Well, i think I'd change your.sig to read 'neocon', since there are still some farmer types who call themselves republicans. Individuals who are really 'conservative' and so don't identify with the progressive politics of the Democrats and the left, but who don't realize that their party has been stolen by the big-corporation-handout government we've got today...
Which is nonsense for a number of reasons.
In the first place, those rural people are not "conservative" in any way shape or form. They are socialists of the worst sort. They live off of government subsidies and pay no income tax at all. Just take a look at how much tax money goes back into their states versus how much they pay into the pool. The fact that they are the worst sort of socialist and yet constantly screech their hatred of what they themselves are is deeply hypocritical, and further it shows their total contempt for integrity and their complete failure to take their responsibility to be informed citizens seriously.
And if they don't realise after more then 30 years that their party was "stolen", then how can you possibly justify pretending that it isn't their fault? It's not like it's a big secret.
Of course it's total insanity to even pretend that it was "stolen". Those people came out in record numbers to elect the current crop of traitors disgracing our country solely due to the fact that they hate faggots.
After Bush's first term when he proved that he was exactly what every decent American who actually did their duty to be an informed citizen already knew he would be, they reelected him, giving their explicit approval of his cowardly treasonous actions and demonstrating their own cowardice and treason. So your argument is basically that they can't be held responsible for their own actively chosen actions because they're dumber than a bag of rocks?
Maybe you should keep in mind that these are the same people who delight in executing actual retarded people and you'll see that that your argument wouldn't be taken seriously by the very people whose treason you are trying to excuse with it.
So, no, there is no reason to limit my sig to "neocons" as *all* Republicans are neocons. If they weren't, then they wouldn't be Republicans.
Sorry, but once you decide to actively support the torture and murder of innocent people, then you give up any right to be treated as a human being as you have willfully and with malice aforethought rejected the very concept of morality.
The fact that so many of these monsters have the audacity to claim to be Christians while pissing all over Christian beliefs is just more proof of their total lack of any integrity or basic human decency.
Really, so the leaders of the american Libertarian party, the Reform party, the American Communist party, and others have been locked up for intending to alter the government? Wow, and I missed it.
Then perhaps you should start paying attention? It's pretty hard to miss.
Since you're the one who so vehemently despises this country and the values we stand for, why don't *you* leave and move to Saudi Arabia or some other country where they already have the system you want to live under rather than working to fuck up our country?
No, that would take integrity which is like Kryptonite to you amoral fascist Republican cowards.
It's just like stopping at a red light in downtown Detroit or Chicago, getting your windshield cleaned by some bum and then him sticking his hand in your window asking for money when all he did was smudge your windshield without your permission.
Dealt with that situation at least a dozen times.
If *once* my windshield was ever left cleaner then when he started, I'd probably throw him a Hamilton just for the novelty.
?? Huh? It's a potential until it happens, then it's data.
There is a distinct difference between "potential", which was the cold war situation of "we could all get blown up if somebody fucks up", and the current situation which is a clearly stated policy of "we are perfectly willing to lob nukes at will at any country nuclear equipped or otherwise for any reason whatsoever".
Indegestion has nothing to do with stated foreign policy. Please try to keep up.
I've been to a police state and trust me, this ain't it.
Well on the way. That's what this new law enables, or aren't you paying attention?
Television, radio and newspapers are not government run.
No, just deeply in collusion.
Since I'm sure you think the current administration if full of neocons, gays and minorities are not rounded up and executed or shipped to forced labor camps.
No, they're just working to modify our constitution for the first time in history for the specific purpose of promoting discrimination against a specific group based solely upon who they were born. These things take time. Our nation was pretty well designed by some pretty smart people. Removing the defenses is a major step. Getting cowards like you to roll over and piss themselves at largely made up threats is the first step.
That said, I find it ironic that you feel it would be best to kill all those who think differently than you do,
Now there is where you went completely off the deep end into lunacy.
I don't give a flying fuck what you *think*. I don't give a flying fuck what you say, what you believe, or how you choose to live your life provided you do not infringe upon my liberties.
I promote the murder of Republicans solely based on their *actions*.
They have actively worked to destroy the protections guaranteed by the constitution because there was an attack on our country and they pissed themselves yellow and immediately began accepting ridiculous lies from the administration whose incompetence allowed those same attacks.
Those are the facts.
Your cowardice and the cowardice of the rest of your ilk who support the indisputably treasonous actions of the current administration has allowed and encouraged the destruction of the bill of rights with no possible potential benefit.
