Slashdot Mirror


Would You Take A Paycut for More Interesting Work?

HellsAngel asks: "I work in a business consulting firm. While the pay and the benefits are great, the work itself is mundane and boring, consisting of Excel, Access, and VBA macros. Recently, I got a job offer to move to a startup doing OS development and Systems and Network programming, however it would involve a paycut. Would you leave an otherwise perfect job to work on something more interesting?" "Today, I work as an IT Analyst for a multinational firm doing business consulting. From the looks of it, I've got the perfect job: high pay, extravagant benefits and bonuses, flexi-time, can telecommute whenever possible, and best of all the coworkers are great and have truly become my friends, even the boss.

However, the work I actually do seems to be a waste of my CS education. My current project right now involves hooking up Excel and Access with a little VBA and some macros. The other day I was asked to export a Lotus Notes database into an Excel file and format it. The most programming-intensive project that I've done here was an ASP.NET webapp, for the company intranet.

Am I selling out by continuing to work in my current firm? Should I take the pay-cut to work at a startup where I can make more use of my talents? I'm a recent grad with no loans or credit cards to pay, so I have a low cost of living aside from a girlfriend. Which would you prefer: fun at work, or fun outside of work?"

577 comments

  1. Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by DSL-Admin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd take a cut to have a Mgr that actually knew more than me.

    1. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by 32771 · · Score: 1

      Ha, first post and dead on (at least from what I'm seeing) my thinking. I'll take a pay cut by %50, cange of country, and ~70% PhD level among my colleagues
      (me excluded, I just got a MSc). I'll start next week, Monday. Lets see what is comming out of it.

      Also I'll move back into my parents basement, for a while.

      --
      Je me souviens.
    2. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Why?

      I manage a small office and every so often, I hear this exact same thing.

      I know how to manage -- I hire folks that are smarter than me for a reason -- because if I wanted to do the job myself, I'd have hired someone stupider.

      Beyond that, managers have to know skill sets outside of just your own. I can admit I'm not the best coder out there, and I'm not really upset by it. So long as I can create ideas and others can realize them, I'm in good shape. Coming from both sides of the equation, I'd rather be a manger or have a manager that could admit he didn't know more than me and let me do my job -- I've never micromanaged my employees and I expect the same in return.

      Personally, I think the folks 'under' me are actually more important in the scheme of things -- but without someone to guide them nothing would get done.

      Posted anonymously because I don't want those nerds to get a big ego if they read this. Or more importantly, ask for raises.

    3. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 0, Troll
      I'd take a cut to have a Mgr that actually knew more than me.
      Why?
      I manage a small office and every so often, I hear this exact same thing.
      I know how to manage -- I hire folks that are smarter than me for a reason -- because if I wanted to do the job myself, I'd have hired someone stupider.
      Knowledge != intelligence.

      Your boss SHOULD KNOW MORE than you do!!! Otherwise he is not competent. I've had more than my share of total dolty bosses we could run around by the nose; fuck, once, we even delayed a research project by stalling it for 6 months, and the happy-go-lucky boss didn't notice anything.

    4. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by jkauzlar · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I think you're correct to a point. Managers' jobs are (or can be) wayyy different from software developers'. It depends on the environment. If you're talking about project managers, I think they ought to know more than their underlings. Management that deal in budgets, communicating with higher management, etc, seem totally different. These mgrs can get transferred from unrelated depts into IT and hardly miss a beat. I'm assuming that since you're reading slashdot, you must be somewhat tech-savvy and perhaps not in this breed of mgmt.

      I'm just a peon, by anyone's standards, but I would feel dispirited if someone were promoted past me because they couldn't function at the lower level. I've seen it several times (well, a couple times, but I haven't been in the corp. world long) where the clueless employee is promoted because mgmt doesn't want to risk taking the best guys off the lower-rung jobs. On the other hand, the best guys, the geeks, enjoy their line of work and would probably feel less satisfaction at the mgmt level. So they're stuck at a lower pay level, and like the parent suggests, probably would love to have something of a mentor working above them... it would give them some hope of advancement, careerwise.

      On a side note, if you're managing geeks, or technical specialists of some kind, its probably best to avoid any micro-management simply because you don't know what you're talking about. I like seeing my manager as an ally in my career, not someone I have to slip past to get anything done. It's a complementary relationship, not a strict heirarchy. She knows much that I don't, and that goes both ways.

      Enough of my soapbox.

    5. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by aristotle-dude · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I'm sorry but you have absolutely no clue about what you are talking about. Managers do not have to a complete understanding of what their staff members do. The managerial skills they possess are equally important to the an organization's success as your technical skills.

      If you want to see an example of how poor management performance can negatively affect the output of a company, you only need look at the windows OS development unit.

      MSFT has a lot of talented developers on their payroll but their middle management and project leaders appear to be completely incompetent in their managerial role. I would surmise that a lot of their problems with quality and delays are caused by managers not being able to manage expectations and not being able to de-scope unnecessary functionality while prioritizing core functionality.

      A manager should hire the best people with skills outside of their own core competence. Managers who involve themselves in the day to day operations of their department are micro-managers which is something you do not want.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    6. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "I know how to manage -- I hire folks that are smarter than me for a reason"

      You may not know it, but Charles Schwab said the same thing.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    7. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by christopher240240 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You completely missed the point and managed to come off as an asshole by doing so. I completely agree with the GP (although I disagree with the use of the buzzphrase "Skill Set"). Managers are there to get things done and mere coders, no matter how brilliant they are don't get things done without a fire being lit under their asses. Don't like it? Become a manager and you'll understand where he's coming from. Otherwise enjoy your $15.00 an hour. ASS.

    8. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather be a manger or have a manager that could admit he didn't know more than me and let me do my job

      I think you hit it here - the problem is managers who won't admit that you know more than them, and are forever getting in the way and insisting you can do your job on a 386 on a card table in a rail yard to save money. Manager who knows less but empowers team and works for their benefit: great! Manager who knows so little that s/he thinks enterprise solutions appear magically if s/he says enough buzzwords: booo!

    9. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm a hardcore programmer. Well, at least I was. 2 years into my first job out of college, I got offered another job and the only way my current company could match was to promote me. The promotion came with other benefits such as bonus/stock opts./etc, so I couldn't pass it up.

      I had no experience with management, but knew that there were people out there that could do a better job at web development than I could. So, I got the chance to hire some more people for my web dev group and hired super people that knew way more than I did. It ended up workout out great! I was honest about my skill level and let my people know that their expertice and creativity was always appreciated.

      I view myself as working for my employees instead of them working for me. I ask on a constant basis if they need anything or if there is anything I can do to help them complete their task. By them doing a great job, I do a great job, and that shoots right up the ladder.

      I also know that it helps to be passionate about what you do. I get excited when I think about web development and what it could do for the company and I see that it infects my team. They get excited about it too. They want to learn more and advance and make the corporate intranet easier to use and a pleasant experience for our users.

    10. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'd take a cut to have a Mgr that actually knew more than me.

      I'd settle for a manager who created a positive work environment. I've had a few and let me tell you, there's nothing quite like the feeling of actually looking forward to a good day at work, when you've spent years coming in at 7 or 8 and just trying to get through the day/week/month/year ...

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    11. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are four traditional roles for a manager:

      1) Manager - as in budget/resource/time management, project management
      2) Mentor - as in someone who guides, helps you find your way
      3) Teacher - someone who teaches actual information
      4) Facilitator - as in getting their team to work effectively

      1+4 dont need more knowledge or intelligence than their underlings.
      2+3 you would need at least as much expertise.

      A good manager would have all 4 qualities, but obviously its hard to find someone who can do all 4, but that person is definately worth leaving a company or taking a paycut to work for. Incidentally, in most surveys of why people leave work, it is because of an incompetent manager. I can't cite a source, but it should be easy to google.

      The OP should consider not just interesting work, but all the factors that can make him or her happier:
      Interesting work
      Adequate recognition
      Pay
      benefits/perks
      Opportunities for growth - not just raises and promotions, but professional growth
      flexible work arrangements

      I'm probably missing some, but the OP should take a hard look at ALL the things that contribute to satisfaction on the job, prioritize and go from there.

    12. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd agree 100% with parent.

      being a peon that works on an extremely high profile website application, I think it's great that I can go to the project manager and say how does that look, rather than having to look the code and telling me to make more exceptions to try and catch and so on. To be quite honest, many of my colleagues understand that she is the project manager because she:

      1: knows what each of us are good at
      2: doesn't get caught up in the technical details and looks at ease of use (just like our clients)
      3: knows what our clients like.
      4: knows how to do the lowest job in the company, and is fully qualified to take many positions in-between.
      5: listens to us, and actually helps design layouts on story boards for customer flows, and connects the website together.

    13. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posted anonymously because I don't want those nerds to get a big ego if they read this. Or more importantly, ask for raises.

      Right, because if you can continue to deceive them into accepting less pay then they are actually worth, that's money in your pocket. Just keep taking credit for their hard work and being the general cock bag you most certainly are.

    14. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhh....I think it's called humor.

    15. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by jcr · · Score: 1

      Well, a lot of people like working for someone they can learn from. Something like the apprenticeship model.

      I've had managers who were great teachers, and I've had managers who were clearly out of their depth. The very worst is a manager who thinks he's technical, and wants to waste your time by interfering with your work in order to try to demonstrate his technical skills.

      It's also quite possible to be a good, non-technical manager. Such a person takes it upon himself to get you what you need to get your work done. I think I've met maybe three or four of those in my entire career.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    16. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "If you're talking about project managers, I think they ought to know more than their underlings."

      I think that there are two entirely separate skill sets that you are trying to meld into one.

      1. Ability to mentor less experienced programmers and offer design and analysis.

      2. Ability to manage schedules and juggle multiple things at once.

      IMO, the first requires someone who can focus and ignore distractions. The second requires someone who can multi-task. These are fundamentally different personalities. To my mind, a project *manager* needs to be the second kind of person. You seem to be saying that you want a project manager to be the first kind of person. I would call that person the project lead or project architect. If you're trying to manager your projects with an engineer, I suspect that you will have a lot of badly managed projects.

      Also, the way to fix the problem of the better people being in lower paid jobs is simple: pay engineers more than managers. At my job, we have engineers at all levels, from people like me (at the bottom) to people reporting to the CEO. The engineers who report to the CEO get paid like vice presidents.

    17. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by st1d · · Score: 1

      Obviously, you've never held a management position, because if you had, you'd know that most managers have next to zero influence in salary decisions, especially when it comes to "floor" managers, the ones that you deal with on a daily basis. In addition, as a manager you tend to be very careful about exercising the influence that you do have. Anyone who has managed for a fair amount of time has probably been burned "helping" someone obtain a raise or other benefit, only to have that person leave the company soon after, or otherwise prove to your own superiors that you shouldn't bear much influence in that area.
      .
      After that happens a couple times, you simply learn to shrug and hope the skilled employee is smart enough to either work hard/well enough that you can confidently bring them to the attention of your superiors, all but forcing them to offer an increase, or smart enough to move on when the time arrives. Sadly, it's kind of a "once bitten, twice shy" thing, usually brought on by the employees' own actions, or those of former employees.
      .
      Eventually you learn what kind of employees you can "trust" with increases, but this generally depends as much on that employee's ability to be discreet as it does the quality of their work. Few things are as disruptive as giving an employee a raise, simply because everyone thinks they deserve more money. This is one of the reasons companies tend to "hire up" from outside the company, giving a new management opening to someone who was skilled worker of the same level as those they will manage at their former employer, especially at higher levels. When you promote someone, there is often (not always) jealousy of various sorts, and usually some dropoff in production because of it. When you hire in someone new, everyone can hate the new manager, but they don't try as hard to undercut them, because they don't see "their hard work" putting more money in the pocket of someone they should have been promoted ahead of. At higher levels, you don't want to lose a strong employee because you only had one opening and had to make a difficult decision, so you avoid it altogether and hire from outside of the company.
      .
      I'm sure there are probably managers out there that laugh wickedly at the thought of "scamming you out of what you're worth", but those folks are few and far between. I can't imagine a manager that wouldn't rather pay somewhat whatever it would take to make them work to the level of their ability, or at least enough to get them to quit complaining about whatever percieved wrongs they imagine.
      .
      To paraphrase Carlos Mencia, "If your job sucks, there's only one person you have to blame. Maybe you should have tried a little harder in school".
      .
      It's harsh, but sadly, very true.

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    18. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I have a really upside down view of how things should work. I don't think employees work for a manager. The manager works for them. The manager's job should be to help his/her employees be their most productive and effective. I once had an incredible manager that acted this way. He was very talented and a geat programmer. When I got stuck on something, he would come by my office and see how he could help.

      He always coded the most difficult pieces of our projects. When two team members were struggling to get their pieces to work together, he would help them get it working. He was very good technically. He worked on the hardest stuff, and he worked the hardest on the team. When he told me that what I was doing would not work in the context of our team's project I listened. Everybody listened. I would often disagree with the approach of other team members, but I was more pursuaded if he sided with them. Not because he was my manager. Because he had been up to his elbows in my code and in their code, and had the best understanding of the big picture and how to put it all together.

      The manager above him needed to be able to talk tech with our team and talk spin with the marketing guys. He had to be willing and able to roll up his sleeves in both camps. He had to be able to win my manager's trust the same way my manager won my trust and respect.

      Now I understand that a CEO can't practically be an expert in every aspect of a company that has achieved any real size and complexity. But managers at all levels should make themselves the servants of the team they manage. They should be able to fill assignments given to them by any of their team members. When they prove that they are that kind of an asset, they win the leadership position in the team.

      Startups frequently enjoy that kind of leadership. The founders have proven that they had the technical ability to get things off the ground along with the business and marketing acumen to get things as far as they are. Many of the employees are in awe of the founders because they have been able to achieve the present company. They are willing to be guided by the founders because the founders have a proven track record of more than just managing. It's hard not to respect the person that had the original ideas and did the original labor that is now providing your paycheck. When that person drops buy to see if they can help out in any way, you're going to listen to their "guidance."

    19. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by rblancarte · · Score: 3, Informative

      I will agree with what you say. I think it is very important to understand the role of a manager.

      That all being said, the real question was "Would you take less for more interesting work?"

      And that being said, the real question is - "How do you feel about your job?"

      Because, regardless if your job is "a waste of your talent/education" or you have a bad manager, etc, if you are happy at your job, then you should not leave. IMHO, happiness at your job is the most important thing. If you are happy, then you can deal with the work that is below your level of education.

      Now, if you are unhappy, then maybe this change of environments would be good for you, even with less pay. It is a choice you have to make.

      I would also say, from what the writer said, this person sounds kind of younger. Why not take a risk and see where it leads? You are young and can take these chances.

      Good luck.

      --
      It is human nature to take shortcuts in thinking.
    20. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So long as I can create ideas and others can realize them, I'm in good shape.


      Now a really *good* manager will also get the others to create the ideas for them.
    21. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Posting A.C. to avoid inflating the egos of one's employees works up to the point, wherein one's employees are skilled in the use of writing style analysis tools - and recognise your writing style from your e-mails.

      Gotcha, Rob.

    22. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      This is called "The Peter Principle," and there was a book published about it some years back. The Principle states, people tend to rise to the level of their incompetence.

      And that's all I have to say about that, heh.

    23. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      To paraphrase Carlos Mencia, "If your job sucks, there's only one person you have to blame. Maybe you should have tried a little harder in school".

      So you're branded for life? Do better in kindergarden and you'll have more opportunities in grade school.....college....job.

      I think it's more of a case of "Good grades may get you a job, but they won't keep a job."

      At what point do you have something beyond (unless it's another degree):

      Education
      ----------------
      B.S. Computer Science, X University, 1999

      ???

      Do you need that much room on your resume or do you take a chance of leaving it off and have someone assume you didn't get the paperwork or spent the time in prison?

      Come to think of it, how do people address criminal histories on their resumes?

    24. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny... usual worker who complains about their boss getting involved in their day to day work are usually the poor worker; they're scared the boss will realize how bad their work is.

      I could argue that there's different "level" of manager but I can certainly say that the first manager after the "geek" workers should definitely know about the technology. Otherwise, that manager is due to report whatever he's given and his role/job is redundant and should be cut.

      I personally think you're the one who doesn't know what he's talking about. Managers' skills are definitely important to an organization; they are the leaders. But you lead by example, not by title.

    25. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having said that, could you now justify why you get paid more?

    26. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "On the other hand, the best guys, the geeks, enjoy their line of work and would probably feel less satisfaction at the mgmt level. So they're stuck at a lower pay level, and like the parent suggests, probably would love to have something of a mentor working above them... it would give them some hope of advancement, careerwise."

      I work at a small company and consider myself to be one of the 'geeks', enjoying the fact that I can just program and needn't worry about customer relations and all that crap. My current project manager, though in a higher position than I am, is at a lower pay level. We started on the same day, but I am more important to the company (training a new person up to my level takes quite a while since I'm worked in in the tons of code we have, whilst training a new person up to the level of my project manager is not really that hard).

      Though my manager is in no way better than I am with code (he's an economist and has never even seen code if you ask me), I have no problems with him. He understands a bit about developing so he knows that coders making deadlines is something that only happens in stupid movies. And he lets me do my job without bothering me too much.

      I know there's little chance I'll advance 'careerwise' in this company, but is that really necessary? I've got a job I like, I've got superb hours, can work at home every now and then, we have an unlimited (and free) supply of coke here, and the pay is more than decent (and rises with experience, not with promotions).

      But in reply to the first guy: I'd stick with what you're having. Good friends where you work is a real benefit, certainly if your manager is included with those friends. The fact that you don't use your full degree is not very relevant unless you're really bored with your job (and think using more of your CS knowledge will help improve that). Work to live, don't live to work :) And working to live is so much easier if you can take it easy writing vba-scripts and make a lot of money :)

    27. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by xero314 · · Score: 1

      I know how to manage -- I hire folks that are smarter than me for a reason -- because if I wanted to do the job myself, I'd have hired someone stupider.

      Where do you work and are you hiring? Honestly I have a manager than is exactly the same and I am very happy with him as a manager because of this.

      Managers should be managers and nothing else. As long as a manager does not atempt to make decisions about things he is not knowledgeable about then there should be no issue about how "smart" he is. On the other hand people in non-management positions should not be asked to do managerial work, and shoul dbe allowed to focus on task more suitable to the skillset they were highered for. I say all this as I take the hours it is taking me to fill out an assesment of my work for the last year becuase some high up tought this would be a good idea, rather than allow our managers to do thier jobs and asses their direct reports themselves.

    28. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Come to think of it, how do people address criminal histories on their resumes? "

      I find that pulling out my 9mm when we get to that stage in the interview often breaks the ice. (although I still dont have a job - unless you class car jacking as a career?)

    29. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by AlecC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you're talking about project managers, I think they ought to know more than their underlings.

      I disagree. I work for a company which produces hardware. The Project Manager for whom I am working is usually a hardware engineer. Often a good hardware engineer. And one who can cut a fair bit of software - in these days of programmable devices, hardware looks a lot like software. But he has not got, and knows he has not got, my software skills. He cannot do my job, and would be wrong to try to.

      In multi-discipliniary teams, it is unreasonable to expect anyone to be able to master the all the skills used in the project. Managers have to have only enough skill to judge outcomes, not to do the work themselves.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    30. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Alejo · · Score: 1
      So long as I can create ideas and others can realize them, I'm in good shape.

      Exactly that kind of management thinking is why I dislike most IT managers. How can you evaluate your own ideas if you are not qualified? How can a qualified subordinate tell you you are completely wrong without upsetting you and risking your favor.

    31. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Americano · · Score: 1, Troll

      If you're talking about project managers, I think they ought to know more than their underlings. Management that deal in budgets, communicating with higher management, etc, seem totally different. [ . . . ] I would feel dispirited if someone were promoted past me because they couldn't function at the lower level. I've seen it several times (well, a couple times, but I haven't been in the corp. world long) where the clueless employee is promoted because mgmt doesn't want to risk taking the best guys off the lower-rung jobs.

      I disagree with this sentiment. There seems to be, amongst technical people especially, a preconceived notion that being promoted into management is some sort of a reward for a job poorly done. I won't argue that this *never* happens, but look at the skill sets that are required to be a good developer, project manager, or plain-old manager. They're vastly different. In the ~9 years I've been working as a software engineer, I've known a bunch of good managers, good project managers, and good developers. And I've seen plenty of people who are, at best, *mediocre* software engineers, who turn out to be absolutely brilliant project managers and managers, and conversely, plenty of brilliant software engineers who end up being complete hacks when they're given proj. mgmt or management responsibilities.

      I certainly wouldn't want to see a bad software engineer getting promoted into a senior *technical* role. But your logic that bad developers cannot be good managers is kind of like claiming that a brilliant doctor must also make a fantastic lawyer... or someone who's bad at being a fireman would also be a terrible chef.

      It sounds to me like you're more likely wishing for a senior TECHNICAL person on your team, i.e., an Architect-level job, who knows more than you, who can mentor you, and so on. And to that I say, "AMEN!"

      Don't make the mistake of assuming your boss is a complete moron just because he doesn't understand the minute details of your work. If he can't understand the general thrust of what you do, then take a step back, and figure out what you need to do to educate him, and communicate more effectively. However, it's not necessary for him to be able to replace you tomorrow in your job, and in fact, any boss who would purposely hire a staff that isn't better at development than he is, is going to wind up with a terrible product on his hands.

    32. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      because if I wanted to do the job myself, I'd have hired someone stupider.

      I guess in the end, that makes you smartier.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    33. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      This is Schwab trying to sound like he's a smartie for hiring smarter people [than he is].

      To borrow from borrow from Robert Goren, "...they have complementary skills...".

      It's salesmanship, which is to be expected.

      In a construction company, is a plumber smarter than a carpenter?

    34. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1
      de-scope unnecessary functionality while prioritizing core functionality
      Yeah, see, this kinda ruined your credibility. "De-scope" is managerial jargon, not English. Likewise with overuse of "priority" and "functionality".
      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    35. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You weren't making such a climb up Mount Soapbox - good insights.
      ____________________

      Some of this raised some thoughts of my own. I'm wondering if a good parallel in terms of "skills" or "talent" or "experience", would be in sports - whether they've had a good "hands-on" career, enough of a career to "understand the ropes", had a bad career but came away with enough knowledge, or has no playing experience at all. Also, differing sports require differing skill matches, just as the IT field does. e.g. In baseball, it's essentially hit, throw, catch, run. The various combinations & strengths in those combinations which determine where your position on the team can make the best use of you and how long they need you in that position. Personally, I like being a utility player, not the strongest in any one skill, but able to move around as desired, wanted, or needed. That changes how I match up with opportunities, and if someone asks me, "What are you the best at?" My blunt answer has to be "nothing". And I don't work at being or staying that way and I don't feel out of my league when I deal with specialists who could outcode me in a particular language or use of technology with a pencil in their teeth and blindfolded. I *love* the learning curve. People have a tendency to draw little comfort zones around them and dare only to look beyond it. I'm not afraid to ask stupid questions and those who gague me solely on my early questions frequently regret it in the future (if they want to make it a contest). I like sitting with blank paper beside me, taking notes, browsing deep & wide, frequently finding myself nested deeply in browser tabs as one thing leads to another, not unlike Theseus. With almost twenty years of Internet exposure, I've been able to watch the progression of the global technology framework and I'm happy with when it took place. Any earlier and I might have missed some things yet to come, but any later, and I would have missed the post-Krol explosion. I keep track of my ideas along the way and frequently find others are going to market with similar ideas, but much later. I've got an idea listed as "BookMark Market" or a "BookMarket", from the 2000-2001 timeframe, and we've since seen http://del.icio.us/ come to fruition, along with variations in operation. I got tired of the standard hierarchical system because it was so cumbersome and I got tired of porting my bookmarks around with me. I can't claim the including the element of AJAX^w remote scripting from the onset. That's something Google helped solidify into place.[1]

      On that note, that's the only social bookmarking system I've looked at and I waited until Yahoo! purchased it - such that it would be a bit more static - as in not likely to add anything exponentially over the status quo. I've read reviews of the others, but intentionally avoided visiting any of the sites - that way, I know the features I've scribbled over time aren't the result of contamination from outside influence; at least, not directly. I started with a GUI which leaps (a bit ) over where del.icio.us is now. Now, I just have to decide if I want to finish it and compete with the other #2s or grab something else and try to be first on something untried.


      [1] Speaking of AJAX, it looks like the "AJAX OpenAPI" and "Eclipse Foundation" are good chase words for staying current with AJAX, and hoping to avoid older (relatively speaking) aspects, as groups are forming to congeal what will be the longer-term direction of the technology.

      (I've got two tv series which need some airtime if anyone is interested ;) )

    36. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by tux_fairy · · Score: 0

      Keep the job, and start an open source project that excercises your exact talents you would like to use. That's what I do.

    37. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Nurgled · · Score: 1

      You make some good points, but my take on what the OP was getting at was that he wanted a manager who understands enough about the field to understand what the work entails. I assume from your comments that you are such a boss, in which case I would be happy to work under you if it wasn't for the fact that I already have such a boss! (maybe you're him; who knows? :) )

      The original article attracted my attention because I currently work for a well-below-average salary at a little company with 10 employees, four of which are full-time software developers. It was started by my boss, also the owner, who had earlier on in his career decided to go freelance and eventually started a company around his work. I only recently joined this company, at quite a dramatic pay cut, because I was being driven insane by my previous job. They constantly provided unrealistic deadlines, forcing me to work overtime. I also, as with the OP, felt that I wasn't really making use of my talents.

      The nice thing about a smaller company is that a single person can make more of a difference. I can see how my work directly affects the growth of the company, and my opinions on subjects outside of my job are listened to even if ultimately they decide I don't know what I'm talking about! Like the OP I don't have any major living costs so I really didn't need the salary I was earning before, and I'm much happier where I am now. For the OP I'd say that as long as he is sure about the security of the job he's transfering into then go for it. There are always other things to consider beyond salary and enjoyment, though as someone with no major financial responsibilities you can afford to take some chances in that respect. It certainly worked out for me, having now been at this company for about a year.

    38. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      I don't think I'd go to the extreme of a 50% paycut - but I have sort of done the opposite. I currently work in a job where I have the best manager imaginable. He knows every member of his team have their specialities and he'll listen and respect each of our views. He himself has excellent management skills, organisational skills AND a good "general" knowledge of each of the areas of specialisation within his team.
      I was offered a job for just under twice what I'm making now, but I could tell the situation would have been terrible, so I turned it down.

      So, in short, I don't think I'd take a paycut for a better position, but I'll happily pass up a huge payrise to keep my current good position - which you may interpret as being the same sort of thing.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    39. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by wlj · · Score: 1

      If you are still negotiating, look for an equity participation. If the new company is in the very early stages any position you get (or are promised) will get diluted, but it still makes sense.

      If you go back into the job market after the start-up (for whatever reason) this approach will look much more rational to anyone you interview with AND you get the advantages you already outlined.

      Good luck.

    40. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by darkmeridian · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You will never enjoy your work. Work will always suck. Your boss will always be bad. Your co-workers will always be idiots. It's you, not the work. Take the money, save it up, and try for early retirement.

      Really. How many times do we hear, "My boss is an idiot" and then the guy goes onto say, "They offered me a job in management, but I'm no manager so I turned them down"? If you think all your co-workers are jerks, no matter wear you work, then perhaps you are a jerk. Anyway, work is not going to be fun for long because you get good at it. Once you get good at it, it's boring. Why do you think professional athletes get so amazingly blase? They play for a living, and yet, it still gets boring for them because they have to do it every day

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    41. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Jr.Guy · · Score: 1

      you are a stupid ass manager. how do i know.

    42. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by msobkow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You neglected another key point of the real question -- which company is going to be around next year? 2 years? 5? 10?

      What if the interesting job is with a company that has no perceived revenue stream, a dot-bomb tech-driven business plan (whether they label it 2.0 or not), and no real business plan other than a hope to be bought out? Are you really that "interested" in finding another job when they start bouncing paycheques on their way to bankruptcy?

      Unfortunately that's the real world of most startups. Great talk, great perks, low pay, long hours, no business future, no budget.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    43. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem with doing a job that does not come to the level of your abilities or education, is that it gets boring really quickly. I am in that situation right now. I do enjoy what I do, it's not a bad job, but it lost its challenge a long time ago and is now quite boring. When you're not as interested in your job, it's hard to keep motivated to care and continue to do your best. That said, if you come across a job that will be more fun and will use yoru skills and education more fully, i would say go for it even if it means a paycut. If the lower income will still be comfortable and not drop you to the level of say...what I make (spare change and pocket lint), go for it. Job satisfaction is more important.

    44. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by sbinning · · Score: 1

      Ask yourself not what you get from the job but what do you "become" from this job. The first couple of jobs you have out of school you should learn more about the IT industry. You may find you enjoy doing macros is more satisfying, doubtful. If you take a cut in pay it will not have a significant impact on your life style. I would go for it.

    45. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by wjsteele · · Score: 1

      Let me get this straight. You've picked the largest deployed Operating System out there as a target for poor management?

      Your basis is the poor "quality and delays." We've got humans involved here and there are bound to be mistakes.

      You might not like Microsoft (or their products) but you have to admit, their products are selling like hotcakes and are generally a good product. They do have issues, however, but not that many compared to the complexity of the development project. I fail to see now they negatively affect Microsoft. I don't think that the Windows project within Microsoft is a failed project by any measure due to lack of good management... I argue on the contrary - their excellent management made it what it is today, the #1 selling OS - failed projects don't generate billions of dollars for a company.

      I know you're going to respond about delays of Vista, etc. But I'm sure they have their reasons and it might have been a good management decision to have the delay. Perhaps you're simply not aware of all the issues involved.

      Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    46. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by heck · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Are you really that "interested" in finding another job when they start bouncing paycheques on their way to bankruptcy?

      The above is the more important question. I would say "if you're young, single, and want good experience, take the dot-com job for the experience." It may work out - and you make oodles - but more you get the experience. But - realize you've got possibility of crazy hours; your job could evaporate; you need to realize that while Task A may be due tomorrow, that could be quickly trumped by Emergency B where you quickly have to learn skill Q (not saying that can't happen anywhere; but large multinationals tend to have schedules that stick because there are more people to spread tasks around, and the skillset tends to be in house...somewhere); etc.

      If you're risk averse - and coming out of college I knew several people that were - than stay put. You'll be happier overall, even though you know the work isn't as challenging as it could be.

      Now if you have a family and large bills the question changes. But you didn't give me that impression.

    47. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually did this a few years ago, going from a frequent flyer IT manager to a group manager for awhile then a purely tech post. It has been a good choice for me; during the manager years, I got away from my love of tech which actually got me into this business in the first place. Lots less stress now, it actually *is* more interesting than the endless strings of meetings, emails, reviews and such, but yes, it does pay less. Tough to have it all. Lifestyle change for me, worked, and has put me back in touch with that love of tech that got me going way back then.

    48. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by odyaws · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry but you have absolutely no clue about what you are talking about. Managers do not have to a complete understanding of what their staff members do. The managerial skills they possess are equally important to the an organization's success as your technical skills.

      When I was graduating college, the best interview I had was at a small aerospace research center in Palo Alto (run by Lockheed, but not the gigantic Missiles and Space in Sunnyvale). This was a hardcore R&D facility, with something like 80% Ph.D.'s working there. The manager I would have worked for had I not decided to go off to grad school had a "mere" master's degree and little understanding of his underlings's jobs beyond a superficial level. And yet, they all loved him. The reason? He knew what he knew and what he didn't, and he let the talented people under him do their jobs with minimal interference. His job was to find projects for them and make sure the resources they needed were in place so they could focus on the work they had devoted their lives to and not the everyday BS. In my mind this is exactly what a manager of technical people is for.

      I later went on to work for JPL in Pasadena. I had good managers and bad in my time there, and some of the worst have been highly skilled technical people who had then been promoted to management. Although they had the skills and intelligence to do my job, they weren't good at handling the management tasks required of them. Again, some of the best were less technically talented people who were able to recognize that and not interfere, instead working to take care of all the administrative stuff so I didn't have to worry about it while devoting 80+ hour weeks to mission success.

      As an answer to the original question, JPL was a place where I certainly did not make nearly the money I could elsewhere, but the opportunity to work with an incredibly talented bunch of people on work that was unique (and I felt, important) was well worth it.

      --
      Still trying to think of a clever sig...
    49. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

      If you want to see an example of how poor management performance can negatively affect the output of a company, you only need look at the windows OS development unit.

      3 letters RCN.
      How not to run a company:
      1) Buy up all the best Dialup ISP's with good tech support/customer service.
      2) Decide since techs are just phone monkeys, anyone can do it.
      3) Declare that underpaid,overworked techs desire to help people will offset the fact that performance bonuses are paid for keeping call time to a minimum.
      4) Tell you're techs that customer satisfaction indexes are higher for companies who's customers have a few small easily fixed problems than those companies that just work.
      5) Delay maintenance on all equipment.
      6) Decide since Dialup is not part of your core business plan, it's unimportant and should be scrapped - even if it's the only division in the company turning a profit.
      7) Look stunned that you're bankrupt.
      ** Yes I had a manager tell me 3, and a VP tell us 4. 2 I can only infer from the 'Universal Agent' philosophy and the people they brought in.
      Is it any wonder that the VP of Internet technology opted for his golden parachute after 9 months.

    50. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Actually what he's talking about seems to be more along the lines of "The Dilbert Principle" - incompetent people get promoted to positions where the higher ups feel they can do the least damage.

    51. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Mikmorg · · Score: 1

      I would disagree with this way of looking at a managerial position. When heading up any sort of group, including an entire business, you should be at least mildly educated in each sect under your authority. This tends to be a well known method of management. While I do not claim to be an actual business owner, I have been educated on the topic from different sources (books, networking, classes, etc.). While I do agree on the topic that one must be able to cut a project when necessary, this does not constitute incompetance in the technical fields you're overseeing. In fact, without a general understanding, you may be more likely to make mistakes in this particular decision making, among many other important decisions. I'm also not saying that you should hold the hand of everyone under you; that is theoretically impossible; but what is not impossible is the ability to communicate on their level to come to a much better understanding of their (and hence your) situations. Anyway, thats my 1.5 cents on the subject.

      --
      Codito, ergo sum.
    52. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by DuckDodgers · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If you mean it is always good to have a skilled, intelligent manager, then I agree.

      If you mean you would like a manager that is skilled in the tools and programming languages that you use, I disagree. My current boss and his superior are both good managers. They prioritize items, they help plan projects and provide reasonable time estimates, and they're willing to spend the required money to get the tools, software, and other items we need to get the job done. My boss has never programmed anything, and his boss hasn't done any software development in 15 years.

      My last boss was, hands down, the best software developer out of the 10 developers at the company. He would modify the Linux kernel for different hardware, write a display driver for Windows XP on another device, create network tools, anything. However, getting detailed project specifications out of him was harder than squeezing blood from a stone and he would never, ever sit down and take part in project planning. You would get a one page feature description out of him, and the next time you had any input would be harsh criticism on the failings of the finished version. More importantly, you had to fight like crazy to get funds for anything out of him. The amount of time we spent waiting in line - literally - for a turn to use a particular piece of hardware was absurd. This genius software developer probably wasted $75,000 a year in salary for unproductive employees for each of the four years I was there because he was too cheap to spend $15,000 on two extra servers and a handful of spare hardware items.

    53. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "In a construction company, is a plumber smarter than a carpenter?"

      Depends, if there's a leak on one of the pipes, who would you rather fix it? The carpenter or the plumber?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    54. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The managerial skills they possess are equally important
      > to the an organization's success as your technical skills.

      What if all managers get together to write a Linux kernel?

      At least geeks made it without managers! :-)

    55. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doing interesting work is only one part of the equation. The other part is learning from others things that you may not learn in college - design, architecture, management, performance tuning, etc. Are your entry level developers learning from their more experienced colleagues? Are you imparting your management expertise to those that you manage? If not, then I think your employees are missing out...

    56. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by starfishsystems · · Score: 1
      Why?

      Well, the answer goes to the heart of the discussion at hand.

      Many people in this field are attracted by interesting work. What makes work interesting is the opportunity of learning and developing new insights. For technical people, the focus of interest is primarily technical.

      A manager who can lead staff to these insights is worth gold. I have the enormous fortune of working for one. He knows the subject matter comprehensively, so I can go to him for advice and insight, and I can trust his judgement in areas where I have to take his judgement on faith. He hires extremely capable people, so I'm surrounded by colleagues who also contribute toward an effort based on merit and collegiality.

      He also understands how to manage people, and he does it very generously. This is, of course, a very important characteristic to have in a manager, but my point is that it is not sufficient in a technical manager. A really competent technical manager can afford to lay back a bit because he will have a complete read of the situation, not just a fractional one based primarily on a feel for personality.

      Naturally enough, managers who lack technical ability tend to discount any suggestion that it really matters. How could they do otherwise and still persist in their profession? But that state of denial is exactly the problem. Sure, I've had a couple of managers who were not technically strong, but were really decent. Because of their humanity, those situations were quite tolerable. They were, however, not excellent. I would not take a pay cut for them.

      --
      Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
    57. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but wasn't the Dilbert Principle, from what little I remember of it, explicitly stated to be a mutation of the Peter Principle?

    58. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by The+Spoonman · · Score: 1

      I know how to manage -- I hire folks that are smarter than me for a reason -- because if I wanted to do the job myself, I'd have hired someone stupider

      Here's the problem: you're in an increasingly small minority of people. You're not a manager, you're a leader. There's a significant difference between the two. A leader understands the purpose of each member of their team is to provide skillsets that the leader doesn't possess and utilizes the skillsets within their group to produce results. You ask for solutions, and let your people provide you the best ones. After all, they're the ones you hired to provide those solutions. Conversely, a manager is a twit who was promoted into their position via the Peter Principle. They read books like "Who moved my cheese" and think they know how to lead a group of people. They refuse to hire qualified people because, frankly, they may be found out to be a moron and thus get themselves fired. Hiring the less qualified becomes a job security strategy. When a solution is needed, they provide it themselves and hand the actual implementation over to their people. If it doesn't work, the failure is placed on the implementer instead of the manager who came up with the failed solution. After all, if they were so smart, they'd be managers, too. Wouldn't they?

      Unfortunately, there's no way to fix this problem. Who would fix it if you could? The managers? That would require them to admit they're failures and move aside to let qualified individuals take the reins. As corporations become bigger, the need for leaders becomes greater. Unfortunately, leaders aren't made, they're born that way. It's a limited subset of the human population, so you hire what you can get and hope for the best.

      Yeah, it's a bleak outlook, but it's realistic...

      --
      Which is more painful? Going to work or gouging your eye out with a spoon? Find out!
      http://www.workorspoon.com
    59. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but that's like saying that "Do unto others before they do unto you" is a mutation of "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you." The message is really quite different. Peter's Principle involves promoting good employees to positions they're unqualified for, while Dilbert's Principle involves promoting bad employees to those position. jkauzlar's post talked about the latter case. It's true, though, that in both cases you wind up with unqualified managers.

    60. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by WaterBreath · · Score: 1

      I'm just a peon, by anyone's standards, but I would feel dispirited if someone were promoted past me because they couldn't function at the lower level.

      You shouldn't feel like the only way you can be promoted is into a management position. If that's the environment where you work, then there is a flaw or fault in their positional infrastructure. I would view promotion into a managment as a demotion. To me the higher salary offsets a more onerous task. I have no desire to go into that type of management, and I don't (right now, anyway) have the skills that would be necessary for it. That shouldn't leave me stuck at a dead end though....

