And your point is what? That it's OK to have an unconstitutional law because it was upheld by a judge? That's like saying it's OK to put an innocent man to death because his appeals were turned down by the supreme court. Injustice is injustice, even if the legal system green lights it.
This has nothing to do with other countries. It has to do with the US setting an example for the rest of the free world in regards to liberty and justice.
The Justice Department obtained the records under a federal statute that allows for the release of non-content Internet records without obtaining a search warrant, which requires prosecutors to demonstrate probable cause.
No search warrant was obtained. They couldn't even prove probable cause when they attempted to get a warrant, so they found a loophole. Anything else?
I suppose I prefer any president that doesn't take us to war over a personal vendetta. Perhaps I'm suggesting 13+ years later they have no idea where the uranium came from. The IAEA saying they believe it might have come from a mine that hasn't been active since before the first gulf war isn't exactly a smoking bullet.
Right, and she's arguing that her online account should be subject to US search and seizure laws. The Government completely bypassed their own rules, claiming because it's online they can ignore your right to privacy, and the need to get a warrant to obtain the information.
You just said that after Bush claimed there was yellow cake in Iraq, they found some. Your article says they found uranium in NORWAY, which came from Jordan, and the original dealer says he's "confident" it came from Iraq. Talk about a leap of faith. Any grain of salt to make Bush look like slightly less of a complete fucking failure?
No, Bush claimed that Iraq was trying to get yellow cake uranium from Africa. Interestingly enough, after the invasion it was discovered that Iraq had a small supply of yellow cake uranium.
Righhhtttt, which is why the first thing out of Whitman's mouth was that Leo wasn't acting alone, and that she had no plans to change his plans for the company. If you think a CEO at a company that size makes announcements like that without board approval you simply have no idea how a company that size works. Leo wouldn't even legally have the ability to sell off ANY division of HP without board approval. What the hell makes you think a veteran CEO would make an announcement on plans he couldn't enact without getting approval first?
What do you expect? At least Larry is being honest. "Cloud" is nothing but a marketing term. Everytime it comes up in a meeting I want to stab myself in the face with a spork.
Really? You think that Leo made decisions like that without the board's approval? LOL! The board agreed with every last announcement Leo made. This wasn't a Leo issue, this was an "HP's board has no fucking clue what they're doing". They now keep making announcement like they have been with no action to test the waters of wall street. Do you really think these "rumors" about webos, the pc division, etc. are just rumors? They're being floated by HP marketing to watch the stock market to determine what to do. They literally have NO IDEA what they're doing. At this point they're just praying that they don't get murdered any harder than they have, because they'll ALL be out on their asses. To be quite honest, I can't believe they aren't all already out on their asses. The only reason they aren't is because the board and the executives of companies no longer actually answer to their investors; they answer to the hedge fund managers who control their real investors funds.
"I'm really hoping that the bloggers can come to a consensus so I know what to do. I've never actually had to make a decision while in a leadership decision, and I'd hate to have that change now."
Uhhh, no. All of the major banks will cash checks from other banks. At WORST they will want to call the other bank to verify the check is legit before cashing it, but I've never once had an issue cashing a check at *insert major corporate bank* from my CU.
There's absolutely no way that ESXi costs you the exact same amount of money as deploying Hyper-V unless you're talking about deploying the free version that includes no features. Hyper-V is included in your Server Datacenter license allowing you to run as many copies of windows as you want on a single physical box. You would also likely want SCVMM for $1300 list (likely far less if you've got volume licensing) to manage it. The "same functionality" from VMware costs you at minimum another $2k per server on top of the windows license.
Use storage based snapshots, like NetApp provides. Get snapshots without the crippling I/O overhead that comes with VMware snapshots. Nobody in their right mind would suggest software snapshots in a production VMware environment... in fact VMware themselves tell you to never leave software snapshots around for an extended period of time on any production VM.
Uhh, yes they are counted. They simply dont' charge you for MORE than 96GB per VM if you allocate more than 96GB. The first 96GB is fully accounted for. And rightly so, because their research showed that none of their customers had any VM's with more than 96GB of memory. It was a nice marketing spiel to show how they were looking out for the little guy. When in reality they were making 0 concessions.
