To whoever wins this one, put in on your mantle for a week, and then put it back up for bid on ebay, proceedes going to charity! Maybe we can keep this going on and on and on... With lots of money raise for charity. You know the publicity would be great for charity and ebay.
To eBay, advertise this in your comercials. You never know what ill show up on eBay. Like our own cool site of the year award that we forgot to pick up. It could be yours! There is no such thing as bad publicty, and this could be good for them.
PS, I'll forgive eBay if they close this auction and demand their award, but I think they are better off in this case pardoning anyone who holds the trophy for less then six months, and donates all proceededs from the sale to charity.
Come on, what true geek has ever seen a comtpuer with hot swapable motherboards and never wanted to try. Perfect exceuse to see if solaris really will route around such a problem in real time. Pull some boards, get the kitten, put the boards back.
Although turning the power off wouldn't have been a big deal considering this machine is so uncritical that you can consider turning it off for the night.
I'm not a lawyer, but my understanding is this: A will means nothing legally, except that the courts need to consider it. In general, a judge will not throw out a will, and because it exist the judge will spend less time considering the estage ("look, a will, tell whoever is appointed executer to take care of it, court fee of almost nothing. Next" vs "no will. well, who are heirs, give them so long to come forward... big court fees.") However anyone with a lawyer can contest any will. In most cases a judge will laugh at you for trying, but it you approach it just right, you can break a will.
Wills are generally only broken when a direct decendant isn't mentioned at all. So if you have illigitiment children who you don't contact, and don't otherwise owe support you should leave them one dollar. A lawyer should know details like this, in addition to other details that you may not have considered.
A major advantage of having a lawyer draw up a will, is you have someone who knows what your wishes were when you made it. This lawyer not only will defend the will (for a fee, we are talking about pond skum, but at least you are paying them - they might help you) but they can testify in court about what you likely ment if something new comes up.
I personally woudln't recomend anyone with significant assets get a will without a lawyer. One of my uncles did, died last year with no decendants. There is considerable hasstle because the will he left was done without a lawyer. (or software) As family we decided not to break it, but I would have had a chance at more money if I really cared to try. (the family would forget about my existance though.)
I'm not a lawyer, but the above should be considered the worst case, and if not true, close enough.
Millions were made off the pet rock for a while too. The question is for how long. Now if you have a driect line to God, and you can convince him to give you market advice, keep buying Yahoo and the like until just before it runs out.
I'm not saying that Yahoo is nessicarly a bad investment, just that past results are not indicidive of future success.
In genisis Abraham is told to go on a journey, but he isn't told how to get where he is going, or why. Just a Get thee to Cannon. Obviously a foreshaddow of Layered packets where the content is of no importance, and while the destination is generally known, routers in between decide how where you will go next. Moses took the Children of Iseral on a similear journey, but he was hampered by the fact that like a true man he refused to ask the routers direction, and wanderd 40 years before he died, and his successor promptly asked which(1) direction and arrived.
Jumping forward a bit, we find King david who finger(1) anouther man's wife, and eventially got her with a child process. This (remembering the cultural differences of those days) made it nessicary for him to kill(1) the other man(1). He accomplished this via a different person, obviously a foreshadowing of distributed processing.
There is of course more to be found in this wonderful book or prophcies, but now that I've wet your appitie perhaps you want to read it yourself.
In genisis Abraham is told to go on a journey, but he isn't told how to get where he is going, or why. Just a Get thee to Cannon. Obviously a foreshaddow of Layered packets where the content is of no importance, and while the destination is generally known, routers in between decide how where you will go next. Moses took the Children of Iseral on a similear journey, but he was hampered by the fact that like a true man he refused to ask the routers direction, and wanderd 40 years before he died, and his successor promptly asked which(1) direction and arrived.
Jumping forward a bit, we find King david who finger(1) anouther man's wife, and eventially got her with a child process. This (remembering the cultural differences of those days) made it nessicary for him to kill(1) the other man(1). He accomplished this via a different person, obviously a foreshadowing of distributed processing.
There is of course more to be found in this wonderful book or prophcies, but now that I've wet your appitie perhaps you want to read it yourself.
If your charged by the megabyte, is cachedot involved with this? I personally only use that site (somewhat faster at times, and with a few more people it would be faster)
Now granted there are problems with it, but I'm sure others would be willing to switch if it saved you money.
