Slashdot Mirror


Budweiser Vetos Genetically Modified Rice

fishdan writes "Anheuser-Busch the makers of Budweiser and other beers, has stated that they will not buy rice from Missouri if genetically modified crops are allowed in the state. Budweiser is claimed to be the best selling beer in the world Bud Light is the second best selling. I wonder about the stats of Tsing Tao I'm not sure what they're afraid of from genetically modified rice. Do they think their beer could get any worse?"

142 comments

  1. Rice? by turtled · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who cares when you are gettin drunk and watching the race!?

    --
    "I cannot think of any need in childhood as strong as the need for a father's protection." -- Sigmund Freud
    1. Re:Rice? by True+Grit · · Score: 1

      Somewhere in the Far East a Sake drinker has heard of this and thought "Hmmm, getting drunk on the alcohol from the fermented rice and then getting stoned on the drugs the rice makes" then .... [ring, ring] ... "Yes, I'm calling about your genetically modified rice, do you accept mail-orders with overseas destinations? These would be *large* orders, definitely worth your while..."

  2. because not only americans drink it by feandil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    there are plenty of people in the world who do not want anything to do with biotech food or drinks, so if it was known that budweiser contain GMO their sales would plummet in the world, especially in europe.

    1. Re:because not only americans drink it by omibus · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? No self respecting European would dring Budwiser! (Bud Spencer aside)

      And it is definatly a sorry state to the world where the most drank beer in the world is Budwiser. But if all you want is to get drunk -- I guess it works.

      If you want to enjoy the beer...no.

      --
      Bad User. No biscuit!
    2. Re:because not only americans drink it by sfjoe · · Score: 4, Interesting


      Beer isn't the only thing. California has banned GM rice because the largest consumer of California rice is Japan and they will NOT buy GM rice.
      Personally, I haven't made up my mind one way or another. However, having been lied to any number of times by people whose only motivation is profit, the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt is on the corporations.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    3. Re:because not only americans drink it by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      their sales would plummet in the world, especially in europe.

      Why would Europeans drink Bud? Got to be the worst beer in the world - something like sex in a canoe. The only people in Europe that would regularly consume Bud would be USians visiting there - same as here in Aust where bugger-all people drink it because the local beers are so much better.

      Europe has hundreds of better (and funnily enough, cheaper) beers to choose from and any of them is better than the overpriced Bud.

      I can't see Bud sales in Europe dropping except from the USians that visit europe and don't drink it because it's got GM bits in it.

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    4. Re:because not only americans drink it by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Get off your high horse. Plenty of Europeans are drinking Budweiser and other American brands. It just goes to show that beer snobs can be found in every country, while the common man drinks what he pleases.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    5. Re:because not only americans drink it by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Why would any europeans drink budweiser? I was under the impression that seppos only drank it coz it was often the only choice.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    6. Re:because not only americans drink it by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      Bah high horse? Sorry, US beer (particularly Bud and Miller) is crap compared to practically everything else. The only examples of beers around the same standard I can think of are Fosters and VB.

      There are plenty of American (not from the US) beers. Please be careful in your terminology. Some of the South American and beers are great - I tried some years ago.

      Your comment shows you to be very American. I know plenty of Europeans who wouldn't dare touch US beer on account of it's overpriced muddy water.

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
  3. A generation of rice superheros by L.+VeGas · · Score: 1

    All the nascar fans will acquire the powers of, hmm, rice. Whenever they get drunk, they will become tasty and irresistable to asians.

    1. Re:A generation of rice superheros by SunFan · · Score: 1


      There was an e-mail circulating a while back with a photo of a NASCAR fan who shaved Dale Earnhardt's number into his back hair. Irresistable...

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
  4. Beer? by Prien715 · · Score: 4, Funny

    All this time I thought Buddweiser only sold water!

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
  5. But does it taste different? by karn096 · · Score: 1

    All these companies are all up in arms about genetically altered crops. But my question is does it taste any different? I bet that if no one said anything, nobody would even be able to tell the different. If genetically modifying rice allows the rice to grow better, and faster, then so be it, people are thirsty out there, and this can help.
    Actually after reading this, I could really go for a beer right now.

    1. Re:But does it taste different? by tOaOMiB · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you RTFA, you'd notice that this is not about genetically modifying rice to have to grow better or faster. This is about a drug company that wants to use rice to produce human proteins to be used at drugs--not rice for consumption! The fear here (from Anheuser-Busch) is about cross-pollination with normal rice strains.

    2. Re:But does it taste different? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0

      Budweiser tastes like piss. If all that matters is its flavor, why don't you help yourself to the free stuff you make yourself. Cheers!

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:But does it taste different? by hohead · · Score: 1

      It seems a lot of people make comments about the taste of piss.
      With these comments, I can assume that you all have actually tasted piss?
      If this is fact, then why should I trust the opinion of a person who has tasted piss?

      Obviously, if a person has tasted piss, then they must be damaged somehow.

    4. Re:But does it taste different? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I can say that I have tasted my own piss. It's no big deal, and I am not ashamed. I can also say that if you are so afraid of your own piss that you cannot try it, that you (or your curiosity) must be damaged.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  6. They are afraid... by jangobongo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not sure what they're afraid of from genetically modified rice.

    They are afraid that they will lose customers. Since the public has not made up its mind as to whether genetically modified foods are safe to ingest, Budweiser does not want to alienate anyone who purchases their products.

    Remember, people are afraid of the unknown. "Will it cause cancer?", "Am I going to turn into a mutant??", etc.

    --

    Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
    1. Re:They are afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, people are afraid of the unknown. "Will it cause cancer?", "Am I going to turn into a mutant??", etc.

      They'd be better off worrying about the damaging health effects of the alcohol in the beer rather than some make-believe scare stories put out by a bunch of granola-chomping hippies who think that anything created by scientists must be evil on principle.

    2. Re:They are afraid... by moof1138 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This has nothing to do with cancer fears or even GM food. The modified rice is genetically enhanced with synthetic human genes to produce lactoferrin and lysozyme, which are intended to be used in medicines so they would be very likely affect someone who consumed them. They are afraid that the modified rice could cross pollinate with standard rice. It is well known that pollen can travel large distances, so the possibility of contamination is very real and could in theory have serious negative consequences. It may be that their concerns are unfounded, but that is really something that only an expert could make the call on.

