Slashdot Mirror


Why Do We Have To Restart Routers?

jaypaulw writes "I've owned a WRT54G, some cheap D-Link home Wi-Fi/firewall/routers, and now an Apple Airport Extreme (100/10 ethernet ports). In the context of the discussion about the worst uses of Windows — installation in places where an embedded device is superior — I've gotten to wondering why it's necessary to reboot these devices so frequently, like every few days. It seems like routers, purpose-built with an embedded OS, should be the most stable devices on my network."

936 comments

  1. The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You're doing it wrong.

    1. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's what I was thinking. I have a linksys wrt-54g or whatever they are running ddwrt and I've probably has to reboot a handful of times in all the years I've had it.

    2. Re:The most likely reason by pablomme · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, I've never had a problem with my rou

      --
      The state you are in while your HEAD is detached... - wait, what?
    3. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mine never used to need re-booting until I added a Vista Laptop to the network???

    4. Re:The most likely reason by livewire98801 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm a network admin for an ISP, and we've been recommending UPSs for the frequent-reboot routers that our customers have. We've found that routers (especially Linksys) have a real problem with power fluctuations that most other systems and devices don't notice. A decent line-conditioning UPS might solve your problems, but a cheap one will suffice.

      Also, could be the device is running out of memory, if your ISP is changing the properties of your connection a lot, or you might have a duplex issue causing a lot of retransmissions. . .

      Just a couple of thoughts :)

      --
      "He may be mad, but there's method in his madness. [...] It's what drives men mad, being methodical." G.K.Chesterton
    5. Re:The most likely reason by Mia'cova · · Score: 1

      The most likely reason is usually overheating if you leave them on the carpet or somesuch. Load can have an impact. Wireless hardware is going to be less stable than wired due to complexity and age (newer in market). Remember to upgrade the firmware. Many people forget to update that once they're up and running, leaving their home networks open to attack down the road. And well, cheap devices are going to be buggy. If you value stability, go for brands known for better hardware. You can often replace the OS with an open source alternative as well.

    6. Re:The most likely reason by nuintari · · Score: 5, Interesting

      mod parent up, as I came here to say that.

      Also, the Linksys WRT54G up to version 4 was a fine router, plenty of memory, ran Linux, was very stable. Then Linksys decided that quality wasn't nearly as important as driving me batshit insane, and we started getting tons of complaints about users needing to reboot Linksys routers, which came _highly_ recommended from the geek squad over at worst buy.

      The modern WRT54G, and anything past version 4, that doesn't have an 'L' in the name is an utter piece of crap, firmware revisions to the VXworks OS they now run have helped, but they are still lockup city.

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    7. Re:The most likely reason by bangthegong · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have to agree on the first point about power. i have experienced that power has a big impact on stability, especially on linksys. I have had several linksys devices (WRT54G, WAP54G, WRT150N) and they all got flaky when too many devices were powered from the same outlet (I have a multiple monitor setup with a KVM and multiple computers). Moving these routers to another outlet in all cases helped, but it unfortunately was not convenient. I didn't try a UPS, but that seems logical. I have found that my Airport Extreme is less sensitive to the power on the same outlet. So I repurposed the Linksys devices, and keep the Airport near my desk, but lesson learned.

    8. Re:The most likely reason by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've noticed that ALL home routers at some point will require a power cycle, and not because they're bad, but because they all seem to occasionally lose their ability to provide DNS resolution. This isn't a problem on a LAN (like mine, obviously) which has a dedicated nameserver on the inside of the LAN, but for people who (like I once did) use their router as a nameserver.

      --
      " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    9. Re:The most likely reason by badasscat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Also, the Linksys WRT54G up to version 4 was a fine router, plenty of memory, ran Linux, was very stable.

      Yeah, I have a 1.1, which I didn't even know until right now (checked the sticker), and I don't think I've rebooted that thing once in the entire time I've owned it. It's been running continuously right now for at least six months 24/7, and before that had a stint of probably 2 years uninterrupted. (I was forced to use Verizon's POS FiOS router for a little while.)

      I was about to leave a comment wondering what the hell the submitter was talking about, because to me the WRT54G is probably the most stable router that exists. It really couldn't *be* anymore stable. But I didn't realize there were such problems with version 4 and above.

    10. Re:The most likely reason by sc7 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've found that to be true. Where I live, the summer months bring terrible thunderstorms. If there's ever that lightning strike that causes the lights to flicker, the internet always "goes down". Every time, it's always been fixed by unplugging and re-plugging the power to the router.

    11. Re:The most likely reason by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      All the Linux-based ones (decidedly few, admittedly) I have seen use the same DNS proxy (dnsmasq). I guess it's just not perfectly stable but I haven't seen a reboot anymore than once every few months.

      I gave up on mine and turned it into a dumb PPPoE bridge. An OpenBSD box at the border handles the dirty guff of PPP sessions and NAT. Now my connection is perfectly stable and the modem never needs to be rebooted. To top it all off I trust the BSD box and the firewall I created on it more than I trust the router to do it properly.

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    12. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just want to second the UPS suggestion. For a few months, my apartment complex had brief power fluctuations at least once a week. My cable modem would mysteriously stop passing packets after each of these power blips until a full reset was performed. Sticking a small, cheap UPS on the modem solved the problem.

    13. Re:The most likely reason by Alibaba10100 · · Score: 1

      That fits with my experience. If anyone slams my front door I have to reset my WRT54G.

    14. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      How'd you submit that?

    15. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My router (D-link) used to require rebooting at odd intervals till I found out my dual 2.4 mhz cordless phone set was locking it up. Got a 5.8 gig phone set, no further problems (except for power outages).

    16. Re:The most likely reason by kv9 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The most likely reason is usually overheating if you leave them on the carpet or somesuch.

      I think the most likely reason is that he uses cheap crappy consumer routers.

      # dsh -w helia,merope uptime
      helia : 4:14AM up 76 days, 6:47, 0 users, load averages: 0.70, 0.60, 0.65
      merope: 4:14AM up 80 days, 35 mins, 1 user, load averages: 0.31, 0.27, 0.32

      last reboot was when I installed the new UPS and when I upgraded the kernel, respectively.

    17. Re:The most likely reason by macdaddy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Agreed on the power problems. I'm the engineer for an ISP here too and we also run into problems with our residential FWs. We were reselling D-Link but have switched to LinkSys. Both of them exhibit problems with power fluctuations. My parent's live in our service area, far from the paved roads. They are literally the last meter on the line. They get browns often. The usual outcome is that the router freezes hard. Rebooting does not fix it. The only fix appears to be a week or so with no power. The device eventually starts working again. We resell 350w UPSs to our users but our CSRs don't push them hard enough IMHO. Since most of our service area is rural we should really push them a lot harder. Personally I recommend Panamax surge strips. They actually open the circuit on undervoltage. Unlike most surge strips they actually cut off on overvoltage as well. They don't require the massive surges to set them off like most of the rest. Good stuff. I wish we sold them.

    18. Re:The most likely reason by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      Nice information. I've been running the cable modem, and three linksys routers (one is wireless, one is the Vonage link point) off of my server's UPS system for years. The only reboots that I've ever needed in some 5 years was a firmware upgrade, and for DNS server changes that are no longer needed thanks to OpenDNS. I can't actually remember having to reboot them for the last 1.8 years or so, even when I had to replace the cable modem they just reconnected and all was good. I hope that the UPS power is really helping me there. I had just thought they were damned reliable... hmmm As for router versions, see nuintari's post, I don't think any of mine are version 4 or later. Mine have just been working like champs, no need to upgrade... go figure.

      BTW, I'm using a Fry's cheap APC UPS, 350 model or something like that. It's years old now, but also has not failed even in power outages from storms etc.

    19. Re:The most likely reason by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 3, Informative

      My off hand guess, Bittorrents. I've noticed with the WRT54G that I had for a while would have problems if you're running multiple torrents, and don't have any cap on how many inbound and outbound connections there can be (IE, overnight runs where you don't need to use any of your bandwidth :-) A reboot always fixed the problem - I assume it's either running out of memory, or running out of ports to work with (since each connection has a timeout of an hour, IIRC)

      --

      Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

    20. Re:The most likely reason by mtmra70 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The only time my WRT54G is rebooted is when the UPS battery runs out or when my kid unplugs it from the UPS.

    21. Re:The most likely reason by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What I've noticed sometimes is that I need to reboot my Cablemodem to get a new ip address, and then MIGHT have to kick the router, but I NEVER have to reboot my router without also rebooting the cablemodem.

      Sometimes comcast flips my IP and the modem can't keep up with it.

    22. Re:The most likely reason by suraklin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK. So other than bashing so called "cheap crappy consumer routers" and posting your uptime, what do you suggest? Not everyone has the resources to buy a $3000 Cisco router, nor does everyone have the time or knowledge to configure a Linux machine for routing.

    23. Re:The most likely reason by Aredridel · · Score: 1

      So very hear you on the Linksys.

      Power control is expensive. It's usually skimped on.

      The same components with a high-quality regulated power supply would be pretty much failproof.

    24. Re:The most likely reason by aurispector · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a Netgear WNR834B and have never had to reboot it. I really don't know what we're doing right, but the damn thing just works, wired or wireless. Our old Linksys WRT54G worked pretty well; we gave that to my in-laws and it's been good to them, too.
      Come to think of it, we had a cheap-assed Dell wireless router that worked ok, too.

      Do other people generally have to screw around with their networks a lot?

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    25. Re:The most likely reason by ottothecow · · Score: 4, Informative
      Torrents are what have always locked up my routers or at least made them unusable. It seems to be the connection count rather than bandwidth that matters so I usually capped connection totals.

      Now I have a Buffalo G125 with dd-wrt and is AMAZING (good luck finding one of them these days in the states after their legal troubles though). The last time I had a necessary reboot was when I upgraded the firmware (to enable cool things like bandwidth graphs). Sometimes I will reboot it when it is not necessary--such as when comcast has some sort of unknown network issue so my first thought is to start powercycling things until I remember the cable modem's IP and see that there are connection errors in the log. Other than that, rock solid stable with 5 active users and a good deal of game/torrent traffic.

      --
      Bottles.
    26. Re:The most likely reason by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      My cable internet connection used to drop frequently, two or three times a day. I called tech support there and they kept saying "buy a UPS" but I insisted on having someone come to the house. During the house visit the tech determined that our cable signal was much weaker than normal and they just bumped up the dBs. Did a lot less rebooting.

      What finally got me a really good connection was when I replaced my old POS Netgear with a WRT54GL + tomato. I probably reboot that once in a couple of months, if that.

      You can get a rock-solid router like a 2600, but the better ones aren't usually all-in-one (router + switch + AP), nor are they $50 new.

      The only time our Pix at work ever went down was when the UPS it was attached to died (which I thought was pretty funny).

    27. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well Like most cheep things you get what you pay for... I have a p54c with 128MB of ram and 2 10/100 cards. In my closet where I keep the cable modem and boccie set... Lets just cat /proc/uptime... yeah: 2 years 3 days 41 hours and 23 sec.. huh... i wonder why that's working so good; when your link sys needs to be rebooted every week... i payed 8 bucks for mine at a garage sale...

    28. Re:The most likely reason by cashman73 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think I've rebooted my WRT54G router like twice since December. It's quite reliable.

    29. Re:The most likely reason by aurispector · · Score: 1

      Tangentially off topic, but how do you like the FIOS service? I looked at Verizon when I got sick of Comcast's antics, but they couldn't offer triple play in my area for some reason so I went with RCN cable instead. (another tangent: with Comcast, large downloads never exceeded an average of about 750 KBps, whereas RCN gives about 1.5MBps. $30 cheaper per month, too)

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    30. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I have to agree on the UPS. I have owned a long list of routers as well, and often had issues requiring reboots. Eventually, I put in a UPS with power conditioning, and the problem completely went away. I was surprised, and have run all my home network/servers UPS'd since.

    31. Re:The most likely reason by cmeans · · Score: 1

      This agrees with my experience too...definately bittorrent traffic...and I have my routers on a UPS too.

    32. Re:The most likely reason by cheater512 · · Score: 0

      A issue with my router was it kept changing dhcp addresses.
      Every 2 days or so it would just reassign a new one for no apparent reason.

      Drove me insane because computers that hadnt been rebooted suddenly had a different IP.
      I got dnsmasq going fairly quickly.

    33. Re:The most likely reason by suprcvic · · Score: 1

      Ditto. The only time I ever had to reboot my router on a regular basis was when I had Windows DNS settings point to my router as the DNS provider and I was torrenting a lot. Once I put my ISP's DNS servers into my windows settings, I stopped having to reboot it all the time.

    34. Re:The most likely reason by PitaBred · · Score: 5, Insightful

      DD-WRT on my WRT54GL, I've never had to reboot it for those issues. I even have a couple separate VLAN's set up, two DHCP pools on separate interfaces, etc. I've had uptimes of over 80 days before I tweaked something else on it that required me to reboot it.

      It's not the hardware... it's the generic crap software that they run on.

    35. Re:The most likely reason by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 1

      I've had FiOS for awhile now, and I find the service to be great. The picture quality is on par with OTA, in other words, they don't do there own compression for their own network. Their OnDemand selection might not be as good as a cable provider, but I've notice the list has gotten bigger since I've first had it. Verizon doesn't cap internet connection for using too much bandwidth, since they are a Tier 1 ISP, they have helluva bandwidth.

      I've read the Verizon issued router is a little flaky for some. It's been solid for me, but I don't do much configuration except open ports for gaming. It's a good service, and I'm glad they rolled it out in my neighborhood. I was stuck with Comcrap before, and the TV would go out at least once a month if not more.

    36. Re:The most likely reason by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to have that problem, but DD-WRT on my WRT54GL fixed it. I can run torrents day and night, tons of connections, and it never gets upset. It tends to run out of memory like you said, it tries to manage state incorrectly or something, the connections don't time out soon enough.

      If you have an older WRT54G (pre v4), you can just load DD-WRT, or I'd highly recommend the investment in a WRT54GL so you can run DD-WRT.

    37. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's this amazing thing where somehow not all routers cost 30$ and less, or $3000 and more. there's actually routers in between these two prices. unbelievable, i know. and if you search around, you'll be able to find which ones are not crappy, and you don't even have to know much about linux or computers even, just be a smart shopper, do you're own background checks on products, don't trust whatever they tell you at the stores.

    38. Re:The most likely reason by PitaBred · · Score: 4, Informative

      So pay $70 to get a WRT54GL, then use some different firmware like DD-WRT or tomato on it. Cheap, and they even make installing it and all easy, as easy as the "normal" routers are to configure, and it'll get you those long uptimes.

      If you don't like your crappy router, fix it. It's not that hard.

    39. Re:The most likely reason by spymagician · · Score: 1

      I'm a network admin for an ISP, and we've been recommending UPSs for the frequent-reboot routers that our customers have. We've found that routers (especially Linksys) have a real problem with power fluctuations that most other systems and devices don't notice. A decent line-conditioning UPS might solve your problems, but a cheap one will suffice.

      Also, could be the device is running out of memory, if your ISP is changing the properties of your connection a lot, or you might have a duplex issue causing a lot of retransmissions. . .

      Just a couple of thoughts :)

      All excellent points, to which I'd like to add another: My employer uses consumer grade routers from Motorola, Linksys and DLink. (One of which is a special version of the WRT54G) Each manufacturer has its own set of quirks; some are more troublesome than others. But in each and every case, without exception, those quirks are a direct result of shoddy firmware. The current mindset among hardware manufacturers is "Release a new version as quickly as possible and fix all the bugs with firmware updates." Aside from the obvious flaw to that kind of thinking, they typically introduce new bugs and/or break things that previously functioned correctly. It never ceases to amaze me how little quality control is applied to pretty much anything today...

    40. Re:The most likely reason by p0tat03 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I used to think D-Link routers were crap. Then I got a Linksys WRT54G, and my life went to hell. Constant lockups, power cycles, and constantly losing DNS service... It was batshit insane.

      And then my folks got a D-Link 605 (the draft-N one) from a copy of Vista, and I inherited it. My connection has been ROCK SOLID ever since, NEVER have to reboot that thing. Their firmware also does more than the WRT54G.

      In short, Linksys sucks, go D-Link.

    41. Re:The most likely reason by dudepigeon · · Score: 1

      In my experience, the arp cache gets corrupted on the low end routers. I have seen in personally as well in a non-profit i support. Linksys and Netgear are susceptible to this.

    42. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I personally have a WRT54GL at home running OpenWRT acting as an AP. At my work, we've deployed 4 of the same routers also running OpenWRT to a few remote sites. The routers there do their normal job of connecting to the ISP, but then uses OpenVPN to connect back to our LAN so the remote users have access. We route their IP phones over the VPN connection back to our PBX.

      These routers have been in production for the better part of a year now and we've never had to reboot them or touch them at all. Phone calls, Active Directory, Exchange, SAP, web... the routers handle it fine and we've not once had a problem.

    43. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comeon, Cisco is working overtime to make sure that Linksys is just crappy enough that you would never want to use it commercially.

    44. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Buffalo that currently has an uptime of 35 days. It's cheaper than the Linksys wrt54g v8 that had a web server that would crash on the configuration page requiring a power cycle.

      The Buffalo been banned for sale in the US by that judge in Texass that sucks patent troll cock.

    45. Re:The most likely reason by dfn_deux · · Score: 3, Informative

      My experience was nearly exact oppostie of yours, just chiming to say that anecdotal evidence is rarely accurate in practice. As others here have suggested, you might be more happy running the Linksys hardware with some 3rd part software; then again you seem happy with you d-link so maybe it isn't worth the effort for you.

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    46. Re:The most likely reason by tarball · · Score: 1

      I've gone to the Panamax site, and it looks good. But I haven't found anything that speaks of low voltage cutoff. Could you point at a particular model?

      Thanks.

      tom

      --
      I hate sigs, and refuse to have one.
    47. Re:The most likely reason by dfn_deux · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even the post version 4 wrt54g works fine with openwrt, takes an extra step to flash it and you don't get the FULL version of openwrt, but the micro version with vxworks killer has been running plenty stable on my ver. 5 for quite a while now.

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    48. Re:The most likely reason by dfn_deux · · Score: 2, Informative

      A correction to the above, replace openwrt with "dd-wrt", I realized I mistyped immediately after hitting submit.

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    49. Re:The most likely reason by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      I tried to run DD-WRT on my Linksys before I gave it away to my unsuspecting parents :) Many of the advanced features could not be enabled due to the fact that Linksys was cheap enough to only give me 2MB of RAM or something equally ridiculous. It didn't fare much better with DD-WRT running. My parents do not BitTorrent at all, so the WRT54G is working out for them. In connection-heavy environments it buckles and requires rebooting every few MINUTES.

    50. Re:The most likely reason by ajlitt · · Score: 2, Funny

      It took me 9 years of being a broadband customer to realize that the "NO CARRIER" meme is irrelevant. Thank you.

    51. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wanted to add... this is also a pet peeve of mine. Folks saying NO CARRIER or such nonsense, where there is obviously a submit needed to complete the comment.

    52. Re:The most likely reason by elton247 · · Score: 1

      I run an ISP and don't recommend any router. They all have crappy quality control and the probability of getting a lemon from any brand seems pretty high.

      --
      How strange it is to be anything at all
    53. Re:The most likely reason by horatiocain · · Score: 1

      Seconded-DDWRT is the only thing keeping me sane, considering the ridiculous instability of native linksys/netgear software, especially under torrent traffic.

    54. Re:The most likely reason by jnana · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, the WRT54GL is a very good deal! I've had one for about 8 months or so, and though I haven't bothered to update the firmware yet, it is still very reliable. I've never needed to reboot it. Before that, I had a $40 Belkin router that had to be restarted at least once a week and often once a day.

    55. Re:The most likely reason by pablomme · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, very simple: I have a fr

      --
      The state you are in while your HEAD is detached... - wait, what?
    56. Re:The most likely reason by suraklin · · Score: 1

      For those of us that are at a minimum technically competent this is not an issue.

      I was mostly making a suggestion to the original poster to actually post something useful. Instead of just bashing someone for using something cheap and not offering a possible solution.

      You on the other hand provided a possible solution.

      I was just thinking there are probably a lot of people that do not have the ability or want to tinker with firmware.

    57. Re:The most likely reason by magarity · · Score: 1

      I think the most likely reason is that he uses cheap crappy consumer routers
       
      My rev A1 D-Link was so damn cheap it was free after mail in rebate and the uptime for the thing is that it's has been running for almost a year now since I moved here and I don't think there's been a power outage since. I wonder if wierd and / or wrong configurations and / or the ISP doing funky things are more likely culprits.

    58. Re:The most likely reason by dfn_deux · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I doubt the problem is the 2MB of flash (you said ram, but linksys has never made a wrt54g with less than 8M of ram), since I'm also using the micro version of the firmware, however the 8MB of ram vs the 16 or 32 Megs in most of their model lineup could be a problem, I see than my router is using about 13MB of ram right now with 150 active TCP & UDP connections. At any rate, most SOHO network gear is garbage, the best think you can do before buying is to read the supported devices list on the dd-wrt web page and make sure that you'll have an alternative to the factory firmware AND confirm that you aren't being sold on a device with a substandard processor or insufficient flash and/or ram.

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    59. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, I know nothing specific about wall wart that comes with various Linksys routers but mine came with a AD12V/1A-SW which is a regulated switching power supply. That type of wall wart is very good at maintaining the correct out voltage across a wide range of input voltages and frequencies and varying output loads, the best of three common wall wart types.

    60. Re:The most likely reason by mrbcs · · Score: 1
      THANK YOU! That totally explains why my router has been rock solid since I moved my office. I had it hooked up to an outlet on an unknown cicuit and the damn thing needed rebooting weekly if not more.

      I now have a server, the router, one machine and 2 printers running off a 30 amp circuit and it's been perfect.

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    61. Re:The most likely reason by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

      That's still "bad" in my book. Maybe I'm just not a good geek, but I don't need or want my own DNS. I've got a laptop, a desktop that I never use anymore, an iPhone, and a Tivo on my network. It shouldn't be too much to ask that they just be able to get to the Internet.

    62. Re:The most likely reason by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      Tangentially off topic, but how do you like the FIOS service?

      I had FIOS up until I moved out of my last house. I never had problems with the Verizon router or service; I was able to get things like SSH working without too much trouble (just the typical setup of port forwarding, etc.) I highly recommend the FIOS service for anyone who is able to get it.

      I now have DSL service through AT&T/Bellsouth. The speeds are decent (about 6mbs) but I have not been able to get services like inbound SSH working at all, unfortunately. (AT&T does strange things with IP addresses; before I got a static ip from them, I got a new Ip every time the router reset itself after a power failure and what not) My current router is configured for SSH, but I have no idea why it's not working. I'm not trying to be offtopic, but I would really appreciate some help from anyone who is able to give it.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    63. Re:The most likely reason by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      That makes as much sense as any other explanation I've heard. More than others actually... and may explain why my own router seems to be defective, in that I can't remember the last time I had to reboot it.... Mine's a WRT54G, and it's even using the original stock Linksys/Cisco firmware. :) It's not on a UPS any more, but it was on one until I decomissioned the server that was running through its wired net.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    64. Re:The most likely reason by tarball · · Score: 1

      I found it - AVM option.

      tom

      --
      I hate sigs, and refuse to have one.
    65. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I maintain quite a few Smoothwall and Monowall routers. The Monowall deployments have at least 100 clients behind them and are attached over the WAN to each other with IPSEC. They have NEVER "hung" and I've never had to reboot them to clear an issue. In fact, I don't think I've rebooted them more then once since I set them up almost two years ago. I am running them on HP desktops. They boot from CD and use the floppy for the config file.

      At home I have another Smoothwall and various Linksys routers all running some version off DD-WRT. Since I put that on them, I've not had any problems. My previous routers (AT&T, D-link, Netgear and probably others) and the Linksys with the stock firmware were always going down for one reason or another, mostly during heavy load.

    66. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Belkin Wireless G Plus. Great router. The only time that I have to reboot it is when my cable modem flakes (due probably to some issue on my ISPs end) and I have to reboot them both at the same time so that the router will update its IP address. The features on the router are great, too.

      I've had several Belkin routers in the past and encouraged my non-technical friends and family to purchase them. Virtually now problems. The Netgear routers that I've had are another story...

    67. Re:The most likely reason by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Bittorrent will kill a Linksys/Dlink router because of the number of open connections the box has to keep track of (with limited memory).

    68. Re:The most likely reason by eat+here_get+gas · · Score: 0

      i have a nat-based smc barricade router on WINXP Pirate Edition and P2P (torrents..) all the day and night and in the 3 years ive run this, ive had to reset it once.

      am i doing something wrong?

      --
      the significance of a signature is insignificant
    69. Re:The most likely reason by William-Ely · · Score: 2, Interesting

      After going through a few cheap routers I decided throw down some cash on a D-Link gaming router. It got rave reviews and I liked the fact that it had giga-bit Ethernet which was rare at the time (over two years ago) and it let me prioritize traffic (QoS?). It has performed flawlessly no matter what I do to stress it out. I could have bought two WRT54Gs for the price I paid for this but I swear the quality was worth it. I didn't know about using a router as a name server. I always used my own DNS. In any case I'd recommend turning of unnecessary features and ensuring the router isn't overheating. My old router (WR?54G) had a serious problem with heat.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred, and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    70. Re:The most likely reason by mistahkurtz · · Score: 1

      my wrt54g v5 has been awesome. *had* to reset it maybe twice in the 2.5 years i've owned it. one of those times was due to some major power fluctuations, as stated above, that effected the whole house/neighborhood.

      --
      not only is time travel possible, it's irrelevant.
    71. Re:The most likely reason by TheSambassador · · Score: 1

      It may have something to do with location as well. I know that people who had their routers lying on the floor had tons of problems (static buildup? Dust? I don't know anything about these kinds of things), but people put their routers up on desks or other raised surfaces, especially away from other electronic equipment (like the computer) they seem to work a bit better.

    72. Re:The most likely reason by TheWingThing · · Score: 1

      I have a $75 Linksys WRT54G and I've installed the latest DD-WRT. I still have to restart it once every two weeks.

    73. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree. I worked for a Wireless ISP for a couple of years and we had ALOT of trouble with the WRT54G v.5 model. We had also tried D-Links and Trendnets and a couple of other brands. In the end we found that the WRT54GL (the L stands for Linux) were the most stable and longest lasting. We had customers that could leave them on for several weeks without reboot. The 54G, on the other hand, would get to where it wouldn't even pass traffic after a year.

    74. Re:The most likely reason by TheWingThing · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry to reply to my own post. The previous version (v2.3) of DD-WRT gave uptimes of nearly two months. But the current version (v2.4) isn't as stable.

    75. Re:The most likely reason by sjmacko29 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Agreed. The WRT54G was a good piece of equipment. Unfortunately, I have a version 6. It needed to be rebooted every few days, with only 1/2 dozen machines connected... at the most. When I upgraded my Macbook Pro to Leopard, the reboots were more frequent. I installed the DD-WRT micro, and it has been solid ever since. It has not needed a single reboot... I guess I can skip Plan B, which was to run the router over with a large truck.

    76. Re:The most likely reason by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 0

      I've noticed that my wireless router (free linksys) has to be rebooted quite a bit during a thunderstorm, do you think a ups will help that?

    77. Re:The most likely reason by dissss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a WRT-54G v5 - it locked up quite regularly with the original firmware. Switched it to DD-WRT Micro and it's been fine ever since. Definitely worth the upgrade.

    78. Re:The most likely reason by Sxooter · · Score: 1

      I order mine from China via Ebay, preloaded with dd-wrt-v24. Cost about $80 shipped for the high powered WHR-HP-54G model, which is a rocking piece of equipment. We get a lot of interference at the office so we have one on channel 1, one on 6 and one on channel 11. Both WinXP and Linux clients roam seamlessly.

      --

      --- It is not the things we do which we regret the most, but the things which we don't do.
    79. Re:The most likely reason by Drantin · · Score: 1

      To clarify, it was with versions above 4, 4 itself was just fine.

      --
      Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
    80. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting, I have a WRT54G v5 and have not rebooted the thing once, been up for months. Of course it is not exposed to internet trash. I just use it as a wireless access point onto one of my private networks. I have an old cisco DSL router taking up the burden of being a router, I never have needed to reboot it either. Now the actiontech POS router I used for about 2 weeks on the other hand crashed constantly( at least once a week)

    81. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use a linux router (computer) with a wap-54G and virtual never have to restart unless I am working on something.

    82. Re:The most likely reason by CorSci81 · · Score: 1

      I'm running WRT54G v8 and so far I've never had to reboot it. I think my record uptime is about 6 months, and that's always been due to power outages. The only issue I've encountered with it is that it occasionally freaks out and randomly decides to boot every device and reassign IP addresses (my DHCP is set so IPs never expire). While that's annoying, it's only happened about 3 times in a year. All of my other issues have been related to the network cards I was trying to use and NOT the router. I had a POS Belkin USB wireless for my laptop after the original network card crapped out, but it has had issues with every router it's tried to talk to. And my netgear wireless card for my desktop should just go in the trash, it won't hold a connection with any wireless device for more than 10 minutes.

    83. Re:The most likely reason by arminw · · Score: 1

      ..If there's ever that lightning strike that causes the lights to flicker, the internet always "goes down"..

      We solved out power problems with a continuously converting, regulating, 1.5KVA UPS. It will regulate the output to 120V even when to input power varies from 90-147V. All equipment runs from this, except for the laser printer. Lightning and other disturbances are totally ignored by all systems running from that power source.

      --
      All theory is gray
    84. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like you work for Comcast!

    85. Re:The most likely reason by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 5, Informative

      In theory, none of those routers should need a UPS, just a better AC-DC converter perhaps with a bigger capacitor across the DC lines. I've never investigated the quality of the wall warts they supply with routers, but my guess is they are very cheap and simply don't handle voltage fluctuations as well as they should.

    86. Re:The most likely reason by Cylix · · Score: 5, Informative

      The problem I've had with dd-wrt and torrents is the max tcp connections is by default very low. Not something you would notice under normal traffic, but during swarms it can fill up fairly quickly.

      It give the appearance the unit has locked up since it is difficult to establish a tcp connection. These will bleed away eventually and allow a connection to be established.

      I just set the max number of tcp ports and it fairs fairly well using bit torrent now.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    87. Re:The most likely reason by Discrete_infinity · · Score: 1

      I am really pleased with my D-link gaming router.
      My voip works great now!

      Cheers.

      --
      Windows Haiku Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return.
    88. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > :wq!
      :x!

      FTFY

    89. Re:The most likely reason by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Informative

      Linksys is the one manufacturer that's on my "never" list. My previous employer used to use their hubs and cascaded them into a network switch. The darn things kept losing track of what MAC addresses were hanging off them and refusing to route traffic. You only have to have one complete and utter failure like that to be written off in my book.

      That said, I've recently also written off Netgear. After about my fourth or fifth Netgear card went dead (I think I have one left that is still functioning after three or four years), I started avoiding their cards like the plague. Then, I bought one of their consumer hubs a couple of months ago and it was dropping something like 80% of the packets that went through it (between any two devices including upstream). I took it back to Fry's and replaced it with a D-Link and it worked flawlessly. (And no, I didn't have something hooked up to the uplink and the non-uplink port beside it. Been there, done that.)

      Bottom line is that after three hard drive failures in the course of a little over a month (yes, I have a third Seagate drive misbehaving massively, randomly corrupting data), I've pretty much come to the conclusion that nearly all electronics built today are mass-Chinese-manufactured crap that barely works and doesn't even do that for very long. Very sad, really.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    90. Re:The most likely reason by kv9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Instead of just bashing someone for using something cheap and not offering a possible solution.

      the possible solution was implied (don't use cheap crappy consumer routers). also, to clarify, my routers arent $3k ciscoezzzz and don't run Linux.

      For those of us that are at a minimum technically competent this is not an issue. [...] I was just thinking there are probably a lot of people that do not have the ability or want to tinker with firmware.

      I can't understand why, what I like to call, "the grandma scenario" is constantly being brought up here (my grandma can't use Openbox / my grandma can't compile shit in the command line / my grandma can't update her fucking firmware). did the OP imply he is technologically retarded and can't use more than the router equivalent of a fucking toaster? this is Slashdot, not tech-tips-for-fucking-lonely-housewives. try to keep some decency, I mean look at your UID, for FSM's sake man!

      why do cheap routers fail? well, here's a few tips: you paid shit for them, they're made of plastic and most of them are brightly coloured.

      (apologies for going somewhat offtopic and using foul language)

    91. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just suppose that new versions of this router have 'acquired somehow' from 'windows' the 'fantastical new ability' to 'update itself' with micro$#@%$ malware, especially hooks to 'the micro$ 'advantage'. All of you know as well as I do that any change in router configuration requires a router 'reset'. Is it any rocket scientist question that some external malware provider who comes in as a con artist masquerading as your 'trusted' operating system provider and modifies or 'updates' your router firmware remotely would also as his/her last act 'reboooooot your router?

    92. Re:The most likely reason by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a WRT54G v8 here as well, and I don't think I've had to reboot the thing since around the first of the year (2008). Very stable, works just fine with Linux, WinXP, Win2k, Win95 OSR2, OS/2 Warp 4, eCS, and my Nokia 770's running OS2006. w00t! :-)

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    93. Re:The most likely reason by Lendrick · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's too bad.... I didn't know Buffalo was having legal troubles. I bought one and put DD-WRT on it, tweaked some of the timeouts and raised the maximum tcp connections and now I can run bittorrents and surf the net at the same time with noticeable (but very tolerable) slowdown.

      At any rate, it looks like you can order their routers on line. Just check DD-WRT's compatibility list first so you know you're getting something you can put a custom OS on.

    94. Re:The most likely reason by ericferris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know much about failure modes of Netgear routers, but your string of disk failures is alarming. Can you please provide some details?

      Were these disks at home or in an office?

      Were the failing disk in a server (with a lot of continual I/O) or a workstation with only intermittent I/O?

      Thank you.

      --
      Fantasy: http://ferrisfantasy.blogspot.com/
    95. Re:The most likely reason by Kaeles · · Score: 1

      Build a box out of an old crappy pc (find one in a dumpster, I've found working amd64 3200+'s that work) and install smoothwall or monowall or pfsense or ipcop or any other simple boxed firewall distro's?

    96. Re:The most likely reason by Fencepost · · Score: 1

      Note that the WRT54G-TM (T-Mobile branded) routers are basically the same thing as the GL, though I don't believe you'll be able to reflash with other firmware (yet) without some hardware hacking.

      --
      fencepost
      just a little off
    97. Re:The most likely reason by nick.ian.k · · Score: 1

      Odd, I've run beta v24 for a good 8 months on the WRT54GL (v1.1 hardware) and have only restarted the router when re-arranging furniture has necessitated unplugging. Are you sure the problem's with the router and not with the network interfaces connecting to it? And you're not, say, blocking the vents on the router, or anything like that which might result in overheating? If it's not either of these, I'd look for any issues with your particular version of the router as there are some minor hardware differences between versions. If there aren't any, maybe you've got a defective unit?

    98. Re:The most likely reason by tk6078 · · Score: 1

      I used a WRT54G for some time. Often had to reboot many times per day. For the past 18 months, I've used an Airport Extreme. I've had to reboot it once; after an electrical storm. Love it.

    99. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's even true of Cisco (even if you don't count that they're slowly co-branding all of the Linksys-gear).

    100. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, your pirating windows. Its like stealing a broken car.

    101. Re:The most likely reason by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 3, Funny
      this is also a pet peeve of mine. Folks saying NO CARRIER or such nonsense, where there is obviously a submit needed to complete the comment.

      .
      Yeah! And nobody *really* knows why the chicken crossed the road, or why fruit flies like a banana. What's the matter with these people?

    102. Re:The most likely reason by empaler · · Score: 1

      Any half-decent cable internet provider should be able to determine the signal-to-noise ratios from their consoles. Even if their setup is expecting manual typing through a terminal, it's all of one minute's work...
      (Cisco example: telnet to the local CMTS, $ show cable modem | i [modem MAC]). Your ISP seems to blow.

    103. Re:The most likely reason by eat+here_get+gas · · Score: 0

      yeah, but at least i have the balls to register my car....

      --
      the significance of a signature is insignificant
    104. Re:The most likely reason by linuxpyro · · Score: 1

      I love FiOS. It's fast and stable, and I've never had to reboot the router.

      However, I have had some issues with it in the past. A while back I was messing around and trying to set up multiple subnets on my internal network. (Basically I just had another machine as a router, and the ActionTec router Verizon gave me had to have routes configured so I could get to other machines.) The static routing setup which worked fine with my Linksys router before (we gave this to my brother after getting FiOS) for some reason would just not work with the ActionTec one.

      It wasn't a big issue, and other than this it works beautifully. I'd troubleshoot it more, but I just didn't care about it that much.

      --
      Saying "I'll probably get modded down for this" in a post is the best way to get it modded up.
    105. Re:The most likely reason by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Another thing with these routers is that they do tend to run a bit warm, so making sure there is plenty of airflow may help with the stability issues and will prolong their life. I've always considered the fact that Linksys designs stuff to be stackable as some kind of form of planned obsolence on their part. There is a reason why the enterprise-level stuff like hubs and switches typically include a fan. Note that I'm not trying to imply there aren't other problems with the later WRT54G's.

    106. Re:The most likely reason by empaler · · Score: 1

      I can't understand why, what I like to call, "the grandma scenario" is constantly being brought up here (my grandma can't use Openbox / my grandma can't compile shit in the command line / my grandma can't update her fucking firmware). did the OP imply he is technologically retarded and can't use more than the router equivalent of a fucking toaster? this is Slashdot, not tech-tips-for-fucking-lonely-housewives. try to keep some decency, I mean look at your UID, for FSM's sake man!

      (apologies for going somewhat offtopic and using foul language)

      You've just put words to something that has been on my mind for years! xD

    107. Re:The most likely reason by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      I have a WRT54G version 1.0 and it's been very stable, but only after I forced it to 11 Mbps. At g-speed, (54 Mbps) it wouldn't last an hour. I have to reboot it about once every six months or so. (I've had it for about 2 years)

      Firmware updates might get me up to 54 Mb, but the truth is, I just don't care about the extra speed, since my Internet connection is only 1.5 Mbps.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    108. Re:The most likely reason by flappinbooger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      x2. I was using a walmart grade linksys router on the LAN at work. It was for like 6 users, mixed wireless and wired, and a NAS with a switch for wired users. Low budget, low cost, low reliability, low performance.

      It required periodic reboots, which I eventually narrowed down to being most likely router DNS table problems. Now, we are using a Zyxel wireless router provided by our new ISP, on a much better network (real switches, a rack, everything).

      Yeah, it's pretty much a consumer grade router on a pro-grade setup but it does the job of being a WAP and a firewall, and hasn't been flaking out. I'll take it.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    109. Re:The most likely reason by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      I don't think it has to do with being a "cheap crappy consumer router".

      I hate to admit it but I still have the BT Home Hub which came with my 8meg upgrade but it works and I've never had to reset it in the 8 months that I've had it and considering home hubs are supposed to be some of the shittiest modems/routers around, I think I'm doing quite well.

      The cost of something will always a part of it but I think I think how the router is configured and how often it's attacked play a larger part of the problem.

    110. Re:The most likely reason by spazdor · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also, jam the TCP timeout way down low. That will do wonders.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    111. Re:The most likely reason by raju1kabir · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've had a WRT54G for almost two years. I've never had to reboot it, not even once. The trick was installing OpenWRT firmware.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    112. Re:The most likely reason by destruk · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what's causing it for you. I have a linksys router for years. it's a simple 5 port switch that connects to a cable modem. I don't have to unplug/replug/reboot it at all. It's been 9 months since my internet service went out. The router has been constantly powered on for the last 2 years without a problem. When the cable modem lost connection all I had to do was log into the router and release/renew the WAN information.

    113. Re:The most likely reason by Darundal · · Score: 1

      I am using a WRT54G (with Linksys' official firmware, of course the CURRENT VERSION) and can't remember the last time I had to reboot it.

    114. Re:The most likely reason by networkBoy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mine is sitting on my server...
      Have not rebooted it since I moved (~1 year)
      really, I think it's power issues. This same router gave me tons of greif at my previous place, but when I moved I put it on the UPS and no issues since...
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    115. Re:The most likely reason by radarvectors · · Score: 1

      My WRT54 needed a reboot about once a day - I had noticed that the outages were coming after my oil burner kicked on. The router and the oil burner were on the same circuit (old house).

      I ran a new dedicated circuit straight from the electric panel box right to the router. It's the only device on that circuit. No more reboots.

      UPS would probably work as well.

    116. Re:The most likely reason by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Jesus..... anything is better than RCN. Maybe it was just my area, but their TV and Internet offerings were both miserably pathetic, their support terrible, and the prices high.

      As a point of evidence, we finally got two-way cable installed and supported in our town around 2006-7.

      It's a pretty sad state of affairs that the cable companies are bad enough to make the phone company, of all things, look good.

      And yeah. FiOS is fantastic. The cable companies will be out of business in a few years, and although I don't look forward to a Verizon monopoly, for now the service is phenominal, and the FTTP infrastructure is just about as future-proof as you can possibly ask for.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    117. Re:The most likely reason by suraklin · · Score: 1

      Agreed that most of us here know our way around PC stuff, but just telling someone "hey don't buy junk" is not really a solution. Seriously that statement is almost as useful as telling someone "Hey, just stop using the internet."

      There is nothing wrong however wanting consumer hardware to work properly. The "grandma scenario" as you call it applies to a lot of us here with hardware. I imagine you and many others here; myself included; end up being computer support for friends and family

    118. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      openbsd is the way to go. it will run fine on any old pc that can't handle modern versions of windows (i used a p133 for years, just "upgraded" to a pII 500), and obsd's packet filter (pf) is powerful, elegant, and very well documented. my firewall gets rebooted exactly twice a year: may 1 and november 1 - when they release new versions of openbsd. 8-)

    119. Re:The most likely reason by Plutonite · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, I've never had a problem with my rou

      You know what, those jokes are fucking la

    120. Re:The most likely reason by Malc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Is that OpenBSD on a 12W device that sits silently on a shelf?

      Personally I prefer to use a decent modem. I have a SpeedTouch DSL modem that seems to be more functional than most consumer routers, as well as being one of the more stable modems I've used on a marginal line. I connect my wireless devices to my network just on the switch side (use them as wireless access points and not routers). Very stable set up.

    121. Re:The most likely reason by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1

      WRT54G V1.1, Linksys firmware version 4.21.1. I've owned this router for four years now. After I installed the current firmware, I haven't had to reboot it. Not once. This thing is a tank.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    122. Re:The most likely reason by Slashdot+Suxxors · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You need to take better care of your stuff, you must be doing something wrong. Either that or you have the worst luck I've ever seen.

    123. Re:The most likely reason by FingerSoup · · Score: 2, Informative

      While this is somewhat true, some Linksys routers have a 4 day cache on these connections.... As a result, the memory gets hosed pretty quickly... Switching to DD-WRT, and lowering the connection cache to around 4 hours tends to make things run a lot longer.....

    124. Re:The most likely reason by MaineCoon · · Score: 1

      I also have the WRT54GL (which is different than the WRT54G, for other readers).

      I run the stock firmware, and never need to reboot it.

      --
      Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
    125. Re:The most likely reason by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mine isn't, but it could be: http://www.soekris.com/

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    126. Re:The most likely reason by Provocateur · · Score: 2, Funny

      Usually to set the password for 'admin'

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    127. Re:The most likely reason by Captain+Segfault · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bottom line is that after three hard drive failures in the course of a little over a month (yes, I have a third Seagate drive misbehaving massively, randomly corrupting data)

      Are you /sure/ your power supply is sufficient and your drive(s) are sufficiently cooled?

    128. Re:The most likely reason by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Most often, actually, I've found that the cause is, gasp, Bittorrent. Fills up the NAT tables and they're not purged fast enough, unable to open / map more ports, effectively, no more connectivity.

    129. Re:The most likely reason by Sitnalta · · Score: 1

      The REAL reason is they're built as cheaply as possible to keep the cost down and margins up. Actually good consumer-grade routers are easily $100+. The WRT54G, while being a good value and a versitile product, just isn't made with quality hardware. They're like the Chevys of the home networking world.

    130. Re:The most likely reason by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

      Let it never be said that your anal-retentive attention to detail never yielded positive results!

    131. Re:The most likely reason by mikkelm · · Score: 1

      Hey, you're off the job, you're not taking calls. Enjoy your weekend.

    132. Re:The most likely reason by vistic · · Score: 1

      Fruit flies like a banana because it's delicious and nutritious. You never figured that out?

      As to why time flies like an arrow... I don't know.

    133. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've bought an old Amiga PSU, which gives me 5V/2Amps and 12V/500mAmps of power. D-Link 524 rev. A and S-A cable modem (EPC2200) bot use this PSU. Works for weeks with no problem (and the usage is quite heavy - link spikes to 4Mbps, 4 PC connected). I'm only shutting it down when we leave for a week or so.

    134. Re:The most likely reason by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I can't understand why, what I like to call, "the grandma scenario" is constantly being brought up here"

      Grandma owns the basement and pays the bills.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    135. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      It may have something to do with horoscopes as well. My aunt Mabel knows several people in her trailer park who had routers who had tons of problems, and they were all Pisces. Hmm. Now I don't know anything about any of this, but when they're owned by Geminis, especially ones not married to Capricorns they seem to work a bit better.

    136. Re:The most likely reason by KangKong · · Score: 1

      Agreed, my router reboots itself.

    137. Re:The most likely reason by AndGodSed · · Score: 3, Informative

      That was rated funny, but truth be told I have seen Vista Laptops screw up networks often.

      Especially with out Linux Fileservers, XP computers and Laptops can access them fine, but while the Vista machines sees the Fileserver in the "Network and Sharing Centre" as soon as you try to access the server Vista claims that the server "Does not exist or may be switched off"

      Apparently there is a registry hack for this...

    138. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that a question?

      How the fuck do we know if or why Vista is crashing your router. I mean, it probably is, but we can't say for sure.
      Well, actually I can say for sure as I'm parked outside your house using your wide open wireless and using the default password for the web interface to your router. If I lock you out, will you still pay the bill?