You commited the crime. Be a man for once in your life and eat a bullet.
Maybe you should look in the mirror, you fucking Nazi before you start calling anyone else names. I
You're the one supporting the fascists you idiotic dipshit. I'm the one standing up for liberty. These are simple concepts, so you clearly know you're lying.
In other words, when you use hyperbole, it makes you sound like... wait, scratch that... it PROVES that you are fucking idiot who has a serious case of diahrea of the mouth who is barely competent enough to regurgitate what you read in your local conspiracy theory rag or heard on Art Bell.
Where was the hyperbole? The 4th amendment was abolished by this legislation. The half ass protections in it are easily "hackable". Your cowardice encouraged this.
By the way, I served my country. I went to war defending it.
Oh the fuck you did. Our military has not been used to defend this country since WW2. What you did was leech off of my tax dollars while fucking over some poor dirt farmers to benefit a few wealthy corporations and the military industrial complex.
Hell, if you had any interest in defending this country you wouldn't be licking the boots of the people working to destroy it you cowardly lying fuck.
So don't lecture me about rights, because I've done more to defend your rights than you have.
The fuck you have. You have not done one goddamned thing to defend anybody's rights. That's not what our military is used for. The greatest attack on our rights in my entire lifetime is happening right now and you are bending over like a bitch and even going so far as to get up in my grill while I am standing up for them, so save it you lying fuck.
What have you done to give you the right to call me coward?
I'm speaking out against the worst attack on America that has ever happened. You are colluding with the enemy. That makes you a coward and it makes you a traitor.
You have a responsibility as a citizen to pay attention. You are a complete failure at your job.
No, McCain still parts ways with the party quite often. He recently brought into question "interrogation techniques" used by the CIA.
And then like a typical cowardly Republican he caved in and went along with the party and against the constitution. Try to keep up.
And as far as your sig goes... I'm one, try it!
I'd be happy to do my patriotic duty and end your cowardly treasonous life. It's a simple matter of self defense. You have acted to turn my country into a police state and you have given the government the power to lock me up and torture me to death with no cause and no oversight.
Why don't you take the high road for once in your cowardly pathetic life and just put the bullet in your own head?
Heck, I'd even consider you to have died with honor at that point. It's really the only way you wull ever have any integrity at this point.
Did I miss something? I thought that Republicans were for freedom and Democrats were for government intrusion?
My voter registration says "R", but that can't be right. The Republican party that I know would call a bill like this "Democratic Big Brotherism at its worst" or something like that.
Maybe its all just a weird dream. When I wake up, things will be back to normal.
Unless you're a lot fucking older than most people on here, you have never lived in a time whyere there was any reason to believe that ridiculous nonsense.
The Republicans have been the party of bigger government, less freedom, more oppression, and more big brotherism since Reagan at least.
This is in no way intended to imply that the Democrats are good, but if you honestly think that the Republicans are supposed to be against government intrusion then you haven't paid any attention whatsoever for the last 30+ years.
It's truly amazing how deeply stupid Republican voters are.
"Durrrrrr welll they say they're for freedom" without doing one fucking thing to actually look into it.
So if you are not a complete partisan and tote the party line, they will throw you out of the Democratic party? Much like McCain and Powell were thrown out of the Republican party?
McCain was kicked around a bit, realised his "error" and decided being a good little lapdog was better than being a patriot.
Yeah, they're called Republicans. They don't seem to have actually acted on that platform, but there's no denying that the GOP platform is "less government, less regulation, less taxes".
That's just nonsense they spout to get fools to support them.
They might have once believed in slightly small*er* government than the Dems, but that hasn't had a scrap of truth to it for at least 30 years.
The party faithful still keep betraying their country by voting for these sick fuckers though since their loyalty is entirely to their party instead of their country.
Hey whack job gun nut Republican douchebags. This is what the second amendment was put there for. Step up and do something *now* or forever STFU you cowardly fucks.
I voted for the lesser of two evils...I voted for Kerry.
Meh. I voted for the lesser of more than 2 evils. I voted Badnarik. Granted if I didn't live in Chicago, I might have had to consider voting Kerry, but anybody who was undecided between Bush and Kerry is just a fool. There is no comparison between the two and no possible sane way of even putting them in the same league.
... but even with the speed, flying an SR-71 is a pain (at least in the sim) -- drives like a boat. I'd much rather fly an F-22.
Then it's a bad Sim.
