Does anyone else think it is sad, that they had enough bug fixes and updates to even warrant creating a "Respin" cd? That would lead me to believe that it was ready when they released it to begin with.
I think the argument could be made from both sides, until they are blue in the face. I think performance depends on what you are doing with the server, and how it is being used. I have a linux server with the sole responsibility of processing employee time punches, that has been running successfully for 3 years now without a single reboot. Another linux server runs several different tasks in our building, and has had to be rebooted 3 times this year due to a system lockup. And of course our Windows File server has been up and running for nearly 2 years now, without a reboot. Patches for all servers are considered carefully for all of our servers, and with our file server solely on our internal network, we haven't applied many patches at all. Again, I think it just depends on what your use is for the server.
Does anyone else think it is sad, that they had enough bug fixes and updates to even warrant creating a "Respin" cd? That would lead me to believe that it was ready when they released it to begin with.
I think the argument could be made from both sides, until they are blue in the face. I think performance depends on what you are doing with the server, and how it is being used. I have a linux server with the sole responsibility of processing employee time punches, that has been running successfully for 3 years now without a single reboot. Another linux server runs several different tasks in our building, and has had to be rebooted 3 times this year due to a system lockup. And of course our Windows File server has been up and running for nearly 2 years now, without a reboot. Patches for all servers are considered carefully for all of our servers, and with our file server solely on our internal network, we haven't applied many patches at all. Again, I think it just depends on what your use is for the server.