This essay should be edited and cleaned up, just as all traditional published writing is edited and cleaned up. The result would be something along the lines of,
"The second reason is that they are generally - and there are exceptions - much more well written."
What you seem to miss is the idea that this particular author is trying to convey an idea that he has had about the state of gaming journalism. Whether you agree with that conclusion is one thing, but to simply attack the writing because the guy posted his raw draft with an assortment of technical errors is pointless.
Of course, you're not out there coming up with ideas and sharing them with whoever will listen. You're making fun of someone else for having an interesting idea and trying to share it with you.
Slashdot Mirror
really, nobody needs to see images of uranus. /har
Time Warner runs cable card TV commercials in NC.
Right...the new games journalists. Not the new games grammar instructors.
that the next people they'll sue are the IT guys and tech kids who have to explain to their friends/peers/relatives what in the heck bittorrent is?
Well, you're one-fourth correct.
This essay should be edited and cleaned up, just as all traditional published writing is edited and cleaned up. The result would be something along the lines of,
"The second reason is that they are generally - and there are exceptions - much more well written."
What you seem to miss is the idea that this particular author is trying to convey an idea that he has had about the state of gaming journalism. Whether you agree with that conclusion is one thing, but to simply attack the writing because the guy posted his raw draft with an assortment of technical errors is pointless.
Of course, you're not out there coming up with ideas and sharing them with whoever will listen. You're making fun of someone else for having an interesting idea and trying to share it with you.