Slashdot Mirror


TorrentBits.org and SuprNova.org Go Dark

Numerous people wrote in with similar stories: "Without providing a reason, both of these sites have shut down: SuprNova.org and TorrentBits.org." We mentioned a few days ago that the MPAA was going after Bittorrent sites.

1,260 comments

  1. Well, uh... by Icarus1919 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Maybe it was a flashcrowd? (pertaining to yesterday's story)

    1. Re:Well, uh... by ToyKeeper · · Score: 5, Funny

      I sure hope I didn't contribute to the death of suprnova, by submitting that article to /. ...

      I mean, I know that wouldn't have anything to do with it, but I still feel bad drawing attention to it the day before it died. :(

    2. Re:Well, uh... by theyenk · · Score: 1

      Yea that is what i figured is that being on both /. and the register in one day crippled their will to live....bummer

    3. Re:Well, uh... by Ambient_Developer · · Score: 1

      I been trying to say that people need to develop technology on freenet that will allow for bit torrent trackers to work, in order to combat this stuff. This way both of these new protocols will benefit.

    4. Re:Well, uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir,
      Are An IDIOT!

  2. who else? by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 1

    I don't know if this is coincedental, but the filelist.org tracker seems to be acting up as well.

    1. Re:who else? by aldoman · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think they are getting way too many members to cope with at the moment (with TB and suprnova going down). They got about 15,000 in 12 hours (went from 140,000 last night to 155,000 this morning when I checked).

      This is going to be a huge issue for all the new/small torrents sites - how do they work with the load that millions of new users demand?

      BTW: If you have an IRC client, you can join #bt, #bt-gm and #tvtorrents on efnet. #bt and #tvtorrents serves TV show torrents and #bt-gm serves torrents for games and movies.

      Since it's IRC it stands a somewhat better chance of surviving.

    2. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      isohunt.com is also out for the count...

      Something defo going on

    3. Re:who else? by ReeprFlame · · Score: 1

      Would DDoS be a consideration? Not too long ago, such servers were beign attacked for no apparent reason, and now with one, why not attack again?

    4. Re:who else? by golgotha007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think they are getting way too many members to cope with at the moment (with TB and suprnova going down).

      The only way these sites will be able to remain online is to host them on servers out of European and American jurisdiction.

      I'm a system administrator here in Saint Petersburg, Russia for an ISP that I'm a founding member of (even though I'm not Russian). I've got oodles of bandwidth, and would love to host a popular torrent site (especially because I rely on these torrents to escape from having to watch Russian television).

      Is anyone interested in teaming up with me so we can get the torrents back on the web without legal worry?

      You can find me here (sale [AT] winlink.ru)

      p.s. to all the mods that are going to mod me into oblivian, think of this: the whole idea here is to keep the torrents alive. Isn't that what we all want?

    5. Re:who else? by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I doubt that slashdot's attorneys think at all well of you using their bandwidth for illegal solicitation. Do you think that VA Software wants to wind up in the legal crosshairs of the RIAA or the MPAA?

    6. Re:who else? by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How?

      " All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2004 OSTG."

      Seems pretty clear to me that Slashdot absolves itself of responsibility, especially with them not deleting comments, and letting the community moderate posts (specifically mentioned in the 'comments might be moderated' caveats are Illegal comments).

    7. Re:who else? by The+Warlock · · Score: 1

      That's what The Find Print is for. Didn't you read it?

      --
      I've upped my standards, so up yours.
    8. Re:who else? by happyhangone · · Score: 2

      Why not distribute .torrents by using emule or irc... lets go underground...

    9. Re:who else? by protocol420 · · Score: 1

      I don't think thats the problem at TB, i'm a member there and they've had full membership for a while with no problems.

      --
      www.gaian-mind.org - eco-punk/crust coop and collective | www.anarchistfederation.org - so cal anarchist federation
    10. Re:who else? by Pacifix · · Score: 1

      And join the child pornographers on IRC? Let's stay above ground and fight instead. There's no reason to be pushed around by 20th century behemoths while developing 21th century media distribution models.

    11. Re:who else? by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

      Okay and thanks for the list of available channels. I've configured Kopete and joined all of the ones you listed but I have no idea how to actually get it to cough up a torrent list. Yes, I'm a helpless n00b! :-)

      Would you be so kind as to throw a FAQ or some documentation my way so I can figure out wtf I am doing?

    12. Re:who else? by topynate · · Score: 1
      Excuse me. This is not China. This is a public forum, similar to a town hall, or something of that nature. Additionally, while there is some possibility of you being a helpful lawyer, the possibility of you being someone who can't help but care about business that is very definitely someone else's is greater, in my reckoning.

      But in answer to your question: nothing would come of it, except a possible quick comment deletion.

    13. Re:who else? by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sorry, no. Slashdot tried to fight the scientologists, and found out Real Fast (TM) just how far that disclaimer's protection actually extended. The answer is "not very, even for documents arguably in the public domain".

    14. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make a site like allofmp3.com and have it sell all kinds of media files instead of mp3s. It seems according to Russian law that it's legal.

    15. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Since it's IRC it stands a somewhat better chance of surviving.


      Not with idiots like you screaming about it in public. Thanks a lot, asshole.

    16. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to you, The Warlock, and topynate, I think the point of the joke was that he's implying slashdot is run off some sketchy Russian ISP.

      whoosh

    17. Re:who else? by Tirinal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Speaking as a Russian, I can at least verify that this man is sane and in full possession of his faculties. Russian TV is just about the most horrid and bleak torrent of dementia ever to spring from the mind of man.

      --
      ~Tirinal
    18. Re:who else? by secolactico · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why not distribute .torrents by using emule or irc... lets go underground..

      You also need the trackers. You can't distribute those.

      --
      No sig
    19. Re:who else? by Epidemical · · Score: 1

      I don't know about European jurisdiction - The Pirate Bay is in Sweden, and it hasn't been taken down despite numerous threats.

    20. Re:who else? by B3ryllium · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For the record, BitTorrent *sucks* as a media distribution model. It only works for "popular" data, which results in an ever-worsening spiral downward into The Land Of FOX. Once the torrent dies, dozens, hundreds, or thousands of people are left with incomplete and useless files.

      World's Worst Reliable Delivery Method. ;-)

    21. Re:who else? by realdpk · · Score: 4, Informative

      Slashdot caved; that doesn't mean that the Scientologists were on the right side of the law. It would have been too expensive for Slashdot to fight, that's all.

    22. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hosting torrentsites for pirated stuff is not, for the moment, illegal in sweden

    23. Re:who else? by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Slashdot caved; that doesn't mean that the Scientologists were on the right side of the law.
      You're right, but that's even worse. There's no real question that the scientologists weren't on the right side of the law, and they won anyway. In giving them the victory, the editors showed that contrary to their disclaimer, they do exercise full editorial discretion over the content of the site. That makes them fully liable for any illegal solicitation which they allow to remain visible.
    24. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      didn't slashdot cave on the ms kerberos issue as well? I seem to remember they deleted a post finally, but the wired article implies they won and didn't delete any posts in that confrontation.

    25. Re:who else? by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Which is the weakest link in the entire concept of a law-based society. And it is one of the major contributing factors to the inequality among citizens based on level of income and wealth. A rich football player can get away with murder and mayhem, but a public forum can't discuss an obviously phildickian "religious" organization without being threatened with eternal litigation, which is a lot worse on a practical level than eternal damnation...

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    26. Re:who else? by Boronx · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's because in Plutocrat Russia, the T.V. owns *you*!

    27. Re:who else? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      It has now ...

    28. Re:who else? by 1moreastronaut · · Score: 1

      I think happyhangone's point was that neither the MPAA or the RIAA would have had any clue about Bittorrent had it not had such an obvious, web-based distribution system.

    29. Re:who else? by smokeslikeapoet · · Score: 1

      I hardly find this to be the case. A group of 10 or so testers for a Linux Live CD are currently using bittorrent for distribution. Instead of one of us having to host the ISO we all can. The torrent doesn't die until a new version comes out. Distribution would be nearly impossible, or unaffordable without bittorrent. I don't see how a single server - multiple peer model would be very efficient for our needs.

    30. Re:who else? by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about finding "rare" files. Episodes of Vengeance Unlimited, for instance. I got 350MB done a 400MB file, and then it vanished. There's no guarantee a file will be there to be completed, especially when it's a rare file, and that turns me off of the distribution model. My comment about spiralling downward toward the Land of FOX had to do with the thought that if only popular files are completeable, then they will rule, and eventually BitTorrent would only be good for finding the latest Britney Spears sex video.

    31. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's an interesting idea. Do you take payment in the form of DMT/ALTA or e-gold?

      Why not just setup and run the site yourself, it would at least pay for itself, and you wouldn't have to worry about the law and where you're located. It's an interesting idea to me, but being the US it seems "risky" if you will. Living in Russia, I'd be all over it.

    32. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They must have taken lessons from French television!

    33. Re:who else? by op00to · · Score: 1

      How is this any different than on Kazaa when the share-er dissapears, or when a web server drops off the face of the Earth?

    34. Re:who else? by realdpk · · Score: 1

      On Kazaa, you basically run the tracker on your own machine, using Kazaa's network as a database to determine where you can grab files. BT, you have to find another tracker on your own, manually.

    35. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you are saying is that Sweden is home to a lot of immoral and unethical people.

    36. Re:who else? by swdunlop · · Score: 1

      It would have to be, to prefer American television, which must be a close runner up..

    37. Re:who else? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I think Suprnova and others should switch from hosting trackers to hosting edonkey2k links. They're just links so they're legal, and the system is much more robust and has a good client (emule).

      And before people say that emule is slower than BT, that's because people rush to BT files in massive waves and then forget them, but while they're fresh, they go fast. If people swarmed to ed2k files as quickly, the speed would be the same. After all, emule doesn't use (much) more overhead bandwidth than BT, so in both networks, downloadrate=uploadrate.

      I think this is the right moment for making the switch.

    38. Re:who else? by netless · · Score: 1

      great idea. or maybe merge best of two technologies together (edonkey + bt) and create ultimate copyright infringement p2p network

    39. Re:who else? by tetromino · · Score: 1

      Russian TV is just about the most horrid and bleak torrent of dementia ever to spring from the mind of man.

      Speaking as a Russian who has lived in Britain and the US, I can tell you that TV sucks planet-wide.

    40. Re:who else? by 2004.3 · · Score: 1

      They're not down. They are just having difficulties with the severe incerease in traffic.

    41. Re:who else? by Taladar · · Score: 1

      There is no guarantee the original Web-Server won't take the File down before you downloaded a complete copy either. This can't be guaranteed with any protocol.

    42. Re:who else? by Taladar · · Score: 1

      .torrent files don't contain more info than ed2k links. Hosting them is the same grade of legal or illegal. ed2k is slower because everyone shares whole directories with lots of crap while in bittorrent you have to put a little bit of effort in publishing a file and so the bandwith stays with the intended files.

    43. Re:who else? by B3ryllium · · Score: 2, Informative

      With a standard centralized distribution model, there's a higher probability that a user will log back in who is sharing the file in question. When a BitTorrent dies, it's pretty much permanently gone unless it's a special case.

    44. Re:who else? by Slack3r78 · · Score: 3, Informative

      First off, ed2k links and torrent files are both essentially hashes - you're no more in the clear hosting one than the other. The actual tracker mechanism does possibly leave you open to greater legal attack, but often times the torrents and tracker are hosted in seperate locations.

      Secondly, ed2k isn't slow because of the protocol itself so much as the queueing system. With ed2k you *will* spend most of your time simply waiting to download a file. When I used it regularly, I found that you generally had to have at least 20-30 things queued up to have *something* downloading at all time. ed2k is great for finding older or obscure files, but I wouldn't call it a replacement for the pure power that a torrent leverages.

    45. Re:who else? by defile · · Score: 1

      Their responses to legal threats are comedy gold.

      I wish I had the balls to talk to lawyers that way when I'm on the receiving end of a notice. I suppose knowing that the threats are meaningless helps increase courage.

    46. Re:who else? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      It was an expensive victory for CoS. When Slashdot took it down, they also posted a large list of critical sites and links. That and the go-round with Google helped bump xenu.net's ranking up to #2.

      BTW, a new photo of what CoS seems to have done to the Lisa McPherson memorial brick. scroll down a little

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    47. Re:who else? by jakethecake · · Score: 1

      http://static.thepiratebay.org/legal/ - funniiee

    48. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, way to read that into his post I can play your game too by saying this about your comment:

      "So what you are saying is that you don't understand how to read what was written, and instead must put your own words into it?"

    49. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once the torrent dies, dozens, hundreds, or thousands of people are left with incomplete and useless files.

      So, you're saying that it's common that thousands of people are stuck on a torrent with incomplete files?

      Everyone will get their files as long as there is one entire copy within the swarm. Alice might have the first part of the file, Bob has the midle part and Charlie has the end part, noone has the complete file, but as long as they all hang in there, eventually they'll all get the complete file. The propability that there wouldn't be one complete copy spread in a swarm of thousands is very unlikely.

    50. Re:who else? by danila · · Score: 2, Informative

      Suprnova was in Hungary. They were sure they don't need to worry about American laws too. It seems they were wrong. Though I do agree that St. Petersburg, Russia is still a rather safe place to perform on the Internet activities that are considered illegal elsewhere. Speaking from experience. :-)

      If you are seriously interested, though, I think it would be wise to ask people from sharereactor.ru, nnm.ru and the like, who have experience running "shady" sites and more importantly, getting ad money to finance them. May be they can offer some advice.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    51. Re:who else? by blanks · · Score: 1

      I thought suprnova was located in sweeden and didnt have to worry about copyright laws from the US. I only assumed this because they had it posted in one of the return letters they got from a letter dealing with copyright issues.

    52. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are complaining that a hammer cannot cut and conclude that it is a bad hammer.

      If you need to download "unpopular" data, just use plain HTTP download. BitTorrent is designed to download "popular" data where the huge demand would ordinarily kill the server using plain old HTTP download.

    53. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a great article on Suprnova:
      Apparently run by an 18 year old high school student from the capital of Slovenija
      http://www.google.ca/search?q=cache:QoV vhPh2TxIJ:w ww.carniola.org/theglory/2004/11/the_hunt_for_sl.h tml

    54. Re:who else? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      The propability that there wouldn't be one complete copy spread in a swarm of thousands is very unlikely.

      This would depend on how popular the seed was and if there are enough fragments to construct a complete download. This has not happened to me often but it has happened. If someone is observant enough to see this and nice enough to re-seed it is easy enough to resolve.

      Despite this small flaw my experience with BT has been far more enjoyable than with other file distribution systems.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    55. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh:
      Link here
      Here's another good one on an interview with the apparent owner: Here

    56. Re:who else? by apanap · · Score: 1

      Seriously? It's the most stupid shit ever written. Yeah "Hey, you are stupid you stupid stupid idiot, go fuck yourself". Very funny indeed...

      --
      Give me a job. Please?
    57. Re:who else? by phillymacmike · · Score: 1
      Well, of course, but only if Alice, Bob, and Charlie want the same file. Hence the comment that it only works well for popular content. I can see that people being stuck with incomplete pieces of unusual files might be quite common.

      And Bob's your uncle.

      --
      _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _>8
      Too many errors in one post (make fewer).
    58. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I looked at hosting a server in Russia, but they all seem to want you to turn up to their offices!

    59. Re:who else? by xgamer04 · · Score: 1

      As of now, they are back up...

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
    60. Re:who else? by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      Why is it so bad? Surely it can't be as bad as american reality TV?

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    61. Re:who else? by Travy.b · · Score: 0



      The Suprnova.org mirror is still going strong:

      http://www.bi-torrent.com/

    62. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compared to Korean soaps

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

      sob

    63. Re:who else? by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Russian TV is just about the most horrid and bleak torrent of dementia ever to spring from the mind of man.


      So where can you download those torrents? ;)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    64. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, I'd purposefully buy Swedish products because of this...

      I doubt it's done intentionally, but I'd happily show support for any country that tells big American businesses to "get stuffed" with respect to copyright.

    65. Re:who else? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      is there a practical difference?

    66. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can easily say that I will never purchase a product manufacturered in Sweden or a product produced by a company operating in Sweden.

      Riiight. Sweeds should fear you and your little boycott.

      How's your boycott of Chinese goods going? Funny, it doesn't show up in the US trade deficit with China..

      ..but China doesn't pirate anything, right?

    67. Re:who else? by issachar · · Score: 1
      I seem to recall that at one point Xenu.net was the top link on a google search for Scientology. Am I mistaken? Anyone who hasn't had a look at Xenu.net really should. I don't know if they mention the bet Hubbard had with Robert Heinlein, (who actually wrote good sci-fi), but that's worth a gander too.

      --
      . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
    68. Re:who else? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1
      I take it that the legal objection was to the hosting of trackers, not the torrents. Anyway, if there was any trouble because of the links, the sites could always just have a blurb that says "Enterprise 4x09 is now uploaded to the network" and you'd use search to find it. Or maybe you could write out the hash, and then you could search by hash. A bit less convenient, but at least it's pure information and no linking.

      Then I was thinking that maybe the edonkey network itself could host some sort of a Suprnova-like site, but in a distributed fashion. It would require some extra work to make it annonymously postable and yet not easily spoofable... then I thought that maybe Freenet would be the perfect place for hosting such a thing! Why not move SuprNova to Freenet?

    69. Re:who else? by polyiguana · · Score: 1

      Suprnova was in Hungary.

      No, Suprnova was from Slovenia. Close enough though.

    70. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once the torrent dies, dozens, hundreds, or thousands of people are left with incomplete and useless files.

      Well it is kind of like a pyramid scheme in some ways... but it's great as an alternative to http downloads. If you're distributing some large and popular file, something that you would otherwise be providing all the bandwidth for, it's great. And it might mean you can keep the server up longer so more people will get the whole thing.

      Now in a situation where the original server is taken offline, what can be done? No matter the protocol, if not enough is shared, you are screwed. With http that happens as soon as the original server goes down. With bittorrent, you might even survive the tracker dying. (but only if you're really lucky)

      Eh, for less popular stuff, newsgroups fare well, but they have many problems of their own.

    71. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha-ha.
      You haven't seen Swedish TV.

    72. Re:who else? by SurgeonGeneral · · Score: 1

      >>Slashdot caved; that doesn't mean that the Scientologists were on the right side of the law.

      >You're right, but that's even worse. There's no real question that the scientologists weren't on the right side of the law, and they won anyway. In giving them the victory, the editors showed that contrary to their disclaimer, they do exercise full editorial discretion over the content of the site. That makes them fully liable for any illegal solicitation which they allow to remain visible.


      What you said is patently false. Settlements are certainly not an admission of guilt. Far from it, settlements have ABSOLUTELY no bearing in court. If they did, people would be reluctant to settle. People are encouraged to settle out of court rather than bog the courts down, therefore the reasons for settling have no bearing on future litigation.

      Furthermore, those reasons can only be found in the minds of those that settle and therefore any speculation on what those reasons are is hearsay and inadmissible in court. The fact that there is "no real question" about what side of the law the scientologists were on in YOUR mind is therefore irrelevant and whether or not they would have won was never decided.

      --
      -- "Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains." Jean Jacques Rousseau
    73. Re:who else? by SurgeonGeneral · · Score: 1

      Which is the weakest link in the entire concept of a law-based society. And it is one of the major contributing factors to the inequality among citizens based on level of income and wealth. A rich football player can get away with murder and mayhem, but a public forum can't discuss an obviously phildickian "religious" organization without being threatened with eternal litigation, which is a lot worse on a practical level than eternal damnation...

      I assume you are refering to the O.J. Simpson trial. It is a common misconception of lay people that O.J. won the case by having a ton of money and being able to afford the best lawyers. As a member of the legal community, I have to tell you that the prosecutors did a terrible job of the case and even a mediocre lawyer could have taken it apart. Not only that but the investigation was botched. But the dominant view says otherwise, and it is a dominant view that cant be bothered to read a 200 page case. Its also a view that presents an easy opportunity for jokes and maligning the one institution that keeps the government in check - the law.

      --
      -- "Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains." Jean Jacques Rousseau
    74. Re:who else? by The_Rift · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of pirates bay, not suprnova.

    75. Re:who else? by Strudleman · · Score: 1

      World's Worst Reliable Delivery Method. ;-)

      More like the world's best unreliable delivery method ;-)

      --
      Do it doug.
    76. Re:who else? by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Nope, couldn't find it anywhere!

    77. Re:who else? by z80 · · Score: 1

      >If Europe wants to freely violate US copyright, then we have no obligation to respect Swedish products and/or copyrights.

      Well, actually, american companies have been ignoring several swedish patents for years now by stalling them in courts. Swedish inventor Håkan Lanz has the patent for colour graphics in a computer and several AMERICAN computer companies has helped ruining this man when he came to them pointing out that they owed him money...

      --
      -- http://z80.org - all opinions, all the time --
    78. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was another case of a football play killing he pregent girl frien 2 years ago. He driver off the road and a hit man shot her. Some how he got out of it too.

    79. Re:who else? by DrSkwid · · Score: 3, Funny

      the latest Britney Spears sex video

      url ?

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    80. Re:who else? by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

      sounds to me like a) you have you ports firewalled, b) don't have much BT experience and c) you are more bitter than others your age.

      --
      Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
    81. Re:who else? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


      wtg Captain Underestimate

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    82. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking the same thing! LMAO!

      I have only been using BT for a couple of
      years, But i have to say its the Best as far as speed i have ever used!

      {{SkinR}}

    83. Re:who else? by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to understand. I don't think that anybody was guilty of (or, more importantly, liable for) anything in the posting case. I completely agree that had OSDN fought, it would have won.

      That's irrelevant. The nature of the settlement established certain things as facts, which, in turn, established liability for OSDN and VA in other contexts. The parent of this thread (here) is a clear solicitation to illegal activity. I pointed out (here) that the attorneys for VA Software almost certainly didn't view that as a good thing.

      If the editors exercised no control whatsoever over the content of the forums, that wouldn't matter, because they would be able to employ the common carrier defence. Unfortunately, their behavior during the scientology affair shows that this is a moderated forum, and thus that the editors don't have that defence. The facts of the scientology case itself are irrelevant; what the editors did in response is what matters -- and that, folks, is a matter of public record.

    84. Re:who else? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Yes, I think it hit #1 for a while. By "actually wrote good sci-fi", I assume you mean Robert Heinlein? :) BTW, the "bar-bet" story is generally regarded as just a story, and I'm sure it does mention that somewhere on xenu.net.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    85. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering what slashdot posters have said about this group, I am not surprised.

      I am not going to dig through the slashdot comment archives, but to sum it up it looks to be setup by a bunch of kids who think everything should be free, and it is their inalienable right to get it for free. You know, it a necessary human right, just right up there with the right to entertainment.

      And thanks to their countries laws they can get have that attitude and really tell people off without any fear of legal recourse. That is why they have the balls to reply the way they do, it is because they know the lawyers can't touch them. I highly doubt that they would have the balls to stick up to the lawyers otherwise.

    86. Re:who else? by Arthen · · Score: 1

      Somebody modded this *troll*? Ignorant youth! Best update of classic Yakov Smirnoff I've seen in a long time.

    87. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It helps if we had a server to connect to on irc..

      Just an idea. :)

    88. Re:who else? by Ahman_Ra · · Score: 1

      but the law you say keeps order is bullied into a way that takes away rights of others. MPAA brought that out against 321 Studios by just running them out of money on a couple points, and ignoring a 3rd located just below the other 2 points. We have the right to back things up, but not to tell others how, provide them with information to back it up, and use our cam corders to backup what we want because it is acceptable. because the law backs up the common rich corp. america group.

    89. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where can one this video you speak of?

    90. Re:who else? by DieuEM · · Score: 1

      You also need the trackers. You can't distribute those. why not? We all know the "warez rings" that live in IRC, each person hosting an XDCC bot or what not with files "for educational use only." Each person hosts GBs of files and they seem to manage distribution fairly well. In that case, why not have each person in a torrent ring in irc host trackers. The bandwidth strain can't be any worse than an XDCC bot's strain. And, hosting the torrents is perfectly legal, since the bot (or person) doesn't actually host the material. This way someone would have to use something like www.ircspy.com to search for a torrent file, download that, and then start distributing...i don't see why this won't work.

    91. Re:who else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i can see that noone here has seen japanese game shows LOL!!! much worse than american reality shows!

  3. BitTorrent is a pirates' delight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's easy to download full isos of software and have them error checked while downloading. Bittorrent is much better at transfering binaries than Usenet. Plus no chance of losing parts of the files downloaded unless there's nobody to seed the torrent.

    1. Re:BitTorrent is a pirates' delight by m50d · · Score: 1

      Not really. It has no anonymity, and relies on centralized sources, which as this very story shows are easily taken down and then you're SOL. It was designed so it's obviously not intended for copyright infringement.

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:BitTorrent is a pirates' delight by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that also makes it useful for legal software. Screwdrivers, Chop Sticks, Forks, and Knives are used to kill ppl. Are you advocating getting rid of these?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:BitTorrent is a pirates' delight by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      It's not rare for a story to be a dupe. But is it really necessary to post a comment that is a dupe?

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    4. Re:BitTorrent is a pirates' delight by D'Sphitz · · Score: 1

      Do you have a problem with locking up people who use screwdrivers, chopsticks, forks and knives to kill people?

  4. Exeem by gunpowda · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Exeem, anybody?

    1. Re:Exeem by TheBadger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Where is exeem located? I cannot seem to find it...

    2. Re:Exeem by gunpowda · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think they did this to drum up interest in Exeem, their next generation torrent p2p client, which makes everyone a tracker. It's in private beta testing right now, so only 5000 users allowed on it.

    3. Re:Exeem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can only get to it on the sn forum... but it isnt realy too good in the current beta(your not missing much)

    4. Re:Exeem by alexandre · · Score: 1

      Yes exactly, when exeem will be released, everything bittorent will be distributed...

      After that, let's add encryption and privacy... That's what MPAA,RIAA, etc.. are asking!

    5. Re:Exeem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "I hope Exeem dies a firey death, as places like suprnova can easily be replaced."

      It's a little early to be saying that these places can be replaced when we don't know why they're being shut down. Perhaps the MPAA/RIAA is going to DDoS attack all the torrent sites to bring them down. As for your remarks on Exeem, they just show you're an immature zealot. Do you really think that it would have been a problem for Kazaa not to have a Linux client? I mean I'm a Linux user but we make absolutely no difference as we are in such small number compared to Windows users. It's really pathetic that you hope that any piece of software not fitting your 'open source' ideal fails.

    6. Re:Exeem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Since I read somewhere that it's closed source, and there is no intent to port it to linux... I hope Exeem dies a firey death, as places like suprnova can easily be replaced.
      Now if Exeem because opensource, and becomes availible for Linux... well... another matter entirely."

      Only on Slashdot would nonsense like this get moderated up. Please explain what is insightful about this? He proclaims he read something that he cannot backup with a source and he shows that he is a zealot and hopes that all non open source projects fail. That's really insightful.......

    7. Re:Exeem by Sipos · · Score: 1

      I agree. Funny would have been much better. The problem is Slashdot is full of zealots.

    8. Re:Exeem by karstux · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, I dunno about the "insightful" either, but I for one would never use a closed-source p2p client.

      It's really just a matter of safety (and paranoia): only with opensource clients I can be relatively sure that the client won't rat out on me or install malware of various sorts. Honor among thieves (or pirates :)) is nothing I'll trust on...

      The portability is an added (very nice) bonus.

      --
      Don't whistle while you're pissing.
    9. Re:Exeem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's really just a matter of safety (and paranoia): only with opensource clients I can be relatively sure that the client won't rat out on me or install malware of various sorts."

      Unless you go through every line of the source code one by one before you compile anything you cannot be 100% sure that it won't do something you don't want it to do.

      I do agree though that the portability is a nice feature. In this day in age I don't understand why they wouldn't write the program in a language that is either cross platform capable or that can be very easily ported.

    10. Re:Exeem by canwaf · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well, Mr Anonymous Coward... I don't consider myself an open source zealot... I'm often paranoid enough not to want to install anything binary on my linux box. But the main reason why I hope Exeem dies a firey death is because it is based off of, and quite dependant on the torrent network... and the protocol will be pretty much the same...

      And Bit Torrent's source is availible for all to see. I just think it would make sense, and allow for faster development if it was open source.

      That's pretty much it, and besides, watching "a firey death" is always fun. Like a train wreck.

    11. Re:Exeem by camooT · · Score: 1

      suprnova's goodbye message stated that they won't be back in the "same form." I'm guessing that this is a heads up for anyone who knew about Exeem. My guess is that they've been planning for this shift for a while, but have had to push ahead the schedule because of the recent raids. Chances are, they'll play their cards right with Exeem, and we might finally have the ultimate P2P service. Or not -- let's keep our hopes up shall we :).

    12. Re:Exeem by secolactico · · Score: 1

      It's really just a matter of safety (and paranoia): only with opensource clients I can be relatively sure that the client won't rat out on me or install malware of various sorts. Honor among thieves (or pirates :)) is nothing I'll trust on...

      I hear ya... Remember the earthstation5 scandal a few months back (can't find the link to the slashdot story).

      Nope... no closed source p2p for me either. How do I know that spiffy new torrent/g2 client is not actually turning my machine into a spam sending zombie or worse?

      --
      No sig
    13. Re:Exeem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But the main reason why I hope Exeem dies a firey death is because it ....."

      Well maybe if you had put that in your original post you wouldn't sound like such a zealot. Nobody can read your mind and if you read your original post you just come off as a zealot, as you gave none of the information that you gave in this post and claim information from something that you cannot site the source too. Call me 'Mr. Anonymous' all you want it doesn't dispute the validity of my claims.

    14. Re:Exeem by aero2600-5 · · Score: 1

      The problems I pointed out with Exeem haven't gone away, and appear to have gotten worse.

      Exeem still sucks, and it doesn't appear to be replacing Suprnova.org, as there are still hardly any files on it. I won't post the entire message from Suprnova again, but not only does it not sound induced by the MPAA, it doesn't mention Exeem or 'coming back in another form'. I think it's likely Exeem is almost as dead as Suprnova.org

      Also, for those who haven't had a chance to read the Exeem forums, because they're closed to all but the beta-testers, they have no intention of making Exeem open-source.

      Aero

      --
      Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
    15. Re:Exeem by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      BitTorrent is not opensource. It's public domain. If Bram Cohen MADE it public domain, it is obviously his intention for his IDEA to spread as far as possible, into both opensourced (Azureus) and closed source (Exeem) products. He was more generous than the OpenSource proponents are; he wanted his creation to benefit as many people as possible, without restriction.

    16. Re:Exeem by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Exeem still sucks, and it doesn't appear to be replacing Suprnova.org, as there are still hardly any files on it.

      And Suprnova.org did, when it was barely in testing stages?

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    17. Re:Exeem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I concur.

      --
      Disclaimer: by modding this comment down because you feel offended at being called-out, thus proving the point, You are hereby in agreement with this post and it's parent. Make your desicisions accordingly.

    18. Re:Exeem by RoofPig · · Score: 1

      And he's especially more generous than the Exeem people.

    19. Re:Exeem by Taladar · · Score: 1

      How exactly is he a zealot because he hopes a system he can't use won't become popular draining ressources/users from systems he can use?

    20. Re:Exeem by ultranova · · Score: 4, Funny

      The ultimate P2P service would be Freenet 1.x, scheduled to be released sometime after the last atom of hydrogen has been consumed by the last star and the remaining ashes frozen solid.

      Beneath the starless sky, on the frozen landfill that was once Earth, a feeble glow suddenly appears. It comes from a long-dead display, which slowly comes to something resembling life. For a while it flickers like a candle in the wind, then stabilizes into a steady glow. The last surviving human is drawn to it, and for a moment he just stares, not sure if he should believe his own eyes - Freenet 1.0 actually found the key he was searching for !.

      Then, suddenly, he realizes - the "Index of not-yet-inserted keys" actually found what he was searching for ! Exited, he starts reading, and soon he knows how to reverse entropy. He throws his head back and laughs. And so it begins again...

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    21. Re:Exeem by blanks · · Score: 1, Informative

      So you look at every line of code for each client application you run to verfiy that you are safe and dont need to be paranoid?

      And with each update you go through each line and verfiy that its safe?

      I totally agree with where your coming from, but your just pulling the bullshit card when saying that you only use open source software because its secure because you can check to make sure nothing is install that shouldnt be.

      Because most people never check.

    22. Re:Exeem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It's really just a matter of safety (and paranoia): only with opensource clients I can be relatively sure that the client won't rat out on me or install malware of various sorts. Honor among thieves (or pirates :)) is nothing I'll trust on...

      People with that argument always make me wonder. Just what the fuck is the logic in that? Do you honestly review every line of the code before typing your ./configure;make;make install; make clean;?

      If you say you do, you're a liar, because you wouldn't have that Mozilla based client you're browsing with right now since it's well over 20MB of source. And you can't really expect the CVS contributors to do it; they're at a higher level of access than you, and only handling the specific files they're updating.

      If open source software still had some kind of a backdoor or fallback plan to fuck the user, you would be none the wiser than were it in closed source.

    23. Re:Exeem by Knnniggit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe not, but someone will check. And if they find something that shouldn't be there, word will get around quickly. Even if nobody actually looks at the code, the programmer can count on it happening. Open source keeps people honest that way.

      --
      Brain kills internet cells.
    24. Re:Exeem by bfields · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So you look at every line of code for each client application you run to verfiy that you are safe and dont need to be paranoid?

      And with each update you go through each line and verfiy that its safe?

      I haven't read the proof of Fermat's last theorem. Nevertheless, I think it's probably true, because:

      • I know that all the details are available for anyone to examine.
      • I know that very smart people have given the proof careful critical readings.
      • Every time I've personally read the proof of a mathematical result that has stood such tests, I've found it to be sound.

      For similar reasons, I also believe that the structure of DNA is what my chemistry teachers told me it is, even though I haven't personally performed the necessary experiments.

      *Most* of the things I'm asked to believe on a daily basis are things I've never personally verified. I decide how much faith I should have in them partly by thinking about the processes by which they were arrived at.

      Not that I have *that* much faith in the process that produces bittorrent. But still, it's important to realize that there are ways you can get assurances from the open source process without personally verifying every line.

      --Bruce Fields

    25. Re:Exeem by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Which is differnt from closed source how? Bear in mind I'm only talking about sneaky uses, but it seems to me everyone that's tried it with closed source has gotten caught too. Maybe not as fast, but they get caught, and then people avoid it.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    26. Re:Exeem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Beneath the starless sky, on the frozen landfill that was once Earth, a feeble glow suddenly appears. It comes from a long-dead display, which slowly comes to something resembling life. For a while it flickers like a candle in the wind, then stabilizes into a steady glow. The last surviving human is drawn to it, and for a moment he just stares, not sure if he should believe his own eyes - Freenet 1.0 actually found the key he was searching for !.

      And he downloads a 0 day crack of "Duke Nukem Forever", a full day before official release!

    27. Re:Exeem by NOPteron · · Score: 1

      Don't Need To[tm]. The reasons bugs get eradicated systematically-quicker in OSS are the same reasons OSS programs are more trustworthy in general: SOMEONE is going to discover undermining-code or flaw, and if they broadcast that discovery, then I can discover its existence, see. . .

      --
      IPTables enhancement Fail2Ban bans cracker-login's
    28. Re:Exeem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honor among thieves (or pirates :)) is nothing I'll trust on...

      What about copyright infringers? Making a copy is not stealing, neither it is a crime committed on the high seas.

    29. Re:Exeem by julesh · · Score: 1

      The Last Question

      A brilliant story, and thank you for reminding me of it. :)

    30. Re:Exeem by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      * I know that very smart people have given the proof careful critical readings.

      Although, if everyone makes the assumption that someone *else* read it for them, you're back to square one. As far as the kernel, yes, it's reviewed by higher authority.. but all the other crap that goes into a typical install? It's a crapshoot. Maybe you've heard of a little security problem called sendmail?

    31. Re:Exeem by blanks · · Score: 1

      Most of the replys to my comments were mostly "I dont check, but someone will" comments. Im willing to bet the number of people check code for security issues or exploites, has just as many chcking the code for seucirty issues or exploites to use. I really dont see much of a difference of expcting someone else to verfiy a piece of software then having no one at all.

    32. Re:Exeem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh - nice story. Thanks for posting the link.

      But it took me a few minutes to stop grinning about his description of Multivac, and the way he got the increase of computing power so incredibly wrong... Now I must find when he wrote it :)

  5. Reason by leonmergen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I really can't imagine neither of these sites would say something naughty about the MPAA if they would be the reason the sites has to shut down, so what *could* the reason be ?

    Simple bandwidth usage or server load ? To me, that looks like about the only option left, and sounds very plausible after reading Suprnova's message...

    It's all very very weird, especially both sites going down at the same time...

    --
    - Leon Mergen
    http://www.solatis.com
    1. Re:Reason by Scoria · · Score: 1

      I really can't imagine neither of these sites would say something naughty about the MPAA if they would be the reason the sites has to shut down, so what *could* the reason be ?

      Unless, of course, non-disclosure happened to be a term of their settlement. ;-)

      --
      Do you like German cars?
    2. Re:Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Since the MPAA has no legal jurisdiction in Sweden (or wherever these sites were run), I'm guessing they took the money that they would have spent on lawyers/legal fees and simply bought off the owners of Suprnova and TorrentBits.

      It might sound implausible, but if your 2 choices were to either get sued or get a fat paycheck and go away, which would you pick? That would also exlain the secrecy of the shutdowns. I suspect that if it was simply a bandwidth/DOS issue, they would have said so.

    3. Re:Reason by dk.r*nger · · Score: 4, Informative

      I really can't imagine neither of these sites would say something naughty about the MPAA if they would be the reason the sites has to shut down, so what *could* the reason be ?

      A "we know we probably can't nail you properly, but our lawyers can make life tough on you for years to come - so just leave town, and do it tonight" - deal?

    4. Re:Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    5. Re:Reason by Wavicle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you make it lucrative for sites to host material enabling piracy, then you are going to encourage new sites to pop up hoping to get bought out by the MPAA.

      I'm thinking the "all the kids got out of school for christmas and are looking to download the latest juvenile teen flick" theory is fairly probable.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    6. Re:Reason by M51DPS · · Score: 1

      Guys, I think they are having bandwidth problems at this site.

      Really? Okay, let's post a link to them at Slashdot. I am sure that will help.

    7. Re:Reason by geoffspear · · Score: 1, Insightful

      MPAA has no "legal jurisdiction" anywhere. They're a trade group, not a government body, and the most likely do have legal standing to sue under Swedish law.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    8. Re:Reason by lightsaber1 · · Score: 2, Funny
      That article mentions part of the problem is that internet access is going so fast now that larger movie files can easily be downloaded...maybe that means the MPAA can do something right that the RIAA didn't -- and that is to EMBRACE the new technology. Set up an online movie store where, for a small price (small because they don't have packaging fees and such), one can download a DVD -- legit.

      Since DVDs are so easy to copy now anyways, there's no argument that it would make things easier to copy. So what's the delay? I think people would pay 5 to 10 bucks for a movie download. Look at iTunes as an example of where this has worked.

    9. Re:Reason by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      iTunes already has free music videos available on the music store :-D You just cant download them, only watch. Movie Trailers too.

      Im just waiting for hte iTunes movie store!

    10. Re:Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm a legitimate site, so Bring It.

    11. Re:Reason by Blublu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry, that would make too much sense. People might actually get accustomed to paying for movies on the internet. There's even a chance there would be less pirating! So I don't think this will happen. We all know MPAA hates money. I mean, if they didn't, they would have done this already, right? Right?

      --
      meh
    12. Re:Reason by jrockway · · Score: 1

      No, they don't.

      Trackers are doing nothing illegal. They are not hosting any copyrighted content (well their own content... but that's legal).

      It's like me posting a link to something illegal. Not illegal.

      --
      My other car is first.
    13. Re:Reason by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      It would be a strange thing for the MPAA to demand though. And, assuming at least one of these sites is in the US, rather foolish of them to agree since the DMCA safe harbor provisions actually offer them some protection.

    14. Re:Reason by camooT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They have always had bandwidth problems. Recent events probably only helped encourage them to shutdown, and as there was no direct comment regarding either AA, we can probably assume no direct pressure was applied (unless you're a crank conspiracy theorist, in which case you can join the speculating hordes at suprnovaforums.net). I strongly believe that Exeem has a lot to do with this. I stated in another post that they've probably planned this shutdown of their HTML index for a while, but have had to do so earlier mainly because of the looming fear of raids and jail-time. No amount of rebellious nature and self-conviction could've convinced them to swap the possibility of the big canner with keeping their site up longer. Even if they are based in Slovenia, the fact that there is no precedent might be the most alarming precedent of all -- if they can get to Finland, they might just as easily get to Slovenia.

    15. Re:Reason by eliktronik · · Score: 1

      They have, there are services up like Movielink. The only problem is this one doesn't support linux.

    16. Re:Reason by lightsaber1 · · Score: 1

      Nor is it available outside the US...hell, I can't even look at the web site. Anyways, I think TV shows could also benefit from such a service, though syndication might get annoyed.

    17. Re:Reason by cdrguru · · Score: 0

      They are materially assisting in the distribution of the material that is in violation. They are doing this assisting in a manner that specifically makes it difficult for anyone to stop the distribution.

      OK, so it isn't illegal. Why isn't it being done in the US then? Napster answered that. The "Grokster" decision will keep getting revisited until it comes out that way as well.

      You can't have a copyright system and at the same time have people actively preventing it from working. Today, the only people with enough visibility to make it known are the P2P music sharing folks. The movie sharing people are starting to gain in visibility. The software stealers (and believe me, they are stealing!) will eventually make it.

    18. Re:Reason by mikiN · · Score: 1

      Congratulations! You may have just provided the missing essential item for the creation of an Over-Unity Money-Machine!

      Let's see, here are what I think are the necessary steps:

      1. Software house develops application, creates Gold Master CD.
      2. Software house brings Gold Master to CD manufacturer, preprints and box designs to publisher and pays for the production of, say, 200 million copies of said items

      (Money input = x * 10^6 dollars)

      3. Wheels turn, boxes are filled, shipped to stores and stacked
      4. ???
      5. Profit!! Customers rush to stores, buy boxes, hurry home, install software.

      (Money output = y * 10^6 dollars)

      Since y >> x and y / x >> 1, you should now have an Over-Unity device... What you say? Has already been done? Bwoowoo, there goes my patent claim, ah never mind...

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
  6. pay off by Pu'be · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Crap o'

  7. Damn it! by nordicfrost · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How am I going to watch Enterprise now? No TV channel in Norway sends it, nor do they have any plans to send it. I buy the DVDs. I watch the movies. And then they fuck people over by removing my only way of watching it before it comes to DVD?

    And, no, I don't have access to Swedish channels.

    1. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was going to say TvTorrents but they're down as well. So hurmm... learn to love IRC all over again.

    2. Re:Damn it! by Further82 · · Score: 1

      I too download Enterprise from links posted on Suprnova. I dont have UPN so for awhile I had to, but recently FOX started playing the new episodes on Sunday nights. Either way, the rips on Suprnova were of so much better quailty, plus no commercials, that I didnt even bother watching it on TV anymore. Either way, I'm sure somthing else will pop up very soon. Besides, you got till about a week into January before they start airing new episodes again, so we got some time

    3. Re:Damn it! by pixas · · Score: 2, Informative

      SVT no longer brodcasts Enterprise. We sweedes are out of luck too when it comes to watching the latest trek (If it wasn't for bittorrent that is).

    4. Re:Damn it! by Prophetic_Truth · · Score: 1

      Enterprise? Easy alt.binaries.startrek

      --
      time is a perception of a being's consciousness
      time is your 6th sense, the wierd ones are 7+
    5. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      you can get enterprise and many other showes from the folks at btefnet.com

    6. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Try www.thepiratebay.com. It's a Swedish website, so you can even support other Scandanavians... ;)

      It's listing several season 4 episodes at the moment.

    7. Re:Damn it! by MrHanky · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not to mention Simpsons. There should be a new episode tonight, I think. Yes, I can watch Simpsons on TV3, but not the newest episodes. Not yet. But I have the right to time-shift, haven't I?

      Ouch! Mrtwig.net is down as well. No South Park for slow children this christmas.

    8. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      www.btefnet.com - only tv shows

    9. Re:Damn it! by RinzeWind · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      You can try TV Torrents.

    10. Re:Damn it! by JDevers · · Score: 1

      Try the Edonkey network and http://www.the-realworld.de/index.php
      They list virtually every TV show, sorted nicely too.

    11. Re:Damn it! by CPM+User · · Score: 5, Funny

      I particularly like their legal threats page

    12. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is a new site for torrents for tv. It is a split off of tvtorrents. it's tv-swarm.com :)

    13. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, forgot to mention that the design will be changing soon, so it will look less like tvtorrents did.

    14. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And then they fuck people over by removing my only way of watching it before it comes to DVD?

      WTF? I do feel your pain (well, I could have, if I were the least interested in Star Trek), but you're not being "fucked over".

      You'll just have to wait until you can watch it legally. I.e. when a TV station you have access to broadcasts it, or when you can buy the DVD. Tough shit.

      You have no right to download stuff (or more precisely, in more civilised non-DMCA-afflicted countries, people have no right to illegally distribute stuff) just because it's not yet available legally where you happen to live.

      Some retard modded your post "insightful". I think it could possibly be "informative" or "interesting", since despite your confused outlook you provided an example of yet another effect of the anti-piracy crusade.

    15. Re:Damn it! by rcs1000 · · Score: 1

      TVtorrents.net could not be found.

      Weep.

      --
      --- My dad's political betting
    16. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I have the right to time-shift, haven't I?

      No.

    17. Re:Damn it! by Tim+Browse · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You may be moderated 'Insightful' but I have a hard time working out how this equates to 'fucking people over'...maybe it's just me.

    18. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just what is a right?

      why do the authorities have the right to stop people copying material that isn't even availible legally?

      copyright laws were not designed in a world with high speed instant virually free connections and all attempts at modernising them have resulted in extremely dodgy laws

      i don't know what the answer is but traditional copyright is seriously showing its age in this modern world and dmca like laws small of police state

    19. Re:Damn it! by ztane · · Score: 1

      In Finland we can watch SVT on cable for free, and many of us did watch Enterprise on it... The Finnish Channel 4 stopped broadcasting Voyager after its second or third season years ago and since that we haven't seen any new episodes of Trek on Finnish tv. Luckily, we have STTNG now...

    20. Re:Damn it! by nkh · · Score: 1

      You'll just have to wait until you can watch it legally.

      You're not living in Europe, do you? All the series I download will be available on DVD in a million years, not before. And I won't live a million years to see what I can watch now. Of course if I could buy the DVDs... (and now, I don't want dubbed TV series, I want the original ones)

    21. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://robotolabs.cjb.net/ usually posts a torrent for a new simpsons episode a few days after it airs.

    22. Re:Damn it! by Hatta · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You have no right to download stuff (or more precisely, in more civilised non-DMCA-afflicted countries, people have no right to illegally distribute stuff) just because it's not yet available legally where you happen to live.

      Maybe this is a troll, but I'll bite anyway. You have a right to do anything that does not harm another. Since they are not even trying to get his money for the show, there's no basis whatever for any claims of monetary losses. The author gains nothing by keeping his work from others, so disseminating it cannot be said to harm him. There is nothing whatsoever immoral about violating copyright in those circumstances. It is enforcement of copyright that is immoral.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    23. Re:Damn it! by SirWinston · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > How am I going to watch Enterprise now?

      It starts with a "U" and rhymes with "BLUESNET". ;-) Seriously, *everything* gets posted there a day or two after it's released. Just follow the white rabbit to a big premium news server provider and download anything you want without the possibility of the MPAA or RIAA ever seeing your IP.

      All these episodes of Hex and uncensored Degrassi: The Next Generation and advance Battlestar Galactica I'm watching in the U.S. have to come from somewhere...

      Funny how Europeans always complain about not getting American shows in a timely manner, when most of what I want are Canadian and British shows I can't get here (or can't get uncensored, like Degrassi), or U.S. shows that were cancelled here before showing all episodes but have all the episodes shown overseas (like the sexiest teen show ever on American network TV, The Opposite Sex). The new *Battlestar Galactica* is the only exception, but it's a joint U.S.-British production shown in Britain first...

      I'd gladly pay for subscrptions to premium British and Canadian TV services if I could, but I'm not allowed thanks to geographically discriminatory content licensing. Content providers need to be pushed into broader worldwide same-date (or at least close--not many months or years difference) availability. Funny how in the era of "free trade" the multimedia content industry is the only one erecting more barriers to trade instead of tearing them down. While geographically I can't just subscribe to Britain's Sky Digital since their satellites aren't positioned for this side of the world, there's no technological reason I shouldn't be able to subscribe to Canadian services. I'm not permitted to by Draconian content licensing.

      Artificial trade borders are gone on the Net, but instead of adjusting to exploit it the content industry is trying to protect the old fiefdoms. Instead, it should be doing for downloadable TV what iTunes did for downloadable music. But it's too complacent and protectionist to adapt.

      --
      "It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word."--Andrew Jackson
    24. Re:Damn it! by Thing+1 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I wonder if FreeNet might be a good source for torrents. It's hella slow, but you only need 35K or so downloaded before you can go off and connect to the torrent.

      The problem is that everyone's exposed at that point: all the MPAA has to do is connect to the torrent with Azureus and they'll see all the IPs that are currently attached.

      It is my life's mission to produce an unbreakable, fast form of BitTorrent: the Copyright Cartel shut off my Internet for a day earlier this week. There's nothing I can do to fix the law (which stated that copyrights were to promote the arts and sciences and should only run for 20 years); it's horribly broken and things that are currently under copyright protection will never leave copyright protection, due to continual extensions. This is abysmal; Disney made much of their money from re-doing old stories that fell into the Public Domain, like Snow White, Beauty and the Beast, etc.; today that would be impossible.

      Anybody developing newer versions with encryption and anonymity, feel free to contact me. I have both developer time (C, C++, HTML, Perl, Javascript, etc.) and disposable income, to support creating a new version.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    25. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're not being "fucked over"... You'll just have to wait until you can watch it legally.

      The problem here is discord between ethics and the law. He's a fan of the show. He gives the company money on a regular basis because of this. There's no reason to prevent him from watching the episodes as they air. But he's still being punished because it's technically illegal for him to do this.

    26. Re:Damn it! by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Why can he buy a DVD as soon as the film is finished? I'd say he's being fucked over.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    27. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While true, the pdtv-lol torrents advertised on Suprnova were of much higher quality.

    28. Re:Damn it! by j3110 · · Score: 1

      It should be a civil matter... and if he downloads it, they should have to show damages... which since he can't purchase it legally, should be close to 0$, right?

      You're argueing for rights that shouldn't exist. The intent of copyright law was to promote innovation by rewarding the creators for their content. Through no action of this person in sweden is the creator hurt, nor profits deminished. Basically, as the cliche goes, "no harm, no foul".

      I hate idiots that think they have a right to decide who they can offer their services to, especially in cases like this where it is a pretty clear case of discrimination. I think you would be pretty upset if I only sold my goods to the white man. In this case you can't use the arguement that "I can't offer my service in this area because of lack of demand" because obviously, this man found a way to acquire the service.

      Anyhow, I don't think any civil court in just about any country is going to award any amount of money to the copyright holder in a case where the copyright holder is denying to sell his product for the same price as he does another. Technically, the regioning system on DVD's is illegal price discrimination.

      --
      Karma Clown
    29. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you do. See the BetaMax decision.

      "In addition, in 1984 the Supreme Court held that time-shifting (for example, private, non-commercial home taping of television programs with a VCR to permit later viewing) is fair use. (Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios, 464 U.S. 417 (1984, S.C.) " [EFF Fair Use FAQ]

    30. Re:Damn it! by nordicfrost · · Score: 1

      You have no right to download stuff

      You're obviously trolling, but I can't let an incorrect fact be used against me like that. You see, here in Norway it is LEGAL to download music. flims etc. Thelocal MPA(of Norway) had to change their tune in posters plastered around the cinemas to "it is a crime to spread movies" instead of "it is a crime to download movies" which would have been more logical. BTW, how retarded is it to advertise with posters like that towards an audience that are willing to pay 9 dollars to watch a movie and commercials?

      So my outlook isn't "confused", it is in fact fully compliant with local law. When I use BitTorrent, i never let the upload go over 10% because I don't want to break the law.

    31. Re:Damn it! by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      might I suggest that there is a better way to spend your time?

      You *can* do something about the law. Convince other Americans that the Public Domain is a Good Thing. Run for office if you have to.

