You just guessed phone numbers till you got it right? Or made one up on the fly. Man that's brilliant I'm headed to the store right now to duplicate this.
Its been a while since we did test, but my home town has fiber loop and we get 50 symmetric to the home if subscribed. When we had it installed the first day we did remote back ups at 10MB/s on 3 devices simultaneously to verify it works. I find most of the bandwidth usage is stuff you just wouldn't due with out it there. The connection is 100Mbit symetric inside the loop so my co-works and I set up a distributed encrypted backup system across a few homes which when fetching large files can use that data fairly well.
The other time it gets used is during the holidays. Each kid has his own laptop and the teenagers are very bad about running vid calls with there friends while watching hulu/youtube. You start doing that on 5 or 6 laptops as the same time and it adds up. Its nice to not nee to run quality control during these times and still be able to use the internet.
I don't think this is true. Maybe networks blacklist ips that send to many text off network, but it is already free to send text messages from any computer and I have written plenty of server apps which send text to report critical failures. If your assertion was true I should be getting multiple spam text a day which I don't. I don't know what the networks do to keep the spam down, but it seems to be working.
A few things here to realize a text message is just an email once it hits the tower. The method two and from the phones are a handled in the SMS protocal but the server side methods between networks are basically emails. So, if you get unlimited emails in your data plan they really have no justification for charging so much for emails that must be smaller then x-amount.
Second, is that GSM and CDMA handle the SMS protocol differently, with CDMA taking a very long time to come up with a solution that worked as well as GSMs. For years to send a text message on sprint I had to log in to a web portal and send it. The first phone with a native interface just hid the process from me. The same restrictions applied to Text messages as data plans including not being able to send them on them while using a voice connection. This has been fixed over the years.
Now, I'm not expert on the subject and other more experienced posters might correct the following in formation, but I believe its cheaper on a GSM network to send an SMS because the bandwidth portion of there network is pre-allocated and while its not the same as sending something on its IP bandwidth the point is it doesn't hurt there voice quality and they can't really argue its that much different from IP data. Things are supposedly very different on the CDMA.
His argument is that BC is more then just if I copy and paste this source code it will run programs already compiled. Its a given that CentOS and RHEL are BC because they are the same code base. BC is normally used to imply a design relation where as two different source bases can be run code compiled on either. Generally the two projects will be radically different.
I also use it to describe updates to a code base that does not require projects dependent on it to recompile. In this case the implementation may be completely different but the interface is the same so the dynamic libs will still work. I guess this whole speech is that if you say CentOS and RHEL are BC your oversimplifying BC and you should default to there the same damn thing.
He runs the experiment on a vmware install. Its actually very interesting, but man does the guy know way to much about early versions of windows. As he points out with the exception of Windows 2000 his Doom install still runs after 7 upgrades which is just amazing, and I guess that means the whole thing installed on fat32 system. The most interesting part of the entire thing was that his visual settings for windows 2.0 kept all the way up to XP, but non of the os upgrades after XP stored default windows settings.
While its is the reason Microsoft has a hard time innovating you have to admit that type of compatibility is impressive. I would hate to see someone try this on MAC OS.
Well NP Hard isn't Hard for NP, but at least as hard as the hardest NP problem. It could exists outside NP. I'm going to admit to not following all the yelling above, but I wanted to point that out. As for citations.
At least one poster has cited reliability. There's fine print on most CFLs warning of reduced life if placed in an enclosed fixture. There are no such limitations on incandescent bulbs.
Going to have to go with non issue on this. I almost always remove my fixture guards and just let the bulbs sit out there. It could be all in my head, but I find that by removing the guard all bulbs work better
I've never had a single CFL blow on me in 10 years. I've lived in various places taken bulbs with me between moves. Replaced them all in 2006 instead of moving with them again and I just had a single one show signs of ballast failure in 2010. I switched in 2001 to CFLs when my outside lights started blowing every day due to bad wiring in a new house. Replaced it with a CFL and it didn't blow for the next 3 years I lived at that location, after the first year I switched the entire house and well you can read how well they preformed above.
I don't know if we can educate people in social engineering unless getting scam becomes a basic part of our education system and upbringing. I mean its the natural abuse of common human behavior. A 2 hour seminar isn't going to cut it for most people.
Well, the problem with most of these is even if you know about them it only takes one lazy employee to introduce them. So, its hard to be 100% vigilant against the threats and because it only takes one crack to break the damn, this makes it impossible for most security companies to improve.
