Slashdot Mirror


Large Storms On Earth Are Particle Accelerators

MondoMor writes "Apparently, the atmosphere above Earth's strongest storms acts like a particle accelerator, according to a UC Santa Cruz paper. TGFs (Terrestrial Gamma ray Flashes) may occur as seldom as 50 times a day, 'but the rate could be up to 100 times higher if, as some models indicate, TGFs are emitted as narrowly focused beams that would only be detected when the satellite is directly in their path.' I'm glad the gamma-ray bursts are directed into space."

166 comments

  1. So that's what those are.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..I seem to recall watching a Discovery Channel programme about thunder-storms, and these unexplained 'lightning strikes' that are directed a some upper atmosphere.

    Good to finally learn what those bloody things are. :)

    1. Re:So that's what those are.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm glad the gamma-ray bursts are directed into space."

      Why? If they weren't, we'd long ago have evolved some method of dealing with it. Either that or we wouldn't be here to worry about it.

  2. Particles by Musc · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I am made out of subatomic particles.

    --
    Hamsters are at least as feathery as penguins. HamLix
  3. We already knew TGIFs were dangerous by zurtle · · Score: 5, Funny
    Gamma rays? Pfffft!

    Last time I was in a TGIF restaurant, I was exposed to all sorts of dangerous things...
    Waiters
    Loud Americans with cigars
    and of course copious amounts of spilled beer.

    --
    Couldn't stand the weather
  4. Magnetic Field? by poopdeville · · Score: 1

    Can someone describe the physics that describe the creation of magnetic fields powerful enough to cause particle acceleration to some interesting end? Something just isn't adding up here. My guesstimates put the magnetic fields created by rotating charged particles at several orders of magnitute below any thing that can smash a baryon.

    --
    After all, I am strangely colored.
    1. Re:Magnetic Field? by SUB7IME · · Score: 4, Funny

      Describe the physics that describe the creation of those magnetic fields?

      Yes: Bloody difficult.

    2. Re:Magnetic Field? by gnuman99 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You don't need a magnetic field to have a particle accelerator. An electric field is sufficient. Particle accelerators simply accelerate charged particles. You are looking at one (if you have a CRT).

    3. Re:Magnetic Field? by aurum42 · · Score: 1

      "Smash a baryon"? Why is that essential? I thought this was synchrotron radiation from accelerated electrons..

      --
      "The slave who knows his master's will and does not get ready...will be be beaten with many blows."Luke 12:47-48
    4. Re:Magnetic Field? by Bigos · · Score: 1

      There's a theory about influence of electricity in universe. Here are few links that might help you. http://www.electric-cosmos.org/links.htm/
      http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=9eq6g3 aj/
      http://public.lanl.gov/alp/plasma/elec_fields.html /

    5. Re:Magnetic Field? by TapeCutter · · Score: 0

      Albert Camus - sound like a religiuos snob.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:Magnetic Field? by TapeCutter · · Score: 0, Troll

      Albert Camus - Sounds like a patronising religious snob to me.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    7. Re:Magnetic Field? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody still has a damn CRT for surfing the web. Except you, bloody cheapskate.

    8. Re:Magnetic Field? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, Bigos 857389, kould you pleas chek yo gramma n speling. AND CHECK YOUR FUCKING LINKS BEFORE POSTING THEM! They don't work.

    9. Re:Magnetic Field? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, what's that smell? Is that burning karma? Yours maybe?

    10. Re:Magnetic Field? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because your mental age is obviously below 12. Read a book.

    11. Re:Magnetic Field? by smparadox · · Score: 1

      They work just fine. One needs an extraneous slash removed, the other opened without the slightest difficulty.

      --
      "I am become Gerund, Destroyer of Verbs"
    12. Re:Magnetic Field? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They work just fine. One needs an extraneous slash removed"

      Then they didn't work "just fine", you stupid cunt.

    13. Re:Magnetic Field? by dsmithorew · · Score: 1

      Actually it's bremsstrahlung, but you have the right point -- you don't need any baryons accelerated or nuclei altered, just have the electrons bounce off some nuclei and you'll get the gammas. -David Smith (the author) [how cool that the article got here :) ]

  5. Free particle accelerator for use! by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ""The idea that the Earth, a fairly small and tame planet, can be an accelerator of particles to ultrarelativistic energies is fascinating to me," said David Smith, an assistant professor of physics at UC Santa Cruz and first author of the paper.

    "The energies we see are as high as those of gamma rays emitted from black holes and neutron stars," Smith said.

    The exact mechanism that accelerates the electron beams to produce TGFs is still uncertain, he said, but it probably involves the build-up of electric charge at the tops of thunder clouds due to lightning discharges, resulting in a powerful electric field between the cloudtops and the ionosphere, the outer layer of Earth's atmosphere.

    "Regardless of the exact mechanism, there is some enormous particle accelerator in the upper atmosphere that is accelerating electrons to these very high energies, so they emit gamma rays when they hit the sparse atoms of the upper atmosphere," Smith said. "What's exciting is that we are now getting data good enough for the theorists to really test their models."

    Cool, huh? It's like having a free, giant, massively powerful particle accelerator for use by scientists, but without having to build a massive building and dealing with constructions costs, red tape, and NIMBY issues.

    "Jenkins! I want to test some data. Run it up the flagpole* and tell me the results."

