Slashdot Mirror


A World of Warcraft World

An anonymous reader writes "On ebay people are paying real money to buy WoW gold... while some guy in Korea murdered another guy over a rare sword that existed only in an MMORPG. This essay looks at the way more and more people are failing to draw a distinction between their real and online lives and takes it to its logical, yet utterly insane, conclusion." Amusing, and with more than a few ounces of truth.

457 comments

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. Or... by JonN · · Score: 5, Funny

    The people are ripe for it. You've heard stories about how ticket sales are plummeting at movie theaters, in favor of home DVD viewing. Why? Why do so many people want to work from home now? Because we're sick of having to sit with other people. We want that extra layer of control that meat interaction will never give us. We want a world without the unpredictability of real, unrestrained humanity. Either that...Or DVD+/-R & DVDwriters prices are coming down.

    --
    do.what.promptcmds
    1. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some people have in the past months seen nearly half an hour of ads before the film would start

      most DVD players you can skip that

    2. Re:Or... by Surr3al · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I find netflix to be far more convenient than going to a theater and paying the extortion rate prices for popcorn and soda.

    3. Re:Or... by bladesjester · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Working from home helps cut down on the money spent on gas now that the prices have become prohibitive.

      Renting dvd's also tends to end up being cheaper. Cost of getting to the theater, $10+/ticket in a lot of places, and soda, popcorn, etc. by the time it's all said and done, if more than one person is going to see the movie, it's actually cheaper just to buy the bloody thing in the store when it comes out on dvd.

      Avoiding rude people is just kind of an added bonus.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    4. Re:Or... by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Funny
      I find netflix to be far more convenient than going to a theater and paying the extortion rate prices for popcorn and soda.

      Is it impossible to watch a movie without buying popcorn and soda? With determination, one CAN go for two, or even three, hours withiou eating a snack. Work up to it, start by watching a 30-minute sitcom without eating.

      If the monkey is really on your back, it's not hard to smuggle snacks into a cinema.

    5. Re:Or... by khrtt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Movie ticket prices are about $10, which is ridiculous, considering what you're getting -- the right to sit in a dark room in a filthy uncomfortable seat and watch the back of the head of the fat fuck in front of you, who moves it back into your line of sight every time you twist your neck in a different way to see around it. You also get to listen to other people around you discuss some stupid shit, snarf popcorn, and fart.

      A DVD rental is next to free with netflix, and if you can't watch it for some reason, and you have a computer, you can copy it off for later viewing for the cost of a DVD blank.

      I only go to the movies when my stupid gf wants to "go to the movies", as opposed to "sit home and stare at the tube all evening" again. In which case I do go to the movies, because my other options are pretty much limited to taking her to some "cozy" yuppie restaurant and spending the evening staring at her face and listening to her silly chat. Not that I mind the look of her face, but the movies have the advantage that she can't really talk all that much there:-).

    6. Re:Or... by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You've got some serious relationship issues.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    7. Re:Or... by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 1
      JonN wrote:
      The people are ripe for it. You've heard stories about how ticket sales are plummeting at movie theaters, in favor of home DVD viewing. Why? Why do so many people want to work from home now? Because we're sick of having to sit with other people. We want that extra layer of control that meat interaction will never give us. We want a world without the unpredictability of real, unrestrained humanity. Either that...Or DVD+/-R & DVDwriters prices are coming down.
      A female friend of mine recently went to see the premiere of War of the Worlds on opening day in a packed theatre. After a particularly intense scene about half-way through the movie, realized the strange man next to her had his hand on her knee and she had no idea how long it had been there.

      She freaked. The other theater patrons thought it was just part of her reaction to the movie. The man took off. And for some reason she's expressed nothing but antipathy at going to a theatre since that incident.

      (And no I was not the strange man, you sicko's)

    8. Re:Or... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I find netflix to be far more convenient than going to a theater and paying the extortion rate prices for popcorn and soda.

      Move to Finland, pay 8 euros for a movie ticket and carry as much food into the theater as you want. On the bad side, you can't get work, if you do you'll be paying half your income as taxes, and the local politicians are trying to bow to Russia, EU and USA all at once, and will propably take us to NATO just to make themselves feel important :(.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    9. Re:Or... by lowmagnet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Prohibitive? In Europe, folks pay $5-6/gallon (Adjusted from Euros/litres) which is far more prohibitive than $2.50-3/gallon. In the US, we are used to a subsidised (Our energy bills pander to the petroleum industry) fuel delivery system. Well, the fantasy is coming to an end, oil man President or not.

      I'm totally for renting videos. I pay Blockbuster $25/mo. and get probably 20 or so rentals out. I don't even rip/burn the discs. I just watch one every other evening or so.

      Well, not totally. I'm still going to see a few movies in theater. Tops on this list is Serenity.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    10. Re:Or... by Bobsledboy · · Score: 1

      Serenity is well worth it. I caught a preview screening a few weeks back. Fantastic :)

    11. Re:Or... by cloudmaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the USA, we pay higher taxes elsewhere to support the roads, rather than paying high taxes on fuel to support the roads. It's not more subsidized here, it's just taxed differently in the two places. A barrel of oil costs [roughly] the same in either place.

      Then again, even if I'm totally wrong, where in the heck do you think the government gets the money for subsidies? That's right - from the taxes the citizens pay. My taxes haven't gone down recently, but the price of gas sure has gone up (mostly due to lack of refinement capacity in this great price-fixing-industry-supporting nation of ours).

      Not to mention that lots of Europe is a bike ride / public transportation ride from work, that many parts of Europe have sane health care systems from a price point of view, and that there's enough other differences that directly comparing Europe's and USA's fuel costs alone is effectively pointless...

    12. Re:Or... by OmniVector · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I know how you feel. My girlfriend seems caught up in the "old way" of doing things when it comes to movies. Her first reaction is to rent, or go to the theater when I repeatedly tell her I can just download the DVD and we can watch it tomorrow. I don't know what it is, but I think girls get some sort of kick out of wasting our money. It makes them feel better or something.

      --
      - tristan
    13. Re:Or... by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      In the US, we are used to a subsidised (Our energy bills pander to the petroleum industry) fuel delivery system.

      I'm not sure where this myth comes from, but it simply isn't true. The reason the price of gas is higher in other countries is much higher taxes. The price of gas is not subsidized in the US, unless you count the military occupation and support of certain middle eastern countries.

    14. Re:Or... by hsteck_ylf · · Score: 1
      We all know that gas prices in the US haven't followed inflation over the past few decades... The main problem isn't that the prices are so high, but that they have shot up over 150% in the last year!

      I have an 80-mile round-trip commute to my job in Washington DC. The $0.50 increase in the past two weeks have increased my month traveling costs up by almost 50%!!!

      --
      If you are expecting something here, I don't know what to tell you...
    15. Re:Or... by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      If the monkey is really on your back, it's not hard to smuggle snacks into a cinema.

      Smuggle you say? Hmm... I would like to inquire about your services as a snack mule.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    16. Re:Or... by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 2

      Work up to it, start by watching a 30-minute sitcom without eating.

      The real trick is watching a 30-minute sitcom without drinking yourself into a coma.

      --
      Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
    17. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Of course, maybe your girlfriend would rather not wait until the next night, but feels like actually watching it, you know, spontaneously. Of course, there may always be the option of perhaps NOT illegally downloading the film, but I suppose it's unacceptable her in the Slashdot crowd to imply that legality and ethics are somehow more important than FREE SHIZNIT, YO!

      *sigh*

    18. Re:Or... by ninjagin · · Score: 1
      Funny you mention it, but I heard this mathematician on the radio yesterday talking about a mathematical study, using game theory, into what the best type of gift-giving would be to woo a woman.

      The options were, 1) an expensive durable purchase (like diamonds), 2) an expensive non-durable purchase (like tickets to an opera, or skiing) and 3) a cheap non-durable purchase.

      The study predicted that 2) was the best bet. So, I think it's not necessarily the wasting of the money, but that your waste it on her.

      --
      .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
    19. Re:Or... by khrtt · · Score: 1

      ...mathematical study...

      Math? Seems more like psychology to me...

    20. Re:Or... by Kethinov · · Score: 1
      spontaneously
      I find this behavior tends to coincide with attention deficit disorder.
      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    21. Re:Or... by ninjagin · · Score: 1
      Not so much.

      It's gauging probabilities of success across a range of strategies (abeit simple).

      I'm pretty sure that such a question can be explored by math games. It can be explored statistically in study, can't it? Why not then by games?

      --
      .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
  3. violence by stoutpuppy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ever consider the benefits of mmorpgs and computer games? ever compared the real violence rate and drug rates between nerds and jocks? jocks are the generally the ones beating peers, raping women and snorting coke. sh~t happens with anything. what doesn't influence people?

    1. Re:violence by a55mnky · · Score: 1
      jocks are the generally the ones beating peers, raping women and snorting coke

      Uhm, this is a pretty blanket statement - care to support it with facts

      --
      Where oh where has my Underdog gone?
    2. Re:violence by Izago909 · · Score: 1

      ever consider the benefits of mmorpgs and computer games?
      Well... living in your mothers basement and never having a girlfriend is definately a financial benifit. Although, bad hygene and poor social development may be considered by some to be con.

      ever compared the real violence rate and drug rates between nerds and jocks?
      Take a knee junior. This type of humor, although not ironical, uses juxtapositioning to present the stereotypical nerd, geek, dweeb, and dork just as irrational as the feared jock when it comes to ones obsession.

      jocks are the generally the ones beating peers, raping women and snorting coke. Now who's the one holding the irrational stereotypes. How is your opinion any different that a jock thinking you are going to spend half your life as a virgin? I don't even know where the whole coke thing came in. If you think coke is worse than the massive ammounts of super processed junk food known as the staple of the nerd diet... you have a big suprise coming to you in a few years.

      sh~t happens with anything. what doesn't influence people?
      Finally, a half way rational statement, "shit happens, things influence people".

    3. Re:violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      jocks are the generally the ones beating peers, raping women and snorting coke

      i beg to differ - i did coke, raped loads of women, beat up pretty much all of my peers at least once and never really bothered with sports at all

    4. Re:violence by tacarat · · Score: 2, Funny

      The support the poster's assumption that most /. nerds couldn't fight their way out of a wet paper bag, wouldn't know what to do with a woman if they had one (willing or not) and spent all their $$ upgrading something that runs on electricity.

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    5. Re:violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent needs to get beaten up and raped by a coked-up nerd ASAP.

    6. Re:violence by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      Nerds also tend to be weaker and smarter.

      By being weaker it's harder for us to rape women and smarter means we know better.

      --
      I like muppets.
    7. Re:violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I resent that, my vibro wand 2000 just got a pointy attachment upgrade that can now poke me out of a paper bag, and possibly please a woman as well.

    8. Re:violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Parent needs to get beaten up and raped by a coked-up nerd ASAP.
      That is one messed up personal ad...

    9. Re:violence by CharonIDRONES · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'll add some fuel to the flames.

      I guess you could possibly say I was that 'stereotypical' looking jock/prep guy in highschool (just graduated, 3.6 GPA, so not a 'dumb' jock either). Yeah, I've done an assortment of drugs, not really to my regret either, started out small, escalated, and I still do them at parties on the weekends, though nothing really 'hard'. By hard, I mean essentially using a needle to do it, but used to snort 80s of OxyContin among other things.

      However - I'm also what you would call a 'nerd' to an extent, I've worked in computer businesses for two years (two seperate businesses for a year each - both went out of business and I was with each from start to finish). I took state three times in wrestling, twice in collegiate and once in Greco-Roman, but I'm not a violent person at all, I party a lot but I don't get into fights, I don't rape women or anything like that, I adhor violence honestly.

      So essentially, I'm a jock that plays MMORPGs (Lineage II, EverQuest, fyi), wears Abercrombie, uses Linux, used to do coke a lot, has never taken advantage of a woman, and yet still bound to these petty stereotypes? Sorry, but grow up and get your head out of your ass, the world needs stereotypes about as much as they need racism.

      -Brandon

    10. Re:violence by turrican · · Score: 1

      True, but it always seems to be the nerds that EAT them(!)

    11. Re:violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a closet jock...

    12. Re:violence by tacarat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm rather worried you might accidentally please the paper bag and poke out the woman... ;)

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    13. Re:violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't insult us nerd, we're all hopped on speed!

    14. Re:violence by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Yes, right after heading into a corner and munching the power pill...

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    15. Re:violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jocks are the generally the ones beating peers, raping women

      To be honest, the average nerd probably doesn't know enough about women to rape them in the first place !

      "OK now you're all tied up and gagged and all that... Now what do I do ?... Er... Wait I'm gonna look it up on wikipedia..."

      (Yeah, I know, -1 Sick)

    16. Re:violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nerds and jocks? What is this, middle school? Grow up!

    17. Re:violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell ya man. You know I've met some pretty smart, friendly and completely reasonable "jocks" and I've met some rather stupid, petty and generally prickish "nerds".

      Yes, I'm sure some people have anti-jock baggage from high shcool or whatever but come on people once you are an adult get over it.

    18. Re:violence by stoutpuppy · · Score: 1

      How about that this is a single case of serious violence over a mmorpg and there are many cases of sport, after sport and such violence and when it happens once with nerds it's a huge deal. Here's an older article I think was shared with slashdotters: http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la- oe-johnson27jul27,0,1432940.story?coll=la-news-com ment-opinions I have given my opinion and if you don't agree I think you know well enough to find out the information on your own, hmm dare I say the magic word? A quick 'google' and there are many statistics, facts, etc.

  4. You fools by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    How dare you sully the great name of Blizzard? I and my 80 strong army of MC loot equipped legionaires will lead a crusade against you until there is not but one of you left to mock us!

    But we need a one hour break from 6-7, Mom will murder me if I'm not there to eat dinner with the familly. Don't worry, this "real world" instance seems to be pretty persistant, our progress wont be lost, just aa few minutes to clear the repop...

    --
    Beep beep.
    1. Re:You fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ok guys looks like we got an attacking guild on our hands. We need a strategy.

      Somebody infiltrate their guild ranks and pull a Leeroy.

    2. Re:You fools by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 1

      I just about peed my pants watching leeroy

      LEEROY JEEEENKINS!!!

      --
      I am Spartacus
    3. Re:You fools by Kidbro · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't worry, this "real world" instance seems to be pretty persistant

      Fuck man, it's not an instance! There's people there I run into over and over again, and I'm telling you, they're not in my team!

    4. Re:You fools by martiansoup · · Score: 1

      "The "Real World" is another cult internet phenomenon, but with no known origin. It is said to be a Matrix-like RPG existing outside the Internet, but there is little evidence to support this theory. It apparently accounts for the unexplained phrases "Be Right Back" and "Away" which often appear before a gamer or chatter is inactive for a while. My hypothesis is that this game (most likely to be produced by Blizzard) is highly addictive, as users may return ranting about their visions of "friends" or "family" (i.e. sentinent beings with no apparent online presence - they may be similar to messagebots), or talking about their commitments to "work" or "school" (i.e. smaller integrated games run within the Real World engine). I have heard reports of some gamers who seem to disappear to play this game at regular, thrice-daily, times. My sources call this "eating". However, I have found no further information on the subject.
      The Real World craze appears to be a worldwide one. I hear quotes from the game (such as "Sorry, gotta go now" and "Talk to you later") regularly from both chatters and gamers. It seems to be available on all formats as well, with confirmed sightings of the game on PC, Mac and console formats. There is just one thing, however, stopping the Real World from becoming the most popular RPG ever. There are no cheat codes."

      Linden -- http://www.bookofrandom.co.uk/index.shtml?main.php ?id=118

    5. Re:You fools by SilentSheep · · Score: 1

      Anyone in an instance who's not on your team, is supposed to be killed! Or thats the way i play instances!

      --
      .
    6. Re:You fools by endx7 · · Score: 1

      I think they are just trash mobs, not people!

  5. Re:Well by JonN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In addition to this, who is to say someone cannot get emotionally attached to something that isn't physical?

    --
    do.what.promptcmds
  6. Re:Well by try_anything · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Absolutely right. If the time and effort required to obtain something is real, and the satisfaction derived from it is real, then why does it matter if the object itself is virtual?

    The fact that people care so much about a silly game is, however, pathetic in my opinion.

  7. I was taking this article somewhat serious... by rogabean · · Score: 4, Funny

    until I ran into this:

    "Just think of how porn changes when the user also gets to go in with the toned body of an underwear model. It'll make our current online porn look like just the tip of the assberg."

    Was that really needed?

    Anyway the article smells of someone trying to get posted on /. and not something of actual merit.

    --
    "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
    1. Re:I was taking this article somewhat serious... by JonN · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Anyway the article smells of someone trying to get posted on /. and not something of actual merit.

      Isn't the biggest reason of releasing something into the public to get acclaim or notice from it? It doesn't matter if this person was trying to get onto /. or not. What matters is if the article itself holds water, which imo it does.

      --
      do.what.promptcmds
    2. Re:I was taking this article somewhat serious... by tsm_sf · · Score: 5, Funny

      You might have saved yourself a little time if you'd taken note of the article's host domain.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    3. Re:I was taking this article somewhat serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assberg. Best. Word. Ever.

    4. Re:I was taking this article somewhat serious... by Sam+Ritchie · · Score: 1
      blah blah blah PORN blah blah blah

      Great, now I have to go RTFA.

      --
      This sig is false.
    5. Re:I was taking this article somewhat serious... by Old+VMS+Junkie · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of Dennis Miller's quote about virtual reality... "If some unemployed punk in New Jersey, can get a cassette to make love to Elle McPherson for $19.95, this virtual reality stuff is going to make crack look like Sanka."

    6. Re:I was taking this article somewhat serious... by irokie · · Score: 1

      Really? I found the reasoning a little... weak.

      It sounds to me like someone spent the weekend power-levelling and wanted to explain to someone how exciting it was... then that became a behemoth blog-post.

      Facts are not tremendously relevant ("There are more people playing World of Warcraft in the U.S. today (two million) than had indoor plumbing 100 years ago." - What the hell sort of comparison is that? I have more apples than Jimmy did 6 hours ago). And some of the reasoning is inconsistent (InGameCurrency (TM) will be valid in the real world. Or will it? Or won't it? Well, I don't know, it might be).

      The author doesn't deal with some rather important points, such as offspring from the proposed virtual marriages. Or how about what happens when there's a crash that wipes a bunch of people out? Or the thief who just goes off and starts a new character as a Cleric or Paladin. This article reeks of zealotry and MMORPG evangelism.

      I *do* think that some day, some of what is described in the article will be possible. But I think that a guy who spends that much time on his blog, and delivers propaganda full of specious reasoning isn't the guy who's vision we should listen to... I liked some of his points, and I was fond of his "quotes" from famous visionaries, but the article just didn't hold water for me.

      --
      and if you see me strut, remind me of what left this outlaw torn...
  8. Evolution of Digital Worlds by DumbWhiteGuy777 · · Score: 1

    I have seen this evolution of people in MMO worlds and I'm not liking it so much. It used to be a fairly docile and pleasant place to go and talk to people, but now I can't login to anywhere without someone offering to pay gold to watch a Ranger do a /dance. It's getting really full of jerks and creepy people. Maybe we need to retreat back to MUDs to get away from these folk.

  9. The Real Question by Boss+Coffee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd like to see a study on the percentage of people that drop out of college due to WOW and how many actually recover.

    1. Re:The Real Question by ebrandsberg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It really doesn't matter if it's WoW or something else--I dropped out from college because I was playing on this newfangled thing called the Internet, to the detriment of my studies. This was back in '95, and I got lucky that what I got involved with ended up being my job years later. Somehow though, unless you want to become a chinese gold farmer, I don't think this type of experience will carry over, but it points out that such passions have always occured, be it getting involved with drugs, sex, hobbies, etc. I don't really think this will change that much except the lack of both damage as a whole people do to themselves playing the games, and the lack of anything possibly long-lasting.

    2. Re:The Real Question by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I saw someone addicted to MUDs at CMU (this was betweeen 1991-1993 (!)) they were in the computer lab, and still there when I returned the next day - they had never left!

      Yeah, they had the Internet back then.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    3. Re:The Real Question by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see a study on the percentage of people that drop out of college due to WOW and how many actually recover.

      I gave up 4 years of gaming so I could study hard and earn a CS degree. I couldn't find a job, so now I'm unemployed making up for lots of wasted time.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    4. Re:The Real Question by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      Ah, you youngsters. Back in my day people dropped out of college because of Everquest.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    5. Re:The Real Question by Shakes268 · · Score: 0

      Get a job even if its not in your field of study. You're just being lazy right now it sounds to me. If you're on welfare, are you going to pay me back a percentage when you finally do get job?

    6. Re:The Real Question by twifosp · · Score: 1

      Except there's no actual proof those same people would have finished college without the existence of the game. Be it Quake, Everquest, World of Warcraft, or competative drinking; people will find whatever excuse neccesary to have a good time on their parents dime under the guise of getting an education. Some kids just aren't ready for college after high school.

    7. Re:The Real Question by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      I'd like to see a study on the percentage of people that drop out of college due to WOW and how many actually recover.

      When my parents went to school they had friends who dropped out because they spent all their time in the student lounge playing bridge. (Remember when games were played using physical tokens in the real world?)

      There have always been college students who will do anything and everything to pass time...except go to lectures.

      Back in my undergraduate days, I was late for class a few times because I got caught up in a real-time strategy game. I have also been late for or missed classes because I was playing euchre, overslept, plain forgot, felt like going home early, or was talking to a girl. (No, really.) I imagine that any one of those things, taken to excess, could ruin a school career.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    8. Re:The Real Question by schnoid · · Score: 1

      I know a lot of people that failed out of school cause of Counterstrike. That was one crazy addicting game!

  10. sure its real... here's the line blurred for ya. by deft · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Of course these people dont think they live ina fantasy world... but here's the reality of it.

    These people have a very real connection to the entertainment, social, and self image (among many other things) aspects of playing this game. The ways you can gain prominence, excell, get friends, make a splash, whatever it is they are talking about (swords and money are prime examples).

    When someone takes that from you or offers to sell it to you, it has real world implications to their lives that are no less real than anything else. It does not matter what social construct it is.

    Going down to my local club where every girl is dressed up and dancing is also complete surreal to the normal world around me. And if I drive up in a nice car (+5 pimp/has money) and wearing a rolex (+3 nice job) it has effect on that world too. And it's the bsuiness owners job to make it as surreal as possible just like a game... with flashy lights to make the girls look better, and drinks to.... make the girls look better (and the guys too).

    It's all about power and these people are just living it with a game as the medium. But it's no less real. Odd maybe, not so accepted, yes, but it's very real... as that guys rage in killing someone demonstrates quite well.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
  11. Re:Well by Lord+Pillage · · Score: 0

    Uhh.... emotional attachment is innately non-physical.

    --
    try { Signature mysig = new CleverAttempt(); } catch(NonCleverSignatureException e) { postanyway(); }
  12. As Fark might say.. by kevin_conaway · · Score: 4, Informative

    Personal responsibility surrenders. Its not the game. Its not the weapon. Its not the sex. Its the person!

    1. Re:As Fark might say.. by LordHatrus · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Its not the sex.
      Of course not, this is slashdot; we don't get that kind of stuff here...

    2. Re:As Fark might say.. by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      I still think it's funny that I got a lot of interest from girls in college because of the swords (I've trained martially since I've been a kid and was a member/pseudo-coach of the fencing team at my college).

      There were other reasons too, but the swords one was just amusing. Swords lead to rabid fan-girls, and those just lead to general amusement in various and assorted ways. :P

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  13. nerd post, turn back now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bonebiter is a quest reward for completing SM.

    Can't be Ninjaed. PTFG, author! /stole my cloudsong!

  14. I'll be worried... by craznar · · Score: 5, Funny

    When there is internet cafe's in WoW Inns and Taverns on which I can read the news, read slashdot and even play online games such as WoW.

    And what sort of conspiracy that my verify word was 'sorcery' ... mmmm!!!

    --
    EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
  15. It can become an addiction by Bralkein · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to play EQ a lot, I was pretty hooked on it for about a year. I don't regret it, since I had a lot of fun times, but looking back, I certainly burnt a lot of hours in Norrath. My brother got really hooked on it too, and he's not even the complete nerd that I am. There were certain people there who were pretty terrifying though. For example, I often heard people talking about how they were skipping school in order to spend the day playing the game, and my brother once even got paid (EQ money, but still) to guard someone's character while he took a nap at the keyboard. This guy was so thoroughly obsessed with the game that he wouldn't leave the computer - not even to sleep.

    Take these stories as warnings. You might not think yourself capable of such things, and okay, I doubt you'll end up killing anyone, but even a stupid little game can become a major feature in your life if you're not careful. Especially when you have to pay per month, since it's so easily justifiable - you're only getting your money's worth, after all!

    1. Re:It can become an addiction by aaza · · Score: 1, Interesting
      What I have to say is not as bad, and was from the time of the text MUDs. I guy I know once went without sleep for a few days so he didn't have to log off. The problem with logging off was that your character was asleep, and hence vulnerable to anyone who came along.

      It can be a problem, but only if you take it seriously. If you treat it as the fun it should be (and not as a life/career etc), then there is no problem.

      This sort of problem is not new, but goes all the way back to D&D, and the suicides of people whose character died. (http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0046/0046_01. asp for those of you who have not seen it before) If your only social interaction is virtual (either as packets on a network, or stats on a page), then you may have a serious problem on your hands.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
      In practice, however, there is.
    2. Re:It can become an addiction by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      Ah, Jack Chick. His anti-Catholic rants are my favorite.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    3. Re:It can become an addiction by Orion83 · · Score: 1

      WOW addiction is covered in a very entertaining way in the latest 2 episodes of the Net show
      http://www.purepwnage.com/
      I love the scene where he's trying to explain to the psychiatrist that he hasn't had food for days because "priest's don't need to eat, and you know, typically my regen is so high cus of my high spirit that I'm basically always full anyways"

    4. Re:It can become an addiction by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      Thanks... That super-religious cartoon was hilarious. The ironic humor in it was wonderfully done, especially the assumption that witchcraft was real and that D+D would cause someone to become a witch. The whole "Jesus will save you" thing from that random guy (what was he, a boyfriend?) was precious.

      Who does these? I love a good satire.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    5. Re:It can become an addiction by goodenoughnickname · · Score: 1

      Thank you for hyperlinking "EQ"; I didn't know what you were reffering to. On an unrelated note, did you know I enjoy eating Cap'n Crunch?

    6. Re:It can become an addiction by DerWulf · · Score: 1

      This sort of problem is not new, but goes all the way back to D&D, and the suicides of people whose character died.

      Now thats dedication to staying in-character. Farewell!

      --

      ___
      No power in the 'verse can stop me
    7. Re:It can become an addiction by big+ben+bullet · · Score: 1

      a wow addicted co-worker of mine found a note from his girlfriend on his keyboard when he got home from work booting his gamepc:

      "If I don't get some tonight... I'm finding it some place else!"

      they're still together :-)

  16. What Would Darwin Do? by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Sure... There is the initial, Why would someone kill some guy over something as intangible as an online sword?

