thread right now? Please?

    3. Re:It is probably to protect the company. by mlheur · · Score: 1

      I am an outdoor survival instructor. Living where I do there's no lack of rain water, but we do teach a method of recycling standing water into drinking water using grass, sand, charcoal, some branch poles, twine and cheesecloth (a t-shirt will do).
      You build a 3 ft tripod with your poles and twine.
      8 inches down the tripod fasten a triangle of cheesecloth, put the charcoal in here.
      16 inches down put another triangle of cheesecloth, fill this with grass and other green vegitation, ferns etc. Leaves don't do as well.
      Finally, near the bottom tie off the rest of the cheesecloth, fill it with sand.
      Put a cup/bowl/basin at the bottom of this contraption. Pour water in the top, and watch it filter.

      I've been told this works for urine to make it drinkable.

    4. Re:It is probably to protect the company. by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      An 'experiment' is perfectly safe and meaningless. In fact, you don't need a magical urine desalter.

      While drinking urine is basically as harmless as drinking salt water, and probably tastes about the same, the problem isn't ammonia. (If you really had a problem there you could just drink sweat instead.)

      The problem is, if you're in an enviroment without water, and you get to the point where you're willing to drink urine or salt water, you're already dehydrated, and you already don't have any water to drink.

      At that point, it is vitally important you do not drink salt water or urine, which has salt in it. Pour it on yourself to cool off, but do not drink it. Why? Because the entire reason you're thirsty is that you're trying to get rid your salt inbalance! You have too much salt and not enough water.

      Now, yes, if you have some magical water desalter, sure, you could drink it...but I'd drink sweat, instead, personally. Or salt water. But magic water desalters do not exist. If they did, a lot less people would die in liferafts at sea. The only free way to desalt water is to evaporate it (Which, BTW, would probably get rid of the ammonia from urine.) and recondense it. This is very slow.

      However, if you do ever get stuck in the middle of the desert, and manage to make a water consender, by all means, urinate next to it or even under it, so the water will condense on that. But there are no circumstances where you could drink straight urine and come out ahead.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    5. Re:It is probably to protect the company. by dmadole · · Score: 1

      The only free way to desalt water is to evaporate it (Which, BTW, would probably get rid of the ammonia from urine.) and recondense it.

      Not true -- reverse osmosis will remove salt and other impurities from water. In fact, it is used to produce drinking water from sea water in some areas in the Middle East and Africa, as well as by the military.

      Here's one of the first Google hits on the topic.

    6. Re:It is probably to protect the company. by harrkev · · Score: 1

      Yup. The only downside is that it is MAJORLY expensive to de-salinate sea water.

      And it IS possible to get one for your life raft. Just be prepared to dig very deep in your wallet. Well, there goes that new vid card for Half Life 2. But that's OK. By the time that Steam begins working, you will have saved up enough for another one!

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    7. Re:It is probably to protect the company. by PSandusky · · Score: 1

      You really, truly, deeply in your heart believe that your choices in reading material and the aversions that resulted therefrom will guide the course of a thread on Slashdot?

      Holy smokes, that must be some aversion.

      --
      "What's the use in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes?" --Fourth Doctor, "Robot"
    8. Re:It is probably to protect the company. by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      ...where you could drink straight urine and come out ahead.

      Oooohhh, if I could only hook up a generator to Dr. Freud's whirling skeleton right now.

      --
      What?
  127. More than 190 proof by gatzke · · Score: 1

    Ethanol - Water mixture will exhibit an azeotrope, which means you cannot separate the two beyond 95 % purity (190 proof) without a special process. Look up azeotrope for more info...

    From my understanding, there are two ways that you can get pure EtOh. One is to add a third chemical into the mix to break the azeotrope. Then you have to deal with triple species phase diagrams that make my head hurt. So, you end up with ethanol and benzene boiling off, then separate the benzene and ethanol in another process, but you always get stuck with a bit of what you are trying to separate.

    The other way to get the last 5% of water out is to chemisorb the water out, if I remember correctly. Get something that selectively reacts with the water over the ethanol so soak the water out.

    Actually, you may be able to selectively freeze the water out, but you may need really cold temps.

    It is pretty useless from what I hear, as pure ethanol is pretty volatile, evaporating pretty quickly.

    Stick with 190 proof everclear, it will hurt you plenty.

    Disclaimer, separations and thermo are not my specialty, drink responsibly.

    1. Re:More than 190 proof by caveat · · Score: 1

      IIRC the benzene and the water form an azeotrope that boils off first, then the remaining benzene come over in an EtOH azeotrope. Of course, as I mentioned in a post below, USP ethanol is certified for human consumption - so it's usually dried by salts or molsieves.

      Oh, 100% EtOH doesn't evaporate any faster than 190proof, at least not that I ever noticed.

      --

      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    2. Re:More than 190 proof by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      No, 100% won't evaporate any faster than 190 proof. In fact, it actually GAINS volume at first, as it absorbs H2O vapor from the air, until it is back to 190 proof again...

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  128. Re:not surprising... by kesuki · · Score: 1

    The actual distilation process of vodka relies heavily on industrial sized filtration... It seem pretty clear to me that cheaper brands are skimping on the filtration required, and yes, the premium brands do filter their vodka dozens of times, some even use reverse osmosis...
    I learned all this thanks to a tour given to the hands on history show, which seems to be preoccupied with the history of distilation.. they've covered the history of vodka, irish wisky, tequilia, and beer... they've covered beer a couple of different ways as i've recalled..

  129. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  130. Re:not surprising... by texas_mustang · · Score: 1

    I tried this swill both room temperature & chilled and it sucked. Finally resorted to mixing with OJ. Definitely not shotworthy.