The SR-71 airframe was originally designed as an interceptor, so its lower speed flight characteristics are actually very good. My father flew them in the Air Force in Vietnam (and other places), so I do have some knowledge of that albeit secondhand.
I was actually born on Beale AFB and I have some great pictures of myself sitting on the wing of one when I was a baby;-)
Who is going to sue California for employing such fucktastically retarded engineers to design their highway system?
Please note! I do not live in California, but I know quite a few people who do and speak to them regularly during their hour plus commutes.
The freeways are actually much better designed than most places I'm familiar with. I lived in California for most of my life, travelled to and through a lot of other states and now live in Chicago.
The fact that there are so many freaking peope driving there during commuting hours ( and most other times) is the problem. The design of the freeways is fine, capacity keeps increasing faster than they can expand the roads. Heck, they're 14 lanes in places already.
What exaclty makes you want to blame the "fucktastically retarded engineers" for something that's totally outside their control?
Well, Ronald Reagan went from actor to president... and i think he did pretty well.
Then maybe you should pay attention? Reagan was one of the worst presidents we've ever had.
Just look at his legacy:
Torture schools for Latin American extremists. CIA involvement in the international cocaine trade. Iran Contra Massive budget deficits. S&L ripoff Massive wall street corruption Culture of unmitigated greed Al Queda And oh so many more
Seriously, Dude. The only people who think Reagan was anything but a disaster haven't actually even looked into it.
Hopefully, you are either very young or mentally handicapped so at least you'll have some excuse. You are sad and I'm busy right now so I don't have time to play with you anymore.
That's right. Back under your bridge now, little troll.
Uh, except thats more than three commands. In fact, it is 22 commands. Even worse, stringing them together with &&'s is stupid because if you make a mistake somewhere or a command fails, the whole thing fails.
Well, in the first place it was a joke as several people didn't notice and several others pointed out already. I would have thought the fact that I mentioned that it was just a quote from bash.org would have cleared that up;-)
In the second place, if you were dumb enough to try and do an install that way, then you absolutely would *not* want it to execute the next command if you screwed one up.
- You mean like Slashdot posting "(anthropogenic) global warming is real" stories and not posting the same number of "(anthropogenic) global warming might not be real" stories?
The only possible reason to do something like that would be if there was exactly the same amount of data, scientists, papers,etc. supporting each position.
Arbitrarily deciding that having equal numbers of stories from either side regardless of merit is a totally idiotic idea. Just look at the main stream media these days with that moronic idea of "balance" which only serves to remove the bullshit detector that used to work fairly well.
So in short, no not like that at all.
- Or do you mean like the news media reporting on global warming during the hottest part of the summer and then shutting up during the coldest part of the winter?
Never heard of that one. Facts? Links?
- Or do you mean like last year, when all those hurricanes "were caused by global warming". This year, on the other hand, the lack of hurricanes isn't cause to think that global warming might be less of a problem -- so let's not bring it up at all.
I heard a few retards saying that on web forums, but nowhere else. Did I miss something there?
- "Big" Tobacco, but never "Big" Government
Ahhh, so all those stories about the massive criminal actions by the big government are just totally like not there? Wow, dude, just wow.
- We hear that anti-GW studies are "tied to Exxon". (What a shock! Exxon engages in self-defense. Shame on them.) But we never hear when pro-GW studies are tied to socialist groups.
That's because there are no real Socialist groups in the US. Of course, any bias in the funding/commissioning etc is always brought out no matter who it's pro/anti.
So while there may be (ok, certainly is) bias on all sides of the issue, your little diatribe did nothing to illuminate any of them. Well, except for your own, of course.
Slashdot Mirror
Well, i think I'd change your
Which is nonsense for a number of reasons.
In the first place, those rural people are not "conservative" in any way shape or form. They are socialists of the worst sort. They live off of government subsidies and pay no income tax at all. Just take a look at how much tax money goes back into their states versus how much they pay into the pool. The fact that they are the worst sort of socialist and yet constantly screech their hatred of what they themselves are is deeply hypocritical, and further it shows their total contempt for integrity and their complete failure to take their responsibility to be informed citizens seriously.
And if they don't realise after more then 30 years that their party was "stolen", then how can you possibly justify pretending that it isn't their fault? It's not like it's a big secret.
Of course it's total insanity to even pretend that it was "stolen". Those people came out in record numbers to elect the current crop of traitors disgracing our country solely due to the fact that they hate faggots.
