Slashdot Mirror


Optimus Keyboard With OLED Display Keys

Koskun writes "What appears to be a Russian design company has on their website a keyboard in which the keys are using OLED to display what function the keys represent. The product is Art. Lebedev Studio's Optimus Keyboard. The uses of this could be amazing. They have pictures of layouts for Photoshop and Quake, as well as a QWERTY and Russian. Here's hoping that this will make it to a production model and not just a design model."

540 comments

  1. Good Idea, Bad Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Coral Cache Link

    It's not even a "design model". It's a "rendered model". Sweet concept. You'd spend a bloody fortune on 116 individual color OLED displays - in several sizes - and all the circuitry, interfacing, and drivers to run them. I see that they are Macintosh fans, though.

    1. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Gnascher · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a great idea ... but utterly fake.

      These guys are digital artists ... not keyboard manufacturers.

      It's a really neat idea, and one that may even some day be created. I'd imagine that it would be prohibitively expensive to do today though.

      --
      It's not my fault! It was this way when I got here.
    2. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by kuzb · · Score: 1

      I see that they are Macintosh fans, though.

      Yes, but I'll try not to hold it against them. It's a really nice looking design concept.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    3. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by zev1983 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I also was thinking about this, but only a few months ago. The thing is you'd have to have wires going up into every single key to have each one light up individually like that, which would seem like a pain in the ass to mass manufacture at an affordable price. Although there's probably a better method that uses some sort of connection that connects when you clip on th key, I don't really know much about this type of stuff. But if you were able to mass manufacture the keys with that printable OLED tech I've heard about it just might make it. It would be cool to see this in ergonimic designs like the ones from kinesis-ergo.com. I'd buy one of those with the picture keys and try out all the different ergomic keyboard layouts I keep hearing about on /.

      You could have a bunch of other nifty, eye candy features in it, like being able to display pictures, or even motion over the whole keyboard if refresh was fast enough, though displaying a big picture would be the easiest. I would love to have an EQ going on my keyboard synced to music, that would really spruce up my desk!

      Also as an added bonus you can finally have a Breasts Key!

    4. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Otter · · Score: 4, Interesting
      They do seem to make some real stuff, some of which is pretty sweet looking. (Although $125 for a whitebaord with a clock in the middle is a bit over my budget.)

      At any rate, I'm pleased to see people catching on that the keyboard isn't real, especially after the 1000 post argument a few days ago over a joke about executing virus writers...

    5. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by CyBlue · · Score: 1

      A friend I worked with in 1997 was applying for a patent on this concept. The only difference is that he was specifying black&white LCDs (the only thing available) instead of OLEDs. So, yeah, this is old news until there's real product.

    6. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not only expenisive monitarily, but I bet that bad boy would be heavy too.

      Not that people carry their keyboards around much.

    7. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by drgonzo59 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Yeah but still they can get the patent on it first then they can start thinking about production. That is why it is just a design studio not a hardware company. I am sure this would look interesting to people at Alienware or Belkin or even Microsoft. It is good for games, would be great for an IDE, or Photoshop and many other uses.

      Actually I just thought of another idea, why not use the keyboard as a small console display as well. This could be used as a portable console in administering and fixing rack-mounted servers. The keyboard can have a small screen that will show about 10-20 lines of a terminal and also the keys would dynamically change to reflect various connection and management functions. For example after pressing "F1" the layout of the keyboard changes and now the keys to reflect a new submenu. If the key is not pressed but just slightly touched the console will display a short help message.

      This would be one expensive keyboard but people who have the money to blow might be interested...

    8. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If i was making it i would have clear keys and a lcd backplane on the keyboard.

      maybe try it with a slight lens on them to make the image seem closer or use a higher output backlight and 'rear project' to the surface of the keys.

    9. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by moonbender · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, if only LCD/OLEDs weren't so heavy, they sure would be useful to have on mobile devices...

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    10. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Svet-Am · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      they can only get a patent if they beat Jeff Bezos to it. I'm sure he'll find some way to bring this under the "1-click" patent he has :-P

      --
      [move .sig! for great justice, take off every .sig!]
    11. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Talking+Goat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seems like you'd be better off making a flat keyboard, a la ST:TNG. OLED is flexible, so you could actually produce a single sheet, with indentations behind it that give a "flex". So, you get around the 100+ tiny OLEDS problem by now using a single OLED, and you also get something out of your flat input device that no one has been able to accomplish: tactile feedback.

      Plus, you can operate OLED in "lit" mode or plain LCD mode, giving you functionality in a wide range of ambient light situations.

      Let's go into production, damn it!

      --

      + G to tha Izzo, A to tha Tizee, Talking Giz-oat, Ya'll Bettah Feel Me... +
    12. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You could use it on mobile devices.

      But it'd require a harness. :)

    13. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by eyeye · · Score: 1

      how disappointing, its really beautiful i'd love to own one (if they actually existed!).
      I can only hope this will inspire the real thing.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    14. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by swerk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this beast would be hella expensive at the moment, and whether OLEDs or e-Ink or some other wacky thing would wind up being the way to go is still not clear (to my ignorant self, anyway), but I think it's too good an idea to write off.

      I've been pissed off at keyboards ever since it got hard to find one without stupid windows keys on it. On those grounds alone it would be cool to use something like this. But more seriously, some of my favourite and most-used programs are Emacs, the Gimp, and Blender, all of which have tons of wacky keyboard shortcuts, often more than my little brain can remember if it's been too long since the last time I used some given function.

      There are plenty of fancy keyboards upwards of $100 out there today, and while most people would just as soon have the manufacturer-bundled freebie or some cheapo board and keep the extra cash, something like this could change that pretty quickly. I doubt many people would pay much higher than that; for all my interest I don't think I would. But once the right technologies get cheap enough to make this sort of thing possible, I would think it could easily become the next big thing in input devices. I'm spoiled with my scroll-wheel-equipped, optical mice and hate using any mouse without those things, and if/when I get spoiled with a keyboard like that, I'll similarly never want to go back to anything less.

      In any case it's a better idea than my old dreamed-up keyboard innovation: analog keys. Tap as usual for normal operation, or mash harder for the repeat rate to go up. Mostly handy for the arrow keys and backspace I suppose, but it would be nifty in games too.

    15. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by IorDMUX · · Score: 1

      Hmm... they also advertise a one button Mac-mouse [the "Mus"] shaped like a cursor. It seems that their Mac pride ends there, however, as the Mus's description reads:

      "We will possibly make Mus more sophisticated by adding another button and a wheel. "

      Low blow... Low blow.

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    16. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHOOOSH!!

    17. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You completely missed the sarcasm of the gp, didnt you? Did you also miss the AC whoosh?

    18. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you stupid? Do you have a complete inability to detect sarcasm? Maybe you should just jump out your window.

    19. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

      Why is everybody always hatin' on the "Windows" (Mod4) key? I've fallen in love with using it for window management. Mod4+LeftMouse anywhere in a window to move it; Mod4+RightMouse similarily to resize it; Mod4+MiddleMouse to send a window to the bottom layer; use it in conjunction with the arrow keys or cursor movement near the edges for desktop switching, etc...

      Many programs bind the other meta-keys (I use Maya a lot, so using Alt for such tasks essentially disables all viewport manipulation in the program), so I find it very handy to have a meta-key that I can more-or-less reserve for my own use on a WM-level.

      (Disclaimer: pekwm at work, BlackBox at home. May not fit as well with other WM designs, but I can't see why it wouldn't)

    20. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Skevin · · Score: 1

      Heavier than the IBM Model M keyboards, at 6.2 lbs.?
      Heavier than the Xerox 820 keyboards, at 13 lbs.?
      Heavier than the Sol-20 terminal keyboards at 27 lbs.? [okay, so it was attached to the CPU, big deal, but I owned one of these and it was a heavy mother.]

      Solomon Kevin Chang

      --
      "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
    21. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by releppes · · Score: 1

      The concept in great, but I think their vision of implimentation is off. As pointed out, I think it's prohibitively expensive.

      I think the idea of have a custom keyboard with definible graphics for each key is great, but it's not new. I think a better solution would be a keyboard that's nothing but a 4"x16" touch screen. Then you could change the size of the keys as well as the graphics. You wouldn't have the tactical feel you'ld get from a regular keyboard, but the coolness factor alone would be worth it.

      A much cheaper product could be made by just having a 4"x16" glide pad. Imagine that on a laptop instead of the keyboard/glide pad combo. Just a big glide pad in place of the keyboard with overlays for various keyboards.

    22. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Dasch · · Score: 1

      Hmm... what if they used that digital paper stuff - you know, that doesn't need continuous current. That would be sweet, and since the keys probably aren't changing all the time it wouldn't matter if the images wouldn't refresh that fast.

    23. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Winkhorst · · Score: 1

      Why not just put the keyboard on a touchscreen display and avoid all the stupid problems with wiring keys and the like? The Russians were always good at building better versions of old technology, like bigger A-bombs after the H-bomb was invented.

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
    24. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by JoeD · · Score: 1

      You could even use it as an actual monitor, sorta.

      Just do the same thing as those giant multi-monitor TV walls. There'd be gaps in the picture, but it'd look cool.

    25. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Paladin128 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Spoken like a person who doesn't type much.

      Tactile feel is everything. That's why I insist on spending extra on old-fashioned clicky keyboards. A laptop keyboard alone is enough to have my fingers hurting after just a couple hours of typing. I can do 12 hours straight on my Unicomp Customizer 101 -- the buckling-spring recoil is much better for your fingers, and actually increases the speed you type. Type on a completely flat surface for a couple hours a day, and you'll develop RSI faster than you can say "shiny".

      --
      Lex orandi, lex credendi.
    26. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by zebadee · · Score: 1

      "Yeah but still they can get the patent on it first then they can start thinking about production"

      I was under the impression you couldn't disclose your idea if you were after a patent. Posting it on the internet and linking it to /. would count as disclosure to me.

    27. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by AsbestosRush · · Score: 1

      Because tactile feedback is a good thing.

      --
      EveryDNS. Use it. It works.
      AC's need not reply
    28. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Rethcir · · Score: 1

      Now that you mention it, you gotta feel bad for the crew of the Enterprise D, especially the wesley crusher types who have to sit there and hit random buttons on flat surfaces all day. I guess the old-school Kirk era consoles don't seem so outdated when you think about it from this perspective.

    29. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by xinit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why does it always have to be like Star Trek? That interface system is awful; nothing like the tactile response of a glass screen.

      --
      --- http://foo.ca
    30. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Dasch · · Score: 1

      I'm actually thinking of suing that copycat bastard - I patentet clicking on buttons WAAAAAAAY back!

    31. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by ncc74656 · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      Seems like you'd be better off making a flat keyboard, a la ST:TNG. OLED is flexible, so you could actually produce a single sheet, with indentations behind it that give a "flex". So, you get around the 100+ tiny OLEDS problem by now using a single OLED, and you also get something out of your flat input device that no one has been able to accomplish: tactile feedback.

      Something tells me you've never used a computer with a touch "keyboard," such as an Atari 400. You don't want to use such a keyboard for anything even approximating an extended length of time. Even something like what you describe doesn't sound like there'd be nearly enough feedback; at most, it'd be like the click wheel on an iPod (OK for navigating through the menus and selecting songs, but there's a reason the built-in organizer features are read-only).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    32. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

      There are already individual keys that are graphic displays of a size appropriate for a keyboard. So the innovation is arrangement? Use of OLED instead of LED or LCD? I wanted to do this years and years ago. Long enough that had I patented it, it would have expired (I wanted to change between qwerty, dvorak and things like chinese or japanese characters at the time, although glyphs for tasks were in my write up as well). For a full keyboard it just isn't practical.

      Of course the main reason it is not practical is the cats would just it as a heating pad because of the amount of energy it would concume. ANd when your display went to sleep would you also 'sleep' the keyboard?

      I wish them luck as I really want one of these. (currently typing on the Apple cyrillic keyboard where the character sets are both in the same shade of gray for some reason.)

      --
      - Tjp

      I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

    33. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Jeet81 · · Score: 1

      Yeah but in mass production they might be able to bring down the price. I guess OLED are prety inexpensive if I think what they are.

    34. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by kidlinux · · Score: 1

      In North America there is a 1-year grace period for filing patents after the idea has been publicly disclosed.

      No chance anywhere else in the world though.

      --
      -kidlinux.
    35. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by vhogemann · · Score: 1

      Not really, You could build a single oled screen, hidden inside the keyboard, and use optic fibers to send the images to the keys. This way we could eve use a regular LCD screen. Also, the same functionality can be achieved using individual B&W Dotmatrix displays, witch are both cheaper and simpler to produce. This desing is really fantastic, and I really would love to see a real one!

      --
      ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    36. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Blue-Footed+Boobie · · Score: 1

      +1, Missed the Joke?

      --
      DAMN YOU OCTODOG! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
    37. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you look at their site, most of their design work is industrial design for other companies for real products. This very well could be the case for this keyboard.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    38. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These guys are industrial designers. There's a difference between this profession and being a digital artist.

    39. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by geschild · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And suddenly you are well on your way to an early version of the LCARS interface ;)

      --
      Karma? What's that again?
    40. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by KanSer · · Score: 1

      They also make the coolest desktop backgrounds ever.

      http://www.artlebedev.com/posters

      Russian design geeks with a bar code fetish. And a rather flighty motto that I like; "Design will save the world."

      Maybe in Soviet Russia...

      --
      • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
    41. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

      See the web page. Patents pending.

      They've already applied for the patents.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    42. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by raarky · · Score: 3, Insightful

      try thinking outside the box for a moment. Who says the displays inside the keys have to move with the key. You could simply have the outside transparent shell push down around the display which would be flush mounted on circuit board.

    43. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Why does it always have to be like Star Trek? That interface system is awful; nothing like the tactile response of a glass screen.

      Well, it works in the future. Surely it can work now!

    44. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by seweso · · Score: 1

      What about one plain lcd screen, lenses and a small projection screen under every key?

    45. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Of course you're right but it wouldn't be nearly as cool =)

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    46. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by raarky · · Score: 1

      it would probably also have a certain flaw in which those cavities between the display and the casing would eventually be filled with keyboard bits'n'crap which will be made even more obvious by the lit backdrop.

      I know my cellphone screen suffers from a serious case of pocket lint syndrome.

    47. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by rob_squared · · Score: 0

      "This would be one expensive keyboard but people who have the money to blow might be interested..." I was willing to buy it without anything more than the graphic. Then again, I was going to get Das Keyboard too.

      --
      I don't get it.
    48. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      OLED = Organic Light-Emitting Diode.

      By definition, emitting light is the only thing OLEDs can do. There is no such thing as LCD-mode OLED but LCDs could use OLED pannels for perfectly uniform backlighting.

      As for the OLED keys, they could be programmed and powered by RFID or other similar technology. In large volume, these could probably be manufactured around $1/key.

    49. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by floodo1 · · Score: 0

      just hermetically seal each key to its display!

      --
      I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
    50. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      this would be a great idea to try with a fingerboard!

    51. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      so you'd put OLEDs under a Fingerworks..

      oops they went out of business.

    52. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by anagama · · Score: 1

      Hell - I WANT it to be heavy -- like my Model M feels substantial and real and unlike the $10 memorex bubble switch keyboard I picked up 3 years ago for a computer at work -- letters already worn off.

      Although just a design model -- I have to say it has me drooling. And if made with quality parts that gave it a nice heft, I'd pay bucks for it. The keyboard is, afterall, a large percentage of how we communicate with our computers. Why is it such a neglected component?

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    53. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by fullpunk · · Score: 1

      Won't the key heat after a couple of hours of usage?

    54. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems that M$ needs to produce these--I won't mind Bill '[spending] a bloody fortune' if it means I can get my hands on one of these. :)

    55. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next thing to add would be an explosive plasma conduit right behind it.

    56. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by jafuser · · Score: 1

      If someone could make one of those magnifying tapers so that it can be compressed like a key, they could insert one into each key and use one large common OLED screen underneath all the keys.

