If you're paying enough taxes to make a difference in that rich man buying a car, then you're rich enough to buy a car, too. The bottom half of earners pay *very* little tax.
You're comparing the cost of an entire power plant against just the fuel cost without delivery or shipping or operation or cleanup of another and that is more fair than the article?
The S4 is cheaper, but more practical? The model S seats 7 has a trunk up front, and gets an equivalent to 93 mpg in electricity cost, if you're not using a supercharger. But I agree with you, the acceleration is fine for daily driving on an S4, was just pointing out that the Tesla is in hypercar territory, not family-hauler territory.
It's hard to go 0-60 when you're starting at not-0. I strongly suspect it will, like almost all launch control programs, be available only prior to launch.
Yeah, like this car that crashed into a painted tunnel scene: https://i.imgur.com/mOTHgnfl.j... People make mistakes. Machines make mistakes, because people made the machines. It's good to improve the machines through testing like this, but let's be honest: the time when the machine is the better driver is fast approaching, especially considering the number of distracted drivers there are on the road.
When I moved to working from home, I became more productive. If you suck at self management, I suppose there would be a problem, but I don't. My boss tells me that I regularly turn out 1.5x to 2x what he expects from any employee, and some weeks 3x, and I very rarely put in more than 40 hrs/wk.
I'm approachable to all my coworkers, so they can still use me as a resource. They just message me in jabber, and then I either answer them there, on the phone, on a video call, or with a screen share depending on what makes sense, but it doesn't break my train of thought the way someone walking up does.
I wouldn't go back to working in an office unless I had no choice. I don't like unnecessarily wasting my time in a car, risking my life on the drive, wasting my company's time on idle chatter, wasting my money on lunch out or more of my time on packing one. I like actually getting to see my kids grow up, and being able to support my autistic son in therapy. And I like being the best at my job. All of that means I work from home.
I know of very few places in the country that require much more than median household income to live, so let's adjust Congressional salaries to be pinned to median income.
Yep, nothing new in the electric market since the mid 1800's: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... They came first, which means it's old news and no one should iteratively improve it, only look for new things.
The primary ingredient, Lithium, is only about 4x as expensive as pure iron. It's not actually all that expensive. You're totally right, though, I'm sure that Tesla will die as soon as we have an economic downturn, like the one we've been in since the company launched.
I'm afraid that the limited market for the resources and the batteries will not make it feasible to ever mass produce cheap batteries.
So are most automotive executives, and most investors, which is why it hasn't happened. It takes someone with the vision *and* the capital to make a revolution happen.
If the time has come for the general to pick up a rifle, the war is lost. You should not be thinking in single-system mode. You should be able to trust your minions and underlings to do what they're paid to do, which is follow your direction. Read-only access is a great ask, since it ensures that any changes made are documented, and therefore repeatable.
Did you try clicking and dragging left / right? That turns it each direction. When you let go, it stops turning so you can get a better look. Granted, it's not as good as being able to open / close, but it is interactive.
The government is willing to take as much money as you're willing to give them in the interest free loan that is overpayment of taxes with the intention of a bigger return. When you file your taxes in the beginning of the following year (what most people call "filing their return"), is when it matters, because then you could be getting back more money / paying less taxes than you are legally required to, and that's when Uncle Sam begins to get peeved.
Filing as "single" when you're married is flat out tax fraud, and you're subject to fines up to $250,000 and years of imprisonment, so I doubt that is a common method of filing. http://www.avvo.com/legal-answ...
That's, of course, why every strut they tested failed in exactly the same way, including all those on the successful launches as well, and not that they had to test an 'enormous' number of them to find one that failed in the same way. Or perhaps it was the other way around.
Using multiple sources helps to cut down on that as you look at the one meter areas from each sensor and find the overlapping areas, which are likely much smaller than one sq m.
Married filing separately isn't the same as filing single. That's why there are three columns. Note the following is straight rates, no deductions.
Say a man makes $80k and his wife makes $150k. Single he pays $15856.10, and she pays $35175.60. Total together is $51031.70 They get married, they pay $51804.20. Which is $772.50 more. They file separately and he pays $16023.35 and she pays $37452.10, with a total of $53475.45. That's $2243.75 more than when they were single and $1671.25 more than filing jointly.
The only way that it makes sense to file separately is if you're going to move all the family's deductions to the higher paid person's taxes to get an overall lower rate, and if the changes more than pay for the accountants and potentially lawyers. So, I'm afraid you're wrong, there are definitely ways that married people could end up paying more, but really only if they make enough to actually pay taxes in the first place.
But simply having their application return the same amount of traffic as it downloads would be cheaper for them to implement, since it would only be a few lines of code, and it would resolve the bandwidth mismatch at the peering point. It would hurt the users a bit as they tried to figure out why their video quality is suffering as the ISPs network chokes out.