The french were flying heavier then air devices wtih a wing shape when the wright brothers were in the craddle. (well, maybe not quite that long, but a long time) The difference is the Frech were taking 150 foot uncontrolled hops that often resulted in death.
The wright brothers managed to go from 150 foot hops (that lukily didn't kill them) in 1902 to several hour flights limited only by the fuel (capcaity and weight) in 1904.
BTW, the french then took what the wright brothers did and made it into a useful airplane, the Wright brothers built the first prototyupe, but the french refined it.
True geeks already knew everything in the kernel compiling artical. (though we may not have put all the peices togather) They compile a custom kernel anyway. It isn't hard (for a true geek) and they get the stuff they need all the time in the kernel, and the stuff they don't need isn't there.
Besides, most geeks have a 386 or similear in a corner someplace that invalidates everything in the artical.
Of course the geeks want hetrogenious processing systems. It is cool. Talk to your mac buddy about the ppc in your computer, then the pc bigot about the k7, and then the real geeks about the true power of the alpha, without losing x86 or ppc compatability.
usefull is a different story, they don't care. If the hardware will support two different chips, I'm sure linux will gain support.
the comptuer in my truck is having porblems anyway, how do I find out what I need to control it though?
I presume that I need to put a (variable) voltage/current to the fuel injector, and read all the sensors and decide what to do. How do I go from there to doing it though? What numbers, and how time critical is it. I have a throttel body which I presume has less critical timing requirements, but I need to know if linux will do it, or if I need a more real-time OS.
No playing quake on the system, but I'd know more about what is going on.
Aork is legal, but do you have permission for rest
on
Zork CGI
·
· Score: 1
Just a legal nit pick. I suggest you deal with it b4 the lawyers get to you. I'm fairly certian that Zork is legal to put up as Activision has released them, but Hollywood hyjinx I don't belive was released.
I love the idea, too bad I'm at work and down have time to play. This will probably get a spot on my web page though.
Access time is a legitimate concern, if it becomes a bottle neck. in comptuer scient terms: a 50 gb tape takes O(r+n) time. A bunch of cdroms take r^75+n time. Also note that the constant before n is bigger with a cdrom. Simply a dense tape is faster then optical, and has about teh same lifetime. (CD-R is not good for 100 years, as others have noted it is gaurentied for 20 years, tape can be that good)
I'm not against an optical storage system. I'd seriously consider investing money in reasearch ofr such systems. But magnetic media still has life, and is still in general a better solution then optical. Yes I expect this to change in the future, but NASA is dealing with today, they will probably migrate to better media again in 5 years. SOP for many buinesses as they try to re-claim the space consumed by the older storage.
I know for a fact that most current NASA storage is from StorageTek, and they are famious for robots, so it is likey that the current stuff is robotic. I'm also well aware that 2 years ago it was someone else, and if they aren't careful it could be someone else again as they keep upgrading capacities.
So it is a safe bet that the new tapes are in a robot. I'm comfortable saying, though unsure, that the old tapes were at least partially manual.
Accually I know the new systems are robotic, because NASA keeps their data in the same building they handle the deadly chemicals for the Shuttle booster rockets. The data center people really hate to be in a room that shares ventalation with a room where they mix two deadly gasses to make something even more deadly. I don't know why they don't move it.
I agree use the right tool for the job. I also agree that optical storage can work, but optical drives go obsolete too, my perdiction is that in 5 years manufactures are going to notice that CD-ROM is never used and the DVD players will cost $.50 less because they don't put the ability to read CDROMS in DVD drives anymore. Whopps, goota move that optical data off cdrom not, while you can still find a reader.
Your still missing the point though: They want to use that data. I just stated the speed they can get from tape. They can't tell me which tapes they will need to read next year, but some of those tapes will be needed for some project. A supercomputer is a device for turning a CPU bound problem into an I/O bound problem. While many supercomptuers run unix and can multitask, the users still want the answer fast, and waiting for data to come off an optical cartrage isn't a good use of time. In todays world human time is more expensive then computer time, so it is worth the cost to make sure human time isn't wasted.
Don't forget that were talking about several hundred terrabytes of data at NASA, even in the optical stroage system everyone is envisioning (which may eventially be made, but it isn't effective today) it will take up significant space, and unless the media never changes (like CDROM->DVD media didn't change, right) they still need to migrate. I'm not a profit, I'm not about to perdict formats won't change.
Of course there are good programers from India. I've met some.