      But then that might cost more than just putting a small OLED screen in each key =P

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    57. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by jstevans · · Score: 1

      Back in 1988 or 1989 I was the US product marketing manager for one of Sony's professional video products (a $200k video production switcher). I came up with the idea, which was implemented and sold internationally, for "display buttons." These were actual control buttons whose top surfaces were 3/4" square LCDs that graphically displayed the specific special effect that had been selected to occur if that button was pushed. It was a ery big leap forward in usability for the high-speed, real-time world of video production. Sony was going to go for a patent on it, I'm pretty sure they did. I would truly love to have this modal OLED keyboard, such a tiem saver, so incredibly useful. Someday maybe, someday.

    58. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by areve · · Score: 1

      I was a little disappointed when I clicked on the teleport.

    59. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you want a keyboard that offers custom keysets for games and apps that actually works today, and can be bought for less than a house payment, check this out .

    60. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by hotpotato · · Score: 1
      Yeah but still they can get the patent on it first then they can start thinking about production

      It seems like this is what they're doing. On their site, below the pretty images, it says Patents pending.

    61. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by geschild · · Score: 1

      Yes. But only for dramatic effect and that seems to be an option specially resevered for a Hollywood Basement... ;)

      --
      Karma? What's that again?
    62. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have no idea what you are talking about. Art.Lebedev is the premier design firm in Russia. Having been there and seen their expansive studio in the center of Moscow, I can tell you that they have a very talented group of designers who make very real products.

      You are correct that they are not a manufacturer of keyboards. They are a design studio who have designed a number of products that have been produced. They just haven't been sold where you live.

    63. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by psylew · · Score: 1

      If they can manage to get that electronic paper stuff that was mentioned recently incorporated into production, it could be used readily in this idea. The images would be good, refreshable, and not use a lot of power in the process. I'm sure the price will be a bit high for a while, but most things are that way when they're first introduced. :-)

    64. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price by Guanine · · Score: 1

      Now wait a second. 130+ OLED's and the controlling electronics are not going to be expensive. The controlling electronics statement can be easily discounted as false with some basic thinking: an average monitor has about 1024*1280 = 1 310 750 pixels (about 1.3*10^6 pixels) that require control. From the pictures supplied by Art. Lebedev, I counted square keys as being about 35 pixels across. This gives a single key 35^2 = 1225 pixels times around 140 keys = only 171 500 pixels to control for the keyboard. Multiply that by 2 if you feel my estimate is off, giving 343 000 pixels to control. This is about _one quarter_ of the number of pixels a normal graphics card has to deal with. Controlling only 1/4th the number of pixels will make the card at least 1/4 of the price. As for the former, (the cost of OLED's) do note that, as quoted here (http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/O/OLED.html) OLED technology is less expensive than LCD: "It [OLED technology] is beginning to replace LCD technology in handheld devices such as PDAs and cellular phones because the technology is brighter, thinner, faster, lighter than LCDs, uses less power, offers higher contrast and is cheaper to manufacture." The cost of this keyboard will be set by what people are willing to pay, not the technology that is contained within it.

  2. Optimus Keyboard? by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny

    A prime idea, that.

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't think there's a "+1 Transformer's Reference", but if there was, I'd give it to ya. ;)

    2. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by sik0fewl · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wonder if it autobotically transforms the keyboard for whatever application is active.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    3. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by Svet-Am · · Score: 1

      beat me to it. good job on the reference +1 :-)

      --
      [move .sig! for great justice, take off every .sig!]
    4. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 1

      Some of us are just more efficient at wasting time on Slashdot when we should be getting work done. ;) Don't worry, there's always room for improvement in that department. ;)

    5. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by GoodNicsTken · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just think, with a little programming to group keys, you could have porn on screen and on the keyboard at the same time.

    6. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by minus_273 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You should also note that when this keyboard transforms, large parts materialize out of nowhere and then disappear when it transforms back. The designers havent been able to explain why that is.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    7. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 0

      Sure, but I bet it'll be damn expensive for a while yet. Prohibitivly so.

    8. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by Takara · · Score: 3, Funny

      Woosh.

    9. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by SpicyLemon · · Score: 1

      You could literally have all the porn you wanted at your fingertips.

      (just make sure it's not in a shoot'em up rob'em game)

      --
      This post approved by Shampoo.
    10. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I wonder what would happen if you sent a Star Wars lightsaber through a Star Trek transporter.

      Wonder all you like. It doesn't exist.

    11. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's a lot of fukken winks in this thread mate

    12. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It turns out that the "Funny" mod covers appropriate Transformers references. Guess that mod is capable of more than meets the eye....

    13. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha! The GP is getting PWNT in this article. Oh man, that really made me laugh.

    14. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by mechsoph · · Score: 1

      BarbeauBot!

    15. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And I wonder what would happen if you sent a Star Wars lightsaber through a Star Trek transporter.

      That's easy. The demolecularization of the focusing crystal in the lightsaber would cause the dilithium crystals to destabilize causing a power surge that destroys the primary transporter matrix. This would of course leave Picard and two anonymous security officers stranded on the planet just as they are being chased by a Borg army with the Borg Queen and Darth Vader at the lead. Back on enterprise, Riker has ordered the transporter system repaired. While several anonymous engineers suffered massive facial burns from consoles exploding, they are able to bring the transporters online by reconfiguring an EPS conduit to draw power from the tertiary backup to the auxiliary antimatter storage system. Meanwhile back on the planet, the two security officers have been assimilated while being force choked but they have helped Picard destroy half the Borg army. Just as Picard is surrounded with the Queen begging for Locutus, the enterprise launches a spread of photon torpedoes in a delta pattern into the Borg army while simultaneously beaming Picard back on board. As the torpedoes tear through the Borg army, Vader screams "NOOOOOOOO!"

      ... duh.

    16. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by MonoSynth · · Score: 1

      Should be great for Vim!

      but I think the price will be a great decepti(c)on

    17. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by emarkp · · Score: 1
      Definitely more than meets the eyes.

      (Sigh. Now I've got the theme song going through my head. Isn't it amazing you can remember this garbage a decade or more later? The other day someone said something and my wife and I--nearly in unison--began singing the Transformers theme song. I am such a geek.)

    18. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by dextroz · · Score: 1

      Not one to nag... but the second one is not a wink - it's a smile

      --
      Where's my free iPod!? Until then, I'll settle for a kiss...
    19. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it does, I wonder what it becomes when Windoze BSODs on you. ;)

    20. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by craXORjack · · Score: 1
      I wonder if it autobotically transforms the keyboard for whatever application is active.

      I hope so. I can't count the number of times I've need to press the "any" key to continue.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    21. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by plover · · Score: 1
      Heh. With this keyboard, EVERY key can light up with the word "Any"!

      If the developer was truly twisted, he could have some of them blinking "Press me!", and their neighbors alternately flashing "No, press me!"

      Damn, I thought this would be hilarious but now it occurs to me that Sierra Games would probably do exactly that :-(

      --
      John
    22. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if it autobotically makes up words, I mean finishes the words you are typing.

    23. Re:Optimus Keyboard? by radiotyler · · Score: 1

      Funny, I was thinking that the first thing I would do if I ever got my hands on one of these is change the useless-to-me windows key, and bind it to my favorite pr0n site. Bewbies on demand, with just one keystroke!

      --
      hi mom!
  3. Impressive board by SeanTobin · · Score: 1

    Well, it is definitely an impressive keyboard. I'm sure there are UI designers looking at this thing and having seizures as we speak. I know if it had some durability, spill resistance, and was =$250 I'd pick one up for my next machine.

    In any case, the keys don't look like they are OLED. They look just like regular backlit LCD (maybe LED backlit). Any OLED experts want to chime in on this?

    --
    Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
    1. Re:Impressive board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitly OLED, they can't make traditional LCD screens small or durable enough to put them in keys.

    2. Re:Impressive board by malachid69 · · Score: 1

      When you say that they don't look like OLED, what do you mean?

      Do you mean that it doesn't look as good as this SVGA OLED http://www.emagin.com/images/svgamck.jpg (or even their UXGA one)?

      Regular LED drivers are even usually used for OLED (though you loose all of the advantages of the 0-energy-unless-image-changing aspect of passive OLED).

      --
      http://www.google.com/profiles/malachid
  4. very fucking cool! by squarefish · · Score: 1

    I'd be very curious of what one of these would cost though. any ideas?

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  5. a couple of questions before buying by yagu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wow! Looked at the pictures, very attractive!

    So, eye-candy aside:

    • Is it reliable (how many keystrokes is it designed for lifetime?)?
    • Is it comfortable, is the key travel and feel well done?
    • (for me), Is it reasonably quiet? (I'd really like to find a nice silent keyboard, but at least it has to be about 20 db quieter than the monolith I'm banging away on right now (at a friend's house).)
    • last, but for me most importantly, are the pretty pictures on the left-hand column of keys configurable? There's no way in Hell I'm ever buying a keyboard with a picture of the IE icon on one of its keys! For less expensive keyboards I satisfied and content with ripping out the Microsoft menu keys (though it's landed me in hot water at work a couple of times), but for something this (probably) expensive, those pictures had better be configurable!
    1. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... but for me most importantly, are the pretty pictures on the left-hand column of keys configurable? There's no way in Hell I'm ever buying a keyboard with a picture of the IE icon on one of its keys!


      that's the point of this story, idiot

    2. Re:a couple of questions before buying by norminator · · Score: 1

      are the pretty pictures on the left-hand column of keys configurable?

      They'd have to be... the picture shows iTunes and QuickTime keys, and not every user has those installed. Maybe you can tell a config utility which programs you want the buttons to use and it automatically takes the programs' icons and loads them in. Looks pretty cool.

    3. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      (for me), Is it reasonably quiet?

      All quiet keyboards I've ever had always turned out to be utter crap. Right now, I'm banging away on a IBM Modem M keyboard that is still doing fine after years of typing (obviously) but also coffee spilling (hot and cold), heavy banging, hurling across the room, and sitting on. Some of the heavily used keys are so worn out that the plastic surface feels smooth and the etching has gone, but it's still doing fine. These things sure were made to last.

      I've long since forgotten about the incredible racket noises it makes. My cat loves the feel and clicks when he stretches on it though, apparently.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    4. Re:a couple of questions before buying by snorklewacker · · Score: 4, Funny

      > last, but for me most importantly, are the pretty pictures on the left-hand column of keys configurable?

      No. After all, the whole point of a super-expensive keyboard with keys that can dynamically change their labels is to hardwire their function in. It was just cheaper to use an OLED display than to silkscreen them on.

      You even rip off the MS menu keys on your work PC? Just ... wow.

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    5. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Mr.+Spontaneous · · Score: 1

      http://www.artlebedev.com/portfolio/optimus/keyb_0 02.jpg

      the bottom left key (barely shown in the pic) looks like it has the firefox logo.

      --
      Its all fun and games until someone loses an eye... then its just fun.
    6. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Mr.+Spontaneous · · Score: 1
      --
      Its all fun and games until someone loses an eye... then its just fun.
    7. Re:a couple of questions before buying by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Interesting
      last, but for me most importantly, are the pretty pictures on the left-hand column of keys configurable? There's no way in Hell I'm ever buying a keyboard with a picture of the IE icon on one of its keys! For less expensive keyboards I satisfied and content with ripping out the Microsoft menu keys (though it's landed me in hot water at work a couple of times), but for something this (probably) expensive, those pictures had better be configurable!

      I gte the distinct impression that since the keys are displayed graphically, you're seeing a sample they contrived.

      For instance, I suspect most users wouldn't need a donkey icon on a daily basis, and it too would be a waste of space.

      (And as to the Windows menu key, I find it easier to just disable it and leave it in -- a sa sloppy, non-home-row typist, it's far more nuisance than it ever will be help.)
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    8. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Adrilla · · Score: 2, Interesting

      These guys are obviously big mac fans. Itunes, quicktime, plus if you look at the mouse that's designed for a mac. But I'd love this for photoshop and music programs. The big problems being having the program manufacturers map out programs for such a rare keyboard (assuming it ever made it to the public).

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    9. Re:a couple of questions before buying by The_Wilschon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, those keys could be very nice for desktop switching. Some WM's and desktop pagers will put a miniature view of each desktop on the pager... now we can move that off the screen and onto keyboard, saving even more valuable screen space! I think it's a great idea.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    10. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Fortyseven · · Score: 1

      Best keyboards ever. Bought a couple spares and ensured that I had one available for work when I started. The common plastic keyboards make me cry. :(

    11. Re:a couple of questions before buying by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You even rip off the MS menu keys on your work PC?

      Damn right I do!

      That gap between Alt and Ctrl was left there for a reason. I HATE it when my pinky is a little to the left or right of where it should be, and the result is that Windows steals away focus from whatever window I'm using and gives it to the Start menu.

    12. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, I loaded up on them after the company I used to work for was giving them away because they were changing to newer keyboards. All in perfect condition.. no one else wanted them because they're load and clicky and harder to press compaired to normal keyboards... all the reasons I wanted them. So I've got the one I'm using and 19 others waiting to go to geeks as christmas/birthday gifts, and for the day mine finally gives up.

    13. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      Odd. I've been able to touch type since I got my hands on a Commodore 64 about 14 years ago (well, it took me a little while to learn touch type), and I've used loads of keyboards in various layouts, both with and without the windows key, and I don't think I've ever hit the windows key instead of something else.

      The only times I've hit something I didn't mean to while touch typing, is when I'm using somehting with a changed layout, like laptops with function keys or Macs, where the keys are laid out differently.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    14. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For less expensive keyboards I satisfied and content with ripping out the Microsoft menu keys

      Seriously, you're a douchebag.
    15. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. There are several hotkey programs that would make those Windows and Menu keys very useful, but you decide to tear them off instead for no reason, other than because youdon't like the logos (which you could easily scratch off).

    16. Re:a couple of questions before buying by cjh79 · · Score: 1

      last, but for me most importantly, are the pretty pictures on the left-hand column of keys configurable?

      What would be cool is if they dynamically displayed what programs you have open, ie, what's in the task bar. Then you could get rid of the task bar altogether, or at least hide it most of the time. I don't often have more than 10 windows open at once, actually yes I do, but whatever, the point is it would be neat and save some mousing.

      At any rate, I imagine a much more practical version of this would just be a keyboard sized touch sensitive lcd, perhaps with some sort of transparent keyboard device over it so you'd have some tactile response from the thing.

    17. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Oh. That makes sense, I guess. And here I was thinking that the Windows logo was to hardcore Linux geeks like garlic to vampires.

    18. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE, you stupid fucking piece of shit.

    19. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This infringes on my pending patent of using light in the form of various colors and shapes to identify differing information! I see a world where people use light to represent letters, numbers, and even images. Just in case this patent doesn't succeed, I better submit a secondary one that adds, on the internet.

    20. Re:a couple of questions before buying by pthor1231 · · Score: 1

      Its all fun and games until someone loses an eye... then its just fun. Nope, then it's just a game to find the eye..

    21. Re:a couple of questions before buying by TheUnknownCoder · · Score: 1

      That guys works as a CompUSA salesperson, that's why he got in trouble for popping those MS keys.

      Must... not.... humpf.... surrender..... URGHHHH! There goes another "Windows" key. Next!

      --
      Uncopyrightable: The longest word you can write without repeating a letter.
    22. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I swear.. the idiots have descended on this article. I've seen more idiotic posts in this article than I've seen on Slashdot in a while...

    23. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you didn't happen to notice the pictures where the key mappings were changed for different apps? Oh wait maybe every other key on the thing can be mapped EXCEPT the shortcut keys on the left. Are you really that dumb or do you just like to post for the sake of posting?

      Oh and of course lets now forget that these are rendered concept images for a keyboard. So it doesn't physically exist anyhow, so technically none of your stupid questions have answers.

      And if it makes you feel any better, the Windows key maps to the Apple key when you use it with a Mac.

    24. Re:a couple of questions before buying by drew · · Score: 1

      For less expensive keyboards I satisfied and content with ripping out the Microsoft menu keys (though it's landed me in hot water at work a couple of times)

      How on earth do you live without your META key?

