I am talking about "enemy combattents" -- that is what. As for Japanese camps, all I have to say is that Brazil, who has the world largest Japanese population outside of Japan, and did in WWII as well, where the Black Dragons society ran rampant did not lock up their Japanese and the vast majority of their shipping was sunk because the spies were everywhere. Germans had to stalk American shipping, they weren't tipped off at the start because there was little opporuntiy for spies. This much is true. Whether it is really BECAUSE we locked up our Japanese and not just a coincidence is anybody's guess. All I can show is that Brazil kept them free, and their shipping suffered inordinantly.
NO, YOU ARE WRONG. It was created by FDR to get around the law and get rid of alleged German spies during WWII. Just because you don't like Bush doesn't mean he made up everything you disagree with. I hate Bush too. But FDR started this shit.
We usually follow the common law (ie, precidents) up to that point. In fact, there have been some US Supreme Court decisions based on British Common Law (don't ask me to say which ones right now, I'm an English Literature major with no plans for law school, I just read this somewhere in something not on the internet one time). Statutory law (ie, passed by parliament/congress) is different and I believe largely ignored.
at least the rules, unlike everything else these days, aren't Made in China... yet. Please remember Germany would have won WWI if not for the USA (Germany lost no battles, broke the Italian front, and was rallying. The eastern front disappeared with the Russian Revolution. You and your "democracies" were getting tired of war and would probably have accepted any terms offered). Please remember Germany would have starved Britain out of existance if not for the USA, thereby leaving no place to launch a western front using mostly American troops and arms, ending World War II without leaving the ENTIRE continent under the jurisdiction of the Nazis or the Soviet Union, neither of which were any good, and, oh yeah, the USA garrisoning Europe to protect you from Soviet attacks after the war. Big, bad America. What have they ever done for anybody!?
yes, and the Shinbet (Israeli version of M15 or the FBI) created Hamas to split the Palestinian cause and weaken the PLO. Then Hamas got away from them and turned into a real group in their own right. That much is true. Such tactics were used by the FBI during the 60s with the threats from the New Left. It wouldn't surprise me a bit if the powers that be created Al Qaeda for just such a subversive purpose. Bin Laden made his debut under Bush I, earned his wings during Clinton, and went for the gold during Bush II. Bush I and Clinton are now all buddy-buddy, despite the "partisan" bickering by those on their respective sides. Is it that dificult to believe that the Bushes and the Clintons are in it together (not, of course, by themselves) and that they control Al Qaeda? I don't think so.
how about a.DUM(B) for all the useless "home pages" out there that teenage girls put up with green script on pink backgrounds to talk about how OMG TIM IS TOOOOOOOOO CUUTE!!!!!11!!11!!! and other such frivilous crap that clutters the web?
or we could just kill the web. having more people on it doesn't make it better, just like having a wider electorate doesn't make "democracy" better. The content still sucks.
I guess for the same reason they had a Young Indiana Jones: to try and get impressionable kids into something that originally wasn't really for them in the first palce. Kind of like Joe Cammel.
That saying, above all, is quoted so many times on Slashdot that it is almost a cliché. So, you wouldn't trade it, but you do nothing to stop it. You sit here and complain to a bunch of nerds living in nerdville who, also, will do nothing about it but complaine. Then you'll get congradutalted for citing the quotation. I suspect that over 75% of Slashdotters have never held a gun, let alone fired one. Do they really think that politicians are going to stop because of a vote or a message on a board? No. Can you hope? Yes. Sure, it was hoped things could have been worked out with Britain, but the war was planned for and preped for none the less. Yet many if not most slashdotters will be filling right in line to vote away gun rights so that they will have no recourse after their so-called voice is denied. What then? hmm? as cited above by voltaire, a witty saying proves nothing. You can quote Franklin all you want to, but you'd be better off in the mold of Patrick Henry if you expect to effect change in a corrupt world.
by increased diversity they mean freezing out straight, white, christian males from the country that their straight, white, christian male ancestors founded in order to instill the rights they fought, and many died for, for themselves and their posterity (us). Diversity is just a code word for institutionalized racism against white people.
frankly speaking, if you're bored out of your mind then your job is not perfect. If you're going to have less pay and benefits then the new job will not be perfect either. A perfect job would be an interesting job with good pay and benefits. However, lets face it, the 90s are over and gone are the days when i could have branded a spork as an "eCommerce solution" and gotten away with it and 10,000,000USD. You're not going to find a "perfect job." My advice would be to stay where you are for the practical benefits and do whatever you want to in your spare time to keep your mind sharp and your wits about you. I'm an English major looking at graduation. I'm likely not going to find a job writing or anything. I'll do that in my spare time and get some mindless office job to pay the bills. I went out for the Army, but they disqualified me because of asthma; couldn't get the waiver. I envy your possition. At least you have a job. besides, there is no guarantee that this new venture is going to stay solvent. It could die in a month or a year, and leave you with nothing. Stay where you are and get a hobby.
http://www.bede.org.uk/flatearth.htm -- This is one myth that really needs to die! Even more so than that Betsy Ross was involved with the American Flag.