      --

      Hyperbole is the worst thing ever.
    3. Re:They are afraid... by bobster45 · · Score: 1

      I agree with the stated information and have some other information to include... Even if there is cross pollinization from the GM rice, the resultant rice from this year's crop would contain only the parent's rice plant's attributes rather than that of the pollenizing parent. I would contain the next crop's genetic formulation. I believe the potential (sales) hazard would be in next year's (or next crop depending on the climate and how many crops per year are grown) crop as the new genetic material is expressed in the plants (from those cross polinated from GM rice plants) rice seeds and might contain the potential mutagens that those consumers that are fearful of might be affected by. In fact there may even be a chance that a cross polinated seed could be non-viable. A rice mule equivalent!

    4. Re:They are afraid... by sagekoala06 · · Score: 2, Informative

      AFAIK lactoferrin and lysozyme are both in production by every single person who would be able to read this sentence. Lactoferrin and lysozyme are really nothing but enzymes that kill bacteria that are already found in our spit, snot, tears, and just about any other mucus that comes from our bodies. I wonder why they would produce these enzymes in rice for consumption because the instant they would hit the stomach (with a pH ~2) the protiens would denature and be rendered into useless macromolecules. A more likely use would be to prevent some bacterial rice disease caused by a gram positive bacteria.

    5. Re:They are afraid... by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      What? You think finding out budweiser is made out of rice instead of malted barley, hops, water and yeast isn't a major disincentive? Before we even start thinking about the specifics of the ingredients origin, we should make sure we're actually using ingredients that are supposed to be in beer, not fried up in a wok.

      This is beer! Beer is not made from rice. Foolish american brewers.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    6. Re:They are afraid... by hild0557 · · Score: 1

      I would be cautionary of introducing gm rice to yeast, it might produce something carcinogenic from a gm protein

    7. Re:They are afraid... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We're talking about an entire industry based around selling toxins to people. Alcohol is a poison. They don't give a fuck about consequences of GM rice on a moral level; they weighed the costs and benefits of advertising not using this rice, and then potentially not using it, as opposed to using it, and losing customers afraid of GM foods, or possibly having to pay settlements if such fears were to be realized.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  7. To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by benhocking · · Score: 1

    I don't drink beer, so I don't have first-hand experience on the matter, but to hear all the jokes about US beer (e.g., "How is American Beer like making love in a canoe?", from Monty Python's Live at the Hollywood Bowl), I'm surprised the overseas market for Budweiser is that large. Is this one of those cases where people complain about how bad a product is, and then they buy it anyway?

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by afabbro · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In my experience, 99% of people who say "American beer sucks" or only drink micro- or foreign brews would happily drink Budweiser if it was named something else. Give them a glass of Bud and tell them it's Pete's Wicked Spring Blonde Ale or something and they'll coo about the taste.

      Most people are idiots. Pretentious beer drinks are worse.

      (I don't drink beer. I'm pretentious about high-end vodkas).

      Wikipedia on Budweiser

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    2. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by Uber+Banker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I RTFA, and this really isn't so much about GM rice, more about other effects of GM, but no doubt the GPs point is still valid.

      To answer your question:
      Budweiser is by far the most widely consumed US originated beer here in the UK. That is if you call it beer. Having lived in the US for some time I appreciated most beer sold in bars was very cold (glasses often kept in a fridge), very fizzy (unless the bar was out of CO2/N) and quite tasteless. That wasn't/isn't always a bad thing - if dehydrated I don't know what could be nicer than a watery cold drink - and if going out with the aim of getting drunk I don't think the quality matters after the second pint - but if drinking beer for beer the taste is extremely important and that's what US mass brews lack - taste. If looking for a fizzy somewhat (but not very) tasty beer that will deliver sugars in your blood Bud is a good choice of many (bar excellent German lagers which are not highly available in the US).

      This is not to dismiss US beer as a whole, micro-brew is a massively growing industry and has some excellent choices. But to drink beer for being beer ice cold piss isn't always good. If you're not a big beer drinker why not try something like Old Speckeld Hen or whatever local micro-brew markets itself as strong in taste, it could give you a fresh perspective.

    3. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


      Wow...guess that makes me a one-percenter.

      And BTW, not all American beer sucks...Sam Adams is quite passable.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    4. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly. American beers like Bud and Miller are designed to be drunk ice-cold, so you can't actually taste the rankness.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    5. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Pretentious beer drinker here...

      Simply put, Budweiser tastes like hobo ass. The only lager that tastes worse, IMO is Foster's. They both have the defining characteristic of wickedly nasty aftertaste.

      As a Guinness drinker, I'm blond-beer biased anyway, but in those rare instances when that's not available, there's a dozen beers I'd rather have first. Heineken is quite smooth, Castlemaine XXXX has a nice punch to it, for example.

      Disclaimer: I have not tried any of the American bargain beers: Pabst, Schlitz, Colt 45, etc., so I could ultimately be wrong.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    6. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      Well there's a difference between people who drink good beer and people who drink "anything but budweiser".

      You'll never find me confusing my Guinness or Yuengling with Budweiser. (No matter how many I've already had. :-)

      Oh, and the canoe people truly are right - Budweiser really is fucking close to water. And Bud Light? Well, I think they removed the canoe...

    7. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by shawb · · Score: 1

      I personally prefer many of the super bargain beers to Bud: Pabst, Blatz, etc. And I really prefer a good beer. A good nut brown, stout or IPA. On special Occasions Delerium Tremens follwed up by a good Raspberry Lambic. Normally I just go with Vodka, though. The sugars in beer can leave me feeling really bad (I think my body is overly sensitive to sugars and refined starches in general.)

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    8. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by shufler · · Score: 1
    9. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by nauseaboy · · Score: 1

      They still make Blatz? I didn't think they did.

