You would have found the first single instance of technological development hurting the economy.
You are a carriage maker in the age of the automobile, sir. Going green is a boost to America's economy.
I think the point of checking the S/O is a legacy procedure that was built in to ensure that they could not be blackmailed. The security people want to know you're not hiding anything so that a bad guy can't say, "if you don't hand over those pictures of alien spacecraft around Jupiter I'll tell your wife/parents/dog that you're gay/use drugs/watch manga."
As long as you are up front with your past drug abuse and s/o, the bad guys can't blackmail you with it, and you're okay.
I bought one CD last month, They Might Be Giants Science album, and that was the first one in over a decade. Likewise, I have almost no DVD movies. They're making themselves irrelevant even quicker than necessary. I'm all about Hulu, Pandora and Netflix.
The sun is a great target and a solar filter costs about $20 tops. Count sunspots during each class period on at least a weekly, if not daily basis.
The moon is great day or night.
Planets are very impressive, contrary to some other opinions on here. I do public and school outreach for the Howard Astronomy League (howardastro.org) and everyone loves the planets. Mars is good right now.
A 4" will show the Orion nebula on Orion's sword quite well, with or without filters.
Depending on where you are there is a good chance your local astronomy club will even put on a show for the kids, or at least have a public star party they can attend to look through amateur class scopes.
Kyr
I recommend doing short stories instead of full books, especially for some of the heavier authors (Tolkein). "The Coldest Place" is a great story. Larry Niven has written many short stories, especially about Gil Hamilton and the stories about the origin of humans. Asimov has lots of short Robot stories, and I'm sure you won't have trouble finding plenty of others.
What I'm getting at is that quantity is sometimes... not necessary. There is plenty to learn comparing short stories by classic authors.
my 2c.
I'm in the Navy in a very technical field, cryptology. I see two groups of people in my office, those that are good at their jobs, and those that are good at being in the Navy. The USN consistently rewards those who volunteer for fund raisers and know their 11 General Orders over those who know how to do their job. I spend about 20 hours a week training people as a "subject matter expert", and the rest of the time gathering info and getting out to the fleet. This accounts for very little on my evaluations.
"Where's your volunteering?" they ask. PTA and my astronomy club, nor my teaching martial arts to kids doesn't count. They want honor guard and donut sales.
"Where's your leadership?" they ask. I'm too busy teaching the new personnel how to do their job... err... wait, that would be any reasonable person's definition of "leadership". Not the Navy's.
But the pay is good, especially in this economy, I get 2 hours a day to go to the gym, and 30 days paid vacation. Plus, I don't have to make up time lost for doctor visits, and I get to go on my kids' field trips as well.
The Civ games are a perfect example of a failed AI, and many RTS games are similarly crippled. When you played on a higher difficulty in CIV (all of them) the AI player didn't get any better, he just got a bigger and bigger attack and defense bonus, and got ten extra turns before you were allowed to start playing. It resulted in situations where my fusion-tank unit would attack their bow-and-arrow barbarian unit, and LOSE!!!
The same thing happens in RTS games, where the AI gets a resource bonus, and extra time to play before the player gets to start.
LAME!!!
I'm not even a very good programmer, but I can write a better AI than Sid Meier?
I wouldn't worry about them kansans. Even if this craze envelopes the nation, the rest of the world is on the right track, and these arguments never last. The church has fought various scientific ideas for millenia, and always loses. Terracentricity, heliocentricity, big bang, base-10 numbers (arabic numbers, esp. zero); the list goes on. They even gave up on Creationism not too long ago, realizing evidence had piled up too high, and they needed to bury their heads in a new kind of BS, namely (un)ID.
They're like little kids crying over nothing, ignoring them is the best recourse.
I'd like to add that in Nature this week was a chart showing that as education increases, so does acceptance of evolution.
Don't invest in bio-companies from Kansas.
Since ID and C cannot be DISproven, they are not science.
The above poster relies on the logic of "If it's too complicated to explain today, God must have done it." This is unscientific thinking, and so this logic cannot be used to debunk anything scientific. In order to debate science, one must use science. On the reverse, to debate religion, one must use religion, since disproving the existance of God is impossible.
Science explains the natural world, Religion explains the supernatural. There is no overlap.
Slashdot Mirror
You would have found the first single instance of technological development hurting the economy. You are a carriage maker in the age of the automobile, sir. Going green is a boost to America's economy.
