Nobody is twisting your arm to click on the dumb self-refferal link, any more than they're making you click on the homepage listing we're all allowed under our usernames.
Frankly, I could give a damn about the person who submitted the article. I'm interested in the article itself. If it's good or bad, I don't get pissed off at the submitter, or at Taco, I just move on. It's just not that big a deal.
Umm... Me too? To be honest, I have never clicked on a Referral link in my life. Didn't care enough to realize they were there. And Viola! so-called problem submitters never caused me the slightest grief.
One of your problems is, when you post statements that are blatant untruths, you kind of undercut any credibitlity that you, or your god, might have ever had. Even more so when you contradict yourself within the same sentence. You can have your ignorance - I'll take knowledge over what you are peddling any day.
The two party system is retarded, and by trying to blame every idea you disagree with on one party or the other, instead of actually discussing the idea, you are only furthering the two-party system.
That is because there is only one party. The polarization of the so-called two-party system is a sinister plot by the Republocrats to distract attention from the ongoing struggle between the grays and the-
Never mind. I've said too much.
-I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
Slashdot Mirror
I thought Pluto was more like a large coma
Umm... Me too? To be honest, I have never clicked on a Referral link in my life. Didn't care enough to realize they were there. And Viola! so-called problem submitters never caused me the slightest grief.
There's a parable in there somewhere...
Ah, THAT explains why my place of employment uses it then!
One of your problems is, when you post statements that are blatant untruths, you kind of undercut any credibitlity that you, or your god, might have ever had. Even more so when you contradict yourself within the same sentence.
You can have your ignorance - I'll take knowledge over what you are peddling any day.
Please define "sin" in a self-consistent way without resorting to deity.
Easy. "Sin" means "without".
Oh, you meant in English...
They work just fine. One needs an extraneous slash removed, the other opened without the slightest difficulty.