Which was my point. I'd be far more worried if I was in the US South or US East about impacts from Yellowstone, than I would be in the Pacific NW, or at least West of the Cascades (about mid point in WA/OR), due to how mountain ranges deflect shockwaves.
Not to say it won't trigger the Cascade megaquake to rip from CA up to Alaska. But that depends.
Main problem would be the lack of sun for much of the world, but it would be fertile soil eventually. When Mt St Helens blew we had some good crops, but there were some weeks when the dust literally damaged our car windshields and we all had to wear dust masks, especially the dryer areas in Eastern Washington.
Wow, so shockwaves go through entire mountain ranges? I've got the Rocky Mountains and the Cascade Mountains between me and there. And our own volcano.
saying these make up more than 50 percent of the code in your DNA is not something I've seen in medical genetics.
Perhaps their might be some confusion between "hot spots" or coding mishap regions which cause miRNA, siRNA, mRNA, and cisRNA to recode protein segments in response to environmental conditions, which can include stress (which is a factor, including environmental biochemical stress during pregnancy) and inflammation (which is a severe factor).
But the statement in the actual article that this is 50 percent of the Human Genome is not what I would describe as an accurate depiction.
You're confusing frame relay switch effects from loops in DNA coding, which may be there for good reasons to adapt to changing environmental or other stress conditions, or are survivor characteristics from prior infections and biochemical events in human history (plagues, massive food diet changes), with "half your DNA is damaged and you should blame your mom cause she stressed out when she was pregnant".
Most of the people who live in Seattle that I know don't wait in long lineups while driving - we tend not to use the freeways, those are for suburbanites.
I suppose if I had to sit in stuck traffic on the I-90 or SR-520 bridge this might be a concern, but the question was about why I would need to charge after driving 2 miles. Since I've lived here for a few decades, I rarely go on routes that sit and do nothing.
Regardless, this would extend your range if you do spend most of the time not moving, even if you use air conditioning (we mostly just use heaters in Seattle, and rarely use air conditioning), preferring to roll down the windows and enjoy the sun instead.
Think of it as a booster pack, depending on what type of commute you have. If it's mostly sitting stuck in an unmoving grid, you might not even have to charge up at your destination, but if it's one where you spend most of the time in motion, you probably could hope to recharge only part while at work, if you live a fair distance away.
Why would you need to charge if after driving 2 miles?
My cousin in West Seattle drives his Chevy Volt to work and plugs it in when he gets to work. But sometimes he goes to a park nearby, so it might be useful to have a full charge after.
Some people like to have the maximum range when they leave work. This would also help if you had to wait in a ferry line on one of the islands - it would charge up while you waited.
If you drive less than 10 miles to get to work, as most of my relatives do, you could get a full charge by the end of the day, in Seattle or Santa Barbara, on a typical day.
If you drive to work in LA where it takes more than an hour to get to or from work, you'd want to plug in.
When you're outdoors, in public, you have no expectation of privacy. Why the hate?
I think you meant to say "When you're outdoors, in public, you have no expectation that we're not going to hit you in the face for taking pictures without asking."
Look, aside from the fact that they're way too heavy and the battery and accouterments are a pain, your right to record people ends where my fist starts.
Slashdot Mirror
And the documents show that.
Never assume. It makes an engineering project go belly up.
They also demoted or fired or transferred most of the Windows 8 execs at Microsoft.
Talk about a failure. Nobody wants it.
Which was my point. I'd be far more worried if I was in the US South or US East about impacts from Yellowstone, than I would be in the Pacific NW, or at least West of the Cascades (about mid point in WA/OR), due to how mountain ranges deflect shockwaves.
Not to say it won't trigger the Cascade megaquake to rip from CA up to Alaska. But that depends.
Main problem would be the lack of sun for much of the world, but it would be fertile soil eventually. When Mt St Helens blew we had some good crops, but there were some weeks when the dust literally damaged our car windshields and we all had to wear dust masks, especially the dryer areas in Eastern Washington.
Obviously it's not like space-time.
You forgot to add the Dark Matter.