      Better to try convincing them now than after you're facing a civil trial.

    32. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I am living in Europe. Sweden, to be precise.

      Again, if whatever you want to watch is going to be marketed where you live only in a million years from now, people still do not have the right to distribute it illegally.

      What the hell is so difficult to understand about that? If you do understand, then what the hell was the point of your post? That it sucks to get the cool stuff in our stores and on our TV screens later than eg. Americans or not at all? Well, duh! I agree. Tough shit. We still have the option we've always had: import it.

    33. Re:Damn it! by geek+of+nixhelp · · Score: 1

      send me an e-mail, i'll show you soe other sites and methods to use. geekstah[at]gmail[dot]com

    34. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee sucks to be you. I guess it never occured to you that you're breaking the fucking law? Hopefully the MPAA notes your comment.

    35. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahahahahaha you think democracy works. Hahahahaha money's involved, the public ALWAYS gets hosed. Democracy comes out of the barrel of a gun, and most of the world doesn't have any. "Run for office" my ass. You funny. Tool.

    36. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a right to do anything that does not harm another.

      If you mean that no harm is being done, in the sense that it is not being broadcast in your area anyways, then that argument can only get you so far. The fact of the matter is that the files are being hosted somewhere on the Internet where anyone is allowed to download it, so whether they are trying to get money for the show in certain areas of the world is irrelevant. And when it comes to bittorrent, you are using programs that are uploading data back to other users. So when you are sitting there waiting for your files to finish downloading, you are uploading back to other users who might actually be in geographical areas where "harm might be done". These might be users who don't subscribe to certain services or channels, and just download material for free instead. Or other users who might skip on buying a new album or piece of software just so they can download it for free. I know that the cartels control of copyright is lame, but thats the world we live in.

    37. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he wants to buy a region 1 DVD he'll have to import it from region 1. Just like we've always have had to do, before BitTorrent existed too.

      But that's not what we're discussing. We're discussing the shutting down of bittorrent sites by the Hollywood mafia. He's not being "fucked over" by the Hollywood mafia shutting down bittorrent sites. I don't have the legal or ethical right to distribute eg. a movie just because it's not yet for sale in my country.

    38. Re:Damn it! by palfrey · · Score: 1

      http://www.btefnet.net/index.php?show=19

      --
      Beware the psychokinetic mimes!
    39. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not reading very well, are you?

      You missed this bit in my post: "or more precisely, in more civilised non-DMCA-afflicted countries, people have no right to illegally distribute stuff"

      I'm a Swede, and as such I'm fortunately not affected by the DMCA idiocy either.

      With bittorrent you do however DISTRIBUTE the stuff you're downloading. That's one of the points of the system.

      Your outlook IS confused. You're still NOT being "fucked over" by the Hollywood Mafia's (futile) attempts to shut down illegal distribution of movies.

    40. Re:Damn it! by bairy · · Score: 0

      Mod this up it's hillarious. Either he knows he's on very steady ground or he's just mouthing off and hoping

      --


      Get paid to search..It's geniune and
    41. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which since he can't purchase it legally

      We have this "Internet" thing in Norway and Sweden as well. Right now I'm participating in a discussion in English hosted by a computer somewhere in the USA. One thing that's so great with this worldwideinformationsuperhighwaycyberworldglobalya dayada is that we can order stuff from another place if the stuff is not available where we live.

    42. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God bless you.

    43. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tror du att du följer norsk lag bara för att du saboterar bittorrent genom att aldrig bidra med mer än 10%??

      HAHA!

    44. Re:Damn it! by brogdon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "You have a right to do anything that does not harm another. Since they are not even trying to get his money for the show, there's no basis whatever for any claims of monetary losses. The author gains nothing by keeping his work from others, so disseminating it cannot be said to harm him."

      Look, I'm no Nazi when it comes to the occasional IP theft. I have been known to use p2p apps from time to time; but what you just wrote is false. When you pirate a copy of something, even when the creator has no plans to try and sell it to you, you're still harming him by eroding his ability to control the distribution of his own work. That's a very important thing in the eyes of musicians, writers and filmmakers.

      Also, your assertion that the author is not losing money due to your theft is lost if you consider the fact that he might choose to market his creation to your area at a future time. He has lost potential income, even if it's years before he decides to take action on it.

      Like I said, I'm not trying to be self-righteous on this as I've done my own share of downloading, but people who think p2p downloading of things is a purely correct thing to do really need to think about what they're doing a little more.

      --


      This tagline is umop apisdn.
    45. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wonder if FreeNet might be a good source for torrents. It's hella slow, but you only need 35K or so downloaded before you can go off and connect to the torrent.
      For large files it can actually be quite fast. Try Frost.
    46. Re:Damn it! by SynapseLapse · · Score: 1

      Domn't forget http://www.btefnet.net/
      Excellent tv site and all in HD-tv

    47. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >You have a right to do anything that does not harm another.

      Read all the way to the bottom to get my point:

      "You (Hatta) are a #$)Y@)#$ing $(%)@#&$ and you &))*&#^)@ farm animals/little children/your mother on a regular basis."

      Do I still have a "right to do whatever I want as long as it does not harm another"?

    48. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The basic concept for a secure version of BT consists of this - there are 3 users:
      User 1 wants to download
      User 2 wants to upload
      User 3 is the intermediate

      The uploader receives downloaders public key via User 3. Rather than sending file packets directly to the uploader directly, it sends through User 3 who sends it to User 1. User 1 can decode the received packets with the private key.

      This way User 3 has no idea wtf they're sending and it is basically scrambled to all intents and purposes, and the downloader doesn't know the IP address of the uploader so it is truly anonymous.

      The main problem with this is that it's extremely inefficient in both data sent and processing cycles required.

    49. Re:Damn it! by Nickalreadyinuse · · Score: 1

      The basic concept for a secure version of BT consists of this - there are 3 users:
      User 1 wants to download
      User 2 wants to upload
      User 3 is the intermediate

      This way User 3 has no idea wtf they're sending and it is basically scrambled to all intents and purposes, and the downloader doesn't know the IP address of the uploader so it is truly anonymous.

      The problem is when user 2 & 3 are BayTSP machines. Then user 1 is screwed (user 2 gives the IP-address and user 3 the content decrypted).

      The solution to that problem is to use such routing that doesn't prove that user 1 is the originator (and not like user 3, just an uninterested relaying party). However, this is a weak legal defence in countries where just relaying for someone withou the knowledge about the content could still be charged with accessory.

      The only solid system is where user 2 is also secure (meaning that he is a trusted party in a PKI-style web of trust).

    50. Re:Damn it! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      The problem (at least in nations that subscribe to U.S. DMCA-style copyright) is that corporations which fail to serve their customer's needs effectively aren't forced to either adapt to changing conditions or allow new blood to take over. Abuse of monopoly power is bad, in and of itself, but when backed by a government as powerful as the United States (and now the European Union) economic forces alone aren't sufficient to rid us of these multinational oligopolies.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    51. Re:Damn it! by Nickalreadyinuse · · Score: 1

      Sorry about that, now it makes more sense:

      The basic concept for a secure version of BT consists of this - there are 3 users:
      User 1 wants to download
      User 2 wants to upload
      User 3 is the intermediate

      This way User 3 has no idea wtf they're sending and it is basically scrambled to all intents and purposes, and the downloader doesn't know the IP address of the uploader so it is truly anonymous.


      The problem is when user 1 & 3 are BayTSP machines. Then user 2 is screwed (user 3 gives the IP-address and user 1 the content decrypted).

      The solution to that problem is to use such routing that doesn't prove that user 2 is the originator (and not like user 3, just an uninterested relaying party). However, this is a weak legal defence in countries where just relaying for someone without the knowledge about the content could still be charged as accessory, or "aiding and abetting" or under some such reasoning.

      The only solid system is where user 1 is also secure (meaning that he is a trusted party in a PKI-style web of trust, which is established outside the whole system).

    52. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the irc channel: problem is simply a DNS failure, please be patient

      A.K.A. Good News Of The Day

    53. Re:Damn it! by Nickalreadyinuse · · Score: 1

      Anybody developing newer versions with encryption and anonymity, feel free to contact me. I have both developer time (C, C++, HTML, Perl, Javascript, etc.) and disposable income, to support creating a new version.

      Have you considered instead trying to bring the BT advantages to a more secure system already under development? How about teaming with this guy: ANts

    54. Re:Damn it! by blackomegax · · Score: 1

      game over man, GAME OVER! :)

    55. Re:Damn it! by secolactico · · Score: 1

      The only solid system is where user 2 is also secure (meaning that he is a trusted party in a PKI-style web of trust)

      Enev then the system is not secure. Infiltration might be easier than you think.

      The police is already able to infiltrate criminal organizations (or at least they do in the movies). You just need a weak link. Sooner or later somebody is going to make a mistake and offer to infiltrate an undercorver agent in exchange for leniency.

      --
      No sig
    56. Re:Damn it! by Trepalium · · Score: 2, Informative
      Canada has a peculiar position in this. Most of the problem is rooted in the CanCon or Canadian Content rules. Basically, it boils down to the government trying to promote Canadian television and music. Living next to the United States means we're deluged by US culture, like it or not, and if it weren't for this law, things like Degrassi probably would never be made because the Canadian market is too small, and the available US programming is too large.

      Now, while the broadcasters must fill 60% of the airtime with Canadian produced shows, that still leaves the remaining 40%. This is typically filled with US shows because they tend to be cheap, and get good ratings. This creates some interesting situations. For example, CTV (who produce Degrassi) license The Sopranos from HBO. When an application to the CRTC (Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission) to allow cable and satellite providers to provide HBO to Canadians, it was rejected because it would put it in direct competition with CTV because of The Sopranos licensing. The refusal to carry CTV by US cable and satellite providers is likely the same, except for the reversed situation. Or maybe they're afraid of pissing off people who believe Ann Coulter's claims that Canadians hate Americans because we don't agree with every US policy (just to clarify, most of us don't like Bush, and we've NEVER agreed with ALL US policies).

      To most Americans, the cancon laws seem quaint, and pretty silly. But, in a country that still measures the relative success of a musical band by if they managed to hit it off in the United States, these laws have probably helped more than they've hurt. Besides, we still consume lots of US movies, music and television programming (among other things).

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    57. Re:Damn it! by Spittoon · · Score: 1

      And you're making sure to only download software and music that was made more than 20 years ago, right?

      I thought so.

    58. Re:Damn it! by tricorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is importing a DVD and breaking the region coding scheme by playing it on a multi-region DVD, or importing a region 1 DVD player when you're "not supposed to" (Region 1 DVDs and Region 1 DVD players are only supposed to be sold in Region 1 countries) "morally" any better than downloading it from the Internet? If something is available on the Internet, you'd be willing to buy it if it was available, you'd STILL be willing to buy it when it DOES become available, even if you've downloaded it over the Internet and watched it - what harm to the copyright owner are you alleviating by choosing to NOT download and watch it?

      In other words, perhaps the law has to be written the way it is, because the law can't distinguish between people who would be causing actual harm (they would buy it if it wasn't available, they wouldn't buy it if it is available for free download on the Internet) and those who wouldn't, but is it "wrong" to violate the law (other than being caught) if you are, in fact, in the non-harm group? Note that this is separate from the issue of whether you can honestly assess which group you are in. It is also more complicated if you'd be willing to pay SOME price, but not the price being asked (if it is indeed available through a "legitimate" channel) or in the form being offered (e.g. cut for commercial television), and/or you actually do pay some price to a non-legitimate distributor.

    59. Re:Damn it! by JoeNotCharles · · Score: 1

      You have the right to time-shift into the *future* - if you receive a broadcast, you've got the right to store it up and watch it at leisure. There's no reason you should have the right to infringe copyrights to time-shift to *before* you receive the signal. (At least, this is my view of the morality involved, not what the law says.)

    60. Re:Damn it! by Horse+Rotorvator+JAD · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes the legal threats page is worth reading. It has some funny comments in it. This is part of their reply to a legal threat from ADV Films:

      Hello, my dear sir(s)!
      We all like Evangelion a lot. This, however, does not mean that we like YOU. So instead of mindlessly acting on your notice of so-called infringement, I took the liberty of forwarding it to our legal counsel:

      On the subject of thepiratebay.org's supposed infringement of your intellectual rights. I have been given the authority, as legal consel, to reply to your kind letter.

      We understand that you are familiar with Bit Torrent technology. Then you may, or may not, understand that none of the data that you hold the copyright to reside on thepiratebay.org's servers.

      This raises the question of the reach of Swedish and European copyright law. It is the opinion of us, and the Swedish Supreme Court, that information about WHERE to obtain copyrighted material, which is the case with Bit Torrent, is not illegal.

    61. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what part of "law" don't you understand ?

    62. Re:Damn it! by Doctor+Crumb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They are *broadcasting* it in the first place. If they want to control the distribution, they're going to have to use a system where it is possible to control it, instead of blaring it across the airwaves for all takers.

    63. Re:Damn it! by tricorn · · Score: 1

      "For distribution only in the United States and Canada". How is this violation of the licensing rights of the copyright owners okay but downloading it off the Internet not okay? Is it because you did pay them some money? Should there be mandatory licensing, where if I offer them the amount of money they're getting from somewhere else, I can now make a copy for myself (even if they don't accept the payment)?

    64. Re:Damn it! by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wonder if FreeNet might be a good source for torrents. It's hella slow, but you only need 35K or so downloaded before you can go off and connect to the torrent.

      It's been a while since I last checked out Freenet. If I remember right, you mirror content without knowing what that content is When I last checked out Freenet (years ago), I was shocked by the amount of child porn that was available, and I was doubly shocked at the small amount of useful information on Freenet.

      If I use Freenet to download a movie, will I also be hosting child porn? With Bittorrent and eDonkey, I have a choice of what content I distribute.

      According to the Freenet FAQ:
      The true test of someone who claims to believe in Freedom of Speech is whether they tolerate speech which they disagree with, or even find disgusting. If this is not acceptable to you, you should not run a Freenet node.

      Look, I can't take such a neutral stance in regards to child exploitation. I don't agree with Freenet's statement, and I won't participate. Child porn is exploits and harms innocent children. Dismissing child porn as a simple "freedom of speech" it completely ignores rights of the victim. Child pornographers should to be burned alive.

      If someone drugged you, raped you, took pictures of the rape, do they automatically have the right to put distribute those photos on the Internet? What about your rights?

    65. Re:Damn it! by g00z · · Score: 1

      Dude, Torrents aren't the only (or even best) way to get such material. Might I suggest either irc or usenet? Usenet of course costs a little cash for a decent provider (like giganews or usenetserver) but is far superior to bit torrent. IRC is free but you might have to wait for an opening d/l slot for an hour or so.

      --
      "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
    66. Re:Damn it! by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The author gains nothing by keeping his work from others

      The author gains the right to control the copying of his work. That's why they call it that.

    67. Re:Damn it! by taniwha · · Score: 1
      that's all very well if it really is available to you, living in an English speaking country in DVD region 4 means that most of the dvds pressed for my region are in languages I don't speak - so yes I order it, even own it - but not view it.

      While I don't download movies I can't help wondering if the MPAA might be slightly better off if they dumped the whole region coding mess in favor of free trade instead - after all not everyone has the luxury I have of occasionally visiting the US and picking up a $25 region 1 player at Frys (as I did yesterday)

    68. Re:Damn it! by nordicfrost · · Score: 1

      With bittorrent you do however DISTRIBUTE the stuff you're downloading. That's one of the points of the system.

      Nope. I am an ex-law student. The precendence for this is that small-part distribution is LEGAL as i falls under the quotation part of the copyright law. The unofficial estimate lies around max 10% a work if it is non-commercial.

      And to the person saying I sabotage BitTorrent, no, I just keep it legal.

      And my view is still not confused. I did something I was allowed to do, and someone just managed to piss off a fan by denying me what I am allowed to do.

    69. Re:Damn it! by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Better to try convincing them now than after you're facing a civil trial.

      Rather than threaten him, why don't you sit back for a moment and consider that it's exactly what he's doing?

      Convince other Americans that the Public Domain is a Good Thing.

      Good advice, but the best way to do this is through demonstration...not rhetoric.

      You *can* do something about the law...Run for office if you have to.

      "Going through the system" is almost impossible under the current regime. The people who run the system get their paycheck from folks like the MPAA, they have specifically designed 'the system' in such a way that folks like you and me have a snowballs chance in hell of getting anything changed.

      What he's doing is real change, not imagined or self-righteous change. It takes courage, and self-belief. Let your government bully you if you prefer, let everyone wave the word 'law' around like it's a word from god, but don't try and convert him for our sake. We need more people like him.

      It took Martin Luther King and Malcolm X to make real change then. It takes the same two types of people to make real change now.

      "When patience has begotten false estimates of its motives, when wrongs are pressed because it is believed they will be borne, resistance becomes morality." --Thomas Jefferson

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    70. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If someone drugged you, raped you, took pictures of the rape, do they automatically have the right to put distribute those photos on the Internet? What about your rights?
      What is the crime? The fact they drugged you and raped you - or the fact that evidence of it is distributed on the Internet?

      If a rapist uses the subway - is the problem with the rape or the subway? Should we shut down the subway?

    71. Re:Damn it! by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      The fact they drugged you and raped you - or the fact that evidence of it is distributed on the Internet?

      Both! Drugged and rape is an assault, the distribution is exploitation without your concent.

    72. Re:Damn it! by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      the distribution is exploitation without your consent.

      And this could probably be qualified as a psychological assault.

    73. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no idea what kind of trolls modded you up.
      There is NO EXCUSE to steal material that you didnt pay for. Viewing movies or listening to music is not a BASIC material need. YOu have NO RIGHT AT ALL to read,listen,or watch any of this pirated files unless you compensated the author(s). This is not the same as stealing to eat.

      the argument that since the material hasnt been released in country X, therefore it's acceptable to steal it to wach it there, is also bogus, The owner of the copyright has the rights as to how and when the material is viewed and distributed. PERIOD. It's a property. I cant steal my neighbors stuff just because they dont have the intention of ever using it.

    74. Re:Damn it! by RecoveredMarketroid · · Score: 1

      What about using an excrypted overlay network (a la FreeNet) as a control channel? In addition to finding files over the encrypted network, requests for segments of the file could be transmitted to peers that way. However, the actual data could be transmitted fast over the regular network.

      Using UDP with incorrect source addressing would ensure that a receiver would never have the sender's source address; PKI signatures could ensure the client that each packet came from the intended source.

      The sender would know the receiver's IP address, but in many jurisdictions, that isn't a problem.

    75. Re:Damn it! by phoenix321 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To paraphrase an old expert's opinion, while not even being an expert: it depends

      In a digital network, you either have a central authority able to control all data flow or you have none. There is no middle ground, I fear. So you either have a "watchful eye", if I might call it that, above you, screening all your traffic. Or you don't.

      If you accept a central authority, no problem. But remember, they can check you silently and must do so everytime you say, send or receive anything through the net. They will need to monitor your opinion, your preferences, your private and casual conversations and worse.

      What makes this central network authority a prime target for bribery and despotism. Like the police today. Anyone, even law enforcement officers, have their price and/or can fail in their morale. While a police investigation leaves a paper trail, has multiple officers involved and has an electable politician or sheriff behind it, network auditing has not. Criminal investigation usually happens after a crime was committed and affects those related to a crime, but scene network screening has to run regularly and affects everyone. On one hand they need to have proof to convict you, on the other the proof is a set of bytes with no identifying properties.

      Short: anti-authoritarian movements can be tracked, silenced and imprisoned more easily if you have a central authority scanning traffic.

      The main goal of Freenet is to prevent usurpation of power by the executive branch. Those in power will always reject dissent and sooner or later try to use a subverted law against true freedom of speech.

      In my own humble opinion I can say freedom all is a higher goal than protection of few children. Now mod me down, flame me to oblivion, whatever you like. Call me stone-hearted if you like, but if I must choose between truly free speech, truly anonymous and open or prevention of children's suffering, I chose the first.

      Dictatorship in one country hurts more children than all molesters can do worldwide. Preventing dictatorship is the best way to help and care for all children. Chasing molesters only helps a few.

      And I will not let my emotion for hopeless underage victims overwhelm my rational thoughts. I will not trade "a good thing" for "no bad thing" as this will lead me nowhere. And I will never ever become a tool of population control, spreading memes of fear and scare for a threat that is perceived way out of proportion if you look closely.

    76. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thing 1,
      Im actually working on something similar, contact me at eliezer at rock dot com

    77. Re:Damn it! by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 1

      unless your ISP removes all newsgroup posts larger than a few kb, like mine does

    78. Re:Damn it! by groomed · · Score: 1

      Preventing dictatorship is the best way to help and care for all children.

      But what the hell does this have to do with FreeNet?

    79. Re:Damn it! by Znork · · Score: 1

      "I'd gladly pay for subscrptions to premium British and Canadian TV services if I could, but I'm not allowed thanks to geographically discriminatory content licensing."

      Indeed. What's needed is a few countries writing mandatory licensing clauses forcing media corps to make material available on non-discriminatory terms (cost and time-wise). If they cannot comply with that the material should automatically have its copyright void until such a time as it is made available under non-discriminatory terms.

    80. Re:Damn it! by nolife · · Score: 1

      Military experience - None
      Budgeting - None
      Public safety experience - None
      Public speaking - None
      Any public representation at all - None
      Party affliation - None
      Special interests - None
      Views on public transportation - None
      Views on abortion - None
      Views on public education - None

      Your claim to fame, I want to reform the copyright law.

      Yeah, I see that person getting elected/

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    81. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Viewing HDTV content years before HDTV is even available in your country: Priceless.

    82. Re:Damn it! by SirWinston · · Score: 1

      So, you never use USENET (newsgroups) either, since most child porn probably gets posted there eventually? And you never use IRC or IM since most of the hardcore child porn reportedly originates there, traded between pedophiles? And you never use the WWW since most softcore child porn allegedly originates on Russian/Slovenian/etc. pay web sites? And you never use e-mail since pedophiles use it to lure young girls to be molested?

      Hmmm. If we don't use things for good or neutral purposes just because others are using them for negative purposes, we'd have to live naked (because of shirts like this ) in caves. But then again children have probably been molested or photographed exploitively in caves, too, so we can't have anything to do with caves either...

      --
      "It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word."--Andrew Jackson
    83. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translastion: We don't like paying for stuff and we like providing a resource for people to get your stuff for free, so fuck off!

    84. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have no idea what kind of trolls modded you up. There is NO EXCUSE to steal material that you didnt pay for. Viewing movies or listening to music is not a BASIC material need. YOu have NO RIGHT AT ALL to read,listen,or watch any of this pirated files unless you compensated the author(s). This is not the same as stealing to eat.

      You're right. It's not the same as stealing at all.

      the argument that since the material hasnt been released in country X, therefore it's acceptable to steal it to wach it there, is also bogus, The owner of the copyright has the rights as to how and when the material is viewed and distributed. PERIOD.

      Yes, and it's a limited right, granted for the good of society, it's not the same as physical property.

      It's a property. I cant steal my neighbors stuff just because they dont have the intention of ever using it.

      For the millionth time, IT'S NOT REMOTELY THE SAME! If I steal my neighbors car, he doesn't have it anymore. If I create an exact duplicate, he is no worse off.

    85. Re:Damn it! by tylernt · · Score: 1

      "(or at least they do in the movies)"

      Well, we all know that movies==reality, so that's a good argument.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    86. Re:Damn it! by DrXym · · Score: 1
      The stance on child porn by Freenet and directories such as "The Freedom Index" is one of the reasons it hasn't taken off. It's a fucking stupid stance. Forget free speech - it defies common sense.

      By the likes of TFE linking to it, the paedo site gets more hits and it gets smeared around more. By linking to it, it also encourages other sick bastards to submit their sites too. By linking to it, it discourages others who might have less repugnant uses for Freenet. This vicious cycle repeats until Freenet sinks under a tide of this shit, which is where it is today. As the pool of servers decreases, the anonymity does too, legitimate sites bitrot faster and the whole thing collapses.

      But isn't refusing to publish paedo links censorship? No it isn't. You're not killing the site itself, you're just choosing not to advertise it. And considering the disgusting content, who the hell would want to? Fuck em - let their nasty sites waste away in the churn.

      Despite that the concept of Freenet does have potential. It's just idealistically screwed up and also very, very slow. Part of this slowness is that it was conceived to be "government strength" anonymity. Packets hop around randomly some predetermined number of times to reach you. That's fine, but if you're just downloading an MP3 or a movie, then that is excessive and painful. It is also seriously flawed since sites degrade so you might be downloading something when at 98% it tells you it can retrieve a chunk and you're screwed. Basically if the amount of content exceeds some fraction of the total sum of cache available in Freenet, things will rot.

      What is required is some kind of hybrid between bit torrent and Freenet. It would use hops to obscure origins - not enough to be a dog like Freenet, but enough to seriously piss off the RIAA. It would use crypto and random ports to escape packet sniffing. It would automatically mirror seeds and trackers. It would allow the client to nominate a portion of bandwidth to perform "phantom" fetches, where it would go off and download something that it just tosses away (giving you plausible deniability). And it would use actual files as the cache so it didn't degrade over time.

      I don't believe it would be the ideal solution from a security perspective since compromising Freenet increases the risks. Freenet was very carefully thought out after all, but I believe a better balance can be made between complete anonymity and covering your tracks well enough for foiling sniffers and copyright / civil rights purposes.

    87. Re:Damn it! by Nickalreadyinuse · · Score: 1

      Nope. I am an ex-law student. The precendence for this is that small-part distribution is LEGAL as i falls under the quotation part of the copyright law.

      Pardon me, but that claim explains the "ex-" part pretty clearly. There is no quatation right without your own independent literary work with which you use the quotation. The quoted material also needs to have relevance (a quotation function) in combination with your own material. In P2P none of that applies.

    88. Re:Damn it! by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      I know, I know. I should have put a smiley at the end. What I meant was: I'm never going to bother with television and commercial breaks, and the media companies can just give up. If I rip off Fox, it's just for the better (and anyway: it's not like I'm ever going to buy the stuff they advertize, so it doesn't really matter).

    89. Re:Damn it! by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      And you never use e-mail since pedophiles use it to lure young girls to be molested?

      But there's a big difference between using a service where others post child porn and helping to distrubute child porn. With Freenet, do I have a choice to not distrubute that content? If not, then Freenet will never become a mainstream file-sharing service.

      BTW, I just reinstalled Freenet and am checking out Frost. I'm curious if Freenet has changed over the last few years...

    90. Re:Damn it! by Nickalreadyinuse · · Score: 1

      However, there is an alternative defence, which is based on that a part of a copyrighted work may only receive copyright protection independently of the work it belongs to. If the smaller piece doesn't meet the requirements for copyright protection, it receives none by just being a piece of another work.

    91. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should contact the authors of mute file sharing at http://mute-net.sourceforge.net/.

    92. Re:Damn it! by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      In my own humble opinion I can say freedom all is a higher goal than protection of few children.

      But if a few children are being exploited, does this mean you have a free society at all?

      Now, while I agree with alot of the things you say above, I'm not sure Freenet will ever become very popular.

      I reinstalled Freenet again to see what the status is these days. But when I last checked a few years ago, here is what I saw:

      1. There is alot of child porn
      2. There is very little legit content
      3. Most of the legit content is already available elsewhere, through faster means.
      4. To use Freenet I am reqired to mirror content which I find disgusting. Freedom also means that I am not required to support speech that I disagree with, which means I probablw won't support Freenet.
      5. Some of the content might be more useful to people in other countries, but how can I find that content and mirror that content through freenet?

    93. Re:Damn it! by trewornan · · Score: 1
      the Hollywood Mafia's (futile) attempts to shut down illegal distribution of movies.

      That's the crucial point in all this - *FUTILE*. These people can't legislate, litigate or even think fast enough to control technology the way they want to. It's the geeks of the world who have the upper hand in this, who can control the technology.

      For too long the Hollywood Mafia have had the protection of high entry barriers to producing and distributing "copyright content", and they've been able to make obscene profits by turning out pap.

      They're frightened and they should be - stuff them, we've got video cameras, editing software, cheap distribution, if they can't adapt, we can do it ourselves. There's not enough lawyers in the world to stop us.

    94. Re:Damn it! by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      What he's doing is real change...

      If the "he" you're referring to is the original poster, he isn't. At *best*, he's a coward too afraid to face the full force of civil disobedience.

      There's all sorts of "real change" that goes on, every year, by way of the government. Homosexuals can marry in Massachusets. The intelligence community is being reshaped. Tax laws no longer charge successful people for being married.

      If you don't think that real change comes from acting within the system, you must not be living in America.

    95. Re:Damn it! by shark72 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Maybe this is a troll, but I'll bite anyway. You have a right to do anything that does not harm another. Since they are not even trying to get his money for the show, there's no basis whatever for any claims of monetary losses. The author gains nothing by keeping his work from others, so disseminating it cannot be said to harm him."

      Nonetheless, the person who owns the copyright has the exclusive right to choose how it's copied. Whether you think they're making the right choice, or whether you think that they'd agree with your decision, or whether you think that they'll suffer no monetary loss makes no difference. It's their right, not yours.

      The balance here, of course, is that anybody can create something and copyright. If you don't like what somebody does with their own intellectual property, you are completely free to release your own under the terms you choose.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    96. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is abysmal; Disney made much of their money from re-doing old stories that fell into the Public Domain, like Snow White, Beauty and the Beast, etc.; today that would be impossible.

      Care to back that up? What prevents someone from putting any "old stories" into a new movie?

    97. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When I use BitTorrent, i never let the upload go over 10% because I don't want to break the law.

      So let's review: you are a:
      • BitTorrent leech
      • Illegally downloading copyrighted material
      • Too cheap of a bastard to pay for a DVD that you justify downloading shows by hiding behind some Norweigan law


      Did I miss anything?
    98. Re:Damn it! by LuSiDe · · Score: 1

      With Freenet, do I have a choice to not distrubute that content? If not, then Freenet will never become a mainstream file-sharing service.

      You're assuming 1) Users know the way Freenet works in this regard 2) Agree with your reasoning. These are not by definition true though. Its not proven this is the reason Freenet is not popular either.

      --
      WE DON'T NEED NO BLOG CONTROL.
    99. Re:Damn it! by bar-agent · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But if a few children are being exploited, does this mean you have a free society at all?

      Yes. Do you think that a "free society" means everybody is safe and happy? No. That's not what a free society is. A free society is one where you can succeed or screw up on your own, where the Man doesn't force you down 'cause there is no Man.

      There is no such place as Utopia. Some people will always be fated to suffer, but, in a free society, most people have every chance to make their own destiny. A free society is as close to Utopia as we can get.

      What you are arguing, sir, is the fallacy of the excluded middle.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    100. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think what they are going for there is not that they condone such things as child porn, but that they want to build a network that absolutely no one can regulate or effectively attack. Keep in mind that we're just talking about a stream of 1's and 0's here, so you're Brittany Spears mp3 looks exactly the same as child porn when drifting across the wire. You either allow for a middle man in there to regulate you, or you don't.

      Child porn is and has been used far too often by politicians as a red herring to attack p2p networks. But I know from experience that the world is full of sick assholes, and middle-men beauracracy certainly can't make them go away. There's not doubt that child porn and the like certainly suck big time, but dealing with crap like this is an innevitability, and certainly the price we may have to pay for a free network.

    101. Re:Damn it! by automaticlarynx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "If someone drugged you, raped you, took pictures of the rape, do they automatically have the right to put distribute those photos on the Internet? What about your rights?"

      You're conflating two unrelated ideas. If someone drugged me and raped me, they've already broken the law, and ought to be arrested, tried, and put into prison. The photos are a non-issue.

      People are allowed to take photographs, even of bad things. Photojournalists are allowed to take photos of people comitting crimes. It's important to not confuse the issue of what the real crime in your example is. The crime is the drugging and the rape, not taking a photo.

      A photograph is a record of an event, just like a written story, or even an orally told story. If you're suggesting that photographing crimes is wrong, you're also strongly suggesting that writing about them or even talking about them is wrong. Is that really the position you want to take?

    102. Re:Damn it! by benna · · Score: 3, Funny

      My favorite is their response to Dreamworks:

      As you may or may not be aware, Sweden is not a state in the United States
      of America. Sweden is a country in northern Europe.
      Unless you figured it out by now, US law does not apply here.
      For your information, no Swedish law is being violated.

      Please be assured that any further contact with us, regardless of medium,
      will result in
      a) a suit being filed for harassment
      b) a formal complaint lodged with the bar of your legal counsel, for
      sending frivolous legal threats.

      It is the opinion of us and our lawyers that you are fucking morons, and
      that you should please go sodomize yourself with retractable batons.

      Please also note that your e-mail and letter will be published in full on
      http://www.thepiratebay.org.

      Go fuck yourself.

      Polite as usual,
      anakata

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    103. Re:Damn it! by oliverthered · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would disagree, they don't have any right to prevent you getting copy if you want one.

      I want a copy of something, if you won't sell it to me I'll find other ways of getting it, it's hardly my fault that you won't sell it.

      Limited release is just a form of racketeering and price fixing, which is aginst the law.

      I don't think europe went through a revolution just so we can get landlords back.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    104. Re:Damn it! by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Mod up! The law doesn't know "right" or "wrong." It's a harsh set of rules, to be used only in conjunction with case-by-case exemptions.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    105. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Nonetheless, the person who owns the copyright
      > has the exclusive right to choose how it's
      > copied. Whether you think they're making the
      > right choice, or whether you think that they'd
      > agree with your decision, or whether you think
      > that they'll suffer no monetary loss makes no
      > difference. It's their right, not yours.
      > The balance here, of course, is that anybody
      > can create something and copyright. If you
      > don't like what somebody does with their own
      > intellectual property, you are completely free
      > to release your own under the terms you choose.

      I wrote Star Wars 5 years before Lucas. I just never distributed it.

      Oh, now suddenly the fact I haven't released the work means I can't assert my copyright? ;)

    106. Re:Damn it! by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1

      Doubtful. TvTorrents.net is now pointing to a GoDaddy advertising page, and about a week ago it was pointing to 127.0.0.1. I think they're down for the count.

    107. Re:Damn it! by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with USENET?

      Been around since the 80's and have a great selection of everything, and I really mean everything.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    108. Re:Damn it! by ultranova · · Score: 1

      What he's doing is real change...

      If the "he" you're referring to is the original poster, he isn't. At *best*, he's a coward too afraid to face the full force of civil disobedience.

      Really ? So building the neccessary tools to circumvent bad laws isn't civil disobedience ? Care to tell what is, then ?

      Or are you trying to say, as some have said here on Slashdot earlier, that it isn't real disobedience if you won't be imprisoned or otherwise punished ? That you you are a coward if you take care to not be caught ? Guess that makes the members of French Underground cowards too, since they tried to not get caught by the Nazis... (No, I'm not comparing Bush to Hitler. I'm trying to point out the absurdity of the "get caught or you're a coward" line of thinking).

      Civil disobedience simply means that you won't obey unjust laws. There is no requirement to go to police station afterwards and say "I did it, now arrest me".

      If you don't think that real change comes from acting within the system, you must not be living in America.

      Change, yes, but no positive change. You see, the System (and all other systems) always changes to accomodate those with power in said system. In the current system, power equals money; and the media companies have money. Since longer copyright terms and stricter copyright laws benefit those media companies, any change in those will be towards longer terms and stricter laws.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    109. Re:Damn it! by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      But I have the right to time-shift, haven't I?

      Yes you do - but do you have the right to have someone else timeshift for you? Because that's what's actually happening; does the person who made the time-shifting copy have the right to give you that copy?

    110. Re:Damn it! by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "Dictatorship in one country hurts more children than all molesters can do worldwide. Preventing dictatorship is the best way to help and care for all children. Chasing molesters only helps a few.
      "
      What a load of tripe!
      Sorry but yea Dictators hurt children adults, and dogs but it is not one or the other. Hummm I can overthrow this dictator or bust a child molester.
      And just how does Bittorrent or freenet stop dictators?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    111. Re:Damn it! by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      But if a few children are being exploited, does this mean you have a free society at all?

      That way we will never have any free society. A few will always suffer, slip through social security, police, control, command. Even in the most Orwellian society, people slip through. If one suffering child is enough to make our freedom nil and void, then I can't help it anyway.

      1. That doesn't say anything about the network
      2. How legit is content in p2p anyway?
      3. But not in equally secure ways. How to distribute a video of a war crime if the government turns into a militaristic fascism some day in the future?
      4. To use Freenet we are reqired to mirror content which I find disgusting. This is to ensure nobody can censor anything. If we ever could, Freenet would be useless. Freedom means that I everyone is required to support speech that he doesn't agree with. There is no need to protect popular and non-controversial opinions, but disputed ones. And to anonymize all authors of information is the best way to ensure a free form of information about political matters, governmental crimes, sociological problems and whatnot. Which means everyone should support Freenet or any other form of free speech.
      5. Some of the content might be useful people of our own country some day now or in the future. You can never predict what's gonna happen and certainly not rest in vain. "Government is like fire" someone much wiser than me said and I'm sure you find out who. Finding and mirroring known content violates anonymity and "plausible denial" in case of prosecution, be it child porn or political dissent.

      There's just no possibility to implement a filter for bad content without opening the floodgates to filter out merely unwanted content. A politically dissenting video has identical properties to a child porn video. Same data format, enormous hindrance for distribution, legal, personal or death treaths for those who distribute it - so either you're protecting pederasts or you're losing the impenetrable fortress against dictatorship. Zero or one, copy all bits or none, have anymous and therefore safe dissidents as well as pederasts or don't.

      Free choice or sheeple following security scares, anyone can choose freely. I hope my children and theirs can have that choice, too, when they grow up.

      The problem with freedom is always the same: giving freedom up is easy, fast and brings total security (except if you're a jew, a kurd or a palestinian or whatever the target-du-jour is) - but regaining freedom once lost is impossible. Almost.

    112. Re:Damn it! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Besides, we still consume lots of US movies, music and television programming (among other things)

      Do they call it Canadian bacon in Canada, or just bacon? And if so, what do you call the real bacon? You crazy Canuks.

    113. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you on this one.

      After reading most of the replies which mostly harp on about freedom being more important than anything else I can conclude that none of you have any children of your own.

      If you did I simply can't believe that you'd have that kind of attitude. The protection of children is more important than ANY information related "freedom".

      Burning pedophiles alive is too easy for them - much too quick a death. You want something that's really going to make them suffer over a long period of time.

    114. Re:Damn it! by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Its terrible yes, however Child porn on FreeNet is far less bad then actual paysites offering the stuff. On Freenet it is free and as such downloading it will theoreticaly not cause more children to be hurt, paying for it though provides an incentive for people to make more of the stuff. More children would get hurt in that case.

    115. Re:Damn it! by Kjella · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I use Freenet to download a movie, will I also be hosting child porn? With Bittorrent and eDonkey, I have a choice of what content I distribute.

      Yes - and no. By participating in this network called "Internet", you are paying a fee to your ISP which is used to buy network infrastructure and bandwidth. You do not own any specific part of this infrastructure, it is pooled and used by all participants - including those trading in child porn.

      On Freenet, you contribute infrastructure and bandwidth directly instead of paying a fee. But the basic system is the same - it is pooled and used by all the participants. Perhaps your participation in Freenet might help pedos trade child porn - but your ISP bill might help give the pedo down the street broadband.

      If you do not post child porn and you do not request child porn, what is the difference between your ISP and your Freenet node? They both route content for others. Neither has any idea (nor want to have) what they're routing. There's no exact equivalent of the Freenet store but they do have caches, in other words temporary storage. It is just easier to pay your X$/month and let your ISP do it than have it happen over your connection...

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    116. Re:Damn it! by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      Dictatorships hurts everyone, pederasts only a few. Hunting molesters is orders of magnitude easier than toppling dictators.

      Bittorrent doesn't stop anything. Freenet may do. Dictatorship relies on population and media control, threats to dissenting individuals and general manipulation of public opinion. Free speech is the only way to prevent establishment of a dictatorship or to overcome it. If the only available opinions are the state-controlled ones, dictatorship can last MUCH longer than with numerous independent views. Without information and organization, you'd never topple dictators. If you don't have an army ten times larger than the dictator's standing-by to free you, that is.

      You are being naive about the security and stability of government and power itself, feeling the western world invulnerable to corruption and seizing of power. But no nation or government is.

    117. Re:Damn it! by Trepalium · · Score: 1

      We call 'Canadian bacon', back bacon.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    118. Re:Damn it! by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I've already started looking into it. And Freenet/Frost (hadn't seen Frost before).

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    119. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? That made no sense whatsoever...

    120. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, if you have a place that's safe from the MPAA to host the 1st seed fil e(or any seed file for that matter), why not host the .torrent there???

    121. Re:Damn it! by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      The protection of children shouldn't trump the First Amendment.

      Of course Kiddie Porn is not simply a first amendment issue. It should be illegal and rightfully so.

      We shouldn't (and can't) build our world to be "child-safe." We're adults. There should be considerations for children, nothing more.

      Look if children are so damn important that society must cater to their needs, why not just let them vote on it? Oh, that's right, "we know better." I'm not convinced. "Do as I say and not as I do." That's called hypocrisy, and even children can see it.

      I take a very cynical view when things are done "for the children."

      And no I don't have kids.

    122. Re:Damn it! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I think you are selling yourselves short by not calling it Canadian bacon.. We call our cheese "American," and it's barely even a dairy product.

    123. Re:Damn it! by gessel · · Score: 1

      That's the half of it. The whole of it includes the limitation: "to promote the progress of science and the useful arts..." It is unconstitutional to offer an "embarrassing monopoly" [Thomas Jefferson] on the dissemination of invention such that the result of that monopoly is to retard the progress of science and the useful arts.

      The author has no intrinsic right to his or her creation, there is no property right, unauthorized distribution is not theft, the only piracy is of the public domain. Copyright is a government granted monopoly, offered by We The People as a quid pro quo, for which we demand an increase in output, quality, and availability of invention.

      The principles of copyright were utterly obfuscated by the publishing industry (particularly Disney and the Gershwin foundation) in the 1970s. Patent law retains the character intended by the founding fathers. A patent is clearly still a temporary (20 year) monopoly in return for "teaching the art." Indeed, a patent is invalid if the inventor does not teach in the embodiments, with sufficient detail for one skilled in the art not only exactly how to implement the invention, but the best known method of doing so at the time of filing.

      As to copyright, it is incomprehensible to me how extending the term of the monopoly nearly indefinitely increases the dissemination of invention, rather than the seemingly obvious outcome of impoverishing the public domain. Further, I cannot comprehend the computations that underlie a decision to retard the computer industry, which contributes trillions dollars to the economy and is obviously a true engine of ongoing invention, to protect a minuscule, economically irrelevant ($20B/year) entertainment industry that's greatest invention seems to be Brittany Spears.

      By what argument can our bought and paid for by the entertainment industry legislators think they are fulfilling their sworn duty to uphold the constitution? Abject ignorance?

    124. Re:Damn it! by Thing+1 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Thanks for the defense. I know that my GP believes that only "sensational" civil disobdience is "worth it" but I'd be far less effective rotting in jail or paying heavy fines through the nose.

      And I'm actually going to perform a form of "civil obedience" -- No More Downloads. I have a ReplayTV and a TiVo, so I can get all the video I care to watch from them. Yeah, the new movies will take longer, but there are so many, many old movies to watch that it's not really an issue.

      So I can't be thrown into jail, or be fined. (Of course, since they weren't required to show me the evidence against me (I'm still appalled at that!), then I suppose they could convict me with the same "level" of evidence, in which case I could easily end up in jail or with heavy fines...)

      But regardless of what the authorities have in mind for me, I will be spending perhaps 20% of both my free time and my disposable income in supporting this position, which is that there is no stop to the spiraling Copyright Cartel. Works produced now, even 50 years ago, will never see the Public Domain. The software I add value to will be able to be used to violate current copyrights, but that's not my goal: I should be able to freely download TV shows, movies and music from the 70s and early 80s. That was how copyright was originally intended, as a way to increase the wealth in the public domain, not as a way to make some people rich for doing a small amount of work.

      I will promote only valid uses of the projects I support, where "valid" means "the original definition." Yes, I agree that for some small subset of issues, technology can drastically change the meaning and it should be reinterpreted. But with technology turning a traditionally scarce economy into an economy in which there is no scarcity, and then having the law turn it back into a scarcity economy for no other reason that to enrichen some corporations (not even individuals!), that's just wrong and I will fight against it until they come to take me away (haha).

      And soon, we'll have nanotechnology and we will be free from a world in which there is scarcity in physical items as well as audio and video. At that point (if they let me live...), I'll start helping open source nanotech projects working towards building factories to duplicate any physical good based on a blueprint. Some of the first blueprints we share (over the internet, of course, and likely using ANts/Freenet/Frost/other project I will be working on shortly) will be those items that can help out the lower levels of Maslow's Heirarchy of Needs -- like food and shelter. Perhaps McDonald's will be upset that someone "uploads" a Big Mac, so that everyone can download and eat as many as they want. And moving forward the higher-value items like Playstations, computers, and Corvettes will ruffle a few feathers. But those feathers should be calmed knowing that these wonders are available to everyone on the planet.

      Yeah, I'm waxing a little philosophical/utopian, and I know the future won't be exactly the way I see it, but then one of the steps is to distribute blueprints for advanced spaceflight, and then all bets are off because no government will be able to keep all of its citizens within its sphere of influence (without crippling or killing said citizens, and then those governments which don't do that will expand far faster).

      It hurts having my internet access removed, and I'm still reacting. But I like to think that I'm reacting in a productive manner; rather than burning down Hollywood, I'll just help create technologies that make them less profitable.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    125. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MrTwig.net is not down, they have exceeded their bandwidth limit. Im a regular on the forums, this HAS happened before, usually resolved in 48 hours.

      Besides, theres NO MORE SOUTHPARK UNTIL ABOUT MID 2005! The last ep was released about 4 days ago.

    126. Re:Damn it! by kevinx · · Score: 1

      Umm no. Taking nude pictures against their will is an invasion of privacy. That too is a crime. The whole thing is a crime.

      Regardless, the sharing and selling of those photos will only increase the demand for these horrible acts.

      It's also arguable that someone viewing these photos for the first time and finds them selves turned on, may evolve into something more then just a content downloader.

    127. Re:Damn it! by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      "Gone With the Wind" was written in 1936 , so should have been well into the public domain in 2001.

      However, see the following story: Judge Blocks Publication of Gone With The Wind Parody.

      Note that it was later allowed to be released, but to answer your question: the government prevents someone from putting "old stories" that should have entered the public domain years ago but have not due to copyright extension, from being included in a new movie. (I was not completely specific in my original post, which might have led you to believe that other Grimm's Fairy Tales were off-limits, but they aren't; I was referring to the public's inability to create derivative works using, for example, Mickey Mouse, or anything created in the last 80ish years.)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    128. Re:Damn it! by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      The photos are a non-issue.

      I don't agree. Distributing the photos are a further violation of that individuals rights.

      If you're suggesting that photographing crimes is wrong,

      Photographing a crime with the intent of harming or exploiting the victim is wrong, and is probably illegal in many places.

    129. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the dead have the power to hold back the living under current copyright. Copyright is not the right of the author -- it's a grant of a monopoly for a limited amount of time. A necessary evil to promote a common good. Today's laws only protect the evil and do nothing to promote the common good. The system is broken, hence the more people discard the system the better the future looks.

    130. Re:Damn it! by Snaller · · Score: 1

      There's nothing I can do to fix the law (which stated that copyrights were to promote the arts and sciences and should only run for 20 years);

      Got a link for that?

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    131. Re:Damn it! by Snaller · · Score: 2, Insightful


      The balance here, of course, is that anybody can create something and copyright. If you don't like what somebody does with their own intellectual property, you are completely free to release your own under the terms you choose.


      What we don't like is the term "intellectual property" - property is something you can touch - to apply it to anything else is amoral and wrong.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    132. Re:Damn it! by gnovos · · Score: 1

      If someone drugged you, raped you, took pictures of the rape, do they automatically have the right to put distribute those photos on the Internet? What about your rights?

      You misunderstand the point of freenet...

      If a the governerorof a state/head of media organization/incredibly rich whoever drugged you, raped you and took pictures, and he had everyon on his payroll, and there was NO WAY to post your story without it getting it instantly pulled, changed, sued, etc... Then where can you go to tell yoru story? Freenet will let you tell your story, good or bad.

      If you want truly free speech, you must take the good with the bad.

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    133. Re:Damn it! by gnovos · · Score: 1

      What is required is some kind of hybrid between bit torrent and Freenet.

      Something like this?

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    134. Re:Damn it! by RoofPig · · Score: 1

      The pdtv lol torrents on suprnova usually came from one of a handful of irc channels. They're pretty swamped at the moment so I'm not going to mention them by name, but I'm sure several other people already have.

    135. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nonetheless, the person who owns the copyright has the exclusive right to choose how it's copied. "

      This so-called right is not an intrinsic moral right, it is simply a made-up right that receives statutory enforcement from the government. Show me in your Bible, Koran, or Talmud where it says I can't copy any information that comes into my possession.

      Enforcing copyright requires the initiation of violence against people who copied information wtihout hurting anyone - merely because the initiators of this violence are trying to protect a broken business model. Now that *is* morally wrong, according to my Bible.

    136. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're trolling.
      Plus it looks stupid when you say stuff like "but I'll bite anyway"

    137. Re:Damn it! by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

      What do you think of 'child porn' that does not involve children? Like porn with of-age people made to look like children, or just non-photographic, generated images(drawings, CG)?

      It is still illegal in the U.S. and many other countries(Japan would be an exception that I know of). Would you agree with it's illegality?

    138. Re:Damn it! by Shaklee39 · · Score: 1
    139. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There ARE better things to do with my life than get the latest movies for free... I think I'll go and do some of those things instead.

    140. Re:Damn it! by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I use Freenet to download a movie, will I also be hosting child porn? With Bittorrent and eDonkey, I have a choice of what content I distribute.

      Freenet works precisely because the people who are hosting content can not find out what that content is, and therefore (presumably) can not be held responsible for it. You need this to have a truly anonymous network, which is what Freenet is trying to be. The Freenet FAQ is being honest with you. If you can't tolerate the possibility (however remote) of hosting child porn or whatever, then you shouldn't run a Freenet node.

      For what it's worth, if you do run a node you can always publish lots of non-child porn material to decrease the probability that your node (and all the other nodes as well) are hosting child porn. Who knows, maybe if you publish lots of good stuff more non-pedophiles will be attracted to Freenet. I for one was happy to find a bunch of classical music on Freenet when I first checked it out. The network really is whatever you want to make it.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    141. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.btefnet.net/ is a nice alternative.

    142. Re:Damn it! by handslikesnakes · · Score: 1

      I feel dirty for asking, but what groups does Degrassi: The Next Generation get posted in?

    143. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the fucking retard. These companies are not losing anything significant due to BT or any other P2P system.

      They are posting record album sales, movies are breaking ticket sale records all the time and concert prices go up unceasingly.

      The technologies behind radio, movies, television, etc. have irreversibly changed our society to one which is greatly involved and deeply influenced by media. While this is not an entirely good or bad thing, its sway is impossible to deny.

      How is it that we can be denied the right to *freely* participate in this system? It's not as though people will stop buying music or watching TV commercials - their income will still be there.

      Our capability to participate in mass media culture without the duress of legal threats for sharing what to some may be kin to sacraments or religious icons in a spacey sense with each other cannot ever be allowed to be halted, or else we might as well have been *completely* bought and sold by the system.

      If our culture in this Information Age is so deeply rooted in mass media, it is just as much ours as it is theirs, because they are studying us, manipulating us, for ways to make more money. In turn, we should be able to exercise *fair use* and share media with each other.

      This has already been fucking debated by the US Supreme Court in spirit with VCRs and blank cassette tapes. Why it should be revisited, I can only imagine.

      HMM, corrupt wastes of protoplasm controlling our quasireligious expanse of Pop for the sake of greed and fear of losing their profit margin while trying to prosletyze the weak subjects back to their own old mannerisms of dogmatic rigor? Why, yes.

      Go fuck yourself with a frozen roll of *AA lawsuit paperwork.

    144. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a hypocrite for not seeding what you download, and you *are* sabotaging BT. Don't make lame excuses about it.

    145. Re:Damn it! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1
      I salute you. Ignore all the people saying that there is no technical solution to this problem, so we shouldn't even try. There is no reason to not persue both tracks in parallel, and if with your spare developer time and disposable income to succeed in your life's mission and produce an unbreakable, fast form of BitTorrent, you will be the world's hero.