      This is why many companies have two separate career tracks which can originate out of the developer or engineer position. My previous employer had just such a plan in place. As a level-I software engineer, if I had stayed and advanced there, I would have been given two options. Moving beyond level-III, I could go into a management track or stay on the engineer track. The engineer track (which included project management, a technical position) had more levels within the department than the manager track (which included team management, a resource management position). In fact the top-level engineering position in the IT department was almost guaranteed to make a salary greater than the top-level management position. In order to make more as a manager, you had to be at least the head of the whole IT department.

      Obviously, this type of infrastructure isn't necessarily feasible for smaller companies. Ours was a company of nearly 500 people (nearly half in sales), with 80 or so in IT.

      Anyway, to restate, you should be able to be promoted for technical skill, without being expected to take up a management position. A promotion into a management ladder is a recognition of different types of skills (resource management and interpersonal, for example), not a recognition of lesser or greater technical skills. It isn't one-way: I've known a lot excellent engineers who were promoted to management on that merit, but were terrible managers in practice. There should be a separate recognition of technical skill and experience, and an official designation, authority boost, and salary boost to go with it.

    61. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Danga · · Score: 1

      "In a construction company, is a plumber smarter than a carpenter?"

      Depends, if there's a leak on one of the pipes, who would you rather fix it? The carpenter or the plumber?


      Just because the plumber has more knowledge about pipes than the carpenter does NOT mean that the plumber is smarter. The plumber very well might be smarter, but just because he can fix a leak better than the carpenter doesn't mean he actually is smarter. As the other guy mentioned:

      To borrow from borrow from Robert Goren, "...they have complementary skills...".

      So assuming the carpenter had better carpentry skills than the plumber and vice versa, to put the whole house together they need each others skills working together if they want the result to be better than if each tried to build a house alone.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    62. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Draconomicon · · Score: 1

      I agree -- the manager's job is to manage, not to code. In fact, according to the Fair Labor Standards Act, a supervisor should spend no more than 20% of his workday in "non-managerial activities" -- in particular, doing the same tasks as those 'under' him.

      That said, the manager needs to have a clue about what his people do and how they do it. I think the worst manager I ever had was one of these who thought that management skills were universal, so a good manager could do a good job managing any group of people, even if he had no experience at all with their type of tasks.

      On behalf of your team (even if I don't know who they are), THANK YOU for not micromanaging! There are very few things I hate worse than that. Personally, I tend to take the approach of, "Tell me what you want me to do, or tell me how you want me to do it. If you're going to do both of those, you might as well do it yourself."

      As for the original topic of whether I'd choose a "good team + good compensation + low utilization of skills" or "lower compensation + unknown team + higher utilization of skills," I would be *very* strongly tempted to choose the former. I *hate* being bored, and if my work isn't challenging me enough then I'll find things to do on my own, but a good team is worth their weight in gold, IMO.

      Perhaps the original poster should consider keeping his current position, and taking on an independent-contrator status with the startup company, committing to a small number of hours with them (assuming they're agreeable to this). That way, he gets the best of both worlds -- great team/benefits/pay, and stimulating project work.

      --
      You must be PRESENT to win!
    63. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      Hm, I'm unsure if this is accurate, but I'll admit it's been a while since I've heard much of the Peter Principle.

    64. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by heavyVoid · · Score: 1

      I agree. But as another poster said: if he is young, he can take the risk. The work doing OS development may look better on his resume than the one involving excel and macros..

      After all, people learning to become scientific researchers do start their careers with very very low wages, expecting the knowledge and the experience as the main reward.

      Of course, everything depends on his particular situation (whether he has/will_have a family to support, age, etc.)

    65. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by GolfBoy · · Score: 1

      If you've got mod points, mod this guy up.

      This isn't a tech question. This isn't a pay question. This is a life question.

      Decide what you want to do. Do that.

    66. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by zopf · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I worked in a lab with a brilliant EE prof as my advisor/manager, and I had a great time there. Had I felt more talented than him, I would not have been nearly as motivated or as happy. I also probably would not have felt any compulsion to create good ideas, as I wouldn't trust my manager to accurately assess them.

      --
      Did you see the pool? They flipped the bitch!
    67. Re: Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by gidds · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I was honest about my skill level and let my people know that their expertice and creativity was always appreciated.

      I think that's the important thing; the problem isn't with managers who have less technical knowledge than their people, but with managers who don't realise that. Or who don't think that matters.

      Back on topic, 'interesting work' was one of my main criteria when doing my last round of interviewing. But you've no idea how hard it is to explain 'interesting work' to recruiters or agencies! The most common reaction was that if I wanted to learn stuff and work with smart people, I should become a professor, and that if I wanted to be creative and take pride in my work, I should become an artist... :(

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    68. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by jsfetzik · · Score: 1

      From my experiences the type 1 person you mention would be called a Team Lead, while type 2 would be called a Project Manager. I completely agree that these are really two different types of people and have yet to come across anyone that can do both jobs well. Particularly at the same time.

    69. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
      Yeah, see, this kinda ruined your credibility. "De-scope" is managerial jargon, not English. Likewise with overuse of "priority" and "functionality".

      I'm sorry but I'm a developer and systems analyst. The jargon "descope" refers to dropping of features in release scope sessions where the team leads, system architects, analysts, and project managers decide which features are necessary and which are not for a release. That decision is based on consultation with the key stake holders of the project who provide priority for each element of functionality they would like to see. Due to time constraints, not all features they would like can be included within a release so a decision must be made to only include the higher priority items.

      I have a great deal of experience with project scope meetings. Do you think all developers work on fully defined specifications? I'm afraid that it is you that has ruined your credibility as anything more than a code monkey.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    70. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
      Bill, in my experience the quality of a software release will go down if end user/project stake holder expectations are not managed properly. When managers fail to manage expectations you can end up with developers working under unrealistic release schedules or feature scope. Such pressures can lead to a great deal of rushing/overtime which can lead to mistakes being made and shortcuts taken.

      I speak from experience that I cannot directly talk about but I have been following Vista/Longhorn for a number of years. These latest delays are the latest in a string of delays as Vista was supposed to be released last year originally. All of these issues only serve to illustrate that they project was poorly planned and executed. Given the resources MSFT has at its disposal, they should have been able to release WinFS and some of the more useful features by now as Vista/Longhorn "release 1" and delivered the rest a year or two later as Vista 2.0.

      I feel it was unrealistic to try to do everything in one shot and MSFT will have to pay for it down the road with bugs and security flaws.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    71. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1
      The jargon "descope" refers to dropping of features in release scope sessions where the team leads, system architects, analysts, and project managers decide which features are necessary and which are not for a release. That decision is based on consultation with the key stake holders of the project who provide priority for each element of functionality they would like to see. Due to time constraints, not all features they would like can be included within a release so a decision must be made to only include the higher priority items.
      "The customer tells us what they need, and we tell them what we can do in the time given to us. Then we decide what to do." See, that's what someone who speaks English should say. It's clearer and more consise.
      I have a great deal of experience with project scope meetings. Do you think all developers work on fully defined specifications? I'm afraid that it is you that has ruined your credibility as anything more than a code monkey.
      I'm not a developer at all. I'm a mid-level sysadmin and desktop analyst at a midsize company with about a 100 person IT department. We have a handful of in-house developers, and about two-thirds of the department are system analysts of some kind (we have a lot of highly specialized systems). IMX, people who speak like you do tend to be all-fluff-no-buff. I'm sure you have lots of experience with project scope meetings. It certainly sounds like exactly that.

      I'm sorry, I'm really not trying to insult you personally. It just irritates me that I have to spend extra time decoding what people standing right in front of me are actually saying. It's bad enough when I have to decode some poorly written documentation written by someone who speaks English as a second language. I shouldn't have the same problem with someone who grew up 20 miles from me.

      Sometimes the jargon is a necessary element of the conversation because it is more precise about the topic, but jargon shouldn't be used just because it exists. Adding technical BS to what you're saying serves only to obfuscate your meaning, and communicating meaning is what we're trying to do, right? Try asking some of the code monkeys you work with to define "scope". If they can't, then everytime you say that word to them, you're speaking nonsense to them. You sound like one of Charlie Brown's teachers.

      For example, my team is currently short staffed. Me and my team members have heard the word "priority" from our boss so often in the past six months that it no longer makes any sense. Everything is a priority, and so now nothing is a priority. Priority is a joke, now.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    72. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1
      Your boss SHOULD KNOW MORE than you do!!! Otherwise he is not competent. I've had more than my share of total dolty bosses we could run around by the nose
      By your logic, the CEO of every Fortune 500 company should be an uber-janitor.

      fuck, once, we even delayed a research project by stalling it for 6 months, and the happy-go-lucky boss didn't notice anything.
      There is a grid of possibilities. Either your boss was totally ignorant, or your project was totally unimportant, or some combination of both.
      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    73. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
      I'm not a developer at all. I'm a mid-level sysadmin and desktop analyst at a midsize company with about a 100 person IT department. We have a handful of in-house developers, and about two-thirds of the department are system analysts of some kind (we have a lot of highly specialized systems). IMX, people who speak like you do tend to be all-fluff-no-buff. I'm sure you have lots of experience with project scope meetings. It certainly sounds like exactly that. I'm sorry, I'm really not trying to insult you personally. It just irritates me that I have to spend extra time decoding what people standing right in front of me are actually saying. It's bad enough when I have to decode some poorly written documentation written by someone who speaks English as a second language. I shouldn't have the same problem with someone who grew up 20 miles from me.

      We don't have code monkeys. Everyone I work with understand what phrase "project scope" means. Maybe products of the US educational system have a problem with the English language but Canadians such as myself do not.

      Now if our Sys Admins have no problem with the word and you do, who has the problem here? Here is a definition of project scope management.

      English is my second language but I have no difficulty understanding these terms or learning new languages. Do not blame me for your learning deficiencies.

      I hope all of that jargon on the wikipedia page did not scare you but IT professionals regularly have to learn to deal with jargon day in and day out. It is the same for virtually any professional.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    74. Re:Paycut for a more intelligent Mgr by stanmann · · Score: 1

      More on the topic, the foreman and Architect don't have to know how to run pipe or lay timber to direct the carpenter and plumber or draw the lines on the plans.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  2. Less pay, more stimulation by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

    Yes.

    1. Re:Less pay, more stimulation by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 2, Funny

      I keep telling this to my wife, but she's still mad I see that hooker. :)

      --
      Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
      Africus aut Europaeus?
    2. Re:Less pay, more stimulation by Pii · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Why settle for one or the other?

      If you've got a good salary, and good benefits, stay where you are while you search for an opportunity that can provide you with the kind of environment that you're after without having to sacrifice your current standard of living.

      It's not 2002 anymore... You can have a job that you like, and get paid well for it.

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    3. Re:Less pay, more stimulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes.

      Well, that's a simple and straightforward answer :)

      However, I've been in almost the exact same situation as the poster, and I did leave my job (even left the city and moved!) and there's been good and bad effects.

      First off, I miss all the friends I left behind. Perhaps it was because I moved to a whole new city and didn't have any social network there at all, but it was difficult and I've definitely had some lonely moments. The folks at my former job were my friends before I joined the firm, and they are even now that I've left, and I still miss 'em. I go back to Boston every chance I get :)

      The pay cut wasn't too bad, though. I did just manage to buy myself a condo in one of the most expensive real estate markets in the country, but I would have owned myself a home three years ago if I'd stayed in Massachusetts because my former employer was willing to give me a large raise to keep me on.

      And I will say this-- I was doing the same kind of Word/Excel/VBA and sysadmin stuff, and I left my job (and moved) for an opportunity to do genuine cutting edge R&D and software development, and the change was totally worth it. Three years later and I'm still excited to come to work every day. Every day I wake up, I think "my job totally kicks ass!" How many people can say that?

      So consider whether you're willing to part ways with your friends, how much of a pay cut you'll be taking, what your prospects for advancement are in the current position versus the new one, where you are in your life and how they're all interrelated. Some food for thought, anyway...

    4. Re:Less pay, more stimulation by richardtoohey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would try and change the work itself to use tools/techniques that you are interested in. Show that there is a better / cheaper / faster / more elegant way. Use code generators to knock up the code that is needed for the job in hand - in half/quarter/whatever of the time - and with the spare time learn something else.
      Empower *yourself* to make *your* job more interesting. Take yourself (and the role you occupy) to the next level. Save your stonking salary in a bank account while your outgoings are low. If your current employers don't notice you and your new skills and your better ways of doing things - you've just got a lot of money in the bank and a lot of skills - the world is your oyster.

    5. Re:Less pay, more stimulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen brother. I graduated college in 2002 and everyone hired for a large multinational software company with me was in the same boat-- it was the only serious offer we received, and it was about 10k off of what they offered for starting college grads in 1999 and 2000.

      Quite a disappointment, but it's better now.

    6. Re:Less pay, more stimulation by TechieHermit · · Score: 1

      No problem! Here's a website with instructions! MUCH more stimulation in fact...

      http://www.leisuretown.com/library/qac/2.html

    7. Re:Less pay, more stimulation by TTK+Ciar · · Score: 1

      Me too .. and right now, I am.

      I have traditionally been willing to trade off between interesting work, more responsibility, informal atmosphere, better commute, and compensation. When I was at TSG, the commute was pretty good, and I had a lot of responsibility (I was the entire IT staff -- sysadmin, programmer, and webmonkey), but the salary was lower than at FCI and the work was less challenging. Right now at The Archive, the work is really, really interesting, with a fair measure of responsibility, and a great amount of informality, but the commute is the worst I've ever had (75 to 90 minutes each way) and the compensation is barely better than TSG's. I've thought about leaving and making half again as much at a for-profit corporation, but it would mean giving up on too many interesting prospective projects which The Archive would pay me to pursue.

      Sometimes, though, more interesting work can mean better pay further down the road. If you work in a specialty field which interests you more, you will learn more about it and accomplish more, which looks very good on a resume or performance evaluation. If this specialty field is more lucrative than what you had previously been doing, then you can net a higher salary in the long term.

      For instance, I already knew how to make money developing compiler technology, but decided distributed processing would be more interesting, so I switched gears and started over as a newbie. It was a good decision, and has brought me more satisfaction, and potentially more salary (if I ever leave The Archive), than continuing my career in compiler technology could have delivered.

      -- TTK

    8. Re:Less pay, more stimulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last year I did. The ability to add some really awesome experience to my resume has been invaluable, but most of all I saved myself from a horrible job that I hated (politics and horrible code). Now, well, the market appears good enough so taking pay cuts is not neccessary -- or at least I've reached the magic 5+ year experience mark. But yes, if a small paycut is the only way out of heck, get out of there. Your sanity is the most important thing you have; we all stay at work too long each day to dislike what we do.

    9. Re:Less pay, more stimulation by akaina · · Score: 1

      That's exactly where I'm at right now. I'm young just like the author and I do a lot of the same types of work that the author describes, the pay is also good, especially when you become appreciated for prompt reliable data from senior management.

      Although I feel this work isn't as cutting edge as it could be, I know I don't have to stop at impressing my manager. So I take every opportunity to do extra side-projects that help me maintain and build my skills in other languages like ASP.NET, perl, python, and javascript.

      It's VERY important to incubate your skills at all times.

      I'm a huge fan of startups though. If you really think you can get mega wealthy at a young age, I highly recommend taking the risk. Just make sure you get excellent referrals, already have funding lined up, and you're ready to work your ass off.

      --
      Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose.
    10. Re:Less pay, more stimulation by cloudezero · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you work man, but you have totally drank the Kool-Aid.

    11. Re:Less pay, more stimulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that. If you're good, and you aren't currently overpaid (which you might well be at a consulting firm), then you shouldn't have to take a pay cut to go to a startup. That is, you shouldn't have to take a cut in base pay; your total compensation may well suffer a bit because of lost benefits (no employee stock purchase, poorer health insurance, etc.)

  3. NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    NOOOOOOOOOOO

  4. dupe / this has been posted before by TouchOfRed · · Score: 0, Troll

    I saw this same question asked about 6 months ago. The general concencus is what do you want to do, not slashdot crowd. although if you are really that one dimensional and need the slashdot crowd to give you an answer, you might as well stick with the higher paying job :P

  5. CS Degree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Where did you get your degree and how good exactly are you at programming? Maybe you should stick with doing nothing.

  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. Get Together by imoou · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You should get together with this guy and start a company which does programming-intensive and patent-free works.

    I find that this is a common greener-grass syndrome where one doesn't realize how lucky one is, however this is a good syndrome because that is what got us human-beings to where we are today. Imagine what would the world be if we didn't invent TV and we had to sit on an empty couch all day?

    My advice is to try out some part-time works that utilize your talents, this will give you time to understand what your talents and interests are without risking what you have right now.

    1. Re:Get Together by name773 · · Score: 1

      the world would be much better off without television. you wouldn't be sitting on the couch, you'd be doing something.

    2. Re:Get Together by aborchers · · Score: 4, Funny

      " the world would be much better off without television. you wouldn't be sitting on the couch, you'd be doing something."

      Maybe if you watched more television, you'd learn how to recognize a joke from the laugh tracks.

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    3. Re:Get Together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how the link in your sig just sends Google results, and then the main site has AdSense content on it. Way to not do one shred of original work and try to get some kind of credit.

    4. Re:Get Together by Moggyboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. A colleague at a previous job said to me once, "The three aspects of a job you can be happy with are 1. money, 2. people, 3. work. If you're satisfied with at least two of these aspects, stick with it." I laughed at him at the time, and have jumped from job to job for the last six years, purely in the pursuit of higher salary every time. Now I've come to realize that he was right - it's pretty darn hard to find a job that has all three, and sometimes it's better the devil you know. A job is a means to an end, and facilitates the other things in life that you really enjoy. If you're feeling mentally unchallenged, find a hobby that DOES challenge you.

      --
      Work smarter, not harder.
    5. Re:Get Together by jafac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Work hard and save up enough money to retire early.

      Then spend the rest of your life contributing to open source projects.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    6. Re:Get Together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree almost..
      And ofcourse Location matters..
      Im working in Salem,OR and hardly see sunshine and that matters..
      Considering moving to Dallas bac

    7. Re:Get Together by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      You forgot: 4. Babes. Eyeballing sexy babes can be very relaxing and exciting at the same time. Nothing like the sight of a good hind end to relieve stress.....even if you can never (physically) touch it.

    8. Re:Get Together by st1d · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >>A job is a means to an end, and facilitates the other things in life that you really enjoy.

      I couldn't agree more, but it's always amazing to me how many people see their job as a major part of their worth as a human being. If they have a bad day at work, they go home and kick around the family a while, get drunk or drugged up, or otherwise compound the effect of a single bad day. Of course, it's hard not to see things like this, because they're practically drilled into you from a young age. What your dad did for a living tends to set the stage for how you grow up, in the sense that whatever job he had you tend to want to at least meet that level of success for yourself. If you don't, you're a "failure".

      Somehow, a few of us manage to break that cycle, and realize a job for what it is, a way of earning enough to create a means of doing the things we really enjoy, whether it's traveling around the world, feeding a hobby, etc. Without having some sort of goal like that you're simply chasing rainbows, because there will always be someone who makes a little more, has a little more interesting job, a little less stress, etc.

      Of course, the saddest situation is when you see someone whose job has become their life, and this is common whether you're working at a fortune 500 office complex, or tiny machine shop. We've all worked with that one person who had no life outside of work, whose only hobbies were gossiping about coworkers and trying to stir up fights to entertain themselves. These are the folks that get fired and show up the next day with a shotgun. If you're falling into this category, get the heck out!

      You should enjoy work, and find it stimulating on some level, though. Perhaps not your duties (I'd be worried about the janitor that looks forward to cleaning the bathrooms), but some aspect of your job that you deal with on a regular basis, maybe working with your coworkers, customers, or simply (like myself) watching company dynamics (watching how various parts of the company interact, for better or worse) in action. You should also make enough to pay the bills, spend on whatever hobbies you have, and put away for later. Lastly, you should have a position that allows you to spend time with your friends and family, and on your hobbies.

      If you can do all three, the dollar amount is kind of like a high score on a video game. Cool to have, but not all that important in the long run.

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    9. Re:Get Together by ornil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I couldn't agree more, but it's always amazing to me how many people see their job as a major part of their worth as a human being

      But work is a major part of your life. It takes about half of your waking hours. Your hobby can't come near it. Call me stupid, but not being satisfied during majority of your time is only marginally better than not being satisfied at all. Of course you don't need to go crazy over it, but it's pretty damn important, and being happy doing what you do there is also pretty damn important.

    10. Re:Get Together by TERdON · · Score: 1

      Aren't babes (technically) people too?

      --
      I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
    11. Re:Get Together by Flashbak · · Score: 1
      Whilst the 1,2,3 rule sounds like good logic, I think it would probably encourage you to stay with a job that isn't good for you.

      It's quite possible to find yourself in a job you quite enjoy, i.e. the work isn't particuarly taxing and you get along with the people. Quite often if you stay long enough, the pay will become quite good, I know far too many people who having stayed at a company for many years and built a healthy salary - suddenly discover they'd have to take a pay-cut if they move because they're being paid far more than the job (and by extension their skills) merit in the open marketplace.

      If you analyse what you're doing, you're sticking with an easy unchallenging job. Which ultimately will generate a void in your CV - and you will regret it! (Here speaks the voice of experience!)

    12. Re:Get Together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The three aspects of a job you can be happy with are 1. money, 2. people, 3. work. If you're satisfied with at least two of these aspects, stick with it."

      On recent experience, I cannot agree with you. For me 1 and 2 are OK. 3 was wrong, though I didn't realise it For the Pratchett fans, my boss was acting like Archchancellor Ridcully - a situation that had grown up over years. A recent boadroom change abruptly removed him - literally the day I had been intending to tell him I was about to do what this thread is all about - hunt for a lower paid job with a better boss.

      I cannot believe the change it has made to me. I am a happier person at both work and home. I should ahve made the change years ago. Luckily for the company, they got there just in time.

      (Posting as AC because I know a few colleagues read this, and I don't want to hurt the old manager now he has gone).

    13. Re:Get Together by odyaws · · Score: 1
      I've often felt there are two good ways to get a lot of satisfaction out of your job:

      1. Have a job that may take a lot of commitment, but provides big rewards in terms of satisfaction. That is, you feel the work is important and meaningful. I spent time as an engineer at JPL, and this definitely fell into this category - the hours were long and the pay not great, but the work itself was amazing. Many people there have very little lives outside of work for years at a time when things get busy, but they do it in exchange for the chance to work on something meaningful.

      2. Have a job that pays well, doesn't suck, and generally takes 40 hours or less of your life, freeing you to fill the remaining hours with rewarding hobbies and other interests. I've had friends work as engineers at Boeing, and this was the model for most of their coworkers. Many of them were very happy to leave the job at the door and do all sorts of other things outside of work.

      I find I'm happiest with number 1, but many people are different.

      --
      Still trying to think of a clever sig...
    14. Re:Get Together by Senobyzal · · Score: 1
      I solve this conundrum by enjoying my hobbies at work. It's amazing how much writing (fiction) you can get in between projects and during breaks, and I've sketched out the plot for many a Neverwinter Nights module during a two-hour staff meeting.

      This may just be empty rationalization, but I think it helps my work performance as well; when I'm focused only on work, my mind wanders easily and I don't end up getting as much done in the course of a day.

    15. Re:Get Together by mclaincausey · · Score: 1
      A job is a means to an end, and facilitates the other things in life that you really enjoy.
      Is that really always the case? Think of social workers, teachers, and other professions that involve self-sacrifice--professions that could be called "callings." If you are pursuing a calling, then your job is a means to a greater end than financial restitution: it becomes a source of pride, identity, and purpose.

      I, for example, had a decent job and a comfortable life before I realized that I had to go back to school for a computer science degree to realize a higher calling. I love programming and administering computers, and find the work meaningful and satisfying. So a job is a means to an end for me, yes, but those ends are meaningful. To actually enjoy going to work, and to be compensated well for it, becomes an unbelievable state of affairs: "They're paying me for this? I'd do it for free!" It's not always just about money, and people who think that way might carve out happiness during their nonworking hours, but for the rest of the week, they're stuck doing something they'd rather not be doing.

      --
      (%i1) factor(777353);
      (%o1) 777353
    16. Re:Get Together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you be sat on an empty couch?

    17. Re:Get Together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can agree with you to some extent, but not wholely. Think about it: would you feel the same way if you were a surgeon? Although I'm still many, many years from becoming one, I intend to train as a neurosurgeon. Now I can totally agree that if you let everything you experience get to you, then you're never going to make it as any sort of doctor, but if you just consider your job a means to an end what kind of worker are you going to be? Would you put that kind of thing on a CV?

      Personally, I don't think I could live with a job that is simply a means of making money so I can do other things I enjoy. If I could, I'd go with my strongest subject (maths) and get some soul-destroying job as a city banker... but in my opinion, a job should be so much more. Now I'm not saying it should take priority over family/friends/etc, but I certainly don't think it should be seen as a one-track exercise.

      Just my £0.02

      Ben

    18. Re:Get Together by rjstanford · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But work is a major part of your life. It takes about half of your waking hours.

      Oh, really? You're awake about 128 hours a week. You're at work about 40, leaving almost 90 hours free. If you structure your life around the concept that your time is valuable (live close to where you work, not an hour's drive from anywhere, even if it means a smaller house (which means less expensive crap to stuff into it, etc)), that's quite a bit of time.

      Unless you work on the weekends, of course. In which case, I recommend not doing that.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    19. Re:Get Together by PatentThis · · Score: 1

      Hey, yeah! Bring it on! GreenerGrass Inc. We don't make any money, but by Cthulhu we feel good about what we do.

    20. Re:Get Together by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      You are not thinking like a guy :-)

  8. Not Perfect by Cave_Monster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's hardly 'an otherwise perfect job' if it's mundane, boring and you are contemplating taking another job that involves a paycut.

    1. Re:Not Perfect by Lord+Ender · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, but if his pay really is that good, he could keep it, invest the extra pay like mad, and once he has enough invested to lived off the dividends, he can then do WHATEVER work he wants REGARDLESS of pay in a completely stress-free life.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    2. Re:Not Perfect by TallMatthew · · Score: 1
      Yes, but if his pay really is that good, he could keep it, invest the extra pay like mad, and once he has enough invested to lived off the dividends, he can then do WHATEVER work he wants REGARDLESS of pay in a completely stress-free life.

      Trading happiness in your twenties/thirties for freedom in your fifties/sixties is hardly a good trade. The whole "work hard while young so you don't have to work anymore" idea is a great way of getting people to trade in their youthful energy for a few extra bucks. I wouldn't be surprised if one of the monopoly kings thought that up.

    3. Re:Not Perfect by nra1871 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Trading happiness in your twenties/thirties for freedom in your fifties/sixties is hardly a good trade. The whole "work hard while young so you don't have to work anymore" idea is a great way of getting people to trade in their youthful energy for a few extra bucks. I wouldn't be surprised if one of the monopoly kings thought that up.

      Isn't this attitude the cause of most of the problems people have when they reach late twenties/early thirties? They spend the first decade out of high school 'having fun', parties, cars they can't afford, no concern of saving money...then they wake up and realize they are in massive credit card debt, have no money to buy a house, and realize they actually have to retire someday and will need money.

    4. Re:Not Perfect by SnailNobra · · Score: 0

      So why not just turn your job into the "perfect" job. Just because you are doing one thing doesn't mean that there aren't opportunities with more rewarding potential inside your company. If you want to be doing something more challenging just ask! Management always has ideas of things to do, side projects to work on, software that needs a design overhaul. Or take a bold stance and propose something that will "add value" to your company and project and have it be something that you really want to work on.

      Most manangers I have worked with do not like to lose a talented person. There is usually have some sort of investment in them.

      If this does not work, and you are still unhappy, jump ship.

      --
      Nihilism means nothing to the dancing peasants
    5. Re:Not Perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said it was good pay, not that he was becoming a millionare. Do you realize how much money you have save in order to live of the dividents with some dignity? Apparently not.

  9. Work to live by jarfhy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I always encourage folks to do something they enjoy. The whole 'work to live' not 'live to work'. Six months ago I quit my job becaue I didn't find it interesting or challenging anymore, and stumbled into some interesting and different work from what I had been doing.

    Now that that is over I will look for something else interesting. I am married and have a stay at home wife and daughter and I will still look for something more interesting or fun to do, life should be more than just paying the bills and being bored.

    1. Re:Work to live by Grax · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I definitely believe life is too short to spend it in a job you don't like but I also feel that you need to make sure you take care of your commitments such as your family.

      Finding a balance and learn to avoid the "grass is greener on the other side of the fence" syndrome.

    2. Re:Work to live by krayzkrok · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My dad always told me there were three types of currency in jobs:

      1. Money
      2. Power
      3. Satisfaction

      Having all three is a perfect job. Having two out of three is a damn good job. If you can only have one, at least try to enjoy it!

      And if you don't have any, quit and try again.

    3. Re:Work to live by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      As someone who is in the process of finding out what they want to do (I'm the guy who posted the Ask Slashdot about jobhunting while in a lousy job), I figure I'll ask this again since more input is always useful.

      How the hell do you figure out what you might want to do? I don't want to live to work, but I do want money, and freetime, etc.

      Aside from all of that, is there any way to find out what you might like doing aside from actually wasting the time to try to figure it out? I'm just really looking to narrow down my preferences into a handful of job titles I might be best fitted for.

      Are there professionals that can help me with this? Would headhunters be good at this?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    4. Re:Work to live by roderickm · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Enjoying your job has its benefits, but there are other valid reasons to work. None of the following apply to everyone equally and they aren't direct substitutions for each other. Being a little heavy in one can compensate for being light in another:

      • Direct Compensation
        • High salary/wage
        • Excellent retirement benefits
        • Excellent health coverage
        • Discounts on products/services
      • Deferred Compensation
        • Ownership equity
        • Stock grants, warrants, or options
        • Profit-sharing
        • Bonus or performance incentives
      • Educational Benefits
        • Experience, On-the-job training
        • Internship
        • Tuition reimbursement
        • Cross-training from co-workers
      • Intangible Enrichment
        • Pure enjoyment
        • Spiritual purpose (Read 1 Cor 10:31)
        • Patriotism/Service to public
        • Fame, prestige, reputation
        • Philanthropic (joy of helping others)
        • Friendship, camraderie

      To say that job satisfaction is above all others is self-serving and short-sighted. It may be true for a season, but there are many, many other motives for work. Think as a long-term investor: be aware of your motivations for accepting a position, and be continually aware of whether the original motives are no longer being served. Be also aware of the opportunities you forgo as you maintain your position. Be willing to change, and be ready to defend (to your own self) your decision.
    5. Re:Work to live by fishtop+records · · Score: 1

      First, you have to know what you like. Do you like to write code? Do you do it as a hobby? Do you do something without someone paying you to do it? If so, that is what you want to do. Job titles are meaningless. Figure out what you want to do. My kid was a good trumpet player. Wanted to be an LA studio musician. So one summer, off to Interlochen Music and Art camp. Gee, the kid found that some campers liked practicing, and did so for several hours a day, after lessons, band, orchestra, and first two or three hours of playing. So I told my kid, they are going to be better than you at this, even if they aren't now. Do you really want to compete against them? That was the end of dreaming about being a musician. I used to spend all night in the computer lab. So I got a job writing code. Works for me. YMMV

    6. Re:Work to live by chromatic · · Score: 1

      The book What Color is Your Parachute? might help. (You don't have to get the latest version; anything recent is fine.)

    7. Re:Work to live by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

      As fishtop said figure out what you like to do. It's always good to think about how realistic it is. That being said, I say if you have a dream, go for it. If it is completely off the wall, be careful, but some people pay good money for really strange stuff. I recall reading something about the dilemma vegans are in that are into bondage (vegans, leather in case you're not following). It never hurts to follow your dream, just get a good plan together and get in with the right people.

      I'm in a semi similar position. I just lost a job that paid about as much as I could expect to make in the industry. I absolutely hated the job, but I was good at it. My passion is volleyball, so I decided to follow that dream. I got a job that paid the bills and volunteer with the local college programs. I'm in the process of applying for a number of coaching positions with some solid recommendations from successful coaches. At first I'll be making less money, but I can make as much or more than I was making not too far down the road. Plus the greatly reduced price graduate degrees will be a nice plus.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    8. Re:Work to live by schematix · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Spiritual purpose (Read 1 Cor 10:31)

      According to internet sources this passage is: So whether you eat or drink or whatever you do, do it all for the glory of God.

      I have to say that i am probably the most anti-religious person that you will ever meet in your life but i do have to admit that this phrase (minus the G-d part), has a lot of merit to it. I used to think that the most important part of life was making money. That was until i took a job at about 20% less than i thought i should be making, and moved 2500 miles just because i thought the job was too perfect for me. Almost a year later i still love my job and love the work i do and i wouldn't trade it for twice the salary only to be miserable and regret getting up every day. My two cents: do what makes you happy and the rest will fall into place for you.

      --
      Scott
    9. Re:Work to live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd second this, the things that money can but are not really of great value.

    10. Re:Work to live by Magada · · Score: 0

      Offtopic, yes, but I have to ask. How did that Jesuit motto come into a discussion about jobs, sir? I fail to see how one's choice of job would affect that...

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    11. Re:Work to live by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 1

      As many here know, there are financial rewards to being good at what you do in high-tech fields. I had a great job at a highly respected technology company in São Paulo. I worked in the business unit that makes software-based solutions for business problems. That business unit was producing the most innovative and interesting stuff in the company, and I was making a salary many people in Brazil would kill to have. I really liked and even admired some of my coworkers. But after a few years (and several years total in high-tech jobs), I found the work wasn't making me happy anymore. I tried and tried to think of something else to do, but with no success. My background is in physics, but I can't go back to physics research because there are people who have just finished their PhDs, and they would have a certain advantage, from having produced results more recently and from having more direct communication with researchers in the field. People completing first or second postdocs would have even more advantages. Additionally, I left physics in the first place because I didn't find the "rat race" aspects of fighting for grants appealing at all. So going back wasn't really interesting to me. When I tried to think of something else to do, I ended up not thinking of anything beyond other high tech jobs, and changing jobs in the same field didn't interest me much.
      The idea of starting an ice cream company came to me three times (different things made me think about it), and I rejected it each time. When it appeared for the fourth time, I started taking it seriously. I went on vacation to Chile and met some Brazilians there. When we were getting to know each other and they asked me what I did, even I was surprised to hear myself saying "well, I work at a technology company, but I want to start an ice cream company."
      After that, I intended to keep working at my job at the tech company and work on the business plan for my ice cream business in my spare time. Well, after a few months I discovered that this "spare time" didn't exist. I was basically waiting for a sign that it was time to take a risk and leave my job. Some changes happened at the company, and so I had a good opportunity to leave while minimizing the disruption for my coworkers. A few other things happened at the same time that convinced me it was time. I checked my finances and determined that the money I'd been saving to buy a home would support me for long enough for me to be able to give it a try. So I left the safety of a comfortable salary to chase after a dream.
      People asked me if I was sure I wasn't making a big mistake, just walking away from a job with a good salary, and one at which I probably could have stayed until retirement. I wondered if I would ever have any doubts and look back and think I shouldn't do it, but my mind was made up, so I did leave the job. I never did second guess my decision. Even when money got tight for a while, I was sure I was on the right path.
      I am a different person now than I was before. I used to be a very stressed-out person. I am now much calmer (one friend uses the term "serene"). I stopped biting my fingernails. In the last several months, three different women have made comments like "I wish I had nails like yours." This is a huge victory for somebody who used to chew his nails, giving him very ugly hands. I'm not tired all the time like I used to be. I'm enjoying life much more, and I have through all this time since leaving my job, even when my money started to run out early last year.
      To summarize, I am happy. There's a really good way to express how happy I am in Portuguese that is a bit difficult to translate to English, and it will definitely lose something in the translation, but here goes...
      In Portuguese, there are two verbs that work like the verb "to be" in English. One, estar is used for states that are subject to change in the short term, like "estou cansado," which means "I am tired." The other, ser, is used for states

      --
      "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
    12. Re:Work to live by johneee · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. But what people should realise is that those three things don't necessarily have an equal weight. For myself, right now, I don't care about power at all, I sort of care about money, and I really do care about satisfaction a whole lot. I'd give up a whole lot of the first and some of the second to have more of the third. But I don't have a family, and I'm not the kind of person who needs power.

      Inherent in this is the fact that none of these factors are a have/not have situation. You're never going to rate a job on whether you have power or not, or are satisfied or not, or have money or not. (And no, unless you're Bill G you can't even say you have 'enough' money. Nobody ever thinks they have enough money) Everything is a continuum, everything is fluid. How much money is a lot, how much is not much?

      Also, security should be there, along with a whole lot of other factors - moral, religious, etc. but when you're trying to make a pithy reductionist theory about things I guess something's gotta give.

      What I'm saying is that your answer would be different from mine. Not just which order they'd be in, but how much of each you'd give up for the other. If, for example, you had a family, with three kids who needed medical care and had no savings, I'm absolutely sure your money factor would be very very important to you - Perhaps to the point where the other two factors are almost non-existant. We have no idea where the OP is in his or her life, what his or her background is, all that kind of stuff. Nothing we say here is really going to have a whole lot of bearing on their situation, and nothing we do will change that.

      You have to live your life to your own standards. Not anyone elses.

      --
      - ------- There are ten kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who... Huh?
    13. Re:Work to live by BVis · · Score: 1
      Would headhunters be good at this?
      Headhunters aren't paid to figure out what you want to do with your career, they're paid to cram you into a job description so they can make money. I'd suggest you make an appointment with a career counselor who has no financial interest in your situation. Frequently state or local government will provide these services, primarily to those finding themselves collecting unemployment insurance payments, but often their services are available to anyone. (At least in this state.)

      That, and I hate headhunters on principle; they're another obstacle between you and the job you want. HR is bad enough, there's no reason to add another layer of clueless communications majors and financial drain.
      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    14. Re:Work to live by Anonymous+Meoward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I couldn't agree more.

      We had a situation in our home not too long ago that shines as an example. My wife was a product manager at a firm with international presence (can't go into more detail, sorry). She was thrown on airplanes to many far-flung places -- that's not a perq; business travels sucks -- during and after her pursuit of a part-time MBA at a top-notch program. While this was going on, she was also using her spare time to come up with business plans for said firm. Granted, it helped that she needed one for a class, but she poured a lot of effort into them for the sake of future use.

      The lovely little firm used her plans, gave her no credit for them, threw her on more planes, trashed her in a performance review, never publicly acknowleged her MBA (despite a very nice ad taken out by the university in the Wall Street Journal that printed the company's name as well as hers), and was forced to sit through a team event where the laziest sacks of shit received accolades while her name went unmentioned.

      (Our evenings at home, with her black moods at the time, were a real treat too. Being the supportive spouse was getting exhausting as well.)

      Her manager's only advice to her during all of this? Quoting from memory: "We're here to collect paychecks, make money, and retire. That's it." What a nice motivational career statement: Go Along to Get Along, For We Are Waiting Around to Die.

      I should also add that the former employer loved to dole out huge bonuses (near 20% of salary) in lieu of having a non-dysfunctional culture.

      My point? Without power and satisfaction, the money means next to nothing. My wife left the firm. We left a lot of money on the table because we valued her sanity more. She now works for a group that thinks she's Wonder Woman, just because she's used to working very hard with a lot less support than she's getting today. That which does not kill you etc., I suppose.

      I managed to get the MBA from the same school as well, and I understand the fineries of organizational behavior and business etiquette. Having said that, I'd still punch her ex-manager in the face if I saw him on the street.

      --
      --- The American Way of Life is not a birthright. Hell, it's not even sustainable.
    15. Re:Work to live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your dad must be some kind of freak. The second thing is not "power", it's "people".

      Glad I'm not working with someone who thinks power is one of the most important things to look for in a job, and that friendship is more or less irrelevant.

