Payoff time? How much power do you utilize on a daily basis? That vs your shortest possible collectible solar time is going to determine how much solar + batteries+charge controller+inverter you will need, and thus from there I can tell you how much time you're likely looking at. You've already given me most of the information required.
"As an electrical engineer that works for a company that installs solar systems, they don't work."
Yea, no wonder you posted as AC. Your systems must be absolute fucking garbage.
Meanwhile, people that listen to me enjoy no power bill for about a two year's worth of power bills off the bat. Most of them get loans from the bank, pay off their loans in five years, and enjoy (for their purposes) limitless power.
No subsidies. Just good sourcing, proper testing, and proper engineering. Something you fail at if your systems don't work and can't be done at a reasonable price.
" You need a bit more than an an oscilloscope to mess up a signal travelling inside a chip."
Not when you de-lid it and realize that there are shared traces.:) Kill one device to figure out how to break the rest. Man can make it, man can break it, no exceptions.
When you make a RAMDisk for multiple machine access, you give it no FS and just give it raw data with pointers to that data when requested.
It's exactly how my 2D Second Life clone works. Very efficient, very fast, all world changes are practically instantaneous. One raw binary resource file, multiple nodes access it all from RAM, every access forces a refresh across every accessing node. You only need a proper backplane for node interconnectivity.
Find the rail that's responsible for sending out write signals/data using the oscilloscope, give it a dirty signal so the signal to wipe is fucked every time. Guess away.
34 guesses later (and the moron getting half-inebriated again for state-dependent memory) I'm in.
Probably the same way I hacked an iPad Mini2 (which uses the same A7 model as the 5S and has secure enclave) to save a drunk moron from losing every bit of data they had on their iPad Mini2 because they changed the password while drunk and had formatted their computer.
It's absolutely trivial given an oscilloscope and some proper live-rail bit banging.
Man can make it, man can break it. Zero exception.
"Picture a weather simulation consisting of 10,000 processes that work together in parallel, where all of them perform semirandom input/output using the same files. That's gonna be difficult to do right with conventional filesystems...'
But absolutely trivial to do on a RAMDisk. This seems like a solution in search of a problem, however said problem was solved long ago with far superior capability.
I already offered to do so (in fact, my experience in the semiconductor field gives me a great advantage here and I've broken into every iPhone from the original to the 5C) but it's obvious they don't want to be outed by criminals for their own criminal behavior. They want a company they can bribe to stay silent.
"So if Apple pays the hackers $10,000 then the hackers won't go to the FBI when the FBI offers them $100,000?"
Correct. If the hackers know about it, and already got paid by Apple, as soon as the FBI finds out it's not a legit 'never-before seen' hack (because it has been reported and a prize claimed) then they'll be on that hacker's ass.
Hackers have logic. Try using some of it some time.
"Today you can't because all of them use ROLLING CODES."
Wrong! Cars now days have the means to tune into the rolling code transmission (this is how newer cars have the ability to 'program' them with your garage door's rolling code, so you can open your garage door by pressing a button on your steering wheel or whenever the car detects it is getting near your home.)
If you can't figure out that this means "Put your shit in a faraday cage like a freezer" then you are showing either your ignorant youth or your increasing senility.
Umm, no, insurance companies will NOT pay for punitive damages, only the initial damages.
The most common reason given for this belief is that punitive or exemplary damages are always uninsurable as a matter of law—public policy does not allow payment of such damages. The prohibition of the insurability of punitive damages based on public policy typically hinges on the answer to one overriding question: whether the purposes of punishment and deterrence are defeated by allowing insurance to pay for such damages.
Slashdot Mirror
Payoff time? How much power do you utilize on a daily basis? That vs your shortest possible collectible solar time is going to determine how much solar + batteries+charge controller+inverter you will need, and thus from there I can tell you how much time you're likely looking at. You've already given me most of the information required.
Secure Enclave and A7 share data output traces inside the A7.
The only problem is getting to those traces, which requires de-lidding the APL A7-0698 because it's a BGA-mounted package.
"I think the AC wants to make back the money that he spent on his panels rather then have saved that much"
Saving that much = making back that much. There's no difference in money.
Yes, it does matter. For all intents and purposes, as this case was VACATED, *IT NEVER HAPPENED.*
They can't point to this case as any sort of precedent, PERIOD. Legally, IT DOES NOT EXIST.
So at least 24,000 out of a global population of nearing 8 billion.
Again, what a shit study. Shit sample size, shitty controls, horrible sample group selection.
Scam science like this should never be allowed on /.
"As an electrical engineer that works for a company that installs solar systems, they don't work."
