Slashdot Mirror


User: flyneye

flyneye's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,398
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,398

  1. Re:The Problem on 1.8 Million-Year-Old Skull Suggests Three Early Human Species Were One · · Score: 1

    38 minutes to get around to questions? Not on my valuable time.
    I will say for the benefit of the snake handling faith healers among us; I can find NO place where evolution disproves the creation story. I can find NO place where the Science we have isn't feasable to creation. What I CAN find are two factions, who can't tell the difference between rooting for a team and searching for truth, both replete with bullshit, closed minds and the priority to be right over the priority of truth. Most of this fault is attributed to laziness and lack of rigor on behalf of what passes for Atheism and Christianity. Both, as it stands, lack a reasonable presentation of facts to either eliminate or nurture faith, due to the general ignorance and political aspirations of their erstwhile leaders/spokesmen.
    It's like a bunch of kids jumping around in cape costumes pretending to be superheroes while everyone knows they are merely children.
    The Christians haven't delved far enough into Hebrew history, let alone the books they purport to live by and the Atheists haven't even gotten that far.
    It really resembles an old Looney Tunes feature to watch both their "arguments", yet I am not amused and more disturbed that my equanimity has been challenged by their distant farting.

  2. Re: I guess this means.... on US Should Cancel Plutonium Plant, Say Scientists · · Score: 1

    Waste not , want not.
    We really should do upgrades and recycle instead of buying a new toy every time.

  3. Re:Obligatory creationism troll. on 1.8 Million-Year-Old Skull Suggests Three Early Human Species Were One · · Score: 1

    Actually I did. Reread it.
    I didn't address your concerns at all.
    When the criteria starts out " There are four winds and four corners of the earth so there shall be four gospels" it starts whimsical and stays that way. The only serious part of it is that changes were made for political control reasons. Oh , I suppose you can listen to "divine" excuses all day and believe them if you have limited capacity like the majority, but a spade is still a spade and the self proclaimed Catholic organization is a sham. The only thing worse is the Protestants (Protesting Catholics) who shaved even more data off for their purposes. These reasons were silly and further, the exclusions were made on top of frivolous exclusions before it. So I'll hear none of the USUAL apologeas.

    If you had an inkling of the history of the church from Christ forward, you wouldn't say stupid things like "the notion that the essential truths to be conveyed was selected based on political considerations is highly implausible". Irenaeus is the moron I quoted above. When you start with shit, it stays shit and we all know alchemy is fluff , so you won't be transmuting gold from it anytime soon. Better to quit relying on others and their agendas, especially lit up in neon as they are, and pick up the truth by your own judgement. Constantine was even worse and was a sure sign that the "Catholic" organization was completely in the wrong and has yet to transmute gold from the shit that began it. Ask a Jew, ask a molested child, others too. Infallability, bullshit.

    Go read some history and make note that when you edit you can change entire meanings. Do the meek inherit the earth or do the resilient? Is the MDMA-like calmus an ingredient in the Annointing Oil, or is cannabis? Archaeology and Anthropology have uncovered loads of information not presented to the public by their "organizations". Quit relying on organizations, seminaries and "ministers", all reek of taint like a Repubmocrat on the campaign trail.
    How many know there were other branches of Christianity busily seeking truth when the Catholics began killing them and burning their data? Again we know a tree by the fruit it produces. Female Popes having babies during parades and being stoned to death. The FATHER of Lucrecia Borgia murders his way past the others to become Pope Alexander VI. Whooee with leaders like that, I can't imagine there being any other truth.

    Differences? Well, we can begin by comparing what is left with what has been thrown out or never included. Like the Book of Jasher, in a way, a plain language copy of the Septuagint, actually mentioned in the old testament twice, as an old example. For new examples we have the NIV adding the text : "In saying this Jesus declared all foods clean " to Mark 7:19, which is complete bullshit and could only be manipulated out of meaning by a car salesman who never did much more than Sunday School as a child. Further Paul is twisted to saying the same things by those who didn't realize what the point is.
    These Apostles still followed the law and kept the holidays and never was all food made clean. Romans 6:14 has been obfuscated through several translations to nearly mean its opposite. It is never mentioned that "Under the law" or Curse of the law means "responsible for ones sins" and is never compared to the subject spoken of before in Deut, 11:26-28. So now we not only have hidden truth, but also painted over truth. Many many many others and I am not going to write a book today. So yes I would call Clean Food a MAJOR difference in doctrine.