      This is not to say that we should let unjust laws stand, but pinning our hopes on a successful legislative outcome is pure desparation. If an unbreakable, fast BitTorrent variant were available, it would definitely accelerate the legal process of improving our IP laws. Anyway, cheers! And good hunting.

    146. Re:Damn it! by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      "Won't someone please think of the children!?" The degredation of the human mind caused by having children.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    147. Re:Damn it! by decosterthomas · · Score: 1

      Mrtwig.net is not really down they just exeeded the bandwidth limit. "Bandwidth Limit Exceeded The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to the site owner reaching his/her bandwidth limit. Please try again later. "

    148. Re:Damn it! by Tom · · Score: 1

      Like SciFi? Robert Heinlein wrote a nice book called Take Back Your Government. It's and old book (the 1992 is a reprint) I think from the 60s or so. There's still much truth in it. It may not be too late yet.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    149. Re:Damn it! by houghi · · Score: 1

      You'll just have to wait until you can watch it legally. I.e. when a TV station you have access to broadcasts it, or when you can buy the DVD. Tough shit.

      A lot of shows are NOT broadcast where I live. Not in two years, not in 10 years. Also if I want to buy the DVD, I can not play them, because I am in the wrong DVD region.

      So even if I wanted to give out money, I am not able to do so.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    150. Re:Damn it! by CowbertPrime · · Score: 1

      say what? IANAL, but if you read the betamax cases, it is perfectly legal to record shows (analog or digital broadcast tv) for timeshifting purposes. That constitutes fair-use of the broadcast. This extends to say, if you asked your rommate to record $some_hot_show for you when you were not around. It can then extend to you asking your neighbor to record $some_hot_show for you and then transferring the tape to you, which still constitutes fair-use, because "what if you didn't have a vcr". As long as that person was not making money from doing it. The logical extension is that when I bt $some_hot_show, it is as if I asked someone to DVR said show, and then transfer the show to me. Now obviously this hasn't been to court, but to me it would be within fair-use rights to make copies of the recording and give them to your friends for _timesharing_ purposes (which is legally defined to be recording a broadcast to be viewed at a time convenient to the consumer). Thus, if I have no DVR but I missed last night's episode of Survivor: East Bumfuck, I have the right to obtain a recording of it.

    151. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but you call most of the world "American" and piss people off by doing so, hence it might be better if they just stick to what they have been doing all along as they might actually know better.

    152. Re:Damn it! by spleck · · Score: 1

      Also, your assertion that the author is not losing money due to your theft is lost if you consider the fact that he might choose to market his creation to your area at a future time. He has lost potential income, even if it's years before he decides to take action on it.

      That's why copyright should expire after 20 years. If you want to make money, make sure your distribution is complete.

      My main complaint is that most things cost too much. I love to consume (I am a consumer), but there is too much for me to afford. If I can only afford to purchase $xxx of goods, why not give me everything free after that point? I am unable to contribute more money, so there is no loss of revenue to the producer of the work...

      This is related to "I wouldn't buy it, but I'll take it if its free." There are many movies, albums, etc, that I am unwilling to pay the asking price for. Since the market structure precludes me from bargaining for it (corporate pricing pressure), I am unwilling to buy it and therefore if I steal it, there is still no loss of revenue. Fortunately, many DVDs eventually end up on the $6 rack, but why do CDs often end up on the $18 rare discs rack?

    153. Re:Damn it! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      So I can't be thrown into jail, or be fined. (Of course, since they weren't required to show me the evidence against me (I'm still appalled at that!), then I suppose they could convict me with the same "level" of evidence, in which case I could easily end up in jail or with heavy fines...)

      You're confusing civil and criminal law. If the MPAA sues you, they only have to prove it's "more likely than not," that you're responsible. If the FBI knocks on your door, they have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. In the former, you pay reparations. In the latter, you pay fines/jail time. The FBI has better things to do than track down filesharing individuals. The MPAA sees it as protecting their livelihood, so they're naturally willing to devote considerably more energy.

    154. Re:Damn it! by Greg+W. · · Score: 1

      Dijjer's a nice thing, but it's nowhere near being a hybrid of BT and Freenet. Dijjer still enforces the need for a central, original server, and every Dijjer download contacts that central web server to get the HTTP headers before it hits the Dijjer peers to get the data. If the original web server goes away or gets slashdotted under a million HEAD requests, you get no file. For that very same reason, there's no anonymity -- not for publishers and not for requesters. So it's really got very little in common with Freenet.

      Also, it doesn't work very well just yet. Give it a bit more time.

      But for what it's designed for, which is to ease the burden on traditional content distributors, it seems pretty promising.

    155. Re:Damn it! by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "What we don't like is the term "intellectual property" - property is something you can touch - to apply it to anything else is amoral and wrong."

      "We" don't like the royal "we," either. The Queen of England can get away with using it; when enybody else does, it tends to look silly.

      Your position is understandable, but far, far too many Slashdotters hold this opinion because it's a convenient, guilt-free way to engage in piracy. As in: "I don't P2P all my music because I'm trying to save a few bucks, but because I think that for Usher to claim a copyright on this music is amoral and wrong."

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    156. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Piracy and theft are words directed to the people who sell for profit. Even that, piracy and theft aren't correct words to use. Thus, those who do not profit or even spending their resources to distribute contents shouldn't be put in the same category as those who sell for profit.

      The problems with copyright law are its guaranteeing exclusive rights for too long a term, and its allowance for transferring of those rights. What you're advocating is morality, which would be fine only if the media cartels hadn't extended the terms, for their benefit, based on the original definition of copyright.

      I'd advocate for complete boycott of their products, which includes no buying and no downloading/consuming etc. Everyone can do this, but the larger public seems to cannot figure this out.

      Fight fire with water.

    157. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THAN for fuck's sake

      Anyway, invoking the ditribution of child porn as the one test for any information sharing technology is pointless. Peadophilia is an aspect of human sexuality just like any other - a peadophile will derive sexual titillation from watching kids TV shows as much as anything they might find on via the internet - taking away the material won't take away the desire. The best approach to child abuse is to educate children to speak out when they are abused, so often people who prey on children get away with it by convincing the kid that they cannot or should not speak about the abuse.

      In short, we cannot make peadophilia disappear, but we CAN educate our kids to report abusers and abusive behaviours. Crippling huge swathes of technological development won't ever stop the abusers abusing.

    158. Re:Damn it! by Snaller · · Score: 1

      "We" don't like the royal "we," either.

      You are part of the other we ;)

      Your position is understandable, but far, far too many Slashdotters hold this opinion because it's a convenient, guilt-free way to engage in piracy. As in: "I don't P2P all my music because I'm trying to save a few bucks, but because I think that for Usher to claim a copyright on this music is amoral and wrong."


      I don't believe the actions of some change the validity of position.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    159. Re:Damn it! by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Is it illegal to _make_, or just illegal to _sell_ ?

    160. Re:Damn it! by pdbaby · · Score: 1

      or tv-swarm run by the people who used to run tvtorrents.

      --
      Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
    161. Re:Damn it! by Ivop · · Score: 1

      They're now at http://www.tvtorrents.tv/

    162. Re:Damn it! by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Care to tell what is, then ?

      Demonstrating that the law is unjust, by violating it, getting caught, and then letting everyone see it.

      Going to a restaurant and being arrested just for sitting down is Civil Disobedience. Sending your white friend to get take-out is NOT.

      Guess that makes the members of French Underground cowards too, since they tried to not get caught by the Nazis...

      the french underground were members of a revolution against the extant government. Civil Disobeidence was NOT one of their weapons.

      If you want to try revolutionary overthrow of the government, go right ahead. Just don't say "it's civil disobeidence!" because C.D. is looked upon favorably.

    163. Re:Damn it! by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      I'd be far less effective rotting in jail or paying heavy fines through the nose.

      If your goal is to actually change the law, you're wrong. You would be MORE effective being the victim of an unjust system than you would be sneaking around and not getting caught.

      And I'm actually going to perform a form of "civil obedience" -- No More Downloads. I have a ReplayTV and a TiVo, so I can get all the video I care to watch from them. Yeah, the new movies will take longer, but there are so many, many old movies to watch that it's not really an issue.

      That's not C.D. or even a boycott -- it's lawful behavior.

      As for your plans against the "copyright cartel" -- might I suggest that you take the additional step of actually boycotting (i.e, don't partake of at all) work that doesn't meet your criteria?

    164. Re:Damn it! by realityfighter · · Score: 1

      Except that as counterintuitive as it may seem, in the U.S. distributing child porn is a crime in and of itself, even if you didn't take the pictures or commit the prerequisite rape.

      --
      A strain of paranoid prevention can be worse than the disease, whate'er the intention.
    165. Re:Damn it! by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

      Well I'm not sure of all the various laws...but it's illegal to posess in Canada and the US for any reason except for holding it as legal evidence.

      So making it or selling it would be illegal as you would posess it in some way.

    166. Re:Damn it! by traxNHP · · Score: 1

      They've moved to www.tvtorrents.tv. According to the site, there was apparently some sort of internal conflict with one of the former ops and they lost the domain name.

    167. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [i]He has lost potential income, even if it's years before he decides to take action on it.[/i]

      'Potential Income' is largely MEANINGLESS. It's nearly impossible to calculate. Someone dling a torrent of a tv show, movie, or what have you cannot constitute a lose of an entire sale, since they were not 100% certain to buy the legal version. The fact that the torrents are largely free and DVDs are $30US (depending on what it is, area, etc.) ensures that it is only a small percentage of ppl who would have bought the item didn't because they dl'd it. Getting something that's free is a casual decision where most people will answer affirmative (all other concerns being equal; ie no effort on their part and no risk to themselves). Paying a non-trivial amount of money greatly decreases the likely hood of someone getting something.

      Heck, how many people dl stuff because they're too lazy to go to the store???

      So the whole idea that the distributors have "lost billions in potential income" is a farce. A few 1,00,000,000 files getting swapped around edonkey or kazaa or bt does not mean that the movie industry lost $30B in revenue, or even potential revenue. Those dollars simply don't exist.

    168. Re:Damn it! by DarkMan1957 · · Score: 1

      The ANTz paper has been utilized already, with a very interesting fully Anonymous P2P application called MUTE http://mute-net.sourceforge.net/ ? for more details ! ,, this project should be given the communities full support.. Then we all may be able to sleep at night, not worrying about the MIAA people knocking on our peer's doors ! I don't understand why this GPL'd Military grade encrypted p2p client hasn't got the exposure it needs to get it moving to v1.0 !!! Please have a look all !!

    169. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't stop laughing for minutes after reading that the first time I read it! It's right up there with the "surrender your company to me" letters.

      http://www.dtek.chalmers.se/~d3rebas/humor/lette r. html

      (I was unable to create an account)

      notsoanonymoussocaluser

  8. Not Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Just gone to IRC.

    1. Re:Not Down by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      So how is it that they (RIAA, whoever) are going to manage to take out IRC? My personal guess is that they are going to spearhead legislation that works on two fronts:

      a)makes the owners and operators (in the cases where they are two different parties) of the IRC network legally responsible for what is held on their servers

      b)making foriegn servers responsible for IRC servers who are accessible from the united states (and suing them for damages that way).

    2. Re:Not Down by PastaLover · · Score: 1

      That's all unnecessary. IRC is trackable in the same way that the web is. They just join the channel, write down the ip of everybody who's serving files, and then sue them. None of this legislation is really needed.

    3. Re:Not Down by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      That only works until the servers switch over to using anonymous proxies (similar to the one I'm using to post with, for instance, except for being IRC-based).

  9. suprnova t-shirt by tkr2099 · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I just bought my suprnova.org t-shirt!

    1. Re:suprnova t-shirt by iosmart · · Score: 1

      it'll be worth something someday :( if suprnova is down, all the other torrent sites are gonna fall pretty soon. suprnova seemed to have the best method of distribution. i hope the kid doesnt get in big trouble for it...

    2. Re:suprnova t-shirt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah, jinx still has 'em.
      http://www.jinx.com/scripts/details.asp?affid=-1&p roductID=275
      grab one while they're left?

    3. Re:suprnova t-shirt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, if it's a large, I'll totally buy that shirt from you!!

    4. Re:suprnova t-shirt by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Hey, I don't have one of those shirts and the site is down... could you put it up on BitTorrent?

    5. Re:suprnova t-shirt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it'll be worth something someday

      Yes... in .1% of all possible universes. In the other 99.9%, it will be forgotten in 6 months just like every other dead website.

    6. Re:suprnova t-shirt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why buy a suprnova t-shirt if you can illegally get one for free from a torrent on SuprNova.org?

    7. Re:suprnova t-shirt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its not a total loss...at least you can use it to wipe your ass now.

    8. Re:suprnova t-shirt by Rirath.com · · Score: 3, Funny

      Great, now it's even better! Now it's retro.

    9. Re:suprnova t-shirt by aztektum · · Score: 1

      Retro is in

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
  10. So it goes. by danhm · · Score: 1

    At least Yotoshi is still around.

    1. Re:So it goes. by danhm · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just checked it a few minutes ago. It took about a minute to load on my cable modem, so I assume it's just being swamped.

    2. Re:So it goes. by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      I think it's because every forum on the 'net that allows pirate talk (yarr!) probably has one of these threads, and everyone is now rushing off and hammering all the lesser known sites as people say "hey, what about example.com!".

      I suppose it's a flash crowd / slashdotting that's being generated from numerous forum threads across the net.

      But that's just my theory.

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    3. Re:So it goes. by hyperbaba · · Score: 1

      Nope, It's down now :(

    4. Re:So it goes. by danhm · · Score: 1

      I certainly hope so. Guess I'm not helping, eh?

  11. Not only SN and TB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    A lot more other sites went down today...

    1. Re:Not only SN and TB by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Youceff is dead too, thanks to a raid by the French police. Phoenix torrents has killed itself.

      LokiTorrent is still around, but who knows for how long?

      Interestingly, Suprnova posted torrents for Firefox, Thunderbird and other legal software. They helped share the load for legal software developers, regardless of what warez was shared by their users.

      All these sites will be sorely missed by many.

    2. Re:Not only SN and TB by brohan · · Score: 1

      Lokitorrents is infact going down, they're giving out the alternative URL in their channel.

      'Tis a black day for Bittorrent

    3. Re:Not only SN and TB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you are saying is that it is ok that they are helping illegally distribute software/music/movies/etc because make up for it by helping distribute say 5% of their stuff legally?

      Yeah, it isn't like they did that to cover their butts, or as a PR stunt saying "look, we distribute legal stuff as well" and "pay no attention what we really help people get."

    4. Re:Not only SN and TB by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So what you are saying is that it is ok that they are helping illegally distribute software/music/movies/etc because make up for it by helping distribute say 5% of their stuff legally?

      Yes. Sony v. Universal.

    5. Re:Not only SN and TB by bhadreshl · · Score: 1

      You're correct.

      www.btsites.tk
      shows over 500+ torrent sites on the net. They show TB.org, SN.org as down and others too.

    6. Re:Not only SN and TB by msuzio · · Score: 1

      Saying "well, they hosted torrents for legitimate stuff too!" is like saying "well, John Gotti bought cookies from the Girl Scouts!". A very minor 'good thing' doesn't really excuse the fact that the sites really were engaging in fairly widespread piracy. I saw commercial software posted there every day... as much as I despise the MPAA and RIAA, I can understand that at the most basic level, they do have legitimate complaints.

      Is this the best use of their time and resources? Well, no, obviously not. The real pirates are a much bigger danger to their bottom line, and are much more clearly "real" criminals. However, I can't really muster up much in the way of a defense of the right for SuperNova.org or other sites to do what they did.

      Too bad, though, I did find lots of "grey" stuff there of interest - scans of old comic books in particular (the only loss of commerce there being perhaps to my local comics store's back issue sales, but I support them with plenty of my income as it is, I doubt they would complain much).

    7. Re:Not only SN and TB by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that many people actually do not have access to such software, usually sold at exorbitant prices.

      The same goes with movies and music. Where I live, classics such as Coltrane and Miles Davis cost more than newer pop releases, which cost a fortune on their own.

      TV shows such as the Daily Show, Chappelle show, and the Simpsons (amongst a host of others) is not shown on TV in many countries. There is no other way to get access to these shows except with torrents.

      Say what you will, BitTorrent, and P2P, bridge a gap, between the haves and the have-nots.

    8. Re:Not only SN and TB by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      True ... but that's only considered a good thing if you're a have-not. Claiming that you have an intrinsic "right" to someone else's published works just because you can't afford them or can't get legitimate access to them is an ethically suspect position. I'm not defending the media cartels here: I'm not too concerned about people ripping off known crooks. What goes around comes around. But ... where do you draw the line? Only download bootlegged stuff from known "bad" corporations? Who decides which ones are "bad"? In any event, I have more respect for people that just admit that they download stuff because they can get away with it, without trying to rationalize it in some way.

      Now, when it comes to creative works that should have been in the public domain but have been kept proprietary because of stupid copyright extensions, I would have to agree with you. We're losing a lot more to that than I think most people realize in countries that have extended their copyright periods beyond reasonable limits. Like the U.S., Australia and now I guess the EU. Too bad.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    9. Re:Not only SN and TB by msuzio · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I should have clarified:

      I found lots of interesting reading material via BitTorrent, including comic scans that I had zero interest in and would never have bought, but enjoyed because they were essential "free" to me.

      I don't defend that position, rationalize it, or claim I'm "right". I just say that, yep, that's what I did. Just like I've download plenty of MP3's in my day too (although, interestingly enough, not so much anymore - I guess I like having the actual CDs, or more and more I just buy music via MPeria)

      I think we all have to face up to the fact that people are doing stuff like this, they're liking it, and it doesn't seem likely to stop anytime soon. No possible solution can be reached without that realization.

    10. Re:Not only SN and TB by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Sorry, didn't mean to pick on you. But, yeah ... this does seem to be a phenomenon that the entertainment companies and copyright law have yet to really come to grips with. And you're right ... it doesn't seem likely to stop soon (given that P2P usage has been going steadily up in spite of all the lawsuits and other threats.) Something will eventually have to give, and I don't think it will be the global consumer.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    11. Re:Not only SN and TB by bani · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, Suprnova posted torrents for Firefox, Thunderbird and other legal software. They helped share the load for legal software developers

      Now you know one of the reasons SN was shut down. Certain corporations with deep pockets who feel threatened by opensource software.

  12. Suprnova Mirror by Faust7 · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Suprnova Mirror by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

      *in a Mr. Burns voice*
      - Excellent

    2. Re:Suprnova Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unfortunately, without the suprnova.org site to generate the torrents, I doubt that will stay alive for too long. I also doubt it will get any new torrents, and the ones it has will probably go stale.

    3. Re:Suprnova Mirror by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now that it's gone, what is there to mirror? The old stuff? That's not really so useful. Also, weren't suprnova also hosting trackers?

    4. Re:Suprnova Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be nice if someone made the database available for download along with the code to browse the "database".

    5. Re:Suprnova Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you just send that link straight to the MPAA while you're at it?

    6. Re:Suprnova Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for the preferentially-exclusive crowd, torrents now available in Straight and Gay format too!

  13. As everybody should be able to figure out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    Suprnova.org itself says:

    Greetings everybody, As you have probably noticed, we have often had downtimes. This was because it was so hard to keep this site up! But now we are sorry to inform you all, that SuprNova is closing down for good in the way that we all know it. We do not know if SuprNova is going to return, but it is certainly not going to be hosting any more torrent links. We are very sorry for this, but there was no other way, we have tried everything. Thank you all that helped us, by donating mirrors or something else, by uploading and seeding files, by helping people out on IRC and on forum, by spreading the word about SuprNova.org. It is a sad day for all of us! Please visit SuprNova.org every once in a while to get the latest news on what is happening and if there is anything new to report on. As we wish to maintain the nice comunity that we created, we are keppig forums and irc servers open. Thank you all and Goodbye! sloncek & the rest of the SuprNova Team

    1. Re:As everybody should be able to figure out... by WankersRevenge · · Score: 0

      So I was just at SuperNova yesterday, and in order to get into the site, they were asking for a fee. I'm not too sure about the prices, but there were different plans (monthly, year, etc). I laughed, then surfed elsewhere. I wonder, now that the site is gone, what will happen to all those peeps who actually purchased a subscription plan. I haven't seen any info about that.

    2. Re:As everybody should be able to figure out... by Oopsz · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, you were at one of the commonly known spam and scam site @ suprnova.com, suprnova.net, or supernova.org. The original, always free suprnova.org is what shut down.

    3. Re:As everybody should be able to figure out... by bamf · · Score: 1

      supernova != suprnova

    4. Re:As everybody should be able to figure out... by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 1

      that's because you went to suprnova.com or suprnova.net - suprnova.org is free as in beer.

    5. Re:As everybody should be able to figure out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You went to suprnova.com while the correct address is suprnova.org. Everyone knows that suprnova.com is a scam and has been for quite sometime.

    6. Re:As everybody should be able to figure out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SuprNova.org - .com and .net are scammers!

    7. Re:As everybody should be able to figure out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We enjoyed suprnova more than I can say with words. Good luck with future projects and remember
      Never let the bastards grind you down.

    8. Re:As everybody should be able to figure out... by kootch · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yes, it's a sad day for Suprnova.org, but now I'm worried about my #2 favorite bit torrent site...

      Empornium!

    9. Re:As everybody should be able to figure out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the nice thing about the US legal system: They don't care about the rights of the porn industry... :)

      If they only host porn, onthing will happen.

      By the way, check out http://www.torrentreactor.net/

    10. Re:As everybody should be able to figure out... by camzacid · · Score: 0

      agreed empornium rocks. though good luck getting in cause dam there is some people dying to get in.

  14. also... by Dayflowers · · Score: 1

    dvdr-core.org has also been unavailable recently....

    --
    I am a speak english. Do you not? - Saroto
  15. In a possible related story... by saskboy · · Score: 1

    LokiTorrent has just upgraded their account interface.

    Perhaps rival torrent sites were applying some sort of pressure?

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:In a possible related story... by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      I was always annoyed at torrent sites that need accounts for access.

      Torrents work best when LOTS of people are downloading the same thing at once. If you restrict people by telling them to log in and/or register, less folks will use the torrent and it'll go slower.

      The few times I've had to log in to download something, it went a lot slower than the various anonymous torrent sites out there. There just weren't enough people in the swarm.

      -Z

  16. torrentreactor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it's a good thing that torrentreactor is still around.

    wink, wink ;)

  17. Did I ever tell you your my hero? by EvilGoodGuy · · Score: 1

    Thank god I found some good private trackers that are holding their heads high still. SuprNova I will mourn this day in memory of you. :( You brought me world's of enjoyment that I never new a fast bandwidth could provide. All of those guys out there who run these sites are true hero's in my eyes. Time to put on the tin foil hats, they're always after me lucky charms. *runs to corner to cry*

    1. Re:Did I ever tell you your my hero? by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Sadly, even if the volunteers keep up their websites, they won't have the massive capability that suprnova.org had to screen out bad files through the moderators. The moderators volunteered to screen the submitted seeds for bad names, invalid files, and MPAA and RIAA stooge spam.

      **IA's next step will be to flood the remaining torrent link pages with bad seeds, making the system untenable.

      Exxeem was the successor to Bittorent. Let's hope the people who are developing it aren't scientologied to the point where they won't want to even try.

  18. PSA: SuprNova down last couple of days by Hangtime · · Score: 0

    Its been down for a couple of days now, not just due to Slashdot.

    1. Re:PSA: SuprNova down last couple of days by EvilGoodGuy · · Score: 1

      Sorry buddy but this didn't have anything to do with slashdot. I wish it did, but suprnova isn't comming back anytime soon.

    2. Re:PSA: SuprNova down last couple of days by jpmkm · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. I was just on it last night and it worked just fine.

    3. Re:PSA: SuprNova down last couple of days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true, I was on the site last night.

    4. Re:PSA: SuprNova down last couple of days by Oceanplexian · · Score: 1

      BS on this, I was using it only minutes before it went down. *banging head on keyboard while crying*

    5. Re:PSA: SuprNova down last couple of days by bkissi01 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was too. My last download (EVER) from Suprnova.org was at 5:00 this morning. When that one finished I went to download another and it couldn't connect to the tracker. Then the site became inaccessable later in the day and now there is a message on it stating that they don't ever intend on hosting torrents again.

  19. Sounds like they hit him hard by Exstatica · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well they have the notices on their site. It looks like they either got a letter or a visit. http://www.torrentreactor.net/ is still up. A very well crafted letter from a laywer will really put some threats on people. Sounds like this is what happened.

  20. youceff.com is also down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    youceff.com is down as well. lokitorrent still seems to be up though.

  21. A possible hype machine? by NightWulf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is it possible they brought their web pages down on purpose in order to create a little hype and maybe some panic amongst Torrent users. Then in a week or two they will release that new P2P file sharing program the have had in beta for a while? Seems like a good enough marketing campaign as a lot of Torrent users are students, or kids, and Slashdot may not be their source of information, though this story did find itself on the front page.

    1. Re:A possible hype machine? by Lando · · Score: 1

      Very unlikely since Torrentbits.org was not participating in the new program.

      Also, the new program is/was windows only... not much good for Linux users.

      Oh well, plenty of other places to get "legal" torrents, though I will miss the ability to look up TV shows that I miss...

      --
      /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
    2. Re:A possible hype machine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like it's possible, but since Suprnova and such are non-profit.. Why would they need a 'marketing campaign'?

    3. Re:A possible hype machine? by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      That sounds like it's possible, but since Suprnova and such are non-profit.. Why would they need a 'marketing campaign'?

      You appear to be under the misguided impression that non-profit companies don't make any money for their owners.

      They do.

      The revenue, however, that forms the profit cannot be stashed away by the company for a rainy day. They have to pay all that extra money out as salaries to their owners, rather than the owners increasing the value of the company as an investment property.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    4. Re:A possible hype machine? by Threni · · Score: 1

      // TODO: Learn a more convenient commenting style.

    5. Re:A possible hype machine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since Suprnova and such are non-profit.

      It's nice to think that, isn't it? Nice to think that
      nobody is making money off of piracy. Nice to think
      that those annoying goddamn ads are there for show,
      and not to make the operators money.

    6. Re:A possible hype machine? by mikiN · · Score: 1

      /* FIXME: Breaks portability to older compilers */

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
  22. If you click into the links by mcnut · · Score: 3, Informative

    You'll read that they have both given up and shut their doors to torrent hosting. I don't want to jump to conclusions, but when two of the biggest torrent link sites go down very close in time to one another, I'm guessing there was a sweep of cease and decist letters. Guess its true about the "The bigger they are" hypothesis

    --
    ok.. so heads you lose tails I win. right?
    1. Re:If you click into the links by nkh · · Score: 1

      If this is what happened, I swear I'm not buying one more CD or DVD in my whole life. I'm PISSED OFF enough to improve my crypto skills and help an anonymous P2P project (something like GnuNet or FreeNet).

    2. Re:If you click into the links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you won't, you fucking lazy, whiny asshole.

    3. Re:If you click into the links by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I was done buying CDs a couple years ago, and DVDs as of a few days ago when they turned off my cable modem without a warrant or court order.

      I'm doing exactly as you suggested: I'm honing my skills to help support an encrypted, anonymous P2P project. Already I've gotten a couple offers of interest, so I'll be deciding how to spend about 20% of my free time and disposable income over the holidays.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  23. IRC Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    IRC for SuprNova is dead too, so there's no asking there.

    1. Re:IRC Link by b00stA · · Score: 1

      No. The link on suprnova.org was wrong.
      irc.suprnova.org is working fine, but you probably don't want to join any channels anyway, because everybody is going crazy about the closing of SN.

      --
      Stop making that big face!
    2. Re:IRC Link by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      [14:49] * Connect retry #77 irc.suprnova.org (6667) - [14:49] ERROR All connections in use - [14:50] * [10053] Software caused connection abort - [14:50] * Disconnected i think they got /.ed like a mf'er.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    3. Re:IRC Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From #suprnova.org a few hours ago:
      <sloncek> <izigo> i need as many as possible to connect to 65.110.55.95 or 65.110.55.99 because the first irc server is getting overloaded. Many thanks izigo and the Suprnova Team.
    4. Re:IRC Link by b00stA · · Score: 1

      I'm on the network right now.
      Try banzai.suprnova.org

      --
      Stop making that big face!
  24. Reply from Admin? by vossman77 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Taken from here
    -------
    AT LAST!
    I've got a chance to reply to some of these rumours and wild speculation!
    (YES - this is going to be one of the Puppy's long boring posts,
    but if you don't read it all, don't bother replying - NO CRIB NOTES AVAILABLE)

    Firstly, I have to say,
    I am extremely dissapointed with the response from some of the members of the TB community.
    Scare-mongering and spreading rumours is not the most helpful thing to do in a situation like this!
    I know everyone is unhappy about it, but don't burn your bridges with insults or by playing the blame game!

    Secondly,
    I am extremely delighted with the reponse form some of the members of the TB community.
    Members like DeeJee, and Warlok, who are trying to keep us all together,
    to get the correct information out. There are probably more that I don't know about yet....
    and all those working behind the scenes.... Thanks guys

    OK lets get down to it.
    A few facts:-
    - I am extremely sad to report, that I have just found out that, TB, as we know it, is DEAD.
    - The full reason why Rb choose to close down is still not yet known
    - Rb was "on holiday" when the site went down, and is in no position to put it back up again,
    or explain anything, until he gets back
    - There was a Ddos attack - After the site went down!

    One more fact:-
    Nobody, REPEAT, nobody, except Redbeard knows what Redbeard is planning to do.

    Keep watching torrentbits.org for a statement.
    It's the ONLY place to get the full facts

    1. Re:Reply from Admin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the amount of words used, that message was anything but.

    2. Re:Reply from Admin? by arcanumas · · Score: 4, Funny
      from the response:

      -There was a Ddos attack - After the site went down!

      ... They are on to us!

      --
      Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
    3. Re:Reply from Admin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scare-mongering and spreading rumours is not the most helpful thing to do in a situation like this!

      Uh... a situation like what?

      Members like DeeJee, and Warlok, who are trying to keep us all together, to get the correct information out.

      So what is the correct information?

      A few facts:-
      - I am extremely sad to report, that I have just found out that, TB, as we know it, is DEAD.


      Okay...

      - The full reason why Rb choose to close down is still not yet known

      Okay...

      - Rb was "on holiday" when the site went down, and is in no position to put it back up again,
      or explain anything, until he gets back


      WHAT? Did RB take the site down, as the same person said a couple of sentences earlier or did it just go down? If he took it down on purpose then how can he not be in a position to put it back up, or at least how can that be due to being on holiday?

      Keep watching torrentbits.org for a statement.
      It's the ONLY place to get the full facts


      Unbelievable. What facts?

      Either they had a competition to see who could produce the most meaningless pointless anouncement, or else this guy just has a natural flair for it.

    4. Re:Reply from Admin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, like slashdot is the only place full of free loaders who know about the site.

    5. Re:Reply from Admin? by hyperbaba · · Score: 1

      "Good-bye Thanks to all users, uploaders, mods and donors for helping create the best torrent site on the net, but this is where the road ends for us." This is what is left from torrentbits.org :(

    6. Re:Reply from Admin? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Hey, thanks for the news that there's no news yet. :-p

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    7. Re:Reply from Admin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      keep it up mate....cheers......

    8. Re:Reply from Admin? by 787style · · Score: 1

      They thought that being slashdotted was a Ddos attack...funny.

    9. Re:Reply from Admin? by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      - There was a Ddos attack - After the site went down!

      Was it a malicious Ddos attach, or was it really a million web browsers, RSS clients and automated trying to fetch and re-fetch content that suddently went missing?

  25. An alternative is by p0 · · Score: 1


    http://www.torrent-base.dl.am/

    still lives...

    --
    This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
  26. No worries by voya · · Score: 3, Informative

    Use www.lokitorrent.com from now on. It's just as good as suprnova.org was.
    Also, check out it's sister site: www.mufftorrent.com

    1. Re:No worries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Am I the only one who thinks it's stupid to register an account to download warez? It's just one more thing for them to track.

  27. Coincidence? by anamexis · · Score: 1

    In the past, both of these sites have had less than exemplary uptimes. Is there a chance that they both just happened to have problems at the same time?

  28. Not really dark by Derg · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Got this from suprnova.org

    Greetings everybody,

    As you have probably noticed, we have often had downtimes. This was because it was so hard to keep this site up!
    But now we are sorry to inform you all, that SuprNova is closing down for good in the way that we all know it.
    We do not know if SuprNova is going to return, but it is certainly not going to be hosting any more torrent links.
    We are very sorry for this, but there was no other way, we have tried everything.

    Thank you all that helped us, by donating mirrors or something else, by uploading and seeding files, by helping people out on IRC and on forum, by spreading the word about SuprNova.org.
    It is a sad day for all of us!

    Please visit SuprNova.org every once in a while to get the latest news on what is happening and if there is anything new to report on.

    As we wish to maintain the nice comunity that we created, we are keppig forums and irc servers open.

    Thank you all and Goodbye!
    sloncek & the rest of the SuprNova Team

    --
    I'm a little tea pot.
  29. Bye bye SuprNova by colonslashslash · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I saw earlier in SuprNova IRC that the topic stated:

    Now talking in #suprnova.org
    Topic is 'SuprNova is from today on DOWN. It will not be returning in any way that we know it now. We are very sorry for this, but it is not possible any other way. Thank you all for all your help! SuprNova crew '
    * Set by sloncek on Sun Dec 19 16:08:10

    I knew it was serious as sloncek is the owner of SN and doesn't fool about with the topics much (unless its April 1st).

    The thing that affects me most is that we at TLMP get a large portion of our traffic for Linux ISO torrents from SuprNova's listings.

    Anyway, there are other sites, and much like when SR was taken down a couple of years ago, one of them will likely take the traffic and fill the void. Where there is demand, there is supply.

    Anyone have any more information as to why this happened? Is it anything to do with the developement of Exeem? I can't see it being as simple as the MPAA taking legal action, as AFAIK they have little influence in Slovenia where it is hosted, and they have whethered alot of copyright group's actions fine until now....

    --
    She's built like a steak house, but she handles like a bistro....
    1. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Why are people looking for Linux ISOs on Suprnova? You never know if they're official. Just use the official distro Web sites.

    2. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by colonslashslash · · Score: 1

      Who knows, but we get a fair bit of traffic coming from suprnova, and we only serve out legal ISO's.

      --
      She's built like a steak house, but she handles like a bistro....
    3. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, try finding the latest debian isos on the debian site its PITA, there are several similar versions (same name/number) of each release all in different folders.

      I used suprnova to get a single simple listing of all the isos available for Sarge (returned 20+) which linuxiso.org couldn't give me and even then I had to burn three different versions of the number 1 install cd to find the dimwits had left out drivers for Apple's common as dirt (as in all G3/G4 have them) ethernet controller on the PPC iso.

      I ended installing a year old version of Yellowdog 3.0.1 as it was the only thing that would boot the xserve correctly & had all the apple standard stuff available... (Why not OS X - well if the second hand machine had come with OS X in the first place...)

    4. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by polyiguana · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For starters, "sloncek"'s identity was essentially revealed by the Slovakian magazine Mladina.

      It gave his initials (A and P), the high school he went to (which meant which town he lived in), and basically everything short of an online map to his house. In a small country like Slovenia, if the authorities know who the culprit is, it's very easy for them to put some pressure on "sloncek" to make him go away so that little Slovenia won't be declared a member of the Axis of Evil. I doubt that sloncek is going to jail, but he might have decided that cooperating is better than having his life made hell for the next few years like DVD Jon.

    5. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      That's what hash checking is for*.

      (* yes, I know bittorrent's internal hash checking won't guarantee you get the same file from the distro, just that you get the same file that was originally posted to the tracker. That's what md5sums are for).

    6. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i reguarly used suprnova for there linux bittorrents. they have lots of iso's of distros and games. most useful.

    7. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by bani · · Score: 1

      The thing that affects me most is that we at TLMP get a large portion of our traffic for Linux ISO torrents from SuprNova's listings.

      Now you know one of the reasons why SN was shut down.

    8. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Why not OS X - well if the second hand machine had come with OS X in the first place...)

      Of course, you don't seem to have realized that you could have gotten OS X off of SuprNova.

    9. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slovenian, not Slovakian.

    10. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by merdark · · Score: 1

      member of the Axis of Evil

      Haha, this is funny. You know, many people outside the US feel that the Axis of Evil is the US, Isreal, and a few others. Read up on some Chompsky, a famous US professor.

    11. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by GooDieZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ok to help you out a bit in that article in magazine Mladina...
      I live in the country where so called "sloncek" is so much into trouble. And no he's not into trouble. Only servers are down and are not comming back no time soon, as FBI, MPAA and RIAA are making their cowboy dance. The man is harmless, and he didn't do anything illegal at all by our Law.

      And to awnser final question! YES USA are the biggest Copyright brakers, as 37% of all suprnova hits was from US.

      --
      Things in a rear mirror might be behind you
    12. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, please I've loved/hated *BSD (& clones) since SunOS 4 days - my favorite distro is Slackware which is still very SunOS 4/BSD like...

      Its just that running anything OS X is such a pain as all the online guides indicate stuff should end up in Apple mandated places and not the usual Unix places, now I could ignore those guides, but the same as applying BSDism on a SYS V alike (say Solaris or the bastard Redhat or SuSe) is asking for trouble and vice versa.

      I'd rather not learn yet another quirky unix alike (AIX sucks)

    13. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      much like when SR was taken down a couple of years ago
      It closed 10 months ago not "a couple of years ago", yuo insensitive clod.
    14. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by l-ascorbic · · Score: 1

      Slovenia? Slovakia? Even Bush can't tell the difference.

    15. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really want to ruin the fun about discovering his identity, just check out the domain registration for exeem.com. http://whois.sc/exeem.com

      Doh!

    16. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      You know, I never thought that the day would come when I would defend Israel, but it is the only true democracy in the Middle East; Arabs sit in the Israeli parliament (the Knesset or something, right?), while no Jews are in power in the Arab countries; despite its disregard for certain parts of international law (e.g. the Eichmann kidnapping), it tends to be a decent state. Although I'll never forgive the Israelis for their unprovoked attack on and sinking of the USS Liberty, which murdered thirty-four US sailors.

      But for all their sins, the Israelis are far more palatable than anyone else in the region. Jordan? Egypt? Syria? Iran? Saudi Arabia? All are hellholes by comparison.

      And as for the United States, we need no defence. From our victory over militarism in '18, to our victory over national socialism in '45, to our victory over communism in '89, to our ongoing war against Islamofascism (not to mention our suppression of the Barbary pirates; our suppression of the slavery trade and eventually slavery itself; our pacification of the American aborigines and so on) we have been on the whole a force for good. Yes, we screwed up in the Phillipines and Hawaii, and in the long Cold War we were often forced to choose the least of some pretty nasty evils, but we've done much more good than harm.

    17. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by JofCoRe · · Score: 1

      to our victory over communism in '89

      Uh, yeah... cuz there's no more communist nations in the world, right? And just because they're communist must mean they're bad, right?

      Heh, the war on communism was about as successful as the war on drugs, and I predict that the war on terror will be just about as successful :P

      --

      Place sig here.
    18. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      Uh, yeah... cuz there's no more communist nations in the world, right?China is not really communist; it's oppressive and totalitarian, but it's not soviet.

      North Korea is a holdout (which is the international community's shame--NK is worse than Nazi Germany ever was, and no-one cares).

      And just because they're communist must mean they're bad, right?

      Considering that communism has killed more people than any other ideology in history, yeah.

    19. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by JofCoRe · · Score: 1

      Considering that communism has killed more people than any other ideology in history, yeah

      I'd say that organized religion probably holds that title :)

      --

      Place sig here.
    20. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello, moron. His name is Chomsky, and he's a nutcase. Feel free to believe the writings of a lunatic though.

    21. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by aminorex · · Score: 1

      It is a bit odd to see the claim that Israel is a
      democracy when the vast majority of the people whose homes are inside the territory controlled by Israel are not permitted to vote. The Arabs (actually mostly Druze) who sit in the Knesset are impotent to effect any respite in the continuing slaughter of the non-jewish population of Israel.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    22. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by aminorex · · Score: 1

      No, it's definitely nation-states that do most of the overt killing. During the 20th century more than 180 million human beings were killed by the direct action of nation-states. I think the dead due to direct action of religious organizations would have to number in the low thousands.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    23. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by jblekinge · · Score: 1

      Take Lebanon. They at least have popular democracy for all people Lebanese. Same applies today for Turkey as well - a prequisite requirement for joining the European Union.

      Israel on the other hand is manipulating the democratic system by not allowing war refugees (people *born* there) to return and vote. Their democracy is just worth the word, not today's standards.

    24. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by smack_attack · · Score: 1

      One word: China.

    25. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chompsky is a known anti-semite, albiet a smart man. No doubt he would consider israel a part of the axis of evil.

    26. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aminorex, anyone who wants to become an israeli citizen can do so, especially if they live there. the only reason in which they would not be allowed if they tried to get citizenship would be if the background check came up as to having relation with a form or terrorist group as defined by the UN as a terrorist orginization.
      truth is alot of arabs are israeli citizens. plus have you even been here to determine this? i think not. i think as an arab, who has visited israel and has relatives in palestine, i would know slightly more.

    27. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by merdark · · Score: 1

      I've always found the whole anti-semite thing odd. For instance, I have no love of Isreal due to their political practices. However, I would not consider myself an anti-semite.

      I can't help it if Jews live in Isreal. I would not like Isreal no matter who lived there. It seems people are very quick to yell anti-semite these days.

    28. Re:Bye bye SuprNova by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From . . . our pacification of the American aborigines and so on . . . we have been on the whole a force for good.

      Are you seriously claiming that the genocide of the American Indians was a "good thing"?

      Come to that, how do you claim that America won the first world war (which it only entered once Germany's defeat was inevitable)? I'll grant you WW2, but the Cold War was lost by the USSR rather than won by the USA, the slave trade was sustained by the USA long after the rest of the civilised world had denounced it as vile (and even then you had to fight a bloody civil war before half your country would accept it), and there is NO SUCH THING as "Islamofascism", nor are you fighting any of the nations that come closest to it (Saudi Arabia, for one).

      Either you're an idiot or a troll, and I tend to the latter view.

  30. IRC announces suprnova is dead by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 2, Informative

    the irc channel (#suprnova.org) on irc.suprnova.org is announcing that suprnova won't be coming back online

    1. Re:IRC announces suprnova is dead by Catnapster · · Score: 1

      I think this guy's a troll... but I'm not sure.

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
    2. Re:IRC announces suprnova is dead by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 1

      check my user page (more specifically my comments) and tell me if i act like a troll

      p.s. informative, interesting, and insightful are not trolling

    3. Re:IRC announces suprnova is dead by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I recently visited the channel. It's true to an extent: they have announced that they will no longer be hosting/linking torrents. Don't bother visiting, because the chanops are incompetent. Their bots will announce that they have "banned" someone for using !list (or similar) by spewing three lines of text and kicking them, which is typically followed by an autorejoin, but they ban for spamming... Classy joint. They finally set the channel invite-only to cope... right after I got banned for flooding (4 lines) a message about how to ignore joins. Wait a couple days before joining to whine about its demise.

      And yes, I AM an asshole.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:IRC announces suprnova is dead by Catnapster · · Score: 1

      See, there are these trolls that claim Netcraft announces BSD is dead and... oh fuck it.

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
  31. Public Library by dvduval · · Score: 1

    I guess I'll have to get my movies for free at the public library. Hopefully, before long the libraries will start offering downloads.

    1. Re:Public Library by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      No, they won't. Not without licensing the content from the studios, which would cost more than pretty much any library has to spend.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    2. Re:Public Library by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wny does a library have to license content from the studios in order to lend out movies when no similar requirement exists for the lending out of books?

    3. Re:Public Library by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for speaking on behalf of the libraries of the world but it seems you must have forgotten to attend our last meeting. In Canada some libraries are in the process of digitizing their books. The plan is to allow internet access to their catalogues and use DRM to limit access to each publication. If it works as planned phase 2 will do the same for music, which makes a ton of sense since the CDs get damaged so quickly. There has been no mention of video yet but I'm betting it's just a matter of time.

    4. Re:Public Library by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      To lend out a DVD or videotape of a movie, a library does not need a license. To reproduce a movie or a book and to distribute copies, a library does need permission from the copyright holder.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    5. Re:Public Library by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      I'm not familiar with copyright law in Canada, so I can't speak as to what they're doing. I do work for a very large American library with large electronic holdings, and the licensing (and this is just for text, licensed from publishers) is a huge part of our budget, and the license agreements are very restrictive.

      There are numerous legal challenges to being able to digitize books here and provide them online; the general belief (I don't believe there's any case law establishing this for certain) is that a library would be legally allowed to let one person use a digital copy of an item for each copy owned by the library, as long as the print version of the resource was taken out of circulation for the period it was in use.

      Of course this would protect aging collections as the actual books wouldn't be circulating, but the cost of digitizing the materials and controlling access make it unlikely many libraries would pursue this.

      As far as movies and music are concerned, American copyright law would most likely require the libraries to use technology that makes reasonable assurance that downloaded materials could only be used while they were "checked out" to a certain user, and not retained by the user who downloaded them. Some minimal DRM might satisfy this requirement, with the assumption that a patron breaking the DRM to make copies would be his or her responsibility, not the library's. I'd assume the MPAA and RIAA would challenge that idea if libraries tried anything like this, though.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  32. Re:Message on suprnova FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WE LOVE YOU. SuprNova was by far my favourite... plz come back!

    EXEEM is the holy grail.....

    LEECHER FOR LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  33. I hit it friday by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure I was hitting it Friday night, if not Saturday some time, so it couldn't have been down *that* long...

  34. Word on the Street... by sH4RD · · Score: 0, Troll

    Word on the street is that Apple didn't like them sharing a torrent of the latest Tiger build, but that's just what I've heard...

    --
    WASTE - The Secure P2P
    1. Re:Word on the Street... by WoBIX · · Score: 1

      Or it could be the fact that the MPAA publicly stated they were going after torrent sites a week or two ago.

      Or it could be they shared a game and a publisher went after them.

      Or their bandwidth bills all came in and they realized the DDOSs they were being hit with were going to cripple them financially.

      Or I could just be spouting off useless rumor with no basis in fact like parent.

    2. Re:Word on the Street... by sH4RD · · Score: 1

      No one said that was the only reason, it just could have been the straw that broke the camel's back (well...I suppose it was already broken, so maybe the straw that brutally beat the dead camel?)

      --
      WASTE - The Secure P2P
    3. Re:Word on the Street... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Grabberslasher is "the street", then yes.

    4. Re:Word on the Street... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it not possible for Apple to go after pirates? Are they too good for that? Get a grip Apple zealot.

    5. Re:Word on the Street... by WoBIX · · Score: 1

      Oh fuck off you idiot.

      If all the torrent sites going down carried Apple torrents you might have a leg to stand on, but not all carry software. Some only carry TV shows or movies.

  35. Trackers or Indexers? by maskedbishounen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A big point many people miss -- trackers are what keep the torrents together. Indexers like SuprNova, although highly popular, do nothing but point people where to go.

    It's like asking a bartender about the street corners where the girls hang out late at night. If he responsible for how you use the information; ie, if you engage in prostition?

    It's a sad, sad day when information is made the scapegoat. If anything, they should be applauded, and kept as a means for getting to the real criminals.

    --
    "An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program."
    1. Re:Trackers or Indexers? by brandonY · · Score: 1

      No, it's like asking the bartender to check the age of the man who wants a drink.

    2. Re:Trackers or Indexers? by maskedbishounen · · Score: 1

      Err.. How?

      An indexer has no way to know if you own a legit copy of what you wish to download; in fact, it's not their place to ask.

      The bartender, however, does. He has the capacity to do so, and the law to demand this of him.

      Until there's a law that comes about demanding the legitimacy of all internet downloads, and it's technically enforcable, indexers should receive no legal blame for misconduct of the users.

      Does this remind you anything of the Betamax defense?

      --
      "An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program."
    3. Re:Trackers or Indexers? by Duke+Machesne · · Score: 1

      Another unreasonable imposition.

    4. Re:Trackers or Indexers? by Jim+McCoy · · Score: 0

      An indexer has no way to know if you own a legit copy of what you wish to download

      If you have a legit copy then you have no need to download another copy, you can just use your legit copy if you need to change the format or make a backup.

      Care to try again?

    5. Re:Trackers or Indexers? by Scrybe · · Score: 1

      What happens if I don't want to waste 14 hours of computer time per DVD to re-encode them for easier portability while traveling?

      --

      <This .sig left intentionally blank>

    6. Re:Trackers or Indexers? by maskedbishounen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dreamcast discs? 5 1/2" floppies? Insert technology that user may not be able to access without spending a boatload in money and knowledge to archive.

      It's many times faster and easier to download yourself a backup for perfectly legit purposes. One could claim that if the user isn't able to achieve backup, he has no use for the backup itself -- yet that's not always the case. Dreamcast is the perfect example of this. You may not end up with a perfect backup (ie, GD-ROM), but a CD-ROM with the exact same data works just as well.

      In 50 years from now, what will become of our old physical formats? Will digitized images of them be easier to access than the old counterparts? Of course.

      Just because something can be used for criminal purposes does not mean it will be. We should always take that into consideration, and plan accordingly for the future. :)

      --
      "An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program."
    7. Re:Trackers or Indexers? by wdd1040 · · Score: 2, Informative

      What if your legit copy was just stepped on and you didn't make a backup? What if you don't own the equipment to reproduce a copy of it? What if... What if... What if...

      --
      wdd
    8. Re:Trackers or Indexers? by Botty · · Score: 0

      If you have a legit copy then you have no need to download another copy, you can just use your legit copy if you need to change the format or make a backup.

      BS. Sorry. Id love if this was true, then I wouldnt HAVE to spend hours on the net looking for ISOS.

      Every few months or so a game pops into my head and I'll say "YEA! That was a great game! that I played X years ago. I'll play it again." I'll search my entire collection of CD's only to find it missing. Im not going to be able to go to the store and buy it. Most reatailers only carry newer games. Crap that has been made in the past few months, not years. I use Bittorrent and the like to download CD's that I've lost or lent out but never had returned or that got scratched beyond repair. I LEGALLY bought and owned these copies but no longer have access to them.

      Yes Ive lost both the backups AND the originals to some games before someone complains I should have backed them up. Shit happens. Services like these let me continue to have fun with games I legally purchased even if something bad happens to the original.

    9. Re:Trackers or Indexers? by ScooterBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can always push this concept to whatever level you want. Should the alcohol companies or firearms manufacturers be considered co-conspirators? Should your ISP be liable? Should the government be liable for information that traverses the ether since they tax it and are therefore "involved"? Should the U.S. military be liable for "incidental deaths" in Iraq?

      The reality is that the one with the biggest stick makes the rules. Those of us with the little sticks have to be far more clever which isn't that hard when it comes to competing with governments and large corporations.

    10. Re:Trackers or Indexers? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Blah, SuprNova has a moderator system where actual people check to ensure that the data in the torrent is what it claims to be. Those people are responsible for ensuring that the person injecting the torrent has a legal right to do so.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    11. Re:Trackers or Indexers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeh? how do you feel about those ppl posting names of abortion doctors then nutcases go and assassinate them?

    12. Re:Trackers or Indexers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      An indexer has no way to know if you own a legit copy of what you wish to download If you have a legit copy then you have no need to download another copy, you can just use your legit copy if you need to change the format or make a backup. Care to try again?
      Sure: An indexer has no way to know if you the material offered has copyright on it (public domain?), or if there are licenses in place which allows it's distribution (Creative Commons?).
    13. Re:Trackers or Indexers? by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

      And just how fo you figure that? Th laws are usually simple misdemeanors such as "Minor in possession of alcohol'. Compare that to the major misdemeanor, and the loss of license/income, when a bar or store violates the "No sales to minors", and it's obviously in the bartender's own interest to check IDs. Sometimes,....wow, logic, does it only exist in software,or what?

    14. Re:Trackers or Indexers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A better analogy would be a pimp for prostitutes.

    15. Re:Trackers or Indexers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if your legit copy was just stepped on and you didn't make a backup? What if you don't own the equipment to reproduce a copy of it?

      What if you just drove into a tree and you hadn't insured your car? What if you don't own the equipment to fix it yourself?

      Same deal - tough cookies, you have to pay to get your car fixed and you have to pay for another copy of the software.

      Software out of print? You'd better hope you can find someone else with a copy who's willing to sell it to you. Or you could try asking the publishers to make you a copy, or to sell you permission to copy someone else's. And if they say "no", you have to do without. Deal with it.

  36. tvtorrents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tvtorrents.net is also down.