    * For sufficiently large flagpole, that is. Hey, combine this with the space elevator and you really got something!)

    1. Re:Free particle accelerator for use! by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2, Funny

      but without having to build a massive building and dealing with constructions costs, red tape, and NIMBY issues.

      I don't want these gamma ray flashes in my backyard.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    2. Re:Free particle accelerator for use! by Baby+Duck · · Score: 1

      Parent is Funny, not Flamebait. Someone's Sarcasm Detector is broken.

      --

      "Love heals scars love left." -- Henry Rollins

    3. Re:Free particle accelerator for use! by daniel23 · · Score: 1


      Think of the children!

      --
      605413? Yes, it's a prime.
    4. Re:Free particle accelerator for use! by deglr6328 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The energy of the particles involved here are not particularly impressive....from a particle physics research point of view anyway. They are VERY impressive in that no natural mechanism before now has been known (on earth) to produce particle energies this high though. They are speculating that the accelerated electrons involved here are in the ~30 MeV range which is a commonly available energy range easily attained by even small medical e- accelerators (the therac 20 accidents happened with a beam of 20MeV electrons for instance) and the range is not that far above common natural beta decay energies(perhaps an order of magnitude). If you want to get to scientifically interesting energy levels these days (for particle physics research) you have to be at least in the high GeV range and for cutting edge research (the large hadron collider etc.) you need to be in the TeV range (trillion electron volts. When they say "good enough for the theorists to really test their models" they're not talking about the standard model of particle physics, they're talking about the models of particle acceleration in thunderstorms, I suspect.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    5. Re:Free particle accelerator for use! by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Think of the children! ... in Japan!

    6. Re:Free particle accelerator for use! by dsmithorew · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly..... -David Smith (the author)

    7. Re:Free particle accelerator for use! by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      :o) Hello David. I see you are acquanted with the guys who are doing the X-ray's-from lightning-research, perhaps you might be able to answer a question about this I've been bugged by for quite some time. I confess to not having read many of the lightning-X-ray papers but I assume that due to the high attenuation of X-rays in air all the detections must've been done with artificially triggered lightning usng model rockets trailing thin wires behind them. My question is: how do they know that the X-rays are not an artefact of using these wires? The mechanism by which the X-rays are produced, I suspect, must be the 'self-pinching' the plasma channel experiences due to the strong magnetic fields associated with such high current flow and the subsequent plasma heating/density increase thereby created. But wouldn't loading the plasma with (high Z) metal ions from the trailing wire essentially force the plasma to radiate away all of its energy via bremsstrahlung in one quick pulse? I'm not suggesting that "natural" lightning does not emit X-rays but that perhaps the "artificial" variety has an increased portion of its energy abnormally converted to X-rays. Is this idea defensible? Also, how much X-radiation are we talking here?

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    8. Re:Free particle accelerator for use! by dsmithorew · · Score: 1
      OK, I'm pretty new to this field, having only started reading about lightning about 6 months ago when we started seeing the gamma flashes with RHESSI. But I think I can give this a shot....First, they see very similar x-rays from natural lightning as they do from lightning triggered as you say (see for example: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bi bcode=2005GeoRL..3201803D&db_key=AST&high=421da048 9515590)

      I believe x-rays of these energies (a couple of hundred keV) can go through many meters of air (tens to hundreds) -- at least enough of them to register on the detector. Some luck involved, of course, but they looked long enough to get it.

      Second thing, although you are absolutely right that bremsstrahlung gets more efficient with higher Z (and with higher energy), it will never be more than about 10 to 20% of the energy loss for electrons of these energies (about an MeV, give or take a factor of a few). Most of the loss will still be by ionization and excitation of air. So bremsstrahlung won't suddenly take over and start dominating the physics, I think, for this reason and because there will be just a lot more air around than evaporated wire. If I were a real lightning physicist I could address your idea that there is heating due to pinching by the magnetic field, but I won't try.

      As for the x-ray intensity, I get the impression that it's much less than a chest x-ray, and lasts much less time as well.

      One more cool thing in closing: there are groups trying to trigger lightning with a laser (of a suitable wavelength to cause ionization, I presume), and apparently the Japanese have already done so a couple of times: http://www.spie.org/app/publications/magazines/oer archive/july/jul99/laserlight.html

      Cheers,

      --David

    9. Re:Free particle accelerator for use! by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      great stuff. thanks much for your time!

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  6. Sprites ? by Animaether · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm curious... could these be related to 'Sprites' in any way?
    http://www.ess.washington.edu/Space/AtmosElec/spri teinfo.html

    1. Re:Sprites ? by calidoscope · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'd be willing to bet that they are related to Sprites - guessing the potential between the top of the thunderclouds and E-layer of the ionosphere could be tens of millions of volts. The mean free path of the particles may be long enough that they can pick up some significant energy.

      On a related note, in the early 1980's, QST was reporting a very strong correlation between thunderstorm activity and sporadic E-layer propagation. Those reports came to mind when first reading about sprites over ten years later.

      --
      A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
    2. Re:Sprites ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now they would make a boffo weapon. Just boffo. Well done Animaether, I'll get cracking on it right away.

      Splendid.

