Slashdot Mirror


Thousands of Natural Gas Leaks Found In Boston

poofmeisterp writes "Due to old cast iron underground pipelines, natural gas leaks run amok in Boston, MA. '"While our study was not intended to assess explosion risks, we came across six locations in Boston where gas concentrations exceeded the threshold above which explosions can occur," Nathan Phillips, associate professor at BU, said in a statement.' With 'a device to measure methane' in a vehicle equipped with GPS, Duke and Boston University researchers created a nice little map showing the methane levels in parts per million at different points in the city. 'Repairing these leaks will improve air quality, increase consumer health and safety, and save money,' study researcher Robert B. Jackson, of Duke, said in a statement. 'We just have to put the right financial incentives into place.' It looks like money is an issue. Imagine that."

179 comments

  1. Spend more not do anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Let's say it costs $500 million to fix. But it only costs $200 million a year to leave it as is. Guess which option would get chosen.

    1. Re:Spend more not do anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess they would fix it! The investment would return after 2.5 years :-)
      And then the profits would be increased ...

    2. Re:Spend more not do anything by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Why? Once you've quantified the leak, then you can get the local utilities board to raise rates to compensate for the loss. Result: don't have to spend $500 million to fix it and you get your "customers" to pay extra to cover the loss. Win/win for the utility!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    3. Re:Spend more not do anything by ilsaloving · · Score: 2

      Don't forget to factor in the cost of lawsuits when entire neighborhoods get vaporized!

      Unless that was part of the $200m.

    4. Re:Spend more not do anything by Worthless_Comments · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can tell you're not a sleazy CEO. You raise rates to cover the cost of the leak, fix the leak anyway, and then leave the higher rates in place to profit even after you've made up your loss.

    5. Re:Spend more not do anything by Stirling+Newberry · · Score: 2
      You aren't either. Raise the rates to fix the leak, don't fix the leak, pocket the money, and when the explosion occurs, raise rates again.

      http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/14/us-boston-fire-idUSBRE82D0DS20120314

    6. Re:Spend more not do anything by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      If an underground natural gas leak is classified as a Grade 1, then you have no choice but to repair it. You have 24 hours from the time it was reported.

      Generally a Grade 1 is 75 to 100% gas in air as measured with a combustible gas indicator, but a leak in a sensitive location that reads smaller than that can be classified as a Grade 1.

    7. Re:Spend more not do anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deaths are usually cheaper than injuries because you're only paying the remainder of family income the bread winner was going to earn. And dead people don't get pain & suffering judgments. If utilities could vaporize neighborhoods, they'd probably do that over a conflagration where lots of people get maimed.

    8. Re:Spend more not do anything by kmoser · · Score: 1

      The more customers who get blown up, the more you have to raise your rates to compensate for loss of future revenue. This isn't even taking into account raising rates to cover repairing destroyed infrastructure.

    9. Re:Spend more not do anything by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      75 to 100% gas in air would suffocate anyone in the near area - you need approximately 12% oxygen in your air supply to survive for more than a couple of minutes. Given that there is approximately 4 times as much nitrogen in air as there is oxygen, and no easy physical method of separating the two, that would imply that anything more than about 40% gas in air (volume/volume) would suffocate people.

      The combustible gas indicator that you're talking about is almost certainly calibrated in percent of Lower Explosive Limit, and is probably based on a katharometer, also known as a "thermal conductivity sensor" or "hot wire sensor". While these sensors do have issues (low sensitivity, abysmal linearity, poor stability, unpredictable response to different gas compositions), they are adequate for this sort of binary decision - "do we or don't we have a gas problem". For analytical work, I'd always prefer an FID.

      I have spent decades running gas analysis equipment in the oilfield. Our laboratory equipment is calibrated to read out in PPM (parts per million) for each component, as we're approaching the question from a chemist's and geologist's perspective. The rig's equipment however (which needs a calibration check every 12-hour shift ; no, seriously ! ) typically reads out in %LEL and comes from a perspective of legislation concerning mine safety. At least, that's the case in the various (7, IIRC) world-wide jurisdictions that I've worked in, including on several rigs owned and managed by American companies. I got bored with explaining this difference in readings in the late 1980s.

      Oh ... it's 8 jurisdictions. I forgot Israel.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    10. Re:Spend more not do anything by Stirling+Newberry · · Score: 1

      Let me introduce you to the concept of inelastic demand...

  2. Does Boston really smell that bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Does Boston really smell that bad that no one could smell these gas leaks?

    1. Re:Does Boston really smell that bad? by lancelotlink · · Score: 2

      Well, now that the Charles River is, I believe, the cleanest water way in an urban city in the world, then other smells start to get noticed more.

    2. Re:Does Boston really smell that bad? by bhcompy · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's like saying you're the smartest retard on the shortbus

    3. Re:Does Boston really smell that bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did that river ever catch fire?

    4. Re:Does Boston really smell that bad? by amck · · Score: 2

      Maybe not?

      Methane on its own doesn't have a smell. For safety, another gas like methanethiol is typically added, so that people can detect leaks.
      Perhaps these leaks are pure methane?

      --
      Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist
    5. Re:Does Boston really smell that bad? by amck · · Score: 1

      Why? you can have clean rivers in Urban areas if you try.

      For example, we now have trout returning to two main rivers in Dublin, Ireland (the Liffey and the Tolka, I believe).
      Increasingly people are swimming (again?) in urban rivers in Europe. can be done.

      --
      Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist
    6. Re:Does Boston really smell that bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odorants would be added before the gas transitions to the distribution networks.

    7. Re:Does Boston really smell that bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      City Hall shouldn't have been so quick to award those franchise permits to Nathans Hot Dogs.

    8. Re:Does Boston really smell that bad? by tacokill · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, they are not pure methane. The DOT requires gas companies to put methyl mercaptan (mentioned above) in the gas stream specifically so we can smell leaks. As far as I know, all natural gas that is distributed in the US has mercaptans. If you've smelled "natural gas", propane, or butane, you are smelling the mercaptans as those gases are odorless.

      Natty gas with H2S in it (aka: sour gas) smells like rotten eggs. However, at around 100ppm, you quit smelling it and you start dying instead. At 1000 ppm, one inhalation and you are dead.

    9. Re:Does Boston really smell that bad? by CowTipperGore · · Score: 2

      In rural areas, customers are often served by farm taps on well gathering lines or transmission lines. The gathering lines are usually odorized but transmission lines can be a real problem. Transmission companies are not required to add odorant to their lines. The local distribution company has nothing but a regulator and meter sitting on the transmission line. Many of these taps are simply out of compliance and have no smell.

    10. Re:Does Boston really smell that bad? by Mark+Atwood · · Score: 1

      I find that Boston does have a distinctive smell. Maybe it *is* the faint trace of methyl mercaptan floating around.

    11. Re:Does Boston really smell that bad? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Well, now that the Charles River is, I believe, the cleanest water way in an urban city in the world, then other smells start to get noticed more.

      I'm not sure about that. It's certainly very much improved, according to this article, but I don't see a claim that it's now the cleanest -- it has a B+ rating, so there's room for further improvement.