Yea, no wonder you posted as AC. Your systems must be absolute fucking garbage.
Meanwhile, people that listen to me enjoy no power bill for about a two year's worth of power bills off the bat. Most of them get loans from the bank, pay off their loans in five years, and enjoy (for their purposes) limitless power.
No subsidies. Just good sourcing, proper testing, and proper engineering. Something you fail at if your systems don't work and can't be done at a reasonable price.
" You need a bit more than an an oscilloscope to mess up a signal travelling inside a chip."
Not when you de-lid it and realize that there are shared traces. :) Kill one device to figure out how to break the rest. Man can make it, man can break it, no exceptions.
Shit got vacated. That means the court order they obtained in the Farook iPhone case is null and void.
They talking about the weak one they got in New York? Yea, that one won't fly very far, either.
When you make a RAMDisk for multiple machine access, you give it no FS and just give it raw data with pointers to that data when requested.
It's exactly how my 2D Second Life clone works. Very efficient, very fast, all world changes are practically instantaneous. One raw binary resource file, multiple nodes access it all from RAM, every access forces a refresh across every accessing node. You only need a proper backplane for node interconnectivity.
Find the rail that's responsible for sending out write signals/data using the oscilloscope, give it a dirty signal so the signal to wipe is fucked every time. Guess away.
34 guesses later (and the moron getting half-inebriated again for state-dependent memory) I'm in.
Probably the same way I hacked an iPad Mini2 (which uses the same A7 model as the 5S and has secure enclave) to save a drunk moron from losing every bit of data they had on their iPad Mini2 because they changed the password while drunk and had formatted their computer.
It's absolutely trivial given an oscilloscope and some proper live-rail bit banging.
Man can make it, man can break it. Zero exception.
"Picture a weather simulation consisting of 10,000 processes that work together in parallel, where all of them perform semirandom input/output using the same files. That's gonna be difficult to do right with conventional filesystems...'
But absolutely trivial to do on a RAMDisk. This seems like a solution in search of a problem, however said problem was solved long ago with far superior capability.
I already offered to do so (in fact, my experience in the semiconductor field gives me a great advantage here and I've broken into every iPhone from the original to the 5C) but it's obvious they don't want to be outed by criminals for their own criminal behavior. They want a company they can bribe to stay silent.
"How dare you! This is the entitlement generation. Apple owes us money."
Actually, when you look at the offshore tax avoidance, they most certainly do, as far as tax money goes.
"So if Apple pays the hackers $10,000 then the hackers won't go to the FBI when the FBI offers them $100,000?"
Correct. If the hackers know about it, and already got paid by Apple, as soon as the FBI finds out it's not a legit 'never-before seen' hack (because it has been reported and a prize claimed) then they'll be on that hacker's ass.
Hackers have logic. Try using some of it some time.
Also, when was it made, originally?
Shake hands? This particular garage door opener was made in the late 80s. It's a dumb transmitter, no receiver inside it.
"Today you can't because all of them use ROLLING CODES."
Wrong! Cars now days have the means to tune into the rolling code transmission (this is how newer cars have the ability to 'program' them with your garage door's rolling code, so you can open your garage door by pressing a button on your steering wheel or whenever the car detects it is getting near your home.)
"Huh? Pudding pops? What does that even mean?"
If you can't figure out that this means "Put your shit in a faraday cage like a freezer" then you are showing either your ignorant youth or your increasing senility.
Given your UID, I'll have to assume the latter.
Try educating yourself. Digital is just discrete analog.
All signals are prone to reamplification attacks.
They already made the first big mistake - not writing the entire thing in ASM for utter speed.
Since they did that, I can safely assume they're clueless, and continue using master-race MenuetOS.
Umm, no, insurance companies will NOT pay for punitive damages, only the initial damages.
The most common reason given for this belief is that punitive or exemplary damages are always uninsurable as a matter of law—public policy does not allow payment of such damages. The prohibition of the insurability of punitive damages based on public policy typically hinges on the answer to one overriding question: whether the purposes of punishment and deterrence are defeated by allowing insurance to pay for such damages.
Blu-rays sales suck BECAUSE BLU RAY FUCKING SUCKS, moron. Digital distribution and on-demand is fucking king now days.
>2016
>using spinning shit slow fragile as fuck optical media
>ISHYGDDT
"I would. They are port extenders."
Yea, you try designing one to work reliably and get back to me on 'insane pricing.'
Something tells me you don't do electronics design.
All it will take is one idiot on their cellphone trying to cross the light-less intersection to show MIT just how short-sighted this idea truly is.