  131. Amount of water in urine by base_chakra · · Score: 3, Informative

    Urine is almost entirely water, with a little bit of other substances dissolved in it. I doubt it's ever more than 5% solutes by weight, in 95% water.

    Close. As one would expect, it's variable, but urine can be up to about 96% water. When you drink an abundance of water, your kidneys are free to pass more diluted urine. When body water is at a premium, the kidneys conserve water by passing concentrated urine, which looks darker and more opaque. Completely transparent urine is sign that you're drinking enough water.

    1. Re:Amount of water in urine by jerde · · Score: 1

      Neat fact: 180 liters of fluid are removed from your blood each day by your kidneys. They then go on to reabsorb most of the water from that fluid, leaving behind what you excrete as urine.

      But so 180l would be about the maximum you could ever pass in one day, though something tells me you'd likely have other problems to deal with if you ever had to remove that much fluid for any reason.

      - Peter

      --
      INsigNIFICANT
    2. Re:Amount of water in urine by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      I was just discussing hydration with my doctor about two weeks ago. He told me they were taught in med school that your urine should be about the color of Mellow Yellow (common American soda, especially in the southeast). We both agreed that it looks a bit lighter than that if you drink 'enough' water, but he swore that was the standard given by his professors.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  132. James Bond by frank249 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As noted byt the Accordian Guy, There are similar tricks with liquor. In the Ian Flemming novels, such as Moonraker James Bond had the habit of shaking pepper into his vodka shots. He'd picked it up from the Russians, who did it as a matter of safety rather than taste; the pepper dragged fusel oils left over from their crude distilling process down to the bottom of the glass.

    For wine, apparently just decanting the whole bottle into another container improves the taste.

    --

    Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

  133. Extracting resins from the filter media? by freelunch · · Score: 1

    A friend and I were discussing this article a week ago and had some concerns that the resins used for ion exchange may be soluble in the alcohol.

    So we asked a chemist. Here is his reply. Also, the Brita uses a small amount of a silver compound to inhibit biological acvitiy. We forgot to ask him about that.

    I read the link and I can't decide. The chemical species that do the ion exchange are bonded to a polymer support. It would depend on whether or not anything could be extracted from the polymer support by the ethanol. Often compounds added to the plastics (plastisizers) to give it specific characteristics are extracted. These would be selectively adsorbed by the carbon but??? Also any o-rings or seals (I've never seen a Brita filter pitcher) may be a problem with chemicals extracted by the ethanol. Ethanol is not particularly aggressive as a solvent (2-propanol, rubbing alcohol, is tremendously more of a problem for extracting things from plastics) so I doubt the people were poisoned at any level even measureable. Repeating the experiment I would just use activated carbon from the brewing website suggested in one of the comments. The possibility that the ion exchange resin is removing anything from a distilled product seems small. Unless someone has watered the vodka with hard, nasty tasting water the ion-exchange is pointless.

    My friend points out that the water used to dilute barrel strength spirits is critical to flavor, so the IERs may have an effect.

  134. Re:Benzene has almost the same boiling pt. as etha by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Couldn't you absorb the last of the water with, I dunno, anydrous calcium chloride or something?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  135. Vodka, Pepper, Fusel Oils by handy_vandal · · Score: 1


    In "Moonraker" (the book -- not sure about the movie), James Bond sprinkles cracked black pepper into his vodka. He explains that he picked up the habit while stationed in Russia. Cheap vodka contains nasty fusel oils, which lead to wicked hangovers. The pepper binds to the fusel oils, then falls to the bottom of the glass, resulting in a better grade of vodka.

    I don't know if it's true or not, but Ian Fleming presents it in a confident offhand manner, so I'm guessing that there's something to it.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  136. 'tards with mod points strike again by Moderatbastard · · Score: 1

    This is a Star Trek reference. Ergo, it is automatically funny.

    --
    1/3 of jokes get modded OT. If you get the joke, mod 1 in 3 insightful/interesting/underrated to restore karma balance.
  137. Ethanol by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    No, by percentage of effect, its the impurities that give you the hangover.. That's why
    they are shooting for 100% pure, in theory no hangover...

    Wont work out in practice of course, but at least at that point, it WOULD be the alcohol and
    not the impurities..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Ethanol by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      > Wont work out in practice of course, but at least at that point, it WOULD be the alcohol and
      not the impurities..

      Yep. that in many cases a hangover results from methanol does not mean you wont get one from ethanol.

    2. Re:Ethanol by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, by percentage of effect, its the impurities that give you the hangover.

      Care to back that up? According to this ethanol causes dehydration, electrolyte imbalance and low blood sugar. Further, it states that pure ethanol can cause hangovers, and that it is unknown whether ethanol or the impurities have the greater effect.

      That's why they are shooting for 100% pure, in theory no hangover...

      Who is they? Care to back this up? You do realize that it's impossible to get 100% pure ethanol, right? Although one could probably produce 99.999% pure ethanol, as soon as the bottle was opened, it would begin absorbing water from the atmosphere until it reached the azeotropic composition, about 95% purity, if I remember correctly.

    3. Re:Ethanol by eluusive · · Score: 1

      I make 100% natural wine without using sulfur or any other chemicals to kill the yeast off. The result is very dry wine, but I've yet to get any kind of a hangover from it.

      You really don't want to know what kind of nasty chemicals make it into your store bought cheep alocohol.

    4. Re:Ethanol by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      Supposedly, drinking some of the yeast helps you to avoid a hangover, according Charlie Papazian. I haven't made any wine; but, I have produced some very nice beers and meads. I don't bother with killing the yeast or filtering it out, but I do rack the stuff a few times before bottling to remove most of the spent yeast.