    There is much to be found in Apocrypha,pseudepigrapha, early christian writings and other excluded books. Are they all real? Of course they are, they are a slice of the history of Christianity and the struggles and beliefs of those seeking. Are they all truthful or even genuine? Most have truth, some are fanciful and replete with bullshit, but they all have value in creating a window for us to see what really happened. This is something to be judged by an individual and not a self appointed political bureaucrazy. You want truth, go find it, but don't tell me how you have some authority on truth inherited from something someone told you once.

  4. Re: I guess this means.... on US Should Cancel Plutonium Plant, Say Scientists · · Score: 1

    A bit of history for you- chumps believe anything the government approves for mass consumption. North Korea is escalating their raspberry posturing along with military capability (maybe so, maybe no), Iran is/wants to be in the game, many small countries have large organizations that aren't beneath dirty bombs.
    Don't tell me squat about downward trajectory unless you mean some statistical credibility according to some self appointed authority.

  5. Re: I guess this means.... on US Should Cancel Plutonium Plant, Say Scientists · · Score: 1

    I notice all the fuss rests on the tension created by the phrase " expected future downward trajectory of the U.S. nuclear arsenal". Now what Rocket Surgeon actually expects there to be a future downward trajectory of the U.S. nuclear arsenal? Allies? Enemies? Penguins surfing Dubai? Snake handling faith healers? Nope, poll says everyone is pretty sure everyone is building nuke weapons, so they are buffing up too. That downward trajectory stuff, is just the horseapple pie that the press serves to the public. I didn't eat it, did you? Did you cave under pressure or continue to hold out for ice cream and demonstrate vulgar finger signs?

  6. Re:The Problem on 1.8 Million-Year-Old Skull Suggests Three Early Human Species Were One · · Score: 1

    wul , yeah
    But, anyway Ozzy, Sharon and Al are having a barbeque and I think I'm just gonna go hang there for a bit....

  7. Re:Obligatory creationism troll. on 1.8 Million-Year-Old Skull Suggests Three Early Human Species Were One · · Score: 2

    No no, Homerus Scientificus. He tends to believe any piece of bone he finds still has meat on it. mmmmmmmmmmm

  8. Re:Obligatory creationism troll. on 1.8 Million-Year-Old Skull Suggests Three Early Human Species Were One · · Score: 1

    uh-hmrm. I was just scrolling by, minding my own business; when I saw your little faux passe about the truth in the Bible not changing over time.
    Apparently , you never knew any of the controversy over the ages of translation mistakes, both accidental and political, the entire Septuagint rewritten from memory by Ezra while whacked out of his skull on the ancient "cup of fire" entheogen tea. The whittling down of the 600 or so books by the Catholic church for oftimes whimsical and political reasons to establish themselves over the several other factions of Christians present at the time.(Genocides followed, guess we know that tree by its fruit.Ask a Jew) How about the large amount of truth cut out of the King James Version itself? That started out many books larger than the condensed version in your mitts now. Gee, maybe we couldn't take all that truth. We should let submorons who aren't fit to decide how the solar system works, decide important things in our lives.
    Creationism could even mean there were established hominid species and Adam and Eve were created separately with self awareness and souls to differentiate them while allowing sexual compatibility with Fred Flintstone. Who knows, you sure as hell don't. I guess it's not as important as you think, unless you want to just cause chaos amongst people who can't tell the difference between rooting for a sports team and finding truth in philosophy. It's always about "being right" no matter what, with no regard for the unknown, conflicting data or the MESSAGE BEHIND ALL THE FUSS!

  9. Re:The Problem on 1.8 Million-Year-Old Skull Suggests Three Early Human Species Were One · · Score: 1

    Not a problem, I'll let him know, he's over at Ozzy and Sharons for tarot poker.
    I'll see your Crowley and raise you one Lovecraft as a Seminary lecturer.

  10. Re:The Problem on 1.8 Million-Year-Old Skull Suggests Three Early Human Species Were One · · Score: 3, Funny

    Put on some Speed Stick and you wouldn't be so awful.
    I'm just delighted to be able to explain the ridge brow, knuckle draggers I've had to cover for all my life.
    Of course these species are one. Still are! As are Homerus Erectus,(average hominids) Gluteus Rex,(species attracted to elected office) Rattus Habilis,(law enforcement and judicial hairy lizards) various mamosauruses (double breasted rod suckers) and ptero shrews( pinchy face complainers).
    I can't get down the street for herds of them making nuisances of themselves all day long. We need a hunting season...

  11. Re:Really? on Shutdown Cost the US Economy $24 Billion · · Score: 1

    NON paid furlough. Let's do this right.

  12. Re:Really? on Shutdown Cost the US Economy $24 Billion · · Score: 1

    I was going to say;
    "Yes, but how much would it have cost to keep the government open?"
    "What if we only furloughed specific money hogs, like Congress, NSA, DHS, SRS, IRS and other non essential offices until the end of the Obama administration?
    How much could we save?