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    25. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see: there's the eMule icon, Firefox, Photoshop, and iTunes.
      I doubt anyone would ship a keyboard with those as the default options...

      It's a great idea, though: using the keyboard as an alternative to the taskbar/dock. I can't wait until someone creates something like that that we mortals could actually pay. (but as they're applying for patents, I doubt we'll see this anytime soon on the standard keyboards...)

    26. Re:a couple of questions before buying by x404x · · Score: 1

      I have the one without the numpad, I love it. I have pounded away on that thing for years and it shows no signs of stress (other then the normal "shiny" spots on the keys that get the most use). There is no way in hell I could treat a new keyboard the way I use my IBM, it would be dead within a week.

      They sure don't make them like they used to, that's for sure.

    27. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "Some of the heavily used keys are so worn out that the plastic surface feels smooth and the etching has gone"

      The BBC Micro had injection moulded keys with the glyphs running right through the key. After ten years the keys were smooth but still as legible as the day it was bought. A lovely keyboard.

    28. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Gondola · · Score: 1

      I've been touch-typing since my C64 as well, but keyboards have changed over the years. I've been using "ergonomic" (split) keyboards for years.

      Anyway, every keyboard is a little different from the next, so it's very common for me to have a long adapt period where I hit some keys that I didn't mean to. The size and shape of the enter, alt, shift, control, space, tab, caps lock, esc, fkeys, backspace, cursor keys, home/end/insert/pgup/pgdn/del can ALL vary by keyboard manufacturer and model.

      Finding ergonomic keyboards is hard. Finding them without F-lock, and built well enough to last more than a couple months before keys start sticking (Microsoft keyboards are really bad about strike angle - I can take a MS keyboard out of the box and have problems with keys not working properly because of the angle at which I type), is difficult.

    29. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "You even rip off the MS menu keys on your work PC?"

      "Damn right I do!"

      The true geek (comme moi) writes a new Windows keyboard driver to disable the MS key.

    30. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, grow up.

    31. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I'd really like to find a nice silent keyboard, but at least it has to be about 20 db quieter than the monolith I'm banging away on right now (at a friend's house).)

      Tell me about it. I too would really like to find one at least about 20 lb lighter than the monolith I'm banging away on right now (at a friend's house).
      Oh you were talking about a keyboard.Never mind...

    32. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Actually, the keyboard driver already lets you remap keys. If you remap them to scan code 0x0000 they are disabled. http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/device/input/w2kscan -map.mspx

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    33. Re:a couple of questions before buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Actually, the keyboard driver already lets you remap keys."

      But if you do this it applies to all users. A new driver can be loaded for your user only, so you don't confuse anyone else using the computer.

    34. Re:a couple of questions before buying by iamjoltman · · Score: 1

      "For less expensive keyboards I satisfied and content with ripping out the Microsoft menu keys" You know, that Microsoft menu key can actually come in handy. WinKey + E brings up Explorer (not the my computer crap) WinKey+D takes you right to the desktop, WinKey+R brings up the Run dialog, not to mention just that WinKey by itself brings up the Start menu, which I don't use much, but it works good for a quick log out/shut down (WinKey,Up,Enter brings you to the shut down dialog) Now, obviously you can't do that stuff in non-Windows, but on my Fedora Core machine, I use it for similar shortcuts (WinKey+F for file manager, etc...)

  6. Get these into our highschools NOW! by Seumas · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since all of our jobs are being outsourced to other countries, this keyboard will be perfect for public schools where they will need to teach children to function in the wonderful world of order-taking at fast food restaurants on those nifty little picture-only cash-registers..

    1. Re:Get these into our highschools NOW! by double-oh+three · · Score: 1

      Sadly true. These things need to be able to be locked into QWERTY for new users otherwise they'll never learn to touchtype. I would love one of these things, but I'm wondering if it might fare better as a panel of buttons to go alongside a keyboard, like a bigger numpad.

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    2. Re:Get these into our highschools NOW! by concept10 · · Score: 1

      You know what? This may have been a joke but thats just one more application for this keyboard.

      *Point of Sale*

      The uses of this keyboard could prove to be enless.

      So much for that high school typing class.

    3. Re:Get these into our highschools NOW! by microwave_EE · · Score: 1

      "The uses of this keyboard could prove to be enless."

      Well, you could configure the keyboard to be "n"-less if you wanted to...

      --
      I'll take you to the ball, Barbara Manitee!!!
    4. Re:Get these into our highschools NOW! by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      while I appreciate your humor, this actually could be usefull in classrooms. Think keyboarding class.. Blank out all keys, and make them learn to actually touch type. Or, switch it to DVORAK, and make them learn a different style of typing...

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    5. Re:Get these into our highschools NOW! by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      POS terminals with LCD touchscreens are pretty common and seem to work well enough.

      Somebody beat you to the idea :-)

    6. Re:Get these into our highschools NOW! by alc6379 · · Score: 1
      Well, you could configure the keyboard to be "n"-less if you wanted to...

      Or, even better, you could configure it with an extra "D" key or two, just so you don't mistype "endless"

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
    7. Re:Get these into our highschools NOW! by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Since all of our jobs are being outsourced to other countries...

      Dude, outsourcing jokes are so 2003. Seriously.

    8. Re:Get these into our highschools NOW! by Seumas · · Score: 1

      How can outsourcing jokes be passe when some guys are floating around a business plan currently to put a cruise ship three miles off the coast of America and fill it with sub-$22,000/yr (mostly non-American) programmers so that htey don't have to bide by American salaries and labor laws?

      If that doesn't clearly show that this is PRIME TIME for outsourcing jokes, I don't know what does.

    9. Re:Get these into our highschools NOW! by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      People have been floating around these sorts of schemes for decades. Seriously. Do you really think this was the first genius to think of something like this?

      In any case, there are plenty of American developers in middle America making less than $22K, just like there was during the .COM boom.

    10. Re:Get these into our highschools NOW! by jafac · · Score: 1

      Since all of our jobs are being outsourced to other countries, this keyboard will be perfect for public schools where they will need to teach children to function in the wonderful world of order-taking at fast food restaurants on those nifty little picture-only cash-registers..

      They wouldn't teach that in grade school.

      They'd teach that in your Senior Year of Engineering school, after you'd saddled yourself with $150k of student loans.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  7. The advent of the $500 keyboard by dgrgich · · Score: 1

    Even with mass market production, this sucker would have to be expensive, dontcha think?

    I'll take my $15 USB keyboard thank you - although I'm starting to wish I had a better ergonomic alternative!

  8. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who needs labels? Are you looking at the keyboard or the screen when you're gaming?

    1. Re:WTF? by bmalia · · Score: 1

      Who needs labels? Are you looking at the keyboard or the screen when you're gaming?
      It would be sweet for new games, where you're unfamilar with the keys, to see what all your options are. Once you know the keys, you won't need to look.. unless you just had a brain fart and can't remember which key arms a granade vs flash bomb. I think its a very cool idea.

      Side thought.. One could create a Simon-like game with that keyboard. 101 button Simon.. yay!Could make people type out stuff like:
      I
      I,[SPACE]
      I,[SPACE],A
      I,[SPACE],A,M
      I,[SPACE},A,M,[SPACE]
      I,[SPACE},A,M,[SPACE],A
      ...
      I,[SPACE},A,M,[SPACE],A,N,[SPACE]I,D,1,0,T,!

      --
      There's no place like ~/
    2. Re:WTF? by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

      If I ever had one of these things for real, I'm not too sure. I noticed the Quake-mode mock-up and I don't think it would be too much of a stretch to envision, say, darkened-out weapon keys for which you have no ammo, or only an outline drawn if you do not currently have the weapon. Heck, you could program it to display your remaining ammo, updated realtime. A key that lights up when you need to reload. I could go on forever. There are some great possibilities with this idea.

    3. Re:WTF? by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      There are some great possibilities with this idea.

      In an IDE, press the ALT key, all the keys change to show what ALT- does, etc.

      drool....

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    4. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And since you're drooling over your keyboard and others keep playing, you're toast.

    5. Re:WTF? by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, not every game is a twitch-reflex FPS.

      Even if it were, I can't see how extra feedback can be harmful. If I see a bright red key light up out of the corner of my eye and am trained to react to it as an indicator that my ammo is low, and that pushing it will reload my weapon and turn off the light, then I don't see the harm in it.

      In fact, displaying ammunition status data on the keys is far preferable to me than having it on the screen. Again, that's just a preference. The first thing I do when playing any FPS is turn every non-essential HUD component off (including--no, especially--the actual weapon graphic). As long as I have my health, a crosshair, and, depending on the game, a minimap (as small as it can possibly be while still maintaining sufficient legibility), I prefer to keep all state-based information in my head ("How do you know which weapon you're using?"..."Dude, how can you NOT know which weapon you're using?"). Unfortunately, non-essential but still-useful state information that's hard to track mentally (i.e. ammo count) must remain on the screen, taking up precious pixels that could be used for rendering, say, an incoming projectile.

      This doesn't even begin to describe the value of using it as an additional factor of the game (pie-in-the-sky here, probably, since you can't assume everyone who plays the game has one). Bringing up your datapad actually changing your keyboard INTO a datapad, for example. Press the key marked "Mission" for mission info, "Map" for map data, etc.. Sequences where you have to learn how to use an alien terminal interface, with an actual ALIEN INPUT DEVICE! That, alone, would warrent this technology for gamers.

  9. Virtual Keyboards == LCARS? by bc90021 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It will be handier and handier to have virtual keyboards, and in fact, they obviously already exist.

    However, soon enough, as with other inventions, it just may be that we get a glass panel in front of us, and the display/input conforms to the user and his/her function, instead of the other way around. ;)

    1. Re:Virtual Keyboards == LCARS? by Blutarsky · · Score: 1

      Ya know, it used to be that someone talking to themselves and pretending to type on a random surface was insane. Now they're chatting on a wireless headset and typing with a virtual keyboard. ;)

    2. Re:Virtual Keyboards == LCARS? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      However, soon enough, as with other inventions, it just may be that we get a glass panel in front of us, and the display/input conforms to the user and his/her function, instead of the other way around.

      I think using a touchscreen as a primary interface for extended periods of time would be really uncomfortable.

      Most of the ways we've come up with to physically interact with electronic and mechanical systems have some element of movement, and I think there's a reason for that. I'm imagining my fingertips getting numb typing away on a glass screen for 8-14 hours a day.

      Now, if the screen were made out of something rubbery, that might work. I'd want a David Cronenberg desktop wallpaper to go with that though.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    3. Re:Virtual Keyboards == LCARS? by xdroop · · Score: 1

      Fascinating news from 2002. Got anything more recent?

      --
      you should read everything on the internet as if it had "but I'm probably talking out of my ass" appended to it.
    4. Re:Virtual Keyboards == LCARS? by soundofthemoon · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you read Sternbach and Okuda's tech manual for the Enterprise-D, you'll find the LCARS terminals have an interface that includes not only dynamically shifting graphics but tactile feedback as well. All the soft button graphics and okudagrams are fronted by low-power force fields that let the user touch type, feeling the buttons by sense of touch and getting tactile feedback for button presses, slider movement, etc.

    5. Re:Virtual Keyboards == LCARS? by stephenry · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your confusing Star Trek with reality...

    6. Re:Virtual Keyboards == LCARS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the "Self-Destruct" button will shock the hell out of you just to make you hesitate and think whether or not you really, really want to do this.

      -- The "Cancel Self-Destruct" button does the same thing but only because you've pissed every off by scaring the crap out of them.

    7. Re:Virtual Keyboards == LCARS? by emilng · · Score: 1

      I think using a touchscreen as a primary interface for extended periods of time would be really uncomfortable.

      Most of the ways we've come up with to physically interact with electronic and mechanical systems have some element of movement, and I think there's a reason for that. I'm imagining my fingertips getting numb typing away on a glass screen for 8-14 hours a day.


      How about a haptic glove that that would give you keyboard feedback while you typed on the virtual screen? Obviously you wouldn't limit the use of the glove for just typing on a virtual keyboard, just as you wouldn't limit the screen just for displaying a virtual keyboard.

    8. Re:Virtual Keyboards == LCARS? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      A little lacking in tactile feedback, aren't they? The whole point of "touch typing" is to be able to type WITHOUT looking at the keyboard. It appears that would be impossible with a virtual keyboard!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    9. Re:Virtual Keyboards == LCARS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      low-power force fields that let the user touch type, feeling the buttons by sense of touch and getting tactile feedback for button presses, slider movement, etc.

      All that in the 26th Century, sure, but they haven't found a cure for Jean-Luc's male pattern baldness?

    10. Re:Virtual Keyboards == LCARS? by soundofthemoon · · Score: 1

      Your confusing Star Trek with reality...
      No, I'm comparing them. The original article confused a rendered mockup with reality. And the parent comment mentioned LCARS, so I expanded on that. I'm not confused all.

    11. Re:Virtual Keyboards == LCARS? by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      I currently have one of these -- at least until the Return Authoristaion form comes through. The hardware is superb, but the drivers are a complete write-off. In between crashing my N-Gage, it really does work well.

    12. Re:Virtual Keyboards == LCARS? by JohnHegarty · · Score: 1

      They were asked about that just before the series started. The answer was very good, its not that we won't have a cure in the 26th century , we just won't care he is bald......

    13. Re:Virtual Keyboards == LCARS? by Kaki+Nix+Sain · · Score: 1
      Maybe they were never insane. Perhaps they were hooked into a level of perceptions that others were not.

      --

      (C) Kaki Sain, 2011. By reading this, you have illegally copied my property to your brain.

  10. Licensing/Implications? by shadowknot · · Score: 3, Insightful
    If anyone reading works for Logitech or some other big peripheral manufacturer please let your R&D department know about this and maybe they can license the design and technology from the good people at art.lebedev.

    But seriously this technology could have huge implications for the future of peripheral manufacturing (on the high-end at least) purely because you can have it as QWERTY, AZERTY, DVORAK or any other english, arabic, cyrillic, sanscrit, klingon or other layout!

    For the cheapskates there's always Das Keyboard!

    1. Re:Licensing/Implications? by MynockGuano · · Score: 2, Informative

      Technology? As far as I can tell, these are just pure concept renderings, with the "Patents Pending" referring to the idea and design, not the actual function. Notice how almost everything else on the site has a date attached to indicate when the product will be available for consumption. Not so with this one.

    2. Re:Licensing/Implications? by tgrimley · · Score: 1

      you're calling people who buy an 80 dollar keyboard cheapskates?!

    3. Re:Licensing/Implications? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      "Price: $79.99"

      Um...cheapskates? For the cheapskates, there's always the keyboard that came with your computer...or a $10 generic PS/2 keyboard. Definitely not Das Keyboard.

  11. Drool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, now i have saliva all over my plain, ordinary keyboard.

    1. Re:Drool... by Tackhead · · Score: 0
      > Damn, now i have saliva all over my plain, ordinary keyboard.

      ...which would be an expensive mistake if you had one of those droolworthy OLED keybors saw on /. frgn mes now gta cleeeeeee mne ou too.

      fk

  12. PSU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i bet it needs an external power supply..

    1. Re:PSU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh big f-ing deal.

      that thing is soooooooo awesome looking if its less than 500 bucks i'm getting one

      i bet 10 years from now if not sooner all keyboards will do this.

    2. Re:PSU by swimin · · Score: 1

      OLDED uses very little power, and none at all if it isn't changing. It could easily draw enough power off of USB.

  13. not production? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is is - I have one. Cost me $45 and some imagination.

  14. Great looking and functional keyboard, but.. by concept10 · · Score: 0


    I didn't see any layouts for quick prOn navigation and the i'm at work auto-escape minimize key.

    Seriously, this would be great for music sequencer applications like Cubase SX and Nuendo.

    1. Re:Great looking and functional keyboard, but.. by Foolomon · · Score: 1

      Yes. Or any other shortcut key intensive application. (But I like the way you think, as I am a Cubase SX user.)

      I'm still drooling over the eye candy.