    16. Re:Work to live by drsquare · · Score: 1

      And if you don't have any, quit and try again.

      I don't think that living on the streets eating out of bins would bring any more money, power or satisfaction.

      Jobs that are enjoyable are few and far between, and usually require rare qualifications, and are all taken anyway.

      Paycut? I make 15k, if I was paid any less I wouldn't be able to pay the mortgage.

    17. Re:Work to live by nytes · · Score: 1

      You forgot the fourth currency: Sex

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    18. Re:Work to live by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Jeez, why do you hang out at Slashdot? You obviously don't have any technical skills, or else you'd be making a decent wage. Plus you're always expressing your contempt for the opinions of other Slashdotters. Don't get enough flagellation at home?

    19. Re:Work to live by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

      According to internet sources this passage is: So whether you eat or drink or whatever you do, do it all for the glory of God.

      I have to say that i am probably the most anti-religious person that you will ever meet in your life but i do have to admit that this phrase (minus the G-d part), has a lot of merit to it.

      OK, so *without* the "G-d part" as you so eloquently put it, where does that leave that phrase?

      "So whether you eat or drink or whatever you do, do it all for the glory of ..."

      So, are you doing it for the glory of yourself? Cause if you are, I don't think you're doing a very good job because I have no idea who you are, and therefore you're not glorifying yourself very well. Or are you doing it for the glory of others? Well, I also don't know who they are, so you seem to not be doing a very good job at that either. And if you're doing it for the glory of being "happy", aren't you again, just glorifying yourself in which case I would again say "so what?" because I have no concept of anyone who is known the world over for being the happiest person alive all the time, so you're clearly not fulfilling that role very well either.

      My point is, I simply cannot respect you for finding a passage of the Bible as "inspirational" when you take 100% of the meaning out of the passage that you find "inspirational." The ENTIRE point of that passage is to glorify God, and not just any god, or whomever you decide is your god, or even a character trait that you view as approaching godhood, but THE GOD of the Bible. Call me a religious nut, but only call me that for not being able to respect your logic in this matter.

  10. The more interesting question.. by CynicalGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Would you take a pay raise for less interesting work? Hell yes! Make a bunch of money first, then use that money to do something that interests you.

    Money isn't everything.. But it IS freedom..

    1. Re:The more interesting question.. by DeadPrez · · Score: 5, Funny

      Money isn't everything.. But it IS freedom..

      So that's why we put millions of dollars into each bomb headed for Iraq.

    2. Re:The more interesting question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      True.. money is not everything.. but in referring to money as 'freedom', then you are conciously/unconciously referring to 'more money, more freedom', ergo you become a slave to money and thus you give up your freedom....
      but hey, if you win the lottery, let me know :)

    3. Re:The more interesting question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should listen to this guy, he might be Cynical, but he has a point.

      You could do some nice things with the money you are earning to make your life more interesting, such as hobby or hobbies after work.

      Do you like girls?, money is needed in this area.

      Do you like computer games? graphic cards are expensive and
      girls too.

    4. Re:The more interesting question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Girls and computer games in the same remote neighborhood? Please. If you're a "gamer," you sleep alone. It's the only justice left in this damned world.

    5. Re:The more interesting question.. by schematix · · Score: 1
      Would you take a pay raise for less interesting work? Hell yes! Make a bunch of money first, then use that money to do something that interests you. Money isn't everything.. But it IS freedom..

      It takes quite a long time to amass a fortune large enough to retire on then do whatever you want to do. To the type of person that ONLY lives for money i say, i hope you become a millionaire before you are 30, and then die when you are 31 only to have done it all for nothing.

      --
      Scott
    6. Re:The more interesting question.. by mysticwhiskey · · Score: 1
      To the type of person that ONLY lives for money i say, i hope you become a millionaire before you are 30, and then die when you are 31 only to have done it all for nothing

      Why wish them dead? Why not wish them that they one day see that life is not purely money making, but rather to further love & knowledge?

      --

      Stuck down a hole! In the middle of the night! With an owl!

    7. Re:The more interesting question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. A couple of points:

      You THINK the other job will use your skills more. Lots of offers are one thing, the actual job is something else.

      If it is so much more demanding work, how come they don't pay better? That tells me they won't value your skills. While you don't list actual dollars, your current employer seems to value you more (and don't let anyone tell you pay doesn't directly equate to how much they value you).

    8. Re:The more interesting question.. by anthro398 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Money isn't everything.. But it IS freedom..

      That isn't necessarily the case. I've worked for billionaires, including Doris Duke, and I never got the impression that they felt anything near the freedom I had. I had the freedom to drop everything, move to Hawai'i, and start a new life. Perhaps there is a financial sweet-spot under which a person worries about money constantly and over which a person worries about money constantly. Richard Kelley, chairman of Outrigger Hotels, once told me to watch my pennies and the dollars would take care of themselves. He was an excellent example of a man who, although rich (to the tune of 2.8 billion at the time), was a slave to his life, his work, and to money. Money!= freedom. If it did, no one would be more free than those with the most money and that is often not the case.

    9. Re:The more interesting question.. by sharekk · · Score: 1

      But while I'm working towards that goal of early retirement I'd like to be happy. If I switched jobs right now I could probably make 5-10k more than I do. That might let me retire 1-2 years earlier. In the meantime, I'd be working for 20-30 years spending 40+ hours a week on jobs I don't like so I can have 'freedom' on year earlier.

      That doesn't sound like a very good tradeoff to me.

    10. Re:The more interesting question.. by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 1

      My advice would be to keep the boring good paying job and get some interesting work started on the side. Then you'll be able to save your brainpower/energy for what you enjoy. And maybe you'll get enough side work to eventually be self employed. Then you'll have good pay and interesting work.

  11. That's easy. by Zarel · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Which would you prefer: fun at work, or fun outside of work?
    Let's see. Excluding sleeping and other mundane activities, how much of your time do you spend at work, and how much do you spend away from work?

    I thought so.
    --
    Want a high quality FOSS RTS game? Try Warzone 2100!
    1. Re:That's easy. by DupeMaster+Donkey · · Score: 0
      Which would you prefer: fun at work, or fun outside of work?


      You said you have a girlfriend, right? So, uh, unless you are lying, why don't you ask her?
      --
      Persistence is futile. You will be metamoderated.
    2. Re:That's easy. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Fun at work involves free cake and mandatory socialization.

      Fun outside of work involves women jumping out of cakes and voluntary copulation.

      You decide.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    3. Re:That's easy. by larry+bagina · · Score: 3, Funny

      In anorexic russia, cake jumps out of woman!!!

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    4. Re:That's easy. by sedyn · · Score: 1

      "Let's see. Excluding sleeping and other mundane activities, how much of your time do you spend at work, and how much do you spend away from work?"

      I think one thing that should be considered is at the startup that is working on an OS, overtime might be unofficially required. So that should be taken into consideration.

      --
      Am I open minded towards open source, or closed minded towards closed source?
    5. Re:That's easy. by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Damn you, lack of mod points! Damn you I say!

      +X funny
      where x is any number from 1000000000 to infinity

    6. Re:That's easy. by jbrader · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Well, if you sleep 8 hours a day and spend say 4 hours a day on mundane activities (commuting, eating although granted sometimes eating is a fun social activity, getting dressed in the morning etc.) then you have 12 hours a day left and 8 of that is spent working. So now you have 4 hours a day to yourself. Now I've had lots of jobs, I really loved a couple of 'em and hated most of the rest. And I noticed that when I got home from work after the haeful jobs I was tired and pissed off so my four hours of free time usually consisted of drinking beer and watching T.V. because I didn't want to do anything else. But when I got home from the jobs I loved I was usually in a good mood and wanted to go out and do things.

      And the jobs I liked happend to pay less than the others, so even though I was makiing less money my life as a whole was way better. I had more fun when I wasn't working and when I was at work I didn't feel like I was wasting my time at some futile activity just to go home and rot on the couch.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    7. Re:That's easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, dude that's bolemia

    8. Re:That's easy. by glassjaw+rocks · · Score: 1

      You're the reason I read the comments. Thank you. I'll turn in my application tomorrow.

      --
      -gjr
    9. Re:That's easy. by protohiro1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Totally. I second this statement. I had a job makine $7k more, and it sucked. It sounded good on paper, but it was boring and shitty. And it was going nowhere. And I had to commute 45 minutes. So I took this other job. It is interesting, pretty fun and its a 10 minute bike ride from my house. I sold my car (wrx...sniff sniff) and now I have *more* disposable income, more free time and a better quality of life. Your mileage may vary (WRX got about 24-26)

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    10. Re:That's easy. by runderwo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bolemia? Isn't that a country?

    11. Re:That's easy. by Makarakalax · · Score: 1

      The fact that some people here don't realise this makes me sad. I'm with you all the way.

    12. Re:That's easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will be, once the US government bombs it into democracy.

    13. Re:That's easy. by sckeener · · Score: 1

      There is a reason why people get paid to work. Work is not fun. If 'work' was fun, then you'd do it for free and it would be called 'play.'

      I think everyone should step back and think about that.

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    14. Re:That's easy. by jbrader · · Score: 1

      I never said a job should be fun, I just said if you can do something that you find satifying then you'll probably be a lot happier. For instance back in high school I worked at a shop that fabricated electric lighted signs for retail buisnesses. The work was hot and dirty and I was forever cutting the hell out of my hands on sheet steel and having to dig huge holes to make the foundations for sign poles etc. It wasn't fun, but it was very satisfying because at the end of the day I could step back and see that I had created something concrete out of raw materials. Even now ten years later I can drive around and look at some of the work I did. So the fact that I was leaving a thumbprint (so to speak) on my home town made me like the work so I was always happy at the end of a long hard day.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
  12. If the job had potential for advancement by phobos182 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would depend on the size of the paycut (A large percentage?), and the advancement potential in the position. Why start a new job at the top of the pay scale, and at the top of the ladder?

    You may be happier at the new position, and gain valuable experience to further your carrer. But it would not be optimal to start a new position where it takes two years to get back to your current wage if your not learning valuable skills to help your earning potential.

  13. Yes... by technoextreme · · Score: 1

    In fact I plan on getting into robotics. Everyone in my family including myself assumes there is absolutely no money in this area of engineering and quite frankly I don't care. I just want to build something cool. I don't care about material possessions or in the case I do buy a lot of items, it will be on lathes, mills, and other devices.

    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    1. Re:Yes... by horatio · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...there is absolutely no money in this area ... and quite frankly I don't care. I just want to build something cool.

      The mortgage, car loan+insurance, electric bill, groceries, etc don't pay themselves. I would enjoy spending my time running my own business. But I'm not in a position to quit my day job right now and expect the lights to be on for very long.

      That being said, this is America - you can do and be nearly anything you want if you're willing to work at it. You might have to get a McJob to pay the rent if you want to build robots in your garage (HP, Atari?), but no one can force you to work for corp this or that. In your case, if robotics is a field that interests you, hunt for and complete your education and then maybe a job in the industrial sector (heavy machinery, vehicle production, other factory-type settings) working on their equipment. You might not be building "something cool" for a while, but the experience will be invaluable.

      Just a few thoughts from someone who should have studied harder in school...

      --
      There is very little future in being right when your boss is wrong.
    2. Re:Yes... by cndrr · · Score: 1

      I would enjoy spending my time running my own business. But I'm not in a position to quit my day job right now and expect the lights to be on for very long.

      Well, it that's really how you feel, it's a good thing you won't be running your own business. It sounds like you love your 'comfort zone' way too much. Sometimes being successful involves taking risks.

      --
      cndrr
  14. You only live once by doonoop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm a habitual paycut-taker, so maybe I'm biased. But I stay happy, and money only makes you happier when you're really struggling financially. The world is too wonderful, life too short and precious to waste on VBA programming.

    1. Re:You only live once by syphax · · Score: 1

      money only makes you happier when you're really struggling financially

      Bravo. I am actively considering taking a more interesting job. The bad news is that there is a paycut and I have 3 young kids; the good news is that I will still get paid pretty well relative to, oh, most of the rest of the world. And most importantly, I would travel less, so I could spend more time with said kids.

      --
      Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
    2. Re:You only live once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could be like me and take a pay cut for a job that sucks. It must be nice to have good choices. I'm off to learn basket weaving or something, anything but this baloney. The good days are over.

    3. Re:You only live once by AusIV · · Score: 1
      I've made the decision in the past to take a paycut for a less stressful job, but I was miserable at the place I was leaving. I'd be hesitant to give up a job that was comfortable to take less pay that I hope will be fun.

      If you have a job that pays the bills and gets you some extra perks, would you rather give up the perks to enjoy your job?

    4. Re:You only live once by bit01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The science agrees with you. e.g. Lottery winners, one year after, are no happier than they were before. What makes people happy long term are experiences, not pay increases, and with a bit of lateral thinking and creativity experiences don't have to cost much.

      ---

      Creating simple artificial scarcity with copyright and patents on things that can be copied billions of times at minimal cost is a fundamentally stupid economic idea.

    5. Re:You only live once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And I don't have a lot of use for money. (Posting anon because I don't want attention from con artists.) I tend to just pile up what's left after paying for the basics, and there's usually a fair amount left over because I don't have a wife or kids. Consumerism doesn't do much for me. What's left for me to do with the money? No, you can't borrow any of it, don't ask! Save it so I can retire earlier, if I don't come up with any uses that seem better to me. Meanwhile, it is very nice being able to walk out on employers should they become obnoxious.

      Has the asker got enough saved up he could retire right now? If yes, then sure, why not quit and look for something better?

    6. Re:You only live once by Peldor · · Score: 1

      Good news! I'll let you do whatever the hell you want, but the paycut will be pretty large.

    7. Re:You only live once by balevine · · Score: 1

      "The noble soul has reverence for itself." - Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil Below is Ayn Rand commenting on this quote in her introduction to The Fountainhead. It struck me as the truest guide I had ever found for choosing work. Find greatness in your work. "This view of man [Nietzsche's] has rarely been expressed in human history. Today, it is virtually non-existent. Yet this is the view with which...the best of mankind's youth start out in life. It is not even a view, for most of them, but a foggy, groping, undefined sense made of raw pain and incommunicable happiness. It is a sense of enormous expectation, the sense that one's life is important, that great achievements are within one's capacity, and that great things lie ahead. It is not in the nature of man - nor in any living entity - to start out by giving up, by spitting in one's own face and damning existence; that requires a process of corruption whose rapidity differs from man to man. Some give up at the first touch of pressure; some sell out; some run down by imperceptible degrees and lose their fire, never knowing when or how they lost it. Then all of these vanish in the vast swamp of their elders who tell them persistently that maturity consists of abandoning one's mind; security, of abandoning one's values; practicality, of losing self-esteem. Yet a few hold on and move on, knowing that that fire is not to be betrayed, learning how to give it shape, purpose and reality."

    8. Re:You only live once by HonkOnBobo · · Score: 1

      The science agrees with you. e.g. Lottery winners, one year after, are no happier than they were before. What makes people happy long term are experiences, not pay increases, and with a bit of lateral thinking and creativity experiences don't have to cost much.

      Yeah, but with lots of money, you can achieve many of those enriching life experiences:

      Peter Gibbons: What would you do if you had a million dollars?
      Lawrence: I'll tell you what I'd do, man, two chicks at the same time, man.
      Peter Gibbons: That's it? If you had a million dollars, you'd do two chicks at the same time?
      Lawrence: Damn straight. I always wanted to do that, man. And I think if I had a million dollars I could hook that up, cause chicks dig a dude with money.
      Peter Gibbons: Well, not all chicks.
      Lawrence: Well the kind of chicks that'd double up on a dude like me do.
      Peter Gibbons: Good point.

    9. Re:You only live once by *Pres* · · Score: 1
      There are so many people in their fifties who are ruining their health trying to keep up with the ever-increasing productivity demands of their employers.

      Saving up to be able to bail out when it's getting too much is a great idea. Life is finite and there's more to it than work...

  15. Done! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Done! Exactly this, last week. Much happier now...

  16. What is money "worth" by Alcimedes · · Score: 1

    The question is, what can that extra money buy you? Do you think you'll be happier working a job that's fun, or having more money to spend when your eight hours are up. (or ten as the case may be).

    Personally, I work at a Univeristy. It's less money than working in the private sector. However, it's a really mixed enviornment. I see a little bit of everything, from a huge range of applications of computers and their versitility.

    At the end of the day, if you spend eight hours a day wishing you were doing anything else, dying to go somewhere else, you should probably leave. Odds are the difference in price wouldn't be able to make you happy an extra eight hours per day five days a week.

    1. Re:What is money "worth" by NixieBunny · · Score: 1
      Money isn't everything, although it's nice to have some for long enough to buy a house.

      I'm in the same situation as above. I used to work at a very good-paying job but the work turned into designing computers for to kill people more efficiently (and it became very Dilbertesque), so I left and now earn one third of the money in the astronomy world. But I'm happier! The university environment is much more relaxed than industry, and I was given a chance to design and built a large project which actually got completed. My old job had me too distracted and headless-chickenlike to ever do finish anything that I started except the well-defined military things. Plus, I work part time so have time to spend with family and design silly wristwatches etc.

      --
      The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    2. Re:What is money "worth" by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      I've changed jobs several times in my career. With one exception, each time I took a pay cut to do so, and I considered every one of them a "promotion" to a job I liked better. Except for the one time my pay went up, which turned out to be the worst work environment I've ever been in (despite being in academia).

      Probably correlatively, the dress code (or expectations) for each successive job as been increasingly casual, starting in jacket and tie and currently in casual shirt and nice jeans. I figure by the time I retire, I'll be doing my favorite job, in my underwear. {smile} (And when I retire, I'll stop bothering with the underwear.)

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  17. I did.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in my 40s. Normally someone like me would be in management and earning good money, etc.... and be in meetings most of the time and work early/late to catch up, prepare reports, proposals, etc... Instead, I'm a research engineer. The money not as good, but the work is challenging and engages me. The best of it all, I go to about one or two meetings a week. !

  18. Not with Kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got stuck in a part of the IT spectrum that is looked down upon, so my pay can't get much lower than it is for my geogrpahy, and I have college loans, kids and credit cards.

    I have almost thought of leaving IT and come back in a few years after a "suit" job just so I could expunge some of my resume. The only people being paid less than me are the lowest of the low programmers and general purpose IT people. I fit the second category.

    NEVER work in Point-of-Sale!

  19. academia by superwiz · · Score: 1, Interesting

    well, if goin back to school to teach half-wits while geting my PhD instead of having a wall-street job counts, then, yes.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  20. Do it by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

    Recently, I got a job offer to move to a startup doing OS development and Systems and Network programming, however it would involve a paycut.

    You can stay in touch with your old friends from this company, make new ones (hopefully) at your new job, take a reasonable pay cut that you could make back (if the startup succeeds) and get to do every hacker's dream work!

  21. That depends on one thing... by supremebob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How serious is the relationship with your girlfriend? If you're thinking marriage and children in the near future, that bigger paycheck is going to come in handy.

    Of course, you shouldn't let money be the only issue, but it still should be a major factor depending on where your life is headed. Whatever you do, try not to become one of those mini-van driving soccer dads who loathe going to work every day.

    1. Re:That depends on one thing... by vertinox · · Score: 0, Troll

      If you're thinking marriage and children in the near future,

      Can I ask a simple thing? Why must we put up with this having of the children routine with women?

      I've met plenty of women who aren't keen on the idea. They are out there guys and the way I see it, its kind of pointless to have children if you don't already have them (no offense to the people that already have them, I'm just saying if you don't already have them... then maybe you should consider just not having them unless any of you parents are considering retro-active 29th term trimester abortions for that little ingrateful bastard... Well that is up to you guys).

      My real point being is that child bearing serves no purpose other than to continue your genes, and considering my quality genes, I'd rather spare the human race the suffering and put my foot down and say "No children for ye whenches! Go find some football watching, beer drinking college prep jockey who is too dumb to know what to do with his life other than to stick his penis in some whench who wants to spurt out some std otherwise known as a kid! Me? Oh yeah... I'll be sticking to the singles scene way into my 40's way past my prime hanging out at the clubs and I'll be enjoying the platonic companion ship of some older lesbians who I don't have to deal with their kids when I don't wanna!"

      You see life isn't all about having kids and having sex. Do something else... We are almost 50 years away from a world that doesn't need human procreation and if I don't live to see Strong AI then well... I might as well not be around.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  22. Probably not by ThousandStars · · Score: 5, Insightful
    When I read your blurb on the homepage, "yes" leapt to my mind. Reading this, however, changed my mind:

    From the looks of it, I've got the perfect job: high pay, extravagant benefits and bonuses, flexi-time, can telecommute whenever possible, and best of all the coworkers are great and have truly become my friends, even the boss.

    Most people would kill for job conditions like those. The excellence of your coworkers and boss in particular makes me inclined to say that you should stay. If you feel your CS degree is wasted, work on open source projects or try to bring open source into your organization. There are a myriad of ways to apply your knowledge without necessarily quitting your job. The dissatisfaction you experience may not be alleviated in your new job and if your boss and/or coworkers are worse, you'll regret the switch.

    1. Re:Probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Job's like this usually require an employment contract. That means you are not free to create anything outside the workplace without first giving the legal department right of refusal. Only an idiot company woulld ever give any of these rights up.

      Just because you do it on your time, doesn't mean it is your property when it comes to IP, intellectual property.

    2. Re:Probably not by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

      i think this is THE best comment so far. The author has a point. Are you miserable, or just indifferent because you're not being challenged?

      Hell, I'm almost 17 and i face the same damned problem... >.>

    3. Re:Probably not by generic-man · · Score: 1

      I'd think that if the submitter were on the fence, the "can I work on open source stuff" question would push him over one way or the other. I've been told that, at least in theory, working on unrelated stuff is just a matter of writing a request and having the legal department sign off on it. If he's working at a company where the lawyers won't sign off on unrelated work, then that's a Very Bad Sign.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    4. Re:Probably not by smackenzie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, actually, it kind of does. My experience has been that non-compete agreements and IP rights that you do completely away from the work environment are very difficult to defend in a court. However, if you have a good relationship with your boss and coworkers, you can probably explain the situation to them and they will respect you even more. Just don't work on personal projects at work.

    5. Re:Probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In California, it is explicitly not allowed by law.

      Your own work on your own time with your own resource is your work and you cannot sign that away in an employment contract.

    6. Re:Probably not by electroniceric · · Score: 1

      I would second that. OS programming may sound glamorous, but unless you think you're gonna become the next Sun kernel architect, you might want to think carefully about jumping into full-day OS coding. Spending a full day whacking away in C at buggy filesystem code might not be as great a transition as you're thinking. You can certainly get a better idea of whether you like it by doing some open-source work.

      To my mind you have asked a lesser job question before a more important one. Rather than looking at this job or that, you need to ask yourself what kind of job you most want to be in: what work do you actually want to do? How important are the coworkers, the pay, the flexibility, etc.? Asking and answering (to whatever extent you can) that question will put you further along than trying to compare facets of these two jobs. You're not cosmically obligated to do OS programming, or even programming at all just because you got a CS degree. You should do it if you think it's the job you want.

      Since you sound like you're on the younger end of things, I'd think that doing interesting work might well rank about pay or telecommuting, especially if you don't have kids and/or a spouse. That's just me. But do spend some time thinking over the job you want - I really think it will pay off.

    7. Re:Probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, you can always do what I've done a couple of times...you know, write some "code poetry", and show your "poetry" to a friend, who may or may not make a derivative work in the form of a patch and submit it.... ;)

    8. Re:Probably not by Courageous · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I believe it's actionable if they even ask.

      C//

    9. Re:Probably not by eyrieowl · · Score: 1

      thanks for that. i was rushing to say yes too, having read the blurb, and went back up for a closer read after reading your comment. i think i, in that situation, would probably leave anyway (single etc). i've always been pretty strident about working places because i'm interested in the work, not for the money. and it's generally held true, and i've generally been pretty fairly compensated for my efforts. i certainly think it's a path that can be taken. however, i know that in the future it's gonna be a little harder to say that with family on the way...but...single? young? why not? as long as you leave amicably, don't burn bridges, in the long run i think the experience gained could be parlayed into a more successful career than staying in the cush job.

    10. Re:Probably not by azmaveth · · Score: 1

      The excellence of your coworkers and boss in particular makes me inclined to say that you should stay.

      It is all about the people. Having good people that understand and support you can make a mundane job enjoyable. If you're in good standing with your boss, talk to him/her about expanding your job duties or shifting them in a different direction to make your work more interesting. It's far better to do boring work with great people than great work with a bunch of monkeys and donkeys' rear ends.

      "The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence."

    11. Re:Probably not by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Iam sorry, but what i do in my freetime is MY property.
      I have a patent for automated self-testing of IFX based webServices.

      That doesn't mean the patent is owned by my employer.

      Courts have ruled time and again that if i create something using my property then it belongs to me.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    12. Re:Probably not by Bandraginus · · Score: 1

      I'll second that. I am a freelance contractor and have worked at a multitude of places over the years. The best lesson I've learned is that people make *all* the difference. Having good managers (few and far between) make crappy work tolerable, and mediocre work a joy. I would gladly take a rate cut to stay for another 6 months just to work with good people.

  23. Otherwise Perfect? by weston · · Score: 1

    Would I take a paycut for more interesting work? Sure. Especially if it were interesting enough that the time that belonged to my employer felt like I were working on hobbies.

    Would I dump an otherwise perfect job? Maybe not. Especially if that "otherwise perfect" meant that the pay was great, stress level was low, that more often than not, I found myself with a clear tast list or ahead of schedule at the end of the day, and it was easy to leave work at work after, say, a 7 1/2 hour day. A job like that supports an outside life full of personal interests rather well -- even, perhaps, systems/kernel hacking. It might have to be actively rotting my brain / corroding my soul to leave.

  24. You likely won't have a choice! by intnsred · · Score: 1

    In today's free[sic] trade economy, you likely won't have a choice.

    For consecutive years, the average real (after-inflation) wages of Americans have fallen. Given that reality, along with the outsourcing and declining jobs in tech (the US now imports more tech than it produces), trading money for contentment is common sense.

    1. Re:You likely won't have a choice! by bnenning · · Score: 1

      For consecutive years, the average real (after-inflation) wages of Americans have fallen.

      True but somewhat misleading. Total compensation is up, which means employers are actually paying more for employees, it's just not showing up in paychecks. The difference is primarily due to increasing costs of health insurance, which is a whole separate mess.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    2. Re:You likely won't have a choice! by intnsred · · Score: 1

      What total compensation is up? Do you have any references? Color me skeptical.

      I've read numerous reports that far fewer employers are offering health insurance compared to decades past.

      While pension or other benefits may have risen, given the routine news we get of companies changing pensions to screw their former employees, the near criminal underfunding of pension funds by corporations, I have a hard time imagining that workers are seeing significant increases there. After all, pensions and those sorts of benefits are the most attacked items in union strife today -- e.g. the recent NYC transit strike.

  25. Do you have any responsibilities? by Swift+Kick · · Score: 1

    Not to rain on your parade, but can you afford to take a pay cut, to go to your 'dream job', or do you have responsibilities, like wife/kids/mortgage/car payments/etc?
    If you have any kind of commitments such as the ones that I described, you should think long and hard before moving to a volatile environment such as a startup. I wouldn't do it unless I had at least 6 months or so worth of savings that I could fall back on if the 'dream job' didn't pay off and I was out on the street.
    Your mileage may vary, of course. As I grow older, I find myself looking at my job as just that, a job. I use it to pay my bills and to 'fund' the activities I actually enjoy, and while there's always a certain level of 'enjoyment' in it, I don't find it necessary to be challenging to be happy.
    A steady paycheck and great benefits are most enjoyable, thank you.

    --
    "We'll need 2000 crickets, 4 cans of Easy Cheese, and the fluid from 18 glowsticks for this plan to work...." - ph0n1c
  26. Do what you wont kill you but get you damn close. by hesperant · · Score: 1

    An opinion given to me goes as follows.
    "Find something you would do for free, and find the fool who will pay you to do it."

    I added, Dare, but dont kill yourself. You have to look at your situation, if you just bought a house, just had a kid, just got married, just got hired... then give it a little bit in your current job. A good situation would be to have more control over how droll or boring your job is by inserting yourself into the biz with ideas. Spice it up. break new ground.. Some times this doesnt work; thats another story.

    Please excuse my gramatical errors. (aplenty)

    The gist is, do what you can, and try to do more but never throw yourself off a bridge without a parachute, just cus "it's fun"

    hesperant

  27. Easy Answer by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    Yes. More stimulating work implies challenges and new knowledge. New knowledge always trumps money if you have a brain. I prefer working in a job where I feel like I'm either bettering myself, or I'm contributing to the people in society who have less. That is always far more preferable to making loads of cash. If you're a rational human being anyway... ;P

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  28. This Made it on SlashDot?? by ThisGuy · · Score: 1

    In a word -- In a heart beat! I graduated last year with a BS in Computer Science and I have spent my time working my way to the Professional Water Ski Tour. (I'm not kidding). In a good month, I make 600 bucks. But I wake up every morning and love what I do. If I had to get up every day and go to a mundane job where my primary function involved work in Access and Excel... I would either quit or kill myself, and I can't say which of those would happen first.
    OK, maybe I'm a little naive, I don't have a lot of bills to pay. Balance what you will make versus what you need to get by on and make a decision.

    (I do some freelance web design in my spare time... hire me!)

    1. Re:This Made it on SlashDot?? by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 0, Troll
      Let me guess -- you live at home? Call it a hunch. How nice that you're chasing your financially worthless goal while your parents get stuck with an overeducated adult child living in the basement. Should I also guess who paid for your education?

      I am ALL for doing what one enjoys, but there's no excuse for laying your lack of professional motivation on the backs of others. I HATE working, but I do it anyway because there's a time in life where one has to step up and be a self-sustaining adult.

      But, maybe I'm just living in an earlier generation where being autonomous was a source of pride. A quick look around (certainly beyond the parent post) will quickly show that it ain't the case anymore.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
  29. Time to weight the big choices by nizo · · Score: 1
    Can you live on the salary that you would be getting? If the company tanks in a year, can you find another job to pay your bills? Do you have enough money/magic credit card money to survive for a few months if the company tanks and you only get unemployment for awhile? Is there the potential to make piles more money at the new place later, or can you continue there happily at the salary they are offering? Will the other company wait a few days so you can do a naked can-can dance for your old boss first? (Ok the last one might be more or less important, depending on how things have been going with your boss). Seriously though, you probably don't want to burn bridges, no matter how tempting the naked can-can dance is.


    Weigh all your choices, and if you can afford it (and think you will enjoy the new job) then go for it. If you can't afford it, make sure you aren't piddling money away, and then see again if you can afford the new job. It is hard to put a pricetag on happiness.

    1. Re:Time to weight the big choices by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      It doesn't sound like he's done the obvious thing here. Ask for slightly different work.

      Get all his regular work done quickly (say in 80% of his work time), then go to that Boss he say's is so great and ask for something more interesting to do to fill that other 20%. Say he wants to learn something new, work on something new, so that he can stay interested in his work and progress technically.

      If he really does work for a great company with a good boss, then that'd be a no brainer. If he is actually only smart enough to write vb macros, then he'll find that out pretty quickly also.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  30. Obviously... by rampant+mac · · Score: 0, Redundant
    "Would you leave an otherwise perfect job to work on something more interesting? "

    It's not a perfect job if you're finding yourself disinterested and bored to tears.

    --
    I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    1. Re:Obviously... by sasdrtx · · Score: 1

      What part of "otherwise" do you not understand?

      He may be uninterested in his current job, but while employed there he cannot be disinterested in it.

      --
      Most people don't even think inside the box.
  31. Stay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's a personal decision. The fact that you are asking suggests to me you need to stick with your current job. The other one may require some independent thinking.

  32. Heck Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since I spend a good chunk of my waking life at a 8am -5pm job, I would gladly work for minimum wage if it was something I truly loved to do. I've been trying to find a job where I can really express my talents and passions for years now, unfortunately that happens to be in the computer industry. I really know my stuff but I can't seem to land my dream job.

  33. stick it out a while where you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They say when you get old and look back on your life you tend to regret things you didn't do, rather than things you did.

    Having said that, I would stick it out at your present job until you have enough for a house, if you want that. Working at startups is fun, but is no fun being RIFed because the idea didn't work out.

    Great opportunities do come along every so often I guess. Why not automate all the scripting and such you are doing? That would leverage your value and challenge where you are?

  34. Hell yes! by nickgrieve · · Score: 1

    Think about it... what do you do (you being a consumer whore like the rest of us) actualy do with the money you make... thats right, you spend it on things to keep you interested, like games, music, movies, remote controled airplanes. So take the money you lose in doing a more interesting job, and re-code it to disosable income and try enjoying your days in the office, its well worth the cash. You go home feeling better about what you do, your happier becasue of it, you spouse, or SO or kids/dog/cat enjoys having a happier healthier (mentaly) you around the place... money well spent.

  35. Take a chance... by Wishful+Thinker · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not that you can't do sophisticated stuff with excel, access, etc. (maybe you are), but if you're not, the kind of safety-scissors, connect-the-dots programming that usually gets done with these tools is a prime candidate for offshoring. Unless you're desperate for the cash (babies to feed, mortgage, etc.), do something that'll challenge you, and don't rest on your laurels.

  36. Yes, quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do something that makes you happy. Besides, you're letting your brain atrophy doing VBA all day. I took about a 30% cut and went from a 5 minute commute to 45 minutes just to do something more interesting. It hurts a bit, but at least I am doing something more interesting.

  37. In the end, you work for money by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

    There are some circumstances where I'd say go for the more interesting job, but IMO all the benefits you get at the boring job outweigh it. You may think you're wasting your time and your talent there, but remember: when its all said and done, you work for money.

    If you want to do something interesting, use some of the time you're saving by being able to telecommute and do some programming of your own (open source or whatever). Save some of that extra money you're getting to open your own programming business someday.

  38. A few thoughts by code+addict · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's a tough choice. Try looking at it this way: If you stay will you still be qualified for more interesting work in 5 years? Alternatively, what if you find you don't find the more challenging work any more fun and just make less money for more work?

    It's important to look at the non-work elements too. For example, I would imagine that your current job is so easy you have lots of free time to spend that big salary. A start up will pay less and leave you with way less time free.

    Also, don't under-estimate the importance of your work environment. If your co-workers are fun to work with and the job isn't very hard, you've got a pretty good thing going. My recommendation would be to keeping your self challenged with projects on the side.

    Another thing to consider is to talk to your boss about it. Say that you'd like to take on some more challenging tasks. Even better, look for ways to improve the business processes through software develop, and then request permission to implement them (in addition to your normal work, of course). It's usually worth trying to fix your current situation before thinking about leaving.

  39. Think long term by nuttzy · · Score: 1

    Excel, Access, and VBA macros You've got to think long term. You can take a (relatively) small paycut now, or you can take one later that will compound yearly. While you may be taking a paycut now, you'll learn new skills and become more marketable for the future. Besides being boring, how's the future looking for Excel, Access, and VBA macro programmers 5 years from now? 10? How's your outlook for learning new things at this company? Not only is your current job boring it could also be terminal to your career if you're not keeping up with technology!

    1. Re:Think long term by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

      To add to that, you want an answer, but I can't give you one without knowing all about the company that you work for and the startup you are considering.

      Does your boss know that you want more technical challenges? If you have career reviews, bring it up. If you don't, find another way to talk to them and see if you can be steered in that direction. Do these challenges even exist within your current company?

      My advice to you is not to let your technical skills atrophy. If you can't get the challenges you want at your current employer, and you have a good feeling about the startup, then go for it.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

  40. Run the numbers by mrsam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If a lower pay is enough to pay the bills and lead a comfortable life style, I would seriously consider dumping a high-paying boring job for a rewarding low-paying.

    But:

    The fact that it's a startup complicates things. Startups can fail at any time, and one day you may wake up and find yourself on the street. You need to do your homework and take a very close look at the startup: are they just a dot-bomb wannabe, or do they have a solid business plan, a marketable product, and a firm roadplan? The answers to these questions will guide you to making the call here.

    Your other alternative is to find the time in your cushy job and make it interesting. If it's really such a bore you should have plenty of time to spend on educating yourself. Find something you want to learn, some skill, and use your free time to study it. If it's even barely relevant to your current line of work you are on solid ground to justify using your free time, on the clock, on this. No employer -- especially the solid company you claim to be working for -- would object to their employees learning and picking up related skills that might be relevant to their employment; they should even encourage it.

    1. Re:Run the numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that it's a startup complicates things. Startups can fail at any time, and one day you may wake up and find yourself on the street.

      Large companies have been known to go tits-up too. Worldcom is the obvious example, but there's all that annoying parasite--SCO--that seems to be doing everything in their power to destroy itself. Even if the company survives, there's no guarantee that your position is equally immortal; former Lotus, Novell, Corel, Be, etc. employees can attest to that.

    2. Re:Run the numbers by shinghei · · Score: 1
      The fact that it's a startup complicates things. Startups can fail at any time, and one day you may wake up and find yourself on the street.
      Isn't also true that you may get pinkslip from your multi-national employer one day when you come to work due to "corporate restructuring"? I'd rather have a more marketable skill when I am "on the street".
    3. Re:Run the numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Startups can fail at any time, and one day you may wake up and find yourself on the street.

      That's a tad bit melodramatic, don't you think? True, startups can fail, but that in no way necessitates that you'll wind up on the street. If anything, it makes you more valuable to a company should you need to reenter the market... personally, I would rather hire every member of a failed startup than ten-thousand VBA drones any day of the week. I want working for me those who understand that risk and reward are indeed proportionate, those who constantly think and dream big.

        -- Jay

    4. Re:Run the numbers by richieb · · Score: 1
      The fact that it's a startup complicates things. Startups can fail at any time, and one day you may wake up and find yourself on the street. You need to do your homework and take a very close look at the startup: are they just a dot-bomb wannabe, or do they have a solid business plan, a marketable product, and a firm roadplan? The answers to these questions will guide you to making the call here.

      On the other hand a startup has a potential for much bigger upside.

      I've worked for two startups. One did well the other went belly-up in less than 2 years. Both provided me with invaluable experience.

      I worked for a large company that layed off bulk of developers - for mostly political reasons (one of two development locations was closed).

      Job security comes from what you know and what you can do. Having only VB development on my resume would not make me feel secure in any job.

      BTW, I've been a software developer for 28 years....

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
  41. Money isn't everything by CarlHall · · Score: 1

    I've changed jobs several times with pay cuts so that I could be interested in my job. I found out early that although having lots of money is nice, after a while it's just money. Being interested and enjoying your job is a bigger reward than you may realize and after you've mastered your domain, the money will come.

  42. Hell yes by bhav2007 · · Score: 1

    Hell yes

  43. Yes!!! by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    It is not only an issue of more interesting work, but also more satisfying work.

    I have a friend who is a 1st year law student. He took an unpaid summer internship at the FTC -- helping them go after spammers. I had opposing counsel (representing a spammer) leave private practice and become a a prosecutor. He enjoys putting bad guys away, even though it is less money.

  44. Supply and demand... by Otter · · Score: 1
    Of course people take paycuts to work in more interesting areas -- that's why you'd have to take the paycut. It's not like you need to be smarter to do VBA than to be a systems programmer or game developer, it's that people demand a premium to do it, in money, benefits, hours and everything else.

    The other day I was asked to export a Lotus Notes database into an Excel file and format it.

    Hell, I'd take a paycut just to never see Notes again...

  45. Perfect (obvious?) Solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just keep the current job, and on side start helping out one of the cool open source projects, such is KDE, FreeBSD or Haiku?

