Are you a fucking retard? The only goddamned difference is the ORIENTATION. I've run a TI 99/4A vertically stacked using the extension bus.
So much for the patent. Those magnets holding it are of no actual purpose when the bus connector should pretty much handle it all, assuming it was built worth a shit. Hinged screen for the top? Nothing new, laptops do this already and have extension bases with modular components THAT STACKS VERTICALLY.
Logical failure detected. Detach yourself from mommy's PC and reattach yourself to her titty.
What? Come again? Industry use is small? Gold is required for many medicines, plating electrical contacts for corrosion resistance, used as power leads for every LED die, processor pins, aerospace, dental fillings, etc.
"Making the Caller ID value "correct" would mean you couldn't dial it (it's a 4 digit number after all), and it wouldn't tell you who is calling you. Completely worthless.
It can't be made a DID since the phone has none."
I can tell you don't know jack fucking shit about CID. My old business extension would show up on CID, be it two, three, or four digits long. Internal routing systems can append that data before going outside, how the fuck do you think CID spoofing works in the first place?
I do know better, that's why not a single one of them have ever been able to compromise my WINDOWS system EVERY TIME I'VE ATTENDED. Go home, child. You're nothing.
Pwn2Own has become a self-congratulatory bunch of fucktards who no longer care about making things safe for people, they're only out to stroke their own egos. This announcement pretty much clinches that.
Until some dumbass (Like I've seen in Texas) puts tied neutral/grounds too close to separated grounds, and wet ground conditions cause problems when lighting hits.
But hey, I've actually bothered with having to install full-building electrical systems. You keep talking.
In many, if not most USA electrical panels, neutral and ground are tied together at the bus. A separate ground is run (or tied to pre-existing metal plumbing going into earth) for the third prong. Even without the third prong, the general protection remains the same.
Still the same effect. This is essentially irrelevant unless some idiot wired hot/neutral backwards, and even then, the additional ground won't help much.
Your article also goes against what has been common use for a decade-plus.
Every portable computer I've had comes with wall-cord-brick-cord-portable device charging scheme. Desktops still follow this convention once you decouple the idea of internal vs external.
Only my phones have wallwart-cord-device charging.
"I suspect Einstein had a version of my own internal simulator, one he put to use more effectively than I. Given a strong grasp of physics in that era, he could have readily generated new theories based on a few seconds of examining a behavior in his head--a behavior which would be perfectly in line with reality, even if he didn't understand it--and start working out the mechanics."
This is exactly what I think. I sit here and look at various systems, supposedly unrelated to most people, and suddenly I see a relationship between them. This is how I came to the conclusion that light isn't a requirement for photosynthesis (I looked at the system as another energy generation system, noted it's a solar system, and figured out other things like sending power down the molecular connections to other systems,) just the appropriate energy exposure via another means would do the trick. Funnily enough, after a few years, I find out that others have had this thought, and have PROVEN IT, a couple of years before I could figure out the proper experiment to even begin an attempt at proving such a thing, let alone even thought of such an experiment.
Never underestimate the power of ones internal gut feeling/intuition. It has led to more unexpected turn-arounds in history than you can imagine.
"Well, except for the niggling one where it demands a completely different vacuum energy level than the similarly well-tested theories of Quantum Mechanics."
That would be considered a miscalculation. It still follows basic thermodynamics once you break it down.
That doesn't actually preclude physics. We can get multiple bits of information from a single photon. QAM, frequency, phase-shift, etc. The theorem still holds across almost every perceivable 'sound effect' until you get to the matter of pitch shifting, in which case, even with the minimum 2x sampling rate, the reality is that you need about 32x that amount to get an accurate signal representation that won't distort across a wide range of frequency shifts.
There's a reason Nyquist-Shannon has a "THEOREM" instead of a "LAW."