There are a couple problems they have not overcome though. One is language. I don't expect them to be good, but they should be at least passable. According to the mythical man-month writing code is 1/6th of a programing effort. My expirence backs that up. So being good at writing code doesn't help these excelent programs (who are not particularry better then Americans) do the other 5/6th of the job. Still overall I can deal with a few of these programers on the team, I'll make up the slack, they do add to a team when there aren't so many that the other 5/6th goes lacking.
The porblem is my expirence is that these people are a minority. I worked with them in College, since many of the other students were not American. Most were not compentant programers. They couldn't be trusted to write the code that needed to be written in such a manor that I could go in after them and make a minor change. Unmaintainable code is a death toll in the real world. Much of the Y2K problem exists in code written in the 50s and early 60s! Mind you I've seen americans who write code just as bad, and just as many. The difference is I can shunt those americans off to the other 5/6th of the task.
The sterotypes exist for a reason. Some sterotypes exist for the wrong reason, others are no longer true, but most sterotypes once existed in truth.
I can place 50 gigabytes on a singe tape, uncompressed. I can read or write that entire tape in the same time that a single speed cdrom can read 640 megs. A 40x cdrom would need more media changes (a robot would do the changes of course), and not counting the media changes would take 1.5 times as long!
Optical storage has promis, don't get me wrong, but when your trying to spool data as fast as NASA does from some applications they aren't suitable.
#include %lt;stddisclaimer.h> I'm not speaking for anyone here, all numbers have been rounded and esitmated.
It suddenly occures to me that the US has different views from most of the world, (in this case we are right) in most countries prior art counts for little against a pantant. If I invent something and then you pantent it, I own the pantant in the US just as soon as it goes to court. (and if you can't afford to fight it, offer a competor a license to your pantant for dirt cheep, they just need to get it for you)
In many countres that is not true. If I invent something and you pantant it you own it. Therefore please check local laws before considering anything on here.
After some thought I think that software pantants would be okay, if they weren't covering obvious things. The concept of the wheel is not pantantable, but a specific wheel might be. Right now everyone is discovering the wheel, and then the axel and other obvious things. the obvious needs to settle out before pantants are awarded.
Okay, so they sue you. You get a lawyer, and then while they are suing you, you counter sue, claiming in your counter suit that they should have known about the prior art you are claiming, therefore they shoudl pay all your court and lawyer fees.
Before you belive this go to a university and study logic. I did it in Math, but I understand philosphy has similar studies that aren't as difficult. All these arguements needs to be reconciled with Godell's incompleteness therom.
I think electricial engineers will tell you that moore's law isn't expect to hold our that long because the size of atoms is larger then the predicted size of a chip. Note sure exactly here since that isnt' my field.
I welcome the days when comptuers can do the boring difficult tasks. (there will be farmers though, but farmers have never made money, and so robots killing any possibility of money doesn't stop them.)
Musicains regularly work with computers to create music. I prefer the sound of accoustic music though, and I have heard musicians who cannot play a keyboard and never will be able to becuase they are outplaying a mechanical piano and the comptuers can't capture the feeling of a real piano.
Comptuers will help. The disabled will love the new mobility. The rest of us will enjoy other benifits. They won't take over. They can't. Go see some logic.
I suppose that this book will appeal to those who know nothing about technology. They buy (and belive) the national enquirer, the weekly world news and similear pappers.
Some family members of mine are anorexic, or they were until they died at 72. Doesn't look like it helps much if you go overboard. Now there are people who eat too much, I'll grant that.
I eat three times more then my brother, and have more engery then him. He weighs 100 lbs more then me. Our bodies are build different, and until all those differences are clasified in I won't belive it.
Let me also remind everyone that while smoking is a major factor in many cancer cases, there are smokers who live to 95, and attribute the old age to smoking two packs a day all their life. It doesn't take a genius to point our the flaws in that arguement, and I look on these arguements the same way. People living longer in spite of bad habbits are not reason I would take them up.
Slashdot Mirror
To whoever wins this one, put in on your mantle for a week, and then put it back up for bid on ebay, proceedes going to charity! Maybe we can keep this going on and on and on... With lots of money raise for charity. You know the publicity would be great for charity and ebay.
To eBay, advertise this in your comercials. You never know what ill show up on eBay. Like our own cool site of the year award that we forgot to pick up. It could be yours! There is no such thing as bad publicty, and this could be good for them.
PS, I'll forgive eBay if they close this auction and demand their award, but I think they are better off in this case pardoning anyone who holds the trophy for less then six months, and donates all proceededs from the sale to charity.
