Slashdot Mirror


Object Blocking Giant Tunnel Borer Was an 8" Diameter Pipe

An anonymous reader writes "A few weeks ago we discussed news that a tunnel boring machine measuring 57.5 feet in diameter was halted underneath Seattle after running into a mysterious object. Project engineers have now figured out what the object is: an 8-inch-diameter pipe. In 2002, researchers for another project — the replacement of the Alaskan Way viaduct — drilled down into the ground to take water samples. They used the 115-ft-long pipe as a well casing. As it turns out, this well site was listed in the contract specifications given to all bidders for the tunnel's construction. In addition, the crew manning the machine noticed that it was chewing up pieces of metal, and they removed part of the pipe and kept going. Only later did they realize that significant damage had been done to the machine's cutting face. Officials aren't sure how long repairs will take, or how much they will cost."

141 comments

  1. Reading and comprehension skills by petteyg359 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like somebody forgot to RTFM.

    1. Re:Reading and comprehension skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      ... Big Bertha’s blockage did indeed hit the press, but the media chose to emphasize nonsensical speculation rather than serious discussion. Of course a boring machine like Bertha would not be stymied by a wooden boat, or a rock of any size, or pig iron from a ship’s boiler. Even mankind’s hardened metals, in use today, would eventually melt from the continuous friction, and give way. The decision to withhold this from the news was made at a high level, and in keeping with the ongoing cover-up over the alien presence. Some other excuse will be proffered, involving a failure in Bertha’s bore head, while the humming box encountered is quietly extracted or simply disappears. This attempt to gain traction on disclosure, enlightening mankind, failed, once again, due to the grip the cover-up over the alien presence has in the US.

      http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/04ja2014.htm

    2. Re:Reading and comprehension skills by cold+fjord · · Score: 5, Funny

      Looks like somebody forgot to RTFM.

      In this case they get to RTFM: Repair The Fine Machine

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    3. Re:Reading and comprehension skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Good news, everybody! We finally found that pipe we lost 2002! I've felt so guilty about not recycling that, but now I can sleep at night. Carry on.

    4. Re:Reading and comprehension skills by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Informative

      (From article summary):- "As it turns out, this well site was listed in the contract specifications given to all bidders for the tunnel's construction. "

      Looks like somebody forgot to RTFM.

      Looks like they should have had a "Brown M&Ms" clause in the contract for just that reason.

      And if anyone doesn't get the reference (or even more so if you think you do, but don't get what the archetypal ludicrously demanding rock band rider has to do with tunnel boring), read the linked article.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    5. Re: Reading and comprehension skills by iamhassi · · Score: 2, Informative

      For those that don't want to RTFR (read the fucking reference) some band use to put at the beginning of the contract that they wanted M&Ms in their room and then at the end of the contract put all the brown M&Ms must be picked out. If they arrived and saw the brown M&Ms they knew the contract was not read and would check to see what else was forgotten and/or cancel the show since the contract was not followed.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    6. Re: Reading and comprehension skills by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unfortunately, your summary omits or misrepresents several aspects of the article and in the process dilutes (if not entirely misses) the point, as well as making it less interesting. Honestly, it's only a single-page Snopes article- if you don't know the story already, it's worth spending a minute or two reading.

      Anyway:-

      (i) The "brown M&Ms" clause *wasn't* at the end of the contract- where it would have been more likely to stand out- it was (presumably intentionally) hidden amongst all the other countless (but important) technical requirements.

      (ii) The clause also stated that if it was not followed *the entire show would be forfeit*. That's a rather major penalty, and one anyone who'd actually been paying atention would be almost certain to want to avoid by following it to the letter. Hence its effectiveness as an indicator.

      (iii) You also omit *why* it was so essential that the technical requirements were followed closely. (I could summarise that, but I'd probably just end up rewriting paragraphs that are more effective in context anyway; just read the blooming thing! :-) )

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    7. Re: Reading and comprehension skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Capitals. Use them.

    8. Re: Reading and comprehension skills by msauve · · Score: 4, Funny

      "david lee roth pretending to be a pretentious douche"

      That would be like a duck pretending to be a duck.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    9. Re: Reading and comprehension skills by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      it wasnt just some band... it was van fuckin halen \m/... and it was david lee roth pretending to be a pretentious douche of a rock star by asking for the m&ms .

      Right, some oldies band. What he said originally.

    10. Re:Reading and comprehension skills by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      How the hell is this modded up as informative? Should be modded fucking stupid and irrelevant to the discussion.

      Just a guess, but I suspect everyone else understands why a "canary" clause (*) inserted to verify that people were paying attention to important technical details *might* be relevant to a case where the contractors had failed to pay attention to the technical information supplied to them.

      (*) Which was the purpose of the "No Brown M&Ms" clause. You did understand that... right? Or were you still labouring under the assumption that it was a gratuitous rider requirement despite the fact I explained it wasn't and linked to the article?!

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    11. Re: Reading and comprehension skills by Alsee · · Score: 4, Funny

      it wasnt just some band... it was van fuckin halen \m/

      I think you mean van fuckin halen \m&m/

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    12. Re: Reading and comprehension skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess you never saw them live - did you ?
      Maybe in the 80s ?

    13. Re: Reading and comprehension skills by JustOK · · Score: 4, Funny

      I saw them when they were just Station Wagon Halen

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    14. Re: Reading and comprehension skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      TL;DR version.