    If you are making tons of money, then there is not reason to give that up. Why not just save some extra money, and help out one of these cool open source projects. You could do anything you'd like to try out and do. You want to code Operating Systems? Then join FreeBSD team or Haiku team for example. Or if you like to make desktop applications, then join the KDE team and help them out.
    Of course, if you are making a lot of money, these projects would be more than thankful if you donated some to them.

    Be lucky that you have a good paying job. Its hard to find a job that pays better, however its easy to join one of the open source projects and do what you like.

  46. YES, and NO! by AlienGoods · · Score: 1

    Speaking from experience, don't leave one job for something you presume would be more interesting, because it may turn out to be dull as hell after a few months (personal experience). Having said that, one of the nice things about startups is they offer more opportunity for growth and advancement, something I am sorely missing at my current job. All the same, I wouldn't go back to a paycheck-to-paycheck lifestyle no matter how interesting or promising the job was.

    On a side note, this is why everyone needs a sugar momma/daddy.

    --
    Lighten up. Its only a post.
  47. I have done exactly this. by Patman · · Score: 1

    And never regretted it.

    Your new job is going to have a lot of the same crap as your old job, but it's at least going to be interesting for you.

    Ask yourself this question: will the pay/benefits of my new job be enough for me to live comfortably on? If so, I say go for it.

  48. Google pays less by int14 · · Score: 1

    I would totally do it. I feel far too many people become complacent with their job and the settle with something that pays the bills but doesn't satisfy them. Also, I read somewhere that Google actually pays less than most of its competitors in the area, part because they offer such killer benefits, but also because most engineers who work there seem to really like what they do. Also, if its a small startup you're thinking of working for, try to work a small amount of equity into your compensation, that way if the company gets sold for $50 bajillion you'll get a slice.

  49. well by scapermoya · · Score: 1

    I'm not old enough to be in the workforce yet, but I imagine this is a simple economics question just like anything else. If you are assured that the job is a certain amount more interesting, with room for you to grow (promotions, pay increases, whatever), and the pay cut doesnt drastically affect your standard of living, go for it.

    basically, is the pay cut so much that it would change how you live, and if so does the more interesting work make up for that?

    This is 95% a personal preference question

    --
    Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun the frumious Bandersnatch.
  50. HELL, yes! by Gorshkov · · Score: 1

    I've done it before, and I'd do it again.

    The bottom line is this: you spend (roughly) a third of your adult life at work. You cannot expect to be happy in the rest of your life if you are miserable during such a large chunk of your waking hours.

    The difference in quality of life when you earn $10,000 or $20,000 is huge ...... but the difference between $60,000 and $70,000 is marginal.

    Take the pay cut .... and you'll enjoy the money you DO have a lot more.

  51. I did by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 3, Informative

    I took about a 30% pay cut to move from programming to science. I'm happy with that choice.

    Apparently there is a term for this: "downshifters".

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  52. Pay Cut by sedyn · · Score: 1

    I am still a student, but recently I faced the same question. I was guarenteed 2 jobs, one where I would be programming a wireless app for windows (in visual C++, C#, etc.) for $x/hr or in the other I could become an administrator for $(x+4)/hr. Now, considering I am a student and x is quite small the $4 was significant enough to make the decision interesting.

    I finally settled on the programming job because I realized that getting experience / diversifying my resume would be well worth it in the long run. You may not be making much now, but it sounds like a good opportunity to add to your resume. I can't say for sure that you'll have more money in the future, but I like to think about it this way: What is better, building a career I could see myself doing for the rest of my life, or a single job that I regard as a vehicle to simply pay the bills?

    Besides, there are plenty of jobs like the one you have now. And if they have a CS major doing it, then I doubt they really care about being a person being overqualified. So it probably won't be hard to get another one like it.

    The only thing I would be concerned about is the overtime of the OS job. And the ramifications should probably be explained to your gf (if the two of you have a significant enough relationship).

    --
    Am I open minded towards open source, or closed minded towards closed source?
    1. Re:Pay Cut by billster0808 · · Score: 1

      I'm also a student and recently faced something similar. I was making pretty good money (for a college kid) working in the mind-numbing field of phone surveys for a well known company. Last semester I got offered a job as a teaching assistant at my University. I was working somewhere with a great atmosphere, great pay, doing work that made me want to rip my hair out. The new position paid just slightly better than McDonalds, but actually offered interesting work, and would look great on my resume. I decided to leave phone survey world, and I couldn't be happier. I don't come home from work stressed out anymore. I'm even more broke than before, but it's definetly worth it.

  53. This has been discussed many times... by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 1

    ... here before and it all boils down to what you value. Do you value security and high pay over a potentially big reward (money, experience, personal satisfaction) that may or may not materialize? Would you be willing to leave a "good job" for something else that may be better or worse? How much do you believe in the start-up's chances and the people behind it?

    One thing to consider is can you grow in your current job. Have you seriously discussed expanding your role or broadening your experience within the company? A good company will work with you to do that. After all, companies should (note, I said "should") value employees who want to grow and improve.

    If your current employer is willing to do this, then I'd suggest staying with them. It sounds like you've got a good thing going on the compensation side.

    If they give you the "you're too important where you are" bit, then you have start weighing all those things you value and determine whether staying or jumping ship is best for you. As has been said numerous times here before, only you can decide that.

    --
    -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
    1. Re:This has been discussed many times... by rjstanford · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you value security and high pay over a potentially big reward (money, experience, personal satisfaction) that may or may not materialize? Would you be willing to leave a "good job" for something else that may be better or worse? How much do you believe in the start-up's chances and the people behind it?

      Let me put it a better way. Why bother defining yourself by your job?

      Show up at 8. Leave at 5. Every day. Give yourself a good life outside the office. Take up hobbies in your free time, which you'll have now and won't at the startup. Bank some money - if you can live off half your salary, that's a great cushion for the future when you do get the entreprenurial bug (or will let you retire surprisingly early if you don't).

      But, in all seriousness, don't try to get everything you want out of life from your job. Take all of your vacation time every year. Insist on comp time and raises, too. Then go to Tahiti. Or train for marathons. Or play around with some cool scratch-an-itch software in your spare time (just don't spend it all in front of a monitor). Hang out with friends. Invest in yourself.

      Don't let yourself become a "developer." You are a person. You have a job. The two are, should be, and can be seperate.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  54. An apropos quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you are doing something you don't believe in just for the money there's a word for that... prostitute.

    But, that said, it's a lot easier to take a high paying job and do the things you love in your free time than to work for less money doing something you love. When I was young and idealistic I thought I should do something I really wanted to do and enjoy myself. Call me a sellout, but ten years later I realize that I'd rather put in my hours at work, collect a fat paycheck then use that money to enjoy myself. Think about it - each week you spend 40(ish) hours at work and 128 outside of work.

  55. I already have by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    I do a lot of interesting embedded and OS level stuff. I could wear a tie and crank VB/SQL for government/corporate operators for a lot more money.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  56. Give it a time limit by WindBourne · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I have worked on 6 starts-up over the last 15 years. The 2'nd to last one put me in the hole 50K (from being up 60K in savings) which took several years to pay back. However, I am getting ready to do it again. Do I love it? absolutely. But I have been burned enough that I would offer you several suggestions.
    • Make sure of the money in the company. Are they financed? How much money do they have in the bank?
    • Get it up front as to what you will be earning, and what benefits.
    • You are giving up a lot of money, so make sure that you will be compensated for your efforts. That is get chunk of the company.
    • Make sure what is expected of you. Are you the core coder? Is this your idea? Who are the people that you will be working with. Understand that most of the ppl who do start-ups are bright, hard-driven, and egotisical. Can you deal with that.
    • Did I mention that need to know what financing they have?


    Finally, count on the fact that this company will fail (most do). What back-up plan do you have? If you quit your current job, make sure that you keep your foot in it( i.e. leave on a very good note). For the last 5 years, the economy has been so-so, with a enormously rising deficit, and almost certain that the deal with Iran is about to blow up. When it happens, the price of gas will probably shoot to 3-3.5/gal. That means that the economy will cut back. i.e., there is likely to be at least a softening in the economy. If the economy softens, what happens to the company? Is its product dependant on a growing economy.

    Now, with all that, consider going. If you are a true CS, then the current job will guarentee you no future. Why would I hire you if you have shown no initiative. At the very least, if you stay with it, consider doing some OSS work. Since you do Windows, you can do that work in Windows as well. But you need something that shows that you are capable.

    Good Luck.
    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Give it a time limit by TheReal_BarkMan · · Score: 1

      I agree. You may also consider negotiating for something they do have -- time. I am a serial start-up employee and have successfully negotiated four day work weeks at the last two companies I've worked for.

      As the parent says, don't lose sight of the financials of the new company. Also, in my experience, most start-ups are missing one or more of the key ingredients to success (sales and marketing, leadership and vision, technical execution). I have found that a start up that really recognizes the importance of sales and marketing has a shot at being around for awhile.

      BTW, I think this article/question is a great advertisement for living beneath your means in a significant way. If the poster has paid down a significant portion of his home and not gotten addicted to the lavish lifestyle he can currently afford, he would probably not be asking /. for advice, but rather taking the plunge.

      Go for it! Live!

  57. Just weight both options by Hexedian · · Score: 1

    Sounds like your current job isn't all that bad; having friends as coworkers really should weight more than the paycut. In the end, though, you're the only one who can decide whether you enjoy life more with the extra cash or the extra challenge.

  58. Yes yes yes yes yes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please dear GAWD pick ME pick ME!!!

  59. No... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

    ... at least not at this point in my life. However, one of my goals is to make it so when I am 40-45 I *can* take a paycut, if needed, to find more "fulfilling" work. I am not unhappy with what I am doing now... but I could see myself teaching , or doing volunteer work. I also like to eat :) But by preparing now... living off 75% of my pay, so I have more options.

    If you are already at this point. GREAT! For those of you living off 105% of pay... I guess SOMEONE has to keep working so the rest of us can retire :)

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  60. Would I take a cut? In a heartbeat... by spagetti_code · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look - pay is usually ranked #6 or lower of most employees list of criteria for satisfaction. Dont mess with a boring job - quality of like just skyrockets if you are having fun.

  61. I swore off corporate work in College by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In college as a Computer Science major I worked at the University as a Network Engineer/Security handyman. I learned so much from the Internet 2 community. As a follower of the FSS I would always make sure to release my work, research and share with others in the community. I enjoy the academic community so much that when I decided to make Network Security my career I swore I would never work for a corporation. A corporation who would only restrict my output to the community, who would not allow me to do independent research that would help make the internet a better place. In an academic environment this is encouraged. I later joined a non-profit Internet2 related org. being paid to do Network Security research in the interests of academia. I am free to do independent research, release all my results, data and tools for free to the community and they pay me to go to hacker cons and training. All in the interests of helping out fellow researchers in academia.

    It's much more fulfilling than being a cube junkie running around fixing windows problems or tracking down problems on a corporate network. Sure some companies are exceptions, however I feel I have a lot more freedom. Of course I could make a hell of a lot more money in a corporate environment, but it just would not be the same. I am working on some really interesting bleeding edge research in Network/Operating System Security.

    Not to mention I get that good feeling in me that I am helping out my local Universities, helping make them a better place for learning. Plus I have access to a ton of bandwidth! :)

    I am free to run any OS I want (I only run Linux anyways but still), I am free to talk about my research, I get to go to meetings in t-shirts that say RTFM on them. It's laid back and interesting work. Very stress free (thats key for me), no crazy TPS reports, no managers, I am almost my own boss. Try getting away with any of that in a corporate environment.

    I also have the pleasure to deal with people who are at the top of the field in Network Security research in academia and corporate. I don't have to deal with dumb users, I don't have to deal with dumb managers and best of all... I'm 22.

    I could have worked for a major global network security firm that just happens to have their offices in my state, I could have made easily 20 or 30k more than I do now. The perks of this job outweigh any amount of **money, trouble and headaches** any corporate job would give me.

    Is it worth the paycut? You bet ya!

    Did I mention I also have a ton of free time to boot? And I come and go as I please from my work (well almost, but 60% of the time when I don't have to be in the office for any particular thing I can).

    Gotta love that paycut! Waking up at 10am to go into work has never felt so good, thank god for salary. :-)

  62. Yes. Quit. by mrimprov42 · · Score: 3, Funny

    You should definitely quit.

    After you do, can you put in a good word for me with your boss? I could really use the *high pay*, *extravagant benefits and bonuses*, *flexi-time*, and the ability to *telecommute whenever possible*.

    Sheesh...

  63. I did! by davezirk · · Score: 1

    In the late 80's I went from a low-level management position (25,000 USD) to a teaching job in a religious school making 8,500, in order to get my certification. Once certified I went to 20,000. I've never regretted it, I love my work.

  64. My thoughts by Jerf · · Score: 1

    You say you have "great pay", and you are thinking about taking a pay cut. Are you currently saving money at some significant rate per month? Everybody should be, but you're the canonical example of someone who should be.

    If you've got a cushion stashed away, so that the startup can go under and you're not on the street in the next week, I'd strongly suggest jumping ship, for two reasons. One is that your current complaints are only going to become worse. The second is that you may find that you are in a career dead-end, relative to where you want to be. You hint at this; I confirm this.

    If you can get equity in the startup (ask!), so much the better. (If you believe, you may even seal the deal with a bit of investment.)

    If, on the other hand, despite your great pay you have no savings, my suggestion would be, pretend you're taking the pay cut now and start pocketing the difference, but unless you can make yourself extremely sure the startup is a "sure thing" for some period of time, skip it. You'll have to take on the next opportunity that comes by. Odds are extremely good there will be one.

    (One aspect of savings that people seriously underestimate is how it frees you to take certain riskier opportunities as they come by. Spending every last dime traps you even before the "health catastrophe" or the "death in the family" or "sudden illness" or the other traditional sudden money drains.)

  65. I did that today by cdn · · Score: 1

    I submitted my resignation today. I was in a job that bored me to tears after I accepted an offer for a position that pays 20% less. I am emotionally erect that the prospect of having a challenge in my job again.

  66. It's all about tradeoffs by theobscurest · · Score: 1

    I work in academia.. I make a decent salary compared to a lot of other sysadmin types at my university. I think the people I work with are great and I've been presented with many cool projects that keep me working there. All of this despite the fact I could be making twice as much in corporate. I wouldn't leave my job for that. Money isn't everything. I wouldn't take a pay cut either..

    However, I'm working on starting my own business. I can do this safely without taking a pay cut while I continue working at my academia job. However, once my retirement vests in two years, I'm probably going to quit, and risk the pay cut and other risks that come with starting a business (altho hopefully we'll be profitting to some degree by that point). I'm doing this in the interest of doing something I find incredibly cool and fun, and most importantly, as my own boss.

    Most importantly, when considering a pay cut, is making sure you'll be happy and can afford to live on the lower salary. If you're just making ends meet right now, probably not a good idea to quit the current job, no matter how interesting the other job is. For instance, I wouldn't quit my job now to concentrate on starting my business. Sure, I might progress with that faster, but I won't be able to pay my bills or have some minimal comforts in life.

    There are always tradeoffs in any job change. A previous post listed you are happy with your current coworkers. This is important. A new job could be more interesting, but not if you can't get along with your coworkers/boss. Of course other benefits should be taken into consideration as well. Going back to academia vs. corporate, I like how I can work on my degree, all paid for by the university. I also have a very flexible schedule. All tradeoffs for a lower salary. I also have job security and know for a fact when I'm going to get raises, retirement money, etc..

    Good luck and think carefully about making life decisions!

  67. Open Source Development by TallGuyRacer · · Score: 0

    Why not keep your current job and find some interesting open source development projects to work on in the background?

  68. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for asking though.

  69. Go for it! (YMMV) by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

    From you description, I'd jump at it... you're young enough to take risks and you're bored. Strike while the iron is hot.

    More practically, it depends on just how bored you are, how big a pay cut, and how much risk is there in the startup.

    Even if it all falls to dust, having the risk-taking, interesting job on your resume will probably help you find the next job.

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  70. Who says VBA has to be boring? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1
    Through judicious hackery and pythonic idioms, I've used VBA class modules with definitions like

    Public do_not_try_this_at_home As i_wish_VBA_were_not_teh_suckin

    Public Function a__init__( self As yeah_I_would_rather_code_python, but_WTF_this_is_what_they_gave_me As String )
    self.do_not_try_this_at_home.a__init__( self.do_not_try_this_at_home )
    End Function
    Things get more interesting when you want to overload a function.
    You can pass in Variants, which can be class modules, so you could have two leaf modules implement, say, a ThatHurts( self As yep_VBA_really_is_a_python_without_a_spine ) method. Trouble is, you have to instantiate the class module you want with a classically hack-tacular Select Case, a la:
    Public Function foo_0( hey_we_can_implement_stuff_better_managed_by_the_r untime As Integer )
    Dim ouch As Variant
    Select Case hey_we_can_implement_stuff_better_managed_by_the_r untime
    Case DISASTER
    Set ouch = New yep_VBA_really_is_a_python_without_a_spine
    Case Else
    Set ouch = Nothing
    End Select
    foo_1 ouch
    End Function

    Public Function foo_1( ouch As Variant )
    ouch.ThatHurts()
    End Function
    You get the picture
    And, no, I won't take it back.
    Slashcode's refusal to support any code indentation only makes the idiocy more poignant.
    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    1. Re:Who says VBA has to be boring? by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      After reading that, I'm glad my job (sometimes) involves writing Perl! :-) (no really, I'm serious though...)

  71. (current && new) == !perfect by mickyflynn · · Score: 1

    frankly speaking, if you're bored out of your mind then your job is not perfect. If you're going to have less pay and benefits then the new job will not be perfect either. A perfect job would be an interesting job with good pay and benefits. However, lets face it, the 90s are over and gone are the days when i could have branded a spork as an "eCommerce solution" and gotten away with it and 10,000,000USD. You're not going to find a "perfect job." My advice would be to stay where you are for the practical benefits and do whatever you want to in your spare time to keep your mind sharp and your wits about you. I'm an English major looking at graduation. I'm likely not going to find a job writing or anything. I'll do that in my spare time and get some mindless office job to pay the bills. I went out for the Army, but they disqualified me because of asthma; couldn't get the waiver. I envy your possition. At least you have a job. besides, there is no guarantee that this new venture is going to stay solvent. It could die in a month or a year, and leave you with nothing. Stay where you are and get a hobby.

  72. I took a paycut to escape the corporate world... by TechieHermit · · Score: 1

    ...does that count?

    Back in 2000, when everyone was laying off and outsourcing was just starting to build momentum, I saw the writing on the wall and I got the hell out of Manhattan. I got a civil service job with the government, and it took me a few years to build seniority, but now I get paid about the same as I used to but with half the living expenses, better benefits, excellent job security, and family-friendly hours.

    Best of all, I'm still doing Java development. With nice tools, too. And my boss actually RESPECTS me. They even pay for training. And books.

    Why would anyone still want to work for an American company in this day and age?

  73. Already did by defile · · Score: 1

    Put an extremely successful but rather tame computer consulting career on hold to work for these clowns ;)

    Pushing it to the limit!

  74. Do what you love, the money will follow. by chasisaac · · Score: 1

    Title of a book that has really helped me. I have taken several paycuts for other jobs, the total overall is about 2/3 paycut over the past 10 years. The last one I took was about 1/3 paycut. Best thing I ever did. Money is sometimes tight but my sanity is worth it. My wife is hapy, I am happy and my kids are happy. Now, I am doing what I love amd love what I am doing. When the alarm goes off, I am glad to get up. In three years I have never had to think, maybe today I will just oversleep. When vacation is over I am ready to go back. BTW: I am high school teacher at a private school who earns about 60% of the public school counterparts. I receive no bounses, no profit sharing, just my pay and I am glad.

    --
    -- A computer without Windoze is like a choclate cake without mustard
    1. Re:Do what you love, the money will follow. by IAAP · · Score: 1
      I saw the title and I thought of that book. I'm also thinking of an author who took the advice and is having a bittersweet experience. He gave up a six figure job to write full time. He's been published and all, but he has no money and is relying on charity from friends and family - he hates it.

      He's been out of corporate too long to go back. I have my own pretty rotten story regarding doing what you love and the money will follow - NOT!

      Unfortunately, what I or someone else loves to do is also loved by many others, and as a result of supply and demand, there's usually not much money to be made. And by not much, I mean not being able to make a living at it. Ex. The majority of Artists, writers, well anything artistic; most pilot jobs pay shit, as in having to apply for food stamps (See archives of Patrick Smith's column on Salon.com), I'm sure you can think of some yourself.

      Don't get me wrong, it's obvious that what you did was right for you. As a matter of fact, I know an attourney that got so sick of it, she became a High School teacher herself. She says she doesn't regret it at all. Even though she's broke all the time now.

      What I'm getting at is, maybe it should be "Do what you love and don't count on the money following, but if it comes, it's icing on the cake."

  75. Yep definitely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd take the pay and cut... out.

  76. Heck yes. by SocialEngineer · · Score: 1

    While most people would say the main point of a job is to make a living, you should also enjoy what you are doing, and it should give you a sense of accomplishment. I also want to be pushed to continue to learn; access macros aren't going to do that for you, I'm guessing, so I'd say go for the paycut, if you can survive.

    --
    "Better to be vulgar than non-existent" -Bev Henson
  77. Don't take it! by sixpacker · · Score: 1

    Take my advice seriously since you look far from reality.
    If you think your job mundane and boring, develop your hobby such as creative programming or whatever else you like to do and do it during your spare time.

    Even though the job offer may look fantastic and interesting, once it becomes your job, it just gets boring, mundane, and even stressful. That is a reality and an essential part of every start-up project.

    --
    Your ego is Matrix!
  78. I already did by brokeninside · · Score: 1

    I'm making about 2/3 of what I would be if I had stayed at my cushy job at a large multi-national firm.

    And, once I get my evil machinations into place, I'll be making 1/3 of what I am now.

    But I'll be sleeping much better at night.

  79. Start-up? Any stock options involved? - Go for it! by PaulBu · · Score: 1

    You do not work for a start-up because of good pay -- you work for a) fun and b) a chance to make it BIG, really big... You are not going to have a chance to be able to do your early retirement at 35 if you live on your "well-paid" $150K/year salary (if you are somewhat normal and can not live on dry chinese noodles alone... ;-) ).

    And you do not have too many bills to pay (yet!) -- maybe it's time to make a plunge!

    I did myself recently (and I do have bills to pay, wife, and so on...) -- my deal with the start-up I work for now was to match my perivious salary in USD in their Canadian dollars (~18% paycut) -- but the whole fun part definitely pays for it (even taking into account crazy prices for everything BUT sushi in Vancouver ;-) ).

    Paul B.

  80. no by bholub · · Score: 1

    no, good pay and "flexi" time allow for you to find stimulation elsewhere. to me it sounds like you'd be moving to a job that might be more intersting work... maybe more work, less money, and less flexible time. time and enough money to allow you to do what you want in the time that you have is one of the hardest balances in life.

    --
    I farted
  81. Code at work anyway by slapout · · Score: 1

    In every job I've had (programming or not) I've written programs to help coworkers and myself with work. Usually utilities that make things easier. Of course, I'm sure the culture would vary by company so yours might not approve but even though mine wheren't official projects, they were always well received.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    1. Re:Code at work anyway by olorinpc · · Score: 1

      this you do have to be carefull with though. Some places word contracts in such a way that anything you produce while working for them (or while on company time) is owned by them etc.

  82. An easy job that pays can fund your other pursuits by vg30e · · Score: 1

    I am a Windows Systems Admin. Honestly, before everyone jumps on me because I work with Microsoft product, I view it as a way to finance the things I do outside of work.

    Right now, without the job that I do (which involves lots of paperwork), I would not be able to pay for my night schooling that I take in order to get my Bachelors. In the future, when the school stuff is done, I feel that I will have more skills, more free time, and more money to challenge myself in other ways, like learning another OS.

    If your pay is good, and you still have time that you feel is not being put to good use, you can find other ways to grow in your chosen field.

  83. Life is long, if you know how to use it. by zunger · · Score: 1

    Provided that the new job does not instill specific hardships - that you will have enough to keep yourself and your family fed, housed, clothed, insured and the like - I would say yes. Life is very short; would you rather spend your days at a job that gave you money, but never gave you a chance to use it for the things that mattered most to you? Consider how many hours in a day you spend at work; I see my officemates more than anyone else. If I were given more money for a boring job, at the most I could use it to buy myself leisure time to try to counteract it - but since that would be less than half of my time, I would be losing in the bargain! Better to ensure that all your moments are spent on things which are worth the while.

    But other people have said this before -- Seneca wrote on the shortness of life (Or in an excellent dead-tree edition, either way it's very short) much more eloquently than I could.

  84. What are your goals in life? by Zopilote · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Depends on your goals and state in life. If you are married and have kids (like me) you might want to stick with the higher-paying, more stable job. A job at a startup sounds like too much risk even without the pay cut.

    However, if you are still relatively unattached, go for your dreams and what makes you happy at work. If you enjoy what you do, you will be more likely in the long run to find a job that does pay well and is fun at the same time. Consider the startup job to be a stepping stone along the way. Rather than let your skills get rusty and find yourself losing your edge later, keep them sharp and keep your motivation and enthusiasm up.

    If you are unhappy with your current job but are still averse to the riskiness of a startup, don't take this opportunity but go ahead and look around for other jobs. There may still be a better place for you that doesn't have as much risk or as much of a pay cut. The economy is doing fairly well so don't be timid!

    One more note. I know this is Slashdot and I also know the industry we are in, so the following advice may seem out of place. Nevertheless, here goes. Even in a job that you enjoy, try not to let it totally consume your life. There is life beyond work. I advise you to retain enough time for yourself to be able to strike up and nurture relationships with other people. If you have a family, spend time with them. If you are single, don't hesitate too long to find that special someone! The trend in our society is toward marrying and starting a family in your 30s or even later. First of all, that makes it harder to get used to each other when you do find someone. Second, it increases the risk of unhealthy children (birth defects, etc.). Third, despite the stereotypes, family life really is a lot more fun and enjoyable than the single life-- study after study claims this, and my own experience confirms it. When you look back on your life, will it matter more that you had a stellar, enjoyable career, or that you had a good family life and have relatives around you in your old age?

    Again, I guess it really does boil down to what your goals are in life. They're not the same for everyone, but I do recommend sitting down and thinking honestly about your own goals and making sure they are the right ones for you-- that you aren't just following whatever everyone else is doing because you don't have your own clear path in mind.

    1. Re:What are your goals in life? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Even in a job that you enjoy, try not to let it totally consume your life. There is life beyond work. I advise you to retain enough time for yourself to be able to strike up and nurture relationships with other people."

      So let me ask you something....what do you do if you don't have ANY time during the week because of work, and your weekend is dominated by rest and chores that piled up from the week? How do you have time for relationships....or more importantly, the energy!?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:What are your goals in life? by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      So let me ask you something....what do you do if you don't have ANY time during the week because of work, and your weekend is dominated by rest and chores that piled up from the week? How do you have time for relationships....or more importantly, the energy!?

      Quit, if you can. Seriously. You are (or should be) way more than a job.

      Not carrying a significant debt load is probably the single biggest contributor to being able to carry out that plan at will, of course. Still, I would say that you either want to find a relaxing (although interesting) job that gives you the time you need, or failing that at least a job that pays through the nose and lets you build up the savings necessary to get the flexibility to do what you want to do (even if that just means quitting for something else).

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    3. Re:What are your goals in life? by Wocko · · Score: 1

      Hire a cleaner.

    4. Re:What are your goals in life? by Zopilote · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even in a job that you enjoy, try not to let it totally consume your life. There is life beyond work. I advise you to retain enough time for yourself to be able to strike up and nurture relationships with other people.

      So let me ask you something....what do you do if you don't have ANY time during the week because of work, and your weekend is dominated by rest and chores that piled up from the week? How do you have time for relationships....or more importantly, the energy!?

      The simple answer lies in the section you quoted: "Retain enough time for yourself..." in other words, don't let your job take up all your time during the week. In order to have a life outside of work, if I were in a job that required more than 50 hours a week as the normal state of affairs, whether I liked the work or not, I would start looking elsewhere. Think about it. At 50 hours a week, that's at least 2 extra hours out of each and every workday! What could you do if you had that time back?

      The tough reality, however, is that it is not always easy, especially in certain industries, to find an employer that respects your off-work time. In the tug-of-war between employers and employees, it seems the trend is toward employees losing more of their personal time. It fluctuates with the job market: the last few years have favored the employers, pushing expected working time on average up quite a bit. But the market is swinging back toward the employees; it's up to us to ask for what we want. If market forces fail and current trends continue, as much as I hate government intervention, there may eventually need to be some changes in workers' rights legislation.

      As for weekends, chores, etc. I totally hear you. It is frustrating and there never seems to be enough time for the relationships and hobbies you want. The only thing I can say is you have to prioritize the important things in your life, and sacrifice some things that don't make the cut. It all comes back to... "what are your goals in life?" Is it to play every great video game that comes out? Is it to have an immaculate, sparkling clean model home? (Good luck with that one if you have a family... give it up now!) Is it to have meaningful relationships? I'm not here to say "you can do it all." It might sound trite but it's totally true that you can't have everything. Those people that seem to have it all together, often only appear to on the surface.

      I'm discovering this every day in my life. I am struggling so hard to finish my master's degree and still keep a sane work and family life. I had to sacrifice some things I liked, such as video games. My house is not the newest, biggest, or cleanest house among those in my social circle. I have unfinished projects right and left. But I'm happy with the choices so far because I know what I want out of my life. And my family life, even though it is not all perfect, is still worth everything I've given up for it. Nothing beats the feeling of having a wife and two cute kids to come home to, and spending at least some time with them, even if they are a lot of work most of the rest of the time. ;-)

      All of this is pretty common sense stuff, but it's amazing how many times we have to remind ourselves of it. Sit down and evaluate what you want in your life, and that will help you find the job that accomodates those goals.

    5. Re:What are your goals in life? by ignavusinfo · · Score: 1
      > Hire a cleaner.

      i'm not sure if this was tongue in cheek or not but it is excellent advice. there's the whole not having to clean on the weekends part but there are at least a couple other benefits: one tends to keep things neat and put away (so the cleaners can get to the surfaces to clean) and one's house is always ready for impromptu guests.

      on the OP's notion that "family life is better than single life" that's not always true. i'd point out that sometimes (and not always, this isn't meant as an all inclusive statement) the married with children types say this because they'd like to drag you into the bowels of hell that they find themselves in. i'm perfectly happy being in my mid-30s, single, childless, living alone, and in a stable 10+ year relationship. i honestly don't believe having children (or somebody else picking out my furniture) would make me any happier in either the short or long terms.

  85. Random thoughts... by Yhippa · · Score: 1
    1. Take the job with the highest pay that you hate the least.
    2. The grass is greener on the other side.
    3. Job "coolness" and "pay" are often inversely proportional for us normal people.
    4. ???
    5. No, I'm not going to write what you think I'm going to write.
  86. In short... by kvn · · Score: 1

    Hell yes. I was in a similar position, working as a consultant and BORED TO TEARS. After 4 years of the money chase I walked out. I was ready to leave software development alltogether... fortunately for me, I eventually ended up in grad school, at around $17k/year to get by, but I am so much happier. I would do it again in a heartbeat.

    If walking away is not an option, talk to your manager at the consulting company - they have an investment in you, and if they care at all they will help you find more interesting/exciting assignments.

    The old saying is true: money isn't everything. You have the rest of your life to work... find something you love/like to do and do it.

  87. Do what you enjoy by Drakin030 · · Score: 1

    This goes back to "Do what you have a passion for." I for one am a Programer, I deal with access and such. I make a good amount of money. This is very teadious work however, its brain busters sometimes. But would I leave that and take less to become a network administrator? (Which is what I want to be) YES.

    The reason is I have a passion for network administration, I would have more fun with the job, I may make less I may make more, that doesnt matter. If I can put food on the table, then thats all that matters to me. I want a job I can enjoy doing and look forward to. I want to do what I have a passion for.

  88. I'd do it. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My current job was very interesting at first, but it's gotten somewhat boring. Actually I've been looking forward to a paycut to have more free hours so I can work on things I like, i.e. Open Source development. Currently i get too tired from the job to keep on going, but by programming on Open Source projects, I feel like I'm helping the world and all that.

    I'd like you to ask yourself this question: "Do I see myself doing this for the next 20 years?" Note that I didn't say '... in the next 20 years', but 'during the next 20 years'. Sometimes a boring job really gets to your nerves, and as marriage, when it gets boring, you tend to stop liking it and then it goes all downhill.

    Fortunately, jobs aren't marriages, and you can quit whenever you decide. So, this seems to be the moment of your decision. Plus, when you get the other job experience, later you'll be able to ask for a raise :)

    I'd say go for it, I'm sure you won't regret the decision. And if you do regret it, at least you'll have gained the good experiences of the new job - something you can't gain in the current one, don't you think? :)

    1. Re:I'd do it. by typical · · Score: 1

      Actually I've been looking forward to a paycut to have more free hours so I can work on things I like, i.e. Open Source development. Currently i get too tired from the job to keep on going, but by programming on Open Source projects, I feel like I'm helping the world and all that.

      I've found that when I work a lot on interesting Linux systems programming at work, my desire to do open source goes down.

      When I'm writing .NET code, I get desperate to get out of the office so that I can actually produce something solid at home.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    2. Re:I'd do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately, jobs aren't marriages

      Yes, jobs make you money instead of costing you money and it's worth fighting to keep a job.

  89. "me too" by eagl · · Score: 5, Funny

    I gave up a great programming job in 1990 that would pay me as an intern through college and then hire full time on graduation at over $35,000 entry level, not bad back in 1990. 10 years later, I passed up an opportunity to transition to an airline job that would pay in excess of $120,000/year after 3 years in the company. I married a doctor 3 years ago and if I quit my job today, she could join a private practice and make well over $350,000 per year while I kicked it doing... well, anything really.

    What job has led me to make these financially retarded career moves?

    I'm a USAF fighter pilot.

    Woot.

    1. Re:"me too" by dr_dank · · Score: 5, Funny

      What job has led me to make these financially retarded career moves?

      I'm a USAF fighter pilot.


      Does your ego routinely write checks that your body can't cash?

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:"me too" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God bless you, sir! And thank you for your service!

    3. Re:"me too" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, im jealous! Jobs like that sound so fun! :D

      and im stuck being a webhosting technical support agent / systems admin!

    4. Re:"me too" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking of the Navy.

    5. Re:"me too" by scovetta · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I bet he's flying cargo planes out of Hong Kong filled with you-know-what.

      --
      Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
    6. Re:"me too" by jafac · · Score: 1

      Video games kill that pain real quick.

      That and waking up at 7am, and feeling thankful that I didn't have to get up at oh-four-thirty!

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    7. Re:"me too" by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Hey eagl, serious question...how tough is your job? I know its got some perks, like pushing the limit in a multimillion dollar fighter jet with the capability to unleash massive destruction....but what are the downsides? Does anything in the job ever make you think to yourself "man, I gotta get out of this"?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    8. Re:"me too" by devfsadm · · Score: 0

      We don't have ohhs in the military.
      Like an oh henry bar.
      We have zeros as in zero four thirty.
      At least we didn't when I was in the Military.

    9. Re:"me too" by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know, the parent is modded Funny, but he's extremely on-target here. He has repeatedly given up the high-paying jobs to continue doing what an always-exciting job that he loves. As the submitter was asking whether or not it is worth it, this is extremely relevant.

      This man has not only said 'take the fun job!' but has actually done it and proven that it works.

      I'm not saying there's nothing funny about the post, but I find it quite an important post on the topic at hand.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    10. Re:"me too" by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Ok...I'm probably the only person to bitch about a positive mod...but I was actually quite serious with my question. The reason I asked it is because someone may sound like they have an awesome job, but thats just because it has been glamorized by popular culture. Every job has its downsides. Take doctors for example, you save lives and make a TON of money....but when they have bad days...wow, they just get bad. Things most humans will never have to deal with.

      Thats why I was wondering about our ace's job. I mean, if you are in active duty, I would imagine that if you play a direct role in shooting things, it would be pretty emotionally stressful.

      But I'm wondering, is it true that all fighter pilots are pretty much alpha males (yourself excluded because you might have a LITTLE bias)? Or are there some complete geeks in there who don't have social skills, but can do amazing things in and with machines?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    11. Re:"me too" by BaudKarma · · Score: 1

      I would think that shooting things would not be nearly as stressful as having things shoot back at you.

      --
      It's the land of the brave, and the home of the free
      Where the less you know, the better off you'll be.
    12. Re:"me too" by eagl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hey eagl, serious question...how tough is your job? I know its got some perks, like pushing the limit in a multimillion dollar fighter jet with the capability to unleash massive destruction....but what are the downsides? Does anything in the job ever make you think to yourself "man, I gotta get out of this"?

      I won't compare it to other tough jobs, but it is very stressful. A 12 hour work day is standard when flying due to 12 hour off-duty rest requirements prior to the next flight (leaving 12 hours to work, right?) and since we're so macho, anyone griping about the work is laughed at so the work pretty much builds to completely fill our day. It's not uncommon to arrive at work at 0400 in the morning and go home at 8 pm that night if you're not flying the next day, otherwise you leave work 12 hours before you have to be at work the next day.

      Add on the death/destruction nature of the work, having close friends of yours get splattered from hitting the ground at 600 knots following as little as 4 seconds of inattention, 4 or more months away from home every year, moving your family to the other side of the world every 2 or 3 years, and the stress/strain adds up.

      On top of that, the fact that a fighter pilot is the end result of a series of selection processes means that everyone we work with has been at the top of almost every competitive endeavor they've ever tried in their entire life. A quick example, is my career. And I'm not even all that good...

      These numbers are by memory, so some of them may be a bit off. But the order of magnitude will be correct...
      The year I went to the USAF Academy, there were around 250,000 inquiries. Of those, there were around 50,000 people who met the minimum entrance requirements. Of those, 10,000 were highly qualified. Of those, approx 1,600 were accepted. By the time I graduated, fully 1/3 of my class had quit or washed out. Of the 1000 graduates in my class, approx 800 were medically qualified for pilot training, but due to post-cold war drawdowns, there were only 225 pilot training slots. So just in getting my pilot training slot, I was one of 225 selected from a pool of over 350,000 potential applicants.

      At pilot training, my class had 32 students. Of those 32, only 6 went to the fighter/bomber track. Of those 6, only 4 got fighters.

      Not trying to beat my chest, but I'm trying to get across the point that not only is uncompromising drive for excellence and actual job competence a requirement, everyone else I work with has these same values and to some degree, if we want to get promoted then we must somehow stand out from our peers. That's easier for some people than others, and frankly sometimes it seems like I struggle just to keep up with everyone else just because everyone else is so damn good.

      I won't dig too deep into the remaining sources of stress, except to mention that our primary job, that of being a fighter pilot, is extremely difficult and complex. Technology, tactics, and threats are constantly changing and failing to keep up results in getting killed, getting your wingman killed, not hitting your target or worse, killing the wrong people when employing weapons. I fully understand that the guy changing the oil in my car may have just as much pride in his job as anyone else, but nobody's going to get killed if he can't recite the molecular composition of every major brand of oil on the market or describe in detail the construction methods used to make an oil filter. You can bet that (as one small example) needing to memorize the tactical capabilities and limitations of around 100 enemy weapons systems is going to be a source of stress.

      A quick note about medical issues - I estimate up to 20% of pilots I've flown with have serious but undiagnosed back injuries. They are undiagnosed because as soon as you tell the doc about them, you're grounded. I flew on a herniated L5-S1 disc for 6 years before the pain crippled me and I had to go to the doc to get it fixed. I

    13. Re:"me too" by eagl · · Score: 1

      It takes a certain amount of aggressiveness and arrogance to be a fighter pilot, but we're not all pegged at the far end of the scale. And arrogance does not always go along with aggressiveness. We simply MUST be aggressive when it is appropriate to be aggressive, because we'll be dead or won't accomplish our mission if we're not. And there is a VERY fine line between having the confidence in your abilities necessary to do our job, and being an arrogant asshole.