  37. Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Mirror by yosemite · · Score: 1

      Gawd-damn

  38. Stop Posting Links by EvilGoodGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People, please stop posting links to your favorite torrent site that is still up and kicking. They are already under tremendous pressure right now, and I don't want them to have any more attension brought to them. Those that are interested can find the sites themselves, so please, help save the few that are left and stop posting links.

    1. Re:Stop Posting Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly. these forums are the * exact * place the industry will be looking through for leads. don't feed them ANYTHING. point to shitty networks to take down, like kazaa... oooh, kazaa it's so illegal! my GOD! if only some sexy power hungry corporation could kill it off

    2. Re:Stop Posting Links by Buran · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People find resources they need through web links. People advertise the resources they have, or like, through web links. Especially if there is a need needing filling, like there seems to be now. "Find the sites themselves" how, without weblinks? I'd like to see a search engine that does a good job indexing sites that no one links to! I'd like to see a web browser that automagically knows about unlinked sites, no matter how perfectly they may match the needs of whoever is doing the surfing.

      There is no point in having a web site that no one links to, because no one will ever go there. Furthermore, if people like a particular site, they tend to talk about it, and link to it. That's just the way the net is.

      In other words, you're advocating doing something that makes it IMPOSSIBLE to do the other thing you're advocating doing.

      So which do you want? Pick one, dammit, and be consistent.

    3. Re:Stop Posting Links by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      The MPAA/RIAA must be killing themselves laughing. Whether they took down the sites or not, Slashdot is now making their job of tracking down the smaller sites trivial...

    4. Re:Stop Posting Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because the GPL uses copyright only to achieve the opposite effect that it's normally used for.

    5. Re:Stop Posting Links by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

      Everytime they shut down a torrent site, god murders a lawyer.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    6. Re:Stop Posting Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Everytime they shut down a torrent site, god murders a lawyer.

      So, it's not all bad then, is it?

    7. Re:Stop Posting Links by Performaman · · Score: 0

      EvilGoodGuy has a point. It could be possible that some of these site outages were caused by a "domino effect." When one or two sites were taken out (MPAA? DDoS?), people panicked and started trying to grab the torrents they could from other sites, fearing that these other sites might get shut down as well. This caused these sites to collapse under the immense traffic, fueling the suspicion that there was a large-scale crackdown.
      So, please, give it a rest. Just for a few days. Let things calm down and then see what really happened.

      --

      I have gas, but my car uses petrol.
    8. Re:Stop Posting Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Everytime they shut down a torrent site, god murders a lawyer.If it's a tort lawyer you're talking about, that seems like a pretty good deal to me... Where do I sign up?
    9. Re:Stop Posting Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Have you been at Darl's stash?

    10. Re:Stop Posting Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought BitTorrent sites could handle a lot of users?

    11. Re:Stop Posting Links by dagur · · Score: 1

      Everytime you submit that fscking quote, a lawyer kills a torrent site. Please think of the torrent sites.

    12. Re:Stop Posting Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Piss off you selfish prick!!!

    13. Re:Stop Posting Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Suprnova.com is still going strong!

      IRONY ALERT.

    14. Re:Stop Posting Links by Excelsior · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If there was a god, there would be no lawyers to murder.

    15. Re:Stop Posting Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Everytime they shut down a torrent site, god murders a lawyer.

      Every Time you download a torrent, a job is lost

    16. Re:Stop Posting Links by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      Please think of the...! oh wait. Keep on. :D

    17. Re:Stop Posting Links by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

      So were gonna run out of sites first.... Damn!

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    18. Re:Stop Posting Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Find the sites themselves" how, without weblinks?

      The internet is more than just the web. I often go to web sites from links I get via IM, email, newsgroups, etc. Broadcast media, like web links, are more likely to be intercepted by people who you'd rather not have visit. More private means are not.

      Of course, this limits your popularity, but that's exactly what you're going for. If you want to evade a more powerful foe, keep a low profile. If you're easy to find, you're dead.

  39. Re:FP? by mordors9 · · Score: 1

    But wouldn't the MPAA/RIAA be engaging in illegal behavior by doing a DDoS.... oops I forgot they have a separate set of rules for them.

  40. Oh the Humanity! by Shafe · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is terrible! Where will people get their movies now? Applications? Games? Let's just hope that SuprNova continues to develop the decentralized P2P bittorrent network they were talking about. Beta testing ended a few weeks ago, so perhaps we're getting close to a release candidate.

    1. Re:Oh the Humanity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and all is lost! We will all now have ot go back to using gnutella! then the world will and and aliens willt ake over... and stuf. yo!

      -JD

    2. Re:Oh the Humanity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Where will people get their movies now? Applications? Games?

      Is this a trick question? Errr... how about buy them in the shop and support those that make them?

    3. Re:Oh the Humanity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What if:
      1. There are very few shops selling.
      2. The choice is bad or worse (avarage mainstream or mainstream crap).
      3. The praces are around ~1/15th of your montly salary for 1 item.
      Tell me again how do I go legal with my entertainment!
    4. Re:Oh the Humanity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Best Buy. Sheesh, jobs are hard to find but has anyone heard of shoplifting? If caught, you ge ta much easier peneality than downloading stuff.

      http://buyblue.org

  41. MOD DOWN PARENT! KARMA WHORE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goddamn it.

  42. BitTorrent's big weakness by utexaspunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    this is the same sort of thing that happened with the original Napster. Any sort of centralization is going to become an immediate target for MPAA/RIAA legal action. At least with BitTorrent there can be other sources for .torrent files, but so long as they can shut down any large repositories like suprnova.org, finding files will be too cumbersome for all but the most determined users.

    DC++ seems to have the same weakness, with the hosts, but as long as host lists are legal, it will remain pretty easy to find new hosts. Gnutella seems pretty safe, but they've managed to pollute the network enough to make it almost unusable.

    alas, it is only a matter of time before something comes along that perfects this problem and leaves the MPAA/RIAA with no option but to come up with a new business model. Free music seems to me to be a fine way to advertise a touring artist who is making money off of the shows. Movies may have to resort to product placement, or something.

    1. Re:BitTorrent's big weakness by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      This isn't a weakness in BT. If you want to use BT for a legitimate purpose, you don't need Suprnova to do that, just your own tracker and torrents, which are immune to this attack since it's not violating a copyright. If you want to do small-scale copyright infringement by exercising your personal right to not be under constant surveillance, you can do that too by keeping it private and among a small, trusted group (and having a negligible effect overall). If you try to do massive, widespread, easy, free-for-all-comers copyright infringement, you get busted and shut down, and you deserve it.

    2. Re:BitTorrent's big weakness by Buran · · Score: 1

      Has anyone actually started such a torrent site? I would honestly actually keep it in my bookmarks as I'd like to try more Free Software, and a central repository arranged by category and offering up torrents and also links to the project sites (in case the torrent died, or there wasn't one available for whatever reason, or in case the user wants to learn more before downloading) would do a lot to help people more easily find freely distributable and open-source or real-freeware (i.e. no spyware etc) means of filling their needs.

      I never used BT much (though I'm an X-Plane user and downloaded an update that way a few times) but this does seem like a worthwhile use.

      It could be called freeasinbeerorspeechtorrents.net or something.

    3. Re:BitTorrent's big weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3dgamers.com uses it for game downloads as do a number of Linux distros. I'm sure there are lots more.

    4. Re:BitTorrent's big weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      alas, it is only a matter of time before something comes along that perfects this problem


      It's called Kademlia and is Emule's serverless network. Have been using it for months.

    5. Re:BitTorrent's big weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Movies may have to resort to product placement, or something.

      Or, er, charging money for people to go to the theatres...movies are still profitable apart from DVDs. Most likely they always will be. I don't care how big your home TV is and how good the download is, it's still not as much fun watching at home as it is going out to a movie. Being in a big audience that's laughing, shrieking, whatever, is part of the fun.

    6. Re:BitTorrent's big weakness by ajs · · Score: 1

      Gnutella is far from useless. Using magnet links, I share a great deal of data including photography and open source software. Please, do not assume that because you can't figure out how to find something that it's automatically useless to all users.

    7. Re:BitTorrent's big weakness by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      no need to be a dick. the point is that if it's not easy for someone to figure out how to find stuff, it's not really where it should be yet. BitTorrent was pretty good once one found Suprnova, DC++ is pretty good once one figures out how to connect to a hub and put their settings on active. Similar things with eMule and gnutella, but none of them is simple search'n'get. gnutella or kazaa being probably the closest to that, except that it's often seach'n'get something else...

    8. Re:BitTorrent's big weakness by SaturnLeia · · Score: 1

      >>>Free music seems to me to be a fine way to advertise a touring artist who is making money off of the shows.

      I'm not entirely sure how the economics work for major labels, but for an indie musician (as I am one), making a tour BREAK EVEN is difficult. It's entirely possible to lose money on tour (too possible, actually). Distributing free music can help indies get heard, but buying CDs is one of the only ways I can make money from the black hole called recording costs. So by all means listen to the music, but support the scene and give us a means to keep doing what we do by buying a CD or merch and spreading the word.

      And note: the RIAA is evil. They have no legal imperative to actually distribute money to artists (and they're always trying to find ways to kill 1. creativity and 2. indies).

    9. Re:BitTorrent's big weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The weakness for BitTorrent is not the torrent file, it's the tracker. How you get the torrent is outside the scope of BT. Find a clean means of distributing it and you're good.

      The tracker is a different story. The tracker is a part of the protocol, and a centralized server that can be found and shut down. (no doubt the protocol can be adjusted, but as it is...)

      That said, this is not a flaw. BitTorrent was not designed to be robust against this.

    10. Re:BitTorrent's big weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      time to hop on eMule.

    11. Re:BitTorrent's big weakness by ajs · · Score: 1

      "no need to be a dick"

      Having not resorted to name-calling, and also having specifically stuck to only the facts involved, I'm not sure exactly what it is that you're getting at.

      "the point is that if it's not easy for someone to figure out how to find stuff"

      That's as may be, and that might make Gnutella less useful to you than something that's centrallized, but you made one very specific assertion: "Gnutella seems pretty safe, but they've managed to pollute the network enough to make it almost unusable"

      I in turn asserted, "do not assume that because you can't figure out how to find something that it's automatically useless to all users". This is a simple reality. I could say that the Web is useless because there's so many porn and squatter sites (the combination of which far outweigh the useful content), but those of us who know how to use the Web find the useful bits anyway. The same is true for Gnutella. It's a popular way for everyone to share anything they want, so of course 99.99% of it is crap. Magnet URIs, search sites, content indexes, client-side search filtering and various other technologies make Gnutella VERY usable, and far and away better than any other decentralized technology I've seen.

      This is not a personal attack, and if you insist on taking it that way... well, have fun I guess.

    12. Re:BitTorrent's big weakness by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      I said you were being a dick because you interpreted my assertion that "they've managed to pollute the network enough to make it almost unusable" to mean that I'm too stupid to know how to find things, and to mean that it was "automatically useless to all users"

      Certainly things can be found on Gnutella, and it may work for lots of people- my only point was that what most people want is to type in what they're looking for and get it. In my experience, DC++ has come closest to this for even the most obscure files, but maybe we're looking for different kinds of stuff...

      just try not to think (or sound as though you think) that just because people don't do things the way you do them that they are too dumb to figure them out.

    13. Re:BitTorrent's big weakness by ajs · · Score: 1

      "I said you were being a dick because you interpreted my assertion that "they've managed to pollute the network enough to make it almost unusable" to mean that I'm too stupid to know..."

      Ok, we can stop right there. Did I say "stupid" at any point in anything I said? You can pick my points apart all you like, but please don't add to them without making it clear that they are YOUR comments. I doubt that you're stupid at all. I just think you're someone who doesn't know the current state of Gnutella usage very well (hardly the mark of stupidity), and you took a shot at it on Slashdot (more haste and poor judgement than stupidity).

      Like I said in my last post, if you want to interpret this as some kind of personal attack, then have at it. That's not how it was intended, and I've yet to see anything specific that you've said to counter my original point.

      "what most people want is to type in what they're looking for and get it"

      I find that too difficult. I prefer to click on a link. This works very well with a magnet-URI-capable web client. There are also sites that review Gnutella-based content and others that index it. Harken back to the dawn of the Web and you'll see many parallels.

      As for DC++, it's a nice effort, but is currently as limited as Gnutella used to be when it was first introduced, lacking the features of BitTorrent or modern Gnutella in terms of chunking/swarming and UDP-notification. These features make downloads far, far faster and more reliable for large, popular content. See DC++'s FAQ for more information. For small things, like songs or images, you probably don't care, but when you start downloading whole operating system images, you're going to want more than one source per target active at a time. A LOT more.

      I'm sure they'll add this functionality to their network, or perhaps they'll decide to merge their protocol with Gnutella and take advantage of thousands upon thousands of download sources already using it. Either way, I'm glad people are thinking about these problems rather than just sounding off like you and me ;-)

  43. Closing in advance of raids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Several bittorrent sites that I use have gone dead. The ones I miss the most are torrentbits and delirium vault.

    People have said that these sites are closing voluntarily before they get raided. The site owners seem to have solid information about the raids. I doubt they'd close down without it.

    The best community sites kept track of ratios to encourage people to upload. Suprnova didn't, but torrentbits did. Unfortunately, that means that the sites maintained databases of everything users downloaded.

    Without those databases, the MPAA would have to join swarms and try to collect as many IPs as possible. With such a database, they could look up everything everyone had downloaded through that site.

    So it was a very good thing that the site admins pulled the plug on those sites before the databases could be seized.

    It seems likely to me that the old model of the bittorrent community site, which depended on such databases, is dead.

    Perhaps some old cypherpunks could come up with a better way to incentivize users to share and participate in the community, without leaving data behind in a database. Maybe something with blind signatures, similar to a digital cash protocol.

    But the old model is probably dead.

    1. Re:Closing in advance of raids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solution?
      Freenet

    2. Re:Closing in advance of raids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could use a one-way hash of something unique (a username, for example) and record ratios using that. Then, even if the authorities get ahold of, all they have are a bunch of hashes for names that don't really mean much.

    3. Re:Closing in advance of raids by maeka · · Score: 3, Informative
      People have said that these sites are closing voluntarily before they get raided. The site owners seem to have solid information about the raids. I doubt they'd close down without it.

      The best community sites kept track of ratios to encourage people to upload. Suprnova didn't, but torrentbits did. Unfortunately, that means that the sites maintained databases of everything users downloaded.

      Without those databases, the MPAA would have to join swarms and try to collect as many IPs as possible. With such a database, they could look up everything everyone had downloaded through that site.


      Yes Torrentbits has detailed records of user accounts - what they've uploaded, and what they've downloaded.

      But...
      Your IP is only attached to that user account on a temporary basis. As soon as you stop seeding or leeching a Torrentbit torrent they no longer have a record of your IP.

      If the **AA wants to collect your IP address they simply have to join the swarm. Getting their hands on Torrentbits records will in no way aid them in their attemps to collect IP addresses.

      Perhaps some old cypherpunks could come up with a better way to incentivize users to share and participate in the community, without leaving data behind in a database. Maybe something with blind signatures, similar to a digital cash protocol.

      Most large tracker sites have long abandoned the pratice of tracking their users via IP address. Many sites now attach a "key" to every .torrent downloaded from their tracker. They use this key to relate a peer with an authorized user in their database.
      So there is info in their database, but nothing that can be used to attach any particular user with their real-life self.
    4. Re:Closing in advance of raids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Most large tracker sites have long abandoned the pratice of tracking their users via IP address. Many sites now attach a "key" to every .torrent downloaded from their tracker. They use this key to relate a peer with an authorized user in their database. So there is info in their database, but nothing that can be used to attach any particular user with their real-life self.

      I'm the original anonymous coward you responded to. Thanks for explaining this. It makes me feel better.

    5. Re:Closing in advance of raids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It really shouldn't, because they have your email address and your IP can be gotten through that unless you used an anonymizer for your email.

    6. Re:Closing in advance of raids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Now I feel bad again. This is turning into a real emotional roller coaster.

    7. Re:Closing in advance of raids by NeoSkink · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia new model makes you!

      Or wait... No, I remember what joke we're supposed to make now:

      In Korea, new model is only for old people!

      Right?

    8. Re:Closing in advance of raids by happyhangone · · Score: 1

      and what about the project to make torrents decentralized? Decentralizing bittorrent...

    9. Re:Closing in advance of raids by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps some old cypherpunks could come up with a better wap

      OK, here ya go, since you asked: ... Pay for your movies.

      Oh you wanted a way that doesn't involved paying for the work of others, then the solution is: ... Move to China, you'll fit right in.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    10. Re:Closing in advance of raids by camooT · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'm particularily afraid for demonoid.com. They're suffering tremendously from the hail of suprnova refugees, and they have a comprehensive database indicating share ratios. I've recommended to them before to ditch the DB, but I think they're afraid it might undermine their community mantra. What I'm afraid of is that it'll undermine their community's bank accounts as well...

      update: http://www.demonoid.com/ has hit the slammer.

      Not Found

      The requested URL / was not found on this server

      Chalk another one up for the RI/MP Ass. Of America, at least for now.

    11. Re:Closing in advance of raids by Soulfarmer · · Score: 1

      Torrentbits only had a record of the amount of seeded/leeched stuff. They did not keep a log of files seeded/leeched. You cannot sue someone based on only the amount of data transferred.

      --
      -Is the meaning of life vanity, or is vanity the meaning of life?
    12. Re:Closing in advance of raids by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1
      The best community sites kept track of ratios to encourage people to upload. Suprnova didn't, but torrentbits did. Unfortunately, that means that the sites maintained databases of everything users downloaded.

      Actually, it's much easier just to keep a counter of how much has been uploaded and downloaded so far - two 64-bit unsigned integers. Simple. And doesn't help the *AA much.
    13. Re:Closing in advance of raids by wookyhoo · · Score: 1

      Or, they could have waited until the raid was about to happen and done the far more romantic thing of sitting on top of a car, hacking into the server, and deleting all of the incriminating data.

      Of course, it would also be helpful if the server room had a door surrounded by a powerful electromagnetic!

    14. Re:Closing in advance of raids by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      ironically westerners in china are treated nicely, taxes are less than 10% and its easy to setup a busines, which my friend has done, although you earn less, the expenses are tiny and everything is dirt cheap, including upscale trendy apartments ($300/mo)

      All this "china stops freedoms" is only to control the 1/2 psychotic population, so if you ever end up living there for more than 6monmths you'll find out that its a good thing.

      Why do so many americans think that any place outside usa is backword 15th century? Often they are more advanced and cheaper and cleaner.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    15. Re:Closing in advance of raids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure they can. They'll just put a price on it, say one million dollars per byte.

    16. Re:Closing in advance of raids by Psychotext · · Score: 1

      I dont know... there seems to be more to this than meets the eye. So many of them have shut down so quickly that I think MPAA / RIAA have used nastier tactics than before. Some of the sites I've seen seem to be saying that they did this for the sake of their users.

      I could only hypothesise, but I'd love to hear from one of the people who run these sites to find out exactly what happened here. Hell, maybe they resorted to the good old fashioned goons at the door technique!

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
    17. Re:Closing in advance of raids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just spent a month in China (as a white guy)...

      Good times. I was a bit startled to see the sheer number of police they have in Beijing, but when you consider how little each individual policemen gets paid, it starts making sense.

      For example, there is a park there which is maybe 50' long... they have a permanent policeman watching it.

    18. Re:Closing in advance of raids by Soulfarmer · · Score: 1

      They would have to prove that charged data was copyrighted. And just based on byte count, you cannot do that. At least not in here.

      --
      -Is the meaning of life vanity, or is vanity the meaning of life?
  44. Good Old DCC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    As we wish to maintain the nice comunity that we created, we are keppig forums and irc servers [irc.suprnova.org] open.

    In Other Words: You know where you have to get your stuffs

  45. Spineless Jellyfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand this whole
    "we're not doing anything illegal,
    yet we are caving in and admitting defeat anyway"
    attitude. You're not even IN THE UNITED
    STATES! Who gives a f**k about the MPAA?

    All this cause 4 guys wanted to quit. They couldn't find 4 guys in the netherlands with the BALLS to keep this going? After the THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of dollars in Paypal donations they received?

    That said, I had 150 GIGABYTES of unused downloads
    (based on 250 GB of uploads) at TorrentBits, ALL DOWN THE SH**TER.

    F**K you very much, TorrentBits!

  46. IsoHunt by idolcrash · · Score: 1

    IsoHunt also appears down. I wonder how many smaller, ultra-private servers are going to go up now (especially thanks to the features of the client .....CLIENT DROPPED

    1. Re:IsoHunt by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

      It does seem to be down.

      It was a great site to search torrents throughout many torrent sites which it had in database to look for.

  47. scammers by davideo_ID · · Score: 1

    On a brighter note, .com and .net are still online. Now if i only fill out this registration, and uh.. here it says i should send 'm some money... and ehhh, well don't worry i'll be downloading these free search tools in no time!

    --
    I have nothing to say, just want people to read my cool new sig
  48. Alternatives? Compile below by carlcmc · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Any good alternatives please post in reply

    my only suggestion are

    http://www.isohunt.com/

    http://trackerwww.prq.to/frame.html - which always seems to be slow

    http://www.torrentbox.com/torrents-search.php

    1. Re:Alternatives? Compile below by ProfMoriarty · · Score: 1
      Ok .. thanks for the info ... let me try isohunt ...

      Could not connect to database, probably down for maintainence. Please come back shortly.

      Too late ...

      --
      Karma? Karma? I don't need no stinkin' karma.
    2. Re:Alternatives? Compile below by travisco_nabisco · · Score: 1

      http://www.torrentreactor.net/ This tracker is still up.

    3. Re:Alternatives? Compile below by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      http://torrentsearch.com/

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  49. Evolution of Torrent Sites by Omega037 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Having been a proud user of Bit Torrent for a few years now, I have witnessed the rise and fall of many torrent sites on the web. I remember a time when bytemonsoon was the major site with a large list of torrents, and suprnova was just a crappy site with an ok collection of torrents. At the time there were many torrent sites out there, some large with random files, others very specific to a certain type of file or even just a certain series. Inevitably though, bytemonsoon fell, leaving suprnova to rise from its ashes. With the fall of these major sites, I expect there to be a major increase in the usage of other, smaller sites, until finally one or two of these sites rise up to become the new leaders. Just as bytemonsoon was replaced with suprnova, and anime.mircx was replaced with downloadanime, boxtorrents, Project MAO, and Tokyo Toshokan, suprnova will be replaced as well. Hopefully, these new sites will be better than the last ones, but for now we must settle for what's around. Besides, there is always DC++, eMule, and IRC if you really can't find a new tracker you like :)

  50. I postulated this previously... by zmollusc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How's this for a solution to film piracy? 1. Forget chasing 'pirates'. This will save a lot of expensive legal bills. Cut back drastically on advertising too, as you don't need to whip people up into a frenzy to get them to theatres in the first week. 2. Make film (Citizen Kane 2: starring Adam Sandler or something). 3. Make a VCD cut and make unlabelled cheapo vcd's. Using the economies of scale, sell these so cheap that the guys selling pirate vcd will buy from you rather than burn their own copies. Your margin is the difference between a bulk pressed cd and a small scale burned copy. 4. Simultaneously sell the film as a download for the same price as you get for the vcd. ...wait a few weeks 5. Make a nicer, longer dvd cut of the film and, again, sell these so cheap that the guys selling pirate dvd will buy from you rather than burn their own copies. 6. Sell the dvd cut of the film online at the same price as the DVD wholesale price. .... wait some more 7. Theatre release of film in lovely THX/35mm 8. Boxed set dvd release with extra everything. By doing this you make money from the guys currently selling 'pirated copies' of films and money from people who can't be bothered to find a torrent of your film. The money saved on lawyers and advertising would probably pay for setting up the servers. At stage 3 you are the sole supplier of vcd of your film, it is uneconomic to burn copies so you own the market. People may share your film over the internet but the hassle of finding a torrent and/or running P2P software is competing against the paid download (4) which is priced as low as a blank cdr. This is simple economics. Cut back on expensive things like lawyers and advertising, then put out bargain bin priced product to soak up the sales to misers and the poor. You can still make bigger margins on the nicely packaged versions to people who want to buy them.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  51. Can't say I'm sad by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These sites really had it coming, frankly. While I'm concerned about corporate power, and less than thrilled with the modern media, they weren't trying to do anything about that - they were just plain illegal. Not in a recent way, either - they were ignoring the same copyright laws that protect the software I write, and the GPL so many here are so fond of.

    I'd find it far easier to understand a site that restricted its self to things not otherwise availible than sites like these that appear to have no problem with full scale piracy. Yes, I realise that would still be illegal - but IMO rather less offensive.

    I used to be a bit more sympathetic to this stuff, but I know too many people who view it as their RIGHT to access other people's work for free, without their permission. I guess its just another version of the "information wants to be free" zealotry (Free Software bigots who don't actually understand free software and usually hypocrites. The few, very loud ones that give the whole community a bad name to some.).

    AC posts will be ignored.

    Now - -1 flamebait me. You know you want to.

    1. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Beautyon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How can posting a list of files possibly be illegal?

      That is all that Suprnova ever did. Now, if its illegal to post a list of files, it must also be illegal to print one in a newspaper, or write one on a piece of paper with a pencil anad photocopy it.

      If you go a google search for "index of" apache *.dmg* "port 80" you get lots and lots of links to copyrighted software. By your flawed logic, Google "is just plain illegal" because it provides lists of files just as Supernova did.

      Printing a list can never be an illegal act. At least not in a free country it cant.

      --
      ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
    2. Re:Can't say I'm sad by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      How can posting a list of files possibly be illegal?

      That is all that Suprnova ever did.


      That's also all that Napster ever did. Say, whatever happened to Napster anyway?

      I suggest you look up some information about contributory and vicarious infringement, and how they're applied. Because printing a list can indeed be an illegal act, even in free countries.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    3. Re:Can't say I'm sad by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that 2600 got done for linking to deCSS...

    4. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Beautyon · · Score: 1

      contributory and vicarious infringement

      Suprnova was based in Slovenia.

      Is there such a thing as "contributory and vicarious infringement" in Slovenia?

      Do you practice law in Slovenia?

      hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

      --
      ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
    5. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Beautyon · · Score: 1

      2600

      Indeed, and that decision was insane.

      What that lawyer above failed to adress is the issue of Google. Google links to deCSS, and millions of copyrighted files, but no one clamours for it to be shut down.

      Its called "Double Standards".

      --
      ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
    6. Re:Can't say I'm sad by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      You didn't limit your statement to Slovenia, of course. The rule of thumb on /. is that we generally talk about US law.

      As for Slovenia, who knows. I wouldn't be surprised.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    7. Re:Can't say I'm sad by psykocrime · · Score: 1

      I suggest you look up some information about contributory and vicarious infringement, and how they're applied. Because printing a list can indeed be an illegal act, even in free countries.

      Then the law is wrong. Too bad more people don't understand the concept that government has no intrinsic power, other than that which is granted to it by "the people." If the majority of "the people" decide they want things done a different way, then laws are irrelevant... The people can take away the law-making / law-enforcement power they granted the government.

      For that matter, it's a shame that more people (in the USA at least) don't understand the principle of Jury Nullification. "We the people" do have the power to nullify bad laws, and it doesn't take an armed revolution to do it.

      --
      // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
    8. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Beautyon · · Score: 1

      The rule of thumb on the internet is "check the facts with Google".

      Too many people think that american law and the insane proclamations of the RIAA and the MPAA are aplicable world wide - they are not.

      If its legal to list files in Slovenia, then there is no reason why Supernova should shut down just because its illegal to list files in the usa. Slovenia is a soverign country. Its laws, like its territory, are inviolable and the business of Slovenians.

      Finally, you never answered the part of my post about Google listing links to copyrighted software. Should Google be held accountable for that or not?

      --
      ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
    9. Re:Can't say I'm sad by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      Printing a list can never be an illegal act. At least not in a free country it cant.

      "Hey guys. Come to my site for a list of illegal arms dealers! Addresses, phone numbers, websites! Get your AK-47 today!"

      Now..illegal arms dealers are vastly more dangerous than unauthorized movies, but still 'not legal'.

      How can posting a list of files possibly be illegal?By helping to provide the means to actually get the file in the list. Clickable links to actually get the file is far different from a text file.

    10. Re:Can't say I'm sad by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      If its legal to list files in Slovenia, then there is no reason why Supernova should shut down just because its illegal to list files in the usa.

      Well, we don't know if that's the sole reason that they did shut down. It could be that it's not legal there, or that they had some exposure to liability elsewhere, or that they were abducted by aliens. We don't know yet.

      Finally, you never answered the part of my post about Google listing links to copyrighted software. Should Google be held accountable for that or not?

      Google is a search engine -- it's eligible for the safe harbor under 17 USC 512(d), provided they comply with the applicable provisions of 512. Congress set up this section of the law just to protect various kinds of ISPs since there was a serious concern that they'd be liable for a lot of things otherwise.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    11. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Pofy · · Score: 1

      Didn't Napster actually run the servers you connect to? here we deal with a site that simply has a file which points to were content can be found. You download the file and feed it to your program which in turn connect to servers to get the actual content (from other users connected). Napster sort of ran it all in one sort of. Or am I misstaken.

      In many countries simply having links to material that might have copyright is no in it self a copyright infringement. That is all these sites do.

    12. Re:Can't say I'm sad by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      No, IIRC. Napster users would provide files for download and send a list to the centralized Napster index of what those files were. Then downloaders would connect to the index to find files to download, and having found one, make a direct connection to the appropriate user. Infringing files never crossed through Napster's hardware. But Napster was directly involved in establishing connections so that people could infringe with one another.

      More modern networks attempt to get around this by having users host the indicies. This just shifts more liability on the users, and away from the developers, but that's about the best you could hope for.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    13. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Beautyon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Google is a search engine -- it's eligible for the safe harbor under 17 USC 512(d)

      So, if Suprnova were hosted in the usa, in order to take advantage of the above, they would need to:

      1/ Stop allowing the upload of torrents.

      2/ Create a system that spiders named folders on each users hard drive where torrents are stored.

      3/ Call themeselvs a "search engine".

      Then the criteria is met is it not? Suprnova would be simply spidering compters that are on the iinternet, just like Google does, and providing a search interface, and nothing more.

      Same functionality, same list of torrents to download, no liability whatsoever.

      As for who runs the trackers, this would not be Suprnova's affair, just as it was not while it was running in Slovenia.

      --
      ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
    14. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Beautyon · · Score: 1

      but still 'not legal'

      talking about an activity and doing it are two separate things.

      Clickable links to actually get the file is far different from a text file

      You dont know Perl do you?

      --
      ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
    15. Re:Can't say I'm sad by camooT · · Score: 1

      Yes. Piracy is wrong. Even from someone who does this almost exclusively (I have NO MONEY), I admit it is wrong. Arguing the legality of such sites is moot, it only serves as a source of mental compensation for everyone who participates in piracy. But are the corporates taking the right approach to solving the problem? Does terrorizing 11 year olds and website volunteers sound ethical to you? Why not embrace the technology, and stop fighting it? Don't tell me this is impossible - it hasn't been tried. Couldn't the industries offer high qual versions for download w/ mandatory ads? Or maybe a subscription site that lets you "rent" movies? Do you believe that poor folk (read: me) wouldn't use these services instead? I'd much rather pay $20 a month for unlimited downloads of official quality files than spend all night with my rackety computer keeping me awake for a potentially crap-quality theater-recorded piece of crap.

    16. Re:Can't say I'm sad by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2, Informative

      No.

      Google for 17 USC 512.

      If you're concerned about what they're posting links to, you need to read 17 USC 512(d), (c)(2), (c)(3), and (i)-(k).

      If you're concerned about what users are uploading to their site, you need to read 17 USC 512(c), (g), and (i)-(k).

      THOSE set forth the applicable criteria. There's a lot of them, and they're not terribly complex but long enough that I didn't feel like posting them here.

      What you've posted would not qualify at all. The protection doesn't run to an entity that walks like a search engine and quacks like a search engine. It runs to entities that fall within the statute and take the affirmative steps necessary to comply with it.

      This having been all done, I'd be impressed if you could run a torrent site like suprnova that was popular and useful while still staying within the boundaries of the law.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    17. Re:Can't say I'm sad by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      talking about an activity and doing it are two separate things.

      And both may be illegal
      "Conspiracy to commit..."

    18. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Beautyon · · Score: 1

      I'd be impressed

      Interesting. It looks like all of these conditions can be met.

      For example,

      "does not receive a financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity, in a case in which the service provider has the right and ability to control such activity..."

      Google makes money from Adwords displayed when you search for torrents, ISOs zips dmgs and evey other archive type. So if its good for Google, its good for Suprnova2.

      "upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously to remove, or disable access to, the material;"

      This is doable, because google does it.

      And like I said, uploading is not an issue, since this is a pure search engine, and nothing more, not in any way a "torrent site".

      --
      ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
    19. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I just love this kind of attitude. We (the U.S.) are literally engaging in genocide around the world, invading other people's nations or giving aid and comfort to those who do in our stead, and yet we can still find retards like the parent who would have us all shed a tear for the poor, poor people at the MPAA.

      Right is wrong, and wrong is right. That's just the way it is. Don't go singling out the pirates when there is so much more that is fucked up in this world today.

      Downloading copyrighted material may be wrong, but baby, it's like 832nd on the list of shit that is wrong.

      Worried about stealing? Then why not pay some attention to the monster Bush, who just stole the election for THE SECOND TIME!

      When does somebody shut down whitehouse.gov?

    20. Re:Can't say I'm sad by SirWinston · · Score: 1

      > I used to be a bit more sympathetic to this stuff, but I know too
      > many people who view it as their RIGHT to access other people's
      > work for free, without their permission.

      Actually it is. Traditionally, once you showed something publicly, anyone who saw it had a fundamental natural right to copy it. This is both a common-sense approach and in the roots of Common Law. For 99% of human history that's how it was, yet it didn't keep Shakespeare from writing his plays even though they were pirated at each first performance.

      Modern copyright law is a social contract--explicitly so in the Constitution at least in the U.S.--whereby the public *temporarily* trades its natural right to copy anything it sees to give creators more incentive to create more things. But it is not the creator's natural right to prevent everyone else from copying his inventions.

      Copyright laws are being abused and the public is clearly interested in revoking its social contract creating this artificial right in order to reclaim its natural right to copy. Unfortunately we have a corporate government now, so that won't be allowed to happen.

      --
      "It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word."--Andrew Jackson
    21. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Beautyon · · Score: 1

      "Conspiracy to commit..."

      Printing and disseminating a list does not count as conspiracy.

      If that were the case, it would be possible to ban books that teach you all sorts of dangerous things.

      --
      ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
    22. Re:Can't say I'm sad by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      upon notification of claimed infringement as described in subsection (c)(3), responds expeditiously to remove, or disable access to, the material that is claimed to be infringing or to be the subject of infringing activity

      This however can be very, very broad. I've seen cases where ISPs had to remove entire newsgroups. A US-based torrent site would pretty likely end up having to remove most of its links in short order.

      in the absence of such actual knowledge, is not aware of facts or circumstances from which infringing activity is apparent

      And this one requires being really blind to the contents of the index. If it's only spidering torrents then the commonality of infringement by means of torrent will probably work against them, since this prong involves imputed knowledge -- that is, that they fail unless they didn't even have a reason to know something was infringing.

      Google is so large, with its approach of indexing everything, that it, can make a better case for itself. More focused search engines would have difficulty.

      This is why I said: I'd be impressed if you could run a torrent site like suprnova that was popular and useful while still staying within the boundaries of the law.

      I think that they could set up a site that was lawful, but I think it would not be popular or useful since it would only be able to link to legal torrents as soon as the notifications rolled in, if not earlier.

      Feel free to have a go at it, however. We can see how it all plays out in the end.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    23. Re:Can't say I'm sad by groomed · · Score: 0

      Dude, did you travel through time from the year 1999 to make this comment? Who'd have thought libertarians still existed!

      And a fundamentalist libertarian no less, with zero insight into the actual workings of the state, but a deep ideological yearning for a system rigidly derived from axiomatic principles.

      Enjoy your stay here, my friend, but be warned that many things have changed since 1999! And when you get back, please contact my past self and tell him to dump his stock immediately! Thanks!

    24. Re:Can't say I'm sad by sprayNwipe · · Score: 1

      Last time I went to Google, it didn't have a big link saying "DOWNLOAD MOVIES FOR FREE HERE. ALSO, PLEASE UPLOAD TORRENTS TO ILLEGAL MOVIES AND GAMES HERE"

      Google isn't actively asking for illegal software links, they just happen to find them while indexing the web. If Suprnova worked the same way, I'd agree with you, but they actively ask for people to create and host torrents with them. There's no possible 'accidental' way that someone would 'accidentally' post an illegal Xbox ISO in to their "Xbox ISO's" section, then 'accidentally' seed it.

    25. Re:Can't say I'm sad by shark72 · · Score: 1

      That's a HUGE slippery slope. Come on, you can do better than that. If you're really not sure why Suprnova is on legally shaky ground and Google is not, don't take the intellectually dishonest route of declaring Google to be illegal -- instead, ask the questions and do the research. To fight unfair laws, you must first understand them.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    26. Re:Can't say I'm sad by kokoloko · · Score: 1

      Where are we "literally engaging in genocide", jackass?

    27. Re:Can't say I'm sad by kokoloko · · Score: 1

      I still haven't seen anyone post a convincing argument why its unethical for me to share movies, music, literature? The fact that the author will not make money off my doing so is not persuasive. I believe the onus should be on the person who wants the government to intervene against my own ability to dispose of my property in a way that not only does no harm, but benefits others.

    28. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is an article about the legality of linking to illegal content. Court decisions are mixed, to say the least.

    29. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iraq, Afghanistan, Colombia, Palestine and any country that bows down before U.S. drug policy (including the U.S.), a policy which indisputably kills millions of people every year. But retards like you who only get their news from DRUDGE, Fox or The New York Times wouldn't know anything about it, so you're excused.

    30. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the GPL allows (cheers on) file sharing of it's software. You can do so as long as the licence and source code is there, and any GPL'd software I've ever seen on these sites had the source code and licence attached. Torrents make it a bit harder for people to get GPL software, although when a new distro comes out, you can get .torrent files from the source web site, and go from there.

    31. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

      I was going to mod you down, but the legality of posting a link is still in question. You can't say "plain illegal" without the disclaimer: IANAL.

      I'll just leave it at that.

    32. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... people could infringe with one another.

      In these parts, we call that "having sex".

    33. Re:Can't say I'm sad by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      I guess an argument could be made that Google links indiscriminately, whereas 2600 linked explicitly.

      Kinda similar to the P2P defence that they can't censor because of the scale of the dataset.

      I do completely agree that making linking an offence is madness though.

    34. Re:Can't say I'm sad by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      and more importantly, they actively moderate the content that people submit to them to ensure it *is* warez.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    35. Re:Can't say I'm sad by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. I know that signature. That wouldn't be my old friend from UQ whose name I wont post here would it?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    36. Re:Can't say I'm sad by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Probably not. I don't know what UQ is.

      I normally post here, MacNN, Ars, and once in a while on k5.

      In fact, I just had to change the .sig on Friday. Before that, for years, it had read:

      -- I support anonymous posting. This and all my other posts are in the public domain. I am not a lawyer. /., with its stupid 120 character limit made me dump the anonymous posting bit.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    37. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      printing a list can indeed be an illegal act, even in free countries.


      No, printing such a list cannot be illegal in a free country. Because if it is illegal, the country is not free.
    38. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Cap'n+Steve · · Score: 1

      Give me a break. So it wasn't technically illegal. Their main purpose was still to encourage illegal downloads.

      For every Linux ISO, there were probably 30 bootleg movies.

    39. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Snaller · · Score: 1

      but I know too many people who view it as their RIGHT to access other people's work for free, without their permission.

      That's because some fell that having that "permission" to give is the amoral problem to begin with.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    40. Re:Can't say I'm sad by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      So if I'm a mafia don, and I order a hit on someone, is that also something that free countries must permit, presumably as a form of free speech?

      If so, then I think that you'll have a hard time finding any places that are free.

      If not, then where is the dividing line? What is the rule that produces these results, and how might we apply it in other situations?

      On a related note, if I set up a website, and I allowed anyone to upload or download software to it, and I knew exactly what was being uploaded and downloaded, and I advertised the website as a place to trade warez, and I provided other assistance, such as u/d ratio monitoring for users, etc. but I never personally uploaded or downloaded any of the software, do you think that I ought to get in trouble? Why?

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    41. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Snaller · · Score: 1

      How can posting a list of files possibly be illegal?

      That is all that Suprnova ever did.


      It depends on context, Suprnova was helping people comit crimes, it exsisted for no other reason. Google exsists for finding legal websites, occasionaly it might find some that isn't legal, but since the links are build automatically for the purpose of legality its wastly different.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    42. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Snaller · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Its laws, like its territory, are inviolable and the business of Slovenians.


      That's what Iraq said as well. Don't forget the US government do not care about international law if it goes against their commercial interests.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    43. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google for "index of" "port 80" exeem then :)

    44. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Fizzyboy · · Score: 1

      Next thing you know they will be suing people who post their Winamp playlists.

    45. Re:Can't say I'm sad by psykocrime · · Score: 1

      Dude, did you travel through time from the year 1999 to make this comment? Who'd have thought libertarians still existed!

      Ummm, yeah, whatever dude.

      with zero insight into the actual workings of the state,

      You do realize that "the state" is just an abstract thing, formed by "the people" as a convenience, right? "The State" is composed of individuals... without the individual, the state is nothing.

      Geez, you'd think I was talking to the reincarnation of Karl Marx or something.... sheesh.

      --
      // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
    46. Re:Can't say I'm sad by jeavis · · Score: 1
      Beautyon wrote:
      How can posting a list of files possibly be illegal?
      By precedent, if not by rule of law. 2600 was forced to stop linking to sites that mirrored DeCSS, even though they did not actually distribute the software.
    47. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't find the Deriving A Four-Megabyte MP3 File From A 50-Character Entry In A Winamp Playlist HOWTO. Can you put it up on your local webserver and post a link?

    48. Re:Can't say I'm sad by ckedge · · Score: 1

      For me it comes down to a few things that *are* defensible. Please bear with me.

      I don't like the way the content producers use and spend our money on advertising and marketing.

      I don't like the way they price their products.

      I don't like the length of the exclusive term they have on the information (aka entertainment) they have produced. (Yes, the $100 million spent creating a movie probably deserves more/longer protection than the 2 sentence poem..)

      I don't like the fact that it SHOULD according to technoligical advancements cost near to zero to send the content from their production room to my screen, yet it's still not being done AT ANY PRICE (except in porn, in porn you can do that, they offer tons of porn online live with price competition). Not only that, they insist on forcing me to pay 90% overhead on their 10% production costs.

      I don't like the territorial exclusion zones in where products are offered (I'm in Canada, and I CAN NOT IN ANY WAY get Battlestar Galactica).

      I don't like being fed 80 channels of goo - I want on demand and I want a copy I can go back and watch again and again WHEN I WANT TO.

      I don't want $200 Billion dollars a year spent on the global movie industry.

      *IF* I spend $1000 per year (arbitrary choice on my part) supporting content producers (those that I think deserve my money), I don't see why I should be limited to a tiny subset of the INFORMATION that humanity is generating.

      I especially don't like all of the above when CLEARLY due to technological advances it costs absolutely NOTHING to bring the data to me exactly when I want it.

      Finally we have to face the following - someday (oh about 50-100 years from now) there will be enough movies and music in existence such that EVERYONE will be able to watch old movies and tv and listen to old music for their entire natural life - and not purchase a single new product.

      What will we do then?

      My solution to all of this is simple. Keep spending my $1000 a year on artists (Guardians of the Earth), in the way that I choose, and is most effective as far as I am concerned - and yet access whatever information I want, whenever I want.

      Technology and the math means I will be able to do this. Short of an ultra-nazi state putting 20,000,000 of us in concentration camps.

      Yes, I am advocating a move from pure capitalistic method of determining who produces what product, to a more socialist method. And I am aware of the possibilities of abuse and failure. The good news is that it's working, and so far none of the content producing industries are failing or under stress.

      The odd thing is that it's going to happen whether anyone likes it or not. In 10 years I'm going to be able to handy any friend of mine a $100 piece of media that has almost every song ever recorded on it. And no-one will be able to stop us.

    49. Re:Can't say I'm sad by groomed · · Score: 1

      I apologize for being a jerk. It was supposed to be funny, I guess.

    50. Re:Can't say I'm sad by tonsofpcs · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. reading 17 USC 512 (d)(1) --
      "(1)
      (A) does not have actual knowledge that the material or activity is infringing;
      (B) in the absence of such actual knowledge, is not aware of facts or circumstances from which infringing activity is apparent; or
      (C) upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously to remove, or disable access to, the material;"
      -- Does 17 USC 512 (d)(1)(C) mean that if I link to a site and then obtain knowledge that the material/actvity is infringing, I am within my rights (and actually, it seems, required) to try to forcefully remove content from their server or run a DOS against their server?

  52. Settlement? by moofdaddy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I find it hard to believe that they would not have issued warnings or other things of that nature if the issue was that bandwidth and all of that was becoming too expensive. Suprnova was incredibly popular with teh torrent community and they had to know that people would come to their aid.

    I think it is possible that Suprnova and a number of these other sites reached an agreement with the MPAA or whoever was threating to sue them that they just disappear quiety into the night and they can save them self from a lawsuit.

    It strikes me as odd that they would not heve mentioned it, but I can easily see the reason for this. If your the MPAA you have two options, either make an example of these sites so people are too scared to fuck with them, or just make them go bye bye. I think the first won't discourage enough people, because the law is on suprnova's side, so a number of people would rise up just to defy the MPAA and take up the cause. However, if the MPAA were to tell suprnova that in order to avoid a lawsuit they need to tell people that the site was just too much work, it prevents them from being martyrs and other people won't be so quick to jump in and fill the vacum left.

    --
    Be better in bed. Wikiafterdark!
    1. Re:Settlement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is the Law on suprnova's side?

    2. Re:Settlement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fine point many are missing is that they didn't post anything illegal, and everything they posted was not created by the MPAA or the RIAA or any of their agents or members. They posted information about the material, not the material itself. Video rental stores post lists of videos as advertisements all the time. Are they illegal too? When does knowledge become illegal? Merely knowing something can get you arrested? That's were we are going here. .torrent files in themselves are not illegal. They do not infringe on any material the RIAA or MPAA has. Any 'Taketown' was illegal.

    3. Re:Settlement? by glass_window · · Score: 1

      It sounds more like they took down their sites so they could keep everybody anonymous before RIAA and MPAA process servers knocked at their doors subpoenaing the databases listing the file servers so they could find out who they need to sue.

  53. FAQ by optize · · Score: 3, Funny

    http://www.silentdragz.net/suprfaq/

    1. Re:FAQ by aero2600-5 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the FAQ. Seriously.

      Aero

      --
      Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
  54. What a relief by BenSpinSpace · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man, I'm so unbelievably relieved that you guys are listing off virtually every torrent site in existence. Since obviously nobody at the MPAA would ever think to read Slashdot, it's totally obvious that you should post more torrent sites, including a mirror of one site that was apparently just forced to shut down. No need to be covert here!!

    1. Re:What a relief by davideo_ID · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you under the illusion that the MPAA would not already know about these sites? I mean, you reckon they don't have google or are you thinking the don't have an internet connection? Maybe they work from a dail-up connection and don't get to check out any forums? A bit more respect for the powers of the dark side might suit you well

      --
      I have nothing to say, just want people to read my cool new sig
    2. Re:What a relief by ProfMoriarty · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ya ... well I encrypted my posts with double-ROT13 encryption ... so if they attempt to decrypt it ... it's a violation of the DMCA ...

      --
      Karma? Karma? I don't need no stinkin' karma.
    3. Re:What a relief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, mod parent up.

    4. Re:What a relief by dv8ed · · Score: 1

      Yay for security through obscurity! Somebody should tell Microsoft about the technique.

    5. Re:What a relief by russint · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, beacuse the MPAA doesn't already know what torrent sites exist.

      --
      ^^
    6. Re:What a relief by templest · · Score: 0

      I Agree, how's about those mods put them censors to -good- use and start crossing out 'dem URLs?

      --
      I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
    7. Re:What a relief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget about Don Vito Torrents, they still appear to be up & running.

    8. Re:What a relief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the site I just visited --what was their name again-- is still alive and kicking, (and responding fast too!). I downloaded a .torrent file (nothing illegal in that, nothing infringing or stealing or anything else in that old .torrent file), and happy to get it too!

  55. suprnova :( by paranoidforlife · · Score: 1

    I am greatly saddened by this incident. Suprnova.org was my life. it helped me through hard times. i will never forget it. there are a few sites i found that may take its place. but in my heart, suprnova was the best :-( *crawls into bed and weeps*

    1. Re:suprnova :( by General+Trolltalk · · Score: 1

      Nowhere was it said that the sites were shut down for good. This could be the result of anything - some kind of effort on the part of MPAA, lack of funds to keep operations going, service outage, etc. Stop jumping to conclusions people..

    2. Re:suprnova :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a link to a story from CIO ... can't find it now. Officially, being sued by the MPAA.

      Nobody's jumping to any conclusions.

    3. Re:suprnova :( by aero2600-5 · · Score: 1

      The story from CIO made no mention of suprnova.org. That could have been any site.

      Aero

      --
      Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
  56. Freenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freenet's performance has been improving lately after several months of not working very well. In combination with Frost, perhaps now people will seriously start to migrate to this anonymous architecture.

  57. You could try paying for it by Ogemaniac · · Score: 1

    But that might be asking too much, right?

    1. Re:You could try paying for it by StratoChief66 · · Score: 1

      Yes, we all know that many, many things are illegally torrented, but what about really old games, linux distros, old episodes of tv shows? Don't be a troll, there are many valuable uses for torrents.

      --
      Frylock: "We should have cloned twenties, Jackson wouldn't have given a fuck."
    2. Re:You could try paying for it by Shafe · · Score: 1

      Actually I'd gladly pay $20/month to get an unlimited Netflix on my Internet. I want access to every damn movie ever put on DVD and every Discovery Channel special, all available within a few remote control clicks.

      Frankly, I do pay for all of this stuff. I'm more concerned with the Internet users who are eating up 35% of internet bandwidth on bittorrent. What of these people?

      Besides, people have always pirated and will always pirate. What's funnier is seeing desperate, technologically incompetent Hollywood executives scrambling to add another layer of protection to their forms of media. Get over it! You can't beat the hackers!

    3. Re:You could try paying for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you, rich asshole.

  58. I use google anywayz by polyp2000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    eg:

    the ultimate torrent search ...

    are they going shut down google now ?

    nick...

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    1. Re:I use google anywayz by nicklott · · Score: 1

      How often does google update though? I get 50% 404s

    2. Re:I use google anywayz by YetAnotherDave · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I forsee a simple program (could even just be a perl script) that does a google search for .torrents, and eliminates those that give 404 before presenting the list. It won't find as big a list, since it'll only get long-lived seeds, but that shouldn't really be too big a hindrance...

      The race is on, who'll post a reply with the code for this first?

    3. Re:I use google anywayz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, this is really sweet.
      So long SuperNova, Long Live Google!!

      Cheers,
      Ben

    4. Re:I use google anywayz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called bitoogle.

    5. Re:I use google anywayz by k_stamour · · Score: 2, Insightful

      dam u code fast.....

      --
      Julius Caesar - Act I, Scene i: "What mean'st thou by that? Mend me, thou saucy fellow!"
    6. Re:I use google anywayz by Baorc · · Score: 1

      As much as this sounds like a long shot, well at least to me, I just read a couple of days ago, O'Reilly's Google Hacks and it would be possible to do what you say. It also inspired me to try a few things, your proposition would be totally do-able in html and a little javascript. For example, try searching for the name of anything you want followed by filetype:torrent in the google search bar and see what comes up.

    7. Re:I use google anywayz by rmccann · · Score: 1

      :) One of the ads on that search: Download The Incredibles Get unlimited DVD quality movies! Watch on your PC, burn to DVD/VCD Should be easy to track down. Silly pirates.

    8. Re:I use google anywayz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it were somehow possible to exploit this behaviour of google into something more steadfast / by building it into an azureus like application it might be possible to cut out the need for sites like suprnova all together - if someone could figure out how to do this things could get very interesting.

    9. Re:I use google anywayz by Baorc · · Score: 1

      Well I've been reading more, and if people are interested, you should read about the Google API, downside is, you need a web key to make a request upon every search if you use it's API and it is limited to 1000 requests per day per key. But essentially you can develop certain web applications built on Google's web search, I am still not sure of all of the functionality that this has to offer, but at least it looks interesting for further applications.