    5. Re:Ethanol by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      You are aware that water does not under any circumstances cause a hangover, right?

      By your logic, you can't drink 100% pure anything, because you can't help but swallow air and saliva when you drink. In the real world, even in biology, air and water are completely ignored...you can have pure substances at 50% concentation with water as the other half. Water does not count as an impurity.

      However, yes, pure ethanol can cause a hangover.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    6. Re:Ethanol by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      Of course water doesn't cause a hangover; I didn't mean to imply that it did. And yes, by my logic, you can't drink 100% pure anything. In the real world (in particular, in chemistry) air and water are NOT completely ignored. For example, sodium hydride can spontaneously combust in the presence of oxygen in the air. If you make nitroglycerin, you want your nitric and sulfuric acids as dry (water free) as possible, since the yield decreases rapidly with an increase in water. There are many, many more examples.

      If water doesn't count as an impurity, then what do you mean by pure substance?

    7. Re:Ethanol by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I said in biology. In general chemistry, obviously, you'd care if water got into your stuff.

      In biology, though, ingesting water is pretty much completely ignored, just like injecting salt water into the blood is ignored. It has no effect, and it's not included in any calculations. You need to know the amount of alcohol, and, once you do, you couldn't care less about the amount of water.

      I don't know what you mean by calling chemistry the 'real world'. When you're talking about the effects of alcohol on the body, you're talking biology. Is this some sort of scientific pissing contest I walked into? You don't explain reactions to alcohol with chemistry anymore than you explain circuit diagrams with quantum theory or bridges with the general theory of relativity. And in biology, water is not generally considered an impurity.

      And I think it's obvious what I mean by impurities. Impurities in ethanol are things that aren't ethanol. (Or, explicitly stating something that doesn't really need to be stated in biology, water or air, or, heck, carbon dioxide.)

      In general, though, when talking about impurities in alcohol, people are talking about the semi-toxic organic compounds that come with it, and are accidently created by the same thing that created the alcohol.

      Instead of, oh, added coloring, which is not specific to alcohol, and thus doesn't have anything to do with hangovers, even though it is technically also an impurity. Vodka doesn't have any such additives, though. It's just alcohol. (And, for those playing along at home, water.)

      (Ironically, this one of the few cases in biology where the water does matter, because not having any water would make the alcohol pull water out of you. So it is literally impossible to injest pure ethanol...even if you could get it in your mouth, it would have water in it by the time it hit your stomach by pulling it out of your throat. So, in a way, it's an anti-impurity...it's already there, and removing it will cause effects not expected by ethanol.)

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    8. Re:Ethanol by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you mean by calling chemistry the 'real world'. When you're talking about the effects of alcohol on the body, you're talking biology. Is this some sort of scientific pissing contest I walked into? You don't explain reactions to alcohol with chemistry anymore than you explain circuit diagrams with quantum theory or bridges with the general theory of relativity.

      Do you have any clue at all what you are talking about? Biology - Chemistry = Nomenclature. In other words, biology is almost entirely chemistry. How can you talk about metabolic processes without chemistry? Have you ever heard of Kreb's cycle? Photosynthesis? Fermentation?

      How is ethanol made? Chemistry.

      How is ethanol dealt with in the body? Chemistry.

      When the cop gives you a breath test, what is going on in the device? Chemistry.

      How does ethanol manifest its physiological effects? Chemistry.

      Chemistry --- it's more than just labs, white coats, and goggles.

    9. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "cheep alocohol"
      It's for the birds...

    10. Re:Ethanol by Deanasc · · Score: 1
      You do realize that it's impossible to get 100% pure ethanol, right?

      Care to back that up with some science. At least give us a link. It's true that through simple distillation 95% is the best you can do. However there are other methods you can use to further purify a mixture to pure ethanol. Adding benzine to the distallate will up the purity. You can also pass the solution through something that can soak up all the water. There are many ways to do this.

      I am officially calling you out on this.

      --
      I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    11. Re:Ethanol by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      I stand by my statement. Prove me wrong. Show me one liter of pure ethanol without a single molecule of anything else in it, and I'll lick your ass until it's 100% free of anything but living skin.

      You don't need hard science to back up my claim. You just have to think about it.

    12. Re:Ethanol by Deanasc · · Score: 1
      Show me one litre of anything without a single molecule of impurity and I'll lick your ass. The fact is that you can't be a pure mathematician about this. At 6.02x10^23 molecules per mole it's very easy to get one or two moleculs of anything mixed in to a liter of ethanol. However when you're throwing number like 95% pure vs 100% you can't split hairs about about one or two molecules.

      That is unless you're being a douche about your point.

      --
      I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    13. Re:Ethanol by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      Well, if 100% doesn't mean 100% then what does it mean? 99%, 99.9%, 99.99%? Or does it mean that a 0.1 mL sample passed through an HPLC produces a single spike? Since you like links, please provide one that officially states exactly what fraction below unity is the cutoff for 100%.

      I'm not being a douche. You took issue with something I said, and I'm defending my statement. I want to know what YOU think 100% means.

    14. Re:Ethanol by Necromancyr · · Score: 1
      I work in a lab and can get 100% Ethanol whenever I want. Many of the protocols I do call for 100% and given that the bottles aren't sealed in any special way (plastic screw cap), I highly doubt the ethanol is adsorbing anything major.

      Also, we have to sign to say we aren't going to drink it when we get it from the stock room because otherwise they would have to tax us on it. :)

    15. Re:Ethanol by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? Look closely at the label.

  138. Re:not surprising... by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

    costs only ~$20/750ml.