    3. Re:Sprites ? by dsmithorew · · Score: 1

      A little elaboration beyond what went into the Science paper..... Well, they're both above thunderstorms and both require high E-fields, but.....a TGF will happen within about a millisecond of the related lightning stroke, while sprites can be delayed for up to hundreds of milliseconds. Also, the sprites last much longer than a TGF. There's another paper just submitted to another journal, which I shouldn't comment on the details of yet because I'm not the first author, but from what we're seeing from radio data I'm guessing that most TGFs will not turn out to be accompanied by a sprite. There may be a different optical signature associated with them, but it probably wouldn't be as spectacular as a sprite (which look like giant red jellyfish). -David Smith (the first author of the Science paper)

  7. Not a new idea. by lecithin · · Score: 5, Funny

    This dates back to 'The Wizard of Oz' when Dorothy and Toto were accelerated over the rainbow by a large storm.

    --
    It could be worse, it could be Monday.
    1. Re:Not a new idea. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 4, Funny

      This dates back to 'The Wizard of Oz' when Dorothy and Toto were accelerated over the rainbow by a large storm.

      Hmm... Mesons, Bosons... I'm missing Totons and Dorons...

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    2. Re:Not a new idea. by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 1

      I was thinking along the lines of...

      Mesons, Bosons, and Hadrons, Oh! My!

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    3. Re:Not a new idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glinda the Good always gave me a hadron. I wouldn't mind accelerating her particles.

    4. Re:Not a new idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh Man,
      Hadron?

      There ain't that many people going to get that one.

    5. Re:Not a new idea. by Dabido · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whouldn't it be closer to:

      Nuc-lions, Tigons and Bearyons! Oh,my!

      (Okay, a bit of massaging of Nucleons and Baryons to make a better fit!) :-)

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
    6. Re:Not a new idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing morons ...

    7. Re:Not a new idea. by MPHellwig · · Score: 1

      Nope he doesn't, they are named AC these days.

    8. Re:Not a new idea. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      *tips hat*
      Yeah, that's it.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    9. Re:Not a new idea. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      I don't miss them at all.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    10. Re:Not a new idea. by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      Or Morons. How do you produce them? How to detect them? Are they charged? What would be the spin of a Moron? Science is fun once you get the hang of it.

    11. Re:Not a new idea. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Or Morons. How do you produce them?

      The jury's still out on that one, but shoddy schools seem to play a part.

      How to detect them?

      They often run for political office. While not 100%, Congress is a moron enriched environment (and the morons REALLY enrich themselves, let me tell you!)

      Are they charged?

      Sometimes, but convictions are all too rare. Mostly the charges are masked by political force.

      What would be the spin of a Moron?

      "Think of the CHIIIIIIILDREN!!!" is a fairly popular spin.

  8. Important! by bprime · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The scientists forgot to mention what the lethal range of these particles is! How are they going to secure funding for next year?

    "If the atmosphere was 200 meters closer to the ground, these particles would trigger a mass extinction."

    1. Re:Important! by LinuxGeek · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, it sure is a good thing that the atmosphere dosen't go all the way to the ground, we would all perish... Oh, wait.

      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
  9. Images of these gamma bursts by centipetalforce · · Score: 5, Informative

    These gamma ray bursts are also known as red sprites, blue jets, and super lightning.
    http://images.google.com/images?q=red%20sprites

    1. Re:Images of these gamma bursts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a page with lots of good examples.

    2. Re:Images of these gamma bursts by deglr6328 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Note that while higly plausable, this connection has not been established at the current time. If I were to speculate on such things though, I would say that it is a very VERY good bet. :o)

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    3. Re:Images of these gamma bursts by pb · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... and purple horseshoes.

      --
      pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
    4. Re:Images of these gamma bursts by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      ... and new red balloons.
      Yeesh, I feel old. My earliest memories of those commercials were when it only went as far as the blue diamonds. I still remember the commercial where Lucky got his ass kicked(literally) by a purple horse, while trying to think of a new marshmellow shape to add. I know this is entirely off the original topic, but it is pretty interesting in its own right. I found a history of the Lucky Charms shapes and what year they were added. The blue diamonds were the first new shape added in 1975 after the original 4 that debuted in 1964.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  10. The article says: maybe by centipetalforce · · Score: 1
    I have a feeling the answer is yes, but here is what the article says:
    TGFs have been correlated with lightning strikes and may be related to visible phenomena that occur in the upper atmosphere over thunderstorms, such as red sprites and blue jets. Just how these various phenomena are related is a question the RHESSI investigators plan to pursue in collaboration with other researchers around the world, Smith said.
    1. Re:The article says: maybe by Animaether · · Score: 1

      d'oh.. totally missed that in TFA - thanks :D

  11. not extremely energetic by pyth · · Score: 1

    They say they're getting 35 MeV electrons. This isn't enough to help out in modern high-energy particle experiments, but still could be useful. Maybe.

  12. A fingerprint? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It would be interesting to see if these bursts act as a fingerprint of the planet that produces them. Perhaps they could be used to identify other planets with Earth-like atmospheres (or just planets in general...)?

    1. Re:A fingerprint? by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 1

      You sir, have posed an interesting question.

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    2. Re:A fingerprint? by ari_j · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's too bad empirical evidence points to his insightful, interesting, underrated, informative, and potentially funny comment being modded down despite fitting every positive moderator point the site offers. ;)

    3. Re:A fingerprint? by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It would be interesting to see if these bursts act as a fingerprint of the planet that produces them. Perhaps they could be used to identify other planets with Earth-like atmospheres (or just planets in general...)?