    10. Re:I use google anywayz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this sounds really interesting. i could just imagine the press if the **AA tried to cry foul on google.

    11. Re:I use google anywayz by Dacmot · · Score: 1

      No, but they might ask Google to prevent search on torrent files.

  59. This time with breaks! by zmollusc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How's this for a solution to film piracy?

    1. Forget chasing 'pirates'. This will save a lot of expensive legal bills. Cut back drastically on advertising too, as you don't need to whip people up into a frenzy to get them to theatres in the first week.
    2. Make film (Citizen Kane: starring Adam Sandler or something).
    3. Make a VCD cut and make unlabelled cheapo vcd's. Using the economies of scale, sell these so cheap that the guys selling pirate vcd will buy from you rather than burn their own copies. Your margin is the difference between a bulk pressed cd and a small scale burned copy.
    4. Simultaneously sell the film as a download for the same price as you get for the vcd.
    ...wait a few weeks
    5. Make a nicer, longer dvd cut of the film and, again, sell these so cheap that the guys selling pirate dvd will buy from you rather than burn their own copies.
    6. Sell the dvd cut of the film online at the same price as the DVD wholesale price.
    .... wait some more
    7. Theatre release of film in lovely THX/35mm
    8. Boxed set dvd release with extra everything.

    By doing this you make money from the guys currently selling 'pirated copies' of films and money from people who can't be bothered to find a torrent of your film. The money saved on lawyers and advertising would probably pay for setting up the servers.

    At stage 3 you are the sole supplier of vcd of your film, it is uneconomic to burn copies so you own the market. People may share your film over the internet but the hassle of finding a torrent and/or running P2P software is competing against the paid download (4) which is priced as low as a blank cdr.

    This is simple economics. Cut back on expensive things like lawyers and advertising, then put out bargain bin priced product to soak up the sales to misers and the poor. You can still make bigger margins on the nicely packaged versions to people who want to buy them.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    1. Re:This time with breaks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cut back on lawyers? Are you insane? How will they make those payments on the $1M house, 4 Mercedes, and put their 3 children through private schools?

      Please, won't someone think of the lawyers?

    2. Re:This time with breaks! by xstein · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is simple economics.

      You're missing the idea behind cost of production and supply/demand. Hollywood filmmakers will NEVER be able to sell as cheap as pirates for the simple reason the pirates do not pay anything for the material. Making movies is a costly venture, advertising or no advertising, lawyers or no lawyers.

      While I do agree Hollywood is approaching this the wrong way, your idea is fundamentally flawed. Besides, this has nothing to do with cost of production--this is simply supply/demand economics. The market will set the price, and right now it has done so very efficiently for DVDs. Hollywood needs to embrace the Internet, not implement artificial methods of stopping Internet piracy--remove the demand for pirated movies, not the supply.

    3. Re:This time with breaks! by j3110 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a better idea... Charge me once for the content. Most software has an "upgrade" policy. They don't reward people for doing business with them. They try to screw you every way possible, and expect you to play nice. Let them clean up their act first before they go after people not playing fair with them. I just can't find it in my heart to feal any pitty for the "plight" of anyone working in or for the MPAA.

      1) They lobbey the government into outlawing things that the average person wouldn't agree with.
      2) They form a monopoly through an organization... this seems like an illegal trust to me, but they are still operating.
      3) They are definately guilty of price fixing, considering that just about every movie follows the same pricing scheme. The theatre charges the same no matter what movie you see. DVD prices are formulaic based on quatity on hand and days since release. They are all marked up excessively, just like CDs, and all cost the same no matter how much it costed to make the movie.
      4) They ignore "fair use", and blast me with propaganda commercials about how it is "theft" or "piracy" instead of "copyright infringement".
      5) The laws are now tilted so far in their favor that it is a crime to break "copyright law" instead of a civil case, as it should be... This is so they can use our tax payer money to go after what is a civil matter.

      Comparatively, I wonder who's the bigger leach on society, the copyright infringers or them.

      --
      Karma Clown
    4. Re:This time with breaks! by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      I really like this idea. I would change only one thing:

      [...] which is priced as low as a blank cdr.

      Price it as low as a CD-RW, and then if you didn't like the movie at least you can reuse the disc!

      But as other responses have said, the MPAA won't go for this. It doesn't maximize their profitability, simple as that. Whether it will be better for them in the longer run is up for debate, but it would definitely have short-term negative effects for which executive might lose their jobs (for not putting the shareholders first).

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    5. Re:This time with breaks! by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. Without your support I will never be able to buy a house, four cars, and three children. Then where will I be?

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    6. Re:This time with breaks! by NoData · · Score: 1

      You're missing the idea behind cost of production and supply/demand. Hollywood filmmakers will NEVER be able to sell as cheap as pirates for the simple reason the pirates do not pay anything for the material. Making movies is a costly venture, advertising or no advertising, lawyers or no lawyers.


      Right, the costs are extraordinary and hard to recoup, which is why the pirates make so much more money than the studios..erm, uh..wait...

    7. Re:This time with breaks! by karnal · · Score: 1

      If I were you, I'd hold off on buying those three children. I think you could go to jail for that....

      --
      Karnal
    8. Re:This time with breaks! by coopaq · · Score: 0
      Cut back on expensive things like lawyers and advertising...

      You forget the relationship dynamics.

      The lawyers wives all hang out with the producers wives and their kids all go to school together and have playtime together.

      And the advertisers would poo poo you if you stopped marketing your product via them.

      It really is a large society of people tied to each other in lock step.

    9. Re:This time with breaks! by DaRealPock · · Score: 1

      9. Lose money because half the people buying DVDs now will either wait for the cheap VCD release or 'pirate' the DVD version because they don't want to wait for the VCD.

    10. Re:This time with breaks! by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      nobody would go to see the movie knowing the plot is crap. most of the time the film IS crap.

      and your way doesn't really tell how they'll bill you 2-3 times for the movie in case the movie is good.

      also... the way the lawyers/execs have spun is it that the expensive lawsuits save them money(or even generate it).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    11. Re:This time with breaks! by mrwonton · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, he knows what he's doing. He's a lawyer.

      --
      Not more than you need, just more than you want
    12. Re:This time with breaks! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      First, I still think the companies use piracy to increase market share in places where their prices are simply unaffordable. Those people will pay out the nose once the WTO or the World Bank blows in with easy credit. Instant and somewhat captive market. Remember it's about control. They don't want anything out there if they don't own it. Pirated or not.

      Second, There's that little thing called featherbedding. Nepotism plays a part here. The owner's shyster lawyer brother-in-law is out of work at the moment, and the wife is telling him that he aint gettin' none if he doesn't help him out and give him a job. He better not forget his moronic, coke sniffing, two timing, back stabbing nephew for the advertising department either. Turns out ol' boy can bring in some serious money, eh? A few well placed bri...er..donations and, viola, the law is yours to write as you please. Beats the hell out actually spending money on R&D looking at new business models. Oh, I forgot that he has a thirteen year old daughter who shouldn't be allowed sing in the shower, much less a studio, screaming, "I wanna be star, daddy!!!" How could anyone possibly turn her down?

      --
      What?
    13. Re:This time with breaks! by frostman · · Score: 1


      It's a nice idea, but...

      Even accepting all your assumptions, I see two problems:

      1) It's going to be very hard to bring the price of your VCDs down to what the local pirates will pay. Yes, it's cheaper to mass-produce, but the pirates are copying in bulk and already there in their markets. This part could definitely work, but you'd probably lose money on the first few releases as your distribution network gets set up. Plus it would only work for very, very popular movies.

      2) I can buy blank CDRs for a few cents each. Can you really operate a download service with 650MB downloads at a few cents a pop? I kinda doubt that.

      So as I see it basically the VCD and download parts of your plan are loss leaders.

      That means you're in big trouble if your assumptions about the DVD and ticket sales don't work out.

      --

      This Like That - fun with words!

    14. Re:This time with breaks! by man_ls · · Score: 1

      The price of DVD movies, while high, is about in line with the perceived "entertainment value" out of them.

      Assuming I'm billing myself out at my absolute rock-bottom rate of $25 per hour which I reserve, basically, for 802(c)3 non-profits which are operating with negative net income, a movie is half an hour's work for me. I'll get about 4 times that much time back out of it on the other end.

      I would pay about $5 per movie to download an ISO image, legally, of the feature film DVDs. No extras, etc. just the feature film in unmodified version (even if that meant watching trailers and such beforehand, as long as I could still skip them.) Or they could offer, say, DVD47 quality ISOs, not a full DVD9, thus you go to the store and pay for a better copy, or something.

      The problem, like you mentioned, is that Hollywood isn't able to make the jump to direct-distribution. I bet if they eliminated the middleman, and 100% of that $5 went to the top-tier distributor, they'd make a bit more money overall, as a result of significantly lower overhead.

    15. Re:This time with breaks! by zygote · · Score: 1

      How about this: "give" a DVD - barebones no extras, just a dupe of the film -- to everyone buying a ticket to the movie in the theatre.

      Right away you think: first one in line is going to turn around and pirate the DVD. Sure, but then think about how many more people will go to a movie because of the value added by the DVD. Beside, why pass up a nicely pressed DVD for some torrent/p2p download hassle when you get to see the movie on the big screen to boot?

      Wouldn't this offset the "lost revenue" from bootleg/pirated DVDs?

      I think it would be worth an experiement.

      --
      the future is here, it is just not evenly distributed - w. gibson
    16. Re:This time with breaks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is about how it works in Russia... DVD Factory owner makes 10,000 copies of legal packaged DVDs and pays MPAA (and its equivalents) the smallest possible licensing fees... Then on that same factory they run 100,000 "pirated" dvds and sell them to street vendors. When the 10,000 "legal ones dont sell at the "proper" hihg prices factory owner can push for a discount since they are not selling well.. Anyway :-) I'm with you - just keep the product placements non-obvious (unlike in the Austin Powers series)

    17. Re:This time with breaks! by cfuse · · Score: 1
      The market will set the price, and right now it has done so very efficiently for DVDs.

      Maybe where you are, but region coding exists solely to ensure that the highest possible price is payed for that corresponding market.

      I live in Australia, where the free trade agreement with America is about to come into force and make region coding legal here (after it was struck down by our consumer body the ACCC). Do you really think that is going to drive DVD prices down?

      God I hate our politicians, they've made my country into America's bitch.

    18. Re:This time with breaks! by Nevyn · · Score: 1
      Assuming I'm billing myself out at my absolute rock-bottom rate of $25 per hour ... a movie is half an hour's work for me.

      Here's a free clue, you don't get to spend all of that $25. I'm guessing you get about $16 ... and then a non-trivial amount of that will be taken in essential bills (food, housing, etc.). So it's much more likely that you are working a couple of hours for that single movie.

      Here's another free clue, not everyone get's paid as well as you do.

      Not that I recommmend copying stuff, it's just helping the bad guys. However the current pricing of entertainment is certainly too high ... and wouldn't be sustainable if it wasn't for illegal price fixing.

      --
      ustr: Managed string API with ave. 44% overhead over strdup(), for 0-20B
    19. Re:This time with breaks! by romiz · · Score: 1

      I live in Australia, where the free trade agreement with America is about to come into force and make region coding legal here.

      Or it might be an occasion to ruin it.
      Region-coding is an artificial separation between markets, thus against free trade. When the European Union observed this case, it concluded that it was a matter of contracts between producers and manufacturers, and could not be struck down because there was no market distortion beween European states.

      But in the Australian case, if there is a free trade agreement, either you or US customers can argue that not being able to buy their DVD in the other country, due to collusion between producers and manufacturers, is a restriction to free trade between Australia and the US, maintaining artifical prices. Thus, you have an even better reason to repel this system...

      Oh, yeah, IANAL, as you usually said in those cases.

    20. Re:This time with breaks! by cfuse · · Score: 1
      But in the Australian case, if there is a free trade agreement, either you or US customers can argue that not being able to buy their DVD in the other country, due to collusion between producers and manufacturers, is a restriction to free trade between Australia and the US, maintaining artifical prices. Thus, you have an even better reason to repel this system...

      It's called a 'free trade agreement' when it should be called 'protection for American trade and a severe arse ramming for Australian industries agreement'. Search slashdot if you want to read about how bad the FTA is.

    21. Re:This time with breaks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1. [...] Cut back drastically on advertising too, as you don't need to whip people up into a frenzy to get them to theatres in the first week.
      No matter how little you spend on advertising, the pirates will pay less (i.e., nothing at all). Strike one.
      2. Make film
      Yeah, it's just that easy, isn't it? Unfortunately, you forget that this costs money. Generally, tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars. Here's another 8 or 9 figures of overhead that the pirates will NEVER have to pay. Strike two.

      3. Make a VCD cut and make unlabelled cheapo vcd's. Using the economies of scale [...]
      ??? Plenty of legitimate but small distributors could quite easily be out-scaled by a pirate operation. Strike three.
  60. Jurisdiction? by Kozz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What about all those folks who said at the last "SuprNova is going bye-bye" story that it couldn't be touched because it was somewhere in Europe where the MPAA can't reach them?

    We can't really say this is the result of MPAA, can we? Can they "get" the folks related to suprnova.org if they are located in Belgium or Turkey or whereever?

    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    1. Re:Jurisdiction? by Zardus · · Score: 1

      They can't, but the assassins can...

      --
      You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
    2. Re:Jurisdiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Can they "get" the folks related to suprnova.org if they are located in Belgium or Turkey or whereever?

      Of course they can get to anyone in any country that has a suitable copyright law. (Newsflash to USA readers: there are laws in other countries besides yours.)

      Here is how you sue someone who committed a crime against your and lives in a foreign country: Get the yellow pages for a major city of that country. Look under "Legal Services". Call a lawyer. Ask if the crime is prosecutable under that country's legislation. Hire lawyer to file necessary paperwork and to go to court.

      Details differ, such as does each country's law make it possible succesfully to prosecute torrent file distribution as contributory infringement, aiding and abetting, or similar.

    3. Re:Jurisdiction? by hazee · · Score: 1

      Well, they had a go at Jon Johansen of decss fame, didn't they? The MPAA's jurisdiction certainly doesn't cover Norway - he wasn't even breaking any laws there - but that didn't stop them trying. Just the potential costs of defending even a bogus lawsuit may well be enough to get someone to comply.

    4. Re:Jurisdiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember what they did to Gene Kan.

    5. Re:Jurisdiction? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      The MPAA has no jurisdiction, they are a group of companies.

      They seem to be winning their campaign, because people are starting to think the MPAA and RIAA are law enforcement departments.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  61. donkax by uibi · · Score: 1

    reminds me on donkax being shut down

  62. Ha not the end of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I know what I'll be doing this holiday season: setting up another suprnova... where will I host it? hmmm how about on the thousands of hacked, infected Windows installations plaguing the planet.

    If anyone succeeds in shutting * that * down, they will have simultaneously found the solution to the world's spam. i.e. either way we win.

  63. Frost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That may be their plan, but I, and many SuperNova users I know, are migrating to Frost. Its based on Freenet, Open Source, and doesn't rely on any centralised website that can be shut down (for those of you that tried Freenet in the past and were disappointed, it has come a long way in recent weeks and months - so its probably time to give it another chance).

    1. Re:Frost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why in the hell they write stuff like this in Java, I can't understand.

      Idiots.. Sheesh. Nowadays it's not hard to write cross-platform precompiled software.

      I hate Java and its monsterous install requirements. I don't want all that crap, I just want to run the application.

  64. problem in general: censoring metainformation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  65. Inevitable by SirChive · · Score: 1

    This was inevitable. In our society money brings power. And the forces opposed to file sharing have vast sums of money hence they have vast political and legal power.

    Also the RIAA and MPAA are learning. They are focusing more widely. Bittorrent slipped threough the cracks for awhile. Next they are likely to go after the alt.binaries newsgroups.

    Those of us who want to want to share entertainment and culture will continue to lose every battle until basic laws are rewritten. And I don't know what kind of societal meltdown will have to take place before power is redistributed and we see these laws rewritten.

    1. Re:Inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      behead the evil amoung us

  66. Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    <sarcasm> Haven't you read the Constitution? It is your God-given right to obtain and distribute copyrighted works without the author's permission! Except when it comes to GPL'd software, of course. We hang motherfuckers who violate that shit. </sarcasm>

    Let's face it. The majority of BitTorrent traffic is not strictly legal. What did you expect? The RIAA is going to try to protect its business.

    1. Re:Duh! by ThoreauHD · · Score: 1

      I expect them to follow the same rules as any other corporation. They are beholden to due process of law, just as real people with real rights are. You cannot just take something from somebody because you feel that it is yours- without first proving it.

      What they have done is unConstitutional. I don't give a flying fuck if their reason for it is getting laid by you. You will repect the highest law of the land, or your ass is next in line.

  67. More torrent sites ... by n3m6 · · Score: 1

    More torrent sites that have gone down just recently..

    http://www.n4p.com/

    Sorry
    Our torrent site has been shut down
    by our ISP (Techdroid) due to a DMCA complaint.

    http://www.sharelive.com/

    Sorry, ShareLive has been forced to come offline. We are keeping our Forums online.

    1. Re:More torrent sites ... by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      Sharing The Groove. Has been gone for a while and I miss it badly.

      For a while it was the one true source of bootlegged concerts. For example, it was nice to be able to get my hands on the first night of the most recent Rush tour about 1 1/2 weeks after the show....and it sounds as good as any live album.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    2. Re:More torrent sites ... by AGTiny · · Score: 1

      That had nothing to do with the RIAA or MPAA. The owner stopped paying the server bills.

    3. Re:More torrent sites ... by AGTiny · · Score: 1

      FYI, here is the replacement site started by many of the former STG mods: The Traders' Den

    4. Re:More torrent sites ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think Li'l V will grow up to be a yellow-bellied tattletale, too?

  68. Bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had just discovered BitTorrent and wondered why it didn't seem to work... but have now meantime discovered that all the alternatives seem to demand registration etc... Can't believe this is the future of P2P...

  69. The Pirate Bay is up and running by TorKlingberg · · Score: 1

    thepiratebay.org is mostly targetted at the Swedish audience, but there is a lot of international stuff there too. It is heavily loaded now, bit is certainly not going away.

    1. Re:The Pirate Bay is up and running by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just too bad it's run by complete fuckfaces or I'd might consider using it...

  70. Torrentspy.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Torrentspy looks like a great alternative to suprnova.

    1. Re:Torrentspy.com by enjoys-pigeons · · Score: 1

      and it has a search engine for firefox :)

      --
      Hello slashdot, my old friend, I've come to talk with you again...
  71. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the last few hours several ISPs have noted a 30% increase in overall bandwidth on the Internet. Responsiveness of websites also increased at the same moment.

    Internet and protocol gurus are baffled by the phenomenom. One stated, "We are at a loss for an explanation here. We have seen some recent solar activity, we are investigating whether some universal constants may have changed resulting in faster-than-light electrons. This potentially truly shatters physics as we understand it."

    1. Re:In Other News... by Rie+Beam · · Score: 1

      *blankity-blank-blank*...next time I will remember to preview...fix:

      The RIAA/MPAA announced today that the controversial book, "The Day Nobody Shared", would be banned and removed from all Kindergarten and Pre-School shelves.

  72. Re:This is a sad day... by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 1

    gamecopyworld.com

  73. Suprnova down ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooo! KHAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  74. Alternatives by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Well, Suprnova is still keeping the forums and irc channels open.

    Back to the ol' times...

  75. SuprNova mirror by ilyagordon · · Score: 0
    This SuprNova mirror is still up:

    http://www.bi-torrent.com/

    --
    People seem to love modding me down for pointing out their stupidity and arrogance...
  76. Also, Mamereactor.com (MAME ROMs via P2P) by antdude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    See this newsgroup thread.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  77. Interesting that MPAA can actually shut them down by bigberk · · Score: 1

    I'm rather impressed that the MPAA (or its equivalent corporations globally) are actually successful in shutting down these web sites! After all, look at all the spammers web sites that have been operational for years, and that is while continually advertising themselves in millions of irritating emails. If only it were that easy to shut them down too.

  78. Suprnova.org down? by Special_K_21 · · Score: 0

    When did it get taken down. I just put on some torrents from there less than an hour ago without a problem. Site seems to be Slashdotted now so I can't tell whats going on.

  79. Here's a hint, kids. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't want your favorite torrent site to go down next, don't post links to it here. It doesn't make you cool to be in the know and just hurts the site's chances of survival. Thanks.

  80. Why I think the MPAA is like Hitler, maybe worse! by iosmart · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hitler invades and remilitarizes the Rhineland on March 7, 1936. Historian Donald Kagan calls it a "Saturday surprise," because it was a weekend, and the French leaders who were at their homes would have to scramble together to come up with a response. Things were just too slow compared to if the invasion was done on a weekday. The MPAA attacks on a Sunday. How disgusting. The MPAA does it while everyone is taking their Sunday evening nap...

  81. One word for you: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Usenet

  82. Finnish police raid BitTorrent site by optize · · Score: 0

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/12/14/finnish_po lice_raid_bittorrent_site/

    1. Re:Finnish police raid BitTorrent site by wk633 · · Score: 1

      There's a space in your link.

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/12/14/finnish_ po lice_raid_bittorrent_site/

    2. Re:Finnish police raid BitTorrent site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a space in your HTML skills.

      Finnish Police Raid Bit Torrent Sites

    3. Re:Finnish police raid BitTorrent site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, there is a space in your link too. Its called 'slashdot'.It intentionally inserts spaces into links. If you weren't so lazy you would create a real clickable link such as
      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/12/14/finnish_po lice_raid_bittorrent_site/

      I imagine it is to keep robots from scrape-ing the slashdot pages.

    4. Re:Finnish police raid BitTorrent site by Buran · · Score: 1

      And in yours. ;) It's a bug in slashcode.

    5. Re:Finnish police raid BitTorrent site by ColaMan · · Score: 1
      It's not a bug, it's a feature , to stop the page-widening trolls :-)

      Now a handy slashdot feature to have would be an auto-html-link-maker, seeing as people seem incapable of typing <a href="http://your.site.com">site</a>

      But that's just my rant :-)
      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    6. Re:Finnish police raid BitTorrent site by Buran · · Score: 1

      I've never seen any of those, even before this bug/feature/whatever was introduced.

      If I was a programmer I'd write a patch to do what you suggest, but I'm not -- are you? Perhaps you could... or maybe if someone who reads this is, they could.

      It's irritating how many times I have to fix links broken because of this before I can view them, although I can't really blame all the people who just don't know how to HTMLize a link (there's lots of them - have discovered that over the years)

    7. Re:Finnish police raid BitTorrent site by mlk · · Score: 1
      It's irritating how many times I have to fix links broken because of this before I can view them, although I can't really blame all the people who just don't know how to HTMLize a link (there's lots of them - have discovered that over the years)

      I can, if people read the the stuff under the submit button, look at what they see. That is not very hard, so why can people use it? Gah.

      URLs <URL:http://example.com/> will auto-link a URL
      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  83. Usenet by Universal+Indicator · · Score: 4, Interesting

    BitTorrent is a great technology, and it has sped up many Linux ISO downloads I've had in the past. However, I think it is so funny the way people freak out over stuff like suprnova closing. "Where are we supposed to get our MP3s and warez now?!!"

    I NEVER hear anything about usenet, and there are hundreds of gigabytes of stuff posted every single day. Nearly my entire MP3 and digital video collection (and actually just about everything else) has come from usenet. I don't understand why this seems to still be the great untapped resource? Especially nowadays with services like newzbin.com, it makes finding and downloading from usenet a real snap!

    Just the other day I introduced my brother to usenet, and he couldn't believe what he had been missing for so long.

    1. Re:Usenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK let's keep the NGs on the DL.

    2. Re:Usenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No shit. Ontday alktay boutay netusay.

      ~~~

    3. Re:Usenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shhhh don't tell "them" about it.

    4. Re:Usenet by MooCows · · Score: 1

      A good usenet server (with a large amount of groups, retention, etc.) costs money.
      Using a Bittorrent tracker is free. (bandwidth costs excluded)

      --
      The path I walk alone is endlessly long.
      30 minutes by bike, 15 by bus.
    5. Re:Usenet by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Many ISP's choke bandwidth on usenet.
      SBC and Road Runner choke it down so badly that it's just not feasible to get large files or large volumes of files through usenet.

    6. Re:Usenet by MXK · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately many people aren't able to use Usenet because of the bandwidth limits, and paying $10 for 5GB/month (newsgroups.com) kinda defeats the purpose. As for the free stuff from ISP, I'm limited to 1 GB per month and need some of that for actually posting to and reading programming groups.

    7. Re:Usenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use a Usenet service that has ports other than default open.

    8. Re:Usenet by Universal+Indicator · · Score: 1

      news.astraweb.com is $10 a month for unlimited transfer at 75k/second. That's not too bad.

      I know people just want to get all they can for free, but the way I look at it (ethics aside of course) is that $10 a month is still cheaper than buying a single album just so I can have MP3s, and its certainly cheaper than a single DVD.

    9. Re:Usenet by xjerky · · Score: 1

      I think he was aiming for more DLs, so mission accomplished!

      --
      A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
    10. Re:Usenet by value_added · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Many ISP's choke bandwidth on usenet.
      SBC and Road Runner choke it down so badly ..."

      Bzzzzt!

      Sorry, usenet is not your ISP's news server.

      Subscribe to any good news service (newscene, giganews, easynews, yada yada) and the bandwidth your ISP allocates to you will be maxed out almost as fast as your hard drive will fill up.

    11. Re:Usenet by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Usenet is great. I hear they even have some discussion groups on there now.

    12. Re:Usenet by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      Bzzzzzt! Road Runner and SWB throttle usenet bandwidth when you access usenet through road runner or SWB systems.

      You should not have to go to a third party for full speed access. I PAY $55 a month for RR, I'm penalized an extra $10 a month because I do not subscribe to cable TV, normal access is $44.95 a month here.

      At $55 a month I expect a LOT... I'm friggin paying for it, I should get it. I should not have to pay a third party for something I'm already paying for. My contract says "unlimited access" and "high speed"....

    13. Re:Usenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I NEVER hear anything about usenet, and there are hundreds of gigabytes of stuff posted every single day.

      In the imortal words of Carl in the Stonecutters episode:

      "Shuhuhuhuhut Uhuhuhup!"

    14. Re:Usenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have Roadrunner. I have spent hours on end, using all 3 mbit/sec given to me by rr, downloading from usenet. I'll pull multiple movies a day. No problems.

    15. Re:Usenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't like the restrictions? Then stop paying!
      man...

    16. Re:Usenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks man.....that was helpful....

    17. Re:Usenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I NEVER hear anything about usenet, and there are hundreds of gigabytes of stuff posted every single day.

      Son of a bitch, fucking blizzards, you just don't get it do you? Why do you think you "NEVER hear anything about usenet"? The first rule of newsgroups is you don't talk about newsgroups. You seem to take that as a joke so fuck you. (Don't take that too hard, it's just some venting steam. It's kinda like how you use to open the lid to a pan of something boiling when you were a kid and the steam just about blinded you, but underneath that steam was some goodness awaiting your smacking lips, cheers)

      Nearly my entire MP3 and digital video collection (and actually just about everything else) has come from usenet.

      Good. And you expect that to be free? You expect nothing is required of you in return? Your requirement is to keep mum which your IQ doesn't apparently permit.

      I don't understand why this seems to still be the great untapped resource?

      It is tapped. Where do you think you got your complete collection you fucking nut? Don't you realize you were one of the selected few to gain access to? It was either from someone else or you were just born with that odd adaptation of exploring and stumbled across it. (Note this doesn't necessarily make your IQ higher, it could just as well be instinct.)

      Especially nowadays with services like newzbin.com, it makes finding and downloading from usenet a real snap!

      Despite what is discussed here; OSS, linux, BSD, etc, the majority of users run windows. It's possible the use of linux purges to intelligence, but not necessarily. What I'm meaning to get at is if usenet was a snap people would be talking about it. The rule of thumb is if UN is not being discussed, you don't discuss it. And NEVER do you say it should be discussed.

      Just the other day I introduced my brother to usenet, and he couldn't believe what he had been missing for so long.

      This is what it is. Just make sure that reading this and learning the code you somehow weren't passed on to learn, you also pass it on to your brother.

      In conclusion I hope this information is not accepted as a joke. You have to realize that I wanted to respond earlier, but there was too much attention on the topic with torrents and all. I meant for your post to look like a crazy old person wrote it from the dark ages, not a nimble 15 year old who stumbled upon the elixir of life.

      I reiterate my preaching of not being an idiot. Every medium when caught under the nose of common folk meets a dire end. If you think that everybody knowing about this will somehow make it better ... well you don't understand the protocol.

      The newsgroup protocol is designed to propagate al l material to other servers handling this protocol. Currently you support or don't support a newsgroup, but do not filter the messages. It's an all or none approach. The ability to break this is not very feasible given this fact and that the networked servers run global. If you may not have already guessed, dictating law globally is difficult thing to do. However, with politics moving more international and with relations extending, we're at more of a peril of obliteration.

      The only thing that thus truly keeps the clowns from slapping the proverbial stick upon us is the cost:benefit of arguing a mandatory shift from this protocol to a new one. It's like changing TCP/IP which is the backbone of the internet. You might think NGs are petty and of little importance to big corporations, but many use them for internal communication. Microsoft for instance uses newsgroups for customer relations against products and blah. However they monitor these NG (microsoft.*) so don't use them.

      So do us all a favor and keep the big end of the stick into the selected few. It's similar to big CEOs earning millions while you squand

    18. Re:Usenet by burns210 · · Score: 1

      What does it matter who hosts it? You don't think ISPs have the last say on port and protocol shaping/capping?

    19. Re:Usenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but the whole point of internet piracy is that it's stuff is shared for fucking free. No money involved.
      If you pay for access you've already lost. The usenet providers that charge for bin* access are obviously bottomfeeders making a living off of other people's copyright materials. This is something completely different from sharing stuff for free.

      All you idiots that pay for your usenet access and think you're so much more clued in that the little torrent newbs are just too stupid to realise what it's all about to begin with.

    20. Re:Usenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! And let's not forget the hard drive makers for selling drives big enough to store all that stuff. And what about those power companies? They make a mint off of us using their electrons!

      Please.

    21. Re:Usenet by cjb110 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      so don't put the actual files on there, put the .torrent metadata!

      hell you could even have the metadata as plain text so you wouldn't need to have a binary group.

      --
      ----- I refuse to have an argument with an unarmed person
  84. For all of you guys that want to change things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Get all the torrents you can from the mirror sites that are still open

    2) Put them on shareaza or IRC

    3) ????

    4) "Profit" for all! :D

    1. Re:For all of you guys that want to change things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      2) Put them on shareaza or IRC

      Why not beter make an offline mirror of teh torrent websites and make a torrent of it? Like: "suprnova.org offline mirror category anime series (1 of 10).torrent" or somtehing.

  85. Yeah, but by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny

    You got Norwegian babes!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  86. Assuming it was *IAA by chiph · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wouldn't automatically assume it was the fault of one of the recording industry groups ... it may be that suprnova.org simply couldn't afford their bandwidth costs any more. But until we hear more from the owners, we're all just guessing as to the cause.

    Chip H.

    1. Re:Assuming it was *IAA by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

      That's a darn good point. I think the chances are good, but you're quite right - there's no evidence. Assumptions are dangerous things, so thanks for calling this one.

  87. Not a Problem by gomoX · · Score: 1

    Use a mirror:

    http://www.bi-torrent.com

    The biggest problem with this was that the community that had gathered around suprnova.org will now be lost and spread out. But since they left the IRC channels up, maybe something can be done about it.

    --
    My english is sow-sow. Sowhat?
  88. SMACKTARD ALERT by tulare · · Score: 1

    So this guy complains (without mentioning which of the two websites listed in the story he's complaining about) that there are horrid adverts in his site, and then he goes on to spamvertize a free-shit site in his sig that is nothing but an opt-in for spammers. What a jackass. I have a suggestion for he you can stick his free gadget...

    --
    political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
  89. P2P Client by wzeallor · · Score: 1

    Was does this mean for suprnova's decentralized p2p client?

  90. Just another case... by KennyP · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... of the MAN trying to keep us down...

    I'll miss SuprNova... A lot of good old tv there.

    Kenny P.
    Visualize Whirled P.'s

    1. Re:Just another case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? I bet you're working for THE MAN right now.

  91. Try the TV torrent sites. by eMartin · · Score: 4, Informative

    tvtorrents.net
    btefnet.net

    The MPAA and RIAA have little reason to go after them.

    1. Re:Try the TV torrent sites. by 87C751 · · Score: 1
      me@here me $ hostx tvtorrents.net
      tvtorrents.net does not exist, try again
      Hopefully, that's temporary.
      --
      Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
    2. Re:Try the TV torrent sites. by cjsnell · · Score: 1


      Sadly, tvtorrents.net seems to have gone away, too. This is a real shame--tvtorrents.net was the clearinghouse for most of the TV torrents that later appeared on Suprnova. Their rips were of excellent quality and they had a wide variety of shows and put the rips up very quickly.

      What a bummer. :(

      Chris

    3. Re:Try the TV torrent sites. by sgant · · Score: 1

      Looks like it's gone for good

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    4. Re:Try the TV torrent sites. by OctaneZ · · Score: 1

      tvtorrents isn't dead (thankfully), they have what appears to be the worst DNS system ever created; and unfortunately only one person can change it. They'll be back up as soon as the new DNS propogates.

    5. Re:Try the TV torrent sites. by imnoteddy · · Score: 1
      tvtorrents.net
      btefnet.net

      The MPAA and RIAA have little reason to go after them.

      Most of the companies that make movies also make TV shows, so the MPAA probably would go after them.

      --
      No electrons were harmed creating this post, though some may have been subjected to electrical and/or magnetic fields.
    6. Re:Try the TV torrent sites. by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      TV Torrents is down.

    7. Re:Try the TV torrent sites. by eMartin · · Score: 1

      But people sharing TV show episodes can't be as easily tied to ticket and DVD sales. People who download these episodes aren't doing so to avoid paying $10 at the theater or even to avoid watching ads.

      Usually, they are doing it because they want to watch it again (for those of us without VCRs, downloading is easier than recording), they don't get the show in their area/city/country, or they just missed an episode because they were out at the time.

      In those cases, it's not even hurting ad sales, and since TV shows are ongoing, there's a good chance that if someone is willing to go through the trouble of downloading or sharing the episodes, they are also pretty likely to watch it on TV or get others hooked on the show.

    8. Re:Try the TV torrent sites. by imnoteddy · · Score: 1
      But people sharing TV show episodes can't be as easily tied to ticket and DVD sales.

      Lots of shows go to DVD now. The people who own "Sex and the City" want people to rent/buy season one DVDs, not download episodes.

      --
      No electrons were harmed creating this post, though some may have been subjected to electrical and/or magnetic fields.
    9. Re:Try the TV torrent sites. by tepples · · Score: 1

      The people who own "Sex and the City" want people to rent/buy season one DVDs, not download episodes.

      Season one, region what?

      And what about those shows that have not made it to DVD?

    10. Re:Try the TV torrent sites. by lc_overlord · · Score: 1

      try

      thepiratebay.org

      Better, bigger, and MPAA can't reach em.

      --
      - "There is nothing quite like an ineffective solution to an nonexistant problem"
    11. Re:Try the TV torrent sites. by anethema · · Score: 1

      No, on irc they say its just a dns problem. They say its coming back

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    12. Re:Try the TV torrent sites. by anethema · · Score: 1

      No, but you and your ilk have now blown their server out of the water. Congrats.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    13. Re:Try the TV torrent sites. by strider44 · · Score: 1

      so? 99% of tv torrents are by countries outside the US/wherever it is shown first that want to see it as soon as possible. I do this living in Australia yet still buy DVDs when I can and have the money.

      DVDs are just more convenient especially, and better quality without logos etc. Better for archiving purposes as well.

    14. Re:Try the TV torrent sites. by spleck · · Score: 1

      Well watch out for MGM. They work alone. And they own Stargate. And they collect IP addresses. And they know how to contact your ISP. And my ISP cuts me off after a cease and desist...

    15. Re:Try the TV torrent sites. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well watch out for MGM. They work alone. And they own Stargate. And they collect IP addresses

      Damn that MacGyver! MGM got him to make an IP address tracker from old TV tubes and a wire clothes hanger.

  92. You all need to start getting organized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Look man, everyone knows he with the gold makes the rules.

    So if you really want torrents to continue being available on the internet, and in general any kind of p2p activity to be available on the internet for US customers - then the following must happen.

    1) You need to get some gold for your own lawyers. That is just the fact of the matter. It sure is nice to get all this free stuff, but as they say - there is no free lunch.

    2) You need to get some gold for your lobbiest to the congress critters. They only know what the MPAA/RIAA mouths tell them. A politician basically knows only how to get elected, otherwise they would be doing something else.

    3) You need to get politically motivated. You need that political organization named above. You need your own moveon.org to keep the membership active in letter/fax/email writing and informative campaigns.

    Play time on the internet is over. It is time to grow up and realize politics, government, and all that corruption is part of the game now.

    1. Re:You all need to start getting organized by bigberk · · Score: 1

      That's one insightful anonymous coward. It's true, it's all about money and lobbying. If I had a $300 million yearly advertising budget, I could get you to believe that pigs can fly.

      Morality, social norms, and consumer behaviour can all be manipulated with the money and influence. I don't personally think there is anything wrong with copying media for personal use; the MPAA thinks otherwise, and is using money (advertising + legal action + government lobbying) to get their way.

      There are no absolute "right" or "wrongs" here.

    2. Re:You all need to start getting organized by Nickalreadyinuse · · Score: 1

      Or maybe the filesharing community could try to win friends from the *AA camp and make some of the big companies defect from the dark side?

      Let's see, if everyone currently sharing files would send a personally grafted paper letter to the customer relations department announcing a boycott of the said corporation's products, unless they decide to finally come out and start meeting the customer demand for inexpensive (compared to traditionally distributed), legal, free format downloads.

      It greatly puzzles me why not a signle one of the big companies forming those lobby/enforcement clubs has not decided to gamble with the public relations and just say "Enough of this!".

      Without naming names, I'd fathom some big CEO to step to the podium and announce that their firm is leaving the league and instead starting their own (let's call it "Fairplay" shalle we?), promoting competition through pricing and meeting moder customer demands of high quality DRM-free formats, with one time or attractive licence payments schemes.

      From the response of the techie crowd to the "stick" forumla currently employed EXCLUSIVELY by the industry, everybody would just LOVE if there was any "carrot" alternative.

      They call me an optimist, but hey, someone has to have naive dreams...

    3. Re:You all need to start getting organized by EvilNight · · Score: 1

      Pshaw. We have the option of not playing those silly games. This isn't politics. Nobody is running for office. This is more akin to a gnat buzzing near one's ear while one is out on a good fishing trip.

      I'm glad Suprnova.org has been shut down. I wish the *AA all the luck in the world shutting down all the remaining sites and trackers they can find. They are doing more for the progress of P2P than anyone. Do you know why?

      They are creating an itch. People want to share. People will share, laws or no laws, as they always have. This constant itch will eventually turn into a better filesharing protocol, one that is harder to find, harder to penetrate, and better at its job. Every time they score a "victory" all they do is force the networks to evolve into something even harder to enforce laws against or monitor. It will continue until they run out of money, or a network forms that is immune to such petty interference. Then their choice is to turn the Internet off, or live with it.

      They haven't got the money to sue one tenth of one percent of the infringers. Their gestapo tactics have no effect whatsoever, never have, and never will. They cannot fight human nature. Let them make their laws and lobby their politicians. We'll do what we always do... write code. They will spend the rest of time chasing our tails and trying to catch up with us.

      Sooner or later it is they who will adapt or go out of business, not us. We're not in business, we have no revenue stream to choke. We do this sort of thing because it is fun and because we want to. They can easily provide us a better service for a fee than what we get for free, yet they choose not to. Eventually they'll have to capitulate and compete on our terms, regardless of what laws are in place.

      Give me an online archive of all digital media, and I'll happily pay a subscription fee. (One catch, no DRM, period.) Until then, I'll enjoy the free archive of digital media and put up with the occasional blips caused by this amusing technology arms race.

      Relax. I'm sure while the *AA are blowing fire and brimstone, some clever business people are taking a good long look at this and figuring out how to model a decentralized, set-top media network out of the chaos for Time Warner or Tivo or some other media conglomerate. It's not a stretch to put a 500GB drive in every cable box, put all your corporate media on the network, and make it an on-demand service. It's not even expensive.

      The only reason it's taking them so long to do it is that they can't accept the death (or drastic reduction) in advertising that this will cause them. They'll get over the future shock eventually. Frankly I'd say they are a bit overdue for it already... those people in suits think and act at a truly glacial pace. Perhaps they should work at making the advertising properly targeted so it is easier for people to tolerate. That's not hard, or expensive, either. Especially when the data stored on their own set top device tells you what they like.

      I would also point out the danger of the web of IP-restrictive laws the USA and its like-minded global neighbors are entangling themselves in. This draconian web of control chokes progress, putting any country bound by it at a very severe disadvantage to countries that are not. I think eventually when these laws begin hurting and holding back the ones who lobbied so hard for them, the situation will reverse itself. It'll take years, but then again it is law, and law is usually a decade or two behind the times.

      I was hoping the EU would be smart enough to avoid slitting its own wrists by adopting the USA's IP laws, but this is looking less and less likely.

      --
      Hell is being intelligent in a world full of idiots.
  93. Re:Why I think the MPAA is like Hitler, maybe wors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how can you hate a man who loves watermellon so much

  94. Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by Jim+McCoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A big point many people miss -- trackers are what keep the torrents together. Indexers like SuprNova, although highly popular, do nothing but point people where to go.

    It's like asking a bartender about the street corners where the girls hang out late at night. If he responsible for how you use the information; ie, if you engage in prostition?


    The big point that you are missing (and most people running torrent trackers) is that if you have a reasonable suspicion that the information you are providing to someone is going to be used for criminal purposes then you are treading dangerously close to the definition of "conspiracy".

    Let's take your example of the helpful bartender a bit further. You wander into a bar and over several drinks proceed to tell the bartender about your sleazy business partner and how he is cheating you. The bartender tells you that "he knows a guy" who can take care of your problem for a bundle of cash. You take the number he gives you, meet with a contract hit man, and pay him a wad on money so that your business partner meets a rather violent demise.

    Is the bartender a participant in your conspiracy to commit murder? According to the law he is. A reasonalbe person would have no problem conecting the dots here and information that was provided had a purpose...

    To drag this back in to the real world, you might want to take a look at how the law deals with flea markets and swap meets where counterfeit goods are being sold. The person organizing the swap meet can post as many signs as they want saying that they have no idea what you are selling and are only providing a place for people to put their goods on display, but the law treats that claim like the BS it truly is. The people running the torrent trackers know what is being provided and what their role in the game is, and if they try to claim that they are shocked that people are trading pirated music, software, and videos on these services they will be bitch-slapped by the law.

    1. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by mcc · · Score: 1

      The big point that you are missing (and most people running torrent trackers) is that if you have a reasonable suspicion that the information you are providing to someone is going to be used for criminal purposes then you are treading dangerously close to the definition of "conspiracy".

      If "conspiracy" can be used to illegalize the transmission of simple information then something is very very wrong with our definition of "conspiracy".

    2. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by cnettel · · Score: 1

      Would, let's say your credit card details, constitute anything but "simple information"? Would you object if someone got hold of them and published the data?

      If you would, why? If the bartender from gp takes your credit card details and gives them to his "friend", wouldn't it be quite obvious that he has some guilt in the frauds that his friend probably uses the information for?

    3. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by oliverthered · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did you know that once a month their is a run from scots weapons shop to the armoury.

      I can tell you that the vehical is usually packed full of mill-grade weapons and ammo, and is a much easier target than the shop, as it has no security, or cameras.

      With some of the weapons you would easly be able to kill someone giving a speach to a large crowed from a mile away.

      I would also like you to konw that the presedent is giving a speach this comming monday, the day after the shop is due to take another delivery.

      I can't possibly see how this infomration may be of use to you, but I thought I'd tell you anyway.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    4. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by Dead_Smiley · · Score: 1
      You have a good point. Here in Nashville, TN (USA)

      "December 16, 2004

      NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- An advertising executive for a weekly alternative newspaper was charged Thursday with six counts of promoting prostitution in connection with adult ads he accepted and coordinated.

      A grand jury indicted Nels Noseworthy, 29, following an investigation that spanned more than a year. Police said Noseworthy was the contact person for anyone placing ads in the "Personal Adult Services" section of the Nashville Scene."

      linkage: http://www.wsmv.com/Global/story.asp?S=2702608

      --
      I know what the Internet is, what the hell is this Interweb business?!
    5. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your analysis of conspiracy is inaccurate. Conspiracy is an agreement between two or more people to commit a crime. Depending on the state it might require some type of overt act by someone in the conspiracy, or just the agreement itself.

      If you aid someone in finding a hitman there is not necessarily conspiracy at all, but that doesnt mean you can't be complicit in the final crime or attempted crime. If you aid someone in the crime then you are complicit in the crime if you had at least knowledge of what that specific crime would be, and had a purpose to aid that crime. All of this depends on the jurisdiction.

    6. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it a defense to conspiracy charges to make the spelling so bad that no juror can be sure what the message was meant to be?

    7. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, my previous response about the spelling was cruel. I'd retract it if there was an option to. Merry Christmas.

    8. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez learn to spell and write coherent sentences. There are free software for every operating system (and some web based) that will spell and grammar check. There is no excuse for tripe like that.

    9. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by antiMStroll · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Murder, contract killers, I'm surprised terrorists and children in peril didn't make the analogy. How about something a bit more realistic? The bartender tells a patron who wants to go fishing the location of the nearest sporting goods store. The patron uses the fishing gear purchased out of season. The bartender knew it wasn't fishing season when providing the directions. No murders, no money changing hand with the bartender, no quantifiable loss, just breaking a law intended to preserve a resource. Is the bartender guilty of conspiracy? Only in a sense worthy of a Victor Hugo novel, a reasonable person would not connect the dots. In a civilized, humane society the patron bears full responsibility for the act, which is at best a misdemeanour and a small fine.

    10. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by rmccann · · Score: 1

      "how the law deals with flea markets and swap meets where counterfeit goods are being sold" I believe the argument there was that the owners of the swap meets would gain financially from the sale of counterfeit goods, since the more counterfeit goods there were on sale the more people visit the swap meet, thus it gets more popular, thus the owner can get more rent for it.

    11. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You missed the boat completely here. It's already illegal to provide someone with information which will be used to commit a crime, it makes you an accessory.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      And the same can be said for most torrent/P2P sites. More goods(files) = more more vistors = more ad revenue for the website.

    13. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As a counter example - read the yellow pages in any major city in America. Look up "escort services" -- typically you will find multiple pages of listings. It has been this way for at least twenty years (that's when, I as a horny teen, ordered my first call girl on a trip to the big city) and probably a whole lot longer than that.

      As escorts are just another name for prostitutes, that would make the yellow pages of every major metropolitan area guilty of conspiracy for solicitation. Yet, these ads continue to run and the yellow pages publishers seem to be completely unmolested by the legal system for their part in it all.

      Now, you can't quite download a hooker via bittorrent, but I think the analogy between the call girls in the yellow pages and suprnova is a lot closer than the analogy between the bartender's hitman and suprnova.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    14. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by adam31 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You take the number he gives you, meet with a contract hit man, and pay him a wad on money so that your business partner meets a rather violent demise.

      Or, to use a probably more accurate analogy... when my friend wanted to shoot spit wads during english class, I lent him a pen to bore out for a spit-tube... and damn! We both totally got busted for detention!!

      bittorrent != murder

    15. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by Doctor+Crumb · · Score: 1

      A better analogy would be if you got the information off of a bulletin board in the bar. The bartender can point you at it, but he didn't put the notices up, nor does he know everything that is there. Suddenly he's not part of the conspiracy, even though he runs the bar where the information was received. Even if he knows there's some less than legal things posted there, it's still not his responsibility to police it.

    16. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      'Learn to spell...... free software for every operating system. ' Hey, look why do I need to learn to spell when there's free software for every OS?

      And funny enough, KSpell has just broken, until it's fixed you'll have to put up with tripe.
      So, what are you waiting for, go fix the spell checker so you don't have to see tripe like that again. I would fix it, but then again I can spell so I wouldn't know if it was fixed or not.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    17. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know my spellings bad, but incase to didn't get it the sentence structure was supposed to be odd.

    18. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Torrent indexes kill people on a daily basis. That's why they have to be stopped!

      Get off your soap box. Who's law is it anyway? It may be conspiracy in your country to link to (not hosting) copyrighted material. Not so in others.

      There's a whole world out there for you to discover if you'd care to open your eyes.

      How did this get modded to 4 insightful? It's a biased world police mentality. Score 0 for silly.

    19. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would, let's say your credit card details, constitute anything but "simple information"? Would you object if someone got hold of them and published the data?

      Your bank, the supermarket, the state, your insurance company, your mortgage company, your credit card company, and Netflix or Blockbuster do that already when they sell it off to the spammers. Private, personal information is slighty different from widely distributed information meant for public consumption. However, I for one, don't care about my personal information, as long it can't be used against me in any way, but I'll still only provide it on a need to know basis.

    20. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would fix it, but then again I can spell so I wouldn't know if it was fixed or not.

      You might want to re-read the comment he was replying to... I count at least one in every paragraph (you do know that every sentence doesn't get its own paragraph, right?).

    21. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firstly, you may like to check the name of the poster you were replying too. Secondly, the sentence structure and language is meant to be broken in to 'bits' of information. Now if George W Bush had a job in the whitehouse as a junior secutary I'm sure you could check his spelling for him, untill that day keep wipeing tables.

    22. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their are no terrorists, I have no children, what would I be afraid of?

    23. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by Snaller · · Score: 1

      And for a counter counter counter example, just go to Denmark where prostituion is legal (after all a woman should be allowed to rent her body if she likes, as long as she pays taxes!)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    24. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spelling bees?

    25. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By far the best school analogy would be the time in 7th grade science when I finished my classwork quickly and the two guys at the same table as me copied(we usually copied off each other at that time as I recall) I got a "check," and one of the two also got a "check," but the third got a "check-minus." So he complained to the teacher that "my work is the same as his." (pointing to the other guy rather than me) So they BOTH got check-minuses.

    26. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by tiggles · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you're missing the obvious distinction:

      Prostitution is a victimless crime, whereas P2P eats babies and will make widows of your women.

      It's all right here in this informational video the RIAA donated to my school...

    27. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by cra · · Score: 1

      I would also think there is a difference between the bartender-example where you bitch about you being screwed by your partner and the bartender offers a "service", and if you come in and say that you need help finding someone to whack your partner, thereby explicitly asking for that information.

      --
      This message has been ROT-13 encrypted twice for higher security.
    28. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you fucking learn how to spell or, better yet GET A FUCKING SPELLCHECKER SERVICE RUNNING ON YOUR BOX?

      I mean, really, what kind of geek are you?

    29. Re:Check out the definition of "conspiracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a reasonable person would not connect the dots.

      That's where the analogy breaks down. Where Suprnova was concerned, a reasonable person would find it damn hard to avoid connecting the dots. When you have a site that provides fucking categories for things like TV shows that are never legal to redistribute, it's really rather hard to argue that you never thought anyone would actually use them.

  95. suprnova.org by Oceanplexian · · Score: 1
    "We do not know if SuprNova is going to return, but it is certainly not going to be hosting any more torrent links."

    Hmmm.. There's still a good chance they might release Exeem.

  96. Back to usenet, I guess by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just like every other time a website has gone down. Everyone flocks to the newsgroups and grabs what they need from there. I'll bet that the torrent newsgroups suddenly explode with traffic.

  97. Usenet is your friend by Kozz · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is why when all else fails, I turn to the alt.binaries groups to find my VCDs, SVCDs, etc. Use an excellent free news reader like XNews, browse to alt.binaries and then filter the groups based on your keyword ("enterprise" or "simpsons" or whatever). Many of the most popular shows have their own groups. And even the less popular show up in alt.binaries.vcd, alt.binaries.svcd, etc.

    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    1. Re:Usenet is your friend by nicku · · Score: 1

      First rule of usenet is: Don't Talk About Usenet!

    2. Re:Usenet is your friend by Carlos+Laviola · · Score: 1

      Sadly, free usenet servers are extremely hard to find these days, let alone ones that carry binaries.

    3. Re:Usenet is your friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sadly, free usenet servers are extremely hard to find these days, let alone ones that carry binaries."

      So why not pay up for a premium NSP!

      It sounds like you don't want to pay one bloody cent in the process of obtaining "copyright challenged" stuff.