    K, why would someone kill someone else over something as intangible as the way they honor their preferred deity? There are always people on the fringe of any group whose very fringiness make them outcasts. Online wealth is still wealth. People go to war for essentially the same thing; albeit on a larger scale.

    I say, Let Natural selection decide who is the victor, People with intangible swords vs. people with tangible swords and questionable mental stability.
    --
    0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
    1. Re:What Would Darwin Do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say, Let Natural selection decide who is the victor, People with intangible swords vs. people with tangible swords and questionable mental stability.

      Well in my case the person with the intangible sword (me) would win because the person with the real sword and questionable mental stability would in all likelyhood choke and die on a couple of loads of #4 buckshot.

    2. Re:What Would Darwin Do? by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 1

      Let Natural selection decide who is the victor

      Great idea! I'm fading, who's got the hive?

  17. Well hot damn. by Ekiken+Tochikura · · Score: 1

    Everquest Syndrome strikes back.

  18. reality by slashdotnickname · · Score: 1

    Let's face it, fantasies can be far better than the reality of most people's lives.

    Being a level 10 warlock or clan leader beats being a oft-lonely corporate slave.

    Why though, are some online pursuits (such as the above) looked down on? History if full of celebrated poets and prophets that dealt with the fantasies of what life might be.

    1. Re:reality by znaps · · Score: 1

      Very true! It's quite simple really and doesn't require over analysis.

    2. Re:reality by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Because they produced something of value that could be shared. Who the hell wants to watch you play with digital dragons and faeries? On the other hand, Edgar Allan Poe, Walt Whitman, Shakespeare and Twain *created* things which speak to the human condition.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  19. Why distinguish online vs. offline life? by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't understand why people ridicule online life and view it as some trivial sideshow to "real" life. The history of human existence shows that people have a penchant for taking many things seriously. Many of these activities reside far outside the realm of pragmatic, utilitarian life. Whether it's being a sports fan, a serious gardener, a breeder of dogs, an avid golfer, a sailboat owner, or any of a thousand other activities, people can become quite immersed. If online gaming "doesn't count," then so many other activities that people invest time in do not count either.

    Without these "hobbies," people would be little more than animals -- eating, sleeping, reproducing in the endless cycle of life that we share with even the lowliest bacteria. What distinguishes humans from animals (perhaps only quantitatively) is the extent that we can move beyond the mundane activities of "real" life and explore such a wide range of alternatives.

    For the record, I, personally am not into online gaming or sports -- this post is not a personal rant -- but I can see how these activities can become a major part of a person's identity and daily life. As such, it is important to understand and respect (in a love-of-freedom sense, not a politically correct sense) the fact that different people value different things. Its not that some people go overboard on online life vs. real life, its that some people become immersed in a life that is different from the utilitarian vision of a standard life.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Why distinguish online vs. offline life? by Caspian · · Score: 1

      The difference between sports and video gaming is that if some loony rugby/football/whatever fan goes nuts and kills someone over some sports issue, nobody will seriously suggest sweeping restrictions on sports among the youth, that sporting is 'of the Devil', etc......

      --
      With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
    2. Re:Why distinguish online vs. offline life? by syousef · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't understand why people ridicule online life and view it as some trivial sideshow to "real" life. The history of human existence shows that people have a penchant for taking many things seriously. Many of these activities reside far outside the realm of pragmatic, utilitarian life. Whether it's being a sports fan, a serious gardener, a breeder of dogs, an avid golfer, a sailboat owner, or any of a thousand other activities, people can become quite immersed.

      Two things:

      1) When the dog breeder stops going away for weekends, and starts dressing their dog and talking to it like a human being, they get plenty of ridicule. Same with sports fans that get so obsessed they riot, or that sail boat owner that won't even talk to their wife and kids and is about to lose his job (but hangs on to it JUST barely...so he can buy parts for the boat). No one's going to ridicule you for playing an online game occassionally. But when you start to shun friends and family and get obsessed you can rightly expect to be called a twit.

      2) There is some feeling that because there is no tangible physical real-world gain, it's all just a waste of time. This is largely a point of view issue. Some see more abstract things as worthwhile. Others don't. But most people would agree that if you've got a great "online" life and a terrible real life, it's time to stop the escapism for long enough to give your real life a go.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    3. Re:Why distinguish online vs. offline life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hobbies are nice, but when people get so wrapped up in their 'hobbies' as to start forgetting about 'real' life like relationships with real people, eating, sleeping then they have a problem. When real life passes you by, people leaving, real people stuck in real life suffering and the players can't turn away from the computer screen then what we have is real tragedies. I think this is what the article is about.

    4. Re:Why distinguish online vs. offline life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without these "hobbies," people would be little more than animals -- eating, sleeping, reproducing in the endless cycle of life that we share with even the lowliest bacteria.

      You're making the point but missing it ---that indeed eating, sleeping and reproducing in fact IS what life is all about. So get on with it, ask that chick out for dinner and be funny enough so she doesn't fall asleep until after sex.

    5. Re:Why distinguish online vs. offline life? by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure it would be healthy to keep her awake for over a year.

    6. Re:Why distinguish online vs. offline life? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      First off, I think you need to differentiate between "hobbies" that are passive and active. Watching sports and playing sports are two different things, one giving you a benefit that lasts beyond the moment. There is also a difference between interactive and non-interactive hobbies, such as gardening (can be non-interactive) and sports (almost always interactive). Again, interaction provides a benefit beyond the moment, which online gaming can also provide, but often doesn't appear to.

      I think everyone should take a step back from time to time and review their lives and see what they're getting from their activities, whether it be work or play, and see if they're getting anything from it besides hours whittled out of your life.

      This is why some make the distinction between recreation (to re-create yourself, to refresh yourself) and entertainment (idle play). Both have value in appropriate quantities, but they also have fundamental differences.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    7. Re:Why distinguish online vs. offline life? by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      1) When the dog breeder stops going away for weekends, and starts dressing their dog and talking to it like a human being, they get plenty of ridicule. Same with sports fans that get so obsessed they riot

      But not sports fans who go to the game wearing body paint of their team's colors and logo and the big hat with their mascot on top?

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  20. All those wacky Asian countries are the same? by nunchux · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... while some guy in Korea murdered another guy over a rare sword that existed only in an MMORPG.

    CHINA, not Korea. It happened in SHANGHAI. Geez, do a little research, tens of thousands of people are going to read your submission...

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8143073/

    1. Re:All those wacky Asian countries are the same? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1
      Geez, do a little research, tens of thousands of people are going to read your submission...
      You must be new here...
      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    2. Re:All those wacky Asian countries are the same? by ChesterTanuki · · Score: 2, Funny

      And besides, everyone knows that in Korea, only old people kill people over virtual swords...

    3. Re:All those wacky Asian countries are the same? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...tens of thousands of people are going to read your submission...

      Well tens of thousands of people are not going to RTFM

    4. Re:All those wacky Asian countries are the same? by Coneasfast · · Score: 1

      Well tens of thousands of people are not going to RTFM

      so they should RTFM to get correct information, has slashdot's reputation become _THAT_ bad?

      --
      Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    5. Re:All those wacky Asian countries are the same? by wfberg · · Score: 1

      ... while some guy in Korea murdered another guy over a rare sword that existed only in an MMORPG.

      CHINA, not Korea. It happened in SHANGHAI. Geez, do a little research, tens of thousands of people are going to read your submission...


      Also he spelled the name Sum Gai wrong..

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    6. Re:All those wacky Asian countries are the same? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does that mean he's chinese or japanese?

  21. Mirror? by maxogden · · Score: 1

    Link is already slashdotted...can someone post the article text or provide mirror please?

  22. FTFA by Raunch · · Score: 1

    For instance, none of the illustrations used in the article below were done with human hands. Each was rendered automatically by a remarkable piece of software called Nedroid, which can scan any piece of text, "read" it for comprehension and, incredibly, render artwork to match the context.

    Huh? Nedroid is completely fake.

    --
    George II -- Spreading Freedom and American values, one bomb at a time.
    1. Re:FTFA by CatherineOmega · · Score: 0

      That WAS the joke, thanks.

  23. Tell that to this girl I was dating! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhh.... emotional attachment is innately non-physical. the "attachment" part implies the emotion connects to other things, which may be physical.

  24. Dupe by melikamp · · Score: 2, Informative
  25. The Psychology of MMORPGs by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's a link to a phsychologist who's making his living on studying people who play MMORPG's.

    http://www.nickyee.com/daedalus/

    I've filled out his surveys for 4 or 5 years.

    At the site you may find many tools for characterizing your personality type and how it relates to the alternate reality of the games. As well as analysis of how MMORPG's have affected people en masse.

    --
    George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
  26. Re:Well by athmanb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The sword was worth a good 5000 yuan on the open market. Adjusting that for GDP, that's around $3000 in the US.

    Now how many americans have gotten murdered over $3000 or less? A lot.

  27. Re:Well by Keloid+Milk · · Score: 1

    i'd confirm that. (yes, as an obsessive gamer) there's something about the investment of time and effort that i can see causing someone to retaliate to that, or a similar situation, with violence. it's not to say that the majority of gamers are so unbalanced that they would resort to murder, but these items that "aren't real" can have definite value that a lot of people don't appreciate beyond the cost of the game.

    --
    ~it's the ultimate dinner show~
  28. abnormal all the time by Haxx · · Score: 1


      Anyone who has the capacity to murder a gamer over an in-game item could be expected to show similar strange behavior in real life situations.

    1. Re:abnormal all the time by PenGun · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, I kill everything that moves in a game, FPS is where I play. I have played in RPGs but everyone hates me for murdering them ... hi ho.

        In real life I think carefuly about killing a mosquito.

          PenGun
        Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

    2. Re:abnormal all the time by Haxx · · Score: 1

      He killed the guy in real life you moron.

  29. Puh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cheat online, I can get any sword I want.

    Honestly, perhaps that is the only way to guard yourself against this kind of crap: non-online games having any real value. Those games have value with me, but as soon as I feel I'm getting too busy playing them, I dig up some cheatcode and check the ending. It's not worth getting your life screwed for some game, or someone elses. Not that there is something seriously wrong with these people that I'm afraid cheatcodes can't help, apart from the fact that some people cheat online games which I firmly oppose.

  30. Re:Well by dnoyeb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You dont need to be an obsessive gamer. Anything you put time and effort into has value. Someone stealing it has commited a true crime.

    Yet in playing the game you must understand that everything within the game mechanics is fair play. Exploits are another story. And its even worse when you get exploited and the parent company does not admit the exploit exists and wont make you right. Or even worse when they deny it exists, then you see a fix in for it a month later, but no reimbursement.

    I play eve-online.com and its a blast. But you can't forget its a game. But those unreimbursed exploits!

  31. OMG! The sky is falling! by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 0, Troll

    Oh no! Some idiots are spending real money on fake gold! Some stupid kid killed some other kid! Why is it that whenever a couple of crazy people do something crazy, it gets portrayed in the media as an epidemic? Is this taught in Journalism school, or is it something you learn how to do on the job?

    --
    If you can read this sig, you're too close.
  32. it's the price we gotta pay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh it's the price we gotta pay,
    and all the games we gotta play,
    makes me wonder if it's worth it to carry on

    'cause it's a game we gotta lose,
    though it's a life we gotta choose,
    and the price is our own life until it's done

  33. If you RTFA you will realize by Doom+bucket · · Score: 1

    ...That this is a satire website, a satire article...(A joke) And also, that this is a dupe from 2 weeks ago?

    1. Re:If you RTFA you will realize by Virak · · Score: 1

      Yes, it may not be serious, but it brings up some good points.

  34. Re:OMG! The sky is falling! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No YOU'RE the idiot. Spending money on "fake" gold is the same thing as spending money on a "material item" in the way that this item can be lost or destroyed as quickly as it was bought/created just as "fake" gold can be deleted or dropped from the character in an online game.

    Perhaps if you weren't such an ignorant fuckwit (which I know you are) I'd explain more, but not today.

  35. Re:Well by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The comment that was made in the blurb/article about not being able to differentiate between a game and real life is ridiculous. It's inflammatory and biased and baseless. Nobody is making a mental disconnect between the two "places". It's just people with anger issues. Some people get seriously pissed off when someone cuts them off in traffic. They tail them until they can beat the crap out of them. Other people might let their anger get out of hand over a discussion on abortion or religion or the invasion of Iraq or a sports team or getting fouled in a basketball game. Otherwise might do so because they felt screwed over in a game that they'd invested a lot of time in.

  36. Oh, yeah, it's 1979 D&D all over again! by multipartmixed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is nothing more than more of the same crap that surrounded Dungeons & Dragons in the late 70s and the 80s.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dungeons_&_Dragons#Cr iticism_and_controversies

    These people behave irrationally not because of the game, but because they are irrational, sick, or sociopathic people.

    If these same individuals were in a knitting club, they'd be stabbing each other's eyes out with knitting needles and paying stupid amounts of money for fancy-assed wool to turn into butt-ugly sweaters and scarves. But we don't hear people telling us that knitting is evil -- probably because other people outside the knitting community understand what it's all about.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    1. Re:Oh, yeah, it's 1979 D&D all over again! by angeles13 · · Score: 1

      You obviously have never seen the arguments of bamboo vs acrylic vs metal needles (and look out if crystalites are tossed in the mix). Then there are the battles between wool and other natural yarns vs acrylic yarns and blends.

      And look out for the battle between knitters and crocheters ;p

      As for stabbing each other with needles, yeah - there are rumors on the knit blogs of such. And yeah, I've paid $$$ for that perfect yarn for the perfect project. People outside the knit community do not really understand.

      Next project is either a dna scarf or code red scarf - probably in alpaca.

      --
      design is art - art is design
  37. WoW is serious business by StandardCell · · Score: 4, Informative

    In case you haven't heard how serious (read: messed up or funny, depending on your disposition) MMORPGs can get, have a listen to this:

    http://wowseriousbusiness.ytmnd.com/

    This was recorded from a voice chat on WoW. All I can say is...WOW...

    1. Re:WoW is serious business by jreilly · · Score: 1

      It's from Dark Age of Camelot. Why did someone try to pretend it was from WoW? I dunno. Probably because WoW is the Google of MMORPGS right now, and is therefore the one to pick on. Not that I'm necessarily saying WoW players can't get that high-strung, just that people with a bone to pick against a culture aren't going to be terribly rigourous with their arguments against it.

      --

      Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose
    2. Re:WoW is serious business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just another noob mouthin off. Whats sad is a website was set up and bandwitdh was wasted to these moronics(thats a word right?) All I can say is cry more plz, noob.

    3. Re:WoW is serious business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was rolling when I heard this ...

      There is only one word for this ... 'Wow.'

      Absolutely 'Wow.'

      Well, I guess there's always : 'Anger Management Courses.'

      -c

    4. Re:WoW is serious business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, he just goes on and on...

    5. Re:WoW is serious business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I even believe its from the Merlin server in DAoC.

      But its certainly from Dark Ages of Camelot and Cloudsong is a cloak. Its pretty good, but certainly not the best in the game. The thing about it is that you can risk camp for it for a couple of days if you are unlucky.
      But this guy has nothing to cry over since he is a necro...they are pve gods.. :D

      And the vnboards is here:
      http://vnboards.ign.com/ - lots of this kind of stuff there :p

    6. Re:WoW is serious business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you wanna see / hear something that is indeed from wow and is pretty famous then check this out:

      http://www.warcraftmovies.com/movieview.php?id=166 6

      LEEEEEEEEERooooooooooooooooyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

    7. Re:WoW is serious business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is also from daoc and pretty funny about two guys going out again each other on ventrillo in daoc. http://www.ninja-neer.com/sounds/druttremix.mp3

      Drutt agains BWC on merlin :p

  38. Death by Game by dagr8tim · · Score: 1
    This is almost as bad as the news article I read afew days ago where a South Korean man logged into a game at an internet cafe.

    About 48-50 hours later, his friends came looking for him and he told them he would be going home soon. Shortly there after, he died. IIRC it was from heart failure from lack of sleep.

    --
    "Does your computer have IP on it?"
    1. Re:Death by Game by w007 · · Score: 1

      Here is the related article on internetweek: http://www.internetweek.com/news/168600599/

  39. Nothing new by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    Forever people have been wrapped up in their fantasy personalities/lives. Witness:

    Son of Sam. Watches movie and goes around shooting people.

    Street racer kids who watch "Too fast Too furious" and go racing around streets killing people.

    People that take Oprah/Arnold/whomever as role models.

    If you have a boring RealLife(tm) then you are quite likely at risk of taking your more exciting FantasyLife quite seriously and attaching significant value to your FantasyLife.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  40. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All I would say is that this level of feeling is not some unique nerd-loser quality. See "World Series", "Super Bowl", "Championship Belt", "Formula One", etc.

  41. Obligatory comment by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 0, Redundant

    (I can't believe nobody has posted this before)

    1. Play WoW
    2. ???
    3. Profit!

    Now this will prove mom that I was just training for business these days! :D

    1. Re:Obligatory comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume step 2 would then be "do some real-life PK'ing"?!

    2. Re:Obligatory comment by Chuu · · Score: 1
      Let me fill in #2 for you.

      There are several companies out there, as the op aluded to, that sell gold. Here's an interesting story about them :


      http://www.1up.com/do/feature?cId=3141815


      Their hourly quota is 10g by the way, about $0.88 for the end user to buy, and at those wages they appear to have a decent life. They work either 3 or 2 shift schedules (12/8 hour days), and some of them actuially bust their ass to earn 160g in 8 hours and spend the rest of the time actuially playing if they can find a guild to take them. Two farmers I'm aware that do this are Moong on Kel'Thuzald who groups with goons (Banana Syndicate, The Goon Squad, old school Pacifist) and ChuiChiu, who I really don't know much about but apparently is some kind of legend on the server he's on.


      These farmers have a huge effect on the game though. They are unavoidable, and because of the language barrier they completly ignore many social constructs of MMRPG's and annoy players greatly. If your a 60 Mage in WoW, and anywhere near EPL or get unlucky in IF, a chinese farmer will literally latch on to you and won't go away until you provide him food (for non wow players, these allow them to farm MUCH more efficently). Others take more drastic approaches. Some people "adopt" farmers, try to teach them how to behave, and deck them out in set pieces and take them on runs. Others, at least on PvP servers, get in touch with the opposite faction and lead them to where the farmers are to exterminte them.

    3. Re:Obligatory comment by rooftop11 · · Score: 1

      I think you mean:

      1 Play WoW
      2 Get sword
      3 Get murdered
      4 ???
      5 Profit!

  42. I know a guy... by TerranFury · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...who met a woman, and dated her, as much in the World of Warcraft as in the real one.

    She ended up leaving her husband and moving to an apartment near him just to be with him -- a college kid. Talk about insane!

    Poor guy didn't know what'd hit him.

    She was po'-white-trash with no job and no education beyond high school. Finally he got enough sense knocked into him to get away from her.

    The kid is still addicted to WoW, much to the detriment of his grades and his social life. For all I knock the crap that passes for a "social life," sitting by yourself in a dark room playing MMORPGs sure isn't healthy!

    I've been in some bad situations, but man: What happened to him sure makes me feel normal.

    1. Re:I know a guy... by The8BitHero · · Score: 1

      My cousin who is 21 now has been playing everquest since week one. He met his now fiance playing it. He just quit his job here in PA and moved up to Maine to live with her. She is 35 and left her husband for him. Crazy if you ask me but whatever floats your boat.

  43. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I do not believe that you can possibly identify a single country, except for perhaps Monaco and Vatican City, where someone has not been murdered for a sum of money less than 3000 USD. So I am not sure why gripe you have against the US that you feel the need to try and turn everything into a failing of the US "social experiment."

  44. MMO's are very addicting by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

    I play SWG, and have for the last 9 months. I went thru the crazy insane grinding that was needed to get a Jedi character, and then to get full template.

    Nuts.

    But now I am having tons of fun :)

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
  45. Re:sure its real... here's the line blurred for ya by moviepig.com · · Score: 1
    Of course these people don't think they live in a fantasy world... Odd maybe, not so accepted, yes, but it's very real...

    ...and not without precedent.

    "Reality" has always been defined by what we agree on. Ask any anthropologist, politician, or phone-sex operator...

    --
    Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
  46. China, not Korea by micah_gideon · · Score: 1

    If you read the related article, you would find that it wasn't a Korean man or even a man in Korea, but rather a Chinese man in China.

  47. MMORPG == digital crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No matter how strong the will is, it will always succumb to the lower brain functions. If these functions become addicted to something... there is very little you can do, other than seek help from someone. MMORPG Anonymous? Maybe one day certain virtual fantasies will be considered illegal drugs and outlawed.

  48. YOU STOLE MY FUCKING CLOUDSONG! by Slider · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://wowseriousbusiness.ytmnd.com/

    Obligatory YOU STOLE MY FUCKING CLOUDSONG!

    1. Re:YOU STOLE MY FUCKING CLOUDSONG! by amrust · · Score: 1

      That never EVER gets old, lol.

      --
      VOTE!
  49. The same people have always been there by bersl2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    participating in a fantasy world. Usually, it's been their own, in their own heads; but now they manifest these behaviors in a public, communal fantasy world, in a way that is widely observable.

    Of course, there now are regularly elements that are beyond the control of one person, namely other people; this is where the combination of fantasy and immaturity lead to "bad things".

  50. "End of evolution"? by differentiate_this · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's the end of evolution, and I welcome it. Some of what this guy is saying is interesting, at the very least, to think about. But, I don't think that last sentence is very true or convincing. Regardless of billions of people "escaping" to the metaverse as he talks about, reality will always catch up. Eventually, some real crisis WILL happen and threaten people's lives but only those who react, those who haven't delved completely into the whole MMORPG, will be the ones who survive. No matter how much a person immerses himself or herself, there are fundamentals of reality that are inescapable and will catch up the more a person runs. But, there is some truth in that we all want to be kings without the responsibility. Just as children are often happy because they enjoy life without many of its responsibilities. I think that, however, we all have to just grow up one day and be proud of the work we do. Otherwise, one day will come when mass death occurs from people's bone structures collapsing from their own weight, heart failure http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4137782.stm , or some random bacteria. In the end, natural selection chooses the strongest to survive. And the strongest do not have addictions.

    1. Re:"End of evolution"? by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Actually, there appears to be a link between combat willingness and being addiction prone.

      In the absence of addictive materials, those who crave stimulation have often found it by doing battle. The genetic tendancy to addiction appears more often in people from races that had a war-like history, particularly those that survived long term oppression.

      Exactly how much genetics affects personality is not completely known but there is an effect, such as the recent discovery of a gene that corellates to people with Tattoos and Piercings.

    2. Re:"End of evolution"? by Maian · · Score: 1
      And the strongest do not have addictions.
      I dunno...lot of people seem addicted to sex.
  51. Dupe-a-lupe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been a bad week for slashdot. :(

  52. Mmm.... not so sure.... by King_TJ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems to me that it's just as much of a problem of having a "chronic need to escape reality" if you're blowing all your money at the strip clubs or nightclubs, going out to the movies every single night, taking recreational drugs to escape, or spending most of your waking hours inside an MMORPG.

    The way "reality" works in our world, entertainment = escape. The entertainment industry probably prefers you not equate the two so starkly, but I think it's just the facts. All of us have a need to disconnect from our daily lives (the "daily grind" as we so often call it), so we crave some "entertainment" to whisk us away from all those worries and stress for a while. But some people live for the escape itself, not for their lives as a whole. And that spells trouble.

    Just because while playing an MMORPG, one might have a real connection to the "social aspects" of the game and so on doesn't mean it's any more "real" than other forms of "escape". Most people hooked on cocaine, heroin, or other drugs tell you that all their friends are doing it, and it's "cool" and so on and so forth, too. It does let them become a part of a particular "social circle" and attain a level of "popularity" they might not otherwise have had ... But again, all of it is ultimately "false", because those "friends" are only connecting because of the common addiction they share.

  53. futility? by Renraku · · Score: 1

    I played WoW for a long time. I lost enough Deathstrikers to mages and priests to know that it doesn't make too big of a difference.

    I can still PvP quite well. Very well, infact, with my half-decent equipment.

    But even that doesn't matter. Unless you spend horus a day playing, you can never really be well-rewarded for your PvP efforts.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  54. Dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow I can't believe this went so long without someone point out that this is a dupe: http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/08/ 1959214&tid=209 . It was a joke article then, and its still now...yet still tons of serious commentary. Let me know when we start reporting theonion.com articles again.

  55. Dupe by Evro · · Score: 1
    --
    rooooar
  56. Re:WGet a Grip... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So I am not sure why gripe you have against the US that you feel the need to try and turn everything into a failing of the US "social experiment."

    I think the point the poster is making is that here in the US, violent crime is so common as to be generally un-news worthy, and that the US have a very high violent crime rate. Of course I am not going to quote you numbers, but I'm suggesting that this idea is not arguable.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  57. Who is called Sulva? by CustomDesigned · · Score: 2, Insightful
    FTFA: You'll meet a couple who have been married for years and have never seen each other's real-life faces.

    In That Hideous Strength , Merlin asks Ransom, "Who is called Sulva? What road does she walk? Why is the womb barren on one side? Where are the cold marriages?"

    In part, Ransom replies, "... the womb is barren and the marriages cold. There dwell an accursed people, full of pride and lust. There when a young man takes a maiden in marriage, they do not lie together, but each lies with a cunningly fashioned image of the other, made to move and to be warm by devilish arts, for real flesh will not please them, they are so dainty in their dreams of lust. Their real children they fabricate by vile arts in a secret place."

    Lewis had modernism pegged way back in the '40s.

    1. Re:Who is called Sulva? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      It's funny but I know some people in NYC who are well on their way to that. They obsess over the perfect match, and are dissapointed if any aspect of their relationship does not match Hollywood level passion/lust/perfection. Needless to say, they're pretty lonely people and getting more than a bit bitter.

    2. Re:Who is called Sulva? by tcopeland · · Score: 1

      Well done sir. This is a fine quote from a fine book.

  58. Not surprised by Robotron23 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in 2001 when I played UO, I remember hearing of a dude who committed suicide over being scammed out of some valuable possessions worth (back then) about a thousand bucks on eBay. I was scammed a few times in UO myself, and it sucked and I got pissed off over it for awhile - like you would if you were a victim of minor theft. Its pheasable to imagine - if your loss was much greater (equates to bankruptcy/major theft) - that some may kill/assault/commit suicide over it.

    I read somewhere that that dudes sword was worth about $600-700 via Ebay, and was very, very rare within the game. My point being is that a lot of people have been killed over non-virtual possessions worth a heck of a lot less, and a lot easier to come by too.

    Oh and also, the linked article is just a bunch of incoherant rambling with some bad jokes and satire to boot. Hence, pointlesswasteoftime.com . :P

  59. Seriously...this is the worst story ever posted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm...people have been doing this since everquest...and probably even before that...

    That's like posting:
    "A new study finds that Counter-Strike is addictive and many people play it!"

    I'm considering changing my start page...

  60. Re:GP Score 2???? by secolactico · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And the trolling and flamebait never ends.

    GGP makes a statement. Thin skinned GP take offense at what he obviously believe to be an attack on the U.S. and P spouts inane trolling crap.

    And here I am answering for some reason to that crap.

    I'm not the GGP but I'll take the liberty to re-phrase what he said:

    "A lot of people have been murdered for less than $3000 in almost every country in the world."

