Further along that string was posted this further update....
From: jmsatb5 at aol.com
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:03:38 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 36
>
> The rest I leave to the quiet turning of your considered conscience.
>
> J. Michael Straczynski
Actually...belay everything I just said.
In the 24 hours between the time I composed the prior note, and sent
it, and it made its way through the moderation software, two things
happened:
1) I heard from a trusted source that Paramount is giving the Trek TV
world a rest for maybe one to two years, depending on circumstances, no
matter who would come along to run it. So it's not right to have folks
putting in time doing something that ultimately would be pointless, I
don't think that's a proper use of anybody's time.
2) At the same time as the above, an offer came in to run a new TV
series for fall of '06, and since there's no way anything Trek can
happen in the interim, I've said yes (now we have to negotiate the
deal, but that should be fairly straightforward).
So on two counts, the whole thing is kind of moot.
We can reconvene a year or two down the road to see where this takes
us, but in the interim...my apologies for waking everybody up in the
middle of the night.
As you were.
Thanks and with great chagrinedness --
jms
Slashdot Mirror
I'm sure Greenpeace is gonna Love this!!
Does anyone else see the real potential for an interstellar ark ship now?
Further along that string was posted this further update.... From: jmsatb5 at aol.com Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:03:38 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 36 > > The rest I leave to the quiet turning of your considered conscience. > > J. Michael Straczynski Actually...belay everything I just said. In the 24 hours between the time I composed the prior note, and sent it, and it made its way through the moderation software, two things happened: 1) I heard from a trusted source that Paramount is giving the Trek TV world a rest for maybe one to two years, depending on circumstances, no matter who would come along to run it. So it's not right to have folks putting in time doing something that ultimately would be pointless, I don't think that's a proper use of anybody's time. 2) At the same time as the above, an offer came in to run a new TV series for fall of '06, and since there's no way anything Trek can happen in the interim, I've said yes (now we have to negotiate the deal, but that should be fairly straightforward). So on two counts, the whole thing is kind of moot. We can reconvene a year or two down the road to see where this takes us, but in the interim...my apologies for waking everybody up in the middle of the night. As you were. Thanks and with great chagrinedness -- jms