    20 bucks for a fifth is cheap?!? I bought a 1.75 liter bottle of Vladimir just last night for 12 bucks. The stuff really isn't ANY where near as bad as these guys are trying to say it is, BTW.

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  139. Re:not surprising... by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

    At my previous job as a Network Administrator (Resident Computer Geek, sysop, Asshole, whatever names we get called in the office), we had one of those filtering, spring water cooler things. *I* used that for making coffee. Some people used the regular tap water. There was a huge difference in taste. And it's not that one person would put in more grinds than the other. People would ask me how many scoops to use to make a pot (and I usually make battery acid... :-) ), so people were making it the same way I do (oh, BTW, pack the grinds in the filter before making the coffee! Trust me!). I noticed a difference in tap vs. filtered just from the very first sip.

    So, yes, filtered vs. tap DOES make a difference in your coffee. I understand this isn't EXACTLY what your musing about, but still. At home, I have a Culligan system in the kitchen. That makes DAMN good coffee too.

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  140. Better technique by HangingChad · · Score: 1
    I've definitely been going at this the wrong way. Before I'd mix in activated charcoal, then start the painful process of filtering it out. This is better.

    At the boat races in Washington state you could take a cooler, but not alcohol. They'd even sniff jello in search of jello shots. But we discovered livening up an orange with an injection of everclear would get by every time. But you had to be careful as it was possible to get totally plastered sitting there eating orange slices.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  141. do you know what USP means? by caveat · · Score: 3, Informative

    Notice I said it was USP-grade ethanol, meaning the United States Pharmacopeia has certified it to be free of harmful impurities and safe for food or drug usage. Well...technically safe; the safety of consming absolute ethanol is debatable. Incidentally, 95% doesn't have the same weird oily/dessicating characteristics of absolute; it's already got that 5% water it desperately wants so it just burns like hellfire going down.

    If you're interested, the chemistry behind it: the benzene forms an azeotrope with water that boils at a lower point than the 95-5 EtOH-water azeotrope, allowing the last traces of water to be distilled off. USP ethanol is usually dried out in other ways, like running it over drying salts or using molecular sieves to absorb the excess water....no benzene allowed.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:do you know what USP means? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actual, drinkable high-proof ethanol is very definitely not cheap. If you were drinking from a $20, 5 gallon tub of 'ethanol,' it was denatured ethanol, full of either benzene or methylethyl ketone to remove the last of the water. Drinkable alcohol (in the US) is subject to taxation, whether it's 4% beer, 95% grain alcohol or 100% ethanol. The last bottle of 100% non-denatured alcohol I bought was $30/pint. And yes, that's the cheap stuff.

    2. Re:do you know what USP means? by caveat · · Score: 1

      Well then, I guess I'd better get the ATF on the phone and file a report...the containers (Pharmco) were definitely stamped "USP" and had a seal across the spigot, as well as being listed USP in the catalog. Came with a spec sheet for the lot as well, I don't recall anything hazardous in a concentration over ~2ppm. I certainly wouldn't drink anything with benzene or MEK in it. Maybe the freshman twits will guzzle anything labeled "Alcohol", but the fourth-year chem majors don't make the same mistakes.

      --

      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  142. Re:Benzene has almost the same boiling pt. as etha by caveat · · Score: 1

    that's how they make USP "drinkable" absolute ethanol - soak up all 5% with salts (i think it's actually magnesium sulfide, but CaCl2 would work fine as well). yes, i am gonna beat this USP horse for the rest of the day :)

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  143. Pills by Kevin108 · · Score: 0

    I've had Vitamin B that color.

    --

    It's a perfect time for being wasted.
    A perfect time to watch the stars.
    - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
  144. Re:not surprising... by budgenator · · Score: 1

    Vodka is just ethtanol cut with water, carefull attention to distallation technics will lead to a purer, smoother product, up to a very well defined specific point. I just took a pretty good look at Tito's site, alot of what he says makes sense even if his terminology and a couple of his idea's is a bit whacked.

    I kinda think that Tito's real advantage is his senses are a bit crossed, some people's olifactory sense get's crossed with their color sense, making them smell in color and they can detect very minute differences in odors that are completely beyong what most people can sense. Still he's not doing anything I can't with a gas-chromatagraph.

    There is no reason why you can't run some rot-gut vodka through a real fractional distilalation colume like every 1st semester organic student has used, and get a much better produce out than you put in. Filter it through some activated charcoal (ala water filter) you can tweak it even more. If it is still not smoother enough for you add a bit of food-grade gycerin like the mass-producer do.

    I also believe that this is another spoiled rich-boy fad like Cigars, Scotch, Fine wine were before them. When you think about it Grey Goose is a French Vodka, French and Vodka to me that's an oxymoron.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  145. Backup by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ask any good vodka distiller that goes thru the purification process, why they are doing it...

    There will be your answer. Need a name? Try Skye.. The stuff in the blue bottle.. There are more.

    And yes I know it cant get to 100%, but 90+ is close enough to call it 100%. This isn't a chem. lab, its real life.

    And if you noticed what I said a bit closer, I was talking that in today's percentages of alcohol / impurities its the impurities that are causing the hangover.. and that making it 100%, which isn't practical, but if done, in theory, it would then move any hangover to the responsibility of the remaining alcohol..

    Never said it would stop them totally, just what their theory is, relative to the fact that most of the hangover IS caused by impurities..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Backup by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Nope. Most of the hangover is caused by dehydration. You can drink the cheapest of assey vodka, but if you drink a lot of water during the night and have a good 16 oz before you go to bed, you will wake up fine. The more booze you drink, the more water you need to offset it.