It's a completely valid technical solution to an artificial problem, because it points out that by not balancing the traffic you're benefiting the ISP. Since almost all the traffic is downstream to the users, they can focus on providing higher downstream speeds without having to deliver higher upstream speeds. This enables bigger numbers on their advertisements. "50 mbps SUPER SPEED ULTRA FAST FAST* (*2 mbps upload)".
Purchased The Spark on this recommendation, and I'll read it through when it gets here. Much appreciated! I'll also continue to try to tie things into his interests more closely, though his primary interest is video games, and we *have* to limit that for everyone's sanity. I bought him some circuit builder starter kits and a couple other tinkering things and will continue to work with him to help him find more interests. Glad to hear of your work, I'm sure we'll all benefit from it in times to come.
Having read her page, she offers a lot of solid advice to parents of children regarding their emotional well-being, growth and therapeutic methods. I don't necessarily think that she *will* have an answer, but given the opportunity to ask a question, I felt it prudent to ask the question that - if answered - would be most likely to improve his life the most. For the most part, he's only in school to continue improving his socialization, we do a lot of at home learning with books and explanations, questions and field trips so he gets real world association with what he's learning. But I want to make sure that I'm providing the best to him that I can. When we were awarded custody from his mother, the judge said that he had the "worst behavior [she'd] seen in [her] 20 years on the bench" and our primary focus with the schools and therapists has been resolving that, and he's made astounding progress (from a violent outburst 3-4 times per day, lasting hours per episode) to once a week or less for less than an hour, in 9 months. But during that same time period, his typical education has not progressed as much and we know he's often bored, and we want to make sure that we're working hard to help him there, too.
So you're saying that netflix should make their applications return random garbage from the customer's machines to their servers in an equal amount used to deliver the video, so that the ISPs have an equal amount of traffic going back to netflix? This doesn't sound like it will end well for the ISPs which dedicate a lot fewer channels to upstream. Perhaps netflix should enable it for a couple weeks to show the ISPs what "fair trade" traffic would look like.
Slashdot Mirror
If you're paying enough taxes to make a difference in that rich man buying a car, then you're rich enough to buy a car, too. The bottom half of earners pay *very* little tax.
You're comparing the cost of an entire power plant against just the fuel cost without delivery or shipping or operation or cleanup of another and that is more fair than the article?
The S4 is cheaper, but more practical? The model S seats 7 has a trunk up front, and gets an equivalent to 93 mpg in electricity cost, if you're not using a supercharger. But I agree with you, the acceleration is fine for daily driving on an S4, was just pointing out that the Tesla is in hypercar territory, not family-hauler territory.
It's hard to go 0-60 when you're starting at not-0. I strongly suspect it will, like almost all launch control programs, be available only prior to launch.
Mid 5 to mid 4 0-60 times. You're off by a couple seconds. http://www.zeroto60times.com/v...
You either re-bought the games, or you're lying. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Ps3+on+ps...
Yeah, like this car that crashed into a painted tunnel scene: https://i.imgur.com/mOTHgnfl.j... People make mistakes. Machines make mistakes, because people made the machines. It's good to improve the machines through testing like this, but let's be honest: the time when the machine is the better driver is fast approaching, especially considering the number of distracted drivers there are on the road.
When I moved to working from home, I became more productive. If you suck at self management, I suppose there would be a problem, but I don't. My boss tells me that I regularly turn out 1.5x to 2x what he expects from any employee, and some weeks 3x, and I very rarely put in more than 40 hrs/wk. I'm approachable to all my coworkers, so they can still use me as a resource. They just message me in jabber, and then I either answer them there, on the phone, on a video call, or with a screen share depending on what makes sense, but it doesn't break my train of thought the way someone walking up does. I wouldn't go back to working in an office unless I had no choice. I don't like unnecessarily wasting my time in a car, risking my life on the drive, wasting my company's time on idle chatter, wasting my money on lunch out or more of my time on packing one. I like actually getting to see my kids grow up, and being able to support my autistic son in therapy. And I like being the best at my job. All of that means I work from home.
I know of very few places in the country that require much more than median household income to live, so let's adjust Congressional salaries to be pinned to median income.
Yep, nothing new in the electric market since the mid 1800's: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... They came first, which means it's old news and no one should iteratively improve it, only look for new things.
The primary ingredient, Lithium, is only about 4x as expensive as pure iron. It's not actually all that expensive. You're totally right, though, I'm sure that Tesla will die as soon as we have an economic downturn, like the one we've been in since the company launched.
I'm afraid that the limited market for the resources and the batteries will not make it feasible to ever mass produce cheap batteries.
