I already have a hard enough time finding a store that sells those tiny cassettes for my answering machine.
Next thing you know, they'll stop selling computers with floppy drives. The world's gone mad I tell ya! Mad!
"This phone will charge your account a $1.50 fee to make this call. This fee is on top of any other fees that may be charged by the phone to which you are dialing."
At first it seemed like they were giving me the rate because of a mistake made on the online price quote that I complained about, but I heard from the installer that it was a price offered to early adopters. To be honest, I'm not sure which one it is.
I pay $55/month for 30 down / 5 up. I think you can get 15 and 2 for about $40. I also get my TV through the fiber now -- $30 cheaper than digital cable through Comcast, more channels, HDTV, yadda, yadda. I'm in the northern VA suburbs of DC and I know that Verizon's already in a wide variety of towns in the area.
I haven't noticed that issue since getting fiber through Verizon. I can see a consistent 30Mbps when I download very large files. No real point to that. Just braggin':-)
If you like Settlers (and who doesn't?), you should pick up the expansions:
Seafarers of Catan adds ships, a new resource type and a bunch of different board layout options.
Cities & Knights of Catan ads so much it's like a whole different game.
Also, check out the game Puerto Rico. Lots of Catan players migrated to it when it was released a few years ago.
The problem is not that they chopped the top and bottom of pan and scan movies. The problem is in the deceptive pacagking making it look like every widescreen movie was in a 2.35:1 ratio.
From: http://www.widescreen.org/commentaries/2005_01_jan.shtml/ Before any of you start to worry, the realistic side of me says that this was indeed a frivolous lawsuit - to an extent. MGM misrepresented the facts, but no harm was really done, either mentally or physically, to anyone. The whole idea behind widescreen, regardless of how MGM misrepresented the widescreen examples, is the sustaining of artistic integrity for those who spent a great deal of time making that movie - a hell of a lot more time than someone who sits and watches the final results in the form of a $20 DVD. MGM was a tad too over-zealous in representing 1.66:1 and 1.85:1 movies, but the final result was the same - the aspect ratio of what was seen in theatres. Their widescreen DVDs appear on the TV screen exactly as they should. I don't see that a lawsuit in this case was really necessary.
Slashdot Mirror
There's always room for another bug tracking app.
we wouldn't have to worry about those mom and pop scandals riding someone else's coattails by just adding -gate to the end of their name.
Bravo,
my favorite C&H ever.
Professor Slartibartfast is particularly proud of his glacier work with this model.
I already have a hard enough time finding a store that sells those tiny cassettes for my answering machine.
Next thing you know, they'll stop selling computers with floppy drives. The world's gone mad I tell ya! Mad!
When Word or Acrobat allows me to draw 3D boxes and other geometric shapes in the margins of docs, then we'll talk.
"This phone will charge your account a $1.50 fee to make this call. This fee is on top of any other fees that may be charged by the phone to which you are dialing."
Or you could just store it on the Amazon cloud. Their 5 gazillabyte plan will run you about $40/month.
That's just one of many theories. Some say it was done with Pop Rocks and Soda. I happen to believe it was done with Mentos and Diet Coke.
Everyone knows the CIA hired the mob and anti-Communist Cuban militants to bring it down.
Very interesting. My Martian anatomy is a little rusty, but I didn't think they even have thyroid glands.
"Upgrade to a hybrid today and get 20% more mileage on your phishing messages"
c'mon. It's all ball bearings these days.
At first it seemed like they were giving me the rate because of a mistake made on the online price quote that I complained about, but I heard from the installer that it was a price offered to early adopters.
To be honest, I'm not sure which one it is.
I pay $55/month for 30 down / 5 up. I think you can get 15 and 2 for about $40. I also get my TV through the fiber now -- $30 cheaper than digital cable through Comcast, more channels, HDTV, yadda, yadda.
I'm in the northern VA suburbs of DC and I know that Verizon's already in a wide variety of towns in the area.
If you really want me to torture you, I'd tell you that the 5Mbps I get upstream is what's really the bee's knees.
I haven't noticed that issue since getting fiber through Verizon. I can see a consistent 30Mbps when I download very large files. :-)
No real point to that. Just braggin'
Obligatory...
1. "free flight"
2. ???
3. Profit!
My vote is for Crawford, Texas.
And did you notice the arm costs $6 million? Coincidence, or is it something more?
If you like Settlers (and who doesn't?), you should pick up the expansions: Seafarers of Catan adds ships, a new resource type and a bunch of different board layout options. Cities & Knights of Catan ads so much it's like a whole different game. Also, check out the game Puerto Rico. Lots of Catan players migrated to it when it was released a few years ago.
The problem is not that they chopped the top and bottom of pan and scan movies. The problem is in the deceptive pacagking making it look like every widescreen movie was in a 2.35:1 ratio.n .shtml/
From: http://www.widescreen.org/commentaries/2005_01_ja
Before any of you start to worry, the realistic side of me says that this was indeed a frivolous lawsuit - to an extent. MGM misrepresented the facts, but no harm was really done, either mentally or physically, to anyone. The whole idea behind widescreen, regardless of how MGM misrepresented the widescreen examples, is the sustaining of artistic integrity for those who spent a great deal of time making that movie - a hell of a lot more time than someone who sits and watches the final results in the form of a $20 DVD. MGM was a tad too over-zealous in representing 1.66:1 and 1.85:1 movies, but the final result was the same - the aspect ratio of what was seen in theatres. Their widescreen DVDs appear on the TV screen exactly as they should. I don't see that a lawsuit in this case was really necessary.