After Bush's first term when he proved that he was exactly what every decent American who actually did their duty to be an informed citizen already knew he would be, they reelected him, giving their explicit approval of his cowardly treasonous actions and demonstrating their own cowardice and treason.
So your argument is basically that they can't be held responsible for their own actively chosen actions because they're dumber than a bag of rocks?
Maybe you should keep in mind that these are the same people who delight in executing actual retarded people and you'll see that that your argument wouldn't be taken seriously by the very people whose treason you are trying to excuse with it.
So, no, there is no reason to limit my sig to "neocons" as *all* Republicans are neocons. If they weren't, then they wouldn't be Republicans.
Sorry, but once you decide to actively support the torture and murder of innocent people, then you give up any right to be treated as a human being as you have willfully and with malice aforethought rejected the very concept of morality.
The fact that so many of these monsters have the audacity to claim to be Christians while pissing all over Christian beliefs is just more proof of their total lack of any integrity or basic human decency.
Really, so the leaders of the american Libertarian party, the Reform party, the American Communist party, and others have been locked up for intending to alter the government? Wow, and I missed it.
Then perhaps you should start paying attention?
It's pretty hard to miss.
Leave.
Since you're the one who so vehemently despises this country and the values we stand for, why don't *you* leave and move to Saudi Arabia or some other country where they already have the system you want to live under rather than working to fuck up our country?
No, that would take integrity which is like Kryptonite to you amoral fascist Republican cowards.
It's just like stopping at a red light in downtown Detroit or Chicago, getting your windshield cleaned by some bum and then him sticking his hand in your window asking for money when all he did was smudge your windshield without your permission.
Dealt with that situation at least a dozen times.
If *once* my windshield was ever left cleaner then when he started, I'd probably throw him a Hamilton just for the novelty.
?? Huh? It's a potential until it happens, then it's data.
There is a distinct difference between "potential", which was the cold war situation of "we could all get blown up if somebody fucks up", and the current situation which is a clearly stated policy of "we are perfectly willing to lob nukes at will at any country nuclear equipped or otherwise for any reason whatsoever".
Indegestion has nothing to do with stated foreign policy. Please try to keep up.
Be even smarter to let Israel do it, what the heck are we paying them for? ok, that was sorta a troll.
The only troll was calling that a troll.
Then they get radioactive clouds overhead as a bonus. It certainly could spiral out of contrl, at least the potential is there.
It's not "potential". It's the current blatantly stated US foreign policy.
Or what exactly did you think the point of the preemptive nuclear attack thing was intended for?
Seriously, this whole "durrrrr I ain't payin' attention to shit for more than a day" approach to citizenship sucks ass.
Please quit it
Well, if we massively nuked Yellowstoner, then it could be both!
Yes, I caught the typo. I left it because it made me laugh.
I've been to a police state and trust me, this ain't it.
Well on the way. That's what this new law enables, or aren't you paying attention?
Television, radio and newspapers are not government run.
No, just deeply in collusion.
Since I'm sure you think the current administration if full of neocons, gays and minorities are not rounded up and executed or shipped to forced labor camps.
No, they're just working to modify our constitution for the first time in history for the specific purpose of promoting discrimination against a specific group based solely upon who they were born.
These things take time. Our nation was pretty well designed by some pretty smart people.
Removing the defenses is a major step.
Getting cowards like you to roll over and piss themselves at largely made up threats is the first step.
That said, I find it ironic that you feel it would be best to kill all those who think differently than you do,
Now there is where you went completely off the deep end into lunacy.
I don't give a flying fuck what you *think*. I don't give a flying fuck what you say, what you believe, or how you choose to live your life provided you do not infringe upon my liberties.
I promote the murder of Republicans solely based on their *actions*.
They have actively worked to destroy the protections guaranteed by the constitution because there was an attack on our country and they pissed themselves yellow and immediately began accepting ridiculous lies from the administration whose incompetence allowed those same attacks.
Those are the facts.
Your cowardice and the cowardice of the rest of your ilk who support the indisputably treasonous actions of the current administration has allowed and encouraged the destruction of the bill of rights with no possible potential benefit.
You commited the crime. Be a man for once in your life and eat a bullet.
Maybe you should look in the mirror, you fucking Nazi before you start calling anyone else names. I
You're the one supporting the fascists you idiotic dipshit. I'm the one standing up for liberty. These are simple concepts, so you clearly know you're lying.
In other words, when you use hyperbole, it makes you sound like... wait, scratch that... it PROVES that you are fucking idiot who has a serious case of diahrea of the mouth who is barely competent enough to regurgitate what you read in your local conspiracy theory rag or heard on Art Bell.
Where was the hyperbole? The 4th amendment was abolished by this legislation. The half ass protections in it are easily "hackable". Your cowardice encouraged this.
By the way, I served my country. I went to war defending it.
Oh the fuck you did.
Our military has not been used to defend this country since WW2.
What you did was leech off of my tax dollars while fucking over some poor dirt farmers to benefit a few wealthy corporations and the military industrial complex.
Hell, if you had any interest in defending this country you wouldn't be licking the boots of the people working to destroy it you cowardly lying fuck.
So don't lecture me about rights, because I've done more to defend your rights than you have.
The fuck you have. You have not done one goddamned thing to defend anybody's rights. That's not what our military is used for.
The greatest attack on our rights in my entire lifetime is happening right now and you are bending over like a bitch and even going so far as to get up in my grill while I am standing up for them, so save it you lying fuck.
What have you done to give you the right to call me coward?
I'm speaking out against the worst attack on America that has ever happened.
You are colluding with the enemy.
That makes you a coward and it makes you a traitor.
You have a responsibility as a citizen to pay attention. You are a complete failure at your job.
No, McCain still parts ways with the party quite often. He recently brought into question "interrogation techniques" used by the CIA.
And then like a typical cowardly Republican he caved in and went along with the party and against the constitution.
Try to keep up.
And as far as your sig goes... I'm one, try it!
I'd be happy to do my patriotic duty and end your cowardly treasonous life.
It's a simple matter of self defense.
You have acted to turn my country into a police state and you have given the government the power to lock me up and torture me to death with no cause and no oversight.
Why don't you take the high road for once in your cowardly pathetic life and just put the bullet in your own head?
Heck, I'd even consider you to have died with honor at that point. It's really the only way you wull ever have any integrity at this point.
Did I miss something? I thought that Republicans were for freedom and Democrats were for government intrusion?
My voter registration says "R", but that can't be right. The Republican party that I know would call a bill like this "Democratic Big Brotherism at its worst" or something like that.
Maybe its all just a weird dream. When I wake up, things will be back to normal.
Unless you're a lot fucking older than most people on here, you have never lived in a time whyere there was any reason to believe that ridiculous nonsense.
The Republicans have been the party of bigger government, less freedom, more oppression, and more big brotherism since Reagan at least.
This is in no way intended to imply that the Democrats are good, but if you honestly think that the Republicans are supposed to be against government intrusion then you haven't paid any attention whatsoever for the last 30+ years.
It's truly amazing how deeply stupid Republican voters are.
"Durrrrrr welll they say they're for freedom" without doing one fucking thing to actually look into it.
Fucking spineless sheep.
I love this country and I'd gladly give up privacy to ensure that my children are safer.
In the first place that's an oxymoron you coward.
In the second place, provide one single scrap of a reason to believe that this will do one single goddamned thing to make your kids safer.
Nice try.
This is the land of the free and the home of the brave.
That means it ain't your home you goddamned cowardly traitor.
Why don't you move to China or Saudi Arabia or some other place where your sort of person lives.
Why do you insist on allowing your cowardice to fuck up my country?
Yeah, I didn't think you'd have an answer for any of that.
So if you are not a complete partisan and tote the party line, they will throw you out of the Democratic party? Much like McCain and Powell were thrown out of the Republican party?
McCain was kicked around a bit, realised his "error" and decided being a good little lapdog was better than being a patriot.
So yes, that's a great example.
Yeah, they're called Republicans. They don't seem to have actually acted on that platform, but there's no denying that the GOP platform is "less government, less regulation, less taxes".
That's just nonsense they spout to get fools to support them.
They might have once believed in slightly small*er* government than the Dems, but that hasn't had a scrap of truth to it for at least 30 years.
The party faithful still keep betraying their country by voting for these sick fuckers though since their loyalty is entirely to their party instead of their country.
Hey whack job gun nut Republican douchebags.
This is what the second amendment was put there for. Step up and do something *now* or forever STFU you cowardly fucks.
I voted for the lesser of two evils...I voted for Kerry.
Meh. I voted for the lesser of more than 2 evils. I voted Badnarik.
Granted if I didn't live in Chicago, I might have had to consider voting Kerry, but anybody who was undecided between Bush and Kerry is just a fool.
There is no comparison between the two and no possible sane way of even putting them in the same league.