      Do you pay for your computers, internet connectivity, electricity? Consider a subscription to a premium NSP just like the above.

    4. Re:Usenet is your friend by Carlos+Laviola · · Score: 1

      There's only one DSL ISP in my city, which is one of the biggest on my country, Brazil. I can tell you for a fact that basically no Brazilian ISP offers quality access to Usenet; I'd have to know someone from the educational or research backbones.

    5. Re:Usenet is your friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but the whole point of internet piracy is that it's stuff is shared for fucking free. No money involved.
      If you pay for access you've already lost. The usenet providers that charge for bin* access are obviously bottomfeeders making a living off of other people's copyright materials. This is something completely different from sharing stuff for free.

  98. Please explain to me... by mrbarkeeper · · Score: 0

    Hi! I'm new to BitTorrent, please explain to me the following: All these sites do is provide you with the .torrent file, right? They don't serve the data themselves. That comes from the other peers, right? Do all these .torrent files really eat that much bandwidth? How big are they? I thought they were just a few kb each. Why do these sites moan then? Or is it just that there are so many peoples downloading the .torrent files? This is not a flaimbait or a troll, I just don't know about the BitTorrent protocol.

    1. Re:Please explain to me... by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      The sites are slow because they run a database of torrent files in the background. Also, their html is full of crap and they serve ads.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  99. Coincidence? by Dayflowers · · Score: 1

    Youceff Torrents got raided it seems.. http://www.zeropaid.com/news/articles/auto/1215200 4b.php

    --
    I am a speak english. Do you not? - Saroto
  100. Dear TV companies... by Xugumad · · Score: 1

    I have money. I want to give it to you, in return for downloadable episodes of TV shows I like. Or how about free downloadable episodes with adverts in?

    1. Re:Dear TV companies... by AGTiny · · Score: 1

      I depend on suprnova for downloadable Malcom in the Middle episodes that are pre-empted on the east-coast by 4pm football games. If Fox offered some kind of alternative, maybe I wouldn't have to do this. It's too bad the ads are taken out but I have a DVR so I wouldn't watch them anyway. Ah well there are lots of other TV torrent places.

    2. Re:Dear TV companies... by Starbreeze · · Score: 2, Informative

      Soapcity.com offers this kind of service... obviously only for Soap Operas. And they once offered episodes of Dawson's Creek. It was $10/mo per Soap Opera, and you could only start your download after the episode had finished airing on the west coast. So it's clearly easily feasible...

  101. So bad by RinzeWind · · Score: 1

    I was planning to buy the whole CSI: Las Vegas series in DVD; if it's confirmed that the MPAA is behind this sites going down, I might think about not doing it.

    1. Re:So bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you *might* *think about* it?

      ooooooh, scary.

    2. Re:So bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stopped buying CDs and DVDs from labels represented by the *AA years ago. Stop just thinking about it and go and find some quality independent content. Your mind will thank you!

  102. mirroring the sites by jonastullus · · Score: 1

    here's an idea:

    why don't the guys responsible for all these site simply put the content of their databases as well as the CMS configuration on their own site for anyone to mirror!
    if the site is then taken down, someone will have all the latest torrent links, forums, ... and can happily host the site (maybe under a slightly different name) elsewhere!

    shouldn't be that much of a problem, not have the owners of the original site commit any crime AFTER having been taken down and would take care of our need for good p2p links ;-))

    jethr0

    1. Re:mirroring the sites by so1omon · · Score: 1

      They could just pick a name like suprnova.com, or suprnova.net!

      --
      i'm the jedidiahmarkfoster your parents warned you about
  103. Torrentbits Community by brohan · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd be glad to let you know that the commmunity created by torrentbits has really been strong. Now a temporary forum has been setup bustling with 2000 users so far. As well plans are taking shape for Torrentbits2. Well, its sad to see all the admins leave for real life. All you slashdotters know that life is underrated. As quoted from the forums ------- Yes... its soon gona be official... RB is preparing the TB main page now... TB is closed for good... It will not come back... Read up on TB mainpage in a short while and you will see for yourself... I know many is gona get sad about this fact but life goes on... Several other sites will prolly pick up the slack... I just wanna thank everyone involved for their time and dedication to TB and hope life treats you all well... Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you all... /Helshad Ps... Alright... I know many wanna know the reason for this but all I can say its private reasons... It has nothing to do with the rest of the world... in anyway whatsoever... We simply dont have the time and dedication we once had... Life has changed for us and thus we felt it was time to end it... And if it makes you all feel better blame it all on me... I started the downfall... hehehe

  104. Re:Interesting that MPAA can actually shut them do by General+Trolltalk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No one said the MPAA shut them down. It was just only mentioned that these sites went offline around the same time it was announced the MPAA was going to start going after these types of sites.

  105. aww by Clete2 · · Score: 0

    Aww, I used suprnova for legal purposes, but I'm sad to see it go... It was nice advertisement too for some unpopular games that are freely downloadable...

  106. I know who's responsible... by comrade009 · · Score: 0

    Kahnnnnnnnnn!

  107. Re:Glad It Is Gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone begging for a free Ipod in their sig should be banned from the Internet. Get a job and earn an Ipod! Stop begging your friends to submit to advertising schemes to fulfill your greed.

  108. Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The sanction of the victim" is a phrase which I first heard while reading Atlas Shrugged, by Ayn Rand. The book focuses on Ms. Rand's philosophy of Objectivism, which holds that the products of an individual human mind are the rightful property of that mind alone, and no other. She draws a distinction between two classes of people: Thinkers, those responsible for creating the wealth and prosperity in the world, and looters, those who raid that wealth by force of law or intimidation. As is typical of most thieves, the looters offered a steady stream of justifications such as fairness (it was unfair for the industrialist to keep the wealth he earned when there were poor people in the world), nobility (it was selfish for an industrialist not to destroy his company by giving away its entire asset base), or the collective good (the good of the society as a whole was more important than the good of any individual). For years, this strategy succeeded, with the thinkers continuing to labor away under increasingly oppressive policies, policies which made it more and more difficult for them to operate, while simultaneously being condemned by the looters at every turn as the cause of all economic and social woes.

    The thinkers were able to achieve victory over the looters when they realized that, in order for the looters' philosophy to succeed, the cooperation of the thinkers was absolutely required. The thinkers, led by a man named John Galt, simply withdrew their support from the society which claimed to hate them, causing its eventual collapse. In Rand's words, the success of the looter philosophy was dependent upon the sanction of the victim.

    While there may indeed be better short-term profits in your "can't beat em, join em" plan, the precedent being set shifts the burden of ethical behavior away from the looters and puts it squarely on the shoulders of the producers - who were acting ethically to begin with! What also hasn't been said is that the expenditures on lawyers, etc. are not arbitrary (the employers have been wronged under the law) or meaningless - the direct goal is to halt piracy, not to enrich lawyers. The producers already recognize that the most profits would be made, short or long term, if the criminals could be made to stop committing crimes.

    1. Re:Irony by shurdeek · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The problem is however, MPAA tries to cling to outdated business methods that don't work anymore, and use "force" (legal system) for it and complaining how everyone is so unfair. In contrast, the heroes of Atlas Shrugged (Dagny Taggart, Francisco D'Anconia, Hank Rearden, ...) were always striving to do something new, that pleases their customers, that WORKS, and to SOLVE problems. They weren't complaining that the world is unfair and "they couldn't help it".

      That unauthorized copying (incorrectly called pirating or stealing) is illegal doesn't change the fact that the current model will never again work (in other words "the genie is out of the bottle"). If a typical (non US) consumer has a choice of e.g. downloading the new episode of Simpsons the day after it was released for free, or wait 1 year until it reaches local TV (and is usually dubbed and I prefer the original), or wait 5+ years until it's released on DVD, how can MPAA keep expecting people to play "nice"?

    2. Re:Irony by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      ...looters, those who raid that wealth by force of law or intimidation.

      force of law...you mean like copyright?
      intimidation...something like lawsuits? See scientology.

      ...the precedent being set shifts the burden of ethical behavior away from the looters and puts it squarely on the shoulders of the producers...

      This depends on your point of view. Some might consider that the copyright holders are the looters. Most understand they they(copyright holders) do not want to halt piracy. They would lose significant market share if they did halt it. Some, like me, would also question just who is the criminal here. See payola, price fixing, etc.

      ...producers - who were acting ethically to begin with!

      Excuse me? How ethical was it for them to run off to California to evade Edison's patents? Also I repeat, see payola, price fixing, etc. These people are everything BUT ethical.

      The producers already recognize that the most profits would be made, short or long term, if the criminals could be made to stop committing crimes.

      Hah! They should talk!

      Try to focus on the fact that this talk about piracy and copyright infringement is a smokescreen to cover up the "producers" attempts to stamp out self publishing and distribution. They are simply trying to insure that they own and control all widely distributed works.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Irony by Daggah · · Score: 0

      I stopped reading when you said, "The book focuses on Ms. Rand's philosophy." Rand's bullshit hardly counts as philosophy.

  109. Re:Interesting that MPAA can actually shut them do by bigberk · · Score: 1

    OK, but what I'm suggesting here is that if there is a correlation between MPAA initiative and disappearance of the sites, maybe that "solution" can be extended into the spam realm.

    i.e. if the MPAA did something, or induced a situation which resulted in these sites shutting down, then perhaps a similar situation can be induced w.r.t. spam that would shut down long running spammers' sites.

    Mind you the MPAA has a bit of a head start, since WIPO/DMCA legislation in the US and EU gives corporations lots of power. Heaven forbid that the government would similarly be in favor of making spamming illegal.

  110. In other news... by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    Santa Claus, aka. Chris Crigle, has been shot.

    Movie at 11.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  111. Gnutella still usable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only recently had major problems with gnutella. But the gtk-gnutella client has great filtering features, which make gnutella very usable still. Overall, I find gnutella to be one of the best p2p networks: very fast for small stuff like music files.

  112. sad sad day.... by torrents · · Score: 2, Informative

    suprnova however was not running a bittorrent tracker and had not for a very long time... chances are that most of the trackers that were linked to from the torrents on suprnova are still operational... all that's needed is a new way of sharing the meta info (.torrents)

    still sad to see suprnova gone after all this time...

    --
    Get your torrents...
  113. This will just shift the traffic somewhere else by robogymnast · · Score: 1

    http://www.torrentreactor.net still seems to be up and running. Such a sad day. If this is the work of the **AA, you can bet that all this is going to accomplish is to motivate a new means that is more difficult track, similar to how Napster's shutdown led to the mainstream rise of Kazaa and several other p2p apps. I plan on buying that SuprNova.org shirt I've had my eye on for a little while today

    --
    unzip ; strip ; touch ; grep ; find ; finger ; mount ; fsck ; more ; yes ; fsck ; umount ; sleep
  114. ohh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    today is a dark day for all of us...
    FREEEDOOOOOOOOOOM
    this must stop now, or they'll keeping taking our individual rights...

    (they are my bytes, i do whatever i want with them..)

  115. www.dvdr-core.org down too by legrimpeur · · Score: 2, Informative

    they are also down, without any message though

  116. Just a silly theory... by davemb28 · · Score: 1

    Seeing as to only redbeard and sloncek are the only 2 people who know why the sites are down, is it possible that they got a little money under the table to shut down their sites? A bribe of 1 mil USD is still less than they would pay for litigation

  117. don't worry, by leuk_he · · Score: 1

    It will be several weeks before the next episode is aired in the US. You will find a new source then.

    Remeber the internet: If you try to censor it, people will find a way arround it.

  118. boo hoo by SpamapS · · Score: 1

    First let me say that sites like these should not be legally responsible for their users' indiscretions. As someone else said, its like a bartender telling you where to find prostitutes and drug dealers.

    But this does not make me sad, not one bit. If one person can explain to me how bittorent fits in with the fair use provisions of most copyright laws (such as those in the US and Europe), then I'll shut up.

    Until then, you people need to get real and start *SUPPORTING* copyright holders who choose to allow distribution by such media.

    Free software uses systems like bittorent. Free media is far less common, but maybe it shouldn't be. I know for me, I decided to follow the policy of strict adherence to copyright law, in support of Free software. I threw away pirated copies of software, and replaced them with Free alternatives.

    At my place of business, when we find a piece of Free software we don't understand, we pay the author to teach us, and enhance it.

    This model just doesn't work for every piece of entertainment. I mean, you can pay the guys from Monty Python's Flying Circus to come by and ply their trade.. but a local version of Enterprise or The Simpsons isn't exactly a good idea.

    The bottom line is this. Bittorrent is mass distribution, and far beyond fair use. If you can't buy it locally, that doesn't entitle you to a free copy. For a long time I couldn't get any sort of broadband at my house except ISDN. I didn't go out and pirate an ISDN line. I just pissed and moaned until somebody brought me broadband.

    --
    SpamapS -- Undernet #Linuxhelp
  119. Re:Glad It Is Gone by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

    AdBlock made the site pretty fast for me. I just blocked *super_sky.html and it blocked the whole side frame. I don't think I would be able to use the web if it wasn't for Firefox and adBlock. I personally have no clue how anyone can use IE for general net usage. I personally don't block all ads. For example, Google ads are well done IMO, and I don't block those. Basically if it flashes, I kill it ; )

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  120. TorrentBits and Delirium Vault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From one AC to another, I must agree with you. TorrentBits and Delirium Vault were my favourites too.

    I was on a business trip this week, and when I came home for the weekend, I booted up my machine and tried to connect to Delirium Vault. It could not connect.

    While disappointing, I did not think much of it at the time. DV did get overloaded from time to time, and I thought that if I gave it a few hours or so, it would come right back as it always had.

    Well, it hasn't. And from the comments here, it might never again. What a shame.

    We Anonymous Cowards will miss you, Van Helsing! DV was truly a community, with active message boards and good discussions. I hope you find another home on the Internet.

    1. Re:TorrentBits and Delirium Vault by astrashe · · Score: 1

      DV is going to survive as a community, although I doubt there will be any torrents or sharing involved.

      The forums are back up now...

  121. We can make it better...... by bartkusa · · Score: 1

    What if there were a P2P torrent tracker? Filesharing didn't die with Napster. Can't torrents learn to "go guerilla" and decentralize?

    1. Re:We can make it better...... by Nickalreadyinuse · · Score: 1

      Well, BitTorrent wasn't originally conceived as *AA-proof. It wasn't meant to avoid the central weakness problem.

      Unfortunately the current state of art means that you need at least high level of decentralization and some level of anonymity to survive against the legal onslaught.

  122. Probably Not Because of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a few posts in this thread that are arguing that suprnova and torrentbits went down because they could not afford to stay open.

    Well, the parent post mentions delirium vault, and I can tell you with certainty that computer or bandwidth costs were certainly NOT the reason why that site went down this week.

    There actually was a thread where the question of donations came up. Delirium vault's users were asking the sys admin how they could donate to the site (as is common on other trackers), and the sys admin essential said not to worry about it, that he would pay the costs, and if he ever felt he needed donations, he would ask for them.

    So if delirium vault is down, I suspect it is down for a much darker reason. A threatening letter or a knock on the door from some big media outlet or copyright holder probably did it.

    1. Re:Probably Not Because of Money by a8o · · Score: 1

      It's a real shame too because DV had a lot of stuff that was impossible to get hold of. It was also cutting the bottom out of any profitabiltiy releasing old movies on DVD had. I don't buy DVDs, I can't afford to. I rent them. I saw DV as a VERY convenient rental service. I would've paid to get rid of the ratio and have the quality of titles available without DRM.

  123. Frost is completely different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frost is an almost completely different approach to p2p from that of BitTorrent. Where one is centralised, fast, and trying to be seen as legitimate, the other decentralised and anonymous, encrypted, slow as hell, and trying to create a subculture beyond the control of legalities.

    Although I really like the idea of Freenet and Frost is OK too, anyone switching from BT to Frost is simply experimenting rather than switching to real alternatives to previous activities.

    1. Re:Frost is completely different by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      decentralised = good
      anonymous = good
      encrypted = good
      slow as hell = give it time
      trying to create a subculture = We prefer superculture, or supraculture, or ultraculture, or hyperculture.
      beyond the control of legalities = free of the legal quagmire.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Frost is completely different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slow as hell = give it time

      That's exactly the problem!

    3. Re:Frost is completely different by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Oh c'mon. What's the rush? Where's the fire? Let's help make it faster and better. If it doesn't look viable, let's create something that is. The solution exists. It's up to us to discover it.

      --
      What?
  124. Hopefully they can/will mitigate the damage. by Lethyos · · Score: 1

    I assume these sites are going to wipe out the lists of people who have used torrents from them? It'd be a shame if their hardware were confiscated and information about who used their torrents (and contributed back) were available to authorities. (And on that note, I really hope they're using disk encryption.)

    --
    Why bother.
  125. "notice of infringement" emails have already hit by v1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    A friend of mine just received one of these gems:

    Infringement Detail:
    Infringing Work: Grudge, The
    Filepath: The.Grudge.SCREENER-VideoCD.torrent|CD1
    Filename: vcd-tg1.r00
    First Found: 18 Dec 2004 04:21:14 EST (GMT -0500)
    Last Found: 18 Dec 2004 04:21:14 EST (GMT -0500)
    Filesize: 14,648k
    IP Address:
    IP Port: 58546
    Network: BTPeers
    Protocol: BitTorrent

    Apparently the RIAA has been sampling the swarms or getting their data from somewhere like that. This torrent was gotten from Suprnova... was that "paper" we saw the other day here on slashdot linked to any data they collected that the RIAA might have dipped into?

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  126. Money by Sipos · · Score: 1

    Could they just have been offered significant sums of money to stop (on condition they don't tell anyone)

  127. Newsgroups? by AnonymousCowheart · · Score: 1

    Why not put the .torrents in newsgroups? I requested to make a newsgroup of torrents awhile ago, but they poopoo'd it

    1. Re:Newsgroups? by Megane · · Score: 1

      Just post the torrents in the appropriate binaries newsgroup. That's already being done to some extent in the anime binaries newsgroups.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  128. Not the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RIAA = Music, MPAA = movies.

    1. Re:Not the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RIAA = Music, MPAA = movies.

      Huh? Music and movies have a future, RIAA and MPAA otoh...

  129. the reason? by Ibuprofen · · Score: 1

    What I don't understand is how several very popular sites regarding torrent indexing have all shutdown at about the same time yet we have no conclusive reasons as to why it is happening. This constant speculation is really irritating.

    Are they all shutting down for the same reasons? Can some staff from any of the sites effected give us any clues?

    1. Re:the reason? by Nickalreadyinuse · · Score: 1

      In Finland and Holland the police shut down torrent sites by coming and taking the servers away (as evidence of suspected felonious copyright infringment).

    2. Re:the reason? by Ibuprofen · · Score: 1

      Indeed: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/12/14/finnish_po lice_raid_bittorrent_site/ Wonder if there have been any other arrests/raids.

    3. Re:the reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's just like when drug dealers hear the cops are comming to their neighbourhood! or even worst: they hear that the cops actually arrested 'Big Joe' two blocks ahead! It gets hysterical for a couple of hours and days! but the trend will be back! people only seems to push the panic button over and over again!!

    4. Re:the reason? by Ibuprofen · · Score: 1

      Heh, nevermind: Dutch Raids

      Wheeeeee.

  130. FUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  131. No big deal by isNaN · · Score: 1

    So what? Those sites were not that good anyway...

    The Pirate Bay (http://thepiratebay.org) is a lot better. This will only increase the amount of torrents on it.

    The best thing is... it's hosted in Sweden. So MPAA can take their american laws and go fuck them selfs.

    --
    No, i don't like sigs...
  132. What A CROCK (and a troll) by argoff · · Score: 0

    I used to be a bit more sympathetic to this stuff, but I know too many people who view it as their RIGHT to access other people's work for free, without their permission. I guess its just another version of the "information wants to be free" zealotry (Free Software bigots who don't actually understand free software and usually hypocrites. The few, very loud ones that give the whole community a bad name to some.).

    FYI, these people built on information that was given to them freely literally from the time they were born. Now to turn arround and say that they have a right to add to that, push it arround the world, and to controll it such as to lock everyone else out from copying is simply bullshit.

    The right of people to copy and immitate freely - information that is at their disposal is a right. And in the information age, there is no natural way to distinguish from copyrights and free speech rights - so what are you saying?

    It's not about property, respect, or any other type of right, it's about controll. If you stole my car, I think I would be very violated, but if you make a copy - hell have two. In fact it's a Geo, there are 10 million coppies, I am not violated. Implying that copying things violates people is bullshit morality. It's anything but free market. And most of all it's unworkable in the INFORMATION age.

  133. A blow to freedom of speech by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Just because something *can* be used for illegal purposes does not mean it should be assumed its ONLY for illegal purposes. ( and last I heard, the links they had to mepis, debian, etc were legal... and much faster then FTP from their home sites )

    Nor should liking to files be illegal. Its the end user that ( potentially ) broke the law.

    Remember, they are not hosting ANY file...

    Telling someone where the crack house in the area is shouldn't get you into trouble. Selling someone a car, that they later use to mow people down with shouldn't make the seller liable.. Manufacturing a gun that is used illegally later on shouldn't get you sued by the victims..

    Remember too, some places these sites are being viewed, its still legal to download what you want, regardless of some other countries laws.. We are supposed to be independent sovereign nations, remember? ( or at least until the WTO has their way )

    So when do we go after newspapers for having ads about autos? or cutlery sets? Oh ya, they are part of the 'media' who is driving this in the first place.. Fariness stops at their door it appears.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  134. 'Intellectual' Property Isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am seriously fed up with the MPAA. Don't they, and the RIAA realise that the reason their artists don't make as much money anymore is because its mostly crap and filler.

    Maybe its those of us who are knowledgable enough to know how to use P2P and BitTorrent who are downloading the 'good stuff', because its only us who realise the rest of this stuff is crap?

    If some of it was even barely intellectual, then these artists might deserve some money. So what if people are copying their work? Obviously they're effort wasn't worth the money. If I do some work for someone and do it badly I don't expect to get paid either.

    Personally, I don't download much; except for the odd South Park and Simpsons episode, and HIGNFY every Sunday morning, just because I can't watch those things during the week, and I'm too cheap to buy a video recorder. For me it seems the same as borrowing a VT from a mate at work, but then I'm not downloading films costing millions to make and expecting all their money back... MAYBE YOU DON'T DESERVE IT?!

    In fact, I haven't been to the cinema in years. I'm going next year; but only to see Team America. Guess what? Its not even out in this country (UK) yet. I may have already seen it, but Matt & Trey deserve my money.

    Its just a shame that these places are seen as liable yet they only LINK to a .torrent. That's just sick.

    Fuck you RIAA/MPAA. I wouldn't stop if I saw any of you crossing the street.

  135. I can't steal anymore! Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How am I going to watch Enterprise now? No TV channel in Norway sends it, nor do they have any plans to send it. I buy the DVDs. I watch the movies. And then they fuck people over by removing my only way of watching it before it comes to DVD?

    Sad that you can't watch it for free, but you have to shell out money for the DVDs. Gee, maybe you should just buy the fucking DVDs like you claim to do and stop stealing. Is the world coming to an end if you don't see the episodes as they air?

    1. Re:I can't steal anymore! Re:Damn it! by VoidWraith · · Score: 0

      And another AC gets theft and infringement confused. Copyright infringement, if its illegal, is not theft. Theft is like going to the store and taking a bottle of milk from them. Copyright infringment is like having a friend of yours buy a bottle of milk, but make exact replicas of said bottle with milk intact, at no cost to anyone but himself, and give you one.

  136. mnb Re:Closing in advance of raids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    ... they have your email address and your IP can be gotten through that unless you used an anonymizer for your email.


    You are assuming that the email address given is a legit one. Even if the email address in their records is legit then they have to subpoena Hotmail or whoever (unless you were foolish enough to not only use a real email address but to use your ISP's email).

    Even if they have your real email address, that proves nothing. It proves who created the account, it does not prove who used the account. Weak evidence, and with 100,000 Torrentbits users they can (will) pick and choose who they go after.
    1. Re:mnb Re:Closing in advance of raids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, if I own the domain my email addy is on, and shared a bunch of terabytes, I'm screwed? If some **AA had that database, that is.

  137. MPAA Goes After Human Nature by wintermute1974 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the MPAA is co-operating in criminal investigations with police in Finland, the Netherlands and France, so it is reasonable to infer that reports of raids in more European countries are likely to surface shortly.

    Yes, the MPAA is acting on behalf of its members and copyright holders, ensuring that intellectual property is not distributed for free. They have the law on their side, and can probably buy or lobby anyone of importance that disagrees with them.

    That said, I think the MPAA is fighting a losing battle. People like to share, to spread what little wealth and happiness they have around.

    BitTorrent enables a system where people of like interests and hobbies can reward one another as they are connected to the same torrent. And yes, this includes both legitimate and illegitimate uses.

    Sharing is part of human nature and any organization that throws its weight around in an attempt to circumvent our instinct to share will ultimately prove to be futile.

    1. Re:MPAA Goes After Human Nature by ithicine · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, hoarding and greed are also parts of human nature.

      In this case, the law enables a system where people who have an existing advantage can enforce continued personal gain... for legitimate and illegitimate uses....

    2. Re:MPAA Goes After Human Nature by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Sharing is part of human nature

      So is greed.

    3. Re:MPAA Goes After Human Nature by shmergin · · Score: 1

      "People like to share, to spread what little wealth and happiness they have around."

      Paint me cynical but in my experience peoples first reaction when they finish a torrent is to shut it down, lest they 'give away' more than they downloaded. Human nature tends to lean more towards getting 'something for nothing' rather than sharing what they have. This is generally not the case with open source torrents, but OS torrents are a drop in the ocean compared to pirated.

    4. Re:MPAA Goes After Human Nature by jschottm · · Score: 1

      I think you'll also find that it's a very common human value to be far more tolerant of other people's problems if they don't see them. For example, if most people saw someone who was literally starving to death in their neighborhood, they would be likely to take some kind of action to try to save them. Starving Africans halfway around the world don't get the same consideration. Granted, there are contributions to various aid charities and awful music you can buy to support them, but when it comes down to it, most people spend *far* more on their personal comfort than on improving the world. How many thousands of people could have been granted life for the cost of the Nintendo DSes and Sony PSPs that have been sold this year?

      There's also a large sense of empathy only with a group that you associate yourself with, which is why an earthquake that kills three US citizens gets far more coverage than one that kills thousands someplace else and why the Holocaust is far more known in the US than the Rape of Nanjing, which per day killed as many if not more.

      The vast majority of file sharers that I've talked with use this to their advantage, by abstracting the damage they do as "just hurting big companies or rich people." Most of them are motivated by greed, pure and simple, by the concept of "I want therefore I deserve," and because they don't see the little person getting hurt, the human empathy doesn't kick in. The overwhelming sense of "deserving" is part of why the United States is going to be in a world of hurt in a few years, because the vast majority of today's youth/early adults have it and have been nothing but coddled since birth.

      There are some universal values which everyone the world over would agree furthers humanity.

      You'll find that virtually every major religion agrees that murder is bad, but that hasn't stopped people from going to war time and time again for the past couple thousand years.

      Most religions and cultures have prohibitions against having sex with someone else's spouse, but that happens time and time again as well.

      Humans are inherently weak (what's often termed original sin) and will very often do what they think they can get away with, hence rampant file "sharing."

      People like to share, to spread what little wealth and happiness they have around.

      There's nothing inherently wrong or evil with saying something is nice and wanting other people to experience the same pleasure. The problem is that many things that are worth sharing involve some kind of cost (this can include time - it's not just financial) to create. So I do my best to share with the world - I share with my friends through gifts, hosting dinners, taking them on trips, and so on. I share with the world through supporting charities. In both cases, I am limited in my sharing because I have a finite amount of time and money. Unauthorized file duplication, on the other hand, breaks the model because it still costs *someone* money and time to create but doesn't cost the "sharers" other than whatever their bandwidth costs.

      Naturally those somebodies fight back just like a car dealership would fight back if someone tried to "share" the dealer's cars with their friends. And before someone jumps in to complain that intellectual and physical property are not the same, the ultimate point is that both someone that earns their living creating intellectual property and someone that creates physical property are just as broke at the end of the day if people take it without paying for it.

      Chances are, the majority of the people that read this site make their living through intellectual property. It's just that they don't have to worry about people taking their work without permission because it's so specialized to their purpose that the world at large has no interest in it. Media makers aren't so lucky.

      The bottom line is that when it ceases to be profitable, the quality content will go away and we'll be left with the pop-mass-marke

    5. Re:MPAA Goes After Human Nature by weicco · · Score: 1

      Keskusrikospoliisi (hmm.. I guess it's like FBI in Finland) said that MPAA had absolutely nothing to do with Finnreactor shutdown. I don't know who's behind this but MPAA is just trying to collect some points from this. And remember kids, ware is bad mmmkay.

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
    6. Re:MPAA Goes After Human Nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copyright laws came to be in a time when making a copy of something was not an action which the common person could take. Printing presses were just not available to every person. The film and music industries as we experience them today were built on the basis of that same structure - not just anyone could press a record, not just anyone could print a film reel.

      With the advent of the information age, the ability to copy and distribute information has become more readily available to the average person. This has destroyed the structure upon which the music and film industries were originally founded, and upon which the copyright laws evolved. The industry is trying to protect the structure they have in place, rather than adapting. Calcified, entrenched interests will do that, just due to corporate + legal inertia. However, short of making computers + the internet illegal, the forces of old + decrepit will not be able to restore that structure which they are so desperately trying to stop from disintegrating. But, it can hurt to try.

      All you are seeing is the industry generally not wanting to shift to a different distribution model(s). The music and film industries have had distribution monopolies for so long that they have been able to artificially inflate their profit margins by starving us for content. I think the media industries are just irritated because they are having trouble throttling us with the same 10 songs on auto-repeat all day, the single movie that anyone cares to watch . . . it's great that all of a sudden you don't have to be rich to produce an album, that you can distribute your flick without selling your soul to the devil.

    7. Re:MPAA Goes After Human Nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People like to share, to spread what little wealth and happiness they have around.

      In that case, you certainly won't mind sending me twenty bucks. It may only be a little wealth and happiness, but we can't deny your human nature!

    8. Re:MPAA Goes After Human Nature by ZedmanAuk · · Score: 1

      Exactly, which is why communism fails whereas capitalism seems to work. The entire might of the Soviet Union (nukes, secret police, and all) was unable to overcome this part of human nature. Why does the MPAA think with far less resources that they will be successful?

      --
      -ZA
    9. Re:MPAA Goes After Human Nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think the only logic the mpaa will understand is numbers - how much stunts like this cost them. you can add your numbers here:

      http://shake.humans.cc
      http://break.humans.cc

  138. change the hosting provider by groups.google · · Score: 1

    People who owns torrent site,
    Why dont you guys take dedicated hosting from a place where MPAA or RIAA (or US LAW?) doesn't have any influence on?
    May be North Korea?

    1. Re:change the hosting provider by KillerBob · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't have to go quite that far.... in Canada, there is no DMCA, and all of the attempts to create something like it have failed. Even if there was one, parliament has ruled that there is no grounds for passing a law against downloading files of any nature.

      Serving up copywritten material is still illegal, but as I understand it, BitTorrent is completely decentralized peer2peer, and the host websites don't actually host any copywritten material, no?

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    2. Re:change the hosting provider by tepples · · Score: 1

      and the host websites don't actually host any [copyrighted] material

      That doesn't matter. A&M Records v. Napster.

    3. Re:change the hosting provider by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      I think this is thier perspective on it:

      Having a list of links to pirated files is no different than having a list of links to creditcard numbers.

      Unfortunately, many Higher Powers(tm) think this is true (or a paid enough to think it's true).

      That being said, I'm not sure they take into account the full ramifications of that statement. If providing a list of (insert something illegal here) is inherently illegal, then what of the search engines like google? Should it be the information provider's fault, or should it be the user who is seeking such information that should be held accountable? Should they both be held accountable? Should neither?

      These are questions which are being blindly pushed aside presently for the cause of the greater profit. If P2P programs and bittorrent link sites are illegal, how long will it take the Big Corporations to throw their weight around on the search engines? How long before the entire internet in the U.S. (at least) becomes one giant PolitiCorporate lock-box?

      Information wants to be free. Well...so did the slaves. Same concept, Big Corporations fearing the worst if their business model changed. Except they underestimated when they imagined "the worst".

      ~X~

      Interesting Sidenote Regarding Slavery:

      Slavery almost died out in the early 1800's because it was becoming economically unfeasible for a large number of cotton plantations in the south. Cotton was just too difficult a crop. It was Eli Whitney's cotton gin that suddenly made the whole thing work again.

      For that, I'm glad he died miserable and penniless.

      --
      ~X~
    4. Re:change the hosting provider by yamla · · Score: 1

      A&M Records v. Napster is completely irrelevant here. That was a U.S. court decision, this guy is talking about Canada.

      --

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    5. Re:change the hosting provider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about hosting torrents/tracker in the native reserve?

    6. Re:change the hosting provider by Zen+Punk · · Score: 1

      Pfft. The Feds pay lip service to them as "independant nations," but when the natives "evade" taxes or the Gov. decides they really need a certain parcel of land, those age-old treaties are ignored. They would be ignored so they could come after indexers, too.

      --
      Sleep is futile.
    7. Re:change the hosting provider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to update your Canadian copyright knowledge really quick. The politicians are ready to ratify WIPO before year's end. By ratifying WIPO, they will enact DMCA like laws.

      http://www.digital-copyright.ca/
      http://www.fai rcopyright.ca/

      Parliament doesn't judge anything - this explains the retarded laws they push. The courts interpret the laws and do the judging and ruling.

      Bit torrent is not decentralized. There's this central server that uploads and coordinate users. If you're talking about server lists of bit torrent servers being decentralized, then that's true, and they are only lists.

  139. They may be trying... by Animaether · · Score: 1
    Since they are not even trying to get his money for the show, there's no basis whatever for any claims of monetary losses.


    Okay, to cover the latter part first...
    If I never intended to buy a movie in the first place, and I download it, watch it, enjoy it, then there's no claims of monetary losses - right ? Riiight.

    Anyway, on to the first part. You say that they're not even trying to get his money. Well, who says ?

    Let's say that Paramount (they own Star Trek, yes? not sure anymore) has been trying to pimp Enterprise off to the Nordic broadcasters for the sum of Large_Amount. The Nordic broadcasters look at the figure, the amount of people who would actually watch it, and say "Uhh. no. Our subscribers / our government-sponsored income figures show that you'll have to come down on that price if you want it to be shown here."

    So now here is the grandparent who goes "oi! wtf. I want to see that. *clicks on to a torrent site*.

    Now... did Paramount try to get grandparent's money ? Sure they did - not directly, but indirectly through the broadcasting service for sure.

    So.. if he wants to see Enterprise on TV - he should complain to his broadcasters.

    If he wants the latest Enterprise on TV - he should complain to Paramount (since they, and about every other station and movie distributor, tend to want to cater to the U.S. market first, then reap as much as they can by selling an entire season of weekly shows to a foreign broadcaster, who can then make it a daily show).

    Or.. he could order the DVDs from the states.(Surely he's got a region-free DVD player. Saves him a silly Nordic packaging as well.)

    Anyway.. plenty of legal options available before going to illegal (yep) torrents.
    1. Re:They may be trying... by garbletext · · Score: 1
      Blockquoth the GGP:

      And, no, I don't have access to Swedish channels.
  140. Ask Slashdot by slasho81 · · Score: 1

    Deep down we all knew it would happen. Now, it happended, what do we do next?

    1. Re:Ask Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      what do we do next?

      Er, carry on as usual? Pretend nothing happened and use other sites/technologies? Set up new sites? None of the above? Take your pick.

    2. Re:Ask Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We now take to the streets and demand people use Torrent to download Ubuntu so we can setup mirrors of Linux ISOs. Make it free and fuck MS.

  141. This time with breaks!-Karma. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course and as the NASA story showed we worship crimminals because they appeal to our inner rebel.* Besides is there any crimminal that has ever fathomed the depths of their actions. This situation is simply the karma principle proving itself.

    *A world without rules, and society are polar opposites. Some have never been taught that, and others rebel against that.

    1. Re:This time with breaks!-Karma. by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      A world without rules, and society are polar opposites.

      Maybe so. A world without rulers just might work though.

      --
      What?
  142. Question for NOC folks... by timotten · · Score: 1

    It's been reported a few times (including yesterday) that BitTorrent makes up something like a 1/3rd of Internet traffic. With the major hubs for finding torrent links going down... has there been a notable decrease in overall Internet bandwidth usage?

    1. Re:Question for NOC folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not! Do you really believe that load of crap? the decrease in overall bandwidth usage will happen ONLY IF government declare the war on spam and and they shut down the sites and ISPs that facilitate and relay spam and scam. Then you will see a decrease of 50% in overall bandwidth.

    2. Re:Question for NOC folks... by Nickalreadyinuse · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Question for NOC folks... by timotten · · Score: 1

      That site has some interesting charts. It does look like they had a decline over the past week, and it's particularly pronounced looking at their daily averages over the past year.

      But the decline predates this slashdot story by a couple days. Maybe some other variables (university finals?) explains it, or maybe slashdot was a little slow in picking up on this round of anti-piracy moves... or maybe I'm just making noise...

    4. Re:Question for NOC folks... by mikolas · · Score: 1

      Actually I think the traffic has dropped because Finreactor got busted last Tuesday. It seems to have lowered the total Ficix traffic over 1 Gbps...

    5. Re:Question for NOC folks... by Nickalreadyinuse · · Score: 1

      And I might add that this is not so much because the actual loss of connectivity to the site (or the separate tracker server which went down soon after), but because of the huge wave of rumormongering that has scared all the little kids to cut their P2P-connections, including many other unrelated P2P networks. Many have also been scared to sweeping files from their HDs, encrypt them or physically hide them in fear of further raids.

      The scares have included various "pranks", some very elaborate, to scare even more people to unnecessary panic. While the police has stated that there are no more busts being planned and the investigation will take months, it has not stopped or calmed these fears (this is the second only Finnish P2P case to be investigated by police with home raids).

      False rumours have included:
      a) Claim that police is using an IT-security company to deploy backdoors with trojaned files released over BT (this was in a form of a fake internal police email)
      b) Police is planning to raid 1500 homes in connection with the investigation beginning next year (this was in a form of a fake police internal memo)
      c) Police forces are being trained in crash courses and students are drafted from the National Police Academy just to provide enough manpower for this gargantuan operation (bigger than any in the US thus far for example)
      d) That police has been issued court orders to obtain traffic logs from all major ISPs in Finland
      f) Various other bullshit which has no base on any reality, but sounds scary enough to make some people stick forks inside their HDs and burn them!
      (well that fork picture was probably a joke, but that's the general idea)

      Now THIS is what really dropped the traffic by several fractions. Expect it to return for the Xmas holidays when things calm down.

    6. Re:Question for NOC folks... by mikolas · · Score: 1

      Yes, I totally agree. The actual tracker servers were located in the Netherlands (and trackers would have no visible effect in the traffic figures anyway), but rumours running wild in IRC seems to have scared kids away from P2P.

      I myself don't see this as absolutely bad thing as a number of teenagers I know via relatives etc. already use P2P to obtain anything they need. It has become really casual copying and people do not even think they're committing anything illegal when they download software using torrents. In some cases the Finnish copyright law permits copying stuff for personal use (music and movies), but downloading pirated software is always illegal.

      Just today I convinced a relative to legally download OpenOffice instead of pirating copy of MS Office from emule and I think that is the way to go in the long run -- do not pirate software if there is a free alternative available.

    7. Re:Question for NOC folks... by Nickalreadyinuse · · Score: 1

      It has become really casual copying and people do not even think they're committing anything illegal when they download software using torrents.

      It's quite an open question whether downloading software using BT is illegal in Finland. BT is a markedly different technology than the only P2P case (CuteMX) that has reached the court thus far.

      While I don't think it's very likely that using BT could be found completely legal, I believe there is a strong possibility of a judgement by which for example only seeding full archives is considered "making available for public". OTOH it might be that an opposite spectrum decission is reached, whereby just running a tracker is illegal. There is absolutely no applicable precedent for those actions in the Finnish copyright law.

      I could lecture a lot about this because I have followed all of the relevant cases and have the decission papers with me.

      However, I would like the international audience to take note that our parliament is CURRENTLY debating the 2nd attempt to pass the Euro-DMCA into Finnish Law (actually it's in the education committee right now). Coincidence? The first attempt failed miserably, probably because there was no huge "piracy ring of ordinary kids en masse" to push it through the final vote. Could this be it? I don't know. The lobbyists are claiming that the central piece of the new legistlation is to control HOME USERS, not professional "pirates".

      The industry wants for some reason a precedent case under the old law before the law changes. However, the proposed law will add very important new restrictions to customers and new milking rights for the corporations.

      This is a huge subject and personally I would like to talk on end about this, but on Slashdot this thread will be forgotten in a day or so. It will be too fast to really participate in it, like in a tradition small circle deep rooted discussion of a highly technical-legal subject (for example the thread about the actual Finreactor and Dutch bust went dead in some 24 hours).

      All I can say, we all are in a world of shit within about 10 years if nothing is done to control these corporations by a GLOBAL consumer rights effort. Their lobby groups and enforcement clubs are international (or should it be supernational?), and this is how they can write the law all around Earth with their total control of the media (which they use both to get funds and secure more WIPO-laws for even more funds and so on).

  143. here is a fine torrent site that won't die by puzzled · · Score: 1



    http://digitalpanic.org

    Free full concernts from Widespread Panic, Grateful Dead, Phish, String Cheese Incident, and many others - all perfectly legal. Why piss and moan about the RIAA when you can escape their crapola free of charge? Because you're conditioned to listen to junk is one possible answer to that question :-)

    --
    I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
    1. Re:here is a fine torrent site that won't die by ajaxxx · · Score: 1

      except the Dead suck.

    2. Re:here is a fine torrent site that won't die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the Grateful Dead were mentioned, not The Dead. In either case you're obviously barely entitled to an opinion.

    3. Re:here is a fine torrent site that won't die by puzzled · · Score: 1


      The Grateful Dead alternated between fabulous and miserable throughout their career, but their work requires that you listen to most all of it to genuinely understand.

      The Other Ones did some truly amazing work all on their own and it hurts me greatly that I never got to see them live. I saw The Dead last summer and I was not terribly impressed - some much loved standards played, Down The Road is very touching, but the song to song fusion just isn't there with the new line up. Perhaps they'll improve in time, or maybe I'll wander off to String Cheese Incident ...

      --
      I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
    4. Re:here is a fine torrent site that won't die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeh, it won't die becuase it has zero-traffic since the .torrent files it hosts are shite.

  144. Face it, this is no big loss by character_assassin · · Score: 0

    99.8% of everyone using BitTorrent are infringing on copyrights. Criminals, in other words. This outage is a very good thing.

    --

    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    1. Re:Face it, this is no big loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on where you are. In some countries it is perfectly legal to download files as long as it is for personal use.

  145. It's just business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never cause the MPAA to lose more money than it would cost to have you killed.

  146. I mean torrent servers, not IRC servers. by RLiegh · · Score: 1
  147. combined BitTorrent and Usenet? by timefactor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's an idea: distribute torrent files for the binaries on text-only newsgroups. People without access to binary groups could still get the torrents and use BT to get the actual files. The torrent files would need to be encoded as plain text but as the torrent files themselves are small that'd be a minor obstacle. No SuperNova or equivalent needed. Or have I not taken something into consideration?

    1. Re:combined BitTorrent and Usenet? by CommanderData · · Score: 1

      Well most torrent files are between 4K and 200K, so that seems like a possibility. All we need is someone to create an Alt.Torrents newsgroup (or even better- Alt.Torrents.NoSpam and have people moderate it) and then everyone start posting torrents to it. Hell I would probably like that even better! You could fire up the newsreader every day, download ALL the torrent postings in minutes and then pick through them later...

      Of course we still have the problem of Tracker sites being vulnerable, but we no longer would need torrent index sites...

      --
      Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
    2. Re:combined BitTorrent and Usenet? by BlueCup · · Score: 1

      Thats a good idea... then people with companies that choke off access to usenet (sbc, time warner) would still be able to get stuff... the only problem I can see is that some of the tracker sites are still probably going to get hunted down and killed... lets just hope enough of them are outside of the US and europe.

      --
      WANNAWIKI Wannawiki WannaWiki WANNAWIKI!
    3. Re:combined BitTorrent and Usenet? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Moderating it would be stupid, unless the moderator was in some country which has no copyright laws, no extradition treaty with the U.S., and which the U.S. is more dependent upon than the movie and music industries combined. Hint: there is no such place.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:combined BitTorrent and Usenet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      unless the moderator was in some country which has no copyright laws, no extradition treaty with the U.S.,

      N. Korea

      and which the U.S. is more dependent upon than the movie and music industries combined.

      eh?

    5. Re:combined BitTorrent and Usenet? by CommanderData · · Score: 1

      You must not use the .nospam Usenet newsgroups? Moderation in those cases is primarily to make sure that all posts are on topic - in our case that they all contain .torrent files. Moderators will weed out the pr0n ads, spam, pictures, and exe trojans that inevitably get posted in the newsgroups.

      Are you suggesting that a moderator might be held accountable for the posts that ARE allowed to go through (the torrent files)? I'm not sure that they could. Can Slashdot moderators be held accountable for not modding down to oblivion every post with a bittorrent site/link mentioned in it? Or what if they mod them up to make them more visible?

      --
      Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
    6. Re:combined BitTorrent and Usenet? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I am absolutely suggesting that a moderator might be held accountable. We have seen time and time again that fora with no content control are allowed to exist while moderated systems get shut down and people get fined, arrested, what have you. There is no plausible deniability for something like that, which is why napster could not mount a defense.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:combined BitTorrent and Usenet? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Would content-neutral robomoderation, which checks only that each post contains a uuencoding of a valid .torrent file, expose anybody to legal trouble?

    8. Re:combined BitTorrent and Usenet? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      IANAL but I doubt it, since that's basically analogous to a file dialog that only opens one extension, and torrent itself is not useful only for illegal purposes, but anything.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  148. Re:"notice of infringement" emails have already hi by camooT · · Score: 1

    The RIAA collects information the same way the folks at Register did. A script was used to collect IP addresses from specific swarms, and that IP address could be traced with sufficient help from certain bulliable ISP's. If you checked the suprnova "bad files" forum, there was a guy employed for an ISP that would periodically post warnings on "watched torrents." I'm not sure if he ever listed this one specifically, but it's stupid to assume that one ISP has recieved all the **AA C&D letters. Still, it's a reminder to folks who haven't installed peerguardian or aren't behind a firewall (routers count). I'd probably be knee deep in these things if I hadn't...

  149. Too young to run for office by tepples · · Score: 1

    Convince other Americans that the Public Domain is a Good Thing.

    Ha. The copyright industry owns the advertising media and has the right under private property law to deny any public service advertisement.

    Run for office if you have to.

    I was too young to vote when the 105th Congress (the one that passed the Bono Act and the DMCA) was elected, and I'm still constitutionally too young to run for the House of Representatives. But for those Slashdot users who happened to have been born before I was, which guide on how to run for public office do you recommend?

    1. Re:Too young to run for office by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The copyright industry owns the advertising media and has the right under private property law to deny any public service advertisement.

      If you think that political will can only be harnessed through advertising, you don't know politics.

      You need to find some charismatic people -- NOT anyone who's stumped for OSS, because largely they aren't -- and convince them. They will, in turn, convince others.

      Arguments like "Snow White might never have been made if the laws today were in place then. Who knows what new great movie isn't being made because of overzealous copyright laws?" are what you want to go for.

      As for entering public office -- get yourself a respectable profession, and pick a political party.

    2. Re:Too young to run for office by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Start at grass roots and work it. Right now just start conversations with people around you (in line at the store, whatever). Once you have convinced them that you are a reasonable person mention copyright. Best is if they bring up politics. Make your message short, and make sure you seem like a nice guy. Appearances count, often more than the message so don't be some "long haired hippie freak", or today the tattooed and pierced freak. Dress nicely, and spread the word as a reasonable person. Give the others no reason to suspect that you don't go to church every sunday. (What you do is your business)

      In a year politics will start picking up again. Attend the local caucuses. Pick one that mostly agrees with you and try to get copyright reform on the platform. Just by attending you automatically can represent the party at the state level, and so you get to pick who gets on the ballot! Remember it doesn't matter who the people vote for so long as you control who is on the ballot!

      It is important to start now. One person is nothing if you start too late. Start now, learn what the process is in your area (every state is different!). Learn how the parties work. Get the process working.

  150. Re:Making movies is a costly venture by zmollusc · · Score: 2, Informative

    The voices that the CIA beam into my teeth tell me that promoting a film costs about as much as making the film. Halving the costs seems a fine start to the economic fight. Setting up a cdr manufacturing plant probably costs quite a few $million too, but their product gets to the shop for pennies.
    The market has set the price for DVDs; it is the price that the pirates sell at.
    To recap:
    Reduce the costs (no advertising means less staff to deal with the advertising which means less office space which.....etc)
    Make a few cents on each VCD sold (and more on the download).
    Make even more cents on each label-less DVD (more on download).
    Make a few dollars on each fancy boxed set.
    Make a few dollars at the theatre.
    And this will remove the demand for pirated movies too, as customers can 'preview' a film on a grotty format before paying big bucks for higher quality versions all of which you will make money on . You can even put trailers for your other films on the discs.
    vcd and low quality dvd copies of your film will be availible on streetcorners whatever you do, do you want to make money on those sales or not?

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  151. Irony-Facing the music. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Irony is the mental gymnastics people go through around her to reconcile what their senses are telling them verses what they wish the world to be.

    The content producers are still here, while the fabled "new model" that geeks hold up is being shut down. What is the outside world to make of that?

    1. Re:Irony-Facing the music. by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      What is the outside world to make of that?

      That the law is clearly for sale to the highest bidder?
      My senses are telling me that we are letting criminals make the laws and run the show.

      --
      What?
  152. Public Slashdot Anouncement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EVERYONE SHARE YOUR TORRENTS ON P2P, though i only have a few that i got accedentally by clicking save as instead of open with, i am sure some of you can rummage through your files and collect quite a bit, maybe a p2p network could be created just for this reaso............... any takers ?

  153. That's part of the problem by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you pirate a copy of something, even when the creator has no plans to try and sell it to you, you're still harming him by eroding his ability to control the distribution of his own work.

    Not entirely: see the fourth fair use factor.

    That's a very important thing in the eyes of musicians, writers and filmmakers.

    The mere fact that major publishers and copyright industry trade groups have convinced musicians, writers and filmmakers that complete control over distribution is so desirable is part of the problem. How would one go about solving it?

  154. Update: it's not dead by cjsnell · · Score: 5, Informative


    According to efnet:#tvtorrents, they are just having DNS problems. Hopefully tvtorrents will recover!

    1. Re:Update: it's not dead by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      It will be back, and it will be run by BayTSP :)

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  155. now thats just funny by dogod · · Score: 1

    made me laugh :)

  156. Re:It doesn't maximize their profitability by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    I reckon it maximises their REALISTIC profitability rather than their THEORETICAL profitability.
    CEO: "Our spies tell us that a 15 year old unemployed stoner downloaded 100 films this month over his neighbour's wifi internet account! Therefore, if our DRM was impregnable, that same unemployed stoner would have paid $1500 to buy the DVDs!"
    Shareholders : "OMFG! Buy more DRM and Lawyers!"

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  157. One word by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Bummer.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  158. 1 problem by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    They weren't hosting one single illegal file.

    I guess you don't support free speech. That is all that the *link* sites are participating in. Speech.

    Now if you want to discuss the 2nd level, perhaps you have a case.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:1 problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is it free speech if I just provide a link to your personal CC# and other financial information?

    2. Re:1 problem by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      If you provide a link, by definition, yes.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:1 problem by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      And now Slashdot is incriminated for linking to Suprnova! Where will the madness end! /sarcasm

  159. There are others... by Mahtar · · Score: 1

    Specifically www.demonoid.com -- which is a register only site. This is good because it enforces a ratio. The selection is not as good has Suprnova, but maybe now it will get better.

    To search all the sites use http://yotoshi.com/

    Considering the strength of the BitTorrent protocol, these sites -- and others -- will only grow as a result.

    1. Re:There are others... by loekf · · Score: 1

      True. As far I can see, BT is alive and kicking. Suprnova was just a high-profile site. There are plenty of others and plenty of others will come.

      Of course there are plenty of lawyers in the US (don't you love the law-system in the US ?), with nothing else to do then keeping track of tracker-sites, but even they can't stop P2P.