    10. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by shawb · · Score: 1

      I think it's currently done by Pabst. Still tastes the same. Wow. Looking at that list: Pabst, Blatz, Schlitz, Stroh's, Old Milwaukee. Oooh... Schaefer Beer. Wow. Pabst is like liquid punk rock. Now if they would pick up Huber...

      Oh wow... champale.

      And can't forget... Colt 45.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    11. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by Exocet · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm like you - I prefer not to be able to see through my beers. Even better if light appears to bend into the the beer's event horizon.

      That being said, I love Red Stripe beer. If you hate most lagers you might like Red Stripe.

      PS: For dark beers, Deschutes Brewery makes Black Butte Porter. Their Obsidian Stout sucks, IMO, but the Black Butte is awesome.

      --
      Exocet Industries - Taking over the world, one computer at a
    12. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by nauseaboy · · Score: 1

      That's amazing. I really want some Blatz now.

    13. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by shawb · · Score: 1

      Thankfully I'm going to the side bar at my favorite bar tonight. Notice the first beer they have on tap.

      God bless Milwaukee. And God bless the Landmark. Check the arcade... that's right, five pinball machines. That's not even counting the Playboy pinball in the back bar. And four REAL dart boards (even though the chalkboards for keeping score kinda don't work very well.)

      And then there's the regulars who hang out there: inspiration for my favorite toast: "to good friends, and bad influences."

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    14. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by nauseaboy · · Score: 1

      This is my favorite local watering hole. The only other one in existance is in Munich, Gerrmany.

    15. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a big fan of Miller largely due to locale and their awesome support of the Brewers, but if you go do the brewery tour, you may be surprised by the free sample you get at the end (the one you get in the chilled glass, not the one in a plastic cup). I still don't care for Ice House, but that was easily the best beer I have ever had.

    16. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention that, but I have a very negative reaction to Red Stripe. I don't know what it is, but there's something about it that that just makes my skin crawl when I take a sip.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    17. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by Exocet · · Score: 1

      Oh well. There are lots of beers, as long as you aren't drinking cheap shit ...whatever floats your boat. :)

      --
      Exocet Industries - Taking over the world, one computer at a
    18. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 1

      Nice beer, but no national distribution.

    19. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      Budweiser is definately one of the worst beers I have ever encountered. As a home brewer and alcoholic, I can safely say even I can make better beer.

      Fosters Lager is almost completely unobtainable here in Australia, with perhaps one in every four bottleshops selling it in small quantities, which nobody buys.

      A little pointer for even the pretentious to be aware of: Guinness is a stout, specifically a draught stout beer, and should not be confused with a blonde beer. Amusingly, the Guinness brewery actually has a license to produce Budweiser. (source: Wikipedia)

      Blonde beers and ales are generally lighter in colour, texture and flavour than a stout, although it's likely that a good beer drinker will have a diverse palate that enables enjoyment of a variety of beers not including budweiser, fosters, or any beer produced by the Swan Brewery in WA.

      In defense of american beer (yes, I can hear you all laughing from here) there is a strong community of home brewers and microbreweries in the states that produce beer which is around as good as anything you'll find in the world (excluding europe).

      This article is revealing however, that the barley prices must be so high in the USA that breweries use rice to bulk their wort. That would be unforgivable in Australia and I believe downright illegal in Germany (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, IANABL)

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    20. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Malt Liquor is not a type of beer. It is a term stupid sate legislatures in the US forced beers with slightly higher alcohol content to put on thier labels. Which beers are "malt liquors" depends entirely on what state you are in.

    21. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by speculatrix · · Score: 1


      "put it back in the horse", said one visitor to the US on drinking American beer!

      true, there are many people who only care that their drink is cold & not water, but there are many people who really enjoy beer and discovering new beers. try the Flying Saucer pub in Forth Worth TX for example.

      the real tragedy about Budweiser is that the original Czech product, http://www.budvar.cz/ Budweiser Budvar is a really nice beer.

    22. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by fra+b · · Score: 1

      Unless you're in the Republic of Ireland you are almost definately drinking a very poor approximation to real Guinness which tastes like tramp's toenails (Irish equivilant of hobo ass)

    23. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1
      Sad but true.

      However, UK Guinness is, I've found, far superior to the stuff they get in the US.

      And at the end of the day, poor-quality Guinness is stell better than pretty much anything else out there. Not to mention it has traveled a little better than some of my other favorite drinks. The American-brewed version of Newcastle Brown Ale, for example, is just plain revolting.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    24. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by shufler · · Score: 1

      Malt Liquor is not a type of beer

      I know. That's why I pointed out that it was a Malt Liquor.

      It's not a stupid term, but an actual definition for how it is brewed.

    25. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In your experience? 99%? You don't drink beer?

      How can you make the claim of 99%? What methods did you use to perform your research that support this claim? If you don't know what you're talking about, then it's best to not talk about it. There is a clearly defined vomit-flavored aftertaste to Budweiser. Anyone can pick it out.

    26. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Disclaimer: I have not tried any of the American bargain beers: Pabst, Schlitz, Colt 45, etc., so I could ultimately be wrong."

      Home brewer here... You are not wrong!!! Don't bother trying unless you have some issues with yourself.

      But there is one thing that I have learned is that color and taste are not connected. One example is that IPA's have a very light color but rock the house. I have also had black colored water as well.

    27. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too true.

      On the up-side, the cans of Guinness are excellent. Not quite the same as draught, but close enough and perfectly consistant.

    28. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by Go_Ask_Alex · · Score: 1

      Budweiser and other companies export malt and other beer making products to breweries in Europe. It has been awhile but I believe that Bud has at least one plant in Wisconsin dedicated to export.

    29. Re:To hear many foreigners talk about US beer by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I can't stand Budweiser, but I like Bud Lite okay. It says something about a beer when watering it down improves it. I only drink it in social situations (when it is offered, to be polite) or when I am on a lake or similar. It's fucking close to water, so drinking it when you are thirsty is not automatically a horrible mistake.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. Business opportunity! by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I see a clever new business opportunity here:

    GenetiBrau: the Beer made from 100% genetically modified ingredients!

    (I'd drink it.)