    139. Re:The most likely reason by Fri13 · · Score: 1

      I think the most common reason are very short power cuts. I have long time be thinking why does my family and friends ADSL+WLAN routers reset them so often without reason. Yesterday, I was using my laptop next my family router and my laptop informed me with two fast beep (both came under a second) that it has lost AC cord and is using battery and then AC cord is connected. Right away I watched the router and it turned off SYS lights but keeped PWR, WLAN, LAN and ADSL lights ON. For two minutes, there was nothing happening, network worked as it should after small 5 secon hickup, but System light didnt turn on. I checked the settings and everything was reseted. I turned router off and back on and checked again, all settings were as they suppose to be.

      Small power cut seems to affect so it will reset it's settings but not reset the modem itself, keeping it workin with default settings. This happening told me right away why it was so wieard always to check settings after reset what someone on family did when speaking on phone and hearing that everything was OK, but without reseting, router didn't allow network printing beecause connectin with correct IP's was not happening.

      Now I'm planning to buy those 50â UPS to protect the router, nothing else in the power grid in our house, does not affect this kind happenings, not even PVR devices or Computers, only a Router.

    140. Re:The most likely reason by Nemo's+Night+Sky · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It could easily be a uPnP thing.

    141. Re:The most likely reason by opus · · Score: 3, Informative

      I like the way you think. alix2c3 uses 6 Watts - a little more with a VPN card installed. I agree on keeping the wireless devices separate, they're just not gonna be rock solid.

    142. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrt54gl
      Firmware: DD-WRT v24 (05/24/08) std
      Time: 06:16:55 up 6 days, 13:00, load average: 0.17, 0.04, 0.01

      6 days up since my last reflashing... so I dont have that problem

    143. Re:The most likely reason by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Funny

      I tried to mod you up, but my connection timed o

    144. Re:The most likely reason by wrook · · Score: 1

      Thank you, thank you, thank you!!!

      You just saved me lots of frustration trying to figure out why my cable modem/router is "locking up" when I open up lots of connections.

    145. Re:The most likely reason by cervice · · Score: 1

      I too have a WRT54G router v.7. I do not have any problems on it except that I cannot install a third party firmware on it.

    146. Re:The most likely reason by Flossymike · · Score: 5, Informative

      This MS KB may help.

      http://support.microsoft.com/kb/932134

      There is also an MS KB related to the broadcast flag which may be what is being referred to.

      http://support.microsoft.com/kb/928233

    147. Re:The most likely reason by hyc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some folks prefer a little more control. Personally, I run my own caching DNS on my laptop, as well as on my main server at home.

      These stanzas in my /etc/named.conf are the only thing that make web browsing bearable for me:

      zone "intellitxt.com" in {
                      type master;
                      file "junk.zone";
      };

      zone "doubleclick.net" in {
                      type master;
                      file "junk.zone";
      }; ...

      viola:/var/lib/named> cat junk.zone
      $TTL 1W
      @ IN SOA @ root (
        42 ; serial (d. adams)
        2D ; refresh
        4H ; retry
        6W ; expiry
        1W ) ; minimum

        IN NS @
        IN A 0.0.0.0

      --
      -- *My* journal is more interesting than *yours*...
    148. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I've noticed that ALL home routers at some point...
      You have had experience with ALL home routers? No? Then how did you notice it exactly? If you are going to post, at least tell the truth!

    149. Re:The most likely reason by flewp · · Score: 0, Redundant

      What I've noticed sometimes is that I need to reboot my Cablemodem to get a new ip address, and then MIGHT have to kick the router, but I NEVER have to reboot my router without also rebooting the cablemodem. Sometimes comcast flips my IP and the modem can't keep up with it.

      WRT54G here, and I rarely am able to just reboot the router. Usually I have to first cycle the modem, then the power the router back up. I frequently have to do so when I've got some torrents going, and it can be quite annoying to be interrupted in the middle of browsing a site, uploading a work file, or other such things to get up, go to the next room, and do the whole power cycle thing. (Especially since I have to allow the cable modem to fully boot and establish a connection which takes a good 30 seconds or more)

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    150. Re:The most likely reason by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      I'll second Zyxels as being excellent little routers.

      I work for an ISP that hands them out on all consumer and small business grade lines, and they're rock solid. You're right in them not being the nicest thing you can get, but Cisco's cost quite a lot more, and for most environments it would just be overkill anyway.

    151. Re:The most likely reason by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      AT&T does strange things with IP addresses; before I got a static ip from them, I got a new Ip every time the router reset itself after a power failure and what not

      Uhhh... yeah. That's what a dynamic IP address will do.

      I'm sure AT&T have their problems, but delivering the service you paid for is probably not one of them.

    152. Re:The most likely reason by Atti+K. · · Score: 1
      I second that. ASUS WL500g Premium with OpenWrt, stable like rock. Longest uptime so far was around 40 days, and it's rebooted only when there's a power outage or I power it off for the weekend when I leave the house. I never had to reboot it because of some failure.

      Not every cheap consumer router is shit. You don't need a $3K cisco for your home.

      --
      .sig: No such file or directory
    153. Re:The most likely reason by aetherworld · · Score: 1

      I own a Linksys RVS4000 which came with the newest firmware. I only update the IPS rules every few months (which doesn't require a restart) and never had a single problem with the device. Never had to reboot it either.

      Granted, the RVS4000 isn't exactly a "home" router but the price was fair and the feature-set fits my requirements.

      I use the DNS servers provided by my ISP and power surges/outages/fluctuations are extremely rare over here (Austria) so that might have something to do with it.

    154. Re:The most likely reason by kklein · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've never actually figured out why Linksys was supposedly so good. The Linksys WAP I had died and the router... Well, it somehow got under my boot repeatedly, a few days after randomly bricking and never coming back from any kind of reset. It worked for about one year.

      I use high-end Netgears, which seem to be rather unpopular, but I swear by them and I have my small-business clients on them as well. I love 'em. I don't think this one I have now has ever been rebooted.

    155. Re:The most likely reason by bensode · · Score: 1

      I've had a Buffalo AitStation for about 18 months now. It's been up since the day I bought it. I must admit that it sits on a cheap APC UPS and only supports 3 wired and 2 wireless connections. Not bad for a $29.99 router to be honest ...

      --
      "Keep at least 3-6 full bottles of hard alcohol on hand, a 2 week resignation notice,..." - Poetmatt
    156. Re:The most likely reason by StormyWeather · · Score: 1

      Plasma TV power supplies have the same problems. I work o

    157. Re:The most likely reason by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      I can't understand why, what I like to call, "the grandma scenario" is constantly being brought up here (my grandma can't use Openbox / my grandma can't compile shit in the command line / my grandma can't update her fucking firmware). did the OP imply he is technologically retarded and can't use more than the router equivalent of a fucking toaster? this is Slashdot, not tech-tips-for-fucking-lonely-housewives. try to keep some decency, I mean look at your UID, for FSM's sake man!

      Some of us have a lot of people we recommend hardware to. I do, and I don't mind. A simple question I can answer in 60 seconds. However, we do NOT want to be their tech support, configuring their routers and all of their other purchases because we have other things to do with our time. Or perhaps we aren't even in the same state (or country). Having suggestions for great off-the-shelf items is helpful.

      Oh, and by the way...when you have an issue with another poster's comments, try not to be such a prick about it.

    158. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the hardware... it's the generic crap software that they run on.

      Hear! Hear!

      About 6 years ago, I had the same frustrating experience with every embedded router available at that time. I kept taking them back and trying another. SMC, D-Link, Linksys, etc, etc - they all required rebooting, sometimes daily. I finally dedicated a system to the router/firewall task, loaded it with IPCop and haven't ever had to reboot the system except for software updates.

      About 2 years ago, I had a friend complaining about the same thing with his Linksys wrt54 (no idea what flavor). Based on my experience with IPCop, he loaded dd-wrt on it and hasn't rebooted since. He doesn't have any UPS or power conditioning for it.

      I think this is totally and solely the shit firmware they run. Why consumers continue to tolerate and buy this kind of crap is beyond me.

    159. Re:The most likely reason by cryptodan · · Score: 1

      I used to think D-Link routers were crap. Then I got a Linksys WRT54G, and my life went to hell. Constant lockups, power cycles, and constantly losing DNS service... It was batshit insane.

      And then my folks got a D-Link 605 (the draft-N one) from a copy of Vista, and I inherited it. My connection has been ROCK SOLID ever since, NEVER have to reboot that thing. Their firmware also does more than the WRT54G.

      In short, Linksys sucks, go D-Link.

      I had wanted to try D-Link routers for my Cable internet, and guess what 3 routers from Best Buy were DoA as some services worked and others wouldnt like out bound web traffic. I got a free replacement from Best Buy and I took a Linksys WRT54G, and all my issues went away. D-Link also runs embedded Windows OS on the American ones. On the foreign ones you can get either Linux or Windows on them. So please do more research. I always recommend Linksys WRT54x Series routers. They work and they are easy to configure as GEICO says: "Even a Cave Man can do it."

    160. Re:The most likely reason by cryptodan · · Score: 1

      Linksys is the one manufacturer that's on my "never" list. My previous employer used to use their hubs and cascaded them into a network switch. The darn things kept losing track of what MAC addresses were hanging off them and refusing to route traffic. You only have to have one complete and utter failure like that to be written off in my book.

      That said, I've recently also written off Netgear. After about my fourth or fifth Netgear card went dead (I think I have one left that is still functioning after three or four years), I started avoiding their cards like the plague. Then, I bought one of their consumer hubs a couple of months ago and it was dropping something like 80% of the packets that went through it (between any two devices including upstream). I took it back to Fry's and replaced it with a D-Link and it worked flawlessly. (And no, I didn't have something hooked up to the uplink and the non-uplink port beside it. Been there, done that.)

      Bottom line is that after three hard drive failures in the course of a little over a month (yes, I have a third Seagate drive misbehaving massively, randomly corrupting data), I've pretty much come to the conclusion that nearly all electronics built today are mass-Chinese-manufactured crap that barely works and doesn't even do that for very long. Very sad, really.

      Maybe its not the equipment, but rather user error causing all your issues. If you want good network equipment stay away from Hubs as they are pure crap. Get a good switch and youll never have issues. As far as your drivers go it could be various reasons from a bad SATA/IDE Port, Bad Cabling Practices, or low voltages.

    161. Re:The most likely reason by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      In other words, routers are now at the same stage PCs have been in for ages. They've evolved from appliances into versatile devices with the bulk of the functionality in software - and a lot of the software is crap.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    162. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't say "ALL", I use a cisco 678 dsl router and it only gets restarted if the power goes out, otherwise its up 24/7 and never has any problems.

    163. Re:The most likely reason by Andrew1963 · · Score: 1

      I have had trouble when my ISP changed my IP number (I'm on a dynamic IP but my router insists it is static ...)

    164. Re:The most likely reason by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 2, Informative

      My wrt54g V4 may be a 12w device, but the power brick it came with is less than 50% efficient.

      I went ahead and went with the VxWorks one for my mom. It comes with a much better switching supply. Hopefully it will work well for her.

    165. Re:The most likely reason by RalphSouth · · Score: 1

      Very good, ditto the mod points.

    166. Re:The most likely reason by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

      I have a WRT54GS (Firmware Version: 1.52.4) and it has very long uptimes - forced reboot every 3 months, maybe. And seems like the only times I need to boot it are right after a major storm comes through my area, so I've always assumed it had more to do with the cable modem getting into a funny state, but I bounce both anyway.

      Maybe I'm lucky, but I had the same experience with my WRT54G that I had before my GS, right down to the "reboot it after major storms" thing.

    167. Re:The most likely reason by cecil_turtle · · Score: 1

      For me on my Actiontec router (FiOS) it seems that DHCP response gets slower and slower over time until new machines time out their DHCP requests and can't get an IP, then I reboot the router and it's fine again.

    168. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you were daisy-chaining hubs? no wonder it wasn't satisfactory... the complete and utter failure is the design of that network, not the equipment's fault...

    169. Re:The most likely reason by nuintari · · Score: 1

      Its both, read my post again, I specifically mentioned the one with an "L" in the name. The WRT54GL is the re-release of the WRT54G version 4, which was the last good one Linksys made. The L series, and the version four have a faster proc, about twice as much memory, and more flash space than a version 5, 6 or 7. The L series also discards VXworks in favor of the older Linux firmware, which versions 1-4 also ran.

      On the new ones, it is the crap hardware and it is also the crap software. You can put DD-WRT on a WRT54gv7.... it will make it far more stable, but you are likely to run into memory issues if you use too many of the features at once.

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    170. Re:The most likely reason by doodleboy · · Score: 1
      me@home:~$ ssh -p 222 root@ipcop "uptime"

      root@ipcop's password:

      09:41:04 up 240 days, 7:07, 1 user, load average: 0.12, 0.07, 0.05

    171. Re:The most likely reason by nuintari · · Score: 1

      I work as the Network Admin for a small ISP, so my anecdotal evidence comes in piles.

      We get tons of complaints about Linksys routers, specifically later model WRT54G ones, as some of Linksys' other models are just fine. But the WRT54G is still the router the clowns at geek squad will recommend when asked, and people should listen, because those idiots clearly know more about networking than I do.

      I get almost no complaints about D-Link hardware issues, the only issue we do have, is most newer D-Link routers refuse to talk to the DHCP Server in a Motorola Canopy Subscriber Module. So those customers have to be walked through a setup. Which is a breeze, type in any D-Link router into google, with the word, "emulator" in the search.

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    172. Re:The most likely reason by north.coaster · · Score: 1

      What would be a reasonable value?

    173. Re:The most likely reason by johndmartiniii · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I just flashed dd-wrt micro onto a WRT54GS v6 (which doesn't have room for any of the other open firmwares) and it works really well. Even before that, though, the only time that the router ever got restarted was in the instance of a power outage. Try new firmware, if you can. Often it can turn any cheap router into a much better router.

      --
      If you don't know what you're doing, you can't make mistakes.
    174. Re:The most likely reason by nuintari · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mine is, I have a Soekris net4501 running OpenBSD 4.2. Nice and quiet, low power, high reliability. And the smallest CF I could find was a 1gig, so I have the entire installation, sans X on that puppy. Full support for VLANS, OSPF, Pf, the works. All in a small, quiet, low power, albeit ugly green case.

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    175. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't understand why, what I like to call, "the your mom scenario" is constantly being brought up here (your mom can't use Openbox / your mom can't compile shit in the command line / your mom can't update her fucking firmware). did the OP imply he is technologically retarded and can't use more than the router equivalent of a fucking toaster? this is Slashdot, not tech-tips-for-fucking-your-mom. try to keep some decency, I mean look at your UID, for FSM's sake man! why do cheap routers fail? well, here's a few tips: [they're like your mom] you paid shit for them, they're made of plastic and most of them are brightly coloured. (apologies for going somewhat offtopic and once again proving that slashdot is actually just a place for people to screw with other people)

    176. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that doesn't explain why time flies like an arrow.

    177. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Our WRT54G was on a line conditioning UPS. We replaced it with a dedicated Ubuntu Server machine to act as our router and haven't had any troubles since. An embedded device should have a watchdog to prevent power fluctuations from causing improper operation. I blame it on shitty engineering.

    178. Re:The most likely reason by Gim+Tom · · Score: 1

      I think this change happened in 2006 when I was looking for a router. All I could find locally were the WRT54G's that did NOT run Linux. I ordered a WRT54GL off the net -- it cost about $25 more at the time -- but it has been rock solid stable. Of course I locked down access, turned of UPnp etc. , but I was a paranoid Network Security Officer in my former life.

    179. Re:The most likely reason by aurispector · · Score: 1

      A little competition is great, isn't it? I was reluctant to go with RCN for the exact reasons you mention, but they really aren't bad. The channel selection is weaker, but we didn't use most of the stuff we lost.

      I doubt Verizon is going to have a monopoly anytime soon- in our area their prices were high enough to make me look elsewhere. Hell, I couldn't get anyone on the phone to answer questions about the FIOS. Old habits die hard for a for a former monopoly.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    180. Re:The most likely reason by termineite · · Score: 1

      I also had my router rebooted about once a week but since I've plugged everything into the UPS it keeps giving and giving...

      UPS the world!

    181. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then Linksys decided that quality wasn't nearly as important as driving me batshit insane

      Speaking for Linksys' Board of Directors, I'd like to make a public apology. We were all drunk one day, you see, just completely trashed in the boardroom and someone said "Hey, there's this guy named nuintari on Slashdot that's happy with our current consumer router line - let's fuck it up and drive him batshit insane!"

      A vote was taken, and, well, you know the rest.

      Not one of our better moments, I'm afraid.

    182. Re:The most likely reason by nuintari · · Score: 1

      Heh! I have doubleclick in mine, good idea on the intellitxt, also:

      zone "myspace.com" {
                      type master;
                      file "master/shit.zone";
      };

      zone "facebook.com" {
                      type master;
                      file "master/shit.zone";
      };

      My home network is untainted!

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    183. Re:The most likely reason by nuintari · · Score: 1

      Right about the time Cisco bought Linksys, and decided that they didn't want Linksys cheapos cutting into the SOHO market.

      Least, that has always been my theory.

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    184. Re:The most likely reason by mpe · · Score: 1

      I'm a network admin for an ISP, and we've been recommending UPSs for the frequent-reboot routers that our customers have. We've found that routers (especially Linksys) have a real problem with power fluctuations that most other systems and devices don't notice. A decent line-conditioning UPS might solve your problems, but a cheap one will suffice.

      Do these have "wall wart" PSUs? These things appear to be built as cheaply as possible, subject only to the conditions of not being likely to catch fire and being capable of powering the device some of the time.

    185. Re:The most likely reason by mrbooze · · Score: 1

      I've had quite a few different routers over the years, mostly Linksys but also one Netgear combo modem/router. The only time I've ever had to reboot one regularly was when I was running DD-WRT on one. When I switched that to Tomato the daily reboots stopped being necessary.

      But, I have pretty much always had my router powered through a decent UPS, so that indeed might be relevant.

    186. Re:The most likely reason by morari · · Score: 1

      Even before installing after market firmware, I never had to restart my WRT54G. If you have to restart your router every few days, I'd wager that something in is simply wrong, whether it be the setup or the user.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    187. Re:The most likely reason by msim · · Score: 1

      Smart arse muthafu

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
    188. Re:The most likely reason by mrbooze · · Score: 1

      My understanding of the DHCP protocol was that once a system has obtained a DHCP lease it is expected to keep that same IP address as long as it keeps requesting a lease renewal before the lease expires.

      It's not *guaranteed* that the IP address won't change, of course, but if AT&T is handing out different addresses every time a device reboots then that's not normal to me. Maybe they have an extremely short lease configured?

    189. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's versions above v4. V4 units had 4mb flash. V5 and above = 2mb flash...a damn shame.

      I have a WRT54GS v1 with 32mb ram and 8mb flash...probably the best router I've ever owned.

    190. Re:The most likely reason by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

      For the record... similar experience here.

      I bought a WRT54GS and kept it stock for a while. I think as I recall it was a version 4... the one with more memory. Anyway, I had some problems with it requiring occasional resets. More often than not it was the wireless that crapped, not the router itself... at least in my case. It was like the WAP would just suddenly vanish and I'd have to power-cycle to get it back.

      Eventually, because I got Vonage I wanted to implement some QoS rules which the stock firmware on the GS at the time didn't support. I hunted around and eventually put DD-WRT on the device... and voila! Currently, having just logged onto it for the first time in a while I see that my uptime is showing as 381 days. Pretty much once I'd configured it, I haven't had to mess with it since. Hmm... wonder if I should reboot it for old time's sake ;)

    191. Re:The most likely reason by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

      And right there we have the beauty of an OSS router OS that's under development by people who really understand what geeks want from their router! The ability to modify these sorts of things.

      Though just out of curiosity when I saw this post I just had to go check what I had mine set to. I never had a problem, but I figured it wouldn't hurt to try. Apparently when I configured it, I maxed it out at 4096... never had an issue :)

    192. Re:The most likely reason by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 1

      I too have observed this with most consumer routers. As a previous poster said, the older Linksys ones (which ran on Linux and had plenty of memory) didn't really have this issue. The majority of today's Linksys routers, however, run on VXWorks and don't have nearly enough memory. There are still Linux based ones available but they are more expensive and hard to find. On a side note, my roommate has a cheap D-Link wireless access point (not a router, just a wireless access point), and it has to be rebooted every 2-3 days. What I did to get rid of this "router rebooting" problem was build my own. Mini-ITX motherboard with dual NIC's, small slight-bigger-than-Gamecube sized case, gig of RAM, 160GB hard drive, minimal Gentoo installation (no X or anything like that). It runs headless and never reboots...I had a 1-year uptime on the thing before I had to move. It's back up to about 2 months now (updated the kernel 2 months ago shortly after I moved). I do run it on a UPS, also.

    193. Re:The most likely reason by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 1

      Interesting...dnsmasq could very well be the culprit there. I don't use it myself. Of course if you were using a Linux box as a router, you could just ssh in and restart dnsmasq, but on a standalone router that's hard to do unless you are using OpenWRT or something like that. I use a fully configured BIND and dhcpd setup on my router...even though BIND is probably overkill for a home network.

    194. Re:The most likely reason by ericferris · · Score: 1

      And that, boys 'n girls, is the difference between an amateur and a grizzled pro. A pro is always collecting war stories to add to his collection of "when things go wrong" tales. Because in this industry, experience is measured in the number of botched projects and boneheaded mistakes you survived.

      Since there are only so many blunders and disastrers you can get involved with and keep your job, you benefit greatly from the tales of disasters from other people.

      So, dgatwood, please do tell us your tale so that we all benefit. That way, your drives would not have died in vain. :-)

      --
      Fantasy: http://ferrisfantasy.blogspot.com/
    195. Re:The most likely reason by spazdor · · Score: 1

      It's tricky and can take some adjusting. A good place to start is around 2x or 3x as long as the highest latency spike you are likely to get in normal operation.

      If you'd rather not measure that, just start with 10 seconds and swubtract 2s a day until it gets unstable.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    196. Re:The most likely reason by mikkelm · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's the difference between people who make their jobs their lives, and people who don't. :) Enjoy your Sunday!

    197. Re:The most likely reason by eriklou · · Score: 1

      Yea we have the same problem but with power spikes (lightning) and the WRT54G's actually resetting them selfs..

    198. Re:The most likely reason by jnork · · Score: 1

      My experience has been different. DD-WRT on my Linksys fails more often than factory firmware on my Netgear.

      But this all gives me something to look into. Thanks, everybody.

      --
      Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
    199. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and by the way...when you have an issue with another poster's comments, try not to be such a prick about it.

      Don't worry, he does that all the time. Just take a look at his post history. And these kind of pricks even get modded insightful. I mean ok, this is slashdot. It's fine to bash Microsoft, the MAFIAA, the government, whatever. But it's not ok to bash each other. The true geek is helpful with his geek fellows. And even with his grandma.

    200. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ???? I have never heard of this. Have tried upgrading your firmware? Do that or get a new "router" (Actually nothing more than a glorified Switch with a cheap Wireless Access Point).

    201. Re:The most likely reason by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

      Let the fight begin:

      darkpixel@hoth:~$ ssh root@cortana.wifi.sq.local
      root@cortana.wifi.sq.local's password:

      BusyBox v1.00 (2007.01.30-11:42+0000) Built-in shell (ash)
      Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.

      (snip out OpenWRT logo because slashdot thinks I'm using too many junk characters)
      root@cortana:~# uptime
      18:26:41 up 242 days, 18:26, load average: 0.07, 0.03, 0.00
      root@cortana:~#

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    202. Re:The most likely reason by h4rdc0d3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      For me, it seems to depend on many factors. I have two WRT54G routers (pre vxworks switch) and I had the same rebooting problem. I switched to DD-WRT which helped for a while, then I began using BitTorrent frequently. This caused my router to get "bogged-down" and I had to start rebooting it again. A few months ago, I switched to the Tomato firmware and everything has been running perfectly. This firmware is much lighter and cleaner and over-all is just better than DD-WRT (which I used to swear by). Perhaps you should give it a try.

    203. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work tech support for an ISP, and so far everyone is right on the money.

      I would like to note it's not just Linksys (they have actually been pretty good in the past), Netgear brand is especially crappy, and I'd probably bet a little careful with the Belkin brand. D-link seems pretty reliable (relatively).

      Some things to keep in mind:
      - Check for power issues. Power drops are worse for your equipment than surges, and without a conditioner or UPS surge bars won't help.

      - HEAT. This is critical. Keep those things well ventilated with air moving over them. Linksys and Netgear are especially heat-sensitive, and it doesn't take a lot to burn one out.

      - It might not BE your router. It could be any one of the devices hooked up to your router with either a flaky NIC, or some traffic-based issue that is just simply overloading the router.
      If you are running wireless, it oould be RF interference from other routers or equipment like cordless phones/stereo speakers, HAM radios, etc. is breaking the connection. Test this by hooking up with a cable and see if it changes.

      I agree that the issue seems to stem primarily from DNS. We see a lot of people call in who can ping out by IP but not DNS, but we also see a lot of the wireless devices doing the 'connected/not connected' thing.

      I thank the real heart of the issue, is that you get what you pay for. If it's worth your while, you might consider looking into a more professional grade of device. We almost never have issues with corporate grade hardware. I think the SOHO hardware vendors are just trying to squeeze too much into too cheap of a package.

    204. Re:The most likely reason by yy1 · · Score: 1

      I find this is true for the Actiontec more for wireless connects than connects over the wired network. Putting another wireless router on helped alot. But still have to reboot it every so often.

      My Airport Express hardly ever needs a reboot however.

      --
      Because, sometimes they just have to touch the stove.
      -YY1
    205. Re:The most likely reason by jnork · · Score: 1

      I'll certainly look into it, thanks!

      Part of the reason I'm even using DD-WRT is that I inherited this Linksys with DD-WRT already installed. It seemed simplest to just upgrade and configure it. :)

      --
      Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
    206. Re:The most likely reason by BVis · · Score: 1

      If you don't want to be computer support for friends and family, DON'T.

      Personally I think it's Just Fine that people WITH knowledge have advantages over those that DON'T. It's called social Darwinism, and it's far too rare for my taste. It's not like someone will DIE because they have to reboot their routers too many times, and those of us with the technical knowledge to prevent such a scenario aren't in a position to enslave the rest. Those who lack knowledge can always LEARN, and if they're too lazy to do so, then that's their problem.

      The Grandma scenario can be avoided by answering every request for help with "Reboot the router" first and foremost. Eventually Grandma will figure out that that fixes the problem 85% of the time, you get fewer calls, and Grandma gets to see the pictures of her grandkids that she's looking to see.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    207. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a WRT54G on special and it failed within an hour.

      Replaced it with a WRT54GL - runs linux and has twice the RAM - and it stays up for months on end.

    208. Re:The most likely reason by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

      My cable modem, a Motorola SB5101 only gets cycled when I need to clean behind the bookcase it's on... And I got a Linksys BEFSX41 firewall router. Runs great, never needs cycling. Until I enable uPNP, then if I still have a connection it drops it for 2 mins ever 55-60mins.

      So much talk about wireless devices tho, I swear... Give me wires or give me death.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    209. Re:The most likely reason by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      Same here (a v.2 WRT54G running DD-WRT), and I don't think I've ever had to reboot it since the initial setup years ago.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    210. Re:The most likely reason by agoliveira · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with that. I have 2 WRT54G, one V3 and other V4 both running dd-wrt and apart from upgrading the software, they run 24x7, never requiring a reboot.

      --
      Scientia est Potentia
    211. Re:The most likely reason by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 1

      The only two options are A) get your hands on a rock solid router... as has been stated above, or build your own routing/NAT/firewall box using either Linux or BSD or some other Unix. When I was still in college Freesco was big (Free CISCO is what it stands for, it was a linux based router only distro that was about floppy sized and thus required little else.) I found Freesco to be remarkably useful for building small config boxes without having to do all the stripping down of a distro myself. All in all, a great setup... however not all users have either the knowhow, or the ability or desire to set aside time and learn how one's tools actually work or can be used.

      --
      " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    212. Re:The most likely reason by adolf · · Score: 1

      We use cheap Linux-based Linksys routers (old versions of WRT54G, or newer WRT54GL) where I work, for about 20 people over 5 locations.

      Things are, generally, fine. Other than an old copy of Alchemy being used on one of them for some basic QoS, they're all running Linksys firmware, and all have been fine.

      There was an issue with some of these, whereby the hardware would deadlock every now and then due to an obscure timing issue between the CPU and memory clocks, but that was fixed with by Linksys with firmware update (which slightly increased the CPU clock).

      Nobody has needed to mess with these guys since then. They are squarely in the category of things which Just Work(tm).

      At home, I've got a pair of them. One of them plugs into the cable modem, and runs X-WRT off of a 256MB SD card that I hacked into it one drunken night - it's perfectly stable aside from some recently-resolved issues with UPNP (and I can hardly blame Linksys for my custom firmware woes). The other runs DD-WRT, and is currently serving as a wireless client for a couple of Ethernet-connected devices. It works so well I might as well forget that it's there.

      Sorry about your luck. :)

    213. Re:The most likely reason by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 1

      Nope, nobody in my house used bittorent from home :)

      --
      " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    214. Re:The most likely reason by Mista2 · · Score: 1

      You get what you pay for. Our corporate wireless network has a guest channel we use which just has straight internet access. For this we use a 2MB DSL line and a cisco router with a DSL WIC in it. This has never needed rebooting, ever, but did cost a bunch of money (The router supports VLANS and QOS and so does other jobs too) My D-Link junk at home used to be reboot city, but I think that was line quality issues as the local exchange was upgraded and I now have to reboot only after my ISP throttles my link speed if I go over quota)

    215. Re:The most likely reason by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      The power-adapters shipping with most consumer-grade routers are crap too.
      Might help to simply get a regulated adapter.
      Most that come with routers are unregulated, so the voltage will vary depending on variation on the powerlines and current load.

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    216. Re:The most likely reason by adolf · · Score: 1

      I hope that's a typo: You do realize that running a 30-amp breaker with devices that are meant to plug into 15- or 20-amp outlets is completely and disastrously unsafe, yes?

      The 18 gauge wire which is common in IEC power leads in America fuses (ie: melts, burns) at just 82 amps. And make no mistake: It's completely possible to get that much current past a HACR-rated 30-amp circuit breaker, since those are designed to deal with short-term high-current situations like starting AC compressor motors.

      Therefore, if your power supply dead shorts its 18-guage power lead, you WILL almost certainly have a lovely plastic-fueled electrical fire in your computer room -- the wire will become the fuse instead of the circuit breaker. Chaos ensues.

      Again, I really hope it's a typo. If it is not a typo, please replace that 30-amp circuit breaker with a 20-amp breaker. You'll still have enough current available to run a shit-ton of consumer electronics, and you'll avoid burning your house down.

    217. Re:The most likely reason by Scuff · · Score: 1

      If all these drives are in the same system, you should be checking internal temperature and possibly the voltage coming out of your power supply.

    218. Re:The most likely reason by sciurus0 · · Score: 1

      No, the WRT54GL is a terrible deal. Compare its specifications to the similarly-priced Asus WL-500G Premium, for example. The Asus has a faster processor, twice the ROM, twice the RAM, and 2 USB ports.

    219. Re:The most likely reason by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

      I had a D-Link DI-524. If I enabled Wi-Fi and DHCP at the same time, I can look forward to device failure within hours. Firmware updates have not addressed this. It aggravates me to no end.

      It seems like routers, purpose-built with an embedded OS, should be the most stable devices on my network.

      Word to your mother.

      --
      Fnord.
    220. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if this is just a joke/troll, but I noticed suddenly my router box (linux running shorewall) would change the MTU of the internet interface from 1500 to 520 spontaneously, and this behavior started after I added a Vista laptop to the network.

      The symptoms were crappy "web 2.0" performance, most notably yahoo mail, and an inability to connect to XBox live.

      I suspected Vista was doing something weird, but the hard drive on the router fried before I could really figure out what was going on, and I haven't rebuilt it yet.

    221. Re:The most likely reason by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I bought a G125 (NO one around here stocks the WRT54GL) and have had nothing but problems since flashing it. I have problems where it reboots periodically, it drops idle telnet sessions (my SnapGear NEVER dropped connections!) and the pptp client sucks. I didn't have a problem with the frequent reboots with the stock firmware.

      The only reason I stick with the G125 is my SnapGear is an older model which is limited to 3.5Mbps on the WAN side. When I ran the SnapGear I never had a single problem with it aside from the limited bandwidth (the pptp connection would stay up for months, the telnet session would remain open for 100+ hours, erc). Ever.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    222. Re:The most likely reason by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Contrariwise, I do use Torrent (often with launchmany) and have never ever had to reboot a router.

    223. Re:The most likely reason by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      What version of the firmware? There has historically been a separate version specifically for that router and with the current one mine runs great.

      Perhaps the non-router specific version has issues?

      --
      Bottles.
    224. Re:The most likely reason by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Max TCP ports at 4096, Tcp/udp timeouts at 90.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    225. Re:The most likely reason by mrbcs · · Score: 1

      Your right, it was a typo. 20 amp circuit on 12 guage wire.

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    226. Re:The most likely reason by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      Interesting,
      I've always put that down to the ISP throttling the connection, maybe it's my router. I know a reboot restores my connection ...

    227. Re:The most likely reason by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      of the router _ sorry.

    228. Re:The most likely reason by jnana · · Score: 1

      There is more to buying a product that just the specs. Specs are definitely an important factor, but just as important to me are honest reviews such as those at newegg.com, price, reliability, etc.

      The Asus router you mention is $89.99 at newegg and has only 1 review (so I can determine nothing of its reliability). The WRT54GL is $61.99 (after $8 rebate) and has 1423 reviews (with close to a 5 star rating).

      The Asus is 45% more ((89.99 - 61.99)/61.99). That's a big difference. The specs say nothing about the reliability of the product. The reason I'm so happy with the WRT54GL is the reliability. I know that if I want a lot more software features I can easily install other firmware. A faster processor, twice the ROM and RAM, and 2 USB ports mean nothing to me, since they would have no noticeable effect on my experience of the product. And there's a non-trivial chance that the Asus would turn out not to be as rock-solid reliable. For me, there is no question as to which is the better deal.

    229. Re:The most likely reason by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. I can log into my modem right now and check the signal level. The thing is, they don't know if I have 50 radioshack splitters rigged up in my basement, so they have to send someone to check. But yes my ISP does blow. You may recognize them -- they recently signed on with NebuAd and it took the threat of a congressional investigation to get them to knock it off (that is, wait till no one's looking to try again).

    230. Re:The most likely reason by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Add a digital power scheduling module to the outlet. 10 dollars, and you can automatically power cycle once per week at an innocuous time. The digital scheduling will let you have as little as 5 seconds of downtime on the power line.

    231. Re:The most likely reason by TENTH+SHOW+JAM · · Score: 1

      The other thing I have observed is a simple overheating problem when using intensive Wifi for extended periods. 4 hours of solid bittorrents tends to do evil things to my router.

      I keep meaning to stick a heatsink and a fan on processors to see if this improves.

      --
      A sig is placed here
      To display how futile
      English Haiku is
    232. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe arrows are delicious and nutritious . . . TO A TIME FLY!!

    233. Re:The most likely reason by Atti+K. · · Score: 1

      +5 Insightful.

      --
      .sig: No such file or directory
    234. Re:The most likely reason by Atti+K. · · Score: 1
      The ASUS WL500gP is rock-solid reliable, believe me. I can't say anything about the ASUS firmware, as I've ran it only for about an hour, but with OpenWrt, this IS THE wifi router. Twice the ROM and twice the RAM mean that, you can install more additional software, and run more services simultaneously on it. And the two USB ports mean that you can hook up your printer, USB drive, webcam, audio stuff, whatever you can hook up to USB and OpenWrt has support for, and share them out. I also used it to download torrents and stuff from eDonkey to a hooked up USB HDD all day long (why keep the PC powered up just for downloading). Also, WiFi performance is comparable to the WRT54GL. All in all, the WL500g is a very good deal and I can recommend it to everyone, especially if they want to play around with OpenWrt and the like.

      If this router is not stable out of the box, it means that ASUS's firmware is crap. Because the hardware is more than decent.

      --
      .sig: No such file or directory
    235. Re:The most likely reason by Genocaust · · Score: 1

      Mine sits next to me. A Linksys WRT54GL, the good model, with good (3rd party) firmware.

      Firmware: DD-WRT v23 SP2 (09/15/06) std Time: 18:27:20 up 353 days, 14:30, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00

      I had internet troubles one day and called the cableco (TW) and they had me cycle my modem after it lost sync to the signal it was locked on, and were rather shocked when they noticed it had > 240 days uptime before I cycled it. They wanted me to do the router too, but no dice, and it's still working with zero issues :).

      2xVista Desktops, 1xXP Laptop, 1xDebian Server, 1xSmartphone

      --
      It could be that the only purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others.
    236. Re:The most likely reason by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      How many times did you reboot? You need to reboot the router three times.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    237. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UPS also solved my problem of having to power cycle the router every few days.

    238. Re:The most likely reason by pburdine · · Score: 1

      I see the DNS issue fail about once every 3 months on my linksys wrt54g. Its very odd, rebooting it doesn't help.

      I have to restore factory default settings on the damn thing to make it work again. This means I lose all of the wireless settings, encryption keys, mac filters, etc.

    239. Re:The most likely reason by algae · · Score: 1

      Servers you right for getting a D-Link. Worst. Home networking kit. Ever. Did you do it to save the $10 over a Netgear or Linksys, or did you fall for the "super-high-speed pre-release 118Mb wireless that will never work with anything else on the market"?

      --
      Causation can cause correlation
    240. Re:The most likely reason by runningduck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I found the Fit-PC to be the best and easiest solution for this sort of thing. It consumes less than 5watts, has 2 100meg interfaces, dual boots Ubuntu and Gentoo, and is very hack friendly. I turned off video, send syslog to may vhost, turned off my hard drive and throttled down my CPU and am now consuming a bit over two watts. It runs like a champ, consumes almost now power and it is so good to be able to have the flexibility of a full Unix-like box again.

      --
      -rd
    241. Re:The most likely reason by Stone316 · · Score: 1

      The only time I ever need to reboot my router is after a power spike/outage. Actually, reboot doesn't even work.. I have to reset it to factory defaults and re-set it up. Most of the features still work, ie basic networking, but if you redirect ports to certain computers on your network (ie, hosting a website) then that no longer works.

      Next time a UPS goes on sale i'm going to pick up one for the router.

      --
      "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    242. Re:The most likely reason by dfn_deux · · Score: 1

      Marching out your professional qualifications doesn't change the content of the message. I too work for an ISP, a LARGE one... Some equipment works better for some people and some situation more than others. I recommend the linksys models with dd-wrt to my friends and family and I've met nothing but success and like I mentioned earlier I've had nothing but sour experiences with d-links. Again its anecdotal evidence in both cases and it should be taken as just that. I don't think your particular station in life has much bearing on the situation, especially as you presumably only work for one ISP you experience with one piece of equipment over another is still going to be limited to it's interoperability with what ever upstream equipment your particular ISP employs. Each situation has different circumstances...

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    243. Re:The most likely reason by pthisis · · Score: 1

      Amen. I have a WRT54G, and it's been rebooted whenever the power goes out and that's it in 3 years.

      I'm not sure _why_ some people feel the need to reboot them more often--they may actually need to do so. But it's not an intrinsic thing that all users need to do.

      FWIW our internal network is 2 Windows desktops (upgraded about 4 months ago), a Windows laptop, a Linux desktop (still running an ancient Redhat release from before Fedora existed) and an Ubuntu Gutsy laptop.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    244. Re:The most likely reason by nuintari · · Score: 1

      Please do not put words in my mouth, it is very fucking rude. I never tried to use my station in life, or shouting out my qualifications as some kind of excuse. Just pointing out that, because of my line of work, I am exposed to a huge quantity of anecdotal situations, and regardless of the CPE, the worst router I have ever seen consistently is the WRT54G. Sure slopping DD-WRT on them does make them _much_ better, but that wasn't the point of my statements, and it is not a valid option for 99% of end users.

      And my ISP deploys about 7 different kinds of CPEs, depending on the service type. WRT54Gs has been used on the customer end of all of them, and I have gotten nasty phone calls about all those situations. Anecdotal? Sure, but there is a fucking pile of it.

      Also, just go read linksysinfo.org, read WHY the WRT54Gv5 through v7 are all fucking pieces of shit. It isn't anecdotal, there are some very solid reasons why so many people have these issues.

      Sure, I am seeing this all from my network's point of view, but, I am the admin, all these customer complaint reports go across my desk, and I am asked to figure out why there are so many, all the same. So, I did research, I found answers.

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    245. Re:The most likely reason by nuintari · · Score: 1

      That is a factor I hadn't considered, my ISP does service a lot of older homes in the country that lack air conditioning.

      I've personally never had much heat issues with anything I use, but I do like it very cold. I keep the thermostat at 65 in my house during the winter months. And all that money I save on natural gas during the winter I blow running the AC non-stop in the summer. Probably why I rarely think of it as an issue in my professional adventures.

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    246. Re:The most likely reason by stmfreak · · Score: 1

      DD-WRT has an option to reboot daily. Which I use because that helped the stability problems immensely. Prior to that scheduled early morning reboot, I would lose the DHCPD service on the router causing clients to sort of "lose it" over the next 36 hours. Rebooting the wrt54g brought dhcpd back online and thus allowed clients to reconnect.

      Now I run dhcpd from a linux server along with dns and nat, etc. The router is just a dumb WAP and I still have to cold reboot it every month or so. What do you expect for $100?

      FYI, I have the same problem with my Apple Airport Express.

      --
      These opinions guaranteed or your money back.
    247. Re:The most likely reason by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I'm using the router-specific build and although later builds up through the general release (DD-WRT v24 (05/24/08) vpn - build 9526 ) have had fewer issues with each build, the problems I'm seeing aren't resolved. If it weren't for the limited bandwidth I'd switch back to the SnapGear (which is enterprise quality) and start using the Buffalo just as a WAP again.

      Right now uptime is 3 days, 21:34 but I was away all weekend and aside from sshing in a few times during the weekend and after I got back reading my email and posting here today I haven't used it much. It's the longest uptime I've seen with dd-wrt.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    248. Re:The most likely reason by lasse_2 · · Score: 1

      Agree.. I switched my ISP some last year and got an NEC router (since I live in Japan), and only had to reboot by router 3 times in one year.

      Before when I had Linksys WRT54G i had to reboot it often.

      I will NEVER buy any Linksys products afain.

      Lars

    249. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been running version 5 for about three years now and only needed to reboot it a handful of times. It runs 24/7, but I'm not a heavy Internet user (rarely use bitorrent, but I do occasionally stream audio & video).

    250. Re:The most likely reason by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      The first one was in a MythTV box. Bursts of continuous I/O with long periods of inactivity in between. Two fans pulling air from outside the machine and blowing it at full blast right across the top and bottom of the drive.... Failed after about ten months of use with a head crash. Walked into my house one night and heard the infamous chainsaw-of-death sound.... Cloned the data off to another drive. Lost a few blocks in the media partition, but no big deal.

      The second one was in a laptop. Failed after about ten months with click-of death. That one hurt a bit more.

      Third was in the MythTV box. The drive was used for about two weeks in my TiVo, but kept causing it to reboot and it wouldn't boot successfully about 90% of the time (but behaved flawlessly in a FIreWire case), so I swapped back to the previous drive, assuming the misbehavior was the fault of the somewhat ancient ATA chipset in the old S1 TiVo. Well, when I swapped it in as a place to dump a clone of the first Seagate 500 GB drive, I quickly got the MythTV back up and running, but after three weeks of use, it started misbehaving massively. Daemons and libraries started randomly failing. I'd copy in replacements from another machine and then something else would break. This kept happening for three days before I realized that the drive was just randomly corrupting data during reads.... I think I finally have that machine working again after cloning it off to the replacement SATA drive (which I got back from Seagate last week)....

      Three different models of drives, three radically different failure modes.

      Been that kind of year.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    251. Re:The most likely reason by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Positive. One of those was in a laptop, so it is unrelated to the other two. The others had two fans blowing air from outside the machine right across the drive. The two drives were identical except that one was SATA, so given that one worked perfectly (until it started making noises like a chainsaw), it's safe to say that the power supply isn't the issue, and since the second Seagate drive (random data corruption with no errors reported) also misbehaved in my TiVo (whose power supply voltage I adjusted myself), I'm pretty sure that the drive has issues.... :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    252. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the same problems with my netgear WGR614 v5... I don't know what caused the problem exactly but I had to do a daily power cycle to get my computers to connect to the net again. Then I bought a cheap UPS ($40) and haven't had to reset it since.

    253. Re:The most likely reason by dfn_deux · · Score: 1

      Take a shower or something man, for someone trying to present an argument as being objective you sure seem awful wrapped up in arguing against what I posted... Reread it, different stuff may work better or worse in different situations. If you are going to say that isn't a true statement.. well I'm glad I don't work with you.

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    254. Re:The most likely reason by kwanbis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the WRT54GL (L=Linux) is the way to go.

    255. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a version 6 WRT54G, running the latest firmware, and haven't had ANY issues that require me to reboot the router. Of course, I do not have the device directly connected to an external modem either.

    256. Re:The most likely reason by chrisvdp74656 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised nobody's made a Candlejack refere

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    257. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I have a 1.1, which I didn't even know until right now (checked the sticker), and I don't think I've rebooted that thing once in the entire time I've owned it. ...
      But I didn't realize there were such problems with version 4 and above.

      Up to V4 is fine, version 4 is also Linux-based. It's V5 and up that are bad. They're night and day bad... seriously.

                I have a version 2.2, it's great like yours. Stock firmware was good, I have DD-WRT on it now and it's also good.
                I got a V5 for my parents -- crap! Locked up like 10 times within an hour, was buggy so a few wireless devices would not associate with it, lost settings, and so on. I took it back the next day and returned it. The person at the store was very confused, pointed out how great the WRT54G is. I was like "Well, the WRT54G *was* great but the version 5 is a different beast.. believe me you're going to get a lot of returns on these new ones." I guess the newer firmware for it is "better" but still unstable. Oddly, you can get a mini-DD-WRT, flash it in, and it's as stable as the V4 and older... but Linksys keeps using their "new" firmware in these units. I guess this is due to Linksys being bought by Cisco, I think Cisco is intentionally worsening the Linksys, trying to cannibalize it's sales to increase Cisco sales.

    258. Re:The most likely reason by SgtSnorkel · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I too often DON'T get what I pay for -- that's partly why I've become such a cheap SOB.