Microwave lasers. EM can still be directed and made into coherent beams no matter the wavelength. Wave-particle duality FTW, son. Go back to basic physics class in high school. Oh, wait, you're likely one of the NCLB generation.
That sampling theorem got blown out by any real audio technician that uses pitch-shifting.
That theorem is NOWHERE CLOSE to being adequate for any situation where pitch-shifting is a requirement. You need at least 32x the sampling rate to achieve near-flawless pitch-shifting up or down to a MEASLY TWO WHOLE NOTES, NO MATTER WHAT THEIR FREQUENCY RANGE.
I've proven it with.FLAC files,.RAW files,.WAV files, and.PCM files, across every pitch-shifting plugin known for the most popular media players.
Shannon-Nyquist are old-age. Time for a new theorem.
"Is it even possible for Slashdot to do competent reporting on a bitcoin story?"
Is it possible for Bitcoin to be competent? Nope. Not as long as your literal backing is the price of electricity/hardware you spent to make a bitcoin instead of an actual good or service. When people figure that out and realize that they're paying hundred of dollars for something that ultimately cost a few cents to create, they're going to leave you high and dry.
The only people that approve of this new-age Ponzi Scheme are those typically performing criminal activities, the overly-paranoid, conspiracy nutjobs, and the people that plan on taking advantage of the other aforementioned groups.
Slashdot Mirror
Doesn't matter when the recharge time is a matter of a couple of minutes instead of hours!
Can't show the boss shit when your website is down and remains down.
Thanks for a new slashdot effect target! It's been a while since we've had a chance to sharpen our claws.
Are you a fucking retard? The only goddamned difference is the ORIENTATION. I've run a TI 99/4A vertically stacked using the extension bus.
So much for the patent. Those magnets holding it are of no actual purpose when the bus connector should pretty much handle it all, assuming it was built worth a shit. Hinged screen for the top? Nothing new, laptops do this already and have extension bases with modular components THAT STACKS VERTICALLY.
Logical failure detected. Detach yourself from mommy's PC and reattach yourself to her titty.
"Industry use of gold is very small"
What? Come again? Industry use is small? Gold is required for many medicines, plating electrical contacts for corrosion resistance, used as power leads for every LED die, processor pins, aerospace, dental fillings, etc.
http://geology.com/minerals/go...
AND THE USES KEEP GROWING.
Just scam them from Martin Shkreli's dumb ass.
"Making the Caller ID value "correct" would mean you couldn't dial it (it's a 4 digit number after all), and it wouldn't tell you who is calling you. Completely worthless.
It can't be made a DID since the phone has none."
I can tell you don't know jack fucking shit about CID. My old business extension would show up on CID, be it two, three, or four digits long. Internal routing systems can append that data before going outside, how the fuck do you think CID spoofing works in the first place?
But MATLAB has a Z80 simulator, you fecking moron, but if you actually used MATLAB, you wouldn't have made that stupid remark you just made.
I do know better, that's why not a single one of them have ever been able to compromise my WINDOWS system EVERY TIME I'VE ATTENDED.
Go home, child. You're nothing.
Pwn2Own has become a self-congratulatory bunch of fucktards who no longer care about making things safe for people, they're only out to stroke their own egos. This announcement pretty much clinches that.
Every App I've used tries taking me down a road/exit that has NEVER EXISTED IN THIS CITY.
My Tom Tom does not have this road.
I'll trust my Tom Tom.
"making it NOT a neutral line."
Until some dumbass (Like I've seen in Texas) puts tied neutral/grounds too close to separated grounds, and wet ground conditions cause problems when lighting hits.
But hey, I've actually bothered with having to install full-building electrical systems. You keep talking.
"Sorry, wrong!"
Apparently your dumb ass forgot to read the *MY* part.
"There's a simple AC cable without ground"
In many, if not most USA electrical panels, neutral and ground are tied together at the bus. A separate ground is run (or tied to pre-existing metal plumbing going into earth) for the third prong. Even without the third prong, the general protection remains the same.