      As I said before, we've all been through a rigorous selection process that emphasizes competence and harshly screens out weakness, because in our line of business the weak and/or incompetent die fast.

    14. Re:"me too" by eagl · · Score: 1
      Does your ego routinely write checks that your body can't cash?

      I flew fighters and primary trainers (up to 6.5 G's in the trainers) for 6 years with a herniated L5-S1 disc, and I'm not the only one who made the choice to ignore a medical problem to keep flying. 3 months post-surgery, I was back instructing and 4 months after that I was back in fighters.

      Does that count?
    15. Re:"me too" by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1

      Plus nobody pays you to be a target :).

    16. Re:"me too" by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Eagl, thanks for the VERY in-depth responses to my posts. I really appreciated the insight into a profession that I know little actual truths about.

      I have kind of another random question...but in Battlefield 1942, Desert Combat, and BF2, I would consider myself to be (pardon my bragging) a bit of an ace based on my score and the fact that I consistently am ranked best pilot on the servers I play on...now, my question is, in your opinion how much relevance do real world dogfighting tactics have in this kind of game?

      Obviously the physics are VASTLY different (I can't even imagine how many negative G's I must be pulling sometimes), but if you're familiar with the game, are there any tactics you can recommend I read up on?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    17. Re:"me too" by HugeFatty · · Score: 1

      Well, apparently the mods haven't seen Top Gun. I just wanted to let you know I appreciated the joke (and the GP's joke too...), even though apparently other people didn't...

      --


      I am clearly fatter than you.
  90. thanks by syrinx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You've made me feel better... My job may be boring at times, but at least it's not Access/Excel VBA macros.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
  91. I did it by (shea48) · · Score: 2, Informative

    I took a $20,000 pay cut to work for a young media company. The people are fresh and exciting, the office is cool, and I am the one man IT shop (meaning my way is the way it is). But temper this with no set procedures for anything, management with permanent crisis on their hands, and the knowledge that we might not make the payroll next month.

    There are ups and downs to every job, but really think hard about who you are, how you like to work and remember that 1 in hand is worth 6 in the brush.

  92. Talk to your boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlike what many will tell you, not all bosses are asses. A lot of them want their employees to be happy. Try talking to your boss, tell him/her what you think, why you are unhappy and considering other employment.

    You might be pleasantly surprised and get what you want without leaving the firm.

    And frankly if you are bored, you probably are not being proactive and approaching problems with solutions that can use your skills.

  93. It's the benefits, stupid by Bill+Hayden · · Score: 1

    Benefits are worth more than salary to me. It sounds like you are loaded to the hilt with benefits, in a great environment no less. You don't know how good you have it. At the very least, try to take on newer more exciting responsibilities first before looking outside the company.

    --
    Protect your browser with the Force Safe Search add-on
  94. Yes, But. by Irvu · · Score: 1

    I place a higher value on the interesting work and the lifestyle I live now over money. The question really is not Money v. Interest it's The Old Job v. The New Job. The answer to that lies in what you value most. The very fact that you are asking the question indicates that you do place a value on interesting work. What you need to ask now is, what value do you place on money. Also, what prospects for advancement are there at The New Job versus The Old Job. If your current job is well-paying but dead-end while the other is low-paying but high growth then the growth may in time win out.

    IMHO don't ask us, ask yourself: "What is important to me?" and "Which job fits better?" And when doing this consider all the variables lifestyle, stress, benefits, drinking companions, whatever. If you care about it consider it. List them, rank them, rate the jobs and make your choice.

    I can tell you what I might do but I'm not you so I really wouldn't want you to just do what I say.

  95. million dollar question by f00zbll · · Score: 1
    Devil walks up to a man says, "would you like to make lots of money?" Man replies, "Sure, sounds great, but what's the catch?" Devil replies, "No catch, you'll have smart people to work with, a nice boss and flex hours, but the work will be mundane. Who needs creativity and spiritual growth, when you have a truck load of money. All I ask for is your soul when you die." Man replies, "And how much longer do I have to live?" Devil replies, "No one knows, but in the meantime, you can buy lots of nice toys."

    Does that answer your question?

  96. Re:Probably not - Bang on! by sumotracks · · Score: 1

    You get paid for being social - enjoy the friendships! You can work the hours you want - test yourself technically outside of work. So many people work in bad conditions, to earn poor money, to do what they really want in the weekend. You're telling me: you work in good conditions, for good cash, and can do what you really want, when you want. You want to swap jobs?

  97. Overall quality of life by qaffle · · Score: 1

    I think this is a personal question. Compare your life outside of work at the lower income with the life outside of work you have now. If that change is acceptable then take the other job.
    Just make sure you leave your current job on good terms (just in case) and make sure that this startup isn't going to invade the rest of your life (for instance with long hours trying to get the new product out the door, hours you could spend with your girlfriend or doing whatever else).

  98. It depends on how you value your time by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

    I guess the answer depends on how valuable your time is to you. If you waste hours every day, for example by posting to slashdot, then you probably won't mind working at a boring-ass job for good pay. Especially if you post to slashdot on their time. Then again, if you feel compelled to work on interesting things to the point where it is interfering with the rest of your wife, then by all means take the pay cut and move to the interesting job.

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    1. Re:It depends on how you value your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rest of his wife?

  99. You should definitely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    move on. In exchange for that bit of wisdom let me send you a resume to drop off at HR on your way out the door. I think they might have an opening I might be interested in...

  100. The goal is fun/stimulation, no? by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Some people go through life putting up with work so that they can make enough money to afford to have fun at home. I don't personally like this view; regardless of how much fun you have at home, you've still got 8 hours of guaranteed boredom/misery at least 40 hours a week.

    On the other hand, if you can get paid less and have fun AT WORK, you're MUCH better off. Ask yourself this - How much would you pay for 40 hours a week of fun?

    If the difference between your current job and the more interesting job is less than or equal to that amount, you might need a switch.

    --
    http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
  101. Absolutely ... by duncan+bayne · · Score: 1

    ... provided I could afford the paycut (mortgage, dogs, etc.) Fortunately every time I've quit for a more interesting job, I've received a pay rise as well. My wife, however, recently took a pay cut in order to move to a (non-IT, Call Centre Analyst) job that's more interesting than her previous team leader role, and will benefit her career in the long term.

  102. Think long term by Wills7 · · Score: 1

    You may think that you are earning good money now, but there is very limited potential where you are. Your salary isn't going anywhere fast with excel, access and vba experience. I'll rather take a temporary pay cut for more interesting/challenging works and then utilise the skills I learn in this new job to earn more money further down the track. Life/fun outside work is good, but it doesn't mean your work has to be so boring!

  103. Enjoy your job by oob · · Score: 1

    A wise man once told me; "If you enjoy your job, you'll never work a day in your life."

    Life is too short to do something that you don't enjoy. "I had an awesome time" is a better death bed confession than "I made stacks of cash."

  104. Where are you? by shinghei · · Score: 1

    Let me see...high paid, excellent benefits, no credit card debt...can't possibly be U.S. worker!

  105. I just did that... sort of by Regnard · · Score: 1

    Before, I had two offers: one which paid more and the other, a significantly lower-paying, but interesting and has flexibility.

    I chose the latter because I knew it felt right-- I'd be doing something that's closer to what I want.

    Ultimately, I think it boils down to the balance between practicality and passion: Your job should be close enough to your heart but won't leave on an empty stomach.

    --
    Need a color? Try 100 random colors
  106. "Opportunity to Advance" not valuable to everyone by Jelloman · · Score: 1

    Many of the above comments talk about the "opportunity for advancement" as though that's a universally good thing. But not all of us are ladder-climbers, and managing engineering is often very, very different from engineering. I've seen engineers take a step up the ladder, only to find they're spending most or all of their time on project management, budgets, meetings, etc., and they hate it. Even if they do still code, I'd say from experience that the roles of boss and fellow coder rarely mix well; it depends on the person. Design discussions aren't very fun (and also don't result in the best ideas) when someone pulls rank.

    But "opportunity for growth" is a much broader prospect. In the long run, I say it's better to be learning new skills, taking on a broader range of responsibilities and challenges, experiencing different industries and organizational styles, and so on. If you're young and without major financial commitments (family, mortgage, etc.), then stuff like flex-time and benefits and salary should really be taking a back seat to your personal and career development.

    It took me a long time to see that. After more than a decade of fairly low-stress, well-paid, team software development work, I'm now making 2/3 of what I was a couple years ago, on-call 24/7/365, coping with much more pressure and responsibility, overworked and underpaid in a totally new industry, and I'd say that it's well worth it for the challenge, personal growth, and everything I'm learning. (The change from the typical sausage factory of tech companies to a majority female environment is pleasant as well.)

    As far as relationships with co-workers, I guess it depends on your view of humanity. I figure most people are cool. The fact that you have good relationships now means you're probably the kind of person who will find them again. Of course it only takes one PHB to make work hell for everyone...

  107. Why not do a little of BOTH? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    If your current employer doesn't know it's you (well, "multinational" and the Lotus notes and excel stuff might give you away...), then review your HR policy. If there's no written objection, and if your "flex-time" and telecommuting allow, then see if that startup will allow you to work as an off-site, staff employee. The cut in pay will have no hit, and you'll be able to contribute to Open Source.

    But, honestly, with your skills and degree, why keep contributing to the megalomaniac machine, especially where it involves facilitating another little piece of Lotus down. See if you can help Lotus and IBM port Lotus SmartSuite to Open Source. I'd LOVE to be an end user/beta tester. I'm doing in Approach some stuff I'll NEVER be able to do in Open Source as a non-programmer. All IBM & Lotus need to be convinced to do is flip the flags in their asset survey (SURELY IBM surveyed all of Lotus' IP before they bought the company years ago...) and just dump the non-IBM code before uploading the Lotus SmartSuite stuff to a CVS.

    Why not try to coordinate between Sun and IBM to merge the best of both suites. Star Office and OO.o DOOOO have a few neat/nifty things but the charting and database stuff is just utterly depressing to my mind given how intuitive and well-designed Approach and Word Pro are.

    At the rate IBM and Lotus are going by not contributing SmartSuite code for a thing I loosely call "Open SmartSuite", Open Source is being seriously deprived of something that would so quickly fill a void you'd hear the "KLANG" as SmartSuite assumed it's position and Approach takes more awards (after years of hiatus, languishing in windoze land...). If I knew how to code, I'd probably just give up and go for a combination of Trolltech QT Designer and MySQL for the thing I'm doing. Actually, since my efforts and activities are ultimately (apparently) "going for shit" given the heart-rending absence of SmartSuite in Open Source, I ought to do JUST THIS: take my prototype stuff and present it to TrollTech and MySQL. THAT could be JUST what it takes to light a fire under IBM and Lotus to give ME what I want and need and what millions of others DEFINITELY can use. And, it could be done without harming Open Source. After all, if Open Source is giving ms a run (for it's grip) on the money, then IBM/Lotus can help reinforce what end-user databases and end-user (non-geek) word processors SHOULD look like, and act like.

    Approach and Word Pro and Organizer could be JUST what Open Source needs when it comes to quality, thought-out interfaces and functionality.

    Rather than slowly build to intense, irreversible bitterness, I think YOUR post has revived my recent consideration to "approach" Trolltech and MySQL. Better to do THAT than to continue stewing and getting no where.

    So, keep YOUR day job and consider a real challenge: Assaulting bad end-user database and word processor interface design in the OS community.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  108. depends... by dallask · · Score: 1

    Questions about current job.
    A) is your boss hard to please/work with? Do people hound you daily?
    B) are you stagnant in your position with no place to advance?
    C) if someone offered you a lateral move would you take it?

    Questions about new job.
    A) can you lower your cost of living and be comfortable at your new pay scale?
    B) will you learn skills which you can take on to a higher paying job elsewhere?
    C) Can you see yourself comfortable in that environment for 5 years?

    Answer yes to 2+ in section 1 AND answer yes to all 3 in section 2 = quit.
    Otherwise, stay where your at.

    --
    The Code Ninja is swift with his tool, precise in his delivery, and deadly accurate in his execution.
  109. Yes! by noz · · Score: 1

    The short answer: in a second!
    The long answer: if you can afford it. I'm not serving three concurrent life sentences comprising marriage, children, and mortgage. *g*

  110. A job you love by Onuma · · Score: 1

    It's that old saying: "Find a job you love and you'll never work another day in your life." I feel this is true, but the number of people who actually have that one job that satisfies them completely is few and far between.

    You need to consider what you enjoy more. Is it the money that you like, the tasks that you're accomplishing, or the people you work with that means the most in your workplace? Perhaps the benefits or vacation time are extremely good. There's a chance that you may or may not like the new job better.

    For me, the social work environment has to be good. If I don't get along with the people I work with, I won't be as effective in my job. Currently, I would put my life on the line for the people I work with.

    The tasks themselves just need to keep me busy without being nonsensical. This goes either way in my line of work...I get stupid BS and then I get things I like doing.

    The money...am doing quite well considering my relatively low-paying job. I am single and have zero obligations. I've already got a strong financial future planned although I'm not quite 23 years old.

    The point is, you find a job that works for you. You won't be happy in every aspect, because life isn't likely to deal a good hand every time. If you're happy, stay. If you think you will become unhappy where you are or will find greater happiness in another venture, then by all means change. Go with your gut, whatever it tells you.

    --
    What else can happen when an unstoppable force collides with an immovable object?
  111. Plan for the future by morcego · · Score: 1

    Doing the right thing for the wrong reasons is still wrong.

    You have to be careful about your future. What does staying on your current job represents in 10 years time ? What about the new job ?

    Just because your current job gives you loads of money today, doesn't mean it will be so in the future. What if you have to leave your job, how will your current experience reflect on your resumé ? Does it open or close doors ?

    As you said, you have a low cost of living right now, so you can afford to make decisions. Just make sure you do looking at the future.

    I have both accept and refused paycuts in the past. My decisions was always based on a single question: "What does it represent for my future?". Today I own a company, and make some good money. I still get proposals to quit it and become an employee sometimes. But, as far as I'm concerned, my future prospect with my own company (grown rate around 43%/year) is much better. But, when I started it, I've got a 60% paycut (technicaly, income reduction). But it was the correct decision.

    --
    morcego
  112. Being happy in your job by Lazarus_Aust · · Score: 1

    ...will not keep the debt collectors away.

    I would love to ditch my current job, and get a less stressful one, I want to get a part time support one, and spend more time on my Uni course.

    Sadly, due to a rough run, I have debts n such I need to clear, once I have done that, I will look at my options.

    In the mean time... I'm working for "the man"

    --
    Everybody lies...users doubley so
  113. Would and Did by Why+Should+I · · Score: 1

    Would and did.

    You'll find that the well paying, yet boring job will eventually leave you so brain dead that you'll get to a point where nothing about the job is worth the money and you do whatever you can to get out.

    If you get a decent offer now, for interesting work, and you're resultant budget (taken into account new salary) is workable then I would do it. After all you spend a great deal of your life working, so you may as well be doing something that entertains you, or you at least believe in.

  114. Definite NO. by waffleman · · Score: 1
    To change would be a very poor bet because the risk is too high.

    Think of it like this: each situation has exactly one drawback at this moment. Your current isn't as much fun as you want, while the other pays lower. However, the variables of the current situation are known, whereas the variables of the new situation are unknown.

    If things go perfectly, it's a toss up whether you choose more money or more fun. However, things never go perfectly, and if any of the variables of the new situation go sour, your decision will become a bad one.

    So, in my opinion, it's a bad bet. I wouldn't touch it and not regret the pass for a moment.

  115. Me Too by Comatose51 · · Score: 1
    I'm in a very similar position right now. My company is great and just about everything is excellent except for the work. I got my degree in CS as well because I love to program. To me programming is kind of like playing with clay or legos. It's extremely liberating to have an open-ended question and being able to imagine and then implement the idea. My job right now is mostly IT-related. I have some programming projects but they're low priority compared to my IT tasks. So to get my fix, I would stay late and pull 10-11 hours days sometimes. It's starting to hurt other areas of my life. More and more of what I do now revolves around computing and my job. As much as I love programming and computing, I like to have balance. So right now, I'm re-examining what I'm doing and deciding what's really important to me. It seems that money is not of the utmost importance. It's being able to make the most of my time that really matters to me. Doing something interesting and important is very satisfying. Whatever the outcome, though, I'm sure the answer I arrive at eventually will be a road map for the next few years of my life.

    Best of luck to both of us.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  116. it's all a trade-off by ronsta · · Score: 1

    I took a $15k pay cut to work at a hip retail start-up. I was an R&D consultant and now I do business development...10x more fun, 10x better people...but the pay cut hurts.

    Everything is a trade-off -- no job is perfect, but you can certainly work towards your ideal job. The only problem is what comes next after you realize what you thought was ideal actually isn't so great at all.

  117. Fuck yeah! by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    And I've done it before.

    Best job I ever had was only part-time, 20-30 hours a week at about $20/hour (and they religiously paid overtime). I was maintaining the computers and the network for a company that made museums.

    Small and Big museums all over the world, like one for the Smithsonian. Or a space camp. Or an insect zoo (once a year, they have a degustation; can you imagine a zoo where you can eat the critters?).

    The office was located in an old bank, so I had my own office, the server room, located in the vault (with the operational door)...

    Before long, I was doing other work for planning museums, and since I had mechanical experience I was soon very much in demand to debug things the designers did...

    We had interesting meetings like "where do we put the dinosaur skeleton"; or I had bosses who came to me and ask "Quick! I need a planetarium" (absolutely true - turns out he did not want the projector [I located 10 used ones] but the dome screen) or "I need a monorail and a cable car!" (true, too [I found two engineering design firms who would design the monorail]).

    I didn't care much about the low pay, because it was a 10 minute walk from home.

  118. my story by carpe_noctem · · Score: 1

    Like you, I used to have a rather generic and cushy job which I sacrificed to do something more interesting. I used to work for a software engineering firm in Indianapolis, which is the most godawful city in the planet. I'd worked several similar jobs to get me through college, but doing it fulltime was another story. Like your job, it was great on the surface... semi-casual work environment, great pay, and the work was neither too boring nor too interesting.

    I'm somewhat young (so take my words with a grain of salt), and I felt that for the first time in my life I was finally in a position to fully do what I wanted with my life. Rotting away in software engineering firms wasn't what I had planned for my future, so over the course of several months, I agressively saved up my paychecks, taught myself German, and then quit my job. I moved to Berlin, where I now work freelance writing audio processing software. The nature of the work is very challenging, and I feel that I've grown a lot in terms of my programming and math abilities since I started doing this. Plus, I always loved music, and I'm also a DJ/producer, so being able to work with one's passion is now a freedom which I greatly cherish. In my old life, 5.00PM was a time I used to look forward to, as it meant the end of my working day. Now, my work doesn't feel like "work" anymore, so I let it just absorb my life.

    Of course, being a DJ and working freelance doesn't exactly bring home the bacon as working in a professional firm used to. However, actually leading a life that I love is worth every cent of it. Looking back on it, the things that I had to sacrifice to get here (sold almost all of my possessions, got rid of the car, etc.) are all things that I don't even miss. Of course, there are certain hardships involved in this tradeoff, but I think overall it was worth it. If things start getting rough financially, then I'll pick up another part-time job, but I wouldn't do the corporate world again... I just don't know if I can deal with that crap anymore.

    My advice to you: do what your heart tells you and never look back. Money isn't everything. :)

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
  119. No by Nept · · Score: 1

    Would You Take A Paycut for More Interesting Work?

    Or looking at it another way, would I accept a pay-raise to do useless & repetitive work? It would be tempting, as it would make it easier for me to afford a home, but the answer is No.

    --
    "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
  120. already halfway there, so why not? by swordgeek · · Score: 1

    I'm ALREADY taking pay cuts, so why not make the #$@*() job worthwhile?

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  121. Yes, I would. by Coryoth · · Score: 1

    I know that I would, because I have. I have taken a 1/3 pay cut to move jobs once, simply to move to a better and more interesting position. Money only stops you being unhappy, it doesn't make you happy; for that you need do something fulfilling and get recognition for the work that you do. Believe me when I say a better job with better management can easily be worth 1/3rd of your salary. What you really have to ask yourself is "How much is happiness worth to me?"

    Jedidiah.

  122. Heck, I take paycuts for the same work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... because of the continuous cycle of jumping from one layoff to the next. And you're asking about taking a pay cut for better work? Geez, I wish I lived near your job market. The tech industry sucks here.

  123. don't settle -- do what you love by gubachwa · · Score: 1
    Go for it! No amount of money is worth slaving a way at a job that makes you miserable. Look at this way: 30 years from now, when you think back on this, are you going to be more proud of opportunities you took, or the opportunities you missed?

    Having said that, you should also be prepared for disappointment. The grass isn't always greener on the other side. You may end up missing some of the friends that you made at your old job and find that your new coworkers aren't all that pleasant. It happens. At worst it will be a learning experience and will give you some perspective on how things are elsewhere; at best, you will have a found a job that makes you excited to go into work everyday.

  124. Transfer? by Leftmoon · · Score: 1

    You seem to be a popular and well-liked employee, is there any chance of getting a transfer to a position inside your company that you might enjoy more? I'm sure they'd hate to lose you.

  125. It depends on the degree we're talking by jbarket · · Score: 1

    Taking a small to moderate pay cut for a small to moderate increase in on-the-job happiness probably isn't worth it. I left a company where I was doing web application development in a language I despised for another where I was Chief Web Monkey. It was a startup like you seem to be talking about, and at first it was great--I had the opportunity to really branch out my skill set by helping to set this company up from scratch. For the first six weeks or so, I exchanged my keyboard for a tool belt, and together with the rest of the IT team, we removed and installed carpet, built walls, put together a beautiful custom NOC, et cetera. Unfortunately, after another six weeks, I realized that I hadn't traded pay for happiness--I had traded job security for coding preferences. Eventually the company went under, and the state of the economy at the time left me back at the bottom of the ladder. It was shocking how hard I had to try to scrape back to the level I was at before I left to join the startup. What I'm trying to say is--yes, I absolutely believe that a pay cut is acceptable to do something you'll really enjoy, but don't confuse a job more interesting than your own for one worth jumping ship for. When the job comes along, as yourself this question, as ridiculous as it sounds--If I was financially golden, and had no reason to work a moment for the rest of my life, would I work here? If you wouldn't even consider it, then it's not worth it. Stay where you are, do your monkey work, and cash your big paycheck. On the other hand if your answer is Yes, then jump ship immediately. Personally, I've realized that it takes considerably less money than I originally projected to have a great standard of living, especially if you've got a significant other picking up part of the tab. I'm filling in some loose ends and saving up to jump ship within the next eighteen months myself--but I'm going to do what I'd do if I was loaded, and leave being a code monkey behind as best I can.

    --

    -----
    jonathan barket
  126. this rang alarm bells for me ... by constantnormal · · Score: 1
    "I work in a business consulting firm."

    To me, this screams "code whore", where you are billed out to do whatever the intersection of business needs and buck$ happens to be. As such, you will be under-utilized 99.99% of the time.

    I speak from experience. As an employee, you are expected to work to the full extent of your abilities, but as a contractor, your time will (almost) always be spent doing work below your abilities, as most users of contractors try to rent bodies whose skills are considerably above those demanded by the task, in order to justify (?) the expense, and to ensure that they will be able to handle the work (believe it or not, contractors' qualifications are frequently exaggerated).

    But to me, the real issue here is whether or not you would always wonder if you had passed on an opportunity you should have taken.

    I say GO FOR IT!

    The consulting firm would surely be willing to hire you back (should this new venture not work out), assuming you are on good terms with them, and don't burn any bridges by leaving to try this out. From their perspective, this experience would make you more marketable.

    Of course, a lot depends upon exactly how big a pay cut is involved, and the results of any due diligence on your part as to the viability of the startup (which statistics would say will likely fail, but that probably should not be a large consideration, depending on your ability to tolerate uncertainty and risk).

    Good Luck with whatever path you chose.
    But be sure that you do CHOOSE a path, and not let inertia carry you along.

  127. It really depends on the work and the manager by cbreaker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, sorta. There's a difference between a manager that knows the field, and one that does not. While I can not expect my boss to know all that I do, and perhaps I wouldn't really want him to, I do like my boss to know the basics of the technology so he/she can appreciate the magnitude of the work, timetables, impacts, etc.

    Being an IT manager is not so different then being a project manager. Almost everything done is a project in some way or another, besides the normal daily admin tasks that don't generally fill the day. If you have an IT-illiterate boss that is capable of effectively running projects and trusting his "experts" (employees) it can work. Unfortunately, I've met very few effective project managers, so to balance it out, it helps to have a boss that knows the technology - even a little.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    1. Re:It really depends on the work and the manager by kopper187 · · Score: 1

      "Unfortunately, I've met very few effective project managers ..."

      You must be working in the wrong industry. Not that I haven't worked there myself. The biggest complaint I had while working at a software startup in Silicon Valley was the lack of project management. Sure, we had a "product manager" but, in the traditional sense, there was NO project management. Having been raised in the construction industry on various Bechtel projects, I have learned to differentiate between the "project manager" in tech versus that in established businesses, ie construction and large dollar items (airplanes, etc.).

      Good PMs can complete projects on time (or early) and under budget the majority of the time, even given unexpected events. They plan for these things on methods that have been tried, refined, and proven over many years. I have learned a great deal about how to manage ANY project from established and honored managers in both construction and production environments.

      Despite all the amazing technical and creative energy in the tech. environment, the project direction side is still lacking. Those who see this need, and incorporate it are those who truely succeed and survive.

    2. Re:It really depends on the work and the manager by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      I agree. Project Management is something I'm hoping to focus on in my career - I'm hoping my current employer will send me to some PM classes to get me started. I've worked with some PM's that are quite good, and I've learned a lot from them. I tend to incorporate what I've learned into my daily work and it is effective even on a very small scale. I like a pragmatic approach to things; it's just less stressful when you have all your bases covered.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    3. Re:It really depends on the work and the manager by kmak · · Score: 1

      Being a programmer, it also helps if people working above you programmed before.

      They'll understand your random screams while debugging, and they'll understand that sometimes debugging will take just a little longer than expected, and that "a little addition" won't be anywhere near that little.

      I think everyone programmed a little (to some degree, if even in VBA) just to get a sense of how difficult it is, just to get it work, nevermind design, etc..

      --

      I'm not the devil.. just his advocate.
    4. Re:It really depends on the work and the manager by helfire57 · · Score: 1

      While I run the chance of being "OffTopic", get your PMP from the PMI. Study via Rita's Guide to passing the PMP ( http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932735003/sr=1-1 /qid=1139376634/ref=pd_bbs_1/103-6860889-0376656?_ encoding=UTF8 ).

      When you pass, the mere fact of having the cert will move you in that direction.

      The PM career is extremely young in IT and thus better paying while more difficult than in other industries. (I have 15+ years experience in IT and Manufacturing and a PMP and MCSE.) I'm trying to implement some of the methodologies that I have picked up in manufacturing to apply in the software projects that I am on now. It helps but ironically (or not) it's the lack of understanding of PM worth by the development staff that makes the introduction of good PM tactics more difficult.

      The management consultants call it "Change Management."

      Get the PMP, its worth it and won't ruin you (too much).

    5. Re:It really depends on the work and the manager by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      While I'd love to study up and get the PMP, I don't think I'm ready for it yet. Since I have only an Associates degree, I'll have to do 7,500 hours of project management. I'll have to look into the specifics on how you are supposed to qualify that number - I'm pretty sure you can't just say "Yea, I got that. Check."

      There really should be a beginner certification =) Something that says you've trained on the basics of project management and you're serious about it. You know, like an MCSE certification - they're easy to get and you learn the very basics at the same time. Then, after some work experience, you go for the PMP.

      My friend has a similar problem with his work in surveying. In order to get your "stamp" you have to put in years of job experience, and it doesn't pay very well (read: crap) until you get the engineer's certification and the stamp. After three years of working in the field, he's every bit as good as the engineer that merely looks at his work and stamps it while collecting his $180K/yr. I'm not saying it should be easy, but sheesh.

      I'll check out the book at the bookstore and see if it's too far over my head at this point to make any use of it. I don't think so - if you learn how things should work from the beginning, the 7,500 hours will be worth a whole lot more.

      If you have any other suggestions for PM literature, shoot me an e-mail at jjamieson at futurefoundations dotcom.

      Thanks!

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    6. Re:It really depends on the work and the manager by helfire57 · · Score: 1

      It was really the only book that I ran across that was exactly what it wanted to be: teach you project management so that you can pass the exam. Individually, the other books were a waste of money BUT were valuable as a collection.

      There IS a lower level exam: the CAPM
      from the pmi.org website
      http://pmi.org/info/PDC_CAPM.asp

      Certified Associate in Project Management (CAPM®)

      As project management grows in scope, importance and recognition, so do the related career and credential options available to you. The CAPM is designed for project team members and entry-level project managers, as well as qualified undergraduate and graduate students who want a credential to recognize their value to project team performance.

      A CAPM Credential can benefit professionals from all disciplines by demonstrating clear direction to their work and by gaining knowledge of project management processes and terminology.

      You can benefit from a CAPM if you are a:

      Project team member;
      Junior project management practitioner or new to the project management profession;
      Undergraduate or graduate student with an interest in project management.
      Professionals with project management skills are increasingly seen on the leadership track, and earning the CAPM from PMI is one of the best ways to advance your career. This credential can go a long way toward enhancing your employment and/or project assignment responsibilities -- and getting you recognized in the workplace.

      CAPM candidates must first meet specific educational and project management related experience requirements and then pass a comprehensive 150 question computer-based examination.

      Eligibility Criteria

          Educational Background
            Project Management Experience
                    Project Management Education

          High school diploma
      or equivalent

            1,500 hours of work on a
      project team

            OR

            23 hours of
      formal education

    7. Re:It really depends on the work and the manager by GlennC · · Score: 1
      There really should be a beginner certification =) Something that says you've trained on the basics of project management and you're serious about it.

      You may want to check out the CAPM (Certified Associate in Project Management). You're eligible if you work 1500 hours of project work, or if you take 23 hours of project management training.

      http://www.pmi.org/info/PDC_CAPM.asp

      --
      Go on, citizen, stamp the vote card. R or D, your choice.
  128. Intangibles and Long Term Benefit by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

    Would you leave an otherwise perfect job to work on something more interesting?

    Job enjoyment is part of your total compensation package, just like health insurance and a paycheck. Most parts of your compensation package are a mix of dollars and risk (eg: checks are almost pure dollars, stock options include risk). Satisfaction is intangible, so it's hard to quantify in relation to the others. It is very hard to calculate, and inherently personal. If you're young, it may be a very good investment to sacrifice some satisfaction now if it will open more doors in the future.

    Am I selling out by continuing to work in my current firm? Should I take the pay-cut to work at a startup where I can make more use of my talents?

    Since you have low overhead, it's probably best to look at the pragmatic issues from a long-term perspective. Getting paid more now will make it easier to convince a future employer that you are worth more - future employers will ask your current compensation and base their offer at least in part on it. At the same time, getting pigeon-holed as a VB script guy will hamper future earning potential.

    That is to say, aside from the intangible issues like satisfaction, if you don't have large fixed expenses you should be picking your jobs at this phase in your career based on their ability to contribute to your resume.

  129. Get a fucking hobby!!!! by jjh37997 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Dude, your job is sweet! Do you really think a high-stress job with less pay and co-workers you hate is going to make you happy? Get a hobby, coach pee-wee football, volunteer with some open-source project but for dear God don't quit your job! No job is perfect but yours is damn close. If you can find fulfillment outside of your work then consider yourself one lucky son of a bitch.

    1. Re:Get a fucking hobby!!!! by charles-m · · Score: 0, Troll

      How-a-bout getting a piece of ass...maybe that will help clarify things...then you can waste all your money on that

  130. My Own Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am currently in the same position, with my job being relativley well paid and laid back. However, you should also look at what you like. Do you REALLY like systems programming? Who knows, you could hate it more. At first I thought I would like low level coding. I mean look at all the cool devices coming out of places like Apple and Motorola. Working on embedded systems just looks awesome. You can go to your parents and say "Hey, I made this". However, after working on it for some time, it really was just not my cup of tea. I realized I liked higher level applications.

    If you can, take this opportunity to learn what you really want to do. If you can finish most of the work management gives you before the work day is over, start picking up stuff and try a little bit of everything in CS. Try some web dev, low level stuff. There are plenty of OSS projects out there that you could try, modify, and see how you like it. Do something you think would be cool and at the same time learn. If you like low level, try making an mp3 decoder. You get to read specs, play with bits. Or do a kernel module.

    Just my 2 cents, good luck. BTW i am in the same situation, with plenty of start ups in this area.

  131. No. Follow your inner voice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > They say when you get old and look back on your life you tend to regret things you didn't do, rather than things you did.

    Absolutely. I fit that category.

    I had a real unripened talent and penchant for drawing, but I never developed it. I loved it too. Talents come in all shapes and forms and generally engage the person and reward them with satisfaction.

    Instead of pursuing that career (or more importantly, talent), I earned several computer degrees in college and traveled the developer/manager tract. What a waste.

    There really should be some sort of elementary school curriculum standard across all states which identifies and directs talents into their respective fields. Advisors don't cut mustard. Nor do expensive magnate schools. Cranking out a conveyor belt workforce is the real tragedy in a market driven government. Hopefully, a new government Rennaisance will surface and improve upon the crafts and trades from guilds of traditions past.

  132. Why not do both? by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

    Why not keep doing your mundane, high-paying job while it's still there and develop real software on your own time? Find a niche and start up a small business that you maintain in the evenings and on weekends. You'd be utilizing your talents and you'd be earning more money than either of the other jobs. Plus, you'd get to be your own boss at the side job. If you decided to change jobs in the future, you could list both for your work experience. If I were going to take a pay cut to leave a job I didn't really like but didn't really hate, I'd have to really really love the other one. Just my naive two cents.

    --
    If you can read this sig, you're too close.
  133. Where is it going? by Chris+Snook · · Score: 1

    Why's the work more interesting? If it's a company that's going somewhere, you might not be making less for very long.

    --
    There's no failure quite as dissatisfying as a complete and total solution to the wrong problem.
  134. Most definately, a paycut indeed by CherniyVolk · · Score: 1


    Of all the horrors of Capitalism, those of us on the beneficial side of the equation never see, the degradation of acadamia is of noticable concern.

    Now, hold on. An academic utopia is just as foolish as the mis-conceptions of Karl Marx in concluding he was striving for a socio-economic "utopia"; which, he wasn't the word is the only impressive vocabulary word a person is able to muster in retort. However, Capitalism has had real effects on acadamia while so many of us refuse to see any harm of a well educated society through and through; the key word here is "refuse", becuase in reality a society that's over-educated... suicide bombers, famine, "terrorists"--there are very well learned men who also have experienced, first hand, the social aspects of the Middle East, and there is strong argument to suggest such horrors are in fact on account of everyone having a degree. It is true, in the Middle East, it's not uncommon for your waiter to have the educational equivalent of a Masters Degree or a Ph.D. Bottom line is, you can't hire everyone; and someone must do the dirty work.

    Now, back to the upper echelons of the problem I'm proposing. I'm in my second effort to complete a degree. And, even after my completion I'll not let arrogance cloud the fact that it is, in all philosophical meaning, worthless and a waste of time. I want a Mathematics degree, and there's no class of any University in the world teaching the students any information a moron can't find within his town's library. Which, for all practical purposes, for most fields there exists a diploma for, you could very well have taught yourself and saved thousands of dollars and have attained the knowledge far quicker and at your own pace. Which leads me to my parallel philosophy; if you actually learn anything in college from strict class ciriculum, you aren't that interested in the subject.

    The fact is, most of the people today are going to college not becuase they are deeply interested in the subject, but becuase they think that they will make lots of money. They really don't want to go to college, but feel compelled to becuase the myraid fields one takes an interest in overwhelms any investor to the point a Genetic Engineer might think their prospective VC is a complete idiot. Yet, economically, the VC would like to have some level of assurance with his investment, and loves to see a workforce of "degrees" from "accredited" educational institutions. He has no other knowledge; to speak nothing of the fact of the essence that drew him to the company to begin with, perhaps they truely are idiots? HINT: He wouldn't have been there anyways had he figured they weren't doing well. Go figure right? So, this creates an interdependancy of it's self.

    50 years ago, a person with a degree in any field well knew that field and probably lovingly endured it's discipline till the day they died. Today, far less proportionally walk across the stage with such eternal passion and it's becuase of the above predicament. Then, to further the problem, colleges have gotten into the habit of doing whatever to help people pass, becuase they want those graduation numbers to attract more students and hopefully land a famous face in the process; think about it, what really makes Harvard attractive? Harvard is attractive not becuase of it's name or inherent fact of existance, it's attractive becuase upteen million presidents, dignitaries, senators and other rich and powerful people have attended the school...

    When you have some one at the keyboard, who is only looking forward to a fat paycheck, his work will NEVER be as honest or resemblant of the quality of someone else who is passionate about programming. Never, the self-motivation isn't there, the goals are askewed. One is only doing whatever is necessary for a paycheck, while the others goal is more inline with his job... he want's to code up a function that is so good, it even sparks an internal happiness for hisself.

    This is a spreading virus, of rampant proportions. It a

    1. Re:Most definately, a paycut indeed by Dissectional · · Score: 1

      I enjoyed this post.

      I see newcomers to the IT industry here in Australia quite regulary who quite literally do not give a toss about what they are doing - there's no passion, care or genuine interest in what they are doing. And from what I gather at the moment, there are entire armies of these University produced clones to be rolled out across the country.

  135. Not unless your work is your life by Kithraya · · Score: 1

    "More interesting work" seems to almost always mean "more time doing it." I don't know about you, but I have (and want to continue to have) a life outside of the office. The older I get, the more I realize that I can stand to do work that's boring for 8 hours, because that guarantees me that I can do what I want to do when I get home. And I can promise you, what I want to do isn't what I did at the office. When I had a more challenging position, I was only mediocre at it, and the management dictated that I spent a lot of time doing it (12-14 hrs/day, plus 2-3 weekends a month). Now I'm doing what some people might consider boring (web work), but I'm good at it. I'm able to stand out, get the raises, get the bonuses, and still get it done in a normal work day. I can't even remember the last time I worked a weekend.

    I guess my point is this: If you're bored, look for something to fill that void outside of work. Work is not (or at least, shouldn't be) your entire life. Now, if after some careful thought you decide that the only thing that will fill the void in your life is more work, then by all means go for it.

  136. Why not? by DarkNemesis618 · · Score: 1

    Ask yourself this. Do you like your job? Do you like where and who you work for and with? Do you enjoy your job for the most part? If you can answer yes, then why should it matter whether or not your job is truly your college major. I can say personally, that I would rather have a job that I enjoy, over a job that may be more directly related to my major that I wouldn't enjoy. As I see it, you have it pretty good. It's not selling out as far as I'm concerned.

    --
    What's the matter, James? No glib remark? No pithy comeback?
  137. Stay put! by coljac · · Score: 1

    I hope you read down this far. :)

    You described your job as: "high pay, extravagant benefits and bonuses, flexi-time, can telecommute whenever possible, and best of all the coworkers are great and have truly become my friends, even the boss." From this I am guessing it's a low-stress job.

    Don't leave. It sounds like a great workplace. You can find ways to relieve the boredom by being creative. Work on open source projects of your own outside of work. You'll be very lucky to find a job where the stress level's low, the people are great and the benefits sound. Work is work as high-end enterprise developers will tell you.