    There. I believe it's still faithful to the spirit of GGP's post which was something like:

    "The man wasn't killed just for an imaginary object in an imaginary world. That object had a value of about $3000 and that is why he died."

    Disclaimer: I'm not american nor I live in the U.S. I don't hate America, tho I probably hate a few americans. I also hate people in several countries in all continents. I'm probably a very spiteful person. A country is an abstraction. I can't hate a country any more that I can hate the color blue. But that's just me.

    --
    No sig
  61. Virtual and Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is pretty close to the bone, in real life we spend our time going to work to earn money so we can pay the bills and buy stuff we want to have. Its the same within a virtual world, going to work can be considered picking up your sword and slaying a few creatures so you can buy some items that you want. You could say "its just 1's and 0's" well we pay real money for 1's and 0's already in the form of sofware and even the movies and music that entertains us.

    People already are making money from playing MMORPG's it's just a short matter of time before it becomes a commonplace job. Game commerce already has the foundations of exchange rates, through ebay and sites that specifically buy and sell items and gold.

  62. 4 Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  63. The sword is real by JanneM · · Score: 1

    Or at least, it's just as real as a piece of music, or a movie, or a book.

    They all have it in common that they do not have an intrinsic physical embodiment and they could conceivably be copied endlessly without losing use value for the owner of a copy.

    Stealing a virtual sword is if anything a lot worse than making a copy of a record. It's more akin to stealing the actual CD from someone, or making a copy and deleting the original, since you deprive the owner from use of the item.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    1. Re:The sword is real by MKalus · · Score: 1
      Or at least, it's just as real as a piece of music, or a movie, or a book


      MMMhh, not sure if I agree with that.

      A book is a real physical object, sure the "entertainment" value doesn't happen until it hits your brain, but still....

      A piece of Music is going the same way, so does a movie, also all of them are linear, and they are not trying to "replace" your world but rather are part of your world.

      What the article (after briefly skimming it) seems to suggest is that the technology soon will allow us NOT to distringuish anymore between our real world and the game world.

      Okay, you can argue now that this makes it even more real than a book, but it does not make it more real than your life. If your body dies, then it's game over for good.
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    2. Re:The sword is real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's a point the article makes. There's really no difference between that sword and digital music/video. If duplicating the latter without permission is a crime, surely taking away the former must also be.

      Of course, this isn't exactly an area in which lawyers have gotten involved - it'd be interesting to get a legal opinion on exactly how the laws apply to virtual property like this...

    3. Re:The sword is real by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Except that the programmers of the game can make a better sword at any time by changing one or two numbers. Music, movies and books, on the other hand, require artistic effort to improve.

      It doesn't take more intelligence or skill to make a Sword+5 than a Sword+4. It takes effort to make it look better graphically, of course, but people aren't buying these things for the looks.

  64. In a word: 'Snowcrash' by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    Read the book.

    Personally, I vow never to buy into a MMORPG until they are like in Snowcrash.

    By then, the argument about the difference between real and virtual property will be redundant. And the USA will be broken up into franchises. And skateboards will have glass-powdering sonic blasters on them.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  65. Zero players before 1998? Excuse me? by SynapseLapse · · Score: 2, Informative

    I seem to recall Meridian 59 being around long before that.

    And before even that I remember wasting a lot of time playing Legend of the Red Dragon, Usurper, the Pit, and many many more game titles I have since forgotten.

  66. There's no such thing as "real" money by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Real" money is just a fantasy substance that people barter for. Money is not a fancy piece of paper, it's a delusion, that we all politely buy into to make trading easier.

    Like some third-world currency that suffers boutes of inflation and counterfeiting, MMRPG money is ephemeral and unstable, but from a mathematical standpoint, economics does not care if there the resources are real or imagined.

    Markets have judged the supply and demand and the perception of inflation/permanence have assigned it a conversion rate. And because there are a great many unknowns in how a game will develop or be managed, the markets may from time to time exhibit irrational exhuberance, have pyramids and bubbles, just like the "real" world.

    It's not entirely impossible that some day a court might rule that income tax will have to be charged on game money for the simple reason that there is a market for it - just as if it was money earned in another country.

    1. Re:There's no such thing as "real" money by MKalus · · Score: 1

      You do know that the entire currency system these days is just based on "good faith"?

      Yeah, originally there was gold to back up the money that was in circulation, but the US of A stopped doing that back in the 70s, sold the gold for more money and right now there is NOTHING that secures ANY of the major currencies.

      I am almost certain that one day that'll bite us in the ass again like it did on black thursday.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    2. Re:There's no such thing as "real" money by failure-man · · Score: 2, Funny

      So in the future I'll get to stand in eLine for three hours while I wait for my turn to have a Kobold Accountant to audit me? For each of my characters? Weeeee!
       
      Happy happy, joy joy . . . . . .

    3. Re:There's no such thing as "real" money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problems in in-game trading are not due to the currency being unreal, but rather, that the things bought and sold being such.

    4. Re:There's no such thing as "real" money by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      That's why I only use real gold in me buy'in n' sellin'. Test each piece with my one good tooth. Arrr...

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    5. Re:There's no such thing as "real" money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      property is usury

    6. Re:There's no such thing as "real" money by maraist · · Score: 1

      You do know that the entire currency system these days is just based on "good faith"

      Bartering has always been a sense of good-faith. People would bite coins to semi-verify their authenticity. They would be suspicious of the quality of the animals that were used to make purchases.

      There have been numerous issues with counterfitting gold, and the enormous issue of shipping massive amounts of gold from country to country; piracy, insider theft, organized harbor crime, etc. Thoughout the centuries, the management of gold has been an issue.. And once a cache of gold was found in a country, the country would become artificially wealthy. Look at the rise & fall of spain.

      If money grew on trees, then economies would collapse, and the core intent of efficiently allocating scarse resources (such as food, water, land, etc) would no longer have meaniful trade.

      When you standardize an open commodity like gold, you have to protect it. When you standardize an artificial and hard to reproduce fiat like coin/paper, countries are suddenly being valued by their assets, not their luck of finding a very specific type of natural resource. Being lighter and more compact, it's easier to protect and transport.

      There are other economic issues involved with using an intrinsicly valueable commodity for currency. The "value" of gold fluctuates. This means, no matter what the state labels the value of gold, the consumers (who wear and decorate their homes with it because it's pretty) will have their own aggregate value. When there is a disconnect between the state sanctioned value and the consumer value, arbitrage can occur. This would be something similar to if the marginal cost of producing a penny or dollar were 100 times greater than the value of it. With gold, WHEN this occurs, people take their pay, melt it down, and resell it until the supply-demand equilizes ; lowering the price to match the state's stated rate. Or until the state wises up and raises the value of gold. When gold is too low relative to it's value, people will melt down their jewlry and fashion coins.

      When two countries have different values for gold (e.g. I can buy a chicken with fewer gold in one country than another), then people will trade gold until their effective prices are equilized (arbitrage). The negative is that improperly set gold prices will form a massive egress of their stockpiles of gold.

      In the old days, the cost of transporting something over-seas was VERY high.. You had piracy, heavy slow ships.. You had to pay the crew well to get honest enough shippers.. All sorts of things.

      Now you can put it in an anonymous box for the most part and have a pretty high degree of trust.. Moreover you can ship billions of dollars worth of assets. Arbitrage is almost instantaneous in the modern world.. We no longer require physical presense of our assets.. We purchase "orange juice futures" by the billions while the commodity actually sits in another country... Likewise with gold.

      A country in our modern world would very quickly find it's "currency" dramaticlly shifted due to minor fluctuations in the stock-market. And currency is extremely important to the economic welfare of a country.

      If we were still on the gold standard, then inflation would NOT be controllable by the fed (who's job it is is to manage our currency). Instead of buying/selling US treasuries, the fed would have to directly buy and sell gold. But in econimicly tight times, they would eventually deplete the gold stock-piles, and surely congress would limit how low the stockpiles could be depleted. Again, remember, they never have to take the money out of fort-knox to sell it.. A serial-numbered pilon is merely designated as owned by someone other than the US government.

      The 1999 forward recession has been dramatically avoided because the fed has been pumping virtual dollars into the economy like mad.... Inflating the economy. Whether you believe this is a smart move or not, the fed would NOT have this

      --
      -Michael
    7. Re:There's no such thing as "real" money by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You do know that the entire currency system these days is just based on "good faith"?

      It has always been good faith. When you had a piece of paper backed by a government that said they would give you gold for it if you asked, how many people actually asked? What would happen if the government told someone "no"? Could you really walk in with a $1 bill and walk out with $1 worth of gold? The way it worked was no different in execution than today. The only difference is that when paper money was started, it was claimed to be backed by other materials to get people comfortable with the idea of artificial values assigned to money. Once people were comfortable with it, it was no longer necessary.

      Yeah, originally there was gold to back up the money that was in circulation, but the US of A stopped doing that back in the 70s, sold the gold for more money and right now there is NOTHING that secures ANY of the major currencies.

      I am almost certain that one day that'll bite us in the ass again like it did on black thursday.


      Wait, so the cause of the crash in 1929 is because we went off the gold standard in 1970 something? And there is something that secures the major currency, it is the government itself. Do you think that if the government collapsed that the replacement government would be held to the promisary nature of notes issued by the previous government? No, your paper is just as worthless with the "backed by gold" stamp on it as the "backed by nothing" stamp on it. All of it was faith baised, but some people are too myopic to see that because they have to imagine it as a place holder for something else, and not the actual end in itself.

    8. Re:There's no such thing as "real" money by megalomang · · Score: 1
      It's not entirely impossible that some day a court might rule that income tax will have to be charged on game money for the simple reason that there is a market for it - just as if it was money earned in another country.


      Would this income tax be paid in this game money as well? And if so, what the hell would the government do with it... provide entitlement programs to our hobo population and fight a game war on terrorism in Iraq?

    9. Re:There's no such thing as "real" money by MKalus · · Score: 1
      It has always been good faith. When you had a piece of paper backed by a government that said they would give you gold for it if you asked, how many people actually asked? What would happen if the government told someone "no"? Could you really walk in with a $1 bill and walk out with $1 worth of gold? The way it worked was no different in execution than today. The only difference is that when paper money was started, it was claimed to be backed by other materials to get people comfortable with the idea of artificial values assigned to money. Once people were comfortable with it, it was no longer necessary.


      It is not so much about the individual, but the USD is also used as the currency any OTHER currency in the world is measured against, that is more than just appealing to the vanity of the people of the US there are some real reasons for this, up until the end of WWII it was the British Pound that had the "lead" now it is the USD, and pretty much anybody in one way or the other hinges on the health of the USD.

      Wait, so the cause of the crash in 1929 is because we went off the gold standard in 1970 something? And there is something that secures the major currency, it is the government itself. Do you think that if the government collapsed that the replacement government would be held to the promisary nature of notes issued by the previous government? No, your paper is just as worthless with the "backed by gold" stamp on it as the "backed by nothing" stamp on it. All of it was faith baised, but some people are too myopic to see that because they have to imagine it as a place holder for something else, and not the actual end in itself.


      The problem is that if the US Government would go broke, ALL The currencies in the world would tank as well. The reason I pointed to 1929 is not because of saying that it had the same causes, but that the impact will be just as severe if not worse.

      Read up on Brenton Woods and the new coined "Brenton Woods II" to see what I mean.

      Right now the US (and thus to some degree the world) is living on the sheer hope that it will all work out.
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  67. Re:Mmm.... not so sure.... by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1
    The way "reality" works in our world, entertainment = escape.

    Right on. To paraphrase Socrates, there are two basic kinds of pleasure, the first being the kind one derives from bowing to one's immediate desires for sensory gratification, and the second being derived from acting according to one's conscience, thereby "ennobling" oneself.

    Those of us living in the wealthiest societies habitually choose the former kind of pleasure.

    --
    "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  68. Re:Well by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

    The comment that was made in the blurb/article about not being able to differentiate between a game and real life is ridiculous. It's inflammatory and biased and baseless. Nobody is making a mental disconnect between the two "places".

    Is it baseless? After all, it would seem that a lot of people don't know the difference between a satire web site article and a completely serious one.

    --
    This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
  69. Ahh, kids, they think they invented everything by QuantumG · · Score: 1, Funny
    And just how do you punish a rape committed by one virtual character on another, if the real person's body is left untouched?

    That's obvious, you ban the guy, even though you promised you weren't going to use your powers to interfere in the game anymore and then watch the society you built crumble into dust.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  70. Now... by thesnarky1 · · Score: 1

    Do you mean abhor, or adore?

    1. Re:Now... by CharonIDRONES · · Score: 1

      Er, abhor, sorry.

      -Brandon

  71. No kidding. (Even though the article is a parody). by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People are playing World of Warcraft, EverQuest 2, Star Wars Galaxies, etc. as a hobby or form of entertainment when they are away from work or school. And like every other hobby or form of entertainment, there will be some who do it way too much or way too seriously for their own well-being.

    I work a regular, decent job like any other normal person. When I come home, my wife and I play World of Warcraft together. This is opposed to sitting ourselves down in front of the TV for 6 hours like many people do.

    We have formed a guild with other working adults who treat WoW as a game, and not a replacement for life. We have a great deal of fun when we play without needing to be pressured by others to be involved in raiding or other activites every waking hour.

    Yes, there are some people we know who are in the game at least 18 hours a day and treat raiding Molten Core as if it were more important than life itself. Yes, it is pretty sad. But if it weren't WoW, they'd most likely be squandering all their time obsessing over some other activity.

  72. It happened to me (to an extent) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Years ago (think back during the days when Meridian 59 was first coming out) I would spend all the time (that I wasn't in school or doing the minimum amount of homework) playing a MUD. Just before college I cared a lot more about what happened in that game then I did about what happened IRL. Luckyly a problem with another player got me to noticed it and was able to force myself to quit cold turkey...but I wonder if I would have ever made friends in college if that other player wasn't around. I probably would still spend 8+ hours a day mudding.

  73. Swords?! by thesnarky1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    forget swords! These people are obvious terrorists and should be dealt with. Track back the IPs and carpet bomb 'em! On Ebay? well, WE don't negotitate with terrorists, therefore whoever does... well, lets just say, more carpet bombs!

  74. Re:Well by Seumas · · Score: 1

    No.

    Some of us just don't RTFA.

  75. Not actually by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you look at this Thottbot entry it appears to be from some other game.

    They do say that one sign of MMORPG addiction is if you get far too emotionally involved in the ups and downs of the game.

  76. Oh Good Lord Get Real by eno2001 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    For one thing, I hate MMORPG style games. I think they are for control freaks who have failed to get the control they want in real life. Most of them probably of a libertarian bent. There was this guy I knew through a friend of my wife. He loved playing Civilization back in the 90s. He loved it so much that it's pretty much all he would do when he got home from work. Now, this guy was a Republican Nazi. I'm not exaggerating. He actually said once that Hitler really had a lot of good ideas and that the Republican party will go far utilizing them. Anyway, he love playing this boring ass of a game so much that on Valentine's day when his girlfriend asked him what he wanted to do for the special day he actually resorted to physical violence (nothing extreme, but certainly not warranted in the least) just to indicate that he wanted to keep playing Civ. Freak. Let's put it this way, choose:

    1. Play Civ all night and imagine yourself to be the master of all that you survey on your CRT.

    Or...

    2. Go out to dinner in the real world with a cool woman and get laid.

    Simple choice really. Sex always wins. But not for him. Fortunately, she ditched his ass.

    I also knew this other guy who was also addicted to Civ at the same time. Also a Republican with Libertarian leanings. In general a pretty nice guy. But he took Civ so seriously it was just weird. Since I saw all this fuss being made over the game, I thought I'd look at it myself. And you know what? I thought it was the most boring thing I'd ever played in my life. I've had more thrills playing tic-tac-toe against myself and winning every time.

    However, it became clear to me why some people just love the game. It makes them feel like they are part of something. Makes them feel important even. They can throw off the humdrum of their real lives and mayors, presidents, service men, etc... Even moreso, it encourages the false notion that everyone has a chance at being successful if they work hard and do everything right. That's pretty much the focus of these kinds of games, except that "chance" is thrown in which may throw off success. They might think it's their mighty skill at politics or military strategy or magic spells or what have you, but in actuality, it's pure luck. Kind of like real life. The only difference is that you can be a wimpass and save your best states to retrun to after a dismal failure. Can't do that in real life.

    So, what do these games do for society? THey are DAMAGING. They help people hide from dealing with harsh realities. They also give these people unjustifiable egos. A lot of these people take their online feelings and begin attempting to transfer them to their real lives. Most of the time they come off looking like pricks or weirdos. But sometimes, they convince just enough people that they know what they're doing and wind up ruining things for other people by furthering the lie that everyone can be a success. Yes, you should work hard. Yes, you should try to succeed. But you should always keep in mind that failure is the likely outcome in every case and if you do miraculously succeed, then you should be quiet about it and accept it with dignity instead of being a total ass and saying "I RULE".

    Yeah. I hate MMORPGs. I think they are a total waste of time and brain cycle. The time those people are spending living these ridiculous fantasies would be better spent helping those around them. That is the only true way to success. Help those in need. Because if this is done at every level, then all of those who need help will be helped and all of those who can help will have a REAL purpose (ie. NOT buying yachts and Cadillac Escalades). Besides, every real gamer knows that FPS games are the bomb! Let's hear it for my next 18 hour Quake III Arena session! Yeah!!! I RULE!!!!

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:Oh Good Lord Get Real by Tarison · · Score: 1

      MMORPG? I don't think that acronym means what you think it means.

    2. Re:Oh Good Lord Get Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what does political preference have to do with anything?

      i think this is one of the worst posts i've ever seen.

      you my friend, need to get laid.

    3. Re:Oh Good Lord Get Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And playing MMORPGs are different from spending inordinate amounts of time watching football how?

      (or even playing it - if you agree with Chomsky :))

      Aren't you really talking about all those people with borderline autism who concentrate on anything to the exclusion of everythine else?

    4. Re:Oh Good Lord Get Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "Oh Good Lord Get Real"

      Right back at ya.

      They also give these people unjustifiable egos.
      The time those people are spending living these ridiculous fantasies would be better spent helping those around them.

      Quit blowing air from out your a-hole. You sound like a Republican Nazi or something. People play games for fun. You should try it sometime.

    5. Re:Oh Good Lord Get Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you stick to your FPS. OOoo explosions! pretty colors!!

    6. Re:Oh Good Lord Get Real by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Hehehe. So how does it feel to be born without a sense of humor folks? ;P

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  77. I don't know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blue sometimes pisses me off.

  78. Re:WGet a Grip... by boomgopher · · Score: 1

    Hey, aren't you the guy who wrote the Necronomicon??? jk

    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
  79. Re:OMG! The sky is falling! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, guess what, you need to ease off the crack and learn to relax. The GP was trying to make a point in that the media is making something out of nothing. He never questioned why the guy killed somebody . But lets face it, if you kill someone for money or even digital money your probably deserve to be called an idiot because its an idiotic thing to do. If you don't believe me you should go ask some guys who have killed for money and are now spending their life in jail.

  80. Re:GP Score 2???? by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 3, Funny

    " I can't hate a country any more that I can hate the color blue."

    Don't get me started on the color blue! Just thinking of the color blue makes me see red! I'm not a violent man, but if the color blue were ever hit by a bus and tasted its own blood, I would want to be there to see it.

    In short, down with the color blue!
    (except for the periwinkle shade, which is kind of nice.)

  81. Re:Well by MKalus · · Score: 1
    Nobody is making a mental disconnect between the two "places"


    I take it you have never forgotten where you are while reading a book?

    I find it a bit unlikely with the current technology, but given a few more years I think that's highly likely. Especially if people are more and more NOT doing thing outside their houses.
    --
    If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  82. Re:Well by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

    Very well Stated. If you have put enough time into it, aside from not getting payed, how is it all that different then some sort of sports career?

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  83. Blizzard loves farmers by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

    On ebay people are paying real money to buy WoW gold... while some guy in Korea murdered another guy over a rare sword that existed only in an MMORPG.

    I tried to sell some gold on ebay and had my auction pulled with ebay claiming it violated copyright and trademark law. That's total BS; it violates Blizzards ToS (and I was willing to risk my account being pulled) but it is not illegal and ebay had no right to pull the auction.

    I replied with a protest of their decision and listed 20 "farmers" auctions for gold. They never replied to me and left the farmers auctions alone.

    My guess is blizzard likes the farmers because it's thousands of additional accounts and big income for them. They attack people competing with the farmers who might cause the farmers to close up shop and yank their $15/month.

  84. It IS arguable by bonch · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's a popular meme that crime in America is "so high that it's not newsworthy." Crime happens all over the world and no higher in America than anywhere else. Crimes are more often prosecuted here than anywhere else, and many crime rates are proportionally lower here than in Europe. There are several places to look these stats up, but here's a site from Google that summarizes them:

    Stats

    Of course I am not going to quote you numbers, but I'm suggesting that this idea is not arguable.

    In other words, you won't cite anything but will declare your argument inarguable. It's sad that this is what passes for insightful commentary on Slashdot these days!

    1. Re:It IS arguable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Provide numbers and links to your sources. Otherwise you are just stating your opinion. The content you are refuting is based on the available demographics as provided by the US JD.

      You would probably also claim it is racist to state the the most recent statistics provided by my local law enforcement indiates that 50% of the violent gang crimes in my area are perpetrated by illegal immigrants, who make up 30% of the population. Such analysis is necessary in order to understand the problem.

      Unless you can support your assertion that violent crime is so common in the US as to have become non-newsworthy I would say that you lose. This is evidenced by the fact that instead of showing sources for numbers to support your position you instead start crying racism and begin the adhominem attacks.

    2. Re:It IS arguable by nicxz · · Score: 5, Informative

      this site you use for backing up your claim, it claims to get its stats from an interpol page which says 'The International Crime Statistics are only available to authorised police users.' when I try to access it. NOFI, but that doesn't really to much in the way of bolstering your argument, seeing as I can't check those numbers, not being a law enforcement dude and all. So really, you complain you get no citation of research backing up an argument, you then turn around and do the same.

    3. Re:It IS arguable by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Informative

      Homicide rates are regarded as a key balanced metric for violent crime (ie, not heavily influenced by variants of law). US homicide rates vary widely by region, but their average of about 10 homicides per 100,000 people is high in the context of region and comparative wealth (Canada is 1.7/100,000, for example).
      Washington DC's homicide rate of 45.8/100,000 is more than a hundred times that of the capital of the European Union, Brussels
      http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/homtrnd.htm
      http://www.benbest.com/lifeext/murder.html#world

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    4. Re:It IS arguable by smallguy78 · · Score: 1

      plus, the only stats that

      http://www.tinyvital.com/BlogArchives/000220.html

      gives, is 'crime rates'. How about violent crime, or crime evening a firearm. Crime rates could be any number of small, country-specific crimes.

      --
      Nothing costs nothing
    5. Re:It IS arguable by terber · · Score: 1
      HTF could the parent be rated as "Informative" ? Will we rate conspiration theorists "informative" now regularly?

      Surf the net, visit the world and make your own decisions.

      For instance, murders in 1999 or 2000:

      12685 USA (about 0.04 per 1000 inhabitants)

      1051 France (~0.01)

      960 Germany (~0.01)

      850 United Kingdom (~0.01)

      637 Japan (less then 0.01)

      More murders per capita then in the US happen mostly in less developed countries (top three: Colombia, South Africa, Jamaica).

      It's mentionable that most follow-up nations of the former Soviet Union (including Russia) have higher murder rates than the US. Another shameful exception was Poland, which was on par with the US till short ago.

    6. Re:It IS arguable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That site is just... worthless. Could never be considered a useful resource as it doesn't stratify crimes by type. You make America look bad for all of us, and I hope you are killed by one of the "Inner City Blacks" your reference is so so keen to discuss.

    7. Re:It IS arguable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cracked up at the place in the article where blacks are removed from the statistics...

      My tears of laughter had my collegues looking...

      Damn good article :D

    8. Re:It IS arguable by Pentagram · · Score: 1

      That site is completely worthless. For a start, you can't trust a page which has an inaccurate tagline -- 'Watching Those Whom Lenin Called "Useful Fools" (also translated as "Useful Idiots.)' -- Lenin never said this. Then it goes on to selectively quote the higher crime rate of other countries, but when it comes to the relative murder rates, declines to publish the stats.

    9. Re:It IS arguable by amliebsch · · Score: 0
      Homicide rates are regarded as a key balanced metric for violent crime (ie, not heavily influenced by variants of law).

      I'm not so sure about that. Nobody can argue that the United States has ridiculously high rates of homicide. But that's far from clear as to other violent crimes. For example: This report (warning: pdf) is dated, but since crime levels in the United States have trended down while crime rates in the UK/Wales have trended up, its conclusion is probably still valid.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    10. Re:It IS arguable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our murder rates are higher, but they have been dropping. Our muggings and other crimes are lower than Britains, our crimes are more often prosecuted, and those prosecutions more often result in a jail sentence.

      It really is a myth that America is this hyper-violent crime-ridden place compared to the rest of the world. It's not.

    11. Re:It IS arguable by bonch · · Score: 0, Informative

      Britain and Australia top U.S. in violent crime (the U.S. wasn't even in the top 10!)

      Crime is higher in the UK in every major category except rape and murder, which are declining in the U.S. and have for the past decade

      Official crime rate facts

      No matter how much some need to believe it, the U.S. is not some downtrodden, crime-ridden hellhole. Europeans and other foreigners need to stop watching Law & Order to get their idea of what the U.S. is like.

    12. Re:It IS arguable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That site is completely worthl"

      Translation: I can't refute the numbers that destroy my preconcieved notion, so I'll call it worthless.

      The link addressed murder rates. RTFL. Murder rates in the U.S. are higher, but remove the inner city element, and it's lower. Furthermore, our rates have been decreasing for ten years while other countries rates have been going up.

      Amusingly, the countries with the strictest gun control laws like Australia have the highest rates of violent crime.

    13. Re:It IS arguable by SteelRat · · Score: 0

      It bites that those interpol people (you know, the guys that might actually have crime statistics) are out to get you specifically. ..and if you did see statistics on their webpage, you would want to confirm that with the individual precincts that reported them, and then to each individual that made a report.

      At what point can you allow yourself to believe a statistic from a large organization that would actually bother tabulating these statistics?

      I therefore view your criticism as being wholly without merit. Have a nice day!

  85. Re:WGet a Grip... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    Thank you, no.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  86. just like the old D&D days.. by ruebarb · · Score: 1

    reminds me of all the hollering they did about Dungeons and Dragons a few years ago - they were saying how a schitzophrenic shouldn't play it, how it was dangerous to kids (not to mention religious nuts saying how was devil worshipping)

    ANYTHING can be used as escapism and blur lines between reality and fantasy - so it's MMORPG's right now - big deal - tomorrow it'll be holodecks -

    it happens....

    RB

    --

    ----------
    ah honey, we're all resplendent - Bill Mallonee
  87. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent down, 5000 yuan is about $700 USD. Also currency exchange rates aren't the same thing as GDP, although the two are related.

  88. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent cites actual numbers to disprove "America's high violent crime" myth and is at -1, while grandparent just repeats something they heard and is at +4?