      *Van Halen concerts need a LOT of amperage for their very heavy equipment.
      *Venues aren't providing amperage, circuit breakers are blowing, and concerts are ruined. Floors are also being damaged by said heavy equipment and venues are unhappy.
      *Van Halen put their exact requirements in their contract so this doesn't happen.
      *Van Halen inserts "M&M clause" as a mine canary to deal with bullshit venues that can't read simply documents.
      * Brown M&Ms mean call in an electrician to check everything.

    15. Re:Reading and comprehension skills by denzacar · · Score: 1

      And if anyone doesn't get the reference (or even more so if you think you do, but don't get what the archetypal ludicrously demanding rock band rider has to do with tunnel boring), read the linked article.

      Iggy Pop has taken that to a whole new level.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    16. Re: Reading and comprehension skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a special snowflake, Mr. Fixed Pitch?

    17. Re: Reading and comprehension skills by Dogtanian · · Score: 1
      Same mistake as the previous guy- in an attempt to "summarise" the article you've omitted details that make clear the logic behind the clause, and introduced inaccuracy.

      Van Halen concerts need a LOT of amperage for their very heavy equipment.

      Still misleading; makes it sound like the amperage was needed because the equipment was "heavy". Also, you're extrapolating things that weren't actually mentioned in the article.

      If you read the article, the heavy equipment (which could- and did- damage floors that weren't designed to take it) was the *only* specific, detailed example given of a problem that actually happened, and wasn't related to the issue of amperage.

      And the latter was only mentioned as a potential clause (" So just as a little test, in the technical aspect of the rider, it would say "Article 148: There will be fifteen amperage voltage sockets at twenty-foot spaces, evenly, providing nineteen amperes . . ." This kind of thing."). They didn't say anything about circuit breakers blowing- that may have happened, but you're still guessing.

      *Van Halen inserts "M&M clause" as a mine canary to deal with bullshit venues that can't read simply documents.

      Despite the fact I pointed out the problem with the *original* guy's summary of this part, you've repeated his mistake. You haven't explained *why* the clause was effective, i.e. the forfeiture penalty that anyone who'd actually read it would go out of their way to avoid... meaning that anyone who didn't do that clearly *hadn't* read it, or any of the other clauses properly.

      The problem is that your summary may work as a reminder to someone who's *already* read the article and understood the points being made. But by definition, that's not what a "tl; dr" is aimed at.

      Speaking as someone who's definitely too longwinded, I have great respect for the ability to be concise. Summarising by cutting corners isn't that hard. And burying all the information in a pile of semi (or not at all) relevant waffle isn't either- it's all too easy for geeks like me.

      Actually distilling the *important* information into a concise but listenable *and* accurate form? That's harder to do well than most people think. :-/

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    18. Re: Reading and comprehension skills by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 1

      And for those of you who are really interested, you can read where it is mentioned in the the actual backstage rider here.

      The bit about the M&Ms is on page 9.

      Actually, a rather fun site. Apparently Dick Cheney's contract required that his hotel room have the TV set to Fox News. And Iggy Pop's contract is pure rock'n'roll.

      Anyway, the point of it all is that it is important to read the whole contract and then follow up with the agreed upon conditions. It's as true for venues signing Van Halen as it is for businesses running 57.5 foot wide boring machines.

    19. Re: Reading and comprehension skills by kick6 · · Score: 3, Informative

      it wasnt just some band... it was van fuckin halen \m/... and it was david lee roth pretending to be a pretentious douche of a rock star by asking for the m&ms .

      Actually, according to his autobiogprahy, it was buried in the TECHNICAL part of the contract, and existed to make sure that the promotor/venue read this section so something (like the stage collapsing) didn't occur. What a douche, not wanting to die mid-show killing audience members...

    20. Re: Reading and comprehension skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those that don't want to RTFR (read the fucking reference) some band use to put at the beginning of the contract that they wanted M&Ms in their room and then at the end of the contract put all the brown M&Ms must be picked out. If they arrived and saw the brown M&Ms they knew the contract was not read and would check to see what else was forgotten and/or cancel the show since the contract was not followed.

      He had to beat them to death with their own shoes.... but that's another story, altogether.

    21. Re:Reading and comprehension skills by aaronb1138 · · Score: 1

      It seems retarded that each day or during each little bit of down time that Bertha isn't cutting that the surveyors don't perform a forward looking ultrasound / radar / metal detection. They're cutting 50 feet a day, they can reasonably look forward and see if there is anything coming up that might be an issue.

    22. Re:Reading and comprehension skills by aaronb1138 · · Score: 1

      It would be even easier to check for refined metal from the cutting face or a foreign object in the conveyer waste. Situations like these have me convinced that the contractors intentionally ignore warning signs so they can milk contracts for the overages.

    23. Re: Reading and comprehension skills by quetwo · · Score: 1

      Stupid shop owner and their bengal tiger... Always getting in the way of Ozzy's M&M's...

    24. Re:Reading and comprehension skills by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 1

      RTFM? I thought it'd be to RTFSIR.

      --
      I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
    25. Re: Reading and comprehension skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Van Halen fucking sucks. Fucking shitty ass glam hair rock crap.

    26. Re:Reading and comprehension skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would be more funny if it was a Metal band.

  2. underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even recent stuff tends not to be recorded in a nice way, like a computerized 3d model that can be used to keep all the data in one place and plan excavations. Instead it's often just a list of things in freeform text, like "well site at [lat,long], dug 2002, depth 115 ft". And older stuff is even less well documented; nobody really has an accurate map of what's under NYC.