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Business opportunity! by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Only if they manage to make plants that produce skittles or perhaps tommaco.

    2. Re:Business opportunity! by nauseaboy · · Score: 1

      GenetiBrau is people! GenetiBrau is people!

    3. Re:Business opportunity! by Ken+D · · Score: 1

      You are too late: GM Beer to hit the shelves

  9. Not water by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1

    Americans drink beery, watery-tasting piss.
    Canadians drink watery, beery-tasting piss.
    Aussies drink anything with alcohol in it.

    --
    Yeah, right.
    1. Re:Not water by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      If you consider budweiser watery-tasting piss, that's the best compliment I have ever heard.

      To seriously like budweiser, you'd have to be ULTRA PATRIOTIC with no tongue. And prefer the taste of battery acid + rubbing alcohol.

  10. Other way around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the nascar fans will acquire the powers of, hmm, rice. Whenever they get drunk, they will become tasty and irresistable to asians.

    You got that the other way around: whenever you get drunk, asians become tasty and irresistable. I dated this incredibly cute Japanese girl last year and she had the best-tasting privates of any girl I've ever been with. I used to love to go down on her (and, needless to say, she was in 7th heaven when I did). Everytime I got drunk, we both knew what was going to happen that night...

    1. Re:Other way around by scupper · · Score: 1
      he said:
      best-tasting privates
  11. Life is not all ... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

    Life is not all genetically modified skittles and beer you know!

  12. not any gm rice just drug rice by bmongar · · Score: 1

    No. 1 buyer of rice as well as its largest brewer, says it won't buy rice from Missouri if genetically modified, drug-making crops are allowed to be grown in the state.

    It isn't that they don't want any gm rice to be grown in Missouri. They are concerned about contamination from rice designed to grow drugs. If drugs got into their beer then they would have some serious problems.

    --
    As x approaches total apathy I couldn't care less.
    1. Re:not any gm rice just drug rice by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1
      If drugs got into their beer then they would have some serious problems.



      You got your drugs in my beer!

      You got your beer on my drugs!

      Now you can have both! Two great highs that go great together!

      There's no wrong way to drink a Reese's.
      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    2. Re:not any gm rice just drug rice by Muhammar · · Score: 1

      Even though the taste is bad, their beer-soda sells pretty good and they need to maintain the reproducibility of the manufacturing procedure so they do not to want fiddle with the ingredients. Besides, it is a good marketing ploy. (Some time ago, Bud had an large ad campain emphasizing that they never use any preservatives - like benzoate - in their beer. Which is fair enough except that no brewery does that either.)

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    3. Re:not any gm rice just drug rice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer the term "alcopop" although that is generally reserved for those fruity malt beverage things like hooch.

    4. Re:not any gm rice just drug rice by jusdisgi · · Score: 1

      If drugs got into their beer then they would have some serious problems.

      Wait, what was the point of beer again? I'd say the big problems would start if the drugs somehow got left out.

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
  13. Real Beer has no rice by gvc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Where I come from, beer is made from barley, hops, yeast and water.

    Not rice, corn or potatoes.

    1. Re:Real Beer has no rice by DrKyle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and you probably think a Martini only contains Gin, Vermouth and an olive. Damn purists, not letting the rest of us destroy their favorite concoctions by bastardizing the name with any ingredients we wish. Next you'll tell me This stuff isn't butter, but there it is, right in the name you fascist!

    2. Re:Real Beer has no rice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I come from, words have meanings which can evolve over time.

    3. Re:Real Beer has no rice by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      Correct. That's why the US has things almost, but not entirely unlike "beer", "chocolate", "bread" and "freedom".

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    4. Re:Real Beer has no rice by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 4, Informative
      How did this get modded informative? First, even the Germans make plenty of wheat beer. Last I checked, malted wheat ain't barley.

      Second, the quality of the finished product has little to do with whether or not the brewer uses rice, corn or potatoes. Budweiser sucks because they use less malt and hops than in a traditional pilsner, and because they go to extraordinary efforts to remove whatever flavor they do add to the beer.

      For that matter, I've had some excellent beers made with all three of your verboten grains (yes, including potatoes), and some of the best beers in the world are made with added sugar.

      For an example of a classic beer made with corn, check out the Classic American Pilsner. This is a style of beer brewed in America before Prohibition, and which was revived in large part through the efforts of homebrewer Jeff Renner. Unfortunately, it is true that there aren't any good commercial examples.

    5. Re:Real Beer has no rice by 01000011011101000111 · · Score: 1

      Best. Humorous/sarcastic. Post. Ever.
      I tip my hat to you...

      --
      Programming is an Art. I am an Artist. Does that mean I get to wear a daft hat?
    6. Re:Real Beer has no rice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The problem here is this: it's not that a pilsner made with rice isn't real beer, it's that pilsner beers in general aren't real beer. Ease of distribution and storage != good beer.

    7. Re:Real Beer has no rice by winwar · · Score: 1

      "it's that pilsner beers in general aren't real beer."

      Yes, they are real beers. Now we could debate whether macro pilsners are real beers...

      "Ease of distribution and storage != good beer."

      Nor does it mean BAD beer either.

      Remember, the large brewers have a lot of talent. It takes a lot of skill to remove flavor from beer and brew it in many locations and have it taste the same. The previous statement is both scary and sad....

    8. Re:Real Beer has no rice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would've been better had he used the canonical no-tea sentence form. The original format has a rhythm which is almost, but not quite, entirely unlike the grandparent's.

  14. Another Misleading Story... by tOaOMiB · · Score: 5, Informative

    Please do note that this is not a story about Budweiser not using GMO. In fact, there is nothing that says they are even against GM rice--just rice being modified to produce drugs grow outside, where it can potentially crosspollinate with rice meant for consumption. While the summary states that Anheuser-Busch "will not buy rice from Missouri if genetically modified crops are allowed in the state," the article clearly states they "won't buy rice from Missouri if genetically modified, drug-making crops are allowed to be grown in the state."

    The trolling summary then continues on with links to the popularity of Bud and the uprising Tsing Tao for no obvious reason.