    259. Re:The most likely reason by empaler · · Score: 1

      Don't really follow that much the American ISPs, as I live in Denmark, but I've worked for three ISPs so far - two of the delivering, in part, through cable modems. Incidentally, my current employer is renting office space from the danish branch of Verizon Wireless... xD

    260. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Panamax surge strips? Does that mean that the surge strips are the maximum size that can fit through the Panama canal?

    261. Re:The most likely reason by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

      Whoa, skipper, reign in the nerd rage. I got it as part of a package that I bartered an old CRT for. It worked fine as an extra ethernet hub, but then I tried to hook a neighbor up on a wireless network for some Starcraft action. I just ended up creating another subnet on my dev system.

      --
      Fnord.
    262. Re:The most likely reason by valhallaprime · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like you need to finally move that huge magnetron out of your office. Find better ways to heat your space.

    263. Re:The most likely reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm a lolcat you insensitive clod!

    264. Re:The most likely reason by dwater · · Score: 1

      I used DD-WRT on my 54G. I had to 'restart' it every now and again because it's web server would 'lock up'.

      'restart' could be a real restart, or I could ssh in and kill httpd
      'lock up' is httpd using 100% CPU and not responding to http clients

      I think there's been an update since then, but I haven't had the change to update. I think I was running v23 or something...looking, it seems v24 is there, which I hope will fix this.

      --
      Max.
    265. Re:The most likely reason by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I have used a variety of the SpeedTouch routers (I won't even get into the calling them "MODEM" thing 'cause, well, it is way too early here) and they DO actually do a great job. They run very hot in some instances and, my observation is, they suck with dealing with dirty power. When they start to brown out they fail - we went through a few of them here. I'm currently using a Westel (spelling?) that I pulled off a customer site to replace with their Wal-Mart purchase that they felt was better. Irony? They are still using that same modem but, as a person above mentioned, they're doing so with an APC UPS. THe current Westel runs like a champ and the configuration is a wee bit lacking but is actually all I need.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    266. Re:The most likely reason by sjmac · · Score: 1

      Yup, I get that - internal network name lookup starts to fail, IP addresses are fine; reboot the router fixes the problem.

      Happens every few weeks/months.

      The router is a Billion 7404VGO - don't know what the OS is, but it isn't Linux. It's easier to do the off and on again than to jump through the flaming hoops of persuading tech support to report it as a bug, especially as it's only very recent firmwares that have allowed internal name lookups anyway!

    267. Re:The most likely reason by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 1

      Seriously, it sounds like the power in your house is not clean. When I used to work as a field tech at a university, there was on old building on campus that we knew had bad power problems, and the MTBF for any device in that building was significantly lower than the rest of campus. By far the worst, though, was the networking equipment and hard drives.

    268. Re:The most likely reason by Wonko · · Score: 1

      You're doing it wrong.

      That's terribly likely. Within short distance here I have 2 WRT54GL routers running Openwrt and OpenVPN. The one in this house currently claiming 246 days of uptime. That number actually surprises me greatly, I'd be willing to chalk it up to some sort of clock issue but I certainly don't remember the last time we actually power cycled it.

      The one on the other end of the tunnel has an uptime of 27 days, I remember that it restarted during a power blip.

      During my last job I deployed over 20 of these same routers running OpenVPN. Most of the offices had huge uptimes. The less stable offices had flaky internet connections (you get what you pay for, I suppose). In those offices, the VPN would sometimes drop overnight and not be able to reconnect without restarting OpenVPN. The nice ladies in the office would power cycle the router to make that happen. :)

      I don't recall if/how we fixed the VPNs in those offices.

      I do recall that a stock firmware on the WRT54GL (or G < v 5.0) has ridiculous settings ip_conntrack settings. I recall it being very easy for p2p apps to fill up the table and tie up any future NATed connections.

    269. Re:The most likely reason by Ares · · Score: 1

      My previous employer used to use their hubs and cascaded them into a network switch. The darn things kept losing track of what MAC addresses were hanging off them and refusing to route traffic.

      Aside from what others have posted about using hubs, going stupid about MAC addresses is not the fault of the hubs; they simply repeat the traffic they receive to all their ports. The switches are what keep tabs on what MAC's are hanging off of which ports.

    270. Re:The most likely reason by slashgrim · · Score: 1

      sadly, building one's own embedded router costs at least $150-200, whereas buying a Netger/D-link/Linksys is what $40...besides, who _needs_ wireless at home?

    271. Re:The most likely reason by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      The few wall warts I've poked around with were just a little transformer and a rectifier/cap: no attempt at active regulation. I've started building my own on fussy things, using a wart rated 3v or so higher and a linear regulator soldered to a small bit of copper sheet for a heatsink, with a 1000uF cap across the linear's output. Overkill, but for $7 worth of parts I don't ever have to worry about the quality of the output again.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    272. Re:The most likely reason by Scorchio · · Score: 1

      Ah, another of life's mysteries is solved!

      I kept running into problems with what seemed like our internet connection disappearing. At first, I assigned the blame on Time Warner, as their track record isn't exactly stunning. However, once I noticed that the admin page on the router would be either extremely slow or not responding at all, I realized the problem was with the router itself. I didn't understand exactly what was going wrong, though, but your explanation makes complete sense.

    273. Re:The most likely reason by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      If you have a router that can either use DD-WRT, or has something along the lines of (probably in advanced settings) "Connection Timeouts", or similar to what I'm saying, that'll reduce the problem, if not eliminate it. DD-WRT isn't immune either, it just has a far more sane default (sometimes the default can be up to a week. Alternatively, connection limiting in a Torrent client will have the same effect.

    274. Re:The most likely reason by CottonThePirate · · Score: 1

      I have to agree, I have a D-link ultra extreme speedboost plus extra intense extreme rangeboost 4,000 router that I put in my attic. I've never rebooted it, it's on for months at a time between power glitches with no problems. Maybe it's all those extremes (pardon me X-tremes) that they put on the package.

    275. Re:The most likely reason by FauxReal · · Score: 1

      My off hand guess, Bittorrents. I've noticed with the WRT54G that I had for a while would have problems if you're running multiple torrents, and don't have any cap on how many inbound and outbound connections there can be (IE, overnight runs where you don't need to use any of your bandwidth :-) A reboot always fixed the problem - I assume it's either running out of memory, or running out of ports to work with (since each connection has a timeout of an hour, IIRC)

      Here's the issue that causes that. http://utorrent.com/faq.php#Special_note_for_users_with_Linksys_WRT54G_GL_GS_routers

      The default firmware for Linksys (and all replacement firmwares except for one) have a severe problem where they track old connections for FIVE days, which causes the router to hang when using P2P apps, or any software that generates a lot of connections. DHT only aggravates the situation because of the number of connections it generates.

      I updated my DD-WRT firmware to the newest one and set the the TCP timeout to 300 and things seem fine now.

    276. Re:The most likely reason by ab762 · · Score: 1
      That's an interesting thought. By hypothesis, these reboots are covering up a resource-starvation/exhaustion situation. Fine-tuning the limits and timeouts presumably heads this off. Add more memory could also prolong the time between failures (but is likely hard). Since many of these are little Linux systems, does anyone have any experience getting some kind of kernel stats out of them?

      My Linksys router is on a UPS, and will sometimes go for three or more months without a reboot. My DSL modem, also on a separate UPS, is a bit more likely to lose its PPPoE connection and require a reboot, every month or so. Whether that's my Thompson modem or the telco DSLAM is an open question. I know my power is quite dirty, hence the UPSes.

    277. Re:The most likely reason by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I disabled uPnP on my ancient Linksys about two months ago and haven't had to reboot it since. My throughput is far more consistent, too.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    278. Re:The most likely reason by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      I have the stanadard (std) release instead of the vpn edition.

      If you dont need those extra functions, it might be worth a shot to try standard and see if it fixes the problems.

      --
      Bottles.
    279. Re:The most likely reason by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the delay. I don't know the actual feature name. I first learned about Panamax during a dog and pony they did for us as a college I used to work for. They took half a dozen of our old surge strips, even some from production gear, on the promise that they'd replace them with new units. They explained a bit about the architecture inherent in most surge strips, about the pot that can only take a single surge before it's burnt out, leaving the device after that point to be nothing more than a receptacle expansion unit. They had a nifty briefcase rig that took in 110v from 2 different circuits (trial and error to get opposing 110v legs). It had a built in circuit breakers. They briefcase had a simple light fixture base attached to it. They added a 100w build and flipped the breaker for 110v, just to show that it would work. Then they added the second 110v leg and the bulb got real bright. Then they disconnected the lamp fixture's cord from the briefcase and hooked up one of our surge strips inline between the bulb and briefcase. They repeated the test. 110v, just fine. They flicked on 220v and not a single one of our surge strips popped. Come to find out that they all already had been popped through normal use and no one knew it. The APC surge strip actually melted down in front of our eyes. Nice. Then they hooked up the Panamax. I forget to mention earlier that they had a simple voltage meter in the rig as well to give us some visual output. Anyway they did the same test and the instant the 220v was flicked on the Panamax cut out. They had a dial in the chassis as well, on the second 110v leg. A reostat or something like that (I've forgotten most of my component electronic knowledge I'm sorry to say). They started cranking up the voltage until the Panamax cut out. I forget the exact number but it was something like 135v and it cut out. They disconnected the first 110v leg and started back the second leg down from 110v and it cut out at around 95v. Slick. Anyway, that's the premise behind their gear. It cuts out before it burns something out. I've been impressed with their gear and have their units all over my house. You can find more models that they've discontinued online too.

    280. Re:The most likely reason by xalorous · · Score: 1

      Linksys is not and has never been, IMO, suitable for use in anything larger than a home office. For hobbyists they're fun. For setting up networks for other people they're fine. Basically, any use where you plug it in, set the config and walk away.

      Cascading Linksys hubs. Brrr. Failure.

      Cisco bought Linksys. Hopefully, they'll improve the quality control. For business purposes, buy Cisco or one of their direct competitors. The quality level, in the end, will save you money.

      --
      TANSTAAFL GIGO Acronyms to live by!
  2. USR8054 by NFN_NLN · · Score: 5, Funny

    US Robotics 8054 (USR8054). At least it has the decency to reset itself though throughout the day. Saves some manual labor I suppose.

    1. Re:USR8054 by Clived · · Score: 1

      Hmmn

      I have a linksys wrt54g router. The only time i had to reboot it was when my ISP was screwing around with an ADSL2 upgrade and they kept disconnecting me. Now that they seem to have figured that out .. finally My two bits. I haven't had to restart my router in like 3 months ...:P

      My two bits

      --
      Clive DaSilva Email: clive.dasilva@gmail.com Ubuntu 18.10 Kernel 4.18
    2. Re:USR8054 by Ignis+Flatus · · Score: 1

      US Robotics 5461 here. It rarely needs a reboot, maybe once a month or so.

    3. Re:USR8054 by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I have the same router. Never had it reboot on itself. At least not that I noticed. There is one problem I do have with it though. If I leave the WiiConnect 24 on, it craps out and requires a reboot after a few hours for any other wireless devices to connect.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:USR8054 by peragrin · · Score: 1

      I have to restart it maybe 3 times a year, usually when my cable modem drops, or is acting up. IE just the other night service to my area went down and after it came back up I had to reboot the damn thing to get it working once again.

      the only other time it falters is when it is 95 outside, and it heats itself up to the point of crashing. that happens maybe once a year.

      As long as both the modem, and the router are chugging alone they are happy if one drops oddly it takes the other with it usually.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    5. Re:USR8054 by themoneyish · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean U.S. Robotics?

      If you lived in Chicago (like I do), you would know that Will Smith is always there to shut down all the USRs. Or at least find a USR to do it for him.

      Oh never mind, I hear he's a super hero now.

    6. Re:USR8054 by socsoc · · Score: 1

      It's only 95 once a year where you're at? Goodness friend, I'm moving there!

    7. Re:USR8054 by peragrin · · Score: 1

      yea but we measure snow in feet or meters

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    8. Re:USR8054 by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Same for my Trendnet TEW-432BRP. Quite often it does this in the middle of a game or a multi-gig download (or maybe that's the only time I notice.)

      Oh and I also have to set up a continuous ping to the router, or it randomly kills active connections within a minute or two. Not good for watching streaming anything.

  3. rebooting routers? by zeropointburn · · Score: 2, Informative

    It shouldn't be necessary to do that.
    Usually, though, it would be either a problem in the firmware leading to instability or a change in routing, DNS, or DHCP assignments that the router can't handle live for some reason. It could also be possible that the firmware allows no changes at all to the running configuration, forcing a restart for any change made in an attempt at making it less hackable.

    --
    -1 raving lunatic; +6 subGenius... Things even out...
    1. Re:rebooting routers? by slashtivus · · Score: 1

      Replying to you since there does not seem to be a better place to make a post :p. I've got a crappy 'Dynex' router. I have not needed to power it down in 18 months. It refuses to talk with the cable modem so I plugged directly into my computer NIC, and got all the info needed (including NIC UID). I then set it to be static for DNS, gateway, etc etc. I realize that if my IP changes I would have to re-set all of that, but I leave my computer online 24/7 so my IP address keeps renewing itself to the same one. Might not work for everyone, but seems to be working well enough for me. Cheers.

    2. Re:rebooting routers? by Dan541 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It could also be possible that the firmware allows no changes at all to the running configuration, forcing a restart for any change made in an attempt at making it less hackable.

      That's just stupid.

      Honestly, who sacrifices convinience for security?

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    3. Re:rebooting routers? by crossmr · · Score: 1

      forcing a restart for any change made in an attempt at making it more annoying./blockqouote
      Fixed that for you.
      I love linksys but I want to strangle them every time I try to forward a new port and have to restart the router. Typical scenario is:
      "I just installed a new app that apparently needs a port forwarded"
      "I could do that but I would have to interrupt what everyone else using the internet is doing to reset it"
      "Screw 'em I never liked them anyway"

      It really doesn't change what I do, but it does make me appear like more of a jerk.

    4. Re:rebooting routers? by empaler · · Score: 1

      Also, how does restarting it after changing configs make it less hackable?

  4. My theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I base this on absolutely nothing, but my primary suspect is the cheapskate power supplies that these devices come with. However I've never cared enough to test it out.

    1. Re:My theory... by AimHere2000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I base this on absolutely nothing, but my primary suspect is the cheapskate power supplies that these devices come with. However I've never cared enough to test it out.

      I think you're right. This seems to be especially common on D-Link routers. I used to run a DI-624 which was stable for years, until one day it just started rebooting itself. Did it infrequently at first, but progressed to the point where it rebooted continuously and was unuseable. Poking around, I discovered that the AC adapter (power brick) was not only VERY warm, the plastic shell was actually deformed a little on one side. I replaced the AC adapter, and the router worked good as new... until a few years later, when AGAIN it started rebooting, then stopped working entirely. And AGAIN, the AC adapter was at fault (totally dead this time). And again, replacing the AC adapter resurrected the DI-624.

      It seems to me that the manufacturers of residential-class routers really skimp on the power supply, or at least D-Link does. The AC adapters they've bundled in recent years are smaller than a deck of cards, yet I'm supposed to believe that they can put out 3 amps of current at 5VDC indefinitely?

    2. Re:My theory... by Cramer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The AC adapters they've bundled in recent years are smaller than a deck of cards, yet I'm supposed to believe that they can put out 3 amps of current at 5VDC indefinitely?

      Yes and no. Yes, a power supply the size of 2 US quarters can (and does) generate stable 5VDC@3A forever provided you never exceed specs (lightning, bath tubs, overheating, etc.) However, these things cost more than the pennies cheap hardware makers are willing to put into the process. They go as cheap as possible... huge coil of chinese wire (read: transformer), a diode, capacitor, and regulator (ala 7805) (if it's a "good" one.) [Note: most cheap hardware has the regulator in the unit, not the wall-wart.] [Note 2: USR/3com is even cheaper... the wall-wart is 100% transformer. It turns 120AC into 20AC.]

    3. Re:My theory... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      The AC adapters they've bundled in recent years are smaller than a deck of cards, yet I'm supposed to believe that they can put out 3 amps of current at 5VDC indefinitely?

      That's only a max of 15 watts, which isn't much, particularly because the things are switchers, not linear supplies. Besides, it's not the size, it's the fact that they use cheap-ass parts.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:My theory... by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Here's an idea:

      It shouldn't be that hard to wire up a simple resistive 15W load to one of these cheap power supplies.

      Connect a multimeter/oscilloscope, and take a look at what sort of signal it's putting out.

      To take it a step further, connect the input of the cheapo power supply to a benchtop supply capable of putting out a "clean" 120VAC signal, and start fucking around with it. How high/low can you go before the supply's output is degraded? Remember that even a "good" mains supply can vary by up to ±10%.

      I'd rather do things scientifically than recommend that all router users purchase a UPS that will likely cost more than the router itself. I've found router power supplies to be unusually subpar. However, there's an extremely fine line between the amount of voltage required to make the router unstable, and the amount required to fry the thing. I really doubt that slight fluctuations in the input voltage are causing the routers to become unstable because of this, or that a UPS could solve the problem. A better suggestion would simply be to replace the DC power supply with a more robust one.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    5. Re:My theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AC adapters they've bundled in recent years are smaller than a deck of cards, yet I'm supposed to believe that they can put out 3 amps of current at 5VDC indefinitely?

      That's because modern power bricks use a switch-mode power supply to step down the voltage instead of a transformer. The transformer constituted the bulk of the size/weight of those old school power bricks.

    6. Re:My theory... by mako1138 · · Score: 1

      You've got me scared now. I have a DI-524 that I'm going to check for meltedness...

    7. Re:My theory... by andersbergh · · Score: 1

      Wow, I had the exact same issue with my DI-624+. It was awful, so we replaced it with an old Pentium 2 computer running Linux and I haven't looked back.

    8. Re:My theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They all do it, Linksys, D-Link, Belkin, Netgear. Netgear are really cheap pieces of crap, if you have one that works than good for you. I used to have great luck with Linksys, but in the last 6 months I had to replace mine 4 times so I ditched them and went to D-link.
      On a side note, my version 1.1 linksys wrt54g is still rocking out non-stop, no problems, and it's almost 6 years old now- the only issue is that the uplink is only at 10 meg.

      I think you are somewhat right, the power supply is a big part of the issue.

      All in all, you get what you pay for. If your router is resetting itself then get a decent UPS and if that doesn't help, get a better router.
      And I don't mean go to Wal-Mart and spend $120 on a 'gaming' router they are't any better. Get a real pro router or dedicate an old computer with a decent switch to be your router instead.

    9. Re:My theory... by PipsqueakOnAP133 · · Score: 1

      I'll back you up.
      A used Linksys router was given to me. It boots up only like once every 20 power cycles but will stay working for months if it boots up.

      After a power outage, I noticed the power supply makes a weird buzzing noise. So I cracked the power supply open to find that one of the large capacitors is burned out. Replaced the power supply with another one and the router has been rock solid.

    10. Re:My theory... by Lihtan · · Score: 1

      I've had a DI-704P that I've used for years that started becoming flaky, which also turned out to be the AC adapter running toO hot and beginning to fail. I fixed this for good by chopping the cord off, and soldering it to the power output of an old power supply I harvested from a Mac LC475. The power supply has enough capacity to run two routers, and the metal case is barely a degree or two warmer than ambient despite not having any kind of cooling fan.

      --
      Divide by zero hurts my brain.
    11. Re:My theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is good to know. I was given a DI-624 about three years ago when I signed up with Verizon and it's been rock solid. It my not have QoS, but I'd hate to lose it. I'm going to remember this if I one day start having issues.

    12. Re:My theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AC adapters they've bundled in recent years are smaller than a deck of cards, yet I'm supposed to believe that they can put out 3 amps of current at 5VDC indefinitely?

      Yup, thanks to the magic of switching power supplies you dinosaur!

  5. Because they are cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fast, Stable, Cheap - pick two.

    1. Re:Because they are cheap by Somegeek · · Score: 1

      I had a Linksys that I used at home, had to reboot once a week or more. Replaced it with a Netgear that cost three times as much, but its been rock solid going on several years. No more reboots.

      Due to my sample size however, this has zero statistical significance.

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    2. Re:Because they are cheap by aliquis · · Score: 1

      My guess as well, cheap and limited hardware not up to the job people demand from them. I suspect that a cheap PC running some of the many software based solutions would give much better performance. At least compared to the "routers" of lastlastlast year or similar.

    3. Re:Because they are cheap by kellenc · · Score: 1

      I go with Cisco, myself...so much for cheap!

      --
      "I never did give anybody hell; I just told them the truth, and they thought it was hell." - Harry S. Truman
    4. Re:Because they are cheap by springbox · · Score: 1

      I made a router (old computer) for a home that has two wireless linksys APs. The APs usually need reboots every time something weird happens with the power but the router never had any problems.

    5. Re:Because they are cheap by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with you on the cheaper it is, the less stable it is.

      Take any high end wireless gear like real cisco branded gear and you don't have issues. I have never had issues with point to point wifi gear made by breezecom (Whatever they're called nowadays). But those are far from cheap.

      I also have about a dozen meraki units in use. Cheap and they require rebooting about once a week. Bittorrent will make them need a reboot even faster. Meraki is a linux based system, I'm also thinking it has problems with the DNS it uses.

    6. Re:Because they are cheap by KeithIrwin · · Score: 1

      I would like to pick stable and cheap, where do I find a router which is both of those? I can live with no fast, since my internet connection is only like 5Mpbs tops and connecting to the internet is the main thing I use it for.

    7. Re:Because they are cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats what SHE said...

    8. Re:Because they are cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I pick Stable and Cheap. Which router is that?

    9. Re:Because they are cheap by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Why not use something like m0n0wall and have all three? It's fast, very stable, the software is free, and if you can't scare up an old PC to run it on then you don't belong here.

    10. Re:Because they are cheap by Barny · · Score: 1

      I'll take the first two options please.

      VIA mobo under clocked with a USB stick booting monowall, the only time it reboots is when the UPS runs out of juice during a long power outage (once in past 2 years).

      Not as cheap as all those crappy little routers, but solid as a rock, supporting more open ip connections and features than your mom!

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    11. Re:Because they are cheap by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      My god, all those years of trying to understand the relation of those things summed up in 5 words...

    12. Re:Because they are cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fast, Stable, Cheap - pick two.

      You nailed it right there. By installing a $50 router, you're exchanging money for stability. I've been on many routers (and switches) that have had up-times of 3 years or more.

      Over the years, feature creep in router operating systems has reduced their stability. That is why you see companies like Cisco moving away from their custom code to a stable OS base like Linux (see the Nexus line). Features can then be started or stopped like any other service daemon / kernel module.

      This also plays into Security since too much time is placed on features and not enough on ensuring a secure product design. Therefore, code has to be updated regularly forcing a reload even if traffic is flowing fine.

    13. Re:Because they are cheap by Wells2k · · Score: 1

      Yerp. I had gone through two Linksys models and a D-Link model before I got tired of the constant reboots, at which point I E-Bay'ed a 3com 5231. That thing works like a champ, has plenty of capability and has yet to fail on me.

      In other words, I chose fast and stable and sacrificed cheap (sort of... a 5231 was not cheap when it originally came out)

    14. Re:Because they are cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree. Pitch your Linksys in the garbage and either setup IPCop or buy a Cisco ISR 800 or ASA 5505. You will never need to reboot either.

    15. Re:Because they are cheap by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Funny, because my m0n0wall router built from spare parts (cheap) took, maybe, an hour to set up (fast), and has *never* crashed on me. Ever. (stable)

    16. Re:Because they are cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pick fast and stable:
      http://www.engeniustech.com/datacom/products/Category.aspx?id=39
      Way more powerful than standard junkSys.

    17. Re:Because they are cheap by scld · · Score: 1

      ummm. . . .stable and cheap.

      --
      'Those are my principles. If you don't like them, well. . .I have others.'

      twitter.com/scld

    18. Re:Because they are cheap by hellop2 · · Score: 1

      Or choose all three!

      I never have reboots on my older Linksys WRT54G, v.3 and v.4. I have seem them overheat and lockup, especially when overclocking. I have fixed all sorts of different routers with intermittent lockup problems, by giving them a little air. e.g. Making sure that hot little switch isn't stacked on top of the router. I took the plastic off mine and screwed it to the wall. Some people put fans on their router's or switch's case or cpu.

      With the DD-WRT Linux firmware you can add quality of service so that random bittorrent users don't affect your video game or browsing speed.

      My very stable configuration:

      Router: Linksys WRTG54G
      CPU Model: Broadcom BCM5352 chip rev 0
      CPU Clock: 216 MHz (Overclocked from 200Mhz)
      Firmware: DD-WRT v23 SP2 (stable)
      Maximum ports: 2048 (default 512)
      TCP Timeout: 300s (default 3600s)
      UDP Timeout: 300s
      QOS Settings:
      -bittorent = bulk
      -http = exempt
      -Game and chat program ports = exempt

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
    19. Re:Because they are cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL

    20. Re:Because they are cheap by hellop2 · · Score: 1

      I've answered the whole thread. Yet, this perfect post gets only a score of 1.

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
  6. The only time I ever have to by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 1

    restart my Airport Extreme is when I update the firmware. Otherwise it stays up and works without problems. I don't understand the question I guess.

    1. Re:The only time I ever have to by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      The only time I ever have to restart my Airport Extreme is when I update the firmware.

      I have to reboot mine because it is locked up once a year or so, certainly not every few days. It puts up with a lot of traffic from a lot of machines, both always on and laptops and all manner of traffic including bittorrent. My best guess is someone has a defective one or keeps it on top of a very hot server in a closed case.

  7. I don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because they want you to buy the more expensive one without the crippled software?

    actually I've never had to reboot my router

  8. Who you callin' "We"? by epotash · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm guessing what you actually need to do is reset the connection to your modem or release and renew DHCP, Every router I've used allows you to login to a web based configuration and do these things.

    1. Re:Who you callin' "We"? by Barny · · Score: 1

      Problem I have seen with a lot of these routers, and its very visible because a fair few of them have linux in em.

      Max open connections: 200
      Auto close connections after: 3 days

      Add a BT client or 2 to the network with "unlimited open ports" option and its sleepy time for the router gnomes.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
  9. Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If your having to restart yours every couple of days...something is wrong. The one here at the house has been up for last 173 days. I checked the main router at work and its been up almost 300 days.

  10. Good question. by TW+Atwater · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Why DO you have to reboot your routers? Mine, including a WR54GT almost never require rebooting. Occasionally, after a power outage, it's necessary, but not very often. Maybe once or twice a year, and I live in Panama, where power interruptions come fairly frequently.

    --
    More than 60,000 Windows programs won't run on Linux.
    1. Re:Good question. by Telecommando · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you have frequent power interruptions, aren't they rebooting your router frequently?

      /just askin'.

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    2. Re:Good question. by DarkShadeChaos · · Score: 1

      I've had a WRT54G (default) firmware which - as others have mentioned needed a reboot once a week; upgraded the firmware and lowered it to once a month or once every two months.

      Currently using a Cisco SOHO-A... and never need to reboot it, (I didn't actually buy it, I'm heavily involved with Cisco stuff for work and it was a freebie) HIGHLY recommend you get something a little pricier.

      --
      The machine unmakes the man. Now that the machine is so perfect, the engineer is nobody. -Ralph Waldo Emerson
    3. Re:Good question. by Nero+Nimbus · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering the same thing. I've got a WRT54G (One of the early linux version ones), and a BEFSX41. I usually never have to reset either unless there's a cable outage, and even then I don't always have to reset it. I just had a power outage just today, and that was probably the first time in 6 months that my WRT54G had been off for any reason. I just wish there was a gigabit equivalent to it, but one can dream, I suppose.

    4. Re:Good question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to increase the max number of TCP connections allowed at one time from around 200 to around 2000. The port mappings are preserved for some amount of time, and programs that make lots of a TCP connections (bittorrent clients) will clog the router. Rebooting is a temporary solution to this configuration error.

    5. Re:Good question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree completely. I have setup a number of wrt's for family and friends and have one myself. I go months and months without ever need to reboot it on the latest firmware. I suspect it could go forever without a reboot. Are you running the latest firmware on the device? Are you sure it's not your wireless network cards, ISP or something else that's causing the issue?

    6. Re:Good question. by atari2600 · · Score: 1

      Ditto, I own a WRT54G as well and in the last 3+ years, I've powercycled the router less than five times. Maybe I am lucky but maybe the real problem isn't with the router and how the other devices talk to the router?

    7. Re:Good question. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Any router that has to be rebooted because some device speaks crossly to it is buggy. I've never had to reboot the old Aptiva running Debian that I use as a router.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    8. Re:Good question. by dreamchaser · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That was my thought too when I saw this. If you have to reboot your router very often then you're doing it wrong.

      We are heavy Internet users here at my home, especially since I work from home frequently and use VPN with the sending and recieving of large attachements, etc. I don't think I've ever *had* to reboot my WR54GT in the past year that I've had it.

    9. Re:Good question. by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I picked up a D-Link DI-524 several years ago on sale for dirt cheap and it has never needed restarting, save for the obligatory changing of some needs-a-reboot feature.
       

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    10. Re:Good question. by Teckla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why DO you have to reboot your routers? Mine, including a WR54GT almost never require rebooting. Occasionally, after a power outage, it's necessary, but not very often. Maybe once or twice a year, and I live in Panama, where power interruptions come fairly frequently.

      WTF? How did this end up +5 Informative?

      The power interruptions are obviously regularly rebooting his equipment. Is it any wonder he doesn't need to reboot it himself?

    11. Re:Good question. by colenski · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did it ever occur to you that you never had a problem *because* of the power failures doing the rebooting for you?

    12. Re:Good question. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Prepare to make fun of my non-1337ness...

      But my Microsoft MN-700 router goes months between restarts, easily. I think I can safely say I've manually had to restart it twice ever, and other than that it's only restarted when the power goes out. (Remember, Microsoft hasn't sold these in something like 4 years, and I had it months before they stopped making them, so that's a pretty damned good uptime. Sad they cancelled the home networking line of products, they're all excellent.)

    13. Re:Good question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had problems with my WR54GT locking up about twice a month, moved it to a DC battery system I use for CCTV and the alarm system in the house though (always runs off batteries, AC just recharges it) and it hasn't locked up once in the year since.

    14. Re:Good question. by Robber+Baron · · Score: 1

      Did it ever occur to you that you never had a problem *because* of the power failures doing the rebooting for you?

      Actually I have one client where the quality of power there is shitty and I can tell you that, even though it's counterintuitive, a power failure usually fucks up most cheap routers (and mini switches too) and the fix is always...wait for it...cycling the power again.

      I've used a number of different wireless routers as access points and the most stable by far have been the Apple Airports. Linksys, D-Link...they all suck by comparison.

      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

    15. Re:Good question. by DRobson · · Score: 1

      We have periods of regular brownouts in our house. Our previous router (Linksys of some description) would recover from these, regaining line sync and all services. Our current router (Billion, piece of crap) will quite often require a manual power cycle to regain anything beyond wired internal LAN switching. Hence, power outages for us require a power cycle.

  11. Power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that things like power fluctuations are more to blame for frequently needing to reset those devices.

    1. Re:Power? by gdickie · · Score: 1

      I also used to have to restart my cable modem or router every few days. Putting them onto a UPS solved the problem.

    2. Re:Power? by Ignis+Flatus · · Score: 1

      very probably. i can't even re-insert a loose power cable on my laptop without it freezing up. we've also got a Kenmore freezer that some numbnuts was stupid enough to put a microprocessor into. every time the power fluctuates, the micro freezes up, causing the freezer to shut down. idiots.

  12. Buy one that works. by jcr · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have a pair of Apple Airport routers, and the only time they get rebooted is when I change settings and restart them. That happens whenever I want to let another computer use my network, about every couple of months.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Buy one that works. by E-Lad · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, I've used Apple Airports (previously, the "UFO" kind and currently, the Extreme (1Gb ports) and Express (for my home theater) and have never had to do "therapeutic" reboots on them.

      But I have been irked due to having to reboot the router to make even the slightest of config changes - such as changing its syslog destination or adding a port to the forwarding table. You'd think that these and other operations, short of a firmware upgrade, could be handled without a full-blown reset, but apparently not. One has to wonder why that is so in this day and age.

    2. Re:Buy one that works. by 7+digits · · Score: 5, Informative

      So you are lucky. My Airport Express needs to be rebooted from time to time (nothing damning, the express sometime stands month without needing it). My previous UFO Apple Airport also needed to be rebooted (and much more frequently than the Express).

      The symptom on the Express are that DNS queries stop working. I can ping it, ping my DSL modem, and ping website for which I have IP. I can nslookup into my provider DNS. I cannot lookup into the Express DNS.

      Another issue is that sometimes, I start getting more and more lag. Rebooting the mac or the DSL model doesn't fix it. But I discovered, amazed, that rebooting the express fixed it.

      Btw "Buy one that works" is an extremely arrogant comment. Those units work for you, it does not prove it works for anyone else.

    3. Re:Buy one that works. by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      I think some of this is the traffic usage. My WRT running 3rd party software reboots itself every night. If it doesn't then after about 3 days it will start acting funky. DD-WRT is the software FWIW. I seed torrents 24X7 but at a low(ish) bitrate - the many connections seem to be what is doing this.

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    4. Re:Buy one that works. by rueger · · Score: 1

      "I have a pair of Apple Airport routers, and the only time they get rebooted is when I change settings and restart them. That happens whenever I want to let another computer use my network"

      You need to reboot your router to let another computer access the network??

    5. Re:Buy one that works. by KURAAKU+Deibiddo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most likely, jcr is using MAC filtering (capitalization == acronym; it has nothing to do with Apple's Mac computers). I have yet to use a consumer router that did not want to restart after you changed router settings, and adding a new MAC address to the access list would require a restart. Hence, restarting the router when letting another computer use the network. Some people actually care about the security of their network; living in a major urban area with a lot of neighbors generally encourages it.

      You may wish to look into using MAC filtering and a strong WPA2 password to protect your wireless network.

      I also have a gig-E Airport Extreme, and it has been rock-solid stable for me; the only restarts have been for either changes I have made to the settings or for a firmware update. (I've done one of the latter since I got it.) It's been up continuously since it replaced a 10/100 wireless-G Netgear that constantly needed reboots, whenever I put any kind of load on my network. (It locked up constantly.*) If I hammer the Airport Extreme, it performs flawlessly. I still think that it was a great upgrade decision, but I'm sure that I'll get bashed as an Apple-fanboy because of it (most likely by people who can't differentiate between "MAC" and "Mac"). ;)

      * To mitigate my Netgear bashing slightly: I've had nothing but success with wired Netgear products. The wired router by them that I used to have worked great, and their gigabit switch that I currently use has worked admirably well, without issue. I just should have gotten a wireless router from them that would have run Linux. ;)

    6. Re:Buy one that works. by jcr · · Score: 1

      You're right, I am indeed filtering by MAC addresses.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    7. Re:Buy one that works. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't be surprised at the comment. Seems like you might really need the therapy.

      My impression of you from finding your name at the top of one too many blindingly self-assured posts: Someone who, through a combination of success and an innate arrogance, never managed to figure out that you don't actually know anything.

    8. Re:Buy one that works. by 7+digits · · Score: 1

      jcr... that ringed a bell to me. John C Randolph, of course. (I don't fully remember. Maybe you worked at NeXT at some point ?)

      I do recall that we crossed fire a few time last century over comp.sys.next. You had a few sound ideas (I mean, someone who hates C++ can't be all bad), but an annoying tendency of considering you could never be wrong.

      After a quick search through my mailbox, here you are, arguing that NeXT changed "return self" to "void" in foundation kit to "be more efficient with network resources" (which is truly stupid as those methods were not oneway). Still a good laught, even after all those years.

      Glad to see you didn't change. You still sound like a I-know-all self-righteous you-know-what...

    9. Re:Buy one that works. by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1

      I'm curious... It sounds like you're using MAC filtering. That's not very secure, but it is a pain in the ass. Why not use WPA(2)?

    10. Re:Buy one that works. by spyowl · · Score: 1

      I still use my "ancient" Netgear RT311 (has both web and telnet interfaces), has run for years at a time without rebooting. None of the setting changes require it to restart.

      Since RT311 is just a router (no access point, or a hub/switch), I have a separate switch and a Cisco access point (which also has rock solid stability).

      I recently bought a combo device (wireless ap, router, hub) D-Link from Best Buy for my internal subnet and I have to reset that puppy every few days. Sometimes it just gets weird latency issues as well out of the blue.

    11. Re:Buy one that works. by empaler · · Score: 1

      It's the connection count.

    12. Re:Buy one that works. by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Informative

      This may be just anecdotal evidence, but the Airport Express series has a reputation for being flaky, and typically dropping flat-out dead after about a year.

      I don't want to absolutely bad-mouth the product, because I've also got an Airport Extreme base station that has never needed rebooting in the few years that I've had it, and because I've also got an AE Express that's worked fine for me the entire time I've had it. However, the Airport Express seems to be based around *much* different hardware than its bigger, more expensive cousins, which are put in the same league as high-end gear from Cisco and the like, rather than the $50 boxes from Linksys that most of us have in our homes.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    13. Re:Buy one that works. by Malc · · Score: 1

      Of course, Air Port Express routers don't support UPnP. Ridiculous - it's been eight or nine years since I last had a router with this feature missing. It also seems to let me create multiple profiles, but they don't work. I have reconfig the bloody thing where ever I go.

    14. Re:Buy one that works. by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Yes agree. Odd that it seems to only occur after an extended period of time. My memory usage never seems to max out though so not sure what buffer is being filled but yes that seems to be it. I'd like more capable hardware but short of spending a mint I see no way to do that and I still have a POS FIOS Actiontech in the way!

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    15. Re:Buy one that works. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Is that you, David Stes?

      If you're going to bash me over the [return self] convention, you really should try to get your facts straight. Returning self has negligible cost within a single process, but it gets expensive in a Distributed Objects context. This is why NeXT changed the convention to only return values when there was a meaningful value to return.

      Maybe you worked at NeXT at some point ?

      Nope, I never worked for NeXT. I worked for Apple several years after the merger.

      You still sound like a I-know-all self-righteous you-know-what...

      Only to ignorant prats like you.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    16. Re:Buy one that works. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Gee, that would really hurt if I had any reason to value your judgement. If you think I'm wrong about something, then point out what I said that you disagree with, and explain why you disagree. Taking cheap shots from the cover of anonymity is a snotty and childish thing to do.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    17. Re:Buy one that works. by jcr · · Score: 1

      This may be just anecdotal evidence, but the Airport Express series has a reputation for being flaky, and typically dropping flat-out dead after about a year.

      I've heard of Airport Express units dying, but I wouldn't go so far as to say they have a bad reputation. Saying that it's typical for them to die after a year is quite an exaggeration.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    18. Re:Buy one that works. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well me too, but we're all ignorant. Some of us just don't know it

    19. Re:Buy one that works. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh... they require a reboot to add another computer to your network? Time to ask Apple to fix their shitty code...

    20. Re:Buy one that works. by cs02rm0 · · Score: 1

      I have yet to use a consumer router that did not want to restart after you changed router settings, and adding a new MAC address [wikipedia.org] to the access list would require a restart
      ...
      * To mitigate my Netgear bashing slightly: I've had nothing but success with wired Netgear products.


      FWIW I have a Netgear DG834G Wireless ADSL router. I can add new MAC addresses without a restart and it's been up since I bought it in February (six months?)

    21. Re:Buy one that works. by cs02rm0 · · Score: 1

      I'm curious... It sounds like you're using MAC filtering. That's not very secure, but it is a pain in the ass. Why not use WPA(2)?

      For me, it's easier to figure out the MAC address across Windows, Linux and OSX and add them to the router than it is to figure out some variant of WPA across all of them. Of course I should take the time, but it's probably secure enough around here and if I don't bother with WPA I doubt my neighbours do.

    22. Re:Buy one that works. by Artuir · · Score: 1

      Not that this directly pertains to the bulk of your post, but the DGL-4300 from D-Link (not sure on the 4500) only asks to restart if you want to "enable" the MAC address filter. Once it's on, you can add or subtract MAC addresses pretty much at will and not have to reboot. But there are a lot of other settings that you need to reboot to change, and it is annoying. You're spot on.

      I just wish I could load custom firmware into this thing. It's the best router I've ever owned, but it just can't handle the sheer number of connections required to get a download speed worth a damn while torrenting. It'll start to get laggy and glitchy (i.e. ask for you to re-login every single time you navigate to another page within the router) when I access the administration interface while someone on the network is torrenting with 200 open connections or so. Every router I've ever owned has completely failed to handle the load, so much so that I am frustrated and willing at this point to build a very energy-efficient PC, slap it into a 4U rackmount case (or something), put it in a rack in my closet and set that thing up as a dedicated router. You just can't go wrong with *nix when it comes to networking capability.

    23. Re:Buy one that works. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed airport express doesn't seem to be of the highest quality, but the airport router, which I use as well, just works. And this comes from a person that's usually not particularly fond of apple's products.

    24. Re:Buy one that works. by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      ...I have yet to use a consumer router that did not want to restart after you changed router settings, and adding a new MAC address to the access list would require a restart. Hence, restarting the router when letting another computer use the network...

      I have a 5-year-old SMC 2804WBRP-G wired+wireless router. It does not need to be restarted when a new mac is added to the allowed list, or when the timeserver is changed, or when access rules or schedules are changed, or when the DMZ or virtual servers or applications (NAT) are changed, or when its LAN IP address or DHCP configuration are changed. In fact, I don't know of any configuration change (other than updating its firmware) which would require a reboot.
      The only complaint I have is that there are no hacks available for it, so I can't replace its firmware with a more customizable linux-based OS.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    25. Re:Buy one that works. by Danathar · · Score: 1

      I have an airport extreme as well.

      Very Stable....but pricey, and not too many options on it in the preferences.

      Though the USB connection thingy for an external HD and the airplay mini-jack is cool.

    26. Re:Buy one that works. by 7+digits · · Score: 1

      Thanks God I am not David Stes! He was the mother of all morons. I am surprised his name goes through the profanity filter.

      Btw, please explain us why "return self" have cost in distributed objects.

      - It can't be because of vending, because, by definition, self is already vended.

      - It can't be because of additional round trip, because we are not talking about oneway void methods.

      So, why is it slower / expensive ?

      > Only to ignorant prats like you.

      French have a saying that goes "Etre pris pour un idiot aux yeux d'un imbécile est une volupté de fin gourmet". In English, that would translate as "To be seen as an idiot in the eyes of an imbecile is a pleasure worthy of a fine gourmet". Guess why it comes to my mind when I read your posts ?

    27. Re:Buy one that works. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Btw "Buy one that works" is an extremely arrogant comment. Those units work for you, it does not prove it works for anyone else.'

      And why is the opposite is not true? Why because you are having problems with a device does it mean that anyone who isn't is the exception rather than the rule? Confirmation bias much? Could it not as easily be that you are unlucky rather than he is lucky?

      Even if there are hundreds of people complaining about a problem on the internet it still doesn't compare the thousands or indeed millions of people who are not complaining because they don't have the problem.

      Why people buy something then discover it is faulty and not get a replacement or a refund is beyond my comprehension. In the UK, at least, any router that needed to be rebooted every few days would be considered 'not fit for purpose' and you could surely pick this up within 28 days. Also if you find out later something doesn't work then you probably should have tested your new device properly when you got it. I think the "buy one that works" comment is perfectly acceptable. If you stick with a device that was faulty from purchase it is pretty much your own fault.

      Just to annoy you further my Linksys router sits in the corner happily routing away. It even handles bittorrent without any fuss. The only time it ever needs rebooting is if I change some settings.

    28. Re:Buy one that works. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac filtering is rather ineffective, and I'd imagine entirely pointless if you are using wpa2 with a good password.

    29. Re:Buy one that works. by jcr · · Score: 1

      - It can't be because of additional round trip, because we are not talking about oneway void methods.

      If a method has no return value, then NSConnection and NSProxy don't have to serialize and transmit a return value. This is the case for any void method, whether or not it's also declared oneway.

      "To be seen as an idiot in the eyes of an imbecile is a pleasure worthy of a fine gourmet". Guess why it comes to my mind when I read your posts ?

      Because you project your faults onto others.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    30. Re:Buy one that works. by FrankieBaby1986 · · Score: 1

      Linksys WRT54g v5 (Vxworks) no reboot to add or remove MACs. Update is instantaneous

      --
      ERROR: SIG NOT FOUND (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?:
    31. Re:Buy one that works. by pbaer · · Score: 1

      MAC filtering is snake-oil, it offers as little protection as WEP. It's trivially easy to spoof MAC addresses. You honestly think someone could crack WPA2 encryption, but wouldn't be able to spoof a MAC address? MAC filtering with or without WPA2 is extra work for no gain.

      --
      There are 11 types of people, those who know unary and those who don't.
    32. Re:Buy one that works. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      I have a pair of Apple Airport routers, and the only time they get rebooted is when I change settings and restart them.

      Well, I've found that rebooting our Airport Extreme seems to "fix" a problem that pops up every few days. The problem is that we have a Mac PowerBook which occasionally shows that the wifi seems to have gone crazy. The little wifi-power icon at the upper right starts fluctuating all over the place, Internet Connect shows the same fluctuations, and most of the network apps suddenly start showing very sluggish network response.

      The funny thing is that we have a few other wifi-enabled toys, including a second Powerbook, a Windows Vista laptop, and a several-years-old Treo, and two OLPC SOs, all of which will show a steady, strong wifi signal when this happens. So obviously the problem is with the first PowerBook, right? Probably not. Rebooting that PowerBook doesn't fix the problem; it comes up still showing flakey wifi. But rebooting the Airport usually does fix the problem (for a while). This points the finger right at the Airport, unless there's something more subtle going on between the two machines.

      Actually, a few visitors have seen the same misbehavior. I haven't recorded what makes and models of computers they were using. And they showed the problem at the same time as our Powerbook. So the Airport apparently gets into some weird semi-functional state with some wifi cards while working fine with others, and rebooting the Airport is a temporary fix.

      It doesn't appear that there's any way to diagnose and fix this problem at a price less than buying a new Airport (or some other wifi access point).

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    33. Re:Buy one that works. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its jcr, the resident apple shill. You'll get no shotage of arrogance from him when it comes to apple products.

    34. Re:Buy one that works. by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      I've never coded for embedded systems (which most residential networking hardware is), but here's my guess, based on what little I've learned about software.

      If the system was like a server (simplistically, a kernel and a bunch of processes), one would overwrite a configuration file and restart the process controlling the feature you want changed*. They could stuff some Flash chips into the device and run a stripped-down server OS on the thing, and you wouldn't need to hard reboot the router every time you changed a port number (some mid-range D-Links are like this, and I'm sure the famed WRT54G Linux version was like this as well).