Yah, I'm pretty sure they don't need a "Real" bank account to learn about managing money, but I guess every parents different. Personally, I just broker for them it is a lot easier to teach them about balancing when you can fabricate the mistakes.
It should be pointed out that blase of birth does not imply place where the application for the SSN was sent from. Not all parents send off for an SSN as soon as the child is born and its not required. I would assume that for young parents the probability of moving before sending in an application is at least marginal and should through a large curve ball in the guessing game.
It has been 40 years. If it was so easy to duplicate it would have been done already. For M to come back to our plane of exsistance took will power and determination to learn to reconstruct himself. You might kill 1000 men before you duplicate the results and if the individual isn't of the same mentality and easy to manipulate he will likely go rouge and mad with power. I doubt that many people would be willing to risk it.
Can you call it madness, because it worked. I think it more focus on the writers perceived stupidity of man kind. Personally, I really enjoyed the comic till I turned the page and was like GIVE ME A BREAK. That was like a giant drop in disbelief and it would of been worse on the silver screen. I know tons of people who are fond of the original ending and thing it was the best twist ever, but really with the way it comes out. The ending could of been a guy screaming giant monkeys or the world just suddenly ending and it would of been no more or less silly then a bunch of artist making a giant squid and teleporting it on the US.
The book has a great deal of foreshadowing on what was going on, but I think its all wasted on the sheer ludicrous nature of the plot.
Ok, the original ending is much less a mind screw and much more a oh, give me a break. Bombs instead of a silly monster was a much better ending for the movie. It just wouldn't of worked. Sometimes we have to get over our its not the original material and realize that each medium has its own do's and don'ts
Alright I made some progress on that I was blocking some Java Scrpt needed to get the prefs to work, but I'm now more upset by the fact that the would you like to disable ads on the index takes up a third of the page. Personally I want a 2 column layout I had a single story column layout. Which is even better. The new left bar isn't to big, but the slashbox is huge and even with them turned off the space is still reserved for them
I had just customized V2 for the first time to not have the side bars so I could keep the window fairly small. With this V3 I can't find index customizations and while I have no slash-boxes there is still screen space reserve for them.
If anyone happens to know the setting to change I would appreciate it. Else I leave this comment as a possible missing feature.
While this isn't your main point I thought I would ask. I thought the volt only had an gasoline fueled electric generator that charged the electric battery with enough surplus to run the totally electric card. To my knowledge the volt was not a hybrid, but a fully electric car capable of generating its own electricity. I'll go look that up in case you don't reply.
You took a sci-fi show that was famous for not taking itself to serious and turned it in to Battlestar Galatica style drama it wasn't going to work out. Half the characters didn't trust each other which ruins the team dynamics that fans of SG-1 and Atlantis liked and while I don't think you need a single alien race to make a SG-1 series having nothing isn't idea either. I watched the show, but I can tell you I am thankful it was canceled. Maybe the show would of worked with a more Voyager style set-up, but I found the we don't even know what were looking for time and time again dulling.
I agree, any time I read these articles they never mention that close door buttons are for key turn control mode. They just act like they are put in the panel to please people.
I have my doubts about all therm controls, but In most of the buildings I have worked in I'm told that they only work when the computer is down or during off hours. Even during these times it isn't adjusting the temp that changes anything they clam you have to hold a button down on the panel for x number of seconds and then you get an arbitrary length of air (e.g. an hour).
Either way, normally the nobs and switches which have no function are either outdated redundant controls that used to work. Or only work under certain conditions like the closed door button.
While Censorship and restraint are very different issues. One I wish Wikipedia would learn when clicking on various biology articles. Oh I wonder what that illness is (MY EYES!!). I do find it odd that a site like TV tropes which has no offensive images (that I know of) could run in to trouble on review based off a few counter culture tropes.
Hell even the articles that talk about adult issues are all extremely tame when you think about it compared to the stuff you find on forums. I wouldn't be surprised if the reviewer stumbled on to a mischievous edit or they just got red flag in general for having completely anom edits.
I don't think they should have trouble with the appeal process.
Slashdot Mirror
You just guessed phone numbers till you got it right? Or made one up on the fly. Man that's brilliant I'm headed to the store right now to duplicate this.
If I had mod points!