    1. Re:Another Misleading Story... by booch · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with you. I'm normally not against GM food. Heck, humans have been genetically modifying food the old-fashioned way (cross-breeding, hybridization) for thousands of years. But when you're using GM modified plants to create pharmaceutical products, you're no longer talking about food.

      The biggest problem I see with GM plants is the cross-pollination problem. Crop A is for human consumption, and has been growing fine. Crop B is growing some new rat poison. Crop A gets cross-pollinated by Crop B. Now you've got people eating rat poison. Unfortunately, there's no easy way to prevent cross-pollination of outside crops. A truly closed system is the only way to prevent it. And Ventria's claim that an outdoor field could be considered a closed system is ridiculous.

      Another scary aspect of this is that the only court case I've heard regarding GM crops was a situation in which the "manufacturer" of Crop B seeds sued and won against a Crop A farmer who ended up with some Crop B in his fields.

      While I think GM is a net positive, I think the GM industry needs to figure out a way to prevent cross-pollination. (Unfortunately, this probably means growing in greenhouses, or perhaps infertile crops.) If they don't, I think they should be sued into oblivion by the first organic farmer who gets "infected" by GM.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    2. Re:Another Misleading Story... by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In fact, there is nothing that says they are even against GM rice--just rice being modified to produce drugs grow outside, where it can potentially crosspollinate with rice meant for consumption.

      Yes, Budweiser hasn't said "no GMOs", they're afraid of this particular crop.

      That's true.

      But every single one of these damned GM plants that have been deployed have cross-pollenated and caused problems. Monsanto's wheat being the most eggregious example.

      I'm absolutely terrified by all of this stuff, because it won't take long before the native species we started with are all wiped out in favour of these GMOs.

      In this case, even though we can do this to a plant, I'm not 100% sure we should until we know how to control it/fix it.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Another Misleading Story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Unfortunately, there's no easy way to prevent cross-pollination of outside crops. A truly closed system is the only way to prevent it."

      What exactly is a "truly closed system"? Is it the same kind of system they used when they manufactured killer bees?

  15. This decision on GM rice says a lot about.... by scupper · · Score: 4, Interesting

    what Anheuser-Busch thinks of it's customers, about who they see as their potential new customers, and how they approach advertising to them.

    They are fearful, not of the average white american's reaction to GM rice, but of the reaction from Hispanics, who are coming from agrarian cultures, and are doubly suspicious of any gm agri products, especially corn and rice.

    Hispanics also represent the fastest growing group of drinkers of "Bud".

    1. Re:This decision on GM rice says a lot about.... by DaveJay · · Score: 1

      Wow. Different people have several different theories about why Budweiser would take this step -- all of them reasonable.

      With that many reasons presented by laypeople off the top of their heads, their more informed position should come as no surprise.

  16. genetically modified rice by wertarbyte · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't know which scenario is scarier: modified rice, or rice in a beer!?

    --
    Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
    1. Re:genetically modified rice by shawb · · Score: 1

      I know of a few people who are fans of tsing tao, but I personally think it tastes quite rank.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    2. Re:genetically modified rice by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      The Asians seem to like it.

      Its called sake (Sah-kee). Pretty strong stuff for the most part.

      http://www.sake-world.com/html/rice.html

    3. Re:genetically modified rice by tengwar · · Score: 1

      No, that's much more like a wine, and it's served hot.

    4. Re:genetically modified rice by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

      It is called "rice wine" but that is incorrect.

      Wine is fermented fruit juice. Apple wine, peach wine, grape wine.

      Beer is fermented grain.

      If you take you beer and distal it, you get whisky.

      Rice is a grain. Thus, fermented rice is beer.

    5. Re:genetically modified rice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may by wrong on the brand, but I think that one of the reasons that Pabst Blue Ribbon (PBR) lost most of it's market share what that the company was taken over by bean counters. The accountant types decided to reduce the wheat and increase the rice in the beer because it was cheaper and increased their profit margin. It ended up tasting like camel piss, so they went from being a strong brand to an also ran. I didn't know that Bud had rice in it, but I'm not suprised becasue I hate Bud. I have literally had a soft drink rather then a Bud. Ick.

    6. Re:genetically modified rice by tengwar · · Score: 1
      hokay, if you want to be pedantic - (a) I said it was like wine; (b) beer has hops in it, you're thinking of ale; (c) "wine" comes from a Latin root which only covers grapes, not other fruits.

      Now go and compare sake and a rice "beer" and you'll see that they are very different drinks.

    7. Re:genetically modified rice by gotih · · Score: 1

      my favorite sake (because i can find it for $4 a bottle) is best at room temperature. there are many variaties of sake which are best cold. point is, careful with that microwave. you might ruin a sake by warming it.

      --

      fear is the mind killer
  17. Oh sure I drink it by ramunas · · Score: 1

    I like budwiser, the original Czech one of course :)

    --
    ./R My blog
    1. Re:Oh sure I drink it by straybullets · · Score: 1

      where are my mod points ? this should be modded up +5 "we are sick of cheap remakes we want the original stuff" ;)

      --
      With that aggravating beauty, Lulu Walls.
  18. Since when is rice in real beer by mosabua · · Score: 1

    Geez ... another reason not to drink Budweiser so called beer. I still prefer real beer brewed following the Reinheitsgebot . No other stuff ... certainly not rice. If you wanna use rice.. call it something else.

    1. Re:Since when is rice in real beer by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      Rice is in LOTS of beer, not just Bud. In fact, it's in MOST beer...

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    2. Re:Since when is rice in real beer by ianmakesbeer · · Score: 1

      Bullpuckey. Rice is not in MOST beer. /grad student, brewing lab.

      --
      i can't think of a witty signature, so i won't try.
    3. Re:Since when is rice in real beer by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      Bullpuckey. Rice is not in MOST beer. /grad student, brewing lab.