I think the point of checking the S/O is a legacy procedure that was built in to ensure that they could not be blackmailed. The security people want to know you're not hiding anything so that a bad guy can't say, "if you don't hand over those pictures of alien spacecraft around Jupiter I'll tell your wife/parents/dog that you're gay/use drugs/watch manga." As long as you are up front with your past drug abuse and s/o, the bad guys can't blackmail you with it, and you're okay.
I bought one CD last month, They Might Be Giants Science album, and that was the first one in over a decade. Likewise, I have almost no DVD movies. They're making themselves irrelevant even quicker than necessary. I'm all about Hulu, Pandora and Netflix.
The sun is a great target and a solar filter costs about $20 tops. Count sunspots during each class period on at least a weekly, if not daily basis. The moon is great day or night. Planets are very impressive, contrary to some other opinions on here. I do public and school outreach for the Howard Astronomy League (howardastro.org) and everyone loves the planets. Mars is good right now. A 4" will show the Orion nebula on Orion's sword quite well, with or without filters. Depending on where you are there is a good chance your local astronomy club will even put on a show for the kids, or at least have a public star party they can attend to look through amateur class scopes. Kyr
I recommend doing short stories instead of full books, especially for some of the heavier authors (Tolkein). "The Coldest Place" is a great story. Larry Niven has written many short stories, especially about Gil Hamilton and the stories about the origin of humans. Asimov has lots of short Robot stories, and I'm sure you won't have trouble finding plenty of others. What I'm getting at is that quantity is sometimes ... not necessary. There is plenty to learn comparing short stories by classic authors.
my 2c.
I'm in the Navy in a very technical field, cryptology. I see two groups of people in my office, those that are good at their jobs, and those that are good at being in the Navy. The USN consistently rewards those who volunteer for fund raisers and know their 11 General Orders over those who know how to do their job. I spend about 20 hours a week training people as a "subject matter expert", and the rest of the time gathering info and getting out to the fleet. This accounts for very little on my evaluations. "Where's your volunteering?" they ask. PTA and my astronomy club, nor my teaching martial arts to kids doesn't count. They want honor guard and donut sales. "Where's your leadership?" they ask. I'm too busy teaching the new personnel how to do their job ... err... wait, that would be any reasonable person's definition of "leadership". Not the Navy's.
But the pay is good, especially in this economy, I get 2 hours a day to go to the gym, and 30 days paid vacation. Plus, I don't have to make up time lost for doctor visits, and I get to go on my kids' field trips as well.
Is why have they re-emerged in the midwest and south-central states?
the bulk of the gaming community is NOT teens, its young men, 18-30.
The Civ games are a perfect example of a failed AI, and many RTS games are similarly crippled. When you played on a higher difficulty in CIV (all of them) the AI player didn't get any better, he just got a bigger and bigger attack and defense bonus, and got ten extra turns before you were allowed to start playing. It resulted in situations where my fusion-tank unit would attack their bow-and-arrow barbarian unit, and LOSE!!! The same thing happens in RTS games, where the AI gets a resource bonus, and extra time to play before the player gets to start. LAME!!! I'm not even a very good programmer, but I can write a better AI than Sid Meier?
I wouldn't worry about them kansans. Even if this craze envelopes the nation, the rest of the world is on the right track, and these arguments never last. The church has fought various scientific ideas for millenia, and always loses. Terracentricity, heliocentricity, big bang, base-10 numbers (arabic numbers, esp. zero); the list goes on. They even gave up on Creationism not too long ago, realizing evidence had piled up too high, and they needed to bury their heads in a new kind of BS, namely (un)ID. They're like little kids crying over nothing, ignoring them is the best recourse. I'd like to add that in Nature this week was a chart showing that as education increases, so does acceptance of evolution. Don't invest in bio-companies from Kansas.
I might buy their horrible swill just because it is GE!
Intel. Design (ID) Creationism (C) Evolution (ToE)
Since ID and C cannot be DISproven, they are not science.
The above poster relies on the logic of "If it's too complicated to explain today, God must have done it." This is unscientific thinking, and so this logic cannot be used to debunk anything scientific. In order to debate science, one must use science. On the reverse, to debate religion, one must use religion, since disproving the existance of God is impossible.
Science explains the natural world, Religion explains the supernatural. There is no overlap.