Slashdot Mirror


User: NOPteron

NOPteron's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
57
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 57

  1. Re:Here is how you do it. on Custom Motherboards? · · Score: 1

    What he's asking-after, is essentially an ABIT workstation-board, which seems to be not yet on sale in RL. . .

    The INTERESTING Abit 'boards.

    The Workstation subsection of Abit 'boards.

    The Twin-Opteron Workstation 'board that many drool after

  2. Re:You missed some of the viewpoints. on Torvalds Unveils New Linux Control System · · Score: 1

    I have a question, then. . .

    IF using BitKeeper means agreeing to NEVER work on any SCM system, or anything that could-possibly compete with BitKeeper ( as I've read elsewhere ), then

    Isn't Linus very sue-ably in breach of contract, right now?

  3. Re:#$@#$ fans on VIA Epia SP 13000 Review · · Score: 1

    As long as you prefer quiet to performance, get a Matrox P650: it's fanless dual-head and fully 1/15th the on-card memory-bandwidth of an ATI X800-XL card. . .

    ( yeah, I know, the in-card-memory-bandwidth isn't the only spec that matters, and I chose it for the contrast, so Too Bad[tm]:
    2 or 2.2 GB/s versus 32 GB/s is striking )

  4. Re:Dont bother on Objectively Comparing Competing Search Engines? · · Score: 1

    Google: "the who" or the-who
    they are equivalent methods of causing it to grok the phrase, see.

    A More Interesting Question, however, is which search-engine is for most-searches MORE EFFECTIVE. . .

    http://www.mooter.com/

  5. Re:Why not a UPS? Use What's Available! on Protecting Hardware on Unstable Power Sources? · · Score: 1

    Layer 1
    http://www.zerosurge.com/ for a surge-suppressor that'll protect your UPS, make it one of the wide-spectrum jobbers ( these things don't use MOV's which fade, so you can TRUST 'em, and no I don't work for ZS )

    Layer 2
    line-conditioner

    Layer 3
    UPS, with add-on battery capability, and BIG batteries added on, in parallel ( absorbed-glass-mat or starved-electrolyte, same-thing, are the standard for putting in UPSs, but if you're going to be doing this for extended-no-grid-use, then probably going with a bunch of big normal-lead ones might make more cost-sense. . . )

    Alternative layer 2+3
    get a big line-interactive UPS ( line-interactive is more efficient than the offline ones: it's using a line-conditioner instead of battery for sags etc. ) & add big batteries in parallel.

    Layer 4
    add solar to trickle-charge the batteries to keep 'em very topped-up & help make the hit milder, when having to rely on battery.

  6. Re:self-correcting problem on Welcome to the Future of DRM Media · · Score: 1

    An interesting principle, going on here. . .

    We've all heard the
    "drop frog into pot of hot water, and it'll jump out, but if you drop the frog into a pot of warm water, and heat it, you'll get a dead/cooked frog"
    item, and it's been shown to work against human-worth again and again

    ( I think it was in the documentary "Anne Frank Remembered" where a woman, who survived nazism's-europe, said that each new restriction/regulation/control was "Just One More Thing", until the
    You aren't alowed to go anywhere except in daytime, and only within a mile ( or something like that ) rule.
    Then they knew It Was Too Late(tm).

    Humanity's going to accommodate corporate monarchy until we have our rights removed, and history shows that that's that.

    Believing otherwise's fine, but over thousands of years, we've impersonated drunkenness more than enlightenment, and the fundamental determination isn't going to un-be, just because it'd be a nice idea. . .

    Unshakeable determination to enforce ignorance's Rule
    is
    Unshakeable Determination, not some easily-disappearable-appearance.

    It doesn't matter whether it's conscious or unconscious, it matters only that it commit, for its effect to be. . .

  7. Re:Exeem on TorrentBits.org and SuprNova.org Go Dark · · Score: 1

    Don't Need To[tm]. The reasons bugs get eradicated systematically-quicker in OSS are the same reasons OSS programs are more trustworthy in general: SOMEONE is going to discover undermining-code or flaw, and if they broadcast that discovery, then I can discover its existence, see. . .