I actually just left a company which has been fighting this problem for so long that the entire dev department is spending 80-90% of their time tracking down reported bugs, and the remaining time cramming in whatever was promised to the customers in the fastest way, damn the maintainability. Each year, the cost of bugs and maintenance has gone up, and the devs are now all on call - the operations team cannot support the product themselves anymore. Think about that; you are a developer, and you are on call. 24-7.
Which is to say about half the software companies in the world these days.
No, because it is parasitic upon economies which have governments. There are all kinds of side currencies: air miles, derivs, stock, MS points. Bit coin is big because there is about 1% of the population that doesn't believe in the 20th century economically, which is in fact, somewhat smaller by an order of magnitude that the people who still can't accept Darwinism.
No, that's a total lie. Keynesian stimulus relies on arbitrage between the government's rate of interest and private rate of interest. Spending up to slack capacity puts that capacity online. No slack capacity saith the IS-LM model, only a diminishing stimulative effect from inflationary pressure.
It's also empirically true. Sustained macro deflation ends in war, misery, or depression, or some combination of the above. At some point it is easier to take the deflationary currency than earn it. This has already started to happen with bit coins: when the processing power required to break it is less than the processing power to earn it, virtually the only rational thing to do is break wallets.
Yeah, you gold bugs have been screaming "zomg hyper-inflation!!!" for 80 years now. Hasn't happened. But then the quantity theory of money has the same things to recommend it that creationism has: it's so easy to ignore the truth.
BAC however correlates well to impairment, and is an easy test. The problem with many other drugs is that there is no easy test. This is a problem for a widely permissive society which is also mechanized. Rather than avoid the problem, we should face it head on, particularly because it overlaps with other problems – such as an aging society and sleep deprivation, as well as portable telecommunications.
Field sobriety test is a poor measure, it is also post-hoc. This is why some kind of computer assisted driving is quite likely part of the answer, because it deals with many possible problems. Already traction control is mandatory in all new cars. If we are going to be monitored, we should do it to expand, rather than reduce, liberty.
Further even if something is run by the public, that doesn't mean that there isn't a great deal of profit in building and supplying it. That is why I made reference Eisenhower.
Slashdot Mirror
That's all folks.
We are, however, talking about the US and the UK here, so that's not relevant to this case.
I actually just left a company which has been fighting this problem for so long that the entire dev department is spending 80-90% of their time tracking down reported bugs, and the remaining time cramming in whatever was promised to the customers in the fastest way, damn the maintainability. Each year, the cost of bugs and maintenance has gone up, and the devs are now all on call - the operations team cannot support the product themselves anymore. Think about that; you are a developer, and you are on call. 24-7.
Which is to say about half the software companies in the world these days.
GDP is final demand, transactions will count the same final demand several times. Learn some basic econ.
Stock/flow error. That's transactions not final demand. Learn some basic econ will you?
Nothing wrong with the theory so long as you can point to the continents full of brown people to kill and plunder.
No, because it is parasitic upon economies which have governments. There are all kinds of side currencies: air miles, derivs, stock, MS points. Bit coin is big because there is about 1% of the population that doesn't believe in the 20th century economically, which is in fact, somewhat smaller by an order of magnitude that the people who still can't accept Darwinism.
If by "people who have it" you mean assholes that are trying to crash the economy in hopes of owning it, you are right.
No, that's a total lie. Keynesian stimulus relies on arbitrage between the government's rate of interest and private rate of interest. Spending up to slack capacity puts that capacity online. No slack capacity saith the IS-LM model, only a diminishing stimulative effect from inflationary pressure.
It's also empirically true. Sustained macro deflation ends in war, misery, or depression, or some combination of the above. At some point it is easier to take the deflationary currency than earn it. This has already started to happen with bit coins: when the processing power required to break it is less than the processing power to earn it, virtually the only rational thing to do is break wallets.
That's because you are ignorant. Hoarding and saving are not the same thing.
No, you just showed us that you know zero about economics.
Parent was definitely hit with mod abuse.
So long as there is sufficient currency, supply and demand will clear at the same relative values.
Yeah, other people's lives are valueless.
Yeah, you gold bugs have been screaming "zomg hyper-inflation!!!" for 80 years now. Hasn't happened. But then the quantity theory of money has the same things to recommend it that creationism has: it's so easy to ignore the truth.
Let me introduce you to the concept of inelastic demand...
BAC however correlates well to impairment, and is an easy test. The problem with many other drugs is that there is no easy test. This is a problem for a widely permissive society which is also mechanized. Rather than avoid the problem, we should face it head on, particularly because it overlaps with other problems – such as an aging society and sleep deprivation, as well as portable telecommunications.
Field sobriety test is a poor measure, it is also post-hoc. This is why some kind of computer assisted driving is quite likely part of the answer, because it deals with many possible problems. Already traction control is mandatory in all new cars. If we are going to be monitored, we should do it to expand, rather than reduce, liberty.
Further even if something is run by the public, that doesn't mean that there isn't a great deal of profit in building and supplying it. That is why I made reference Eisenhower.
No you get a great deal less than you pay for. Just because there is government, doesn't mean it is good government.
Much of the gas infrastructure here bears BG stamps.
also known as "location, location, location."
Keep calm and take your meds.
Nstar has a less than stellar record with maintain the metal.