Probably is a bug or something, with original firmware i had to reboot my WRTG54G every 2 weeks, with a custom firmware i just not do that.
This is the output of my own WRT54G running Sveasoft custom firmware:....
BusyBox v1.01 (2005.10.16-13:59+0000) Built-in shell (ash)
Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.
zeus:~#uptime
15:44:09 up 95 days, 15:44, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
zeus:~#
I was working in a 8088 emulator (aka XT emulator) in JavaScript...
Long Live to x86 assembler!!!
will be nice to run CP/M over javascript and a web browser.... but i think C code is just to much
actually the copy paste did not work, i did not mark this as code... sorry, again (with some formatting)....
@ECHO OFF SET DBFILE=dbfile.txt SET _cm_exit=exit SET _cm_list=list SET _cm_delete=delete SET _cm_add=add SET _cm_find=find IF EXIST %DBFILE% GOTO START ECHO LOCATION,NAME,SSID,NOTES > %DBFILE% :START SET/P _exCommand=Enter your command (%_cm_exit%,%_cm_list%,%_cm_delete%,%_cm_add%,%_cm_find%): IF %_exCommand%==%_cm_exit% GOTO END IF %_exCommand%==%_cm_list% GOTO LIST IF %_exCommand%==%_cm_delete% GOTO DELETE IF %_exCommand%==%_cm_find% GOTO FIND IF %_exCommand%==%_cm_add% GOTO ADD CLS @ECHO Invalid Command GOTO START :LIST more %DBFILE% GOTO START :FIND SET/P _line=Search for: FIND "%_line%" %DBFILE% GOTO START :DELETE SET/P _line=Delete all matching: FIND/V "%_line%" < %DBFILE% > TEMPFILE.TXT MOVE TEMPFILE.TXT %DBFILE% GOTO START :ADD SET/P _line=Enter the new host entry (location,name,ssid,notes): ECHO %_line% >> %DBFILE% CLS ECHO New entry added GOTO START :END ECHO Thank you
I release this code under GPL;) and yes... it has bugs... use under your own risk...
--- CUT HERE and ADD THE REST TO A.CMD FILE on Windows @ECHO OFF SET DBFILE=dbfile.txt SET _cm_exit=exit SET _cm_list=list SET _cm_delete=delete SET _cm_add=add SET _cm_find=find
IF EXIST %DBFILE% GOTO START
ECHO LOCATION,NAME,SSID,NOTES > %DBFILE%:START
SET/P _exCommand=Enter your command (%_cm_exit%,%_cm_list%,%_cm_delete%,%_cm_add%,%_cm_find%):
IF %_exCommand%==%_cm_exit% GOTO END IF %_exCommand%==%_cm_list% GOTO LIST IF %_exCommand%==%_cm_delete% GOTO DELETE IF %_exCommand%==%_cm_find% GOTO FIND IF %_exCommand%==%_cm_add% GOTO ADD CLS @ECHO Invalid Command GOTO START:LIST
I received emails telling me how to vote (I quote and translate) "... to vote do click on the link below and write on the body: YES and your information..." I think about how many companies affiliated to the CANIETI (the Mexican chamber for technology, telecommunications, etc.) followed the directions without even thinking about what they where doing.
Today Microsoft reach my limit on acceptance about what a company can do or should do to support their business assets. I was worried about receiving calls (from Microsoft) with instructions on how to vote (as YES) or receiving emails with direct links to an email to vote... until I received a new email from them. The email I received included a direct link which opens my email client and puts on the body 'A Favor' which means 'I AGREE' o 'YES'. The recipient for this email was the person in charge of the votes, but this link included CCs to Microsoft emails!... What!?.... They want to know how many of us voted and what was the vote? Why? Is this illegal? Is this ethic? Why nobody here in Mexico sees this clear illegal and biased tactic to ensure a Mexico vote on YES to the standard?
I don't want to start a flame war over who is right, what standard is better or what the ISO should do with the OOXML. I'm against the techniques and wrongdoing of Microsoft regarding how they are manipulating the vote in Mexico and how nobody seems to see this as I do.
I ear this is happening in almost al the countries; I just don't want believe what I see.