      This article lists the Thames, but I don't believe that (I live in London). It's not bad, and this suggests a lot has improved (and I've seen some newly-created wetland areas and they do indeed have lots of birds etc). But it still gets sewage dumped into it after heavy rain.

    12. Re:Does Boston really smell that bad? by tacokill · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Thanks for the reply as I did not know there were distro taps along some of the transmission lines. I bet those are grandfathered in somehow as the DOT has pretty specific rules about what's going through those transmission lines. To my knowledge, they always require mercaptans in case they have a rupture or other pipeline issue.

    13. Re:Does Boston really smell that bad? by CowTipperGore · · Score: 1

      The federal regs state that "a combustible gas in a distribution line must contain a natural odorant or be odorized”, which means that gathering lines from wells and transmission lines are exempt from odorization. Many companies have classified their farm taps as transportation or gathering systems to avoid the requirement to add odorant. However, PHMSA has made clear recently that they consider farm taps to be distribution systems except in a few limited circumstances. Unfortunately, there aren't many options for economically adding mercaptan to an individual tap. Responsibility for this isn't always clear either because some jurisdictions leave the meter with the pipeline owner while others make the incumbent local distribution company provide the meter and support the customer.

    14. Re:Does Boston really smell that bad? by Uzuri · · Score: 1

      If Cambridge has the same problem (and I assume it does, just as old, just as outdated, and they're always digging up the streets), you DO smell it all the time, a whiff here and there.

      You learn to ignore it. Not that that's a good thing, but calling in because you got a sniff of something that might be gas or might be the neighbor's garbage isn't going to go over well and is eventually going to get you labeled as a kook so when you DO sniff a real problem your number has already been blocked.

      --
      I'm a she-slashdotter... but I make up for it by living with my folks.
  3. Shhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "'Repairing these leaks will improve air quality, increase consumer health and safety, and save money,"

    Gee, ya think?

    Just don't tell the TERRORISTS.

    1. Re:Shhh... by Synerg1y · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or go driving around boston with an open flame...

    2. Re:Shhh... by Applekid · · Score: 1

      It's a good thing the Olympic torch didn't get run through there

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    3. Re:Shhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually this is one of the types of detector used...

    4. Re:Shhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you kidding? Watching someone holding the Olympic torch, running through the streets, leaving a trail of explosions in their wake would make for the most EPIC Olympic opening ceremony EVER!

  4. "Money is an issue" by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sorry, but money is always an issue for literally everything. We live in a world of finite workers and resources, and thus the abstraction of that, which we call money, is an important limiting factor on any task, no matter what the risk or rewards. The amusing irony is that treating money like its not a factor makes money more of a factor, by causing the limitations to appear at unexpected times.

    1. Re:"Money is an issue" by jhoegl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Finite eh?
      1.6 mil workers in USA not employed.
      Plastic/Steel/Copper pipes. I think Steel and Copper can be recycled.
      Cost is valued based on revenue generated, not based on "Finite resources".

    2. Re:"Money is an issue" by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      In an immediate sense, which is part of why money is an abstraction rather than a literal stand-in. I'm not advocating neo-liberalism here, I'm just saying every choice to do something is an implicit choice to not do quite as much of something else.

    3. Re:"Money is an issue" by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      Those workers aren't employed because there aren't enough businesses with unfilled jobs to employ them. In turn, there aren't enough employers because there aren't enough people buying stuff, because people don't have enough money. So yeah, money is still the limiting factor.

      And guess what it takes to recycle steel and copper? Time and resources (i.e. money).

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    4. Re:"Money is an issue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That really bugs me too. People who espouse such nonsense are fundamentally railing against reality itself. They want to be excluded from resource scarcity that requires economic allocation. They wish to be the modern day Cnut, believers in arbitrary mandates that somehow override reality. What bugs me even more is the ignorance of recent history that continues even with all the evidence in the world to the contrary. I see people speak of 'The right financial incentives in place' without recognizing that the reason infrastructure is in such a poor state is precisely because economic incentives have been distorted to encourage putting costs onto future generations. Politicians bribe voters in the present at the expense of our grandchildren. As the debt(monetary or otherwise as is the case in this article) grows, we should see more people acknowledging the unsustainable burden we are placing on those who don't deserve it. Yet all I see is more people clamoring to be shielded from reality. It is vile stuff.

    5. Re:"Money is an issue" by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      We live in a world of finite workers and resources, and thus the abstraction of that, which we call money, is an important limiting factor on any task, no matter what the risk or rewards.

      I would disagree.
      The problem is that the utility's liability is not high enough to motivate them to spend money fixing the problems.

      As a thought experiment: Imagine that the city told the gas utility that there are going to be fines of $1 million per leak (for >3,300 leaks).
      Suddenly, the limiting factor is time and labor, not money, because fixing the problem is cheaper than paying the fines.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    6. Re:"Money is an issue" by onkelonkel · · Score: 3, Informative

      My personal favorite version of this is "Even if it only saves one life, it will be worth it" usually uttered by some will intentioned lackwit who wants you or the government to spend a huge sum of money to fix some minor safety issue. The proper answer to this is "You are an idiot. If we spend that money on we can save many more lives. Why should all those people die so you can maybe save that one person"

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    7. Re:"Money is an issue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then the gas company would inform its customers that it could no longer provide gas service. Unintended consequences.

      It all has to come from somewhere. Only the government can manufacture money, and even then it's at the expense of all the existing money (notice how much more everything costs recently??).

    8. Re:"Money is an issue" by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > Those workers aren't employed because there aren't enough businesses with unfilled jobs to employ them.

      or.....

      Those workers aren't employed because there aren't enough businesses with unfilled jobs, that they are qualified to be employed in.

      There might, in fact, be plenty of jobs for people willing to learn how to work with steel and copper, but, in case you haven't noticed, picking up those skills isn't exactly high on most people's todo list.

      Or as I said to someone the other day.... a college degree is great, but, a high tech manufacturing sector isn't going to keep its machines running, much less set them up and use them, on what you learned getting your MBA or history degree.

      While its true, we need generic businessmen, and accountants, historians, and even telephone sanitizers; can we possibly admit that we have too many people aspiring to be on the "third ship" so to speak.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    9. Re:"Money is an issue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are several other compounding factors including:

      Local Ordinances/Procedures (permits to dig up and fix pipe in roadways can be expensive...time also matters due to season, police/detail requirements, and municipal paving schedules)...once you have dug something up, fixed it, and reburied, and repaved the area. There are a whole series of inspections that have to be done to ensure that you (or more likely your contractor) has 1) fixed the issue, and 2) correctly restored the area (paving)...

      State (and Federal) regulatory obligations...

    10. Re:"Money is an issue" by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      So, what you're saying is that money is not a factor when money is made into a factor? Color me confused.

    11. Re:"Money is an issue" by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We always manage to find money for war (including the war on some drugs) and the TSA.

      Unlike those, fixing the leaks would have a quantifiable benefit in addition to the more difficult to quantify safety improvements.

      I would suggest spinning it as a potential terrorist threat, but fear the 'solution' would be DHS patrolling the streets confiscating lighters.

    12. Re:"Money is an issue" by sjames · · Score: 1

      It means we're working some people harder than we should and throwing others to the wolves for no good reason (and daddy needs that third yacht is NOT a good reason).

