i have to keep proof of concept engine small (see CLI only) i use AWT, not Swing
the whole installation (includes debug info and GUI front end) is 600K and i think it's a lot.
port to C++ is in functional requirements spec. plugin for Firefox is there too
WEB developer can decide to distribute Rodi as an applet (works today). think about PHP which generates Rodi configuration sript (rodi configuration is script based), prepares HTML page with applet. user clicks and the applet does the rest - swarming, etc.
SWT will put additonal 1M+ to the package.
i am not a GUI guru. i hope ideas from Rodi will be used by people smarter than me and in a couple of years from now i will get result comparable to Azureus.
"When you start decentralizing trackers and adding anonymity, then you sacrifice speed, which is why BT is good."
100% agree. BT is good and has it's applications. Rodi has some other applications, Tor/I2P/Mute/WASTE all have strong and weak sides. the world is multidimensional and i would like to keep it this way.
IP spoof and bouncers in Rodi are optional and is OFF by default. Rodi behaves as UDP based "trackerless" Bittorrent if you do not make any additonal efforts.
Ability to use IP spoofing is a bonus, as well as signed with DSA 512/-1o24 packetc, multicast, etc.
" Most individuals have no reason to hide things by default."
Rodi by default behaves like Bittorrent. No bouncers, no IP spoofing. pure and clean UDP streaming (+DNS tunneling, +RTP tunneling, +multicats, +members only hubs ,...)
"It would be better if B stipped all IP information from A before sending it to C"
yes, Rodi bouncer does exactly this - it's a statefull proxy. IP header will contain Rodi bouncer information and no routing information to the origin of packet whatsoever
" Most individuals have no reason to hide things by default."
Rodi by default behaves like Bittorrent. No bouhncers, no IP spoofing. pure and clean UDP streaming (...and DNS tunneling, and RTP tunneling, and multicats, and members only hubs , and...)
"You are responsible for what passes through your system, end of story"
Frankly i do not understand how Tor is in any way better than Mute or Ants.
Tor network reached 100 servers recently. it means that there are 100 IP addresses which are needed to be blocked to shutdown the whole network.
i must say that Websense blocks about 10K websites related to proxy severs. Websense blocks lists of Proxys, commercial proxys like anonymizer and open source projects like HTTPTunnel. What prevents any government or ISP to block 100 IPs ?
The following screenshot was taken a couple of minutes ago http://larytet.sourceforge.net/betaTesting/websens e_Tor.PNG
i truly do not understand all the fuss about the application. With all respect to EFF, i think it was wrong to choose one application among may be 10 others. I will put it bluntly - i think EFF makes mistake encouraging this or that specific project.
" Zero Knowledge systems made their anonymizng network pseudonymous instead of truly anonymous"
Identification server in the Rodi network solves the same problem. Publisher (seed) in Rodi should establish relationships with bouncers. Private and public keys can be used to recognize trusted publishers. Bouncer adds routing rule manually according to explicit request from the publisher. see also http://larytet.sourceforge.net/userManual.shtml#ho wdoesitbesecure
i understand that speed is not that important. just to finish the distance is a great achievement.
why not to slow down near every obstacle and wait for actual impact. then try to estimate the obstacle using the information gotten from the impact. then decide about turning 40 degree and attemptiing again and so on.
Slashdot Mirror
in Rodi you can run hubs like in DC+ or in WASTE.
Rodi can operate exactly as BT. tracker is part of the client code
i do not know if you read my website ... you are 500% right about how it works
http://larytet.sourceforge.net/userManual.shtml#ip ortspoof1
i am handling slashdot alone please, let's move the discussion here http://www.methlabs.org/forums/showthread.php?t=12 902
i greatly appreciate your understanding, arkady
funny that you mention that, but actually they WERE created as a "natural sideffect"
think about IP port spoofing and load balancing and DDoS attacks.
i am not the guy who published on Slashdot. i was not asked to read the article before it was published.
i tried to post on Slashdot 2 or 3 months ago but was rejected. i learned about this posting from 20+ emails this morning (Pacfic Time)
help me with the logo, give me another one, make suggestions, give me ideas see alternative logo http://larytet.sourceforge.net/logos.shtml
+ ability to use multicast in the future, + signed by DSA 512/1024 packets (optional), + decetralized content search in text/pdf files/meta data.
do not underestimate Rodi. its' about five times larger than just IP spoofing. help it to happen. i invite you to particpate in the success story.
port to C++ is in functional requirements spec. plugin for Firefox is there too
WEB developer can decide to distribute Rodi as an applet (works today). think about PHP which generates Rodi configuration sript (rodi configuration is script based), prepares HTML page with applet. user clicks and the applet does the rest - swarming, etc.
SWT will put additonal 1M+ to the package.
i am not a GUI guru. i hope ideas from Rodi will be used by people smarter than me and in a couple of years from now i will get result comparable to Azureus.
Eclipse btw is really GOOOD
100% agree. BT is good and has it's applications. Rodi has some other applications, Tor/I2P/Mute/WASTE all have strong and weak sides. the world is multidimensional and i would like to keep it this way.
Ability to use IP spoofing is a bonus, as well as signed with DSA 512/-1o24 packetc, multicast, etc.
Rodi by default behaves like Bittorrent. No bouncers, no IP spoofing. pure and clean UDP streaming (+DNS tunneling, +RTP tunneling, +multicats, +members only hubs , ...)
yes, Rodi bouncer does exactly this - it's a statefull proxy. IP header will contain Rodi bouncer information and no routing information to the origin of packet whatsoever
fully decentralized content search is the reason behind Rodi. see wikipedia on Rodi
" Most individuals have no reason to hide things by default." Rodi by default behaves like Bittorrent. No bouhncers, no IP spoofing. pure and clean UDP streaming (...and DNS tunneling, and RTP tunneling, and multicats, and members only hubs , and ...)
yes, this is the idea
contact me larytet AT yahoo com
Frankly i do not understand how Tor is in any way better than Mute or Ants.
Tor network reached 100 servers recently. it means that there are 100 IP addresses which are needed to be blocked to shutdown the whole network.
i must say that Websense blocks about 10K websites related to proxy severs. Websense blocks lists of Proxys, commercial proxys like anonymizer and open source projects like HTTPTunnel. What prevents any government or ISP to block 100 IPs ? The following screenshot was taken a couple of minutes ago http://larytet.sourceforge.net/betaTesting/websens e_Tor.PNG
i truly do not understand all the fuss about the application. With all respect to EFF, i think it was wrong to choose one application among may be 10 others. I will put it bluntly - i think EFF makes mistake encouraging this or that specific project.
Identification server in the Rodi network solves the same problem. Publisher (seed) in Rodi should establish relationships with bouncers. Private and public keys can be used to recognize trusted publishers. Bouncer adds routing rule manually according to explicit request from the publisher. see also http://larytet.sourceforge.net/userManual.shtml#ho wdoesitbesecure
not neccessary. Bouncers do not always come together with spam. see http://larytet.sourceforge.net/rodiAnonymity.shtml
may i invite you to participate in testing of open source project Rodi ICQ#: 82857660
i am a principle developer of Rodi project. i invite you to participate in testing of Rodi ICQ#: 82857660
why not to slow down near every obstacle and wait for actual impact. then try to estimate the obstacle using the information gotten from the impact. then decide about turning 40 degree and attemptiing again and so on.
keyloggers can log copy&paste too and collect screenshots of most interesting places you visit, like internet browser.
place - Santa Clara, CA, US
time - now
1, 2, 3
see http://larytet.sourceforge.net/btRat.shtml