Someone who managed to get Russia, China, France and Britain to sit down and negotiate with Iran, even while Russia and the West are embroiled in a mini Cold War.
That's the kinds of things historians will take notice of, not some asshole who talks about female journalists having blood come out of their "you know where".
And that's the real issue. Trump makes a lot of claims and promises that would require Congress to cooperate, and looking at how Trump scores on the whole "get along with other people" index, it suggests that his Presidency, rather than being some great revolutionary change, would be four very long years of him shouting crude abuses at Congressional leadership.
You mean a set of scientific models that indicate large increases in CO2 in the atmosphere is causing more heat (and henace, more energy) to be trapped in the lower atmosphere, as well as CO2 reacting with the oceans leading to greater acidity and altering oceanic ecosystems?
Sure, it isn't "doom" in the respect that lots of things, including people, will survive, but it will represent significant changes, and many not for the better for many people.
Indeed. They should shut all the facilities down, euthanize the animals that have no hope of being reintroduced to the wild and outlaw the importation or breeding of whales and dolphins.
And then some an IP legal firm can just come along, blanket declare it theirs whenever they feel it, and he's buggered anyways.
Take it from me. Unless your worth a few billion bucks, your ownership and right to dispose of IP as you please is long gone. We have new lords and masters, and we will do what they like, or we'll get the hose again.
Oh you silly person. There's no such thing as Public Domain. It's a theoretical construct at this point, and might as well be considered as mythical and unlikely now as unicorns and a third party POTUS.
Believe me, within 20 years, Homer's and Shakespeare's works will be owned by Walt Disney or Sony, and anyone putting on a production of Hamlet will have to pay royalties. This is the world that evil lawyers and culpable, retarded politicians are creating.
With all this building and rebulding and rebuilding the rebuilding, could Microsoft please fucking release a functional Windows 10 version of the RSAT tools?
What's even worse is ad content in the main body of the document that spends about five to ten seconds after a page load changing its size, so that the text of the document is bouncing all over the place as AJAX-loaded images size themselves to whatever is viewed as the correct size. If you don't basically walk away for about thirty seconds, you'll end up trying to click on a link, click on the wrong link and end up in some other page than you wanted.
The sheer incompetence of web design, even on major sites like the Guardian's website, just amazes me. We literally have taken the latest web tools, and found a way to make the web experience even worse than it was during those purgatorial days of Internet Explorer 6.
I have a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse that I've connected to both my Nexus 5 and Nexus 7. On the nexus 5, the small screen real estate makes it pointless, and even on the 7" tablet I find the inadequacies of the interface and the still pretty small screen real estate do not translate into a pleasant experience for editing documents and spreadsheets. I'm sure larger tablets ameliorate this problem, but there comes a point, at least for me, where the screen size gets large enough that I'd rather just buy a notebook. I have a nice 14" HP touch screen notebook that works very well as a mobile word processing and spreadsheet development unit. I keep my Nexus 5 and Nexus 7 for document review when I'm somewhere where the notebook doesn't make sense, but if I have to start bundling Bluetooth peripherals to make a pseudo-laptop, then I'd rather just use a laptop.
I think being able to read documents, and possibly even do minor edits, is useful functionality on mobile devices. But there's a point at which the interface, even with a mouse and keyboard, simply falls down.
It's called being a self-entitled ass clown. It's the same kind of marginal intellect with narcissistic tendencies who likes to do road shows on residential streets at 2am or makes their motorbike idle at 200 decibels. You know, the kind of person who views the rest of the world and everyone in it as a sort of amusement park.
It probably also goes some distance to protecting Google's product development from any threats against its advertising business by cranking regulators.
I think when your only real significant objection to any science is that it fucks up your political or economic ideology, left, right or other, then I think your rejection is at best spurious, and at worst a sign that you're probably mentally ill.
I don't know, is Conservative kool-aid still built with a large dose of "the universe owes my preferred economic system a free pass from the laws of physics"?
All theories are essentially models.
Nothing like being lectured to by someone who is completely ignorant of how science works.
Someone who managed to get Russia, China, France and Britain to sit down and negotiate with Iran, even while Russia and the West are embroiled in a mini Cold War.
That's the kinds of things historians will take notice of, not some asshole who talks about female journalists having blood come out of their "you know where".
Biden never had a chance. He's as close to the Oval Office as he's ever going to get.
The Democratic nomination might as well be Hillary Clinton's coronation.
And that's the real issue. Trump makes a lot of claims and promises that would require Congress to cooperate, and looking at how Trump scores on the whole "get along with other people" index, it suggests that his Presidency, rather than being some great revolutionary change, would be four very long years of him shouting crude abuses at Congressional leadership.