      Good idea, but completely impractical.

      Not to insult everyone, but the fact this is modded to 5 shows how low the general physics knowledge of the slashdot readership is.

      Astronomy is about gathering photons, and that's pretty much it. The more photons, the 'brighter' the source and more easy it is to detect from a greater distance. The number of gamma ray 'photons' produced by a terrestrial storm would probably be undetectable from the distance to our moon, much less from another solar system in our galaxy.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    4. Re:A fingerprint? by shpoffo · · Score: 1

      Is this becuase the gamma rays that would be given off by a entra-terrestrial storm are of lower energy (or something) than the gama and other cosmic rays that come to our planet from space?

      thanks
      -shpoffo

  13. I am Glad! by sammykrupa · · Score: 0, Redundant
    I'm glad the gamma-ray bursts are directed into space

    I, for one, am too!

    1. Re:I am Glad! by bladesjester · · Score: 2, Funny

      At this point I get the evil thought of "if only they could be aimed at a terrestrial target..."

      hmmmmm....

      Ground a tesla coil to my old boss' office chair
      OR
      Fry him with radioactive lightning....

      Option 2 just sounds like more fun.

      Shame it can't be done... =]

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  14. Good old Egon' by AntiPasto · · Score: 3, Funny

    that frood always talked about partical accelerators... just don't f'in cross the streams!

    1. Re:Good old Egon' by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Informative

      You know what you'd really get if you crossed the streams? Nothing, because it can't be done. They're both of the same charge, and like charges repell. Good movie, lousy physics.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:Good old Egon' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Motherfucker, *LEARN* *TO* *SPELL*.

      It's bad enough people write ARTICAL, but PARTICAL? How do you pronounce that? PARR-TEE-KAL?

    3. Re:Good old Egon' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what you'd really get if you crossed the streams? Nothing, because it can't be done. They're both of the same charge, and like charges repell. Good movie, lousy physics.

      You're talking about a movie where ghosts come to life and attack people(!), and you're arguing that it's inaccurate because of the charge on the techno-babble widget?

      That's like saying that flying a kite in a thunderstorm is dangerous: because it's raining, and you might lose your grip on the wet kite string!
      --
      AC

    4. Re:Good old Egon' by Bearpaw · · Score: 1
      Good movie, lousy physics.

      Well, it's a comic movie about ghosts. Somehow it never occurred to me to expect a high degree of scientific accuracy.

  15. Re:We already knew TGIFs were dangerous by ScrewMaster · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Ah yes, one of those Thank God It's France restaurants. I've been to one of those ... mostly it was Americans being loud because all the French waiters refused to take their orders.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  16. Silly comment by pclminion · · Score: 1, Redundant
    I'm glad the gamma-ray bursts are directed into space.

    Ummm... We've had thunderstorms for billions of years, and presumably these gamma ray bursts as well. They are completely natural phenomena. If they could negatively affect us, we would have either evolved a method for coping millions of years ago, or we wouldn't even exist today.

    OF COURSE the things are directed into space. Duh.

    1. Re:Silly comment by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      They are completely natural phenomena.

      Unless they're really an old planetary defence system left over from a previous civilization. (Not quite the Ringworld defence, but who knows what it was designed to stop.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Silly comment by io333 · · Score: 1

      It's too bad they are NOT directed towards us. Every living thing, including us, WOULD have evolved a natural defense -- which would have meant that our current crop of fusion weapons would have been far less dangerous to all life on this planet.

    3. Re:Silly comment by Alchemar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ummm ... We've had thundersorms for billions of years, and presumably these lightning strikes as well. They are completely natural phenomena. If they could negatively affect us, we would have either evolved a method for coping millions of years ago, or we wouldn't even exit today.

      Sorry about being a bit to sarcastic, but I couldn't resist.

      Natural selection works more on what is slightly harmful to an entire species, not what is extremely harmful to a few random individuals. Even if the gamma rays did point strait down, we would be wondering why there was an occasional case of natural combustion, not the extiction of the human race.

    4. Re:Silly comment by hector66 · · Score: 1

      I'm glad the gamma-ray bursts are directed into space.

      Not so silly really. I'm sure the lawyers working for Richard Branson at Virgin Galactic spacelines are already creating waivers to sign so the passengers can not sue if they should return to the Earth as the Incredible Hulk.

      --
      -- I have an extremely witty sig, but you're not good enough to see it.
    5. Re:Silly comment by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1
      Even if the gamma rays did point strait down, we would be wondering why there was an occasional case of natural combustion, not the extiction of the human race.


      The first thing that came to mind when I read that was Spontaneous Human Combustion.

      Mycroft
      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  17. me too by ezthrust · · Score: 3, Funny
    "I'm glad the gamma-ray bursts are directed into space."

    No way, if they shot down to earth, then we could ALL be the Hulk.

    1. Re:me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if we were all the Hulk that really wouldn't be too cool either.

    2. Re:me too by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Road rage would be much more entertaining to watch -- from a distance!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You *are* the hulk. Without these gamma rays, you would be one tenth your current size and strength.