Its been a while since we did test, but my home town has fiber loop and we get 50 symmetric to the home if subscribed. When we had it installed the first day we did remote back ups at 10MB/s on 3 devices simultaneously to verify it works. I find most of the bandwidth usage is stuff you just wouldn't due with out it there. The connection is 100Mbit symetric inside the loop so my co-works and I set up a distributed encrypted backup system across a few homes which when fetching large files can use that data fairly well.
The other time it gets used is during the holidays. Each kid has his own laptop and the teenagers are very bad about running vid calls with there friends while watching hulu/youtube. You start doing that on 5 or 6 laptops as the same time and it adds up. Its nice to not nee to run quality control during these times and still be able to use the internet.
I don't think this is true. Maybe networks blacklist ips that send to many text off network, but it is already free to send text messages from any computer and I have written plenty of server apps which send text to report critical failures. If your assertion was true I should be getting multiple spam text a day which I don't. I don't know what the networks do to keep the spam down, but it seems to be working.
A few things here to realize a text message is just an email once it hits the tower. The method two and from the phones are a handled in the SMS protocal but the server side methods between networks are basically emails. So, if you get unlimited emails in your data plan they really have no justification for charging so much for emails that must be smaller then x-amount.
http://www.emrupdate.com/blogs/ducknet/archive/2008/11/30/how-to-send-email-text-messages-to-any-cell-phone-for-free-from-your-computer.aspx
Second, is that GSM and CDMA handle the SMS protocol differently, with CDMA taking a very long time to come up with a solution that worked as well as GSMs. For years to send a text message on sprint I had to log in to a web portal and send it. The first phone with a native interface just hid the process from me. The same restrictions applied to Text messages as data plans including not being able to send them on them while using a voice connection. This has been fixed over the years.
Now, I'm not expert on the subject and other more experienced posters might correct the following in formation, but I believe its cheaper on a GSM network to send an SMS because the bandwidth portion of there network is pre-allocated and while its not the same as sending something on its IP bandwidth the point is it doesn't hurt there voice quality and they can't really argue its that much different from IP data. Things are supposedly very different on the CDMA.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMS
His argument is that BC is more then just if I copy and paste this source code it will run programs already compiled. Its a given that CentOS and RHEL are BC because they are the same code base. BC is normally used to imply a design relation where as two different source bases can be run code compiled on either. Generally the two projects will be radically different.
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Binary_code_compatibility
I also use it to describe updates to a code base that does not require projects dependent on it to recompile. In this case the implementation may be completely different but the interface is the same so the dynamic libs will still work. I guess this whole speech is that if you say CentOS and RHEL are BC your oversimplifying BC and you should default to there the same damn thing.
I think there was an implied "on" in his sentince
He runs the experiment on a vmware install. Its actually very interesting, but man does the guy know way to much about early versions of windows. As he points out with the exception of Windows 2000 his Doom install still runs after 7 upgrades which is just amazing, and I guess that means the whole thing installed on fat32 system. The most interesting part of the entire thing was that his visual settings for windows 2.0 kept all the way up to XP, but non of the os upgrades after XP stored default windows settings.
While its is the reason Microsoft has a hard time innovating you have to admit that type of compatibility is impressive. I would hate to see someone try this on MAC OS.
Well NP Hard isn't Hard for NP, but at least as hard as the hardest NP problem. It could exists outside NP. I'm going to admit to not following all the yelling above, but I wanted to point that out. As for citations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NP-hard
Some NP-Complete problems are NP-hard. It is possible for NP=P to be true and NP-Hard problems to still not be solvable.
At least one poster has cited reliability. There's fine print on most CFLs warning of reduced life if placed in an enclosed fixture. There are no such limitations on incandescent bulbs.
Going to have to go with non issue on this. I almost always remove my fixture guards and just let the bulbs sit out there. It could be all in my head, but I find that by removing the guard all bulbs work better
I've never had a single CFL blow on me in 10 years. I've lived in various places taken bulbs with me between moves. Replaced them all in 2006 instead of moving with them again and I just had a single one show signs of ballast failure in 2010. I switched in 2001 to CFLs when my outside lights started blowing every day due to bad wiring in a new house. Replaced it with a CFL and it didn't blow for the next 3 years I lived at that location, after the first year I switched the entire house and well you can read how well they preformed above.
I don't know if we can educate people in social engineering unless getting scam becomes a basic part of our education system and upbringing. I mean its the natural abuse of common human behavior. A 2 hour seminar isn't going to cut it for most people.