    2. Re:Great looking and functional keyboard, but.. by concept10 · · Score: 1

      This would be great for Cubase my man. I have used control surfaces but I always go back to using the keyboard for start/stop rewind, quantize, stuff like that..

    3. Re:Great looking and functional keyboard, but.. by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      And it would be even sweeter if it had a function that turned the main block of keys into a full-colour graphical equaliser that's fed by the sound output.

      Hell, there are plenty of cool (but also quite pointless) applications for such a keyboard.

      Imagine, for example, a whack-a-mole mini-game. The whole keyboard goes black and then little pictures of moles/Tux/breasts appear randomly, with the user having to strike the keys as soon as their reactions allow. Whoever strokes the most boobs in a minute wins. Easy way to waste a few minutes at work if you're bored of Solitaire and Minesweeper.

      Incoming email could also be displayed on the keyboard, say one row each for the sender, subject and start of message body. I know you can have desktop alerts that do the same thing, but imagine a large envelope sweeping from left to right across the keyboard, immediately followed by the details specified above. You'd need a good spam filter or it'd get annoying having all these nonsensical strings flashing across the keys while you're trying to type up that report for Jenkins in Accounting.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  15. FlickerKey by el_jake · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can't wait to watch my favorit divx on the Windoze key !

    --
    In order to form an immaculate member of a flock of sheep one must, above all, be a sheep.
    1. Re:FlickerKey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You laugh, but:

      1. your idea is still pretty good
      2. you just gave the people at Apple the idea about putting minimized windows images in specific keys - you then press that key to bring it back in front (instead of navigating to it via the GUI)

  16. Viruses will have a field day! by garcia · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cool, not only could viruses switch what appears on your screen when you type you could also wake up and find a huge picture of goatse on your keyboard.

    1. Re:Viruses will have a field day! by lpangelrob · · Score: 1
      When I read your post, something else came to mind.

      If there are any other (relatively) old people that remember "Press Your Luck" or any other classic 80's game shows, please concur. :-)

      You have been infected by the *WHAMMY!* virus. You have five more spins...

    2. Re:Viruses will have a field day! by islandless · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      If you look closely you'll notice only icons and command keys for MacOSX.

      As a Mac user myself, I can wholeheartedly and unapologetically laugh in the face of all your virus worries. Really, like a Santa Clause, I caught the Trix Rabbit, you just got hit in the nuts with a football, the Three Stooges are hosting a Pie Tasting at a stuffy country club, Laugh.

      Have a nice time with yer spyware, and virii, and ddon;t forget to wash your hands, keyboard and mouse with Purell. Feel free to join the laughter anytime.

    3. Re:Viruses will have a field day! by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      Cool, not only could viruses switch what appears on your screen when you type you could also wake up and find a huge picture of goatse on your keyboard.

      Goatse keyboard virus effect on the cheap! --> look carefully at the three adjacent I, O and P keys, squint a bit, and you can just about see the hands of the goatse guy stretching the, erhm, "O".

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    4. Re:Viruses will have a field day! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd pay to see that.. I think.

    5. Re:Viruses will have a field day! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Have a nice time with yer spyware, and virii, and ddon;t forget to wash your hands, keyboard and mouse with Purell. Feel free to join the laughter anytime.

      With Apple switching to less expensive CPU hardware supplied by Intel, you smug Apple loving assholes should expect to see a surge in users and thus virsues and trojans.

      While I'm disappointed that in owning a Mac I'm lumped in the same degenerate group as you, I'm glad that I know that at least I'm not as big of a fucking toolbox as you obviously are.

    6. Re:Viruses will have a field day! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That show was awesome, I remember being like 6 years old and always cheering for the Wammmys. I loved the buzzer sound...dooooooDOOOOOOOO!!!

    7. Re:Viruses will have a field day! by Steven+W00ston · · Score: 0

      Current Mac hardware isn't really more expensive - they're computers just have $1000 of cuteness built in.

      --
      Steven Wooston, Lead Programmer, J-J-J-Julius Games
      Author of a CONSIDERABLE number of best-selling games
    8. Re:Viruses will have a field day! by qqaz · · Score: 1

      who are "they" and why are they computers?

      --
      sup :cool:
    9. Re:Viruses will have a field day! by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

      Wow, man. Your mind...just...the thought process to even arrive at such a discov...gah!

    10. Re:Viruses will have a field day! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you are the virus?

  17. What I would really like to see by Hungus · · Score: 1

    I think this is a step in the right direction but what I would really like to see it a programable pad that could change interfaces when I change apps as oppsed to using the same key layout. I have something similar to this using my wacom but its not quite there yet.

    --
    Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
  18. geez... by JoeLinux · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll bet you the latest spyware would get the ability to run banner ads through the keyboard. "Hit the monkey now!"

    1. Re:geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hit the monkey, dude forget that. Can you imagine the pr0n spam that will get through to that thing. Enlarge your memeber now!

      ... I need to go wash my hands now

    2. Re:geez... by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1

      Yes, but with over 120 keys, we can look forward to the most frenetic game of Whack-A-Mole ever!

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:geez... by Wilk4 · · Score: 1
      that could be pretty funny in a way, have a picture 'run' around the keybd, key-to-key, and you have to try to hit that key... ok, not as spyware, but part of a game?

      it might also help typing tutor apps, assign colors to the keys or flash the one you are supposed to type next.

      And the function keys could show not must "F1" but the function assigned to it for the current application - kind of like the old WordPerfect function key templates did, but now it could switch when you switch apps.

    4. Re:geez... by karnal · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you want to make it like the annoying, sound-filled flash ads... "Hit the president to get a free car!!!" ... ugh....

      --
      Karnal
    5. Re:geez... by Wilk4 · · Score: 1

      no, just think it might be funny. (albeit probably annoying after about 30 seconds)

    6. Re:geez... by cmburns69 · · Score: 1

      The "mon" key? I haven't seen that key before.

      Where on my keyboard might I find this key?

      While I'm asking, can you show me where the "Any" key is?

      --
      Online Starcraft RPG? At
      Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
  19. eno rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i would have something clever to say about that, but i don't 'cause my pussy hurts.

  20. How can a Brit get one of these? by CyricZ · · Score: 1

    How can a Brit purchase one of these keyboards? Considering the recent trend of credit card data being "misplaced" or outright stolen, I will not purchase items online from foreign sellers. But you cannot find these speciality keyboards in most large retail stores like Maxwell Technology or Circuits Domain. So while I would like to purchase them, I fear I cannot.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:How can a Brit get one of these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's only a design. Not a real product. Sorry.

    2. Re:How can a Brit get one of these? by crypto55 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just get a prepaid credit card from your bank. Get them to input the exact cost of the keyboard, so even if someone steals your CC #, the thing will be empty anyways.

      --
      Due to financial difficulties, the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.
    3. Re:How can a Brit get one of these? by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      What sort of a hassle is it to get one of these prepaid credit cards? Do they pull the common credit card shenanigans of requiring a credit check and all that, or do they treat it more like a money order and give it to you no-questions-asked?

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    4. Re:How can a Brit get one of these? by crypto55 · · Score: 1

      I think it depends on the card. Usually you get it through your bank, so they'd have a record of your financial history. In some places you can order them online.

      --
      Due to financial difficulties, the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.
  21. The keyboard's cool... by lpangelrob · · Score: 1
    The keyboard is cool... what's with the mouse?

    It looks like something newbies would hold up to their computer screen and try to point to stuff, only to wonder why said mouse doesn't work that way.

    1. Re:The keyboard's cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Evidently in terms of mouse design, they learned nothing from apple's hockey-puck mouses that shipped with the original Imacs...

      Just one word for these guys: Ergonomics

    2. Re:The keyboard's cool... by concept10 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the keyboard is cool but that mouse is ridiculous. Even Apple would trash that idea.

  22. This is actually an old idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a company a few years back that had something similar, only their keyboard used CRT technology. Apparently, people weren't ready to purchase the over-sized heavy-duty desks their keyboard demanded and several users ended up in the hospital after attempting to rest these keyboards on their lap.

  23. Comment + mirror by winkydink · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It looks like most of their portfolio makes it into production, but I can't
    help but wonder just how much a keyboard like this would cost?

    Also, OLED's have a short life. 1-2 years.

    Mirror here

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Comment + mirror by badmammajamma · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's funny...my LG cell phone is two years old and the OLED's work fine. Different colors fail at different rates. Blue supposedly goes first. In any event, the keyboard could turn itself off when your screensaver is activated to extend the life of the OLEDs. You could probably get 5 years out of the keyboard that way and 5 years is good enough for most people.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    2. Re:Comment + mirror by UltimaL337Star · · Score: 1

      "Also, OLED's have a short life. 1-2 years." Then how is it that they sell Creative Zen micro's and Sony Minidisc and MP3 Players that use them? http://www.mysimon.com/Sony_NW_E507_Network_Walkma n__1GB_/4014-6490_8-31303102.html?ttag=pdropsingle http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000830027480/

    3. Re:Comment + mirror by stuuf · · Score: 1

      Um... The same way Apple sold iPods with 1-2 year battery life?

      --

      Everyone is born right-handed; only the greatest overcome it

    4. Re:Comment + mirror by AaronStJ · · Score: 1

      > It looks like most of their portfolio makes it into production

      Or perhaps it's that the design that don't make it into production are taken off the site (since they're obviously not super good designs).

      --
      Stupid like a fox!
    5. Re:Comment + mirror by UltimaL337Star · · Score: 1

      yeah but then we get to sue them :)

  24. OLED + HHK by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

    As soon as the HHK is equipped it's mine.

  25. Hardware my ass.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is VAPORWARE, folks.

    It doesn't even exist. The keys are merely modeled.

    1. Re:Hardware my ass.... by Wizzmer · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing an advert for a PC keyboard with LED-tops in the late 80s. Obviously it wasn't a huge success, and with the dirt cheap keyboards of today it probably won't be a success this time around either.

  26. Is this just an Industrial Design exercise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um... Is this a real prototype designed for commercial production (or to attract manufacturing interest), or is it simply an industrial design student's "cool keyboard idea?"

    The keyboard pictures look TOO clean -- like a photo-real CG rendering -- and it makes me wonder if this is simply a design exercise. Cool concept, though -- I'd buy a keyboard like that.

  27. I can't imagine... by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How this thing won't have a manufacturing cost around $3-4 a key...

    That said... If they build these and they have good action, I'll drop $500 on one.

    1. Re:I can't imagine... by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. I'll always drop $500 for good action.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  28. International users and public terminals by ScArE2100 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is an amazing idea for international users at public terminals. Just sit down and select your character set and you're off and running with a keyboard taylored to your needs. I forsee this being in airports and trainstations; even somewhat computer illiterate people could use it to be able to seemlessly type in there language.

    Although the price might render this idea problematic...

    1. Re:International users and public terminals by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1
      even somewhat computer illiterate people could use it to be able to seemlessly type in there language.
      Cool. Then they just need to add automatic grammar control to the keyboards.
      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    2. Re:International users and public terminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice job, grammar Nazi. Too bad you didn't catch all of the errors.

  29. Vaporware??? by Rokewaju · · Score: 1

    Damn, I hope this do not turn out be another geek teaser. Love the idea. I look foward to seeing this for real. On the other hand there is that cold pail of water labeled vaporware just waiting to fall on my head.

    --
    No, I don't have anything planned for you, I promise...
  30. Lottsa uses for this by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But the one that intrigues me the most is the fact that I share a keyboard between a Mac and a PC using Synergy, and the keys aren't mapped identically between both machines. This would be very handy to have my keyboard visually show me what's what, dependant upon which computer has the keyboards focus at that time.

    Not to mention that I'm a shortcut junkie, and a visual kinda guy... This has "productivity increase" written all over it!

    But the bad news is that the keyboard appears to be just a prototype at this point. Hopefully demand will quickly bring it to market soon! (preferably at less than $200 - It looks kinda expensive). There's a rather good thread on it over at digg, from earlier today.

    1. Re:Lottsa uses for this by tgd · · Score: 1

      Appears to be a prototype in the way the opening credits for Enterprise was a prototype of a Warp 5 starship.

  31. Would be great if the OS... by losman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...could drive the OLEDs. So if I switched from Firefox to OpenOffice the keys would automatically adjust themselves. This way we could leave to the application developers to interface their apps to something in the OS. This would be the future version of creating icons for your application or an extension of it.

    --
    Q: I am short, useless and provide no value. What am I? A: a sig
  32. I would gladly pay by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

    ...for a keyboard with some sort of dynamically-assigned logo on the keys. Not anything fancy, a 5*7 monochrome LCD logo per key would be great, I don't need the fancy colors and shortcuts.

    My need is to be able to see the keys when I type with a foreign keytable. My keyboard is US qwerty, but whenever I type in French or German, since I learned to write these languages using native keytables, I have to switch to azerty or qwertz, which is mostly fine with the US keyboard since I don't look at the keys, but can be a problem for odd characters like @ or ~ that I just never remember on non-US layouts.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:I would gladly pay by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      My good man, why do you not just purchase traditional French and German keyboards?

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    2. Re:I would gladly pay by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      I have French and German keyboard. Occasionally, when I know I'll be typing for an extended period of time in French or German, I power off and switch keyboard.

      I did try to have several keyboards connected, but it turns out it's not so great: I could either:

      - daisy-chain keyboards on the PS/2 connectors, which doesn't work well because (1) they draw too much current and (2) all keyboards receive the PC codes, while only one is concerned by them, and it messes up the other keyboards' internal states

      - use the US kbd on the PS/2 port, and one or two as USB keyboards. I can't combine them all as a single keyboard with XFree86 (unless someone points me to a XF86Config-4 example that doesn't rely on a patched-and-recompiled X server?)

      - use a keyboard switcher: that works, but it still leaves me with 3 keyboards cluttering my desk, and since I don't want to put them away (I do tend to switch between different layouts often), it's just not very handy

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:I would gladly pay by wed128 · · Score: 1

      If all of the keyboards are usb, there is a device that combines them, like /dev/usb/kbds or something. I have multiple USB mice set up, with xorg.conf pointing at /dev/mice and it works fine.

  33. Sorry, poster, editor, and everyone else... by Lethyos · · Score: 0

    They're renderings. I don't think they've decided on the exact technology yet for displaying the images in the keys. Funny how someone's art project (although really cool) gets presented on /. like it's a product.

    --
    Why bother.
    1. Re:Sorry, poster, editor, and everyone else... by Scottarius · · Score: 4, Informative

      Um, nobody claimed it was a product, did you bother to read the post or look past that one page on the website? This is a design concept by a russian company who does industrial design. many of their other design concepts have made it to production.

    2. Re:Sorry, poster, editor, and everyone else... by Lethyos · · Score: 1

      Yes, I did.

      What appears to be a Russian design company has on their website a keyboard in which the keys are using OLED to display what function the keys represent.

      (Emphasis added.) This is an implementation detail in the absence of an implementation.

      The product is Art. Lebedev Studio's Optimus Keyboard.

      (Again, emphasis added.) There is no product. This is a concept.

      So yes, I am correct. It does not matter what else the company does, the Slashdot article still presents it as an implemented product, at first. At the very least, the post is contradictory.

      --
      Why bother.
    3. Re:Sorry, poster, editor, and everyone else... by Scottarius · · Score: 1
      Way to go Captain Litteral.

      Here's hoping that this will make it to a production model and not just a design model.


      It seems pretty obvious the poster was aware this was not a "product". I agree their choice of words wasn't the best, but it was pretty obvious to me from the start it wasn't a production model.

      But it still has more merit than the "art project" you imply it to be.
  34. I want one of these NOW! by concept10 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    .. Is this just a proof of concept vaporware?

    I didnt see anything about purchase information.

  35. neat! by meester+fox · · Score: 1

    FINALLY. An idea that makes sense. I would love to get my hands on that keyboard. switching between dvorak and QWERTY would be a breeze. plus games would be easier to play. and yes. that IS an OLED display on each key. which means each key can change design. So no, your not locked into any key icons (such as the internet explorer one) Each key can change, dynamically. since it is it's own little display. This keyboard would be great. for a lot of stuff. like teaching people how to type. or creating custom keyboards without much fuss. or security, even.