  89. Somewhat understandable.. by markass530 · · Score: 1

    I'm a bit of a computer nerd, and a while back I decided to get into Everquest, because I worked with some dudes who played it, and I was trying to stop spending 300 bucks a weekend drinking. I Dropped 50 bucks for the game, and started playing, Turns out it's not any fucking fun in the begining, because you don't have shit. I dropped 100 bucks on Everquest cash, and played it for a week, before I realized it was really really lame, and got bored of it. Point of the story, I understand why people drop a dime on fake crap, but ultimately, really not worth it.

  90. Re:WGet a Grip... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Violent crime is not common in the US. Additionally many countries accept violence as not being a crime at all.

  91. erm... by WhiteZero · · Score: 1

    People have ebayed MMO gold since UO and EQ.

  92. Weren't you just on k5? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    ... complaining that real life sucks compared to MMORPGs? I notice that both of you (assuming you're not the same guy) pretend that real life consists of shallow bar life, in an attempt to make your choice to withdraw from "meatspace" an acceptable one.

    Real life isn't just another game. Stop trying to pretend it is. If it was, gamers wouldn't suck at it so much.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Weren't you just on k5? by slaida1 · · Score: 1
      Nope he's not me. Strangely satisfying when someone links to my comments elsewhere.

      Anyway, define shallow life. Or better yet, define real or normal life. I've been defining them for years without acceptable conclusions. They're very context dependent words, is best I can say.

      In K5 comment the context was bar and family life. And the point was that rules of that kind of normal life which I described, and which mostly greets me when I go out the door, are so familiar to me that if it'd be game, I'd have switched to another game already. I don't like The Sims, either.

      You're right in that real life isn't just another game but it surely can been seen as one and people can survive and even prosper 'playing' real life. Anyway, today we have games so immersive and life-like enough that we can consider them as options or alternatives to real life. And it's only going to get worse/better, which way you like to look at it. But hey, change is always good, right? I know I am very excited about what future is going to be like. It seems it'll be nothing like scifi writers have imagined but as that time draws closer, predictions and visions about it are getting more similar to each other. We can be pretty sure now that virtual life will get big and doubts about mixing it with real, old life, will start to sound funny.

      Real life isn't just another game. Stop trying to pretend it is. If it was, gamers wouldn't suck at it so much.

      What's the matter, are you scared? We're past pretending now. Gamers may suck at real life because they maybe don't want to play it, they think it's boring, unfair, abusive, etc.

      --
      Preserve old classics: copy your collection onto all hard drives.
  93. Was that off the top of your head? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Err... that's some really impressive recall. That, or you were just reading the book.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Was that off the top of your head? by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1

      I read the book years ago. I remembered the image of Sulva (the moon, which in the story is barren on the side facing earth but verdant and fruitful on the side facing deep heaven) and the idea of sex with images (while Lewis clearly envisioned latex robots, virtual reality fits even better) which Lewis correctly foresaw as the logical conclusion of birth control. I fetched the book from my shelf to type in the quote.

  94. From a recovered MMORPG addict. by rootedgimp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I played Everquest from about a 3 months after it came out (late 98 I believe) til around 2002, I 'quit' several times in between. In this small town at one point there were around 20 or so of us that played. You'd never believe the amount of absolute insanity that followd that game. I had friends that got married to someone (in game) then later that person would come to meet all of us.
     
    One incident comes to mind, ok.. Let me see if I can explain properly. In the high end game there is a system called DKP that guilds choose to use or not, basically it is if you are on alot and at their events you get DKP that you can cash in to get an item that a monster yeilds, if everyone wants the item, it comes down to who has the most DKP.
    Well... This real life friend of mine, who is a girl (we got her hooked on eq, bad idea, anyway), she got married in game to this dude that came down to meet her, so he shows up, they get together what ever, and he leaves. Come to find out his guild had set up this 'underground' DKP system that consisted of this - if you could have sex (in real life) with a girl from the game, you would get insane 'underground' DKP from the guild that you could cash in for anything (like getting someone kicked out for no reason, etc).

    Ended up he didn't get his DKP though, because some other guy from his guild had already came to visit and had sex with her and claimed the DKP off her. Sooo, yeah, that game was all kinds of snafu.

    But I'll tell you this, even though I had logged in over 300+ actual real time played / logged in on my account, I would have at any time left the game at the drop of a dime to do something with my friends in real life, the game never had me that hooked, but it was sure something to do those countless nights when I couldn't find any IT work. I'm happily retired now, for the last few years, and would never ever go back to it. I could have been a CCIE with all the time I wasted on that shit. Anyway...

  95. same claptrap by Robocoastie · · Score: 2

    same claptrap that was made in the 80s during the satanic panic: "D&D Players commit suicide and worship the devil!!!!!" There's more killings over damn football games on tv than there ever will be from RPGs. It's the whole "oh that's weird" mentality. For some reason its supposed to be "normal" to veg out in front of the idiot box (tv) but its not normal to use ones brain via two way communication on a computer. So whenever something happens in the "un normal" culture the "normal" talking heads point fingers and shout "see see..." Reminds me of a few days ago when a co-worker of my wife came to visit and saw my throwing knife targets in the back yard and made a comment in jest saying "oh because everyone has to have one of those". Now it's just a joke yea, but I've heard mock jokes like that crap all my life from the "normal" crowd so to speak. But a month ago when a neighbor down the street went wacky at 2 in the morning and started mowing his lawn and slamming things around who's house did 2 other neighbor gals come too because he was freaking them out? - That's right boys and girls the one who had something more than a TV to use on the weirdo if push came to shove. (cops handled it after I called them. The guy despite his snockered state had enough sense at least left to keep his distance one glance was all it took). Point is, claptrap comments like this article gets made to all counter-culture activities whether its video games, collectible card games, pen paper & dice games, whatever the idiot box doesn't give you basically or the damn nightly news doesn't "approve" of.

  96. where did you go to school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yuan is an 8 to 1 for every us $

  97. Re:Well by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    Um, is there anything that this isn't true for?

    How much a person values something has always been simply a matter of:

    - How much did it cost? (time/money)
    - How much do I want it? Sane people measure this relative to what else they could buy with the cost, but there's always something that someone considers priceless -- they wouldn't trade it for anything.

    Saying "It's not real" is bullshit. You read my comment on Slashdot, which isn't real either. It was mostly "free", but it cost you time, which you could have spent doing something else. So, thanks for reading, since you obviously decided my comment was worth something -- or at least looked like it was before you read it.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  98. Real money - right... by kwerle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This article is lame for so many reasons, but I'll just pick at the first sentence of the post:

    "On ebay people are paying real money to buy WoW gold."

    No they aren't.

    They're connecting to a virtual auction house (ebay) to exchange virtual money (credit card/paypal/whatever) for virtual goods (MMO junk).

    I'm half inclined to go an about the value of various pieces of paper (greenbacks) vs. blank pieces of paper and the implication of the phrase "real money" - which is a lot like saying "real promises of value", or even "virtual wealth". But I'm not going to, because I've already put more thought into this comment than I think the author of the article or the post did.

    1. Re:Real money - right... by Quixxilver · · Score: 1
      Acutaly.. unless i'm missreading your post, you're flat out wrong.

      People are paying REAL money.. as in the money that I can pull out of an ATM machine to go buy a soda. This money is used to purchase a virtual item within the game... a 'digital product', but "virutual money" as you call it is still real money as an end result. If making a paypal payment isn't sending real money, lemme give you my info so you can send me some. ;)

      btw.. MMO junk pushes millions of dollars in transactions every year. That's why sony and others are trying to bring it in-house. Because literal or not.. it's real.

      --
      -Quixxilver- "Where am I going? ...and why am I in this handbasket?"
    2. Re:Real money - right... by craznar · · Score: 1

      Real money - I've got some real money here (Aussie Dollars) - I bet I can't go into a US soda (what ever that is) shop and buy some soda (what ever that is).

      Does that make my Aussie money less real, or just less valuable ?

      By the way - how do yanks distinguish between fizzy sweet drinks and silver/tin alloys used for conneting electrical components ?

      --
      EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
    3. Re:Real money - right... by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Well for one things soda(soah-duh)is not pronounced anything like solder(saw-dur). Secondly, not everyone says soda

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    4. Re:Real money - right... by The8BitHero · · Score: 1

      Yes they are you're just trying to overanalyze a simple statement. The money itself is not virtual but the means in which it was transfered is virtual. People are paying hard earned/stolen/given money on virtual items.

      But remember... One man's MMO junk is another man's MMO treasure. ;)

  99. Well, no... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    A very small handful of people are disconnected from reality, probably the same percentage as you'd find in any group.

  100. Re:Well by vmardian · · Score: 5, Informative

    5000 yuan is in fact $617, however, when you factor in per capita GDP, which is a very good indication of cost of living, you'll understand that $617 in China "feels" more like $4300 in the US. GDP is not only valid for comparison but its a much more meaningful comparison too. I'm not sure how the parent arrived at their number of $3000.

    --
    PowerLevel.com - A next generation marketplace for virtual items and services
  101. What's even scarier... by Khyber · · Score: 1
    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  102. This has been going on... by ahpx · · Score: 1

    For how long? I've been playing MMORPGs for atleast 3-4 years and I've seen game money and items being sold for real life money. Infact I've seen accounts sold for hundreds of real life dollars. Yet this article gets posted now. Seems like a waste of a article. I'm sure most of /. already knows this goes on...

  103. Consequence of living Online. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Online gaming became my life for awhile...

    I started playing RTCW and about the same time got a new DSL connection. Well that was it, I started playing more than I was going to friends houses. And after awhile I decided it was easier to set at home and play RTCW than it was to go somewhere and deal with being with people.
    I went from being a bit of an introvert with a few dumb friends. To a clan leader who had 5-10 intelligent people online everynight to game with.

    And I loved it, but then one One evening I was 'planting dynamite at the Sea Wall Breach'(Just sounds dumb dosnt it?) and I realized that I had given up my entire real life to play a kids cartoon 30+ hours a week, with people who I didnt know AND people who really didnt know ME.
    These people would probably be totally different IRL as well and I bet we wouldnt get along at all.

    It trailed off from there, and I dont play anything anymore. I also stopped opening GAIM and talking to my online buddie, And you know what?.., none of them ever showed up to see if i were OK, or had any other way to contact me like a real human would have.

    So I lived online for 2 years, IRC&RTCW. And hardly remember any of it. Unless im watching a demo, then it comes back.

    I just wanted to post my story as online gaming has had a huge impact on my life. Im 22 btw, My solution was to move move right in the middle of a college neighborhood and stop playing video games. Im not doing GREAT, but Its nice knowing 2-3 people that actually exist IRL.

  104. I don't care what people say by bobbyw · · Score: 1

    I paid for this computer I am on with the thousands of dollars I made from Diablo II... and for the record, I would enjoy the body of an underwear model.

  105. Bingo by unsinged+int · · Score: 1

    Very nice comment.

    You can extend your point in so many ways too. For example, the green pieces of paper are in theory representing gold bars in a vault somewhere. They're used because they're more convenient to carry around. But what would you do if you had a gold bar? I doubt many people would find it useful for anything except to trade for something else. So you trade and you trade until you get what you want, and everything you gave away is, in some sense, money -- no matter if it's paper, a gold bar, or a chicken.

    1. Re:Bingo by MulluskO · · Score: 1

      U.S. currency is fiat money. Any gold that is kept on hand is for the purpose of international trade.

      --

      Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
  106. Other forms of obsessive gamer by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...include players of the stock exchange. Same principles, i.e. slow but continuous accumulation of a virtual commodity via intelligent application of rule sets.

    I don't know about murder, but people do suicide over it (a recent event in the stock exchange where I work confirmed this to me).

    Come to think of it, there's an awful lot of commonality between an MMORPG and the stock exchange. Hmm... you listening, Sony? I can imagine my level 63 Vah Shir warrior wandering into the main bank at PoK, right-clicking the banker and investing in the international equities market. All on the credit card. Corporate takeovers could be PvP raids. Thwack!

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    1. Re:Other forms of obsessive gamer by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      So my barbarian character can really run around yelling:

      "WHAT'S IN YER WALLET?!"

    2. Re:Other forms of obsessive gamer by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1
      Hmm... you listening, Sony? I can imagine my level 63 Vah Shir warrior wandering into the main bank at PoK, right-clicking the banker and investing in the international equities market

      Believe it or not, there are a few massives out there that actually incorporate these things as gameplay already. Take, for instance EVE Online, where you have an entirely player-created politicking game, which is supported, but not enforced, by the game engine. It also has systems for stock markets, a robust market system, and full-rights zone-based PvP. (E.g. You can lose everything, if you're not careful).

      It's not the real world... but it does give you the same appeal.

    3. Re:Other forms of obsessive gamer by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      hmm... on second thought, perhaps the Bazaar would be more appropriate, rather than the banker.

      And in the deepest, darkest corner of the Crypt of Nadox where people were using local /say to discuss insider trading, a GM shows up and suspends their account for breach of EULA after reporting them to the SEC. And mom & pop investors would be limited to the mines of Gloomingdeep. The metaphor goes on a bit, doesn't it? Anything missing from the equation, other than the fact that Kobolds don't look good in neckties?

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  107. I can draw a distinct line by DrugCheese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    between me and the internet me.

    And we take offense to these remarks.

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
  108. Re:WGet a Grip... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's Abdul Alhazred, where's the similarity?

  109. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How are you coming up with your "feels like" numbers? If you are just multiplying by normalized gdp per capita then that's pretty flawed. Suppose I create my own country AnonymousCowardLand, population of one. I make $1 per year so GDP per capita is exactly $1. Therefore my $1 in AnonymousCowardLand "feels like" whatever the per capita income of the USA is? Of course not.

    You may be able to "feel like" you have $4300USD with 500 yuan if you stick to certain cheap goods, especially services and resturants in China because food and labor is cheap. Quality consumer goods cost about the same though, $4300 will buy a whole lot more laptop than 500 yuan for example.

  110. There was a time... by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Back when I actually gamed online, I recall that there was a character class... called THIEF!! They STOLE things... gold, items, equipment, you name it, if it wasn't bolted down, they stole it. From NPC's (non player bots) and PCS (player characters) alike.

    Nowadays we have panzies who cry a river because their sword was stolen. I'm a hard core gamer (or was) but I've discovered that there is so much more I'd rather do than just play all day. This is the problem with most gamers. They do not know when to draw the line.

    I personally prefer to build my body healthy than to let an interface make me think I'm healthy, because in the long run, being a fatass will kill you VERY unpleasantly. Most fat guys and girls aren't in the best of health. (Try bending over at 5'10" and 300+ lbs to pick up whatever you've spilled and you'll see what I mean.)

    Most people are inherently lazy, so perhaps forcing them into a virtual world is a benefit. It will leave the REAL world open for those of us who like being outside in nature. (And yes I'd probably have a laptop with me, but I unplug a lot more than I used to nowadays.)

    I love gaming, but I also like being able to know that I'm not just living for the benefit of having an alter ego, which once deleted, would leave me as a poor slob without any alternatives but to start over without a hope. (Hard core MMORPG beta testers will tell you how aggravating it is to build a character and have a server-wide character wipe at the next set of upgrades that invalidate half the items and skills youv'e "earned").

    Oh, and when "thieves" loot items. Best choice is to kill them or get them killed. The reason "real life" is boring is because those with connections can usurp the law and use it to crush those without resources. In games, you can still appeal to the godlike Game Masters to change things for you if you're cheated. Removing thieves from a Dungeons and Dragons like world is like pulling someone's gums out, because you already got all their teeth in your pocket.

    --
    " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    1. Re:There was a time... by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      somehow i dont' belive that

      otherwise to be a pro athleat in tip top shape you only need to excersise any given muscle for 2 hours a week to be the strongest? bullshit, please prove that.

    2. Re:There was a time... by DerWulf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      health relates to strength as longevity relates to horsepower.

      --

      ___
      No power in the 'verse can stop me
    3. Re:There was a time... by Phantom+Zmoove · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with that. My part time job is very labor intensive and I do it about 30 hours a week. I feel a lot worse now than I did two years ago when I started. My elbows, knees and back are always sore all the time.

      Then again, I'm the 99 pound geek variety, so maybe this doesn't apply to me?

    4. Re:There was a time... by dnoyeb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Most people" believe everyone has the same desires they do.

    5. Re:There was a time... by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes "most people" want to feel good, and think that the long term effects of quick fixes (such as taking Stacker2 or whatever to lose weight, versus actual exercise and balanced diet) will be the same as the short term that they can actually see.

      I've been fat, so I can say all this with a greater measure of certainty than skinny geeks who have never been there.

      Wait until you have man boobs (and I mean when your A cup girlfriend or female friends look at you and say "holy shit, yours are bigger than mine"), and look in the mirror, and look at pictures from high school, and if you don't worry, then reap what you sow :)

      --
      " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    6. Re:There was a time... by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      Thank god my wife is a D-Cup heh.

      What was your motiviation? Just curious. I was hard core gaming with DAOC and SWG but when I went home for Christmas I saw my brother playing (he's about 7 years younger than me) and how much he completely ignored everyone around him including his two kids. I decided then and there that I was not going to play anymore and sold my accounts on eBay and sold my machine too.

      I've been using an iMac since and if it wasn't for WoW I'd be ok, I've managed to cut myself down to a few hours in a weekend but when it first came out I was pretty bad about it.

      Fortunately my kids can talk now and they want to play outside on their swingset and stuff so that is what I'm using for my motivation to get me to loose weight. As the other comment said the 5'10" and just bending over at 300lbs was a bit of a wake up call as well.

      after about a month I'm down about 15 lbs so progressing nicely.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    7. Re:There was a time... by OhioJoe · · Score: 1

      I recall being very upset during a D&D game that a drama queen of a friend and passincv agressive at that, foudn a way to kill my 3rd level elf with his 3rd level mage. He accidentlay stumbled upon it after we have an out of game disagreement. He, in desparation, threw a web spell on me, and then not knowing what to do next, figured out to just keep stabbing me with his 1d4 dagger, until all of my hitpoints were gone. I was insensed, felt powerless, and hated him for a bit. But then again, I was 13. I can only imagine these adults are feeling the same feelings, to a 10th degree, and thus too wrapped up in their game.

      OJ

      --
      "Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity."
  111. Re:Well by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

    Some of us just don't RTFA.

    True. Otherwise, people would have seen the below very quickly and known it was a complete satire:

    Gamers rejoiced back in April when it was announced that Blizzard, Square/Enix and Sony were merging their virtual worlds so that online characters from one game could stride seamlessly into another. It made perfect business sense and I was the first to say I wasn't at all surprised by the news. I had been predicting it for months. The fact that it turned out to be an April Fool's joke and entirely false only proves my point. Ahem.

    --
    This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
  112. The Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no spoon...

  113. Re:Well by vmardian · · Score: 1

    You may be able to "feel like" you have $4300USD with 500 yuan if you stick to certain cheap goods, especially services and resturants in China because food and labor is cheap.
     
    And this is exactly what 95% of Chinese do with their income. China is still a poor country. The average person doesn't buy "quality consumer goods." They can't even afford to eat at McDonald's which is about one day's salary.

    --
    PowerLevel.com - A next generation marketplace for virtual items and services
  114. stop blaming games by dorato · · Score: 1

    I think people should just stop blaming games and get back to reality. If a person killed someone for a game sword that same person would of most likly killed somone becoes someone looked at them on the street. The guy was already stuffed in the head, I really doub the game did that to him. We should stop blaming games for everything.

  115. DNA Scarf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I checked out the DNA scarf link; I would have been impressed if the colors of the scarf encoded a real DNA sequence (red = adenosine, blue = cytosine, and so on). But no, I've been working with biotech marketing idiots for so long that you could tattoo a double helix along your wang, and I wouldn't bat an eye.

  116. Just a little food for thought by Quixxilver · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As an MMORPG player, I see the variety of folks playing it. The 9yo kids, to the 40+yo parents... even grandparents. You've got college kids, and moms! I am a firm believer that steriotypes exist for a reason, however, the MMO steriotype is a bit off. The folks I play with work for companies such as Dell, Intel, Microsoft, etc. Many, many Military folks with their MMO as a way to spend time with friends and family. Most of the MMO players are no different than anyone else with a hobby.

    OK.. all that said.. my points I want to mention are:

    1. Most MMORPG players are average people.
    2. A few news stories about someone commiting murder or having a heart attack in association to games makes it the games fault?
    3. There is a REAL economy that directly impacts the in-game economy. Right now, companies like Sony are coming up with in-game auction systems using REAL money. (they want to bring it in game for 2 main reasons a) they can protect their customers from fraud b)they can charge a service fee to make a little extra $$$) Anything involving REAL money tends to increase the focus that a human being will put into that task.
    4. Using online games can actualy be stimulating to the mind. Each game is a new peice of software . Each game provides puzzles and quests that the player must acomplish to succeed. And in the case of MMO's specificaly, it requires a certain amount of social skills to succeed. Unhealthy? only when used in excess, like anything else. (even forum trolling :p ) But mostly, NO.

    I could (probably should) write a book devending gamers, but that's a whole different story.

    (Oh yea, I also sold an online toon for aprox. $750US :p so while y'all bicker.. i've gotta get back to my game!)

    --
    -Quixxilver- "Where am I going? ...and why am I in this handbasket?"
  117. Article on k5 by Skim123 · · Score: 1

    There's a good article on kuro5hin.org on the front page on a similar topic: MMOGS: Abandon hope all ye who enter. The k5 article is about the addictiveness of MMOGS. My favorite link from the article: You stole my cloudsong! Kind of illustrates how folks can take these 'games' all too seriously.

    --

    I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

  118. Re:GP Score 2???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If just thinking of blue makes you see red, wouldn't you be a violet person instead?

  119. Is the "value" of an online item more absurd... by AvantLegion · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ... than the "value" of a piece of cardboard with a certain sports player's image, or a certain image for a collectible card game?

    Of course, the bottom kinda dropped out of the sports card business, so maybe that's not a good example. :)

  120. What's with this gold thing? by TheLink · · Score: 1

    But what's so good about having a currency backed by gold? Why are so many people so fixated about that?

    A currency controlled by a central bank that can actually be trusted is better than one backed by gold.

    You can have a gold backed currency but a screwed up economy. Lots of countries in the old days had currencies based on gold - and there still was inflation (esp when they got lots of gold from the Americas).

    Gold can be "created" (mined) by 3rd parties beyond a country's control. You can't eat gold either. Which brings us to the next point.

    The value of gold is not fixed either. If I'm the only one who has food and you are very hungry and have no food but lots of gold, my food can be worth a lot of gold to you.

    Just because its gold doesn't mean it automatically has some high (or even "magical") value. It has as much right to value as any other commodity or currency, and no more - it's valuable as long as enough people think it is valuable.

    Sure because of that, you could say that gold can have a high value because lots of people have a near-irrational belief in the high value of gold. However to buy lots of gold based on that is like buying lots of tech shares before the bubble burst.

    Before you buy/sell lots of gold check carefully to see whether gold is over or under valued.

    --
    1. Re:What's with this gold thing? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      The reason for Gold is rather simple: There is only a limited amount of Gold available. That is what makes gold so precious.

      The difference with the current system is that the US (or any country for that matter) can just print money as they please, there is no LIMIT to how much money a country can produce and spew out.

      As the USD is the "master currency" to which pretty much all other currencies are compared this is bad. Because the faith of the entire economic system rests on the USD and the US Fed.

      Gold at least gives the currency an artifical ceiling which it doens't have right now.

      Even worse, thanks to the fact that most transcation these days aren't even made anymore in "hard coin" they are just digits that zip through networks. Granted, there are "safe guards", but you being here on Slashdot probably realize that no system is 100% safe, so I wouldn't be surprised if there is MORE USD out there than actually exist.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  121. Re:Zero players before 1998? Excuse me? by craznar · · Score: 1

    Having $20,000 doesn't make you 0.02 of a millionairre.

    Similarly, The first M in MMORPG, suggests that a 1000 player game was probably just an MORPG.

    --
    EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
  122. Re:GP Score 2???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man I hate blue!

  123. Re:GP Score 2???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blue suxs. Molson rocks.

  124. Re:Well by SolitaryMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "It is the time, that you've wasted for your rose, that makes your rose so important" (Saint-Exupery)

    --
    May Peace Prevail On Earth
  125. Re:WGet a Grip... by boomgopher · · Score: 1

    I'm just being silly.

    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
  126. Re:Well by Nailer · · Score: 1

    The comment that was made in the blurb/article about not being able to differentiate between a game and real life is ridiculous.

    Exactly. The distinction in this case is unecessary and arbitrary - someone steals something from me, whether in real life or MMORPG, I won't be able to enjoy it. I may have worked very hard to get it. Who is the essay writer to say things I work hard for online are somehow not worth anything? Clearly they're worth something to me, as I worked hard to get them.

  127. Re:WoW is serious business- DAMN - that's wild... by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
    When he starts screaming "I'M GONNA FUCKIN KILL YOU" etc. and there's no one to kill, you can hear the impotent rage- it's classic.

    I want that audio... I can think of some really crazy shit to do with it...

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  128. Re:Well by J0re · · Score: 1

    Virtual? Far from it. They must use a number of bytes on the disk of some server to store it. Still, probably not worth killing for.

  129. Double your datings with not rolex by fferreres · · Score: 1

    If you really think Rolex and cars will get you the girls you want, just check www.DatingTechniques.net. Note: I have fun on that list and would recommend it to all the timid guys that try to please woman, and then that doesn't work, the try even harder.

    Alcohol does not really make people more beautifull, it's main porpuse it to let your fears or worries go for a while.

    --
    unfinished: (adj.)
    1. Re:Double your datings with not rolex by cobar · · Score: 1

      Just wanted to second you there. Deangelo's techniques rule and shed light on the subject that would have taken me years to discover. Helped me shed the nice guy sydrome and get the girl without having to talk about how much I make, etc.

  130. Re:Zero players before 1998? Excuse me? by marx · · Score: 1

    World of Warcraft only has about 5000 (probable even less) players online simultaneously on a server. So that should also be an MORPG then.

  131. Real-world examples by phorm · · Score: 1

    I just had to comment on the use of real-world objects in terms of fantasy elements. The +5 car of pimpin' and the +3 rolex of higher occupation is a pretty interest wrapper around the concept of how we objectify personal worth around the ownership of material possessions.

    The world is changing now to include more 'virtual' phenomenoa, ranging from video games, to 'virtual classrooms' to people being married from meeting in chatrooms... so why should a "+10 sword of dragonsbane" have any less interpreted value than your "golden-chained-emblem-of-blingbling." Certainly neither are any real indication of personality, ability to provide, or anything else.

    For a personal example... I have a new car because of an insurance settlement... certainly I don't have a bad job but even if I were jobless I could have had the car from which people might interpret I was "well-off."

  132. Some thoughts by DeadlyBattleRobot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My first impression of WOW was that this technology would evolve into virtual malls useful for real world business operations. Browse and purchase business supplies, that sort of thing. Or visit an Amazon book store. Interact immediately with sales staff etc.

    If our consciousness could ever be uploaded into a machine perhaps these virtual worlds are the beginnings of the vessel for this.

    The article brought up an idea that never occurred to me before. WOW characters could join in marriage or civil unions. Opposite sex partners could have children.