    1. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're spot on with that, look around quickly and you'll find dozens if not hundreds of stories about fiber, water, sewer, and NG being cut because *insert company* laid it out differently than what was in the plans, then refused to update said plans, or even come out and mark. In my own backyard(southern ontario) we still run into things like wood sewer pipes, in use but unmarked. Plank roads with the cast belting retrofit anywhere between 8" to 4' under the road surface, and early 1930's cast iron water and sewer pipes that are still in use, but not documented.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by cold+fjord · · Score: 1, Troll

      Even recent stuff tends not to be recorded in a nice way, like a computerized 3d model that can be used to keep all the data in one place and plan excavations.

      This incident is more than a little surprising given the proliferation of geospatial information systems, which Seattle has. Of course it doesn't matter if the data exists if you don't use it.

      What is Geospatial Information?

      Geospatial information is information describing the location and names of features beneath, on or above the earth's surface. At its simplest this can mean the basic topographical information found on a map, but also includes different location-related datasets combined into complex layers that show information such as land use and population density.

      Geospatial information supports a wide range of business, government and community activities, and the use and re-use of this information has significant productivity-related benefits.

      The terms "geospatial information", "spatial information" and "location-based information" are often used interchangeably.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    3. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and information from things 10 years ago that show up on those, are rough estimates at best.

      wasn't a month ago I was locating gas lines that didn't exist on paper. A few weeks ago working at a site where a water line broke which was feeding from one street under a persons garage(newer construction), through another street to three different homes.

      It was put in 50 years ago and the water department had to comb through archives to find the paper explaining what the original crew had done. No one knew about it till it stopped working.

      This is in suburb where most shit is overhead, can't imagine the crap that is under the ground in a city.

      Oh and fiber, in a couple years there are going to be a lot of hit fiber lines as there are no prints on it for MA. new stuff going in, bury and forget, maybe put in tracer line. But when grass covers up the new handholes good luck finding it. Or even getting verizon to run a tracer when a major fiber line is in the area.

    4. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by tepples · · Score: 1

      Then please let me rephrase: "And older stuff is even less well documented; if nobody really has an accurate map of what's under New York City, then how can we expect anyone to have an accurate map of what's under Seattle?"

    5. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by davester666 · · Score: 4, Funny

      We intentionally don't update plans, or even have plans to begin with, because terrorists will use the plans to, well, plan how to attack us.

      The only solution to plan less, and destroy all existing plans.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    6. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by LoRdTAW · · Score: 3, Funny

      So far it appears to be working.

    7. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by sjames · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's why you should always carry a foot of fiber in your pocket.

      If you're ever stranded in the middle of nowhere, just bury the fiber. When the backhoe shows up to break it, hitch a lift.

    8. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by pspahn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Part of my line of work involves calling in "locates" prior to digging. This is generally done on behalf of our customer. Most of the time, people are happy and welcome the security of knowing where things are in the ground behind their house. On occasion, there's the idiot individual that refuses based on some kind of principle or that a locate was already done five years ago. In those cases, we tell them we can either leave the trees in their yard for them, the install costs forfeited, and they can dig the holes and plant the trees themselves, or they can have the locate done so none of the crew guys have to worry about smacking a natural gas line with a skid steer.

      Maps and plans are useless. The only way to know what is in your dirt is to have a locate done and most municipalities will/should do this at no cost to the home owner. This also gives you indemnification in the event that you do end up hitting something that needs repair (so long as you dig within the time frame allowed).

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    9. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by Solandri · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That happened at the hotel I used to work at. One of the tour buses entering hit and knocked over a gate, which hit an electric utility pole. I never got the next part of the story straight, and probably nobody knows for sure. But the underground piling holding the gate bent and burst an unmarked gas line as it shifted underground, and somehow a spark from it or the power pole lit the gas.

      The ensuing fire required 2 fire trucks, 4 Gas Company trucks, and one Edison truck on-site as they tried to figure out what to do. The hotel was over 100 years old and the break was before the meter so in a section of pipe that was the Gas Company's responsibility. They couldn't find any records of where they had originally installed the gas lines, so they couldn't simply go upstream and turn a valve to shut off the gas, at least not without shutting off gas to the entire neighborhood. They had to bring in special equipment to trace the pipe underground several hundred feet upstream to the main pipe under the road. They determined no shutoff valve had been installed when the line was first constructed. So they picked a good spot between the fire and the road, dug down (with shovels so as not to cause another break), and spliced in a new shutoff valve. The fire burned for over 2 days while they did all this. The gate was ruined. The power pole was a write-off and Edison had to install a new one. I spoke with the Gas Company guy in charge of the whole thing and he said this was the biggest incident he'd ever been involved in in his 30 year career, and it was the main topic of discussion for several days among all the Gas Company branches in the entire Southwest U.S. We were just fortunate the fire was in a remote location and didn't spread.

      Always document your work.

    10. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by volmtech · · Score: 2

      I bought some farm land that had a major electrical transmission line run across it. We just farmed between the poles. While cleaning out a drainage ditch, with my backhoe, I noticed a length of (not cable, thank God) red marking tape that read "Warning! Fiber". Apparently there was a cable burred underground along the path of the power lines. It must have been quite deep because I had dug a deep ditch on the other side of the field and hadn't hit it. There were no warning signs anywhere indicating cable buried.

    11. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As someone that does the locates. Typically the major utilities are covered by a one call system (digsafe) you make one call to digsafe, and digsafe notifies all the utilities in the area. ie gas, water, phone, tv, electric, major pipelines.

      Propane is the one that I've run into that doesn't get covered by digsafe. You can hire private utility locators for a cost.