      If they're exceedingly cheap on the hardware end, they probably would allow only a single process to exist in memory to save on costs. In this case, every time you change a configuration, you would have to restart the controlling process-- namely, the whole enchilada. Seems Apple went with this route.

      * Some programs work fine in real-time after a config change without restarting, others panic, still others are unpredictable. Blame Turing.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    35. Re:Buy one that works. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking pissant pile of shit that'll die a nameless death. Fuck off and die.

    36. Re:Buy one that works. by 7+digits · · Score: 1

      Ok, I was on holidays, so I couldn't reply earlier.

      > If a method has no return value, then NSConnection and NSProxy don't have to serialize and transmit a return value. This is the case for any void method, whether or not it's also declared oneway.

      So, the issue is not about the vending, or the round trip, but the serialization ?

      But, why on earth would you want to serialize /self/ as a return value ? Do you realize what you are saying ? Self, is /by definition/ already shared by both sides of the connection... Just allocate one bit in the return packet (and there is extra space here) to tell if the return value is self.

      Face it: the reason for the suppression of "return self" is better code, not inexistent performance enhancements for DO.

    37. Re:Buy one that works. by jcr · · Score: 1

      But, why on earth would you want to serialize /self/ as a return value ?

      I can see that you've never thought the matter through. Methods can't be declared to return self, they can only be declared to return id. That means that you can't take any shortcuts that depend on the object that's returned being the same one that gets the message.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    38. Re:Buy one that works. by 7+digits · · Score: 1

      > I can see that you've never thought the matter through

      I honestly think you should stop being arrogant and actually think about what I posted.

      Annotating the return value is unnecessary, as there is no problem in testing for self as a return value:

      1) Add a single bit in the return message "_self_returned"
      2) Add a test on the remote site after the method had been called, to see if the returned value is exactly equal to the receiver. Set the bit in the returned packet accordingly.
      3) In the local sender code, see if "_self_returned" is set, and return local self if it is.

      No new annotation, no additional vending, no additional serialization, no additional round trip. Just as I said: removing the "return self" was not necessary for DO performance enhancements.

    39. Re:Buy one that works. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Give it up, kid.

      self is a value on the stack. Think about what that means.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    40. Re:Buy one that works. by jcr · · Score: 1

      I honestly think you should stop being arrogant

      The matter at hand isn't hard to understand, so it does me no particular credit to have a grasp of the obvious which you lack. The fact that I understand it and you don't isn't an accomplishment on my part, it's just a failure on your part.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    41. Re:Buy one that works. by 7+digits · · Score: 1

      > self is a value on the stack. Think about what that means.

      It means two things:

      First, it means that you don't have the slightest clue about what you are talking about, and you are trying to get away by spouting irrelevant nonsense, and insulting people.

      Second, it means it is a different value in both address spaces, of course. This is why I made a distinction between "local self" and "remote self". The _self_returned bit indicates to the local site that the remote site wants local self to be returned. What is hard to understand in the following pseudo code ? :

      in sender address space:

      id SendMessageToObject( NSProxy theObject, ... )
      {
          Message message = ... // Build message
          Result result = SendRemoteMessage( message )
          if (result._self_returned)
              return object // Remote wanted self to be returned
          else
              (Normal code)
      }

      In remote address space:

      while(1) // runloop code in real life
      {
          Request request = GetNextRequest()
          Result result = AllocateResult();
          id local_object = GetObjectFromRequest( request )
          result_object = PerformRequest( request )

          if (result_object==local_object)
              result._self_returned = YES
          else
              (normal processing)

          SendResult( result )
          Deallocate( result )
      }

      Note that I don't expect you to actually read and understand this post. It will be easier for you to act like a child, close your ears, sing "I can't hear you", and write some additional insults.

    42. Re:Buy one that works. by 7+digits · · Score: 1

      > The matter at hand isn't hard to understand, so it does me no particular credit to have a grasp of the obvious which you lack. The fact that I understand it and you don't isn't an accomplishment on my part, it's just a failure on your part.

      Priceless. Tell me exactly what "particular credit" insulting people in a adult technical discussion where you are wrong gives you ?

      The main difference between you and me is that, in the 27 years I spent programming computers, I listened and shared ideas with my peers, which at the end, made me an even better coder. Obviously, you only got good at trolling on the net, which doesn't effectively train one's critical thinking attitude.

    43. Re:Buy one that works. by jcr · · Score: 1

      It will be easier for you to act like a child, close your ears, sing "I can't hear you", and write some additional insults.

      You started this thread ad hominem. If you don't like it, then don't do it.

      Your scheme ignores the fact that self is a value that can be assigned. Your proposal introduces new semantics that require the language to distinguish between returning self and returning any other id. You're wrong, you lose, get over yourself.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    44. Re:Buy one that works. by jcr · · Score: 1

      The main difference between you and me is that, in the 27 years I spent programming computers, I listened and shared ideas with my peers, which at the end, made me an even better coder.

        If this is as far as you've gotten in 27 years, then better luck next time.

      I taught Cocoa programming to hundreds of people in my time at Apple, and very few of them would find it as difficult as you do to understand that returning an object across a DO connection has a cost. In fact, the only other person I can think of who can't grasp this is David Stes.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    45. Re:Buy one that works. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are both semi-correct and terribly rude to each other.

      Any method invocation that requires a round-trip has significant overhead compared to a method that is declared (oneway void).

      Regardless of returning self or void, returning from a method in DO requires creating a response that can be sent over the wire. It is non-trivial.

      Returning 'self' incurs additional overhead, but not a huge amount. While the on-the-wire representation can be significantly abbreviated because 'self' exists at both ends of the connection, DO uses the standard object encoding infrastructure and, thus, must give the returning runtime an opportunity to do any substitutions.

      All of this is to say that any synchronous method invocation in DO is expensive. It requires a rendezvous upon return and that is the real cost. Declaring methods as (oneway) is orders of magnitude faster both because of the lack of the return value and mostly because of the asynchronous execution model it enables.

      Bottom line: A return of self or a return of (void) is still a return value and the real cost is in the rendezvous required to tell the caller that the callee is done.

      The move to standardize on (void) as a return value was specifically to reduce the amount of chaining and increase opportunities for (oneway) or asynchronous invocations.

    46. Re:Buy one that works. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Regardless of returning self or void, returning from a method in DO requires creating a response that can be sent over the wire. It is non-trivial.

      This was exactly my point, both in the present thread, and back when I argued this with Stes many years ago.

      As for being rude, he started it. ;-)

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    47. Re:Buy one that works. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Returning 'self' incurs additional overhead

      Oops, that was the point I meant to quote above.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    48. Re:Buy one that works. by 7+digits · · Score: 1

      > Your scheme ignores the fact that self is a value that can be assigned.

      What are you talking about ? The fact that the variable self (ie: the memory offset on the stack frame generated by the compiler) can be re-assigned in objective-C have absolutely nothing to do with the scheme I describe.

      How are can it be for you to understand ?

      In the remote site, look if the value returned by actual call of the implementation of the method is the same bit value we sent it to.

      In that case set a bit value in the packet sent through the wire.

      In the local site, if the bit is set, return the exact bit value of the local object we tried to send the message to.

      > Your proposal introduces new semantics that require the language to distinguish between returning self and returning any other id.

      You cannot seriously call some code to implement an optimization in NSConnection a "new semantic" in the language. (And beleive me, there were quite a few ad-hoc optimizations in NeXTstep code.)

      To focus to what the thread is all about: there was no need to remove the "return self" idiom because of performance issues in DO, as a very simple optimization in DO code could have taken care of that (with no change in the semantic of the language).

      > You're wrong, you lose, get over yourself.

      This have no impact on me. Give me hard facts.

  13. My router by tristian_was_here · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I got my Belkin router about 4 years ago it runs great I can get about 3-6 weeks uptime before I have to manually pull the power cord because it crashes.

    Its still going good and strong though!

    1. Re:My router by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, that's shit... I have Cisco routers (low end, 2800's and 877's) that have uptimes in *years* since they're part of the "never been rebooted" camp and a UPS.

    2. Re:My router by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can get about 3-6 weeks uptime before I have to manually pull the power cord because it crashes.

      I have a WRT54GL running Tomato that can do 3 months without breaking a sweat, and it does get a real workout with torrents. Currently the uptime is 20 days because IIRC I upgraded the firmware, and I can't even remember if I've ever rebooted the thing because of an actual fault by the router (I do reboot it, of course, but thats when I'm experimenting with settings, upgrading etc). A router is supposed to keep on ticking until you manually reset it so I can't help but wonder why people accept reboots like it's normal behaviour. It's not - not even for consumer routers (although they do have a strong tendency to suck badly at the consumer level, and if I was to pull a number out of my ass I would guess that about 75% of these cheapo routers are crap).

      I have a sneaking suspicion Microsoft is to blame for this because everytime I see Windows bug out, people instantly reach for the reset button. It's almost like a reflex.

  14. What?? by linko47 · · Score: 1

    I have a WRT54G wireless router, and I never have to restart it... ever... ever. It's very stable. Except when the power goes out.

    1. Re:What?? by gid · · Score: 1

      WRT54GL here running tomato firmware:
      # uptime
        20:00:54 up 44 days, 2:10, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00

      I've NEVER had to restart it due to a lock up. I think I only restarted it 44 days ago because I updated to 1.19. Awww crap, 1.20 is out. :) The firmware is rock solid with pretty graphs and relatively easy to configure QoS if you know a little bit about tcp and ports and what not.

    2. Re:What?? by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Awww crap, 1.20 is out.

      Must you upgrade to v1.20?

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    3. Re:What?? by LarsG · · Score: 1

      Must you upgrade to v1.20?

      I'd say YES

      "* Updated to dnsmasq 2.43. This takes care of the CERT VU#800113 security issue."

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
  15. One issue with Airport Extreme by mrbrown1602 · · Score: 1

    The only time I've ever had an issue with my AE base station is after a brown out - for some odd reason, it will not work after a brown out and does require a restart. Any other time, though, I have never had a problem with the AE base station... and mine's refurbished!

    1. Re:One issue with Airport Extreme by Nutria · · Score: 1

      it will not work after a brown out

      UPS. And I don't mean the package delivery service.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:One issue with Airport Extreme by mrbrown1602 · · Score: 1

      I know what a UPS is. I'm not running a fine-tuned operation and do not mind getting up off of my skinny ass to reset the router when I have a brown out, which is once in a blue moon.

  16. Resets aren't necessary. by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bought a Buffalo router and flashed it with DD-WRT. The only time the thing reset was when the power went out. If you're restarting your router every few days, I'd suggest looking into your config for the problem.

    --
    P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
    1. Re:Resets aren't necessary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I also have a buffalo router with dd-wrt which I have never rebooted. To add to that, I have two WRT54G's at my parents place that used to give them trouble (and they would call me) all the time. Since I installed dd-wrt on them I have not heard about any issues.

      But really, I can't say im surprised as it runs on Linux.

    2. Re:Resets aren't necessary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had a handful of Netgear and Linksys routers that were all unstable. Then I got a Buffalo, and haven't had a problem since. Unfortunately, they're unable to sell in the US right now because of ongoing patent-troll problems.

    3. Re:Resets aren't necessary. by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

      Looking into your config? There shouldn't be anything I could possibly configure on the thing that should make it require a reboot.

      It should 1) Not allow you to do that in the first place, 2) Fail gracefully (possibly reverting the part that's a problem) if it DOES let you, and 3) Have a watchdog make it reset ITSELF if it's found itself unable to keep routing.

      No, requiring a manual reset is a sign of people who don't know how to develop an embedded system for crap.

    4. Re:Resets aren't necessary. by paredeso · · Score: 1

      FYI I flashed my with dd-wrt V24 and this time it includes a rebooting schedule (every Sunday at midnight) but you can disable it.....

    5. Re:Resets aren't necessary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can confirm that.

      In my family there are three Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 - 40 euro all flashed with OpenWRT. No reboots, no problems.

      I experienced a lot of trouble with D-Link routers and my advise is: When you have a router, which gives you frequent problems: trash it, your time is just not worth it.

    6. Re:Resets aren't necessary. by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      I have a LinkSys router on which the DNS server lasts about 2 days before dying. I'm not really sure how my config could affect that. I don't remember ticking the "Fall apart like a piece of crap after 2 days" checkbox.

    7. Re:Resets aren't necessary. by mule007 · · Score: 1

      Same here. I have a Buffalo router and the only time I've ever reset the thing was after flashing it with the Tomato firmware. Great unit, except they no longer seem to be distributing the units due to CSIRO's patent litigation ( http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2007/06/nonpracticing-e.html ). Its a shame really.

  17. Too Bad... by WebmasterNeal · · Score: 0

    If only "restarting things" would work in other areas of life, such as restarting your current job if it sucks, or restarting your marriage. Oh wait we already have that, its called divorce and getting fired.

    --
    "During My Service In The United States Congress, I Took The Initiative In Creating The Internet." -Al Gore
  18. TCP Timeout by allanw · · Score: 5, Informative

    TCP connection timeouts on some routers default to 3600 seconds or one hour. So, when you use some Bittorrent or such, opening lots of connections, your router keeps these connections (even after disconnection) in its memory for up to an hour. It fills up and your router grinds to a halt, opening connections very slowly.

    There's other timeouts too, but I'm not sure exactly what they do. Firmware like HyperWRT lets you change these timeouts to something much shorter, like 90 seconds, which typically prevents lock-ups like that.

    (I'm actually not 100% sure that this is the sole cause for router lock-ups)

    1. Re:TCP Timeout by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      agree. I am a mod on a DSL forum, and the most common reason for router problems is the route table overflowing from P2P connections. Maybe the poster is torrenting like a madman? Or maybe it is a conspiracy by the **AA and the router builders. Let's see if that idea makes it into a headline tomorrow ;)

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    2. Re:TCP Timeout by sr.+bigotes · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That sounds like an excellent candidate. These cheap home routers have very small routing tables (probably less than 512 entries for the WRT54G). If they're not ejecting old entries because of these extremely long timeouts and the table fills up, you're not going to be able to connect to anything new.

    3. Re:TCP Timeout by Idbar · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a fairly good reason. I have two routers, a Netgear and a Linksys. Netgear has a great firmware from my point of view, but sometimes locked up, and I found it was connections through the wireless. I now use the Netgear as the wired gateway and the linksys as a wireless gateway, which goes through the netgear to access internet.

      Since then, I haven't had to reboot the netgear again, and I think it was because of the "many connections" problem you are talking about.

    4. Re:TCP Timeout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're right... a certain other member of my previous household used to chew up the router with massive bittorrent flooding, and you couldn't get an open pipe to check your email. I'll never understand how someone can download so many linux distros, though...

    5. Re:TCP Timeout by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Sounds like a fairly good reason.

      Sounds like a bug. The router should start killing old connections rather than crashing or locking up.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    6. Re:TCP Timeout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, is there any way to reconfigure these routers to eject old entries faster?

    7. Re:TCP Timeout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is no reason for a router to crash.

      I can't believe you think this is acceptable.

      My 5GT never crashes just because it's session table (4000 sessions is it's maximum) is full. Sure, it drops sessions, but it keeps trucking on the ones it has in it's table.

      Why should a router need to reboot because it's over capacity on it's session table. You wouldn't accept it if your Linux box needed rebooting because it ran out of RAM.

      Tim

    8. Re:TCP Timeout by qbwiz · · Score: 1

      My 5GT never crashes just because it's session table (4000 sessions is it's maximum) is full. Sure, it drops sessions, but it keeps trucking on the ones it has in it's table.

      For all I know, the routers do the same thing. The problem is, whenever you try to visit a website or open any other new connection, that new connection will be dropped. Your internet connection is still useless, even if your router hasn't crashed.

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    9. Re:TCP Timeout by Bieeanda · · Score: 1

      This is the reason that I love my WRT54GL, actually. I do a lot of playing on old-school MUSH, MUX and MUDs, and dealing with ports timing out can require some obnoxious scripting at times. Sure I have to reboot the router once every couple of months, but it saves me a lot of annoyance.

    10. Re:TCP Timeout by owlstead · · Score: 1

      I was using a ADSL modem (SpeedTouch Home) which was hacked to a router by "tweaking" the firmware. It had only one ethernet port, but it worked well as a NAT router. You just had to supply your switch yourself. I happily ran a network with ~10 clients without any problems.

      Then came along BitTorrent and I quickly found out that the NAT routing table only went up to 256 connections. Needless to say I had to forbid torrents after that. The next modem/routers fixed all that, but I can still imagine that this might become a problem, especially since vendors may skimp on RAM.

      I suppose the TCP/IP settings the parent mentioned won't help either. And it might prove very tricky to retrieve this kind of info from vendors. Oh well, glad I am the only one using two connections :)

    11. Re:TCP Timeout by Barny · · Score: 1

      The netcomm nb5 had 200 max connections (you could log into its console and increase it, so long as you weren't running QoS), mine would die after 10 min running with 3 BT clients on the lan.

      Replaced with VIA mobo based machine with monowall, not had a problem requiring a reboot since (that wasn't a firmware upgrade that is).

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    12. Re:TCP Timeout by bot24 · · Score: 1

      Neatgear has fixed this problem without changing the connection time out. The solution is to crash early and crash often. Back when the router was actually routing traffic to the internet, it would crash and reboot within minutes if a Bittorrent client started on the network.

      I have since moved the Netgear router so it is plugged into a real router(Linux PC with multiple network cards) on a LAN port so all the traffic goes over the switch instead of being routed. The router doesn't reboot often anymore, but I have seen it reboot itself a few times since it was moved.

    13. Re:TCP Timeout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was using a WRV200 for a while but just as an access point, no routing, no nat, no dhcp, no nothing.

      It kept locking up every few days. Changed from WPA2 to WPA and it was much better. Changed to using a WRT54G and it's not had any problems even running WPA2.

      I think that the firmware just sucks on some models.

    14. Re:TCP Timeout by kovari · · Score: 1

      I'll never understand how someone can download so many linux distros, though...

      Apparently, you haven't seen Jenna Jameson's newest linux distro yet

    15. Re:TCP Timeout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean s/routing/NAT/

    16. Re:TCP Timeout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not with the Westell 327W from Verizon. It reboots automatically every 24 hours. Really I do not have to do anything :)

      It also reboots continuously if a port is forwarded to a non-existing machine. It took me a while to figure out this one...

  19. Maybe it's not the router... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frankly, I think it might have more to do with the client you may be using to access the router for some reason.

    Ever since I switched from XP to Ubuntu about 18 months ago, I've had to reboot the router maybe 3 times. When I was running XP, I rebooted it at least once a week.

    1. Re:Maybe it's not the router... by Somegeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If a client is able to cause a router to crash then there is something wrong with the router design.

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    2. Re:Maybe it's not the router... by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      If a client is able to cause a router to crash then there is something wrong with the router design.

      Or it could be that the "cure-all" for Windows connection problems is to restart the router, and because Linux has fewer connection problems on average, you only restart the router when it is necessary. It also could be with the TCP timeouts that one poster referred to, it could be that the Windows box was infected with spyware that kept bogging down the router.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    3. Re:Maybe it's not the router... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, don't say that. Here's our chance to blame M$ - booo, hisss, booo!

    4. Re:Maybe it's not the router... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a client is able to cause a router to crash then there is something wrong with the router design.

      Or it could be that the "cure-all" for Windows connection problems is to restart the router, and because Linux has fewer connection problems on average, you only restart the router when it is necessary. It also could be with the TCP timeouts that one poster referred to, it could be that the Windows box was infected with spyware that kept bogging down the router.

      Or it could be that you're a troll and a Windows-basher.

    5. Re:Maybe it's not the router... by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      What if it's just dirt cheap gear, and they weren't willing to pay the extra for something good?

      I don't think this is all that bad, BWT...there's more to life than routers, after all, and some people would rather save the cash.

    6. Re:Maybe it's not the router... by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Or it could be that you're a troll and a Windows-basher.

      Wow, Windows has problems, suddenly I'm a troll and a Windows-basher. Well guess what, your posting anonymously, for what? Don't want to get your precious karma hurt?

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    7. Re:Maybe it's not the router... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily. No more then a server that will lock up or crash if you put 100 gigs of data on 100 gigs of drive space. Fill the drive to the brim, and the system simply does not have the resources to function. If a router has a table to keep track of open connections and you open up more connections then you have space, it is not design problem of the device, it is simply inadequate for the actual task. A perfectly good design, like the VW 1600cc air cooled engine, a perfectly good design, but inadequate for pushing an SUV or an 18 wheeler.

    8. Re:Maybe it's not the router... by nategoose · · Score: 1

      These routers almost always use dynamic port forwarding which is extremely memory intensive on the router. It's the most non-elegant type of network address translation I know of, and all network address translation is non-elegant. It was only dreamed up to stave off IP address shortage problems (though there's some other uses for it now). The resources taken up by using dynamic port forwarding are ports (both TCP and UDP), ram for the state of the connections (as best the router can keep up with them), and a large chunk of extra processor time working on every packet. There is no way to do this right. You can't increase the number of ports beyond 2^16. You could add memory, but like a faster processor that would add to the costs and power usage. It's all just a balancing game, but I've never had one of these devices need resetting as often as this. BTW, I'm writing the software for one of these to run on an AVR right now.

    9. Re:Maybe it's not the router... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the opposite result... when running XP I never had to reboot the belkin 54G, but now with ubuntu, whenever I visit a website with streaming video or something, I lose http traffic until I login and reboot the router. strangest thing. bittorrent will continue to run, but if I went to surf the web, gotta reboot the thing.

  20. I never have to by missing000 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not to be a dick, but I use a wrt54g with tomato firmware and it's about the most stable and powerful (QOS is great on it) router anywhere close to the consumer price range.

    I never have to restart my DSL router or Vonage router either, and I've kept all this stuff up 24/7 often with heavy use for years at a time.

    If you're restarting networking stuff all the time, perhaps you've misconfigured it...

    1. Re:I never have to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get some better hardware for that firmware.

    2. Re:I never have to by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      Question for you as a tomato user. I'm currently using OpenWrt(/X-Wrt) and have been thinking about playing with other firmware like tomato. How hard is it to set up, especially the QOS part (which is what I've been looking at tomato for since everyone and their grandma is telling me to go to tomato for the best QOS)?

    3. Re:I never have to by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't mind being a dick: stock firmware generally sucks. You're absolutely right about Tomato, though.

      The manufacturer's firmware in the DI-624 I used to have, as well as the original WRT54G that I flashed with Tomato, weren't hard to crash at all. Between gaming (I run a Halflife server among other things), multiple VPNs I use with my customers, Bit Torrent, VoIP (AT&T CallVantage) and some other things on my server, Tomato hasn't even stuttered, not once.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:I never have to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I'm not the OP, but I have a similar problem.)

      If you're restarting networking stuff all the time, perhaps you've misconfigured it...

      The only configuration I've done to my modem/router is what was necessary to select the right channel, and done under the eye of the network installer when he was here.

      I'll admit that maybe there's something not set optimally in the deep, mysterious configuration screens it presents.

      If misconfiguration is really, the issue, then the real question is: Why is router configuration so difficult a couple of computer networking professionals apparently can't figure it out? And again, if restarting it solves all my problems, why couldn't the designers simply make it do this automatically when it sees packets coming in and not going out?

    5. Re:I never have to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you're restarting networking stuff all the time, perhaps you've misconfigured it..."

      Oh of course it couldn't be due to the fact that all the listed routers are cheap 'soapbox' routers with no quality to them.

      "Not to be a dick,"

      Fail.

    6. Re:I never have to by Rich0 · · Score: 2

      Ok, exactly what setting on a cheap consumer router would cause it to randomly stop working at intervals? :)

      I have a cheap linksys router that had similar issues - every few days it would randomly hang. It would drive me nuts since I like to remotely connect to my home network, and I can't exactly reboot the router from outside the house.

      In the end I just ended up getting another NIC and running shorewall on a linux box. I only use the linksys box as a wireless access point. Even so, it still needs an occassional reboot every few months (and it literally is ONLY a wireless access point - it isn't even running a dhcp server any longer).

      Cheap consumer products often have cheap firmware. Sometimes the companies finally get it right, but they may not port the new code back to ancient sub-models of their devices. The good-old linksys wrt54g probably has about 15 revisions to it so it is quite possible that only some of them have the more serious issues.

      For another story of an appliance that should "just work" I have a pair of satellite receivers that every few weeks just starts outputting a black screen (sometimes both go out at once, sometimes only one goes out). It drives me nuts since it runs into my mythtv backend and I get blank recordings. I actually have a cron job set up to check the video output hourly and scan for blank frames (script provided by somebody more clever than me - best use of aalib I've seen), and I'm tempted to set up some X10 gear to reboot the receivers automatically - there is no way to fix hte problem short of pulling the plug for a few seconds.

      And don't get me started on consumer DVRs - most work just fine until they stop working right, or they miss a show, or they start running slow, or whatever. :) I easily spent more setting up mythtv on a budget than just buying the DVR supplied by the satellite provider, but when something goes wrong I can actually do something about it now.

    7. Re:I never have to by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      I also use Tomato, and I have routers with uptimes of 150 and 190 days right now. I have a big UPS for each router, so that really helps.

      If a device needs periodic rebooting, I would consider it broken. Especially if it is an embedded device that doesn't have new programs installed.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    8. Re:I never have to by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      It is unlikely that either your DSL *Modem* or Vonage *VoIP Phone Adapter* would be considered *Routers*

    9. Re:I never have to by JAFSlashdotter · · Score: 1

      I hate to tempt fate, but I own two D-Link DI-524 broadband router/WAPs (for over 3 years now), and I never reboot them. And I think I've only rebooted my Actiontec router 2 or 3 times since getting it over a year ago. I leave them all on 24/7. Do I lead a charmed existence? Or am I one of the "silent majority"?

      --
      We apologize for the preceding message. All those responsible have been sacked.
    10. Re:I never have to by RingDev · · Score: 1

      Silent Majority IMO.

      I have a pair of el-cheapo Linksys routers, and the only time they get rebooted is if I flash them, or if the modem drops and I need to force them to renew DHCP. And even then, it's only because it is easier for me to reach over and reboot them, then it is to pull up the web config system, remember the password, and tell them to /renew.

      Same type of stuff at work. Of all the routers in the server room, only 1 that I know of has been bounced, and that's because we were having connectivity issues and we were rulling it out before dealing with the ISP.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    11. Re:I never have to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that you can run Tomato at all would indicate that your WRT54G is of revision 4 or lower. Revision 5 and higher have so little onboard flash that they won't run any third-party firmware that doesn't offer a specialized 'micro' version and seem to be of substantially diminished quality overall.

      My own WRT54G is a revision 5 and I have to reboot it every time the power sags.

    12. Re:I never have to by jez9999 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Does anyone know if there's a nice replacement firmware for Speedtouch routers? I have an ST585 (my ISP gave it to when I signed up). The hardware quality seems quite good, and the router is very configurable, but the builtin web interface is truly a piece of shit. The only way to configure it properly is to use a telnet interface, which is incredibly complicated and enigmatic, as well as not being documented anywhere on the internet (I just about managed to get it to do what I wanted, function as a bridge so my machine has a dedicated IP address, but it was from instructions posted in a forum). I'd like a nice replacement firmware for that, with a nice web interface.

    13. Re:I never have to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Tomato WRT54GL and it is the same for me. However, my Motorola router+modem that came with the service (that is much worse in terms of router capabilities than my normal router) is currently set to do one thing: forward traffic to my router. And yet it needs restarting at least once a week, completely losing its connection!
      Note: Even going into the web interface and choosing 'disconnect' and then 'connect' does not work--it gets an error trying to connect again.

  21. must be mistaken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WRT54G are awesome, reliable routers, and should be fine going indefinitely without being rebooted. I can't speak for the other kind (though personally I have my doubts about Apple networking hardware) but they should be just fine too.

    It may be that you are saturating your bandwith, perhaps with torrent downloads, and that is why your connection needs to be reset periodically. It's not your routers fault, though.

  22. embedded network devices by sjf · · Score: 1

    A good question. I don't have to reboot that often, but sometimes that's what cures my problems.
    However, I can't honestly say that means that the problem is with the router. It could be with devices upstream or downstream - rebooting the router may be the trick that resets the state machine for the connected device.

    I never have to reboot my TiVo, my cell phone, my PSP, my STBs etc...

    1. Re:embedded network devices by bwy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Funny, I think everyone here has had to reboot their router to solve problems in the past. But, in typical slashdot fashion, 99.9 percent of the posts are people telling the author of the question that he is stupid, lacks intellectual ability, must be a high school drop out, or has some bastardized sexual persuasion that prevents his router from working.

      As you say, it could be an unrelated issue that resetting the state machine fixes. In this case though I guess I superior device could do this on its own.

    2. Re:embedded network devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have motorola RAZR cell phone, some times it reboots itself repeatedly till it runs out of the battery. 

    3. Re:embedded network devices by Sxooter · · Score: 1

      I used to have to restart my WRT54G and WRK54G Linksys routers all the time.

      I bought a Buffalo WHR=54G with dd-wrt on it a year and a half ago. It has not required one reboot in that time.

      It's not the user's fault, except in the fact that he is using a wireless router with crappy firmware.

      --

      --- It is not the things we do which we regret the most, but the things which we don't do.
    4. Re:embedded network devices by neon_geniuses · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you don't like the responses, maybe you should be browsing at +4 or +5?

      There are many serious responses to this question that have already been posted. The good ones seem to cluster around the power issue. Which power supply sounds more reliable? A PC transformer is 3 pounds and $30-$70, a router transformer is 3 ounces and $3. Many slashdotters are software people, so the usual strategies of "blame the OS" or "blame the user" might be employed. The problem probably amounts to a hardware inadequacy.

      I would never use a router without plugging it into the cheapest UPS I can find. Voltage fluctuates. The refrigerator compressor kicks on and the cheap Linksys transformer hiccups.

      I've purchased many different versions of Linksys (some old, some new and crippled), Buffalo, Netgear, etc. They ALL go dead after a certain period of time if plugged directly into the wall. The WRT54G 1.1 transformer is physically larger than the 5.0 version. It probably burns more electricity, but it seems to be fairly reliable. I keep one upstairs as an ethernet bridge (no UPS and it has done fine).

      Whether you're talking about routers or cable modems/DSL modems, the only way to ensure reliability is to fix the power supply. Are you running 12 gauge copper on a dedicated circuit to your router/switch/modem? Or just buy a UPS for $20-$30 and you can discontinue your daily or weekly reset of your cable modem. Your wireless access point will actually be on when you go to use it. And you can use your laptop or VoIP during a thunder storm.

      No, I don't work for the battery company.

    5. Re:embedded network devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've definitely found that cheaper routers need rebooting to fix problems, but this is due to multiple things:
      1. they seem to get stuck in some state that is hard to get out of on a regular basis
      2. they are not easy to debug, rebooting is by far the easiest option to "fix" the problem
      3. you have no logging or non-web interface access to see what the real problem is

      Once I put OpenWRT on my router, I have been pleasantly surprised:

      $ ssh router uptime
        06:33:26 up 209 days, 10:18, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00

    6. Re:embedded network devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I think everyone here has had to reboot their router to solve problems in the past.

      Sure but that wasn't the question!

      My ADSL router has held it's connection for 764:12:19 hours. I last manually rebooted it 2 years ago after upgrading the firmware. My Cable router, I last manually rebooted about 18 months ago (no telnet interface on that one - and the shitty HTTP admin app makes me want to slit my wrists). These are both cheapish Zyxel boxes and yet my ISP connections fail much more frequently than than my routers. Previously I've owned Netgear and US robotics routers, and again neither of these needed rebooting until the units began failing.

      I had a Netgear WAP that did fail frequently, especially when a Vista client connected. That was a clear manufacturing defect and the unit died after a couple of months of constant rebooting. Replaced it with an airport extreme and that's been fine, perhaps I reboot it once a month when the printer fucks up.

      To be honest, I have more trouble with the cisco and HP kit at work. If you have to reboot a home gateway appliance every few days, there's something wrong.

    7. Re:embedded network devices by sco08y · · Score: 1

      But, in typical slashdot fashion, 99.9 percent of the posts are people telling the author of the question that he is stupid, lacks intellectual ability, must be a high school drop out, or has some bastardized sexual persuasion that prevents his router from working.

      This might amaze you, but you're not the first person on Slashdot to run into this problem!

      It turns out that the editors devised a "moderation" system whereby moderators assign a "score" to individual posts.

      But it gets better! See the slider floating at the top of the page? If you drag it to the left, Slashdot will filter out the lower scored posts and you don't have to read the irrelevant and stupid stuff.

  23. bad hardware by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 4, Informative

    The hardware on your router might be failing, power supply or whatever. I had the same problem with a DSL modem once, it eventually just outright died. The new one I bought (netgear DG834G) hasn't had to be reset once.

    --
    Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    1. Re:bad hardware by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Open it up and see if it has a heatsink on the CPU. If it is does not get an old 486 heatsink or something similar and slap it on there. Number 1 problem with most consumer setups after user error is heat. One of my friends would get infuriated at his Tivo because it would do strange things like hanging when recording two shows or rebooting randomly. It was stacked between an 800 watt Receiver and an ancient laser disc player on a shelf in an entertainment center made for a 32" CRT. When he got some open mesh crap from Ikea he never had that problem again.

    2. Re:bad hardware by SteWhite · · Score: 1

      Yup, "bad hardware" gets my vote too.

      I used to own a generic no-name router, the thing locked up all the time.

      I've got a Netgear DG834 now and it has currently been up for 124 days, which is the time since we last had a power cut. I never reset it, and never have any problems.

  24. every device has it's limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A router is like any other device it has limits. If you surpass those limits then that may be the reason you need to power cycle it.

    I've owned numerous models of the WRT54G(s) and I did not have to reboot it every couple of days.

    These devices can handle a limited number of connections due to RAM and CPU usage, you may be exceeding the limits of the device and it may be time for you to upgrade to a device that is more capable to handle what you throw at it.

    Also remember that most of these devices are fan-less so you'll need to ensure they are in a cool place otherwise they may overheat.

  25. A $50 Router Stable? by BBCWatcher · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most routers are cheap. (Apple's is overpriced-cheap; the point stands.) A bunch of them are free after rebates. Considering that, it's a wonder they keep running for more than 5 minutes. They come off the same assembly lines as those Norcent (who?) $15 DVD players.

    You can buy reliable routers of course, from the C company, or the N company, or the J company, or a couple others. That's what corporations buy. What I wonder, though, is whether there's a middle ground: a "pro-sumer" router. Maybe somebody has got some suggestions.

    1. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if it really qualifies as "pro-sumer" but I've used several Netgear FVS318's in small business settings and they've worked wonderfully. Reviews online are mixed, but I personally have had great luck with them.

    2. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree, I've set up some friends wireless and wired. Junk, crap, more crap, intermittent crap, even 30ft away. Most people see 'cheap router' and buy it. Or they get one from their ISP for free with a new install, and that thing isn't even worth the plastic it's made out of.

      The router I have is one of the older Netgear RP614's(v2), I've rebooted it once in the last two years after a lightening strike knocked my cable modem off and messed up the resync. I think I paid $45 for it back then, it's been extremely reliable for me. I suppose I should be happy with that.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Get a WRT54G and flash it with Tomato. You'll wonder how you ever got along with the stock firmware. Do you really think that Apple's stuff is substantially higher quality than Linksys, Buffalo or anyone else? It's not, it's made in the same Chinese factories. Apple's profit margins are higher, sure.

      The problem is the poor quality of the stock firmware in the things: it's not well thought-out, not well-tested, and frankly isn't particularly reliable in most cases.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by Jimmy+King · · Score: 1

      US Robotics makes a small business/pro-sumer line of equipment. That said, I've got the 802.11g access point from that line (or what was that line several years ago) and I can't recommend wasting your money on it.

    5. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Cisco's 800, 1800, and 2800 line are certainly affordable (where "affordable" is closer to the $1000 mark than some free-after-rebate special).

      I go this route these days instead of flashing el-cleapos because I don't have the time I did when I was young and single. Sure, the 2801 with a DSL WIC is way more expensive, but I never have to touch the damn thing.

    6. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Read the comment again, he is saying that Apple's profit margins are higher, sure, but their routers aren't any better.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by rcw-home · · Score: 3, Informative

      What I wonder, though, is whether there's a middle ground: a "pro-sumer" router. Maybe somebody has got some suggestions.

      Here's two: Soekris, Mikrotik/Routerboard.

    8. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. A little Pilsner's Urquell will do that.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    9. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    10. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netopia routers are quite stable. Dont have any fancy http setup though, all being done via Telnet, but I like them better. As for price, they are twice the price of a cheap router, but imho worth it.

    11. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually; yes. Buy something used. There are plenty or reasons to disagree with my forthcoming suggestions, but before you reply with "just run tomato" realize that you are still suggesting running solid software on top of a crap platform, which is fine, but not what I think the poster is asking.

      Now that Cisco has completely supplanted the PIX with the ASA you can get a PIX 501 or 506 used for a decent price. It's still probably going to run you around $200 but it's going to be a solid piece of hardware.

      Another alternative is to explore the 'roll your own' aspect on top of good solid hardware. At my house, I use a Soekris Net4501 running FreeBSD from a 32MB compact flash card that I haven't EVER ONCE had to reboot due to a software or hardware fault in at least 6 years. The only problem with it now is that the CPU in it tops out routing at around 20mbit, and I suspect my connection will catch up to it soon.

    12. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use a 486 runing freesco.

      The downside is I had to buy a 100MB switch to handle the LAN traffic.

      I have rarely had to power cycle the thing since upgrading the memory to 16 MB.

    13. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by matty619 · · Score: 1

      I've had m0n0wall running on a soekris board with over a year of uptime....probably the most viable "prosumer" router I know of.

    14. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "pro-sumer," in my mind, would be the kind of person who likely has some older hardware laying around, or money that they're willing to spend on new hardware, and a bit of intelligence; at least enough to read a manual if they have trouble.

      If we can assume that definition to be true, I'd suggest that they use their old hardware/cash flow to set up a small system to run pf, which would be my choice, or iptables on.

      pfSense is free and would be great for someone with the hardware but who wanted an easy way to deal with configuration.

    15. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      Then why do we have to "Monday Morning router reboot" a munch of the C name routers, every week

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    16. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by Eil · · Score: 1

      What I wonder, though, is whether there's a middle ground: a "pro-sumer" router. Maybe somebody has got some suggestions.

      There sure is: a salvaged or home-built PC with Smoothwall, m0n0wall, IPCop, or pfSense. Any of these make an excellent home or small office router. Because you select the hardware yourself, you get to choose how fast, flexible, or reliable the resulting router is.

    17. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on your definition of "pro-sumer." There's routers available at pretty much any price point. Linksys, for example, makes some that cost a few hundred bucks (or more) while Cisco, IIRC, does too. (Yes, I'm aware that one owns the other now, but that's beside the point.) See, for example, the Cisco 800 and 1800 routers, as well as the Linksys RV series.

    18. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you're looking for Draytek (Demo of their web control panel).

      It's a bit odd how little-known Draytek are considering the quality of their products. I've been looking at their Vigor 2820VN. It's lacking in a few features, but combining it with a Linksys WRT54GL running Tomato should give me everything i want.

    19. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by Penguin+Follower · · Score: 1

      I have a Netopia 3387WG-ENT that I love. The ENT in the model name denoting the fact that it comes with the enterprise firmware (no GUI interface, telnet only). And the WG denoting it has wireless built in as well. I have VPN set up on it so that I can connect to my home LAN from wherever I am at on the road. And it doesn't cost nearly as much as a Cisco SOHO router. The 3387WG-ENT currently costs only 117.99$ at Newegg (though when I bought mine they were about $200. Nice price drop.). Here's the Newegg link.

    20. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by gibbsjoh · · Score: 1

      We've rolled out a few 2820Vn's at work for remote users. It (like the 2800 units we still use - you can probably find them cheaper) is good quality and robust. ADSL2+ VoIP, VPN, VLAN support, reliable as hell, ugly looking but built like a brick shithouse. I can recommend them with the exception of my personal peeve below:

      ** the deal breaker for me at home is the fact that the 2820 does not (and will not according to Draytek support) sport 5GHz 802.11n - it is N-compliant but only at 2.4GHz.

      JG

      --
      -- "...I'm a bad guy because I, well, I sing some rock-and-roll songs." M. Manson
    21. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by JSG · · Score: 1

      FWIW - My firm have sold, configured and maintain around 200 Drayteks from 2600 onwards. Like all devices they have some good and bad points. My personal peeves are:
      2800 to 2820 IPSEC tunnels are a no no (what sort of QA testing can possibly have been done! The tunnel comes up but data does not pass)
      The SNMP stack is partial

      On the bright side they are seriously reliable. We've only ever replaced one. Uptimes on them can be of the order of months and usually a reboot is only because a VPN wont connect. The manual is dreadful but then the online support site is stuffed with howtos.

    22. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      I am amused by all the comments from people extolling the virtues of 'brand-x' because they only have to reboot the router 'every few weeks/months'. I use Draytek on all my sites - that's 32 veterinary clinics - and we just don't have to reboot the routers - period. Our uptimes are in the hundreds of days and outages are generally power related, down to phone line faults, or because someone has pulled the wrong power plug.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    23. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Cisco ASA5505. I like it a lot. It was around $350 from Newegg, which I consider a pretty reasonable price. It has plenty of muscle even for a "pro-sumer." And you get an IOS-like management interface so you get to feel smart when you're working with it.

      Truth be told, $350 is damn cheap for what you get. The firewalls we sell at work for $250/month aren't nearly as good, though I have to admit that the "J company" web interface is much easier than Cisco's.

    24. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by bj+bignell · · Score: 1

      Could you please tell us who the C, N, and J companies are? I'm not hip enough to identify them by just the first letter, you insensitive clod!

    25. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the off-chance that you're not trolling:

      C = Cisco Systems
      N = Nortel
      J = Juniper Networks

      HTH. HAND.

    26. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by gibbsjoh · · Score: 1

      What issues are you having with the IPSEC?

      --
      -- "...I'm a bad guy because I, well, I sing some rock-and-roll songs." M. Manson
    27. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by gpuk · · Score: 1

      See my earlier post re: Draytek. They're the closest thing to a "pro-sumer" router I've come across (and I've tested/used 10s of different makes and model of router).

    28. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by Henk+Poley · · Score: 1

      Why can't you just write out the names of the networking companies? Cisco I know. The others escape me.

    29. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

      Another vote for Draytek. Been using them at home and buying them for others for about five years. Never crash, tons of features, most reliable wireless I've ever come across in a compact router, wicked little VPN capabilities for those of you not wishing to shell out a shitload on Cisco but not wanting to set up linux boxes either. Expensive, but will last as long as you can resist the "oooh, shiny!" factor of their next model.

      Have been running a 2800VG for about 2 1/2 years now and the only times I've rebooted it are when we've been having problems with the line when the equipment at the exchange goes south. In my last house the thing wasn't rebooted for the whole year it was in there.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    30. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by bj+bignell · · Score: 1

      Thank you!

    31. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by SubS · · Score: 1

      Pro-sumer would be great, but than again one can do like I did after my latest 3 year old Linksys lost it's wireless capabilities: Cisco ASA5505 as a firewall/routing and Cisco AP-1130 Series access point for wireless. Now I can tweak almost everything live without reloads.

      These things aren't actually that overpriced, specially if you have access to NFR prices.

    32. Re:A $50 Router Stable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most routers are cheap. (Apple's is overpriced-cheap; the point stands.) A bunch of them are free after rebates. Considering that, it's a wonder they keep running for more than 5 minutes. They come off the same assembly lines as those Norcent (who?) $15 DVD players.

      You can buy reliable routers of course, from the C company, or the N company, or the J company, or a couple others. That's what corporations buy. What I wonder, though, is whether there's a middle ground: a "pro-sumer" router. Maybe somebody has got some suggestions.

      I've bought a Thompson SpeedTouch router and find it to be pretty decent. No restart required yet (only restarted it for troubleshooting, and in every case it was not the router but the ISP PPPoE connection).

  26. I rarely reboot mine by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1

    Over the last 10 years, I've owned a couple netgear and linksys wifi routers and they have all been the lowest maintenance devices in my home network. I can't recall ever having to kick-start one of this devices for misbehavior. They've all been left on 24/7 and are only restarted after power outages or when I accidentally kick the plug out of the wall socket.

    Either you or I must be way out on the tails of the bell curve.

  27. Alternative Firmware by leerpm · · Score: 1

    There's usually nothing wrong with the hardware, just the software/firmware. Trying using some third party firmware like DD-WRT on the WRT54G. YMMV, but I can't recall the last time I had to reboot mine.

  28. We don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have never had to restart any of my routers.

    Well, aside from a firmware upgrade.

  29. Slow news day? by kwabbles · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I mean, seriously.

    --
    Just disrupt the deflector shield with a tachyon burst.
  30. Router or Modem? by FonzCam · · Score: 1

    The only times I've had problems with a router has been with the firmware of my old cable STB that also acted as a modem (it would just drop the connection/DHCP lease at random and the only thing that seemed to fix it was a reboot of both STB and router). Since I got a new modem I haven't had any trouble. I can't remember the last time I had to restart my WRT56G because it wasn't working.

    1. Re:Router or Modem? by Dun+Kick+The+Noob · · Score: 1

      Own a WRT54G, experienced wireless connection issues with it where the wireless clients couldnt contact the router. Just save the wireless setting via web config page while connected via cat 5. Seems to solve it. Though of course if switching the power on and off seems to be faster...

  31. Sometimes you really do get what you pay for... by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 1

    However, before you write off your devices, you might try to see if there are more current firmware revisions that will make them a bit more resilient.

    Even if that "fixes" the rebooting problem. You still ought to periodically check to see if there have been critical security bugs that have been addressed and rolled into newer firmware revs. Just because it's a black box doesn't mean you can just turn it on and forget about it. The black hats never sleep.

    Cheers,

  32. Reboot a router, What?? by tuxgeek · · Score: 1

    I use a D-Link EBR-2310. I have never had to reboot it. It just continues to work day in and day out.

    --
    "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
  33. Suggest making sure the firmware is up to date by EdwinFreed · · Score: 1

    I used to have to restart my Airport Extreme every once in a while, but after updating its firmware that's no longer necessary. According to InterMapper it has been running for 84 days without a restart, and if memory serves the reason it was reset 84 days ago was to do some recabling.

  34. It shouldn't be... by evilviper · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've gotten to wondering why it's necessary to reboot these devices so frequently, like every few days.