Come on, what true geek has ever seen a comtpuer with hot swapable motherboards and never wanted to try. Perfect exceuse to see if solaris really will route around such a problem in real time. Pull some boards, get the kitten, put the boards back.
Although turning the power off wouldn't have been a big deal considering this machine is so uncritical that you can consider turning it off for the night.
Someone who can be trusted to not screw up admining him. Not too many people mind you, but enough people that the maintance can be done.
Otherwise he will be gone in a month when everyone realises that the disks are full, and they don't have an clue as to how to fix the probelm.
Nothing!
I'm not a lawyer, but my understanding is this: A will means nothing legally, except that the courts need to consider it. In general, a judge will not throw out a will, and because it exist the judge will spend less time considering the estage ("look, a will, tell whoever is appointed executer to take care of it, court fee of almost nothing. Next" vs "no will. well, who are heirs, give them so long to come forward ... big court fees.") However anyone with a lawyer can contest any will. In most cases a judge will laugh at you for trying, but it you approach it just right, you can break a will.
Wills are generally only broken when a direct decendant isn't mentioned at all. So if you have illigitiment children who you don't contact, and don't otherwise owe support you should leave them one dollar. A lawyer should know details like this, in addition to other details that you may not have considered.
A major advantage of having a lawyer draw up a will, is you have someone who knows what your wishes were when you made it. This lawyer not only will defend the will (for a fee, we are talking about pond skum, but at least you are paying them - they might help you) but they can testify in court about what you likely ment if something new comes up.
I personally woudln't recomend anyone with significant assets get a will without a lawyer. One of my uncles did, died last year with no decendants. There is considerable hasstle because the will he left was done without a lawyer. (or software) As family we decided not to break it, but I would have had a chance at more money if I really cared to try. (the family would forget about my existance though.)
I'm not a lawyer, but the above should be considered the worst case, and if not true, close enough.
Millions were made off the pet rock for a while too. The question is for how long. Now if you have a driect line to God, and you can convince him to give you market advice, keep buying Yahoo and the like until just before it runs out.
I'm not saying that Yahoo is nessicarly a bad investment, just that past results are not indicidive of future success.
In genisis Abraham is told to go on a journey, but he isn't told how to get where he is going, or why. Just a Get thee to Cannon. Obviously a foreshaddow of Layered packets where the content is of no importance, and while the destination is generally known, routers in between decide how where you will go next. Moses took the Children of Iseral on a similear journey, but he was hampered by the fact that like a true man he refused to ask the routers direction, and wanderd 40 years before he died, and his successor promptly asked which(1) direction and arrived.
Jumping forward a bit, we find King david who finger(1) anouther man's wife, and eventially got her with a child process. This (remembering the cultural differences of those days) made it nessicary for him to kill(1) the other man(1). He accomplished this via a different person, obviously a foreshadowing of distributed processing.
There is of course more to be found in this wonderful book or prophcies, but now that I've wet your appitie perhaps you want to read it yourself.
In genisis Abraham is told to go on a journey, but he isn't told how to get where he is going, or why. Just a Get thee to Cannon. Obviously a foreshaddow of Layered packets where the content is of no importance, and while the destination is generally known, routers in between decide how where you will go next. Moses took the Children of Iseral on a similear journey, but he was hampered by the fact that like a true man he refused to ask the routers direction, and wanderd 40 years before he died, and his successor promptly asked which(1) direction and arrived.
Jumping forward a bit, we find King david who finger(1) anouther man's wife, and eventially got her with a child process. This (remembering the cultural differences of those days) made it nessicary for him to kill(1) the other man(1). He accomplished this via a different person, obviously a foreshadowing of distributed processing.
There is of course more to be found in this wonderful book or prophcies, but now that I've wet your appitie perhaps you want to read it yourself.
If your charged by the megabyte, is cachedot involved with this? I personally only use that site (somewhat faster at times, and with a few more people it would be faster)
Now granted there are problems with it, but I'm sure others would be willing to switch if it saved you money.
The french were flying heavier then air devices wtih a wing shape when the wright brothers were in the craddle. (well, maybe not quite that long, but a long time) The difference is the Frech were taking 150 foot uncontrolled hops that often resulted in death.
The wright brothers managed to go from 150 foot hops (that lukily didn't kill them) in 1902 to several hour flights limited only by the fuel (capcaity and weight) in 1904.