    4. Re:me too by gtkuhn · · Score: 1

      hmmm.... mebbe they do come down and we all ARE the Hulk.... ever see pictures of skinny, malnourished, gray aliens?

      We must scare the hell outta them.

  18. Space elevators? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Just wondering if this would disrupt the operation of a space elevator in any way or harm it. I mean, there's no way you can infinitely keep a storm away from one of those things.

    How would this affect carbon nanotubes?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Space elevators? by all+your+mwbassguy+a · · Score: 3, Funny

      thats why we need a space escalator.

    2. Re:Space elevators? by FuturePastNow · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pfft. Lazy ass, I use the stairs.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    3. Re:Space elevators? by khallow · · Score: 1

      Well, given that the tether is going to experience far worse things which have already been anticipated near the ground (wind, electrical strikes) and out in space (hits by orbiting material, hard gamma ray bursts), I don't think this will be a problem.

    4. Re:Space elevators? by Dabido · · Score: 1

      "thats why we need a space escalator."

      Doesn't Springfield have one of those ... it's next to that pop-stick tower and has a monorail station.

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
    5. Re:Space elevators? by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      Would that be the Stairway to Heaven, perhaps?

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  19. Day after tomorrow? by timigoe · · Score: 1

    Sounds scary really... lets hope no-one predicts a 'day after tomorrow' type event next :o

    --
    Tim (http://tim.igoe.me.uk)
    Computers are like Air-con, open windows and they stop working!
    1. Re:Day after tomorrow? by Lyntux · · Score: 1

      This sounds like a disaster of the week movie idea just waiting to produced...poorly.

  20. Re:We already knew TGIFs were dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, two posts in and you manage to turn "Large storms on Earth act as particle accelerators" to "Americans are loud and obnoxious!".

    Kudos, sir. You have elevated geopolitical trolling to an artform!

  21. We must stop global warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it will affect the North Atlantic current causing storms to turn upside down for some reason, showering the planet with gamma ray bursts, and making people act badly.

  22. And to the ground by Viadd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm glad the gamma-ray bursts are directed into space.

    Although the outward going flashes (first detected by CGRO a decade ago) are much stronger, there are also lighting-generated X-rays seen on the ground.

    1. Re:And to the ground by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The scientists who measured those X-rays were triggering lightning blots by firing rockets with trailing wires into thunderclouds (insurance agent: "And what do you do for a living?"), so their detectors were near the actual lightning strike.

      The detectors had to be near the lightning bolt because air absorbs X-rays surprisingly well. Ditto gamma rays, which are the same thing but at higher energies. More than a few feet of air will block X-rays.

      Some of the early nuclear bomb tests had to measure gamma rays from the reaction, and to do that they built tunnels filled with polyethylene between ground zero and their detectors for the gamma rays to go through.

      Bottom line, don't worry about X-rays from lightning unless you're standing where it strikes, in which case you shouldn't worry about the X-rays anyhow.

    2. Re:And to the ground by Muhammar · · Score: 2, Informative

      there is not much gamma released in nuke explosion (except for the fission product decay), most of the initial radiation pulse is actualy X-ray and neutrons.

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    3. Re:And to the ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that may be so, but they didn't know that until they tested it...

    4. Re:And to the ground by njh · · Score: 1

      "More than a few feet of air will block X-rays."

      If that's the case, why do they put so much lead around xray facilities in hospitals? And why can x-rays pass through bodies and metal so easily?

      I'm not saying you're wrong, just that what you say doesn't correlate to my experiences.

  23. Matter of convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm glad we don't live in the ocean. It's not that we'd drown... we'd have evolved flippers and a way to breathe or hold or breath for a long time.

    Fire might be tricky, though.

    Similarly, the gamma ray bursts would make having an electronic society very difficult.

    Of course, we might find something even better from it... it might be a nice night time energy source, once we'd dealt with the shielding issue. Who knows? This is one of the things I like the way it is.

  24. Make it stop. by skids · · Score: 1


    When is it going to stop? How many more flash floods do you guys need in Utah before you wake up?

  25. Evoloution? by ElDuderino44137 · · Score: 1

    So ...

    Could one of theses large storms be responsible for the mutation that caused humans to go from poop flingers to problem solvers? ... The Dude

    1. Re:Evoloution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are the problem solvers? Haven't seen too many lately...

  26. So it just may be then by toddhunter · · Score: 4, Funny

    The the Earth is not only a giant computer, but a particle accelarator as well? Pretty versatile planet really.

    1. Re:So it just may be then by IroygbivU · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It even developed its own sustainable nuclear fission reactor 2 billion years ago according to Discover magazine.

      http://www.discover.com/web-exclusives/natures-nuc lear-reactor0204/

    2. Re:So it just may be then by Dabido · · Score: 1

      " The the Earth is not only a giant computer, but a particle accelarator as well? Pretty versatile planet really."

      The mice are furious that you have worked this out. And the Dolphins send you a message. "So long, and thanks for all the fish!"

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  27. What about aliens, though? by ari_j · · Score: 3, Funny
    I'm glad the gamma-ray bursts are directed into space.

    As am I, but I fear that these bursts of gamma rays are the real reason nobody's made first contact with us yet. It's kind of like when you go around town looking for a restaurant, you generally avoid the restaurants that bullets fly out of when you're pulling into the parking lot, opting instead for a restaurant where you can get at least to the hostess or maybe even your table before anyone shoots at you.