    It's cheap, fast development... Not bothering to pay attention to correctness, not watching for memory leaks, etc., etc.

    It shouldn't be that way, of course. I got an old K6-2 system, underclocked it to 100MHz, removed CPU fan and replaced the PSU fan with a very slow and quiet model to make a nearly-silent 8watt system. Then installed OpenBSD on a 32MB CF card (stripped of unnecessary binaries for size, but otherwise completely normal), and have been using that for years. It will run indefinitely, without a reboot. My record for uptime so far is 5 months, and it's only that short because of power outages, and I don't feel the need for a UPS for my router...

    It seems like routers, purpose-built with an embedded OS, should be the most stable devices on my network.

    There's nothing about being "an embedded OS" that should make it any more or less stable.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:It shouldn't be... by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's nothing about being "an embedded OS" that should make it any more or less stable.

      Except for the fact that the end-user isn't messing it up? And that there are very few programs that are installed/will be installed? Really, most embedded OSes should be very stable because the cause for most OS crashes are A) Applications B) Drivers and C) user error. Because applications are not going to be installed and it should ship with very few to begin with, that takes that out of the picture. For B, the router shouldn't need any specialized drivers, or if they do, they should be minimal, and C) because the user only edits configurations that should be "safe" that isn't a problem.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:It shouldn't be... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I ran Smoothwall for a while ... it was a nice program but I eventually went for a WRT54G with Tomato because I didn't like heating up my basement just for a firewall. You definitely take first prize for general coolness though.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:It shouldn't be... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "It will run indefinitely, without a reboot."

      Megadittos on older 'puters running from CF.

      My P233 m0n0wall box (in an even more ancient Magitronic AT case) has been up 24/7 since 2000 except for the odd power outage. The only reason it runs m0n0wall is that I was curious and switched from Freesco, which was also trouble-free.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    4. Re:It shouldn't be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I took a P100 with three NICs, made a PicoBSD (FreeBSD 4.1) floppy with ipfw+natd+mpd (I think, this was a while ago) and ran happily with DSL on that. Rebooted once in two years to change the floppy (upgraded a few things, change the QoS rules), then took it out of service a year later because I was trying to reduce the number of big, ugly, beige boxes around here.

      Currently, there's 3 routers in service: Speedtouch 516 (never needs rebooting, but has static IPs), Linksys BEFW1154 v.2 (needs rebooting every 6 months), and some D-Link crap that reboots itself every week or two. I think having a UPS, clean power in the building, and (most importantly) minimizing the use of NAT make a huge, huge difference. (The Linksys & D-Link both do NAT - I can't even disable it in the latter device)

    5. Re:It shouldn't be... by Khakionion · · Score: 1

      "There's nothing about being "an embedded OS" that should make it any more or less stable." Embedded OSes are engineered towards a specific tasks. General OSes have many, many libraries in order to run any program you throw at it. In a nutshell, embedded OSes run less code, and the code they do run is higher-priority, and thusly more likely to be robust. This is why the previous discussion on Windows in embedded usecases is relevant; ~650MB of operating system isn't necessary to run ATMs, photo kiosks, elevators and the like. Your stripped down OpenBSD is essentially a custom version of OpenBSD for embedded use cases. (My captcha was "simplify." :)

      --
      OMG! Wau!
    6. Re:It shouldn't be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a Windows NT 4.0 server with an uptime of over 4 years. I wish I would have taken a screenshot before I decommissioned her. A security sieve because it was never patched, but stable as hell. All it did was run an FTP server for years.

    7. Re:It shouldn't be... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 0

      The problem with using a puter for a router is power consumption. While the initial cost might be 0, the long term cost is much higher than even a top shelf commercial router.

    8. Re:It shouldn't be... by Drgnkght · · Score: 2, Funny

      All it did was run an FTP server for years.

      LOL, sorry but I have to ask. Did you install it?

    9. Re:It shouldn't be... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      My record for uptime so far is 5 months,

      $ uptime
      19:14:38 up 420 days, 40 min, 140 users, load average: 2.09, 2.03, 2.00

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    10. Re:It shouldn't be... by bennini · · Score: 1
      mod parent up and mod grandparent way down.

      There's nothing about being "an embedded OS" that should make it any more or less stable.

      ??? are you joking? this statement couldn't be more wrong. this person has obviously no knowledge of embedded and/or real-time systems. the point of an embedded OS is to focus on core requirements and tasks. minimizing features in an OS (or any piece of software, really) almost always results in a more stable system.

    11. Re:It shouldn't be... by beegle · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would appreciate even a link on how to underclock a CPU on OpenBSD.

      OS is irrelevant. When the machine starts, you need to go into the BIOS. That probably means pressing F1 or Del. Somewhere in there will be speed settings (maybe "clock" and "multiplier" with that age of machine). Write down the original settings. Then, start dropping the speed. If you have "clock" and "multiplier", drop multiplier first. Drop a little bit, save, reboot. Make sure the OS still works. If it does, drop another notch. Repeat until you run out of settings, it's too slow for its intended purpose, or it starts to feel like Windows Vista.

      If you go too far, either try rebooting (some machines will always boot into the BIOS at a safe speed), or open up the case and take out the little battery overnight. When you put it back, the BIOS should reset to something useable.

      --
      --
    12. Re:It shouldn't be... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      There's nothing about being "an embedded OS" that should make it any more or less stable.

      A router should be extremely stable for a few reasons. First, the hardware is well-known, there are few external devices meaning fewer drivers, and drivers are a common area of instability. There are also few, well-known applications that need to run on one.

      I know that my linksys wrt54g, with dd-wrt, and a ups, doesn't need to be rebooted. I had a really bad power outage a week ago, but before that the uptime was over 100 days.

    13. Re:It shouldn't be... by plasticsquirrel · · Score: 1

      An old, slow, quiet PC does make an extremely reliable router. I did this with a 25MHz 486, with 12MB of memory and 4 NIC's. It had no hard drive, and loaded the whole system into RAM from a floppy disk at boot time. It performed like a champ without a single hiccup.

      --
      Systemd: the PulseAudio of init systems
    14. Re:It shouldn't be... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      There's nothing about being "an embedded OS" that should make it any more or less stable.

      The thing is that it's doing just one job and anything unrelated to that job can be removed. It really simplifies testing and reduces the number of things that can go wrong.

      BTW: I would consider your installation to be an embedded OS.

    15. Re:It shouldn't be... by linuxpyro · · Score: 1

      I run OpenBSD and PF on a Soekris Net4501 at school. It is pretty reliable. I'd have used an old PC, but I was trying to save a little power and have something more portable.

      --
      Saying "I'll probably get modded down for this" in a post is the best way to get it modded up.
    16. Re:It shouldn't be... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Around here, running a m0n0wall box at 30W for a year will cost me about $22. It'll take a while to save up to a "top shelf" commercial router at $22/year. Don't forget that most dedicated routers also draw 8-12W themselves, and it would probably cost me a year and a half worth of electricity to just to properly recycle the m0n0wall PC.

      Besides, in the case of m0n0wall, if you find you really like it but want to ditch the old PC, m0n0wall will also run on "appliance" hardware from several vendors.

    17. Re:It shouldn't be... by raddan · · Score: 1

      I can second that. OpenBSD on my non-stripped OS (frequently-written directories mounted as ramdisks, the rest on CF) ran for 4 years straight-- the only time it ever went down was when the power went out. This is a Soekris 4526, which is overkill for this particular application (home wireless router), but I can't complain-- got it on eBay for $50 and it typically consumes about a Watt according to my Kill-a-Watt.

      We run the exact same software (OpenBSD that is) on our server-grade hardware at work. These are on much more stable power supplies (UPS-protected, of course), and they almost never go down. The last time I did a reboot (to install memory; was hitting state table limits on a very busy router), our uptime on our main router was 344 days.

    18. Re:It shouldn't be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing about being "an embedded OS" that should make it any more or less stable.

      Except that embedded usually doesn't run on general purpose devices like a pc, but on small devices with a specific task. You won't need svga support on a router, for example, so you don't compile that into the embedded kernel, don't have X running, and so on.

      All code contains bugs. Running less code means running less bugs, smaller chance of memory leaks and so on.

    19. Re:It shouldn't be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to build one of these. Or even buy one from someone who is good at making them. Are there any tutorials of this online?

    20. Re:It shouldn't be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got an old 486SX/2 66 system, underclocked it to 50MHz, there was no CPU fan. Then installed Linux on a 420MB harddisk, and have been using that for years. it will run indefinitely, without a reboot. My record for uptime so far is 12 months, and it's only that short because of power outages and me installing bigger harddrives, and I don't feel the need for a UPS for my router...

      Currently 44MB RAM, 6GB harddisk, 2x 3c509, 1x 460kbps serial card
      Runs qmail, dovecot, samba, knfsd, sshd, telnetd, bind, thttpd, squid, lpd, chrony, efax, and some custom application to log missed calls

      Next time I upgrade this baby it'll get a PCI bus. It sucks to have to use PIO to talk to the ethernet cards and the harddisk.

    21. Re:It shouldn't be... by psydeshow · · Score: 1

      For B, the router shouldn't need any specialized drivers, or if they do, they should be minimal

      That would be true if companies like Linksys and Netgear didn't change hardware configurations every few years in order to increase margins.

      Many folks have already mentioned the v5+ WRT54G as an example. In an anti-Moore's Law move, Linksys decided to save money by cutting the memory in half. This necessitated a shift to a different OS (from Linux to VXWorks (which has a smaller footprint)) and suddenly they had v1.0 firmware with tons of bugs.

      The problem is even worse when they decide to switch architectures. The WRVN4400S I have uses a different chipset, and--get this--DHCP doesn't work. Firmware is at v1.1, and hasn't been updated since October.

      I can't imagine that it's so much cheaper to re-engineer the OS for their products every few years than to just keep sourcing the same hardware, but apparently it is.

    22. Re:It shouldn't be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing about being "an embedded OS" that should make it any more or less stable.

      An embedded OS has a much more exactly predefined set of requirements. Fewer unpredictable events = fewer unpredictable interactions that could cause failure. It's one of the reasons OpenBSD is so secure, they turn everything but the bare essentials off.

    23. Re:It shouldn't be... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      General OSes have many, many libraries in order to run any program you throw at it.

      A library not being actively used by a program, has no effect on the system. "less code" on disk has no effect on anything, other than the necessary size of the disk.

      Similarly, a kernel that has been stripped of unnecessary components, versus included those components and simply never utilizing them for anything, affects only the size on disk and the amount of RAM required. Stability can't possibly be affected.

      You sound like the type of person who removes (non-suid/sgid) binaries from a Unix system (most commonly: the compiliers) in a vain attempt to make it more secure...

      Your stripped down OpenBSD is essentially a custom version of OpenBSD for embedded use cases.

      No, it really isn't. There's absolutely NOTHING about it that could possibly make it more or less stable. I simply removed unneeded binaries and associated libs to save disk space. The remaining necessary binaries and libraries are completely unmodified.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    24. Re:It shouldn't be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most embedded OSes should be very stable because the cause for most OS crashes are A) Applications B) Drivers and C) user error.

      A and C are OS failures. It's the kind of things that would BSOD Windows 95. Even XP does better than that.

      Drivers will of course kill anything - a microkernel will provice *some* protection, but a driver can usually make the card (NIC or whatever) lock up the bus, and no software can protect against something like that.

    25. Re:It shouldn't be... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      I got an old K6-2 system, underclocked it to 100MHz, removed CPU fan and replaced the PSU fan with a very slow and quiet model to make a nearly-silent 8watt system. Then installed OpenBSD on a 32MB CF card (stripped of unnecessary binaries for size, but otherwise completely normal), and have been using that for years. It will run indefinitely, without a reboot.

      Interesting; I did something similar once upon a time. 2002, I think. I picked up a P75 from a flea market, installed a USB card in the one and only PCI slot and an ISA NIC, and installed Smoothwall. It worked great for sharing an ADSL connection among the dozen or so students in our house that year. However, it would come to a grinding halt if I tried to make too many P2P connections - not a matter of bandwidth, I think, just too many connections to keep track of.

      Then again, that old box only had 16MiB of RAM. A K6/2 would have, what... 64ish? That shouldn't have much trouble keeping up with some decent-sized torrents.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    26. Re:It shouldn't be... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      However, it would come to a grinding halt if I tried to make too many P2P connections - not a matter of bandwidth, I think, just too many connections to keep track of. Then again, that old box only had 16MiB of RAM. A K6/2 would have, what... 64ish?

      I would suspect a software bug.

      16MB should be ample. I used a (12MHz?) x386 with just 4MBs of RAM as a router several years ago, with no such problems.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    27. Re:It shouldn't be... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      The average desktop PC draws more like 100W, and the average US electrical rate is about .10 per kw hr. That is about $90 per year, not counting impact on your A/C bill which could easily double the cost. This pays for a Cisco firewall appliance in a couple of years.

      Not to mention the fact that electricity prices are expected to rise rapidly over the next few years.

  35. Must be something you are doing by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    My router is only rebooted when the house loses power... on average about once a year or so.

  36. The problem is.. by Fjornir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...the expectations of the user. Newsflash: when you buy cheap crap it is going to perform like cheap crap.

    --
    I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    1. Re:The problem is.. by philo_enyce · · Score: 1

      seriously. i never let my clients use anything but cisco pix/asa or maybe an 800 series router as their firewall/router. they never crash, well, not never, but hardly ever...

      philo

    2. Re:The problem is.. by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      I'd argue that the problem lies with manufacturers. Yes, cheap crap will perform like cheap crap... BUT, manufacturers with any integrity should not be selling cheap crap. I sympathize with the customers ("consumers" to such vendors) who get ripped off, but they're just looking for the best deal - it's the vendors who are at fault for setting the expectation that their cheap product will perform properly. My little company sells moderately priced product, and I for one, won't compromise on quality when I sell a product. That means not being the cheapest, but I know my customers are getting something that a) works, and b)won't bite me in the ass later.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    3. Re:The problem is.. by bfields · · Score: 1

      Newsflash: when you buy cheap crap it is going to perform like cheap crap.

      Unfortunately, expensive crap can also sometimes perform like crap. And when you're selling as many units as linksys or netgear probably does, the per-unit cost of the extra QA and such isn't likely to be all that much anyway (assuming it's a one-time cost for the firmware development), so in theory a stable router needn't be significantly more expensive.

      And relying on price *alone* always invites the danger that someone will realize they can sell cheap crap at a higher price and people will assume it's worth it.

      So, you're a consumer walking the aisles of your local (or virtual) computer shop, trying to pick a quality router. Price alone isn't a great help. What else do you have? As far as I can tell the computer magazines, for example, don't do a lot of really careful scientific testing of this kind of thing.

      Figure out how to get consumers more information about the quality of alternatives, and you'll have figured out how to improve the quality of what's offered. It'd be better for everybody involved.

    4. Re:The problem is.. by jaredmauch · · Score: 1

      I run a semi-large wireless footprint with old Cisco Aironet gear. There's like 9 APs, some of them in repeater mode, covering roughly 15-20 acres of residental and open space. It's worth the expense to have a real wireless access point vs some all-in-one device on an embeded platform (eg: Aironet, etc..)

      If you want something that will work right, you need to pay a few hundred bucks total. You can get a Soekris board and get the best of all worlds. It uses low power, has a few ethernets, runs your favourite *nix, and the mini-pci or usb-ports are currently futureproofed. When 802.11qwerty+magic comes out, you can swap out the card.

      That all said, even the large router vendors of the world have problems with their expensive equipment and software quality. It's all the same, the situation is trying to find the thing that sucks less (vendor, hardware, support, etc..), and trying to balance the value of your time against your pocketbook. If you're Fry and your time is worthless, go ahead and build a device and tinker over the next month.

      My recommendation? Get an Aironet AP (semi-cheap on ebay, except for the next week likely) I just got another 802.11g Aironet 1121 for $49. If you're doing things faster, think about cat5e (yeah, i know apartments suck, older home challenges, etc..) I will say, I love having my various desktops able to talk gigabit and just the laptops on the wireless. It costs real money to get a 16 or 24 port SNMPable gigabit switch for your house, but when you don't have to spend time tracing what isn't working right every other day, week, etc.. it pays for itself.

      Oh well, if the software were better, I would likely be out of a job.

    5. Re:The problem is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but there's a reason why your company is "little" but D-link, Linksys, Airnet101, etc... are large. People buy crap all the time.

    6. Re:The problem is.. by smchris · · Score: 1

      Hey, I resemble that!

      I don't know. When did Microcenter last have that Belkin rebate? Couple years ago? Three years ago? Was something like $15 for the router. And I rebooted it.......Gee, I don't know. Have I rebooted it? Had a power outage last summer during a storm. Darn it, two so far this summer. Guess they rebooted it.

      Same for the five year old Linksys. I'm voting with the people who say _his_ piece of crap is failing.

    7. Re:The problem is.. by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but there's a reason why your company is "little" but D-link, Linksys, Airnet101, etc... are large.

      "Sorry"? You say it like it's a bad thing. BTW, if you must, take Toyota as a counter example.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    8. Re:The problem is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...the expectations of the user.

      Newsflash: when you buy cheap crap it is going to perform like cheap crap.

      I've been reading Slashdot as long as I've had internet access, and never had a desire to post. But this comment really bugged me.

      You are creating an easy out for manufacturers. "Its less than $100 so it is allowed to perform like crap." That is BS. This is a recent trend in networking hardware. There is no reason for these kind of problems.

      I have an old NetGear RT314 router that I've had since the late 1990's that cost me probably about $50 and is the best piece of hardware I've ever bought. The thing had an uptime of 2.5 years at 1 point (went from DSL to cable and the tech unplugged it... I cried). The only reason I stopped using it was I moved and no longer needed a wired router (although I almost brought it with me).

      The router to this day is still doing a great job, at my mother's house. I gave it to her because I knew once I set it up and got it going, she would never, EVER need to touch it.

      The only reason manufacturers get away with making such cheap hardware (besides the fact that most people don't care and just reboot it) is because people let them get away with it. I didn't spend an arm an a leg on it, it isn't rack mountable, so it has to be crap.

      Hold manufacturers accountable for making decent hardware.

  37. BitTorrent?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had a WRT54GX for years that never needed a reset, until I started using BitTorrent. Then its 4KB (?) connections table would fill up and the device would hang. Had to build an OpenBSD firewall to handle the many active and inactive connections you get with BT.

    1. Re:BitTorrent?? by nchip · · Score: 1

      Correct. On linux 2.4.x based routers the default kernel based limit for simultaneous NAT connections is selected according to amount of RAM. Since routers have minimal amount of RAM, the default gets set really low. If you can login to the shell the device, fix is easy (real example from my a-link router):

      # cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max
      256
      # echo 10000 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max

      Closed-OS routers typically have similar static tables designed before bittorrent was invented.

      On newer 2.6 kernels there is also support for "stateless" NAT, which allows unlimited amount of connections behind.

      --
      signatures pending - ansa@kos.to - (dont mail there)
    2. Re:BitTorrent?? by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Was it that you started using BT, or that you started using a lot more bandwidth?

      What I've found is that ANY home router that I use as the main switch will freak out after a few days... Linksys (original and multiple custom firmwares), DLink, you name it.

      My solution?

      I bought an 8 port gigabit switch and use that for my network, and my router now only deal with things that are actually going to/from the internet.

      I've not had a problem since. (I use a DLink DIR-655 now and love it. The QoS solved my BT hogging-all-the-bandwidth problem nicely and even BT gets better speed now.)

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    3. Re:BitTorrent?? by Wells2k · · Score: 1

      I bought an 8 port gigabit switch and use that for my network, and my router now only deal with things that are actually going to/from the internet.

      I tried this myself, only with a 24-port gigabit switch. Still had the same problems. Once I upgraded to an low-end enterprise level router (3com 5231) the problems went away.

    4. Re:BitTorrent?? by grotgrot · · Score: 1

      I also have a WRT54GX. I have to reset it every two weeks or so because the wireless stops working. If I have my Wii set to do standby connections then the router has to be reset within 24 hours. I haven't had any trouble with BitTorrent but I usually only use it for a few hours at a time (basically long enough to download an Ubuntu DVD).

      I would like to upgrade to a more recent device (gigabit) but if you look at all newer devices including those from other companies on Amazon you'll find people mentioning having to reset them in reviews. Consequently I figured I'll stay with the devil I know. Congratulations to the manufacturers for shooting themselves in the foot.

  38. Bad Wireless Chipsets by kauos · · Score: 1

    I've had a few wireless routers which borked themselves far too often (one particular netcomm model which I had to have replaced 3 times before giving up entirely on it). Now it seems to me after using these things for many years that the wireless chipsets in particular are vulnerable to overheating, and once they do so, they malfunction and the software crashes. So its less the embedded OS software itself and more faulty hardware in my experience. (In summer I still need to take an icepack out of the freezer and stick it on my ADSL modem if I don't want my internet to crash)

  39. depends on your router by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For my old linksys WRT54G (the cheaper K kind), I had to reboot it every couple of days.

    My new D-Link N DIR-655...never once have I had to reboot it in 6 months I've had it.

    1. Re:depends on your router by SirLars · · Score: 1

      I also have a DLINK DIR-655, it has been rebooted three times in the last year. Once when I upgraded the firmware, once when I moved it, and once when the power went out last month. If you have to reboot your router every few days you have a bad router or are doing something else very wrong.

  40. You're doing it wrong? by Kattspya · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've used some Zyxel router that needed restarting every few days until I found out the maximum amount of open connections and bandwidth it could take then it usually only crashed once a month.

    Now I've got an old PII with a CF as HDD running monowall and maximum uptime so far is about two months. It would appear that the modem is more flaky than the router so I've restarted it needlessly a few times. I'm inclined to think it's hardware causing problems when the router crashes on its own. It's a bare motherbord sitting ontop a cabinet with four NIC's (I had an abundance of NIC's but no switch) and it gets a bit jangled from time to time in its exposed position. I'm amazed that it works at all.

    Try to limit the amount of open connections if you're running bittorrent and maybe the bandwidth too. If that doesn't help you should probably build your own router. m0n0wall works for me and I've heard good things about IPCop.

    1. Re:You're doing it wrong? by hjf · · Score: 1

      remove the cover of your modem and/or place it inside the case, near the front air intake. All modems I've seen overheat and that makes them crash (except for my good old Cisco 677 which was killed by a thunderstorm. That thing was like boiling but never dropped connections. Uptime was several months)

    2. Re:You're doing it wrong? by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      A naked motherboard with four NIC's is definately geeky. That router rules.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    3. Re:You're doing it wrong? by Darkk · · Score: 0

      Try to limit the amount of open connections if you're running bittorrent and maybe the bandwidth too. If that doesn't help you should probably build your own router. m0n0wall works for me and I've heard good things about IPCop.

      I love IPCop. It's running on an old Dell desktop OptiPlex GX 150 1Ghz PIII with 512meg of ram off of Ebay on the cheap. I also installed two dual Intel NICs in it and it's been running great for me. It can handle bit-torrent with no problem. Biggest thing I like about it is I've installed the update accelerator add-on which caches the windows updates, adobe, AVast! and Apple to save on bandwidth. Very handy for a household or an office with several computers.

    4. Re:You're doing it wrong? by Kattspya · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have a case and the only fan is in the ATX power supply. The modem crashed twice in the recent heat period but since then it has gotten cooler again. If it heats up again and the modem crashes I'll know it is the heat that's causing it. Then I'll consider putting a fan over the thing.

      The modem is a "broad band sharer" with the routing part disabled so it only works as a modem. It's pure garabge. It's not square so you can't stack it and by default you couldn't even configure the NAT.

    5. Re:You're doing it wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf is with this AskSlashdot? Seriously.

      I've run FritzBox home routers, Zyxel buisness routers, plain vanilla bought-from-a-store Linksys and D-Link routers in a commercial setting with over 40 users, and none have been rebooted in at least 2 years other than for firmware patches.

    6. Re:You're doing it wrong? by hjf · · Score: 1

      then just removing the cover will do.

      I know very well how these things react to heat. In my area 42-45 degrees (celsius!) aren't unusual, and these things can't handle it. I stacked my router (routerboard.com, bare board) gigabit switch (3com officeconnect 8-port), fast ethernet switch (3com officeconnect 16-port), adsl modem (zoom X5), access point (airlive?).

      The 16-port at the bottom was a stackable (it even has an accessory that comes in the box), it was happy all along. The routerboard is pretty cool even at 50 degree ambient, but the modem just didn't want to work that hot. It was sandwiched between the routerboard and the 8-port gigabit switch. I had to place an 80mm low noise fan in one side of the stack and the temperature dropped A LOT, no more problems since.

      As a side note, the 8-port 3com was so hot that the bottom label got loose (!) but the thing kept working. It has TINY holes at the sides but enough for the fan. The 16-port, designed to be stackable, has a much clever "convective" cooling and heatsinks on the two chips. Also the fact that the case is made of metal helps a lot too.

  41. no need to reboot by Eugene · · Score: 1

    I've used SMC routers in the past, then switched to Zyxel router now(the home routers, not the expensive ones). and in my experience, I have never intetionally reboot them, only when I update the firmware (that happen maybe once every 6 month?) my routers are always up and running and never rebooted.. but on the other hand, I used to own a D-Link router for my folk's place. that router lasted maybe 1 week before replaced by SMC.. (reboots and resets randomly)

  42. Ironic Connection Sharing by irlyh8d2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just use a cheap Pentium 2 running Windows XP with Internet Connection Sharing. Disabled the automatic updates and firewalled it properly over 18 months ago, and haven't had to touch the machine since.

    1. Re:Ironic Connection Sharing by sjhs · · Score: 0

      What a horrible horrible waste of power consumption.

    2. Re:Ironic Connection Sharing by Darkness404 · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be just as easy to convert that to a Linux box? I mean, there are loads of distros specially made just for routing and a P II would be almost overkill for most of them. Because isn't XP just kind of... Wasting your resources?

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    3. Re:Ironic Connection Sharing by hjf · · Score: 1

      You should check your connection, your comments for the other guys running pentium 2's with Linux or BSD as routers didn't go through. Or maybe you are just trolling him because he's using Windows.

    4. Re:Ironic Connection Sharing by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yeah ... there's a bunch of good firewall appliance distros that are painless to install. Smoothwall comes to mind. IPCop as well (although I believe IPCop is a fork of Smoothwall.)

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    5. Re:Ironic Connection Sharing by irlyh8d2 · · Score: 1

      Don't know. What was the state of UPnP support 18 months ago? When I was setting it up *nix was my first consideration, but google didn't seem to have know if it'd have UPnP, so I took the lazy way out.

    6. Re:Ironic Connection Sharing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're using an unpatched XP machine as your internet gateway?

      Scary.

    7. Re:Ironic Connection Sharing by Tycho · · Score: 1

      Me, I've got an old Microsoft manfactured 802.11g router running an embedded version of Windows CE that has been running for two years in its current location. I don't think the router has been intentionally rebooted in its current location, ever. It gets little use and probably would be considered a giant security risk by most people, but it is not in open access mode and broadcasts in a somewhat isolated area. Back when I used the wireless router more often and with P2P apps, the router had no significant issues, there were more issues with the Cisco 678 DSL modem the router was hooked up to.

      The Microsoft router was also unusual in that it could switch operational modes. The device could work as a router with a NAT or switch modes and function as an access point like a switch or hub and have no NAT. Linksys and probably more companies produce wireless base station models that are locked in such a way that one model functions only as an access point and another model can only work as a router. Heh, imagine that, Microsoft offering some sort of additional value on a product.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    8. Re:Ironic Connection Sharing by toddestan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just use a cheap Pentium 2 running Windows XP with Internet Connection Sharing. Disabled the automatic updates and firewalled it properly over 18 months ago, and haven't had to touch the machine since.

      In which case, this article is for you:
      http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/11/003251

  43. Sometimes by BPPG · · Score: 1

    My router at home only needs to be rebooted when you're changing admin priveleges or re-assigning the router's IP. But one day I went to a friends house and while trying to figure out how to connect to the Internet, and tried several times to give myself a proper IP. Each time I did, I disconnected my friend's roommate while he was playing WoW. Apparently he was in the middle of a big group mission. I had no idea until the fifth disconnect.

    --
    What's the value of information that you don't know?
  44. Limit your p2p connections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Torrents with a large number of peers (1000+), or any p2p app that you allow to maintain thousands of peer connections, will put your home router at risk of crashing -- they simply were not specified for that kind of load. It has nothing to do with bandwidth, and everything to do with the router's limited memory and such (in combination with buggy embedded software).

    Old Netgear routers were notorious for crashing even with a relatively small number (in the hundreds) of connections. But even top name brands like Linksys have this problem if you crank up the number of connections high enough. Place limits on the apps by going into the config/preferences. The defaults are usually quite reasonable or even a little too high, but a lot of people think it's an artificial limitation so they crank them up. Don't do that unless you have an industrial-grade router at home, or if you're willing to flash your firmware with unofficial fixes.

  45. reset by slack_prad · · Score: 1

    When my free to use wifi is overcrowded and not letting me in..

    --
    Sent from my desktop computer
  46. Crashing!? by CyberBill · · Score: 1

    I've got 5 WRT54G's running DD-WRT out in the desert in enclosures. They routinely operate in temperatures in excess of 110 degrees, and usually have a bunch of users on them. They currently have an uptime of nearly 2 months, the last time they were down is when I upgraded their firmware. The WRT54G in my closet, also running DD-WRT, never crashes. And I download a LOT of torrents!

    --
    -Bill
    1. Re:Crashing!? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've got 5 WRT54G's running DD-WRT out in the desert in enclosures. They routinely operate in temperatures in excess of 110 degrees, and usually have a bunch of users on them.

      Is that degree C, F or K?

    2. Re:Crashing!? by maxume · · Score: 1

      The obvious one. Obviously.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Crashing!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Celsenheit

    4. Re:Crashing!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be Fahrenheit because water boils at 100 degrees Celsius, and I have never heard anyone measure outdoor temperature in Kelvin (and 110 kelvin is a very cool environment).

      110 degrees Fahrenheit is about 43.3 degrees Celsius, I would personally prefer not to keep electronics in an environment that hot, but it should work pretty well in theory.

    5. Re:Crashing!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kelvin temperatures are not measured in degrees since 1968, pedant.
      -Superpedant

  47. dd-wrt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    load dd-wrt on your linksys wrt54g. the only time you will reboot it is when you accidentally unplug it. ive had 50 days of uptime and i would have more if i didn't accidentally unplug it. all thanks to linux.

    1. Re:dd-wrt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      may i point out that the wrt routers already run linux. so, install linux to prevent linux from crashing?

  48. don't see a problem by pbjones · · Score: 1

    I have had both of them and rarely, once a month? or less, reset them.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  49. You don't if you find the right firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a WRTG54 that I haven't restarted once in the year I've lived in my current home save for a power outage. If using aftermarket firmware is possible with your router it may be a good idea.

  50. Iphone messed my WRT54G until I upgraded firmware by rufusdufus · · Score: 1

    I was having problems with my wrt54g when iphones were connected to it. I upgraded the firmware (by downloading it from the net), and the problem went away.

  51. Install OpenWRT. by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 1

    Historically. Old Linksys boxes needed to be rebooted often.
    They never fixed the bugs, and if you wanted a new feature, that meant purchasing a new box. (That was the business model, I guess)
    I gave up on them.

    Then Linksys came out with a Linux based router. WRT54G.

    Of course Linux did not mean the support or bug fixing would be better. They used an old version of Linux with various proprietary junk on top.

    The best support you get is with open-source.

    Overwrite whatever Linksys installs with a truely open system:
    OpenWRT. I have been running White Russion 0.9 since it came out and only have downtime with firmware updates.
    (there are other wrt firmwares besides openwrt, but most are not really open).

    1. Re:Install OpenWRT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Uh... is there an open source driver for the broadcom chipsets the linksys uses then? I got a wrt54gl thinking it was a good choice - it had "linux" written on it! - but turns out there wasn't any open source driver for it, so openwrt was using linux 2.4 and the closed binary, which really sucked. Shrug.

    2. Re:Install OpenWRT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a reverse-engineered open driver for most of the WRT54G family's broadcom chipsets, yes - called "b43".

      It still needs a firmware blob (i.e. the code that runs on the wifi chip is closed, sigh), but that's pretty similar to several other wifi drivers, and is still much less sucky than the binary kernel module (means you're not stuck with linux kernel 2.4, and all the nice features of the "mac80211" linux 2.6.24+ wireless stack can work).

        The soon-to-be-released 8.08 "kamikaze" openwrt includes linux 2.6 and b43 instead of linux 2.4 and the binary kernel module. EXCEPT THERE IS ONE MAJOR CAVEAT- AP (Access Point!) mode doesn't quite work yet (it very nearly works though - expect it in months at most). That means (er) the unit can't actually act as an wifi Access Point if you use the latest kamikaze. But it is the "kamikaze" branch, it's not expected to be perfect...

  52. You have bad luck or a bad router by gelfling · · Score: 1

    My Netgear 624 never had to be rebooted...until it stopped working after 13 months. My Netgear 824, only two months old, granted has never been rebooted except for the three firmware updates in a 3 day period. My Netgear PS121 print server has had to be restarted (to flush the print queue) a few times. My Surfboard SB4100 cable modem I don't think was rebooted since 2001. I replaced it two months ago for a faster one. My Centillium MTA-1 TA has never had to be rebooted in 2 years. My Vonage V-Portal has never had to be rebooted.

    I also have a Linksys BEFS class 'b' router that hasn't been rebooted in more than 2 years and a Belkin F5230-4 that's never HAD to be rebooted though it has been accidentally shut off quite a bit.

    1. Re:You have bad luck or a bad router by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which version of the Netgear 624 do you have Is it the WGT624? V1 or 2? Both had major overheating problems.

    2. Re:You have bad luck or a bad router by gelfling · · Score: 1

      I had a WGT624v3. It's dead now. Not from heat but wireless piece simply stopped working one day. Since the box can't be stacked I had it arrayed standing on its side with nothing remotely near it on any side and nothing blocking any airflow around it.

  53. could be by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

    It could also be the modem/transceiver (cable or DSL). I had a crappy Westell router/modem that Verizon gave to me that would always need resetting. I got a WRT54G and hooked that up to the Westell (set it to act as only a modem at that point) and it still had similar problems. For some reason, rebooting the Linksys would fix it, even though the problem was the modem. I ended up pulling the old 10 year old DSL modem out of the closet and hooked that up to the Linksys and everything's been running perfectly for over 8 months now.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  54. the problem with black-boxes ... by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1

    Most of the devices that you mentioned don't give you details of the status of the OS (cpu, memory, port utilization, et cetera). This is the kind of relationship you have with a black-box. You can put a bug request in, and maybe even send them logs or core dumps, if the device supports it.

    I've only run openwrt or some other open-source firmware for a while now, and I have been happy with performance and the fact that I can see what is going on on the device I own.

    My current setup is:
    OpenWrt White Russian - With X-Wrt Extensions 0.9
    Linux 2.4.30 #1 Thu Feb 22 13:58:48 EST 2007
    Linksys WRTSL54GS
    Broadcom BCM947XX

    My usage is:
    1 Mac, two Linux laptops, one Windows desktop and a Linux server. Moderate bittorrent usage (both Azureus and rtorrent), in addition to frequent outbound ssh connections (X11, rsync, vnc), Citrix and SSL/IPSec VPNs. Absolutely no uPnP or Rendezvous.

    --
    v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
  55. Ditto, but had to reset occasionally with defaults by PseudoThink · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm running DD-WRT 23v2 on two Buffalo WHR-HP-54G routers, and I never have to reset them. However, I did have to update their configuration from the default settings in order to make them reliably stable. With the default settings, I would have to reset them occasionally. I changed the "maximum ports" from the default of 512 to 4096, and changed TCP and UDP timeouts from the default of 3600 seconds to 120 seconds. The reason for this (as stated in the DD-WRT help documentation) is that P2P apps often open many ports without closing them properly. These settings allow the router to handle that kind of usage much better.

  56. QOS in Tomato by missing000 · · Score: 1

    It's really easy enough that your grandma could do it. :)

    Seriously, Tomato has a very clean interface that just does what you would expect. I'd toy with it a bit if I were you.

    Best place to get a feel for the QOS settings is probably a screenshot of the interface.

  57. They All Suck by aarmenaa · · Score: 1

    The last router I had that really worked was a trusty old Linksys BEFSR41. This is not the same router that's going by that model number today. The hardware has completely changed and the new one I bought when my old one finally died was absolute trash. Since then I've been through all the major manufacturers, and they all have issues locking up, resetting, and other weird crap. I finally got fed up and converted an old Pentium (floating point bug included!) into a router running Smoothwall. It's the most stable router I've ever had.

    I really have no idea why the purpose made stuff doesn't work. Many people say the issue is that the routing table fills up, or they run out of memory, or something to that effect. But my ancient Pentium with 32 MB of RAM doesn't seem to have that issue, and most of the top end Linksys boxes are coming with 16 or 32 MB of RAM, though the cheap ones only come with 8. Still, Smoothwall indicates most of my RAM is being used as disk cache - not for running anything in particular. So, I don't think RAM's really the issue. It's obviously a software related issue of some sort: flashed Linksys routers with one of the custom firmwares are apparently quite nice.

    --
    "I do a grep for shit, bollocks, and tits before checking in code. I'm professional..." -RECURSIVE_META_JOKE, reddit.com
    1. Re:They All Suck by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      I can tell you from experience that routers running DD-WRT run very well. I've had Linksys, Buffalo, and Asus routers with varying degrees of suck, and they all improved tenfold when I installed DD-WRT on them. Tomato's pretty popular as well.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
  58. Yes, there is a pro-sumer router by nhtshot · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had several "consumer" grade routers before finally finding the Dlink gamer lounge.

    I've never been happier. I've had it for almost 2 years and I never have to reset it. The wireless always works, the gigabit is nice and the "Gamefuel" QOS is fairly effective.

    The $100+ linksys routers aren't much improved over their $50 brethren, but the $100+ Dlink most certainly is.

    1. Re:Yes, there is a pro-sumer router by aquarajustin · · Score: 3, Informative

      I second this. I have a D-Link Gamer Lounge (DGL-4300). This is the most stable router I've ever owned. Thumbs up on the QoS, stability and speed (GbE). If I were able to run 'uptime' on it, I believe it would say close to two years (I live in Florida, but it's on a UPS). Oh, wait:

      Connection Up Time : 617 day(s), 12:04:53
      Sick.

      My last router was a WRT54GL that decided to brick itself after about three months of DD-WRT. I think I should agree with some of the above posts that offloading network services can help these routers, but I'm not sure. I run my own DNS and DHCP, so this router has never had to bear that load.

  59. I'll tell you why ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    crappy firmware. I flashed my WRT54G V4 with Tomato and haven't looked back. Also haven't had to reboot it in the past year or so that I've been using it, other than the occasional update. Tomato's developer obviously knows what he's doing: compared to the stock Linksys firmware he's lightyears ahead. And he's just one guy, you'd think a company with the resources of Linksys could do an even better job.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:I'll tell you why ... by thisissilly · · Score: 1

      Ditto. My WRT54G V2 has Tomato on it, and its current uptime is 20 days, 10:21:43, and that's only because we had a power outage last month.

    2. Re:I'll tell you why ... by Alibaba10100 · · Score: 2, Funny

      And he's just one guy, you'd think a company with the resources of Linksys could do an even better job.

      Unless he holds meetings with himself and forms committees of himself, I'd say hes got at least one advantage.

    3. Re:I'll tell you why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have 2 WRT54G's, one with openwrt and the other with dd-wrt firmware. They've both been up for 13 days (the last thunderstorm power outage). An Asus 500G Premium with openwrt has been up 17 days (That's when I added a UPS to my PBX-in-a-Flash phone system, to which the router is also connected.).

      Crappy firmware is probably at least part of the answer, though I did have to reboot the asus about daily when the WRT54G's were connected wirelessly. They're now hardwired.

    4. Re:I'll tell you why ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Unless he holds meetings with himself and forms committees of himself, I'd say hes got at least one advantage.

      Ha ... can't argue with that!

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    5. Re:I'll tell you why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto. When I was running my WRT54G with the out-of-box software, I had to reboot it about every 10-14 days. But ever since I installed Tomato, the thing has been ROCK FRIKKIN SOLID.

    6. Re:I'll tell you why ... by mdibiofuel · · Score: 1

      I set my WRT54GL 1.1 Tomoto to reboot every night at 2AM. I also reboot myself every night by sleeping. I have an uptime of around 66% -- that's how long I'm not sleeping every day. When I'm sleeping I don't mind that my router takes a 49-second reboot siesta every night. My router has an up time of 99.94% based on that single daily reboot. Is that so bad? Every morning I know that my router sneezed -- but so what? It /never/ sneezes unless I tell it to. Planned down-time is a damn sight better than unplanned downtime. I'm not sure that the Internet can do much better than 99.94% daily uptime. Every day I have to reload at least one web page -- and I have to do that manually! A $69 router that works with Tomato/dd-wrt firmware as if it were a $800 router? It's amazing that it works at all at that price point. I don't mind a planned reboot. I suppose I could try a weekly reboot, or monthly. The point is that I don't have to touch the damn thing. I plan for a 49 second outage, and it doesn't hurt at all.

    7. Re:I'll tell you why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur. wrt54gl with open-wrt, and I haven't had a therapeutic reboot in months. and I am a heavy bt user.

    8. Re:I'll tell you why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good point.

      I had TWO of these routers and neither of them was able to hand out an IP via DHCP to my laptop.

      I will never buy linksys again.

    9. Re:I'll tell you why ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't have any particular beef with Linksys' hardware ... the things are built about as well as you'd expect. I just think they need to work on their firmware. Now, keep in mind that Linksys is now a division of Cisco, and it wouldn't surprise me that they don't particularly want their consumer-grade equipment to be too good, good enough to compete with their higher end stuff. Frankly, Tomato and some of the other alternate firmware packages offer some real nice options, like QOS, bandwidth monitoring, remote logging and more.

      That said, I will give Linksys credit for re-releasing a Linux-friendly router after having switched to another RTOS.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    10. Re:I'll tell you why ... by adolf · · Score: 1

      Your assertion assumes that a company like Linksys has one person working on WRT54G firmware, instead of one-half of a person. And, personally, I can't assume that they even have a quarter of a human working on firmware.

      I'm quite certain that I, being just one person, could come up with a decent firmware given a place to start, and 8 hours per day to chase bugs and work on new features, and my skillset is pretty limited compared to a lot of people here.

    11. Re:I'll tell you why ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      My assertion really assumes that Linksys knows that it is marketing products to people that were perfectly happy rebooting Windows 98 every couple of hours. Seriously, it's not that inexpensive devices can't perform well, it's that the customer base doesn't know that it's being taken for a ride.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  60. Poor Programming && Poor Hardware Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is due to a combination of poor programming, and poor hardware designs.

    Most properly designed routers have a hardware watchdog timer, which must be periodically written to in order to prevent an automatic reboot.

    When I cut my teeth on Embedded/Small system programming, decades ago, we were taught the reboot button is a bad thing.

    In fact, for our final project , we had to design a "mission critical" system, where the reset button was DISABLED. Instructors would initiate a prohibited condition, and the software had to automatically reboot and restart from a SAFE [not default] state.

    Any system which did not enter a SAFE state, FAILED [and so did the student].

    They don't teach classes like that anymore, in favor of things like Java, which lets students forget about the "hard" stuff.

    Its all fine and dandy to have a nice real-time OS, but it isn't worth anything if the core programs its running are programmed by a bunch of java jockeys used to letting other people do the "hard stuff".

  61. The reason is obvious. by TransEurope · · Score: 1

    Because we need new IP-adresses for Rapidshare and the other filehosters.

  62. Very seldom reboot any of this gear by lorddarthpaul · · Score: 1

    In 1996, I had a PowerMac 4400 (overkill, but one of the few Macs into which you could stick multiple Ethernet cards, 100Base-T on the network) running Vicom Internet Gateway (had Parental Controls and all sorts of nice features). I used to restart that machine every now and then. When the Linksys BEFSR41 arrived, it freed up the PowerMac and I would reboot it every few months just for fun (paired with an original Shark Fin cable modem from LANcity -- seldom restarted that either -- as it was in the basement and the router was in the attic). Eventually bought a Linksys WRT54GS (v2) to use the Parental Controls feature (not perfect, but mostly did what I needed, though that feature is being discontinued). Never restarted that much either (paired originally with a 3Com 3CR29210, later with a D-Link DCM-202, and these days with a Motorola SB5101). This is all on a network with several TiVos, a Win/XP machine, a handful of Macs (mostly MacOS X these days), and an AirPort Express (2 client laptops) and I still don't need to restart it. You probably need to figure out just what is failing by doing some network sniffing? Maybe it's related to the ISP? I've had this gear hooked up to RCN's cable for 7 years with few issues (with the gear itself).

  63. Your router is restarted by the power outages! by BroncoInCalifornia · · Score: 1

    Every so often I need to unplug our WRT54G. When it powers up again it behaves itself for several days. The Netgear model we had was even worse. The only router we had that did not require rebooting was an ancient Apple Airport.

    --

    Religion is the main cause of atheism.

  64. OpenBSD Routers? by Piranhaa · · Score: 1

    I still think it's sad we're seeing Linux routers coming out as much as they do. I can understand from the uPnP prospective to use Linux, but I really don't like having the applications on my computers control which ports people can and cant access (doesn't that defeat the purpose of a firewall nearly??).
    I've wanted to setup a cheap embedded OpenBSD router for ages now (with a web interface and such) that I can give to my friends knowing they're getting security AND stability together. However, the manufacturer support just isn't there.. I finally decided to setup a mini-itx OpenBSD system which runs great on flash, but even though it's small (in my view) the average user won't agree.

    I hope some manufacturers like Linksys decide to change some of their embedded OS', unless of course this is exactly what they want .. Less stability so people are forced to upgrade to Enterprise Class equipment?

    1. Re:OpenBSD Routers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, many are going your route and are being forced to install better os's on pcs to have a decent usable router.

  65. PC as Router by Jack9 · · Score: 1

    I used to use a PC as a router. Anything with 2 network interfaces will do. One connected to the "internet" or greater network, 1 for the internal network.

    Configure Linux:
    Set up your OS security (port blocking, disable remote accounts, etc).

    Configure IP Tables (was IP Chains):
    Set up your network security (some overlap with the above). This is also where you do your intranet packet forwarding (xlating 10.1.1.1 to a real ip on a specific port)

    Configure /sbin/route
    Set up your routing table (if necessary).