      We have time and we have resources. They're just being malinvested in the lifestyles of the rich and shameless.

    13. Re:"Money is an issue" by sjames · · Score: 1

      And the city takes over the gas company and keeps the gas flowing.

    14. Re:"Money is an issue" by gagol · · Score: 0

      Money do NOT relate to actual resources anymore. There is much more money in so called virtual economy consisting of insurances and financial speculation than actual production of goods and services.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    15. Re:"Money is an issue" by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      That's a different argument. I agree that there is misallocation of resources, but to say "money doesn't matter" is sticking one's head in the sand.

    16. Re:"Money is an issue" by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I think a better thought experiment would be the city removing obstacles in the utility's way making it cheaper for them to repair the leaks. For instance, why does it cost 1.5 mil to dig a hole and patch a pipe? If it is labor, suspend the minimum and/or prevailing wage requirements on those specific projects, perhaps lax some of the training requirements for the portions of the job that doesn't involve safety sensitive operations. Don't require the entire pipeline to be upgraded and allow just the portions that are bad and leaking to be fixed. Perhaps pick up the tab on repaving the roadway or parking lots or whatever the pipeline runs under. Perhaps streamlining the permitting processes for identified leaks and so on.

      There are basically two choices to use when changing the motivation to fix something. You can either make it cost more to leave it alone, or make the cost of the repairs less to actually fix. I'm not sure why lots of people think the previous should be the preferred way.

    17. Re:"Money is an issue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The money to fix the problem still has to come from somewhere. The city will face the same problems the private utility did. There is no free lunch.

    18. Re:"Money is an issue" by sjames · · Score: 1

      The money to afford the lost gas is coming from somewhere now. Perhaps it should be spent to stop losing the gas instead.

    19. Re:"Money is an issue" by Stirling+Newberry · · Score: 1

      We live in a world of immense slack capacity and profit push inflation.

    20. Re:"Money is an issue" by Stirling+Newberry · · Score: 1

      Because when playing with utilities, you don't get what you don't pay for. Only psychotics think the answer to every problem is lower wages for those actually engaged in touch labor.

    21. Re:"Money is an issue" by Stirling+Newberry · · Score: 1

      Money doesn't matter is, in fact, a truth of economics. Resources matter. If money matters, then the issue is individuals extracting rents.

    22. Re:"Money is an issue" by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I think you get exactly what you pay for with utilities. They are highly regulated. As for psychotics, I believe your more of the problem then the solution. Wages weren't the only thing mentioned. Lower wages might not even be needed as part of the solution. But keep deluding yourself into thinking it's everything.

    23. Re:"Money is an issue" by geekoid · · Score: 1, Troll

      "why does it cost 1.5 mil to dig a hole and patch a pipe?"
      engineering, laying pipe, testing remove old pipe properly putting the street back together all costs money.
      It isn't 1.5 million to " dig a hole and patch a pipe"

      Anyways, there are a lot of reason why ti's expensive. Mostly your ignorance on what it takes do do this work and keep a city running.
      I suggest you study civil engineering. You come up with a better way that works, you will be rich.

      Or do you thinking the utilities should just be able to dig up the street however they like, stop traffic when ever, and then not bother to put the street back together?

      "not sure why lots of people think the previous should be the preferred way."
      because the latter way is already being done by companies all the time.
      I'm not sure why someone who clearly has some ignorant myopic view of how a city works would bother expressing an opinion based on nothing.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    24. Re:"Money is an issue" by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Ye sit is, and you are ignorant on tat subject. You are also stupid for saying things about topic you clearly no nothing about.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    25. Re:"Money is an issue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, that is why US economy is so strong and did not crashed recently. Wait...

    26. Re:"Money is an issue" by gagol · · Score: 1

      I respect everyone's opinion, including yours. But your english is so bad, I (french canadian) can point obvious errors in your syntax. You just lost all credibility to my eyes. Please look at this graph http://www.nachi.org/forum/f13/too-much-money-being-printed-inflation-here-we-come-46015/ and tell me US doubled its productive output very recently. That was all I got to say.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    27. Re:"Money is an issue" by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      Anyways, there are a lot of reason why ti's expensive. Mostly your ignorance on what it takes do do this work and keep a city running.
      I suggest you study civil engineering. You come up with a better way that works, you will be rich.

      Lol.. I don't have to study civil engineering to ask the fucking question. How stupid is that- requiring someone to be an expert to ask a question is ridiculous. So you are saying that nothing, absolutely nothing can be done to lower the costs of digging a hole that was already dug once before and patching or replacing a pipe that was already laid in the hole at some point in time where all the engineering and studies were already done at one time. I say hogwash. Some thing could be done if they wanted to that could reduce the costs of maintaining the pipes.

      because the latter way is already being done by companies all the time.
      I'm not sure why someone who clearly has some ignorant myopic view of how a city works would bother expressing an opinion based on nothing.

      And I'm asking if that is the only way or the most effective way. We can drive the prices of everything through the roof all you want. All it does is make the poor poorer and negligently impacts the rich. I'm not sure someone as ignorant of how the fucking world works such as you should be pushing you idiotic views without answering the questions asked. If you have nothing of value to add, then please just shut the fuck up and allow those who do the opportunity to speak. Idiots like you are what is wrong with this world. It's why a minimum wage is never enough.

    28. Re:"Money is an issue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Allmighty USA keep theyr US$ value with militiry army intervention in middle est to keep US$ tied to petrol trade. Nothing more. Piriod. Prepare your self for hitting the wall soonar or latar.

    29. Re:"Money is an issue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VIVA LA REVOLUCION!

    30. Re:"Money is an issue" by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

      It's a good question and, without doing any more research than having lived near Boston for 50 years, I'll say it's because Boston is a clusterfuck (Hub of the Universe. is what they tell us).

      Just take a look at the Big Dig project and you'll understand. Boston has its charm but it has always been, and will always be, a civil engineering nightmare.

    31. Re:"Money is an issue" by Stirling+Newberry · · Score: 1

      No you get a great deal less than you pay for. Just because there is government, doesn't mean it is good government.

    32. Re:"Money is an issue" by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. The rates and services are generally known and regulated before you purchase them and the accounting is pretty accurate. It's not like you are going to be getting 60 volts instead of 120 or naphthalene instead of propane or natural gas.

      Unless you are trying to say the utilities are generally over priced. Then I would agree.

    33. Re:"Money is an issue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what are driving the costs up in this case are in this case but from my backgound working with stormwater systems, it could have to do with the need for service location (ground penetrating radar), planning, coordinating with locals to maintain access to properties, compensating local businesses for loss of revenue while closing roads, engineering temp. works to make sure there is safe access for workers, finding and renting suitable staging areas for big or extended duration works, renting of digging equipment, hiring traffic management staff, getting a traffic management plan done, geotechnical testing , relocation of nearby services such as water, cable, power, fibre, sewer, disposal of potentially contaminated soil, dewatering the site if required, actually fixing the leak, testing the fixed leak, restoring the site, demobilising. I'm sure that other can add tasks and requirements that are specific to a gas pipeline.

      Bascially, you can drive up with some cheap workers and just dig a hole and fix the leak, but you will probably inflict greater economic damage by destroying other infrastructure, you'll probably lose a few guys in accidents, you'll piss off the locals, and probably have to do it all again in a few years.