  160. Making [arguments] is a costly venture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Reduce the costs (no advertising means less staff to deal with the advertising which means less office space which.....etc)"

    Which means less people will know about it, and hence less money made.

    "Make a few cents on each VCD sold (and more on the download). Make even more cents on each label-less DVD (more on download)."

    Proportionally still a small number.

    "Make a few dollars on each fancy boxed set.
    Make a few dollars at the theatre."

    The preexisting system already gives them this.

    "And this will remove the demand for pirated movies too, as customers can 'preview' a film on a grotty format before paying big bucks for higher quality versions all of which you will make money on . You can even put trailers for your other films on the discs. "

    Good thing no one's heard of Blockbuster.

    "vcd and low quality dvd copies of your film will be availible on streetcorners whatever you do, do you want to make money on those sales or not?"

    If you can't beat them, become them. Let's extrapolate that to other aspects of our society, and see how well it does with the Darwin test?

  161. Corporate Censorship by SloWave · · Score: 1


    The heavy and cruel hand of corporate censorship strikes again. Human rights are again overshadowed by the inhuman rights of these multinational monsters known as the MPAA and RIAA.

    1. Re:Corporate Censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, there is a human right to infringe on copyrights.

    2. Re:Corporate Censorship by RealBorg · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with this, copyright is just a new word for censorship in the 21st century.

    3. Re:Corporate Censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't for get the human right get their stuff for free! That is right up there with our right to entertainment!

      Sheesh, I agree with you. We have people posting like the grandparent, and claiming providing a service to help people download someone's else's copy righted works without their permission is free speech. Then there are the "whaah whaah, it is a life necessarily that I get free entertainment, or without it I will DIE!"

      Plus all sites postings like the ones on slashdot confirm my belief that despite their preaching of P2P's legal uses, a vast majority of them use it to get copy-righted music/games/software/movies/etc for free.

      Yet I know darn well if some company like Microsoft did something remotely braking the GPL they would be up in arms about it.

  162. Shut off google? by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, but they can force them to filter search results by content..

    Much as they are doing for some other countries now..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Shut off google? by lhaeh · · Score: 1
      We've seen what google does in those cases: They provide a link to the DMCA complaint, like in this example.

      The link is from a the page generated when you search for "kazaa lite." As is required, the complaint contains the url they had to exclude from the search results. Its easy enough to copy and paste the URL from the DMCA notice.

  163. Usenet Group Restrictions by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Specific groups can be dropped from server's feeds, and if enough people drop them, then nothing propagates.

    Back to square one, again.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  164. It's not about bandwidth by cjsnell · · Score: 1



    I find it hard to believe that they would not have issued warnings or other things of that nature if the issue was that bandwidth and all of that was becoming too expensive. Suprnova was incredibly popular with teh torrent community and they had to know that people would come to their aid.


    Suprnova did not go down because of bandwidth usage. There were *plenty* of things that they could have done to cut this down. Some months ago, I pointed out on their IRC channel how they could cut their page size from ~120K to something like 3K (using an all-text page and gzip encoding) but they didn't really care. I'm pretty convinced that some of these sites made their pleas for donations not because they needed to pay their hosting bills but because they enjoyed the cash that these funding drives provided.

    The technologies to implement a relatively manageable torrent directory are available but most sites seem more interested in advertising and PayPal revenue than providing a service to the community.

  165. Suprnova Mirror by JeffZakaib · · Score: 1

    http://www.bi-torrent.com/ Hope this helps :)

  166. Damn it!-AMEN to Techno-Faith. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Anybody developing newer versions with encryption and anonymity, feel free to contact me. I have both developer time (C, C++, HTML, Perl, Javascript, etc.) and disposable income, to support creating a new version."

    Translation: I'm putting all my faith in technological solutions to what is essentially a social problem, because I know the physical laws that govern my solution are different than the physical laws that govern any technological solution my counterpart at the *AA are pursuing.

  167. postdoc tracking Suprnova for 2 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't find anybody relating to this link it might be helpfull to know why they went down.

    http://www.isa.its.tudelft.nl/~pouwelse/Bittorrent _Measurements_6pages.pdf

  168. .org is gone, .com is not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    suprnova.com is still there

    1. Re:.org is gone, .com is not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .com is an imposter/scam site

    2. Re:.org is gone, .com is not by cqnn · · Score: 1

      both .com and .net are scams IIRC.

      Another question is, does the MPAA know those
      sites are not affiliated with .org; or are they
      going to get shutdown as a cascade effect?

    3. Re:.org is gone, .com is not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully they'll get shut down. Of course they won't, though.

      After all: .com and .net are both scams directed towards the masses. Therefore they will remain. .org on the other hand, is directed towards the corporations. Therefore it will be shut down.

      Logic.

  169. Damn it!-Future Tense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You have a right to do anything that does not harm another. "

    Many an argument hangs it's hat on this peg. From legalizing drugs to P2P, and so forth.

    Part of the problem is that the beings making its declaration, are limited in perception. Limited in lifespan, and limited in capacity. DDT, and Thalidomide showed us that our perceptions of "harm" were faulty and limited.* We're repeating the same mistakes with our environment (global warming), and with drugs. (Vioxx, Phen Phen).

    Anyone who's hanging their morality on their perceptions (especially in matters comcerning "what might be") should be ran from as quickly as possible.

    *I'm old enough to remeber when radiation was perceived to be OK. And quack medicines using cocaine and other dangerous compounds were perceived to be OK.

    1. Re:Damn it!-Future Tense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Anyone who's hanging their morality on their perceptions (especially in matters comcerning "what might be") should be ran from as quickly as possible.

      Ah, the time honored "Atheists are evil" troll. Not to be rude, but what the fuck else are we supposed to hang our morality on? And you don't get to say God, unless you have actual proof of one set of God's laws over all the others.

  170. I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how long it'll be until someone distributes a trojan package disguised as a leaked Exeem beta?

  171. what about alt.binaries.*? by Val314 · · Score: 1

    i'm wondering: why are all those p2p networks shut down and one of the oldest sources (usenet) is still there?

    did they find a legal loophole or is there a reason why they werent shut down long ago?

    1. Re:what about alt.binaries.*? by flossie · · Score: 1
      why are all those p2p networks shut down and one of the oldest sources (usenet) is still there?

      Well, firstly, USENET doesn't have a single controller -- so who could the *AA threaten? Secondly, USENET was around LONG before the entertainment industry started complaining about "piracy" on the net. There is absolutely no way whatsoever that they could convince a judge that the main purpose of USENET is copyright infringement.

    2. Re:what about alt.binaries.*? by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      No, but I bet they wouldn't have much trouble getting judgements against the major premium NNTP providers. That's probably fairly low on the priority list right now, though.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  172. I dont care thet much... by DHalcyon · · Score: 1

    All trackers I use are still there. Google filetype:torrent finds basically everything. And if nothing else works, usenet does.

  173. Re:Damn it! (Three words for you) by incog8723 · · Score: 1

    Kazaa Lite Resurrection. I never have a problem getting the latest Enterprise episodes.

  174. Too bad by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    Once again, a service that's of genuine use for legal purposes (distributing OSS, for example) gets taken out for everyone because selfish people illegally ripping stuff on the same service provokes the wrath of the **AA...

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  175. Now What? by codyman · · Score: 0

    So not that suprnova is dead for good... what are we supposed to do? I guess use gnutella and search for .torrents? Hmm... any ideas?

  176. IRC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know what the server and room name is for Loki and for TorrentBits?

  177. Just a little correction to the original story by Weird+O'Puns · · Score: 1

    Contrary to what MPAA says they had nothing to do with Finreactor raid. Here's a link to the story.(in finnish)

    1. Re:Just a little correction to the original story by Nickalreadyinuse · · Score: 1

      Contrary to what MPAA says they had nothing to do with Finreactor raid.

      There is no official word as to the effect of who exactly has filed the criminal complaint. There are rumors about BSA, Microsoft as well as other companies.

      So technically, the police could claim "MPAA has nothing to do with this", while in practice some MPAA companies might have.

  178. Depends on where you piss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm really sorry to see all these site go, but it was expected. You can piss in the pool, but pissing from the deck is asking for it. And they've been flaunting it.

  179. Links with further information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Unofficial SuprNova.org Closure FAQ by SilentDragz: http://www.silentdragz.net/suprfaq/
    Official Demise of Suprnova Thread: http://www.maplebacon.com/sbbs/Thread.aspx?ThreadI D=14822
    BREAKING NEWS: SUPRNOVA.ORG IS DEAD: http://digitaldj.net/blog/archives/2004/12/breakin g_news_s.php

  180. centralization attracts lawsuits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people like bittorrent because it's easy to find stuff on the web. lawyers like bittorrent because trackers are easy to identify.

  181. Two faced by slayer99 · · Score: 1

    I'm always dismayed by the difference in rhetoric between when someone tries to take your average Slashdotter's percieved rights away, and when you try to take other people's rights ways - even if that person happens to be $BIGCO.

    --
    Martin Brooks / Slayer99 #linux / UIN 2178117
    1. Re:Two faced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course, its what happens when you get unsupervised children being allowed on the Internet. Blame Western Society for its Greed Above All Else position that puts parents in the position of having to both maintain employment in order to "live".

      Isn't the american "standard of living" just wonderful? Abandons children, creates ghettos, the list goes on...

  182. Re:Interesting that MPAA can actually shut them do by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Torrent sites are by definition a stationary target. Spam can be, but usually people open an account, spam, and move on. The two problems do not have similar solutions. They are also illegal in very different ways. Finally, there is no evidence that suprnova, at least, was shut down because of the mpaa or riaa. It's a distinct possibility, of course, but assumptions are dangerous.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  183. This is a cunning ploy! by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    The voices in my head say that shutting bittorrent sites is a cunning plan.
    1. Buy stocks cheaply in ailing movie/recording companies.
    2. Shut down suprnova. Instantly, all the leeches switch off their computers and sprint to the nearest shop to buy CDs and DVDs. Sales skyrocket, share prices skyrocket.
    3. Sell shares and then reactivate suprnova.
    Repeat as necessary.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  184. Re:YEAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Intellectual theives? Well, that means they read and steal at once?

    Why must people be cheap and illegally download ever bit of software, music, etc without paying for it so our economy may actually grow and new jobs be generated?

    Bush is anti-intellectual.

  185. Suprnova is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    long live suprnova.

    The internet is like sand, the more you tighten your grip, the more that slips through your fingers.

  186. Without a reason? by phntm · · Score: 0

    Look to me like the slashdot effect from the mysterious future!
    (not a /. promo! this-is-not-a-subliminal-message)

  187. Alternative: ThePiratbay.Org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a little help from all those who put series online at suprnova, we can still use other trackers to get our fix.

    http://www.thepiratebay.org

    It's a pretty good site for stuff like series.

    Elseway we just have to learn to use the ol' search engines again. Or direct connect or simular programs (not KaZaA tho since they suck balls).

    / MackanZoor

  188. Nothing illegal? by Marran+Gray · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, linking to something illegal can be illegal. Remember DeCSS?

    --
    "There are hundreds of game theorists at the gates, sir, and they want to hold an election!"
    1. Re:Nothing illegal? by lunatik17 · · Score: 1

      Not in Sweden.

      --

      Here's my DeCSS mirror, where's yours?

  189. Exeem Screenshots by Beautyon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And review are here.

    --
    ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
  190. this is how warez evolves by poil11 · · Score: 1

    napster wasn't the first p2p program out there. but with its demise a better file sharing program came out of it. With the demise of suprnova hopefully something better will arise. because thats how the internet works.

  191. bad news by Rock-n-Rolf · · Score: 1

    Sh*t, I especially liked SN to get hold of my SUSE Linux torrents and some audio books which are not available overseas.

    --
    In Korea, all your base are Only For Old People
  192. dune, revisited by mthreat · · Score: 1

    The warez must flow

  193. who else?-OJ. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A rich football player can get away with murder and mayhem..."*

    You must be talking about OJ. Need I remind you that while he wasn't convicted of Nicole's death. He did get served with a civil suit by Nicole's family. That they did win. So he didn't escape punishment like anyone reading your post would otherwise conclude.

    *Note to audiance. This is what I mean by "skewing of truth" By ommiting information that otherwise would give a clearer picture of the situation. I trust I shouldn't have to explain this again.

    1. Re:who else?-OJ. by AndyL · · Score: 1

      "He did get served with a civil suit by Nicole's family. That they did win. So he didn't escape punishment like anyone reading your post would otherwise conclude.
      "
      So? He's still free and better off than I am. I don't consider my life a punishment, so why should I consider his life a punishment?
      Murderers are supposed to rot in jail. If they don't, they've gotten away with murder. This is not a dificult concept.

    2. Re:who else?-OJ. by sharok · · Score: 1

      I trust I shouldn't have to explain this again

      You trust ? On Slashdot ? You must be new around these parts.

    3. Re:who else?-OJ. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that in civil suits, it is up to the claimant to actually collect the fines and find out how much money the defendant has. Although they may have won the claim, I have yet to hear of Nichole's family actually collecting any money.

  194. suprnova by Xero_Cool · · Score: 0

    If you would like to sign the petition, Please visit here. You will find the link there.

  195. It will just go underground by pherris · · Score: 1

    What's keeping someone from starting a web site that tracks "local wireless informal gatherings" with time, date and place? I mean bring a laptop with a big external HD or desktop with an AC-DC converter, hang out at the locale McDonald's (or someplace without so many cameras) and start trading. With the advent of mini ITX and nano ITX boards it won't be long before you could build a "trading" box for $200USD that's interfaced and discretely controlled with a cheapo Palm to control it and see what others have. Car clubs and hot rodders have been gathering like this for decades.

    What about dorms that just trade locally via wireless connections? Bury a $50 wireless router in a false ceiling or drop it in a sheetrocked wall. When you're finished hook back up to the campus network. The RIAA/MPAA is going to have bitch of a time shutting down these types of local wireless networks.

    People will beat them. Resistance is futile.

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  196. Anyway of using unpatched windoze boxes? by ylikone · · Score: 1

    Hey hackers of the world... figure out a P2P system which rellies exclusively on multiple-redundant hacked/security-compromised windows boxes to spread tracker info. Let's see anybody try to shut down a moving target like that.

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:Anyway of using unpatched windoze boxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is an idea, instead of making demands like this, why don't take the legal risks and you do it your fucking self?

    2. Re:Anyway of using unpatched windoze boxes? by chrome · · Score: 1

      Haha

      its a great defense too.

      "What?! I didn't know I had all this stuff on my machine! I MUST HAVE BEEN HACKED!?!?!?!!?"

      It probably will come to this :/

  197. That's a reply from one of the moderators. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a longtime member of torrenbits.org. Puppy is one of the moderators and Rb, or Redbeard, is the founder/admin of the site. DeeJee is a former uploader.

    Torrenbits.org had very strict rules about what was allowed to be uploaded and who was allowed to upload stuff, which is why it was the best bittorrent-site on the internet. Among other things, uploaders had to have a minimum of 2 Mb/s upload bandwidth to ensure quick spreading of the files in the begining when thousands of people jump on a torrent at the same time, most uploaders had 10 Mb/s or 100 Mb/s and they would often collaborate to spread the files amongst themselves via FTP before posting the torrent. The site also immplemented a ratio/upload-based delay system so that people with a low upload/download ratio had to wait a few hours before being able to download the torrents. This system pretty much guaranteed that you could always max your download bandwidth.

    I miss it very much, with torrentbits down and a lot of other bittorrent sites down as well I have been forced to resort to direct connect, and alltough I am getting fairly good speeds at the moment, there's just no comparison to torrentbits.

  198. Why it closed by Sir+Tandeth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Site was closed because i nor anyother admins dont have the time and will to fight the legal battles on BT.... We dont even want it to come to that and we dont have time to deal with the pressure anymore because we have other things to do.

  199. A quote from sloncek - Suprnova's owner by Coolnat2004 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Recently in the IRC room, this was said by sloncek, the person who ran suprnova.org.

    [16:25] WhiteWo|F: Site was closed because i nor anyother admins dont have the time and will to fight the legal battles on BT.... We dont even want it to come to that and we dont have time to deal with the pressure anymore because we have other things to do

    1. Re:A quote from sloncek - Suprnova's owner by donkstuff · · Score: 1

      From the sounds of it, "other things to do" could mean getting their new p2p system up and online. That could be really good. If not, it could be really bad.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
      Paluminum.net
    2. Re:A quote from sloncek - Suprnova's owner by Evil_Timmy · · Score: 1

      From talking to sloncek and the other ops (I am, or was, a long-time SN site moderator and IRC chanop), it doesn't appear that it has anything to do with eXeem. It's that the site is taking up massive amounts of time and effort to keep running, and even with all that they put into it, it's been far from stable. With the recent raids on similar sites, they've felt that it's not worth it to continue struggling with the site, with the constant risk of getting busted (they've got nowhere near enough money to fight a legal battle, even if they're legally fine). eXeem didn't factor into their decision to shut it down, as it's a long ways from being ready. It's a shame to see it go, though...without such a great site, I doubt the BT community would be anywhere near its current massive popularity.

  200. The case is Fonovisa vs. Cherry Auction.. by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 1

    The excerpt can be found here

    18] We next consider the issue of financial benefit. The plaintiff's allegations encompass many substantive benefits to Cherry Auction from the infringing sales. These include the payment of a daily rental fee by each of the infringing vendors; a direct payment to Cherry Auction by each customer in the form of an admission fee, and incidental payments for parking, food and other services by customers seeking to purchase infringing recordings.

    So yes, the logic is that they gain both from renting to pirates as well as from admission.

  201. Re:Interesting that MPAA can actually shut them do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, spammers injecting the spam move but their web sites ARE static targets, often hosted in Asia. See www.spamhaus.org for a big list of ISPs and domains that shamelessly spam.

  202. SuprNova Closing FAQ by Sir+Tandeth · · Score: 3, Informative
  203. Distributing and hiding trackers. by slyall · · Score: 1

    You also need the trackers. You can't distribute those

    A possible way aroudn this would be to have trackers behind some sort of VPN (or perhaps even serioes of VPNs).

    So somebody could host the IP and port (pointed to via some dynamic-dns providers) which would just forward (possibly via several hops) to the actual person hosting the tracker. Automaticly erase logs etc to prevent this being all traced.

    It should provide an additional couple of levels of indirection until the technology leaps another generation.

    --
    "To stay awake all night adds a day to your life" - Stilgar | eMT.
    1. Re:Distributing and hiding trackers. by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      This is basically what Metanet is.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
  204. Silly advice. by killjoe · · Score: 1

    I am sorry but that's really a stupid suggestion.

    In America politics are already controlled by big business. In the last election there were only a handful of congressional districts that were anywhere close to being competitive. Only a couple of states were in play for the presidential election too.

    For the vast overwhelming majority of Americans their votes don't matter.

    Also for 99% of the american public this is a non issue. They care way more about Gays being married then just about any other issue on the planet.

    Politics isn't the answer, it's the problem.

    --
    evil is as evil does
    1. Re:Silly advice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Politics isn't the answer, it's the problem.

      which is why sometimes there is a people's revolution to "right the wrongs
      of governing bodies. That's my assumed understanding of what the OP wanted to accomplish by writing a new BT-type client.

    2. Re:Silly advice. by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Revolutions don't come from people pissed off about not being able to see their shows.

      Lao Tzu has a saying "fill a mans belly, kill his ambition". The politicians know how to fill our bellies and to distract us by shiny objects and gays getting married.

      The geeks could of course revolt, they could for example shut down all the routers they are in charge of and bring the planet to it's knees. But we wont because we too have our bellies full and are distracted by shiny objects and gays.

      --
      evil is as evil does
  205. OK then what? by killjoe · · Score: 1

    Just exactly what is the punishment for conspiracy to commit copyright violations?

    Anybody know the answer? Is that even a felony?

    --
    evil is as evil does
    1. Re:OK then what? by provolt · · Score: 1

      Generally, the penalty for Conspiracy to Commit $CRIME is the same as $CRIME itself.

    2. Re:OK then what? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Except that the crime in this case is copyright violation. In most cases it's not a felony if the total amount of "damage" is less then a few hundred dollars.

      I should say that publishing torrents is not the same as sharing the file. It would be damned hard to prove a crime in this case.

      Only if the american legal system was fair and just. Alas it's not and whoever has the most money wins.

      --
      evil is as evil does
  206. not anymore... by katharsis83 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and by linking to it on Slashdot you've managed to single-handedly do what the entire legal army of Swedish media conglomerates could not...

    good work.

    1. Re:not anymore... by Impie · · Score: 1

      Hahahaha.. *ROFL*
      Mod him funny... can't stop laughing...

      --
      I really have another userid as well
    2. Re:not anymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, stop rolling around. And, please, get off the floor damnit. It just wasn't that funny.

  207. Re:"notice of infringement" emails have already hi by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

    The data the authors of that paper used was, according to them, collected about a year ago. The website (http://www.peer-2-peer.org) also mentions that the actual data and scripts will be released at some point (anonymized). As for your friend... well, I'm sorry, but if he really did download that thing, then he only got what he deserves.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  208. According to the by Inf0phreak · · Score: 2, Informative

    FAQ it's under the MIT license rather than in the public domain. Not that it makes much of a difference, of course.

    --
    ________
    Entranced by anime since late summer 2001 and loving it ^_^
  209. And the second rule... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know I cringed just a little when I saw the parent modded up.

    Some people just can't keep their damned mouths shut.

    1. Re:And the second rule... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that, see http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=133299&cid =11133911

  210. The next wave of P2P clients... by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think those organizations shutting down these sites just started to initiate the next generation of decentralized P2P clients... That's usually the only thing they do, help speed up the next generation of file sharing software, more clever than the last time. It usually doesn't happen if not a great deal of sites are taken down, since then there's not as much need to advance technology.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  211. Kevin Rose is retarded. by wasabimilkshake · · Score: 1

    I attribute it partly to stupid news sites reporting on it (and naming the site) and that idiot Kevin Rose trying to be a l33t underground p1rate hax0r by linking to torrent sites publicly, and in doing so, making them mainstream and leading to their death.

    1. Re:Kevin Rose is retarded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. Rose is as much a hacker as I am. I'm lucky I can write bash scripts to make back-ups yet this loser claims to know Liux yet he hasn't used one on the show.

      http://buyblue.org

  212. Smart by xshariq · · Score: 1

    I think it was smart for them to shut down, think about it you're running a site which allows many people to share illegal software, games, music, movies, wouldn't you shut down? I would personally have done same, shut down the site and run for my life.

  213. tvtorrents.net by gladbach · · Score: 3, Informative

    is now a godaddy space holder...

    --
    "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms,
    1. Re:tvtorrents.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tvtorrents.net have a new url.. http://www.tvtorrents.tv/

    2. Re:tvtorrents.net by gladbach · · Score: 1

      hey, thanks!

      --
      "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms,
  214. [Police] Goes After Human Nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well to start with the title is flawed.

    Police go after human nature all the time. Human nature dictates that someone will take your life, possessions and even identity. Only a fool would argue that it's wrong to stand against human nature.

    "That said, I think the MPAA is fighting a losing battle. People like to share, to spread what little wealth and happiness they have around."

    The thing is it's not "their wealth" that's being shared. They played no part in it's creation. Also illegal P2P'ers, contrary to their "basic nature" argument aren't demonstration any creative impulse.

    "Sharing is part of human nature and any organization that throws its weight around in an attempt to circumvent our instinct to share will ultimately prove to be futile."

    Which is why I'm fighting against identity theft laws. Wintermute1974 is fighting against human nature, and his efforts are futile.

  215. We'll miss you by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    We sure will miss you dozen or so linux folk and your strange ogg files. Lets be generous and say linux makes up 10% of the desktop market... Still nothing compared to 90% of the content on windows boxes. Stick with freenet.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:We'll miss you by leonids · · Score: 1

      Ogg isn't strange. No. In fact there are good encoders and decoder support for it in Windows, and plenty users.

  216. Re:"notice of infringement" emails have already hi by deviantonline · · Score: 1

    it was that bad was it?

  217. About ratios by Tap-Sa · · Score: 1

    Why is it so hard to for the 'communities' to realize that bittorrent protocol itself is all you need for ratios? The built-in tit-for-tat mechanism makes sure there can be no leechers, everybody participates in uploading by default, everybody is happy. Tracking ratios the oldfashioned BBS-way is just plain stupid.

    1. Re:About ratios by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Practical experience shows that the torrent protocol isn't enough. The main problem is that it offers no protection from "hit and run" users -- people who disconnect as soon as they've got the file finished.

      Sites like torrentbits offered substantially faster downloads than sites like suprnova did.

  218. Re:"notice of infringement" emails have already hi by Lifewish · · Score: 1

    I would argue that the illegality of his actions is vastly out of proportion to the immorality of his actions

    --
    For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
  219. time to move back to IRC by apostrophesemicolon · · Score: 1

    i am looking at this matter as a battle. the industry's posse can keep suing the platforms but as far as i'm concerned, all they can do in IRC is force them to close the channels.

    back in the days, I used IRC and then moved to napster, kazaa, BT, and others.. but now i guess it's time for us to move back and let others know that there is another way to download files for educational purposes !!!

  220. Unoffical Closing FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just saw this up in an IRC channel:

    Unofficial Suprnova Closure FAQ
  221. Smashed to pieces - or rather "seeding"? by CharonX · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the shutdown won't just result in a bigger problem for MPAA & co.
    Until now they had basically all torrents at one site, but now they are spread up - except that divide and conquer doesn't work when sqashing pirates. Kill one pirate site and two grow back to replace it.
    Kinda reminds me of that old horror movie with the black stones that grew when hit with water, until they broke, then the pieces grew again - "Monolith" I think it was called.

    --
    +++ MELON MELON MELON +++ Out of Cheese Error +++ redo from start +++
  222. interesting site by groups.google · · Score: 1

    At a time like this... all you need to know is which torrent sites are up and down.
    http://btsites.tk/
    Over 500 sites listed... and updated regularly :)-

  223. 404 Product Not Found by tepples · · Score: 1

    Pay for your movies.

    How does one legitimately acquire a copy of a movie that has completed its theatrical run but is not available on VHS or DVD in one's region?

    1. Re:404 Product Not Found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound pathetic. That has never happened to you and never will. If it ever did, you'd just have to live with it, like your father did and his father did. Grow up you stupid shit. You want movies, go and rent them and copy them. If you can't get something you want, then go the fuck outside and do something else with your life. FUCK OFF.

    2. Re:404 Product Not Found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, YOU sound pathetic. Way to post as anonymous coward, asshole. FUCK OFF. Yeah, I'm posting as AC too because you're not worth it.

    3. Re:404 Product Not Found by tepples · · Score: 1

      You want movies, go and rent them

      What part of "not available on VHS or DVD" did you misunderstand?

  224. Damn it!-Future Tense-Didn't see this coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I noticed you went for the religious angle, while ignoring the main point. Atheists may not be evil, but that doesn't make them smart either. Here's the point in plain english, even you couldn't miss it.

    Recorded human history has shown that we are ill equipped when it comes to the "effect" part of "cause". I can push a potted plant off the table, and the effect is immediate, and known. I could push the same off the table, and when it breaks on the floor, releasing spores that I then inhale. Ten, twenty years down the line I could in a moment of immune weakness, suffer an attack from those spores. Now why didn't I know initially at the moment of cause that the effect would be an illness down the line?

    "You have a right to do anything that does not harm another."

    That's why the above is flawed. It assumes that humanity is fully capable of discerning the "effects" resulting from all the "causes" they set in motion. The only way for it to be true is to know all the "effects" beforehand, and then decide what "causes" we have a right to.

    The universe doesn't work that way, and humanity hasn't been granted an exemption. Got it now?

    1. Re:Damn it!-Future Tense-Didn't see this coming? by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      I believe you are missing his point.

      You are correct, we don't know effect in advance of cause, the Universe does not work that way, and we have not been granted an exemption.

      "You have a right to do anything that does not harm another."

      You can never know whether some action does or does not harm another. So, the question is, "what do you have a right to do?"

      All you can do is guess whether someone will be harmed by your actions. So what do you have a right to do? The answer is, "anything that you guess is probably okay."

      That is the way it has to be, the only way it can be, for us mere mortals.

      Don't try to push off your responsibility onto the law, either. Politicians are no better at guessing right or wrong than you, and they have less interest in doing so--and I'm not just slamming on their honesty. A politician can't have more interest than you in the right-ness or wrong-ness of an action you are considering, because a) they're not you, and b) they're just writing laws, they don't have a decision sitting in front of them.

      I expect some Insightful mods here, people.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    2. Re:Damn it!-Future Tense-Didn't see this coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I expect some Insightful mods here, people.
      Yet another disappointment. Time to get in line at the nearest euthanasia booth.
  225. Re:"notice of infringement" emails have already hi by Apathetic1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had a friend who was sent one of these notices after he downloaded a show from suprnova. Fortunately in Canada the notices don't mean jack because the ISPs aren't permitted to (or aren't willing to) turn over subscriber information without a court order. In fact several of the big high-speed ISPs went to court against the RIAA to fight this. It's nice having your ISP in your corner even if it's mutual self-interest rather than the big guy looking out for the little guy.

    --

    My username does not make me Apathetic. It's irony, get it?

  226. Re:wait for the cheap VCD release by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    People who will buy a cheap vcd release are already doing so from pirates.
    You can either take the profits away from pirates by competing with them or throw money away trying to shut them down.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  227. http://www.dvdr-core.org is down too by dalmiroy2k · · Score: 1

    It's been out for a few days...

  228. slyck.com? by Vicsun · · Score: 1

    Slyck.com is also down. Has their plug been pulled or are they experiencing too much traffic to handle?

    Getting shut down would be strange since they neither host copyrighted-files nor have links to such material, but with the recent state of affairs I wouldn't be too surprised if they have also been sent a cease-and-decist order. ISONews were also shut down quite some time ago (if anyone remembers), even though they didn't link to any copyrighted material...

    1. Re:slyck.com? by microbrewer · · Score: 1

      Slyck was just suffing from the "slashdot effect" after news of Supernova was released .Supernova will be pushing for exceem to be released now but it still doesnt protect the end user .

  229. Re:wait for the cheap VCD release by DaRealPock · · Score: 1

    But they would lose money on honest people who used to buy expensive DVDs but switch now to VCD. That would outperform the marginal benefit from selling cheap stuff to former pirates by magnitudes imho.

  230. SuprNova announcement by icleprechauns · · Score: 1

    You can see it @ flexbeta:
    http://www.flexbeta.net/main/comments.p hp?catid=1& shownews=10928

    --
    I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
  231. Yes you can by user9918277462 · · Score: 2, Informative
    The Azureus BT client has had the ability for users to be their own tracker for a long time now.

    Let's say I see a /. post that is going to be censored but contains material that I think is important to get out there (like copyrighted Scientology texts, or maybe Windows source code).

    Assuming I have a halfway stable connection, in roughly 5 minutes I can create a torrent and host it myself using Azureus' built-in tracker. I can either post a link to the ad hoc tracker ("http://123.456.989:6969/" or "http://mymachine.dyndns.org:6969") or post the .torrent file itself here on on IRC or whatever. When I'm done I shut down Azureus and the tracker goes away.

    Peers as trackers is as distributed as you can get.

  232. spyware / malware by abandonment · · Score: 1

    this is the #1 reason that p2p clients should be open-source - every other p2p client that ISN'T open source insists on bundling who knows what other spyware and other malware into the application.

    i mean, look what kazaa turned into - a spyware ridden piece of crap - you take a brand-new install of windows, install kazaa - voila a spyware ridden box that has the network connection being sucked up by the endless spyware on the machine.

    no thank you.

    has nothing to do with being a zealot (which may be the case as well) but more with just knowing that there will be alternatives to whatever commercialized crap version that the big companies decide to release.

  233. Thanks Slashdot! The real "slashdot-effect" by glassesmonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everything is running fine until some moderators feel obligated to let the unwashed masses in on the secret of SuprNova.

    Next time there is good working P2P systems up and running, please don't WRITE ARTICLES ABOUT HOW GOOD THEY ARE.

    Seriously, can we let the lawyers find out about The-Next-Best-Thing(tm) on their own. Do we have to spoon-feed it to them and put a big bullseye on everything good?

  234. Swedish ? Nordic ? by Animaether · · Score: 1

    Well that's sad for him, but what does that matter ?

    He's from Norway. He probably has access to Norwegian TV channels.

    He was just implying that Swedish TV Channels, or at least a subset of them anyway, do carry the show(s) he wants to see. However, he doesn't have access to them.

  235. It's already done in Japan - Winny by joda · · Score: 1

    Have you ever heard of Winny?
    Think of it as eMule using kad on strong encryption ...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winny

    I've used it for a while, and it rocks - if you're into purely jap stuff that is.

    --
    Buy all your crazy japanese videogames from
  236. Murder? by deft · · Score: 1

    Murder?

    How about justifiable homicide? :)

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
  237. Without a reason?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Without providing a reason, both of these sites have shut down: SuprNova.org and TorrentBits.org."

    TorrentBits may not of provided a reason, but SuprNova did. Straight off suprnova.org ...

    Greetings everybody, As you have probably noticed, we have often had downtimes. This was because it was so hard to keep this site up!
    But now we are sorry to inform you all, that SuprNova is closing down for good in the way that we all know it.
    We do not know if SuprNova is going to return, but it is certainly not going to be hosting any more torrent links.
    We are very sorry for this, but there was no other way, we have tried everything.

    Thank you all that helped us, by donating mirrors or something else, by uploading and seeding files, by helping people out on IRC and on forum, by spreading the word about SuprNova.org.
    It is a sad day for all of us!

    Please visit SuprNova.org every once in a while to get the latest news on what is happening and if there is anything new to report on.

    As we wish to maintain the nice comunity that we created, we are keppig forums and irc servers open.

    Thank you all and Goodbye!
    sloncek & the rest of the SuprNova Team

  238. A kind of silly yet serious early response... by mikeb39 · · Score: 1

    http://mike-b.deviantart.com/journal/4103616/ :)

  239. Huh? by itistoday · · Score: 1

    You're kidding me right?

    Slashdotter: "My fellow Americans, join me in disabling the DMCA and other such acts that infrige upon our ability to transfer media over our downtown proxies through Peer-to-Peer sharing technologies!"
    Yokel: ???

    The point is that, as much as it might seem hard to believe, the vast majority of America doesn't _care_ about these issues.

  240. This was always a weakness with torrents... by Platypii · · Score: 1

    This was always a weakness with torrents... you have to get them from somewhere

    I propose we follow usenet's example and start posting torrents in MIME base64 to slashdot!

    O:-)

  241. Slashdot didn't really cave by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Informative

    The slashdot editors took down the post and instead posted a long rant about Scientology's threat to free speech and liberty, complete with links to exposes of the church as well as links that would get you to the information that was originally taken down. It was a rather ingenious strategy, actually; they complied with the letter of Scientology's legal request while at the same time drawing way more attention to the material they took down (as well as creating an open forum for attacks on the church in the discussion). IIRC, the material that had originally been taken down was posted again to the followup discussion.

    1. Re:Slashdot didn't really cave by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From a legal point of view, that doesn't matter. What matters is that the Slashdot editors exercised direct control of the content of the discussion. That, coupled with the "unlimited mod points" that the editors have puts them in a very different position than the bartender with a bulletin board. The barkeep just cleans the board periodically without regard to content. Slashdot's editors constantly monitor the content of the board for content. Bad news from a liability standpoint.

    2. Re:Slashdot didn't really cave by cbr2702 · · Score: 1
      Slashdot's editors constantly monitor the content of the board for content.

      No they don't. Removing posts when asked is exactly what the bartender would do.

      --


      This post written under Gentoo-linux with an SCO IP license.
  242. You'll Never Stop Piracy by garwil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can never stop piracy. People have been sharing copyright material ever since it became available. People have always bootlegged at concerts, copied their friends' music (either onto cassette tape or CD), rented films on VHS and copied them. It isn't legal, but it always has and always will go on. The difference now is that its happening on a larger scale than before, and that people are more easily caught. If I walk over to my friend's house, borrow a CD, take it home and copy it, there's no way anyone will ever find out. If I download the same CD over KaZaA or as a .torrent anyone can find out my IP address, get loads of info on me, and no doubt pressure my ISP into handing over my name/address. I can then be sued. However, this will not stop piracy. Sure it might stop me (for a while at least) but its not gonna stop the majority. The MPAA/RIAA can shut down all the sites they want but sooner or later, they're gonna have to change their business model. There's a great line in About A Boy about getting royalty fees from Christmas carol singers. This anti-P2P stuff is almost as insane.

    --
    If ignorance is bliss, knock the smile off my face.
  243. A couple of points by hm2k · · Score: 1

    I saw a program on bbc2 in the uk regarding bit torrents not so long ago, I also noticed that there was a recent crack down on bit torrent websites and that many were going offline. they seems to think that they had to hit bittorrent websites hard like they hit napster hard, so it would have a similar impact on dvds etc as it did on mp3s. Whether it will happen or not, who knows. I personally think (or hope) the scene will go back to where it came from... IRC

    1. Re:A couple of points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you tie down when this programme went out / what it was called?

  244. why worry?? by ObscureKaffine · · Score: 1

    I always asked why the MPAA should even bother worrying???

    The quality of any downloaded movie i've ever seen has pretty well sucked compared to an actual DVD.

    The only reason to download is to get a preview that i can see. I mean if the flick is worth watching, then 9 people out of 10 are probably going to buy or rent it....

    but that's just the opinion of one man

  245. go kill yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now

  246. Was I right about single point of failure? by danila · · Score: 1
    I wonder if my yesterday comment would be prophetic... Seriously, as I said, ed2k network is much more resistant against scare tactics, police raids, death threats and the like. And even if all servers are closed, the Kad network would still work fine and there is no legal ground to prohibit people from maintaining connections to it.

    Those who want to download Linux distros, don't worry. Those who like to download Adobe and MS software too, as well as other juicy stuff, it may be time to jump the ship. :) Download eMule or another client and start using the eDonkey2000 network. The best thing is that you don't even need sites like FindHash or (now deceased) ShareReactor and ShareConnector - the search functions work just fine with either servers or Kad and a link can be distributed in any form a plaintext string can:
    ed2k://|file|(Why The Riaa And Mpaa Are Wrong) Lawrence Lessig - Free Culture.mp3|7600415|FEF5808A7BC2C7527F1614925D7CF1 20|/

    ed2k://|file|Shakespear - The Complete Works Of William Shakespere.zip|2251136|DCE09B150012755941E50F7EFCB 5CE91|/

    ed2k://|file|(ebook - conspiracy,secret,cover-up) - Bush's Master Plan For The Internet.htm|14156|74DF254E9F84E6166E4DB7A3DC68E68 C|/

    ed2k://|file|Debian GNU-Linux Bible.pdf|7076716|6A06E0BE826D245CB049F5678E5B8B31 |/

    ed2k://|file|12 Year Old Hard Sex Child Kid Porn Fuck Kiddie.avi|13953856|F272E312749EF64411073EAF1F4E41 17|/

    ed2k://|file|ebook - Holy Books Compendium - KJ Bible, Apocrypha, Dead Sea Scrolls, Koran, Book of Mormon, Egyptian Book of the Dead.pdf|25734955|ABB8746027FA36B0C472004DFFB85F99 |/

    ed2k://|file|Illuminati - World Domination Handbook (1.2).pdf|178778|DDD88D12B9773FB36CA1C6A638CB391E| /

    ed2k://|file|school teacher incest xxx fuck porn sex fisting oral blow job pre-teen asian big tits boobs breasts vaginal anal(1).mpeg|72037896|AA8F5CED0E1260F6BB17C442ED71 2598|/
    See? You don't need to host torrents, you don't need to run trackers, you only need the size and the checksum to get the files (and someone to still share them, of course). ed2k network may not have the flashcrowd effect and you may spend a bit longer getting the latest Hollywood release than you would with BitTorrent, but ed2k is here to stay and you don't depend on link sites that much. Furthermore, legally providing an ed2k link (it's just the checksum and the file size, come on!) is much safer than serving a torrent (which contains information about users who distribute this copyrighted work without authorisation).
    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    1. Re:Was I right about single point of failure? by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so sure that merely providing a link is much safer than providing a .torrent - the .torrent doesn't contain more than some basic information on the file, either, after all. Also, recall that 2600 magazine was sued for doing nothing more than providing links.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    2. Re:Was I right about single point of failure? by danila · · Score: 1

      Well, the .torrent does have a link to a tracker, which does provide information about IP of those peers who distribute the file. ed2k link, on the other hand, doesn't actually link to anything. It just provides information (basically the same as the .torrent - size, name, but it doesn't need to be big, because instead of providing hash for each block it provides a hash of the hashes).

      The 2600 case is a precedent that a law can be twisted when powerful people need it. So yes, it's possible that ed2k link sites would get sued, but so far there wasn't a single successful lawsuit (or even a lawsuit at all). They were just raided and servers confiscated as evidence. Simon Moon is still innocent, it's just that he isn't in the position to run a link site right now. :(

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    3. Re:Was I right about single point of failure? by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      I think it would be argued that an ed2k link is not fundamentally different from a http link nevertheless, though. It's not true that the ed2k link doesn't actually link to anything - it's just that it does not immediately tell you where to find what it links to. It could be argued that http links are similar; a link like http://www.google.com, for example, is worthless if you don't have a means to resolve which address(es) correspond(s) to www.google.com, for example. In other words, you do need an infrastructure to give meaning to the link in both cases. But yeah, the 2600 cases teaches us that money can not only buy congressmen, but also courts.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  247. You don't know the power of the dark side! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find your lack of faith disturbing... (pffuuu..hhaaaww..)

  248. youceff by yatahaze · · Score: 1

    looks like torrent.youceff.com is also down...

    --
    PS - This is what part of the alphabet would look like if the letters Q and R were removed. ~Mitch Hedberg (1968-2005)
  249. BT a drug? by agtorange · · Score: 1

    Well after reading some of the post if you replace a few words in each post it starts to sounds like were all a bunch of drug addicts.

  250. Hey, everone with mod points: by io333 · · Score: 1

    Why don't you just do a good thing and push all the posts listing sites still up down to -1. Make the lawyers WORK for it!!!

  251. Legal Hack to save P2P by fakebanana · · Score: 1

    I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.

    Make full and verifyable disclosure of identity a condition of participation in the network and set up a system for downloaders to keep detailed records of who provides each file they download. Write up a binding contract under which the people who collectively provide file(s) are responsible for providing license(s) for the people who download files holding them in trust or else purchasing them on demand.

    In this system downloaders, having taken legal precautions can presume to have a legal license to the software they download. The provider(s) can reasonably claim that they will purchase and/or provide a license on demand for one of the people who have downloaded a file. If the MPAA goes after providers, the only evidence they have is that they provided a file to them, which they presumably have a license for. They can go after the downloader for not having a license, after which they would presumably contact the provider, who would then have to purchase a license, but they have no record of who downloaded the files, only the downloader does.

    ISP monitoring could circumvent this, but the MPAA, etc. can't do this yet.

    Any flaws?

    BTW, I think compulsary licensing is the only really effective legal solution.

    Jeremy.

    1. Re:Legal Hack to save P2P by Nihilanth · · Score: 1

      the MPAA dosen't have to monitor an ISP, just issue a subpoena. keeping track of all the xfers? have another subpoena!

    2. Re:Legal Hack to save P2P by fakebanana · · Score: 1

      End to end encryption could prevent even ISP monitoring.

    3. Re:Legal Hack to save P2P by fakebanana · · Score: 1

      Just to highlight an important point, in this system neither downloaders or uploaders are doing anything illegal. The providers have entered into contract to provide legal licenses for the content they distribute. The downloaders have the same expectation of legality that they have when they purchase shrink-wrapped software at retail.

      How could the MPAA get a subpoena for information they don't have any right to(the records of who downloaded what from whom) when there is no illegal activity going on?

    4. Re:Legal Hack to save P2P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assume I am a shill for the recording industry.

      Why -wouldn't- I download as much as my bandwidth can handle, then start demanding licenses all over creation?

      Sounds like a great mechanism to drive sales and bankrupt the providers!

    5. Re:Legal Hack to save P2P by fakebanana · · Score: 1

      The contract would allow providers to demand a fee for the service of obtaining and providing a license to recoup their expense in this matter. But only content providers or downloaders being sued have any incentive to actually ask for a license. So it could still be free for the vast majority of people.

  252. Not really by harmonica · · Score: 1

    Actually, they know very well most of what's out there and where it is. They are much better informed than whatever you can find in a /. article or by your average /. poster. They employ people who do nothing but tracking down sites and servers.

    1. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are much better informed than . . . your average /. poster. They employ people who do nothing but tracking down sites and servers.

      So how are these people different from your average /. poster, other than the fact that they're employed? :p

  253. BitTorrent is not a P2P network. by myndzi · · Score: 1
    This comment evidences one of the more annoying attitudes I've noticed pop up about BitTorrent. The problem is that all the people using it to illegally share movies, files, mp3s, and such aren't using it properly. Sure, you can make do with a few DSL modems as seeds and there are always those awesome ratio trackers that set ridiculous ratio requirements.

    However, BitTorrent was designed to be used in such a way as to augment bandwidth, not create it. Your seeds should be fast and reliable, and then your torrent will be too. Most people who create torrents cannot or don't care to provide one or both of these, and that is why people like you develop attitudes like this.

    As an aside, I'm happy to see some of the recent forays into more dynamic swarming applications. I'd love to see a swarmed version of HTTP, or some other protocol to distribute web content. Imagine if everyone who visited a website also helped seed for that website while it was open in a browser window? Bittorrent won't cut it, however, as there is no way to keep the same torrent but alter/update its content. And of course, dynamic website content wouldn't work at all.

    Also, Shoutcast swarms could be especially nice.

    1. Re:BitTorrent is not a P2P network. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Also, Shoutcast swarms could be especially nice."

      Peercast does this.

    2. Re:BitTorrent is not a P2P network. by myndzi · · Score: 1

      Peercast is more like um... eMule than BitTorrent, if that makes any sense. What I'd be interested is a dedicated swarming network for a specific stream, in the same way that BitTorrent is a dedicated file transfer network per group of files.

    3. Re:BitTorrent is not a P2P network. by rsdavis9 · · Score: 1

      I had the same idea. No specifics but just the idea of a serverless web. Web pages are swarmed automagically by the browser. Obviously the originating web site(tracker) would tell all others of changes to content.

  254. The next wave of P2P clients...Religious wars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The defense, courter defense argument. The same thinking that brought us the atomic bomb.

    You know that yelling at people, in an ever more shrill manner isn't going to convince them you're right and their wrong, and is only going to make them dig in more.

    Substitute MPAA==christians and Athiests==illegal P2P lovers. Now the athiests yelling ever more shrill, are they going to convince the christians that they should give up religion? Why not? After all volume and technology certainly are powerful weapons.

    1. Re:The next wave of P2P clients...Religious wars. by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Hmm, not sure what you're trying to say, but I was taking no particular stance for/against P2P when I wrote that, just telling what I think will happen, looking at history.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  255. If you take down P2P server, they all go. Bye DNS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the U.S. supreme court bans all peer to peer file sharing, then DNS has to go too. Bye bye internet. You can't have it both ways. Either everyone gets to play, or no one gets to play. The Domain Name System shares information about remote sites by way of a minimal spanning tree technology where knowledge of upstream servers' routing tables are shared by way of a p2p network. If you kill torrent, and friends, you *HAVE* to kill DNS. Payback is a bitch baby!

  256. who else?-Funding freedom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Slashdot caved; that doesn't mean that the Scientologists were on the right side of the law. It would have been too expensive for Slashdot to fight, that's all."

    Translation: We can afford, Blender source code, and a Mozilla ad. But we can't afford a lawyer to defend our right to free entertainment.

    Translation translation: Oh and we couldn't sell enough slashdot subscriptions to "information wants to be free" slashdotters, to fund our defense.

    Translation, translation, translation: Talk is cheap though.

    1. Re:who else?-Funding freedom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But we can't afford a lawyer to defend our right to free entertainment.

      What does that have to do with the price of rice??

  257. Re:Thanks Slashdot! The real "slashdot-effect" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Suprnova was no more a secret than where the WMDs are, or who actually shot JFK, or what soilent green is actually made of.

    There are PLENTY of other reasons to dislike slashdot than suprnova going down, and in this instance, the real enemies are the MPAA and the RIAA, take your hatred out on them instead of the hapless geeks that would argue slashdot.org is 'usefull' and 'in no way reminicent of a blog, we're not emo'.

  258. US corporations a mirror of US goverment? by redwiregmail · · Score: 1

    The actions of the MPAA/RIAA with regards to p2p seems to follow the same self-defeating methodology as the US goverments terrorism stance.

    Full frontal assault detroying the most obvious target and same result. Suprnova.org and TorrentBits will fragment. Guerrilla tactics will now ensue. The link sites will fragment and where you had a few massive sites you will now have hundreds of smaller ones made out of members of their communities.

    It will become a war of attrition with the members of filesharing community gaining numbers with every news report mentioning file sharing. As happened before the sites will exchange links. And the MPAA/RIAA closed all roads to serious infiltration tactics.

    I don't think file sharing could have a bigger friend then the MPAA/RIAA.

  259. Re:It doesn't maximize their profitability by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
    I completely agree.

    However, realistic and theoretical aren't the same in our world as they are in theirs...

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  260. Re:US corporations a mirror of US goverment? by Nihilanth · · Score: 1, Interesting

    it would make sense for coroprations to mirror the government, since corporations -are- the government in this country.

  261. Re:YEAH by scmason · · Score: 1

    I agree with your sentiment. I am a strong believer (and participant) in open source and open standards. The problem I see is that too many people are stoked about these things as "Free as in free beer" and not Free as in freedom.

    We have to understand that if we steal EVERYTHING, then our avenues of real freedom will be shut off as we lose credility and are swept under the rug in the massive corporate backlash that is SURE to follow.

    What can we do? Grow up. Understand what kinds of freedom can really be gained from services like the torrent and benifit from them to help society. In short: get out of your Mom's basement and start contributing to our world. Who cares if you get free TV? It only rots your brain anyway.

    --
    "I am a patient boy. I wait I wait I wait. My time is water down the drain..." Fugazi
  262. Re:The next wave... Mute-net.sf.net by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    Mute is gaining traction as an anonymous file sharing program. It's not fast - and there's real organization to it yet, but there is progress being made unlike almost every other anonymous file sharing utility.

    I use it daily...

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  263. a few graphs without any explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hope the grad-thesis is any better; this is useless

  264. Confusing "no right to" and "illegal" by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1

    It is simply illegal to pirate material, you cannot claim the user has "no right" since there are no international treaties that are binding which describes his "rights", and international trademarks don't count, they neither encompass nor approach the "right" to information.

  265. Shhh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will you shut up already? Are you in such a dire need of karma that you need to tell the world about newsgroups? For fuck's sake, stop mentioning this service at the drop of a dime. Usenet is unpopular and that's just the way we like it!

    And you mods... you folks should know better than feed the whores. Mod this down to -1 and let usenet live on.

  266. Speaking of printing lists by snakecoder · · Score: 1

    So If a list of people (say abortion doctors for a real case) was posted, and one by one the people on this list were knocked off, you would not have a problem with the list?

    I have an idealogical issue with the RIAA, the BSA, and heavy handed tactics. Do you know what I do? I avoid their products. It's legal and would work if everyone did it.

    Instead, it seems people do like to watch movies and listen to songs and they just don't want to pay for it, plain and simple.

    --
    -Nuke the moon
    1. Re:Speaking of printing lists by Beautyon · · Score: 1

      It cant be illegal to take a list of addresses from a phone book and then print them. You dont seem to be able to separate the knocking off (murder, illegal) from the printing of the list (printing, legal).

      Printing a list is not even making a threat (which is illegal).

      Put your thinking cap on BEFORE you post.

      --
      ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
  267. Freenet for distributing lists of torrents by caffeine_monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about this: instead of using Freenet to distribute each individual torrent, could you publish on Freenet a torrent that contains other torrents? For instance, a torrent for each category of files, like what was on Suprnova - a "Movies-Drama" torrent that contained a zipped file of all torrents in that category? This way, you wouldn't be relying on Freenet to distribute every torrent file, just a much smaller index of torrents.

    If somebody wanted to take ownership of this, they could create a Freenet page with an anonymous feedback form. When somebody has a torrent to publish, they could submit the info to the anonymous form, and then the publisher would compile all the new torrents into the next version of the index.

    I'm only an occasional user of bittorrent, and it's been a long time since i tried Freenet, but does this sound like something feasible?

    1. Re:Freenet for distributing lists of torrents by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1
      I like it, but it sounds complicated enough to make it somehting that should have its own specific application. But really, that's not crazy. I figure you could build into a BitTorrent client some sort of a Freenet interface so it could 1) upload to Freenet any trackers you might have made and 2) download from Freenet information about any trackers that have been uploaded (hopefully fast).