It's in the third shelf from the left.
Wow, so shockwaves go through entire mountain ranges? I've got the Rocky Mountains and the Cascade Mountains between me and there. And our own volcano.
Perhaps you've heard of it? Mount Rainier?
You're not including the protective smog layer from China
Wait, so there are only gravity waves and capillary waves in water?
How do you get water to ignore light waves? Is it dark underwater where you lives?
Remember when we smashed a Mars Lander because we converted wrong?
Maybe dark matter is just somebody making a similar conversion error.
No, airflow is to the south and east. Mostly would kill the South and the East, anything west of the Rockies will be fine.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to finger the coke machine and see if there are any cooled down coke bottles left in the vending machine.
And similar results in Canada.
Why?
Because they are spying on you, and selling your data to other countries.
Results matter.
Hint: Try getting rid of oil instead.
Yes, my eyes followed the woman in the red dress, so what?
The consumer is always right, no matter what those who think they are our Lords and Masters say.
Well, it's all repetitive when you get down to it, GCAT kind of hard not to repeat sequences ....
What sort of pregnancies and stressful events are deceased people having?
Well, zombie births happen all the time. Just ask Cherie Priest.
saying these make up more than 50 percent of the code in your DNA is not something I've seen in medical genetics.
Perhaps their might be some confusion between "hot spots" or coding mishap regions which cause miRNA, siRNA, mRNA, and cisRNA to recode protein segments in response to environmental conditions, which can include stress (which is a factor, including environmental biochemical stress during pregnancy) and inflammation (which is a severe factor).
But the statement in the actual article that this is 50 percent of the Human Genome is not what I would describe as an accurate depiction.
You're confusing frame relay switch effects from loops in DNA coding, which may be there for good reasons to adapt to changing environmental or other stress conditions, or are survivor characteristics from prior infections and biochemical events in human history (plagues, massive food diet changes), with "half your DNA is damaged and you should blame your mom cause she stressed out when she was pregnant".
Just my two cents.
Most of the people who live in Seattle that I know don't wait in long lineups while driving - we tend not to use the freeways, those are for suburbanites.
I suppose if I had to sit in stuck traffic on the I-90 or SR-520 bridge this might be a concern, but the question was about why I would need to charge after driving 2 miles. Since I've lived here for a few decades, I rarely go on routes that sit and do nothing.
Regardless, this would extend your range if you do spend most of the time not moving, even if you use air conditioning (we mostly just use heaters in Seattle, and rarely use air conditioning), preferring to roll down the windows and enjoy the sun instead.
Think of it as a booster pack, depending on what type of commute you have. If it's mostly sitting stuck in an unmoving grid, you might not even have to charge up at your destination, but if it's one where you spend most of the time in motion, you probably could hope to recharge only part while at work, if you live a fair distance away.
Why would you need to charge if after driving 2 miles?
My cousin in West Seattle drives his Chevy Volt to work and plugs it in when he gets to work. But sometimes he goes to a park nearby, so it might be useful to have a full charge after.
Some people like to have the maximum range when they leave work. This would also help if you had to wait in a ferry line on one of the islands - it would charge up while you waited.
Well, you have to admit, the cat did want a warm place to lie on ...
If you drive less than 10 miles to get to work, as most of my relatives do, you could get a full charge by the end of the day, in Seattle or Santa Barbara, on a typical day.
If you drive to work in LA where it takes more than an hour to get to or from work, you'd want to plug in.
Try talking on your cellphone when we're on a public flight and you're within reach.
You'll get the same response as I throw your cellphone across the cabin, breaking it.
As I said, don't be surprised when this happens to you in a bar.
People don't care what you think.
Get used to being wrong.
How much time will it take for you to replace your glasses when they're shattered?
When you're outdoors, in public, you have no expectation of privacy. Why the hate?
I think you meant to say "When you're outdoors, in public, you have no expectation that we're not going to hit you in the face for taking pictures without asking."
Fixed it for you.
Look, aside from the fact that they're way too heavy and the battery and accouterments are a pain, your right to record people ends where my fist starts.
Comprende?