One must pay for fuel and maintenance on a tractor as well, however the tractor is not labour, is it? Say I have a bunch of Mexicans working on my farm. Now say that times are a little tough. I cannot sell a Mexican and make money off of the transaction, however, I can sell a slave same as I could see a John Deere Tractor. Also, that slaves may be bred increases their value as well as creating new value. This is an advantage over a tractor as well.
First of all, one must understand that slaves are capital, not labour. So is land. The fact is that the slave owning south had most of the capital on the United States, and it was distributed more widely among the (white) population. Certainly not all white familes owned slaves (mine did). However, practically all of them owned land. and after the introduction of the cotton gin, which made slavery even more profitable, there was an economic boom in the south. it wasn't particularly industrial, but it fed the industrial revolution in Britian. Further, property values skyrocketted at that time, and not just the plantations. even the small family farms dodubled in value in a rather short time. And again, this was a more widely distributed boom than ever happened in the North with free labour and capitalism. Frankly, free labour and capitalism are more evil than slavery in that they foster the conditions necessary to create to so-called Proletariate that liberals like to whinge about, and even Marx wrote so (that it was worse than slavery; proletarianes having no gurantee of existance, unlike sharecroppers, serfs, or slaves): http://marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/pri n-com.htm , and not just Marx, but Hilaire Belloc, too, in "The Servile State." My economic assertions on the South can be found in this book entitled "Confederate States of America: What if the South Had won the Civil War?" it's in the first couple of chapters covering the history priort to the conflict. I can't find where I layed it just this second or i'd give further information.
If i lived next door to a crazy, nuclear-armed country with a million-man infantry, then i'd probably want a technological upperhand as well on the battlefield. However, as wars are always going to be fought no matter what, i'm willing to put my boots on the ground for honour and glory and hopefully some metals... so joining the army. god damned robots better not screw me over on the only thing left that seems to be hiring... graduating with an english degree in May. what else can I do?
Yes, so what? It's called "manifest destiney" and it's the reason we have anything today. What's so sacred about human life anyway? We're just animals who grew out of monkeys anyway, after all, as slashdot is so fond of reminding us anytime anything that remotely seems like "intelligent design" is mentioned. Furthermore, America was NOT founding by Pilgrims. They arived in the 1620s. Jamestown, VA (just near were I live/grew up) was founded in 1607 by people just out to make a buck and nothing else other than have some adventure while doing it. As someone whos family has been in America since the 1600s, and is not a bloody pilgrim I am offended by your assertion of this stupid "pilgrim" myth. However, it is the New Enland puritan morality that keeps boobs off of TV.
they'll use a model, just like the used to before computers. Duh. a model is still "real" unless you take real to mean 1:1 scale with the final production model, or a "real" working aircraft. And they are not going to put all the work and money into building a fullsize or working one without having proven that the basic design is sound. and that can be done with a model.
did i say i was going to blow shit up? no. i cant say shit like that, i already started the process of joining the army (combat medic... got pay back my student loans somehow). I just said, it sounded remarkably similar. as for legislation, i want NO data collection by anyone for anyreasons, regardless of the limitations on who can see it. that's total BS. it doesn't matter how they dress it up, they'll find a way/reason to misuse it. "they" always do.
system like this used to facilitate id cards and shit was exactly the reason the group bombed the FBI building in that book "Turner Diaries" which allegedly gave McVeigh the idea for the OKC bombing. Sometimes I wonder if the government doesn't get ideas for totalitarian projects from books and movies about totalitarian governments.
I remember in the book, there was something about hammond having created pygmy elephants that could be kept as house pets in order to demonstrate the technology to get further funding or something. but it's been years since i read it, and the movie had precious little to do with the book (although far more than the Lost World movie had to do with the book. Jurassic park III was just offensive).