    If IT or office work is not for you by all means make a change. But the grass isn't really greener outside.

    --
    Everyone knows that damage is done to the soul by bad motion pictures. -Pope Pius XI
  138. How could we answer that? by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    You've omitted probably the most important clues to help us out: How much you make now, how much of a paycut it would be, how many bills you have.. etc..

    I say, if your current job is good, stay until you find one that pays more. For me, money comes first. That's why we work. Obviously, I won't work at someplace that sucks, but I'll never take a paycut to leave. You can find work that you like, and have it pay more at the same time. The good thing is that you're working now, so you can take your time finding that great job.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  139. Yes by kmassare · · Score: 1

    I a word, yes. I am very inerested in the work that I do now and I'm well compensated for what I do, but if something came up that I find more interesting I'd jump on it in a heartbeat. Of course in taking my opinion into consideration, you should keep in mind that I'm 60 years old and ready to retire if life in the workplace doesn't meet my needs.

  140. Done this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had several times in my life when I've taken a pay cut to do something interesting and that would force me to grow as an individual. One transition cost me $80K/yr, and two cost me $45K/yr each. In every case, I really enjoyed the change, and if I had to do it over again I would in a heartbeat. Don't get me wrong - the change was hard. But the rewards of doing something different, at least for me, were well worth it. I should also note that some changes netted me far more than I ever thought was possible. And for what it's worth, I'm married and have kids, which means that all these changes were high risk.

  141. pay cut by mdman · · Score: 1

    No way, But I would do a boring crappy job for a huge raise!

  142. Hell no! by Oyume · · Score: 1

    Hello no! That's what hobbies are for!

    Jds, wishing I had your job...

  143. will it pay out in the long run ? by RembrandtX · · Score: 1

    If you hate your current job, and the new job doesnt go under in the next year ..like 80% of all new businesses. Will the new place pay out in the long run ?

    In the real business world (past low to mid level programming monkey jobs) higher risk is rewarded with greater compensation - not less.

    Management, and officers of companies get paid MORE to take risks, thats why they will put their jobs, and themselves on the line more willingly.

    I left a fortune 500 job, very stable - boring as crap, for a riskier startup 4 months ago. I've been doing 16 hour days now, but I get paid more - and had a great package with stock shares. [SHARES, not options on shares.] Our stock price has already doubled over what it was issued to me as, and we are approaching 2nd phase of investment. [When VC's with real money start to step up to the plate.]

    Before going to this new company, I would make sure that they spell out what your package will be. Don't bother with job description - its not a big co. In the small co. universe, you don't have a job description - you are expected to do what needs to be done, if you don't know how to do it .. learn, preferabally quickly, so you still meet the deadline.

    Find out what your benifits will be, find out if you get shares .. shares over options, because if the company takes a bath - you can at least write off the loss if your a shareholder. Find out how much working capitol they have, and if the officer that is trying to hire you wont tell you that - you already have your answer.

    all in all, anyone - and i MEAN anyone, who is not a slack or clueless worker, should never take less for their job. ever. You don't know how long it will take you to get back to where you were, and what you will have to give up because of that. If you don't like that job, you can't go get a new one at your old salary, because employers will see you were getting paid X . .then took a job for X-10k .. They will say : 'Hell .. this guy was willing to work for X-10k .. and now he is looking for work again, offer him X-12k'

    Your time (if you are young, you may not get this) is NOT replaceable. and the two years it takes you to get back to your current income level is still a loss, as you lost the 3-6% raises you would have gotten at your old job, plus your vacation time etc. Years of your life can't be replaced - don't sell them short .. I mean .. unless your coming to work for me :)

    good luck.

    Keep in mind, safe & secure may be boring, but you get to see your family, and know that your going to get paid.

    --

    --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
  144. Been there, done that by davedx · · Score: 1

    I used to work for an investment bank. It was great pay but basically involved a lot of work with databases, programming them, migrating them, etc, and after a year I'd decided it wasn't what I wanted to do at all.

    I now work for a games studio. The coding is more challenging and rewarding (C++/graphics API's versus Java/Corba/SQL etc.), the results are infinitely more fun and interesting and best of all, the working environment is almost the polar opposite from where I used to work. The pay isn't as good, but I thoroughly recommend this kind of career move to anybody not happy where they are. In fact, only reason I wouldn't recommend it is if you have big financial committments, e.g. family/mortgage...

    --
    "This is your life, and it's ending one minute at a time."
  145. honestly by simontek2 · · Score: 1

    Right this second, Any Job I take is gonna be pay-bonus (I am unemployed) but I have always said, and done, work jobs that are fun, not necessarily entertaining, But Its something I am passionate about. I never take a job that will bore me in 3 days. It may sound stupid to some, but I rather enjoy my job and get OK pay than get rich and hate my job. When you dislike your job, you hate waking up in the morning, your work performance is poor. When you like a job, you can't wait to goto work, you volunteer for projects, etc.

    --
    SimonTek
  146. On the road to Dilbertville... by QAChris · · Score: 1

    I can tell you from experience, if the work is drudgery it is a bad situation! Co-workers come and go, but drudgery is never ending; and it constantly wears on you. Ten years will pass, and suddenly you'll realize your in a bad Dilbert cartoon. You won't be sure how you got there; you'll just realize that's where you are. If you think taking a pay cut now is painfull, try changing careers after ten years of salary increases and one or two promotions but narrow experience. It isn't easy. Regardless whether you take this oportunity or another, you need to move on. Too many people find themselves trapped in a job by a combination of comfort and fear. The working conditions are good, the co-workers friendly why move? What if the new job isn't all it's cracked up to be? What if the company fails? What if, what if what if? Don't let fear keep you rooted in place.

  147. Depends on the type of manager. by ashitaka · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A project manager should naturally know more than his staff as he needs to make decisions that require technical knowledge of the issues involved.

    A general business manager should not know more than his staff as they are the ones who should be carrying out the tasks and be able to make the technical decisions themselves.

    A conflict between these two is what cost me my last job. I was required to be a business manager by the law firm's new CFO but knew far more technology than my staff. The small size of my team relative to the projects we were undertaking and the demands of the firm support staff and other managers created a situation where I had to be more hands-on than the CFO wanted. In the end I was replaced by a non-technical manager with no warning whatsoever.

    I'm filling time doing the private consulting gig but would rather be in full-time project management.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    1. Re:Depends on the type of manager. by tubs · · Score: 1
      A project manager should naturally know more than his staff as he needs to make decisions that require technical knowledge of the issues involved.

      You wouldn't specifically need a project manager to know how to lay bricks, or to plumb in a radiator etc. He employs people to know that for him, so why should it be any different for a "software" project manager?

      Of course, if the project manager doesn't listen to his brickie, then he only has himself to blame when the house falls down.

      --

      try to make ends meet, you're a slave to money, then you die

    2. Re:Depends on the type of manager. by pointbeing · · Score: 2, Insightful
      A project manager should naturally know more than his staff as he needs to make decisions that require technical knowledge of the issues involved.

      Respectfully disagree. I'm an IT project manager with a strong technical background and a sprinkling of acronyms after my name. My job is to paint the big picture and keep the project on track - it's not my job to make technical decisions. It *is* my job to act on technical recommendations from qualified subordinates.

      IT project managers should *not* make technical decisions unless required to resolve differences between subordinate teams - that's what subordinate managers are for.

      The transition from geek to manager is a difficult one and I think many companies make a huge mistake hiring managers from the technical ranks - well, not without training them as managers first. Out of the box a good tech is almost *never* a good manager.

      --
      we see things not as as they are, but as we are.
      -- anais nin
    3. Re:Depends on the type of manager. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Respectfully disagree. I'm an IT project manager with a strong technical background and a sprinkling of acronyms after my name. My job is to paint the big picture and keep the project on track - it's not my job to make technical decisions. It *is* my job to act on technical recommendations from qualified subordinates.

      I think the confusion there is that in some shops, there is a distinct project lead and project manager. In that case, the project lead makes the technical decisions and the manager manages resources, compiles the timeline(s), and tracks progress.

      In other cases, lead and manager are lumped together and so the manager makes the technical decisions.

      In general, the manager should have enough technical knowledge to comprehend what the team tells him and translate it with reasonable accuracy for upper management, and to know that they DON'T know enough to overrule technical decisions. They should know enough about the process of software development to know why too many meetings are bad, why a phone on every desk might NOT be productive and that the engineers talking at the water cooler ARE working (if indeed, they are).

      The project lead should be the technical guru/mentor.

  148. No...Get more Education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you like your job (in your field) and need to challenged - then I would say the best bet is to get more education. Whether an MBA or technical Masters - at the very least you will have a greater chance to move onto something better and more challenging at the same time.

  149. Hell by circusboy · · Score: 1

    Yes!

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
  150. Work for your sense of self by DanTheLewis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Money is great, but all it represents is the investment of your time. It is a limitless commodity. Your time, unfortunately, is not.

    I watched Groundhog Day recently. It's nice that Bill Murray learned to love and to play the piano, but I probably would've spent the first million years in the public library. If they'd had the internet then, maybe the first billion years.

    Anyway, I digress. You don't have a billion years, you have three score and ten, plus or minus two score. For a huge chunk of that time, say forty hours a week for several decades, you're at work.

    Think about what kind of life you want to have. If it's a life filled with a lot of stuff, maybe you belong at a job where you can buy it all. If it's a life where you do what you want after age 40 or 50, maybe you belong at a job where you can save up the millions of dollars necessary. But if it's a life where you do meaningful work, maybe you need to leave.

    The meaning of work is intertwined with the meaning of life. I can't tell you what the meaning of your life is. Even if I knew, you wouldn't listen; at some level, you have to discover it for yourself. 40 hours a week is more than a third of your waking life, so figure out if you need your work to mean anything to you.

    Also consider that your work is reshaping your personality. I got back to graduate CS after several years of work that was often drudgery, managed by someone else, with my work time accountable to the nearest six minutes. Experiences like that wear away at you; the thousand tasks you do will recreate your mind. Figure out if they're changing you in a direction you like.

    Paul Graham wrote a good essay about work recently.

    --

    Q: What did the comedian say to the crowd?
    A: If I knew, this joke would be funny.
  151. Why Ask Us? by Grail · · Score: 1

    When you should be asking your girlfriend? If that relationship is going to last, don't you think she'd want to be involved in the decision-making process too?

    After all, any changes you decide to make to your plans for your life might affect her plans for your life.

  152. Just say "No" by CultFigure · · Score: 1

    My suggestion is to change your current job to one that is more interesting in your current environment - don't take the other job. So "you only live once, take the other job" sounds great, but you've got a wonderful environment to work in now; don't change that, you're indeed living now. What you should do is tell your boss matter-of-factly that you are considering the change simply for the better (more interesting) work, *however* you love your co-workers, flexi-time, et al. Make the suggestion that you want some more interesting work with a percentage of your time, ala Google's 80/20. You'll likely find that the novelty of "doing what you wanna do" wears off and it's nice to just get some stuff done, stuff that directly adds value to the company via your job description. (Note, I've been self-employed for the past five years and there are days where it's nice when I have to just get what would otherwise be drudge-work done).

    Peace of mind in your work environment is the most important thing as the job has the ability to change, but a person will likely always be a jerk/lazy/make bad coffee or whatever you find you dislike about co-workers.

    I'm blessed to have good partners and work I mostly enjoy, but I don't make very good money. Would I change to your position? Nope, not a chance.... but that's because I put in five years and now make enough for a decent living with the potential for greater prosperity in the future. Ask me that 2-3 years ago and I would have jumped at your job.

    One last factor I'd consider, since I don't know you, is to determine how ambitious you are. If your a real go-getter, then by all means, quit your job tomorrow morning, go home and start working and don't quit for the next two years (except for the occaisional bathroom/food breaks - sleep and free time is a no-no). You follow this and you will very likely not have to go through what I did, will create something viable that can be sold for an absurd amount of money, then you can retire and do WTF you wanna do.

    Otherwise, be happy with your already enjoyable job and feel glad that you are producing to help the company. If you work it right, in your 20%, you'll be able create something of incredible value and reap the rewards due to you from the very company you would have left.

    Good luck!

  153. Did you sign an IP contract? by GuruBuckaroo · · Score: 1

    If not, do your own, more intesting work on the side. That's what I do.

    My current employer, for the last 7 years, has me doing network & systems management. It's somewhat repetative, although I have learned all sorts of new stuff - like how to migrate from Novell to Samba/FreeBSD - but I never let that stop me from doing side projects that give me more fun times.

    The key to this, of course, is to make sure that you didn't sign away your IP to your company - ie, make sure you own what you produce off-hours. Some places will make you sign away your rights to anything, even stuff you worked on off-hours.

    My employer isn't perfect. It's a non-profit - the pay is lower than what I should be making - but I don't have to wear a tie, I get to put my own server on the company 4.5mb Internet connection, and take any end-of-lease (or lifecycle) equipment I want home. It's also very job-secure, because I'm alpha geek and the only guy who knows how all of the systems work together :>

    --
    Poor means hoping the toothache goes away.
  154. Some steps to take before and during the plunge: by jlseagull · · Score: 1

    I say take the startup, but consider taking these steps first. My paycut on starting at my present job was 100%.
    1. Eliminate debt, especially if you've been living close to your means. Cut back on unneccessary expenses.
    2. 100 hour weeks kill your body. Get an HSA if your startup doesn't have a health plan. Get a physical before you start, and tell the doc that you're going to be working a startup and ask his advice.
    3. 100 hour weeks are hard on your posture. Ergonomicize your office, professionally if need be.
    4. Join a 24-hour gym, or better yet get some dumbbells and a pullup bar for the office. Doing a few reps loosens up the mind.
    5. Stock a desk drawer with multivitamins, dried fruit, jerky, nuts, gingko biloba, etc.
    6. Make sure that you get a deferred compensation package to make up for the cut.

    Most importantly:

    7. Your admission that your girlfriend is a "living expense" is a very telling one, and I think you should be careful. Are you spending more than $100 on Valentine's Day? Do you take her out to expensive dinners? Did you meet her before or after you started making bank? If the answer to any of these is yes, you may be in a spot of trouble. She's going to want you to keep spending money on her. She's going to treat any decision you make that results in less money with scorn, regardless of whether it's your dream. It might not be obvious to you, but almost 100% of your chance at success in a startup with less money is dependent on the whims of your Little Miss Perfect. If she doesn't like your decision, she's going to make your life a living hell. Startup hours put stress on any relationship, and you'd better take a hard look as to whether you should continue to have a girlfriend if she's not going to support your decision 110%. I'm very lucky my girl does, but we're both workaholics and we're both looking forward to a 6 week trip to China this summer so we can decompress. I hope you're similarly lucky.

    --
    'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
  155. Family. Hobby. Job. by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Family. Hobby. Job. Any time one starts to lose out to the others you should start to worry. Life needs to find a ballance.

    My job is actually too stimulating at the moment. I'd take a small pay cut to find a less interesting one.

    TW

  156. I've dug myself a hole, and I can't get out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Currently, this is the situation I find myself in as well (I post anonymously because I know co-workers read this site and know who I am). I find my current job boring and unchallenging, though it pays me very, VERY well. So well, that my wife is able to be a stay-at-home mom, I have a very nice house, we each have a nice car and I can put a max. contribution into my 401k and other savings as well. The thing is, even though we have no debt other than a mortgage and one car payment (all CC bills are paid in full), I've dug myself a hole -- I can't leave my salary without sacrificing something. If I could get rid of the guilt I'd feel for leaving my current job, taking money from elsewhere, I'd take the other, more fun job. But sadly, I can't.

  157. In a word? Probably by MistChild · · Score: 1

    You don't mention your situation beyond a job that you find boring and the fact that there is an opportunity to do what you feel woudl bemore rewarding.

    First: if you are single you have a lot more room for risk. That makes "go for it" a much easier decision.

    Second: does the cut level of pay allow you to live, othewise, as you want. (Pay bills, buy Tacos & beer or Caviar and expensive wines)? Is there any other potential future compensation (do you get shares in the startup)?

    Consider that you are changing type of job (from your description) so the cut may be warranted

    Third: should the company fail within a year or two, or should you become disenchanted, will this job improve your resume for future work in this direction (unplanned job hopping).

    In my case, I moved jobs when jobs "found me". Once I got less for the succeeding job but I changed direction (like this sounds). It works. I ended up with a 20 year ride in a great set of positions within a company and would do it all over again.

  158. Hmm...I want both. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you quit your job and find a higher paying one that you would enjoy even more than your start-up offer? I am sure they exist, it just takes a bit of patience and work to find them. In the end, you would be much happier. There is nothing that says that a high paying job must be boring.

    Btw, VBA is not a programming language. It is a contraption that makes businessmen feel good about themselves. Don't waste your degree. And even if you don't switch, there is nothing that is keeping you from doing personal research into whatever aspect of CS you are interested in.

    You can also think about doing something else at the same firm.

    In any case, whatever you decide, read Atlas Shrugged because it is a good book.

  159. In a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I took a pay cut to work for trolltech.

  160. I would, but.... by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 1

    My landloard, car payment, cable, broadband, and cell phone provider won't.

    --
    No Sigs!
  161. There's more one way to do it by plopez · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, I went a couple of rounds of pay negotiation at my present job. I gave my employer 3 alternatives:
    1) Significant reduction in required hours with no cut in pay and benis or
    2) A significant pay raise or
    3) A moderate pay raise with an increase in vacation time.

    They opted for #3. So at this time I am looking at 4 weeks annual vacation (very unusual for the US), plus holidays and some personal days. (BTW, they way I worked it out in terms of hourly pay over the year, the options worked out to be almost identical, no matter what option my employer chose).

    So before bailing out, impact all your options. Maybe they can give you release time to take classes, more vacation time,working 35 hours a week etc. to keep you from being bored. A start up, speaking form experience, is a crap shoot. You could get rich. Or you could end up like me, burned out and deeply cynical, having ruined my health working insane hours for a startup and getting laid off anyway.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:There's more one way to do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good. It was imperative that you didn't give them the option of cutting your benis.

      1) Significant reduction in required hours with no cut in pay and benis or
    2. Re:There's more one way to do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen. Been there, done that, got the shirt.

    3. Re:There's more one way to do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh huh
      He said 'benis'...

    4. Re:There's more one way to do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      37 hours a week, 5-6 weeks vacation. Life in denmark is good.

    5. Re:There's more one way to do it by chocofudge · · Score: 1

      Iam not interested in Holidays .. But I would like to do something that interests me and be among a great set of coworkers. I can take a larege paycut for what I will love.

    6. Re:There's more one way to do it by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't work for the federal government. 5.2 weeks of vacation and 2.6 weeks of sick leave every year (note: 12 years tenure required, you only get 3.8 weeks/2.6 weeks if you've been in for 3-12 years). Sick leave accumulates without bounds, and you can carry over 6 weeks of vacation every year.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  162. How about the other way around? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm actually in a situation where I am passionate about my work (running a computer repair department) but I am unable to run it as I would like to. Because of this, I'm seeking a mundane, 9-5 type job that has nothing to do with computers, so that I can focus on my passion in my free time, and I actually have something to look forward to when I get home. I guess both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses.

  163. Eh, you called it perfetc by Khuffie · · Score: 1

    You called your job perfect yourself, so why quit? You'd be going to a startup, which may or may not last. If you want to develop/use your programming skills, why not get involved in the open source community in your spare time? Or, create a little project for yourself that'll keep you interested and utilize your skills?

  164. I quit... Money is overrated by A*OnYourA** · · Score: 1

    I'm almost in the same situation and decided to quit. Graduated almost 3 years ago, no debt, no social life, and I was bored with my job. I was making VBA OLE Servers and boring .NET desktop apps.

    I suggest saving up 6 months to 1 year worth of money, then quit. That might be hard with that girlfriend of yours, but it's worth it when you're able to do WHATEVER you want. If I have to get a "real job" again, I will, but we're too young (I'm 24) for managers to peddle their "mission-critical" bullshit on us. Right now I'm just working on a couple independent projects, losing some weight at the gym (15 pounds so far) and I have time to sleep, eat healthy and play video games. It's great!

    And I highly recommend taking off the first two months after resignation to DO NOTHING. I did it... and it was EVERYTHING I thought it could be!

  165. OSS can keep you occupied and you might find someb by tlspurli · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You could try joining an Open Source project to give yourself a challenge, something to occupy your time, and possibly tools to help make your job more exciting.

  166. Talk to your Boss... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

    Your boss sounds like a cool enough guy. Explain to him how you feel. Who knows what little project he might be sitting on. If your boss knows two sticks from three he'll want to keep you happy/productive. A bored mind is energy wasted, If there is something that you could be doing which would better maximize your employment, they'll want you doing it.

  167. Whaaaat?? 3 VBA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *gasp* You don't have fun doing VBA??? Man I sure wish I was still doing that. It was great. If you get bored just ask for more projects... or take initiative and find some good automation you could be doing to streamline biz processes for your company. I love VBA... where else can you get so much done, so much automated in so little time... and make SOOOO many happy workers (as well as your boss)?? Ah the joy! 3 VBA =)

  168. Skill atrophy by PatentThis · · Score: 1

    You should definitely consider not just the short-term effect of switching jobs, but how it will change your situation a few years down the track.

    If you're anything like the vast majority of people, skills just fall out of your brain if you don't get a chance to practice them regularly. On the other hand, the more challenging position sounds like an opportunity to hone your skills and acquire new ones.

    The upshot of this is that in five years' time, you'll probably have a sharper set of skills if you go for the more challenging job than if you stick with what you've got. Most likely you'll also have a more interesting resumé and be more employable; even if you're not planning to switch jobs again soon, it'll affect your value to the company and your negotiating power. It'll also make a difference to your enthusiasm about your work, which will feed back into everything else.

    I'd say go for it.

  169. I've taken pay cuts for more interesting work by Wansu · · Score: 1


    ... and never regretted it. I figure most of my waking hours are spent working and life is too short to squander. Heck, I ended up making alot more money than I would have had I stayed in the dullsville job.

    However, it's been my experience that most people change jobs to get away from assholes.
     

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    1. Re:I've taken pay cuts for more interesting work by wizkid · · Score: 1

      Not exactly a pay cut, but when I was layed off from revolving systems, I took a lesser paying job because it was going to be much more fun. And just before we were bought by the megacorp at the fun Co, we took a company teambuilder to Purto Varda. The Co. had to borrow money the next week to make payroll from the megacorp. The final harrah for the Fun co. I got a good raise at the time. But now the megacorp hasn't given a good raise for 5 years. If I don't get one this year.....

      --
      I take no responsibility for what I say. Even though I'm never wrong :)
  170. YES! by TwoWheelTomy · · Score: 1

    The opportunity cost of not having fun is worth switch jobs.

  171. Working for others is almost never *fun* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    One thing I've learned over the few years that I've been working is that doing other people's work is almost never fun, especially if the pay is stable. Even if you're self-employed as a consultant (like I am) you still end up doing the things your customers want you to do, not necessarily what you want to do.

    I'm not saying that you should or shouldn't quit your job, but I want you to realize that wishing for a job that is challenging, stable, and doesn't threaten your sanity, is a bit like wishing for a winning lottery ticket. Those jobs exist, but they're hard to come by.

    Anyway, good luck!

  172. treat it as an investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Treat it as an investment - you're adding new skills and experience to your CV. Eventually you'll get a return on this.

  173. Take a paycut and go into debt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got tired of the computer industry even though I was making pretty good money in it. I left the industry entirely and went back to school to study for a different degree (Industrial Design). Bottom line is if you don't like you're job, you'll wind up not liking your life. Think about how much of your life is spent at work. It's an awful lot of it (even more than average for most people in the computer industry). If you think you can separate your work from the rest of your life and never let your work frustrations creep into your life outside the office, you are wrong (or one hell of a Zen master and you should be living a perfect life of austerity on a mountaintop somewhere subsisting on a grain of rice per day).

    No amount of money is worth being miserable over.

  174. Find Your Reason... by LEX+LETHAL · · Score: 1

    I think most people tend to leave their current employment based on the following:

    1. Mistreatment by management or co-workers, including lack of positive reinforcement.

    2. Inability to create a continuous path to professional self-improvement.

    3. Failure to achieve fair compensation for your efforts.

  175. I second this. by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree. I've usually taken the option of quitting. I don't regret any of those choices -- in most cases they have translated into career advancement, by giving me options that are more likely to pay off for me in the long term. However, speaking as one who actually has a job he wouldn't mind keeping for a while (for once), I can say that I wish my career had become more stable earlier in my life. That would have given me more of an opportunity to start putting money away. Depending on what part of the country you live in, the downpayment on your first home can be a massive thing. I live in San Francisco, and if I wanted to get in on property in this town I should have done it at least five years ago. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to put together the nest egg.

    Also, don't underestimate the possiblity of early retirement. My parents retired before sixty and they have never been happier in their whole lives. I know that for young people it seems ideal to have all your fun when you're young. But go figure how much more fun you can have when the fun never actually has to stop, because you've worked it out so that you never have to have a job again.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:I second this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No thanks. I prefer to have fun while I'm young, energetic and still curious about many things and places. When I'm 60, I don't think I'll be willing or able to go out dancing for three days straight, hike up a mountain, explore a jungle, have sex with my girlfriend 12 times in one day or anything besides sitting around watching TV.

      Fortunately my job (I'm a DJ) allows and sometimes requires me to travel all over the world. I get to see interesting places, meet good people, do a job that's rewarding and fun and get paid well. I used to be a techie, doing everything from support to network administration and software development, but I realized that it wasn't fun several years ago. That's when I made the big change in my life and I haven't looked back.

    2. Re:I second this. by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      So... you think you're going to be a DJ into your 50s? Good luck on that. It may seem impossible to you right now, but sooner or later nobody is going to want to listen to your music. You'll be an old fart just like everybody else your age. My advice is to start saving.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  176. Go for it by KrisCowboy · · Score: 1

    I'd say go for it if you are single and got no financial obligations to take care of. Since the work is interesting, you'll enjoy it so much that a little paycut won't matter. Or if things turn out for worse, you can always have the experience of working in a start-up on your resume. And you might even get your mundane job back.

  177. Re:I took a paycut to escape the corporate world.. by jcr · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone still want to work for an American company in this day and age?

    Because a lot of them are still fine places to work.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  178. do you live to work or work to live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The answer is exposed by answering the question "do you live to work or work to live?". If programming is what you live for, by all means go for lower pay and better work. If the job is the means to an end and allows you the luxury of putting in 8.00 hours per day so you can do what you really love in the early evening, stick with the boring stuff.

    I've done the boring stuff and I've done more-or-less leading edge, interesting stuff. Both had their place in my life. At the moment I'd take a pay cut *and* less interesting work if I could work a few less hours and play a few hours more each day.

  179. I would and I have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Left a high-paying slacker job at M$ for a low-paying, working-my-ass-off job at a startup. Twice. Two of the best decisions I've ever made.

  180. Have faith by DrunkOnWine · · Score: 1

    I'm cto of an organization that offers everything you mentioned.

    except the pay, of course.

    but there's a trade-off in everything. its not black and white, there are gray areas in everything.

    you're young - take risks now. when you're old you can't, and if you don't when you're young, you'll regret it.

  181. Computers give way to firefighting by ff1324 · · Score: 1

    Ya know, I was 2 semesters shy of graduating college with a degree in CS. Instead, I went to paramedic school, went through the fire academy, and now make more than some of my friends from the CS program, I only work 10 days a month, and I enjoy more job security than I could possible have imagined in IT.

    I would take a pay cut to deal with less of the crapola that invariably comes with working for a public safety entity. I also think sometimes that a degree in child psychology would have been a better path had I known from the beginning I would be a firefighter. :)

      I love the work I do. And in my down time at the firehouse...I design websites...for fun.

  182. Why the slave mentality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the sounds of it, you currently have the perfect job to enable the formation of your own company on the side. This idea that you have to work for someone else is flawed. Are you not creative? Do you not have your own ideas about how things could work better or some killer idea that no one has ever brought to market before?

    Even if you lack those things, there are plenty of mundane things you can do to make money in this wacky computer world that, while maybe not as intellectually stimulating as you'd prefer, will pay you at least as much as that lower paying job. The exceptions are that you can't get fired and your success or failure rests solely on you, not some nitwit ceo who blows the vc money on hookers and coke.

    So the wise path would look something like:

    1. Keep your current job.
    2. Identify the technology areas that interest you.
    3. Construct business models that allow you to startup and grow while keeping your job.
    4. Build it up until it is profitable enough to meet your minimal lifestyle requirements.
    5. Quit your day job and be an entrepreneur.
    6. Hire code monkeys and drones to do the menial crap.
    7. Rinse. Repeat.

    The alternative:
    1. Keep your current job.
    2. Be miserable.
    3. Die asking "What if?"

    or

    1. Quit your current job.
    2. Take a lower paying job that interests you.
    3. Ask yourself wtf were you thinking and start drinking.
    4. New company folds and you're unemployed and unemployable.
    5. Drink more.
    6. Masturbate furiously to penisbird, old cDc issues, and getting first post.
    6. Die in a puddle of your insufflated and inhaled vomit, having bitten off your tongue (Elvis style), mumbling "mmfmfmmmmfamfm" and kicking yourself as your non-corporeal soul looks down at your pitiful excuse for a free, sentient being with the knowledge that you get to come back to Earth (_AGAIN_) in your reincarnated form as a colon-dwelling nematode in a homosexual prostitute named Juan in Mexico*.

    Since you're "Asking Slashdot", you probably lack the capability to be a leader. Having not considered this superior lifestyle path, you are likely too incompetant to succeed in any of the ventures and actually look forward to the oh-so-sweet taste of partially digested refried beans and being bathed in spastic spurts of suppository-like, fluidic protein injections.

    Get a fucking clue.

    * You would not even be worthy of residence in the host colon of a Gay Niggers Association of America member. Mad props to timecop.

  183. Would You Take A Paycut for More Interesting Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm.. It does sound like you have it made as you are.. Though when it comes down to it, does your job make YOU happy? I know you were asking those other flamin, hating others around here, but I'll be honest, if you think you will be happier(not richer) at one, or the other job, then do it. It's all personal preference. If you want to be better for you and your familly and it includes a pay cut, well, then do it, if it can be budgeted. There are some limits.. If your single, and live alone, then it really and truely is a one-sided story... It truely is ALL ABOUT YOU. If you are maried, have kids, etc, then it isn't. But, at the same time, it kinda is. You still have a BIG BIG say in what YOU do. If you want to change from one job to another, then it is your choice.. That's all I have to say.. Let the FLAMERS take the stage...

  184. I Did This!!!! by kabars_edge · · Score: 1

    And it was worth every dime. I left a job that was boring to me and that I was so unhappy with it was a fight with myself to go to work every morning. So I pulled up roots, put my house on the market and moved to a better job location. I was formerly living in Knoxville, TN where the job market sucks. Now I have a job where I do work I love, work with people I like, and I'm excited to get up and go to work every morning. It's worth it, UNLESS the pay cut is so extreme that it would greatly and negatively affect your lifestyle. I say that for me it was definitely worth it and I would to it again if given the same situation.

    "The detachment of worldly things is the key to the cessation of suffering."

  185. Re:Some steps to take before and during the plunge by thedletterman · · Score: 0
    Well there's one very important step you are missing..
    I've been a co-founder of 5 startups since 1995, and the chaotic results of what can happen within a startup are absurd... but most likely, will involve someone trying to screw you out of what is rightfully yours. So here's the FIRST step you want to take if you are thinking of joining into startup venture, and I can't stress this one point enough.

    Get an independant lawyer to protect your interests.

    Don't just "go with the compny's lawyer", and certainly don't "have faith" that your partners will look out for your interests. From partners failing to sign royalty contracts after the work was finished, when royalties were agreed upon before the work was started to the board seperating you from the company on accusations from a total slut of a partner for spending money.. from your own bank account.
    The bottom line is, we're all in business to mke money, and not everyone is concerned with the how.

    It sounds like you've got a really good job alot of people I know that have been laid off from startups would love to have after their experience. Maybe you're just complacent, maybe it's just a phase. Maybe you need to bring in an xbox 360 to your office for when you get bored. Maybe you should spend more time looking at porn. Noone here should pretend to know what you NEED (except for legal counsel) ;)

    Oh nd one other thing, it might not be a bad idea to bring in an accountant for a few hundred bucks to evaluate the company before making the switch. If you can't afford to hire a lwayer and an accountant, then you definately can't afford to leave your current job. Believe me, if you are seriously considering making a big switch like this, and shifting to a more entrepreneurial role, your lawyer and account will be your two greatest allies for success.

    --
    Any fool can criticise, condemn, and complain, and most fools do. - Benjamin Franklin
  186. A question and An answer by layer3switch · · Score: 1

    "I'm a recent grad with no loans or credit cards to pay"
    Are you sure you are a recent grad? Last time I was in college, 2 main daunting things after graduation was paying off the loan and paying off the another loan (aka credit card).

    "so I have a low cost of living aside from a girlfriend."
    OK, there is your problem. Get rid of the girlfriend and join the nerdom as we unit in celibacy. Then we can talk about that fun and exciting low paying job.

    --
    "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
  187. anything you do for a living... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is going to wear thin eventually. If you go around taking pay cuts for something that looks more interesting at the time, eventually you'll be working for nothing and still bored.

  188. Have your cake and eat it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I understand you correctly, you work with great people and you get paid very well. But you are unfulfilled by the work that you do. Perhaps you feel that you are not improving yourself.

    If my guess is correct, then you could probably accomplish everything you do in less time than you are currently doing. If an interesting project came along at work, you could fit it in with everything you are currently doing. Or you would risk dropping an assignment or two to make room.

    Here's my suggestion: Look around for something that interests you inside your company or in the world of open source. If you can make a case for why it is important for your current employment, go pitch it to management to allow you to spend time on it.

    If it is interesting to you, but not really related to your current job, take it on as a hobby off the clock. You could even offer management at your current job to pay you less in exchange for more freedom to work on outside interests.

    The end result: You work with all the same great people as before, plus other interesting and great people. You get all or most of the same benefits and compensation. You also stretch yourself and feel that you are doing something important and interesting.

    Your current employer gets a more satisfied employee. They probably benefit by your exposure to new ideas and methods. Everybody wins all the way around.

  189. Took a 60% cut to get into the film industry by edo-01 · · Score: 1

    Quit a six figure job in IT in 1999 to join the VFX crew for Farscape. My pay dropped overnight by 60% but I got to make spaceships for a living instead of fixing servers. I make more now obviously, but since the show got cancelled I've mostly been working on TV commercials. I sometimes think I should go back into IT before I stab some agency fuck in the head with my Wacom pen.

  190. Think about long term by Mr.Oreo · · Score: 1

    I find that I'm far more productive when I enjoy what I'm working on. Being a far more productive employee makes you a more valuable one and gives you more leverage to negotiate a larger salary later on.

    I find that salary is fairly negotiable, whereas the job you do and the people you work with are hard to change.

    --
    - Mr.Oreo
  191. Re:Some steps to take before and during the plunge by jlseagull · · Score: 1

    Good call. I forgot that one. Lawyer up!

    --
    'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
  192. As long as the paycut is not too big... by Calyth · · Score: 1

    I dunno about you, but as long as the paycut isn't ridiculously unreasonable, I wouldn't mind doing work that's a bit more stimulating.
    Happiness depends on how you define it. If earning more money doing something money makes you unhappy, deal with it.

  193. If your boss is such a great guy... by voss · · Score: 1

    tell him how you feel and ask for more challenging work.

  194. Work longer hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you work an extra 10-20 hours/week for more interesting work?

    What would you like to develop? Web browser? Video codec? VoIP? DB engine? Printer driver? Embedded controller? Game console?

    Pick an existing project or start a new one. Work for free so that nobody can demand more time than your current work schedule allows.

    Now you have the same great pay and benefits. You work with the same great people. You also do things that are interesting and fulfilling.

  195. boring is good by mytrip · · Score: 1

    I quit a high stress job with a big company for one that pays less, is boring as heck and many people there do not know how to copy and paste but it is stress free and many people have been there 20 years or so. I wouldnt go back to the other job for anything even though it was much more challenging and paid much more.

    --
    Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly. It just happens to be particular about who it makes friends with.
  196. Your life's work, or work for life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your post indicates your youth and inexperience. It also shows that you are naive. I was like that once. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A PERFECT JOB.

    When things are good at your present job, you have more opportunities to grow yourself and your career, especially if you have a good repoire with your boss. Have you ever thought about taking courses in Project Management? Have you ever tried to use your recent grad talents at work? As a recent grad, you really don't have that much experience to really know without some more guidance. Ask your boss for more interesting work if you think you're wasting time. Ask your boss to put you in charge of a project or deployment. Take the initiative and make your mistakes (and learn from them) here first. Get more experience and think about what you want to do for your career. Ask to be in on interviews to query candidates. A big multinational firm may have opportunities in other areas, so ask for a transfer or a rotation. Sometimes, variety can help direct your attention. When you find your niche, you'll know it.

    Your girlfriend may become your wife and then you might need to think about kids and then put them through preschool/private school/college/etc and also try to worry about retirement and making sure you stay healthy. Get your ducks in a row.

    It's OK to have fun anytime. Just be passionate about everything you do and you will have fun. Goofing off is not fun and teaches you nothing and steals time from the company that pays you.

    Don't become complacent at this early stage in your career. Don't jump around job-to-job thinking your CS degree is going to waste. And, don't take paycuts unless you know (or at least have a picture of) your outcome(s). Don't forget to network, network, network. Don't ever think you are selling out. You are doing what is best for you.

    Startups are a great experience for someone in your position and your stage of life, and sometimes taking a risk like this is a good way to reenergize and find your calling. I won't discourage you from making a jump, but just know what you're getting into. Recent grads getting into startups can be tough unless you're a rockstar (or know someone there already). Learn about how startups work and what an exit strategy is and how to deal with ISOs for your taxes when you make your millions ;).

  197. Yes, and we planned for it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    (I tried to include as many cliches and quips where possible).

    Sorry, but this is Day Three of isolation on the couch from "The Night the Toilet Cried". I need something else to do but make emesis trips to the euphemism.

    I haven't had to pull the ripcord, but when we got married nineteen years ago, we worked in the same place (hospital), but with differing careers, goals, salaries, essentially the same benefits, although she had a little more Paid Ttime Off from working there longer. We knew, after some experience beyond the two years I'd been out of school and my own summer business(es), that it would be better for my sanity to have some some free license to take advantage of these situations so we put all of our benefits during that enrollment (Fall '86) through her. I knew I might find a small, smallish, or (better!) startup (although it took me many years to find the right one of those)). To prevent money, and more likely, stability, benefits, and salary from interfering quite very much from the decision-making process, this seemed the right approach and always has. Having acquired the right house at the right time helped as well. Refinance at the proper time, equity loans, etc. and life is much less stressful outside of work; and at work, I'm not distracted by the reality of the outside world.