BTW, the french then took what the wright brothers did and made it into a useful airplane, the Wright brothers built the first prototyupe, but the french refined it.
True geeks already knew everything in the kernel compiling artical. (though we may not have put all the peices togather) They compile a custom kernel anyway. It isn't hard (for a true geek) and they get the stuff they need all the time in the kernel, and the stuff they don't need isn't there.
Besides, most geeks have a 386 or similear in a corner someplace that invalidates everything in the artical.
Of course the geeks want hetrogenious processing systems. It is cool. Talk to your mac buddy about the ppc in your computer, then the pc bigot about the k7, and then the real geeks about the true power of the alpha, without losing x86 or ppc compatability.
usefull is a different story, they don't care. If the hardware will support two different chips, I'm sure linux will gain support.
the comptuer in my truck is having porblems anyway, how do I find out what I need to control it though?
I presume that I need to put a (variable) voltage/current to the fuel injector, and read all the sensors and decide what to do. How do I go from there to doing it though? What numbers, and how time critical is it. I have a throttel body which I presume has less critical timing requirements, but I need to know if linux will do it, or if I need a more real-time OS.
No playing quake on the system, but I'd know more about what is going on.
Just a legal nit pick. I suggest you deal with it b4 the lawyers get to you. I'm fairly certian that Zork is legal to put up as Activision has released them, but Hollywood hyjinx I don't belive was released.
I love the idea, too bad I'm at work and down have time to play. This will probably get a spot on my web page though.
Access time is a legitimate concern, if it becomes a bottle neck. in comptuer scient terms: a 50 gb tape takes O(r+n) time. A bunch of cdroms take r^75+n time. Also note that the constant before n is bigger with a cdrom. Simply a dense tape is faster then optical, and has about teh same lifetime. (CD-R is not good for 100 years, as others have noted it is gaurentied for 20 years, tape can be that good)
I'm not against an optical storage system. I'd seriously consider investing money in reasearch ofr such systems. But magnetic media still has life, and is still in general a better solution then optical. Yes I expect this to change in the future, but NASA is dealing with today, they will probably migrate to better media again in 5 years. SOP for many buinesses as they try to re-claim the space consumed by the older storage.
I know for a fact that most current NASA storage is from StorageTek, and they are famious for robots, so it is likey that the current stuff is robotic. I'm also well aware that 2 years ago it was someone else, and if they aren't careful it could be someone else again as they keep upgrading capacities.
So it is a safe bet that the new tapes are in a robot. I'm comfortable saying, though unsure, that the old tapes were at least partially manual.
Accually I know the new systems are robotic, because NASA keeps their data in the same building they handle the deadly chemicals for the Shuttle booster rockets. The data center people really hate to be in a room that shares ventalation with a room where they mix two deadly gasses to make something even more deadly. I don't know why they don't move it.
I agree use the right tool for the job. I also agree that optical storage can work, but optical drives go obsolete too, my perdiction is that in 5 years manufactures are going to notice that CD-ROM is never used and the DVD players will cost $.50 less because they don't put the ability to read CDROMS in DVD drives anymore. Whopps, goota move that optical data off cdrom not, while you can still find a reader.
Your still missing the point though: They want to use that data. I just stated the speed they can get from tape. They can't tell me which tapes they will need to read next year, but some of those tapes will be needed for some project. A supercomputer is a device for turning a CPU bound problem into an I/O bound problem. While many supercomptuers run unix and can multitask, the users still want the answer fast, and waiting for data to come off an optical cartrage isn't a good use of time. In todays world human time is more expensive then computer time, so it is worth the cost to make sure human time isn't wasted.
Don't forget that were talking about several hundred terrabytes of data at NASA, even in the optical stroage system everyone is envisioning (which may eventially be made, but it isn't effective today) it will take up significant space, and unless the media never changes (like CDROM->DVD media didn't change, right) they still need to migrate. I'm not a profit, I'm not about to perdict formats won't change.
Of course there are good programers from India. I've met some.
There are a couple problems they have not overcome though. One is language. I don't expect them to be good, but they should be at least passable. According to the mythical man-month writing code is 1/6th of a programing effort. My expirence backs that up. So being good at writing code doesn't help these excelent programs (who are not particularry better then Americans) do the other 5/6th of the job. Still overall I can deal with a few of these programers on the team, I'll make up the slack, they do add to a team when there aren't so many that the other 5/6th goes lacking.