    34. Re:"Money is an issue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you chose to live with a health problem, hazardous gases floating around and wasting fossil fuels.
      It's funny how money always ends up supporting the stupid choices that make more money itself. Not do anything useful with it.

    35. Re:"Money is an issue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While its true, we need generic businessmen, and accountants, historians, and even telephone sanitizers; can we possibly admit that we have too many people aspiring to be on the "third ship" so to speak.

      I am not familiar with this "third ship" thing you mention. I am assuming from context it means being one of the elite.

      How about this: Not making the first two ships such hell holes of misery? Seriously, actual slavery was better than what we have now (most of the time). You knew where your next meal was coming from, you knew where you were sleeping that night, and you got decent enough medical care (such as there was at the time).

      Today? Ownership is abstracted away through the concept of money. Sounds great but what that does is take away any responsibilities incumbent upon the people who own you... they do not own you as personally as they did previously, but they still own you by virtue of you being able to earn so little that you can not possibly save up enough to exercise your freedom... and even if you did somehow manage to do so, taxes, medical costs, lawsuits, etc are there to ensure that you will be enslaved again soon.

      capcha is fracture. d'oh.

    36. Re:"Money is an issue" by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's not like "supply and demand" is a concept firmly rooted in strictly abstract price points.

    37. Re:"Money is an issue" by Stirling+Newberry · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you gold bugs have been screaming "zomg hyper-inflation!!!" for 80 years now. Hasn't happened. But then the quantity theory of money has the same things to recommend it that creationism has: it's so easy to ignore the truth.

    38. Re:"Money is an issue" by Stirling+Newberry · · Score: 1

      So long as there is sufficient currency, supply and demand will clear at the same relative values.

    39. Re:"Money is an issue" by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      > I am not familiar with this "third ship" thing you mention. I am assuming from context it means being
      > one of the elite.

      Actually its was a Hitchhikers Guide reference, that along with the listing of "telephone sanitizer". If I had remembered it properly, I would have called them the "B ARK"... but basically, the joke comes from this text: http://www.geoffwilkins.net/fragments/Adams.htm

      Its kind of the opposite, the "B Ark", was loaded up with the useless people and middle men, then "sent off first", being told it was because they were so important....

      "Oh yes," said the Captain, "Millions of them. Hairdressers, tired TV producers, insurance salesmen, personnel officers, security guards, public relations executives, management consultants, you name them. We're going to colonize another planet."

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  5. money shouldn't be an issue by hawguy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm not sure how things work in Boston, but in areas where gas is provided by a regulated public utility, there is little cost to the company for infrastructure improvements. They identify infrastructure that needs to be replaced/upgraded, go to the PUC with the list of improvements and petition for a rate increase to pay for them. Then, in theory, the company is supposed to make the improvements, but that doesn't always happen, PG&E in California has been known to ask for money for specific improvements, then spending the money on other things.

    1. Re:money shouldn't be an issue by pla · · Score: 1

      They identify infrastructure that needs to be replaced/upgraded, go to the PUC with the list of improvements and petition for a rate increase to pay for them.

      Natural gas occupies a somewhat unusual market position for a "utility", where it can actually compete purely on price against its competition. Currently, you see people changing over en masse because they can cut their winter heating bill in half. If that advantage were less dramatic (or even nonexistent), natural gas would all but vanish overnight ("Infrastructure upgrade fee? I call, a truck delivers it, end of story!").

    2. Re:money shouldn't be an issue by Xtifr · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure how things work in Boston, but in areas where gas is provided by a regulated public utility, there is little cost to the company for infrastructure improvements.

      Just because their mechanism for getting funds is unusual doesn't mean there's little cost.

      In fact, it's worse than that. The company's income is held hostage by local government, and if that government is controlled by short-sighted fiscal conservatives who equate rate hikes with higher taxes, then people's lives can be put at danger. Those who believe in "no new taxes" no matter what put us all in danger!

      PG&E in California has been known to ask for money for specific improvements, then spending the money on other things.

      Which has recently led to things like an explosion that destroyed nearly 40 houses in a suburban neighborhood, and killed eight people and injured many more. PG&E is probably going to be a little more cautious about such things in the near future.

    3. Re:money shouldn't be an issue by Stirling+Newberry · · Score: 1

      If the utilities were really strapped for cash, their cash holdings would be small, but they aren't. Politicians have every reason to be nice to utilities.

    4. Re:money shouldn't be an issue by perpenso · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure how things work in Boston, but in areas where gas is provided by a regulated public utility, there is little cost to the company for infrastructure improvements. They identify infrastructure that needs to be replaced/upgraded, go to the PUC with the list of improvements and petition for a rate increase to pay for them. Then, in theory, the company is supposed to make the improvements, but that doesn't always happen, ...

      My grandfather worked for such a regulated public gas utility in the north east and that is how it worked. The cast iron pipes described in Boston sound like the gas lines he dug up and replaced in the 1950s-70s. They were originally installed around 1900. Such cast iron gas lines were considered troublesome and dangerous many decades ago.

  6. Everything works on money by RichMan · · Score: 1

    We are all motivated by rewards and penalties. Money is just the convertible currency for this.

    Once the insurance industry gets hold of the map, money will see the fixes are made.

    1. Re:Everything works on money by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      We are all motivated by rewards and penalties. Money is just the convertible currency for this.

      Once the insurance industry gets hold of the map, money will see the fixes are made.

      Nonsense. These are parts per million leaks for the most part. Not necessarily dangerous. How many streets or buildings have mysteriously blown up over the past several decades?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Everything works on money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can think of three... in NY... about 11 years ago

    3. Re:Everything works on money by Stirling+Newberry · · Score: 1
      http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/14/us-boston-fire-idUSBRE82D0DS20120314

      Nstar has a less than stellar record with maintain the metal.

    4. Re:Everything works on money by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Not a lot, and that's do yo infrastructure spending.
      But has infrastructure spending decline in lieu of bonuses, you will see more.*
      This example in Boston was a lucky break,. Becasue of they are loosing that much gas, and the utilities haven't don't anything about it, then they aren't likely to have done anything anytime soon. Or maybe they where just getting ready to fix them.

      *as opposed as paddle balls in lieu of pay. (Thanks Mel books!)

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  7. Beantown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are they sure it isn't just the beans?

    1. Re:Beantown by larry+bagina · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      It's all the massholes.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:Beantown by Grayhand · · Score: 1

      Are they sure it isn't just the beans?

      One match and the place could go up like Hiroshima and Nagasaki

  8. What do you expect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The infrastructure in Boston is a joke. Even the relative new Big Dig looks like it's falling apart.

    1. Re:What do you expect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because it is falling apart.

    2. Re:What do you expect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm waiting for a night - JUST ONE NIGHT - where I can drive through the tunnel without lane closures.

  9. Hmmm .... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm thinking he can expect a visit from Homeland Security on this one -- now the terrorists know how to blow up Boston. :-P

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Hmmm .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm thinking he can expect a visit from Homeland Security on this one -- now the terrorists know how to blow up Boston. :-P

      Just a messenger. Oh, wait, those get killed as well. Fuck.