    I advanced a WOW character to level 60 just to see how the game worked, then cancelled the game subscription. There is no way I can put that much more time into a game.

    There was another story on WOW I saw recently that made some good points about the culture:
    http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/8/7/162558/7544

  133. My mother died playing these games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My mother had been under a lot of stress and grief, the whole bit after my dad died, and she ended up finding solace in a MMORPG. Before I moved out on my own, I saw this woman, whose purpose in life was once being a mother and wife, basically fall away bit by bit.

    She would play this game eightteen hours a day sometimes -- EIGHTEEN HOURS! I had to buy my own computer to get work done. It led to long-standing family arguments, one time landing my brother in jail overnight.

    Worst of all, her health started going into decline. The last time I saw her alive, about two weeks before she died from cardiac arrest, it was obvious something was different about her. She lacked the motivation she once had. She would make up excuses to avoid doing things she needed to do.

    You fuckers can laugh all you want about these games and people who can't separate their lives from them, but I'm telling you now that they're as addictive as crack and even worse, because they're legal. I'm sure someone might reply to this thread scolding my mom for a lack of self-control, but often addictions are brought on by difficult personal situations, and this is no different.

    The wound still hurts, and I still get angry about these games. I go out of my way to not play them myself.

  134. You are misreading it. by unsinged+int · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The post is arguing that both the money in the game and the money exchanged via paypal (or using some other online transaction) are just electronic bits of information, so calling one of them "real money" but not the other is, in that sense, a contradiction.

    You could maintain that both were not real money. It may not be a very reasonable position to take, but it would at least be logically consistent based on them both being bits you cannot touch.

    You're defining the "real money" as the bits that can be converted to cash at an ATM. If you can sell the game money (or game items) to someone to increase your electronic bank account balance, which you then withdraw as cash at an ATM, what is the difference between that scenario and selling (exchanging) a certain amount of French or German currency for US dollars? None. So, as I think you agree, both can be considered real money.

    The parent is just pointing out that it's not really a sane position to call one real and the other not real.

  135. multiplayer NetHack by yongjhen · · Score: 1

    I think a NetHack-style MMORPG is more reasonable. You start a random whole new character every login session. That's life.

    1. Re:multiplayer NetHack by RenegadeRunner · · Score: 1

      What is NetHack? The concept sounds fun and challenging.

    2. Re:multiplayer NetHack by yongjhen · · Score: 1

      http://nethack.org/common/index.html
      You must be new here ;)

    3. Re:multiplayer NetHack by tenco · · Score: 1

      (oh man, i am really answering this question...)www.nethack.org

    4. Re:multiplayer NetHack by RenegadeRunner · · Score: 1

      What is it that makes it so obvious? :)

  136. History repeating itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This type of thing, life imitating art, happened first with Television. Idiots would watch violence on TV and then go repeat it in their real lives. Those who didn't commit actual violence nonetheless became desensitized to it; so when it happens in their own neighborhood, the sense of moral outrage is already long gone.

    Some people pointed out how violence on TV is poisoning our society; while others disputed it. In the end, people simply believed what they wanted to believe, and the televised and real violence both continued to increase.

    This was all repeated a few years ago inside the social microcosm of Bhutan, when this virginal nation got its first widespread exposure to television.

    The results were swift and catastrophic...

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,3605,975 769,00.html

    Yet incredibly, there are those who would still dispute the cause & effect nature of the introduction of TV and the nearly immediate erosion of national morals which followed.

    What we're seeing now with computer games is really the next phase; where the violence becomes interactive. The user is not just an observer, but an active participant in the violence, which has also become more gratuitous and graphic.

    Of COURSE this will have social consequences. How could anyone be so blind as to presume otherwise?

    But don't get me wrong; I know there are plenty of people, indeed the vast majority, who can successfully make the mental seperation between the violent online fantasies and the real world. I'm not saying we should ban violent video games. I don't know what the cure for this problem is.

    All I know is that it might help if we can just be aware of what is going on. Notice how we use the media and what we want from it. What we'll find is that the media become like mirrors of our collective selves. A little self-awareness can be contagious, and it could even change the media, or even our selves over time. This would be a good thing.

  137. Re:Well by DerWulf · · Score: 1

    why would he spent the time and effort to get it in the first place, if it wasn't valueable to him? Personally, I value the items because with them, I can hurt things better (online) ;)

    I think most people just wrongly assume that you can't/shouldn't take something seriously because either a) its a game or b) its somehow less real than other real things. The murder thing, well it WAS fraud and the guy totally flipped out (not justified). Says more about the guy than about MMORPGs or virtual property.

    --

    ___
    No power in the 'verse can stop me
  138. Ok.. by Steeltoe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yes, you abhor violence and rape, until you get hit by a bad hit and do something you would never physicall do otherwise. By the time it has been done, it would all seem like it was a dream, unreal, maybe you won't ever remember it again or your mind might deny its very existence for the rest of your life.

    I was just in a Youth Empowermemt camp with a french teenager who had sexually thing done to her at 6 years due to pot. She knows the guy on friendly terms today. He doesn't remember anything of it. She knows that he did it because of the dope that one time.

    It ruined her life, she said.

    You can live on the edge without knowing it. Putting poison and generally trippy stuff into your body, WILL affect you, even if you think you're invulnerable and strong. It only takes one time, to ruin somebody's life. Perhaps one of the most beautiful girls I've ever seen, feeling bad about herself since 6 years old.

    You can play dice far into the game, but the chance is there you will trip and fall, fall out of grace. Ego says this happens to other people, in my experience, you gain much more by stop playing such games and finding games that enrich life fully.

    Good post about stereoptypes otherwise. It's clear we should treat each others like unique human beings. Not just for the other person, but because it makes the world far more interesting for ourselves too.

    Read the link in my sig for more information about the universe, life and everything ;-)

    She came with this story as soon as somebody in the group mentioned the harmlessness of something as "household as pot". (Yes, I KNOW this will come..)

    "It ruined my life". I will be reminded of this last sentence, since this was one of the moments in life, where you could actually touch the words in the air.

    Nothing else matters. I'm doing yoga, breathing exercises and service that makes life high, healthier and interesting in so many more ways than stuffing your body with poison to experience the effects.

  139. Re:sure its real... here's the line blurred for ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I spent a few years playing EQ in the afternoons, between the fights you spend the time chatting with the people around your. After a while, it becomes many hours of chatting, and you get to know some people even more then you might in reallife. So it endedup with me having one of my best friends ever on the other side of earth. Many of you might think that this is virtual and not real, and that EQ is just a game. But the people you meet there are just as real, and becomes your friends just a much. Only diffrence is that its a 16hour travel to take a coffe with them.

  140. Mind wants an escape by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

    Why escape at all?

    You don't have to watch television.
    You don't have to be spoon-fed "entertainment", you can BE entertaining! Yes! Be a clown, laughter is healthy!

    There's so many interesting, enlightening and productive ways to live your lives. Why do people go on want to live to the lowest common denominator, and then need to escape this "life" that they have chosen?

    It's strange. I used to do these things, but that was just because the others were doing it and I didn't know anything better. Now I do and am a much richer and happier person. The people I meet much more interesting, the kind that are seeking answers in life, and dare to explore the avenues no matter what other people say about things they've never tried themselves.

    1. Re:Mind wants an escape by trayl · · Score: 1

      "Why escape at all?"
      Maybe people aren't interested in becoming self-congratulatory prudes?

      Who says being 'interesting, enlightened and productive' is the correct choice or is even a laudable goal in the first place?

      While I expect I agree with you about excessive escapism in modern society being related to intellectual spoon-feeding, if more people were like you, I'd definately be trying to escape. You may have found something that works for you, but being so holier-than-thou just makes you sound desperate to get some validation.

      Oh, and if your opinions about drugs(from a previous post in this thread) are as strong as you claim, you've thrown away all your favourite CDs, art and fiction right?

    2. Re:Mind wants an escape by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      We as a society have a problem when people escape from their lives instead of embracing life as it is and taking the challenges.

      You have an impression of me through these threads. But really, what you have is coming from yourself. You know nothing about me. Heck, I know very little about myself even! ;-)

      If you don't want to listen, fine by me, I'm not a super-example to show to the world and I certainly am not looking to make copies of myself onto the world. I simply see we're heading for trouble, and people are suffering even when they have all they could need in the world. In fact they have more than 99.9% of the population on this planet, yet, are heading for self-destruction.

      I offer a way out, not by myself, but by any means where you're heading for spirituality. Choose what you like, or don't. As I've said before, I'm simply writing this to inspire people and share my experience.

      Wether I have CDs, play games, read books or whatever, is besides the question. I feel good about what I do. If you do the same, that's great!

      Why do you want to stick an asshole-marker on my forehead?

    3. Re:Mind wants an escape by trayl · · Score: 1

      You say 'we as a society have a problem...' - this is assumes that I agree with your understanding of society, and also that I think it is something worth 'taking the challenges for'. I probably don't.

      You are of course right that all I know of you is from two or three comments in this thread, but I replied because of the way that that you express your ideas and the content. Combined these impressions made we want to demonstrate that I at least disagree with you.

      Although I think we would actually agree on many things, I think you are hiding your ulterior motive, which is religious. Of course you are welcome to any beliefs, but to imply that just by 'realising' something all your desire to escape was 'cured' is IMO, dishonest.

      I don't want to stick an asshole sticker on you. I wanted you to realise that just because you think you have an idea how things could be, or what people really need, you will encounter resistance precisely because of those claims. You state that 99.9% of the population are heading for self-destruction. This is preaching, not inspiring or sharing.

      I'd like to know what you did to assuage desires to escape, or become enlightened, either of those might be inspiring or helpful, but simple assertion that most people are 'wrong' somehow because they don't do as you claim they should is bigoted.

      I don't have the answers, but I don't see the need to invoke the supernatural to create some. I also don't see how denying the cruel bloody and capricious nature of life helps. For many, ney most, escapism is a practical way to relax and live (for a while) without some of the less-pleasant aspects of their life.

      If your answer boils down to -"they should accept God"- then where is no point continuing.

      Forgive me if I am completely off-base here ;)

    4. Re:Mind wants an escape by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      Now we're talking!

      I offer one way, it is not just mine, there are many ways. I think spirituality is it, wether you believe in God or not. Spirituality has nothing to do with God, ie. look up on Buddhism.

      Just be natural and seek wise council and do what is best. There's no one answer. :-)

      I've spoken enough and when there is so much discussing back and forth on details, it doesn't bring any fruits, just bad feelings. So if you feel you're on the right track, you probably are. If not, then you may listen to what I say or follow my links, or find something else.

      However, what I would advice against is to follow where everybody else is going - the lowest common denominator. But it's ultimately everybody's choice.

  141. Rock and Roll baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well, there was a point where blues were the reason people were killing one another.

    For ages, the Christian groups (not just the fundaMENTALists) wanted to make you believe that Rock and Roll filled people with the devil and therefore would turn everyone into murder machines that were selling their souls to satan.

    I think there was an era where TV was the passage to hell and damnation. If you watched the idiot box, then you must be a murderous mad man. Don't forget kids jumping out of windows to be just like superman and the morons trying to impersonate the Terminator in all his actions because he was cool. And then you have the snapped military fruitcakes that try to be Rambo after eating a few too many outdate MRE's.

    I heard that in more cases than not, smoking leads to marijuana usage. Once you smoke the doobie, you're no longer thinking straight and have a 95% chance of moving onto speed, cocain, heroine, elvis music and even worse, christianity. As you can see, the incredible downhill slope is obviously inescapible.

    Now it's video games. They are obviously the key to the soul from what I read in the news these days.

    See, it's obvious. If you play video games, you will be forced by an uncontrollable nature of human beings to impersonate the character roles in the game.

    If you play Final Fantasy, you'll run around with a sword 4 times your body length slicing at everything.

    If you play Smurfs, you'll have to spend eternity singing la la lalalalaaa.

    If you play GTA, then it becomes entirely obvious that you'll run around shooting everyone, stiffing hookers, running over nuns and shooting cops since they tend to intefere with the fun things.

    Wait... let's get a grip here. Let's take a moment to figure this out.

    I am personally willing to believe that if we went through excessive steps to cleanse society from all evils including but not limited to :
    - Guns
    - Cigarettes
    - Heroine
    - Cocain
    - Elvis CD's
    - Swords
    - Television
    - Radio
    - Religion
    - Rock and Roll
    - Video games

    We would have new evils. Stupid people are well stupid. If you take a bunch of teenaged morons from Columbine and try and explain to them that shooting your classmates is bad, well then they'll chuckle like Bevis and Butthead and say "Yeh baby, I'm bad too" or something stupid like "But we have to kill the sinners".

    If you take the idiot in California that claims he murdered because of playing too much GTA, he'd have probably still killed but blamed it on another bad habit of his. Maybe rock and roll or maybe too much choir music on Sundays.

    If you take the moron in Korea that killed over an in-game weapon. I would pay a million dollars to the first person that could possibly convince me that a guy with that large of a testosterone problem wouldn't have killed or mamed someone else over something equally ridiculos elsewhere.

    People are stupid. There are people that can't be taught because they live in the wrong place. Or because they feel persecuted, or because they went to Sunday school, or because mom and dad are just plain stupid and don't put the slightest effort into trying to teach their kids. There are tons of reasons why people are stupid. But the fact is, that in any large group of people, you have at least one person born with no-form of brain damage that struggles at the age of 20 to tie his shoe laces.

    Statistically speaking (and I love speaking statistics since they're as accurate as the bible) there are substantially more stupid people that intelligent ones. More importantly, when you form a group of more than 5 intelligent people, you've no degraded their class to disfunctional idiots. The US senate shows what happens when you take 100 people that are of varying degrees of stupidity though still smart enough to graduate from the ivy leagues and put them together into a group.

    And even more importantly, there's

  142. You know you're addicted to WoW.... by mseeger · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... when you think there is no work to do, just because your boss doesn't have a yellow exclamation mark above his head.

    Regards, Martin

    1. Re:You know you're addicted to WoW.... by Psykechan · · Score: 1

      Actually, your boss will have a grey question mark above his head signifying that you still have work to do for this quest.

      A bunch of guildies were planning to do a PUG raid on a high level instance but the tank couldn't go; his mom wouldn't let him. I immediately piped in the guild chat with:

      You can't go until you finish 8[Math Homework]

  143. Re:Well by ultranova · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I do not believe that you can possibly identify a single country, except for perhaps Monaco and Vatican City, where someone has not been murdered for a sum of money less than 3000 USD. So I am not sure why gripe you have against the US that you feel the need to try and turn everything into a failing of the US "social experiment."

    I believe that parent posters point was that the poor bastard that got murdered didn't get murdered for a virtual sword that's worth nothing; he got murdered for a virtual sword that's worth $3000, with emotional attachments likely upping the value for the other party.

    In other words, whether the sword was made of 1's and 0's or solid gold is completely irrelevant. It was valuable to the people in question. It is no more or less insane to kill over a virtual object than a real one. Not that that's going to matter to the politicians and busybodies who will no doubt be using this incident to try to prove that games are the root of all evil in the world...

    Anyway, quite a few people, americans or otherwise, have been murdered over whatever pocket change they happen to be carrying - which, I assume, usually amounts to a lot less than $3000.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  144. Re:Zero players before 1998? Excuse me? by craznar · · Score: 1

    I think it has around 50,000 per server, several million playing the game .... so that's pretty massive in anyones eyes.

    The fact that 90% of the population are sleeping in inns at any time is probably not relevant.

    --
    EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
  145. korea? wasn't it china? by pitchaxistheory · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If i remember correctly, the incident happened in China and not Korea. Did a google search and here's the original story... http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2005-03/3 0/content_429246.htm now... can i find a dragon saber in guild wars?...

  146. Weed!=Pedofilia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weed makes you lazy, not a pederass. ...

    Do you smoke crack? ...

    Tell Your friend to SEEK THERAPY. She should have ceased contact with this 'friend' of hers. It had nothing to do with 'dope'; he is a sexual predator! If he was also 6. It's not because of the dope. He was also molested. But the fact that she thinks it was dope, makes me believe it was an older sexual predator. ...

    Read a book. Your conclusions are based on dilusions and rationalizations of a 6 year old; not reality. ...

    Drugs, accept alcohol, do not make people do things they weren't already going to do. It makes them have more fun doing it. ...

    PS: NO ONE WANTS TO JOIN YOUR CULT.

    PPS: Maybe you should get some therapy too.

  147. Check this out by avasol · · Score: 2, Funny

    .. if this logic is reversed and applicable, I am a mass-murderer.
    Kewl.

  148. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very true. When I used to play online games a lot (particularly large-scale MUDs), getting killed and losing all of the items I spent a lot of time to acquire really pissed me off. So much that if I encountered the person who killed me in the game in real life, I'd punch them. It's hard to shrug off *anything* (in a game or in real life) that took something away from you that required so much effort to acquire in the first place. However, had I acquired all of those items within the span of 5 minutes and with very little effort, I'd probably be slightly miffed at most (probably about as miffed as I would had I stubbed my toe).

    So yeah, like you said, it's all about the time and effort invested, not the thing itself.

  149. Sucks to be him by jimmypw · · Score: 1

    What a shame the sword would have been soulbound.

  150. Stealing... by spiff42 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From TFA:

    If you say, "but the Bonebiter doesn't even exist," I'll say it exists in exactly the same way that the songs and software I download off Bittorrent exist. And yet stealing them is a crime. The only difference is that when I steal a song, nobody else is deprived of the song. When that guy stole John's Bonebiter, he was left unarmed and forced to go find a replacement. That theft actually hurts more, not less.

    "Stealing" digital music is illegal because you break the copyright-law, which is quite different from stealing a physical object in the real world. I would therefore say that this comparison is pretty bad.

    But concerning theft of virtual objects in a virtual world, it would be perfectly OK if it was punishable in the virtual world. If not, why would it even be possible to steal objects in the virtual world? Or to kill someone? In a similar sense, if you think that someone did you injustice in a computer-game, wasn't it actually because he played by the rules of the game, and you do not think that those rules are fair. Then perhaps you should find another game.

    To sum it up: Killing a virtual character in a game to get revenge is nothing new, but trying to revenge injustice in a game by acting in the real world makes no sense to me.

    /Spiff

  151. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are absolutely right! Take for example one of those imaginary gods (or god, if you are monoteist). This is just the case. Fortunately there wasn't any war due to WoW yet.

  152. Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by Steeltoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Weed makes you lazy, not a pederass. ...

    Weed rots your brain, especially on those who are using it alot, yes. The absolute worst cases you see on the street is in fact due to HEAVY use of harshis, not the harder stuff. But it also has diverse effects on people, not everyone reacts to it the same.

    Do you smoke crack? ...

    I tried harshis a handful of times, but on me it had worse and worse effect. Sometimes I got vibration in my chest from it that really scared me since it felt like it was the heart. Now I know better what it is, and it - along with nervous heart - is gone since I started doing yoga and breathing exercises. I was poisoning my body, now it is cleaning.

    Tell Your friend to SEEK THERAPY. She should have ceased contact with this 'friend' of hers. It had nothing to do with 'dope'; he is a sexual predator! If he was also 6. It's not because of the dope. He was also molested. But the fact that she thinks it was dope, makes me believe it was an older sexual predator. ...

    This you can state without having talked to the girl or anything.. Way to go making generalizations. She knows the guy, he was also young. You may be right he was also molested, but isn't that beyond the point? He did this one time in a trance from drugs.

    Read a book. Your conclusions are based on dilusions and rationalizations of a 6 year old; not reality. ...

    I prefer to deal with reality, not books and generalizations. I also don't claim to own the truth, I just share my experience. My experience was that her pain in the time from she was 6 years old was REAL, and she said this would not have happened if he hadn't taken that smoke. He wasn't himself.

    Maybe she should have figured out how to deal with this at 6 years old without tornmenting herself, but things turned up this way no matter how much you try to excuse drugs.

    Drugs, accept alcohol, do not make people do things they weren't already going to do. It makes them have more fun doing it. ...

    Taken from somebody promoting drugs.. Do we really need advertisement for it?

    People take drugs because they need a excuse for doing fun things in their lives. The drugs lowers the artificial high bars we have in our so-called "modern society" to let go, relax and just do what we feel like, not what others expect us to do. We live our entire lives on the expectations of others, even sometimes when we do the opposite! But when we drink, we have an excuse to drop all that. The sad thing is that is another social acceptable thing to do, so we're not really free even we do this!

    There's no need to drink yourself up to talking with that girl. When you do, you're not really doing it anyways, the booze is doing it for you, you're not quite yourself. In fact people become quite stupid in the effect of booze.

    Why use drugs to artificially lower personal inhibitions, when you can do the same in a drug-free state and really meet yourself and reality? You then also have more control, thought-processes intact and don't risk dropping those inhibitions that SHOULD NOT be dropped.

    You can have as much fun as you like. Just do it, but you also have to go beyond your own fears, and be able to take ridicule and fear from others.

    PS: NO ONE WANTS TO JOIN YOUR CULT.

    That's okay, I don't want to join your cult either ;-)

    What I'm arguing is that you can have a drug-free living with a much better and long-lasting high from doing yoga, meditation and service to the world. It is totally natural, have been practiced in the East for thousands of years and this is what everybody is seeking in drugs and other escapes from reality.

    PPS: Maybe you should get some therapy too.

    Way to go Mr. ad hominem attack.
    What can I say after this?

    I can only direct you to an article about being a fool I once read and now Google'd up for

    1. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by dnixon112 · · Score: 1

      I think his point was that you can't really blame pot for this guy molesting this girl, because all you're doing is taking her word for it. There's no proof one way or another that the weed is the cause, and from all other accounts weed does not make you a child molester, it makes you a twinkie molester. How do you know what this guy was thinking, before or after doing pot? You don't so it's quite silly for you to blame the whole thing on weed.

    2. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      I think his point was that you can't really blame pot for this guy molesting this girl, because all you're doing is taking her word for it. There's no proof one way or another that the weed is the cause, and from all other accounts weed does not make you a child molester, it makes you a twinkie molester. How do you know what this guy was thinking, before or after doing pot?

      What she told us, was that he went into a trance from the "weed", going into a very bad trip. She knows him, and he would never do this in any other state and to her knowledge he has never done it again. All her confrontation with him on the subject has led her to believe he doesn't remember anything that night.

      I get the poster's point, but I don't necessarily have to agree with it. There's an big distinction between understanding an argument intellectually, and agreeing with it. When somebody believes drugs are cool, they will say anything to rationalize taking drugs, making the statements more subjective rather than more objective.

      I also don't have to believe every word she says, but it does seem plausible to me, and counts far more than somebody expressing his generalizing beliefs about this incident on an internet discussion board.

      You don't so it's quite silly for you to blame the whole thing on weed.

      That is your words, not mine.

      I don't blame anything or anyone, and certainly an issue is always more complex than just one blatant black and white picture. I merely point out that taking drugs is generally poisonous for your body and have mind-altering effects. There are much better alternatives, so why take something you know it bad?

      It is often so convenient to blame the person. But you know, the person is the sum of the experience and knowledge imparted on that person, making him/her behave a certain way.

      And what more: It's also convenient to blame drugs, pop-culture, premature sex, society or whatnot for every problem.

      I'm looking for those who take responsibility for their actions, not blaming, but choosing wisely what is best for themselves and others.

      Blame is irrelevant. It makes you dull and inactive. Often, the persons doing the least is blaming the most. Taking resposibility gives you the ability to respond.

      You may argue that you believe drugs have no bad effects on the body and mind, but that is another discussion. That would be to discuss the root here, which people rarely do.

      Instead they attack people and their experiences, just because it doesn't match with their current beliefs. Beliefs change all the time. Why require proof of somebody's direct and personal experience? This is not a singular story I have heard either, although the research on drugs should speak for itself.

      Yes, I know it's popular to repeat the mantra again and again: Weed does not harm you.

      But fact is, it does. If it's pure, maybe not so much at once, but on a subtler level it does thing to your mind and body. If a whole society does weed, it will affect the whole of society. You can see it on the skin of people, and the slugish way they talk sometimes, that they have been using weed/drugs for a long time.

      My experience with harshis has been only bad and I now do not believe in taking drugs for recreation. I have found something which gives me more and longer lasting pleasure. This is what I am sharing to you, but I'm beginning to think it is for deaf ears.

    3. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by TobyWong · · Score: 1

      It's painfully obvious you don't know what you are talking about.

      "harshis" is the most dangerous drug on the streets? o.0

      Your "experience" in this area is laughable. "harshis" indeed.

      "Weed rots the brain" You claim. Makes you CrAzY does it? I don't suppose you are in the movie making business because I think I've seen your earlier work under the name "Reefer Madness".

      Weed is certainly bad for the body, but the reasons are far more pedestian than "brain rotting" which sounds like something out of a bad sci-fi flick (as does the rest of your rhetoric btw). It's bad for you in the same way smoking cigarettes is bad for you. You are filling your lungs with filthy smoke and your body is unable to effectively get rid of the contaminants. The delivery system is just plain dirty. It's that simple.

      You ever hear a virgin bragging about some sexual escapade they had and it's painfully obvious to everyone but them that they are just making it up and they have absolutely no relevant experience? Well that's what you sound like.

      --
      - Toby
    4. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by atayarani · · Score: 1

      you're right, you don't need drugs to be happy. On the other hand, many people don't need drugs to be/act stupid. By saying that weed caused this guy to do what he did, you are shifting the responsibilty from him to the pot. While it probably did lower his inhibitions, in every person there is a standard that will never be crossed. It varies per person. In other words, there has to be a pre-disposition to an act before it will be committed, inhibitions or not. The guy was probably a pedophile, but was afraid of consequences, a fear which drugs removed. I'm not condoning his actions by any means, but I'm saying that the drugs aren't the primary cause. They were a means to a bad end. While I don't take drugs, I don't believe that occasional to moderate use is necessarily evil.

    5. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      It's painfully obvious you don't know what you are talking about.

      Just because I'm daring to contradict often-repeated and populistic mantras of young people? The more you repeat it, doesn't make it any more true.

      Harshis" is the most dangerous drug on the streets? o.0

      That is your words, not mine. You react on what I say and want to make me to look stupid so you don't have to think about the implications, thus you put words in my mouth. It simply goes against your set of beliefs and you react instead of pondering on it and act.

      This is from the people I've heard who have lived on the street as drug-addicted criminals, giving intro-talks to schools etc. True, it's not my own experience (thank god!), but what they said is this: The worst cases you see on the streets is those taking harshis almost every day. Like every day, for years. They become so slugish, can barely walk and think, and suffer worse than the heroin abusers with their bad knees. They might be in the minority and really, really bad abusers of the substance, but they are the ones suffering the most permanent damage. This is what I remember was said and it sounded plausible at the time.

      Your "experience" in this area is laughable. "harshis" indeed.

      I come from Europe. We call it "harsh" in Norwegian. We don't use "weed" or "crack", thus I don't want to use those terms. Should I pretend I'm familiar with those terms instead, so you will accept me?

      Weed rots the brain" You claim. Makes you CrAzY does it? I don't suppose you are in the movie making business because I think I've seen your earlier work under the name "Reefer Madness".

