All I care about is when the next episode of lonelygirl15 is released and is she going to start dating daniel! What would her religious parents think? What is this religious dance she's going to do that requires iron pills? This is what's really important. feed me Seymour!
THis is because msft controls the hardware that is used. The devices are so specific that msft gets a direct contract with motorola, or whoever, and linux never has a chance... monopoly
Detroit will never be the motor city that it once was. The auto industry is to the point of a government service now, with low quality cars at high prices. The important thing is that those huge auto companies provide jobs to michiganders. Now, the company is so bloated and laden with legislation, it can't respond quick enough to create great products. Too much risk involved.
MSFT has all the marketshare that it'll ever need, and the products they make have business decisions and not product decisions in mind. They care about increasing revenue, and controling the market; you can do that without creating any good products! That's what i'm saying about the auto industry example.
I would love to see those detroit makes come up with something innovative that are something special, but its not likely to happen.
If you want to talk about religion, we can talk about the supremacy of Jesus Christ. But assides from religion, I am interested in learning how the world exists. Evolution is a good theory, which helps us understand some things but it does not explain the current situation of the world because the current theory has major holes (like the human eye) which it can't explain. According to the scientific method, you should observe that the state of the world should be in accord with evolution but since its not, the theory needs to be modified.
Intellegent Design is important because it explains parts of the world that exist which Evolution cannot explain scientifically. Men are like gods on earth, who do create things, and there's no reason why a higher life form doesn't intercede. I personally think its God, others think aliens, and others just can't explain it but accept that its there.
The human eye is a text book example of Intellegent Design and Complexity Theory because of it requires several independantly developed components to function that would not develop on their own. Additionally, there are many eyes of varying degrees from light or motion sensing to human eyes: lining them up you can see how one is more advanced than the other but there is no way for one eye to develop to the next evolutionary jump.
In a text book, I do not want to read "Evolution is fact" when its not, and I want to hear other explainations. Unless you want to be like the Japanese last year, who edit persecutions out of their history books, so they can believe they never did anything wrong.
I am arguing that certain leaps require a higher intellegance to cause those improvements. If there is no higher intellegance, then there is no way to make the leap. If the bee is the highest intellegance, there is nothing to intervene and create a hovercraft. Evolution does not explain for every jump in development, and is not the compete answer to how the world has arrived.
A bee could grow stronger and fly faster, so I'm not arguing against improvements, but just saying that not everything arrived on its own. Evolution is suspect when a bee suddenly starts talking, when it had no mouth, etc.
Infinity is a paradox. In calculus, you can have a container with a finite surface, that holds an infinite amount of material. If there were an infinite number of events until now, how did we get here? This universe is finite and has a beginning, if we have a present time.
There should be no universe, because you can't get something from nothing; yet there is a paradox, because we have a developing universe with a time line. As illogical to you it sounds, there has to be a greatest intellegance that has always exists which all lesser beings were created.
Evolution explains part of the world, but as for its inception, and for all its deviations, it doesnt answer. Simply comparing the historical record and current state of the world, an absolute evolutionary model does not answer. As for scientific method, your hypothesis doesn't match the data you collected.
If bees evolved into hovercraft, then that would be darwin, but if a human studies a bee and builds an hovercraft through his intellect, it shows how ID is necessary for large jumps between bees and hovercraft are accomplished.
It is interesting to learn how bees fly and applying their flight to aircraft. To think that we wouldn't figure out how a bee flies is also not proof of Intelligent Design either.
To say that it has to be entirely evolution or intellegent design is not a good argument either. There is no reason existing things cannot evolve, but to say that the world arrived on its own without god, is wrong. There is an unmoved mover, and an uncaused cause, which is God.
This article is disappointing, because of the submitters anger at god, and dampers an interesting story.
Slashdot Mirror
All I care about is when the next episode of lonelygirl15 is released and is she going to start dating daniel! What would her religious parents think? What is this religious dance she's going to do that requires iron pills? This is what's really important. feed me Seymour!
SMB2 was a great game. I liked the article; it made me nostalgic.