      Well, that's your story. But it does not jive with Google on the subject.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    4. Re:Since when is rice in real beer by cswingle · · Score: 1

      American beer is traditionally brewed with 6-row barley instead of the 2-row that is used in Britian. 6-row barley has much higher protein content, which makes it very good at converting other grains into sugars that the yeast turn into alcohol and CO2. Protein also contributes to haziness and stability problems. So the traditional American brewer would use adjuncts (non-barley grains) to help lower the protein content of the beer, allowing it to last longer and be clearer. Corn is more typical as an adjunct, especially traditionally, but there's nothing wrong with brewing beer with other grains. In fact, if you're brewing with American 6-row barley, you're probably better off with some adjuncts.

      That being said, I can't remember the last time I had a Budweiser. Why bother when I can brew something better on my own, and there are craft breweries all over the world making better beer than Budweiser.

      Chris Swingley
      Brewer

      --
      cswingle Fairbanks AK
    5. Re:Since when is rice in real beer by ianmakesbeer · · Score: 1

      ... and Google is the penultimate reference for anything and everything?

      It all depends on how you ask the question: if you ask "What adjunct is used in the most beer, volumetrically?" Its rice, due to Anheuser Busch, the world's largest brewer.

      If, however, you ask "Which adjunct is most commonly used in brewing?" you would get a different answer.

      OR, if you ask "Out of all the different beer brands produced in the world, how many use rice as an adjunct?" Answer, not that many. This last phrasing weighs Budweiser the same as Widmer Hef, for example, which I believe is at the heart of the question in hand. In other words, the number of macrobrew brands is less than the number of craft/microbrew brands, which use virtually no adjuncts other than wheat.

      Stewart, Graham G. "Adjuncts" Handbook of Brewing, edited by William A. Hardwick. New York, NY. Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1995: "Rice is the second most common adjunct used in brewing..."

      The first, you ask? Corn.

      --
      i can't think of a witty signature, so i won't try.
    6. Re:Since when is rice in real beer by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      Blaw, blaw, blaw, blaw.

      If you are a brewer, and you ignore rice, you are not a good brewer.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    7. Re:Since when is rice in real beer by ianmakesbeer · · Score: 1

      Ok, you keep on appreciating your flavorless beer. Personally, I, and all the brewmasters I know (Bridgeport, Rogue, Widmer, Pyramid, Portland Brewing, Redhook, Big Sky, Full Sail to name a few) enjoy using all malt and producing beer you can actually taste. But of course they aren't good brewers because they don't use rice, right?

      --
      i can't think of a witty signature, so i won't try.
    8. Re:Since when is rice in real beer by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      No one ever said rice only. Just one of many parts.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    9. Re:Since when is rice in real beer by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      Ok, you keep on appreciating your flavorless beer. Personally, I, and all the brewmasters I know (Bridgeport, Rogue, Widmer, Pyramid, Portland Brewing, Redhook, Big Sky, Full Sail to name a few) enjoy using all malt and producing beer you can actually taste. But of course they aren't good brewers because they don't use rice, right?

      Ah yes. the good old American beer snob.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    10. Re:Since when is rice in real beer by ianmakesbeer · · Score: 1

      Beer snob? Most definitely. And proud of it. But when you have to drink beer as part of your job and your schooling (not to mention make it), and when you have to learn how to pick out defects and where those defects come from, your viewpoint has to change.

      --
      i can't think of a witty signature, so i won't try.
    11. Re:Since when is rice in real beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Biir perhaps?

  19. WW2 by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 1

    Big US breweries switched to using rice in their mash during WW2 to appeal to the predominately female population and because of grain rationing. When the war ended, they found it was cheaper just to continue to use rice.

    The microbrew craze a while back has become popular almost soley due to the fact that they're using "traditional" ingredients like malt to make a more robust tasting beer - like we used to drink.

    --
    There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
  20. Not Exactly by Shihar · · Score: 1

    The problem is not that Anheuser-Busch is worried about pissing off Europe. The problem is that a drug company wants to produce rice designed to create a drug in open fields. Anheuser-Busch doesn't want that rice to contaminate their rice.

    I am all for genetic engineering of pretty much everything, including things I stuff in my mouth. I don't think that genetic engineering is the boogie man. I don't even care if genetic strains blow to the wind and cross pollinate... so long as there is nothing in them that could potentially be harmful. Genetic cross pollination happens today all the time. Throwing in some human cracks at genetic code really doesn't worry me. That said, such genetic cross pollination needs to be treated like pollution.

    It is a necessary evil, but it certainly needs some minimal level of oversight. If your genetic material is going to drift in the wind, you need to take responsibility for where it ends up, especially if it is harmful to other products. In the case of using genetic engineering to make crops produce drugs, Anheuser-Busch is right to put their foot down and demand steps be taken to prevent contamination of their own crops. It is one thing to catch a gene that makes your rice whiter down the wind from the farm a mile away, it is very much another thing to get a gene that puts a drug into rice meant for consumption.

    IMO, this is just a straight up case of pollution. One guy wants to put something potentially harmful in the area. Either society needs to agree to accept the potential risks associated with the pollution, or steps need to be taken to limit the pollution (green houses come to mind). Whatever the case, the risks need to be understood or precautions taken. The fact that Anheuser-Busch, a company with absolutely zero interest in the debate otherwise is speaking up is a pretty clear indication that either the risks are not properly known, or that the risks are known and have been deemed too high.

    1. Re:Not Exactly by straybullets · · Score: 1

      so long as there is nothing in them that could potentially be harmful

      IIRC there are already many case of GM plants withdrawn from market after it was found out that the agro tech company lied about the genetic mods and was actually spreading antibiotic resistance that was meant to only select the gm modified breed.

      More over, simple resistance against a round up like chemical product, which is already common practice and selled as "weed/chemical" bundle, is obviously a very risky behaviour in the light of cross pollination.

      --
      With that aggravating beauty, Lulu Walls.
    2. Re:Not Exactly by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I am all for genetic engineering of pretty much everything, including things I stuff in my mouth... [snip] ...so long as there is nothing in them that could potentially be harmful.

      And thanks to you (and your children), we'll all know if they are harmful in about 10/20 years. There have been many things hailed as harmless by the companies hawking them; absbestos, Thalidomide (v. nasty), tobacco blah blah blah. They are just molecules, now we're talking genes. God, how often do we hear of the "unknown long term effects of Ecstacy" been touted as reason not to take it?