    2. Re:Hmmm .... by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      1-31-07
      Never forget

    3. Re:Hmmm .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now the terrorists know how to blow up Boston

      Naw, if they wanted to do that, they'd just follow the big blue signs helpfully labeled "Compressed Natural Gas Station".

    4. Re:Hmmm .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please. Look up what they do with CNG tankers in Boston if you're interested in blowing the place up.

    5. Re:Hmmm .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now the terrorists know how to blow up Boston. :-P

      And yet nothing of value would be lost...

  10. NOPE, JUST ME !! AND TACO BELL !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I was in Boston just yesterday, at Taco Bell !!

  11. What a crappy map. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happened to the old useable 2D maps with colors to indicate intensities? That 3D map might look nice, but how are you supposed to read anything out of that except that someone has a cool 3D map generator?

  12. How about not wasting gas into the air? by ZeroSerenity · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What? Is that not enough of an incentive? If it goes into the air, you cannot sell it or make money off it.

    --
    For those who seek perfection there can be no rest on this side of the grave.
    1. Re:How about not wasting gas into the air? by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      What? Is that not enough of an incentive? If it goes into the air, you cannot sell it or make money off it.

      Nope, like most such things, the inventory loss is accounted for, and already passed onto the consumer buried in a line item.

      I'd be very surprised to hear those companies are eating this cost. And, if they're just passing it on to the consumers, they don't really suffer any loss, and therefore don't care.

      In the same way that I have to pay a security fee when I fly so some flunky can grab my junk, it isn't the companies losing money on this -- it's taxpayers and consumers.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:How about not wasting gas into the air? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The price of natural gass is currently VERY low, a quick check says $3/1000 cubic feet, or near it anyways. For methane you have to have about 5.1% methane to have a real risk of explosion. To blow up a large house, say 200x200x30ft you 200*200*30*0.051/1000*3 dollars of natural gas, or about $185. Thats a large leak, for something more realistic, like a 20x20x8 kitchen, you're talking $0.50 of gas, you'd be calling the fire department if you had a leak bad enough to do that to your house (and that would still do lots of damage if it went off, blowing up most of your house).

      The leaks that are being detected here are probably MUCH smaller, maybe $0.05/day or so, it's still very detectable, and then you figure even a leak that leaked $2/day, it's still not really worth fixing, how much does sending a crew of 4 men to dig up the road and fix it, maybe 6 hours or work? If they weren't liable for the damage it caused then they might just let all the small stuff go, digging up a road to fix the leaking underground pipe is expensive, and what it's leaking is cheap. However they got limited funds, so they fix what they have to, the cost of blowing up someones house it probably the biggest reason to fix it, the loss of natural gas isn't really that bad for most of those guys, if it's not an explosion/fire risk then they might not bother with it.

    3. Re:How about not wasting gas into the air? by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      Depends, with anything like this you have to ask a few questions.

      What is the cost of fixing the leak?
      What is the cost of the product that leaks per year at current prices?
      Is there any other cost to you for the leakage?
      What is the remaining lifetime on the pipe before it comes up for scheduled replacement anyway?

      Based on these questions and various financial figures for the utility (what is their cost of funds? does the rate calculation algorithm consider the utility's spending and if so in what way? what is the inflation in natural gas prices?) you can then calculate if it's worth fixing the leak or not.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    4. Re:How about not wasting gas into the air? by CowTipperGore · · Score: 2

      In my state, the gas distribution companies are allowed a set percentage of lost and unaccounted for gas (gas the company buys but doesn't sell to customer and no longer has). As long as the company stays within that acceptable range, they have little reason to care about further reductions since that offset is built into their rate. However, being above that rate means they blowing money out holes in the pipes.

    5. Re:How about not wasting gas into the air? by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      What is the cost of fixing the leak?
      What is the cost of the product that leaks per year at current prices?
      Is there any other cost to you for the leakage?

      Obligatory: Mr. Durden? Is that you?

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    6. Re:How about not wasting gas into the air? by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Your math seems odd. You are talking about a house that is 40,000 square feet and 30 feet tall. Sounds more like a concert venue. Kitchen math seems reasonable.

      The outdoor leaks aren't really related to any of the math, though. They tend to be underground and migrate through the soil, resulting in seepage over a potentially large area. Its outside, with air movement, so a fairly large leak could not result in high concentrations most places most of the time.

      Global leakage is 3 trillion cubic feet/year which is a lot of wasted gas no matter how big your house is.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  13. Fixing Infrastructure is Stupid by EmagGeek · · Score: 0

    It's better to spend money on entitlements, pork projects, a non-existent green energy product market, and free health care for all...

    At least, that's the takeaway from the last 5 or so years of dealing with our fucking retarded and senseless government.

    1. Re:Fixing Infrastructure is Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U mad?

    2. Re:Fixing Infrastructure is Stupid by Stirling+Newberry · · Score: 1

      Keep calm and take your meds.

  14. Financial Incentives by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You mean other than your property not exploding? I think your property not exploding qualifies as a financial incentive, doesn't it? Like if I told you "You need to fix this gas leak or your property will explode," I'm pretty sure you'll want to fix it.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Financial Incentives by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      The chances of your property in particular exploding though are pretty low, low enough that most people seem to put off getting these kinds of things inspected or fixed.

    2. Re:Financial Incentives by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Except that the people who would own and or maintain the infrastructure aren't the ones whose property might blow up.

      This is closer to me saying "you need to fix your gas leak or my property might explode". Unless I can get you to take on legal responsibility in case it happens, what is the incentive for you to fix the leak?

      This isn't property owners who aren't fixing their own property -- this is infrastructure type stuff.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Financial Incentives by Stirling+Newberry · · Score: 1
      For the vast majority of metro real estate, the building rent is trivial compared to the land rent.

      also known as "location, location, location."

  15. Are they sure they are leaking pipes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, it is "Beantown" after all.

  16. Sequels Suck by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 4, Funny

    Big Dig 2: The Explosioning!

    1. Re:Sequels Suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big Dig 2: Dig Back!

  17. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at least then the problem is fixed....for good. There is the cheap quick way and the expensive long way

  18. How can money not be an issue? by xenoc_1 · · Score: 2

    Do the magic gas fairies provide the money? Because otherwise, it's an issue. Just where do you think the PUC or the Commonwealth of Mass. analog is going to get that money they give to the gas company? Have you noticed how broke and dysfunctional your state and its budget are?

    1. Re:How can money not be an issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't you read? They take money from everyone they bill every month for contingencies like this. The trouble is they've been treating that income as a windfall revenue stream and pissing it away as profit.

    2. Re:How can money not be an issue? by Stirling+Newberry · · Score: 1

      Inelastic demand means that yes, the magic gas rate payer faeries do provide the money.

  19. Don't blame the cows, blame the brahmins! by mveloso · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who knew that global warming/climate change was caused by Boston? That fossil fuel argument was just a smokescreen for what really causes climate change: Boston Baked Beans!

    1. Re:Don't blame the cows, blame the brahmins! by heteromonomer · · Score: 1

      Lol.. funny. Wish I had mod points

  20. It's cheaper to ignore it by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    cost-to-fix vs. cost-to-take-a-chance. Chance always wins.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    1. Re:It's cheaper to ignore it by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      cost-to-fix vs. cost-to-take-a-chance. Chance always wins.