You mean a set of scientific models that indicate large increases in CO2 in the atmosphere is causing more heat (and henace, more energy) to be trapped in the lower atmosphere, as well as CO2 reacting with the oceans leading to greater acidity and altering oceanic ecosystems?
Sure, it isn't "doom" in the respect that lots of things, including people, will survive, but it will represent significant changes, and many not for the better for many people.
Indeed. They should shut all the facilities down, euthanize the animals that have no hope of being reintroduced to the wild and outlaw the importation or breeding of whales and dolphins.
Oh, and fuck Sea World's investors.
And then some an IP legal firm can just come along, blanket declare it theirs whenever they feel it, and he's buggered anyways.
Take it from me. Unless your worth a few billion bucks, your ownership and right to dispose of IP as you please is long gone. We have new lords and masters, and we will do what they like, or we'll get the hose again.
Oh you silly person. There's no such thing as Public Domain. It's a theoretical construct at this point, and might as well be considered as mythical and unlikely now as unicorns and a third party POTUS.
Believe me, within 20 years, Homer's and Shakespeare's works will be owned by Walt Disney or Sony, and anyone putting on a production of Hamlet will have to pay royalties. This is the world that evil lawyers and culpable, retarded politicians are creating.
Changing rain belts that will pretty much wipe out large areas of arable land. How's that for a start.
You really are a fucking moron.
With all this building and rebulding and rebuilding the rebuilding, could Microsoft please fucking release a functional Windows 10 version of the RSAT tools?
The oceans are already measurably warmer and more acidic, you fucking idiot.
Because J2ME was such a brilliant mobile platform.
What's even worse is ad content in the main body of the document that spends about five to ten seconds after a page load changing its size, so that the text of the document is bouncing all over the place as AJAX-loaded images size themselves to whatever is viewed as the correct size. If you don't basically walk away for about thirty seconds, you'll end up trying to click on a link, click on the wrong link and end up in some other page than you wanted.
The sheer incompetence of web design, even on major sites like the Guardian's website, just amazes me. We literally have taken the latest web tools, and found a way to make the web experience even worse than it was during those purgatorial days of Internet Explorer 6.
I have a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse that I've connected to both my Nexus 5 and Nexus 7. On the nexus 5, the small screen real estate makes it pointless, and even on the 7" tablet I find the inadequacies of the interface and the still pretty small screen real estate do not translate into a pleasant experience for editing documents and spreadsheets. I'm sure larger tablets ameliorate this problem, but there comes a point, at least for me, where the screen size gets large enough that I'd rather just buy a notebook. I have a nice 14" HP touch screen notebook that works very well as a mobile word processing and spreadsheet development unit. I keep my Nexus 5 and Nexus 7 for document review when I'm somewhere where the notebook doesn't make sense, but if I have to start bundling Bluetooth peripherals to make a pseudo-laptop, then I'd rather just use a laptop.
Or I could just pull out my laptop.
I think being able to read documents, and possibly even do minor edits, is useful functionality on mobile devices. But there's a point at which the interface, even with a mouse and keyboard, simply falls down.
There's nothing I could imagine being better than reformatting a nested bullet list on my Nexus 7. Ah, what bliss that would be!
If I write a confession to a crime in a private cypher, I cannot be compelled to decrypt it.
Find another job soon. BB is going to go under in the next couple of years, and you won't be getting any money for shilling for them.
It's called being a self-entitled ass clown. It's the same kind of marginal intellect with narcissistic tendencies who likes to do road shows on residential streets at 2am or makes their motorbike idle at 200 decibels. You know, the kind of person who views the rest of the world and everyone in it as a sort of amusement park.
It probably also goes some distance to protecting Google's product development from any threats against its advertising business by cranking regulators.
John Candy: It's a BB gun.
Chevy Chase: Don't try me. I could put an eye out with this thing.
John Candy: You couldn't even break the skin with that thing.
Chevy Chase: Oh, I could. I could. I could break the skin, put a little lodge under the skin, and cause a very bad infection
Drone operators view spying on other people as a civil liberty, and if you complain, you're some sort of evil bastard.
Go read some drone forums. You'll see every manner of justification for being a perverted peeping Tom.
"I'm masturbating now. Going faster... faster... Applying more lube... Oh yeah... Oh shit, no, I haven't finished yet.... Nooooo!!!!!"
I think when your only real significant objection to any science is that it fucks up your political or economic ideology, left, right or other, then I think your rejection is at best spurious, and at worst a sign that you're probably mentally ill.
I don't know, is Conservative kool-aid still built with a large dose of "the universe owes my preferred economic system a free pass from the laws of physics"?