Slashdot Mirror
you mean the average American? *ducks*
I am talking about "enemy combattents" -- that is what. As for Japanese camps, all I have to say is that Brazil, who has the world largest Japanese population outside of Japan, and did in WWII as well, where the Black Dragons society ran rampant did not lock up their Japanese and the vast majority of their shipping was sunk because the spies were everywhere. Germans had to stalk American shipping, they weren't tipped off at the start because there was little opporuntiy for spies. This much is true. Whether it is really BECAUSE we locked up our Japanese and not just a coincidence is anybody's guess. All I can show is that Brazil kept them free, and their shipping suffered inordinantly.
NO, YOU ARE WRONG. It was created by FDR to get around the law and get rid of alleged German spies during WWII. Just because you don't like Bush doesn't mean he made up everything you disagree with. I hate Bush too. But FDR started this shit.
We usually follow the common law (ie, precidents) up to that point. In fact, there have been some US Supreme Court decisions based on British Common Law (don't ask me to say which ones right now, I'm an English Literature major with no plans for law school, I just read this somewhere in something not on the internet one time). Statutory law (ie, passed by parliament/congress) is different and I believe largely ignored.
at least the rules, unlike everything else these days, aren't Made in China... yet. Please remember Germany would have won WWI if not for the USA (Germany lost no battles, broke the Italian front, and was rallying. The eastern front disappeared with the Russian Revolution. You and your "democracies" were getting tired of war and would probably have accepted any terms offered). Please remember Germany would have starved Britain out of existance if not for the USA, thereby leaving no place to launch a western front using mostly American troops and arms, ending World War II without leaving the ENTIRE continent under the jurisdiction of the Nazis or the Soviet Union, neither of which were any good, and, oh yeah, the USA garrisoning Europe to protect you from Soviet attacks after the war. Big, bad America. What have they ever done for anybody!?
yes, and the Shinbet (Israeli version of M15 or the FBI) created Hamas to split the Palestinian cause and weaken the PLO. Then Hamas got away from them and turned into a real group in their own right. That much is true. Such tactics were used by the FBI during the 60s with the threats from the New Left. It wouldn't surprise me a bit if the powers that be created Al Qaeda for just such a subversive purpose. Bin Laden made his debut under Bush I, earned his wings during Clinton, and went for the gold during Bush II. Bush I and Clinton are now all buddy-buddy, despite the "partisan" bickering by those on their respective sides. Is it that dificult to believe that the Bushes and the Clintons are in it together (not, of course, by themselves) and that they control Al Qaeda? I don't think so.
how about a .DUM(B) for all the useless "home pages" out there that teenage girls put up with green script on pink backgrounds to talk about how OMG TIM IS TOOOOOOOOO CUUTE!!!!!11!!11!!! and other such frivilous crap that clutters the web?
or we could just kill the web. having more people on it doesn't make it better, just like having a wider electorate doesn't make "democracy" better. The content still sucks.
We DID have a Libertarian government in the first place. Andrew Jackson killed it.
I guess for the same reason they had a Young Indiana Jones: to try and get impressionable kids into something that originally wasn't really for them in the first palce. Kind of like Joe Cammel.
That saying, above all, is quoted so many times on Slashdot that it is almost a cliché. So, you wouldn't trade it, but you do nothing to stop it. You sit here and complain to a bunch of nerds living in nerdville who, also, will do nothing about it but complaine. Then you'll get congradutalted for citing the quotation. I suspect that over 75% of Slashdotters have never held a gun, let alone fired one. Do they really think that politicians are going to stop because of a vote or a message on a board? No. Can you hope? Yes. Sure, it was hoped things could have been worked out with Britain, but the war was planned for and preped for none the less. Yet many if not most slashdotters will be filling right in line to vote away gun rights so that they will have no recourse after their so-called voice is denied. What then? hmm? as cited above by voltaire, a witty saying proves nothing. You can quote Franklin all you want to, but you'd be better off in the mold of Patrick Henry if you expect to effect change in a corrupt world.
So is your small intestine.
by increased diversity they mean freezing out straight, white, christian males from the country that their straight, white, christian male ancestors founded in order to instill the rights they fought, and many died for, for themselves and their posterity (us). Diversity is just a code word for institutionalized racism against white people.
frankly speaking, if you're bored out of your mind then your job is not perfect. If you're going to have less pay and benefits then the new job will not be perfect either. A perfect job would be an interesting job with good pay and benefits. However, lets face it, the 90s are over and gone are the days when i could have branded a spork as an "eCommerce solution" and gotten away with it and 10,000,000USD. You're not going to find a "perfect job." My advice would be to stay where you are for the practical benefits and do whatever you want to in your spare time to keep your mind sharp and your wits about you. I'm an English major looking at graduation. I'm likely not going to find a job writing or anything. I'll do that in my spare time and get some mindless office job to pay the bills. I went out for the Army, but they disqualified me because of asthma; couldn't get the waiver. I envy your possition. At least you have a job. besides, there is no guarantee that this new venture is going to stay solvent. It could die in a month or a year, and leave you with nothing. Stay where you are and get a hobby.
http://www.bede.org.uk/flatearth.htm -- This is one myth that really needs to die! Even more so than that Betsy Ross was involved with the American Flag.