      Then you would have Suprnova inside your bittorrent client itself, hosted in a distributed manner by the whole world. That would be hard to defeat.

  268. Link to More BitTorrent Sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sucks that Suprnova.org is closing, but there are more BitTorrent sites linked at http://www.drunkenstepfather.com/

  269. pls answer me this... by ichiuk · · Score: 1

    I'm sure there is a good reason for this, but I can't work it out which is why I'm asking... Why doesn't suprnova.org host their site in some country that doesn't like the US and therefore the MPAA? The internet is obviously global and if murderers can hide in some country that won't extradite them to the US, why can't they host their website in some country that will basically tell the MPAA that the laws of the US don't apply there?

    1. Re:pls answer me this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      suprnova.org *was* hosted in slovenia, I think, but it's probably hard to find a country that won't take pressure from the us *and* won't care about illegal stuff itself, either. Places like north korea might not care much about what the mpaa says, but I still doubt you'd be able to host a website there without a lot of hassle (*any* website, too).

  270. Big Government by javalizard · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the hard-nosed, fast paced era of big government. Put 1984, Gattica, and Brave New World away. You just need to look out your window. Is the US now defining BT as a form of terrorism? I think they would. Companies enjoy the same "rights" as individuals. They shouldn't have, but they do. Technically speaking, everyone that uses BT is terrorizing our corporate brethren. The USA is in such sad state of affairs. I'm waiting for the day it implodes. It won't be long. Survival of the fittest. The economy is the fittest that can afford the military fittest. I'm scared.

  271. Escort Services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    In my city, all the escorts services in the phone book are "cash and dash." That is, they actually really do engage in a legal (but contemptable) business. Not prostitition. A girl (with her driver) will show up, take your money, maybe talk dirty to you to get a few more "tips" and then she'll leave without you getting any sex.

    You're supposed to think they're prostitutes, but it's really fraud. The fraud makes it legal. Two wrongs make a right.

    Another thing I've learned, from talking to some girls who used to do that, but then "went legit" and became real prostitutes: many of the escort services in the book, even though they have different phone numbers, all actually go to the same phone. It's just a few cash'n'dash companies trying to create the appearance of a diverse market.

    If you want a hooker, forget the yellow pages. Look them up on TER and get a relaxing BBBJTC-CIM-NQNS tonight.

  272. Re:Thanks Slashdot! The real "slashdot-effect" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The real enemies are the losers that think copyrighted content should be disseminated at will, and free of charge, thus robbing copyright holders of their legitimate royalty/license fees. Its YOU LOSERS that have brought the wrath of *AA down upon yourselves, and yet you're STILL too stupid and immature to understand why, and what you can do to Corporate America to bring about change. Its blatantly obvious the path you've chosen won't be that way. Want to beat them at their own game? PLAY IT BETTER THAN THEY DO, DUH. Quit being sheep and supporting their outmoded business model by purchasing their drivel. Just Say No To Purchasing/Possessing Their Copyrighted Material(R). A corporation feels the pain on The Bottom Line. Depriving them of money is the ticket, but this won't work when you losers disseminate the content in question as you have. In order for a boycott to work, it means not consuming the content AT ALL.

    If you're not a part of the solution, you're a part of the problem.

  273. Google search tool for torrents: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.bitoogle.com (www.yotoshi.com) :)

    Been around for ages. Some sites block hotlinking to torrents but its slashdot you can figure it out :)

  274. A blessing or a curse? by Phil246 · · Score: 1

    You know, i dont know if this is a blessing or a curse really.
    On the one hand, it will more then likely spur people on to create the next generation of p2p networks, just as the closure of napster spawned kazaa.
    On the other hand its a remarkable opportunity for a LEGAL film/tv service to be created to replace it - as there is quite clearly a market in it.
    I for one would actually pay for a legal service which showed the latest shows, FOR A REASONABLE PRICE, and without any adverts or possibly drm to spoil it. I dont have any problems with them watermarking the files however, so if they get out they can trace it back to someone.
    I wouldnt be too happy if the files expired after a while but thats probably the only way i can see it happening. A subscription based model where person pays a small amount per month. if subscription is cancelled or isnt paid for, the timer keeping the files valid stops, and the files eventually stop working.
    Of course, theres the 'apocalyptic' outcome of all this - being we all submit to the will of corporations ( stop laughing, let me finish fs ;) ) and shed out oodles of cash for them, sign over our souls etc... ( ok you can laugh now )
    Ah well, its in the hands of geeks in one way or another i suppose. They either create the next gen of p2p services and drive *iaa into the ground, or they get hired by *iaa to make a decent, legal system.
    perhaps if the beeb finish off that dirac codec, they could use that as a sort of standardised internet media format for tv shows and films? Food for thought perhaps.

  275. Unlikely by Morosoph · · Score: 2, Informative

    [trnjw@eveningstar home]$ whois suprnova.org
    [Querying whois.publicinterestregistry.net]
    [whois.publicin terestregistry.net]
    . . .

    Domain ID:D96700160-LROR
    Domain Name:SUPRNOVA.ORG
    Created On:04-Apr-2003 21:28:07 UTC
    Last Updated On:06-Dec-2004 15:03:21 UTC
    Expiration Date:04-Apr-2009 21:28:07 UTC
    Sponsoring Registrar:Go Daddy Software, Inc. (R91-LROR)
    Status:CLIENT DELETE PROHIBITED
    Status:CLIENT RENEW PROHIBITED
    Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
    Status:CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED
    Registrant ID:GODA-07362285
    Registrant Name:Registration Private
    Registrant Organization:Domains by Proxy, Inc.
    Registrant Street1:15111 N Hayden Rd., Suite 160
    Registrant Street2:PMB353
    Registrant Street3:
    Registrant City:Scottsdale
    Registrant State/Province:Arizona
    Registrant Postal Code:85260
    Registrant Country:US
    Registrant Phone:+1.4806242599
    Registrant Phone Ext.:
    Registrant FAX:
    Registrant FAX Ext.:
    Registrant Email:SUPRNOVA.ORG@domainsbyproxy.com
    . . .

    1. Re:Unlikely by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      i'm sorry...i must be completely stupid

      i fail to see how your post has anything to do with exeem...please enlighten me!

    2. Re:Unlikely by Morosoph · · Score: 1
      Re: I think they did this to drum up interest in Exeem.

      It's far more likely that they had their domain closed down. Prohibited is a lot stronger than withdrawn, for example.

      Status:CLIENT DELETE PROHIBITED
      Status:CLIENT RENEW PROHIBITED
      Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
      Status:CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED

  276. don't u agree with me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we should have a place where only torrent user should meet up and discuss....i'm a new user of torrents. just started few days ago...i's the happiest man on earth and now i'm the saddest of all.i'm new this technology..pls guide me...

    i want to join u guys and do my bit..pay my tribute...pls mail me privately if u don't mind...i don't want this infos to be public...as a new user i really new ppl's help...cheers..dj25000(at)yahoodotcom

  277. The jerks could at least have said why... by Snaller · · Score: 1

    ...so their fans would know if they are the true jerks.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:The jerks could at least have said why... by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they can't. Maybe they're under a gag order.

  278. Re:Thieves R Us is dead.....WOOOHOOO. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Radio provides unlimited music.

  279. Re:You people are morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux is copyrighted so I must have warez. Apt is a warez respository.

    Really, get jobs to buy this stuff or shoplift it like I did in high school. Why must each new, valid app for sharing information be used for warez?

  280. Scientology is evil by leereyno · · Score: 1

    I never pass up an opportunity to tell the world just how evil this cult is.

    http://www.xenu.net

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    1. Re:Scientology is evil by brainburger · · Score: 1

      Well....I can't see how they are worse than the Christians, especially with a historical perspective.
      (This is not a troll).

    2. Re:Scientology is evil by leereyno · · Score: 1

      Christianity has been a mixed blessing to Western civilization. I for one would argue that the ills of christianity result from flaws in human nature itself. If Christianity didn't exist then the dark side of whatever religion or religions that existed in its place would be little different. In other words its not the religion but its followers that are the problem, and those problems are shared by every other religion because human nature is universal.

      Scientology on the other hand is a criminal cult whose nature is an amalgamation of the moonies, the Nazis, and the mob. Even at its historical low point, Christianity's got NOTHING on the clams when it comes to the evil department.

      Besides, isn't the whole "I hate christianity" thing a bit trite?

      Lee

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  281. Damn the good old days..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The author gains nothing by keeping his work from others, so disseminating it cannot be said to harm him. There is nothing whatsoever immoral about violating copyright in those circumstances. It is enforcement of copyright that is immoral."

    Remember the good old days, when people who used computers to pirate software may have all been guilty, but at least ACKNOWLEDGED that guilt? Now you've got these freaks of nature who pirate and then think themselves on the right side of the law!

    I mean, making a dozen copies of Windows 3.1 was just as wrong in 1993 as downloading "Pirates of the Carribean" is in 2004. But at least we didn't try to take the moral high ground when we did it.

  282. Writing one as we speak! by The+Real+Nem · · Score: 1

    I was bored so I thought I'd give it a shot...

    My approach here was to send search requests to google then parse the results (HTML files) and search for torrent files in them. The program already works quite well and will download the first byte of each torrent to verify that there are no 404 errors and that it is *probably* a valid torrent (the first byte should be 'd').

    I'm finalizing the interface now and will upload it and it's source shortly (it is a C# app BTW).

    1. Re:Writing one as we speak! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good stuff. By the way, you're killing us HL2 modders without providing a download link for GCFScape. At least, you were until TWL mirrored it.

      What's going on with your site?

    2. Re:Writing one as we speak! by The+Real+Nem · · Score: 1

      The machine that hosts it was compromised a few weeks ago. Its back up now but variables pased through URL addresses seem to have been disabled and I can't contact GameSpy to correct it. Lestat is working on my behalf at the moment but I have no idea when everything will be sorted.

      The files are still all there though:

      gcfscape125.exe
    3. Re:Writing one as we speak! by adpowers · · Score: 1

      You should use the Google API. I don't believe you are allowed to screen scrape the Google results page, they would rather you use the API. It would probably be easier than screen scraping anyway.

  283. Re:Thanks Slashdot! The real "slashdot-effect" by Tzarius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Doesn't matter whether they are publicised or not - it's the Spartacus effect*. There are far, far too many to take down or disable. It's beneficial to get the word out, too - better to have a few big, efficient networks than many scattered, underperforming ones. Besides, the real killer p2p app (decentralized, full privacy) will come that much faster this way.


    *Not sure if I'm using that correctly.

  284. man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yet another reason to hate those f*cking jews...

  285. Why it closed... by JediLow · · Score: 1

    Is a guess... but from posting on suprnova forums and the reponse I got from the mods there it comes down to one word... eXeem.

  286. Legality by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

    That's a darn good point - thanks. That message was posted partly out of irritation at all the /. "oh no, we can't download whatever we want anymore" whining, and could definitely have been clearer.

    1. Re:Legality by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

      Intentions are a messy thing. I do agree that a lot of those on /. think they have some sort of bonfide right to download and play other's works. To a certain extent, I would agree that it's better that they have a right than for some megacorp to come in and universally demand royalities.

      My biggest beef is that these publishers oftentimes have sole rights to copyrighted material and then refuse to reprint it. What are you going to do when you are 75 and think back to that good old Eminem album you had and you will no longer be able to legally listen to it, because the publisher has demanded no new copies be made?

    2. Re:Legality by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

      Exactly. That's why the copyright system needs reform - saner time limits, and probably automatic entry into the public domain if the rights holder decides to kill it.

      I think sites like that reduce the chances of such reform happening.

  287. Ethics of sharing by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

    Agreed. I think it's rather shady to make it illegal to do so, too.

    Nonetheless, that's the law. I think it's important to attempt to change that law so that things are more flexible, because I don't like the current state, but I don't think just ignoring the law is either ethical or helpful.

  288. Couldn't agree more by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

    I agree. However, I don't think the right solution is to ignore the law - rather, I think the solution is to attempt to fix the law. It'll be slow and painful, but I do think it's possible. If nobody respects the law and instead decides to ignore it, that will only give the corporate interests more ability to harm them and make it easier for them to persuade politicians that even stronger laws are required.

    I'd be much happier with a more balanced copyright scheme, but think we have to work to change it rather than ignoring it. These people make me angry because they go around ignoring copyright law, then scream when someone does the same to them. I'm hardly perfect when it comes to hypocrisy, but at least I try.

    My original statement was poorly phrased, but I think the point stands.

  289. Torrents were the wrong approach anyway by This+Is+Ridiculous · · Score: 1

    Torrents have never been a good way to distribute illegal content. They're basically a step above Napster in the "hard to shut down" department (multiple independent servers, but it's still fairly centralized), and no better than it in the "plausible deniability" and "track-covering" departments.

    Anybody who seriously believed that BitTorrent was a long-term tool for piracy was kidding themselves; even its author, Bram Cohen, notes that "distributing stuff that is clearly illegal with BitTorrent is a really dumb idea."

    --
    Hey, you try to find an open nick these days!
  290. Repeat after me: Harmonization by tepples · · Score: 1

    That was a U.S. court decision, this guy is talking about Canada.

    Technically that's true, but it probably won't remain true for long. Not only do copyright industry trade groups buy off legislatures to pass laws, but they also buy off legislatures to bully other legislatures through "free" trade agreements into harmonizing their copyright laws to the version that gives the copyright owner the greatest extent of monopoly.

    1. Re:Repeat after me: Harmonization by yamla · · Score: 1

      It is worth checking out Canada's copyright laws and regulations. Around the time that the U.S. introduced DMCA, Canada declared music downloads were perfectly legal. We've also gone completely the opposite way with privacy laws and legislations. Canada introduced the PIPED Act which provides real and concrete protections for personal privacy even in the commercial sector. Around the same time, the U.S. courts declared that U.S. businesses did not have to adhere to their privacy policies.

      Canada is certainly not perfect, of course. But in my view, Canada's been deharmonising copyright laws and legislations compared to the U.S.

      Disclaimer: I live in Canada but am not a Canadian citizen.

      --

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
  291. USA by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

    heh - check out my past posts if you want to see my view on the USA. Suffice it to say that I don't think you'll find I'm a bush fan ;-)

    I'm also hardly going to argue that breaking copyrigh law is in any way up there on the bad scale. That wasn't the point, though, and you're attempting to refute an argument I didn't try to make.

    Of course, on /. if this was a company using GPL code, it _would_ be the end of the world. *sigh*. Yes, I'm a contributor to GPL projects, not a whining observer. I'd be pretty mad if it happened to me. Since my work is protected by the SAME LAW that these people are ignoring, they kind of shit me.

    My view is that ignoring copyright law weakens our chances of fixing it and reduces our chances of actually making a more balanced system possible. In fact, it probably gives the large media powers more ability to make the law even less reasonable. Is that really a fair price for a few free movies?

  292. Suprnova.org Official Statement by nothingx · · Score: 1

    This was posted on the SuprNova site sometime before it went offline.

    Greetings everybody,

    As you have probably noticed, we have often had downtimes. This was because it was so hard to keep this site up! But now we are sorry to inform you all, that SuprNova is closing down for good in the way that we all know it. We do not know if SuprNova is going to return, but it is certainly not going to be hosting any more torrent links. We are very sorry for this, but there was no other way, we have tried everything.

    Thank you all that helped us, by donating mirrors or something else, by uploading and seeding files, by helping people out on IRC and on forum, by spreading the word about SuprNova.org. It is a sad day for all of us!

    Please visit SuprNova.org every once in a while to get the latest news on what is happening and if there is anything new to report on.

    As we wish to maintain the nice comunity that we created, we are keppig forums and irc servers open.

    Thank you all and Goodbye!
    sloncek & the rest of the SuprNova Team

    1. Re:Suprnova.org Official Statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you have any reason to beleive this is official?

  293. Retaliate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    P2P is way of life and people should never give up doing what's right.

    That's why there are places like P2PSite, because as long as word is free, there is hope for better tomorrow.

    I've spoken. It just came to my mind and I had to spit it out.

  294. Legality and technology by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

    Hell, I'm with you. I think the current situation totally sucks. Check out my other replies so I don't repeat myself ad nausium.

    As for technology - hell yes. Problem is, ignoring copyright law makes it less likely that we'll get anything like that, and more likely that if we do, it'll be so locked down with DRM that it's totally useless.

    I find the industry's lack of imagination and determination to hang on to their existing distribution model very frustrating. I want it to change, because I don't want to have to break the law to watch a DVD for example. I think people who ignore the rules rather than try to change them harm the chances of that ever happening.

  295. Change of Domain by strider44 · · Score: 1

    It seems for now TorrentBits have just changed domain name to http://www.cyphersworld.com/

  296. suprnova.org is back by dschadlich · · Score: 1

    I just checked suprnova (10pm est), and its up. Funny, I thought they where dead

  297. Valid point by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

    You make a good point. It doesn't change the fact that I'm hardly sad to see them go (but see my other replies to replies to my post - lots of folks have asssumed I like the current laws and power balance, which is just right off), but you're quite right that they weren't hosting anything illegal.

    Of course, they were tacitly condoning the hosting and downloading, which is probably what's shut them down. All we can do right now is guess anyway.

  298. It's about fixing things properly by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

    I've explained this fully in my other replies to replies to my post, but in brief:

    Agreed, I think it's stupid that they can entirely control their work when the've just built on the public domain. I don't like the current situation, I think it's totally unresonable and getting more so. I do think we should try to change the law rather than ignoring it or the problem will only get worse, and I think sites like this harm rather than help that aim.

  299. addressed by another poster by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

    Agreed, providing a list isn't illegal. Maintaining a list that you know is and will be used for copyright infringement might be though - hard to say. I didn't say I liked the way these people have been takend down (and we don't know why they were anyway), only that I wasn't sad to see them go.

    I want to see things fixed properly and the copyright system restored to some sane balance. Ignoring the law it will only make that harder IMO. I've written more about this in other replies to replies to my original post.

  300. Because it's fraudnet by tepples · · Score: 1

    How could the MPAA get a subpoena for information they don't have any right to(the records of who downloaded what from whom) when there is no illegal activity going on?

    Perhaps they could accuse somebody of fraudulently misrepresenting that he has the authority to grant such a license?

    1. Re:Because it's fraudnet by fakebanana · · Score: 1

      The providers wouldn't be granting licenses any more than a retail store grants licenses. They are accepting responsibility to purchase the licenses from the content providers should the downloaders' right to use the content come into question.

      In practice, you only actually need to have a license if the content owners questions your right to have said content. There is plenty of precedent supporting that. This just takes the further step of passing that legal obligation on to the content provider with the provision that there is no way of proving exactly how many licenses ( if any ) the provider must procure.

      The only way of forcing the issue is for providers to go after downloaders, identities which under this system could be difficult to identify.

      The beauty of the system is that it could be a perfectly legitimate business model for P2P. But enforcement would be extremely expensive for content providers.

  301. Question by citizenc · · Score: 1

    How did they get his email address?

  302. Police Don't Go After Universal Human Values by wintermute1974 · · Score: 1
    > Police go after human nature all the time.

    In my earlier post, the point I was making is this: There are some universal values which everyone the world over would agree furthers humanity.

    A research in the mid-to-late 1990s did a comprehensive survey of different cultures and societies the world over, and came up with a list of universal human values. I must have read it in New Scientist, Discover Magazine, or Scientific American, but I could not find it tonight. (If you, dear reader, can provide a link to the research I am describing, I would appreciate it.)

    What I did find is this Short List of Universal Human Values:
    1. Commitment to something greater than oneself
    2. Self-respect, but with humility, self-discipline, and acceptance of personal responsibility
    3. Respect and caring for others
    4. Caring for other living things and the environment

    (Source: A Short List of Universal Moral Values. Therese M. Dautheribes, Jerry L. Kernes, Richard T. Kinnier. Counseling and Values. Volume 45, Issue 1, Page 4.)

    That's the full list. The reason media conglomerates are having a hard time is because file sharers believe that they are acting in accordance with these values. To their eyes, it is the media companies that are the villains, using legal contortions to stop people from doing what they feel is good or beneficial to society at large.
  303. p2p is not theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    when you steal something, you remove it from the posession of another person.

    Hollywood cannot claim theft of their revenues by downloading because they had not made the revenues yet. It is like home depot claiming that people who shop at lowes are "stealing" from home depot.

    if you think that "potential revenues" should be protected, then i say go to a communist nation where the government has outlawed competition, because when you get right down to it, competition is defined as "theft of potential revenue"

    1. Re:p2p is not theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say you should stop pushing your communist nation where no one pays artists/programmers/movie producers/etc for their work, and getting it all for free without their permission. So should we now have companies/artists/etc spending all their time, money, resources, and giving up their rights of what they produce just so that you can have your entertainment for free?

      What a flawed analogy, you are comparing people getting their stuff at a different retailer to theft of revenues. That is healthy competition, it isn't "stealing" if a customer shops at a different store. It is absurd to claim this kind of competition "stealing," both are selling common goods, and in a free market place people can chose where they want to shop. Holly Wood can claim theft because they are the ones producing movie XYZ, have sole rights to movie XYZ, and have the right to distribution and profit from movie XYZ. If people go see movie ABC they can't claim it is a potential loss revenue, it is normal competition at the box office. But if people just download XYZ instead of paying for it then it is a loss of revenue for the Holly Wood company.

      While there is no guarantee that that person was going to pay for said movie, why should they let them enjoy it for free? It is reasonable to assume that while not all, there is a large percentage of people who downloaded movie XYZ would have no choice pay for it if they not the resources to get it for free.

      Downloading their work for free is not competition! In addition to my Movie XYZ and ABC example of being competition, company 1 & company 2 selling hammers have competition. Company 4 & company 5 selling different word processing software are competition. Open Source software and commercial software are competition. Person taking company 8's Movie XYZ and putting it online for free or pay is not competition! If you think obtaining their works for free is competition, please move to the communist state you described.

      By obtaining their works without their permission and compensating them for their work you are stealing. You do not have a given right to free entertainment at their expense. I could go further, but I have the feeling that my efforts will be fruitless and judging by your post I will just be arguing with a brick wall with "Its my right to get stuff for free, and I will argue and use whatever means necessary to justify my unethical & immoral actions" scrawled on it.

    2. Re:p2p is not theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Exactly what you will never understand is that black market IS an active form of competition. Don't forget that there is always a 'donate' buttom in my favourite bittorrent site and i will donate.

      So you see, I do pay, But to the ones I do like. And the amount I like. Yes, even leechers donate. When Evil MPAA brings the prices down to the level of my favourite BT site, Then I will consider buying from them. But as I said, I will just consider it....Judging from how MPAA is mudding himself at this moment, I am not sure if i like to break my trust on my favourtie BT site's reputation.

  304. Re:"notice of infringement" emails have already hi by camooT · · Score: 1
    but if he really did download that thing, then he only got what he deserves.

    Ya, getting a slip of paper in the mail always gives me the jitters too.

  305. Re:Thanks Slashdot! The real "slashdot-effect" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are you reffering to the slashdot community as "the unwashed masses?"

  306. Re:"notice of infringement" emails have already hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How did they get his e-mail address then?

  307. this is a good thing by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

    a) the new secure/anonymous torrent technology will be forced out into the open.
    b) with all the 'free' software for windows gone, all the torrents left are for linux distros

    All the free software you need at your nearest torrent site :)

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
  308. I Present: GTorrent by The+Real+Nem · · Score: 5, Informative
    Pic:
    GTorrent.png

    Download:
    GTorrent.zip
    .Net Framework v1.1

    It actually works quite well. Be sure to play with the options, the default timeout is set to one second (because when your searching ~50 links one second takes a long time) and may reject valid torrents.

    The program is witten in C# and the binaries and source are included. If you get an error when you run it you need the .NET Framework (link above).

    Also, for the love of god, be very gentle. My machine is very old and it's connection very poor.

    1. Re:I Present: GTorrent by YetAnotherDave · · Score: 1

      I haven't gotten .NET running under debian yet, can someone verify this so we can give Nem his prize?

    2. Re:I Present: GTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats truly funny here. Is that the MPAA probably invested 20,000 man hours, and the above poster made a lot of it meaningless in under 12.

      Ho hum....technology marches on.

    3. Re:I Present: GTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it works - just tried it... :-) awesome job... now can you program me a ....

    4. Re:I Present: GTorrent by centralizati0n · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it works.

      And it's pretty too. Someone give that man mod points!

    5. Re:I Present: GTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It works.

      Some further functionality would be to connect to the trackers and check that they are running, and then display the number of active peers. This would give is a better idea of how healthy the torrent is.

      Easy to code, but perhaps we should only do this until we find one tracker that's running and healthy, otherwise we'd be bombarding the trackers with pointless requests.

    6. Re:I Present: GTorrent by gekkotron · · Score: 0

      Did this get mirrored anywhere, or does anyone have a copy they downloaded? Sounds interesting and I'd like to see it.

    7. Re:I Present: GTorrent by RobertKozak · · Score: 1

      I just submitted a torrent to Suprnova.org.

      Why slashdot this guys connection when bittorent is perfect for this?

      -- Robert

      --
      Bet this .sig looks familiar.
    8. Re:I Present: GTorrent by SeanAhern · · Score: 1

      Also, for the love of god, be very gentle. My machine is very old and it's connection very poor.

      +5 moderation? Goodbye, old machine!

  309. Re:US corporations a mirror of US goverment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, there isn't any such thing as the US government. The whole thing is run by corporations now. It's hard to tell exactly what corporations are really in charge, but it appears that BIG PHARMA and the oil industry are the president and vice president. Congress has been replaced by Tyson Foods, Dupont, Monsanto, and thousands of other corporations. Unfortunately this is a global new world order and I don't think any country isn't part of it except maybe Burma. It looks like North Korea isn't part of it either, but thats probably fake.

  310. The Fix by argoff · · Score: 1

    I don't like the current situation, I think it's totally unresonable and getting more so. I do think we should try to change the law rather than ignoring it or the problem will only get worse, and I think sites like this harm rather than help that aim.

    I disagree with you about some things here. First off things are getting better, Linux is growing at 20%+ per year, the RIAA and MPAA as we know them are industries in decline, and the copyright press and media are slowly but steadially being bypassed by the internet. The only reason why things are so intense now, is that they are like a drowinding desperate fool thrasing arround violently and willing to bring anyone else down with them that they can grab onto. No doubt there is allot of collateral damage, but they are the ones under siege, they are the ones stuck in a doomed paradigm as society enters an information age that must be based off the unrestricted flow of information. It is parallel to how the industrial revolution demanded a free and mobile workforce, which brought doom to the plantation system, and all their phoney "property rights", and all their BS morality, and all their vast holdings and commerce allong with it.

    Second, I disagree with you about breaking human made laws. If human systems have a right to impose unjust laws, humans souls have a right to defy them. The problem here isn't an unjust law or two that needs changing, it is an unjust belief system brought to it's logical conclusion. There is a big difference between ignoring a legal glitch vs outright defiance of an unjust belief.

    1. Re:The Fix by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

      It's the collateral damage I worry about. Most specifically, the introduction of even more stupid laws and extended protections to help the industry cling on in its current form. Laws that can do a LOT more harm outside the entertainment industry. Witness the DMCA, for example.

      Sure, we could ignore the law. Which laws do we choose to ignore? How do we justify our action and then tell others we believe they're wrong about theirs? I don't think we can. Additionally, I'd rather NOT break my country's laws if I don't have to, and feel that in this case there is a realistic chance to change them instead.

      Personally, I'm very far from convinced the entertainment (esp music/film) industry will go away, but I do expect them to be forced to change considerably. It's clear they don't like this ;-)

  311. Re:"notice of infringement" emails have already hi by Apathetic1 · · Score: 1

    The ISP forwarded the notice they received. Think "stern disapproving look".

    --

    My username does not make me Apathetic. It's irony, get it?

  312. hmmmm stupidity by rofthorax · · Score: 1

    bittorrent is a good solution to the distribution limitations of the Internet. Its the best way to distribute game patches.. I'm sure those proponents of the dieing star-network model, or the centralized hub, will battle the dominance of the peer/distributed content model.. The problem with the pay per play content business is it has fallen down and it can't get up.

    --
    Just say no to license servers!!
  313. MOD PARENT UP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and the next contest should reward the first person to host a mirror.

  314. Message....is this real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Greetings everybody,
    As you have probably noticed, we have often had downtimes. This was because it was so hard to keep this site up!
    But now we are sorry to inform you all, that SuprNova is closing down for good in the way that we all know it.
    We do not know if SuprNova is going to return, but it is certainly not going to be hosting any more torrent links.
    We are very sorry for this, but there was no other way, we have tried everything.
    Thank you all that helped us, by donating mirrors or something else, by uploading and seeding files, by helping people out on IRC and on forum, by spreading the word about SuprNova.org.
    It is a sad day for all of us!
    Please visit SuprNova.org every once in a while to get the latest news on what is happening and if there is anything new to report on.
    As we wish to maintain the nice community that we created, we are keeping the forums and irc servers open.
    Thank you all and Goodbye!
    sloncek & the rest of the SuprNova Team

    Please let everybody know this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    E-mail me at: lkroeze@gmail.com
    please e-mail me and let me know what you think !!!!!!!!!!

    Greetzzzz And Thnx's The Master

  315. That is just crap, I'm sorry. by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

    BitTorrent has a queue as well; it's just much shorter because there are more people sharing the file you're looking for, and there's more bandwidth available. Think about it: I've never heard of a case where someone sharing anything remotely worthwhile on emule didn't have their upload bandwidth maxed out. So both clients are equally fast, namely, as fast as people are able/willing to upload. For some reason (partly because simple BT clients don't have the option to limit uploads) there is much more upload bandwidth available in BT, but if the same bandwidth were available in the ed2k network, dowloads there would be equally fast.

    1. Re:That is just crap, I'm sorry. by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      So basically what you're saying is that if things were different, then they'd be different? I've used ed2k for over two years and BitTorrent for nearly as long. I think ed2k is great for what it is, but what it is is *not* a BT replacement.

      I've checked out your other posts in this article, and you make a couple of mentions about there needing to be a "Suprnova-like site for ed2k." Newsflash for you: There was one and it was called ShareReactor. Before it was shut down, it directed hordes of users to single files, much in the way Suprnova did. Even with this relatively high availability, you could expect to spend more time sitting and waiting in queue than actually downloading. This is why I made the comment about needing 20-30 items enqueued in order to keep anything approaching a constant downstream of data.

      ed2k's greatest strength is that you can find almost anything on it, and that you can find it at almost any time. BT is incredibly fast, but torrents are generally short lived, this being its weakness. Even so, ed2k is most definitely not a network for the impatient. What I can download in 2 hours with BT would often take a week with ed2k.

      Again, don't think I'm bashing ed2k or calling it inferior - I'm merely stating that it does not work as a drop in replacement for BT. I think it's a great network - it's one of the first that I can remember that supported the uploading of partially downloaded files, a HUGE deal at the time - but the "wait in line" situation is by far its biggest weakness. It's not that I'm a Johnny Come Lately that thinks BT is the greatest thing since sliced bread and that everything else must suck, it's simply that I'm a user of both protocols because each has its advantages at times, and I have no problem being critical of either.

    2. Re:That is just crap, I'm sorry. by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1
      You're right to some extent about sharereactor - though it was a search engine, not a "post what's new" site in the say SuprNova was.

      I think I would have made myself clearer if I had said: The difference in speed btw eMule and BT is a function of sociology, and has nothing to do with the structure of the network itself. If eMule users behaved more like BT users, the edonkey network would attain BT speeds. (In fact, if you hook up with the Digital Archive Project, you'll see your download bandwidth quickly max out in eDonkey.) What's great about BT is not the network but the users, who tend not to limit their upload.)

  316. Re:"notice of infringement" emails have already hi by Axess+Denyd · · Score: 1

    The only thing I wonder is...what can they REALLY prove after you get that?

    All they have is a data file with a bunch of IP addresses that they claim were responsible for infringement... I could make that up any day, just need to pick a random list of IPs. Hell, they could just use the counter on their web page.

    Can this really, truly stand up in court?

    --
    ---- Watch out for snakes!
  317. The reason is SLASHDOT posted thier sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's be honest here guys - SLASHDOT lead the to the demise of Suprnova and Torrentbits. Thanks for posting links to sites that most people can't find on thier own, and even when they DO find it, they're perplexed by all of these strange links that aren't working....

    There are MILLIONS of people who DO NOT KNOW how to use Bit Torrent yet. But rest assured, thanks to Slashdot, it will go the way of p2p networking and will become a pay service ala Napster, make zero money, and a major established entity such as Apple or Sony may come along and introduce a service utilizing Bit Torrents as a means of movie distribution on the web for the low price of 10 bucks a movie. Ever think of that?

    Again, truly, THANK You for ruining it for everyone.

  318. Flawed Argument - Torrents don't DIE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Once the torrent dies, dozens, hundreds, or thousands of people are left with incomplete and useless files."

    If a major company dedicates servers and uses them as trackers AND as seeds, then there will ALWAYS be at least one seed shooting out to loads of downloaders.

  319. IRC...and such and stuff by elzurawka · · Score: 1

    all this means, is that the torrents are gone, so now just anyone will be able to get whatever they want. Maybe its a blessing in disquise. All the people that know what they are doing, will still be able to get what they want...via IRC and such...this just means taht this will not be available to the masses anymore, so maybe the MPAA other folks will lay off...and let us geeks be in out IRC channels. There are only some poeple that know how to use IRC, this means that less people know about it, means is less main stream, and means we can stay hidden longer....c u there..... -EL

    --
    -EL
  320. What is original anymore? by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nonetheless, the person who owns the copyright has the exclusive right to choose how it's copied.

    In that case, corporate personhood is the problem.

    If you don't like what somebody does with their own intellectual property, you are completely free to release your own under the terms you choose.

    No I can't. If I create what I sincerely believe is an original work, some incumbent copyright owner is likely to come out of the woodwork and claim I copied it. This happened to George Harrison, and statistics show it could happen to any songwriter.

    1. Re:What is original anymore? by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "No I can't. If I create what I sincerely believe is an original work, some incumbent copyright owner is likely to come out of the woodwork and claim I copied it. This happened to George Harrison, and statistics show it could happen to any songwriter."

      The fact that we remember this case at all (it was almost 30 years ago) shows how rare this is. Billions of pieces of artwork are copyrighted each year. The vast, vast majority are not contested. This does not match the definition of "likely" by any stretch of the imagination. There may be good arguments for abolishing copyright, but this ain't one of them.

      Either way, I think it's pretty obvious that "My Sweet Lord" is the same song. I think the court ruled appropriately.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    2. Re:What is original anymore? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Billions of pieces of artwork are copyrighted each year. The vast, vast majority are not contested.

      In other words, do you claim that songwriters shouldn't be afraid of being made an example of? What's the best way for a songwriter to check for accidents as obvious as "My Sweet Lord" copying "He's So Fine" if he can't afford to pay a million-dollar damage award?

      There may be good arguments for abolishing copyright, but this ain't one of them.

      These are, however, unless you're a fascist.

  321. Watch a bit of Argentinian TV to know what is bad by hppacito · · Score: 0

    As I said, cannot be worst than Argentinian TV, 50% cr*p from usa, 50% homemade cr*p.

  322. Wow, you totally missed the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, you can make anything seem evil if you take one specific use and label that as the entirety of the ethical dilemma. But that's asinine. The Chinese government thinks Freenet is evil because it does not allow them to determine who is distributing copies of the U.S. Constitution. Gee, guess your refusal to run a Freenet node means you like supporting China and all of their horrible systematic torture!

    Wait, I did that wrong.

    "You support terrorists!!"

    1. Re:Wow, you totally missed the point. by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Look, you're missing my point.

      This thread is about using Freenet as a potential replacement for other filesharing services.

      I don't have to support anything.

      Freenet will never become a replacement for other filesharing services. Why? Because it isn't a popular service today, and probably never will be.

      In addition to being dog-slow and hard to use, many people like me won't support Freenet because freenet requires that you host anonymous content on your machine. There is too much Kiddy Porn and too little Legit Content, at a much higher ratio then other file-sharing services, to the point where I question the legitimacy of Freenet as a "freedom tool" at all.

      Hey, believe me I understand your argument about fasist governments. I've worked with numerous groups under represive regimes. Because of the long memory of the Internet, I choose not to post that information here. Ironically, this is a good use for Freenet.

  323. Pirate only from Bono Act supporters by tepples · · Score: 1

    Only download bootlegged stuff from known "bad" corporations? Who decides which ones are "bad"?

    You hint at a definition of "bad" later in your comment:

    We're losing a lot more to that than I think most people realize in countries that have extended their copyright periods beyond reasonable limits.

    In that case, just define a "bad" copyright owner as any entity who filed an amicus curiae brief in Eldred v. Ashcroft in favor of upholding copyright term extension.

  324. SuprNova Mirror - Make your own mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want, you can follow these steps to make your own mirror of suprnova.org:

    Go to http://www.httrack.com/ to get the website copier (to make mirror of entire site)and install it.

    Then using httrack that you just installed, make a mirror of www.bi-torrents.com and pass it to your buddy

    [I have no affiliation to any of the sites mentioned above. I just read the /. discussion and saw that anyone could easily make their own mirror]

  325. Re:Bye bye SuprNova - "SLOVAKIA?!?!?!?" by necromcr · · Score: 1

    Man, you INSULTED me!

    See google search for .si and our gov's web page www.gov.si

    Our "slovakian" country is called SLOVENIA.

    *gosh*

    --
    No more I say.
  326. Gone for good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The inquirer has posted an article that suggests suprnova is gone for good. You can read the full article at thier website, http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=20303.

    I sure hope they haven't...

  327. Re:Thanks Slashdot! The real "slashdot-effect" by RedBear · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, can we let the lawyers find out about The-Next-Best-Thing(tm) on their own. Do we have to spoon-feed it to them and put a big bullseye on everything good?

    What's the point of having a good thing if you can't tell anyone about it?

    Obviously it wasn't that good if it went down with the mere threat of a raid by the authorities. It wasn't that good if the authorities in multiple countries could be talked into performing such a raid. Sites that demonstrably use Bittorrent for purely legal distribution of such files that they own the copyright to will not be going down. Your favorite Linux distro, for example, will still be available by Bittorrent most likely.

    No lawyer has any legal ground to stand on to convince the authorities in France to shut down Mandrake's Bittorrent tracker, run by Mandrake and published with a link on Mandrake's own website. SuprNova and the others are going down for the same reasons the original Napster went down; because they were too centralized and operated on the fringes of legality, if not totally outside the law.

    What's that old saying again? What doesn't kill an Internet technology will only make it stronger. This won't kill BT for 100% legal uses and a new decentralized P2P technology is already evolving (exeem?) to replace BT for stuff like warez that can't be shown to be 100% legal. If you try to keep things secret you just put off the inevitable. The lawyers will always find out about and attack questionably legal things eventually, that's their job. Plus, the more people you keep out with your secrecy, the worse performance you'll get from your BT downloads.

    In the end, the next "working" P2P system will be that much closer to being indestructible. They certainly won't be able to take it down just by shutting down one website or writing an article about it on Slashdot. Anything that can be killed by a simple article on /. doesn't really deserve to be out there in the first place. You're just whining that you can't get to your free warez as easily as you've gotten used to. So what?

    Bittorrent was never even designed to do what it has been used for by sites like SuprNova, despite how cool it may have been while it worked. The creator of Bittorrent said so himself. It was not designed to be an instructible way to exchange copyrighted data illegally without fear of reprisal. It's not Slashdot's fault that you and others decided to use it for this purpose anyway. Slashdot is really doing you a favor by hastening the evolution of the next generation P2P clients. You'll get access to your warez and old TV shows, don't you worry. It just won't be via SuprNova.org after today.

    You have no defensible point and yet you were modded +5, Insightful. At least 3 mods should be ashamed today.

  328. Okay by ucdoughboy · · Score: 0

    In Russia, Bitorrents comes to find you....

  329. What's next - IRC servers ? by Shokac · · Score: 1

    BTW: If you have an IRC client, you can join #bt, #bt-gm and #tvtorrents on efnet. #bt and #tvtorrents serves TV show torrents and #bt-gm serves torrents for games and movies.

    I wonder, if they manage to lock down .torrent sites, what stops them not to lock down IRC sites that hosts links to same .torrent sites.

    Just look at
    The Register and Reuters report that the Motion Picture Association of America is planning to begin a legal assault on websites that host BitTorrent trackers for copyrighted movie files.
    on this link http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/12/14/18 45238&tid=95.
  330. Make your own damn movies by Salsaman · · Score: 1

    http://lives.sourceforge.net

  331. Torrent should be a boon to IRC by Tokerat · · Score: 1


    I would think that all the sharing on IRC that goes on (both legal and illegal) would switch from having their bots/people/whatever from hosting actual files to hosting torrent files. I'm sure some already do this, but think about how much bandwidth is saved.

    Perhaps someone should create a plug-in/add-on/script/whatever for their favorate IRC client that allows it to access BitTorrent? That way, not only will the channel admins be spared, but if the BitTorrent client is part of the IRC client then the files will remain accessable as long as the downloaders keep their clients open for IRC use, as opposed to many people now who just close BitTorrent after they download (yes, guilty...I rarely use BitTorrent, though). This will also free up those nasty queues you might wait forever in, even when attempting to download something perfectly legally.

    I understand that DCC was created as a specific addition to IRC, and no one wants to see IRC clients start to become all-in-one super apps with included web browsers, word processors, and the kitchen sink. However, IRC clients do usually at least have decent scriptability, and so it might be nice to add such functionality for the users who really want to add it in.

    Has anyone done something like this already?

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  332. Re:Bye bye SuprNova - "SLOVAKIA?!?!?!?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Slovaks, Slovenes, Czechs, Poles... so many cuties so little time...

    I wanted to go to the Eurostar terminal on accession day with a banner saying "Welcome to all the Bel Ami countries (plus Malta)". ;-)

  333. Re:Watch a bit of Argentinian TV to know what is b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that's 100% cr*p in total, then?

    BTW what's cr*p?

  334. Glass flows by doodlelogic · · Score: 1

    Most people's science teachers told them that glass is a viscous liquid at room temperature, and that is why windows in old churches and houses are thicker at the bottom.

    Just an anecdote to show why sometimes it is worth going that bit further to find out yourself, which with open source software you can...

  335. is this legal? by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

    If the **AA wants to collect your IP address they simply have to join the swarm.

    I often think about this. Ofcourse, they're able to do this and obtain ip addy's of everybody who's sharing. But in joining the swarm, they're also sharing (and thus, contributing to the swarm). Which means, i think, that they're doing something illegal. Can they still sue after being illegal themselves? I would think that all excuses they come up with are the same other people could use.

  336. Peer-to-peer Tracker Advertising by Nurgled · · Score: 1

    Perhaps a possible solution to this problem is to use a system like Gnutella or even FreeNet to distribute the tracker advertisement data. A crude solution would be to just "share" the .torrent files on Gnutella, but someone clever could perhaps come up with a better plan that plays off some of the characteristics of BitTorrent and its trackers to make things more efficient. One possible idea that springs to mind is to have the clients for this automatically create and advertise new trackers in preference to the original tracker. This would have the disadvantage that it would split up the pool of available seeds but it would also spread around the liability of running a tracker and make it hard to trace who originally created it. The clients don't even need to be seeding the files they are providing trackers for as long as they can get a good list of sources from a parent tracker, meaning that this could happen automatically with no user intervention and each user wouldn't really know what they were acting as a tracker for, reducing the liability aspect.

    I don't really know enough about how BitTorrent works to think about this in any more detail, but I'm sure there are others that could work on this, and probably already are. Leaving the BitTorrent transfer protocol intact assures that it can continue to be used in the current, more efficient way for more "legitimate" transfers, such as retrieving Linux distributions.

  337. #tvtorrents @ EFnet by Aurelius42 · · Score: 1

    We may have been down for a bit, and had an ex op who still had the domain under her control just deregister the domain, but we are back, and are releasing episodes as we speak. Check us out, same old site, new URL. Thanks to everyone who supports us, and sorry for any of the inconvenience! -Aurelius

  338. New address of tvtorrents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They changed to tvtorrents.tv now.

    On a side note, tvtorrents has split and some of the guys started tv-swarm.com instead.

  339. MOD PARENT UP by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    for having the idea of putting suprnova on freenet! could freenet take that level of bandwidth? i'm not completely familiar with freenet, but i know the general idea that anything on freenet is, in theory, completely anonymous

  340. Won't stop BitTorrent by Weezul · · Score: 1

    Here is the new system everyone: Post your .torrent files on traditional P2P systems with searches. PLEASE include a date in the filename, so that people can try the most recent ones first (cuz there are going to be tons of dead .torrent files laying about in people's sharing directories).

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
  341. what gives them the right to prosecute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since when do companies have the right to prosecute someone for "promoting" links that point to downloading a torrent filemap-pack? these aren't links to actual copyrighted files right?

    i don't think it should be so easily assumed that "the law" can so easily do this.

    what makes people think that you can be prosecuted for doing this?

  342. MPAA Goes After Human Nature-The World. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The vast majority of file sharers that I've talked with use this to their advantage, by abstracting the damage they do as "just hurting big companies or rich people." Most of them are motivated by greed, pure and simple, by the concept of "I want therefore I deserve," and because they don't see the little person getting hurt, the human empathy doesn't kick in. The overwhelming sense of "deserving" is part of why the United States is going to be in a world of hurt in a few years, because the vast majority of today's youth/early adults have it and have been nothing but coddled since birth."

    And the assistance that's going on in Finland? It's not just the US that'll suffer. Also to reply to the other AC. Digital hasn't broken the model of exchange that commerce is based upon. It has mearly made it easier for individuals to become crimminals than previously available.

    1. Re:MPAA Goes After Human Nature-The World. by jschottm · · Score: 1

      And the assistance that's going on in Finland?

      I have no firsthand experience with Finns. I do have fairly extensive experience with the 17-23 set in the US both in college environments and in the workplace. I've watched them slack off in classes, destroy things out of idle boredom, and drop trash on the ground because they're too lazy to walk an extra 15 feet out of their way to the trash can. I also see Indian and Chinese students excelling in the classes that many US citizens don't take because they're too hard/require too much effort, and in general, treat the education they're offered as a real priviledge. But the US students still expect to graduate and land a $40K+/year job.

      It has mearly made it easier for individuals to become crimminals than previously available.

      Like I said, people will often do what they think they can get away with, particularly if they don't have to see it hurt individuals.

      As far as the other AC's comments on digital enabling artists to get away from the big companies, that's very true. However, from what I've seen, the vast majority of what goes on P2P networks is the same old stuff that the major companies have made. Run a search on a P2P network of choice and tell me how many results are returned for Usher, Maroon 5, and Nelly. Then tell me how many are returned for The Renderers, Spacetime Continuum, and Robert Fripp.

  343. Faster ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    have they just made bittorrent faster ? Less servers, Less trackers for simalar files.. Therefor more people on one tracker ?!?! Places like The Pirate Bay who supposably because of swedish law will now have exceedingly fast downloads. :D bittorrent just got better

  344. those of you that are waiting for exeem by techefnet · · Score: 0

    heres a preview, http://img74.exs.cx/img74/5163/newtorrents9ib.jpg http://img25.exs.cx/img25/680/transfers1sa.jpg

  345. Re:Thanks Slashdot! The real "slashdot-effect" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this system failed, then it deserves to be. There will be better systems to replace this one, just wait and see.

    Better yet, why not boycott and send a real message to your oppressors?

  346. cheap? by elzurawka · · Score: 1

    there is a difference between cheap and poor....im already paying for an appartment, school, and ocational gram or 2, not to mention i dont have a job(thanx mom and dad)...i cant afford to blow another 60$ to play the newest game. I can buy windows, all i use it for is games, and other then that, its linux. I use teh free alternative where possible, IE linux, open office, but things that arnt free i can get, so i have to download them, so im not cheap, im not like...thahhaa...take that video game industry....i just cant afford to buy the games and software, so i download it...

    --
    -EL
    1. Re:cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So poverty has made you a thief?

    2. Re:cheap? by elzurawka · · Score: 1

      and how... sorry, but u know...shit happens

      --
      -EL
  347. Re:"notice of infringement" emails have already hi by sonic.cfg · · Score: 1

    I was notified by my university's judicial board about such a similar copyright infringement. And if I do remember correctly it was a torrent I downloaded off of suprnova.

    I was fined by the school and kicked off resnet. I was also required to make an informational flyer educating others about what is legal and illegal for download.

    I guess they're really cracking down...

  348. Amazing links site... by TheBadger · · Score: 1

    Someone just sent me this link: http://torrent.hackz.nl/

  349. What's wrong in sharing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, you have invited your friends to a party. None of your friends watch the this latest movie. Now in your home theater you watch the movie with your friends.(it was crappy) so all of them vowed not to buy any dvd of this movie. Did MPAA lose a business here?
    If you have a good movie many people gonna go to the hall to watch it. Even people who already watch it on small screen will be willing to pay to see in the large screen.
    What they(MPAA) are trying to prove here?
    Greed and lust have found their abode in these peoples bone marrow.
    Down with MPAA and RIAA.

  350. Re:who else?.... in that case by denthijs · · Score: 1

    the editors showed that contrary to their disclaimer, they do exercise full editorial discretion over the content of the site. That makes them fully liable for any illegal solicitation which they allow to remain visible.
    in that case:::::
    The Holocaust never Happened !!!
    Hitler is Alive and Well
    I want you to kill all the Jews
    All Nubians should DIE

  351. Re:IsoHunt - BitTorrent search engine by AmVidia+HQ · · Score: 1

    umm no, we are more alive than ever. We chose to cooperate as per our copyright policy: http://isohunt.com/dmca-copyright.php

    Also read the latest news on our frontpage as to our stance.

    We index most of the remain BT sites still left alive, so enjoy while it last. A message made possible by /.

    --
    VIVA1023.com | Political Fashion.
  352. GTorrent v2.0.0 by The+Real+Nem · · Score: 2, Informative

    I rewrote it to use the Google Web API (and comply with Google's Terms of Use).

    As an upside it now returns more results, but as a downside you need a Google Web API Licence Key to use it (if you already have a GMail account just fill in your login and you'll get one no hassle). See the readme.txt for more info (And how to obtain a key).

    1. Re:GTorrent v2.0.0 by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      That's all very useful information, and I'd like to use this.. but.. how.. Links...???

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    2. Re:GTorrent v2.0.0 by The+Real+Nem · · Score: 1

      Like I said, read the readme.txt.

      You obtain a Google Web API key, enter it into the program (in the options form), and thats it, you can search.

  353. "Sharing"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are not talking about a legal use of someone showing a DVD they OWN at a party, what about all those who just download the GOOD stuff, watch it, and back it up to cdr/dvd? You really think that all of those people are going go see the movie again, let alone pay for the DVD if they can get it already for free?

    Just what part of "sharing" is offering a GOOD movie you do not have the rights to, and offering it to thousands of people who you don't know and don't feel like compensating those who made the GOOD move? Are you then going to claim that "they were not going to buy it anyway" and blow your GOOD movie claim? Because if they couldn't afford it they can afford to do without it, or some how find the money to pay to go and see/buy it.

    What they(Free Loaders) are trying to prove here?
    Greed and lust have found their abode in these peoples bone marrow.
    Down with Free Loaders.

    1. Re:"Sharing"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As long the the prices are so ridicolously high, FreeLoaders will exist and we will simply resist.

      Down with Evil MPAA!
      Long Live FreeLoading!

  354. The man's money by Makarakalax · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting that this guy is more willing to give his money to Suprnova.org than the various media industries.

    To me this indicates that the media industries are just going to keep on losing that potential income they are so desperate to keep.

  355. no no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry but the grandparent poster is right. Wardriving with a credit-carded laptop is the only way to preserve the integrity of piracy in these troubled times. I suppose you pay for your DVD-R's, too!

  356. nova is still up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with a little gooooogling you will find all the torrents from suprnova.org on mirrored sites with different urls ;)

  357. the good news by Lotharjade · · Score: 1

    HEY! What about the Naked News thing they did in russia. That was pretty good wasn't it? Now they just have to make all the russian shows naked and with pretty people. (actually it would still be worth watching if they are fugly just for the humor value)

    --
    Party at O'zorgnax's Pub! Buy me a Slurmtini aye?
  358. whatever happened to subjective morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whatever happened to the much lauded subjective morality? One is free to choose to slaughter one's own child. The state encourages statutory rape amongst minors and even facilitates it with free condoms. So why the big hoopla over piracy?

    hmmmmmm

  359. SHHHH!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One word - Streamripper

    Shhhhh! Keep it quiet.