    Optional configuration:
    Set up your network monitoring (both sides), maybe a traffic shaper to make sure those downloaders dont cripple your connection

    After awhile I realized I didn't want a big box sitting in the corner getting dust and occasionally having a hardware failure (7 years of using a box for routing!) and switched to the ever-popular WL500g and havent had a problem for 2 years (DHCP leasing keeps the undesireable wardrivers from connecting through it)

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
  66. What's a reboot? by DeusExCalamus · · Score: 1

    Firmware: DD-WRT v24 (05/24/08) std Time: 19:20:22 up 20 days, 6:30, load average: 0.15, 0.10, 0.02 I've had it for a little over a month now, and it's only been down due to power outages.

    --
    "...Sleep comes like a drug in God's country Sad eyes, crooked crosses in God's country..."
  67. Btw, comments about Linksys by PseudoThink · · Score: 1

    Before my Buffalo routers, I had several different (three or four) BEFSR41/BEFSR81 model Linksys routers. I always had problems with the Linksys ones. BEFSR81 v3 wouldn't let me play Counterstrike, for example, due to a known incompatibility with Steam. Users complained on DSLReports.com for months with no fix, I don't know if they ever fixed it. I had a BEFSR41 with a gimpy power connection, so I had to duct-tape the power cord to the router such that it would put strain on the power connector, letting it remain powered on. Most of my Linksys routers would not let me run two VPN connections simultaneously, which is a common issue with routers (due to NAT issues). If I connected a second VPN session with one already active, the first one almost always got disconnected. I had one Linksys router that seemed to let me run two sessions simultaneously most of the time. All of my Linksys routers ran warm (hot if you stacked them), each of them usually sucking at least 20-25 watts while idling.

    My Buffalo routers running DD-WRT are exactly what I always wanted...they are very reliable. I've never had any problem running dual VPN sessions with them, and they only use 3 to 5 watts of power. It was hard for me to give up on Linksys after being loyal to them for so many years, but I don't regret switching to Buffalo/DD-WRT one bit. If anything, I regret not switching sooner.

    1. Re:Btw, comments about Linksys by the+cdrive · · Score: 1

      I agree entirely. I wanted a Buffalo router, but due to the legal crap they were dealing with, I turned to Ebay. Found my GHR-54s already loaded with DD-WRT. Rock solid for the most part. I had a cable modem issue that I thought was the router, so I was restarting, trying Tomato, back to DD-WRT. Changed the modem (twice) and all is fine. I run my main tower, monitor, cable modem and router on the battery side of my ups and I've never had a power issue. CH

  68. Buffalo routers by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

    I bought a $39 Buffalo wifi router and left the factory stock firmware (BSD-based) intact. I've *never* had to reset it due to a hang or crash or any problem. It's a juggernaut.... runs forever as long as you feed it power. Been running continuously almost a year now, it's been plugged into a UPS and running flawlessly since I made some config changes last summer. It replaced a Linksys router that was a complete piece of shit that needed rebooted about once a week.

    Too bad you can't buy the Buffalos new anymore.

    1. Re:Buffalo routers by wilgibson · · Score: 1

      I love my Buffalo. I grabbed it two years back, and it's been running ever since without reboots on the stock firmware. As you say, they definitely are juggernauts.

  69. You have mouse in pocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is "we" that have to restart routers all time, heh? My router works great and glorious and never needing restarting. Last one and one before is same. Router from capitalist pig Apple is original wireless router and it never is needing restarting.

    Maybe you should get a multimeter and check to see if is flaw in power in your house, da?

  70. Routers need love.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..like everything does

  71. I've got 2 routers by Daimanta · · Score: 1

    They are both big fucking pieces of shit. Is it the hardware? Nope. It's the firmware coded by people who were drunk, on drugs and asleep at the same time. It's that fucking bad. I normally don't get pissed that often but the firmware for these routers are abominable. One router (a SMC VWBR7004) had such disgusting firmware that I had to reboot the router every 15 minutes. Yeah, every, 15, minutes. The update that came 2(two!) painstaking years later was not much better. It refuses to work with Vista if I have upnp on and it will reset my router if my Vista tries to do anything to the network(including starting up and shutting down)I hate the firmware and the persons who coded this should get a major kick in the balls. The second router I bought was another piece of shit. I am currently looking for a good router and I am looking towards the flashable Linksys routers so I can have some decent and open firmware on it. All in all, my experiences with routers have left me totally disgusted with them and I think that the people who are responsible for the product should be subjected to the same shit I have. It will serve them right.

    By the way, does anyone have good tips for a new router?

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    1. Re:I've got 2 routers by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Try a WRT54G V1-4 or the -GL and flash it with Tomato.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:I've got 2 routers by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      The update that came 2(two!) painstaking years later was not much better. It refuses to work with Vista if I have upnp on and it will reset my router if my Vista tries to do anything to the network(including starting up and shutting down)

      That isn't a bug... That's a feature! But, I joke

      By the way, does anyone have good tips for a new router?

      Don't change many settings. For example, my cheap Linksys router I haven't changed much but the password and it works just fine. Granted, I need to reboot about once every 6 months, but other than that, it works just fine.

      I had a friend who couldn't set up his Xbox 360 to connect to the internet and couldn't remember his password for his router (it wasn't the default), after holding the reset button for 30 seconds and resetting it to the default settings, his 360 worked flawlessly.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    3. Re:I've got 2 routers by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

      Here's a tip for a new router:

      Soekris (www.soekris.com) + m0n0wall (http://m0n0.ch/wall) = happiness.

      --
      The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
    4. Re:I've got 2 routers by mrboyd · · Score: 1

      Well, for some unknown reason with the default settings my xbox 360 managed to acquire the public IP given by my ISP instead of a local IP through a DHCP lease of the WRT54G.
      The POS router was perfectly happy with that and the xbox had no issue connecting to xbox live service or msn while no one else in the house could connect anywhere anymore.

      I replaced the POS with a WRT54GL+dd-wrt firmware and since then everything is fine, the xbox gets a private lan IP and other people can still access the internet.
      I don't know if it crashes, the policy at home it to press the big power switch at night. It turns off all of those devices that like to be idling wasting power. That includes the router, tv, dvd player, cable tv box, tivo, xbox, wii, stereo and a bunch of other stuff that I don't need when I sleep.

  72. Speak for yourself by FeepingCreature · · Score: 1

    login as: root
    root@192.168.2.1's password:
    Using fallback suid method

    BusyBox v1.00 (2006.12.09-07:03+0000) Built-in shell (msh)
    Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.

    Using fallback suid method

    Using fallback suid method
    Using fallback suid method
    Using fallback suid method
    # uptime
    Using fallback suid method
    02:23:43 up 71 days, 23:43, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
    #

    Speak for yourself :)

  73. I never reboot my Apple Airport Base Station by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I have only rebooted my "Snow" Apple Airport Base station twice in four years, and both of those times were because I was moving. It just wasn't worth it to me to buy an uninterruptible power supply simply so I could keep the router powered up while it sat in a box in my trunk as I drove across town to my new apartment.

    Maybe if I new how to read the "uptime" on the thing, I would have gotten more motivated.

    1. Re:I never reboot my Apple Airport Base Station by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      That's because Apple has an actual Quality Assurance department. I remain convinced that most other makers of consumer-level routers don't.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:I never reboot my Apple Airport Base Station by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical day at Apple QA dept:

      "Logo on straight?"
      "Yep"
      "Ship 'er"

  74. The most likely causes by jd · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...for a router to require rebooting are memory leaks (especially for the routing tables or ARP tables), buffer overflows (same), a portscan or other attack - say by a zombie or skriptkiddie - putting the system into an unrecoverable state (eg: resources exhausted), or a kernel (likely driver) bug putting the kernel into an unrecoverable deadlock. There's almost nothing else that can possibly go wrong in a software router, at least to the point of locking the system up.

    Ok, the router software - likely ripd, xorp, quagga or zebra for any domestic ADSL router - might crash, but the worst that will happen then is that you don't learn new routes. Since DSL providers don't tend to switch their internal IP addresses very often, that should not impact any existing subnet. It means tunnels can't be generated on-the-fly, it also means your next-door neighbor can't connect their LAN party to your wireless connection, but it shouldn't impact you in the slightest.

    The next question, however, is how on Earth are you noticing the router needs rebooting? The kernel is quite capable of rebooting itself under many (but not all) soft lockups. Linux provides several such mechanisms for doing just that. A simple watchdog circuit, using a bistable circuit, a couple of capacitors, a relay and a trigger line that has to change state, could be added by a manufacturer for maybe a couple of dollars. It probably doesn't even need to be that complex.

    When it does reboot, LinuxBIOS is under 3 seconds and I don't imagine OpenBIOS is that much slower. Intel's Tiano probably is, but it's open source so you can rip out anything that's useless. Therefore, recovery times should be barely detectable to an end user. (Most websites vary in download times by more than 3 seconds between visits. Unless you're playing Netrek or WoW at that precise moment, I seriously doubt you'll notice a 3 second outage.)

    Finally, however, why isn't the router using carrier-grade software? Again, carrier-grade Linux exists, which should give you 5N uptimes in the worst possible case. Domestic routers are not worst-possible. Even data centers rarely get the kind of stress that could be expected to force an unrecoverable state. If your router is not overheating, has plenty of RAM, and needs rebooting more than once every other year, there is something seriously defective in the software or hardware.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  75. Context? An impromptu check list by Symb · · Score: 1

    If you live in an apartment where everybody has one, you just might be in a noise storm. I rarely have to restart my 54g. I am not an expert, but my $.02 is

    1. Get rid of your 2.4Ghz phone. I actually bought my neighbors a new phone because they caused me problems.
    2. Latest firmware
    3. At least wpa security
    4. use *stumbler and pick the least used channel in your area of 1,6, and 11
    5. Try CTS protection mode if you find a lot of other APs
    6. Turn up your DTIM (mine is 100) if you don't do much broadcast traffic.
    7. Turn up your beacon interval (mine is 1,000) to save power on the laptop (some reports of up to 14% battery savings)

    Wireless is just flakey, even our pimp daddy cisco equipment at the university has the occasional hiccup.

  76. WRT54GL by markdavis · · Score: 1

    I had problems with my previous Linksys WRT54G's in the past- having to reboot them as you describe. I replaced one with a *stock* WRT54GL and it runs for months and months, and I have never had to reboot it. Based on that experience, I purchased many more GL's and they have also run for months and months, 24 hours a day, not a single one has needed rebooting.

    Of course, your mileage may vary...

  77. Airport Express plus Netgear DG814 by maktheyak · · Score: 1

    I have to restart those two maybe twice a year, or when I'm changing settings or upgrading the firmware. They seem to play nice together. For the record, it's the AirPort that seems to need the restart on those odd occasions, but I do them both just to make sure.

  78. Why Do We Have To Restart Routers? by zazelite · · Score: 1

    Because routers lack the ghost of the dead graduate student that performs that function in Windows.

  79. Wireless Routers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Friend had a wireless B router that would randomly lock up on him every day or so. The funny thing was that the Wired part of it never stopped working just the wireless. We through so many different firmware revisions and it never seemed to fix it. I guess it could have been bad wireless hardware but rebooting it always made it good for another day.

  80. No trouble with mine by Nimey · · Score: 1

    Linksys WRT54GL with Tomato Firmware. It never needs to reboot, except when I feel like updating the firmware to a newer version.

    FTM, I never had to reboot its predecessor either, a Linksys BEFSR41, and it was in service for several years before I decided I wanted wireless.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  81. Re:Ditto, but had to reset occasionally with defau by Telecommando · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a similar setup on my Linksys WRT54GS. With the factory software it would lock up every other week -- wouldn't pass traffic and I couldn't log into it. Had to pull power to reset it. I loaded DD-WRT (23v2) and set it as you described and it has never failed to pass traffic, although every 3-4 months I can't access it from the Web GUI for some reason. I can still telnet into it though, so I just login from there and reset it.

    I have a second WRT54GS (on it's own subnet providing open access to anyone in the area) and it's never locked me out of the GUI, although it doesn't pass nearly the traffic mine does.

    I used to have a Blitzz router/AP that required rebooting every 3.5 days, regular as clockwork, regardless of traffic or number of connections. Pitched it in the dumpster when I got the second WRT54GS.

    --
    Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
  82. pebkac by TRRosen · · Score: 1

    I haven't restarted mine in many months. Maybe its more related to the modem its attached to. I've found that cable modems in general get stupid after a while, But my DSL modem has only been reset for power outages and That one lighting strike

  83. Get an Uninterruptible Power Supply by ScaldedTauntaun · · Score: 1

    I had the same issue of restarting network hardware. I ended up wasting a lot of time swapping out gear until I realized what all the swapped hardware had in common: the power supply. Perhaps my house was susceptible to mini-brownouts which were resetting the hardware. I got a UPS and connected it to my modem, router, and access point. Never had a problem since. -ST

  84. Cisco 851W? by BBCWatcher · · Score: 1

    Looks like Cisco has something in this category. It's about $329 on Amazon.

  85. FreeBSD by kmsigel · · Score: 1

    My FreeBSD router/firewall/email server/web server/dns server/etc was shut down *once* last year to vacuum out the accumulated dust. Other than that, it was never shut down or rebooted.

  86. Crap hardware by ivoras · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cheap "embedded" devices like routers and NAS-es routinely have extremely bad hardware. The competition apparently is so fierce that cutting corners of everything, from basic motherboard-like functionality to network and disk controllers is ubiquitous.

    I'm occasionally doing hardware reviews for a local IT magazine and it's unbelievable what you can actually buy today as a bona-fide good equipment even from "brand name" companies. CPUs are usually ARM or AMD GEODE (You think VIA is slow? Think again. - Not to say there isn't a place for slow CPUs, only that this isn't it.), network controllers are cheap Realtek's and I don't know what they use for disk controllers (probably parts of the CPUs "companion" chipset) but it sucks.

    I've seen "gigabit" network controllers on NASes that actually negotiate gigabit speed, although they are connected to buses and CPUs that break a sweat even at 100Mbit/s speeds. NASes that accept 4 drives cannot service reads on even one drive at more than 15 MB/s - introducing RAID (especially RAID 5) into this setup slows things to a crawl.

    Practically all of these devices use Linux, because it's free (as in beer). They usually (I'd say 90%) don't acknowledge or obey the GPL.

    It's a sort-of reverse "best scenario" for Open systems (and Open source). The manufacturers have a choice between something like this:

    1. They'll design special ASIC-like functionality which will do one thing only and do it fast and stable.
    2. They'll use cheap off-the shelf hardware and software which is generic.

    The first choice is represented by "truly" embedded devices like ordinary small, unmanaged Ethernet switches (with which I have suprisingly good experience), but apparently it's too expensive to scale it to "smart" devices that have to support many features so everyone opts for the second one. You can (and this is verified!) build yourself a small managed router or a NAS device like the ones sold at every el-cheapo computer shop with the same cheap generic components, and the resulting device will be just as sucky.

    Creating a router or a NAS just like the above but with "proper" hardware (a Duron 800 MHz based system will be excellent) won't even cost you significantly more, but will deliver orders of magnitude better performance.

    --
    -- Sig down
    1. Re:Crap hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right.
      The ASICs usually have CPUs on board. Their called SOCs
      for System-On-a-Chip. While not full blown desktop cpus,
      they can handle the load quite well and at much less power than
      a full blown desktop CPU/system. Many run linux etc.

      I am working on a PowerPC CPU that will go into several SOCs.
      Chip prices on this class of device can be from $5 to $300.
      Ours is going to be a 3500 DMIPs at 2GHz and 2 watts per CPU.
      About 15-20 watts per chip for a mid-high end application.

      Routers you are takling about are low-end. Full blown ASICs (not SOCs)
      are for mainly high end systems (worked on two at CISCO -- that
      one would route the traffic for a good sized college campus).
      Network processors are dead :-(
      Too complicated to program (says the software group and customers).
      So everyone is doing embedded CPUs. MIPS, PowerPC, ARM (which is low end).
      Look a Cavium Networks or Freescale.

  87. Because they're cheap? by istartedi · · Score: 1

    These are cheapo consumer routers, right? I've never messed with a Cisco, but I bet it doesn't get hung that often. I bet it costs more than $40 too.

    Now, in theory that's not a real excuse. The firmware in these things can't be that complicated, and if you just ran some kind of Linux based router on them, they would rapidly improve to the point where they didn't do that. The community would find a fix. I know some of these things can run Linux; but then there's the old "time vs. money" hassle of having to install Linux on the thing. It seems to me, if the company that makes the thing knows it can run Linux, they might as well just support it. After all, they're not in the software business, so it's hard for them to argue that the GPL hurts their business model.

    Maybe the real answer is: because of the suits.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  88. Same problem by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

    I had the same problem with a D-Link ISDN router. I just assumed that the router's bit bucket got full after a while and I had to reset it to empty the bit bucket ;)

    I wrote a little perl script to telnet into the router and do the reboot and then added the script to cron so the router got rebooted every night at a time when I thought I could afford to take the down time. I have an old, partial version of the script if you think it would be of any help.

    Cheers,
    Dave

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
    1. Re:Same problem by Strider- · · Score: 1

      I'll do you one simpler... I had a router that needed to be rebooted on a daily basis to be reliable... I wound up just getting a lamp timer (like what you'd use to turn lamps on and off on schedule) and set it to power the router off at 4am, and power it back on at 4:30. Yeah it was ugly as sin, but worked well enough on a student budget.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    2. Re:Same problem by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

      I thought about doing something like that but I didn't want to be off line that long. I run my own mail, DNS and web server. On the other hand, every D-Link router I've seen runs a very similar CLI when you telnet in. I'm guessing the same code or with only minimal tweaks could login and reboot the OP's router for him.

      Cheers,
      Dave

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
  89. Bad WiFi Routers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interestingly, I have a somewhat related issue. Every so often, we'll say a week, although the time varies, my parents' Vista laptop decides it no longer wishes to connect to the WiFi router in the house. Rebooting the laptop, oddly enough, rarely resolves the issue -- at least, right away. Two reboots or more and all is well. Alternatively, power cycling the WiFi router makes things work again right away.

    The odd part being, my own WiFi connection never experiences such problems. I'm too lazy to track down the exact problem, but I'm guessing it's Vista or a bad Vista driver over the router.

    Moral of the story. Don't just be looking at the router as the cause; it can just as easily be the WiFi driver/adapter itself that's at fault.

  90. I don't have to restart mine by TimFreeman · · Score: 2, Informative

    I run OpenWRT on a Linksys WRT54GS. Up 403 days right now.

  91. Surge Protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is your router on surge protection? I've noticed anecdotally that it makes a huge difference in the router's reliability and longevity, especially for cheap routers.

  92. no problems with my WRT54G by gecko486 · · Score: 1

    i have used my hacked up wrt54G, version 2.1 motherboard, for years. in fact every time i do replace it i am disappointed by the fact that a new router is worse. my franken wrt54G was made from the parts of 3 others (motherboard, new antennas and new powersupply). it has lasted me the last few years. i have been using the DD-WRT and have good results. the only problem i have is i have to test my xbox connection for it to work. i only reboot on power loss and update of firmware.

    1. Re:No problems with my WRT54G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard that there were two versions of the WRT54G, the old stable version, and the new version which sucks.

    2. Re:No problems with my WRT54G by barzok · · Score: 1

      Mine is, IIRC, V2. Like I said, I got it almost 4 years ago, so it probably qualifies as the "old & stable" release.

  93. known issues by cheetah · · Score: 1

    Well, to give you an idea of the type of embedded hardware that is sometimes used in these routers... I was recently given the task of evaluating some Dsl chipsets because we wanted to add a native dsl port to one of our low end routers. It was really interesting, many of the chipsets had notices that said stuff like "The front-end needs to be reset every 24 hours to prevent an unrecoverable hardware failure".

    Granted not all of this hardware is like this but much of it has known issues like this. Since this is home hardware the companies that make this hardware don't really care if you have to reboot it often.

  94. Get A Real Router Then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Netscreen (Juniper) 5GT Wireless.

    I use BT every day, heaps of sessions, you name it. I have two SSID's, the one we use that's not rate limited and the one the public can use that's rate limited.

    Current uptime is 183 days without a single issue.

    You get what you pay for!

    Tim

  95. Try switching to Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They reset me regularly at no extra charge!

  96. My WRT54G never needs rebooted . . . . well by AntonDevious · · Score: 1

    it does sometimes after a brown out or very short blackout. But beyond that it runs and runs and runs.

    --
    Rob Miracle http://www.robmiracle.com
  97. One possible culprit, VPN? by DreamCoder · · Score: 1

    I have the Linsys WRT54G, and a good variety of devices that hang off both the physical ports (a couple of Dell PCs) and the wireless interface (a couple iPhones, an AirportExpress in client-mode, a Wii, a wireless printer, several wireless notebooks). I can go endlessly w/o rebooting the router *except* when I've been recently accessing my corporate network via VPN over the wireless interface. I do this on occasion and usually it's not long after I've been online that *other* devices in my household can no longer see the router. Interestingly enough, the notebook with the VPN connection never complains. Anyway, that's been my experience.

  98. My Workaround... by CyberDog3K · · Score: 1

    Several years ago I was using these devices as my primary home network gateway, and experiencing the same issues. This lead me over time to replace the firewall/routing portion of the device with a home-made linux router on commodity computer hardware. My Linksys has hardly ever required rebooting since. While this is far from a good diagnostic of the problem, it definitely seemed that, at least in my case, it was the firewalling portion (particularly on high-bandwidth or connection count apps) that was crippling the device.

  99. Cost by fabu10u$ · · Score: 1

    Sorry, at those prices you're not going to get the same engineering, manufacturing tolerances, and software testing as on a Juniper or Cisco enterprise router.

    --
    They say the mind is the first thing to ... uh, what's that saying again?
  100. That's what you get for using consumer-grade crap! by Octorian · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I don't run any alternative firmware. However, I also don't have any problems. Why? Well, I'd rather spend extra on eBay for commercial-grade stuff at mostly-affordable prices than use consumer-grade garbage.

    My "router" is a Cisco 3620 (4500 before that), and I never have to reboot it. (ok, I know its overkill, but it works.)

    My WAP is *not*, I repeat *not* a router. It is, however, a Netgear ProSafe WG302. Definitely commercial-grade (~$300 retail, I got it off eBay for $100). It runs a Linux-based factory-provided firmware, supports multiple SSIDs via VLANs, and I have zero problems with it.

  101. Oh by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    You're talking about consumer / home networking devices. I thought the article was going to really be about *routers.*

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  102. I've got a wrt54g - factory firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... so I've got the same router as you (maybe a different revision, mine's old with the larger memory)... anyways, I **never** restart my router!.. maybe once a year?

  103. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a Belkin F5D5231-4 on my home network for a few years, since the day I bought it I had to restart it on a daily basis. I even installed a timer to cycle it in the middle of the night. Belkin never issued a firmware update different than the original. I finally got fed up with the piece of crap and installed a WRT54G v5, which is not compatible with Tomato, but is compatible with DD-WRT. DD-WRT is stable, I've had no problems since, and even retired my timer!!
    PS- I took the Belkin out back and shot it!! Good riddance.

  104. WRT-54GL with dd-wrt firmware = stable by scarolan · · Score: 1

    I've had great experience with the Linksys WRT-54GL loaded with dd-wrt firmware. I've only had to reboot it once every 4-5 months, usually due to a power outage. Not as stable as a Cisco catalyst, but hey, it was only $60 from Newegg.com.

    The QoS feature is great if you use VoIP or play games :)

    1. Re:WRT-54GL with dd-wrt firmware = stable by Fir3Chi3f · · Score: 1

      Same here only with wrt-54g wrt500n wrtsl54g All work work wonderfully, 4-5mounths seems like a but much for dd-wrt tho... lol

      --
      I put out Th3 Fir3
  105. Speaking as a firewall support dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The most common causes of frequently needed reboots are:

    1. NAT exhaustion -- some device on the network (maybe a bittorrent client, maybe someone with a viral infection) is shooting out a lot of connections, and the firewall runs out of NAT ports

    2. Network loops -- your lan network and your dmz network both have the same switch (what's the damn point in having a DMZ if you want to do this), and our firewall isn't tolerating a mac address on multiple ports

    3. Crappy PPPoe providers -- Every time we code around the evil caused by PPPoe negotiation, some fresh evil is perpetrated. I'd blame it on the *ells, but we have this problem anywhere pppoe is in use.

    4. Corrupted configuration -- I can't blame this on anyone but our devs. They can't seem to write a decent engine to convert configurations

    Hardware failure isn't on this list for a reason. Damn near any time we replace a firewall for reboots, the new one magically develops the same problem.

  106. Torrents = crashy by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this has changed in the last couple of years, but the old Linksys routers I've had the displeasure of using, they liked to die on torrent traffic. I don't know the exact details, but if I tried to run torrents, the router would gradually slow down and eventually lock up within an hour or so.

    I guessed it was trying to do connection tracking, filling up its tables and stupidly dying from the heavy connection load of torrent traffic. DD-WRT firmware seemed to fix this, though I certainly didn't test it much.

    What gets me is I have this crappy old Pentium-90 with 32mb ram, that I've used as a NAT box for.. oh I dunno, at least 6-7 years now. It has perfect uptime, no noticeable slowdowns, and despite having a hard drive, it's been pretty resilient to power outages and my breaker-busting kilowatt workstation.

    Why can't these skinless bastards (Linksys) take what I have on that dusty old PC, shove it on a cellphone-sized device with bunch of ethernet jacks, and deliver a "router" that actually works ? The technology is decades old, all you need is Linux + iptables and a simple web interface.

    There's a company that sells kits, which I hope someone can name for me, built around either a P5 or ARM processor on a tiny board - kind of like the Gumstix, but the one I'm thinking of is specifically built for network appliances... they have multiple ethernet jacks and I think they even sell Linksys-router shaped enclosures for them. Anyone with iptables experience should be able to build a bulletproof NAT box into one of those kits. Perhaps the problem (for Linksys), is they couldn't build such a quality device for the cheap-ass $30 market they've dug themselves into.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:Torrents = crashy by kcbanner · · Score: 1

      You may be thinking of Soekris Engineering. I run OpenBSD on a Soekris net4501 and I've had wonderful uptime with no problems. http://www.soekris.com/ http://www.caseybanner.ca/2007/08/19/hackback-1-soekris-router/

      --
      Obligatory blog plug: http://www.caseybanner.ca/
    2. Re:Torrents = crashy by billcopc · · Score: 1

      That's exactly it, now bookmarked and tagged.

      Thank you!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  107. Bad DHCP Software ? by kawsark · · Score: 1

    You should give some details on what problem you face if you don't restart your router.
    The most common problem I have experienced with routers is that they did not write a robust DHCP software and it eventually stops giving out IP addresses.
    I currently have a Linksys BFEW1154 (wireless B, so kind of old) router and sometimes I will see that it doesn't reuse a IP address and just keeps giving new ones. At one point it stops giving out IPs altogether and I have to reset it. At that point I notice I can still use the internet ok as long as I use static ip on the client. -Kawsar
    kawsark.com

  108. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  109. Because it's probably hot... by gravyface · · Score: 1

    Take the cover off, put a fan on it. You'll see the difference. On that note, D-Link, Linksys, etc. are consumer crap -- get a Snapgear or build your own with BSD.

    --
    body massage!
  110. Thanks for the info by CyDharttha · · Score: 1

    Thanks for this post. Consumer-grade networking products are the bane of my existence. I think I'll try Tomato, once I find out whether it will support VoIP for Vonage service. For WAPs, I've about given up. I spent nearly as much as one can on consumer, getting a Linksys WAP4400N WAP, and it still has a shotty signal. I'll likely be purchasing a Cisco WAP using my company's discount, its signal is amazing, and just what I need to stream video to the HTPC upstairs.

  111. Quality counts by thejuggler · · Score: 1

    I had to think for a few minutes to remember which router I owned. After I configured it the way I wanted I have not needed to reboot or login to it for any reason. I have a D-link DIR 655 http://support.dlink.com/products/view.asp?productid=DIR-655. After trying several routers to replace the one that finally fried after two years I settled on this D-link.

  112. Out with the new and in with the old by JunkyardCat · · Score: 1

    I'm still using my old Linksys BEFSR41 (v1), and it has to be rebooted about very 3 months when the isp assigns new ip's. Otherwise it's trouble free, unlike the newer version of the same router I set up for a friend on the same cable system. I think I'll start haunting eBay to find a backup of the same version number.

  113. Buy Netgear by Dan541 · · Score: 1

    Reboot a router!

    Why, what are you doing to it?

    --
    An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
  114. You shouldn't need to reboot your router by Satis · · Score: 1

    I've virtually never had to reboot home routers. I think an old Linksys router I had was mildly problematic. However, currently I have the Verizon FIOS router and a Cisco wireless router and never have to reboot either. They're both connected into a UPS. Prior to getting FIOS tv I had a Cisco SOHO router and it never needed to be rebooted either.

    I may seem somewhat elitist to be running Cisco routers at home, but besides their purchase having been part of the Cisco courses I've been taking in college, I feel you really do get what you pay for. You can drop $50 (or $30) on a cheap router, but I guarantee my $300 Cisco router will be more configurable, more scalable and most stable than your cheap router. When you're paying $50/month or more for your internet service, I don't think dropping a decent amount of cash on your network equipment is that big a deal.

    --
    Satis clankiller.com
    1. Re:You shouldn't need to reboot your router by yuna49 · · Score: 1

      If you're on FiOS, you might think, like I did, that big honking battery in the ONT unit will keep your Internet connection up during a power outage. The backup power in the ONT only applies to the voice telephone circuit since it's mandated by regulation.

      I now have my ONT plugged into a UPS to avoid future service interruptions.

      Oh, and the only thing that locks up my Linksys WRT54GS is bittorrent. Once I limited the total number of connections I haven't seen it lock up since. However I only use the Linksys for wireless connectivity behind my Linux firewall since I need to run OpenVPN tunnels, TCP proxies, and a variety of other services not available with commercial routers.

      The AccionTec routers that Verizon supplies are pretty poor, in my experience. A client had one for their DSL connection, and it randomly would drop them off the Internet. The more recent models they're distributing seem a bit better so far. The AccionTecs seem pretty susceptible to power blips as well.

  115. Used PIX 515E - never needs a reboot by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    OK, never is a bit of an overstatement. Every once in a while I update the PIX OS and need to reboot to apply the new software.

    I picked up a 515E for next to nothing on ebay. Sure, you need to learn the PIX architecture and OS to make effective use of the thing, but it is solid as a rock.

    There are plenty of books written on the PIX firewall appliances. Pickup a used PIX on ebay, buy a book, and throw away your $49.00 nat/firewall/router.

    -ted

    1. Re:Used PIX 515E - never needs a reboot by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      I've had a PIX 501 for 4+ years. They only time it went out is when the wife hit the power strip it is plugged into with a vacuum cleaner.

  116. Do we have to? by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

    Daily? You've got something wrong. My router is in the furnace room with all the other utility equipment and I pretty much just ignore it. In fact, I ignore all of the network equipment - it's all working flawlessly with zero attention. 2 WAPs (one private, one public,) a router, a print server, and a cable modem.

    I had a D-Link for years and have now switched to a little Soekris system running m0n0wall.

    None of my routers have had any wireless capabilities - my routers are routers, and my WAPs are WAPs, and that's how I like it. One device for each task is my philosophy.

    The only time I ever have to reboot anything is after a power or other internet outage. Then there sometimes is a little dance of "unplug cable modem, power off router, plug in cable modem, wait for all the lights to return to good state, turn on router" to get things working again. Aside from a vain attempt a couple days ago (internet really was out) I haven't done that in months at least.

    --
    The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
  117. Temporary Fix by devon.hirshfield · · Score: 1

    To maximize the time you go without rebooting, password protect your network. The "hop-ons" you get speed up the memory leaks.

    DEV

  118. updated firmware by glitch23 · · Score: 1

    I have an WRT54G. I got it a couple years ago. I had issues with it when running BT but eventually Linksys released an updated firmware. In the release notes (I forget which version the firmware was but it was released in February of 2007 I believe) it specifically mentioned fixing issues with BT. The WRT54G had issues with not properly sharing bandwidth across more than about 16 connections and we all know that BT clients open many more than that. Throughput slowed to a crawl when running BT. If your issue is your TCP connection table as others have mentioned that new firmware may be your fix assuming you still have a WRT54G. As for other brands, I can't say what would require them to be rebooted every so often, other than cheap design/manufacturing practices.

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  119. Airport extreme by blubdog · · Score: 1

    I bought of the first Apple Airport Extremes (10/100 ports) too. Originally I had to reboot it every few days. I gave up and switched to DD-WRT on an old WRT54G, which worked great (except no 802.11n).

    Recently my WRT54G died and I switched back to the Airport Extreme. I upgraded it to the latest Apple firmware, and now it's been running for weeks without a reboot. It appears the new firmware has solved some problems.

  120. tcpip timeout, too many connections by po134 · · Score: 5, Informative

    it's simple, most router keep tcpip connections alive for 3600 sec or more (especially d-link one), so each time you establish a connection on a bittorrent client your router open a new one. After a few hours, sometimes a day or a few ones, it can become a problem very quickly as you might imagine. Just install dd-wrt or tomato and drop the timeout to 360sec, it'll do the job.

    1. Re:tcpip timeout, too many connections by OAB_X · · Score: 1

      My ultra-fancy DGL-4300 "gaming" d-link router doesn't have that problem (that I can tell). If it wasn't for a power outage, it would be going on 8 months uptime now.

      I also had a cheap vanilla 802.11g d-link box which was unreliable crap that I was able to give to a friend. (Yes I did tell him it was unreliable at times).

    2. Re:tcpip timeout, too many connections by Vu1turEMaN · · Score: 1

      yea i was just gonna say....i torrent stuff like MAD, and my DIR-625 (the rangebooster wireless N router) has been going fine for nearly 5 weeks, and the only times i've ever had to reboot it was to change settings....no cloggage issues....

    3. Re:tcpip timeout, too many connections by AdamWill · · Score: 1

      With dd-wrt you can also up the maximum connection limit to 2048 or 4096. The default on most routers is 512, which (in combination the long timeouts mentioned by the OP) is far too few for even a couple of machines running BT.

      It took me several months of being driven absolutely bonkers by having to reboot my router every two days to figure this one out, but once I did install dd-wrt and up the limit to 2048, I've literally never needed to reboot my router due to the router's behaviour since.

  121. solution? buy a mac. and pay 50% more ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    gah. apple fanboys suck.

  122. D-link and linksys by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    I used to use both of them, but got tired of them rebooting themselves on heavy usage.

    If they sat idle, the were fine but push some packets thru and they couldn't hold up.

    Since then i went to a PC based solution ( currently Pfsense which does all that i need, but im sure the rest are just as good. Migrated from monowall due to lack of wifi support back then and before that IPcop )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  123. No problems with my WRT54G by barzok · · Score: 1

    I've had a WRT54G for nearly 4 years, powered up 24/7. I've had to restart it maybe a dozen times in those 4 years. I don't know that I've ever gone through a period where I was restarting it "every few days."

    Look at the rest of your environment, especially power.

  124. No Problems Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a 24port switch I picked up off ebay for $15. This thing is an old business class switch which is rack mounted. I never have to reboot it. The times I have rebooted it, I have found the problem to be with one of the computers.

    The reboot thing is just a quick answer to the problem. For every problem there is a quick answer and a perminant answer. I think your perminant answer is to buy a better router. ...

  125. Try a different channel by eccenthink · · Score: 1

    I don't know if it's a similar problem or not but I had a DI-624 a few years ago that rebooted constantly and I sent it in under warranty and got another one. Then that one started acting up and through multiple levels of tech support they finally determined that my 2.4 GHz wireless phone was setting too close to the router and since wifi was also at 2.4 GHz they recommended switching to a different channel. That fixed the problem for me.

  126. OpenBSD Soekris Router by kcbanner · · Score: 1

    I had over 100 days uptime at one point on my Soekris OpenBSD router. http://www.caseybanner.ca/2007/08/19/hackback-1-soekris-router/. I think that winning streak lost out to accidental nudging of the power bar. However recently there has been some hardware issues (nic died), and I've been using a Linksys BEFW114 (or something) wireless B router. I've had to reboot it because it just locks up after a while.

    --
    Obligatory blog plug: http://www.caseybanner.ca/
  127. Reboot routers? waa?! by dissy · · Score: 1

    my switch:

        sw1.lan uptime is 71 weeks, 4 days, 14 hours, 16 minutes
        System returned to ROM by power-on
        System image file is "flash:c2900XL-c3h2s-mz.120-5.WC3b.bin"

    and the linux system i use as a core router:

        21:35:12 up 441 days, 13:43, 1 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00

    As I recall, I did reboot the core router system most recent for some reason, most likely a kernel update. But before that, a storm knocked out my power for around 8 hours, which exceeded my backup capabilities.

  128. Why? by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

    Because you touch yourself at night.

  129. Crappy Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Admittedly, this is on the stock firmware, but I used to have a D-Link 540 router, and every time some setting was changed in the firmware, the router rebooted itself. Automatically.

  130. Limit bittorrent connections... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most bittorrent apps let you lower the number of active connections. I usually halve or quarter the defaults. Most of your bandwidth is going to come from a limited number of sources anyway.

  131. Reboot? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    I use OpenBSD for the router duties of my network. I reboot it once a year, when I install a new version of OpenBSD. If you have to reboot your router more frequently, it may be the symptom of a deeper problem.

    1. Re:Reboot? by dulridge · · Score: 1

      There was a story going around about a netware system that got walled up behind sheet rock and ran for years and years without anyone being able to even touch the server. I doubt it on a personal level just on power alone (where can you find power that NEVER drops over many years? I'd sure like to know...) I could see that a system wouldn't have a critical hardware failure over 6+ years, I just don't see that same system being able to stay up without power problems.

      Clean power?

      Where I live (Smallish UK city) I've had a total of 35 minutes of outages, one of 10 mins and one of 25, since January 1990. Both outages were someone's carelessness with a backhoe. More than ten years of power uptime no problem. This is not unusual for most cities here.

  132. Take a look at the power by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

    Mostly you've gotten crap responses that can be summarized as "get a real router." Sheesh, if people have no clue or anything useful to say, they ought to STFU. But, this is Slashdot. Fortunately, you got at least one clueful response.

    That was from the guy who suggested it could be a power problem. I have a WRT54G that I bought in 2003. It does internal routing on my network, and is downstream for a USR 8xxx (something) that's even older than the Linksys. I've used them in five locations now with no problems at all, and the current connection is 15 megabits down and 512 kbits up. Load is sporadic, but can saturate the inbound link. Mostly downloads via http, but sometimes ISOs over BT. I regularly VPN (Cisco client) to my office with no problems.

    These devices are on UPS and always have been. I think you really need to take a look at the power quality. If your gear isn't on UPS, dig one up somewhere and plug them into it and see if that helps out.

    If it doesn't, also take a look at what kind of traffic is on your network, as some have suggested. It could be that something from the inside is causing the stability issues. Finally, there is merit to the idea of separating the wireless from the routing, although for most people that should be fine. My current setup has it separated, but I used to use the WRT54G as my gateway device and that setup was also problem-free.

    And for you "Shoulda got a real router" trolls, I *work* for Cisco and even I don't bother using a Cisco for my home network edge (I have a 2621 taking up space on my shelf, though); it's just not necessary. Sure, the 2621 is better than the Linksys (for many values of "better"), but it's simply not necessary for a home network.

    Good luck, and maybe you could post again with more info about your network. That would help with troubleshooting.

  133. Quick answer to why we have to restart routers: by fireheadca · · Score: 1

    You don't have to.

  134. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  135. Well, you buy crap, what do you expect? by volxdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Stop buying shitty routers and you might have better experiences...I've used Netscreens (the old NS5/NS10s long since discontinued since Juniper bought them, but solid VPN/Firewall/Routers) for over 8 years - have easily had uptimes of over a year on some of them, and I've only ONCE needed to 'reboot' one (and that was after an especially bad lightning storm that nuked its UPS). It's not just the software/firmware/OS that leads to this (although it is a good part of it), but the actual physical components too.

    1. Re:Well, you buy crap, what do you expect? by bignetbuy · · Score: 1

      Amen. People get what they pay for. Cisco 851 here. It only reboots for IOS upgrades or power outages.

  136. Wrong router by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a WRT54GL instead.

    http://www.amazon.com/Linksys-Cisco-WRT54GL-Wireless-G-Broadband-Compatible/dp/B000BTL0OA/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1215914133&sr=8-1

  137. wrt54gs are good (at least the originals) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    root@gw:~$ uptime
      21:58:57 up 151 days, 7:08, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
    root@gw:~$

    wrt-x running on wrt54gs v1, we have a bunch of them, and Ive had them stay up for over a year without rebooting...

  138. PC Router by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got an old PII that I picked up secondhand for $20 and installed a spare nic and linux on. It runs pppoe and an iptables firewall. It only goes down when the power goes out.

  139. Try a Belkin by kawabago · · Score: 1

    I've had Netgear, Linksys and Dlink and they all needed frequent reboots and they all died after about a year. My Belkin wifi/switch almost never needs rebooting and it's been running constantly for 4 years. It was also the cheapest of the lot.

  140. no regularly scheduled reboots here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    running DDWRT on a WRT54GL; 4 laptops via wi-fi and almost 24/7 torrent uploads. I did have to reboot when using 'stock' Linksys firmware (only when running uTorrent).

  141. Is it supported? by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

    I am seeing no D-Link routers listed on the Tomato page and certainly no N routers. Can someone elaborate? I'd love to find a more capable router...

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  142. Check the Power Supply by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    I had an old linksys router that didn't seem to work properly all of a sudden. After looking into it a bit I realized that I had mixed up a couple power supplies so it wasn't getting enough voltage. After plugging in the correct power supply it worked great again. Not so oddly enough.

    I've been using a Linksys NR041 (costs about $30) for years and have never had a problem with it. It's a pretty basic router that does what I need it to (block and forward ports). Maybe the issue with more expensive consumer routers is that they're half assed versions of expensive routers. I'd rather have a basic router that does just enough but works than a half assed router that wants to pretend it can do things.

    I do have a Conext UPS that everything is plugged into so that takes care of any power fluxuation issues.

  143. Why Not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A bit off the subject. But why not power it off at night to conserve energy?

  144. Poor quality products. by ice_nine6 · · Score: 1

    Or because it's easier to tell people to simply restart the router then it is to explain to them the dhcp release/renew process.

    1. Re:Poor quality products. by retsil · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter where the problem is. Rebooting a modem/router is first thing because it is the easiest thing to. The fact that the modem needs a reboot isn't perceived as a significant problem to most end users. It only takes a few seconds and you don't loose any data in the process. This means that there isn't much pressure on the manufacturers to produce high quality routers for end users. In my own profession I prefer to reset an entire CT gantry (*nix) than the windows workstation attached to it. The only reason is because it is quicker and hence I am more likely to get the patient scanned and out the door.

    2. Re:Poor quality products. by jskline · · Score: 1

      Interesting...

      I never have any issues with DHCP. In the technical arenas that I work in, every time there is a DHCP issue, it's because something silly happened like someone added a new host on the LAN like a cheap print server, or a Linux server that just coincidentally has it's own DHCP server, and when the two of them compete; guess what happens! :-)

      --
      All content in this message is copyright (c) 2008. All rights reserved. RIAA is prohibited here.
  145. VxWorks doesn't. by bersl2 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Discuss.

  146. I have Multitech Routers... by jskline · · Score: 1

    I have the Multitech (http://www.multitech.com) routers and these are semi-Linux based routers, and like a lot of the Linux systems out there, they stay up for ungodly long periods of time and only get rebooted when power outages exceed the UPS, or I kick em for some reason.

    --
    All content in this message is copyright (c) 2008. All rights reserved. RIAA is prohibited here.
  147. Too much bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your router can only keep track of a limited number of states. If you are using an embedded device with lesser hardware, and trying to run bit torrent for too long, it will surely die. You open up so many connections and close them, the memory begins to get fragmented and you eventually run out. A router with more memory may suite you better. All my connections are managed by a pfsense firewall with 256 MB memory. Its not much, but its stands up to a lot more traffic than a linksys...

  148. I've been using this script for years... by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

    ...with routers from at least three different manufacturers. Haven't needed it since putting a UPS in place.

    #!/usr/bin/env perl

    # This script will send an ICMP ping to a target host. If the ping fails to
    # echo back, it will then execute BottleRocket (br) to send a X10 power off and
    # power on to the specified device via a X10 Firecracker module.

    use strict;
    use Net::Ping;

    my $testHost = '4.2.2.1';
    my $x10Device = 'A1';
    my $serialPort = '/dev/ttyUSB0';
    my $br = '/usr/bin/br';

    my $ping = Net::Ping->new("icmp");

    if(!$ping->ping($testHost)) {
            print "Ping test to $testHost failed.\n";
            print "Powering off device $x10Device.\n";
            for(my $i=0; $i<3; ++$i) {
                    system("$br -x $serialPort -f $x10Device");
            }
            sleep(5);
            print "Powering on device $x10Device.\n";
            for(my $i=0; $i<3; ++$i) {
                    system("$br -r 5 -x $serialPort -n $x10Device");
            }
    }

    $ping->close;

    --

    Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

  149. Connection from box on street to your residence by jrottman · · Score: 1

    I use a WRT54G and up until about a month ago I had to manually restart the router at least once per day. I called tech support for Charter Communications, and they looked at the history/signal strength of the line. They immediately noticed fluctuations in the line, and sent a technician to investigate. They replaced the line from the box on the street to the connection going in to the house, and now I have not had to restart the router since.

  150. Because They are Rubbish by markom · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately after 15 years as a network engineer for ISP's and telcos, that's pretty much it when it comes to small routers.

    Turnout of new models per vendor is on average 6-10 a year. In many of these cases, they run different OS's. Needless to say, at that rate I'm quite surprised that they work at all.

    I could keep on the rant detailing nonsense of several small router vendors, but I'll skip for now :-).

    Marko.

  151. Zyxel Prestige 314 by russotto · · Score: 1

    My Zyxel Prestige 314 doesn't need to be rebooted. The only reason it doesn't have an uptime of several years is because of power failures.

  152. Easy as to why t his happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The tubes get clogged from every couple of days...this is by design.

  153. Did you see the ghost? by edmicman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It ran through here; it sli-it slimed me!

  154. I reboot mine maybe once a year... by SmoothTom · · Score: 1

    ...as I'm moving things around and accidentally kill it's power. It's an old Linksys BEFSR41v3 that runs utterly reliably, and has been, 24/7, for years.