    --
    http://www.6765656b.com it's the ~ for us geek's.
    1. Re:neat! by Rick+Genter · · Score: 1
      So no, your not locked into any key icons (such as the internet explorer one)


      Exactly what I was thinking. It would be even cooler if you could animate the keycaps - I would love to install Firefox, and watch the fox eat the IE icon, then curl up around the earth to take a nap, taking its place :-).
      --
      Don't underestimate the power of The Source
  36. Already been done - sort of. by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

    As cool as this is (and as much as I want one so badly), the same effect has been achieved already with the Ideazon Zboard. You can basically take keyplates off and put other ones on there, and they have plates for all sorts of applications and games.

    1. Re:Already been done - sort of. by TomHandy · · Score: 1

      I think "sort of" is the key phrase there. I think there's a big difference between something like a keyboard which uses some sort of OLED/LCD to change the characters/symbols on the keyboard automatically and something like the Zboard which requires you to actually just replace the physical keys with different keysets. Certainly the "idea" is the same, but the actual practical differences between these two approaches to this basic idea are enough that I wouldn't really say it's "already been done", sort of or not.

    2. Re:Already been done - sort of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sort of", you can say that again!

      The Ideazon Zboard is as much as this thing as a static picture is to a computer-controlled movie...

      This keyboard could be controlled by the computer, meaning each app could change keys according to the needs.

      Would also be nice for multi-language users (change keyboard key tops along with the mapping). Sure, the little country flag in my menu bar does reminds me of what keyboard layout I'm using, but having the key tops change too would help a bit).

    3. Re:Already been done - sort of. by tgrimley · · Score: 1

      Man that thing is ugly!

  37. Prefer normal one by mfloy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you ask me, I prefer the good old fashion keyboards with no special buttons, lights, whistles or what-not. Those keyboards seem like they would be fun until the lights stop working.

  38. Animated Images? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont know much about the method of display, but it seems obvious that it is configorable. My question is what would be the refresh rate on the buttons, would it be possible to have animated keys, just think how anoying that could be!

  39. Woo-Hoo! by hellomynameisclinton · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can finally get past the second step - I'll have an ANY KEY!

    1. Re:Woo-Hoo! by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 1

      Right up until somebody hacks the driver to make them all "Any" keys.

      --
      Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
  40. neat, but... by greywire · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This would have to be ungodly expensive for a keyboard. OLED's are definately the way to go, though, because LCD's (especialy in color) are way to bulky and expensive (each key would need a light source, lcd, and a driver chip). With an OLED, if I am not mistaken, you can have the whole display and drivers on one piece. No glass panels, no backlight.

    Still, until OLEDs are in mass (*MASS*) production, I dont see producing a keyboard like this for a reasonable price for some time yet.

    For all the people thinking "OH NO! this would be way to confusing! Bad, bad idea for UI design..".. what's the problem? We have windows full of icons now. What's the difference in putting some icons onto a keyboard? With something like photoshop I could see this being a real time saver. And I bet you will start to use and remember keyboard shortcuts much more often with this, since you only need to look, where now you have to hunt around and find out what the shortcut is..

    --
    -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
    1. Re:neat, but... by Upphew · · Score: 0

      How about LCD touch sensitive display. Add some transparent keys and virtual keyboard... As for bulkiness of LCDs, I would say that my laptop's display is thinner than my keyboard at home.

  41. Do they have a patent for this? by concept10 · · Score: 1


    This maybe a rendering or whatever the fsck it is but they should patent this, if not i'm calling Steve Jobs this afternoon. That thing is SLICK!!

    1. Re:Do they have a patent for this? by arose · · Score: 1

      I disagree, the idea of putting screens on keys to customize them is obvious. If they solve the engineering problems involved that may warrant patents, but ideas should not be patented.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  42. nice, except for the ginormous enter key! by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 1

    I hate keyboards with the ginormous enter key! If they can do it with a normal small sized one I'd be more interested. Then again, maybe it's more customizable and I might actually like it. Having a small shift key on the right side probably wouldn't bother me either as I never really use that anyway.

    The best thing about this would be if I could progmatically control all the displays of the keyboards. Then when I get a new IM, I could display the messages on the keyboard, and or flash other cool messages for when I get email or scripts/jobs finish!! (I already do this with keyboard led's in the plugin I made for Trillian.) This has definite potential to be very useful. Hopefully it wouldn't cost too much! I'd probably pay up to 250 dollars for a keyboard like that if I could control the display of the keys via an API.

    1. Re:nice, except for the ginormous enter key! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate keyboards with the ginormous enter key! If they can do it with a normal small sized one I'd be more interested.

      So you're the little prsck responsible for those damn enter keys that are shaped like and feel like the shift key?

      Enter keys are supposed to be big, to be a fast no-look target. Whoever the hell is responsible for the dominant trend of big backspace keys for the idiots who couldn't simply zero in on the proper sized one by its upper corner location, can rot in hell.

    2. Re:nice, except for the ginormous enter key! by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 1

      LOL! I can hit the enter key perfectly in slightly less than shift key size. Why the heck there is a need for it to take up half the keyboard, I have no idea.

  43. Russians + Keyboards=keyloggers? by bosewicht · · Score: 1

    hmmm, russian keyboards...them damn crafty russians. I'm not going to fall for their trickery.

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world - those who understand binary and those who don't
  44. This Would Be a Great Gaming Advance by Undefined+Tag · · Score: 1

    Anyone who's ever played WOW, GuildWars, or any other MMORPG that has you assign abilities to function keys would love this.

    Not having to have those little icons on the bottom of the screen - because they'd be on your keyboard - would be fantastic

    For that matter, I hope the PS3 designers are looking at this. A console whose controller lights up with appropriate button labels would be fantastic!

  45. that's good news by whovian · · Score: 4, Funny

    There really could be an 'Any' key.

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    1. Re:that's good news by zboy · · Score: 1

      or a whole keyboard full of them for that matter

    2. Re:that's good news by Ryan+Monster · · Score: 1

      Well where's the "any" key? I see Esc, Ctarl , and PigUp. There doesn't seem to be any any key! Phew. All this computer hacking is making me thirsty. I think I'll order a Tab. Oop! No time for that now, the computer's starting.

      --
      Change your name to Homer Junior! Your friends can call you Hoju
  46. Oooohhhh by David+Horn · · Score: 1

    My pants just got sticky.

    --
    PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
  47. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...what Emacs would look like on this!

  48. Hmmm... well... by lurch_mojoff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't want to dis the (obviously) pretty good designers of Art. Lebedev Studio, but do we have a proof that this is even a prototype? For all I see it may just as well be a great idea with a good design, created in Maya (or whatever). Prety picture != real (or even conceivable) product.

    Keyboard design needed something like this for a long time now, but will it ever become a real market product?

  49. "Patents pending"? by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I sure hope the patent applies only to high-resolution or color displays inside the keyboard, as many Slashdot users have "published" (in patent jargon) a description of a reconfigurable keyboard with a small (e.g. 8x8 pixel) monochrome LCD under each key.

    1. Re:"Patents pending"? by TomHandy · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, do you have some examples of this? The reason I ask is that the basic idea (some sort of LCD under each key to allow for a reconfigurable keyboard) is something that had occurred to me a couple of years ago, and I was reading this article now and thinking "Damn, I wish I had actually tried to do something with the idea". I wouldn't feel nearly so bad if it turns out this is something other people have talked about doing before, and hence not such an original idea.

    2. Re:"Patents pending"? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, do you have some examples of this?

      If only Slashdot search actually worked...

  50. Keyboardsaver by Lost+Found · · Score: 1

    I would now like to take credit, on behalf of my open source breatheren, as the first "side" to have thought of the concept of the Keyboardsaver. KEuphoria on the keyboard would kick ass!

  51. Applications beyond computing by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyway. I've always thought of a musical MIDI keyboard with glowing keys.

    Why? You give it the music, and it can teach you to play a specific piece of music. Just put your hands on the glowing keys, and ta-da! :)

    1. Re:Applications beyond computing by zerOnIne · · Score: 3, Interesting

      like this? it's been around for a few years. there's even a guitar version. you don't really need the complexity of OLED displays for this purpose.

      --
      09
    2. Re:Applications beyond computing by justinstreufert · · Score: 1

      I think they beat you to it... No kidding, I saw this at Costco the other day. The keyboard was like $600, and I believe it was made by Yamaha. Looked really neat.

      More on-topic, I'd just like to say that this is one of the coolest nonexistant products I've ever seen.

      Justin

      --
      "Why would God give us a waist if we wasn't supposed to rest our pants on it?" - Rev. Roy McDaniels
    3. Re:Applications beyond computing by nkh · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the games you could write for this with a good SDK...

    4. Re:Applications beyond computing by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Anyway. I've always thought of a musical MIDI keyboard with glowing keys.

      Why? You give it the music, and it can teach you to play a specific piece of music. Just put your hands on the glowing keys, and ta-da! :)


      's been done.
      I can't remember the particular product or manufacturer, but there used to be a setup like that for kids. It was a small midi (well.. USB, actually) keyboard with light-up keys, and some "learn the piano" type software that lit up the keys as it played back music, or as part of interactive music lessons

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
  52. typing class by Plocmstart · · Score: 1

    I thought I took typing class in high school so I wouldn't have to look at the keyboard... this would be tempting to reverse this. Now just integrate the entire computer screen into the keyboard... or maybe I should just get a 17" touchscreen and lay it flat on my desk and use a on-screen keyboard... minus the tactile response of course.

  53. Pending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the web page itself, "Patents Pending."

    1. Re:Pending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      brilliant observation, sherlock.

  54. OT Re:How can a Brit get one of these? by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

    Get a second low-limit credit card. The bank will be happy to let you have it.

    Then when you want to make an Internet purchase, just use the second card. If its stolen, no big deal, just cancel it. Your primary is still good.

    And for big purchases, just transfer a big amount to it (so you have a surplus on it), then do the purchase. Since you don't cross the limit, you're ok.

    --

    - - - - - - - - - - -
    I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
  55. OLED? by Pyrosz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I would think that the new e-paper technologies would be better suited as they maintain the image with the power off. This would enable the keyboard to only use power while the keys are changed (or if they are animated), and of course the wireless portion would use power.

    If they get these out on the market (using e-paper tech) for under $300 CAN I would buy one asap.

    --

    An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
    1. Re:OLED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what I was thinking at first, but then I realized that you couldn't have any cool colors on your keys if that were the case, since e-paper is only B&W.

    2. Re:OLED? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would think that the new e-paper technologies would be better suited as they maintain the image with the power off.

      Now there's a real-world problem.

      Tech Support: Welcome to Bombay Computer Support, how may I help you?

      Consumer: When I turn on my computer, it says 'BIOS ERROR, Press F1 to configure'.

      TS: What happens when you press the F1 key?

      Con: I don't have an F1 key! My keyboard is blank!

      TS: Tell your roommate to give you back your key caps.

      Con: ?!?

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    3. Re:OLED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like $20 US, right?

    4. Re:OLED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the US dollar keeps its slide going, it'll soon be $350 US. Keep up the good work, Bush!

  56. Optimus Humor by ndansmith · · Score: 1
    Think of the potential for fun and humor in customizing the keyboard. Well don't just think of it, post it.

    Here's one: Oscillating 1337 keymap

    1. Re:Optimus Humor by Punboy · · Score: 1

      Screw screensavers... lets have keyboard savers!

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
  57. My concerns by Penguin+Programmer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This looks like a very, very cool idea. However, I have a major concern that would need to be satisfied before I would buy one: Drivers.

    I'm a dedicated Linux user and I think that the complexity of the drivers required for a keyboard like this might mean that a Linux driver doesn't appear right away (I mean, what are the chances of them releasing one, and we all know how long it takes for community-started open-source drivers to become stable, although they're quicker now than ever). Also, that driver had better not put any load on my CPU or memory. I have better things to do with those.

    That said, when an open-source driver for it does emerge, you know it'll do all sorts of cool stuff. For those of us who don't need to look at the keys anyway, it could be programmed to show movies while I'm typing instead.

    1. Re:My concerns by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      But then we would all be looking at the keys, and couldn't make all the hunt and peck typers feel inferior.

  58. Brilliant! by WarmNoodles · · Score: 1

    Some one putting thier noodle to good use.

    Ill buy one when its available.
    Id be willing to pay $200 US for this peripheral.
    Lets hope they get it going and have some competition, cause id rather pay $90 US.

  59. WoW - need one of these in Azeroth! by kingjosh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    WoW would be great with this! Chuckled a bit when I saw the "Quake" idea, first thing I thought of was binding the keys to macros on World of Warcraft, this would just be so much better than an action bar and/or remembering what you mapped all your keys to.

    I'd definitely pay for this keyboard, even if it were $200+

    1. Re:WoW - need one of these in Azeroth! by TedTschopp · · Score: 1

      $200+

      This is the last keyboard you would ever need. If it had a life span of say 10 years, I would be willing to spend over a $1000 for it. Like someone said elsewhere, Logitech or Microsoft NEEDS to license this idea and make it happen NOW.

      --
      Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
  60. Won't someone please think of the children? by Webmonger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's got to be the widest 'standard' keyboard I've ever seen in my life! Where will our obsession with function keys end? First the PC/XT layout put them on the left-hand side, then the AT layout put them along the top.

    This keyboard combines the two, so now we've got function keys across the top and (different ones) down the left, plus a numeric keypad that is completely redundant with other number and arrow keys.

    Where will it end? Will we someday be pair programming with both programmers working the keyboard and telling each other which keys to hit? Will fights break out over who gets to press 'Y' and 'B'?

    I'm sure there are children whose arms won't reach both ends of this thing! Won't someone please think of the children?

    1. Re:Won't someone please think of the children? by JohnsonWax · · Score: 1

      This keyboard combines the two, so now we've got function keys across the top and (different ones) down the left, plus a numeric keypad that is completely redundant with other number and arrow keys.

      Well, the two Fkey areas aren't redundent if you can assign. For the ones on the left, I'd suggest oversized keys - 50% wider than normal or so so that you can program them to show real-time data updates. I'd imagine sysadmins mapping system loads to keys and so on.

    2. Re:Won't someone please think of the children? by VGR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sun keyboards do this, and I love it. (Though Sun keyboards have a number of other qualities which I don't love....)

      If, like me, you're a keyboard power user, then having those left function keys, like Open, Front, Cut, Copy, Paste, Undo, Props and so on is a godsend. And from a user interface standpoint, they're a lot smarter than expecting novice users to know Ctrl-C, Ctrl-X, Ctrl-V, and Ctrl-Z. (And it would be nice if novice users didn't keep trying to get those combinations to work in Unix shells.)

      It may make the keyboard bigger, but I'm not aware of any key combos comprised of both a left function key and some other key.

      --
      The Internet is full. Go away.
    3. Re:Won't someone please think of the children? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      That's got to be the widest 'standard' keyboard I've ever seen in my life! Where will our obsession with function keys end? First the PC/XT layout put them on the left-hand side, then the AT layout put them along the top.

      Too young to remember the Northgate keyboards?

      I think this kybd is teh hawt, and I'd get one just so that I could map my WoW shortcut icons, or run futura modern keycaps.. Kubrick would DIE for one of these if he hadn't already...

    4. Re:Won't someone please think of the children? by TedRiot · · Score: 1

      I for one agree. I don't want the function keys on the left side of the keyboard for health reasons. I started using the mouse with my left hand instead of the right one to stop having pains in my wrist and elbow. The pain resulted probably from having to twist my right arm to move my right hand beyond the numeric keypad. On the left hand side the need for movement is shorter and the arm is less twisted and I have not experienced pain since.

      I always get asked if I'm left-handed, though, which I'm not. I also still have right-handed mouse button configuration, I don't see the need to change mouse button order..

  61. Doable... by ferralis · · Score: 1
    As far as I can tell, OLED's are not the right tech. Oughta look into E-Ink type displays-- refresh rate is slower, but quite livable since you wouldn't switch layouts all that often. Also, current needs only be applied when changing the image, so even when the system was offline you'd have labelled keys.