      Yeah.. Then ship hits the fan.. Now engage "hide all the documents, emails, and other shit you can so it looks like we were going to fix it" mode.

  21. Easy fix by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 0

    Stop serving chowdah everywhere.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  22. Given that this is Boston... by runeghost · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Someone should attach a circuit board along with some wires and blinking lights to the gas pipelines. That should get the government right on top of the problem.

    1. Re:Given that this is Boston... by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      For those who don't know the reference:
      Aqua Teen Hunger Force Brings Boston to a Halt

  23. I believe it.... by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some of our infrastructure is OLD. A lot of it.

    Recently, we were dealing with my grandmother on the first floor. She would call saying she smelled gas, so she would open the windows then call us upstairs, of course, we couldn't smell it.... after a few times we called. They came and said our pipes were old, put some wax sealant on and suggested we fix them soon.

    I didn't doubt their diagnosis, the house has had gas longer than electricity....

    Then a few days later she smelled it again... this time we ended up with a whole crew down,....not in our house... but going up and down the street. Apparently it wasn't our pipes...there was a leak under the road across the street!

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    1. Re:I believe it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Commonwealth Ave and Kelton Street by Harry's Bar and Grill in Brighton used to always smell strongly of gas. A little scary considering the B line trolly screeches and cranks by there every 15 minutes or so.

    2. Re:I believe it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also near Mission Hill / Brookline Ave turn off of Huntington in Brookline Village. For a while I actually saw a number of national grid workers there trying to isolate it or something, it still smells like gas there - must not have ever figured it out.

    3. Re:I believe it.... by mjpaci · · Score: 1

      Last winter I stepped out my front door and smelled gas and called NSTAR and they came out with a truck and detectors and the whole lot. They smelled it too, but the concentration wasn't high enough to call it an emergency, so they put me on a repair list. Two weeks later I come home to find the street in front of my house spray painted by DigSafe and a note on my door saying I need to be home the next day. They came, ran a liner in the pipe from the main to my house, connected it inside, and were gone. No more gas smell.

      Then they came 2 months later to replace my meter (which they do every 7 years).

      --Mike

    4. Re:I believe it.... by mjpaci · · Score: 1

      OH yeah, for relevance this is in a town just north of Boston.

  24. Bean Town by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course there's a high Methane content in the air, is "Bean Town"!

  25. Thousands what? by parkinglot777 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Highlighting the need for repairs, a new study detected more than 3,300 natural gas leaks throughout the city.

    Is gas a countable noun? What is the number indicating? What is the unit? Number of gas pipe location? Number of gas volume? Or maybe number of people who pass gas throughout the city? I am not sure... It has all other units for their numbers but the leaking unit. Are they trying to get media attention or what?

    1. Re:Thousands what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3300 leaks. You know, leak, countable noun. How did you find the button to post your comment, or did you have the nurse click the button?

    2. Re:Thousands what? by raymansean · · Score: 1

      Leaks is the quantifiable noun.* While leak is normally a verb, leaks can be used as a noun just like runs. For example, I have a case of the runs. The verb in the quoted sentence is detected!

      --
      insert inflammatory comment here!
    3. Re:Thousands what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I build a Leak Management System for a Utility Company (which operates in MA, but not Boston).

      "What is a Leak?, is one of the more thorny questions that came up in building and supporting this system.

      I constantly had to go over with management when working on reports (internal and regulatory filings) what was intended when they say "Leak"

      In our system we had "Leak Ids" which actually represented a "Work Zone"
      Then you have "Repair Jobs" the number of times you went out to fix something at in a "Work Zone"
      Then you have "Point Leak/Repairs" the number of actually leaking things you fixed any time while you were on a "Repair Job".

      Depending on what was intended for any given report, and what management feels like emphasizing (which may not be the same things) it could have been any one of these things...

      For even more fun typically you often work in "Leaks per Mile" of a given type of material.

    4. Re:Thousands what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "leaks" you fucking moron
      Learn to read for fuck's sake.
      3,300 natural gas leaks

    5. Re:Thousands what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      time to lay off the burritos.

    6. Re:Thousands what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Leaks. Leaks. No. No. No.
      I do indeed think they want media attention, I guess they got it by stating there are 3300 leaks throughout the city.

  26. Gas is in the air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find this quite interesting since I'm a runner and have logged thousands of miles around Boston. From time to time (i.e. last night) I'll run through an area that smells strongly of natural gas along the sidewalk or street. I just thought it was the sewer, but this makes more sense.

    That being said, the infrastructure is crumbling in Boston from the Greenline T, to the sewers (all being relined) to the LongFellow Bridge which nearly collapsed a few years ago. So this is no surprise.

  27. Where is the control? by avandesande · · Score: 1, Redundant

    How much of the methane is due to a pile of rotting leaves? They should have driven around the country where no lines exist to establish a baseline.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:Where is the control? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      What about cows? or any animal that farts and burps a lot.

      In New Zealand, 47% of greenhouse emissions are from the agriculture sector, 35% of that is methane from cows and sheep. That's more than the transport (19%) and power (26%) sectors combined. (the left overs are 6% industry and 2% waste)

  28. Thiophane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm amazed there can be so many leaks detectable with a drive-by. Does Boston not add thiophane or something similar?

    In SF I've called PG&E twice in the past several years. Once was at my apartment complex, and sure enough there was a leak, although the tech was surprised I was able to smell it. The second time--walking downtown--turned out to be a false-positive (probably was generator exhaust plus pool chemicals), but I figured better safe than sorry--within reason, of course.

    1. Re:Thiophane by BabaChazz · · Score: 1

      Here in BC a building exploded from a natural gas leak some ten+ years ago. The leak was not in the building but some distance away, and the gas traveled through the soil to reach the building. This was a well-used building, yet nobody noticed the mercaptan smell. Gas company experts concluded that in its passage through the soil, the marker compounds got stripped from the gas by the same process that makes gas chromatography work -- larger molecules are slowed by passage through what was effectively a packed column.

      Not saying this is what's happening in Boston; I'm not there, I don't know. But it is possible. I suspect that something similar may have happened in that neighbourhood in Cali that blew up due to an undetected gas leak -- last year was it?

      Sleep tight...

    2. Re:Thiophane by reboot246 · · Score: 2

      Be amazed. I can find an underground natural gas leak so small you can't even smell it by driving by. And we're still using the old flame-ionization method of doing mobile leak surveys, so I have to drive at about walking speed. You service line and meter set are checked by someone walking using the same method. We don't need for the gas to be odorized at all. I've checked gas mains straight from the well to compressors to distribution gate stations that were not odorized. Your local gas company adds the odor.

      The newest technology for detecting leaks uses a laser tuned to the absorption wavelength of methane. You can detect a small gas leak while driving 15 or 20 mph, and very large leaks while driving a bit faster. Checking service lines and meters can be done much faster, too. The laser has a usable range of about 100 feet.

      That's what I've been doing for a living for the last 36 years. I've found tens of thousands of underground leaks and hundreds of thousands of above ground leaks. Saved no telling how many lives and houses.