I've always felt gridlock makes for good government, and I look forward to having it again in November.
Except all of this treasonous legislation eliminates the gridlock as well.
... but even with the speed, flying an SR-71 is a pain (at least in the sim) -- drives like a boat. I'd much rather fly an F-22.
;-)
Then it's a bad Sim.
The SR-71 airframe was originally designed as an interceptor, so its lower speed flight characteristics are actually very good.
My father flew them in the Air Force in Vietnam (and other places), so I do have some knowledge of that albeit secondhand.
I was actually born on Beale AFB and I have some great pictures of myself sitting on the wing of one when I was a baby
What the hell kind of mickey-mouse university would have a graduate level math course that's multiple choice?
;-)
Well, what about Complex Analysis?
Every answer is zero or a multiple of 2 pi.
A. 0
B. 2 pi
C. 4 pi
D. 6 pi
E. All of the above
Who is going to sue California for employing such fucktastically retarded engineers to design their highway system?
Please note! I do not live in California, but I know quite a few people who do and speak to them regularly during their hour plus commutes.
The freeways are actually much better designed than most places I'm familiar with.
I lived in California for most of my life, travelled to and through a lot of other states and now live in Chicago.
The fact that there are so many freaking peope driving there during commuting hours ( and most other times) is the problem. The design of the freeways is fine, capacity keeps increasing faster than they can expand the roads.
Heck, they're 14 lanes in places already.
What exaclty makes you want to blame the "fucktastically retarded engineers" for something that's totally outside their control?
Well, Ronald Reagan went from actor to president... and i think he did pretty well.
Then maybe you should pay attention?
Reagan was one of the worst presidents we've ever had.
Just look at his legacy:
Torture schools for Latin American extremists.
CIA involvement in the international cocaine trade.
Iran Contra
Massive budget deficits.
S&L ripoff
Massive wall street corruption
Culture of unmitigated greed
Al Queda
And oh so many more
Seriously, Dude.
The only people who think Reagan was anything but a disaster haven't actually even looked into it.
Perfectly easy, my grandmother has severe alzheimer's and she managed to get gentoo installed from source in under 15 seconds.
Wow. Is she looking for a job?
Hopefully, you are either very young or mentally handicapped so at least you'll have some excuse. You are sad and I'm busy right now so I don't have time to play with you anymore.
That's right. Back under your bridge now, little troll.
Uh, except thats more than three commands. In fact, it is 22 commands. Even worse, stringing them together with &&'s is stupid because if you make a mistake somewhere or a command fails, the whole thing fails.
;-)
Well, in the first place it was a joke as several people didn't notice and several others pointed out already.
I would have thought the fact that I mentioned that it was just a quote from bash.org would have cleared that up
In the second place, if you were dumb enough to try and do an install that way, then you absolutely would *not* want it to execute the next command if you screwed one up.
- You mean like Slashdot posting "(anthropogenic) global warming is real" stories and not posting the same number of "(anthropogenic) global warming might not be real" stories?
The only possible reason to do something like that would be if there was exactly the same amount of data, scientists, papers
Arbitrarily deciding that having equal numbers of stories from either side regardless of merit is a totally idiotic idea.
Just look at the main stream media these days with that moronic idea of "balance" which only serves to remove the bullshit detector that used to work fairly well.
So in short, no not like that at all.
- Or do you mean like the news media reporting on global warming during the hottest part of the summer and then shutting up during the coldest part of the winter?
Never heard of that one. Facts? Links?
- Or do you mean like last year, when all those hurricanes "were caused by global warming". This year, on the other hand, the lack of hurricanes isn't cause to think that global warming might be less of a problem -- so let's not bring it up at all.
I heard a few retards saying that on web forums, but nowhere else. Did I miss something there?
- "Big" Tobacco, but never "Big" Government
Ahhh, so all those stories about the massive criminal actions by the big government are just totally like not there? Wow, dude, just wow.
- We hear that anti-GW studies are "tied to Exxon". (What a shock! Exxon engages in self-defense. Shame on them.) But we never hear when pro-GW studies are tied to socialist groups.
That's because there are no real Socialist groups in the US.
Of course, any bias in the funding/commissioning etc is always brought out no matter who it's pro/anti.
So while there may be (ok, certainly is) bias on all sides of the issue, your little diatribe did nothing to illuminate any of them. Well, except for your own, of course.
and the tobacco that most people mix in with weed so it burns better...?
Not sure where you're from, but in America aat least, most people don't do that.