      I don't know the medical terms, but people using harshis becomes dull, weak, boring and get a bad skin among other things ;-)

      Weed is certainly bad for the body, but the reasons are far more pedestian than "brain rotting" which sounds like something out of a bad sci-fi flick (as does the rest of your rhetoric btw). It's bad for you in the same way smoking cigarettes is bad for you. You are filling your lungs with filthy smoke and your body is unable to effectively get rid of the contaminants. The delivery system is just plain dirty. It's that simple.

      Thanks for your thorough medical explanation. So the drug itself is harmless, right? This is what you are implying, even if it's not true. Why do you want to spread a lie? Why not look up on research on THC and think about what you say next time before you correct somebody else's weak medical knowledge?

      You ever hear a virgin bragging about some sexual escapade they had and it's painfully obvious to everyone but them that they are just making it up and they have absolutely no relevant experience? Well that's what you sound like.

      This is just getting silly. Take a look at what you wrote.. Somehow, what I say makes me "uncool", so I must be a virgin and unexperienced. While those people who say things you agree with are of course "cool". How broad-minded!

      What I see is many people spouting the same populistic mantras to each other in order to sound intellectual, without having bothered to look up on research on drugs or really look into the social problems around drugs at all. Even if THEY can control their addiction and dosage, somehow everybody else can it too, so there's no problem! And if somebody develops a problem with it, well, that's their problem! We just continue advertise drugs to everybody, even minors, saying it's cool and stuff, but don't really care about those who fall off the wagon..

      I'm sorry if I'm not going to repeat the mantra. I believe in making the best and informed choices whenever possible and go for the highest goals in life. This does not exclude fun, or an ice-cream, or a video, or even slacking some, in fact, REAL fun is without drugs.

      Real fun is to do what is best and feel good about what you contribute to others, among other things you can come up with. Drugs is not really fun: It is sho

    6. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by arkanes · · Score: 1
      and she said this would not have happened if he hadn't taken that smoke. He wasn't himself.

      Here's your problem right here. Spend 20 minutes in a rape councilling center and you'll hear this thing over and over again. Don't take statements like this at face value. Above all, it's ridiculous to take this sort of statement as a meaningful indicator of the effects of pot. Your friend is using a classic and well-known psychological defense technique to protect herself from trauma over the experience. *She* doesn't know any more than you do if it was because of the pot or anything else. Hell, if she was 6, as you describe, then her knowledge of exactly what he was on is hardly to be taken for granted anyway. So while I'm sorry for your friend, and I do suggest she has therapy if she hasn't already, she should not be considered some sort of expert on the effects of smoking marijuana because as a child she was molested by someone she thought was stoned.

      The effects of drugs on inhibitions are well known. It's fine if you personally don't feel the need to use them, but being aware of what they do and why people use them might help you find common ground in these sort of discussions. It's got nothing do to with "our modern society" per se - recreational drug use has been around for as long as there have been people (might want to study your history of Yoga, for example).

      And for the record, weed doesn't "rot your brain", and it's *extremely* unlikely that weed (or hashish [note spelling]) is the sole or even an important factor in any sort of "street case" you're talking about.

    7. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by TobyWong · · Score: 1

      Just because I'm daring to contradict often-repeated and populistic mantras of young people? The more you repeat it, doesn't make it any more true.

      Listen, drugs are bad for you m'kay? I'm not disagreeing with that premise, what I am saying is that you are clueless on this topic and it shows. Leave the anti-drug campaigning to someone with a clue. If you ever tried your little "don't do drugs" speech on a classroom full of teenagers they would laugh you right out of the place. Kids have very effective BS detectors and they can spot a poser a mile away.

      That is your words, not mine. You react on what I say and want to make me to look stupid so you don't have to think about the implications, thus you put words in my mouth. It simply goes against your set of beliefs and you react instead of pondering on it and act.

      I don't have to try to make you look stupid, you do a fine job of that yourself. Anyone with the tiniest amount of familiarity on the topic can see you are talking out of your ass here. Your conclusion that "drugs are bad for you" is perfectly fine but the rationale you used to arrive at this conclusion is completely flawed.

      This is from the people I've heard who have lived on the street as drug-addicted criminals, giving intro-talks to schools etc. True, it's not my own experience (thank god!), but what they said is this: The worst cases you see on the streets is those taking harshis almost every day. Like every day, for years. They become so slugish, can barely walk and think, and suffer worse than the heroin abusers with their bad knees. They might be in the minority and really, really bad abusers of the substance, but they are the ones suffering the most permanent damage. This is what I remember was said and it sounded plausible at the time.

      Take a look at this link and take note of the part where it says "did you mean...".

      Let me re-iterate that there are far FAR worse drugs than hash that are very common. Hash is a walk in the park on a sunny day compared to something like meth.

      Thanks for your thorough medical explanation. So the drug itself is harmless, right? This is what you are implying, even if it's not true. Why do you want to spread a lie? Why not look up on research on THC and think about what you say next time before you correct somebody else's weak medical knowledge?

      Reefer MADNESS!!!@#! Brain rot inc!

      This is just getting silly. Take a look at what you wrote.. Somehow, what I say makes me "uncool", so I must be a virgin and unexperienced. While those people who say things you agree with are of course "cool". How broad-minded!

      I'll tell you what's not cool: speaking from ignorance. Let's see in 2 posts your story has changed from self-experimentation a few times to second hand heresay from homeless addicts. Next post perhaps you will tell me you in fact heard about the dangers of hash on a 60 minutes special.

      Real fun is to do what is best and feel good about what you contribute to others, among other things you can come up with. Drugs is not really fun: It is short-time pleasure, and long time problems. While real fun is short-time hardship and long term benefits.

      Actually you are wrong... drugs can be incredibly pleasurable and often are. Unfortunately they can also do great damage to your body in the process and subsequently are not worth touching. The risk effectively exceeds the reward.

      I also believe in everybody making their own informed choices, war on terror/drugs be damned. People should respect other adults to make their own informed choices, government should stay as much out of private lives as possible and is only making the matters worse. But I will oppose lies and misinformation, no matter how popular they are. These are the real enemies, the viral misinformation and unclear populistic arguments.

      If you oppose misinformation then you must have one hell

      --
      - Toby
    8. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by CheechWizz · · Score: 1

      The absolute worst cases you see on the street is in fact due to HEAVY use of harshis, not the harder stuff. But it also has diverse effects on people, not everyone reacts to it the same.

      I live in Amsterdam, where softdrugs are legal and I know alot of HEAVY users and these are not the worst cases on the street you talk of. These people work at banks, IT whereever. I'm pretty sure the situation is the same in other countries and cities but hidden because the use is illegal there.

      The worst cases on the streets are not looking for rolling paper, they're looking for tin foil and needles.
      Also, marihuana/Hash does not make you do and forget horrible acts like the ones you spoke of. LSD could make you do that,Heroine, sure, crack, sure, Cocaine, possibly, XTC, possible if taken in large quatities but hash or marihuana .. No way.If you ever smoked a joint you would know this.

      And the rotting brain thing? well sure THC (the chemical in marihuana that gets you high or stoned) does kill of braincells but IIRC less then alcohol or a punch in the head do.

      What I'm arguing is that you can have a drug-free living with a much better and long-lasting high from doing yoga, meditation and service to the world. It is totally natural, have been practiced in the East for thousands of years and this is what everybody is seeking in drugs and other escapes from reality.

      This sort of thing could be really bad for your social life, nobody likes a all knowing annoying that's-not-good-for-you-you-should-meditate hippie.

      You probably thought 'what the bleep do we know' was a pretty good movie too huh?

    9. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      Here's your problem right here. Spend 20 minutes in a rape councilling center and you'll hear this thing over and over again. Don't take statements like this at face value. Above all, it's ridiculous to take this sort of statement as a meaningful indicator of the effects of pot. Your friend is using a classic and well-known psychological defense technique to protect herself from trauma over the experience. *She* doesn't know any more than you do if it was because of the pot or anything else. Hell, if she was 6, as you describe, then her knowledge of exactly what he was on is hardly to be taken for granted anyway. So while I'm sorry for your friend, and I do suggest she has therapy if she hasn't already, she should not be considered some sort of expert on the effects of smoking marijuana because as a child she was molested by someone she thought was stoned.

      We both know that we don't know for sure. He did this while under influence of a substance most consider "harmless" and from her quote had a very, very bad trip, that suggests something to me though.

      The effects of drugs on inhibitions are well known. It's fine if you personally don't feel the need to use them, but being aware of what they do and why people use them might help you find common ground in these sort of discussions. It's got nothing do to with "our modern society" per se - recreational drug use has been around for as long as there have been people (might want to study your history of Yoga, for example).

      Herbs have been used for medical use for a long time. However in our society, many millions of people are addicts and having serious problems. I'd like to help by showing there are other ways to live, for those who want to listen. I also believe that if everybody starts using it, it will affect our society in very bad ways without people noticing it.

      I have no problems with people using drugs for spiritual growth based on experience and knowledge, but this is hardly the case in most homes.

      I am well aware that people seek a way out of their lives. This adds to their problems, instead of facing their lives and taking a more active role. If they don't want to, there's nothing more I can do, but at least I can do what I can, and that makes me happy.

      And for the record, weed doesn't "rot your brain", and it's *extremely* unlikely that weed (or hashish [note spelling]) is the sole or even an important factor in any sort of "street case" you're talking about.

      I can only site from reference to those former criminals who made speeches on our school and my experience with people who take harshis regularly. It doesn't look very healthy to me, especially compared to alternatives that exists, like yoga, tai chi or chi gong and drinking lots of water :-) In fact, many former hippies swear to this rather than taking drugs.

      We both know research often shows whatever the researcher wants to find, but my hunch is that weed is far from harmless, in subtle ways and long-term. No meditation or yoga teacher will recommend taking drugs, quite the opposite in fact. Taking drugs in Yoga is very rare, and probably connected to holy rituals and the like, not recreational drug-abuse and escapism.

    10. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      I respect your opinion and Amsterdam must be a pretty cool place to live. People should have the responsibility to make up their own lives and choices.

      He probably got hit by a bad product, for sure.

      Maybe we just have different visions on how society can be? I'm not just talking about handling a day-to-day job, like you see those grim faces on the bus every day? People are barely hanging on, and find ways to escape an inhuman society.

      If you understand this, you do, if not you don't. It's hard to explain =) I should have stopped this discussion many posts ago yes. Obviously I must speak with people who share the same idea as me, so I can be accepted.

    11. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      I never claimed to be an authority on the issue, just speaking what I have experienced myself, stories and information from others.

      It is others who started personal attack and insults, because I state things that go against the popular mantras people like to repeat among themselves.

      I must have hit a nerve, sorry, but it needed to get hit. It doesn't make it any more true to repeat that "weed is harmless" when research and experience have shown the opposite.

    12. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by irokie · · Score: 1

      I can only site from reference to those former criminals who made speeches on our school and my experience with people who take harshis regularly.

      This is very common. Reformed alcoholics are often vehemently anti-alcohol. Reformed drug addicts are oftem vehemently anti-drugs. But when you're that opposed to someone, it's hard not to turn into a zelaot. Which is exactly the sort of person you bring into a school run by a government that is waging a "War on Drugs". You want to scare the children away from drugs.

      I have no problems with people using drugs for spiritual growth based on experience and knowledge, but this is hardly the case in most homes.

      I'm not sure I understand how you can make a distinction. Having a joint and listening to Pink Floyd (for example) might be akin to a religious experience for some people. i'm not being flippant here, I just don't think that any one person (or group of people, like a government, for example) can make that call.

      However in our society, many millions of people are addicts and having serious problems.

      Yes, this is true, but if you have an addictive personality, you can get addicted to anything. There's a well-known singer in a rock band who was an alcoholic. He stopped drinking and instead became addicted to shopping. And this isn't an isolated incident.

      By no means do I want to criticise you for your choice of how to live; I applaud you for your clean living ways, and I'm glad that they're working out for you. But, if you think of it, the sort of people who are going to use drugs (ie, they're looking for a quick thrill) are not exactly the sort of people who are going to put in the time and energy and dedication necessary to get the same sort of pay-off from yoga as your good self.

      I'm not a fan of drugs. Don't like to use them myself, but i think that the choice should be up to the individual.

      --
      Today a young man on acid realized that all matter is mearly energy condensed through a slow vibration, we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, life is only a dream and we are the imaginations of ourselves. Here's Tom with the weather.
      -- Bill Hicks

      --
      and if you see me strut, remind me of what left this outlaw torn...
    13. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      This is very common. Reformed alcoholics are often vehemently anti-alcohol. Reformed drug addicts are oftem vehemently anti-drugs. But when you're that opposed to someone, it's hard not to turn into a zelaot. Which is exactly the sort of person you bring into a school run by a government that is waging a "War on Drugs". You want to scare the children away from drugs.

      True. This was in Norway though, not the US.

      Maybe I am wrong that hash has long-term effect, but it seems something affects those who smoke it so they become dull.

      I'm not sure I understand how you can make a distinction. Having a joint and listening to Pink Floyd (for example) might be akin to a religious experience for some people. i'm not being flippant here, I just don't think that any one person (or group of people, like a government, for example) can make that call.

      That's easy. It's people's own choice. I'm just stating my mind here, not making a party-program or authoritarian regime.

      Yes, this is true, but if you have an addictive personality, you can get addicted to anything. There's a well-known singer in a rock band who was an alcoholic. He stopped drinking and instead became addicted to shopping. And this isn't an isolated incident.

      All the more reason to go into yoga, to understand the mind better.

      By no means do I want to criticise you for your choice of how to live; I applaud you for your clean living ways, and I'm glad that they're working out for you. But, if you think of it, the sort of people who are going to use drugs (ie, they're looking for a quick thrill) are not exactly the sort of people who are going to put in the time and energy and dedication necessary to get the same sort of pay-off from yoga as your good self.

      There are MANY former drug-addicts that I know that are in the alternative community. They are good people and can put alot of effort, when the right cause is there, and not just some empty money-grubbing bussiness.

      I'm not a fan of drugs. Don't like to use them myself, but i think that the choice should be up to the individual.

      Totally agreed. I'm just stating my opinion and sharing my experience. It is people who are attacking me and those stories who make this hard.

      So this is obviously NOT the right forum to post in, and I will think twice to air my mind here again. Obviously, people must already agree with something before they can listen to it..

    14. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      I'm just stating we can do better to feel good about ourselves and others. There are ways, but of course, if people don't want to listen or agree, that's their choice.

      Drugs aren't excactly helping, quite the opposite. And it is not helping that people are saying stuff like "weed is harmless" while minors are listening too, because that is frankly not proven. My experience is that it does things to your body and mind which is not good, and many others have had such experiences too.

      I don't really blame anybody. I just want to do the best thing. It's like drinking and driving: you can be lucky so many times, but one of those times you may also be unlucky. It's just more invisible with drugs like hash.

      I have no idea wether that guy is a pedophile or not, and that's not really interesting. He probably got hit by impure pot, but that can happen too. People take such risks, when there are so many more attracting alternatives. I just have to wonder about it.

    15. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Weed rots your brain, especially on those who are using it alot, yes. The absolute worst cases you see on the street is in fact due to HEAVY use of harshis, not the harder stuff. But it also has diverse effects on people, not everyone reacts to it the same. I tried harshis a handful of times, but on me it had worse and worse effect. Sometimes I got vibration in my chest from it that really scared me since it felt like it was the heart. Now I know better what it is, and it - along with nervous heart - is gone since I started doing yoga and breathing exercises. I was poisoning my body, now it is cleaning. "

      The absolute worst cases you see on the street are most likely on something harder than weed or hash. Some people have adverse reactions to it, however many very successful people use it several times daily with no real noticeable negative effects. You generalize as much as the parent, yet you think because you make an anti-drug statement you're allowed to?

      I don't really think you're qualified to discuss the anti-drug perspective when you can't even spell HASHISH correctly.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    16. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by TobyWong · · Score: 1

      I never claimed to be an authority on the issue, just speaking what I have experienced myself, stories and information from others.

      Like I said...

      It is others who started personal attack and insults, because I state things that go against the popular mantras people like to repeat among themselves.

      What "popular mantra" would that be? The one that says you are talking out of your ass on this issue? Maybe they are onto something...

      I must have hit a nerve, sorry, but it needed to get hit. It doesn't make it any more true to repeat that "weed is harmless" when research and experience have shown the opposite.

      You're quite the self-righteous little prick aren't you? Yes you hit a nerve - I don't suffer fools gladly as the saying goes. As such I find your ass spouting to be offensive.

      I don't do drugs nor do any of my friends, but I do have considerably more relevant experience in the area than some guy who tried hash a couple times and suddenly is an expert on the subject.

      You must make quite the bible study speaker as you relate the story of your troubled journey from the darkness of a hash induced haze to the everlasting glory once you found jesus. Not a dry eye in the house after you are done spinning that yarn i'm sure.

      --
      - Toby
    17. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by atayarani · · Score: 1

      While I agree there are better solutions than drugs and that weed isn't harmless, I also think that many people exaggurate its side effects. Drugs and alcohol don't make people do stupid things, it's just an excuse stupid people use to do stupid things. If used responsibly, these substance don't have to have negative consequences. For example, sometimes I drink heavily, not a good thing, but it's what I do. However, to make sure I don't do anything stupid, I leave my keys and cellphone (to avoid drunken dialing) at home. If used responsibly, weed and alcohol aren't any more dangerous than fast food or chocolate.

    18. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      Also, marihuana/Hash does not make you do and forget horrible acts like the ones you spoke of. LSD could make you do that...[snip]

      First off, I have never taken LSD. Right now I am reading Tom Wolfe's "Electric Koolaid Acid Test", a very fun and surreal read, straight from the heydey of the 60's - and the descriptions of the "LSD experience" doesn't match up to what "they" want you to believe. I mean, Kesey and the rest of the gang drove the Furthur bus across America blitzed out on this stuff without accident. That isn't to say that was the right thing (personally, I think driving under the influence of anything including a cell phone conversation should be illegal), but the fact that it was possible seems to indicate that it isn't as messy of a drug as "they" want you to think it is.

      Now, let me say that the experience does seem to heavily depend on what is in the mind of the user and their surroundings. There have been numerous citations in the book of first timers getting whigged, and Kesey would direct everyone else to "focus Attention" on the individual - show them love, affection, attention, tell them it would be ok, etc - and the user comes out the end of it a VERY CHANGED PERSON. They even had Hell's Angels members changed on that stuff - from rowdey dudes to "frolicking in the woods" - when they got together at Kesey's place in La Honda - crazy shit.

      There has been a lot of mention though of dose - go much beyond 250 mikes and you start getting into "heavy doses" - which really could change you mentally. Kesey at one point was doing 1500 mikes. I have never read of an LSD death, but I would say that a hallucinagenic like LCD at high doses could cause problems (although descriptions of DMT in the book makes LSD seem like nothing). However, so does drinking a lot of water all at once, too.

      I don't think LSD can turn you into a baby-raping-killer any more than eating a tomato will - you would have to already be screwed up in that way for it to encourage it, and based on what I have read in Tom Wolfe's book, LSD seems to pacify and cause wonderment, more than anything else...

      And the rotting brain thing? well sure THC (the chemical in marihuana that gets you high or stoned) does kill of braincells but IIRC less then alcohol or a punch in the head do.

      I am not sure where you are getting your information, but I don't think THC kills brain cells. Unlike heroin, which mimics (IIRC) the properties of endorphines, and thus can "jack in" to the receptors in brain cells meant for endorphines (and thus take over the function of and cause chemical dependency), THC doesn't do this - we actually have cannabanoid receptors in our brain cells that have no internal natural source (unlike endorphine) - but there is a plant that provides such chemicals for the receptors. Or, at least that is the way I have understood it to be.

      If anyone has information or links that could educate me further, that is unbiased and honest research (not anti-drug propaganda), I am very interested in reading about it. The true facts are, for a lot of the "scary" illegal drugs, and by that I mean the "horrendously-suppressed-because-hippies-use-them" , like marijuana and LSD - we have no true data on what and how they work - especially LSD - because so much research into them has been surpressed by our misguided "War On (some) Drugs". I am not even sure if anyone still makes (or knows how to) LSM precursor, or how to turn that into LSD - anymore. I imagine someone does - but LSD is so far underground it isn't even funny. Based on what I have read, LSD (and in combo with marijuana), seemed poised to make us peaceful and insightful as people - rather than warmongering haters.

      Whether that is true or not (seems too simplistic an explanation), or whether that is why LSD had such a downfall (powers that be don't want a peaceful people - they want hate and fear for profit!) - who knows...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    19. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      The delivery system is just plain dirty. It's that simple.

      It's only this way because marijuana is illegal. If it were a legal substance like alcohol, then it would be cheap. With it being illegal and pricey, one can't use it to make brownies or other food items as much because it takes a lot to sautee to make the oil/butter for the food.

      There are also vaporizer systems, which are supposed to be better - but if there was a choice over inhaling something all the time or eating it, many would choose eating it (although smoking it or otherwise would still be an option people would indulge in for social and other purposes)...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    20. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      You obviously missed my entire point.
      I'm not an expert.
      I only state that drugs are bad for you and bad things can happen when you do them, yes, even "harmless stuff" like pot, since you never know what's in it.

      My *point* is that you can do without drugs, and be happier with other techniques in life, but people get triggered by words like "drugs" and need to prove their beliefs, or attack the messenger just because I state it in a different way than you approve.

      Your only arguments are personal attacks, hence this discussion is pointless.

    21. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by Halthar · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone who has done quite a bit of LSD including a few trips which, assuming the coating on the blotter was distributed evenly across the tabs (rarely the case), were somewhere between 1500-2000 mics I would say that it most definitely CAN be a life altering experience. Part of the problem being that many people use it for escapism, which often doesn't lead to the life altering experience in the same manner you are describing. At least they do at first, it's hard not to fall into using it as a life changing experience if it's used more than a few times, in my experience anyway. As I have aged and reflected upon my times on LSD when I was younger, I have come to realize that though they were rough at the time, my bad trips were ultimately my best trips as I tended to learn far more about myself during a "bad" trip than I did during my normal party oriented/social setting trips.

      One thing to note, is that from a psychological standpoint large doses of LSD could be bad, from a physical standpoint, it's one of the more harmless substances you can injest in terms of effective dose vs. LD50 (~12,000 mics IIRC). The LD50 of LSD is so high that I am not sure how possible it would be to even injest that much on tabs (currently the most common dosage method, at least where I live. Liquid can be very hard to come by) not due to the volume that would need to be consumed, but because when a 1000+ mic trip kicks in it's hard to do ANYTHING, much less keep consuming more. Around 1000mics is where reality starts to fade out and people claim they saw God, basically.

      Having also used DMT as well and looking back on the experience, LSD doesn't really feel as though it's in the same ballpark. LSD is generally a nice calm ride up to a plateu for a while, and then a nice ride back down. DMT and Ketamine are both a rocket straight up and out of the atmosphere. LSD provides time to adjust, DMT and Ketamine both feel as though they set in instantaniously.

      At the time I started trying some hallucinogenic compounds I was already meditating on a daily basis, and wanted to see if I could get to the same places in my mind using other sorts of tools. I never really found that I could, the quality of the experiences was different, but not in a bad way. The real problem with hallucinogenic drugs tend to occur when A) Someone already has some issues, and B) when someone can't let go and just flow with the experience rather than trying to fight against the experience.

      You are correct though, basically if set and setting are proper, an LSD trip does tend to fill you with a sense of wonderment at everything around you. It doesnt make people non-violent, but because everything gets so strange and seems so new, that all you can do is watch, listen, and maybe learn from it. For example, LSD causes the pupils to dilate and everything generally takes on a strange glow, colors get brighter, and everything seems more vibrant than normal. The effect, generally, is that everything feels more "real", though it also tends to feel unnatural and somewhat mechanical as a result of the amphetamine edge that LSD has. LSD also generally has an edge to it, as I mentioned, and often people make the mistaken assumption that this is due to strichnine on the blotter, which isn't the case. If you look at the molecular structure of LSD, it basically attaches to one of the same neuroreceptors as methamphetamine. It's a natural effect of the drug itself (which comes in handy at "Raves" because it feels like an infinite supply of energy).

      For information Erowid Vault has some. I can't say that it's unbiased, but there are some good nuggets of information there. Enjoy.

    22. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      "I also think that many people exaggurate its side effects."

      Yes, and obviously this makes the same people complaining about exaggerating its side effects, exaggerate their discussions about it to the point of name-calling. So *both* their minds and the anti-drug minds are aggravated. It's funny to watch people get ticked off by such small things!

      The same discussion being played off an old gramaphone player :-) I know it well, because I can be an expert on it myself!

      It's nice to see somebody who actually listens. Not everybody is an expert on *both* drugs and benefits of yoga / meditation, or whatever issues. I'm utterly novice on both things, but I do have strong experiences in both things too. However, it seems some people are not ready to listen to other than their own tired arguments, and that's fine, if that's what they want to hear. Drugs were FAR FAR from what I wanted to really discuss today. There's this political correctness you have to adhere to when you're young, even though research is not conclusive. Say one thing wrong, and you're dog-food.

      For example, sometimes I drink heavily, not a good thing, but it's what I do. However, to make sure I don't do anything stupid, I leave my keys and cellphone (to avoid drunken dialing) at home. If used responsibly, weed and alcohol aren't any more dangerous than fast food or chocolate.

      I support your *choice* to do this, even though my experience now tells me, no urges me onward on what I have begun and am telling you all about. This does not mean everybody has to follow suit, but for those that this rings a bell of trueness in, it might help them.

      Praise the lord!!! ;-) (Just kiddin' :-D)

      I'm not into discussing drugs really, it's just one of my many experiences that have set my on a spiritual path. I am not anti-drugs, and I'm not pro-drugs, I can care less about it, it's worthless to me. At the same time, I can feel the sadness behind the "happy" people partying out in town.. I care about that, but it might also just be my own sadness and everyone is totally blissed out on alcohol. What do I know?

    23. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by dnixon112 · · Score: 1

      lol, impure pot. That's a good one. You're doing a good job showing how ignorant you are about drugs, while at the same time preaching about how people should treat drugs. Before you preach, try learning about the subject first. Nobody is saying "weed is harmless", it certainly does effect you in some bad ways. However, the effects of alcohol are arguably worse for the body then weed. Both have the potential to ruin someone's life if abused to the max. Both also have the potential to offer some pleasure when used in moderation (and in some cases offer medicinal value also). Hash is not worse then crack, or heroin or many other opiate/poppy derived drugs. There is no "weed is harmless" mantra being spouted here so you can save your "smoke a joint and your brain will rot" scare tactics for your kids, it's obviously the way you learned about drugs.

    24. Re:Drugs/crack/weed are not cool by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      You are not listening to my words.

      All I'm saying is that drugs is bad for you. You don't know what you get and I give experiences of myself and other people who have had bad experiences with it. If you don't want to believe me and those experiences, go ahead, but still people have these experiences. Not everyone reacts to drugs like you.

      That it doesn't fit into your world-view is your issue. To attack on person and not subject, is also your problem with conversation. I never claimed to be an expert on drugs or have the Only truth about it. It REALLY seems like many people responding here do though. It should be possible to talk to each other about differing world-views without offering insults and personal attacks, no?

      I'm not preaching. If you want to do drugs and have a great time doing it, sure, go ahead. Again, read my posts and don't assume I'm somebody you met in the *past*. I'm not anti-drug, and I don't use scare tactics. I just say I am having a better time doing something else, and that everyone who wants to can too.