  29. By thy Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't we just love Fallout 5.....

  30. hang on by viperidaenz · · Score: 3, Informative

    They have a pretty picture showing huge peaks of up to 28.6ppm methane.

    Methane is only flammable in air between 50,000ppm and 150,000ppm

    1. Re:hang on by Avidiax · · Score: 1

      That's the concentration at the detector on the car. Many of those leaks will occur in an partially enclosed space which would allow gas to accumulate and eventually explode.

      Every leak has a concentration gradient going from 100% at the source though the explosive range and eventually to the background level far away from the leak. The important part is whether there is a sizeable volume that is within the explosive range.

    2. Re:hang on by reboot246 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've spent 36 years now as a natural gas leakage technician. I "know" gas leaks.

      The flame ionization instrument I use detects gas in ppm from 0 - 10,000. I can assure you that even when I get a reading of only 28 or 100 or 500 ppm at the ground, the leak at its source is bigger. You can't classify leaks the way these dudes were doing it. You have to punch a hole in the ground and use a combustible gas indicator to measure the gas in air percentage near the pipe.

      There is an explosive limit like you say, roughly 5% to 15% gas in air. Anything under or above that that won't burn or explode. There is danger when a structure fills up with gas and a danger when the gas is being ventilated. During the increase and the decrease the concentration passes through that explosive range.

      You won't always smell the odor. Something as simple as wet soil can leech the odor out of gas. Personally, I love the smell - it smells like $$$$.

  31. Here We Go Again by hondo77 · · Score: 0

    'We just have to put the right financial incentives into place.'

    Cue the leak deniers...

    --
    I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  32. or, don't fix the leaks and say goodnight, Gracie by swschrad · · Score: 1

    sounds like a BOOM! town to me.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  33. diagram the sentence in your mind by swschrad · · Score: 1

    leaks is the object. 3300, and gas are modifiers to the object. natural is a modifier to gas.

    let's look at your work... THERE is a conjunctive, place as subject, check. ARE, passive tense of IS, verb, check. wait, what is HEY! SQUIRREL! doing in there?

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:diagram the sentence in your mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "natural gas leaks"

      i don't see what everyone is complaining about. the leaks are natural. i don't think it would be a good idea to do anything to prevent the natural leaks.

  34. Suprising in a marshy and swampy region by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No kidding, lots of methane in a region full of salt water marshes and fresh water swamps. What a surprise.

    I worked for Boston Gas (an early predecessor to National Grid) one summer on a street crew. There are miles of 3lb pressure cast iron gas mains laid 50+ year ago. They get really pitted. Even worse are the steel high pressure pipes which just get our right dissolved by the salt water electrolysis. But it is a problem which can never be fully fixed.They now insert PVC piping down the old mains but there will still be leaks at the junctions. Besides there is naturally lots of methane around Boston, anytime you smell low tide you're really getting a big whiff of methane.

  35. Visual Demonstration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The gas company by us wouldn't fix a leak we could smell most days when sitting outside. It wasn't above the threshold they considered worth it. However, we called them in after a good size rain when the gas was bubbling up through the water and that apparently made it a big enough problem. It was certainly ominous looking to us.

  36. Re:Suprising in a marshy and swampy region by Stirling+Newberry · · Score: 1

    Much of the gas infrastructure here bears BG stamps.

  37. How far is Boston from Bethesda? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time I was in Mass., I just started firing my laser rifle into every room before walking through it. Sometimes there'd be a *whoosh* of explosion and sometimes there wouldn't be, but I was never in it. Sometimes I even cleared out a few ghoulies before having to deal with them, too.

  38. A fainrly trivial problem to solve. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And cheaply too.

    All the utility company needs to is line the old pipes with plastic (can't remember the type!!) piping which can be inserted at intervals with minimal surface disruption. Its not like having to dig up the whole line and start relaying again. We had it done in our area a couple of years ago.

    Its just something that has to be done occasionally with aging infrastructure, the same will probably have to be done with cast iron water piping too....

  39. My experience in Boston with a gas leak... ugh! by jeeves99 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I live in a dense residential neighborhood in a metro-suburb right next to Boston and have an active gas leak outside my house. You can smell it two houses in both directions.

    The gas company has been here twice. The fire department once. The town fire chief actually called an emergency number at the gas company to ask them to fix it.

    Guess what? No fix... 4 months and counting.

    The party line the gas company has been giving me is (paraphrased)... "There are too many leaks in the area, so we are triaging. Unless the gas is actively leaking INTO the house (as opposed to outside of the house), we won't fix it for now. Given the Hurricane Sandy response in the mid-atlantic region, things are pushed back even further. We'll keep monitoring the leak. Trust us."

    Uh, huh... yeah, my house is going to blow up. Or at the least, one of my trash cans on the curb is turning into a bottle rocket.

    1. Re:My experience in Boston with a gas leak... ugh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it blows, call the lawyers.
      http://gilhoylaw.com/boston-massachusetts-explosion-accidents.php

    2. Re:My experience in Boston with a gas leak... ugh! by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Massachusetts explosions can cause Massachusetts lacerations and Massachusetts severe burns and welts? Who would have thought!?

  40. Dublin's gas leaks were as bad by Diamonddavej · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the 1980s, Dublin gas network had 100s km of cast iron pipes, some 100 years old. The cast iron pipes were connected together by waxed joints, these joints were stable when moist Town Gas (coal gas) flowed through the pipes but when the city changed over to natural gas, which is dry, the wax dried out and the gas leaked. Town Gas was generated by passing superheated steam over coal, creating a gas containing hydrogen, methane and notoriously, carbon monoxide.

    In the late 1980s I could not walk more than 100 feet along suburban street before coming across an overpowering stench of leaking gas. One of the temporary fixes was to drill holes into side-walks to reduce the concentration of gas underground. I don't remember any gas explosions or accidents caused by leaking cast iron pipes then the leaks happened, given the number of leaks we were very lucky.

    By the way, almost half of the water supply in Dublin in lost through leaks (worst in Europe).

  41. Gas Man.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an emergency Call out engineer for a National gas transportation firm i can say for sure if i called out a work gang to work on these levels of methane the gang would call me a pussy and my line manager would be putting me up for some serious work audits.

    fs decaying biomass gives off mere methane

    1. Re:Gas Man.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an emergency Call out engineer for a National gas transportation firm i can say for sure if i called out a work gang to work on these levels of methane the gang would call me a pussy and my line manager would be putting me up for some serious work audits.

      fs decaying biomass gives off mere methane

      * mere=more

  42. Why put off fixing a leak? by Peter+(Professor)+Fo · · Score: 1

    Psychologically we all hate to deal with an issue imposed on us but utility companies are supposed to be rational. A fix today won't cost more than a fix next month or next year but it will stop HUGH amounts of losses.

  43. Greenhouse gas? Storm and septic sewers? by sylvandb · · Score: 1

    I hate it when an article raises more questions than it answers, especially questions directly related to procedure and which may negate the entire premise of the article.

    Most old cities have combined storm and septic sewer systems. One of the hazards of such sewer systems is methane. Did they account for any such sewers in their methane scan?