      The utilities own the pipes in the ground for the most part, its their infrastructure, they send people out to locate it. Its the law. In Mass National grid electric does not own the secondary power lines (transformer to house) So we do not mark that out, sprinkler lines private electric like pool equipment/ lamp posts also not covered.

      Cities usually own the water from main to the curb shut off and won't mark past it.

    12. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      And you are a jackass for not using the onecall service to see if it is ok to dig.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    13. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      And you are a jackass for not using the onecall service to see if it is ok to dig.

      In some places, not everyone has "onecall" or it's equivalent. Just as a helpful point, here in Ontario it only came into existence in the last year or two. Where in other parts of the country it's been out for a decade or so.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    14. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by volmtech · · Score: 1

      Rural area, miles from nowhere, No idea the phone company was piggy backing under the utility easement. The cable was buried deep with a warning tape so tragedy averted.

    15. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      Too bad it is impossible to take a list of lats and longs and depths and generate a map.
      For a project this size, you could hire a few people to read the paper work and pull the lats and longs out.

    16. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by oobayly · · Score: 2

      Personally, I carry a deck of playing cards - whenever I get lost I start play a patience game. When someone looks over my shoulder and says "you should put the queen on the king" I ask for directions.

    17. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 1

      Most stuff actually is fairly well recorded "somewhere". No work gets done without getting locates before (yellow, orrange, blue lines etc), that are generated by surveyors based on both as-built plans, and confirmed on-site from geophysical investigation instruments, be it metal detercors or ground penetrating radar etc.

      After something is installed you have to provide detailed plans of location depth etc. usually in the form of drawings (both plan and profile for line structurese such as utility pipes or cables). Tables with coordinates and elevations may be sufficient for more compact objects. And you have to do a survey for the as-builts, the original plans are not good enough for final submission. (That is for any project of any magnitude that will require city approval... what people do in their backyard won't be covered).

      What often happens is that (as in this case) something is there, and reported the site investigation report, but its presence goes unnoticed in the volume of data looked through when working on the project. Or it was noted originally, but the alignment of the tunnel was different and it was not a concern, but a last minute change in alignment makes it a concern and people (being people) just forget there was somthing there to consider, because they HAD checked those things before after all, and already figured out there was no concern.

      Of course, whent thing are very old, the problem is often getting access to the documentation. Either it was done in a time when records were not kept as thoroughly, or the they are just very hard to track down for one reason or another. Usually, if something does require city approval though, you can find those submissions... and as long as nobody bribed a city inspetor to look the other way while corners were cut , they should provide a reasonable estimate of where things are. The main difficulty is actually tracking down all activities that may have been undertaken at that location over time. While the record may exist, making sure that all things that were done (as owners changed over time) are considered may be challenging depending on the data tracking and storage implemented at the city level over time.

      --
      I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
    18. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think here to rules are that, if it is on the plans and you dig into it you pay to fix it, if it is not one the plan and you dig into it who ever laid and didn't put it in the plans must pay themselves

    19. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by jfengel · · Score: 1

      And then document where you put the document...

    20. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like shutting off the gas to the neighborhood would have made more sense.

    21. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

      I noticed a length of red marking tape that read "Warning! Fiber".

      There were no warning signs anywhere indicating cable buried.

      You realize that these two statements directly contradict each other, right?

    22. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by Meski · · Score: 1

      Yes, the terrorists are cunningly concealed ass contractors who do not read plans .......

    23. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by Meski · · Score: 1

      Should have been as, not ass, but it does read almost as well.

    24. Re:underground stuff is still really poorly mapped by volmtech · · Score: 1

      My mistake, no readily visible signs. This tape was BURIED three feet under ground. Only after making a deep gouge with the backhoe did this tape appear in the teeth of the digging bucket. The warning was, " Don't dig any deeper! "

  3. Was expecting an alien spacecraft... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

    But it turns out that the boring machine found a boring object! (Why am I not surprised?)

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:Was expecting an alien spacecraft... by game+kid · · Score: 1
      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    2. Re:Was expecting an alien spacecraft... by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      And not even an old boring object... An object used in the same project

    3. Re:Was expecting an alien spacecraft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the index of UK Yellow Pages for many years: "Boring - See Civil Engineers"

  4. "Presume" there's no pipe? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    Chris Dixon, project director for contractor group Seattle Tunnel Partners, said the builders presumed there would be no pipe in the way, because casings are customarily removed after use.

    When I dig in hole in my backyard, I may presume there's nothing in the ground. That's because if I hit a snag, my cost will be the price of the shovel.

    But for a $1.44B hole in the ground, I'd want to make damn sure every inch I dig through presents abolutely no risk whatsoever. And since that's taxpayer's money, if I was Seattle resident, I'd sure as hell want to know who the fuck "presumed" stuff on my money...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by gman003 · · Score: 5, Informative

      But for a $1.44B hole in the ground, I'd want to make damn sure every inch I dig through presents abolutely no risk whatsoever.

      And how do you suppose they are to do that? The only real way to see exactly what is underground is to dig a hole. Sonar only gets you so far, records are sketchy and incomplete, at the end of the day the only way to be 100% sure there's nothing in the way of digging a hole is to dig the damn hole.

      This was a fuckup, sure, but it's on the scale of "we hit something we knew we were going to hit (although not exactly where), we removed it when we hit it, but it turns out it fucked up the drill head when we tried to drill through it." I wouldn't bet on this causing the whole billion-dollar project to fail - it's most likely to be a couple hundred grand, maybe a few million in repairs. And that's coming out of the contractor's profits, not from the state, most likely.