    Hrm... how cool would it be to have peoples' keyboards unexpectedly start spelling "All your bases are..." throughout the company...

    --
    Any generalization is a stupid one.
  62. Ugh! Transformers! by uberdave · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The Transformers series offshoot, Beast Wars, so polluted the net that for the longest time I couldn't find a trace of one of the most innovative homebrew robot projects ever published. Subsumption architecture is the way to go.

  63. Dammit, not again! by Ossifer · · Score: 1

    Another one of my great ideas I never got around to doing... [I also dreamt up maglev trains when I was 8 years old--unfortunately that one had already been invented]

    I used to be an old APL programmer and thought LED keycaps would be an excellent idea to see the APL characters...

    1. Re:Dammit, not again! by TomHandy · · Score: 1

      My sentiments exactly. I had also been thinking this would be a cool idea, but never got around to trying to actually implement it in any way. I do take some comfort though in reading that other people on Slashdot have also thought of this....... doesn't make me feel like I was sitting on some million dollar idea that no-one ever thought of and missed some opportunity.

  64. I can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I can't wait until somebody comes out with a slot machine game for these. There's no better way to sit in your office playing games all day AND sound productive! Although Nethack does a fairly decent job of that.

  65. Z-Board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somewhere a Z-Board is jumping from a bridge...

  66. So much for touch typing (without looking) by Wilk4 · · Score: 2, Funny
    So much for touch typing (without looking).... though I presume you'd still be used to standards sets for 'normal' use.

    wonder what the 'feel' is like? that matters.

    have to admit, the displays are pretty cool looking, but I'd sure hate to think what happens to it when you spill your coffee into it... ;-)

  67. vi/emacs by skoch · · Score: 1

    Imagine the possibilites for emacs / vi or any other highly customizable interface if when teh more of prefix is activated the keys change to display the funtion they will perform. No more acrane keyboard combinations, just an infinitely large set of (dynalic) custom buttons.

    1. Re:vi/emacs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vi is so much better than EMACS, why would you want to switch? Duh hickey.

      Who rocks the house? Vi rocks the house...

      Actually, I am just kidding I really like eMacs and run both EMACS and VI on it. Ha hahah! depends on my m0000d.

      But just think how great this would be if it turned out to be the new Revolution controller? Just think how much better the gamecube is than the XBOX

      No wait the XBOX is better. Wouldn't it be great if we had a controller to play vi on?

      Okay this is the important part of the message: Gamecube, Sony Playstation 2 and playstation 2 compatibles, and xbox are all a lot of fun if you enjoy video gaming.

      Wait a minute will the new keyboard make it easier to change my mind?

  68. keyboard demo by MasterLock · · Score: 1

    Which demo group will be the first to write the first keyboard-based demo?

    Will we need keyboard screen savers, too?

    So many questions...

  69. Mod Parent Up! by Spiderfood · · Score: 1

    It doesn't take much to see that this is a concept only.

    --
    + Spiderfood
  70. Shades of Gattaca by phillymjs · · Score: 1

    Where will it end? Will we someday be pair programming with both programmers working the keyboard and telling each other which keys to hit? Will fights break out over who gets to press 'Y' and 'B'?

    I predict that they will breed programmers with six or more fingers on each hand, and only they will be able to properly use future keyboards.

    ~Philly

  71. New type of Trojan by Blindman · · Score: 3, Funny

    You could install a keyboard game like Whack-a-mole, and the user unwittingly types in code to destroy their own system.

    --
    I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person that I'm preaching to.
  72. it will cost too much by epaton · · Score: 1

    it cool but will cost a fortune and it would be a lot cheaper just geting a bunch of blank keyboards and some stickers

    1. Re:it will cost too much by narcc · · Score: 1

      Or save even more money by getting a regular keyboard and some stickers...

  73. you sure you're a Brit? by CdBee · · Score: 1

    I'm in hertfordshire and have never heard of either of the "big retailers" you quote..

    Neither has Google. Is this some sort of sophisticated troll?

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  74. Someone wake me up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when they come up with a keyboard for the

    "Keyboard not found - press F1 to continue"

    error in Windows.

  75. That thing is sexy by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

    I reserve my ultimate judgement until I see how it feels to use, how durable it is, and how much it'll set me back. But that thing is sexy. I'd like the look of that with conventional keys.

    --
    Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    1. Re:That thing is sexy by Svet-Am · · Score: 1

      i was just thinking that it's sexy enough that Mr Jobs might be interested enough to buy a whole bunch of them and bundle them with future macs since they always have the cool sexy hardware.

      --
      [move .sig! for great justice, take off every .sig!]
  76. Decisions with the current price of OLEDs by Foobar_ · · Score: 1

    Car, or keyboard... car, or keyboard...

    Current OLED technology is short-lived (red and green are on par with traditional LEDs but blue wears out really fast, 1000 hours) though recent lab advancements have eliminated that concern. Now if only Kodak would loosen their patents' stranglehold on OLEDs and stop demanding license fees from third-party researchers ;P

  77. For Pretty Pictures by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

    http://www.artlebedev.fr/

    Check out their French site for the same pretty pictures since their English site has been Slashdotted.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  78. Save money.... by Dodgycrap · · Score: 1

    Das Keyboard + Tippex + 30 minutes = Optimus Keyboard
    Just scrape off as you change apps...

  79. Yes, every key would change... by Omega · · Score: 5, Funny

    That would be really funny if the prompt read, "Press any key" and every key on the keyboard changed to read "Any". :)

    1. Re:Yes, every key would change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would *still* get support calls, though.

      Lusers wouldn't know which "Any" key to press...

    2. Re:Yes, every key would change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then the prompt would have to say "Press any 'Any' key"...

    3. Re:Yes, every key would change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then the prompt should read "Press any any key"

    4. Re:Yes, every key would change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine the tech support calls asking which "Any" key should be pressed.

    5. Re:Yes, every key would change... by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 1

      ... every key on the keyboard changed to read "Any".

      Except for the Caps, Shift, Ctrl and Alt keys of course! Those aren't just any old keys ya know...

      --
      Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
    6. Re:Yes, every key would change... by eth1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "That would be really funny if the prompt read, "Press any key" and every key on the keyboard changed to read "Any". :)"

      Tech Support: Hello, how may I help you?
      Customer: Hi, it says to press the 'Any' key, but I see 104 'Any' keys... which one do I press?
      Tech Support: *blam*

  80. Been there, seen that, done that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some time in the very late 1980's the hungarian VT "Videoton" company made a normal 101-key PC/AT keyboard, where each indvidual key had had a small LCD embedded at the top. The keys showed what you chose with a selector, as the character sets were stored in EEPROM. I heard there was a later version, which you could control on the fly via RS-232 tether and use arbitrary charsets.

    Of course those keyboards were not very attractive, because traditional passive black-on-grey LCDs don't have too much contrast and are purely reflective, so the keys were a bit hard to read.

    It was outrageously expensive as well, because of the need to make 101 little keys with an LCD in each one, using lots of manual labor. I think most of these keyboards were used by the soviet bloc militaries (WARPAC) where the need for rapid use of cyrillic and latin alphabet plus code signs at the same time overrode any cost issue.

    So we have some prior art.

  81. Awesome by galaxyboy · · Score: 1
    Think of all of the nifty uses for such a device.

    keyboard, game station, universal remote control, alternate languages, music?, education, larger letters my grandma (who can't type and doesn't see really well), etc.

    Do they have an ergonomic model?

  82. One step further by porneL · · Score: 1

    With bendable touchscreen you could make vdu and keyboard in one.

  83. i wonder if this guy is getting one.. by evilmousse · · Score: 1

    optimus prime (Ohio National Guard 5694TH Tactical Crash Rescue Unit)

    (old news, but still fun for those who haven't seen)

  84. Sweet by CDenno · · Score: 1

    Coolest. Keyboard. EVAR! Perfect for all those IM ninnies out there... now instead of typing three keys: omg, lol, wtf, mom, etc., will all fit nicely into one.

  85. Useless by Thaelon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How completely useless for us touch typists.

    Also, if you need to look down to see what key does what in an FPS game (Quake (III?) is depicted) you're already dead.

    --

    Question everything

    1. Re:Useless by Kevin+DeGraaf · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      If you want to get up in memory's face and smack some bits around, use C. If you want to get things done, don't.

      Right, because as we all know, OS kernels, device drivers, microcontroller apps, embedded systems programs, etc. are all written in Java these days...

      ...oh, wait.

      --
      We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked.
    2. Re:Useless by ferreth · · Score: 0

      Second vote for useless, at least for anyone who uses a computer regulary. Fine for people who have to think what key to hit for 'any key', but useless for anyone else. I find it amusing that they stick with F1..F12 too for the function keys - isn't the point of this thing to show you what the functions are?

      --

      W9x:Thanks for the make-work project Bill.

    3. Re:Useless by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sure. I can touchtype, and I've been able to do that for the last 13 years at least. But it'd still be VERY handy.

      When I'm using a new program, I'd love for my keyboard to show me what keys do what. Hold down shift and a new set of functions pop up on the keyboard. Other modifiers and you get more.

      Touch typing is useless when you don't know that pressing Ctrl+Shift+Space will do what you're trying to find in Tools->More->Neat->Macro->Experimental->Do not touch.

      Or are you just somehow magically able to know just what each and every key combination does in a program you've never used before?

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    4. Re:Useless by Webmonger · · Score: 1

      Not useless. Maybe not worth it either, but for each game, you've got to learn what the keys do. I remember back in the day, you had to work it all out 'blind', by whacking each key and seeing if it had any effect. Unless you actually bought the game or something. Then they invented the 'keyboard configuration' options, and the problem was reduced.

      This keyboard would be a damn sight better than having to open the manual or pull up the keyboard configuration options. I'm still not sure what all the keys in WoW are. But good integration with games or apps that use the keyboard in non-traditional ways would be 'key'.

    5. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. If the keyboard was to be used exclusively for touch typing it would be useless... and a stupid waist of money.

      But:

      I'm a touch typist and I would find such a keyboard extremely usefull. Perhaps I'd like to learn a new keyboard layout... BAM! Or I'm editing some photos or using some program I'm not familiar with and I'd like to see the shortcuts that are available: press CTRL... BAM! the layout changes. CTRL-ALT... BAM! it changes again. I would find that utterly time-saving.

      Perhaps I'm learning a new game that utilizes every gosh dang key on the keyboard. Sure, after a while I wouldn't need to look at the keys, but the learning process would move along much faster. FPS is but one genre in the world of gaming.

    6. Re:Useless by Thaelon · · Score: 1
      When I'm using a new program, I'd love for my keyboard to show me what keys do what. Hold down shift and a new set of functions pop up on the keyboard. Other modifiers and you get more.
      I thought about that then realized that I would probably have to tell the keyboard's software what key combinations did what to begin with.

      Or do you really think that the developers of it are really going to preprogram it the keyboard functions of every single program in existence? I'm sure only mainstream programs will get preloaded, the rest you'll have to do yourself. And if you have to tell the keyboard what keys do what before it can tell you, how useful is it?

      Also I'm not sure how relabeling the keys on the fly is all that helpful to begin with. Sure you can look down and see that the "Hand tool" in Photoshop is on the key that looks like a hand, but then you simply become dependant on it rather than learning what key is the hand tool. You can't just be like, "Oh, it's the H key, I can hit that without looking at the keyboard." because there is no "H" key. There is only a "Hand Tool" key now. I don't see how this is much improvement over icons on the screen to click. It just moves the clickable icons to pressable keys on the keyboard.

      If you ask me, the only value this keyboard has is aesthetic. (Though it is pretty badass looking, especially if you can put badass looking icons on it) Too bad it's not a split keyboard.
      --

      Question everything

    7. Re:Useless by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

      You can't just be like, "Oh, it's the H key, I can hit that without looking at the keyboard." because there is no "H" key. There is only a "Hand Tool" key now.

      How is this any different? How do you know where the H key is? You remember it as a two-key reach with the left index finger on the home row, or a one-key reach with the right index finger on the home row. When you use Ctrl-C to copy text, do you actually think "Ctrl-C"? Or do you just align your hand down a bit and angle it so that hitting the button under your pinky then rolling down the index finger excecutes a "copy" command? I think this would be better because it would help train touch typing for ALL uses of the keyboard, not just typing alphabetical characters.

    8. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this 'BAM!' key of which you speak?

    9. Re:Useless by frohike · · Score: 1

      What is this 'BAM!' key of which you speak?

      It's the one Steve Jobs has on his little remote for WWDC presentations. Or so I gather from his commentary.

    10. Re:Useless by Thaelon · · Score: 1
      I think this would be better because it would help train touch typing for ALL uses of the keyboard, not just typing alphabetical characters.

      You don't learn touch typing by looking at the keyboard.
      --

      Question everything

    11. Re:Useless by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

      Right, I first learned to type by pressing every key on the keyboard until I found the right one. No, I looked at the keyboard and related the image on the key to where I would have to move my fingers to hit it. A one-step correlation.

      Currently, you seem to imply that the best way to remember multiple-key commands (e.g. copy) by remembering that it's Ctrl-C...but you have to know where the C is first, no? Two-step correlation, with a mnemonic thrown in.

      Touch typing is remembering the finger movements, not the actual layout of the keyboard. It doesn't matter what's on the key after you've learned, but a one-step correlation would seem to me to be much more direct than a two-step correlation + (often cryptic) mnemonic as a way to train the fingers.

    12. Re:Useless by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Or are you just somehow magically able to know just what each and every key combination does in a program you've never used before?

      Shh, my boss thinks I do. Have no idea what most are but thank goodness its usually easy for me to find out. Though usually I don't need to learn much. Most of my support calls are for teaching ctrl-A, ctrl-Z, ctrl-X, ctrl-C, and ctrl-V to some one that already knows how to do it. ;) (I know taught 'em half hour ago.)

      My boss thinks that I have magic computer renewing powers as well. Just by touching a computer that we took out of service and have replaced, I'm supposedly able to instantly repair and reload it ready to be "donated" to someone the boss is sucking up to. ;)

    13. Re:Useless by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Or are you just somehow magically able to know just what each and every key combination does in a program you've never used before?

      Not on my own, but if I employ the assistance of a magical tool like a "book" or a "help file"...

      (Yes, the poor quality and completeness of software documentation IS a problem, and is the petard by which I am myself hoist'd)

    14. Re:Useless by wasted+time · · Score: 1

      and a "magical" keyboard would be less cool how? ; )

      --
      The Stone Age did not end because humans ran out of stones. - William McDonough
    15. Re:Useless by Eil · · Score: 1


      How completely useless for us touch typists.

      It's clearly not meant for touch typists. (Or elitists.)

      Also, if you need to look down to see what key does what in an FPS game (Quake (III?) is depicted) you're already dead.

      Yes, but if you're NEW to Quake 3 or any FPS for that matter, it beats the two current leading methods:

      1) Print off a copy of the keyboard/mouse controls (or try to clamp the manual open) and set it next to your keyboard. Die while frantically scanning the sheet of paper for the grenade key.

      2) Review the keyboard/mouse controls before playing the game and try to memorize as much as you can. Die while trying to remember the grenade key.

      At least on with a keyboard with a grenade icon on the key, you simply glance down quickly and bang on the grenade key the nanosecond you spot it. The icons on the keys give you a better visual representation of the layout than the usual "Z = jump, Q = bunny hop, etc" list of keyboard controls in most game manuals. Additionally, this keyboard would do away with key translation: if you want to kill something, you hit a button labeled "Kill," not the friggen "Catarl" key.

    16. Re:Useless by Calroth · · Score: 1

      This keyboard makes all your commands discoverable. In the user interaction world, that's pretty hot.

      Scenario: You hold down the Ctrl key. Instantly, your keyboard remaps itself, changing the key caps from "A" "S" "D" "F" etc. to "Ctrl-A", "Ctrl-S", "Ctrl-D", etc. It may sound silly but even that would make things a lot clearer to newbies - believe it or not, there are a lot of people out there who either never learn how to use key shortcuts, or learn a few by rote and never figure them out!

