They're either running out of news, or some editor over there is getting a bit old and wants this research pushed...
From April 2004, a QA session with "Methuselah Man" Aubrey de Grey.
Sure, scientists will continue doing their jobs, even without monetary incentive to innovate. But who is going to pay for their reagents? New technologies like gene chips cost hundreds of dollars per chip, and you can blow through hundreds of those a week. Many of these experiments are too expensive to do in academia, and academics rely on partnerships with big pharma and biotech to get data.
The core problem is that any information your employee tells me is free for me to use.
That's not quite true; take the obvious example of insider trading for instance. Yes, it's illegal for employees to divulge company secrets, but it's also illegal for you to act on that knowledge.
Did you try sending an email TO an email address without the trailing ">" or FROM an email address without the trailing ">" It was the FROM address that had this nifty feature, if you read TFA
They really have to working on their naming scheme.
Who's going to get something described as "malicious", even if it is a useful software-removal tool.
If they were smart, they'd rename it MS Removal Tool, which wool fool hordes of/.ers to check it out.
Re:IMDB knows a bit more what they are talking abo
on
Top 50 DVDs
·
· Score: 0
Slashdot Mirror
For reading it at your leisure, without coworkers listening in:2 6.html#008280
http://www.buzzmachine.com/archives/2004_10_
Way to kill the uniqueness of the parent's perspective by agreeing with it. --- This statement is false.
They're either running out of news, or some editor over there is getting a bit old and wants this research pushed...
From April 2004, a QA session with "Methuselah Man" Aubrey de Grey.
Sure, scientists will continue doing their jobs, even without monetary incentive to innovate. But who is going to pay for their reagents? New technologies like gene chips cost hundreds of dollars per chip, and you can blow through hundreds of those a week. Many of these experiments are too expensive to do in academia, and academics rely on partnerships with big pharma and biotech to get data.
The core problem is that any information your employee tells me is free for me to use.
That's not quite true; take the obvious example of insider trading for instance. Yes, it's illegal for employees to divulge company secrets, but it's also illegal for you to act on that knowledge.
Did you try sending an email TO an email address without the trailing ">" or FROM an email address without the trailing ">"
It was the FROM address that had this nifty feature, if you read TFA
They really have to working on their naming scheme. Who's going to get something described as "malicious", even if it is a useful software-removal tool. /.ers to check it out.
If they were smart, they'd rename it MS Removal Tool, which wool fool hordes of
I suck. Pardon my ignorance. Try this: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/browse/-/2867 23/102-8067883-7218565
thishttp:wwwamazoncomexecobidostgbrowse-286723102- 8067883-7218565
is a less subjective list of what people out there actually think DVDs worth owning are.
I don't think this is a list of what DVDs sold the most--just UGO's personal picks.
My first post = a first post? Wow and Yay!