    2. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was also unusually deep. And in your backyard, if you hit a gas pipe or a water pipe under prssure, it's gong to cost a lot more than just your shovel.

    3. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Private industry cares about nothing except profits. If you hit a project ending snag, you declare bankruptcy and start a new corporation. This is exactly why projects like this should be done exclusively by government. Game, set, and match to the leftists.

    4. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      What, you've never seen any of those "Call Before You Dig" signs that the utilities companies pepper all over the place? The cost can be a hell of a lot higher than the price of a shovel if you're in a remotely suburban area.

    5. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by mc6809e · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This was a fuckup, sure, but it's on the scale of "we hit something we knew we were going to hit (although not exactly where), we removed it when we hit it, but it turns out it fucked up the drill head when we tried to drill through it." I wouldn't bet on this causing the whole billion-dollar project to fail - it's most likely to be a couple hundred grand, maybe a few million in repairs.

      The problem could be serious in terms of time and effort, though. The machine is meant to only go forward -- there is no reverse. Repairing the bits on the face of the machine will require excavating a large void in front of the machine just to create room for the repair work itself. That probably means old and slow classic mining techniques will need to be used.

    6. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2

      And how do you suppose they are to do that?

      In this case, it's just a matter of making a phone call. As in "Hello, Alaskan Way Viaduct project officials? This is STP. The DOT says you bore a hole in the ground in 2002. We're just calling to make sure you guys removed the pipe."

      One quick phone call. Just like that...

      I'm not saying each and every danger can be predicted in a project like that, but in this case, the hazard was known and could have been fully assessed.

      Also, while all potential problems can't be avoided, at $1.44Bn, they should at least try their best to minimize them.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    7. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Private industry cares about nothing except profits. If you hit a project ending snag, you declare bankruptcy and start a new corporation. This is exactly why projects like this should be done exclusively by government. Game, set, and match to the leftists.

      So when you get a problem, the government can declare bankruptcy and you can get a new government?

    8. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you reform your bankruptcy laws so they can't. Which the left has been arguing against doing.

    9. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, that'll probably work something like this...

      Welcome to Alaskan Way Viaduct customer support. Your call is important to us. We are receiving a higher than expected level of calls at the moment and thank you for your patience. You're approximate waiting time will be 30 minutes.

      4 hours later
      Pleased to be welcome to Alaskan Way Viaduct customer support, how may I help you?

      "Hello, Alaskan Way Viaduct project officials? This is STP. The DOT says you bore a hole in the ground in 2002. We're just calling to make sure you guys removed the pipe."
      Pleased to be sorry, sir, I do not know what you mean about DOT.

      15 minute explanation later...

      Pleased to be putting you through to my manager

      2 hours later

      This is Alaskan Way Viaduct level 2 support, how may I help?

      "Hello, Alaskan Way Viaduct project officials? This is STP. The DOT says you bore a hole in the ground in 2002. We're just calling to make sure you guys removed the pipe."

      The documentation states that the pipe has been removed sir.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    10. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Naw, you just raise taxes.

    11. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 0

      "Hello, uh, ummm, Alaska Way, um, wow, I mean Seattle Viaduct, no, woowowowowo, Alaska Way Viaduct project, can I help you?"
      "This is STP, the DOT says you bored a hole in the ground in 2002 We're just calling to make sure you removed the pipe."
      "Pipe? Wowoww. Yeah, I've got the pipe right here."
      "Did you remove it from the the path of the borer."
      "Umm, wowowow, sure! Right, we did"
      "OK, thanks."
      "No problemo, dude"

      -- Click --

      "Hey, didn't Mary give you that pipe last week."

      Has anybody been in Seattle recently? You can get a contact high just walking around Pike's Place (not far from the Viaduct project).

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    12. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by jasnw · · Score: 2

      I don't see this coming out of the contractor's fee. From local news reporting (I live in Seattle) this looks to me like the state is the up-gefucking party here, and if I were the state I'd be looking to avoid being sued by the contractor for providing misleading/incomplete information during the bid process. I expect that total cost of this little mishap will be well into the $1M+ range, and it'll come out of contingency money. Since we're still early in the dig process and haven't even gotten to the hard parts (digging under large buildings, for example) it's not good to be eating big chunks out of the contingency money at this point.

    13. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd be rather surprised if there wasn't limited reverse (usually about 3-4'), as that's how you get enough working space in front of the head to replace worn cutting discs.

    14. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What good is that? If you're out of money, you're out of money, and it's pretty obvious to your employees, vendors and contractors. Do you thing that they are going to agree to work for you when they know that you won't be able to pay them, no matter what promises are made?

    15. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by hawguy · · Score: 2

      From TFA:

      Chris Dixon, project director for contractor group Seattle Tunnel Partners, said the builders presumed there would be no pipe in the way, because casings are customarily removed after use.

      When I dig in hole in my backyard, I may presume there's nothing in the ground. That's because if I hit a snag, my cost will be the price of the shovel.

      But for a $1.44B hole in the ground, I'd want to make damn sure every inch I dig through presents abolutely no risk whatsoever. And since that's taxpayer's money, if I was Seattle resident, I'd sure as hell want to know who the fuck "presumed" stuff on my money...

      Actually, if you're digging in your back yard with any sort of power tools, you should still call your local utility locating service first to make sure there are no gas lines or other infrastructure buried in your back yard.

      You're probably safe digging with hand tools (there's usually a marker tape or cable above more recent pipes), but if you're using something like a pickaxe or hammering a rod into the ground, you really ought to check first or you may find yourself on the hook for expensive utility repairs if you don't end up blowing up you and your house first.