      You're not really discussing, you're just re-acting on somebody you met in the past, projecting that same person on me. *shrug* Not so much I can do about it other than point it out. It's like I say a few words, and you assume I say volumes, but this is in your *memory*. It is past, and it's not *me*. It was somebody you met in the past which made you angry.

  153. or maybe yes and no? by coolcold · · Score: 1

    if the person spend a lot of time to get the sword then yes, its hard-work. What if the person lose something that friend gave to him like in the case of a previous topic? Is that due to hours spent in game or its value?

    I think its how a person value an item rather than time spent on it. Spending more time on it would definitely increase its value to that person but if its an superb item by its own self, it would be of great value to him in the first place.

    Just my 2 cent

    --
    I am harvesting funny/good quotes. Please help by putting them in your sigs :)
    1. Re:or maybe yes and no? by Veamon69 · · Score: 0

      Let em kill each other. Weed out the gene pool of these obsessive losers who spend all day upgrading their 'uber-orc' and get pissed off when their 'magical butt plug sword' gets stolen. fuck em.

  154. Re:Well by Jekler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's precisely what I'm always trying to point out to people. That this "new wave" of crime is the same old garbage, brought to a new medium by the same psychos who'd kill you for saying their baseball team sucks. Although I have no hard facts to backup this second idea, I speculate that the violent outbreaks over video games isn't even perpetuated by the geeks and nerds, it's a result of video games/PC Games becoming easier and popular enough that the same sick people who kill people over a football game are now playing video games. People weren't killing each other when games were BBS style and you had to be a true nerd to even figure out how to connect, play them, and appreciate the ASCII art. Most maniacs who are prone to kill people just don't have the patience, desire, and intelligence to do all that, but now that the technical knowledge required to play games is so little, your average joe-psycho can hop in and get pissed off in record time.

  155. Re:Well by Frogbert · · Score: 1
    Otherwise might do so because they felt screwed over in a game that they'd invested a lot of time in.

    For example someone could steal your cloud song
  156. But here's just the thing by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    "But most people would agree that if you've got a great "online" life and a terrible real life, it's time to stop the escapism for long enough to give your real life a go."

    The problem with that point of view is still assuming there is a sharp distinction between "online life" and "real life".

    Whereas I'd argue that there is _no_ such thing as a separate "online life". Whatever you do, whatever you fill your time with, _is_ a part of your "real life". Whether you spent two hours getting plastered at the (RL) pub, or watching soccer, or mowing the lawn, or walking the dog, or whatever, it _is_ an hour of your "real life" and it _is_ something you did in "real life".

    The whole "it's not real life" distinction is, to put it very undiplomatically, just anti-gaming propaganda. (Which makes it even more weird to see some gamers propagating it too.) It's just a case of "my hobby is better than yours", or rather of a dubious premise that that case is built upon. "Your hobby isn't 'real life', therefore mine is better than yours".

    And in that "A => B" proposition, I'd contest the very premise A. It _is_ real life, I just chose to spend that time playing a game. That's all.

    So I'd say there is no such thing as having a great "online life" and a terrible "real life", other than as a very thin metaphor. In the end it _is_ real life, and you get to choose how you wish to live it. Playing games is one of the many things you can do in it.

    Yes, in any passtime, there are some trade-offs that might be involved. You spend too much money on a hobby (e.g., modding your car), you have less left for other stuff. You spend too much time on that hobby, it leaves you with less time for something else, e.g., for talking to other people, so they leave. You start skipping work for that hobby, you might get fired. Etc.

    But as with any trade-off, it's in the end something _you_ decide for yourself, rather than the clear cut case of "category A is wrong, category B is right" that the anti-gaming propaganda tries to paint it as. As long as it doesn't hurt anyone else, there is _no_ right and wrong in a matter of personal choices and preferences.

    E.g., if you think you need a wing on your car more than you need the money, there is no "right" or "wrong" in that personal preference. It's just something you chose for yourself.

    The same applies about most other trade-offs waved around as some kind of "proof" that gaming is bad. They're just trade-offs someone made for themselves. If someone chose to spend the evening playing a game, instead of, say, doing overtime to impress the boss, that's their choice and preference. No more. They decided that they need the fun more than they need to compete with the local brown-noser for a promotion. That's all.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:But here's just the thing by syousef · · Score: 1


      Whereas I'd argue that there is _no_ such thing as a separate "online life". Whatever you do, whatever you fill your time with, _is_ a part of your "real life". Whether you spent two hours getting plastered at the (RL) pub, or watching soccer, or mowing the lawn, or walking the dog, or whatever, it _is_ an hour of your "real life" and it _is_ something you did in "real life".


      You obviously really don't get it and that's worrying. Let me put it this way. Today I waged major battles in the South Pacific and in Africa. I flew planes, launched rockets, threw grenades and fired guns. I flew an F16 and crashed in the Balkans several times. I'm not injured, I'm not mentally scarred and I feel no remorse for for shooting people in the head.

      Why? BECAUSE IT WASN'T REAL. It was a freaking game. There was no pain, there were no consequences, I got no fitter and no more injured.

      There is a very distinct difference between "real life" and virtual. What I did above I did in my VIRTUAL life. What did I do in my real life? I caught the train to and from work and played A FEW GAMES on my laptop. I also played games a little when I got home. It's a good thing too. I would never EVER want to kill anyone in real life, and hope that I'm never put in a position where I feel I need to. I consider war abhorent.

      If I didn't understand and appreciate the difference between these things I'd stop. Your approach and inability to make the distinction between real life and games is a classic example of why some people are prone to do the things that got done at Columbine. Get a grip man!

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    2. Re:But here's just the thing by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Well, all that tantrum would be good and fine, if it wasn't answering some completely imaginary point that I never made.

      I'm not even sure where you got that idea from the paragraph you quoted. Exactly _how_ does my using going to a pub (in real life, not a pub in a game) or walking the dog (in real life again) or watching soccer (on your real life tv) as non-gaming examples of stuff people do to "escape reality", lead to all that "then you can't tell the difference between games and reality" tantrum? No, serously, you got me curious now.

      What I wrote is basically that there is no such thing as "living a virtual life". You never really "escaped to a virtual world", other than in a metaphoric sense. Definitely not taken literally, as bullshit journalists love to use it.

      In your example, _all_ that happened is just what you wrote here: "What did I do in my real life? I caught the train to and from work and played A FEW GAMES on my laptop. I also played games a little when I got home."

      What I'm saying is that in the end that's _all_ that happened. All that virtual life never "existed", other than as a metaphor. You were just spending some time in RL, with a RL hobby: gaming. And the gaming itself (not the F16 stuff in the game, but the RL act of sitting there and pushing buttons) _is_ a part of your real life.

      Basically my rant is aimed at the whole "you should go do stuff IRL instead of living in a game" propaganda. Well, I _am_ living In Real Life _am_ doing something IRL. I'm sitting at a keyboard and playing a game.

      I never left Real Life. I'm right here with a mouse and keyboard, having fun.

      Just because my kind of fun involves a computer game, doesn't mean I live inside the game, or any other silliness being waved around. My sitting on a chair and gaming isn't any less "real" than someone else's going to the pub or mowing the lawn.

      Basically what annoys me is the whole anti-gaming rhetoric that's one big text-book example of a "proof" by puns and plays on semantics.

      E.g., there's a (not so) subtle sleight of hand used to switch the meaning of goals/rewards/achievements/etc between in-game ones and my RL ones. Then the logic goes something like "the new armour your character got in WoW doesn't exist IRL, therefore you spent the whole evening doing/achieving nothing". That's quite literally a verbal fallacy: it switches between "in game reward" and "real life reward". In reality, I achieved something (different) IRL: I kept myself entertained for a couple of hours.

      E.g., The whole "you should stop gaming and do something 'real' instead" is based upon some sleight of hand in moving the "not real" part from game contents to gaming itself as an activity. And that's what I'm contesting. Yes, the flying an F16 never happened (IRL), but my sitting there pushing buttons did. The sitting and pushing buttons _is_ real.

      I could go on, but methinks you got the idea by now.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    3. Re:But here's just the thing by syousef · · Score: 1

      Okay let me spell it out for you. In "real life" you do something and there are consequences, good or bad. (eg. you go to the pub and make a new friend). Once your game ends, or the company pulls the plug on your virtual world, very little translates back to the real world.

      If you go out and learn to fish you learn all the aspects of fishing and actually have real experiences as opposed to simulated - you get wet and smell fish. You learn an actual usable skill. Whereas even the best simulations are somewhat simplified and few if any gaming skills are going to translate to being able to do something for real (I sure as hell wouldn't get behind the controls of an F16 just because I can do it in a computer game).

      Again if you spent an inordinate amount of time in your "real life" on a hobby that had nothing to do with computers people would still tell you there's an inbalance. If you keep yourself entertained doing ANY one thing, and neglect other aspects of your life, its called ADDICTION.

      If you don't understand what I'm saying by now, I don't think there's much point. I promise you there is no anti-gaming propaganda consipiracy.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    4. Re:But here's just the thing by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      To start with the important part:

      "Again if you spent an inordinate amount of time in your "real life" on a hobby that had nothing to do with computers people would still tell you there's an inbalance. If you keep yourself entertained doing ANY one thing, and neglect other aspects of your life, its called ADDICTION."

      Well, we can aggree on that, but then you don't need the whole rhetoric about games. If the point you're trying to make applies to doing _anything_ in excess (including then fishing or going to the pub or anything else) then wth was the purpose of the whole speech about how those are superior to games?

      "If you don't understand what I'm saying by now, I don't think there's much point. I promise you there is no anti-gaming propaganda consipiracy."

      Oh, I'm not saying there's a "conspiracy". Some people just need to attack anything new: comics, D&D, rock-and-roll music, computer games, they're all examples of stuff that was or is attacked as being some menace to society. People don't really need a conspiracy to act irrational and/or defend the status-quo.

      And so far what I understand, is what was annoying me all along: it's a bunch of fallacies strung together to serve some preconceived notion. Fallacies such as:

      1. Most importantly, this kind of argumentation tends to be just a textbook case of Begging The Question

      You have already decided that gaming is in some way "worse" (less important, "not real", whatever) than RL, and you use "facts" (read: personal judgment calls) are _based_ on that premise. E.g., that skills that apply in a game don't count, that's already based on the above premise. They're only less important _because_ you've decided already that gaming is less important.

      Yet you use them to "prove" the very proposition they were based on. Circular "logic", here we come.

      2. Starting from a false premise.

      E.g., You claim that what happens IRL has consequences, good or bad, but gaming doesn't have any. Therefore RL is somehow "better".

      Yet such RL consequences as losing a friend, losing a job, flunking exams, or even such stuff as "those chinese guys killed each other for a sword" or Columbine, are waved around all the time as just that: consequences of gaming. So gaming does have consequences. (Not surprising, since gaming is one of the things your RL self does. So if RL has consequences, it stands to reason that this one should too.)

      There goes that premise right out the window, and with it the supposed conclusion. "A => B" doesn't really prove anything when A is false.

      3. Verbal fallacies: puns and semantic plays. A.k.a., Equivocation

      Pretty much half your arguments are _based_ on the semantic ambiguity of "rewards" between "in-game rewards" and "RL rewards", or "skills" between "in-game skills" and "RL skills", or between gaming as in "what happens on the screen" (your airplane did an Immelman) and in "what you do IRL" (you sat there and pushed buttons.) The whole fallacy is trying to sneak through one meaning as a replacement for the other.

      E.g., basically the whole flawed logic that (rephrased) goes basically like "(in-game) rewards stay in the game, therefore you have no (Real Life) rewards when the game ends." Which is just a bogus case of switching a word's meaning is the middle.

      What translates to the real world were _never_ supposed to be the in-game results. The RL results were, if nothing else, simply the fact that I was entertained for X hours. That's all. Not unlike spending the same X hours watching movies, mowing the lawn, watching the news, or any other non-productive occupation.

      E.g., trying to redefine "skills" (which is a very broad term) as "the skill to duplicate IRL the exact action on the screen."

      No, you didn't learn how to fly an F16, but you might have gotten better reflexes, better eye-hand coordination in the

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    5. Re:But here's just the thing by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Once your game ends, or the company pulls the plug on your virtual world, very little translates back to the real world.

      Well you have the real money you made on Ebay selling virtual money to even bigger geeks.

      If you keep yourself entertained doing ANY one thing, and neglect other aspects of your life, its called ADDICTION.

      Does that include posting to Slashdot?

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    6. Re:But here's just the thing by syousef · · Score: 1

      I just thought I'd reply to the non-sarcastic, relevant parts of your argument. Here it is...below this line:

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  157. Re:Mmm.... not so sure.... by cluke · · Score: 2

    The best phrase I've heard to describe this sort of gratification is "Perpetually scratching a perpetual itch". That nails the MMORPG levelling treadmill pretty well.

  158. Makes sense... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    Out of the box, Night Elf females in WoW dance like strippers on a pole and bounce repeatedly when in idle mode. Tell me a well toned buxxom elf isn't going to keep you staring at your screen.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  159. hang on... by QuantumG · · Score: 0, Redundant

    what about France?

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:hang on... by Lectrik · · Score: 1
      what about France?

      I don't think France is a shade of blue
      --
      --- As to make my comment seem, by comparison, more intelegent... doodie doodie doodie poop poop poop!
  160. Virtual or real? by Serious+Simon · · Score: 1

    How much less virtual is the money in your bank account?

    1. Re:Virtual or real? by twistedhumor · · Score: 1

      yes but unlike in a game you can convert your virtual bank money into real money that you already earned. its sad shit like this happens but people do wild stuff when they feel it needs to be done

      --
      Half the world is composed of idiots the other half are people just smart enough to take indecent advantage of them
    2. Re:Virtual or real? by Retric · · Score: 1

      You can use E-Bay to turn virtual game money into virtual bank money.

  161. On "You stole my f*ckin' cloudsong!" by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    I just listened to that second link. It has a strange feeling to it listening to somebody flip out in such a way.
    Curiously enough, the guy yelling/screeching has a solid point. The guy with the calm voice acting (and being) superiour is a prime class super-asshole. He's out of reach and anynomous and thus let all standard moral fare. He probably even faked being a nice party member over days.
    I play WOW but don't know what a cloudsong is (and couldn't care less) but it is likely the yeller spent weeks or months getting one.
    Imagine a guy asking you for a shot at your laptop you worked for for weeks and then walking away with it and then convincing bystanders that it's his not yours, so being able to keep it leaving you bare handed. MMORPGs - having no legal system - work just that way. In real life you would at least try break the guys nose. ....
    I'd probably use all my computing,'bot programming and WoW Community skills to make the stealers life online as difficult as possible. Until I've vented all my frustration and satisfied my revenge that is. Would probably happend fast enough.
    WoW is a faceted MMORPG for intelligent people. Most I've met are super cool, helping me out with Items and Gold. I've increased my fortune 30-fold only by getting presents and loans from higher levels that barely knew me for 5 minutes - I have a level 17 Dwarf Priest and more than 3 Gold. Go figure.
    The above type of asshole can really spoil the fun. Luckily they are wide and far between.

    Yet it goes without saying that screeching about it doesn't change things. The yeller had been better of commentlessly logging out, going outside and chopping the next two years worth of firewood :-) .

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:On "You stole my f*ckin' cloudsong!" by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      I agree that the thief sounds like a royal asshole, and the guy who got ripped off probably worked his butt off for the item and now feels rightfully justified. But it's also important to keep in mind that this is a game. I mean, he was making real-world, physical threats. "I KNOW WHERE YOU LIVE," stuff like that.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

  162. Re:WGet a Grip... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Additionally many countries accept violence as not being a crime at all."

    Like the States?

    Considering nearly everyone in the country is forced or threatened by assault and kidnapping to pay taxes to the federal government every year that fund things like "$26,000,000 for Alaska villages through the Rural Community Advancement Program" (link). Something like agriculture subsidies. Farmers can get their own money, not mine. If they can't, they shouldn't farm.

    Or when the banks perform fractional reserve banking with your money and deflate it? Apparently that's called good economic sense. Still sounds like violent crime to me, because if you try to protect your property from them you'll be assaulted or murdered by the police or whomever. That happens to everyone with money.

  163. there is nothing special in this behavior ... by king's+jester · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In fact you "own" only a limited amount of time in your life.

    Time that you spent for other people is often regarded with money, normally we call this our work.

    Time you don't get money for ist your leisure time, you can freely decide what to do with it.

    Many people spend some of their leisure time to play games, may it virtually or may it boardgames.

    Most games do cost money, be it the money for the box with the boardgame in it, or the CD-ROM for a computer game. For many boardgames there exist extensions, that can be bought to increase the fun while playing the game. Virtual gold or a virtual sword in an online-game is such an extension.

    People like spending money for such "worthless" things, it makes them happy. There is nothing bad about spending money to increase the fun you have in your leisure time even if it is a virual sword, you are spending your money for.

  164. I get a simular feeling maintaining my Linux box by zlogic · · Score: 1

    Only yesterday I sat in front of my PC waiting for Kdevelop to be successfully compiled, and spent a whole day searching for a compiled kernel RPM which would suit my needs. When you do this for more than 10 hours, you get crazy. Like opening a filemanager and forgetting why you did that for. Horrible.
    However, most normal people aren't affected by games in such a serious way as described in the article because games get boring when you play them a lot.
    And I don't understand why people are so fond of WoW. Come on, Warcraft III had unnatural graphics because of the low-polygon models, and the game gets plain boring at times. Not to mention the really crappy Orc campaign included in WC3 Frozen Throne. I've seen WoW and that Orc campaign is exactly what WoW reminds me of.

  165. Re:Mmm.... not so sure.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well i used to see it as "escaping", but nowadays i think of it in a different way.

    People just have a need to experience more and more of everything. They want to expand their senses with technology. McLuhan type-a-thing, yeah.

  166. Just "new = evil, conforming to norm = good" by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    And before D&D, it was comics that are evil and turn people into murderers. No, seriously. And at some point it was Rock & Roll music that is evil. Etc.

    But the general pattern is more like "new = evil".

    In a lot of cases it's not that hard to find something that's a very close equivalent of the stuff they damn, but is socially acceptable.

    E.g., take chess. It was supposed all along to be basically a strategy game, modelled closely after the armies of the time. What we call a "bishop" today, was an elephant, pawns were footmen, etc.

    (Pointless trivia: originally a 4 player game, each starting with half the pieces on the 4 edges of the board. But then it was too hard to find 4 players, so two armies were joined in one, and one King became Grand Vizier. It's the piece we now call "Queen". That's, in a nutshell, why you have two of all other pieces.)

    What I'm getting at is that it's not that different from, say, Warhammer or Battletech.

    However one is socially acceptable, one supposedly makes you a nerd and a loser. And by "socially acceptable", I mean that if the CEO of a corporation said they've spent an evening playing chess at the club, it would be ok. Now picture a CEO of a bank saying they've spent an evening at the game shop playing Warhammer and Battletech, and you'll have some shocked and outraged shareholders and clients.

    And from there to computers the step isn't even as big as some people would paint it. A lot of games are a verbatim implementation of some existing board game. (E.g., see Megamek for an excellent Battletech implementation. And allegedly Europa Universalis was also mostly a board game to PC game conversion.) Others are more complex and making better use of what a computer can do, but still not _that_ far from those boardgame roots.

    Except this time I'm expected to believe that the mere addition of a computer into the mix, makes the game not just "nerdy" but outright evil and/or a mental health hazard.

    Why? What's that different? What makes the exact same Battletech boards and rules and pieces so dangerous because they're on a computer?

    Seems to me like the difference is whether it's already filed under "socially acceptable" or new and deviating from the comfortable norm. Basically that the newer something is, the more people will feel a need to attack it and shout you back into the conformist herd.

    Basically what I'm saying is that the real underlying problem isn't that 3-4 people stabbed each other with knitting needles. The problem is just whether something is new. If knitting had just been invented in the 80's and growing in popularity ever since, then yes, you'd most likely have people feeling a need to fight against this new threat to "normality".

    Then they'd drag out every single case where someone stabbed someone with a knitting needle, or even merely pricked their own finger, and put those on display as definitive proof that knitting is evil. And every case where someone lost their job and, unrelated, had knitting as a hobby, would be dragged out as "proof" that knitting makes people lose contact with reality. And so on.

    And then 30 years pass, and people find another new thing to treat as a threat.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  167. Re:Well by Zanthor · · Score: 1

    As a veteran gamer and leader of a large organization in WoW and formerly EQ, AC and UO...

    I've got members of my guild that purchase items with RL cash - it is a matter of what your time is worth.

    For example, I've purchased gold from http://www.mysupersales.com/ and http://www.playerauctions.com/ myself. The reasoning behind this is that I spend some of my free time doing side work for $50 an hour, that said the time it takes me to earn $50 is far less than it takes me to earn 500 Gold in WoW. Time vs Investment.

    A friend of mine spent RL Money on a very nice mace, the mace it's self would have gone for the better part of 2500 gold, the seller was originally asking for gold, but readily gave up his PayPal account information when my friend offered another form of compensation for the virtual item.

    --

    Zanthor

  168. Making things by loadquo · · Score: 1

    You picked trivial thinsg that most people wouldn't classify as productive. But what about that which puts us apart from Bacteria, but is considered worthwhile, the construction of things of practical value. Whether it be constructing a new theory of physics or building a better mouse trap, people admire the constructors if they put in long hours of dedication. And get something useful out at the end... otherwise they are cranks. It is this, not the ephemera of online games and sports that puts us apart from animals. So your implicit formula of Humans = animals + hobbies I would disagree with.

  169. Mod parent down... by Evro · · Score: 1

    The screenshot in the background of that page is from WoW, the recording is not; the recording is from Dark Age of Camelot, and is probably fake, like the Leeroy Jenkins recording.

    --
    rooooar
  170. Why Doesn't Blizzard sell gold to players directly by spicydragonz · · Score: 1

    If there is a market for it why is blizzard letting sweat shop s take the profit. Sell to players directly and break the market.

  171. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would certainly piss me off to have this happen to me but I'd just fume for a few days and then put it out of my mind. It wouldn't even occur to me to actually seek the person out and then kill him. With this type of person, it was going to happen sooner or later. If it weren't virtual swords, it would have been sneakers or iPods or money or women. Well, probably not women.

  172. Re:Well by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's like somebody getting murdered over a $3000 baseball card. The card, in reality, isn't worth much more than the paper it is printed on. But to the people buying and selling cards, it is worth that much.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  173. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "but I'd just fume for a few days and then put it out of my mind"

    Alright, I'll go over to your house right now and steal the $600 you were probably going to pay your rent with. In a few days you'd just forget it anyways so why bother being upset?

  174. Re:I get a simular feeling maintaining my Linux bo by tenco · · Score: 1
    spent a whole day searching for a compiled kernel RPM which would suit my needs.

    *sighs* Now i really understand the proverb about the "give a man a fish"-thingy...

  175. meek at heart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    life becomes so much easier when you do not have to face people. thats the reason why people chat, why they send messages on cellphones (aka texting), talk on the phone etc. why they flirt or break up without seeing others faces.
    its also the reason why killing with a gun is easier than with a sword - it requires less work and less personal involvement, you`ll no longer see the effects face to face. mentally weak people will always opt for easier over easy. personally i consider this a very sad example of mental weaknesses and lacking control. I have been living for two years without a TV already, still do not miss it. i doubt the same would be possible for me without email, though, as it is one of the few ways of communication with people, since i`m more than often working 12-14h a day recently. take that, add 3 hours commute, and you`ll realize that IT people are hermits by profession, not by choice (yeah, right, i could also not take the money and go find some bones to gnaw behind the chinese fastfood shop).

    moral of the story - the more time we spend with earning our upkeep, the more agressive and the more detached we become.

  176. OMG! by TonFTP · · Score: 1

    OMG news flash you can buy in game money online for real money! Ah....yeah this has been availabe for other MMORPG long before WoW. EQ, Eve Online, etc... I have included some examples http://www.mysupersale.com/ http://www.ige.com/

  177. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe you just seriously suggested that Jack Chick is a source for non-biased information. That's like going to the neighborhood pedophile and asking whether kids should be having sex.:-P

  178. Re:Well by tofucubes · · Score: 1

    people here seem to be talking about killing like if they had enough money from the murder then it's okay, that seems crazy to me

    --
    Some people believe 1-1=3 and for the sake of being politically correct, we should respect their differences
  179. Canadian vs. American crime rates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am always amazed when an american thinks the crime rates in the states are comparable to other places in the world. Where are we talking about? Iraq? Come up to Canada. We have murders. They make the news because they happen once in a while... Here is an OFFICIAL data site to support my beliefs. http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/faits/facts08-02_e.s html/ Enjoy

  180. You're just now catching on? by meethade · · Score: 1

    This has been going on since the game started. Catch up!

  181. hmmmm by Xud · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in high school I skipped a week to play UO, I rember i alomst got held back, I rember how angry my parents were, I rember that being the worst possible time in my life.

    At the time I was very introvert and anti-social, So playing UO counter-acted that completly.

    It seems that there is a link between self-image and the length of time u spend on an MMO. Just think about it

  182. Could Relate... by u16084 · · Score: 0

    I can some what relate to the article, Im not a WoW player, but have spent my share of time playing SWG. After about 2 years of gameplay, i sometimes I do sit back and ponder to myself, WTF am i doing?? But my in my case, i dont have my real life/game life mixed up, the line is clear, but for some reason, i keep coming back. As for spending Real money for Credits/Gold etc, I find it silly, but yet, my initial game play did start with a purchase of Credits on Ebay "To get the ball rolling"

    --
    -- I Dont Deserve A Sig I Have Bad Karma
  183. Re:Well by mikael · · Score: 1

    Any student or worker can tell you of a time when they became upset after losing a coursework, report or spreadsheet or even the contents of an entire disk drive.

    The items didn't exist physically except as the spin orientation of some electrons in an ferromagnetic material.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  184. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Actually people have been murdered for a pair of shoes... Instead of blaming the obsession, look at the person... It takes someone with some real issues to kill someone... Almost sounds like people are trying to drudge up the old Dungeon And Dragons causes people to kill people again... When the demented will always be demented... And it doesn't matter what medium you put them in...

  185. Get your facts straight by Smelly+Toejam · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I love the quality of journalism on slashdot. The guy who killed his friend over the mmorpg sword was chinese not korean. Post your source before attempting to tarnish the koreans' image (lol...)

    1. Re:Get your facts straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw, c'mon. We all know that it was a dirty Korean that did it. Quitcha lyin'.

  186. Re:Why Doesn't Blizzard sell gold to players direc by TeflonTB · · Score: 1

    For the same reason that when you want money you can't just go print off some more at the printing presses. It would flood the market. Blizzard ~= the government, ige, mysupersales ~= banks, stocks, etc ?

  187. What's so unreal about it? by Gorimek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That sword is no less real than the money in your bank account. Both exist only as bits on a disk drive at some server farm.

    Computers are real, as are the people using them. I don't know why they should be considered less 'real' than any other human activity.

    1. Re:What's so unreal about it? by jerryodom · · Score: 1
      Because to people who don't understand what that means to others its still just a game. Once other people gain perspective it'll be just like any other human activity.