PD. The only option, abstention. Why? because if you vote NO you should put the technical reasons why your vote was no and if microsoft fixes the issues your answer is YES anyway. If you vote with abstention then there is a way to limit the quorum required to approve the Micro$oft initiative.
- Omnia iam fient fieri quae posse negabam."
I remember me using pathworks on DEC pc's to connect an Alpha 150 server loaded with OSF/1... that old days when gopher and ftp where the kings of the net surfing.
Probably is a bug or something, with original firmware i had to reboot my WRTG54G every 2 weeks, with a custom firmware i just not do that. This is the output of my own WRT54G running Sveasoft custom firmware: ....
BusyBox v1.01 (2005.10.16-13:59+0000) Built-in shell (ash)
Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.
zeus:~#uptime
15:44:09 up 95 days, 15:44, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
zeus:~#
I was working in a 8088 emulator (aka XT emulator) in JavaScript... Long Live to x86 assembler!!! will be nice to run CP/M over javascript and a web browser.... but i think C code is just to much
He is using windows, let him use EDLIN http://www.computerhope.com/edlin.htm
I release this code under GPL ;) and yes ... it has bugs... use under your own risk...
.CMD FILE on Windows
:START
/P _exCommand=Enter your command (%_cm_exit%,%_cm_list%,%_cm_delete%,%_cm_add%,%_cm_find%):
:LIST
:FIND /P _line=Search for: :DELETE /P _line=Delete all matching: /V "%_line%" TEMPFILE.TXT :ADD
/P _line=Enter the new host entry (location,name,ssid,notes):
:END
--- CUT HERE and ADD THE REST TO A
@ECHO OFF
SET DBFILE=dbfile.txt
SET _cm_exit=exit
SET _cm_list=list
SET _cm_delete=delete
SET _cm_add=add
SET _cm_find=find
IF EXIST %DBFILE% GOTO START
ECHO LOCATION,NAME,SSID,NOTES > %DBFILE%
SET
IF %_exCommand%==%_cm_exit% GOTO END
IF %_exCommand%==%_cm_list% GOTO LIST
IF %_exCommand%==%_cm_delete% GOTO DELETE
IF %_exCommand%==%_cm_find% GOTO FIND
IF %_exCommand%==%_cm_add% GOTO ADD
CLS
@ECHO Invalid Command
GOTO START
more %DBFILE%
GOTO START
SET
FIND "%_line%" %DBFILE%
GOTO START
SET
FIND
MOVE TEMPFILE.TXT %DBFILE%
GOTO START
SET
ECHO %_line% >> %DBFILE%
CLS
ECHO New entry added
GOTO START
ECHO Thank you
I received emails telling me how to vote (I quote and translate) "... to vote do click on the link below and write on the body: YES and your information ..." I think about how many companies affiliated to the CANIETI (the Mexican chamber for technology, telecommunications, etc.) followed the directions without even thinking about what they where doing.
Today Microsoft reach my limit on acceptance about what a company can do or should do to support their business assets. I was worried about receiving calls (from Microsoft) with instructions on how to vote (as YES) or receiving emails with direct links to an email to vote... until I received a new email from them. The email I received included a direct link which opens my email client and puts on the body 'A Favor' which means 'I AGREE' o 'YES'. The recipient for this email was the person in charge of the votes, but this link included CCs to Microsoft emails! ... What!? .... They want to know how many of us voted and what was the vote? Why? Is this illegal? Is this ethic? Why nobody here in Mexico sees this clear illegal and biased tactic to ensure a Mexico vote on YES to the standard?
I don't want to start a flame war over who is right, what standard is better or what the ISO should do with the OOXML. I'm against the techniques and wrongdoing of Microsoft regarding how they are manipulating the vote in Mexico and how nobody seems to see this as I do.
I ear this is happening in almost al the countries; I just don't want believe what I see.
PD. The only option, abstention. Why? because if you vote NO you should put the technical reasons why your vote was no and if microsoft fixes the issues your answer is YES anyway. If you vote with abstention then there is a way to limit the quorum required to approve the Micro$oft initiative.
- Omnia iam fient fieri quae posse negabam."
I remember me using pathworks on DEC pc's to connect an Alpha 150 server loaded with OSF/1... that old days when gopher and ftp where the kings of the net surfing.