    16. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      And how do you suppose they are to do that?

      In this case, it's just a matter of making a phone call. As in "Hello, Alaskan Way Viaduct project officials? This is STP. The DOT says you bore a hole in the ground in 2002. We're just calling to make sure you guys removed the pipe."

      One quick phone call. Just like that...

      I'm not saying each and every danger can be predicted in a project like that, but in this case, the hazard was known and could have been fully assessed.

      Also, while all potential problems can't be avoided, at $1.44Bn, they should at least try their best to minimize them.

      You're assuming that they have the 10 year old documentation and that it's accurate.

      I don't know about underground hazard documentation, but anyone that's every looked at as-builts for any sizeable building can tell you that the as-builts have only a loose connection to reality. The contract may have said that they pulled the casing out of the ground, but maybe it broke off 20 feet below the surface and they said "Good enough!" and just left the rest there.

    17. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by PPH · · Score: 1

      But this wasn't private industry. The pipe was put in for the state. Private industry is legally responsible to mark their underground facilities. Public utilities just say 'Fuck it. So sue us.'

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    18. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by sjames · · Score: 3, Informative

      The "reforms" have been primarily to keep individuals from discharging debt while still allowing corporations to do so. That's why the left opposed it.

    19. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by ZosX · · Score: 2

      Did you even read the grandparent? The cutters can be replaced from inside the machine. If there is damage to the face, they may find it impossible to replace the cutters. The area where the cutter is located is under high pressure and inundated with water. Yeah, they can back it up, but that still leaves the pressure and water to deal with.

    20. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      And how do you suppose they are to do that?

      Ground penetrating radar?

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    21. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The left probably sees how good it works for government, so they're eager to apply the same policies to business. Ought to be a smashing success.

      What's the federal deficit up to lately?

    22. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GPR doesn't work well in this situation. What you would want is the radar to be on the face of the boring machine (hmm, something to think about for the next gen machine).. but GPR doesn't create a nice image from one place. typically, one drags or moves the antenna along a path, and you get a plot along the path (sort of like a depth finding sonar, not one of those fancy side scan imaging units).

      I don't know how fast the boring machine goes.. The radar penetration is probably in the "around 10 ft" range (given the high water content). So you spin the cutting head around and scan everything, then spend a day analyzing the scans, while a few dozen highly paid tunnel dogs stand around waiting for you to conjure up some idea of what's in the murky image, and whether you should dig.

      GPR is *great* at doing things like finding rebar or pipes in concrete, or even finding buried drums of toxic waste buried under a parking lot, or maybe even finding Richard III's grave. You've got plenty of time, there's a nice flat surface to run the antenna over repeatedly.

    23. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But for a $1.44B hole in the ground, I'd want to make damn sure every inch I dig through presents abolutely no risk whatsoever.

      When statements like this shows up I like to move around the numbers to see what it means.
      The tunnel is supposed to be 2 miles and the boring machines diameter is 57.5 feet.
      That gives us 47384164500 cubic inches to check through. For 1.44 billion USD we can afford to spend approximately 0.03 USD per cubic inch assuming that the construction of the tunnel doesn't cost anything.

      It is probably cheaper to dig ten tunnels and use the one where the boring machine managed to get through than to check every inch you dig through.

    24. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if you're digging in your back yard with any sort of power tools, you should still call your local utility locating service first to make sure there are no gas lines or other infrastructure buried in your back yard.

      Fuck all of that. The constitutian guarantees my right to the pursuit of happiness. If digging in MY yard makes ME happy I'll dig and no beuraucrat will tell me otherwise it's MY yard dammit I never gave them permission to bury their shit there. If some jackbooted penpusher tries to stop ME in MY yard he'll have the 2nd ammenment to deal with

      (roman_mir)

    25. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by winwar · · Score: 1

      Chris Dixon is lying, an ignoramus, or quite possibly both. Which probably means the taxpayers are screwed.

      I'd also guess that he is an engineer versus a geologist.

      You don't generally remove casings from drilled wells after use, since they have probably been welded together. If it is a monitoring well like this one, you'd leave it in place in case you want to use it again. If you decommission it, you fill it with bentonite clay or cement and cut the top off to prevent groundwater contamination. Of course if someone had bothered to check the Washington Dept of Ecology's web site, they would have known this (where the information for the well would have been submitted).

    26. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Government is only as good as the voters make it. So in our case, doing it with the government won't work either: you'll just get a project that's totally mismanaged and massively over-budget, and by the time the SHTF, the politicians who set things in motion and are to blame for the mess have already moved on, and the new politicians will blame their predecessors for everything that went wrong, no matter how true that really is, and the voters will buy it.

    27. Re:"Presume" there's no pipe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably the solution to all this is something horribly inconvenient like building an airlock in the tunnel and pressurising the end so they can dig a large enough space to clear the cutter head.

  5. Calling X'zibit by Megane · · Score: 2

    Yo dawg, we heard you were digging a pipe, so we put a pipe in your pipe so you can tunnel while you tunnel.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  6. metal detector by drwho · · Score: 1

    You'd think someone would have a metal detector out there, to help find such things. Yeah, I know, too obvious in hindsight from an armchair.

    1. Re:metal detector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, no.

      I'll let you think about it for a while.

    2. Re:metal detector by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Think about how metal detectors work (inductance detection) and the depth of the tunnel, compared to the amount of metal in the surrounding city at a shallower depth, and combined with the materials the boring machine is made of...