    It's the same thing at work, here. Aliens do not want to share their warp drive technology with a planet that blasts them with gamma rays every time they fly by.

  28. Little more from Stanford's website. by zymano · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Little more from Stanford's website. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  29. Re:We already knew TGIFs were dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, sir, you are the one who invoked the stereotype when converting "loud Americans" to "Americans are loud".

    Kudos, sir. You have elevated anti troll trolling to an artform!

  30. Weak Anthropic Principle by quinkin · · Score: 1
    The definition of a meaningless statement...

    * Weak anthropic principle (WAP): "The observed values of all physical and cosmological quantities are not equally probable but they take on values restricted by the requirement that there exist sites where carbon-based life can evolve and by the requirements that the Universe be old enough for it to have already done so." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_Principle

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
  31. Re:Was this research conducted by a General Ross? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

    I think it would be a bit safer to have the experiments performed by Dr. Clark Savage Jr.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  32. Re:Obligatory by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Funny
    In Soviet Russia, the subatomic particles are made out of you!

    Five points from Slytherin, for making a pointless joke about Muggles.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  33. Free Indeed by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 1

    All we need to do is construct detection systems capable of tracking and positioning themselvs over/around each particle accelerator and then telemeter the results back to some type of simple network. Then have some simple system that can reduce the observations from these many systems, forward that information to the interested scientists. Sounds free to me.

    --
    "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
    1. Re:Free Indeed by chadjg · · Score: 1

      Ok, somebody is probably going to take me to school for this one, but is there a way to set this thing off on cue in one big burst? That should cut down on the observation costs.

      What would happen if you could convince some moron to drive a boat into the eye of one of these storms and then set off a laser in the 193 nanometer range and aim it straight up. If you pumped a big old burst of energy into the laser it should make a nice ionized and therefore conductive path up into the stratosphere. Would that set up a decent experiment?

      I can't quite figure out how this phenomenon is usefl, but that's just me.

      --
      Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  34. Fools! by LaminatorX · · Score: 2, Funny
    These are not "naturally ocurring phenomena," as these simpletons posing as scientists seem to believe. Yes there is something in the tops of these thunderheads interacting with the ionosphere, and when I have it perfected everyone who laughed at my theroies will see what terrestrial gamma emissions are REALLY about!

    .

    .

    Especially the accursed Reed Richards.

    1. Re:Fools! by lpontiac · · Score: 1
      These are not "naturally ocurring phenomena,"

      Of course not, they're obviously part of a liberal conspiracy.

  35. Hmmm... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if blasts of gamma rays can be to blame for Cancer Clusters that have defied other explanations.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:Hmmm... by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure they could. It's possible, but since they are directed towards space, I highly doubt it.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    2. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cancer, gamma rays, thunderstorms, power lines, atmosphere.... The atmosphere blocks gammas, so they could actually be emitted in a bunch of directions and only be significantly noticed above the atmosphere. But the atmosphere is not a perfect block, so some might get through. Now, if there is any correlation between actual thunderstorms and CLAIMS of cancer being caused by power lines....

    3. Re:Hmmm... by khallow · · Score: 1

      No. I don't see the connection since the atmosphere absorbs gamma rays. Maybe I need more happy juice?

    4. Re:Hmmm... by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      Why is it whenever anyone mentions X-rays or gamma rays, people freak out about cancer.

      I chalk this up to general paranoia about radiation. We get hit with x-rays and gamma rays all the time. Our cells get belted with all sorts of radiation.

      It is highly doubtful that this radiation (or X-rays from lightening bolts) are causing any sort of increase in cancer rates. You get more X-rays from your computer.

      And while these gama ray bursts may happen, they are relatively weak. AND THERE STREAMING UP, NOT DOWN.

      Worry about things like unknown pollution factors, not natural phenomena that has been occuring for millions of years.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    5. Re:Hmmm... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Why is it whenever anyone mentions X-rays or gamma rays, people freak out about cancer.

      Two things. I didn't "freak out", I suggested a possible explanation. And I posited such an explanation because X Rays and gamma radiation are known to cause cancer.

      And while these gama ray bursts may happen, they are relatively weak. AND THERE STREAMING UP, NOT DOWN.

      Perhaps, but then again perhaps not. They were only able to measure the ones streaming up because THAT'S WHERE THE SATELLITES ARE.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    6. Re:Hmmm... by dsmithorew · · Score: 1

      In fact, Joe Dwyer at Florida Tech studies x-rays from lightning seen on the ground (the source only meters away), and he saw *one* event where there were MeV gamma-rays too, which he thinks were coming from about 6 km up. The total dose, though, from that high-up event, was really tiny. Much, much less than other kinds of natural radioactivity. There's a somewhat more substantial x-ray dose from being within a few meters of a lightning strike, but then you have bigger problems. -David Smith (1st author of the Science paper)

  36. Noone can... by J_Omega · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, no. The sprites/elfs/jets are usually studied by Elec Engs, and these things are poorly understood. At least, that's how it was ~6 years ago when I was doing minimal assistance for a Prof who was studying those phenomena.