      If you want to take their word for it being "harmless", then I am quite glad to have you as my guinea pig!! :-)

      The problem is not that Anheuser-Busch is worried about pissing off Europe. The problem is that a drug company wants to produce rice designed to create a drug in open fields. Anheuser-Busch doesn't want that rice to contaminate their rice.

      Opinions here in Europe on GM are mostly sceptical. "GM free" is a selling point, and Bud cares about how many units it shifts more than anything else on the planet. If there rice were to be contaminated, it would definately make the news and cost them sales. No one would be pissed off, they just wouldn't sell any.

      Sales of Bud aren't as high as they once were say 10 years ago. It's got an "asshole" stigma about it here now; it's kinda what US style "jocks" would drink if I were to think of an equivalent social group to what we have here. European beers had lots of ad drives over the last while, and frankly few could argue that Bud wins on taste. So, bud took a pasting. Risking further losses would be dangerous as they have investments in "brewed under license" franchises.

  21. Chinese vs. American consumption by Noah+Adler · · Score: 1

    It's true that there are over four times as many Chinese people as Americans; however, please bear in mind that the average American is over five times more massive than the average Chinese (even more if you don't grant them Yao's contribution!), and it logically follows that we consume more beer.

    Of course, me being the sympathetic soul that I am, I try to do my part to level the playing field for our Chinese friends by not drinking Budweiser.

    1. Re:Chinese vs. American consumption by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      As I know, Chinese people are not overweight because of their lifestyle diet. Or more over, they do not over eat.

      I'm curious though; as China becomes more modern and western-like in the next few generations, I wonder if we will start seeing a lot more fat and overweight Chinese.

      It would seem that all developed nations end up having a health regarding weight problems. I suppose cheap food leads to gluttony. Just a thought...

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  22. Budwiser by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Maybe their ad agency balked at having to rewrite for their new motto:

    "We use only the finest barrley mall*t, ryce*, hopps*, yeest*, and water."

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  23. Since... by Louse · · Score: 1, Insightful

    GMO = sick.sick.sick. natural foods/meats and their cultivation are the keystones to human-thought evolution. Modifying them isnt part of cultivation, it's bastardizing an organism's growth process for profit. Plants/animals function in periods of seasons, and to try and alter that effects the nature of the plants ability to mature - which can deminish the amount of nutrients in the organism, and its consumer.

    1. Re:Since... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Insightful
      natural foods/meats and their cultivation are the keystones to human-thought evolution.
      Are they? I've been eating processed foods all my life and I can still think. On the other hand I haven't evolved recently so maybe you have a point.
      Modifying them isnt part of cultivation
      That's an uninteresting semantic quibble.
      it's bastardizing an organism's growth process
      Emotional language like this suggests you've retired your ability to actually think.
      for profit.
      What does that have to do with it? Why do you think people sell organic foods or work on organic farms? For love? Actually, it's for profit.
      Plants/animals function in periods of seasons
      Eh? Do you know any biology.
      and to try and alter
      "Try and". That's horrible writing.
      that effects
      Affects, affects, affects.
      the nature of the plants ability to mature - which can deminish the amount of nutrients in the organism,
      Do you have a citation to a paper you can post to back up your claims.
      and its consumer.
      Well, if you're not eating GMO foods I suggest you examine your diet closely to find out what's inhibiting your thought-evolution.
      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    2. Re:Since... by william_w_bush · · Score: 1

      Wow, broad generalisms, nifty.

      GMO is neither good nor evil in itself, its a technology. Yeah GM'ing rice to make people more hungry or to grow faster w/o nutrients is vry bad, but making wheat more resistant to pests or less likely to get ergot might be a "good thing"(tm). Even modding a strain of wheat that grows better in regions with poorer soil or less water could save lives to people who can't grow their own food today. Not all the world is Europe and the US.

      Judging a technology based on its worst possibly product is very "human", a word that just happens to not rhyme at all with "stupid".

      Damn the internet because of child porn?

      Judge the act, not the idea.

      --
      The first rule of USENET is you do not talk about USENET.
  24. Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Real men drink only Real beer, not some suped up, GMO'd, fancy-pants lab engineered, hyper-modern Monsonto @!$#%. PERIOD

  25. Two points. by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

    1. Beer should not contain rice.

    2. It's debatable wether Budweiser is beer in the first place.

    1. Re:Two points. by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      This is what I was going to point out.

    2. Re:Two points. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in LA and I happened to drive by the Bud plant in the San Fernando valley this weekend. I couldn't help but think "Where are the camels and where do they put the camel shit?" Clearly Bud is not beer, it's camel piss.

  26. Fear Of a Scare Campaign by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    > I'm not sure what they're afraid of from
    > genetically modified rice.

    They are afraid that the anti-GM loons will launch a scare campaign about how drinking Bud will cause your kids to have three eyes.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  27. who gives a sh!t it has alcohol by schematix · · Score: 1

    I can't stand people who say bud/bud light/<insert american beer name here> doesn't taste like beer. Please realize that taste is subjective. Most people that I have met do not like the taste of beer and thus bud/bud light is a great choice for them when they do drink beer. It is also a good beer when you just want to drink a large quantity because it is not nearly as heavy as most "good" beers. Personally I am a fan of some American beers such as Sierra Nevada Pale Ale and Samual Adams Boston Lager. Both of those have significantly more taste than any A/B product but many people find them to taste putrid. Great! More for me!

    --
    Scott
    1. Re:who gives a sh!t it has alcohol by SpookyFish · · Score: 1

      Amen!

    2. Re:who gives a sh!t it has alcohol by 01000011011101000111 · · Score: 1

      It has alcohol? You call 5% Alcohol??? I'll stick with Guiness or (when I can get it) London Pride, thanx... Drinking (or trying to) Fosters and Bud as a young man nearly put me off beer for life :S Horrible taste, and I could get drunk quicker on tap water... One thing I will say for "light" beers is that they do make good snakebite 'n blacks... about the only thing you can use them for imho.