      --
      Not a sentence!
    3. Re:metal detector by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Think about making the cutting face a metal detector somehow. What year is it, anyway?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:metal detector by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Think of what the cutting face is made out of....

      --
      Not a sentence!
    5. Re:metal detector by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Think of what the cutting face is made out of....

      It's got inspection ports. No reason it can't have more of them which some sort of sensor comes out of. Maybe you could just use sonar contact sensors: stop every few feet, extend them, and take a reading. It's better than fucking up the cutting head.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  7. A Boring Answer by thomasoa · · Score: 1

    Well, that was a boring boring answer.

  8. Re: zetatalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just rise reading some shit off this site. Gave me a headache. Do you actually read this crap? I think some sort of brain damage must be required for membership.

  9. Seattle Tunnel Partners statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    However, Chris Dixon, project director for contractor group Seattle Tunnel Partners, said the builders presumed there would be no pipe in the way, because casings are customarily removed after use; adding, "ceci n'est pas une pipe."

  10. Re: zetatalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes

  11. Only a pipe? by rwyoder · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Only a pipe? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      I was going for a Thrint in stasis.

    2. Re:Only a pipe? by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Fine, just don't press any buttons.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
  12. Dang! by Alomex · · Score: 1

    I was sure it was a buried UFO, after all it is the most likely explanation.

  13. Bits are replaceable; it's the rest of the face... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    The cutting bits are designed to be replaced; it's a PITA process but it's very much a normal operating procedure. (They're bolted in from the back; the top picture on the tunnel boring machine wikipedia page shows a machine with all the bits removed.)

    The problem is if there has been damage to the rest of the face, the support structure around the bits. This is not accessible while the machine is in operation, particularly for an earth pressure balance machine like they're using. (Required when there's lots of groundwater or a need to minimize surface disturbance, such as in an urban area.)

  14. Alien pipe? by Chemisor · · Score: 2

    Yes, but was it an alien 8" pipe?

    1. Re:Alien pipe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes it was. http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/04ja2014.htm

    2. Re:Alien pipe? by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      I didn't read the summary or the article, but I'm pretty sure that it explicitly stated that yes it is in fact an alien pipe.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    3. Re:Alien pipe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My pipe is a lot bigger than 8"! Prepare your women for probing.

    4. Re:Alien pipe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Connected to an alien organ.

    5. Re:Alien pipe? by Meski · · Score: 1

      The one that the aliens probe you with? Is that length, diameter or circumference?

  15. Re:zetatalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even mankind’s hardened metals, in use today, would eventually melt from the continuous friction, and give way.

    You mean like the metal used for the bits on the boring machine? Ever watch an inexperienced person try to drill a work hardened metal too slowly? Ever seen a blade meant for cutting only wood hit a nail? Even high quality bits will quickly dull if not used properly or not used for the material they were designed for, and you can end up with the bit being the week point that will give way from continued attempts. Usually even the least experienced idiot can figure out it won't work after their blade shatters, or seeing part of their drill bit galled into the bottom of a half drilled hole.

  16. Even worse than NY: Germany by gentryx · · Score: 1

    With some cities existing for >1000 years and having been dug over in WW2, there is often no knowing of what to expect when digging through the underground. Recently a builder operating a digger was killed by a WW2 era dud. Experts estimate that there are still 100k duds lying around and each year about 5k are being found.

    --
    Computer simulation made easy -- LibGeoDecomp
    1. Re:Even worse than NY: Germany by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

      Seems to me that those are dud duds.

    2. Re:Even worse than NY: Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a problem that is pretty unique for Germany and it is completely unreasonable to have a map of where all bombs were dropped over Germany while it is (or at least should be) completely reasonable to have a map of where cables and pipes are under a city.

    3. Re:Even worse than NY: Germany by xaxa · · Score: 2

      That is a problem that is pretty unique for Germany and it is completely unreasonable to have a map of where all bombs were dropped over Germany while it is (or at least should be) completely reasonable to have a map of where cables and pipes are under a city.

      It's a worldwide problem, there are unexploded bombs wherever there have been conflicts using them, and in training areas. Southeast Asia is particularly badly affected from American bombing.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unexploded_ordnance

    4. Re:Even worse than NY: Germany by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I remember 20-some years ago, a good chunk of San Diego County (not inside a military reserve) was cordoned off because it was infested with old ordnance. I don't recall how it was dealt with beyond that.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  17. Re:They must have hired IT Managers to plan this j by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Absolutely true. Get the warnings in writing to CYA.

  18. seriously, do i look like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IGAFF?

  19. Aliens by ZosX · · Score: 1

    I still think it was aliens. They put the pipe there!

  20. Correction: Not Separate Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The tunnel that Bertha is currently digging is in fact the culmination of the Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement Project. In other words, Bertha was stuck on something from earlier in its own project.

  21. Be glad it was only a pipe.. by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    WW2 bomb blast kills digger driver in Germany: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-25594000

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  22. All we need is one more review panel by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Because the last 14 committees weren't enough.

  23. I got your 8 inch pipe right here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always love a good pipe joke.

  24. An 8 inch pipe stops a 57 foot diameter digger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems strange that a relatively tiny pipe is all it takes to stop this behemoth of an excavator.