  155. Also heat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear a lot of people complaining about this during the summer months. Heat is a big issue for some of these little boxes.
    I haven't had to reboot my WRT54G running DD-WRT since I stuck some small heatsinks on pretty much every chip inside. I think they were the small copper heatsinks meant for video card RAM, but they work great for routers. I used to have a fan stuck on top, but I found it to be unnecessary w/ the heatsinks in place now.

  156. What do you mean "we," white man? by Etherized · · Score: 1

    I have to wonder - just what is it doing that you feel rebooting every few days is the proper remedy?

    I run OpenWRT and never reboot my device (save when a power outage forces me to), but even stock firmware should be quite stable for most people. Rebooting the device is not normal, and either your device is defective or you have another problem elsewhere in your configuration (that's coincidentally fixed when you reboot the NAT device).

  157. Wow by hawkbug · · Score: 1

    I have a Cisco 678 DSL router and a Cisco PIX 501 sitting behind that. I haven't rebooted either of those in over a year, probably lots longer than that. I have them on a backup battery, so even if the power goes out, they stay up long enough. I seriously can't remember the last time I ever needed to reboot them. My linksys WRT54G though freaks out from time to time for my wireless, that bothers me. However, even that goes atleast 6 months without issue at one time.

  158. Not sure what, but *something* is wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also have the experience that routers has to be restarted quite often. But my Apple Airport Express could at least go for half a year until I needed to restart it.

    If you look at user ratings of routers on Amazon you will see a clear pattern, lots of people give 5 starts, almost the same amount of people gives one start, nothing in between. So *something* is wrong, I'm just not sure what it is making the same router model to cause such pain for some users while others have no trouble at all.

  159. Current firmware? by sjbe · · Score: 2, Informative

    Constant lockups, power cycles, and constantly losing DNS service... It was batshit insane.

    Sometimes a firmware update can help. Not always but I do find it worthwhile updating the firmware and it has fixed problems for me in the past.. Having it on a UPS helps too; make sure you shield the data cables as well as the power cables. There are a few linksys units however that simply never seem to work reliably. My father has one. Just can't seem to hold a reliable connection for some reason. Mine on the other hand works damn near flawlessly.

  160. Reboot? by buss_error · · Score: 1

    I've Cisco routers that have never been rebooted except to load up patches. At the moment, I've a 63xx router that's been up for the last two years.

    I also have an AIX system that hasn't been patched or rebooted in the last 4 years. (an internal system. Yeah, it should be updated, but as of now, nothing that is horrible and accesable via the firewall rules.)

    There was a story going around about a netware system that got walled up behind sheet rock and ran for years and years without anyone being able to even touch the server. I doubt it on a personal level just on power alone (where can you find power that NEVER drops over many years? I'd sure like to know...) I could see that a system wouldn't have a critical hardware failure over 6+ years, I just don't see that same system being able to stay up without power problems.

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
  161. Boils down to cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every couple of days? I think that's an exaggeration. But I can't deny that I have to occasionally (say, once a month?) reboot my WRT54G because it seems to get out of sync with my cable modem.

    But at any rate, lemme ask you this:

    How much did you pay for your WRT54? $60? There's your answer. You can pay upwards of ~$2000 for a decent 6-port router (I know -- I have a nice Fortigate at my office). This kind of device never needs to be rebooted.

    (I'm not trying to troll ... This is just how things are in life. Don't be surprised if the $50 commodity hardware you bought at Best Buy doesn't offer 99.999% uptime.)

  162. Combination of a lot of what's already been said.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the problem is a combination of a lot of what's already been mentioned..

    1) Cheap pieces of crap. You can pick these up for what, $10 after rebates sometimes. I just don't think the quality control is there in these 'home routers'. For one thing, have you ever spoken with their technical support? Horrible. If you call them because you're having issues with the wireless connection, half of the time they will try to pass the call off onto your ISP. Of course, it's your ISP's fault somehow, even if your hardwired computers work fine, and the router IS connecting to the internet fine, it's just not working over wireless. "Your modem isn't bridged, call your ISP." That's a common "out" for them.

    2) D-Link doesn't work well with PPPPOE. Why? Because by default, it's set to "Connect on Demand". It's SUPPOSED to pick the connection back up, but for reasons unknown, doesn't. If you manually log into the router and connect, it's fine. Setting it to "Always on" seems to do the trick in most cases. Unfortunately most average users are oblivious to the number 192.168.0.1.

    3) Both D-Link, and Linksys (and a lot of other brands), as mentioned, are sensitive to fluctuations in power. So sensitive in fact, that during a surge/brownout/whatever they will completely LOSE their settings. If your ISP uses the PPPOE protocol, and you need to authenticate your connection, this means re-setting up the router. Again, as mentioned, a good UPS is a must with these cheap home routers.

    4) P2P. Using P2P software can quickly turn your connection to shit. Not sure if the routers and running out of memory due to the sheer volume of connections hitting it or what, but turning off P2P software completely or limiting the number of connections in the software's options seems to help a LOT. Also, turn off that UPNP garbage and properly forward required ports to the computer in need.

    BTW I'm running Tomato on a WRT54GL (on a UPS) and have had have zero issues. No restart of the router is needed.

  163. i pick 3 biatch! by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 0
    --
    -
  164. I have exactly the same router AND the same prob.. by Max+Night · · Score: 1

    Yep - same router, same issues. Sometimes the wireless network will simply disappear. And I'm plugged into a power conditioner, for the record. Sometimes, I'll go to post a file to a site in Dreamweaver, and it'll respond "waiting for server"... time to reboot, in either case. Have updated firmware and everything - no dice. Sigh. M.

  165. Here's a Workaround for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not just routers that get confused or stuck.

    We've had to toggle power to a NetComm NB5 ADSL2+ modem, up to several times per day.

    Contacting NetComm & the client's ISP for advice (most recent being: for a simple ADSL-1 connection, limit the NB5 to using only G.DMT, when connecting) has yet to yield a solution.

    Workaround:

    Even before trying that ISP-provided tip, we installed a 24-hour timer-switch, setting it to toggle -only- the modem's power several times a day (hoping to catch it before it stops working by itself, to minimize down-time):

    1. just before client's start of business day,
    2. sometime after their close of business day, and
    3. around 2 am, just in case.

    (We could also monitor the availability of the Internet connection, and - if needed - add more power-toggles to the timer switch's list, up to a reasonable maximum.)

    The power stays Off for 15 minutes, at each timer-set power-toggle, but client's Internet availability has risen to "On -most- hours of the day MINUS 45 minutes (on the current schedule)" without regular (several times per day) human intervention.

    Hardare cost: Au $5.00 for a cheap (if noisy) 24-hour timer-switch.

    Although now thought to be unrelated:

    Problem: a simple VoIP-phone failed -once- in the 2 or 3 weeks since the installation of the above "workaround."

    W'around: toggling its ATA's power restored the single-line VoIP-phone availability.

    Of course, YMMV.

  166. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  167. I've never had to reboot by jcrousedotcom · · Score: 1

    I have never had to reboot my old NetGear (a loooooong time ago when I didn't know any better and used one of those), I've never rebooted my IPCop - infact the before I moved (this less than a week ago) it had something like 160 days uptime and the previous downtime was due to a power outage.

    My old Cisco 1601 that used to use to connect my servers to the Internet via a DSL circut had never had to be rebooted.

    You've got something wrong I suspect.

    --
    Illiterate? Write for free help!
  168. South Park addressed this issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, Season 6, Ep12 ...check hulu

    They had the linksys router-resetting issue down perfect.

    You know you've got a product issue when a randy cartoon takes it on.

  169. easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Why Do We Have To Restart Routers?" Because they are still little computers with shabby OSs. lol

  170. Re: Too Hot by electrostatic · · Score: 1

    I had ongoing problems with routers needing rebooting and happened to mention it to an EDN editor. He said it's a common heat problem: remove the cover and install heatsinks on the hotest chips. I checked the chips with an IR thermometer, and two of them were over 140F with covers off. I used heatsink epoxy (silver filled) to attach small, finned heatsinks, left the cover off and haven't had a problem since -- approx 18 mos ago.

  171. freebsd monowall + soekris = long uptime by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    its not cheap but I think its worth it. the hardware, that is. the software is free (freebsd m0n0wall).

    a high res photo of mine:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/linux-works/1655498926/sizes/o/

    link to its product page: http://www.soekris.com/net5501.htm

    its fanless, its very low power, its fast booting, it uses throw-away (seriously!) compact flash cards to boot from and the model I have has quite a few ethernet ports (admittedly, 10/100 and not gig-e; but its a wan gateway, not really a lan-router).

    its gui is nice and clean, it pretty much works and the system's uptime is months and months. I think the last time my UPS ran down when the power failed, that's the last time the thing needed a reboot.

    there is also a wireless option for this (it has a regular pci slot, too).

    soekris is a small company and I do recommend people consider them for their embedded networking devices. (I'm just a customer, but I'm local and I drove down to where the comany is located and bought my unit in person. it was cool to see such a small operation turn out such a nice set of small fanless bsd-capable systems.)

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:freebsd monowall + soekris = long uptime by Ancient123 · · Score: 1

      Soekris boxes are nice. FYI Boeing uses them in a few situations as routers and access points. I personally have a 4501 at work and a 4801 at home.
      P.S. the 4501 has the same 8mb Canon CF card that you have... gotta love what you get for free with a digital camera.

  172. Why do you put up with such crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am like the previous poster. My Linksys WRT54G (Ver 3.0.3) has not been rebooted for a couple of years. I too didn't understand what the original poster was talking about, saying he reboots his router every couple of days. If you have a router that won't run more than a couple of days, I'd say you should get your money back. If enough people returned shoddy merchandise, the manufacturer would improve it (and might raise the price, but it would be worth it).

  173. Probably the amount of traffic by techdavis · · Score: 1

    I work for a WISP and an electrical contractor - where we do custom home theaters and smart homes. I have run into this issue numerous times with different brands, and calls to D-Link and Linksys techs confirmed something for me: the routers are designed to handle "normal" home network traffic - if the bandwidth passing through the routers is too high, and too constant, the router will lock up. Both Linksys and D-Link recommended I get enterprise-level routers for high volume routing (like home theater setups passing video to multiple TVs, or heavy torrent users).

  174. Mine has been working over 3 years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a Linksys router for about $50 from Wal-Mart, over three years ago, and it's worked fine ever since. I think I reset it a couple times, but in each case I later determined the problem was something else.

    I left it on when I left the country for six months (so other users on the system could continue to access the net), and when I came back it was still working fine.

  175. Spot on. Clean power == higher stability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Any equipment worth running well, is worth putting on a decent UPS with AVR (Automatic Voltage Regulation). A good UPS isn't expensive, but it will turn the seriously ugly power in many homes (like drops below 100v when the A/C or the fridge kicks on) into a perfectly nice 120v at a smooth 60hz and keep it pegged there.

    Personally, I find less reboots required for devices and appliances, much longer life of server components, and overall increased stability.

  176. Is it really the router? by BeBold · · Score: 1

    I've been using an SMC reouter for the past few years, alternately with Comcast & with Verizon DSL. Internally, we have a linux laptop (Debian Etch 2.6.20) and two mac G5s. The macs & laptop take turns losing network- interestingly often not at the same time.

    I hardly ever have to reboot the router. I do have to restart the Comcast cable modem about once a month (they actually recommend this) and I occasionally have to restart networking on one or more of the user boxes. Looking at my resolv.conf I found that Comcast changes nameservers on occasion even when the external IP stays the same. Weirdly, the SMC picks up the new info, but doesn't pass it on to the boxes unless I do a dhcp reset.

    The other weird thing that I've seen with Comcast is that it occasionally converts some of the IP name resolutions for sites I use most often to IN-ADDR.ARPA addresses. It does this often enough with some of my most-used sites that I manually added them into my /etc/hosts.

    Since doing that, I find that I "lose" network less often. I suspect that many of the incidents I had experienced as network failures were actually name resolution failures.

    --
    Be Bold! BoldEverything Interactive
  177. Huh? by speedtux · · Score: 1

    I haven't had to reboot my routers (WRT54G) in the last 3 years, except for the occasional firmware upgrade.

  178. Heat is a huge factor for consumer routers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heat... I've had many home routers over the years, and most of them failed when they got too hot. Summer can aggravate the problem. The most features a router packs the more likely it is to heat up and fail as well. So disabling any unused features can help a lot. Especially things like disabling WiFi can reduce the heat generated greatly. You can disable most features in the router's configuration page... the less enabled, the better your router is likely to perform and less problems you will have.

    1. Re:Heat is a huge factor for consumer routers by chaffed · · Score: 1

      I took it a step further and added heat sinks. I have noticed that routers are made more cheaply these days. I have one of the original 4 port routers from Linksys. After 9 years it still works fine. Point in fact, I use it along with an access point for best performance. Though recently I have changed over to a WRT54GL with Tomato. Best router hardware and software combo I have seen.

      --
      What could possibly go wrong?
    2. Re:Heat is a huge factor for consumer routers by LarsG · · Score: 1

      Though recently I have changed over to a WRT54GL with Tomato. Best router hardware and software combo I have seen.

      I'd second that. Stable, good UI, easy QOS. Short of building a box yourself from old parts or something like a soekris it is probably the best option out there. Doesn't cost much more than an el'cheapo home router either.

      On that note, I really wish someone like Linksys would come out with an updated model. A bit more ram and flash, slightly faster cpu, a few usb ports and a pots. Make it Linux-friendly and you could turn it into everything from an asterix server to a mini-nas in addition to doing all the router/wifi stuff. You can build your own from parts, but a mass-market model could get the price down a bit.

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
  179. Linksys has failed me, Apple has been fine by ianmac47 · · Score: 1

    I had a Linksys router at home that needed rebooting two or three times a month on average. I switched it with an Apple Airport Extreme, and since then I haven't needed to reboot (though it rebooted during a software upgrade). Its been seven months since I upgraded and couldn't be happier. Also have a Linksys in the office; I reboot that one about twice a week.

  180. modem by luigi517 · · Score: 1

    I have a dlink router and i had to restart it all the time when i was usin the crappy modem provided by the isp but havent had to once since i got a good modem

  181. simple solution to cheap routers by tim8oj · · Score: 1

    i have my router and modem installed on a powerbar with a timer. the timer is setup so that the power get cycled once a day (when we're all sleeping) and we never know about it. actually started out using this as an energy-saving trick, as our home computers are never being used between 1am and 8am... so why leave a router and dsl modem switched on?

    highly recommended for all home office users!

  182. today's business model by anton_kg · · Score: 1

    Linksys went for GPL, produced a good hardware, but had to stop doing it for some reason. That's how the business model works, because you won't buy an expensive router. So there is no reason for vendor to produce a good quality router. So you'll decide to buy a better router, but it'll have another bug, like getting hot or something. Then you'll try get even better one, "NG" model, all for vendor's benefit. Then you'll post it on the slashdot. Conclusion: It's a customer's fault.

  183. Firmware will save you by agant · · Score: 1

    We've set up about 1800 "home" routers over a several year period. I agree power is a big problem. Good firmware on decent chipset's will handle it fine though. After using most every brand on the market it boils down to Linksys WRT54G (Broadcom chipset) with DD-WRT or Tomato for firmware. The stock firmware is trouble. The GL's are cool with DD, but not necessary. The V8's are cheaper and run DD-WRT Micro flawlessly (even with crappy power) I have hundred's of WRT54G Version 8's in use now with negligible problems. The Buffalo WHR's were great too back when you could get 'em.

  184. Crazyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've installed 4 routers. Not a single on has needed rebooting. all $50 wonders. The oldest one has run continuously for 3 years, only rebooting with power failures ( maybe 2-3 over the time period) and never needing service. I did buy a linksys that out of the box never worked, but that's sort of different.

  185. Not allways needed.... by gweihir · · Score: 1

    I have a Linux box as router. It reached 400 days uptime at one point and was then shut-down because of a kernel upgrade. So basically, Linux has wat it takes. The question is whether the installation on the particular router is done right.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  186. Netopia by twm1010 · · Score: 1

    I have a Netopia DSL Modem/Router... it gets restarted only when the power is out.

    --
    If this post has multiple meanings, and one of those pisses you off, I meant the other one.
  187. Multiple problems by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1

    In my experience, it's a combination of things. First, the consumer-grade stuff is very cheaply built, especially when it comes to the power supply section. I had to rebuild the power supply section on my old Linksys a couple times before I retired it. Secondly, the firmware tends to be buggy and limited; for some people it may work fine all the time, but it may lock up or reset on you if you push it too hard. I've got an Airlink-101 I bought used, which I loaded D-Link firmware onto (because it was less buggy that way). If I let uTorrent (a BitTorrent client) have all the connections it wants, it'll overload the router's firmware and make it reset. Even without that though, it still resets every so often, for no apparent reason. *shrug* It's a real crapshoot really. I'd have to say, you get what you pay for, really. If you want high reliability, get something designed for commercial use, not for home use, and plan on paying a few hundred dollars for it. Either that or get a FitPC or something physically tiny that is very low-power, run some flavor of Linux on it, and set up the OS to use it as your gateway. That's what I'm planning on doing because of the same sorts of issues that you're having. It may seem like a lot of trouble, but it would also give you the ability to customize the software running on it to include things like a small web server or SSH daemon if those things are useful to you (they are to me).

  188. Possible causes: by ledow · · Score: 1

    1) Manufacturing fault - not every router is identical and I wouldn't be surprised if the hardware in sub-£50 hardware isn't top-of-the-range (e.g. memory that just had enough banks working even though it's specc'ed to be more etc. - this has been going on back as far as the ZX Spectrum, a quote from the wiki article: "To reduce the price, the 32 KB extension used eight faulty 64 kilobit chips with only one half of their capacity working and/or available.", and Intel/AMD are still doing the same thing with multi-core chips). Things fail randomly too. That's life.

    2) Environment - Power, heat, humidity, physical shock, cabling specifications, static-shocks, etc. Any and all of these can fluctuate in any location, let alone if you are talking about a million units in different people's houses. They won't behave the same in every location.

    3) Crap software - The firmware isn't designed to NASA longevity standards. It's designed for home users to get on broadband once a day to check their email. Live with it, or replace it with one of the Open Source ones. This is why hard P2P use craps out most basic hardware - the software isn't built to cope. This has been true since the very first broadband modems/routers came out.

    4) It's you - Personally, I've seen identical hardware, from identical batches, of very expensive models go into two people's houses. One person will treat it kindly, site it well, treat it with care upon unpacking, basically treat it as a sensitive electrical device (hell, sometimes they're so frightened of damaging the thing that they go overboard). The other will throw it around, plug the thing on/off/on/off while testing it, site it poorly, drop it, leave it in damp locations etc. without even realising they've done it.

    No. 1 is a fact of life. Pay more = get more. No. 2 = Avoidable to some degree. No. 3 = Completely avoidable, but you may have to try something other than the default firmware.

    No matter what hardware you're talking about, No. 4 will hit you if you are like that. I've seen home PC's that have been running for less than a year which people ASSURE me have received no damage, been locked away from the kids, etc. and yet the hard drive registers SMART failures for sheer number of bad sectors. Identical batch harddrives in identical PC's in other people's homes last forever without a single error.

    Personally, my WRT54GS has been working fantastically for about a year now. Over that, in fact. Bog-standard firmware (I think it's even out of date, because I just used the factory firmware). Used every single day by many wireless clients, tons of traffic of every kind goes through it. Periods of dozens of config changes an hour, periods of months of unattended operation. Periods of massive wireless interference, periods of none. No crashes, no weird behaviour. Real power cycles, software power cycles, brown-outs, black-outs, no problem. I have it on a UPS now but it ran for ages without one. About the only problem I have with it is that I forget to put the 's' in https:/// whenever I try to access its configuration page.

    Similarly for my ADSL Router (some cheap Conexant thing, doesn't even have a brand name on it, think it's eTec). That's been going for nearly five years now. It carried itself well through several speed upgrades, several changes of location (by many, many miles), half a dozen powercuts, several ISP faults (where the connection died but the router stayed up and endlessly tried to reconnect).

    And my brother's equipment (printers, print servers, ADSL Routers, ancient wireless access points).
    And all of the cheap rubbish they buy in work (including three consumer wireless ADSL routers on different Wifi channels, used as a mobile hotspot for a laptop trolley).

    In actual fact, the only things that I've seen actually lock hard on a regular basis or a predictable one are:

    Several very expensive Ethernet switches that lock REALLY hard if you get a network loop that goes un

  189. USR router by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a USR 5461 and I found that it would do hard-locks when I did network-intensive tasks (scp, sshfs, etc...). I ended up melting a hole in the top of the casing and popping a little southbridge heatsink on it, with a little fan run off the 5v from the USB port. Now it runs like a charm!

  190. The hamster fell asleep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Restarting them wakes the hamster up. I like my electric starter I rigged up. A word of warning drop the voltage to 9 volts. The 12 volt one tended to cook the little suckers and getting the smell of fried hamster out of your server is a real mess.

  191. D-Link? Linksys? by networkzombie · · Score: 1

    I've got many routers in use (Cisco 1600, 2600, 3600, Asus WL500g, USR 5461, Netgear 302, etc...) and none of them ever need rebooting, and yes, most of them are on a UPS. Title should be "Why do my cheap-ass Apple, D-Link, and Linksys routers suck? After all, I only purchased the cheapest model available."

  192. Re:Poor Programming && Poor Hardware Desig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ah, another anti-Java rant. You seem to be getting confused between a programming language, and programs written in that language. A good language does not stop people from writing crap.

    You might find this useful to read this before your next rant: JSR 1: Real-time Specification for Java

    All good colleges still teach the "hard" stuff.

  193. Solid routers here by obiwan74 · · Score: 1

    Multiple routers on UPS here Dlink, linksys, and others all run without reboot until update or reconfig is required. Not sure why others might need reboots.\ cheers

  194. Maybe it's not the routers? by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

    I have a Belkin. Cheapest wireless router I could find, about 4 years ago. I can't remember the last time I had to restart it. Actually, I don't think I've _ever_ had to restart it. Even through service interruptions, it always picks back up right where it left off.

  195. Reboots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have a Cisco on our corporate network that has an uptime of over 7 years. Who says you have to reboot them?

  196. You do? I don't by mikeraz · · Score: 1

    I don't recall the last time I had to boot any of my little routers. A Linksys WTRG54L and a Netgear WGT have been humming along for months.

    --

    There's more to it than this.

  197. WRT54G by scott_karana · · Score: 1

    I have a WRT54G myself, and even considering the notorious "three day connection keepalive", I can count the number of restarts I've required on two hands.
    That said, I highly recommend putting Tomato on it.

  198. Re:USR8054: the reason it doesnt reboot by konigstein · · Score: 1

    Because I went thru 5 months of hell, with endless USR techs, supervisors, and finally the VP of their wireless products line getting straightened out a problem with the 8054, where if a wireless phone was on the same channel (2.4GHz, US channel spectrum), the router would reset, hang, reset, hang.. and not change channels without a user manually changing it. Unfortunately, when rebooted the phones did automagically change channels, thus making a nice, vicious cycle. This was eventually fixed thru a firmware update, though I haven't reverse engineered the "new" firmware (it was a couple years ago) to figure out what the change was or how it was fixed. I haven't had that issue any longer (Now the issue is that after 5+ years of use, the router is dead. On their salary range, I doubt they are employing anyone with Jesus' power of Router Resurrection) Today, "Do you have a 2.4GHz wireless phone" is the first question I ask friends when I hear of a wireless router that reboots frequently.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  199. Price does not always determine quality by tknd · · Score: 1

    So when you show up to the movie theatre and a coke is $9 is that coke really worth more than the $1.50 two-liter of coke at the grocery store?

    And when you go to fill up you gas tank is the 87 octane gas from the station across the street really that much better because it is marked up 10 cents per a gallon?

    Or when you go to the electronics store does the logitech zfx990 optical wireless laser gaming mouse with blue-metal design really that much different than the logitech 200 optical mouse?

    And how about some desktop ram where one stick of 1gb is selling from some fancy company like OCZ for $60 bucks with aluminum heat spreaders yet an equivalent 1gb stick from no-marketing distributer is selling for $40 (yet when you take the ram back home they have the same memory chips...)?

    The best example of all: are monster audio cables really that much better than a coat hanger?

    In general you could say that the more expensive something is, the higher the quality. But this is not always true. A common business practice is to exploit marketing strategies to target special high margin markets. That is someone at monster cable thought that there existed a market of idiots who would pay top dollar for a product that was not necessarily better than the other products on the market. But as long as they had a perception of being better and a price to back it up, then people in this target market would pay up.

    The same can be said about cheap products that are advertised to be a "cheap product" when really the margin is low or even negative on the product. Companies sometimes do this to enter a new market first or slurp up market share before the competition can. A good example of this is the original xbox.

    But sometimes there are products which end up on the market under priced because businesses didn't do adequate research or a different market (that wasn't targeted) realizes the potential of the product. A good example here is the original Sonic Impact t-amp which was marketed as a portable two speaker amplifier that could run on batteries. Audiophiles eventually came across the amp priced at about $60 (more today since the company realized it was worth more) and initially thought the product might be junk. But when they evaluated the amplifier they found that it could compete with top quality audiophile hardware. While the amplifier didn't have the power to drive a block party, for a living room it was more than enough.

    If you want a more popular example you could go back in time to the time when Japanese entered the U.S. automobile and motorcycle market. The price of the Japanese imports were substantially lower yet the quality of the product was better. Harley Davidson almost failed as a company when the Japanese entered the market with their cheaper, more reliable, and sporty bicycles. Harleys suffered in quality because their production lines were flawed (a Harley back then was essentially hand-crafted and new workers were trained on the spot rather than being told to follow documented practices or processes). This resulted in an overpriced product with poor quality compared to the Japanese offerings. Harleys have changed since the company restructured itself and caught up with Japanese manufacturing methods. But it is just another example of price not being a good indicator of quality.

    Finally businesses can use these same concepts to increase sales if they're smart. A good example here is a supermarket (I forget the name) that actively tries to listen to customer feedback. When they sold fish, they would package the fish into Styrofoam containers with plastic shrink wrap. Some of the feedback they got was that the fish they sold "was not fresh like the other fish markets". The guy in charge of buying the fish said that that was a lie and that he bought the fish from the same distributor that all the other markets bought the fish from and knew for a fact that they had just died. So the founders sent an employee to the other fish markets to see

  200. "My Internet", wait, what? by Doug+Merritt · · Score: 1

    My internet does that too.

    Hey!!! I thought it was ours, too!!! :-)

    --
    Professional Wild-Eyed Visionary
  201. Re:A $50 Router Stable? nope. not even a $5000 one by konigstein · · Score: 1

    So my college was auctioning off its old networking equipment. Much to my surprise, I saw a nortel networks router shell, with the price tag of 25$. Thinking to my geek self that it bore further investigation in the event that it was, in fact, a full fledged router, I investigated. And nearly shit myself when I found it was not only the router, but all the expansion and fiber cards, and dual industrial grade failover sensing power supplies for operating a switched network at above 300,000PPS (packets per second). Shocked, I bought it on the spot. This is the part of my story where I must claim I am in NO WAY responsible for my neighborhoods blackouts that coincide for when I start that beast. And if anyone is interested in taking this off my hands, PLEASE contact me.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  202. Strange, I never have to reboot my home router... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But then again, I never have to reboot mine at work either. That's that plus side of running a Cisco 28xx on a big APC UPS at home. Never had a problem with anything in my home gear rack, but it sure does freak out the various techs that have come out for cable or fiber installs.

    Why are there so few people running that kind of setup here? I was surprised by all the people talking about how "my first router" keeps blowing up.

    And for everyone who is going to come back to this with the assorted versions of "but my router runs linux so i can do x or x or x on it", well, I hate to tell you, but my "home router" does dns, nat, filtering, runs my home VoIP system, including vm, outbound least cost route selection and firmware distribution, in and outbound VPNs, etc, etc.

  203. Gotta love Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My router is an old K6-2 box with 1 single port card, and a 4 port card. Runs Slackware, and has been running for 259 days since it's last reboot.

    Also all my network hardware and servers in the basement are tied to a nice big APC 3000VA UPS
    and have not had a problem since it was installed.
    Also got to love the price I paid, $40.00 for it.

  204. Re: I have the same router! Help me if you can! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey to all that read this. I have the exact same router the WRT54G. I agree that it is a piece of crap. I just RMA'd it, but I have not purchased a new one yet to replace it. Can anyone recommend a good wireless router that doesn't reduce internet speed (which this WRT54G definitely did), needs minimal reboots, and has good range. Please respond. Thanks in advance.

  205. me too by dodgedodge · · Score: 1

    i have to restart my WRT54G every week or two. I almost never reboot my Windows XP boxes.

    pathetic.

  206. Caveat - Re:I never have to by PCMeister · · Score: 1

    For those with experience running earlier revisions of Linksys routers, it's known that they are much more stable than the newer and cheaper (component-wise) brethren. While Tomato may be very stable and have a good QoS implementation, it unfortunately shuts out those with Linksys units v5 or newer as described below. Even with it's QoS functionality being questionable at best, at least DD-WRT offers that segment of users a viable choice to using the stock firmware.

    Following excerpt on Tomato firmware can be found here:

    "This will not work on Linksys WRT54G/GS v5 or newer WRT54G/GS routers."

  207. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  208. I don't. by rindeee · · Score: 1

    Ever. Linksys WRT54GL w/DD-WRT on a small UPS/conditioner. Bullet and proof.

  209. Linksys RV042 by iONiUM · · Score: 1

    I had the exact same problem with the WR** from Linksys, and other routers (D-Link comes to mind). I now have a Linksys RV042 (it actually says Cisco on it as well), and I have not had to reboot this router once. The problem is it doesn't have WiFi in it, so I do also use a Linksys WAP54G (which is not a router, just an access point) and this also does not require a reboot. I realize this is a little extreme, being that the RV042 is for VPN routing (which I have to use anyways), but it is an excellent answer to the rebooting problem, even if the power lines are "dirty" (note: all of these routers have used the same powerbar & outlet, so that's been constant through the 'testing').

    1. Re:Linksys RV042 by Andyvan · · Score: 1

      I second the RV042. I went through about 3 routers (a Linksys, a DLink and a Netgear), and they all started needing daily reboots. I've had to reboot the RV042 once in 2+ years. Yes, I use a UPS. Used it for the other routers too.

    2. Re:Linksys RV042 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have about 7 RV042 series router, and an RV082 router as well. I run MRTG on all of the routers and the 042s never seem to have uptimes greater than 20 days. The 082, OTOH, has an uptime of 90 days, and only because I mistakenly pulled the wrong power cord out of the socket. Here's the kicker: Nobody touches the router! In fact, most routers are locked away, inaccessible to users manually restarting them. I think the geniuses at Linksys put in a routine to automatically restart the router when the memory runs low, or some other condition is met. Not one person has complained, and the VPN tunnels seem to have no troubles reconnecting. The 082 is flawless, and is rack-mountable, but at $300CDN, not quite an affordable consumer model.

      I've been playing with the Planet VRT-401 router $135, and it seems to work very well, but there's no SNMP support(!), so I can't track it's uptime. Booo!

    3. Re:Linksys RV042 by CommanderData · · Score: 1

      I have an RV082 and can second or third it's recommendations. I've got it on a UPS, and have had uptimes of 250+ days with it (including lots of Bittorrent usage). Rock solid device, and the built in VPN allows me to get at all my gear in the house easily while away!

      --
      Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
  210. Easy to solve by Casandro · · Score: 1

    Well you could just use a better power supply. That may, in case of cheap routers, even improve your power efficiency.

  211. Too many variables, however.... by hardwarefreak · · Score: 0

    Unstable power, as previously mentioned, is the likely culprit in most circumstances where folks have to reboot home broadband routers.

    I have an SMC rack mount SOHO broadband router here at home. Twas the only one I could find back when I went looking for an RM consumer grade/price broadband router. Was $80 back in 2004. It's pretty nice, 8 port 10/100 switch, parallel port print server, SPI firewall w/ attack detection, PPPoE, DynDNS, DHCP server, etc. Vxworks based firmware.

    I have it powered by an APC RM1400 in the bottom of the rack. I can't state exact uptime with certainty as the firmware doesn't provide uptime, but I know for a fact I've not power cycled or reset the SMC in over 2 years.

    I have had to reset my DSL modem at least once in that time frame however. It's a SpeedStream 5260 transparent ethernet bridge, so I can only assume there was some kind of ATM or analog signaling problem between it and the DSLAM that caused it to freeze. That's only happened about 4 or 5 times in the 7 years I've had DSL.

  212. My setup by Programmerman · · Score: 1

    I bought a used Cisco DSL router off eBay. Once I set it up, it only reboots when there's a power failure (once every few months or so). The WRT54G was no end of headaches, until its only job was to bridge the wired network and the wireless netowrk, which is the one function that never seemed to stop working on it. It doesn't do NAT, it doesn't do DHCP, it doesn't route, it doesn't do anything but wireless encryption. I haven't logged into it for maybe two years, though it's probably time to change the network password.

  213. In general, people can't code by bill_kress · · Score: 1

    I've seen quite a few embedded systems, and in general most people can't code.

    A few can, and a while ago, programming was hard enough that most code was written by one of these few, but now that Java, VB and C# are so wide spread, companies are able to hire bunches of people with marginal programming abilities and get something that looks like it kind of works.

    It's easier to imagine if you consider how many people are master artists or musicians and how many people can play an instrument.

    In programming there are very similar ratios, but since most people are utterly incapable of differentiating which code is great art and which is someone playing an instrument, they end up hiring the session players (which tend to be much cheaper) every time.

    End result? Routers need rebooting every week or so.

  214. NSLU2 by settrans · · Score: 1

    I use an NSLU2 as a router and firewall for my home network, and I move more often than I have to reboot it.

    --
    "When I wake up in the morning I piss cryptographic excellence." - Bruce Schneier
  215. Try turning on "Block WAN Ping" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a suggestion that worked for me. Turn on the "Block WAN Ping" function.

    I've got a D-Link D-524 that worked for many years. Like others have said, eventually the power adapter died. Got a WRT45G. Ran fine for 15 minutes, then got slow and was unresponsive after 30 Min. I then had to reboot. The cycle repeated like clockwork. My old D-Link never did that. Called customer support. Nothing other than the usual "reboot & check the plug" kind of response. Submitted e-mail requests. Nothing.

    Gave up, got a new D-Link power supply. (They replaced it free; great service!) Now my old D-Link had exactly the same problem! 30 minutes, gets slow, and I have to reboot.

    Finally, I recalled something about bad guys using ping to find live machines. I turned on the "Block WAN Ping" setting. After that, the D-Link was fine for months. I suspect the same trick would have made the WRT54G work.

    I have no idea WHY it works, only that it does...

  216. why do we have to restart routers? by cooker47 · · Score: 1

    1) Most retail or ISP "home networking" routers are built to a low, low price, and you only get what you pay for.
    2) The router OS usually does not include (e.g.) a cron job to reboot regularly to force automatic cleanup of queues, etc. Some customers would like this, but it might be considered disruptive, so it's avoided.
    3) Even if the manufacturer's power supply is robust, they are often mismatched, whether by ISP techs or home owners, and this causes all sorts of problems including overheating and frequent router resets.
    4) [Name of ISP withheld] guidance is NOT to plug an integral modem/router into a power bar or surge protector if possible, since this is supposed to help avoid the problem of the router resetting itself to factory defaults due to a "power surge" (supposedly caused by: lightning, "storm surge", brown-out, or power cut). This mainly affects wireless clients, since customization (SSID, WEP or WPA) gets lost, and you end up with a house full of "wireless orphans".
    5) Rightly or wrongly, many High Speed Internet customers seem to be under the impression that their service is supposed to be up and available ALL the time. Looking at their monthly tariffs (often $50 per month or higher) this is not unreasonable, whereas - in practice - most residential Internet equipment (modems and routers) is subject to various additional upstream issues including line breaks, cable head end restarts, upstream router restarts, name server switching (?), and all sorts of other issues I don't even know about. In this environment, having to restart FIRST the modem, and THEN the router cleans up more than 50% of all "can't connect" scenarios, and - these days - you often do NOT have to restart the computers as well. This simple information is not known by the majority of consumers, especially those whose own sense of "entitlement" gives them the mindset to get on the phone and be sarcastic (or worse) at the first sign of any disruption to their (residential service), "because I work from home", etc. Arguably, MOST router restarts are requested by ISP tech support folks while trying to do basic cleanup as a prelude to other troubleshooting.
    6) I have some sympathy for folks who happen to live "in a bad spot" in terms of their chosen Internet provider's infrastructure. They just seem to go apoplectic after a while if problems continue.

    In conclusion, consumers deserve better, and the industry (both ISPs and router manufacturers) should be providing it.

  217. So many garbage data packets? by Doug52392 · · Score: 1

    My Internet recently stopped working, and I had a strange suspicion it might be getting DDoSed. So I ran a packet sniffer, and I found that thousands of ARP packets were coming in every second! I quickly went online since when I had the modem connected to the computer the Internet worked fine, and come to find out getting that many ARP requests is NORMAL on Comcast Internet! That's why the little light on the modem is ALWAYS flashing, even when no ones using the Internet!

    It was the router. I reset it and it worked fine.

    1. Re:So many garbage data packets? by hardwarefreak · · Score: 0

      What you're seeing isn't necessarily only ARP packets, but all the traffic of your neighbors. Cable TV company broadband networks are built of physically shared cable, thus any packets on the wire are going to be seen by all the cable modems on the shared segment, just like un-switched ethernet networks. The traffic LED flashing you're seeing isn't just ARP packets, it's ALL packets from all your neighbors, and it's not just Comcast.

      Charter, Time Warner, all of the cable networks 'suffer' from this. Back in the day before people got smart and started using firewalls, one could see all his/her neighbors' Windows computers in Network Neighborhood and browse open SMB shares on neighbors' computers.

  218. Linksys fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the problem too, on two of those Linksys V4's. The firware they came with is newer than that on linksys's website, so I didn't try to upgrade.

    Both of these had an incoming port forwarded to a PC for bittorrent. I also use a number of those same linksyses without such port forwarding: those never had the problem.

    Workaround: instead of forwarding that port through the "normal" port forwarding settings, move the setting to the UPNP port forwarding settings page. Froblem fixed, I've never seen it again.

    So there seems to be a firmware bug involved (it's not because of the huge number of incoming connections if you're running a bittorrent client, the router can handle those fine.)
    I also noticed that if you use standard port forwarding, new incoming connections often seem to cause the router's network interface (local side) to reset. You may see "network cable unplugged" pop up briefly, if it's a windows PC that's connected. After this has happened a number of times, the router will just stop working and require a reboot.

  219. Don't know... by cmarks03 · · Score: 1

    Every once in a while, my IPCop box (Celeron 533MHz, 128MB RAM, 5GB HD, running headless just doing routing to two internal subnets plus VPN when I'm out of town) would become completely unresponsive (HTTPS and SSH would time out, no Internet access). It didn't happen often, but enough to annoy the family. The only thing that would fix it was a hard reboot. I have it reboot once a week and all is well. That was a while ago (well over a year now), and it may have been a bug or quirk that has been fixed since. Either way, it's unintrusive and keeps my intranet humming along.

    --
    Peace, Chris
  220. Linksys WRT54GS v6 crappiness solved, sorta by joemck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have to agree, the current Linksys routers are LOUSY. I have a WRT54GS v6 that came with VxWorks and I've installed DD-WRT micro on. In both OSes it was crap -- Wi-Fi randomly dropping out, occasional crashes. It was especially bad on hot days and during heavy network traffic.

    Apparently the Broadcom chip inside it was overheating. I ticky-tackied a PC fan to the table next to the router and powered it with a GameCube power brick (12v DC). The problem went away almost entirely, leaving me with a reliable but somewhat noisy router.

    Later, I opened the router and placed an old heatsink off a Pentium on the offending chip (run it a while, see which one is hot), and used a piece of plastic wedged into the router's shell to press the heatsink down on the chip. The heatsink had some of that heat-conductive foam glue stuff some OEMs stick it to the CPU with on the bottom. Now (almost a year later) I have no fan next to it and it hasn't crashed or dropped the network yet.

    I'm still stuck in the wimpy v6 flash and RAM though...

  221. Well it depends by MSDos-486 · · Score: 1

    Like most things that change configuration setting, you don't need to restart the whole system. They just tell you that because its easier then explaining what needs to be restarted. For example here at my University when they show you how to set up your computer to access the full university network they tell you to restart it after registering it on a web site, when in reality all you have to is run ipconfig /release and ipconfig /renew (ifdown and ifup in linux). They could explain that to you, or they could just tell you to restart your computer.

    They other problem is with bad firmware. With most of the small routers and switches I use for work or personal use I usually check every few months for firmware updates. That something alot of people don't think about, but its does help a lot with bugs in addition to providing new functionality.

    Also the Windows problem is a little more wide spread, trust me they aren't using WRTs as enterprise routers, or Dlinks as enterprise switches. Were, as the article you were referring to states Windows is everywhere. It would get really interesting if they started putting Windows on you home router (yea Internet connection sharing) like they have Linux on now, then started moving up the chain to enterprise routing systems(Minesweeper on a Cisco CRS1 anyone)

    <rant>
    One last thing. We really need to come up with another name for these $40 home "routers". I am sick of having to train new employees and have them call anything from a $5000 enterprise grade switch to a <$10 repeater "routers" </rant>

  222. I hope this explains a few things. by Sillygates · · Score: 5, Insightful
    --
    I fear the Y2038 bug
    1. Re:I hope this explains a few things. by Jellybob · · Score: 4, Funny

      If I had modpoints, you could have them all for that.

  223. Vuze 3.1.1.0 locks up my Belkin router. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Belkin Wireless G ver. 5000. Even setting vuze to only 40 ports, causes the router to lockup in seconds after a few active torrents are opened. I looked in the security log of the router and it was filled with IP Spoofing errors. I went back to azureus 2.5.0.4 and set global connection limit to 200 and haven't had any such problems.

  224. The problem might be on the other side by tgv · · Score: 1

    I have a Asus WL530g which plays badly with my wife's Acer laptop. Rebooting the router seemed to help sometimes. However, I work on a Mac laptop, and it never has had this problem. Even when the Acer loses the connection, the Mac keeps working. So it's obvious that the error is on the Acer's side. I'm pretty sure it's something called XPCOM, but it's hard to be sure (XPCOM might lock up because of a deeper problem).

    Anyway, my point is: router problems are sometimes not in the router, but in the client...

  225. Me too have to reboot the router by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have also owned several routers (US Robotics 8003, Philips-Belgacom cpwbs054, Linksys WRT150N) The US Robotics had to be rebooted at least once a day, "open all in tabs" (open multiple website) could not be used or I had to reboot it. The Philips router was very stable for 1.5 years, after that I could not connect to it anymore (only in rescue mode, but I didn't found the boot image to fix the problem, and belgacom didn't want to help me). The Linksys only needs to be rebooted every few days when I have P2P client running. No parameter found to reduce tcpip connection time.

  226. THe WRT54G is rubbish. by danhuby · · Score: 1

    I had a WRT54G, and it needed rebooting once every two to three weeks. The wi-fi element would just stop working. Really irritating.

    I eventually scrapped the thing and bought a Netgear, which hasn't failed since I first switched it on several months ago.

  227. It's a rock fight. by phulegart · · Score: 1

    Gee. Anyone actually reading the posts is going to notice something unusual...

    There are people posting who have a WRT54G that works perfectly, no rebooting, right out of the box. There are people who replace the firmware on the WRT54G and it works perfectly for them.
    There are people who own a WRT54G using the original firmware and have to reboot it every week, or few weeks, or every day, or every few days.

    This tells me that quite possibly it is not the WRT54G product line that is the problem. It might be different versions that have issues... product runs that proved problematic until a change was made in the hardware or firmware... thus Every WRT54g is different, and while one may require regular rebooting, another might not. But, this would mean that there is no QC.

    If we assume that there is actually QC at Cisco/Linksys... then how could there be such different results in the usage of the same product (WRT54G) from person to person? Other factors. Maybe the ISP is alternating dynamic IPs fast... Maybe the person in question that is having issues is torrenting. Maybe one ISP is sending those TCP kill packets causing the issues. Maybe Someone is being hacked (silly, I know). Maybe there are connection issues on the actual cable/phone line. Maybe the modem has to be replaced. Maybe...

    However, just the fact that this one brand of router, this WRT54g, apparently has the ability to work perfectly for some people and require regular rebooting for others... should point away from the possibility that it is an inexpensive and thus garbage piece of equipment.

    Then again, since it took more than 30 words to get this point across, I doubt many have read far enough to understand my conclusion... that something other than the router might be the cause.

    --
    "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
  228. WRT54G custom firmware stands by edgar_zavala · · Score: 1

    Probably is a bug or something, with original firmware i had to reboot my WRTG54G every 2 weeks, with a custom firmware i just not do that. This is the output of my own WRT54G running Sveasoft custom firmware: .... BusyBox v1.01 (2005.10.16-13:59+0000) Built-in shell (ash) Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands. zeus:~#uptime 15:44:09 up 95 days, 15:44, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 zeus:~#

  229. an old P90 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an old P90 box with Linux for my router. It reboots when the power to the house fails :)

  230. Heat, maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a billion combo DSL/ethernet/wireless and it dies at random intervals - sometimes weeks or months apart, sometimes almost daily.

    It's not power problems, since the router runs on a big UPS.

    I suspected an overheating problem, so I put the router on a tin can to elevate its air ducts and provide airflow underneath.

    I will shortly change to a different one, as this router's pretty long in the tooth and doesn't do ADSL2+, and I'll see whether the new router suffers any reliability problems.

  231. Because you reboot it when it's not required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, a couple of weeks ago I had to reboot my WRT54G running under OpenWRT because I tweaked some parameters on the wireless cards without correctly bringing it down... and at some point it froze.

    This router had more than 350 days of uptime, with near constant use of WiFi (shared with one of my neighboor) + ethernet + PPPoE Internet connection + 3 OpenVPN tunnels.

    I'm still amazed by the reliability of this little router !

    So, my answer to your question, "Why do we have to restart routers", would be:
    1) because your hardware, and/or embeded OS, suck.
    2) or, because you reboot it when it's not required

    The second point depends on your level of perception or investigation on the problem.

    In the case of the OpenWRT I have the ability to connect by SSH and I'm able to see what is happening. With other routers you might not have this level of access to the information you need in order to tell if a reboot will be usefull or not. So, in this cases, the only action possible is the reboot.

    So, even if the problem is not on your side, you have no way to tell wether it's your router fault, or just your ISP rebooting his routers :)

  232. Alternative to home routers by Bladez · · Score: 1

    For those who have an older 500mhz+ box lying around, I have been using Astaro for my home router. I found a 500mhz Celeron HP and added half a gig of ram. I have gigabit on the lan side and 10/100 on the wan. I haven't rebooted this router since I installed it. Granted it's Linux, so it shouldn't ever need to be rebooted, but it's been rock solid for me, which is far more than I can say for my Linksys, Belkin or Netgear routers I have tried....

  233. Static... bzzt!!! by Drafell · · Score: 1

    A lot of the time it is due to either dry joints, overheating, or static buildup.

  234. Arguably, you shouldn't by jrothwell97 · · Score: 1

    If a router needs rebooting every day or so, it's a sign it's on its way out IMO. My Linksys router has started doing that, and now I'm shopping for a replacement. (I used to be able to get around 300 days, solid, out of it.)

    The exception is the AirPort base stations. They have an irritating flaw which means they need rebooting every time the internet connection goes down, even for a fraction of a second. This behaviour varies between modems, but it's quite common. It's been around for a while, but AFAIK Apple hasn't released a software update to fix it.

    --
    Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
  235. m0n0wall on a WRAP by eibbojtir · · Score: 1

    I only reboot my router when the power goes out in my house (a few times a year?). I use a PC Engines WRAP board running monowall and it is rock solid. It is pretty green using only ~1.5W. http://www.pcengines.ch/ Soekris makes similar boards. http://soekris.com/ Monowall rules. http://m0n0.ch/wall/

  236. One word: Smoothwall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I started having this problem a few years ago with my admittedly old D-Link 614 router. My solution was to set up an old K6-2 550Mhz machine which was inches from the garbage heap with Smoothwall (get it from smoothwall.org) and replace the POS D-Link with this gem. Needless to say it NEVER crashes, and had at one point over a year of uptime before an extended power failure brought it down.

      I highly recommend to anyone who is having problems with crashing routers throw them away and put together a Smoothwall router using an old machine collecting dust in the basement or out of spare parts and the free Smoothwall OS. You'll never look back.

  237. Buh? by TheSeer2 · · Score: 1

    I've had my router several months and I only reset it once when I wanted a new IP.

  238. Re:That's what you get for using consumer-grade cr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typical american consumerist.

  239. check for 'exploded' capacitors on the circuitbord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    search the net for images of these things so you know what to look for.

  240. Nokia M1122 by pidge-nz · · Score: 1

    I've been using the same Nokia M1122 for just under 7 years for my ADSL connection. Once I had the latest firmware loaded on it (within a year of buying it), and whilst I had it attached to a UPS, I think it managed to overrun its uptime counter (~160 days IIRC) 3 times, before I started using bittorrent - then the 1024 entry or so NAPT table would get overrun, and cause a reboot. After limiting the number of bittorrent connections, a lot fewer spontaneous reboots occurred.

    Then again, the Nokia M1122 was a NZ$700 ADSL router in 2001.

    And with ADSL2+ finally being delivered with Local Loop Unbundling in my area, I'll have to move onto another router so I can "feel the speed" - probably with the associated "crashes" to match.

  241. This is why by zaunuz · · Score: 1

    The reason why routers have to be restarted in a while varies from router to router. Embedded systems aren't as bugg-free as one would think. for example, the WRT54G series have a bug in the firmware that makes it really unstable after a certain amounts of connections have been made since boot-time, which is why it has be to be restarted fairly often if you use things that are very intense on the amount of connections, for example bittorrent. Luckily this can be solved by flashing the WRT54G with the Tomato firmware (that's what i did, it works like a dream now). When it comes to other routers, just make sure you have the newest firmware, since this type of bug affects many routers and brands.

    --
    this is probably the most boring sig in the world
  242. Re:Vista by dogugotw · · Score: 4, Informative

    Same here. The condition that tripped the problem went as follows:
    My laptop = Ubuntu (latest)
    Wife's laptop = Vista Home Premium.
    Both wireless.
    We're surfing, everything is running great. I'd hit a site that had lots of images all on one page (think Fark's 'Photoshop this pic' page')
    Bang, network goes dead.
    I'd restart the router and my box would come back online no problem. Vista would not re-establish a connection. Repair (or whatever it's called in Vista) failed. We'd need to reboot her computer.
    Searched the web and found that this same problem happens and seems to be related to the router.
    Switched to a Netgear VPN824V3 and the problem has pretty much disappeared.

  243. Sure by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Four words: Switched Mode Power Supply. Switching supplies are extremely efficient and thus small. You've seen this already, there's one in your computer. That's how they can pack an 800+ watt supply in to something that small. You try and do that with a linear supply and it'll be massive.

    Same deal for wall warts. Some companies still use linear supplies, but not many. It is to the point where SMPS is much cheaper to produce. They also have the advantage of being smaller, and running cooler.

    You can see the technology at work in amplifiers. Have a look at Rotel's site sometime. Specifically, compare their old RB-1080 vs their new RB-1092. The RB-1080 is about twice the vertical size as the RB-1092 to house some large components (the transformer and the heat sinks mainly). However it outputs only 200 watts per channel where as the 1092 does 500. How? Well the 1080 is an older style amp. It uses a linear power supply, and class AB output. Thus it takes a lot of space and generates a lot of heat to do what it does. Not very efficient. The 1092 is a class D amp. It has a switching power supply and switching outputs. As such it is very efficient and produces little heat.

    Now none of that is to say that Dlink isn't including poorly made SMPSes, however the fact that they are so small has nothing to do with their quality. You don't need big if you have efficient.

  244. Long time no post by PinkX · · Score: 1

    Must have passed like 2 years since my last post...

    Anyway, I have a WRT54GL and it's the router I recommend to all of my customers to get. First thing to do on it is install OpenWRT, never had a problem on it. I have one on my parents home and it works steady ever since I installed it.

    Blame it on the crappy software built into these machines, I've never had a problem on them. If you're not too tech savvy then you can try some of the other alternatives (I've heard - or read - some good comments about both Tomato and HyperWRT).

    I'm a bit drunk right now as to make a full in-depth tech analysis to the root of the issue but we both God and I knows that all of my OpenWRT-powered devices work as intended.

    As a last recomm#@#@#1!!ONE1!!one!!+++ATH NO CARRIER

  245. Crap Software by mistralol · · Score: 1

    They need rebooted because the routers are crap. I have raised various bug issues with home router companies before and i have never seen a single issue resovled with some of its advanced features that simple dont work. Then i picked one of these up really cheaply from somewhere. Cisco IOS Software, C837 Software (C837-K9O3SY6-M), Version 12.4(5), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3) router uptime is 12 weeks, 3 days, 2 hours, 8 minutes The last 3 reboot reasons over the last 2 years has been a for power failure .... I think i have only ever had to reboot the thing once since i got it because it had crashed and that's over a 3 year period Same deal with the cisco switch i have.

  246. FreeBSD is my Firewall by argent · · Score: 1

    My first "LAN edge" router/firewall, back in the early '90s, was running BSDI, and since Free/Net/OpenBSD came out I've always used an old computer running one of the open source BSDs for this job. You don't need much horsepower for the job... for a long time at ABB I was using old Compaq Desqpro 20e boxes ... 386/20s with 4MB RAM ... and by the time FreeBSD CURRENT outgrew 4MB I had a stack of old DEC Multias with 12-16 MB sitting around. My current firewall is really overkill, a VIA Mini-ITX box, but it uses less power than the ex-desktop K6 it replaced.

    As far as embedded systems and reliability goes, there are always lemons, but I have found that once you get a good network device (router, modem, what have you) if you can keep the ambient temperature reasonable they'll pretty much last forever. If you skimp on the air conditioning you'll pay for it in frequent replacements. Depending on the circumstances that might actually be the cheap option, mind you... spending $100/month extra on A/C to protect a $20 router is probably a false economy... especially if the time value of replacing the router is "oh boy, field trip to Frys!".

    1. Re:FreeBSD is my Firewall by cpghost · · Score: 1

      I'm using FreeBSD 7 on Soekris (net4801) devices as PPPoE router here. Of course with pf, ntpd, named, postfix, cyrus-imapd and lighttpd. You may want to try this: it saves more power than mini-ITX boxes (using mini-ITXs as "always-on" desktops as well, again with RELENG_7).

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    2. Re:FreeBSD is my Firewall by argent · · Score: 1

      Soekris devices are really nifty. I have a friend who swears by them. They always seem to be out of stock of everything I'm interested in, though, whenever I look. :)

  247. even basic D-links rock by CdBee · · Score: 1

    I use a cheapo DI-524 and it runs for months at a time without a reboot and copes with extremely high bittorrent speeds

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  248. Clean power is cheaper than therapy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I stronly agree with livewire. I have a UPS on every node of my SOHO LAN and it never has a problem. Comcast on the other hand...

    I did power engineering for a safety-of-life system, and we saw a tremendous reduction in failures after we seriously cleaned and stabilized the power.

    Like I said, a UPS is cheaper and more effective than getting a prescription for calming your nerves.

  249. Use a Cisco DSL router by mumbler · · Score: 1

    I've had the same problem with many simple routers. When you run P2P software inside you'll get lots of connections from outside, each entry requires a NAT table entry which expires slowly. I invested in a small Cisco DSL router which allows me to set the max. size and the expiry time of nat entries. Problem solved. Without the limit on the tables the Cisco would report the overflow after about one day.

  250. wathever... my WRT54GL runs for 2 months now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a WRT54GL with Tomato Firmware. haven't restarted mine since last upgrade (2 Months)...

    if you have to restart your router so often it's because its a DLINK router or you are wannabe network dude who cant configure a router...

    learn, research and experiment... or else don't complain.

  251. No Problem with Zyxel P330W by clevguru · · Score: 1

    My ZyXel P330W never needs rebooted. I leave it up for months at a time. In fact the only time is gets rebooted is when the power goes out... Oh an I run torrents with a lot of connections and have 2 vista machines, 2 xp machines. One of the pc's is a notebook & vista as well. No problems.

  252. Linksys = Windows only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After my D-Link power supply died because of a severe power glitch, I got myself a WRT54G. Well, actually 3 replacements also, they all locked up after I connected an Apple computer to it (Mac OS X I should say because even a Mac OS X VMware image was able to do so). In the end, Lynksys just said: "Yeah, 802.11g should work in theory, but on the box it says we only support Windows, so tough luck for you". After that, I bought a Belkin router, and that's one of the most stable routers I have ever had. I think in 3 years I rebooted it only 2 times.

  253. rebooted a couple times in 3 or 4 years by oudzeeman · · Score: 1

    I have a Linksys router with 10/100 Ethernet and 804.11g and I've had to reboot it only once or twice since I've owned it

  254. Investigate the hardware by Vastad · · Score: 1

    I use a WRT54GS, the so-called SpeedBoost version. For fear of bricking it, I read lots of forum posts regarding the 54GS knowing it was not the recommended model for installing DD-WRT onto it. Turns out for the production run of the 54GS, certain chips on the 54GS have been made by three different manufacturers, one of them known to get bricked by a DD-WRT flashing. There is no way to check other than to crack the case open and look and I didn't want to do that. I took the risk.

    I was lucky. DD-WRT worked on my 54GS and has done so since November 2007. It is worth reading around. There are often little bits of technical information like this that may be the reason your firmware is unstable.

  255. Because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... you buy piece of shit Linksys equipment.

  256. WRT54G Suggestion by cfriedt · · Score: 1

    As far as the WRT54G[L] goes, the default linksys firmware as well as the default ddwrt firmware (as far as I can remember) both have an unreasonably low maximum number of file descriptors allowed at once. For P2P transfers, for example, which use hundreds of file descriptors at once, a limit of, say, 50 maximum file descriptors would make the embedded linux kernel freeze. The solution was to simply up that number to something more reasonable, like 500. After I did that, I never had a problem again with my Linksys WRT54GL.

  257. firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On WRT54G's, its the firmware. I have a v4 that used to lock up all the time. Ever since flashing it with HyperWRT Thibor firmware, it has worked great.

  258. Power fluctuations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a retail shop that uses verifone ruby cash registers. They won't install one of these w/o a UPS. Those of us that live in rural areas will definitely tell you that brownouts are a major problem. I won't run any devices without a UPS. This gets expensive, but the alternative, which usually involves replacing a PC or other device is much more expensive.

  259. Seconded! by tacokill · · Score: 1

    Agreed - the D-link gaming router is great.

    Not only does it have a nicely customizable firewall, but the QoS you can do is pretty amazing for a consumer device. Re: bittorrent, I had an old Netopia R314 that used to crap out when I had bittorrent going. Since switching to the D-link router, I haven't noticed ANY issues with connectivity. It helps that I can setup QoS to handle things the way I want (ie: http traffic > bittorrent traffic, etc)

    Highly recommended. Plus it's gigabit, which is a nice bonus.

  260. Add a UPS by GuardianBob · · Score: 1

    chiming in on ADD A UPS. I had similar problems and finally put all of my network gear on a UPS. WRT54G + cable-modem + vonage router. Reliability is now excellent.

  261. Interesting by djsath · · Score: 0

    I have a cheap Belkin router (purchased it about 2 years ago) and the only time I have to restart it is when the power fluctuates and knocks my cable modem offline. Usually doing an ipconfig /renew on my Windows boxes fixes the network problems.

  262. reason by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    Periodic power outages help, too.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  263. Because they won't restart themselves by saigon_from_europe · · Score: 1

    Routers are complicated devices. There's a lot of software inside it and it is not a surprise that they get stuck. It is surprise that they don't have some system to reboot themselves, as it is very simple to implement.

    My company made routers for our own needs (never sold to wide market). They were Soekris based, with custom Linux distro inside. We had some issues with one wireless driver, so there was a script that monitored wlan interface to see if everything was ok. If there was a problem (in our case, we had known that wlan0 would disappear if driver had failed), script would reboot the device.

    It is simple to write such script if you "hunt" for the known specific problem, like we did. But it is reasonably simple to make some small monitoring program that will try to see if everything goes right. Maybe it won't catch 100% of problems, but you can always do at least something.

    Real problem is when whole system goes to a freeze. But that is even more easy to solve. Many microcontrollers have "watchdog timer". if the software does not periodically do some required operation with the timer, after predefined time it would reset the controller. Not a perfect solution, but still better than frozen hardware. I think that it would be trivial to add such hardware to routers.

    --
    No sig today.
  264. Not all is crap by dindi · · Score: 1

    But it seems that "many connections" kill these devices. Many connections, which boil down to: BitTorrent or "too many" devices.

    At my house, networked devices are around 30. (4 laptops, 1 PC, 2 Mac minis, PS3, 2 Wifi phones, 4 access points, 3 VOIP ATAs, NSLU2 (asterisk, bluetooth proximity), Xbox 360 (just red-ringed out) ...... and so on. This between 5 members of the family, but I am admittedly responsible for 90% of the smog. Of course I love this planet, so most of the time they are not on at the same time..

    Looking at my routers' MAC address list makes me feel like I am in an office of 15.

    Anyway. My ISP provided DSL box can keep up with this from 6-24 hours, sometimes crapping out after 4. That is some cheap crap I am forced to pay a Buck for, (Globespan Virata). This box is not even configured to do NAT, as I have a fixed IP router behind it.

    So, I reverted back to my old box (which my provider said was incompatible, unreliable, but turned out they killed everyone's connection, gave this lie, so they could push their $1 box on you, for which they do not give password). There is in fact no password, so I can install crap on the whole districts routers, or shut them down.

    Anyway, so put my old (and not working) Zyxel box back in (no MAC address restriction for public IP clients is in place), and turns out that the box miraculously works again with the 2+ year old settings on it.

    The box is NOT freezing, but it is not doing NAT. So my connection (DSL) is stable again. Rock solid.

    Router: bought this nice shiny WRT54G (V8), shich is sadly VxWorks (Vx_IT_DOES_NOT_WORK(S)).

    Same thing, reboots in 1-2days, or no net, Then again, with all the machines on, 4 hours and it is toast.

    So I went ahead, and bought this $35 WRT54G (Version 1) access point with Linux Pre-installed on Ebay. Lazyness won, and got the pre-installed version, but you can do it yourself as well.

    Guess what: The thing has 3 months+ uptimes. I once set some stupidity and it lost some config data, other than that it is rock solid. DD-WRT. NEVER HAVE TO REBOOT. The only downtime comes from the sometimes 3+ hours nightly power failures, for which 6+2 UPSes do not provide enough remedy. Ok, the router is outside on an old UPS that can hold up for an hour and a half with zyxel modem+wrt. I have 2x1000, 3x 750, 1x550, 2x350, and the higher capacity ones are reserved for my ps3, my projector and my Mac computers (a mac mini has 3hours+ on a 1000VA, with a 22' lcd, which I really appreciate.)

    The V1 vs V8 is a shocking difference, they replaced the antennas with cheap-o ones, the status leds are now minimal, on the old you had a bunch, giving nice status. Also the memory sizze is a fraction of the original.

    What also helps: DEDICATE a ROUTER and a separate CABLE/DSL device. Most of these consumer boxes are designed to nat for Grandma's and Grandpa's 2 laptops. They crap out if you are downloading Pr0n from 150 seeds, play 64-player online matches, and have 15 ssh connections, and work on 3+ workstations while conferencing on VOIP.

    I also figured, that cheap access points are pretty stable, if you only use them to provide WIFI, and not do NAT. I have a wrt54gC (the C is the tiny device, the size of a sipura 3102 or PAP-2t). The device is rock solid as an AP, but if you nat 5+ devices over it, it crashes in 3 hours.

    I just got a TimeCapsule, and this far it works, but it barely has 5 hour uptime, so I will see. Naturally in AP mode, and no NAT-ting.

    Well, just my 5 cents. I used to do net/unix admin for years, but now I stay away from it as I turned to programming full time..... no 2 shifts, no support calls ...... still, I like to keep a complex network and play around ....

    Hope that helps you out there with 10+ bit-sucking devices leaching 24-7

  265. DNS queries stop working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used enough of these Airport devices that I've (convinced myself that I have?) noticed an interesting pattern in the failure of the hardware. They'll work fine for a year or two, and then one day, DNS stops working. In every case I've seen, the DNS symptom that you mention is almost always the first sign of a hardware failure. They sometimes last a year or more after the initial problem, but the DNS outages which require restarting the unit become more and more frequent. If you let it ride long enough, it eventually happens several times a day. Usually near the end, other failures happen, too. I haven't seen this issue (yet?) with any 802.11n units (Airport Extreme and new Airport Express), only with UFO and the original Express units.

  266. Throw out your consumer grade router by lpe397 · · Score: 1

    Ive' had (at best) mixed results with any consumer grade firewall/router. A UPS is an excellent start, but your best bet is to avoid them all together, and use that old PC lying in your closet. Put two NICs in it, and download pfsense (google it). You'll never buy another, and you only reboot when the power goes out.

  267. It's just you. by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

    Or maybe the OS on your router? From my DG834:

    # cat /proc/uptime
    7114539.58 7112881.03
    # cat /proc/version
    Linux version 2.4.17_mvl21-malta-mips_fp_le (root@Run-P4) (gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release/MontaVista)) #6 Wed Sep 7 16:50:05 CST 2005

    Yeah, it's unmodified stock firmware, but then it's never crashed or failed on me so I see no reason to change.

  268. I don't have to reset mine. by admiral_potato · · Score: 1

    I've had a WRT54G (v2.2, the good hardware, before they re-branded it as the WRT54GL) for about 4 years now, and I have had to reset it a grand total of NEVER. It has been completely rock solid for me the whole time I've been using it. All I can say is that it has been the best purchase I have ever made for my network.

  269. PPPOE=reboot -- DHCP = good by towster · · Score: 1

    I have personally been using broadband for over 10 years. In that time I have lived in 3 different locations and used 5 different providers. During my usage I did notice one common thing. I had to reboot the router when using PPPOE almost daily (yea cron!) but never ever would it be required when using DHCP.

    All the DSL providers I was on required use of PPPOE and the cable providers used DHCP. I know I wont ever use PPPOE again unless it is the last provider on the planet.

    1. Re:PPPOE=reboot -- DHCP = good by hardwarefreak · · Score: 0

      I've not cycled my SMC 7008ABR in over 2 years and it's configured for PPPoE on the WAN port. Thus your position on PPPoE doesn't really carry much weight. I'm glad I've not had to cycle it, as the power and reset buttons are on the back of the unit.

      It's a shame SMC discontinued this model. It's simply awesome, esp for what I gave for it, about $80. I believe they still offer the non rack mount little brother, the 7004.

    2. Re:PPPOE=reboot -- DHCP = good by hardwarefreak · · Score: 0

      Correction: the reset button is actually on the front of the unit. I guess I never realized this before as I've never had to use it.

  270. Netgear WGR614v6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Netgear WGR614v6 and usually only have to manually restart it once a month. Maybe look into a Netgear? I only paid $40 for it and it has been working great for two years.

  271. Do you have a wireless landline phone? by o517375 · · Score: 1

    I have never rebooted my WRT54G Linksys router since I got rid of my wireless landline phone. Sometimes the frequency used by those phones can interfere with the Linksys wireless. When I had one, I had to reboot very frequently. Also my router is powered through a UPS.

  272. The software is crap by Krneki · · Score: 1

    WRT54G was out around early 2003. It had crappy firmware and was cheap enough to buy. Then all the 3rd party firmwares come out and made this the cheapest processional router to buy. I moved to Tenerife and the routers they gave you here lasts few hours of torrents before you have to reboot them. Since I reconfigured the modem to be only a converter between the telephone line and Ethernet to WRT54GL (tomato) I didn't had to reboot once. As for now, I urge all our customers to buy WRT54GL, since you can't get a better router in that price range.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  273. You might want to take a look at TrendNet's Line.. by Darth+Android · · Score: 1

    I've found Trendnet's products, while inexpensive, to be decently reliable. The TEW-633GR i have from them (gigabit + wifi-N) sustains constant torrenting for months on end. I also have three of their 8-port gigabit switches, one of which was transferring gigabytes of data while outside it's rated operating temperature range (over 110F in the midday heat) without a hitch. The v8 of the WRT54G is crap (wound up replacing t with an old router I had lying around), but I have a v1 that has never given me trouble. $0.02

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons for you are cruchy and good with ketchup.
  274. 3COM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll probably never read this, there's lots of responses, but I'll post it anyways. I had the same problem, went through d-link, linksys, and netgear routers. All had to be rebooted daily, even when on a UPS. They were only used as access points, all the routing was disabled (NAT, DHCP, and such is all handled by a fedora machine).

    Finally bought a 3COM OfficeConnect G+A access point off of eBay for $150 or so. Hasn't been rebooted since installed (7 months).

  275. UPSs and ABSs work for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never had to make a habit of rebooting wireless routers. I've run older Silver and white apple airports, a couple of ABS b/g blocks for 2-3 years now, some belkin b/g and I've never had to go and restart them to 'fix' something unless I wanted to blow away the config and do a total reset.

    My network gear (DSL or cable modem, switches, firewalls) have always been on UPSes - usually APC auction refurbs or cast-offs with replaced batteries. Think the only things that 'broke' in the last decade were the Silver ABS (bad caps) and a Netgear 8 or 12 port Fe switch.

  276. Required Router Restarts are Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the past several years, I have implemented several routers from D-Link, Linksys, Netgear and Allied Telesyn. All the routers have run the manufacturer's firmware at the latest revision. All of the routers, except for the Allied Telesyn, have needed periodic restarts. Some more frequently than others. The symptoms are typical. They either fail in their ability to communicate on the WAN side or they become unreachable on the LAN side as well. In either case, they require a power cycle and for a period of time, all is well again.

    Although, I have not conducted any serious experiments, it appears that workload may be effecting the frequency in which the router needs to be restarted. With moderate usage, this is usually around every 2 weeks and is *never* greater than 1 month. The exception was the Allied Telesyn routers, as they never needed to be restarted.

    Obviously, strict tests under controlled conditions for an extended period of time would be great. Otherwise, we can only speculate whether these restarts are due to firmware, hardware or a combination the two. Given that the problem is so prevalent that it was a major theme in a South Park episode, you're led to believe that the behavior is common to most routers. Only the engineers working on these devices can give us a an inside look as to what the cause of these problems are.

    Anyone out there that's a router hardware or software engineer, please chime in, we'd love to know what's going on.

  277. build yer own =D by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    Due to the increasing trend to cut corners to maximize profits, it's no surprise that most (if not all) consumer-level routers are complete garbage (yay capitalism! ). The solution? Make a fun weekend project out of building your own. All it takes is an old functional computer, Linux (or BSD), a few NICs, and a good Linux (or BSD) router/firewall howto. Or, if you don't want to bother with configuring it yourself, check out projects like m0n0wall. If you really want something slick, check out using one of the many embedded systems on the market. It'll cost you a little more, but you'll have one slick little router. I personally like the Soekris systems for building a router out of. I've been running the Soekris net4521 with Pyramid Linux on it and have never had any issues with stability or lockups.

  278. why it's necessary to reboot so frequently .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    In the case of the BT Voyager it's because the upstream router forgets the allocated IP address and the downstream router has to request a new one ..

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  279. Re:embedded network devices - BOLLOCKS by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    Funny, I think everyone here has had to reboot their router to solve problems in the past.

    I have a "consumer-level" router which only needs to be rebooted if I upgrade the firmware (3 years ago) or move house (a year ago). It's a SMC2804WBRP-G wired+wireless router.
    It has been booted a few other times in the last 5 years due to power failures. Our UPS only has 30 minutes capacity and sometimes a power-out caused by a lightning storm lasts longer than that. We live in the countryside, so it often takes the lazy sods at the power company some time to restore our power.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  280. It's your bit torrent / p2p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    money is on you are running bit torrent / p2p apps that muck with the router due to the way the packet requests are done

  281. solution to and explanation for router problems by chgray · · Score: 1

    programmers have a mentality that crashing is a horrible answer to a bug. In a previous lifetime I wrote router software professionally. When you develop routers you're usually under time pressure because the profit margins are very small and time to market is important. As a consequence bugs that are related to long uptimes are difficult to locate(lots of data flowing through, wedged hardware, memory leaks). The heart of the problem is the difficulty in the industry to get agreement between those who are time driven and those who are quality driven. If you're motivated by time to market you're going to put pressure on your engineering staff to cut quality, if you're motivated by quality you're going to put pressure on those who are time driven. I've met very few software engineers who are comfortable addressing out these balances in developing quality software. In my opinion the most beneficial technical mechanism is to create watchdogs that force reboots the router when things go wrong.

    ...long story short, since as a customer you don't have much say in how the software/hardware are developed. You do however have an option that fixes the vast majority of all problems - put your router on a christmas tree timer. In the middle of the night have your router (and cable box for that matter) power cycle for five minutes. I'll bet you'll be a much happier surfer

  282. Could be DHCP by hulvey · · Score: 1

    I have had problems with DHCP specifically. It seemed that the WRT54G could only give out a certain number of DHCP addresses before it had to be rebooted. It would still work Ok for devices which had static DHCP addresses, or for machines/devices that had been up for quite a while and still had the DHCP address, but if I restarted a machine or turned one on that had been off for a while, it wouldn't work. This seemed to happen both with the original firmware that came in the WRT54G and also with Sveasoft Alchemy firmware which I used mainly so I could crank up the Tx power and use WDS. So, it could have been in the original firmware since I think Sveasoft started with the open-source release from Linksys. I used to use the WRT54G as the main router with an Apple Airport Express acting to extend the range using WDS. Later I got an Actiontec router from Verizon with my FiOS setup. At that point, I setup the Actiontec as the main router and have it do the DHCP. I then ran a 1GbE cable to where the Apple Airport Express used to be and used the WRT54G as a 2nd router. It now has the DHCP disabled, and I've not had any problems with it. It's also possible that later versions of the firmware from Linksys may have fixed the issue, but I have not had the motivation to experiment with any. YMMV, but you might try setting it up to renew the DHCP addresses as infrequently as possible. Another approach is just to set up all the devices on your network with static IP addresses. This might not be practical if you roam with your wireless device, but you might be able to set up any fixed devices like desktops or servers that don't leave with a static IP to avoid them using up the DHCP limit (assuming my theory is correct). You might also try a newer version of firmware, or one of the open-source replacements like OpenWRT, etc. Even though I still have Sveasoft on my own WRT54G, I personally wouldn't recommend Sveasoft as in my experience it seems to have the same DHCP problem as the original. It's also possible that this is not directly related to DHCP, but could just be a more general memory management issue that DHCP happens to trigger after a while. One final note is that WRT54G does seem to have some sensitivty to supply power. To reset it reliably, I seem to have to unplug it for about 30 seconds minimum before repowering it or else it may not fully reset. That said, it's believable that power glitches could also be to blame for some of the issues. Some other posters have noted similar effects. A power filter may help, but a UPS would be even better if your power tends to go out for just a few seconds at a time.

  283. Checking the uptime of my router... by Hurga · · Score: 1

    root@OpenWrt:~# uptime
      19:34:29 up 319 days, 21:12

    That's a WRT54GS. With OpenWRT, as the prompt says. I think it's been 319 days since I installed that particular firmware.

    Then again, I live in Germany. The power grid is quite stable here usually.

    Hanno

  284. I'll add this by Rinisari · · Score: 1

    As many others in the "745 More Comments" have probably said, I've had no problem with my routers not rebooting. I own a WRT54G v2, WRT54GS v1, Buffalo WHR-G54-HP v1, and Asus WL-500W. The WRT54GS has only been restarted when I've upgraded it or when the power has gone out, so that's probably 10-15 times in the past 4 years. The others have had uptimes in the 100 day range because I update them more frequently.

  285. If Cisco is too rich for your home LAN buy Draytek by gpuk · · Score: 1

    Short of buying proper gear from Cisco (not Linksys) or similar, which I agree is crazy for a home network, I've found Draytek to be the only manufacturer worth trusting. I've been using their hardware for years (even for ISDN routers prior to ADSL) and have *never* experienced a problem. They cost more than Netgear/Dlink/Linksys but are as reliable as you get. The only time they ever get cycled is if I have a power cut or my ISP borks. IMHO you can't beat them.

  286. Dlink DIR-655 by Knara · · Score: 1

    Best router I've ever bought. Uptime measured in months and QOS that actually works. Plus 802.11N

  287. I just wish they wouldn't die so often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had 3 routers die out of 6 on the home network: one netgear and two linksys. Quite a failure rate; I'd expect these things to last 10+ years.

  288. Any Linksys I Own Needs Reboot; Except Tomato by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    My first router was a D-Link, then when I upgraded I bought a Linksys which was ditched when Wifi came along for another Linksys WRT54GS (v 4.0).

      Both of the Linksys routers I owned had to be rebooted on occasion for whatever reason, after I installed Tomato on the WRT54GS I never had to reboot.

      Unfortunately and coincidentally (seeing this post today) last night my router died on me, I had recently updated Tomato and it was humming along nicely for a month or more until last night.

  289. ummmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have Charter as an ISP do you?
    The first message on the tech line is how to reboot everything when they nuke your connection.

  290. No problems here by jridley · · Score: 1

    I haven't had any trouble since I switched to a Linksys WRT54GL and installed DD-WRT.
    Previously I had a very old WRT54G (version 3 I think) and it couldn't handle bittorrent, it had to be rebooted a lot.
    I replaced that with a Netgear WGR614, which worked OK but I found that after a couple of years they died of bad capacitor illness. I fixed the caps a few times but eventually it bought it in a lightning strike.
    I tried a DLink (against my better judgement) but it went back to the store in 2 days; DLink should find something to do in the food service industry or something.
    I've been on the GL + DDWRT for about 9 months now and I have yet to have to reboot it. It has been rebooted due to power failures or me moving it around but that's it.

  291. The pro-sumer links sys are pretty solid by klubar · · Score: 1

    I've had really good luck with the mid-level linksys devices like the RV082/RV016. Two+ years between reboots, lots of features.

    The problem with Microsoft OS isn't generally the OS--it's bad applications and compatibility. If you only install quality drivers and hardward, a MS system can go months without a reboot. Stop downloading drivers and installing random fixes.

    1. Re:The pro-sumer links sys are pretty solid by William-Ely · · Score: 1

      If you only install quality drivers and hardwar[e], a MS system can go months without a reboot. Stop downloading drivers and installing random fixes.

      Preach on brother! I haven't looked at Linksys stuff for myself in a long time. I don't have a brand preference really I just like stuff that works.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred, and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  292. User traffic is the culprit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A home user might be using Bittorrent which is going to create a lot of NAT table entries to a lot of different destinations which is really going to chew up available memory.

    Even after you stop your transfer you're still going to have sluggish behavior as the router will keep those translations in memory for an extended period (say 1-4 hours).

    Most people will just reboot the router and be done with it.

    In other instances (where bit torrent isn't the issue); it's probably just poor code running on the router with a memory leak or something along those lines.

  293. What type of traffic are you doing? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    I haven't had much trouble with mine in a long time. However most of my internet traffic is just web stuff. and sometimes downloading a big file. But My wireless router is plugged into a wired Vonage router so and i basically have both locked down to a point where people are not allowed in (No open ports, encrypted wireless with hidden names. So it really isn't taking much of a load. And I haven't had to reboot my router in a very long time. You may want to check your computer's wireless. My wifes old iBook was always going down and loosing connection and the only way to get it back was to reboot the router every day or so. But with the same router and her new iMac with my MacBook the Linksys Wireless has been running like a champ sense them.
    I would suggest trying different systems with the rest of them off.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  294. Replace your PSU and win on multiple levels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I replaced the PSU for both my router and modem with a dual voltage (5v and 12v) switched mode with a battery backup on the 12v side. Both my modem and router are 12v and the LAN lines I care about running in an outage are connected directly to the router.

    It's much more efficient to back up the supply on the DC side rather than on the AC side. Also, you get to run multiple devices on the one PSU thus reducing the overall power consumption of lots of small wall warts. I'm currently looking to replace my network switch with a DC powered version for the same reason.

    The telcos have been running their kit on 48 volts for years for this very reason, I'm surprised there aren't more geeks taking this approach!

  295. Re:Vista by LBt1st · · Score: 1

    I had the same exact problems when I upgraded my XP machine to SP3.
    This was actually covered here already. There's some network stuff SP3/Vista does that's new to Windows and cheap routers fail to handle it correctly.

    I just replaced my garbage Trendnet router last week for this reason. Got a Linksys WRT54GL with DD-WRT and couldn't be more happy!

  296. BSD routers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://m0n0.ch/wall/
    http://www.pfsense.com/

    haven't had to reboot my m0n0wall ever, except for firmware updates.

  297. Purpose Built by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    by offshore inexperienced programmers who are constantly hassled by managers trying to lower development costs by cutting back on validation testing and bugfixing

  298. Rebooting issues by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    I has a WAP54G die on me. Complete failure, didn't even get power onto the board because the regulator popped. I knew it meant that something else on the board was bad too so I tossed it.

    Got a Belkin, I wish I had paid heed to a friends warning. I had to reboot the thing every few hours.

    Next up a Netgear 614. Coverage awful which is odd because I used one on a clients network and it's got perfect coverage. But then I'm in an area where there are LOTS of wireless networks.

    Another client gave me a WRT54G that wasn't working for him. I flashed the latest software onto it and it now works fine. Now if Windows didn't have such a fucked wireless zero config app maybe I'd be happier with wireless.

    But by and large, I like wired better. I bought two 50' Cat-5 patch cables for $30 and ran one to my office and another to my bedroom.

  299. not a problem here by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    I've been using cheap Linksys linux-based routers, which I've never had to reboot. The last time I rebooted one was when I upgraded to a wireless router over six months ago. The time before that was when I moved, over three years ago. I didn't even realize that rebooting routers was something people often need to do till today.

    I seriously doubt the problems people are seeing come from BitTorrent, because, although I limit myself to legal torrents (which means fewer peers, I suspect), I tend to leave the torrents running for days, and often have multiple running at once (using btlaunchmany).

    I'm also somewhat dubious about the claims that it's dhcp-related, because, even though most of the systems here have static IP, we do have two or three using dhcp services.

    On the other hand, we have a static external IP, so my router's dhcp client has never, ever, been used. Maybe that's where the problem is?

  300. reboot? router? huh? by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    "Twice since December" is "quite reliable"? I've never rebooted a router. I've had my current one (WRH54G) since Feb, and the previous one (a similar model replaced because it didn't have wireless) ran for over three years without a reboot.

    My DSL modem needs to be rebooted every three to six months, but my router(s), so far, never.

  301. Belkin... the guys with the spam router by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

    A few years ago, they were caught with this:
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/11/07/help_my_belkin_router/

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  302. why do YOU have to restart routers? by alizard · · Score: 1

    I've got an Airlink 101 el cheapo (bought it for around $30 at Fry's) wireless router feeding my Linux workstation via wire and a Windoze box via wireless. It's continuous uptime is measured in months... and some of those reboots may have been unnecessary. (I now tell it to grab a new IP from my broadband provider if it stalls before trying a reboot)

    My assumption is that its internal OS is something other than embedded Windoze.

  303. all three here :) by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm just lucky, but I'm on my second router with all three. :p

    (Only replaced the first one because I finally wanted wireless.)

    (My Linux-based computers are also a strong counter-example to your apothegm.)

  304. Netgears are the only ones that don't need it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am the un-offical IT support for my family and many friends. All the various routers I have had to put up with over the years that weren't Netgear have had this problem. Most annoying is that some of the routers seem to loose their EPROM on restart. So you then need to set them up again.
    I don't know if the newer Netgear equipment is still good as the one I bought 4 years ago has been in continuous operation, so I have had no need for replacement.

  305. I write router firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it all comes down to the margin. As routers become a commodity the quality of the hardware goes down and so does the quality of the software to squeeze the margin as high as possible. New features are introduced to compete but less money/time is spent on QA to keep the cost down and time to market short.
    Also functionality that used to be in hardware is being moved into software, wifi radios especially, introducing a huge number of bugs to the software, but it keeps the cost lower.

  306. configured?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have seen a lot of people reboot/buy new/complain about a lot of the wireless routers. Most of the time changing the router channel to something other then channel 6, a shared channel between other router, to a dedicated channel, 1 or 11, will fix the problem. The problem is that a lot of people do not change the channel and the entire neighborhood ends up with a router using channel 6 which ends up causing some issues. Another possibility is poor router software so go out and get the latest firmware.

  307. Dirty Power by HitSkyn · · Score: 0

    My router is on the same circuit as the blower on my furnace. The router would occasionally when the AC kicked on. Half my house apperas to be on that circuit. Anyway I plugged my router into the UPS and works fine now.

  308. No one complains about buying quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an 8 port Netgear FVG318 router. It supports VPN, NAT, SPI, and I can create a dozen pinholes without issue. There's all sorts of extra features about it that I love...the metal casing, antenna configuration, and the excellent wifi.

    I bought this to replace an old network solution of having a 4 port netgear plugged into another 4 port netgear since there's 7 in-use wired rooms in this house. I haven't had any problems that the old solution offered....latency, uneven thoughtput, and crashing.

    I could go on about how this $160 router has superior hardware compared to a $10 router despite both of them using the same Linux and IPtables and coming from the same manufacturer but you can see where I'm going.

  309. OpenWRT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    root@wrt54g:~# uptime
      18:13:09 up 212 days, 6:07, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00

    Been working fine both wirelessly and wired for that long.

    (It's powered by an uninterruptable power supply and a backup generator, in case anyone is wondering.)

  310. Brown out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My GS and GL routers were very stable for months. After I witnessed a bownout (lights went dimm for 2 sec) I started haviving connection issues like frequent disconnectect and reboots. After I reloaded ddwrt it became stable again.

  311. Get a router with stable software and stable lines by frambris · · Score: 1

    I never reboot my router just because something is unstable and I have not seen it reboot on its own since I got it. I have a Linksys WRT-54GL with Tomato (http://www.polarcloud.com/tomato) running on it. Currently I have an uptime of 36 days and that is because I tweaked some settings requiring a reboot. The router is hooked to an APC UPS but we have pretty good power here.

  312. Heat and power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heat is the most common cause - -routers are cheap and typically sitting on top of the computer or in some other corner that is hot - and they overheat or they are on the boundry of acceptable power from the also very cheap power supply (typical 9V power supplies deliver anywhere beteen 7V and 11V ) ....

    My cheap D-Link router and equally cheap DSE router work perfectly in the winter and typically have some sort of fit on the few HOT days in summer -- I can almost predict when they will fail. Temperature 30C 50% chance of failure.

  313. No problems here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My very old Netgear DG834G (rev. 2) hasn't been rebooted in almost 3 months.. guess I'm just lucky :)

  314. I can take care of that for you by ryty · · Score: 1

    Go ahead and enable remote management on port 8080, give me your router credentials, and your current public IP, and I'll reboot it for you once a week.

    --
    if you were me, you'd think the same way
    1. Re:I can take care of that for you by symoo · · Score: 1

      Oh and enable VNC on your comp with no password so i can setup my fake paypal logins

  315. RT311 by nura78 · · Score: 1

    I've noticed this with newer routers. My RT311 is still kicking however. Haven't had to reboot for about 2 years, and that was because i moved into a new apartment.

  316. Never had a problem with my WRT54G by Daehenoc · · Score: 1

    I've got a WRT54G v1.1 running DD-WRT v23 SP2 which stays up for months at a time, if we do have a power fluctuation, the router will happily restart and come back up. I have had problems in the past, but my router has been very happy for the last six months!

  317. Cheep router, Cheep solution by symoo · · Score: 1

    I Have a range of cheep routers, some better than others. i find that if you buy a cheep router it's good to buy a cheep timer. I power-cycle my routers every morning during the off peak (about 4am here) i find it's more the Adsl modem/routers that are the problem. use them as just a modem and there great.

  318. Never had trouble with my Linksys! by billstewart · · Score: 1

    ("What Never?" "Hardly ever....")

    I've had an old Linksys running long enough I don't remember the model number; I think it's the BEXS41, but maybe it's the BEFSR41 or something. Behind it I've got a 3Com wireless router that runs in bridge mode rather than routing. Every couple of years something goes wrong, so I unplug/replug/reboot the DSL model, Linksys, and (if the desktop doesn't work either, also the 3Com) in order, and the problem has never obviously been the Linksys. A couple of times it's been the DSL service, once it was the DSL modem, and maybe once or twice it was a power hit that rebooting the router was actually useful, or a loose cable under the desk.

    On the other hand, I haven't tried running two VPNs over it, or uPNP, or other things people complain about.

    Before I got the 3Com, I had a Netgear 802.11b router - I'll probably never buy another Layer 3 product from them, since it was a totally ill-designed piece of junk (as opposed to their dumb Ethernet hubs and switches, which I've always been happy with.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  319. Tomato on Buffalo, no reboots. by liftphreaker · · Score: 1

    I use a Buffalo 54g router with Tomato firmware and haven't rebooted since I upgraded to v1.15 early this year. The linksys and d-link boxes are some of the worst garbage I've had the misfortune of buying, specially with their stock firmware, none of them laster beyond a year.

  320. Subject by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    Now that you mention it, I don't remember the last time I had to power cycle my routers or switches, and I've got 3 of them if you count the wifi. Get equipment that doesn't suck.

  321. Re:Vista by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

    >>Switched to a Netgear VPN824V3 and the problem has pretty much disappeared.

    Every single Netgear wireless router I've ever owned was shit, and needed to be rebooted on a (very) regular basis. This includes everything from their bargain-bin routers to the super-duper-hyperprototype-N-plus routers.

  322. Re:Vista by dogugotw · · Score: 1

    And yet, mine has worked like a charm. It would be interesting to understand why the difference. I've had two and both have worked fine (well, the first one worked fine until Vista that is).

  323. Here a $1000 kid.. get yourself a real router. by uncledrax · · Score: 1

    .. or if you can't do that, you can find some decent ones on the used market still...

    One thing I noticed with my previous WTRG is that if I fired up to many port translations (read: torrenting), it'd just be to much for it (maybe exceeded it's PAT table? i dunno).. now I got me a 'rhymes with Crisco' (and I don't mean one made by Linksys), can't say it's ever needed a reload..

    For the amount of money you probably ponied up for all those routers over the years, you're half-way to a real one already.

    --
    ----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
  324. And what's wrong with a replacement power brick? by Benanov · · Score: 1

    You know you can just replace the power brick, right?

    Anything that outputs the same voltage and tip polarity should do the trick...

    Unless you are insinuating that the new VxWorks wrt's take a different supply voltage, and that the supply voltage for the older wrt models will inherently lead to inefficiency...which I doubt.

  325. Crappy Power by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

    If you have any Router or other electronic gadget that uses AC power and freezes or malfunctions.. Toss it on a Power conditioning UPS.. Get it off AC.. Brownouts are what causes Electronics to go haywire.. if that doesn't fix the issue then I would look at the hardware itself..

    If you paid 11.95 for a Gigabit Wifi Router that was being sold off the back of a truck just off the interstate with a name that you can't pronouce... I might skip the UPS if you have stable power and go buy a new one that has a name that you recognize.

    --
    Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
  326. Speed differences by JakeChance · · Score: 1

    On the exact same laptop I get much faster speeds wirelessly in Win XP Pro than in Ubuntu 8.04. Is this because the driver isn't opensource on Ubuntu and in the restricted section? The computer is a Dell Latitude D600 and the wireless card is a Linksys Wireless-G notebook adapter.

  327. The answer is simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In order to drive down costs, home router manufacturers use as little ram as possible. Which limits the number of active NAT connections that can happen at one time. If you are actively torrenting something, those home routers are for sure out of the question.

    I had a P90 box a while back, never had to reboot it for over 3 years. Then my wireless bridge died and I decided that maybe it is time to get a linksys router with built in WIFI, as I think it would save me power. Had to reboot that pos about every day and a half. I trie a dlink router, same story. I finally couldn't take it anymore, went to ebay, spent $40 to get a 1U p3 (another 40 for shipping ;) ), that box has been running been my router and asterisk machine, been over a year so far no reboots.

  328. Get DD-WRT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get the DD-WRT Firmware from http://www.dd-wrt.com/dd-wrtv3/index.php

    I have it installed in my Linksys Wrt54g v3 and it hasnt caused me any problems for months. i didnt need to reboot. Plus it shows alot of administrative functions and stuff.

    good luck

  329. um by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    My Linksys WRT54g has gone months without a reboot. As has my cable modem.

  330. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never had to reboot mine until it started to go bad and I was loosing my connections so you may have a bad device.