  13. Re:insouciance? on Online Journalism Is Becoming a Billionaires' Plaything (Again) · · Score: 1

    Played with "sour cream" by Orson Wells. Everyone knows he had a family size bag of ripple chips and a jug of Mogen David on the set.

  14. Re:insouciance? on Online Journalism Is Becoming a Billionaires' Plaything (Again) · · Score: 1

    No, they're just mumbling doubletalk in Esperanto...
    What they're saying is; they'd like their coffee now and a high colonic. Just bag it up and step on it. You can brainwash someone like that.

  15. Re: insouciance? on Online Journalism Is Becoming a Billionaires' Plaything (Again) · · Score: 2

    Step right over here, I collect word usage tax, and I can assure you, that is only $1.29.
    Now, ante up the toll, bub.

  16. Re:You'll pry Windows 95 from my cold dead hands! on Windows 8.1 Rolls Out Today · · Score: 1

    Hands Up, who thought of Windows 3.1 when they saw the article?
    Who would really rather work from that interface and have a DOS shell again (provided it were powerful enough and everything was written to run on DOS)?
    Yes, I realize there are much funner and faster out there, this is hypothetical, Gawd! Relax a little!

  17. Re:Prejudiced much? on Oracle Attacks Open Source; Says Community-Developed Code Is Inferior · · Score: 1

    Isn't that the same old song that Microtosh and others sing when our light shines more brightly than theirs?

  18. Re:LOL on The NSA Is Collecting Lots of Spam · · Score: 1

    Where do I sign up to divert all my spam to the NSA?
    Sounds like a more useful program for my tax dollars than anyone let on!

  19. Re:Yikes. on Finnish Doctors Are Prescribing Video Games For ADHD · · Score: 1

    In Colorado everything now is possible. Natural medication and video games...Should have them sharp as a tack by noon.

  20. Re:shoulda got it right the first time on Patriot Act Author Introduces Bill To Limit Use of Patriot Act · · Score: 1

    Still yet, if he were in earshot, " Thanks for nothing , fuckbrains, hindsight somewhere around 20/40, eh?"

  21. Re:Some questions on The W3C Sells Out Users Without Seeming To Get Anything In Return · · Score: 1

    Well you can damn well expect, when something doesn't sound right, then something IS up.
    I'll postulate that it is somewhere along the lines of a shady character approaching TBL to make him an offer he couldn't refuse;like insurance for himself and his family. Don't believe for a second that Hollyweird and any f*ckhead in the music industry wouldn't put out a goon squad to get what they want.
    W3C is being extorted to add DRM.
    Discuss....
    I'm feeling verklempt.

  22. Re:Charles Darwin Wrote on US Adults Score Poorly On Worldwide Test · · Score: 1

    So...Black Africans have what % of what DNA? Because your post sounds like bullshit and that lands you in a mental percentile with white supremacists and rhesus monkeys.

  23. Re:Not surprised on US Adults Score Poorly On Worldwide Test · · Score: 1

    This is a group of people who attended public schools during the beginning of the dumbing down in the 70s.
    Worked pretty well, no?
    I'm pretty much surrounded all day by intellectual/emotional misfits and pick up their slack.
    Feels like a strange analog of "Planet of the Apes". Even here on /., the forums are full of throwbacks who might as well carry mojo bags and hide during full moons.
    What can I say people, either you went to private school, bucked the system and educated yourself in public school or you are currently one of the retard/slaves of the Repubmocrat dictatorship. Well, you, your parents and grandparents voted yourselves into a barrel of dog waste. Wise up and vote yourselves out of it or revolt.
    What am I saying? You people cling to Repubmocrat overlords like they were NFL teams, complete with regurgitating their claptrap and fighting over which is best to enslave you.
    People who love their children and care about life will send them to private school or home school them and teach them REAL history along with ACADEMIC subjects to prepare them to live a cut above the rest and pick up their retarded slack.

  24. Re:Cockroach rights? on Cyborg Cockroach Sparks Ethics Debate · · Score: 1

    LOL, you are SO NAIVE!

  25. Re:Cockroach rights? on Cyborg Cockroach Sparks Ethics Debate · · Score: 1

    All it takes is to bring some home on some groceries. If a roach can ride on produce from where it's grown, or in warehoused boxes at a food production facility, it can ride home from the grocery w/you and set up a colony in your house from the equator to the poles.
    Don't bullshit me about where roaches aren't. They are the fittest non microscopic animal on the planet that could survive a nuclear disaster. A little cold won't stop them. They have no conscience. They can't be reasoned with. They just keep coming. That's what they do.