The porblem is my expirence is that these people are a minority. I worked with them in College, since many of the other students were not American. Most were not compentant programers. They couldn't be trusted to write the code that needed to be written in such a manor that I could go in after them and make a minor change. Unmaintainable code is a death toll in the real world. Much of the Y2K problem exists in code written in the 50s and early 60s! Mind you I've seen americans who write code just as bad, and just as many. The difference is I can shunt those americans off to the other 5/6th of the task.
The sterotypes exist for a reason. Some sterotypes exist for the wrong reason, others are no longer true, but most sterotypes once existed in truth.
I can place 50 gigabytes on a singe tape, uncompressed. I can read or write that entire tape in the same time that a single speed cdrom can read 640 megs. A 40x cdrom would need more media changes (a robot would do the changes of course), and not counting the media changes would take 1.5 times as long!
Optical storage has promis, don't get me wrong, but when your trying to spool data as fast as NASA does from some applications they aren't suitable.
#include %lt;stddisclaimer.h> I'm not speaking for anyone here, all numbers have been rounded and esitmated.
As an employiess of StorageTek I like reading this artical. It gives me hope for the future. :)
#include
Nice write up, but I'm looking for the next step.
When 2.0.0 came out I had to compile a new version of ppp (come to think of it I'm still using that now old version) and kernel module tools.
What do I need to do to upgrade correctly? Its been hinted that I should upgrade to glibc something I've been meaning to do for a while anyway.
I do not upgrade my distribution, I upgrade what I feel like, when I feel like, from sources.
Though I'm considering not upgrading to the latest 2.2.0 kernel, I'm not sure it gains me anything over the 2.0.3x kernels.
It suddenly occures to me that the US has different views from most of the world, (in this case we are right) in most countries prior art counts for little against a pantant. If I invent something and then you pantent it, I own the pantant in the US just as soon as it goes to court. (and if you can't afford to fight it, offer a competor a license to your pantant for dirt cheep, they just need to get it for you)
In many countres that is not true. If I invent something and you pantant it you own it. Therefore please check local laws before considering anything on here.
After some thought I think that software pantants would be okay, if they weren't covering obvious things. The concept of the wheel is not pantantable, but a specific wheel might be. Right now everyone is discovering the wheel, and then the axel and other obvious things. the obvious needs to settle out before pantants are awarded.
Not nessicarly.
If you use a patent they need to sue you.
Okay, so they sue you. You get a lawyer, and then while they are suing you, you counter sue, claiming in your counter suit that they should have known about the prior art you are claiming, therefore they shoudl pay all your court and lawyer fees.
Since you don't have money you can really lose.
Before you belive this go to a university and study logic. I did it in Math, but I understand philosphy has similar studies that aren't as difficult. All these arguements needs to be reconciled with Godell's incompleteness therom.
I think electricial engineers will tell you that moore's law isn't expect to hold our that long because the size of atoms is larger then the predicted size of a chip. Note sure exactly here since that isnt' my field.
I welcome the days when comptuers can do the boring difficult tasks. (there will be farmers though, but farmers have never made money, and so robots killing any possibility of money doesn't stop them.)
Musicains regularly work with computers to create music. I prefer the sound of accoustic music though, and I have heard musicians who cannot play a keyboard and never will be able to becuase they are outplaying a mechanical piano and the comptuers can't capture the feeling of a real piano.
Comptuers will help. The disabled will love the new mobility. The rest of us will enjoy other benifits. They won't take over. They can't. Go see some logic.
I suppose that this book will appeal to those who know nothing about technology. They buy (and belive) the national enquirer, the weekly world news and similear pappers.
They suck in netscape, (I wouldn't mind if I could turn them off) and when there is no tag they are worse in lynx.
Yes, lynx does have frames suport. it sucks. Oh, and yes I can see graphics in lynx, but only if I choose to.
Some family members of mine are anorexic, or they were until they died at 72. Doesn't look like it helps much if you go overboard. Now there are people who eat too much, I'll grant that.
I eat three times more then my brother, and have more engery then him. He weighs 100 lbs more then me. Our bodies are build different, and until all those differences are clasified in I won't belive it.
Let me also remind everyone that while smoking is a major factor in many cancer cases, there are smokers who live to 95, and attribute the old age to smoking two packs a day all their life. It doesn't take a genius to point our the flaws in that arguement, and I look on these arguements the same way. People living longer in spite of bad habbits are not reason I would take them up.