    One of the first questions these days seems to be salary? As if that's always going to be a deal-breaker. Sometimes, people won't go past that as though someone might get a woody, then experience sticker shock from the salary requirements. I was taught young that the first one to actually name a number, loses. But there are two things to know: 1: to be able to say, "I think when we've passed the point of knowing we have a good match you can offer something equal to what I'm bringing to the table"; 2: what I'm actually worth in a particular market [1]. (it's also a good question to keep in your interview quiver, particularly software whores (contract|consult). If someone's being placed in an environment where they're making half of what the people are making, their attention has a tendency to stray because they keep hearing cha-ching. It also causes co-worker problems, but that's a management issue because of all of the variables in the equation. David Schwimmer took care of Friends early on by suggesting the entire cast have one financial negotiator so money wouldn't tear them apart at a later date. Looking back, it was pretty astute. Sure, they had individual issues from the real-world (doesn't or doesn't she want a baby? can she or can't she get|stay pregnant? are they together or split? does he or doesn't he have an addiction problem? is he willing to admit it and get treatment? are they willing to volunteer any of this? are they required to volunteer any of this?) but they knew they were on equal footing financially. An interesting situation: at one time, late in the series (obviously, X-Files), Gilliam Anderson suddenly found she was working for half of what David Duchovny was. I figured it must have been like a lights-out key party. The lights come on and surprise! , you're with your sister. (Perhaps at a secondary level, it was like watching Drew & Mimi having sex).
    ____________________

    [1]. It's also a sign of your overall awareness of the real-world. Imagine being offered half|twice what you're expecting, despite knowing your number is half|twice what it should be. Either there's extenuating circumstances on the part of one party, or someone's unreasonable. A couple of weeks ago, I had a headhunter contact me (specifically) and I knew where he'd gotten his information based upon certain keywords[2] and when they had been added or removed. Up front, it was "$20/hour to be the star Access+ASP programmer". I asked them if this was for a charity or no-profit organization. It was a b

  198. Not only no but by devfsadm · · Score: 0

    Not in a million years. I have worked for many different employers from Government to corporate and it is all the same. They would like you to work your ass of for as little pay as possible. Do not ever sell yourself short. The employers I have worked for are after cash flow or proving budget needs. They are not looking out for your best interest. If you have enough experience and have a proven record you can call the shots not the employers.
    I have seen so many companies try to make themselves out to be the best employer in the world then you are attached to a pager 24/7 then the top level managers guilt you into thinking you owe them the world.
    It is about pay because in business it's about money.
    I might sound cynical but I've gotten burned several times by employers.

  199. I'd Stay by Jekler · · Score: 1

    Your job scenario sounds ideal. At a company like that, opportunities can always be created to apply your computer-science skills in more meaningful ways. You can always make suggestions or perhaps eventually head your own department that fills your desired job function. But you're also young, so you can probably afford to take more risks too. Personally, I'd rather work at a company I can make realistic, reliable contributions to than chase start-up pipe dreams. To me, a pay cut isn't a concern. I'd usually be willing to take lower pay for a better opportunity. For example, I'd rather work for cheaper at Google than for double the pay at a financial institution.

  200. On money and freedom by Impeesa · · Score: 1

    On the contrary... the best thing about having plenty of money is not having to worry about money any more.

  201. Calculate! by Debiant · · Score: 1

    Depends what you gain and what you lose.

    Personally, if diffrent isn't really significant to one self and it means one is more instrested in new work, I'd say go for it.

    My philosophy is that life is about keeping moving. To keep moving one needs is both change and sometimes letting go things that overpower one, like work. Work doesn't end during my lifetime, question is more about does one it easy way or difficult way.
    It's also very important to keep one self in such state of mind, that you can honestly say you're intrested what you do.
    Having higher pay for boring job may sound good idea. Until you notice you're not intrested to current job and don't want new challanges either. Because you're used to the good pay that takes toll of you.

    Avoid that, if you can. Keep yourself fresh and moving.

    Sure there are situations what I suggest above isn't practical. Havign mortage and big family may limit choices and cause some hard choises between personal pleasure and thinking it 'all'. However as long there isn't any really overriding factors, I'd wager what I say above is essentially flawless. Having more intresting work and lower pay, can be considered an investment for future too.
    Compared to staying in one place and not doing anything new or goin anywhere.

    --
    Nobody knows the trouble I've seen, nobody knows has the trouble seen me, even I sometimes wonder why I write these line
  202. Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, definitely. In fact, I did so several years ago. I left an easy, very well-paying (but very boring) job and became a full-time Ph.D. student. It has been one of the best decisions in my life. The funny thing is, I nowadays earn more than I ever did before (well, after finishing my thesis), because I am specialized in a certain area, know how to focus, and enjoy my research work a lot. Everybody needs a challenge in life. So yes, do it!

  203. Don't if the hours aren't long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the hours are long and boring then you may wish to switch.

    Otherwise, you can find interesting things to do after work.

    If you are not _allowed_ to do interesting things after work, because of your job, then your job sucks, switch.

  204. too lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd probably be up for taking a pay cut to get a more interesting job, but the problem is that since my job pays so well, it's hard to get motivated to go job hunting. That's where my boss got it right -- if you pay your employees well enough, they'll be too lazy to quit.

  205. Yup, it worked for me. by Joe+Decker · · Score: 1
    I did, I'm now a nature photographer.

    There's a lot to be said for making a lot of money early, invested well, it can keep you in food, clothing, shelter and health insurance when you're old (your governments policies and/or fiscal malfaesence may vary). There's also a lot to be said for enjoying your life, and never, ever, talking to an SEC investigator ever again.

  206. Keep the job and scratch your CS itch too... by OhNotSeven · · Score: 1

    ...by contributing to a challenging open source project. How about that?

  207. Think long term by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

    Look to the long term. Startups aim to well, start up and make it big. Assess what you think the startup's chances of successes are, and how much you expect to gain financially if it succeeds. Ask the startup for more details if you want to. Get assurances of what you will get in the event of a buyout or IPO. Startups are not all equal.

    Assess the impact on your career path if you take up his offer and the company does fold in a year or two. Could you go on to do something similar for someone else at a good salary? Would it be better pay than what yiu get now? More worryingly given what you say, assess the impact on your career if you don't move. Will you be stuck with VBA for life? Don't just consider your current salary, consider how much that salary can grow.

    --

    My Karma: ran over your Dogma
    StrawberryFrog

  208. what a conundrum by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    I've got an idea. I'll take over your job and you can have mine.

    I'm a contractor. I do linux administration for various companies in my area.

    I've worked with several fortune 500 firms.

    I work maybe 4 days a month if I'm lucky.

    but wow, is the work ever exciting!

    so, how about it, I'll trade my exciting job for your boring one.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  209. Just did and it was a great decision by CousinLarry · · Score: 1

    I quit a development job at a large investment bank in NYC 5 months ago to move to California and work in video game development. Exact same deal - bank had great pay but was as fun as watching paint dry. Took at 50% pay cut and a junior level position at the new place.

    It was best decision of my (short) life so far.

    But I also have no mortgage, no kids and I had to basically break up with a long term girlfriend who stayed on the East Coast. Those factors were significant in my decision.

  210. why not work for the startup? by popra · · Score: 1

    If you, obviously, find your current work enviroment unchalanging, and you have no money problems, why not work for the startup. There, with the skills you say you have you might make a big diffrence, the company might just break trought and you'ld make shit loads of money and have fun. If it doesn't work out, you can always get another job, it's bubble 2.0 man!

  211. Yes, I would & have by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 1
    I moved to Spain to head up dot-net development for an up & comming consultancy firm down here. It's not so much the work itself that I love; rather the my bosses attitude that "whatever it takes, however long it takes, take you time & do it properly - no hacks". It's the tits!

    Oh, also the weather here is several times better than the UK. And the women. Er...and the food too.

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
  212. Absolutely by laetus42 · · Score: 1

    As long as I can pay my bills and get myself a new DVD once every while I'm fine with pretty much any pay. Doing boring work is murder in the long run. You should always try to learn and explore new things. If your current work isn't doing that for you anymore, you're better off finding something else.

  213. Personally by aztektum · · Score: 1

    I would take the bigger paycheck and spend my hobbie time creating something cool/continue learning. I see work as a paycheck that lets me do what I really want.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  214. No problem by Sime208 · · Score: 1

    "A man is a success if he gets up in the morning and gets to bed at night, and in between he does what he wants to do." Bob Dylan.

    Your question about leaving leaving a mundane, well paid job for a more interesting but lower paid one..

    My answer: Without even thinking about it, and have done so before. I work the usual 9-5, so 40 hours a week at work, the same as most I expect. I spend more time at work than I do with family and friends. In one of my past jobs it was difficult to drag myself there, alright money but insanely dull. You don't realise the effect a job you don't enjoy takes on you until you leave it. You quickly adjust to the different income and find ways around it, but the difference it makes to your life overall is surprising. Don't judge your success on what your bank balance is or could be, and don't whore yourself for extra cash if it means you're only happy on a weekend.

  215. Run NOW, Quit... by randalware · · Score: 1

    Life is too short not to enjoy it.

    How many good years ya got left ?

    And you need to keep your technical knowledge up to date.
    It is easy to be pigeon holed.
    People that can program & think are always going to have a job.

    But, You must be able to live on what you make.
    And risk deserves future money/stock (in writing).

    I am 8 months into a sabbatical and buying a new BMW (1200GS/Adventure)motorcycle.
    Going to travel the US this year.
    Rode 12,000 miles last year on a borrowed bike (Harley).
    It was so much fun, the harley owner is going with for 2 months (Alaska).

    My resume is up to date and so is my experience.
    But, After 25 years I needed a break.
    The last few years of psycho customers,politics, & marketing folks.
    On top of mergers & bankruptcy.

    I wasn't tied to my salary ( I live way below my means).

    I saved for the rainy day, & it's raining somewhere today !

    See your smiling face in the mirror.

    A highschool wiz can do macros cheaper.
    Move while its your choice

    --
    This is my opinion based on what little I know and understand of the rumors and lies Thanks, Randal
  216. Creating Personal Freedom by hughbar · · Score: 1

    I resigned from a highly paid job in a place I hated (Citigroup..) and started working for a charity. I removed one zero from my income. I'm a LOT happier now, code instead of filling in forms, no PHBs, teach, mess with small networks etc.

    HOWEVER, I'm end of career, no young children, not much of a mortgage etc. so my personal circumstances (plus the fact that I'm not very 'life in the fast lane' anyway) permitted me to do this.

    To me, that's an important part of it, in a different part of my life, I might have made a compromise and continued suffering for a while. So I think, creating the personal freedom to do this is an important part also.

    --
    On y va, qui mal y pense!
  217. I already did... by MaestroSartori · · Score: 1

    ...which is why I work as a games programmer, and earn less than all my classmates. And earn less than most sysadmins I know, even those who are fairly unqualified and inexperienced. But I have an interesting job, and I don't dread going into work the way most of the people outside of the industry I know, so the value is all relative.

  218. academia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know it's not quite the same, but I've just turned down an industrial job to stay in academia. The pay difference is about a third. Yeah, it smarts a bit to turn down the money. But I do get to work on the bleeding edge of science instead, doing stuff that nobody has ever done before. That makes up for it.

    Life's short - do something fun with it while you have the chance.

  219. Yes, the cut is worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been there, done that. I'm a better person now.

  220. No by mulhall · · Score: 1

    Unless you are already rich, the answer is always 'no'.

  221. Academia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many (most?) people holding an academic position in science or engineering, especially computer science, have made precisely this choice. A typical CS professor could have doubled his salary if he went for an industry career, not to mention the negative income during academic studies and the ridiculous wage during postdoc.

  222. I have two jobs by unfunk · · Score: 1
    I have two jobs;

    I have a data entry job, which pays $35(Australian) per hour
    I am also a bicycle courier, and get paid $16.40p/h

    Guess which job I like doing more?

  223. Paycut For More Interesting Work....I Would by TheGreatGonzo · · Score: 1

    I took a paycut about five years ago to get into IT. It has panned out for me. I'm now working for a great company hacking .Net applications. Although to be honest my interests and ideal job would be to be hacking Linux software I'm unable to find a job that offers that at present. If you (as I) feel that open source software is the future it might be a worth while step to take the cut to move areas. To me it sounds like you like the benefits of your current job so an alternative could be to get involved in some open source projects and get some hacking done in your own time.

    --
    Oh, uh, good question. Now technically speaking, uhh, let's say, put me down as a... 'Whatever'?
  224. Do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was in exactly same scenario about 4 months ago. Had previously changed jobs based on pay rises, but was still bored and unmotivated. Then, last November, I took a 20% pay cut to go and work at what I really wanted to do. I actually look forward to going into work most days, am passionate at what I do. It's not just my working life that has improved, but outside of work I'm happier and less grumpy.

  225. I did... by Knaldgas · · Score: 1

    I believe it depends on your expenses contra income. If you can't afford it, you can't, if you can, I think you should.

    18 months ago I quit my job making software for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs). Pretty interesting product IMHO, but my professional satisfaction was close to zero.
    Inferior architecture, poor development processes, etc. IMNSHO...

    So after about 8 years in that business I gave up. I took a cutback and changed job to something with a higher degree of professionalism. After 18 months I still do not regret that decision!

    I must admit that I sometimes miss the missions (high coolness-factor++), but I will not switch back and loose the professionalism I feel today.

    ~Knaldgas

  226. Fascinating conversations by lpret · · Score: 1
    I just wanted to add that this is utterly fascinating. I'm a senior Human Resources major, and it's incredible to see the various forces at work showing each persons' own ideas. Well, anyways, here's my 2 cents...

    I'm pretty sure you can't change how your current company does it's work (ie introducing OpenOffice is not a viable option) so to use your CS degree while staying in your current job gives you option 1: Stay, but take up an OS project off-hours to hone your skills. Option 2 is pretty evident: take the lower paying job and be mentally satisfied.

    However, the third option is to openly communicate with your manager. Explain where you're at, why you're intrigued by the offer, and see if there's something within your current position or company that will allow you to do more. Open, honest communication with a reasonable manager is the best route. Maybe upper management is thinking of developing some of their own applications but don't feel that they have access to the talent to create these apps. There's a hundred ways it could go well, but you'll never know if you don't ask. Your company seems to care for you, and I would bet that they would be sad to see you leave.

    Like someone else said, though, what are your life goals? Find someone who does what you think you'd love to do and find out everything you can about that job. What it takes, how to get there, stuff like that. If you find you actually like it, start doing things now to build for it. If not taking the new job, get more education, volunteer for different projects, etc. Life is bigger than your job -- if your goal is to make a difference in the OS community, maybe keeping this job, but working only 35 hours a week would be just as helpful if not moreso.

    Also, don't neglect any financial situations that might be coming up. If you are serious with your girlfriend, you may be planning on quite a hefty investment in a shiny, glittering, rock. Maybe you want to trade in your college-mobile and get something with a little more respectability? If you do switch to the low-paying job and start finding yourself in a financial crunch, you will probably start hating your job as many do in financial strain.

    Ok, I'm off my soapbox, and good luck!

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  227. Yes! or Well! No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I got payed enough for it to be more than enough I would.
    Unfortunatly I get payed 150 a month for my part-time job.
    There is very little chance that anyone pays me anything, and it's less than that.
    Most likely pays me nothing for more interesting work.

    Like I said. Depends on the paycut.
    Still enough? Then go for it!

  228. Please make your own decision by cr_nucleus · · Score: 1

    Knowing if someone else would take a price cut for a more interesting job will not help you in any way. It doesn't say anything about the current job or the potential "more interesting" new job.

    If you want to know if someone is ready to do it i can awnser shortly: yes.

    If you want to know if you should quit your job and take this new opportunity, that's a decision you'll have to make for yourself.

  229. Re:That's not all there is to it by xtracto · · Score: 1

    I think he must stay at his actual job. Why?, financial stability. Look, if he is doing okey and the payment is right, what else does he wants?.

    He says that he only works on Office things and that his potential is being wasted?, well, maybe he could get half day of his saturday to do something interesting for him, or even just enter as a consultant to the other company, speding a minimum time.

    The problem will be when he moves to the other "startup company" and it does not work... then he will be without job and money. My father has always said "do not rise the left foot until the right is firmly at the next step".

    What I would do is just stay with my current job and get some time to do something interesting (note: this is what can really improve your resumé).

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  230. Fly! by gborland · · Score: 1

    Keep the job, and use the money and flexibility to take flying lessons. You will find that a whole lot more enjoyable and satisfying than shifting to a low-paid programming job.

  231. I know I would (nt) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blah

  232. Life is too short by jpopper · · Score: 1

    Life is far too short to be unhappy in your work. The stress from working long hours at an unpleasant and demanding job that you do not like is just not worth it. I definately would take a pay cut to have a more interesting job. The quality of life would be so much higher, and you can't put a price on happiness. I'm currently writing this from Japan (originally from Northern Ireland), where I am here teaching English to Japanese High School kids. The pay is quite good, but I would still do this job if they just paid for my food, rent, bills and other "necessities". It's a very rewarding job and I completely love it. Unfortunately, the job is for a maximum of 3 years and then I have to move on to real life again! Maybe I'll be more bitter and twisted in a few years. Ask me again then.

  233. I certainly would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was a freelancer for 6 years and while still studying at uni I earned an impressive amount of money each month. The job was boring though. Your old dynamic website stuff(j2ee,php,perl) and some network admining. So when I got the offer to do a PhD at uni and work as a researcher it took me exactly 4 seconds till I accepted the offer even if it meant earning almost 1000E less each month. I'm happy since :)

  234. always have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I've always taken lower pay because I have always prefered to work in real time embedded software rather than move into databases which I have always been particularly excellent at.


    It's also a matter of doing something that I can see the result directly benefitting society. (Like more efficient engines)

  235. Why does it have to be either-or? by Americano · · Score: 1
    However, the work I actually do seems to be a waste of my CS education. My current project right now involves hooking up Excel and Access with a little VBA and some macros. The other day I was asked to export a Lotus Notes database into an Excel file and format it. The most programming-intensive project that I've done here was an ASP.NET webapp, for the company intranet.
    I don't understand why it has to be a "Stay here and do boring work," or "Go somewhere else and do exciting work," proposition. If everything else about your job is perfect, then talk to your boss, and tell him/her you'd like to do more interesting work. If they ask you to implement something, try to negotiate on the technologies you can use... if you can't, ask to be assigned to projects where you can be creative & have a free hand with the technology choices you make. In other words, don't sit there like a lump waiting for someone else to make your job interesting.

    If you have to export a Notes db to Excel, then find ways to make that an interesting task. Just because the word "Microsoft" is involved doesn't mean it has to be boring. If you have to write a web app for your intranet, then find a way to do it using technology you think is more interesting. Propose new projects for your "spare" time to your boss. Or better still, in your spare time, find a problem, and solve it, and then show the results to your boss.

    Just because your job is boring today, doesn't mean it has to be boring tomorrow... and no job is going to be 100% Fun, 100% of the time. The TPS reports, or their equivalent, will have to be filed no matter *what* job you're working: I still have to send project plan updates, fill in timesheets, and do other administrative B.S. that I absolutely loathe, and you probably will have to, as well. The key is, finding other ways to compensate for that by identifying unsolved problems, and then finding creative ways to make them less painful.

    Bottom Line: If your job is otherwise perfect, then find a way to make the work more interesting. If your boss actively tries to thwart your attempts, then you've got a problem, and then you might want to consider a new gig.

  236. Re:That's not all there is to it by Hydroksyde · · Score: 1

    I'm afraid I must disagree with you. By the sounds of it, his living costs are low, and he is well qualified, so financial stability probably isn't a major issue for him. Doing something you enjoy after hours is alright, but if you don't enjoy your job, it takes much more effort to complete. I know from experience that when you're doing a job you love, it doesn't seem like work at all. The problem will be when he moves to the other "startup company" and it does not work... then he will be without job and money. My father has always said "do not rise the left foot until the right is firmly at the next step". Sometimes that is wise. But sometimes it is necessary to take a risk in search of a greater reward.

  237. Get a job you like by Oldsmobile · · Score: 0

    Get a job you like, and never work a day in your life!

    --
    Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
  238. Your looking at it totally wrong by darkdante · · Score: 1

    The problem I see here is the same problem many people in today's IT world has. Its that they value being comfortable and being stable today much much more than they do having stability, and a better paying job tommorow.

    The smarter you are, the more expierience you have the more you are worth in the long run. If you do decide to stay at your current company the only valid reasons I could see would be because you like the company and think they will do better in the future OR your too old to move because of retirement issues.

    Staying for reasons entirely of pay is one of the most short sighted things you could ever do unless of course your still making poverty level pay, which I don't think you are. From an employers point of view I'd say having an employee who comes to work for pay first is much less desireable than having an employee who comes to work because he loves his job.

  239. Personally by MarkNijhof · · Score: 1

    I would first talk to your boss and tell him you are not happy doing what you do. Maybe he can change your situation, so you will keep your $$ but get more interesting work. If that is no posibility than you can switch jobs.

    I personally think it is more important to have fun outside working hours than during, but if both is possible than YEAH!

    -Mark

  240. Yes and I am... by k31dar · · Score: 1

    ...in two months I will be leaving my job as Senior Analyst Programmer and joining Her Majestys Constabulary. For pay, this will be a massive drop to what ive enjoyed for many years.

  241. Would You Take A Paycut for More Interesting Work? by kevingolding2001 · · Score: 1

    Yes

  242. Give Up the Salary by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

    I spent 8 years after college working as one of those highly paid IT contractors. My basic role has always been Web development, and the kinds of jobs I worked were dissatisfying for a number of reasons. First off, as anyone who has worked in government IT consulting knows, contractors are lower than the sweat in the armpit of the janitor in the eyes of 90% of government employees (especially political appointees). They don't trust you, everyone has an agenda separate from the organizational mission, and they resent the fact you make as much of 2 or 3 of them. Secondly, this type of position does not really lend itself to advancement. The majority of IT contractors just do what they are good at and never try to work themselves into an organizational role within the companies they work for. Thus, companies themselves sort of treat IT as its own animal, and there is typically no heirarchy above manager for contractors.

    Regardless, the lack of opportunity and the general working conditions really did not appeal to me. In January of last year, after a post-Christmas layoff, I started my own company and look at the world in an entirely different way. The salary has not always been there (nor has the revenue, it is not easy to start a business), but I am making more than enough to make ends meet and have not missed any meals.

    The most rewarding part of this is that I have a genuine interest in the work we do. I am not building some crap accounting application for unappreciative people with no vested interest in the project anymore. I get to talk to decision makers, write proposals that are realistic, intelligent and actually serve a purpose in the real world, and generally have a lot more control over things that limited me in the IT consulting world.

    M

  243. Done just this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I stopped contracting and started working for a company full time that was doing interesting work. My pay got cut to a third of what it had been but I've never been happier. Also, now that I've proved my worth to the company I've had three payrises in the last two years accumulating to almost a 20% rise in that time.

      DO IT! Go have fun because wasting your life doing something you are sick of will only allow you to accomplish dying with more money than you would have.

  244. Try this... by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 1

    Sign up for The Landmark Forum. If you get value out of that (almost certain, in my experience) sign up for their 'Advanced Course'. The courses are designed to help you let go of what you're stuck in and think around the corner a bit. You'll get other stuff out of the courses than just figuring out what job would really work for you and I seriously doubt you'll regret it. The two courses would set you back a total of about $1200

    --
    OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
  245. I left my job for more interesting work by pfunk · · Score: 1
    Almost 4 months ago I did exactly that. Worked as a Developer at a small company with a single web application (about 60-75 people total, 15 of whom were developers). It was just an OK job for me, other than the pay. Spent a lot of time working on stuff that ultimately got thrown away as the product changed directions multiple times or priorities shifted, etc. Benefits were ok. Most of the people that were there when I started had left and I didn't really seem to fit in with most of the newer people. Most of all I was just bored. So I left to go to a much smaller company (just three other people, two of whom I already knew) and took a large paycut in the process.

    Even though I make less, I am MUCH, MUCH happier as a result. I can see a real difference in the work I produce. It is actually used by our customers. I have personal contact with the customers on the two projects I am working on. I am actually given responsibility (I run some ideas past my boss, but for the most part, I am allowed to decide how to design or implement stuff). I can actually see myself getting more practical experience for managing projects, timelines, etc. But best of all, I don't dread going to work anymore. I don't have to worry about what I am going to do all day, because I am definitely not bored anymore.

  246. Where do you want to end up? by mikej · · Score: 1

    Do today what you want to be doing later on. Your skills grow in the position you're at, so if you want to be doing advanced system and network programming, get a job doing that. Make sure you can pay your bills, but salary's less important than what you're doing. I've taken paycuts for better work, and I'm glad I did it.

    --
    Ideology breeds Hypocrisy. Just how much is up to you.
  247. Probably "yes" by richieb · · Score: 1
    It depends how large a paycut we are talking about. 10%, 20% or 50%? For 10-20% you should seriously consider changing jobs.

    Unless you are close to retirement (like within 5 years), you need to make sure that your skills remain marketable. It seems to me that there are a lot of VB programmers, especially more in India and China. Your job is more likely to be outsourced, if there are many other people capable of doing it for less. What are you doing that is worth so much money?

    Where do you want to be in 10 years from now? Still doing VB? Unless you learn new stuff you'll wind up like all those programmers who only knew COBOL and MVS when Java came along.

    Being too comfortable is a warning sign - you are not growing.

    --
    ...richie - It is a good day to code.
  248. Corporate IT by pysiek · · Score: 1

    I see that you are getting yourself into business programming and believe me (this is 15 years of experience talking ;-) ) tech experience is not everything. Especially in corporate IT, business experience seems to matter much more than technologies that tend to come and go. Ask anybody who specialised in finance, manufacturing, scm... anything. Of course if you want to be programmer in business consultancy, this is probably waste of your time. just my 2c

    --
    jcp
  249. work with someone else, please by misanthrope101 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's great if you can find self-actualization in your work, but the world is full of flakes who expect too much satisfaction from what they do. If it isn't interesting, challenging, rewarding, and fulfilling, then they can't be bothered, but it still has to be done, and they are the ones standing there getting paid to do it, not to placate their inner unique snowflake. Trained workers don't spring into existence to take the place of the ones who won't work because they feel that they're "not really into it." I work with some of these people, and mostly they just have a high sense of entitlement.

    I have a totally bleak outlook on work--to me, it's just an exchange of time/effort for money/benefits. But the strange thing is, I do the work. I work longer hours, more willingly, than some of those around me who claim to take "pride" in what they do, because I figure if I'm going to be a whore, at least I'll be a good whore and earn the man's money.

    The only hard part is faking the orgasm, because the boss-people don't want to hear that you work there for money and benefits. So I occasionally have to act as if it was great, the best I've ever had, wow may I have another, just to appease the "love what you do!" Nazis. God how I hate them.

    1. Re:work with someone else, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's pathetic. Just because you've settled with something you apparently hate doesn't mean everybody have to. I know plenty of people who expect to have jobs they love and, lo and behold, they actually got them too. You can denigrate them as "unique snowflakes" if you want to feel all fight club and 1999-hip, but the fact of the matter remains that they are much happier than you are.

      I'd take work with your collegues over someone who uses "misanthrope" as his nickname and apparently thinks work is the equivalent of faking an orgasm any freakin' time of the day.

      Sheesh.

  250. Means to an End by TallMatthew · · Score: 1
    Once you know what makes you happy in life, choices like this are trivial.

    For example, what's important to me is having free time, a great apartment and interesting places to walk and have dinner. I don't care if someone offers me double what I make now, if it costs me time or the city I enjoy living in, it's not worth it.

  251. #$%^#$% Work by djbesser · · Score: 0

    well i work in a call centre......tech support...ISP.

    I'd almost half my pay to start learning something....oh the pain.

    happy Tuesday everybody!
    DJB

    --
    DJBeSSeR
  252. DON'T QUIT! by CagedBear · · Score: 1

    I don't know why I'm responding, this thread is already bogged down. But here's my $0.02 anyway.

    You are making money by applying a subset of your skills to the business world. That's how the system works.

    Take some initiative and build something in your spare time that is a challenge and the business could use. Such as a system that handles the mundane parts of your job automatically. Maybe they won't need you anymore, but more likely they'll see your potential and ask for more.

  253. It really depends by v3c7r0n · · Score: 0

    Personally I'd say it depends on a few factors:

    1) Job security at the new company vs. your current job
    2) How much of a paycut you're talking about
    3) How much room to move up would you have in the new company

    But if the answers for those line up in your favor (not necessarily at first, but down the road) then go for it. The day stands a good chance of coming when almost all of those VBA macros you write now will probably come stock with office. Then where would you be?

    As far as the fun at work or fun outside work goes, I'd say that while fun at work may be the best job, as it beats filling out TPS reports all day, although on the flip side, filling out tps reports for a large company may in fact have more job security (unless your name happens to be Samir Naga...nagonnaworkhereanymore or Mike Bolton) against that of a startup company.
    And you'd really want to try for the middle: a job that's fun (or where you atleast avoid most of the "same sh!t, different day" routines that seem to be oh so popular in the corporate world), but provides a steady paycheck.

    Of course, you could train a monkey to do your current job for you and get the best of both worlds too...VBA isnt THAT hard.

  254. Investment by Grax · · Score: 1

    Start putting money into investments that can support you wholly or partially without having to wait for retirement.

    Suppose you reach a level where your investments are paying an amount equal to 25% of your current salary. You could then get a more exciting job that pays a bit less and still maintain the same level of earnings.

    If you actually reached the level where your investment earnings were supplying all of your needs you could basically do whatever you want, in theory.

    I also find that I do better at a job that I have a passion for, rather than one that I find boring and unchallenging so you might look for something like that. It could turn out to be more lucrative in the long run to take a job that pays a bit less and run with it, turning it into something that pays much more.

  255. yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes. i took a $20k pay cut to get out from under a horrible corporate cultrue in a stupid, and ridiculously stressful environment. went to a private company and am A LOT happier now.

  256. What are your real needs? by Ora*DBA · · Score: 0

    I think you have two questions to ask yourself: "Can I live on the reduced pay comfortably (pay the rent, save some pennies for a rainy day)?" and, "What is more important to me, job content or job context?"

    As a fifty-year-old (ouch, that hurt to type), I would say that now is the time of your life you are a) learning your trade technically (coding techniques, problem pattern recognition and how to avoid/resolve it) and b) don't have to worry about feeding a family. Go and have fun - and, once you have some good, solid experience under your belt at this job, think about where you want to be in this industry and look for a leading innovator to work for.

    Just my two cents -

  257. both by Tedium+Unleased · · Score: 1

    unless money = fun outside of work to you.. in which case good luck, chumpster

  258. Re:"me too" Follow your dream... by ursabear · · Score: 1

    1) Follow your dream if you can. If you're capable of doing something that you love, and life lets you do it, then ROCK ON.
    2) Thanks for defending our country, eagl.
    3) It is not egotistical to super-enjoy your work, provided that you're the best person you can be.
    4) One's quality of self-satisfaction and life far outweighs stuff, not matter how much one loves one's stuff.
    5) At the end of the day, one's work tends to consume a third or more of one's life. Make the most of it, if possible.

  259. Hells Yeah, Bitch! by ChaosCube · · Score: 1

    I, too, work senselessly on Access queries and waste countless hours formatting spreadsheets for that silly accounting department.

    My days of spreadsheet jockeying are at an end. I'm so sick of this work that I'm going freelance. I'll be taking a pay cut for a while, until I build up enough business. I'm also giving up the security of a regular paycheck, which is a bit stressful. However, if I really stop to think about it, there's no security in the corporate world. I could be downsized at any time--all in the name of workplace efficiency.

    You see, to me it's worth it, regardless of any reduction in pay. If what you're doing from day to day is wearing you down, leave. It's much better to be happy than to "work at jobs we hate so we can buy shit we don't need," (Durden, Tyler, The Bible).

    Go with what will make you happy. If it doesn't work out financially because the company folds or just doesn't grow at an acceptable rate, get a new job or start your own company. Remember, "there's no fate but what we make for ourselves," (Connor, John, T2).

    Yeah, I love movie quotes. Even if I get them wrong.

    --
    BDR Gear
    Outdoor gear, MREs, and more!
  260. follow your dreams and think about your retirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is really one question:
    Did you major in cs to create, learn, and generally bring ghost in the shell to today, or did you do it for money?

    The answer to that question should decide for you. think about your next job too, what you want your resume to look like when you're 50 (peak earning years + college for kids) and more importantly your salary.

    ps. i'm all for ghost in the shell

  261. Its not a perfect job if you don't enjoy it by jocknerd · · Score: 1

    I had a good job working as an Linux Admin for a City Gov't that was about 30 miles (45-50 minute commute) away. But I was bored because my input didn't seem worthy to my boss. I left in September to come back to the city I currently live in. I work 4 miles from home. I took a $7K pay cut. Is it worth it? I'm now working with Windows, ColdFusion, and inept management that is still stuck in the 90's. Can't beat the drive though. I've finally realized that my perfect job will be me working for myself. So my goal is to be on my own by the end of the year.

  262. Yes by shamowfski · · Score: 1

    See Subject.

  263. Start your own business by s88 · · Score: 1

    If your work is really that easy for you, why not use your spare time outside of work to start your own business and focus on things that really interest you? This way you can be intellectually challenged and make more money than you currently do (hopefully;) ) instead of less, yet still maintain your current stability and perks.

    If you aren't business savy, you could alternatively spend your spare time working on some interesting open source projects.

    Scott

  264. No student loans? by szembek · · Score: 1
    I'm a recent grad with no loans or credit cards to pay
    Recent grad, no loans? Well either you're a lucky bastard or you forgot to mention that one big 15 year loan.

    I am also curious as to how much of a pay-cut you're talking about, I think that is highly relevant. Without disclosing the actual amounts you could have provided a percentage. I mean if you were going from 55k to 50k it wouldn't be a big deal given your current situation, however if you were going from 55k to 30k, I could see where this would be a dilemma.
    --
    nothing
  265. Re:Work to live - You got it. by roger-the-shrubber · · Score: 1

    I thought after 12 years as a consultant that joining the Big company, Big Perks crowd would let me go one place everyday for the rest of my career and that would make me happy. (This was 2 years ago...) I lasted 4 months and have been back to consulting ever since. The variety in my client base is what made me valuable to them. I was bored and I agree that job satisfaction was worth the $50K risk I took. I've since made it up and found that spending more time with my family and having meaningful work that I found challenging and rewarding was worth more than any Salary could overcome.

    --
    I am a Shrubber
  266. I did by ezeecheez · · Score: 1
    Before long, between bonuses and raises, I was making more than I was at the previous job.

    Even aside from the money, the quality of life factors made the new job preferable.

  267. do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like you want to do it. And you've got nothing to lose but things
    you say sound like what you should want. If you've got friends you'll make
    more where you go next. And you can always go visit.

    The startup might suck, it might blow away in 6 months, the owner could
    be a psychopath (last 3 jobs... :-( ). But that's the worst it can get.
    The best part is it will all be new... new work, new relationships, new
    everything. In 10 years it won't matter so much one way or the other, so
    do what you want now.

    You only live once.

  268. I took the cut to be closer to home and buy time by Mille+Mots · · Score: 1
    I used to have my own conslutting corp. I ran the biz (books, paperwork, sales calls, managing 1099s, etc.) as well as doing tech. work. We did system and network admin/mgt/design/whatever for small- to medium-sized businesses (and some very large school districts).

    My typical day started when I got out of bed between 04:30 and 05:00. I was on the road no later than 06:00, and travelled ~250 miles in a typical day. I was lucky to be back home by 19:00, and even then, I'd spend the next several hours doing bookwork, replying to emails, managing people and putting out the days remaining fires.

    I loved it. The challenges, the excitement; hell, it was *fun*. My wife didn't mind the money and benefits, but with a 1.5 year old who wondered who I was, she was starting to question the point of it all.

    I took on the last client in February or March of 04, winding down the existing contracts and projects over the duration of that last three-month engagement. I knew going in that this client would want me to convert to being a captured employee at the end of the assignment, and that's exactly what I was looking for.

    There are still days that I miss being self-enjoyed, believe me. But, I've grown used to a slower pace of life. I work 2.5 miles from my house (not always a good thing), and my longest commute has been 15 minutes. I get to spend time with my family, which is probably the most important benefit there is.

    One of my buddies (who also has a conslutting biz, and stays in the game) once quipped, 'You can work to live, or you can live to work. There's nothing wrong with either choice, but once you make it, do it with all your heart.'

    I choose to 'work to live.' I do just enough to keep from getting fired, they pay me just enough to keep from quitting. With extremely little debt (a mortgage), we don't require much income...our lifestyle is supported *by* my work, instead of the other way around, and our family is much better for it.

    Take a pay cut for work that is 'more fun?' For me, doing 'more fun work' would result in a pay raise...and a lot more stress. I'll stick to being a big fish in a small pond, going home at 16:30 and living life. YMMV.

    --
    Sig Nificant

  269. You only live once, bro by frankmanowar · · Score: 1

    There's nothing perfect about being bored at work, go with the exciting job if that's how you really feel about it.

    --

    "Other bands play, but Manowar KILLS"
  270. leave without burning any bridges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can you leave the current job in a good situation? if so, go for it and if you aren't happy, go back to your current job. i've done it before and really it's not a difficult thing to set up if you are doing well in your current job.

  271. You mean more taxes or less salary? by big.iron.wiz · · Score: 0

    With the oil prices going through the roof the question should be:
    - Would you take even less money home for a more interesting job?

    My question is: Does this interest thing comes in a bikini and thong?

    --
    I am portuguese. If you think my written english is bad, try posting in portuguese!
  272. forget about money by bkg_cjb · · Score: 1

    I quit a well-paying programming job in the US last year in order to teach English to children in China. I'm writing from my nice house in Shaanxi Province, where I have lots of free time to learn more Chinese and work on my own CS projects and other hobbies. My salary is only US$600/month, but that's 6x the average salary in this city - I eat out at restaurants every day and just got back from a trip to tropical Hainan island, which only cost about US$400. Money is relative, do what you enjoy and don't let the fruits of your labor and time go to waste.

  273. Pay vs. Interesting work by LadyCoder · · Score: 1

    I, personally would take the paycut (of course, depending on how big of a cut it was). Why settle for being happy only half the time? If you have a job that you enjoy and that is challenging, then you will be happier even when you aren't at work.

    Of course, if the pay cut is too substantial for it to make sense, you can always pass that opportunity up, but continue to look for other opportunities where you would be able to use your education more fully. The thing is, the longer you wait to get a job doing what you went to school to do, the harder it will be for you to get a job doing that.

  274. Fun outside of work by CarrotLord · · Score: 1

    I'd take fun outside of work hands-down. I don't want a job that replaces my social life. Still, I'd certainly take a pay cut to do a job that I thought offered me better self-development. In my case, that means management, rather than technology. I'd see it as an investment for my future career. But I would never leave a well-paying job with good career development for one that paid less and offered less career development but seemed fun ... unless I was financially set, and considered it to be semi-retirement.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
  275. Alarm Bells by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1
    It sounds like you're not just trading dull work for interesting work. You're trading a stable, low-risk, long-term environment for an unstable, high-risk, short-term environment. From your description, the work sounds far more exciting. But please think twice before walking away from high pay and good benefits. Those jobs are scarce, particularly when your resume says you walked away from one for a "fun" job.

    I speak from experience: I walked away from a nice, stable job back in 2000 to join a friend at a startup. My old job was building databases for my state's public health department. It was slightly dull, paid fairly well, and had benefits out the wazoo. When we took on an incompetent manager and I quit in frustration, moved across the country and started working 70-hour weeks building waycool wireless application frameworks. Five months later they laid off half their developers and I was just another unemployed dotbomber. My friend lasted another year before the VCs ransacked the company and seized all its IP.

    Back at my old job, the manager that made me want to quit had been "relieved of all responsibility," which is government speak for "we can't fire you, but we can make you tidy your desk for eight hours a day until you resign." And since she'd squandered her entire budget on hardware they didn't need, there was no money to hire me back. Yes, I asked.

    The moral of the story, for me anyway, is that there are worse things than being slightly bored with a good-paying job. It could be different for you: You could have a lust for adventure and risk that you just gotta get out of your system. But you should realize that you're not just walking a way from a dull job: You might be walking away from a career company. In a few years, with a wife, kids and an oppressive mortgage in tow, you might feel differently about waking up and knowing you're going to draw a fat paycheck and that your employer, not you, is going to pay for little Billy's braces.