    And regardless of the explosion hazard, or simply the cost of the gas or some deterioration in air quality, methane is a far worse greenhouse gas than CO2. And if you have ever had a small water leak, you know how even a small leak over time results in a large quantity being leaked. (Leaking gases being worse than water because they diffuse so well the quantity of leakage is very hidden.)

  44. Delete the Links and Deny any knowledge PRONTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If any of the SHIT-HEADs at Department of Homeland Security and White House get a 'Wiff' of the this then you are all dead as a door nail in GITMO.

    Move quickly.

    Delete everything. Destroy the hard drives.

    Deny everything. Claim 'psychosis' and ramble on for a few minutes to the FBI at the door.

    NOW!

    Too late! You are already out of time.

  45. Recycling is "free" for the company by perpenso · · Score: 1

    And guess what it takes to recycle steel and copper? Time and resources (i.e. money).

    Nope, it doesn't cost the company a damn thing. My grandfather spent decades tearing up old natural gas pipelines and replacing them. The sweetest words he every heard from the company came when he asked what to do with the old pipes. They were told "the company does not want them, give them to whoever will take them". My grandfather, his company crew and the local subcontractors who assisted on these pipeline replacement jobs took the pipes to the scrap yard (metal recycler) and split the proceeds. Local company management was fine with this. This was 1950s - 70s and the pipelines being replaced were old cast iron lines like what is described in the summary. Stuff originally installed around 1900.

  46. An MBA is not just about accounting ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    .... a college degree is great, but, a high tech manufacturing sector isn't going to keep its machines running, much less set them up and use them, on what you learned getting your MBA or history degree. While its true, we need generic businessmen, and accountants, historians, and even telephone sanitizers; can we possibly admit that we have too many people aspiring to be on the "third ship" so to speak.

    There is a common misconception that MBAs are all about accounting and finance, its not true. Unlike other master's degrees where one goes deeper into some particular field, an MBA is more of a survey of all the parts of an organization (accounting/finance, strategy, marketing, information technology, product development, project management, operations/manufacturing, law, ...) plus some outside forces that will affect it (macroeconomics, human behavior - consumer, employee and leadership), ... Those entering MBA programs are often scientist and engineers. Account/finance types are actually a minority.

    Basically an MBA is an add-on to whatever you current role is, including science and engineering. It helps you to understand things from the perspective of other departments. This allows you to better coordinate your efforts with theirs and perhaps most importantly it helps you more effectively communicate with these other departments and makes it more likely you will be able to persuade them when necessary.

    1. Re:An MBA is not just about accounting ... by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Well of course, I have no problem with the MBA itself, I wasn't actually commenting on the program. Hell, I have nothing against history degrees either.

      What bothers me, is talking to people who don't have degrees, or have rather unemployable ones like History etc... people without real technical skills of any sort, but who may be (or are in process of being) educated; even highly educated. Often they don't know what they want to do (or have an unrealistic idea of it), and their default falls to "I should get an MBA" under the idea that this is what you do....if you want to work for businesses, you study business.... kind of like if you want money you rob banks, because thats where the money is.

      Its not that MBAs are bad, or we don't need people with finance degrees. Certainly we need people educated in these areas. Nothing wrong with having some telephone sanitizers on staff either, those phones need to be clean afterall....just look at what happened to the golgafrinchans.

      Thats the thing, its not engineers who get MBAs that are the problem, its the fact that not enough people want the engineering or science education to begin with thats the problem.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    2. Re:An MBA is not just about accounting ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

      ... people who don't have degrees, or have rather unemployable ones like History ...

      I was a CS major but I would often take a history class each quarter for fun. I once saw a presentation titled something like "Careers for History and Political Science Majors" announced on the history department's bulletin board. I sat in for fun. The short version is these people are employable, just not in their field of study. We were told that many corporations require a 4 year degree for manager trainee positions. Similarly I believe any 4 year degree qualifies a person for officer candidate school in the military.

      Keep in mind that 4 year college graduates, irrespective of degree, have demonstrated an ability to complete a long, complicated and boring process in a bureaucratic environment. That counts for something.

      ... its the fact that not enough people want the engineering or science education to begin with thats the problem.

      Agreed.

  47. Dealing with old pipes is complicated ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    So you are saying that nothing, absolutely nothing can be done to lower the costs of digging a hole that was already dug once before and patching or replacing a pipe that was already laid in the hole at some point in time where all the engineering and studies were already done at one time. I say hogwash. Some thing could be done if they wanted to that could reduce the costs of maintaining the pipes.

    My grandfather spent decades (1950s-70s) replacing the sort of pipes described, old cast iron gas lines. These lines were probably installed around 1900. The lines were not necessarily well documented back in those days. Plus some documentation from 100 years ago probably got lost, especially if the work was originally done by a private company. Also in the 100 years since the original installation other things may have been installed over these lines. In certain areas it was common for my grandfather (representing the gas company) to coordinate with counterparts from the electric company, water department and/or phone company and share what they knew and their guestimates before someone could start digging to get at a gas line, water line, power cable, phone cable, etc needing repair or replacement. This stuff could get pretty complicated in the 1970s, I'm sure its not getting less complicated as time passes.

  48. Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is involved, so nothing will be done until there is a huge explosion that kills hundreds. Then Government will make a law that repairs must be done within 30 days of detection of a leak. Gas companies will sue, stating that the new law violates their constitutional right to free speach. By the time the lawsuits, countersuits, apeals etc...are done, Boston will have burned to the ground and been abandoned for 30 years...

    1. Re:Money by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      is involved, so nothing will be done until there is a huge explosion that kills hundreds. Then Government will make a law that repairs must be done within 30 days of detection of a leak. Gas companies will sue, stating that the new law violates their constitutional right to free speach. By the time the lawsuits, countersuits, apeals etc...are done, Boston will have burned to the ground and been abandoned for 30 years...

      Hey, destruction (earthquake, but still... lots of fires and destroyed buildings) worked in San Francisco..... in 1906. Wonder if it would help "rebuild" a city today.

  49. Re:Greenhouse gas? Storm and septic sewers? by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    From article:

    with a device to measure methane, the chief chemical component of natural gas

    They didn't specify that it was coming from natural gas, just made reference to it.

    Your point could be very valid in identifying the main source!

    Sewage shit (yes, I want to use that word strongly here) builds up over time and creates more stoppage points for festering.

  50. terrorists by phasmatid · · Score: 1

    Arrest these folks on suspicion of gathering information that might be useful to terrorists. Ban methane detecting devices. There Boston, I fixed yer gas leak "problem."

  51. Nothing To See Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The map makes it look like Boston is covered in methane. The researchers located leaks and measured the level of methane in the air immediately surrounding the leak. If you zoom in the map you see the leaks are pretty sparsely located and given the concentrations measured the methane exposure to the public is negligible. If you take an air sample at a random spot in Boston six feet in the air you will get a non-detectable result, i.e. the level of methane in the air due to these leaks is no different than the level of air in the atmosphere.

    So while the researchers are correct in assessing fire risk as a cost it is fraudulent for them to claim public health is at risk. A fraction of a percent of the population will almost certainly suffer due to leaving the system the way it is, but the actual cost to the public is negligible. Let's just be honest that avoiding a few people dying in an out of control fire is a good enough reason to upgrade infrastructure.

  52. Not quite Boston, but an explosion in MA by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1