  37. The ionosphere: famous for its rude French waiters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mostly it was Americans being loud because all the French waiters refused to take their orders.
    Sigh... yet another American here to embarrass us in front of all the geek foreigners by showing off his persecution complex. (They do it at home too, foreigners- only here they have to pretend they're being persecuted for being Christians, not for being Americans, since we're all Americans here.)
    You obviously haven't been to France, Mister Flamebait. They will take your order quite readily. But in France you're expected to stay at the table after you're finished and yak it up for hours. So you can't get them to give you a check. They're always surprised when you ask for it. Why wouldn't you want to stay here, and enjoy the conversation and secondhand smoke? You just got here two hours ago.

  38. Re:We already knew TGIFs were dangerous by Alien+Being · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. expand TLA as needed.
    2. craft dumb joke about the US
    3. profit

  39. SciScoop Reported This Two Days Ago by cybrpnk2 · · Score: 1

    If you read and post science articles here on Slashdot, I encourage you to visit SciScoop and help us grow the community there. We reported this very TGF story two days ago.

    1. Re:SciScoop Reported This Two Days Ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gonna have to do something about your colour scheme first bucko. Nothing hurts the eyes quite like pale blue and white. And whats with the information pie in the face design ethic there? I couldn't find information there if I needed to.

      Reminds me of the time the sales reps were crying out for the designers to produce a silver colour, despite being told repeatedly that silver is silver because its made of silver or a similarily reflective material, the fucking muppets.

      I mean what the fuck.

    2. Re:SciScoop Reported This Two Days Ago by Goaway · · Score: 1

      That is just about the most cluttered and horribly coloured web design I've seen all month. Congratulations. Maybe there's some worthwhile information on your site, but I will not know until it becomes less painful to look at.

    3. Re:SciScoop Reported This Two Days Ago by Al-Hala · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree (at leat in part)with the other posters. I concentrated on the centre section, because of the clutter.

  40. Mod parent up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a good thing the GP labled his post "Silly comment", because it sure was.

  41. Re:We already knew TGIFs were dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My anti likes to troll. Usually in the AARP and Social Security chatrooms. She had one really pissed-off old geezer threaten to gum her to death.

  42. Re:Was this research conducted by a General Ross? by strelitsa · · Score: 1

    Yes, the acupuncture brain surgery seemed to work well. It made bad guys join the Salvation Army and play an accordion.

    --
    No mod points, no meta-moderating/Firehose/all the other free work Slashdot wants me to do.
  43. I'm a 7-up fan, myself... by Prototerm · · Score: 1

    ...so I wouldn't know about Sprite.

    --
    "My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." --Senator Carl Schurz (1872)
  44. Impressive energies but FAR lower than the highest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It sounds like an interesting phenomenon 35 MeV is higher gamma ray energies than I would have guessed. Maybe understanding the production mechanism can produce some insight about how some of the gamma rays from space are produced.

    However, the energies for these are FAR FAR lower than the higher gammas from space. The highest cosmic rays are thought to be 20 TeV - 10^6 times higher energy than these. The highest man made particle beams are only 1 TeV (from the Tevatron at Fermilab www.fnal.gov).

    Nobody has an explaination for how the highest energy cosmic rays are produced...

  45. It's "human" assisted.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    With the huge amounts of RF being pumped into the atmosphere from human activity, it's no wonder that there is a seemingly "natural" particle accelerator up there.

    But it's surely a human caused RF assisted event.

  46. Noooooooooo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then Jerry Bruckheimer will make a movie where the Space Shuttle will have to fly through a wall of tornados. On the other hand, it'd snow on the Moon, so there'd finally be a commercial incentive to put permanent habitation there, with really, really hot hot cocoa. Hopefully all our butts will be as sexy as Flander's in our skin-tight spaceski suits.

  47. Gamma rays and evolution by ZackSchil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "I'm glad the gamma-ray bursts are directed into space."

    I'm not. If they were directed downward, creatures on earth would have evolved some defenses against irradiation and made space travel (and a lot of other things) a hell of a lot easier.

    1. Re:Gamma rays and evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's turn 'em around just like Soviets did with selected rivers and watch the fun begin!

    2. Re:Gamma rays and evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes, a most reasonable application of the milder form of the anthropic principle.

      And, indeed, it may be that life did evolve a defence to radiation. Nick Lane in his fascinating book "Oxygen: The Molecule that made the World":

      http://pages.britishlibrary.net/nick.lane/
      Nick Lane homepage

      points out that radiation damage and oxidation start from opposite ends of the same radical pathway. So why did the first cells develop anti-oxidant protection before there was much oxygen around ? Nick suggests radiation was the trigger.

    3. Re:Gamma rays and evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think anyone will see this here.

      I like monkeys. Sorry for being off topic.

  48. The "Oh-My-God" Particle by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

    30 MeV is impressive for a terrestrial thunderstorm, but much faster and more energetic particles and photons arrive from space. One proton (dubbed the "Oh-My-God" particle by the goofy physicists who observed it) was seen striking the upper atmosphere above Utah with a calculated energy of 320000000 TeV or 51 Joules, the energy of a 55 mph baseball.