      --
      Programming is an Art. I am an Artist. Does that mean I get to wear a daft hat?
  28. Budweiser Vetos Genetically Modified Rice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    beer made from rice ..... YUKKKKKKKK

  29. obviously... by NaturePhotog · · Score: 1

    Obviously, AB is worried that cross-pollination will occur in to rice used for Budweiser. Once the cross-pollination occurs, mutations will take place, causing Budweiser drinkers' IQs to double, making them too smart to drink swill like that :-)

  30. How do you know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply put, Budweiser tastes like hobo ass

    That doesn't sound like a taste test I'd take part in, but to each his own.

  31. Budweiser is Tasty.... IF... by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 2, Informative
    ... you buy it in Canada. Budweiser brewed in Canada is brewed by Molson (I think... or Labatts)... using Molson's techniques. In a recent taste test, 3 out of 5 people couldnt tell Canadian beer from Budweiser brewed in Canada. 5 out of 5 knew EXACTLY when they had tasted the American Bud.



    I just think it's funny that Budweiser, knowing that not a single damn Canadian would buy THEIR Beer, just brew Canadian beer and stick it in Bud cans. There's a metaphor there, but I can't quite get a grip on it.

    --
    I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
  32. Uhm, Rice, Excuse Me?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, what does a beer company need rice for? Hops, yeast, water, barley, that is what I expect in a beer. I do understand that beer is made of rice in regions where there is mostly rice instead of other crops, for practical, historical and cultural reasons.

    What can we expect as upcoming news? "Budweiser Vetos Genetically Modified Mice?" Uggh..

  33. Ob. Monty Python joke: by fsh · · Score: 1

    Why is drinking American beer like making love in a canoe?

    They're both fucking close to water!

    The Bruces, Live at the Hollywood Bowl

    --
    fsh
  34. Budweiser is a Czech beer, not American. by torpor · · Score: 1

    And Czech Budweiser is among the best in the world.

    Seriously.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  35. That's funny.... by kyrcant · · Score: 1

    I might buy their horrible swill just because it is GE!

  36. Tsing Tao by booch · · Score: 1
    I think he must have been thinking that Tsing Tao must sell more beer than Budweiser, because it's the best-selling Chinese beer, and there are 4 times as many Chinese people as Americans. Poor logic.

    And it's also quite false. Tsingtao only has 12% of the Chinese beer market, while Anheuser-Busch has a 50% share of the US market. And Americans drink quite a bit more beer per capita than the Chinese -- the Chinese beer market just recently surpassed the US market. A-B sells over 100 million barrels of beer a year. Tsingtao sells over 3 million tons of beer a year, which comes to about 25 million barrels.

    By the way, Anheuser-Busch owns 27% of Tsingtao. A-B made that move because the Chinese beer market is growing a lot faster than the US market. Also, China is ripe for consolidation, just like the US was in the 1950s.

    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
  37. What is "real" beer anyway? by AB3A · · Score: 1

    Note to moderators: The parent post speaks wisdom. Please mod up.

    I brew my own beer too. Adjuncts can be anything starchy. Don't forget that many brewers often add honey, molassas, even lactose for interesting taste effects.

    The key factor is that none of these ingredients should be a major constituent of the beer. In other words, you should be preparing beer, not mead; so don't go overboard on the honey.

    Also, the use of hops is relatively recent. Beer recipies have been found in the oldest records known to humanity. You can find them in Babelonian clay tablets, and on Egyptian tombs. Against that backdrop, hops are relatively recent --they've only been in common use for the last three centuries or so.

    So what is beer? Beer's primary constituent should be fermented maltose. That's it. Everything else is up for grabs...

    --
    Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
    1. Re:What is "real" beer anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hops taste fucking awful, like earwax. Does anyone make beer WITHOUT hops?

    2. Re:What is "real" beer anyway? by AB3A · · Score: 1

      :-) There is no accounting for other's tastes. I like a "hoppy" beer. Maybe you're used to some poorly crafted beer?

      However, you could seek out some of the German styles of beer. Many are very light on the hop usage.

      The reason we use hops is really one of sanitation. Hops are a preservative. It's not easy fermenting all that maltose without hops to keep other sorts of off-flavors in check.

      Before Hops came in to common use, brewers used lots of other interesting spices. It is known that the Egyptians used Coriander. Another spice was Cinnamon (you think hops are bitter?).

      I can't think of the others off the top of my head, but I'm sure some other /. readers will...

      --
      Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
  38. Nothing's Wrong With That ! by dkhanmam · · Score: 1

    Who knows what are potential long-term side-effects of genetic engineering ? ...

  39. *cough* by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
    I, for one, hail our new Tongueless Ultra Patriotic Overlords.

    Mandatory Battery Acid + Isopropyl Alcohol drinks for everyone! Huzzah!

    --
    Yeah, right.
  40. No such drink by kahei · · Score: 1


    There's not actually any such drink as a 'Bud Ick'. But it's an expression you hear frequently all the same.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  41. Bad by Ramon+Maruko · · Score: 1

    Many people dont trust genetically modified rice. They think that it has many bad side-effects.

  42. Anheuser-Busch, Ventria settle biotech rice disput by scupper · · Score: 1
    Anheuser-Busch, Ventria settle biotech rice dispute
    Sacramento Business Journal - 1:10 PM PDT Monday
    http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2005 /04/18/daily7.html

    Local biotech company Ventria Bioscience has agreed to plant genetically modified rice at least 120 miles away from other rice fields in Missouri, defusing a showdown with brewing giant Anheuser-Busch Cos. Inc., which had said it would not buy Missouri rice if biotech rice was grown in the state.

    Sacramento-based Ventria, which faced opposition in California and has announced plans to move to Missouri, has a permit pending to grow genetically modified rice in southeast Missouri. The rice would produce two types of human proteins which help boost the immune system. Anheuser-Busch and Ventria agreed that Ventria would not plant genetically modified crops any closer than 120 miles from other Missouri rice fields. Anheuser-Busch plans to continue buying Missouri rice.

    Missouri is the nation's sixth-largest rice producing state.

    Ventria has a collaboration agreement with Northwest Missouri State in Maryville, Mo., to further develop the life sciences industry in the state.