Li-Air have roughly the same specific energy as gasoline. I'm guessing aviation fuel is similar. So if electric engines can be that are more efficient than jet engines...
They should simplify the naming scheme! Starting with Hydrogen, which should be called Unium (or Unum if you're American). Water will be Dioctium Unium. And Roentgenium will be Unununium.
What a terrible definition. God isn't a well defined concept. How do you know which one it's referring to? Without bigotry to mandate what "God" is, the "definition" doesn't definite anything. It can only makes sense to someone who's a theist. For example: "the doctrine or belief that there is no Invisible Pink Unicorn". It's absolute nonsense to anyone else.
I think the mistake was trying to use a fixed time-period for seconds. It might work for angles, but it's a mess when it comes to variable lengths like days or years. The second should just be a fixed fraction of today or the current year, and we should give up a conflating it with a unit of time. The SI "second" is a good unit time, similar to a second, and badly named.
I used to think that we needed nukes to prevent someone nuking us. But I'm not sure this makes any sense. What we need is the capability to retaliate. We need a way of killing the people responsible for launching nukes. We don't need a way to kill lots of people in the same country.
Has Microsoft US even told Microsoft Ireland to give them the data? Or are they using this bullshit sovereignty excuse to avoid doing so? it's only when MS Ireland refuse to do so because of local (Irish) laws that there's a sovereignty issue. MS US can't force MS Ireland to break laws in Ireland. At that point though, MS US is in the clear because it's done all it can.
Slashdot Mirror
I'd say it's useful wherever you currently use wifi under artificial lighting.
I was expecting at least BBC12 by 2001...
So if electric engines can be made that are more efficient than jet engines...
Sorry, I didn't notice the mistake when I made the post.
Li-Air have roughly the same specific energy as gasoline. I'm guessing aviation fuel is similar. So if electric engines can be that are more efficient than jet engines...
They should simplify the naming scheme! Starting with Hydrogen, which should be called Unium (or Unum if you're American). Water will be Dioctium Unium. And Roentgenium will be Unununium.
On the plus side, the BBC won't cut your head off if they find you.
Not to mention it's going to be loud. Something that the video doesn't show.
Nobody remembers him for his eccentric philosophical/religious speculation, we remember him for his scientific and mathematical contributions.
There's probably a lesson in there for us all.
6) Makes a good finale to a Disaster Area concert.
Oops. That's actually C++.
Something like this?
out << "Hi" << HTML::Text{post['name']};
Hologram, not simulation.
1. the doctrine or belief that there is no God.
What a terrible definition. God isn't a well defined concept. How do you know which one it's referring to? Without bigotry to mandate what "God" is, the "definition" doesn't definite anything. It can only makes sense to someone who's a theist. For example: "the doctrine or belief that there is no Invisible Pink Unicorn". It's absolute nonsense to anyone else.
I think the mistake was trying to use a fixed time-period for seconds. It might work for angles, but it's a mess when it comes to variable lengths like days or years. The second should just be a fixed fraction of today or the current year, and we should give up a conflating it with a unit of time. The SI "second" is a good unit time, similar to a second, and badly named.
I'm happy to wait indefinitely for it to come to Steam. Just like Mass Effect 3.
Someday people will look back on the shared delusion of religion and wonder what the fuck was wrong with everyone.
The funny part is that they already do. For example, Ra or Ptah aren't popular anymore.
Replacing ! with not hugely the improves readability of code.
24% of the electorate voted for a Conservative candidate. 0.08% voted for David Cameron.
I used to think that we needed nukes to prevent someone nuking us. But I'm not sure this makes any sense. What we need is the capability to retaliate. We need a way of killing the people responsible for launching nukes. We don't need a way to kill lots of people in the same country.
I just kept in mind the invention of the transistor while reading his drivel.
My friends are honest and open.
My enemies are deceitful and secretive.
And all NASA needed to do to convince them, would be to photoshop an alien into one of the photos.
Similar, but the eagle system is more majestic.
That's going to make DoS attacks very effective.
Has Microsoft US even told Microsoft Ireland to give them the data? Or are they using this bullshit sovereignty excuse to avoid doing so? it's only when MS Ireland refuse to do so because of local (Irish) laws that there's a sovereignty issue. MS US can't force MS Ireland to break laws in Ireland. At that point though, MS US is in the clear because it's done all it can.