One must pay for fuel and maintenance on a tractor as well, however the tractor is not labour, is it? Say I have a bunch of Mexicans working on my farm. Now say that times are a little tough. I cannot sell a Mexican and make money off of the transaction, however, I can sell a slave same as I could see a John Deere Tractor. Also, that slaves may be bred increases their value as well as creating new value. This is an advantage over a tractor as well.
First of all, one must understand that slaves are capital, not labour. So is land. The fact is that the slave owning south had most of the capital on the United States, and it was distributed more widely among the (white) population. Certainly not all white familes owned slaves (mine did). However, practically all of them owned land. and after the introduction of the cotton gin, which made slavery even more profitable, there was an economic boom in the south. it wasn't particularly industrial, but it fed the industrial revolution in Britian. Further, property values skyrocketted at that time, and not just the plantations. even the small family farms dodubled in value in a rather short time. And again, this was a more widely distributed boom than ever happened in the North with free labour and capitalism. Frankly, free labour and capitalism are more evil than slavery in that they foster the conditions necessary to create to so-called Proletariate that liberals like to whinge about, and even Marx wrote so (that it was worse than slavery; proletarianes having no gurantee of existance, unlike sharecroppers, serfs, or slaves): http://marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/pri n-com.htm , and not just Marx, but Hilaire Belloc, too, in "The Servile State." My economic assertions on the South can be found in this book entitled "Confederate States of America: What if the South Had won the Civil War?" it's in the first couple of chapters covering the history priort to the conflict. I can't find where I layed it just this second or i'd give further information.
game controllers really WERE intelligently designed!
that is really there for National Socialist. They're trying to tell you something...
If i lived next door to a crazy, nuclear-armed country with a million-man infantry, then i'd probably want a technological upperhand as well on the battlefield. However, as wars are always going to be fought no matter what, i'm willing to put my boots on the ground for honour and glory and hopefully some metals... so joining the army. god damned robots better not screw me over on the only thing left that seems to be hiring... graduating with an english degree in May. what else can I do?
Yes, so what? It's called "manifest destiney" and it's the reason we have anything today. What's so sacred about human life anyway? We're just animals who grew out of monkeys anyway, after all, as slashdot is so fond of reminding us anytime anything that remotely seems like "intelligent design" is mentioned. Furthermore, America was NOT founding by Pilgrims. They arived in the 1620s. Jamestown, VA (just near were I live/grew up) was founded in 1607 by people just out to make a buck and nothing else other than have some adventure while doing it. As someone whos family has been in America since the 1600s, and is not a bloody pilgrim I am offended by your assertion of this stupid "pilgrim" myth. However, it is the New Enland puritan morality that keeps boobs off of TV.
they'll use a model, just like the used to before computers. Duh. a model is still "real" unless you take real to mean 1:1 scale with the final production model, or a "real" working aircraft. And they are not going to put all the work and money into building a fullsize or working one without having proven that the basic design is sound. and that can be done with a model.
did i say i was going to blow shit up? no. i cant say shit like that, i already started the process of joining the army (combat medic... got pay back my student loans somehow). I just said, it sounded remarkably similar. as for legislation, i want NO data collection by anyone for anyreasons, regardless of the limitations on who can see it. that's total BS. it doesn't matter how they dress it up, they'll find a way/reason to misuse it. "they" always do.
system like this used to facilitate id cards and shit was exactly the reason the group bombed the FBI building in that book "Turner Diaries" which allegedly gave McVeigh the idea for the OKC bombing. Sometimes I wonder if the government doesn't get ideas for totalitarian projects from books and movies about totalitarian governments.
I remember in the book, there was something about hammond having created pygmy elephants that could be kept as house pets in order to demonstrate the technology to get further funding or something. but it's been years since i read it, and the movie had precious little to do with the book (although far more than the Lost World movie had to do with the book. Jurassic park III was just offensive).
no, i'm pretty sure they started with the killing. it just took a lull and then got hot and heavy again.