      But then, your custom software comes in. Instead of "Ctrl-A" (for instance), it says "Ctrl-A: Select All". Instead of "Ctrl-S", it says "Ctrl-S: Save". If you let up on the Ctrl key, the other key caps revert. An easy way to see its effects.

      Those same newbies who never learn how to use key shortcuts, they do things by clicking the File menu and choosing Save. Every time. Every goddamn time. To them, Ctrl-S is another cryptic, untrusted, black magic command. But if you change it to holding down Ctrl and pressing the "Save" key, that's much friendler. (It sucks how much some people are scared of computers. This is an utterly alien concept to Slashdotters. But it's true.)

    17. Re:Useless by Tech · · Score: 1

      Ah, but fun if you're learning to touch-type. Remember those old Casio keyboards from the 80s that taught you to "play" music by following the lights?

    18. Re:Useless by p00ya · · Score: 1
      I thought about that then realized that I would probably have to tell the keyboard's software what key combinations did what to begin with.

      This could be solved with hacks for the GUI API. For instance, the keyboard driver will be informed of menu items with accellerators and icons in whatever application has focus. This wouldn't work well where there's no standard API (eg. an X11 desktop with GTK/Qt/*tif, games).

      There is still the problem in the Ctrl+Shift+Space example that that particular function is still hidden by two modifiers. Say there are 24 non-alphanumeric keys. To find it, the user would have to scan through 60 (ctrl modified) + 24 (shift modified non-alphanumeric) + 60 (ctrl+shift modified) keys to find the function. This is analgous to having menus corresponding to each of the $\sum_{i=1}^n{nCi}$ combinations of the n modifier keys, with 60 entries (you could get away with 34 for shift if you discarded the obvious shift+x = X for alpha). The advantage of the keyboard would be that it's more obvious to the user (sitting on the keys he's searching) and there's also some association between function and physical layout.

      The other way of looking at it is the user already knows what key combo he wants to press, and wants to query the function it effects. In this case the keyboard wins easily, but it isn't the approach you'd expect most users to take.

  86. touch-screen keyboard? by mag46 · · Score: 0

    This got me thinking, would a Nintendo DS-style laptop work well? Top screen would be normal, bottom could be a touch screen. You could make literally any keyboard layout (not just QWERTY or DVORAK, but different placements, like those split keyboards, if that's your thing.) The user could also have a touchpad as large/small as they wanted, with as many mouse buttons, scrolls, volume virtual-dials, etc. The only drawback that I can think of is the lack of tactile response, but I think this would be outweighed by the other potential benefits.

  87. Is there a GTA: SA Hot Coffee mapping? by akgw · · Score: 1

    That is all.

  88. Games !!! by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    How fast is the key display refresh rate? You could get some cool games on this thing in which the control AND the display is all on the keyboard.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  89. Puts on visionary hat... by jasofa · · Score: 1

    Let's think about this technology application in the context of convergence. Let's give it a smaller form factor and a few additional controls, and a device like this could be used to control everything in your house - TV, DVD player, computer, game console, stereo, maybe even a cordless phone function. Make it wireless with receivers hooked into all of your home electronics. Now we just need to get the size down and make the layout more elegant.

  90. e-Ink by cryptochrome · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think e-ink would be a cheaper, less power-hungry option for the keys. Also, making the keys contoured would be a good idea.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    1. Re:e-Ink by Anonymous+Commando · · Score: 1

      And Fujitsu has just announced color e-paper - at least in the lab, hopefully making it into commercial production in 2006 or 2007. This would be a better idea for a reconfigurable keyboard than OLEDs, in terms of power consumption and flexibility (able to make contoured keys, reflective vs. backlit, etc.).

      --
      Corporate Jenga: You take a blockhead from the bottom and you put him on top...
    2. Re:e-Ink by Tzarius · · Score: 1

      But the glow! It has to glow! That alone puts the bling factor through the roof!

    3. Re:e-Ink by Ariannus · · Score: 1

      OLEDs don't use alot of power and they are flexable. Also since they emit light themselves they aren't backlight.

  91. transform! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all i have to say is:

    Optimus Keyboard, MAXIMIZE!

    *insert retro transformation sound from our oh so joyous youth*

  92. ...and the downside. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny
    Doubleclick.net/etc and others exploit IE security loopholes and deliver little click-here icon ads to your keyboard without you asking.

    Or, visit a page with a banner, and watch the whole "click the monkey" or "Shoot the duck" bannergame display in your function key row, begging you to hit the right key to win that iPod.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  93. pff, take your pitiful Optimus Prime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    A Mega keyboard should have a mega name - perhaps worthy enough for Megatron

    ..if it was called "tron"

    The megatron keyboard would of course feature a "SPAM them MOTHAS" key, and a "Sasser this"

    ohh, and it would have a keystroke logger by default. A keyboard it NOT evil enough until it can turn on it's own master by recording his/her keystrokes and sending them off to the Ukrainian mafia.

    Also, it has a blue IE (e) key, so it's tailored for Windows, yet there is NO BSOD key and NO "anykey". Windows home users will not be amused.

    As an aside: Should an anonymous user have to wait 44+ minutes to post. Come on crapDOT I used to respect you before you were taken over by Chinese government officials..

    Actually I never had this problem in Europe. Maybe the internet should be regulated by an international bosy!

  94. One big Screen? by Pimpkar · · Score: 1

    Why couldn't you go with one big LCD touchscreen that you could configure any way you wanted, even as a second monitor. It would come with a program that allowed you to designate key size, function, and image. The pause/break key on this keyboard, what is the point? I could change it to my pr0n button and make it the size of the enter key. I know nothing of the tech related to this but I imagine there is some reason this can't be done or the price is to high but I think it would be pretty nice.

    1. Re:One big Screen? by kalislashdot · · Score: 1

      I hate touch screens becuse it is like hitting a wall all day. Movable keys have a buffer, which is way better for the hands.

      Try jumping up and down barefoot on a concrete slap for an hour and see how much your feet hurt, now jump on a bed for an hour, much better. Touch screens will never become mainstream for heavy use as a keyboard.

    2. Re:One big Screen? by Pimpkar · · Score: 1

      Damn, didn't think of that. The screen is made of a material with some elasticity that will give under pressure. Time to go invent some space age polymers and such things!

  95. Good idea, really? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Sweet concept.

    Not terribly practical, though, even if they put it into production.

    How many times did you look at your keyboard while you typed your post, really? In the middle of an intense FPS shootout, do you really need to know which key you configured to switch from the rocket launcher to grenades? Do you really have to check the keyboard shortcut for "Copy" in your text editor of choice?

    No, me neither.

    This is a fun idea, sure, and might have some genuine use in a few niches, but I doubt it's going anywhere as a mainstream idea.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Good idea, really? by conigs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I beg to differ that this is not practical. This would be especially useful to video editors or anyone in media that uses a shit-ton of keyboard hotkeys/shortcuts. Take video for example... Avid and FCP keyboards are all over the place. Imagine having a kayboard like this which avid or fcp could send the user's keyboard layout to, and presto! Instant, accurate representation of all the keyboard short-cuts. This is far better than buying a pre-manufactured keyboard that has the shortcuts printed on the keys... especially if you change the layout (as many do on avid and fcp and many other programs).

      --
      Slashdot: where repeating an article in a post is "+5 Insightful"
    2. Re:Good idea, really? by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 1

      Yes it's useful for FPS games (and more). I don't do games much - part of why (aside from time) being the dorking around trying to figure out and remember which key is which, and that changing from game to game. Ditto for other complex applications with lots of obscure key assignments: I don't want to stop, find the "key help" screen, look up the function and key I want, close that window, remember where I was, and remember what that key was for more than 3 seconds - I just want to look at the keyboard and see a fitting icon on the appropriate key.

      --
      Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
    3. Re:Good idea, really? by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      When you are touch typing a blank keyboard is well and good, but for those of us that use computers a lot there are many cases where we need to find a single key quickly, without having to set our hands on the home row first. I use mplayer as my default video player, and it uses pretty much every key on the keyboard to do something, as well as some of them with shift/control/alt modifiers. If I could repaint the keyboard with all the proper symbols on it while watching a movie then it would make the ultimate remote control. In a game like Quake where there are maybe 12 keys then looking at the keyboard is rare, but what about nethack where you often have access to 50+ key commands?

    4. Re:Good idea, really? by Xenoflargactian · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but think of all the 13 year olds who will be nagging their parents for these things so they can 'keep up with the Joneses.'

      It'll appeal to the same people who go for neon lights inside their half-transparent cases and stickers on everything - the Alienware crowd - except that this thing actually has a use.

      Also, think of the two finger typists. There are still plenty of them out there. Those type of people would probably benefit greatly from such a device.

      I could see this getting big once our injet capabilities have improved, and we can cheaply print OLEDs (and human organs someday :) )

    5. Re:Good idea, really? by Ced_Ex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What about multilanguage keyboards?

      Not everyone uses the Roman Alphanumerics system. Arabic and Asian languages come to mind.

      Plus, it would be cool to see what keys are mapped in games like the old school MechWarrior where you had to use pretty much every key.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    6. Re:Good idea, really? by Keith+Russell · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Do you really have to check the keyboard shortcut for "Copy" in your text editor of choice?

      Ask Logitech and Microsoft. They seem to think that the F-keys are a playground. Thus, odd-shaped F-keys, tiny F-keys, and the ever-dreaded F-Lock, which leaves unsuspecting users wondering why F7 didn't send "Ready!" over the team channel.

      They think users are so stupid and/or lazy, that they need a button on the keyboard to launch Excel, regardless of the number of start menu/quick launch/desktop shortcuts Office places on install. Meanwhile, those of us with 1/16 of a clue are left double-checking the F-Lock LED all the time, because we'd rather get into the BIOS setup than try to launch Outlook Express before the bloody boot loader is read off the hard drive!

      Can you tell this is a pet peeve? My pre-F-Lock Logitech keyboard is becoming more precious by the minute. I'll be damned if I let these marketing-addled fools turn my Step Into Function debugger key into a PowerPoint launcher.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    7. Re:Good idea, really? by Mozk · · Score: 1

      It would be very helpful with switching between languages or keyboard layouts, but I think e-ink would be better suited for this since you wouldn't change it much anyway.

      --
      No existe.
    8. Re:Good idea, really? by _damnit_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When I saw this, the first thing I thought of was the Internet cafe I sat at near Place de Bastille in Paris. It took me a long time to write the simple email I needed to get off because I had no clue where the keys were on a French Keyboard. It occasionally did some strange stuff. Touch typing is out too! Something like this where a single button on the side could change the keyboard to several languages would be great even in the states where English really isn't the only language spoken (even though we tend to think so).
      Hell, the computer labs in school could use this for French, Spanish and other language labs. You know how hard it is to write a French paper without easy access to a cedilla or other diacritic marks?

      --


      _damnit_

      It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run
    9. Re:Good idea, really? by aneurysm36 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      agreed, this could be VERY practical.

      hold down the ctrl key and-
      x changes to "cut"
      c changes to "copy"
      v changes to "paste"

      hold down the windows key and-
      e changes to an explorer icon
      pause/break changes to system properties

      alt-tab out of q3 and the keys change back to letters

      alt-tab to photoshop and the keys change to shortcuts and macros

      --
      ------ hi mom
    10. Re:Good idea, really? by tommertron · · Score: 1

      I just hope it's not put into production by the weirdoes who invented it.

      --
      Random rants about technology: http://technorants.blogspot.com
    11. Re:Good idea, really? by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding?

      Imagine that every program would have it's commands displayed by icons on the keyboard. Right now the keyboard has a bunch of "Variable" keys.

      Specific function keys would be awesome.

      I don't see a price anywhere for the keyboard though. And it looks cool, but ergonomics is not just a buzzword.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    12. Re:Good idea, really? by csrjjsmp · · Score: 1

      control+comma, c will give you a cedilla. control+apostrophe, control+backquote, and control+shift+6 give you aigu, grave, and circonflex, respectively.

    13. Re:Good idea, really? by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      I'm picturing this keyboard being VERY useful to programmers as well.

      Picture a linux noob with this keyboard. He opens VI for the first time and all the shortcuts to edit, save and exit the file are all remapped to the keyboard and change depending on what he's doing.

      If this thing was application and context-sensitive, I could see alot of people becoming more proficient with alot of apps over time.

    14. Re:Good idea, really? by spectral · · Score: 1

      It might almost make emacs useful, if there was any logic to its drilldown mechanism to get to a specific command. So... no, it wouldn't do anything for it. Damn.

    15. Re:Good idea, really? by Petrushka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about multilanguage keyboards?

      Not everyone uses the Roman Alphanumerics system. Arabic and Asian languages come to mind.

      I totally agree. I work with languages in multiple alphabets and a thing like this would be a wonderful tool. Have you ever tried to find a keyboard appropriately marked for polytonic Greek? Well, I'm pretty sure they don't exist ... anyway, I just drooled and drooled over the pictures. Think of scholars trying to type out cuneiform or Linear B, or pretty much any non-European language, and it's not hard to think of applications. I'd love for a keyboard like this to exist and be practical!

    16. Re:Good idea, really? by Excelsior · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is a fun idea, sure, and might have some genuine use in a few niches, but I doubt it's going anywhere as a mainstream idea.

      Nothing like thinking completely within the box. Free your mind, my friend.

      How about an application that changes your keyboard functions as you proceed through steps? For instance, using an IDE, different key functions would show when I'm editing or debugging.

      What if you had toggle keys that, when pressed, the keyboard would show you a visual indication of a completely different set of key-functions? So your keyboard is in its normal state most of the time, but gives you alternate setups as you request them.

      What if in games, when you get shot, your keyboard pulses red. When you swim, your keyboard looks like water, with bubbles floating past. Keys show pictures of the weapons they would switch you to, and how much ammo they hold. Keys show the spells they would cast.

      What if applications and desktops could now eliminate widgets because a key can be set to represent them as needed? No more row of buttons at the top of every web browser, word processor, and email client. Perhaps they could add a row of keys along the top of the keyboard to replace the window taskbar. These buttons would show your apps, and you could press them to minimize windows, restore them, or bring them to the front.

      Or, we could just keep thinking in the box, poo-pooing ideas, and leave the innovation to others.

    17. Re:Good idea, really? by _damnit_ · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the short cuts, but they don't seem to work system-wide in XP as I'm unable to put them into this post or into Notepad or MS Word. Are these Linux conventions? I'll have to wait until my wife gets off the powerbook to try it on a Mac.

      --


      _damnit_

      It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run
    18. Re:Good idea, really? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Narrow minded viewpoint.

      Keyboards are powerful as hell if you know how to use them, but most people don't have the time to learn everything their applications can do. If something like this caught on and became prevelant enough for all applications to include a keyboard configuration, it could really make the full use of keyboard shortcuts available to more people and dramatically increase their productivity. People who would never dream of reading the documentation would notice what their keys turned into when they hit control buttons and use the functionality.

      This should replace every keyboard in the world.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    19. Re:Good idea, really? by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1

      If my experience with customers has anything to say, people will be more likely to see that the keys change when they hit control and think they broke the keyboard.

    20. Re:Good idea, really? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      it needs touch sliders [like laptops are going to] and touch wheels [like the iPod] all backed by color of course!!! real touch sensitive light up gages!!!

    21. Re:Good idea, really? by plover · · Score: 1

      I think it'd probably be of the most value if it were dynamically context sensitive -- hit the CTRL key, and "X" changes to "Cut", "C" changes to "Copy", "V" changes to "Paste". Each application would be offering its own shortcuts, each input box would be able to offer its own hints, etc. eInk would be too slow.

      --
      John
    22. Re:Good idea, really? by sysAdminEnvy · · Score: 1

      For our metric viewers, how much is a sh*t-ton (in kg's)?

      --
      working hard or hardly working?
    23. Re:Good idea, really? by Tekoneiric · · Score: 1

      What would really be interesting is if the drivers could be setup to adapt the keyboard layout for the current application that the user is activly running. If this concept plays out, this could change much in the way users interact with software. The physical layout of the keys reminds me of my Northgate OmniKey Pro. Display keys on something like a Nostromo n50 would be very nice! :)

      --
      *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
    24. Re:Good idea, really? by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      "I don't see a price anywhere for the keyboard though."