If you think that product was brought from design to release in the time she's been CEO, you're nuts. If you think it would be in HP's best interests to cancel a product that they've already bought parts for and manufactured, you're also nuts. Why would they take what is likely a tens of millions of dollar hit on a product that will sell just fine to its target market? Just because YOU are not its target market doesn't mean that nobody wants it.
If they're only 150MB, they are extremely compressed or low resolution. A standard DVD comes in around 5GB. A blu-ray rip is 20-50GB depending on who ripped it and what settings they used. Seinfeld ran for 9 seasons, and had 180 episodes. The complete boxed set is 33 discs. If your 345 episodes were a high quality blu-ray rip, you would need a lot more than a 2TB HD to save them.
To claim there would've been no browser wars is ridiculous. Just because it wouldn't have been Firefox, doesn't mean there wouldn't have been browser wars. Opera? Konquerer? Or hell, at the time Mosaic? Had Netscape gone away, I guarantee Mosaic would've filled the void... and probably better because it had none of the ungodly bloat that they piled into Netscape. Are you forgetting that Webkit (basis of Safari and Chrome) have nothing to do with firefox?
I don't know of a single credit card issuer who does not send updated cardholder agreements when they change policy. Whether or not you've actually read it... I strongly doubt your original agreement from 20 years ago is what they have you beholden to today. In fact, if you're in the US I can guarantee your agreement changed because the government passed laws about fees and minimum payments in the last 3 years that *ALL* credit card companies doing business in the US were forced to implement.
Part of parenting is teaching!!!!! Do you not have kids??
A child can learn with their parents help regardless of how good or bad a teacher is. A teacher cannot teach regardless of how bad a child and his parents are. Period.
Between your attitude and the fact you've got "multiple relatives" that have issues with "problem teachers", it sounds like the problem is right there at home. You might as well say construction workers are paid to build roads, and then send them out to the jobsite with nothing but a hammer and start complaining when you don't have a road a month later. Your ignorance of teaching is quite evident, I'd suggest you just stop before you make yourself look even less informed.
Slashdot Mirror
And your point is what? That it's OK to have an unconstitutional law because it was upheld by a judge? That's like saying it's OK to put an innocent man to death because his appeals were turned down by the supreme court. Injustice is injustice, even if the legal system green lights it.
This has nothing to do with other countries. It has to do with the US setting an example for the rest of the free world in regards to liberty and justice.
The Justice Department obtained the records under a federal statute that allows for the release of non-content Internet records without obtaining a search warrant, which requires prosecutors to demonstrate probable cause.
No search warrant was obtained. They couldn't even prove probable cause when they attempted to get a warrant, so they found a loophole. Anything else?
I suppose I prefer any president that doesn't take us to war over a personal vendetta. Perhaps I'm suggesting 13+ years later they have no idea where the uranium came from. The IAEA saying they believe it might have come from a mine that hasn't been active since before the first gulf war isn't exactly a smoking bullet.
Right, and she's arguing that her online account should be subject to US search and seizure laws. The Government completely bypassed their own rules, claiming because it's online they can ignore your right to privacy, and the need to get a warrant to obtain the information.
You just said that after Bush claimed there was yellow cake in Iraq, they found some. Your article says they found uranium in NORWAY, which came from Jordan, and the original dealer says he's "confident" it came from Iraq. Talk about a leap of faith. Any grain of salt to make Bush look like slightly less of a complete fucking failure?
Yes, having backups of your photo's in original full quality is silly. Really?
Cancun is great? Are you referring to the times when the cartel aren't randomly shooting up tourist attractions in the area? http://travel.usatoday.com/destinations/dispatches/post/2010/08/cancun-bar-mexico-travel-safety/110694/1
No, Bush claimed that Iraq was trying to get yellow cake uranium from Africa. Interestingly enough, after the invasion it was discovered that Iraq had a small supply of yellow cake uranium.
False.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/yellowcake.asp
Righhhtttt, which is why the first thing out of Whitman's mouth was that Leo wasn't acting alone, and that she had no plans to change his plans for the company. If you think a CEO at a company that size makes announcements like that without board approval you simply have no idea how a company that size works. Leo wouldn't even legally have the ability to sell off ANY division of HP without board approval. What the hell makes you think a veteran CEO would make an announcement on plans he couldn't enact without getting approval first?
What do you expect? At least Larry is being honest. "Cloud" is nothing but a marketing term. Everytime it comes up in a meeting I want to stab myself in the face with a spork.