  25. I know some of you have seen Quatermas and the Pit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Pasadena, California, circa 1990, they started to dig a hole for a parking structure with and movie theater combo. This was the first move to to revitalise and old part of town that was a business ghetto. As they dug down next to a 100 year or sold old 5 or 8 story brick building, the building started to show some cracks. The contractor assumed the brick building had a certain type of underground structure. But maybe not. Option one: step: spend about 2 million to excavate and see what was under the brick building. Then decide on that basis what to do. Option 2: stop digging, build the parking structure but the no the movie theater. That is what they did. At the time is was considered an economic disaster. Since then, Old Town(e) Pasadena has become a hot spot. Parking lot is on the NE lot at Green and Fair Oaks.

    But someone who was involved in the planning had to know that that was possible and was betting that once dig got started it would have been too expensive and a bigger loss stop and cover the hole.

  26. Re: An 8 inch pipe stops a 57 foot diameter digger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like a monkey wrench?
    Sometimes that is all is takes.

  27. +6 by stigmato · · Score: 1

    This needs to be +6 painfully hilarious

  28. Lowest Bidder Wins Again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some day we'll learn in this country... but not before we damn near destroy ourselves first.

  29. Weak-ass Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I don't get is that this is a huge machine designed to cut through rocks and it's being made into a little bitch by a pipe? What's this pipe made from, the stuff they use to make black boxes on airplanes?

  30. Correction/confusing summary by ChrisMounce · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In 2002, researchers for another project — the replacement of the Alaskan Way viaduct — drilled down into the ground to take water samples.

    The tunnel that Bertha's digging isn't another project — the whole reason for digging the tunnel is to replace the Alaskan Way Viaduct. See here.

    The wells were drilled in 2002 to study the ground after the 2001 Nisqually quake. But that's a related project, because the Nisqually quake is the reason why we got to thinking about a replacement for the Alaskan Way Viaduct.

    Am I making sense? I hope I'm making sense. At any rate, the story summary needs updating.

    1. Re:Correction/confusing summary by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      In 2002, researchers for another project — the replacement of the Alaskan Way viaduct — drilled down into the ground to take water samples.

      The tunnel that Bertha's digging isn't another project — the whole reason for digging the tunnel is to replace the Alaskan Way Viaduct. See here.

      The wells were drilled in 2002 to study the ground after the 2001 Nisqually quake. But that's a related project, because the Nisqually quake is the reason why we got to thinking about a replacement for the Alaskan Way Viaduct.

      Am I making sense? I hope I'm making sense. At any rate, the story summary needs updating.

      I came to read the replies to see if I was the only one, nothing information wise but at this moment it's (Jan 5 1:30 am PST, Sunday morning)
      The article claims
      "A buried steel pipe is mostly to blame for stopping the giant tunnel-boring machine Bertha, which has been stuck since Dec. 6 along the Seattle waterfront near South Main Street."

      At first I thought the machine Bertha has sat for a year, looked at the date of the article January 3, 2014 at 1:30 PM...figured If nobody works till Monday, (taking the weekends off), there are better ways to mention it, if a part is needed and takes a day or two,,,, well you see the point.

      But lower in the article:
      "then on Friday night, Dec. 6, the cutting face rotated without catching soil."

      The article most certainly needs a rewrite, and I figure your correct all the work put into this piece and all.

      What’s blocking Bertha: a long steel pipe
        Posted by Mike Lindblom (author of referenced article)

    2. Re:Correction/confusing summary by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      I came to read the replies to see if I was the only one, nothing information wise but at this moment it's (Jan 5 1:30 am PST, Sunday morning)
      The article claims
      "A buried steel pipe is mostly to blame for stopping the giant tunnel-boring machine Bertha, which has been stuck since Dec. 6 along the Seattle waterfront near South Main Street."

      Oh if only there were a delete post option, you can bet it would be used here, Damn if I'm not a month off in my timing. I could blame it on a lot of things
      but it was just a brain fart.

      My apologies

  31. The Brown M&Ms story is implausible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know it's fun, but it just doesn't make sense.

    All the work would be subcontracted, the only thing the absence of brown M&Ms would indicate is whether the there are brown M&Ms. Anything else can and could be independently fouled up. Even if you think the penalty means they'll double check the M&Ms, that only means they'd double check the M&Ms. Hence is it a poor indicator.

    And the idea of the entire show being forfeit is just ridiculous. Neither side wants the show to be forfeit. If they thought not having a show was a decent outcome, they wouldn't have bothered to try to have one in the first place.

    It's a fun story, but don't take it too seriously.

    1. Re:The Brown M&Ms story is implausible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not having a show is better than killing your fans, which is a likely outcome if the stage collapses because the venue coordinators didn't read the technical section of the contract specifying weight tolerances, right there next to the 'no brown M&Ms or no show' clause...

    2. Re:The Brown M&Ms story is implausible. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Remember that the article claims that the "Brown M&Ms" clause was mixed in with the *technical details*. It's quite possible that a sloppy promoter would hand the list of tech specs (with that in it) derived from the contract to whoever was responsible- and, of course, the tech guys, if they were doing their job correctly, should get back to the promoter saying "Have you seen this clause? That's not our job, but you should get someone to look at it".

      As for the show being forfeit, that was (I assume) intentionally draconian, but as the other guy said, better that the show be cancelled than the stage collapse because instructions weren't followed- that clause gives the band a get-out if they have to do that due to the promoter's incompetence.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  32. Ehhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ehhhh just keep going.

  33. Union workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Getting the job done the union way!

  34. Talk about getting hosed... by Keyboard+Rage · · Score: 1

    ...we are promised things like UFO's, ancient relics, or rare treasure-filled archaeological wrecks, and we get what, a metal pipe? (or so they say)

  35. There are more pipes than just the one by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    And the documents show that.

    Never assume. It makes an engineering project go belly up.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --