Grr. Was meant to pick "Plain Old Text"... here's those headers again:
Received: from host63-51-dynamic.3-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it ([87.3.51.63])
by mx.google.com with SMTP id w29si3717130pyg.2007.01.21.14.59.34;
Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:59:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: error (google.com: error in processing during lookup of vmvyzas@vyzaslaw.com: DNS timeout) Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:59:48 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Received: from arabic.verizon.com (unknown [24.254.199.172])
by quake3arena.com with SMTP id EOUA4I8P6N
for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:59:32 -0600
Well, it is possible (though unlikely) that in rare circumstances, there is some collaboration - but in these cases I can only assume that the company wasn't real in the first place.
Then, how do you know that the IP address wasn't fake? Read the below SMTP headers, and tell me which machine was the origin of the below email:
Received: from host63-51-dynamic.3-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it ([87.3.51.63])
by mx.google.com with SMTP id w29si3717130pyg.2007.01.21.14.59.34;
Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:59:58 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: error (google.com: error in processing during lookup of vmvyzas@vyzaslaw.com: DNS timeout)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:59:48 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id:
Received: from arabic.verizon.com (unknown [24.254.199.172])
by quake3arena.com with SMTP id EOUA4I8P6N
for >; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:59:32 -0600
Wow. So many words and yet no reasonable explanation for this defect in Windows Vista (even if the defect is by design).
When I buy a motion picture by a distributor on an HD-DVD or Blu-ray DVD disc, I am of course entitled to play back the content on the disc at full quality.
But please wave your hands this way or that: I am still entitled to play back the content on the disc I bought at full quality. And, thus, we are left with a significant problem because Windows Vista downgrades the user experience if "protected" content is involved. Call it "image constraint" or whatever euphemism you want. It still is a downgrade.
It is not a theoretical matter. Of course, Windows Vista can play back the content at full quality (have you seen the hardware requirements of this new operating system?). Being a reasonable customer*, I am left observing this as the defect it is in the Windows Vista operating system playback facilities.
*Not the MPAA/RIAA/MAFIAA, whom I hope did not make Microsoft do this.
Why do you think Windows Vista downgrades the user experience if "protected" content is involved? Then complain to the MPAA who mandated that Microsoft do this. The only alternative to the "content downgrading" is Microsoft being barred from providing "protected content" playback facilities at all.
What are you talking about? The company sure as hell doesn't want Pump and Dump scams, they overall drive their share price DOWN. In fact, PHYA.PK (Physician's Adult Daycare) issued a press release denouncing the P&D scam with their name on it and vowed to hunt down the dirty crooks and bring them to justice.
Seriously, those companies you mentioned are NOT associated with the spam - they lose money off it too.
It's the people who buy before the spam goes out and sell right after (probably even same day) that you would target. Only the people behind the spam have advance knowledge of when the pump is going to occur. Plus, anyone doing this is doing more than one, so there'll be a pattern of this activity proving it can't be a fluke. Except that, from where I see it, those dodgy companies such as "Impex Consult Financial" offering you a part time job "as a financial consultant working with private individuals" are really offering you a job accepting the funds from Pump and Dump scams and forwarding them on via Western Union (untraceable!) to the REAL criminals.
What, you thought they were JUST money launderers? I find that unlikely.
Unfortunately I can't find anything in the OEM System Builder docs regarding whether they OEM bind the Express Upgrade keys or not. The closest I can find is a vague warning that the upgrade license is only for upgrading the copy of XP you are sending a redemption form in for.
The CD Key is usually bound to that OEM vendor's "customized" install. Look at the COA on the machines... does it have a company name (Dell, HP, etc) written on the label? If so, the key is useless except on that type of machine.
I'm never letting this filth touch my hardware but I can use it for testing under KVM/QEMU, how does it perform? It wont. The requirements are too high.
The USA says the exact same thing about space. Access to space is important to the US. They are going to defend that access. They are not going to allow China to deny them access to space.
Are they saying that China can't launch satellites? Are they saying that the US "owns" space? No, they aren't. It's only your bias that makes you read it that way. No, no, they (according to your own quote) reserve the right to deny anyone access to space if they don't believe it's in their national interests. National interests could extend from access to space, to colonization of the moon. So, by that token, if the USA decides colonizing the moon is a national interest, and China wants to do the same, the USA would (according to this policy - this is entirely theory of course) obliterate any carrier attempting to perform this action. Also, though the person you reply to said it in an extremely unnecessarily negative way, they are somewhat correct in their assertion - if the USA decides that anyone in space with weapons is not "in their national interests" they would use the weapons that they have in space to take them out. This is, again, a quote directly from the policy you quoted.
What mythical world do you live in? iTunes doesn't have every major label - last I checked, some of them refuse to sign up because "the DRM is too lax". How is Apple in control again?
Contrary to popular belief, eventually (after about 6 months or so) the Microsoft Activation Clearinghouse does forget that you activated, opening the door for you to activate that same key again - even on a different machine.
Well, in some countries you don't even need SMS support to sign up (I logged into Gmail with my non-Gmail Google Account and it just said something along the lines of "When you click continue, your Gmail account will become your Google account's primary email"
Dude. Slashdot is the last place I'd want to advertise. Their site will be down in minutes (what with being on the front page, and the article unabbreviated).
Found out why too:
For Windows XP users, EV functionality in Internet Explorer requires that the Phishing Filter be Turned On for automatic website checking. If you do not see the green URL address bar when trying the demo, and are running Internet Explorer 7, this setting might be turned off. Please check the Phishing Filter settings in the Advanced Tab by clicking Tools > Internet Options > Advanced.
Who honestly leaves that thing turned on at all times?
I get a message from Internet Explorer saying "To protect your security, Internet Explorer has blocked this website from displaying content with security certificate errors"
Wow. Makes me want to get SSL certificates from these guys!
It has been announced, idiot. Apple has said that the iPhone will not run unsigned applications... because "Cingular expressed concern that errant applications could crash their entire west coast cell network" (which to me indicates that Cingular have more to worry about than 3rd party applications on cellphones) and that "You don't want your phone being an open system" (apparently those were Steve Jobs' actual words!
Erm, it's Peter Jackson's COMPANY doing the whining here, because the COMPANY (with all those people you say that made it successful) that didn't get as much as it should have, which affects those people you say made it successful. You know, the cast and crew?
Technically states that what you say is not possible. Under the UN Law (which Britain agreed to) extending territorial waters can NOT encroach on another countries land or waters (otherwise the USA would just extend it's waters about 3 light years and claim half the solar system for the Land of the Free). Also, Salvage Law says that it's pretty much "Finders, Keepers" on abandoned sea vessels/platforms (the UK did in fact abandon it). Note that "Sealand" also claimed sovereignty before the UN agreed to alter law to prohibit artificial islands claiming sovereignty.
Slashdot Mirror
Grr. Was meant to pick "Plain Old Text"... here's those headers again:
Received: from host63-51-dynamic.3-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it ([87.3.51.63])
by mx.google.com with SMTP id w29si3717130pyg.2007.01.21.14.59.34;
Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:59:58 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: error (google.com: error in processing during lookup of vmvyzas@vyzaslaw.com: DNS timeout)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:59:48 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id:
Received: from arabic.verizon.com (unknown [24.254.199.172])
by quake3arena.com with SMTP id EOUA4I8P6N
for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:59:32 -0600
Well, it is possible (though unlikely) that in rare circumstances, there is some collaboration - but in these cases I can only assume that the company wasn't real in the first place. Then, how do you know that the IP address wasn't fake? Read the below SMTP headers, and tell me which machine was the origin of the below email: Received: from host63-51-dynamic.3-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it ([87.3.51.63]) by mx.google.com with SMTP id w29si3717130pyg.2007.01.21.14.59.34; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:59:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: error (google.com: error in processing during lookup of vmvyzas@vyzaslaw.com: DNS timeout) Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:59:48 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Received: from arabic.verizon.com (unknown [24.254.199.172]) by quake3arena.com with SMTP id EOUA4I8P6N for >; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:59:32 -0600
When I buy a motion picture by a distributor on an HD-DVD or Blu-ray DVD disc, I am of course entitled to play back the content on the disc at full quality.
But please wave your hands this way or that: I am still entitled to play back the content on the disc I bought at full quality. And, thus, we are left with a significant problem because Windows Vista downgrades the user experience if "protected" content is involved. Call it "image constraint" or whatever euphemism you want. It still is a downgrade.
It is not a theoretical matter. Of course, Windows Vista can play back the content at full quality (have you seen the hardware requirements of this new operating system?). Being a reasonable customer*, I am left observing this as the defect it is in the Windows Vista operating system playback facilities.
*Not the MPAA/RIAA/MAFIAA, whom I hope did not make Microsoft do this.
Why do you think Windows Vista downgrades the user experience if "protected" content is involved? Then complain to the MPAA who mandated that Microsoft do this. The only alternative to the "content downgrading" is Microsoft being barred from providing "protected content" playback facilities at all.
What are you talking about? The company sure as hell doesn't want Pump and Dump scams, they overall drive their share price DOWN. In fact, PHYA.PK (Physician's Adult Daycare) issued a press release denouncing the P&D scam with their name on it and vowed to hunt down the dirty crooks and bring them to justice. Seriously, those companies you mentioned are NOT associated with the spam - they lose money off it too.
Unfortunately I can't find anything in the OEM System Builder docs regarding whether they OEM bind the Express Upgrade keys or not. The closest I can find is a vague warning that the upgrade license is only for upgrading the copy of XP you are sending a redemption form in for.
The CD Key is usually bound to that OEM vendor's "customized" install. Look at the COA on the machines... does it have a company name (Dell, HP, etc) written on the label? If so, the key is useless except on that type of machine.
Are they saying that China can't launch satellites? Are they saying that the US "owns" space? No, they aren't. It's only your bias that makes you read it that way.
No, no, they (according to your own quote) reserve the right to deny anyone access to space if they don't believe it's in their national interests. National interests could extend from access to space, to colonization of the moon. So, by that token, if the USA decides colonizing the moon is a national interest, and China wants to do the same, the USA would (according to this policy - this is entirely theory of course) obliterate any carrier attempting to perform this action. Also, though the person you reply to said it in an extremely unnecessarily negative way, they are somewhat correct in their assertion - if the USA decides that anyone in space with weapons is not "in their national interests" they would use the weapons that they have in space to take them out. This is, again, a quote directly from the policy you quoted.
I've seen better spelling and grammar from players of both games.
Michael
What mythical world do you live in? iTunes doesn't have every major label - last I checked, some of them refuse to sign up because "the DRM is too lax". How is Apple in control again?
(Which, BTW, you can only do once.)
Contrary to popular belief, eventually (after about 6 months or so) the Microsoft Activation Clearinghouse does forget that you activated, opening the door for you to activate that same key again - even on a different machine.This may answer the ultimate question: If Slashdot gets digged, or Digg gets slashdotted, which server crashes?
Well, in some countries you don't even need SMS support to sign up (I logged into Gmail with my non-Gmail Google Account and it just said something along the lines of "When you click continue, your Gmail account will become your Google account's primary email"
Dude. Slashdot is the last place I'd want to advertise. Their site will be down in minutes (what with being on the front page, and the article unabbreviated).
Who honestly leaves that thing turned on at all times?
I get a message from Internet Explorer saying "To protect your security, Internet Explorer has blocked this website from displaying content with security certificate errors" Wow. Makes me want to get SSL certificates from these guys!
It has been announced, idiot. Apple has said that the iPhone will not run unsigned applications... because "Cingular expressed concern that errant applications could crash their entire west coast cell network" (which to me indicates that Cingular have more to worry about than 3rd party applications on cellphones) and that "You don't want your phone being an open system" (apparently those were Steve Jobs' actual words!
I especially like section 18e, where it tells you to consult your physician prior to using Yahoo! services, as you may experience epileptic seizures.
Alternatively, why don't they just not use that type of ad?
Erm, it's Peter Jackson's COMPANY doing the whining here, because the COMPANY (with all those people you say that made it successful) that didn't get as much as it should have, which affects those people you say made it successful. You know, the cast and crew?
Yes, but watch out. These IPs now have TRACKERS on them seeding entire worthless garbage files (1GB+ in size!)
That maritime law was altered AFTER the "declaration of sovereignty" by whoever it was in Sealand. Possibly even as a result (but probably not).
Technically states that what you say is not possible. Under the UN Law (which Britain agreed to) extending territorial waters can NOT encroach on another countries land or waters (otherwise the USA would just extend it's waters about 3 light years and claim half the solar system for the Land of the Free). Also, Salvage Law says that it's pretty much "Finders, Keepers" on abandoned sea vessels/platforms (the UK did in fact abandon it). Note that "Sealand" also claimed sovereignty before the UN agreed to alter law to prohibit artificial islands claiming sovereignty.
There is Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and the American Automobile Association (AAA)
Yes. I can see the chagrined Google execs already.