So are most automotive executives, and most investors, which is why it hasn't happened. It takes someone with the vision *and* the capital to make a revolution happen.
What about the NSA-approved always-on spy mode?
I would be seriously impressed if you could break a high end phone screen with your finger.
If the time has come for the general to pick up a rifle, the war is lost. You should not be thinking in single-system mode. You should be able to trust your minions and underlings to do what they're paid to do, which is follow your direction. Read-only access is a great ask, since it ensures that any changes made are documented, and therefore repeatable.
Did you try clicking and dragging left / right? That turns it each direction. When you let go, it stops turning so you can get a better look. Granted, it's not as good as being able to open / close, but it is interactive.
Menu > Settings > Manage Search Engines > Click on the option you want. You can't make it much easier than that without cluttering the UI.
The government is willing to take as much money as you're willing to give them in the interest free loan that is overpayment of taxes with the intention of a bigger return. When you file your taxes in the beginning of the following year (what most people call "filing their return"), is when it matters, because then you could be getting back more money / paying less taxes than you are legally required to, and that's when Uncle Sam begins to get peeved.
Filing as "single" when you're married is flat out tax fraud, and you're subject to fines up to $250,000 and years of imprisonment, so I doubt that is a common method of filing. http://www.avvo.com/legal-answ...
That's, of course, why every strut they tested failed in exactly the same way, including all those on the successful launches as well, and not that they had to test an 'enormous' number of them to find one that failed in the same way. Or perhaps it was the other way around.
Using multiple sources helps to cut down on that as you look at the one meter areas from each sensor and find the overlapping areas, which are likely much smaller than one sq m.
Married filing separately isn't the same as filing single. That's why there are three columns. Note the following is straight rates, no deductions.
Say a man makes $80k and his wife makes $150k. Single he pays $15856.10, and she pays $35175.60. Total together is $51031.70
They get married, they pay $51804.20. Which is $772.50 more.
They file separately and he pays $16023.35 and she pays $37452.10, with a total of $53475.45. That's $2243.75 more than when they were single and $1671.25 more than filing jointly.
The only way that it makes sense to file separately is if you're going to move all the family's deductions to the higher paid person's taxes to get an overall lower rate, and if the changes more than pay for the accountants and potentially lawyers. So, I'm afraid you're wrong, there are definitely ways that married people could end up paying more, but really only if they make enough to actually pay taxes in the first place.
But simply having their application return the same amount of traffic as it downloads would be cheaper for them to implement, since it would only be a few lines of code, and it would resolve the bandwidth mismatch at the peering point. It would hurt the users a bit as they tried to figure out why their video quality is suffering as the ISPs network chokes out.
It's a completely valid technical solution to an artificial problem, because it points out that by not balancing the traffic you're benefiting the ISP. Since almost all the traffic is downstream to the users, they can focus on providing higher downstream speeds without having to deliver higher upstream speeds. This enables bigger numbers on their advertisements. "50 mbps SUPER SPEED ULTRA FAST FAST* (*2 mbps upload)".
Purchased The Spark on this recommendation, and I'll read it through when it gets here. Much appreciated! I'll also continue to try to tie things into his interests more closely, though his primary interest is video games, and we *have* to limit that for everyone's sanity. I bought him some circuit builder starter kits and a couple other tinkering things and will continue to work with him to help him find more interests. Glad to hear of your work, I'm sure we'll all benefit from it in times to come.
Having read her page, she offers a lot of solid advice to parents of children regarding their emotional well-being, growth and therapeutic methods. I don't necessarily think that she *will* have an answer, but given the opportunity to ask a question, I felt it prudent to ask the question that - if answered - would be most likely to improve his life the most. For the most part, he's only in school to continue improving his socialization, we do a lot of at home learning with books and explanations, questions and field trips so he gets real world association with what he's learning. But I want to make sure that I'm providing the best to him that I can. When we were awarded custody from his mother, the judge said that he had the "worst behavior [she'd] seen in [her] 20 years on the bench" and our primary focus with the schools and therapists has been resolving that, and he's made astounding progress (from a violent outburst 3-4 times per day, lasting hours per episode) to once a week or less for less than an hour, in 9 months. But during that same time period, his typical education has not progressed as much and we know he's often bored, and we want to make sure that we're working hard to help him there, too.
So you're saying that netflix should make their applications return random garbage from the customer's machines to their servers in an equal amount used to deliver the video, so that the ISPs have an equal amount of traffic going back to netflix? This doesn't sound like it will end well for the ISPs which dedicate a lot fewer channels to upstream. Perhaps netflix should enable it for a couple weeks to show the ISPs what "fair trade" traffic would look like.