      Unless you are considering alcohol itself to be an "impurity." Then, if you rid your drink of "impurities" you don't have a hangover- but only if you leave the booze out. The other impurities could help to make the hangover worse, or give you a headache that is outside of the hangover, etc- but the hangover is dehydration.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    2. Re:Backup by PSandusky · · Score: 1

      Vodka distillers don't make good sources for such data, actually. It's in their best interests to come up with new bells and whistles that make their products sound better than the average booze to the consumer. Pronouncing "science" is just another bell. You'd be better off to cite a journal article, preferably written by someone studying organic chemistry... rather than vodka marketing.

      Oh, wait.

      And yes I know it cant get to 100%, but 90+ is close enough to call it 100%. This isn't a chem. lab, its real life.

      Somehow I don't think you'd know what to do with the journal article if you had it. Sorry, Chachi, but 90 != 100, chem lab or not.

      And if you noticed what I said a bit closer, I was talking that in today's percentages of alcohol / impurities its the impurities that are causing the hangover.. and that making it 100%, which isn't practical, but if done, in theory, it would then move any hangover to the responsibility of the remaining alcohol..

      Huh?

      Read that paragraph again. When you figure out that it doesn't make a singular lick of sense, come back and try again. Really.

      --
      "What's the use in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes?" --Fourth Doctor, "Robot"
  146. I fscked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fscked the girl in Hanson!!!

  147. Vodka sucks -- ADSINTH IS GOD by Shadow_139 · · Score: 0

    Forget Vodka, after you tryed Adsinth for the first time, you will never go back to vodka.., but you have to have the reals stuff 80%+ and distilled thought wormwood (give the hallucinagenic effects). And you have to use the heated suger as well --- http://www.alandia.de/absinth/index.php/cPath/29/X TCsid/3c2cde4737853a46dde750fbcfab597a
    or with friends http://www.alandia.de/absinth/index.php/cPath/14_2 7
    or http://www.alandia.de/absinth/index.php/cPath/14_2 0


    http://www.beersquirrel.com/

    1. Re:Vodka sucks -- ADSINTH IS GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumb fuck.

  148. "Geeks?" by Caiwyn · · Score: 1

    So, "geek" now includes any drunken fratboy with nothing to do on a Friday night?

    Makes no difference to me, as I never refer to myself as a geek anyway, but this is how generic and overused the term has become.

    1. Re:"Geeks?" by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      So, "geek" now includes any drunken fratboy with nothing to do on a Friday night?

      Not A friday night, ANY friday night.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    2. Re:"Geeks?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am NOT a fratboy.
      NOT NOT NOT.
      Never was.

  149. Re:not surprising... by Peale · · Score: 1

    Living in Vermont has given us a really great (albiet extremely expensive) vodka - Vermont Gold. You guessed it, it's made from maple tree sap. It's about as smooth as anything you're ever going to drink.

  150. Skyy advertises this by Twid · · Score: 2, Informative

    Skyy Vodka advertises their filtration process:

    "Vinquiry, an independent certified lab, concluded that SKYY has the fewest impurities among leading vodkas. Samples of SKYY, Absolut, Stolichnaya, Grey Goose, Smirnoff, Belvedere, and Ketel One were gathered in October 2002 from six major U.S. metropolitan areas. Using a precise Gas Chromatograph, the lab tested for the following impurities found in spirits: Methanol, Acetaldehyde, Ethyl Acetate and Fusel Oils."

    http://www.conraddrinks.com/html/skyy_vodka.html

    Skyy is pretty tasteless, but very "clean". I don't like it straight, but it's great with a club soda mixer. It might be a psychosomatic effect, but I never feel hungover after drinking Skyy.

    --
    - "When you want something with all your heart, the entire universe conspires to give it to you" -Paulo Coelho
  151. Re:not surprising... by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
    In taste tests by both experts and neophytes, Ketel One consistently beats out Grey Goose, in fact, it always rates number one. I prefer Absolut myself because I like flavoured vodkas. In a dirty martini I'd rather have Vox.

    The first issue of Cargo magazine was the last published taste test I saw. They drank it on the rocks and in a mixer or two, I forget the exacts.

    --
    Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
  152. Austin vs. Mrs. Expedition by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
    That's not your mother, that's a man, man!

    Well you have to admit, she is rather mannish!

    --
    Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
  153. The last thing I need in life is to catch a buzz . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Off of my morning coffee.

    From the article.

    Seriously, is this guy for real?

  154. Beer, no. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Unlike vodka, which is supposed to be alcohol and water and nothing else, beer's flavor comes from all of the other things present in it. Filtering beer with a Brita would make things FAR worse.

    Now, if you homebrew, filtering the water you use to brew with DOES make a lot of sense.

    Also, in some situations, particulate filtering (NOT chemical filtering) in between primary and secondary fermentation stages can help too.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  155. In Russia they also use manganese crystals by melted · · Score: 1

    To improve the stuff some folks distill at home - "samogon". Why? I have no idea why, maybe someone has a degree in chemistry and can explain. Then they also add "activated carbon" to it to remove some of the smell, which is exactly the same as "brita filter", except they've been doing that back in the 80's, when Brita didn't exist.

  156. MUDing and Brita by TibbonZero · · Score: 1

    >buy cheap vodka
    -You have purchased the cheap vodka
    >buy brita pitcher
    -You have purchased the brita pitcher
    >Pour cheap vodka into brita pitcher
    -The gods of the mud hope this has some point...
    >drink brita pitcher
    -The vodka tastes only mildly cheap...

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
  157. Probably not by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Vodka is a special case because of the fact that it is water and alcohol and basically nothing else. (At least it's supposed to be.)

    Other forms of alcohols are very different, and hence passing them through a Brita may change their taste significantly in undesired ways.

    (for example, once it's brewed you can't do much for beer.)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  158. What bar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like blues, but I want to know where not to drink the vodka.

  159. Re:not surprising... by The-Bus · · Score: 1

    I completely agree. The whole "super-premium" spirits division is completely ridiculous. Vodka should never be over $20/L especially since Vodka, by definition, should have almost no taste or odor (besides the alcohol itself). You're gonna have flavored vodkas of course (the Van Gogh Dutch Chocolate I like, although there are stranger offerings.

    A good Scotch is worth $50+. I don't think people can really distinguish a $50 from a $20 vodka. It's all marketing directed at those that want to seem connoiseurs at glitzy and overrated martini bars. It is the next fad, and it's idiotic.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  160. Question by gone.fishing · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is a honest question. I really am this dumb when it comes to chemistry.

    If I used whiskey or brandy and ran it through a Brita filter, what would I end up with? Would I get a clear colorless liquid or would I get filtered whiskey or brandy?

    My brother worked in a bottling company for a short time where they "made" different flavored alcohols. Everything they made was really distilled grain alcohol mixted with various flavorings and water. They made things like peppermint schnapps, blackberry brandy, cheap vodka and so on. The lesson he passed along was that vodka or at least the cheap stuff, is really just grain alcohol and water - it is no longer made from potatoes. The cheap whiskey's aren't aged, just flavored and if you look closely, you will see that it doesn't say aged anywhere on the bottle!

    1. Re:Question by StormKrow · · Score: 2, Informative

      The only time vodka was made with potatos was when there was a shortage of grain, or someone had used all of their vodka ration during the days of the Soviet Union. Potatos were pretty plentiful, so some people made their own homebrew out of potatos. (that's the *real* rotgut vodka you hear about). It was of very poor quality, due to impurities from the person's water supply and equipment. (I mean seriously, how many people in the Soviet Union had enough parts to make a proper still?) "Official" vodka is grain alcohol.

      --
      Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!
  161. OT Sie Germans by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

    Ahhhh!!!!!111oneone This is the exact same annoying thing as people thinking asians say "lice" instead of "rice"!

    Now that I've calmed myself, I must inform as many as possible that it is the exact opposite. The Russian language does NOT have a true W sound, and they would NOT pronounce it "wadka". "Vodka" is exactly how it is truly pronounced.

    I have no problem with people making fun of different countries' customs, but please, at least do it correctly.


    On a similar note, can anyone tell me why many/most/nearly all Germans replace v-sounds with w-sounds when they speak English, despite having every reason to do the exact opposite?

    1. Re:OT Sie Germans by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1
      On a similar note, can anyone tell me why many/most/nearly all Germans replace v-sounds with w-sounds when they speak English, despite having every reason to do the exact opposite?
      They're overcorrecting, one assumes.
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  162. The Wine Clip all over again by taustin · · Score: 1

    http://www.thewineclip.com/

  163. Blind Drunk. by twitter · · Score: 1
    10:49 [after two hours of drinking Vlad the Impaler] - 6th filtration dose, Ken - ?Wow? and ?goes down like water.? Fletcher - ?Quite Comfortable.? and I gave it a boring ?Good.?

    The guy flipping you off in this picture then tells you that you are blind drunk and have no taste left. He's substituted gasoline without telling you.

    I've gotten similar results from two hours of drinking. Fast food suddenly tastes good and vodka goes down like water. I have not tried gasoline and don't recommend it as it might just kill you. Still, I suspect it will do it's damage without you being able to appreciate all of the warnings your tounge, nose and other senses try to send your brain. If you are lucky, you vomit. It's really frightening when you wake up the next day and remember some of what you did.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Blind Drunk. by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1
      The guy flipping you off in this picture [dca.net] then tells you that you are blind drunk and have no taste left. He's substituted gasoline without telling you.
      It would be petrol, not gasoline, as the guy flipping you off is doing so in proper (i.e. British) English.
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  164. Let me know next week. by twitter · · Score: 1
    However, it was fun to do and we will probably repeat the experiment again next Friday with that godawful Russian Prince vodka.

    Let me know if you have to buy another $15 filter to do the second bottle. If you do, I think I'll just spend the $15 on a better bottle of Vodka.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  165. What a lovely thread by apankrat · · Score: 1

    What a lovely thread full of Intersting and
    Informative posts. Ain't /. is something :)

    --
    3.243F6A8885A308D313
  166. No he factored that in by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Supposing a Brita filter is $7 each, and you get one use then it would be $17 to filter the 1.75 of cheap shit as compared to $18 to buy the Fin. That's actually slightly more than 2x the Vodka for slightly less than half the price.

    It's something I'm tempted to try out of curiosity. Not like they did with a continual drinking thing. It really doesn't take a lot of alcohol to screw up your taste, but just filter it, then drink. I know what cheap Vodka tastes like. If there's a dramatic change, I'll notice.

    Still the best way would be to do a chemical comparison. Who knows, I'm sure the CEs at work have a mass spec somewhere, maybe they'll think this is amusing and do an analysis for me.

    1. Re:No he factored that in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still pretty convinced that the filtering process ends up lessening the alcohol content (Which could also account for the increased "smoothness" in teaste.

  167. Re:not surprising... by pkhuong · · Score: 1

    For some reason, even normal unflavoured vodka has an aroma for me :( It might be placebo or something, but the aroma is why I prefer Polar Ice (go canucks! :) to Absolut, not because it scored better or worse on some test. So, while I agree that there's a lot of marketing going on, and that vodka is the _current_ fad (even teen chick lit does it! see Gossip Girl), I believe that many people would be able to distinguish their favourite vodka from another one.

    --
    Try Corewar @ www.koth.org - rec.games.corewar
  168. Re:not surprising... by The-Bus · · Score: 1

    That might be true. But if you put an overrated Vodka (say, Belvedere or Grey Goose) next to a good but cheap vodka (Svedka, for example) some people won't be able to tell the difference but will gladly pony up another $4 for the "upscale" martini.

    Personally, I like Svedka, Three Olives, Tito's, and Stoli Oranj, but I am not a big vodka drinker. I will go through two handles of whisk(e)y before a smaller vodka bottle is even dented.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  169. I'd say that's a fair bet by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Which is another reason I'd want to actually get it chemicaly tested. However you can have very smooth 80 proof stuff. The Finlandia vodka I keep carrying on about is one such alcohol. It's possible that the alcohol passes as readily as water, it's a fairly small molecule and the filters in the Brita aren't all that great.

  170. Re:not surprising... by DavidTC · · Score: 1
    I thought everyone knew that.

    All vodka should be good cold. If it's not, you're probably got it confused with your experiments in drinking urine.

    Good vokda is the stuff that tastes good at room temperature. Which is how you're 'supposed' to drink it. (Technically, I think it should be 'chilled'.)

    But, hey, they're not the boss of you. If you like vodka cold, then buy the cheap ass stuff. You'll never be able to tell.

    Well, not the really cheap stuff. Never purchase alcohol cheaper than bottled water, that's my motto. Also never purchase it in a homemade bottle. Or anything that isn't clearly identified as a traditional liquour, like 'hill lightning', 'thirst remover' or 'zima'.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  171. I can't find it :-( by Shazow · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that actually clicked that link in hopes that such a page would actually exist.

    I'll go back to sleep now. :-(

    - shazow

  172. Vodka shouldn't be produced as it is by Benm78 · · Score: 1

    If you are looking for the pure taste of ethanol and water, and nothing else, vodka shouldn't be made from biological materials.

    In fact, you can create a very drinkable beverage from cheap laboratory alcohol (96%, the rest being water) and purified water. This mixture is quite odor- and tasteless, apart from the typical ethanol taste and odor.

    Oddly, in most countries law requires that liqour is produced from alcohol obtained trough fermentation and distillation after that.

    Industrially, ethanol is produced from the addition of water to ethene - a much more efficient, cheap and clean process. I believe we should adopt this route for liquour too. Ethanol sythesized from the ethene/water process costs less than $1 per litre - not counting taxes. After some basic purification, the end product is free from all toxic compounds found in liquour - including nasties such as methanol, propanol or formaldehyde.

  173. Nothing new home distillers dont it for years by microbrewer · · Score: 1

    Nothing new most spirits are filtered through some type of activated carbon to clean them up .
    Even spirt Ive made in a small 20 liter still that produces 5 liters of spirit cleans up well if I use good carbon and filter it a slow rate .

    Why did'nt they do gas cromotography to test the vodka ? like us profesionals do when we test our own grog and Where thier tasters trained vodka judges?.

    If you really wanna hack vodka look here
    <URL:http://www.spiritsunlimited.co.nz/>

    Most vokda is made with some form of cheap fermantable like grain,beets,or sugar basicaly if thier is a surpluss of a fermentable and its cheap you can make vodka out of it .What makes it good is the downstream processing like distillation processes and filtration processes .
    On a comercial level they use even ferment milk derived whey to produce the vodka wash and they distill the vodka from that.

  174. vodka + ultrasonic humidifier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would it be possible to distil vodka to be more potent using a common household humidifier?

    1. Re:vodka + ultrasonic humidifier? by microbrewer · · Score: 1

      Your better off with the Kenmore 'Water' Distilltion Unit from Sears it makes a nice 'legal' pot still

      http://www.kenmorewater.com/productlist/no-plumb in g-drinking-water-systems/34480.html

      For real stills to 'purify' water ,make 'essential' oil and to make 'alternative fuel' cough cough look here

      http://homedistiller.org/
      http://www.brew-usa.c om/
      http://www.milehidistilling.com/ (this one has chicks playing with the equipment ha ha )

  175. Boy Scout Handbook described that still by billstewart · · Score: 1
    You can use whatever moisture sources you've got handy - green plants that might not be edible, cactus you can't get enough water out of, sea water, urine, etc.

    For shipwreck situations, the Maria Telkes still is a floating equivalent, and of course you've got water water everywhere if you need to use it.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Boy Scout Handbook described that still by mink · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression tha tpulping the cactus (crushing it) will let you use it to get water in one of these contraptions.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  176. Vodka snobbery vs. other snobberies by billstewart · · Score: 1
    I've never understood vodka snobbery, because vodka _is_ very precisely tasteless colorless ethanol/water mixture, distilled from femented mash of whatever starch material was available (potatoes, wheat, rye, barley, etc.). The water it's diluted with obviously varies a bit, but you should be paying mineral-water-snob prices for that, not vodka-snob prices :-) The hooch does need to be distilled enough to get rid of the fractions of other alcohols or organics, but it's still just hooch, and the expensive stuff is just hooch in a pretty bottle with more expensive television commercials. Flavored vodkas are obviously a different case, and gin is basically a complex flavored vodka - different gins really are much different.

    But most of those other rich-boy snobbery fads you're disparaging really _do_ have a basis for telling the fancy stuff from the cheaper stuff. Wines have a huge range of differences between them, and Scotch is more subtle but still extremely varied, and both of them take a long time to mature, unlike vodka and other moonshine which are quick industrial products. Cigars are annoying enough that I won't comment much, though second-hand smoke from cheap cigars is usually even nastier than from good cigars.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Vodka snobbery vs. other snobberies by budgenator · · Score: 1

      That's at least part of what I was trying to get across, Fine wines have an additional expense for their added quality, better selection of grapes, some season produce a better vintage, more attention to fermention, more testing durring aging, more selection for bottling also "good" cigars will use rarer and more expensive tobaccos, longer aging stricter quality control and scotch of course loose volume durring aging, a seasons barley may have better results, skills of the fermentors, distiller agers/blender, preparing the aging casks ect. It easy for me to tell the different from most mass produce consumer level product and their premimum counter-parts even if I don't think the difference is worth the added price.
      Vodka I just don't see it, and I wonder how many dis-reputable bar owners keep filling-up empty Grey-Goose and Absolute botttles with economy grade stuff after hours.

      One year at the company Christmas party I told the waistress, "I'll have the same thing He is" and pointed at the boss; turned out that the boss had just order a $300.00 super rare scotch. It was good, and I enjoyed it but not $300.00 worth of good at leaste it was on the bosses tab! After that I made it a point to pay attention to what the waitresses were asking rather than what the accountant was saying about keeping his face and activities off the TV news.
      Personaly, the wine, beer, and liquores I make are best I've had at a tenth to a hundreth the price of the premium brands, and their are a lot of people who will agree with me, the stuff they've personaly made is the best.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  177. Cost and price aren't that closely related by billstewart · · Score: 1
    When I was down in Mexico a few years ago, the proprietor of our local fish restaurant kept pouring tequila like it was water. I later went to a liquor store, and found that you could get the local sugar-based hooch for about $5/gallon (that's ~4 liters for you non-USians), and the lowest-end tequila wasn't much more expensive. If all you're looking for is cheap clear liquor, whether it's rum or vodka, it doesn't really matter if they distill it from fermented sugars and starches or use some more industrial method - most of the cost comes from taxes, marketing, and distribution, and the price comes from whatever willingness to buy that the marketing folks can drum up (so supermarket vodka's pretty cheap.)

    Obviously things like scotch and good brandies that develop from soaking ethanol in different kinds of wood take a lot longer to develop, and there's enough evaporation loss that the cost of a long-aged product reflects a lot more raw material than end product.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Cost and price aren't that closely related by Benm78 · · Score: 1

      If any taste from the biological source matter is desireable, fermentation sounds like a good idea. This would be valid for some liquors such as scotch, brandy and possibly tequila.

      However, liquors that should have no taste other than alcohol itself such as vodka, and liqours where all taste is added after destillation (gin, fruity liquors, etc.) would be more efficiently produced from synthetic alcohol.

      As for the price argument: $1 for a litre of 96% ethanol, that could be diluted to well over 2 litres of normal-strength liquor. Also, the biological sources for producing that tequila could probably have been used for more efficient applications - such as food ;)

  178. California's Wimpy Everclear by billstewart · · Score: 1

    There are some US states with silly prohibition laws which appear to ban 192-proof ethanol, so you can't get real Everclear here. The company sells a 151-proof clear grain alcohol, which is not really the same thing.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:California's Wimpy Everclear by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Yup we do have lame laws. That's why I import it from TX once a year. (for personal use only).
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  179. You should have burned it by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Sounds awful - but burning it would have at least been an honorable disposal method :-)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  180. Re:not surprising... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Stolichnaya is not pricy nor especially good vodka, even absolut is better. That gordon's is as good as or better than stoli does not really surprise me.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  181. Why bother filtering cheap stuff? by StormKrow · · Score: 1

    Just go to your local laboratory supply, (and if you can still order it), order a 5 gallon container of "Food Grade Ethanol". Cut it by volume 50% with water. Take one of the halves you just made and cut that again with Orange Juice 50%. Instant Screwdriver party...(we used to do that all the time in college, and it's CHEAP!!!)

    --
    Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!
  182. at the risk of sounding judgemental... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...What the hell is WRONG with internet people?!?!

  183. Re:not surprising... by Nexx · · Score: 1

    Or grandparent's testors were already sloshed :)

  184. Re:not surprising... by Nexx · · Score: 1

    Sorry, distillation alone doesn't remove organics. Reverse-osmosis water is so good at being a solvent, it will rip soluables (including volatile organic chemicals, CO2, etc.) right from water. You leave it standing long enough, and it will gain so much CO2 that its pH will drop to 4 or 5.

    When making vodka or any other distilled spirits, the idea is to *recapture* *good* aromatics and leave the bad aromatics behind.

  185. Seems to work. by benow · · Score: 1

    My informal, unscientific 6 time filtration made C$17.99 Potters vodka taste smoother, perhaps equivalient to a C$30 vodka. Worth the effort. From reading above, it would seem the filter is not good for more than filtering a couple bottles. Cost of disposable filters and pitcher makes it a close call, price-wise. Has that nice 'home brew' touch to it, tho. Be forwarned: run some water thru the filter a few times to get rid of the particles in the new filter.

  186. Buck Cake by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    Somehow that reminds me of the Buck Cake storyline of Ghastly's Ghastly Webcomic. Long story short, one of the main characters receives an accidental (perhaps) gift of a bukkake video from his brother who (supposedly) thought it was a cooking video.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  187. Hardy Boys Survival by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    ^_^ Yeah, I remember that book. In that story, they took a few wrong turns in the desert and cannabilized their car for materials after it broke down. Fun stuff.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  188. Re:Hey, I often run Vodka through a filtration sys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a very subtle troll, and I will not respond to you...

    d'oh!

  189. Re:not surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first of all you have been drinking way to much of that stuff because a fifth is not 750ml

    try some good vodka first, then compare. hell even that smirnoff tripple distilled is an improvement.