Really? You think that Leo made decisions like that without the board's approval? LOL! The board agreed with every last announcement Leo made. This wasn't a Leo issue, this was an "HP's board has no fucking clue what they're doing". They now keep making announcement like they have been with no action to test the waters of wall street. Do you really think these "rumors" about webos, the pc division, etc. are just rumors? They're being floated by HP marketing to watch the stock market to determine what to do. They literally have NO IDEA what they're doing. At this point they're just praying that they don't get murdered any harder than they have, because they'll ALL be out on their asses. To be quite honest, I can't believe they aren't all already out on their asses. The only reason they aren't is because the board and the executives of companies no longer actually answer to their investors; they answer to the hedge fund managers who control their real investors funds.
"I'm really hoping that the bloggers can come to a consensus so I know what to do. I've never actually had to make a decision while in a leadership decision, and I'd hate to have that change now."
Uhhh, no. All of the major banks will cash checks from other banks. At WORST they will want to call the other bank to verify the check is legit before cashing it, but I've never once had an issue cashing a check at *insert major corporate bank* from my CU.
There's absolutely no way that ESXi costs you the exact same amount of money as deploying Hyper-V unless you're talking about deploying the free version that includes no features. Hyper-V is included in your Server Datacenter license allowing you to run as many copies of windows as you want on a single physical box. You would also likely want SCVMM for $1300 list (likely far less if you've got volume licensing) to manage it. The "same functionality" from VMware costs you at minimum another $2k per server on top of the windows license.
Use storage based snapshots, like NetApp provides. Get snapshots without the crippling I/O overhead that comes with VMware snapshots. Nobody in their right mind would suggest software snapshots in a production VMware environment... in fact VMware themselves tell you to never leave software snapshots around for an extended period of time on any production VM.
Uhh, yes they are counted. They simply dont' charge you for MORE than 96GB per VM if you allocate more than 96GB. The first 96GB is fully accounted for. And rightly so, because their research showed that none of their customers had any VM's with more than 96GB of memory. It was a nice marketing spiel to show how they were looking out for the little guy. When in reality they were making 0 concessions.
Welcome to EMC sales tactics. This is nothing new to anyone who has been dealing with EMC the last decade.
They brought Whitman onto their board because eBay bought a shit-ton of HP gear while she was CEO.
If you think that product was brought from design to release in the time she's been CEO, you're nuts. If you think it would be in HP's best interests to cancel a product that they've already bought parts for and manufactured, you're also nuts. Why would they take what is likely a tens of millions of dollar hit on a product that will sell just fine to its target market? Just because YOU are not its target market doesn't mean that nobody wants it.
If they're only 150MB, they are extremely compressed or low resolution. A standard DVD comes in around 5GB. A blu-ray rip is 20-50GB depending on who ripped it and what settings they used. Seinfeld ran for 9 seasons, and had 180 episodes. The complete boxed set is 33 discs. If your 345 episodes were a high quality blu-ray rip, you would need a lot more than a 2TB HD to save them.
To claim there would've been no browser wars is ridiculous. Just because it wouldn't have been Firefox, doesn't mean there wouldn't have been browser wars. Opera? Konquerer? Or hell, at the time Mosaic? Had Netscape gone away, I guarantee Mosaic would've filled the void... and probably better because it had none of the ungodly bloat that they piled into Netscape. Are you forgetting that Webkit (basis of Safari and Chrome) have nothing to do with firefox?
If only...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKA4GhVn0a4
I don't know of a single credit card issuer who does not send updated cardholder agreements when they change policy. Whether or not you've actually read it... I strongly doubt your original agreement from 20 years ago is what they have you beholden to today. In fact, if you're in the US I can guarantee your agreement changed because the government passed laws about fees and minimum payments in the last 3 years that *ALL* credit card companies doing business in the US were forced to implement.
Part of parenting is teaching!!!!! Do you not have kids??
A child can learn with their parents help regardless of how good or bad a teacher is. A teacher cannot teach regardless of how bad a child and his parents are. Period.
Between your attitude and the fact you've got "multiple relatives" that have issues with "problem teachers", it sounds like the problem is right there at home. You might as well say construction workers are paid to build roads, and then send them out to the jobsite with nothing but a hammer and start complaining when you don't have a road a month later. Your ignorance of teaching is quite evident, I'd suggest you just stop before you make yourself look even less informed.