Well, the problem with most of these is even if you know about them it only takes one lazy employee to introduce them. So, its hard to be 100% vigilant against the threats and because it only takes one crack to break the damn, this makes it impossible for most security companies to improve.
* I'm assuming were talking about young children teenagers when we say early as possible
Yah, I'm pretty sure they don't need a "Real" bank account to learn about managing money, but I guess every parents different. Personally, I just broker for them it is a lot easier to teach them about balancing when you can fabricate the mistakes.
It should be pointed out that blase of birth does not imply place where the application for the SSN was sent from. Not all parents send off for an SSN as soon as the child is born and its not required. I would assume that for young parents the probability of moving before sending in an application is at least marginal and should through a large curve ball in the guessing game.
It has been 40 years. If it was so easy to duplicate it would have been done already. For M to come back to our plane of exsistance took will power and determination to learn to reconstruct himself. You might kill 1000 men before you duplicate the results and if the individual isn't of the same mentality and easy to manipulate he will likely go rouge and mad with power. I doubt that many people would be willing to risk it.
Can you call it madness, because it worked. I think it more focus on the writers perceived stupidity of man kind. Personally, I really enjoyed the comic till I turned the page and was like GIVE ME A BREAK. That was like a giant drop in disbelief and it would of been worse on the silver screen. I know tons of people who are fond of the original ending and thing it was the best twist ever, but really with the way it comes out. The ending could of been a guy screaming giant monkeys or the world just suddenly ending and it would of been no more or less silly then a bunch of artist making a giant squid and teleporting it on the US.
The book has a great deal of foreshadowing on what was going on, but I think its all wasted on the sheer ludicrous nature of the plot.
Ok, the original ending is much less a mind screw and much more a oh, give me a break. Bombs instead of a silly monster was a much better ending for the movie. It just wouldn't of worked. Sometimes we have to get over our its not the original material and realize that each medium has its own do's and don'ts
Alright I made some progress on that I was blocking some Java Scrpt needed to get the prefs to work, but I'm now more upset by the fact that the would you like to disable ads on the index takes up a third of the page. Personally I want a 2 column layout I had a single story column layout. Which is even better. The new left bar isn't to big, but the slashbox is huge and even with them turned off the space is still reserved for them
I had just customized V2 for the first time to not have the side bars so I could keep the window fairly small. With this V3 I can't find index customizations and while I have no slash-boxes there is still screen space reserve for them.
If anyone happens to know the setting to change I would appreciate it. Else I leave this comment as a possible missing feature.
While this isn't your main point I thought I would ask. I thought the volt only had an gasoline fueled electric generator that charged the electric battery with enough surplus to run the totally electric card. To my knowledge the volt was not a hybrid, but a fully electric car capable of generating its own electricity. I'll go look that up in case you don't reply.
You took a sci-fi show that was famous for not taking itself to serious and turned it in to Battlestar Galatica style drama it wasn't going to work out. Half the characters didn't trust each other which ruins the team dynamics that fans of SG-1 and Atlantis liked and while I don't think you need a single alien race to make a SG-1 series having nothing isn't idea either. I watched the show, but I can tell you I am thankful it was canceled. Maybe the show would of worked with a more Voyager style set-up, but I found the we don't even know what were looking for time and time again dulling.
May I suggest a roll your own distro?
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/
I agree, any time I read these articles they never mention that close door buttons are for key turn control mode. They just act like they are put in the panel to please people.
I have my doubts about all therm controls, but In most of the buildings I have worked in I'm told that they only work when the computer is down or during off hours. Even during these times it isn't adjusting the temp that changes anything they clam you have to hold a button down on the panel for x number of seconds and then you get an arbitrary length of air (e.g. an hour).
Either way, normally the nobs and switches which have no function are either outdated redundant controls that used to work. Or only work under certain conditions like the closed door button.
While Censorship and restraint are very different issues. One I wish Wikipedia would learn when clicking on various biology articles. Oh I wonder what that illness is (MY EYES!!). I do find it odd that a site like TV tropes which has no offensive images (that I know of) could run in to trouble on review based off a few counter culture tropes.
Hell even the articles that talk about adult issues are all extremely tame when you think about it compared to the stuff you find on forums. I wouldn't be surprised if the reviewer stumbled on to a mischievous edit or they just got red flag in general for having completely anom edits.
I don't think they should have trouble with the appeal process.