THis is because msft controls the hardware that is used. The devices are so specific that msft gets a direct contract with motorola, or whoever, and linux never has a chance... monopoly
i think that this sums it up well.
People who love fame and the spot light tend to be greedy and selfish. Music should be under GPL and free anyway!
Detroit will never be the motor city that it once was. The auto industry is to the point of a government service now, with low quality cars at high prices. The important thing is that those huge auto companies provide jobs to michiganders. Now, the company is so bloated and laden with legislation, it can't respond quick enough to create great products. Too much risk involved.
MSFT has all the marketshare that it'll ever need, and the products they make have business decisions and not product decisions in mind. They care about increasing revenue, and controling the market; you can do that without creating any good products! That's what i'm saying about the auto industry example.
I would love to see those detroit makes come up with something innovative that are something special, but its not likely to happen.
If you want to talk about religion, we can talk about the supremacy of Jesus Christ. But assides from religion, I am interested in learning how the world exists. Evolution is a good theory, which helps us understand some things but it does not explain the current situation of the world because the current theory has major holes (like the human eye) which it can't explain. According to the scientific method, you should observe that the state of the world should be in accord with evolution but since its not, the theory needs to be modified.
Intellegent Design is important because it explains parts of the world that exist which Evolution cannot explain scientifically. Men are like gods on earth, who do create things, and there's no reason why a higher life form doesn't intercede. I personally think its God, others think aliens, and others just can't explain it but accept that its there.
The human eye is a text book example of Intellegent Design and Complexity Theory because of it requires several independantly developed components to function that would not develop on their own. Additionally, there are many eyes of varying degrees from light or motion sensing to human eyes: lining them up you can see how one is more advanced than the other but there is no way for one eye to develop to the next evolutionary jump.
In a text book, I do not want to read "Evolution is fact" when its not, and I want to hear other explainations. Unless you want to be like the Japanese last year, who edit persecutions out of their history books, so they can believe they never did anything wrong.
Wyatt Houtz
http://www.havenofbliss.com/
I am arguing that certain leaps require a higher intellegance
to cause those improvements. If there is no higher intellegance,
then there is no way to make the leap. If the bee is the highest
intellegance, there is nothing to intervene and create a hovercraft.
Evolution does not explain for every jump in development, and is not
the compete answer to how the world has arrived.
A bee could grow stronger and fly faster, so I'm not arguing against
improvements, but just saying that not everything arrived on its own.
Evolution is suspect when a bee suddenly starts talking, when it had
no mouth, etc.
Infinity is a paradox. In calculus, you can have a container
with a finite surface, that holds an infinite amount of
material. If there were an infinite number of events until
now, how did we get here? This universe is finite and has
a beginning, if we have a present time.
There should be no universe, because you can't get something
from nothing; yet there is a paradox, because we have a developing
universe with a time line. As illogical to you it sounds,
there has to be a greatest intellegance that has always exists
which all lesser beings were created.
Evolution explains part of the world, but as for its inception,
and for all its deviations, it doesnt answer. Simply comparing
the historical record and current state of the world, an absolute
evolutionary model does not answer. As for scientific method,
your hypothesis doesn't match the data you collected.
Wyatt Houtz
http://www.havenofbliss.com/
If bees evolved into hovercraft, then that would be darwin, but if a human studies a bee and builds an hovercraft through his intellect, it shows how ID is necessary for large jumps between bees and hovercraft are accomplished.
It is interesting to learn how bees fly and applying their flight to aircraft. To think that we wouldn't figure out how a bee flies is also not proof of Intelligent Design either.
To say that it has to be entirely evolution or intellegent design is not a good argument either. There is no reason existing things cannot evolve, but to say that the world arrived on its own without god, is wrong. There is an unmoved mover, and an uncaused cause, which is God.
This article is disappointing, because of the submitters anger at god, and dampers an interesting story.
Wyatt Houtz
http://www.havenofbliss.com/
I only pray for the day that I don't have to run M$FT visual, office, emulator, virtual whatever on my mac ever again!
Where did that come from? It's a red dot that I must have downloaded from software update. My poor powerbook.