    1. Re:The "Oh-My-God" Particle by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      I contemplated posting this exact tidbit a few minutes after hitting submit on my previous post! :o)

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  49. Not to Worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    First, about the energy: The energies of the particles (electrons) are only ~30 Mev. That's not much. Just for comparison, the Fermilab accelerator produces protons with 800 Gev (i.e., 800,000 Mev). Second, about the numbers of particles (i.e., the intensity): The article talks about 50 or so events per day. If that is 50 gamma rays, that's not very much. The Fermilab accelerator beam typically has a trillion protons in a pulse. So, it's interesting that one can get Mev energy photons at the top of thunderstorms out of elecrons being accelerated by electric fields but it isn't as big a deal on a technological scale as the article makes it seem.

  50. Camus - religious??? by j_w_d · · Score: 1

    Obviously you never wasted any time in a modern literature class that covered existentialist authors, did you now?

    --
    ------ The only greater hazard to your liberty than n politicians is n+1 politicians.
  51. You call that "Oh-My-God"?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How's this then:

    Malargue, Argentina, Latitude: 35 28S, Longitude: 069 35W, 21 May 2004:

    http://www-f9.ijs.si/~matej/misc/787469.png

    Energy 1200000000 TeV!

    You loose :P

    1. Re:You call that "Oh-My-God"?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my God you physicists are goofs...

  52. Re:The ionosphere: famous for its rude French wait by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

    I haven't been to france for about 5 years. I really miss the place, especially the restaurants where you, like you say, can just sit for hours and hours chatting and enjoying the early evening/late afternoon sun setting over the vines.

    *sigh*

    So offtopic, but come on, french restaurants in the countryside ARE the best.

  53. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't do that Snape will do something nasty to you like *shutter* listen to crab and goyl sing or actually vote. Stupid Mudbloods.

  54. David Smith was my Prof... by Calsat · · Score: 2, Funny

    I had David Smith last quarter for Mechanics! Good prof... The man has a thing for chickens, though... It's unhealthy... He came to class the day before finals in a chicken suit. He also drew himself in a loincloth in one of the problems on the final. To be fair, he was Tarzan. Hmm, maybe I'll go to his office hours and talk with him about this research...

    1. Re:David Smith was my Prof... by dsmithorew · · Score: 1

      Hmph, that's right, out me to the Nerds of the World :) -David

    2. Re:David Smith was my Prof... by Calsat · · Score: 1

      Well, there were already ~150 nerds in Santa Cruz with the image of your poultry finery indelibly marked in their psyches...

      And you know those nerds, they network... AIM, I think it's called...

      ;)

  55. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You fucking anal cake bitch.

  56. Re:Impressive energies but FAR lower than the high by kaos.geo · · Score: 1

    I was thinking about the cosmic rays too. Perhaps in space, analogous processes (but in a larger scale, like a nebula or something) produces the rays. Just a sci-fi fan speculating here! ;)

  57. BOFH by prjames · · Score: 1

    Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzt
    "Oops another satelite ,best turn down the volts when its just the boss..."

  58. Surely some mistake by Napoleon+Blownapart · · Score: 0
    "the atmosphere above Earth's strongest storms acts like a particle accelerator"

    Shouldn't that be "a particle accelerator acts like the atmosphere above Earth's strongest storms"

    Since when did nature copy what we did?

  59. I miss the old B references by Technopaladin · · Score: 1

    As long as we think these phenomena are natural Ming the Merciless will let us survive. Earthquakes Tsunami Wild Fire Hurricanes Gamma Bursts in the Atmosphere

  60. Mystery Spot by towatatalko · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Santa Cruz in the news... just to mention, while you travel near that place in California, visit Mystery Spot, a place that will alter your sense of gravity, a tourist attraction, it has been the place where gravitation forces seem to act wired, something very like the city of S.C. itself. In a few words, if you take your friend with you and he/she is taller then you, in Mystery Spot those roles will be reversed, guaranteed, no bull.

    --

    IP was invented for the sake of lawsuits.
    1. Re:Mystery Spot by ultramk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uh, yeah...

      I leave near there. It's situated on a hill where you don't really have any reference points for what's uphill/downhill. The shack itself was carefully designed in the '20s to fool your sense of perspective. It's just like a hundred other roadside attractions in out-of-the-way places. Just some optical illusions.

      BTW, I remember a few years ago when some girls I knew were visiting from out of town, and asked me if I knew where the Mystery Spot was... (of course, I told them that I most certainly did--at least, according to my ex-girlfriend anyways...)

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
  61. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's so new about this? Spider Robinson included this as part of the story of "Callahan's Key". That book was published years ago.

  62. Re:The ionosphere: famous for its rude French wait by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    {sigh} Spare me. So, it's okay to make rude remarks about "loud Americans" (see grandparent post) but all other nationalities are considered sacrosanct? Phooey. "Persecution complexes" aside, let me point out that we can be just as irritated by broad generalizations about our culture as you or anyone else. Furthermore, I am perfectly free to express irritation at such "foreign geeks" (although that's really an insult to the real geeks of any country ... a better phrase would be "inconsiderate jerks") whenever they feel the need to express their inner twit. Deal with it. And if that offends you ... change the channel.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  63. Re:The ionosphere: famous for its rude French wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably felt the need to comment because s/he is sick of Americans bashing everyone else, and raving about their own country, and how the rest of the world are jealous of their "free" market, and their individual freedoms.

    Just a thought: why is it that the greatest country on the Earth needs to constantly advertise that it is the greatest country on the Earth? Perhaps it's actually about the same: you're born, you live, you die.