I really don't know. I've been trying Linux since Linus published it at some ftp.funet.fi site or whatever. It was always "not good enough for my desktop", until a few years ago I tried Xubuntu and I was finally able to make the move.
So, Tobias Bernard is trying to convince everyone to join his CSD Initiative
"tl;dr: Let’s get rid of title bars." he says. And what is the "tl" in this case ?
title bars are the largely empty bars at the top of some application windows. They contain only the window title and a close button, and are completely separate from the window’s content. This makes them very inflexible, as they can not contain any additional UI elements, or integrate with the application window’s content.
This isn't "too long". It's too short and illogical. "Title" is already the term for what he's trying to say so, he might simply be trying to say that applications don't need a title. So, I wonder he he's using a title ("Introducing the CSD Initiative") at his own article. My take: he's an idiot.
Yes, and that's why I've manually installed the last XUL-based version of ABP and turned notifications off. I'm not sure what I'm going to do in the future, but for now it works perfectly.
Don't worry about saying anything you think is true & relevant at Slashdot. You might get some annoying moderation, but as long as you don't drivel, it does get sorted out. This isn't the Firefox subreddit.
Your argument debunked. As you can see, the imminent release of Quantum marks the day Firefox lost to Chrome in Germany. Not google advertising, neither software bundles.
There's no bloat in FFMPEG but that's the exception rather than the rule per Niedermayer's words:
Old school: Use the lowest level language in which you can solve the problem conveniently.
New school: Use the highest level language in which the latest supercomputer can solve the problem without the user falling asleep waiting.
I think you'll agree that the new school is the majority.
But Mozilla succeeded in breaking the lock Microsoft's Internet Explorer had on the web a decade ago, and now it's fighting the same battle again against Google's Chrome.
This is laughable. Mozilla didn't break IE's hegemony by ditching XUL to adopt ActiveX.
Slashdot Mirror
For most people, not returning lost goods is called dishonorable. Lack of honor and integrity is what makes those "buzz" media so despised.
This isn't about users saving their data, it's about Google making money of something they didn't pay for.
No, it's meant to protect photographer's rights.
That means the sun during the winter will be rising much later.
The coup has failed and the Turkish people are OK with Erdogan. Turkey, thankfully for Turks, didn't have a "spring" from the west.
Dear Mozilla,
Thanks for the privacy but we can already do it ourselves. What we really need from you is to reverse your decision to deprecate XUL addons.
Regards, your userbase (what is left of it).
0-1
I really don't know. I've been trying Linux since Linus published it at some ftp.funet.fi site or whatever. It was always "not good enough for my desktop", until a few years ago I tried Xubuntu and I was finally able to make the move.
It's a CNN.COM article.
Thank you! XFCE is simple, it's good looking, and it's based on what works. It's the desktop that finally made me switch to Linux from Windows.
So, Tobias Bernard is trying to convince everyone to join his CSD Initiative
"tl;dr: Let’s get rid of title bars." he says. And what is the "tl" in this case ?
This isn't "too long". It's too short and illogical. "Title" is already the term for what he's trying to say so, he might simply be trying to say that applications don't need a title. So, I wonder he he's using a title ("Introducing the CSD Initiative") at his own article. My take: he's an idiot.
You can always filter ACs. Or have fun.
Yes, and that's why I've manually installed the last XUL-based version of ABP and turned notifications off. I'm not sure what I'm going to do in the future, but for now it works perfectly.
Don't worry about saying anything you think is true & relevant at Slashdot. You might get some annoying moderation, but as long as you don't drivel, it does get sorted out. This isn't the Firefox subreddit.
Your argument debunked. As you can see, the imminent release of Quantum marks the day Firefox lost to Chrome in Germany. Not google advertising, neither software bundles.
Here's how Mozilla lost its 1st place in one of their last remaining bastions. "Speed is of the essence in Mozilla's recovery plan" the article says, but in reality what should be the essence for a recovery plan is to bite the bullet and admit they were wrong in deprecating what made them unique.
I think you'll agree that the new school is the majority.
Decades ? China has a history of maintaining a well organized and efficient state for centuries.
insightful
Not even close. A bricked system is useless, unless some software or hardware hack -- not standard recovery procedures -- can restore it.
I'm not sure about that. Default adblocking filters do not block trackers.
Posted at comp.os.linux.advocacy
This is laughable. Mozilla didn't break IE's hegemony by ditching XUL to adopt ActiveX.
It's fortunately for them because they have better things to do with their free time. Who cares about Mozilla anymore ?
Does switching to Chrome, Pale Moon or Brave count as "whining" ?
Come on now, don't be angry. Here's a treat for you: chrome://browser/content/browser.xul