      I wonder how many Judges, Senators or Representatives have ever played an online RPG? Not many I'm sure.

      --
      For some reason I refuse to use either spell check or the spacebar properly.
  188. Re:Well by andyt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    people here seem to be talking about killing like if they had enough money from the murder then it's okay, that seems crazy to me

    Nah, of course it isn't okay. What we're saying is, is that it is conceptually understandable.

    If you say "some guy killed another guy for stealing his imaginary sword", the immediate response is "wtf?"

    If you say "some guy killed another guy for stealing 3 grand from him", the response is more, "oh. one more murderer in this wonderful world of ours."

    You don't condone it, but you can sort of see why he might want to do it.

  189. Re:Well by Panaphonix · · Score: 1

    Here, here. Perhaps one day the virtual world will eclipse the real world, drawing the masses into it. Then maybe sports would be enjoyed for sport, music and movies would be good once again, and life would be left to those who choose to live it.

  190. Say that to my brother... by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 1, Insightful

    He looks like bruce lee, but while growing up HE was the fatass.

    I agree that overworking is bad too, but exactly the point, most people DONT work out at all, don't jog, swim, etc. Then they eat fast food like it was handed to them by whatever god they worship as their only salvation.

    Then, a year and 30 lbs later, they wonder "what happened?"

    I know, I did that. I'm 10 lbs down this year alone and 20 to go. (I started at just around 215/220 last year when I left IT.)

    Aiming for 160 lbs as a settling weight (for my 5'9" height) should be okay. The problem is that I was in good shape, and then I went into IT, worked my ass off, ate tons of junk food due to "no time" (I was lazy and stopped cooking my own meals at night, and you'd be amazed how quickly mc'donalds and burger king add up).

    Then I quit IT and got into a different line of work (involves some labor, some driving and less stress, and somewhat more time off). Now I find the time to do everything, from gaming to dating and all that (okay very little dating, but I do get lucky occasionally).

    The point is, staying fit isn't "a talent" or "genetics".

    If one listens to those lazy bitches quoting "I'm genetically predisposed to...[name your malaise]" then, I'm prone to being fat, as is my brother, but with a healthy diet, and a bit of work, anyone can be in good shape. (And that helps one consume far less coffee trying to stay awake.) I'm not advertising any products, or taking any. And I do eat meat :) Just that we figured out it takes moderation and a bit of thinking.

    As a side note: I can focus extremely well and suffer very little trouble in public speaking, despite having been "diagnosed" with ADHD and OCD (obsessive compulsive disorder) and social anxiety. Oh, and I don't take any drugs for it. But I do take responsability for my actions... which leads into:

    I think the main issue we should discuss is that people are inherently lazy, ignorant (and often stupid) cowards in our country and wanting someone else to do everything for them. I was using myself as an example because I'm that "radical" libertarian type who thinks that if you are too lazy to do it yourself, you should probably go plug into some machine to breathe and eat for you and die of heart failure and stop leeching off the rest of us when you go on life support. I don't say "lets kill them" I simply say "lets give them what they want, put them on a farm where they'll never see the sun again except in VR, and let them get as fat as they want, until the veins in their brain burst and they die, of their own doing."

    --
    " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    1. Re:Say that to my brother... by CFTM · · Score: 1

      Good luck losing the rest of that weight man; been there done that and it's a tough road but it's well worth it.

  191. Re: Oh please by shambalagoon · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but that's absolutely retarded. You clearly have no experience of or real knowledge of pot. No drug I've ever tried (and that's a fair number) has ever changed my personality. No one who wouldnt rape or assault withOUT the influence of a drug would do so under the influence of that drug. That's just throwing a red herring into the mix so the guy committing the crime can divest himself of responsibility. Or so that you can do it for him.

  192. Re:Well by Thangodin · · Score: 1

    The sword was worth a good 5000 yuan on the open market. Adjusting that for GDP, that's around $3000 in the US.

    In a society where factory workers often make less than a dollar a day, that's a lot more than $3000 is worth to an American. To some people, that's 10 years pay, so it's more like $300,000 to an American. Nothing justifies murder, but it gives you an idea of the emotional impact.

  193. Re:GP Score 2???? by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

    I'm green with envy.

    --
    Live forever, or die trying.
  194. Re:Well by prell · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It does seem to be a similar phenomenon in different clothes. Frustration, desire, violence. The only things that separate the two are.. the same phenomena :-) At least it seems like that. Your post reminded me of this passage from a book I just started reading online:
    Go to a party. Listen to the laughter, that brittle-tongued voice that says fun on the surface and fear underneath. Feel the tension, feel the pressure. Nobody really relaxes. They are faking it. Go to a ball game. Watch the fan in the stand. Watch the irrational fit of anger. Watch the uncontrolled frustration bubbling forth from people that masquerades under the guise of enthusiasm, or team spirit. Booing, cat-calls and unbridled egotism in the name of team loyalty. Drunkenness, fights in the stands. These are the people trying desperately to release tension from within. These are not people who are at peace with themselves. Watch the news on TV. Listen to the lyrics in popular songs. You find the same theme repeated over and over in variations. Jealousy, suffering, discontent and stress.
    Here's the book!
  195. Re:Well by Kombat · · Score: 1

    In a society where factory workers often make less than a dollar a day, that's a lot more than $3000 is worth to an American.

    Uhm, no. That 5000 yuan is as valuable to them as $3000 USD would be to a USAmerican. That's why it's called an "exchange rate." $3000 US is the comparable amount, in US dollars, that would be equivalent to the same buying power in the US as 5000 yuan would be in their country.

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  196. Maybe this will help. by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 1

    About 6 years ago, when I was in better shape, I put in some time on a truck unloading team. I was right out of high school.

    I was in good shape, but my back was starting to feel strain. Most of it was because working "safe" vs working "fast" are two different things and they wanted us working fast. I started arriving half hour early, and doing stretches and a few dozen situps. Also, I paid attention to how I was lifting things, and though a bit slower at times, I didn't suffer any injuries and my back pain went away without pills. I was sore though, I haven't found a way around that, so anyone with advice, please add :)

    --
    " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    1. Re:Maybe this will help. by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 1

      Try branch chain amino acids: L-leucine, L-valine, and L-isoleucine. I take those before any weightlifting or strenuous activity, and they reduce my next-day soreness to almost nothing. You still need rest and recovery, so don't let the lack of soreness fool you into thinking you can lift more often. I don't use any other supplements besides whey protein powder.

      BCAA's are cheap and safe even in massive doses, so it's worth a shot. Some people say they don't work, and perhaps they don't for some. But they have really enabled me to stick to a resistance training workout without having to worry about excessive muscle soreness.

      You were doing your stretching BEFORE your exertion, but stretching the muscle thoroughly AFTER you exert it is a great help to alleviate the next-day muscle soreness. Don't just flop down on the couch after you lift, make sure you stretch. Yoga or pilates can really help your flexibility.

      Also, nothing will help you avoid painful injury if you are lifting with bad form.

      --
      "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
    2. Re:Maybe this will help. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      take 10 minutes afterwards to stretch down and give yerself a quick stretch when you go on break. We do this after any sport, and your body will love you for it the next day. Hockey and Football 5 times a week combined will put a strain on you, and I used to have the aches the next day.. like a mucles exaustion almost, but since I started stretching after, that's all a thing of the past. I'm 27 and can still get through an Aussie football game, stretch down afterwards and be good to go for hockey the next day.

  197. A Pac-Man Story by lys1123 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was talking to a couple, who are friends of my father's, and we were talking about video game addiction. When the subject came up the woman turned to her husband and said, "Oh God, remember how many times we stayed up all night playing Pac-Man and then had to go into work without any sleep or even call in occasionally."

    I was floored. Pac-Man? But they explained that they would compete with each other, taking turns and getting higher and higher scores until they realized it was daybreak.

    So, spending hours and hours playing a game to the detriment of your real world responsibilities is not something that can be attributed to MMORPGs.

  198. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree that you can get attached to stuff in game. BUt taking it too far (such as killing someone IRL) is really just way too far. One of the harsh realities of roleplaying is that noting is certain. your character can die at any moment, you can lose all your stuff. I think one problem is online gamers who never played and pen and paper games and so never got to really understand that DM's (through thieves, bandits, and any number of other monsters and villanous NPC's) can just take your stuff, off your character, and basically you have to grin and bear it. What we have now are tons of gamers who have never seen a die in their lives and who think that their flaming sword is a right they earned that will be a permanant part of their lives. Sorry, charlie. Get over it and enjoy the game.

    Course, another problem is that this isn't a p&p game. You can't really act functionally without your powerful magic items in the upper levels of wow. If you're playing D&Dn and you lose your holy sword you can go get it back because the thief who stole it can't just leave the world whenever you show up or put it in a bank that you can't access.

    The thing about thieves in p&p games is that you can get back at them and win your things back. Not the case in WOW.

  199. Re:GP Score 2???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to Douglas Adams, there exists a super-intelligent shade of the color blue!

  200. Re:I get a simular feeling maintaining my Linux bo by MrCopilot · · Score: 1
    Kanotix http://kanotix.com/files/kanotix/

    #1 Takes 15 minutes to install the OS from LiveCD.
    #2 apt-get install kdevelop3*

    done. You'll thank me later. Pretty much any Debian will suit your needs, and get you out of this 10hr maintainability problem.

    Course you could be one of those sadistic Gentoo users.

    Did ya try here?http://www.kdevelop.org/index.html?filename=3 .2/download.html

    10Hrs, Wow. I have only hit this mark creating/transcoding DVDs. Although Trolltech's QT can be a bitch to compile on a slow machine.

    --
    OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
  201. Re: Oh please by arkanes · · Score: 1

    *especially* pot. In terms of it's influence on your behavior, it's far less signifigant than any "hard" drug, or even alcohol. And I've never even heard of someone blacking out on pot, not even from the rather ridiculously over-dramatized anti-drug videos they used to show us in high school.

  202. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Silly mods. Not only is it offtopic, but the website he links to does NOT bolster his argument. He's just proven that all you have to do is bluster a bit and act like you know what you're talking about and you'll get modded up as +insightful when you're nothing of the sort.

    Score one for the trolls...

  203. Re:Mmm.... not so sure.... by ahoehn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I largely agree with your ideas about humanity's desire to escape reality, but I've also found from personal experience that it's possible to replace that escape from reality with reality that you truely enjoy.
          During highschool and my first couple years of college, I played quite a few videogames, read books almost constantly, and went to movies frequently. But, for the past couple of years, I've replaced most of that with a girlfriend. We simply spent lots of time together, doing more "real" things, walking, talking, playing, - generally just being together.
          During that time, my video game playing/book reading/movie watching was reduced by something like 3/4ths. But, now that we're seperated by an 18hour drive or $300 flight, I've noticed that I'm again reading lots of books, watching a couple movies a week, and, most disturbingly, playing WoW :)
        I've found that the less enjoyable my reality is, the more I need to escape from it.

    --
    Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
  204. Britain, Australia top U.S. in violent crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am always amazed when an american thinks the crime rates in the states are comparable to other places in the world.

    Well, they are. Sorry if that "amazes" you. America's crime rates, with the exception of murder which has been dropping for a decade now, are all lower than Europe's and other countries. Facts supported by the numbers.

    U.S. crime is actually at an all-time 30-year low. And here's an article: Britain, Australia top U.S. in violent crime. The U.S. wasn't even in the top 10!

  205. Re:Well by happyemoticon · · Score: 1

    3000 may be the comparable amount in terms of purchasing power, but external to those exchange rate differences, your average east asian laborer makes far less proportionally. I think that's what GP was stabbing at.

    However, the comparison is probably not entirely valid, since people who own a computer and spend evenings farming away in WoW probably don't live on unskilled laborer wages.

  206. Semantics by adnausium · · Score: 1

    The debate about the reseasons or roots to why these people play (and get obsessed by) these video games (or other forms of entertainment) could go on forever. After reading all the comments here, I find that most of you are missing the big picture. Remeber the choice Cypher makes in "The Matrix"...how many people would make the same decision if given a similar choice. Its like choosing the better of two hells. "So Bob, you can choose to either live out your days: a.)working in your 5x7 cube, going home to ur tiny apartment, repeating failed dating attempts, deal with all the emotional and physical pains life has to offer like depression and stubbing your toe OR b.)You can be kept on life support in a tube of goo with the assurance of a long life of battling virtual monsters, saving the princess, collecting coins and even if you fail...you can always load a save game....its your call Bob" WWMD? (what would mario do?)

    --
    Don't ya hate it when the correct spelling of your favorite screen name is taken?
  207. Re:Well by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, the GP did a pretty good job equating the two, on the exchange rate market, 5000 yuan is worth about $600 but since the amount of wealth required for a similar standard of living differs, the poster appears to have compared it to wages or something similar. Well trained factory workers make more than a dollar a day, but still considerably less than their counterparts in the US.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  208. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    must. post. anonymously. out. of. fear. of. retribution. by. blizzard.

    I've been playing WOW for about two months now and see this whole vitual/real issuse this way:

    Blizzard creates virtual products as real as possible to make the players believe they are real in the virtual world. However, when a problem arises, Blizzard can claim it's virtual and claim ownershop and sweep the issue under the table. But to the rest of the playing world, it's real as life itself. Blizzard only cares because they're getting thier $50M a month in $14.95/mo fees. Blizzard wins. Customer lose.

  209. Re:GP Score 2???? by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

    From your sig "Doesn't the sink make the urinal redundant?"

    I thought this was brilliant so I ran the idea past my wife. She said she didn't want urinal mints in her sink.

  210. Who is downmodding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Again, he's at -1....it's cool to disagree with someone, but this guy is posting real links to support his argument. America isn't some crime haven. Most of our crime rates are lower than the UK's and Canada's, and the countries with the strictest gun control like Australia are actually #1 in violent crime. who is modding him down and why?!

  211. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...I speculate that the violent outbreaks over video games isn't even perpetuated by the geeks and nerds, it's a result of video games/PC Games becoming easier and popular enough that the same sick people who kill people over a football game are now playing video games."

    While I mostly agree, I don't agree with your next statement:

    "People weren't killing each other when games were BBS style and you had to be a true nerd to even figure out how to connect, play them, and appreciate the ASCII art."

    Through (unfortunate) personal experience, I had met quite a few "joe-psycho" types during the BBS days. By the late 80's, logging onto a BBS was not complicated. And, I have seen psycho nerds too.

    Mostly the ones who caused trouble were the mid-teen types who had more time to sit around during the day than anyone else. If it wasn't for the BBS, they'd be in a gang.

  212. Favorite Quote: "Tip of the Assberg" by KnarfO · · Score: 1

    Do you see? Do you see!??

    Runner up: "Jules Vern was wrong when he said the future is a jock strap made of bees"

    --


    "Creativity is allowing ones self to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep" - Scott Adams
  213. Re:GP Score 2???? by Ced_Ex · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought this was brilliant so I ran the idea past my wife. She said she didn't want urinal mints in her sink.

    That was your first mistake.

    It's easier to ask for forgiveness than for permission.

    --
    Live forever, or die trying.
  214. Re:Well by enjerth · · Score: 1

    Speaking of porn an violence (from your sig)...

    FTA: '...as author H.G. Wells predicted, "the future will accost us with boob-slapping ferocity."'

    What a wonderful, affectionate outlook on the future. I'm looking forward to experiencing the ferocious boob-slapping. I've never been so proud of a bruised face and bloodied nose.

  215. replacing "escape" ... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Yeah... I know exactly what you mean. I was just thinking about that for a while before writing this reply. I think my conclusion is, it's probably best to be as "well rounded" an individual as possible. In other words, yes - you *can* be entertained without "escaping reality" at all; whether that means "quality time" spent with someone you love, or simply doing a job that you truly enjoy doing. But at some point, it's still not a bad idea to delve into some of the more constructive forms of "escape entertainment". Reading books or watching movies or a play, catching some live music, or even playing video games are all ways to enjoy the artistic works someone else put effort into creating for you.

    Therefore, even if you could be entertained 100% of the time without resorting to escapist entertainment provided by the culture around you, I'm not sure that's "ideal" or even a "worthy pursuit". I think the trick is just "moderation in all things".

  216. Re:Well by cashman73 · · Score: 1

    It's just fascinating how the average person in China doesn't buy, "quality consumer goods," (by U.S. stands), yet in the U.S., 90% of our, "quality consumer goods," are manufactured in China. Either that, or it just proves that our standards aren't as high as we originally thought,...

  217. I wish you much luck man by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 1

    And don't give up even when the going gets rough. The best part is finishing up a harder workout a month or two down the road and realizing that not only have you lost the weight, but you're stronger, faster, and you feel more alive and less prone to crashing on the couch devoid of energy. (Better in bed from what I've been told too, but don't let that be the ONLY motivation for being in shape ;)

    I don't have kids, and I doubt I can handle having them right now... mostly because I'm free spirited and could not handle the shackles marriage and kids would place on me.

    As for your other question, my first motivation was looking back to my childhood which was half geek half jock (computer geek, but did karate, judo, soccer, swimming and played chess competitively) and realizing that I was in great shape as a child. I looked at myself and, after the shock wore off, I grabbed my brother, who is a runner and is in spectacular shape, and we took off jogging. What we were never taught in 7 years of consecutive gym class, as I'm sure everyone should recall the "mile run" and "fitness tests" which only worked for those who already knew how to run/jog/workout in middle and high school, I learned in one week from him. It is still not easy, and it is a battle of wills, but in one month I moved up from barely doing half a mile and falling over, to jogging 2 miles straight and having room to sprint the last quarter mile (some of my athletic abilities remained buried underneath the fat, but I felt at times as if I were going to drop and just give up... main thing: I didn't.)

    That being said, know that I was a hard core gamer (and I played pretty much everything except for EQ 2 and WoW, and I still am, but I mostly play single player things where I can save or savestate (emulators) and just unplug and go do what I have to. I also liked Counterstrike because one could fire it up on a short break, shoot up a few rounds of terrorism/counterterrorism mayhem, and shutdown and go back to other things (it works in linux too and makes for GREAT lan parties). The only difference now, is that I know when to unplug and go take care of issues that require attention.

    Besides, being that I'm a linux geek, despite getting almost every game to run in Wine and Cedega, I don't game as much as I used to, I find myself reading, studying, (and blowing off about 1 hour a day on /. and /.TFA's for kicks).

    I think the main thing is feeling free, and feeling good, and knowing that I'm accomplishing something for myself at a very low cost (that being only time and effort). Plus, nobody can make a healthy diet and an exercise regimen illegal or declare it "unhealthy based on studies that show $X".

    PS - my toughest challenge was cutting down on portion size at fast food places. I still hit Taco Bell occasionally (geek thing I guess) but I only get one thing off the menu... no sodas and no side dishes... and I leave full and feeling good. This, again, not only benefitted my wellness, but it has allowed my wallet to retain a sizeable chunk of change (3.99 meal suddenly becomes 1.99, and on days I eat at home or pack lunch at work, its even cheaper). I do keep a spreadsheet with what I eat, calorie count, fat calories, etc. I pretty much engineer my daily allowances to allow me to eat what I want and still not go over my allotment.

    --
    " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
  218. geeks aren't saner, there are just fewer of us by quest(answer)ion · · Score: 1

    the issue here is the depth of the obsession, and that's hardly linked to intelligence or tech-savvy. you could definitely argue that intelligence certainly helps one have perspective about what to kill someone over, but it isn't necessary, and intelligence doesn't guarantee that kind of common sense.

    the expansion of gaming beyond an elite group of intelligentsia has certainly changed what games are, but it's really only the increased size of the gaming community that makes it more likely that people will become obsessed and kill each other over in-game items or events. fewer people playing = fewer bad eggs. simple statistics, nothing to do with the type of people playing and any particular flaws that may or may not be associated with a particular demographic playing.

    hell, you could even argue to the contrary that the very commitment and dedication involved in being a true dork predisposes one to a certain kind of obsession with imaginary things, but i think most self-declared geeks might take issue with that.

    i know i would.

    --
    /. is what happens when geeks talk. get used to it.
  219. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An interesting way of looking at it, I only wish I had mod points.

  220. ahem. by garote · · Score: 1

    "You're quite the self-righteous little prick aren't you"

    Yes, you are. Read back through your posts. You're pulling the same tired forum crap that narcissists have been doing for years - busting up parent messages into arbitrary excerpts and then "refuting" the pieces without context, in order to sound "right", and feed your ego. The internet is chock full of it, and Slashdot is no exception. Say what you mean and then get out of the forum.

  221. Agreed, and conversely... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...having been a nearly 4.0 student during my college years, a pen'n'paper RPG nut back when, a CRPG/MUD nut later on, and the furthest thing from a jock, I must say that I know plenty of nerds and misfits that are or were heavy drug users, myself included. It was responsible for my inability to maintain that lofty 4.0 average. The Harvard fellers I swung with were just a *lot* smarter than I was, and could manage to keep their grades up while spending a little less than half of the week stoned, tweaked, tripping, rolling, or some combination thereof. I thought the same of myself, but I was terribly wrong about that :-).

    The greatest of the stimulant abusers I've known were MMO gamers, and I say this honestly. One can game for *very* long stretches when fueled by bumps of cocaine or hits of speed. The bright ones were able to freelance for fair sums, blow it on... blow... and then skip class for a week while snorting and level-grinding. Sure, coke-snorting ex-jock lawyers can go hit the town and ride their egos, but bars close, bladders fill, stomachs empty, and someone still has to drive home. MMO gamers, on the other hand, are snug and secure in their own homes, without any distractions, and with no inconvenient need to conceal their activities.

    With regards to (ab)use of drugs and alcohol by jocks and geeks, the only difference I've ever noticed is that geeks drink better beer.

  222. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i remember one BBS get together at a pizza place, some dude pulled a katana on another guy for a fight they started in Tele-Arena. this was probably 94 or 95.

    who the hell carries a katana with them? a geek, who's crazy enough to pull it on a guy over a fight that started in an imaginary playland on a majorbbs game.

  223. Re:Well by iendedi · · Score: 1
    Go to a party. Listen to the laughter, that brittle-tongued voice that says fun on the surface and fear underneath. Feel the tension, feel the pressure. Nobody really relaxes. They are faking it.
    Dude. No. You are experiencing the common consensus effect, where you believe that everyone else experiences the world in the same way you do and will read their body language and other cues in the same manner that you would read your own. It is much more likely that the uncomfortable laughter is because the chick laughing really wants to talk to the guy across the room rather than her boyfriend or the guy laughing is imagining the girl next to him naked. Trust me, people are comfortable at these things.
    Go to a ball game. Watch the fan in the stand. Watch the irrational fit of anger. Watch the uncontrolled frustration bubbling forth from people that masquerades under the guise of enthusiasm, or team spirit. Booing, cat-calls and unbridled egotism in the name of team loyalty. Drunkenness, fights in the stands. These are the people trying desperately to release tension from within. These are not people who are at peace with themselves.
    Dude, I think you might need to get some help. Sounds like you have some emotional issues that you are projecting on the world. There really are lots of people who are exactly what they seem to be and are not erupting in emotional volcanism like you are suggesting.
    Watch the news on TV. Listen to the lyrics in popular songs. You find the same theme repeated over and over in variations. Jealousy, suffering, discontent and stress.
    That is your ink-blot. There are many others.
    --

    It is your personal duty to fight for what is right on a daily basis. Ignoring injustice is identical to approving
  224. WTF? by 1337W422102 · · Score: 1

    Geez, I thought I had no life.

  225. Phew by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

    Glad I don't play any MMORPGs... yet. Some people take things too seriously. I've heard a story in a reputable PC magazine (maximum pc) about someone who died after play on the computer at a cyber cafe non stop for 21 hours or so. But to say that this is new is clearly wrong. People always get obsessed over something that takes up a good part of their life. A couple weeks ago I read a story in the newspaper about a kid who accidentally killed an older kid after a baseball game because he had lost and thought the older kid was being mean or something.

    --
    All your base are belong to Wii.
  226. Re:I get a simular feeling maintaining my Linux bo by zlogic · · Score: 1

    I know, I have Ubuntu installed on my PC. I've had a thought of apt-get install kubuntu-desktop, but then had this stupid idea of trying Mandrake 10.1.
    I've already returned to Ubuntu.

  227. Re:Well by NeoSapian · · Score: 1

    That has got to be one the best posts I've ever read. "your average joe-psycho can hop in and get pissed off in record time." That is frigging classic. And im not being sarcastic. LOL.

  228. Founded In Addiction by NeoSapian · · Score: 1

    All this madness is founded in addiction. It is becoming semantics to argue if a game is real or not anymore. Because it is becoming so realistic. The people you interact with are real. This is what counts. Your not just playing a single-player fantasy experience. What brings it to an all new level is that it is real. That its live with other people through a different body and experience. Your arms, fingers, and eyes merely become an interface and you are immersed in another world for all intents and purposes.

    The real core of it is addiction. Addicted to the positive emotions and feelings extracted from these experiences. Its critically simple that when rewarded our minds create pleasure that we seek out over and over again.

    A sword, regardless of its independent value, wouldn't be worth killing if there wasn't a world that made it real to exist in. So this implies that the real reason someone valued the sword was to have that sword in that particular world. An equally rare sword in a less popular game world wouldn't be as worthy. The addiction to the experience creates these perceived values. Perceived friends, marriages, alliances, and experiences.

    In this way they should be looked no differently upon than a drug. What is the purpose of a drug? To help you (or force you) to escape reality. Hmmm... interesting parallels. And the qualities of addiction are present. You take away a hardcore MMO player of WoW or example and they WILL experience withdrawals. The psychological addiction is to blame.

    Cancer sticks, beer, wine, it doesn't matter. People find things to be addicted to.

    Lets also consider that we can't be surprised that there was 1 psycho killer out of 3.5 million people. People kill people every day and it far outweighs that ratio. Not that its right or good. But the sheer numbers of the population of that game world and the diversity... its bound to happen by statistics alone.

  229. Thank You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank You...

    I could not agree more, but seeing this thread pan out was kind of interesting.

    "Fighting over the internet is like a race in the special olympics. Even if you win you're still a retard."

    PS: To the parent I will reiterate that I strongly advise you and your girlfriend to seek psychiatric counseling.

  230. No One wants to join your cult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drop out. Turn on. Tune in.
    Tune in. Turn on. Drop out.
    Turn on. Tune in. Drop out.
    Drop out. Tune in. Turn on.
    Turn on. Tune in. Drop Out.

    Drug users know about meditation.

  231. Re:Zero players before 1998? Excuse me? by marx · · Score: 1
    No.. it does not have 50000 simultaneous players. Have you even played the game? On my server we even had problems getting a 40vs40 battleground game going because of too few players in the queue. I think 5000 is a reasonable estimate during peak hours. There were MUDs with 1000 simultaneous players, so I don't really see what's new with World of Warcraft which makes it massive.

    You get kicked off the server if you're AFK for 30 mins or so, so 90% of the population are probably not AFK in inns.

  232. Re:Zero players before 1998? Excuse me? by craznar · · Score: 1

    Played game, and MMORPG doesn't have an S in it....

    --
    EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
  233. Nobody is downmodding. Liar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides which, you're neither informative nor insightful bonch. So why don't you go back into your little troll hidey-hole now?