    If you're bored, maybe what you need is a hobby. I recommend motorcycling. I got to work this morning glad to be alive, because three commuters tried to kill me on my way in.

    --
    This is not my sandwich.
  276. Boring job by Shralper · · Score: 1

    I'd look carefully before you leap. And I mean VERY carefully. First of all, there's no way of knowing exactly what a new job holds in store. What may sound great on the surface, might be your worst nightmare come true. Unless you personally know someone who's willing to give you an honest assessment of what goes on in the day-to-day operations of the new company, there's always risk, especially in App Dev. This risk isn't that big of deal when you're already in a very bad situation (however, I've actually jumped out of the frying pan and into the fire before). But if you're already in a comfortable position, be careful choosing a new job. I'm actually in a similar situation myself (my job is becoming a tedious bore), but I turned down an recent opportunity because after asking a lot of questions about the work environment, I decided to stay put. When it comes to App Dev, you could very easily walk into a sweatshop (regular 60+ hour workweeks), ridiculous deadlines, clueless managers, and over-promising salesmen. In fact, you could almost say this sort of stuff "goes with the territory." There's things that are FAR worse than a tech job that's boring. You, being a recent grad, have probably been shielded from these things. Your tech life, though boring and non-challenging, so far sounds like a bed of roses. I'm not saying don't leave, but choose CAREFULLY. Ask lots of questions about the new job and their expectations. The ball's in your court...don't blow it. Also, look for more coding opportunities in your current job. Volunteer to help out on teams, etc.

  277. It all depends by Sierpinski · · Score: 1

    The big question: Can you maintain your same style of living with the paycut, not having to give anything major up? If it just means not having a little bit more spending money, I'd say it was worth it. Not only would it be more interesting, but it sounds like it be more useful in securing a possibly better job later on. The money (depending on how much the cut is) will come back with time, but the old job will be mundane forever. If you find the work interesting, you are more likely to work harder and produce more results, which may in turn lead to promotions, more raises, etc.

    If you can handle the paycut, I'd say go for it. What good is a little extra money when you get to the point where you hate going to work every day. I've been there, its not fun.

  278. of course by Danzigism · · Score: 1
    the answer to this question is always dependant on wether or not you'll like the new job moreso than the one you currently have.. i'm ready to be a bit more drastic with my fields of interest even if it involves a paycut.. i've been working professionally in the IT world for a good 8+ years so far.. From parallel computing plants, to the world's rated #1 amatuer porn site.. now i'm stuck at this crappy office now.. my jobs have become less interesting over the years..

    i think shifting towards other areas of interest is essential for people like myself, just because it'll keep me sane.. sitting in an office, hurts my tailbone, keeps me inactive physically, and makes me bored out of my mind.. Not to mention, it hurts my passion for computers so that when I get home, I don't even want to look at my computer..

    its important to get out of serious debt so that you can have the freedom to choose basically any kind of job that you want, and have fun with it.. as long as I can get health benefits, I'll take a paycut.. grocery stores give people health benefits.. i wouldn't mind being a baker ;-) then i could finally bare making computers my hobby again..

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  279. No Paycut . . . by Dausha · · Score: 1

    I would say no to the paycut for more interesting work. But, then again, there are personal preferences. I figure that eventually the younger pups will push me out of the market, so the better bet is to gravitate towards management, where I will be more effective after my ability to keep current with the minutea of tech is overshadowed by the pups. It happens.

    A book on management, I can't remember the title, has a couple of rules about job changing. First, always go for the job that pays more. Second, avoid jobs that are strictly staff--always try to interface with the client. That's because working with the client helps the company earn, which helps the bottom line and increases your visibility to the higher-ups. The caveat to rule two is if it pays more money and is take the staff job, but get out of it in 12-18 months.

    I would also avoid job-hopping, stay within one company as long as you can while getting a varied experience.

    --
    What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
  280. cultivate your Garden... by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 1

    You seem young & bright. It seems like a good company. Financial services & consultants should be around for some time. Jobs like yours are very rare, I would not throw it away unless you are supremely confident in your ability to get another like it (I do not know what the environment is like in the Phillipines, maybe such jobs are common there because of outsourcing. In North America, they are rare.)

    If you are not feeling challenged, then you probably have time to do experiments. Try some of those Excel/Access linkage projects and doing them in OOO & mysql as a demo. Or have the Excel files dropped onto an intranet, and then read-in using OOO to feed mysql and see if you can get interesting features from that.

    Try finding ways to apply open source to what the clients need. It sounds like your work environment would be open to those sorts of experiments. See if you can have 20% time projects (like Google) or some such. I'd make the job interesting, since everything else about it is good.

    If you are skilled, they will be flexible enough to accomodate you, and you will build relationships and skills at the same time.

  281. I took a pay cut by mydigitalself · · Score: 1

    To answer your question from personal experience...

    I took a pay-cut from a role I had been in for 4 years. The company was doing the same stuff as before and I went to join a new innovative company that was about 1.5 yrs into startup.

    The paycut was around 10%. For me, the fortunate situation was that I didn't have to compromise my spending habits too much - so I still have the same quality of life I did before. I'm maybe putting a little less into my savings. I also got an options package, that wasn't overly great, but has already given me some extra cash and when I finally cash them all out I'll have basically made up the shortfall.

    So, my advice in a nutt-shell
    If you have to really compromise your life style because of the pay-cut - think twice. If you are bored, leave your existing job and find another that pays in a similar bracket - even if it's the same role. Sometimes just a change of scenery is a breath of fresh air. If you don't have to compromise your life-style - totally take it.

  282. You Misunderstand Education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    '...a waste of my CS education...'

    The purpose of your education is to help you succeed in life,
    don't get short sighted and think you'll be working in computer science till your 72.

    Save up as much of that well paying job money as you can, 60% or more...

    When the programming cash cow runs dry, you'll be looking for something better...
    With your savings you could buy rental properties, start your own business, travel to a far away place, go to grad school, start your own school, give it all to the poor, or buy your own island...

    The point being: Financial freedom and success in your life cycle (spouse, offspring, good place to live) are things to keep in mind.

    Your first million dollars is the hardest money you'll ever have to work for...

  283. Not using your education? So what. by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

    Being able to use or even fully use One's education in One's Job is a great thing but the vast majority of people end up doing something entirely different or at least relatively unrelated to what they studied in school.

    School is part training but a good part of it just to prove that you can show up on time for something everyday.

    You may find more satisfaction and far more opportinities if you explore jobs options that don't directly relate to your studies. Not always. But if you approach jobs that ONLY involve using a CS major's skills, then that rules out a whole ton of other rewarding and challenging things that might be perfectly good other than not directly using a CS degree.

    There are a ton of ways to exploit your talents without trashing the job that provides what appear to be good working conditions and benefits. You say coding is in your blood. So, do that in your spare time. Start a for-hire coding business on the weekends. Consult on the side and/or write apps for small businesses that could not afford full-blown programmers. Write apps and sell them on the 'net. You might stumble across something that makes a major pile of money, assuming that's what you want. Or you might make just a small amount of cash but hey, writing code is really what you wanted.

    Meanwhile I wouldn't dismiss a nice stable job that appears to have few if any downsides and I wouldn't worry a bit about using my degree.

    --
    Sig for hire.
  284. In a word... by caudron · · Score: 1

    ...No

    In a blog entry: http://tom.digitalelite.com/2005_08_11_08_02_00.ht ml

    You want life fullfillment, do it after work. Don't buy into that "enriching career" crap. The employment contract is a simple one: You are trading time for money. The more you can get that ratio to favor you, the better.

    If you want to have an life that is more enriching, fullfilling, rewarding, interesting, or actualizing, volunteer somewhere after work with a group that really needs you, like a homeless shelter, a food bank, or hell even an open source software project. Don't spend yourself on Corporate America. I promise you that it will never pay you back!

    Never.

    Do your job, do it well, but just do it and go home to your family and friends where life really matters.

    And to answer to obvious next question, yes, my clients love my work. I'm not preaching laziness or sabotage, just perspective. You can write the best code on the planet, with the least bugs, that runs the fastest, the the users adore and cheer, and in the end what happens? A couple of corporate fatcats are a little richer this year than they were last year. w00t? No.

    --
    -Tom
  285. I did it. by MoNickels · · Score: 1

    I left IT support, where I'd worked for more than ten years and was making very good money, to become a lexicographer. It was a two-thirds paycut. While I had to re-learn how to live like a graduate student, I haven't missed the money. Of course, my only serious financial obligations are student loans. No mortgage, no car, no car payments, no wife, no children. So no doubt it's been easier for me than it would be for others.

    --

    Wordnik, a dictionary project which aims to collect

  286. It depend of paycut by MiliusXP · · Score: 1

    If you got cut by 2000$ or 10000$ can make a big difference in your choice. But, I think, if you hate your job, it can bring you to depression if you continue to work here. You must make a choice between $money$ and career.

  287. yes, but it depends by dindi · · Score: 1

    If you do not have kids to take care of of a grandma with an expensive medical condition - in other words if you can afford the cut, go for it.

    You spend 8+ hours (half of your life, not including sleeping times) at your work. If it is boring, and you hate it, you will start to hate your life.

    I left several workplaces just before getting a raise, for others that paid more or less the same, but promised more travel, new people, new challenges, new devices and software to fiddle with......

    But then again, I am the person who is thinking about doing volunteer ( =free) work on a remote island as a park ranger for 3-6 months just for the sake of being there, climb hills, clean trails and dive..... but have no kids or anyone to take care of, and my wife would volunteer as well (she is a teacher/biologist)

    obviously it is not a permanent job change, but obviously it is not for the money, as it involves a 100% salary cut.... but right now I am kinda sick of sitting in my home office and staring at the 4 monitors and hitting buttons for $$$

    just my 2c. your mileage might vary

  288. I say TAKE IT !!! by dweebzilla · · Score: 1
    Take the small bit of risk the jump involves. Working for a startup is often a blast, and will most often take you to the limits of your abilities. Based on my experience at 3 startups, you will meet really cool people - bond with them (similar to college), and learn lots of stuff that will help you in the future, e.g. starting your own business. And when your done, that despicable bunch you bonded with will become an excellent network in your industry.

    If your experience is anything like mine were - you'll have a blast - and end up earning way more than you expected.

    Oh yeah, and:

    If it doesn't work out, take back that "in training for retirement" job or one like it - they will always be there.

    Startups employ lots of young eager smart people - many of whom are female. (See bonding statement above)

    --
    Get your tagline off my lawn.
  289. Make yourself available for coding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My job is actually quite similar to the OP. I also have a CS degree (and am working on my Masters). I do a lot of "busy work" in Excel, and Access, and some VBA to automate these processes. My manager hired me because she was sick of doing busy work tasks. So I came in and automated it within a week, and they had a new hire with nothing to work on. I made myself available for coding tasks (albeit still not in C/C++ or Java -- yet!) and I have been more or less coding special requests from managers ever since. Yes, this is in VBA, but it's a step in the right direction. If your workplace has software engineering positions that you are interested in, make their department notice you (or at least their managers) and apply for the job internally. That way you can keep the coworkers and the good pay without risking an entirely new situation (which, I've noticed, usually lacks one or both of those attributes).

    Good luck!

  290. Take a sabattical? by lysse · · Score: 1

    OK - so you have a great job in every aspect except for the work not really challenging you; and the chance to go and do something much more interesting for a startup for less money. I can understand you not wanting to do either irrevocably! However, if your current employer is that good, could you explain the situation to them, point out that you don't feel challenged, and see whether they would mind you taking 6 or 12 months out from them, without pay, to go and scratch your itch? If it doesn't work out, you're covered (and believe me, good people are probably more important than challenging work in a job); either way, you won't be looking back in ten years saying "if only I'd done that..."

  291. Depends whats more important to you... by arock99 · · Score: 1

    Some people prefer more money and some people prefer something more fun...keeping in mind of course that you still have to be able to afford to live. Personally I look at it this way...if you don't work overtime all the time then your job is the 2nd place you spend the most time at...personally i prefer enjoying what i'm doing (especially spending 40+ hours a week doing it) otherwise i don't feel its worth it...life is short and if your lucky enough to enjoy what you do your ahead of a lot of other people Having said that it really depends whats more important to you but the fact that your even asking this question tells me that money doesnt drive you and thats great...I think you might have already made your decision...its just that your being smart about it and why shouldn't you be...going from a job where your comfortable to any other job there is some risk involved. think of the pros and cons of working at each job and then list in order of whats more important to you to least important and make a decision from it...

  292. I recently had to make this very decision by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, I had already taken a pay cut (~11%) to work closer to home (traded a one hour commute for a ten minute one, applied the saved time directly to my family). It would have been another 10% drop in pay, and I didn't think the work was that interesting!

    --
    Just junk food for thought...
  293. something to consider.... by cloudezero · · Score: 1

    I just made the move from my high-paying consulting gig to a high-energy startup in lower manhattan last year. I may have taken a pretty significant pay decrease, but to me it was worth it... I jump out of bed in the morning totally psyched to get in and write some more badass code. My previous situation sounds worse than yours, though, and this is the "thing to consider" from the subject... my startup gives me equity. I think that makes it far easier to consider taking a paycut - the potential for a large payoff some day really boosts your spirits when you're eating cucumber sandwiches for dinner at the end of the month...

  294. Re:Not using your education? So what. by cloudezero · · Score: 1

    Thanks, that just sparked an interesting discussion amongst our development team. 8 people, and here are there titles/education : CTO - Enlgish Lit Lead Dev - Culinary Arts Sr. Dev - Art History Sr. Dev - Agricultural Engineering Jr. Dev - Computer Science Jr. Dev - Computer Science Jr. Dev - Computer Engineering Jr. Dev - Computer Science I don't think this is an unusual trend, but I can't explain it.

  295. Of course by mclaincausey · · Score: 1
    Considering you could spend most of your waking hours at work, the answer is of course. Life is too short to be dissatisfied with the activities you spend a great deal of wakeful hours engaged in.

    There's a balance that can be struck between job satisfaction and income. That balance is the full measure of the quality of your professional life. If you only attend to one side of that balance, you cannot expect a satisfying life, unless you happen to love doing something that is lucrative, like being a doctor, for example.

    --
    (%i1) factor(777353);
    (%o1) 777353
  296. Think of your career! by dude8151 · · Score: 1

    Think of your long term career - how many people are likely to want to hire you in your middle age with only 20 yrs MS Office experience? At this early stage of ur career go for a job that involves new interesting technologies and set yourself up for later! I left my home to move to France and work with a VoIP company, instead of staying with my boring job at a bank and I'm so happy I did! I'm earning less and beer costs lots more here, but I'm really enjoying myself and learning soooo much! You have recently graduated, you don't have any debts, and no responsibilities - find a new job! (although the gf might not be too understanding if you want to go abroad!)

  297. DO NOT DO THIS. RUN - DO NOT WALK - AWAY. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Trust me. It isn't worth it.

    I had a good job with a good company with good hours and good coworkers. However, after 5 years of doing the same thing with it made very clear that there was no room for advancement, I quit and took a different job that a friend of mine was leaving. The new job paid 80% more than my old job, but I knew that it was miserable.

    The job involves maintaining a horrible suite of interconnected billing applications that is completely undocumented. This in and of itself wouldn't be too bad, but there is horrible bureaucratic red tape choking everything you do. You don't have the ability to install better tools to do your work on your laptop or on the test servers. Getting logins needed to do your job can take weeks.

    Fixing a bug requires a truly horrific number of impediments. First, you must get access to a test server (of which there are less than half the number of employees in my department), which can require over half a day to set up. Then, once you've identified the bug, you have to write up a design doc to fix it which has to be approved within the department. Then it has to be looked over by development (the very same reckless morons who created all the bugs I've looked at) and rubber stamped by at least three different people. Then, you have to stage the fixed executable as part of a weekly move into production which requires three more levels of approval (for a binary that they can't even scrutinize!) before it can go. Only then after verifying the code can you deliver changes into the production stream in the vile, hated, "everyone's workspace is a branch that has to be merged" tool that is ClearCase. This of course means that if someone else is changing the same program, they can't go into production in the same week. In spite of all of this, we are now expected to close all Critical tickets in 3 business days and all other tickets in 7 because "the business" is high on acid and the contractors who I work through are eager as puppies to please with impossible promises.

    The job also requires 24-hour on-call every couple of weeks with weekend on-call every month or so. In addition, our department is storm drain of the city that is my company's billing system -- it all flows down here eventually. Any other system that screws up and feeds us bad data can result in weeks or months of horrible clean up. We are the department responsible for all fact-checking on erroneous bill items and the department responsible for fixing bills even if our software wasn't the source of the problem. In other words, on-call duty is usually a 12-16 hour affair with people constantly pestering you for updates.

    To put it simply the job is extremely stressful and consumes large amounts of my free time. I have developed acid reflux as a result of the stress, and my sleep schedule is wrecked again after working so hard to fix it at my last job. My free time is wasted feeling burned out and not doing anything fun, and I don't have time to cook healthy food anymore.

    Over half of your waking life (counting commuting and short lunch and dinner breaks) is spent consumed by your job. If you know that a job will not bring you joy, run -- do not walk -- in the other direction as far away as possible. The majority of your waking life should not be spent making yourself sick and unhappy for filthy lucre. Money is not freedom if you make yourself a slave to it. Early retirement shouldn't come at the cost of shortening the time you have remaining in exchange for your best years.

    As for me, as soon as a year has passed at this job and my time here will not be too short to look good on a resume, then I'm out of here for a job with less pay and more reward. I took this job to get better paying jobs in the future, but I don't really think it was worth it at this point.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  298. Re:Not using your education? So what. by dude8151 · · Score: 1

    I spent 4 years at uni for my CS degree - what the hell is the use of all that time if I'm not going to use it? Plus, most people have to pay alot of money for their education, so what do you have to show for that then? If you don't really want a career in the thing you study, why should you waste all the time money and effort???

  299. You want more exciting work? by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    You want more exciting work, and are willing to take a pay cut? This seems OK on the surface of it, but when I look at it a certain way, I see a downside to such a decision.

    You have a job right now that is boring, but has a lot of perks: great pay, nice hours, the ability to telecommute as you want, etc. You want to find a job with less money, hopefully good benefits, but more exciting work. I can understand if you wanted to leave your current job because you feel it is a rut in your career (and believe me, it could turn out that way if you stay too long). If you have only been there a few years or less, though, think about this:

    If you want more exciting work, do you want to give away all of that effort (thoughts and energy) doing that exciting work for an employer in exchange for a little money, or would you rather see a great return on such an investment?

    One thing to keep in mind is that in the software business, you may be doing some coding and getting "N" dollars in salary in return, but it is possible that they are turning around and selling that same software for "N x X" - where "X" can be any factor you can think of - to multiple customers. For instance, at one job I was at they needed (for a client) a piece of software which would act as an interface between a scanner and an imaging system. It was to take images, and some data about them (OCR data stored as a CSV file), and dump all of that from that format to the format the imaging system needed. Neither the OCR company nor the imaging company wanted to write it. Since my employer was a VAR for both, they asked me to write it. I wrote a simple app in VB6 which would sit in the tray waiting for jobs, and as it got them, transfer them over. Took me a couple of days to write and debug fully with the test data I had, and to tweak it "just so" to make it easy to install, and to handle licensing issues. I later found out that they sold this software to the client for about $25,000.00! As far as I know, they only sold it that one time, but they could easily sell it over and over again for that same amount! I wouldn't be a bit surprised if the company you are currently working for is doing the same thing with those "boring" VBA scripts and such you create...

    Now - if you can get that amount for some fairly retarded (but crucial to some business operations) pieces of code - imagine what you could get for "exciting" code? However, unless you have some sort of financial stake in the next company you work for - you won't get jack (other than your paycheck, of course). So why go that route?

    Instead - think of an exciting project, and start doing work on it at home! It doesn't even have to be coding related - or even related to computers! But it does have to be something that is exciting to you. Use your current job as the means to support yourself and family - and if you are willing to take a pay cut - do it now! At your current job, estimate what your "new" job would pay, take the cut, and put that amount from your current job into your "new business fund" savings account. Then, with that squared away, take on your "new job" of building that exciting new product. Once you have it at a certain level of "doneness" - start to think about a business plan and start writing that up. Hopefully, by this time, a year or so of time has passed and your "new business fund" savings have accumulated to a certain amount (maybe $5000.00 or so?). You have code (or whatever exciting product you are making), you have a business plan, you have some savings to launch (or at least as collateral for a small business loan, or something).

    Now, all you need to do is find investors in your plan, or find other people interested. Now - you have to do this portion quietly - don't shop it around to your colleagues or clients from work - unless what you wrote (or built) has nothing to do with your current job. If you are doing software, make sure you don't use VBA (for instance) - or that the software does anything similar to what the software you are writing at work doe

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  300. Stability Important to Note Also by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    Personally, I'm in the process of job-seeking and am resigned to taking a pay cut when I go. On one hand, I'm not a big consumer, so I'm not worried about a drop in pay. On the other hand, I do worry a bit about the shift in job stability. My current job, I could probably hold until I retire. If I sign up for more exciting work with a start-up or small company, I could very well be short a job a year later, and with even less saving built up then before.

    Really, the decision depends on a number of factors. Maybe the current job's extra pay allows you to enjoy yourself more outside of work. If your job is merely tedious, not soul-sucking, you might consider staying and pumping up your style outside of work. Or save up enough for an early retirement. But, given what you said about how braindead your taskings are, if you do stay, make sure you keep up on your education outside of work. You don't want to be 10 years out of school, 15 left for retirement, and trying to peddle your ability to create Excel Macros.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  301. low cost of living is key. Do it now, not later. by javaxman · · Score: 1
    I'm a bit late to this discussion, so I don't know if you'll get this advice, but if you're going to work for peanuts, *now* is the time to do it.

    Later in life, you can take the job that pays more but is less interesting, if you have to. Later, when that ( probably working ) girlfriend morphs into a ( possibly not working ) wife with a kid ( or kids ) that you have to support... then, that's the time to decide if you need to look more to the bottom line than to what is fullfilling. But now, when you're young, you should do whatever looks like the most fun for you. As a benefit, you'll be able to point to experience doing more than speadsheet work, and maybe someone will pay you well to do interesting work. I hear it happens occasionally.

  302. 35% pay raise not good enough by mcguyver · · Score: 1

    ...at least for my girlfriend. Just last week she turned down a job paying 35% more - a huge pay raise - because the new company has a stale atmosphere and little potential for growth. It's not uncommon to turn down a raise or job offers for boring work - boring jobs pay more for a reason...because they're boring!

  303. It depends on what you want in life. by 23$kidoo · · Score: 1

    Some people define their life by their job. I have friends like that. They would much rather make less money andwork a lot of hours in order to have interesting work. On the other hand, are people like myself. I see my job as nothing more than a means to an end. While I am fortunate to do something I enjoy (I'm a *nix sysad), I don't particularly care if my work is mentally stimulating. I place a premium on flex time, a 40 hour work week, vacation and being able to leave my work at work. I get my mental stimulation by volunteering as a search and rescue dog handler for the state in which I live. While it's and expensive and time-consuming hobby, it has great rewards. I get to be in the woods with one of my dogs every weekend, I have a highly trained and skilled dog and I'm fascinated by why my dog does what it does and how to train it to have the necessary skills. Plus, I've been able to take my dog training skills and start training my dog's cat (yes, it's my german shepherd's cat). As an added bonus, I get to help people. Additionally, I have time to spend with my friends and family, do work around my house and DJ once a month at local bar. If I made less and/or worked more hours, I wouldn't be able to do a lot of those things.

    My point is that there are a myriad of ways to find fulfillment in life that don't revolve around your job. In fact, you're probably better off if you get your fulfillment outside of your job. To most employers, you are nothing but a number, to be laid off when they need to cut head count or you are no longer needed. If you get your fulfillment from something other than work, it is much harder for it to be taken away from you. It sounds like you have a great job aside from it not being interesting. Having been through a number of layoffs due to companies closing offices or going under, I place a high value on job stability. I would suggest staying at your job and saving/investing a good portion of your salary. Since you are young and don't have debt, you're in a great position to let your money work for you. It will pay tremendous benefits down the road: you may be able to retire early and/or you will have the financial freedom to do other things. Staying in your current job because the money and benefits are good is most definitely not selling out. You are simply looking out for your best interests if you stay. Paul Graham's January essay (previously linked to on /.) would be a good read if you haven't already read it. Jobs with benefits/pay like yours are very rare. Don't make the decision lightly.

  304. I would take a very Drastic Paycut by jameskojiro · · Score: 0

    To Work on Atlantis, I would work for room and board...

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  305. Only one man has the perfect job... by SierraPete · · Score: 1

    ...and that's Hugh Hefner. Otherwise, there's always something that could be better about our jobs.

    But moving back to the topic. I can think of a dozen reasons why I would jump ship. I can think of a dozen reasons to stay put. What it comes down to is "To Thine Ownself Be True." If deep in your heart your desire is to stimulate the gray matter, write code, and put that college education to use, jump ship. If deep in your heart you want to bank the cash and stimulate the gray matter when you go home for the night, stick tight. If you want to stimulate other things, see when old Hugh is going to cash in and then apply for his job.

    --
    Starting next week, all passwords will be entered in Morse code
  306. you misunderstood me, snowflake by misanthrope101 · · Score: 1
    I didn't say I hated my job. You assumed I hate it because I don't love it. You also assumed that I'm unhappy there. That's the problem with the "love what you do" Nazis. They always think they have attained some deep insight into your psyche based not on the quality of your work, but on whether or not you like it.

    I don't hate my job, nor am I unhappy there. It's a job. I don't love my car, but to follow your logic I must hate it, and be miserable driving it. I don't, and I'm not. It's transportation, an efficient method for getting from A to B. My car works for the task I ask from it, as does my job. That is an important point, and bears thinking about. My job gets me the money and benefits I want, and asks from me things I am willing to do. What I do is largely boring and unfulfilling, but I don't hate it. Doing what I do allowed me to live in Tokyo for 5 years, and it's shortly taking me to Korea, and then to Italy for 3+ years. But if you want the cool stuff then you have to do what the man wants. The snowflakes bitch more than I do, because they want the cool benefits but they also expect to find the work a spiritual odyssey or some such crap. I'd clean toilets for the pay and benefits I'm getting. The job is only a way of bringing money and benefits my way. It is a means to an end.

    My nickname is a bit of hyperbole. But I find it vindicated more often than not. And my co-workers like having me around, because I have more of a sense of humor than the stick-up-the-ass snowflake nazis.

  307. I did it last summer... by Breitak67 · · Score: 1

    I took a roughly 50% pay cut last summer to move from a long-term contract job in the city writing portal apps to a full-time w-2 gig in the suburbs with a tech start-up. That was the most satisfying move I have made in my career. Unfortunately, the company ran out of money 5 months later and I am back at the contract gig, but I would do it again.

  308. You open source people make me sick!! by MooseTick · · Score: 1

    "If you feel your CS degree is wasted, work on open source projects or try to bring open source into your organization."

    Why do most people on here take it for granted that anyone with programming skills wants to do open source projects? Why can't you suggest he work on whatever he wants and maybe even sell it for a few bucks? Is that so wrong? Again, why should he be tasked to bring OS into his organization? Perhaps they are already there or it isn't the answer for what they need. I'm not bashing OS here, I run Linux on my toaster and serve Apache pages from my fridge. That doesn't mean I want to do a bunch of work and distribute it to the world for free.

    I have actually put a few snippets of code out in the public domain and don't have a problem with doing it. Nonetheless, why do so many here feel like that will make the OP and others feel more satisfied with their lives?

    1. Re:You open source people make me sick!! by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      Why do most people on here take it for granted that anyone with programming skills wants to do open source projects? Why can't you suggest he work on whatever he wants and maybe even sell it for a few bucks?

      I don't assume he wants to work on open source projects, but I do offer it as a suggestion. The OP sounds like he isn't particularly motivated by money, which lessens the motivation to sell something, and I think open source is an inherently more altrustic endeavor. He also decides what to contribute and how, so he can evaluate how to best use his CS skills to a much greater degree than the vast majority of companies.

      In addition, if the OP wants to contribute in a way that will impact many people, Linux, OpenOffice, Abiword, Mozilla, *BSDs and others already have millions of users. All those worthwhile products need all the talent they can get.

      Finally, if he's selling a product, his employer is more likely to want a piece of the action, and it is more likely that the contracts some other responders to my post mentioned will affect him. Given these considerations, open source makes sense. Obviously, if he doesn't want to, he shouldn't, but open source is an avenue to the destination that the OP sounds like he wants to reach.

  309. I did by hughcharlesparker · · Score: 1

    Just over two years ago I quit my job as the networking guy in the core systems team at a higher education college to work part time as a salesman for a small company that took photos from small remote control airships and to train as a teacher of the Alexander Technique. I'm still on the course, but the company folded within six months, and after a few months of unemployment and temping I now live in a different city. Though the whole process was chaotic both personally and financially, I'm now still poorer and still happier. Money comes and goes, but time just goes. I say go for it.

  310. I did, and I'm happier for it. by __aaaaxm1522 · · Score: 1

    I was a sysadmin, and pulled down somewhere in the neighborhood of $80k Canadian a year. Before the on-call pay.

    I hated it though. The stress, day in and day out was just too much. So, I dropped my $80k a year job and went back to school to study Physics.

    To pay the bills (without digging into savings), I sell Mac computers part-time at the local Mac store for $8 / hr. I'm relatively poor, but I'm happier than I've ever been in the past 12 years.

    I'd do it all over again in a heartbeat.

    1. Re:I did, and I'm happier for it. by DemonSlayer · · Score: 1

      You may lose what you EARN but you won't lose what you LEARN :)

  311. Re:I took a paycut to escape the corporate world.. by TechieHermit · · Score: 1

    That's probably true about small, privately held companies, but I doubt any corporation is still a "fine place to work". I'm not saying it can't happen, but it's unlikely, like, say, encountering a unicorn in the mall.

  312. Making Changes by LinuxLuver · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I gave up a 23 year career in IT to do two new jobs: farmer and corrections officer in the local prison.

    The money is about 25% of what I used to get paid.....but the work is better.

    --
    Only boring people are ever bored.
  313. Vanity, all is vanity by blippy · · Score: 1

    Matthew 6:26-34 26 Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they? 27 Which of you by taking thought can add one cubit unto his stature? 28 And why take ye thought for raiment? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin: 29 And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. 30 Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which to day is, and to morrow is cast into the oven, [shall he] not much more [clothe] you, O ye of little faith? 31 Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed? 32 (For after all these things do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things. 33 But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you. 34 Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day [is] the evil thereof.

  314. Will I? Hell, I have by dbmasters · · Score: 1

    I have on occassion taken small pay cuts just to get out of a stupidly boring job to have a bit more mentally engaging work...as long as the money patys the bills and feeds the family, I should at least have the side benefit of enjoying what I am doing...

    --
    dB Masters
  315. Talk to your boss by gritak · · Score: 1

    Hey boss, you know I really like working here. The benefits and bonuses, flexi-time, telecommuting, the co-workers, and you're a good boss. But I feel like I need something more challenging. I realize that all the Excel, Access, and VBA stuff is important. Not that I am not happy doing it. But perhaps, once in a while, if there's any work that involves more programming. Well, I'd like to volunteer for it. Of course this isn't going to work if your entire department only ever does Excel, Access, and VBA stuff.

    > However, the work I actually do seems to be a waste of my CS education.

    I wouldn't ever say that to anybody at work. Ever. Not even away from work. I know you don't mean it that way, but it could be miscontrued. Your boss may conclude that you think some jobs are beneath you. A waste of your skills. If I'm interviewing, and the candidate said something even remotely like that, I wouldn't hire him/her.

    > The other day I was asked to export a Lotus Notes database into an Excel file and format it.

    After finishing that in 10 minutes, what did you do for the rest of the day? :)

    My sister is a researcher with an M.Sc. Once in a while she'll tell me about how she has to do clerical work. Stuffing envelopes, arranging transport for seminar participants, etc. Seems that a lot of her colleagues are in the same boat (new hires, 2 years there). None of them has yet managed to get a grant, hence no money to hire assistants. So got to do everything yourself.

    In working life, there's always the good stuff that you want to do; and the lousy stuff that you have to do. Well, somebody has got to do it.

    Just a couple of months ago, I had to fire one of our programmers. In terms of technical skills, he was the best we ever had. But he wouldn't share the "nobody wants to do stuff". I tried various ways to get him to change his attitude, but after a while, he was starting to poison the environment in the office.

  316. Why he needs is a hobby. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Not joking.

    A meaningful regular activity outside the office is by far the best antidote to feel constrained in such a good position.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  317. This is why people work in research by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Heck, I probably make 20 to 40 thousand less, but it's way more fun and you learn new things every day.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  318. make your own projects! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think keep the current job, but make it more fun. Find things that need work... your co-workers won't always know, but you should be creative and see things that need work, need tweaking, need a brand new process. If your goal is software development/coding... surely there are a 1000 things that you could make to help the company.

    For instance:
    1. Find some mundane data entry type process. Find a way to make a front end for it that would either make it faster, more efficient, more accurate, or more useful later (like in database format instead of just random excel docs, etc.)

    2. Similar to #1, get a hold of some SQL databases and move any Access databases to the more robust SQL side. You can then make a VB front end to enter in the data or whatnot.

    3. Find reports that are useful for management, all workers, remote workers, whatever... make dynamic reporting mechanisms for your intranet.

    4. Get with other techie workers and see what things you could develope that would streamline their day. Be prepared for a lot of revisions... which is good practice for real world coding anyhow.

  319. Re:DO NOT DO THIS. RUN - DO NOT WALK - AWAY. by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

    You need to read "Death March" by Ed Yourdon. Here's a link:

    http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=1 69512&seqNum=3&rl=1

    In it he gives several strategies for dealing with projects like what you are stuck with. On is to prepare your resume, do things the way they should be, and tell the higher-ups to lump it. If the job really is that bad, there's no way they can get anyone else to do it. If they fire you, your resume should already be in the pipeline, and their project will go down in flames.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
  320. Would you make the move the other way round ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you leave the startup to go to the mundane just for more money and security?

    If not, I'd make the move.

    HTH.

  321. Re:That's not all there is to it by boy_afraid · · Score: 0

    I think he is going to get a 50%-50% response from us. It's good to have a good paying job with no stress, but boring as hell. And it is equally good to have an "interesting" or "exciting" job where you don't dread coming to work, but look forward, and having supporting co-workers and challenges. But, then in the new start-up you will be busy as hell with no sleep trying to keep as many plates spinning as possible.

    Since he doesn't have children, not married (except for a girlfriend which equals HIGH MAINTENANCE and sex sex sex), low cost of living, it's basically a coin toss. It sounds like its going to be either a gut instinct guess, or he needs to gather more information.

  322. take a cut? NO WaY by cgi700 · · Score: 1

    What will it accomplish for you?
    1. Less Income

    If you can afford to take the pay cut and there is a VERY STRONG chance of it going up beyond what you have now soon, then MAYBE take the job.

    Otherwise just keep looking.

    Issues are expenses verses income. If income goes down, so must expenses; otherwise insolvency occurs.

    Of course if you are already independently wealthy and do not need a paycheck, by all means, amuse yourself with the more interesting job, since money doesn't matter.

    But I presume that you are not, since you have posted a discussion here.

    Would "I" do it. No. Not after having done it in the past. It led to me feeling miserable in the long run with current pay which DID NOT go up until I changed jobs again.

  323. Re:I took a paycut to escape the corporate world.. by jcr · · Score: 1

    I doubt any corporation is still a "fine place to work".

    My experience says otherwise.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  324. Re:I took a paycut to escape the corporate world.. by TechieHermit · · Score: 1

    What type of corporation do you work for? I'm curious.

  325. Take the paycut by LB80 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the paycut job would look better on your CV anyway, meaning in the long term, you'll probably make up for any short term losses. I reckon when you are young and childless, you may as well take chances, you may not be able to when you are older.

  326. Re:"me too" - book recommendation by eagl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Real world training can transfer to gaming to a certain extent, but there are considerations required for gaming that can't be gotten from real life experience. The user interface, small/distorted viewport looking through the monitor, and network transmission lag time all require game-specific reflexes and skills. For that reason, gaming skills don't transfer too well to real life either. The reflexes and priorities are simply tuned wrong.

    I will say that a flight-sim gamer would do a lot better in a real aircraft than someone with no experience at all. But a real life fighter pilot is going to romp all over a gaming "ace" simply due to the depth of real life considerations that he's learned to deal with, such as the demanding physical environment. As with anything, some people are "naturals" and for these few people, flightsims are just another dynamic experience that will transfer to anything they do, from flying to playing golf. But for most people, there is no substitute for actual flight time.

    The best book I can think of for a gaming simmer is Robert Shaw's "Figher Combat: Tactics and Maneuvering". I think it's still in limited print, otherwise you should be able to easily find a used copy on Amazon or wherever. It's a bit dated where it comes to modern jet combat, but if you can handle the level of detail it's probably the best introduction to aerial combat you'll find anywhere outside of a secure military location. The list of sources is worth just as much as the book itself, and if I recall correctly (I read Shaw's book at around age 14 in high school) you could probably find enough reading material referenced in this one book to keep you busy for a couple of years.

    If you want to get really "good at flight sims", check out Aces High 2 at http://www.hitechcreations.com/ You won't find a better place to improve flightsim skills against real opponents than in the AH arenas. Yea there's a monthly fee to use the full arenas, but their head 2 head arenas and software are free if you just want to check it out without subscribing.

  327. Re:I took a paycut to escape the corporate world.. by jcr · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm involved in a start-up now, but I spent the last three and a half years at Apple computer. Besides Apple, I've worked at several Wall Street firms, and I was a manager at KPMG Peat Marwick for a while. The only places I've been that had major Dilbert-world situations were both telcos, and I bailed out of each of those pretty quick.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  328. Re:I took a paycut to escape the corporate world.. by TechieHermit · · Score: 1

    I used to work for a place with an insane system administrator who was friendly with the company owner. True story: he tried to force me to use VB-style "Hungarian Notation" in my PERL SCRIPTS. We had this conversation before I fled the company:

    Him: From now on, you'll have to name your variables according to this paper. It's called "Hungarian Notation".

    Me: Beg pardon?

    Him: You must use Hungarian Notation in all your Perl programs.

    Me: You want me to put a prefix in front of variables so you can tell what the variable is supposed to be?

    Him: Yes.

    Me: Are you feeling ok?

    Him: Just do it.

    Me: No way, that's crazy.

    Him: DO IT.

    Me: Look, in Perl, you can use a variable as a string one minute, as a number the next, process it with a regexp as a string then, and turn it back into a number for the next step. Your prefix scheme won't work, unless you want me to just call everything a "variant" and prefix it with "v".

    Him: Nuh, uh. If you're using a variable four ways, use four variables.

    Me: On a web server? Everything will end up paging to disk and the server'll melt. You don't even have particularly strong hardware. Are you nuts? It's ridiculous.

    Him: JUST DO IT.

    Yeah... I didn't like working for corporations...

  329. Yes (SANITY!) by 0peth · · Score: 1

    No question. I took a $20K pay cut to take my current job. Sanity is worth more than money, as long as there's enough money to get by on eating store brand.

    --
    "I'm feeling very shpongled. Smashed, mashed, completely geshtopenflapped."
  330. Re:I took a paycut to escape the corporate world.. by jcr · · Score: 1

    The problem there was the idiot, not the size of the organization. I've encountered idiots everywhere from the Fortune 100 to a five-man operation.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  331. Re:I took a paycut to escape the corporate world.. by TechieHermit · · Score: 1

    Heh heh... Yeah, it's true. But I love telling that story. The guy was really funny looking, too, sort of like a huge overgrown squirrel.