For me, a Taiwanese, non-English speaker, it is because I played before the Taiwan servers is opened, and the company Blizzard licensed is so unprofesional (i.e, unable or delay to deliver correct translation after each patch) and has doubtful attitude (i.e, strongly againt use of addons to eliminate customer service).
If you wanted a copyleft license, why didn't you just use the GPL or LGPL?
We needed an open source license that allowed files released under the license to be linked with files released under other licenses, since initially we will not be able to release the source for all of Solaris. While a license like LGPL would allow this for dynamically linked code, we also needed to be able to release software that statically links source files available under different licenses. In addition, we wanted to allow others to add extensions to OpenSolaris with different license terms. This was only possible under a license like the MPL; however, we could not use the MPL because it is not a "template" license allowing reuse by others. Consequently we crafted a new variant of the MPL, taking the opportunity to make it a template license as a step towards reducing license proliferation for others finding themselves in the same position as us.
Does it mean, when one day ALL the source of Solaris is open, they will change the license for it?
Slashdot Mirror
For me, a Taiwanese, non-English speaker, it is because I played before the Taiwan servers is opened, and the company Blizzard licensed is so unprofesional (i.e, unable or delay to deliver correct translation after each patch) and has doubtful attitude (i.e, strongly againt use of addons to eliminate customer service).
http://nethack.org/common/index.html ;)
You must be new here
I think a NetHack-style MMORPG is more reasonable. You start a random whole new character every login session. That's life.
there will be a Firefox Plug-In that replaces that "Big E" with Earth-hugging red fox soon.