Still the same effect. This is essentially irrelevant unless some idiot wired hot/neutral backwards, and even then, the additional ground won't help much.
Incorrect, cables are made to be bent. If they weren't, they'd be called rods, or rails. This is why cables have a specified bend radius.
Your article also goes against what has been common use for a decade-plus.
Every portable computer I've had comes with wall-cord-brick-cord-portable device charging scheme. Desktops still follow this convention once you decouple the idea of internal vs external.
Only my phones have wallwart-cord-device charging.
They're one of the harder corporate shills. Microsoft or Apple, they know no bounds in selling out.
"I suspect Einstein had a version of my own internal simulator, one he put to use more effectively than I. Given a strong grasp of physics in that era, he could have readily generated new theories based on a few seconds of examining a behavior in his head--a behavior which would be perfectly in line with reality, even if he didn't understand it--and start working out the mechanics."
This is exactly what I think. I sit here and look at various systems, supposedly unrelated to most people, and suddenly I see a relationship between them. This is how I came to the conclusion that light isn't a requirement for photosynthesis (I looked at the system as another energy generation system, noted it's a solar system, and figured out other things like sending power down the molecular connections to other systems,) just the appropriate energy exposure via another means would do the trick. Funnily enough, after a few years, I find out that others have had this thought, and have PROVEN IT, a couple of years before I could figure out the proper experiment to even begin an attempt at proving such a thing, let alone even thought of such an experiment.
Never underestimate the power of ones internal gut feeling/intuition. It has led to more unexpected turn-arounds in history than you can imagine.
"Well, except for the niggling one where it demands a completely different vacuum energy level than the similarly well-tested theories of Quantum Mechanics."
That would be considered a miscalculation. It still follows basic thermodynamics once you break it down.
Man can make it, man can break it. It is a given fact of life to ANY serious engineer in any discipline.
To ignore such a thing is the ultimate range of foolishness and it is also the signal of a superiority complex that cannot be trusted.
That doesn't actually preclude physics. We can get multiple bits of information from a single photon. QAM, frequency, phase-shift, etc. The theorem still holds across almost every perceivable 'sound effect' until you get to the matter of pitch shifting, in which case, even with the minimum 2x sampling rate, the reality is that you need about 32x that amount to get an accurate signal representation that won't distort across a wide range of frequency shifts.
There's a reason Nyquist-Shannon has a "THEOREM" instead of a "LAW."
Microwave lasers. EM can still be directed and made into coherent beams no matter the wavelength. Wave-particle duality FTW, son. Go back to basic physics class in high school. Oh, wait, you're likely one of the NCLB generation.
That sampling theorem got blown out by any real audio technician that uses pitch-shifting.
That theorem is NOWHERE CLOSE to being adequate for any situation where pitch-shifting is a requirement. You need at least 32x the sampling rate to achieve near-flawless pitch-shifting up or down to a MEASLY TWO WHOLE NOTES, NO MATTER WHAT THEIR FREQUENCY RANGE.
I've proven it with .FLAC files, .RAW files, .WAV files, and .PCM files, across every pitch-shifting plugin known for the most popular media players.
Shannon-Nyquist are old-age. Time for a new theorem.
Honeypots are specific. Creating billions of bitcoin wallets would be useless given the current blockchain size that you need to check against.
"Is it even possible for Slashdot to do competent reporting on a bitcoin story?"
Is it possible for Bitcoin to be competent? Nope. Not as long as your literal backing is the price of electricity/hardware you spent to make a bitcoin instead of an actual good or service. When people figure that out and realize that they're paying hundred of dollars for something that ultimately cost a few cents to create, they're going to leave you high and dry.
The only people that approve of this new-age Ponzi Scheme are those typically performing criminal activities, the overly-paranoid, conspiracy nutjobs, and the people that plan on taking advantage of the other aforementioned groups.
So which one are you?