      It's concept art. It's rendered stuff, no real physical device.

      It definately looks possible to create the thing - but it would have to be an intelligent keyboard with a processing unit and memory for all the graphics since it probably wouldn't plug into the VGA port.

      I'd imagine something like this could potentially cost over $2,000 at it's introduction.

      Unfortunately, since these guys are laying down the patents, we probably will never see one like this and if we do, those patents will ensure it's two grand.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    25. Re:Good idea, really? by MagnusDredd · · Score: 1

      How many times did you look at your keyboard while you typed your post, really? In the middle of an intense FPS shootout, do you really need to know which key you configured to switch from the rocket launcher to grenades?


      I type by feel. But I do play quite a few different FPSes. I probably use less than 1/2 of the commands available in America's Army for a few reasons, the major one being that not counting movement and weapon switching, as games incorporate craploads of functions into the game, that other games don't use, it becomes annoying to learn and set up keys for 25 different options.

      America's Army for example, there's report in, call for medic, alt fire (which switches fire modes), a key to use the legs on the sniper and SAWs, a key to equip silencer, a key for night vision, a key to use binoculars, a key for scope (common), two keys for zooming with the scope, a key for resetting the scope to zero range, two keys for crouch and prone, a key for team messages, a key for global messages, a toggle key for run, a key to set squad target, keys to have your character bark various commands, a key to fix jams, and all kinds of signaling/messaging commands, and more

      That's only one game. ...And you say that there is a new game coming out that has a totally new set of keys that do different things??????

      I'm a gamer, but I do have a life. I only play about 1 session or so of FPSing or other serious gaming per week, and some busy weeks no gaming at all. I have a house, a wife, a project vehicle, a programming project going on, need to rebuild the master bedroom closet (I hate wire shelves), a web site/monitoring project I work on from time to time, and an industry to attempt to keep up with.

      Learning all of the differing keys for the 20 or so FPSes that I play (depending on my mood and what the guys on the LAN want to play) is not very high on my agenda. If it's not critical, and doesn't fit into the keyboard layout I use for basically all the FPSes I play, then I don't use the feature. So basically move, shoot, use, and talk..... Most everything else falls by the wayside.
    26. Re:Good idea, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0.90718474 metric shit-tons

    27. Re:Good idea, really? by ziggy_zero · · Score: 1

      And it looks like control+semicolon, [letter] will give you umlauts. Sweet.

      But as the other guy said, it doesn't work for everything, like for textboxes you'd have to put in the html code for those characters.

      --
      I belong to the ______ generation.
    28. Re:Good idea, really? by mbius · · Score: 1

      What if in games, when you get shot, your keyboard pulses red. When you swim, your keyboard looks like water, with bubbles floating past. Keys show pictures of the weapons they would switch you to, and how much ammo they hold. Keys show the spells they would cast

      Why on earth would you look to the keyboard for any of this information? 'Keyboard's flashing, better take my eyes off the screen to investigate that.' It's like putting the speedometer at the bottom of your steering wheel.

      The functionality you cite is already available, just without the "ooh" factor and godawful expense. I'm all for customizable bindings, and not just for games. But natural selection drives a largely universal set of hotkeys. Contextual ones are easy to learn, or map to mouse buttons.

      Optimal input is muscle memory. You don't look at the input device once you learn what's what. Increasing functionality on your chameleon keys quickly becomes the clutter-sort you're trying to avoid. Do you honestly see value in having "File Edit View Go Bookmarks Tools Help" appear on the keyboard, when ALT will get you there?

      It takes about once to learn how to fly through the grocery store self-checkout. Maybe longer for BIG MAC EXTRA sauce NO pickle, or the phone number-address-order rigamarole of a pizza store. Even when the input device is the display, user efficiency has a learning curve.

      Your brain doesn't parse an array of pictures quicker than any other symbol--try resorting your cluttered desktop. Organizational hierarchy is king, and you don't need a $1000 grid of mini-LCDs for that. You shouldn't take a condescending attitude to critics of an idea that, while cool, is not at all practical.

      --
      you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
      Prime UID Club
    29. Re:Good idea, really? by jazman · · Score: 1

      You know how hard it is to write a French paper without easy access to a cedilla or other diacritic marks?

      Actually it's dead simple to do accented characters if you're using MS Word. Ctrl-comma c (nb: not ctrl-comma ctrl-c) gives you ç; ctrl-/ o for ø, ctrl-` e for è, ctrl-shift-6 (ctrl-^) o for ô... The only one that catches me out all the time is the umlaut which is ctrl-shift-; (ctrl-:) rather than ctrl-shift-2 (ctrl-"). Then copy/paste to dump the text into, for example, a Slashdot text form.

      Acute accent is ctrl-', tilde is ctrl-~. I think that's everything - if not, just find a character that looks like the accent, add ctrl, push the letter to be accented, then see what you get.

      The rules for ctrl-shift are simple - if you need shift to get the character (e.g. shift 6 for ^) then you need shift to get the accent: ctrl-^ = ctrl-shift-6.

    30. Re:Good idea, really? by i+wanted+another+nam · · Score: 2, Funny

      1 shit-ton is equivalent to 2.74 metric fuckloads

      --
      The image is a dream, the beauty is real. Can you see the difference?
    31. Re:Good idea, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah thats a great idea! After all, most people playing the games are just staring at their keyboard rather than the screen! Actually, I mostly watch the keyboard rather than the screen when I work!

    32. Re:Good idea, really? by object88 · · Score: 1

      ... people will be more likely to see that the keys change when they hit control and think they broke the keyboard.

      Even if the keys went back to normal after releasing the control key? Taking my wife as a typical user, I think she would be surprised, but pleased. But then again, she doesn't use ctrl-c to copy; she uses context menus.

    33. Re:Good idea, really? by psetzer · · Score: 1

      For keybindings, 1 milli emacs.

      --
      "Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is living in a state of sin." -- John von Neumann
    34. Re:Good idea, really? by Xenoflargactian · · Score: 1
      First you call my viewpoint narrow-minded, then you agree with it?

      If you read the last sentence of my post, you'd see that we essentially agree:

      I could see this getting big once our injet capabilities have improved, and we can cheaply print OLEDs (and human organs someday :) )

      It's naive to think that they will be able to replace all or even many keyboards in the short term with such new(not even invented yet) technology. It will take years, maybe even a decade or more to perfect the technologies necessary to mass-produce an economical OLED keyboard.

      In the short-term, when these things are prohibitively expensive, they will probably be targeted to niche markets, like:

      13 year olds who will be nagging their parents for these things
      and
      the Alienware crowd
    35. Re:Good idea, really? by Xenoflargactian · · Score: 1

      Yes, but she may learn to use keyboard shortcuts if they're more clearly presented to her. I'm not saying it's going to happen, I'm just saying it's more likely to happen if she has a graphical interface at her fingertips clearly showing her what keys do what, mapped in relation to the keys, not the functions themselves (as you would see in the context menus).

  96. Too Exspensive... by CptSkippy · · Score: 1

    I don't see this thing being very cheap with that many OLED displays. I think they'd do better to us one of the monochrome/b&w eInk solutions that only require power to change the display and not to drive them.

    I also have questions about how it handles being plugged into any random machine. Does it have a default layout or a memory of each layout?

  97. Us DIY people have been doing this for years!! by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2, Funny

    We just use tiny little slide projectors behind each key. When you hear this sound: "Bink!", go to the next key image.

    It costs a fortune changing all those light bulbs though, but it keeps your fingers warm.

  98. Bright idea dulled in use by Njall · · Score: 1

    I expect once the new keyboard smell is gone users of this keyboard will come to realize a major problem... keeping it clean. No matter how fastidious one is the keyboard will get dirty with the normal detritus of human use. I fear it won't be easy, possible?, to clean. Then the luster will be gone for sure.

    Good design encompasses all facets of use. Including the more pedestrian issues. All that glitters is not gold.

  99. Price-Shmice by Coyote65 · · Score: 1

    You don't base your decision to buy a keyboard like this in any way/shape/or form on price... Between the top-end cool-factor, the fact that finally us hunt and peck typists can see what we're hitting, and the reprogrammability WITH ICONS for shorcut keying, there is no question I'd pay upto a $200US (or even $200CAN - heh) for it. Tho, the idea of pop-up ads and yet another layer of pop-up blocking running on my machine is a little annoying.

  100. Re:Ugh! Transformers! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

    The term "Dinbot" was trademarked by Hasbro as far back as, I believe, 1986.

    It was the homebrew robot that polluted the net and diluted the term, not the Transformers fans.

  101. Killer product that could save a company. by phorest · · Score: 1
    I'm thinking RadioShack of course! The name certainly fits already.

    Rush that baby into production now.

    --
    God: When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
  102. Obligatory Simpsons Reference by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    Homer: OMIGOD!!!! Tomompoline!!! I WANT ONE!!!

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  103. and doubleclick's slogan by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    And doubleclick.net's slogan as they sell this service to advertisers: "We put your product right at your customer's fingertips."

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  104. Sample size of one is not meaningful by xswl0931 · · Score: 1

    So we should all have blank keyboards then? I would guess that there's more people that don't touch type than those who do. Also, the usefulness isn't in after you get used to the key layout, but when you initially try new software that uses specific mapped keys.

  105. Defeats the benefits of a keyboard... by Leadhyena · · Score: 1
    it might also help typing tutor apps, assign colors to the keys or flash the one you are supposed to type next.
    Sorry, wouldn't be good for that. This whole LED keyboard concept betrays the touch-typing concept. When you touchtype, you are supposed to be looking at the screen, not looking at the keys. That's the whole reason you type faster after learning touchtyping; the hunt in the hunt-and-peck equation has been removed.

    Furthermore, this just goes to illustrate the uselessness of this concept. There should be no time that someone needs to look down at the keys, or else they aren't being productive with the keyboard. If you need to know the shortcuts assigned to keys, put them on the screen, where the shortcut can be spelled out insted of being just some cryptic icon, and where it wouldn't encourage someone to look at the keys. I would actually think that this keyboard would make regular typists type slower because of the fact that the LED keys would encourage they eyes to stare at the keys again, just to break the good habit that these typists developed in looking away from the keys in the first place.

    I remember someone selling a keyboard with no key marks on it a couple years back and thinking at first that it was some geek tech pr0n. After mulling it over however, I realized that this is exactly in the right direction, because it encourages the typist to look at the screen instead of looking at the keyboard. To enhance the concept, it would be good if each of the keys were designed to feel slightly different (like the bumps on the f and j keys) so you had an intuitive and tactile sense of what keys you were pressing. That way you could have the best of both worlds.

    1. Re:Defeats the benefits of a keyboard... by Wilk4 · · Score: 1
      I agree with most of what you wrote on the touch-typing issue. in fact I'd posted a note further down on that... (though there might still be uses for typing tutor s/w, particularly before they reach the point of touch typing. maybe, maybe not.

      Even allowing for that, I still see some advantages for a design like this. The 3 main advantages I'd see would be:

      * labeling the function keys for the current app's assignments. (particularly useful for engineering apps, where the function keys are heavily used, and you need templates to know what they are (no-one memorizes them all for each app, and hitting the wrong one can be painful)

      - switching languages, etc. maybe not useful for a home PC there but think about a kiosk keyboard in an international airport... pick your language. (yeah, they can use a touch screen instead of a keybd but this offers another option)

      - custom gaming and app layouts like they show

      Perhaps a cheaper version that just has displays on the function keys and 'extra' keys would make more sense than having them all be displays.

    2. Re:Defeats the benefits of a keyboard... by Wilk4 · · Score: 1

      fwiw, I do touch-type, so I understand the concepts and reasons behind *not* looking at the keybd.

    3. Re:Defeats the benefits of a keyboard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's stopping you from writing a driver that allows you use one of those handy left-side function buttons to activate all the key screens, having it automatically dim/shut off after 5 seconds or so? Problem solved.

      The benefits of being able to see all the keyboard shortcuts on the keyboard itself (especially when the appropriate ones appear while their respective meta keys are depressed) outweighs the problem you suggest anyway.

      The only drawback I can see is that such a keyboard would probably be pretty easy to break. No smashy-smashy-the-keys and especially no accidental (read intentional) pouring of beverages into the keyboard.

      ANONYMOUS COWARD MAD. ANONYMOUS COWARD SMASH!

  106. Nice idea, (when I first encountered it in 1977.) by crovira · · Score: 1

    The key caps were clear and you could put any image that you could imagine and the electronics could be set up to send any (and any sequence of) ASCII character(s).

    Sorry but I don't think its patentable. That's' not to say some body might make some dough at it if they can get the keycaps OLED prices down low enough. And that's not to say they won't try (and with our Patent Office, when did prior art count for anything?)

    Its just a freaking keyboard. (and then there's the key press 'fee; and feedback mechanism to consider. (I still miss my old Selectric keyboard for its solidity and the great 'clunk' sound.)

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  107. Why not just use a big touch screen? by Hachey · · Score: 1

    Other than not getting the nice feeling of depressing each button, a big touch screen would probabaly be cheaper.

    It could be even more modular too. Want a left handed keyboard? No problem! Smaller backspace key? Sure thing! How about a big red 'panic' or 'launch' button off the the side?

    Shoot. I might start making it myself. Any takers?


    --
    Check out the Uncyclopedia.org :
    The only wiki source for politically incorrect non-information about things like Kitten Huffing and Pong! the Movie !

    --
    Please allow me to hate the creator of the 120-character limit: *HATES*. Thank you.
  108. OK that is spiffy. I want one. by Retired+Replicant · · Score: 1

    I don't normally succumb to gadget envy. I passed on the Palm, the iPaq, the iPod, and the PSP. But I want one of those keyboards.

  109. Fancy ? not !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With this one you can imagine every layout you ever gonna need. http://www.daskeyboard.com/

    -- ApYx --

  110. very old news, patented up the wazoo by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1
    This isnt a new idea-- probably half the geeks out there have imagined such a device. A quick peek at uspto.gov shows at least six patents along these lines, going back to 1975! IIRC the PLATO group was thinking along these lines too circa 1978.

    BTW the economics are impossible-- each key would cost around $20. Plus you'd need at least two gold-plated contacts per key to supply power and data. A more practical approach would be to project a scanning laser image up through translucent or fiber-optic'ed keytops.

    1. Re:very old news, patented up the wazoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Patented in 1975? Cool--the patents are expired, and now they're prior art.

      ~~~

  111. Fujitsu's New COLOR E-Paper by nherc · · Score: 1

    Color E-Paper has been done my friend (including pictures). I would post this as a story at /., but it's a couple days old and already been on The Register.

    --
    'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
  112. possible evolution of this technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't be too concerned about costs in the long run for a few reasons. First, OLED costs will inevitably fall as it is such a new technology.
    Second, the first generation of these keyboards could have just 10 or 12 OLED keys. Replacing traditional F1-F12 function keys with custom ones would essentially allow a toolbar or two to move from the screen to your keyboard.
    If these semi-configurable models got popular, that would naturally create demand for fully OLED keyboards, while at the same time allowing for manufacturers to iron out bugs in efficiently working with OLED technology.

  113. Someboday make this! Please! by mindpixel · · Score: 1

    This message would have no text in the body if it were possible.

  114. who can type and use a non natural keyboard? by dougnaka · · Score: 1
    Am I the only person who types fast (140+wpm) and can ONLY use a natural keyboard?

    What good are flat keyboard, they trash my wrists. I can feel the burn within 5 minutes typing on one.. and I can, and do, type all day on a natural keyboard and NEVER get any wrist/carpal tunnel pains...

    Flat keyboards are depricated.

    --
    My Linux Command of the Day site : LCOD
    1. Re:who can type and use a non natural keyboard? by Devistater · · Score: 1

      I use a natural keyboard and type fairly fast (100wpm or so). Only use the old classic original natural one though. The newer ones (like the elite) suck nuts. MS likes to play with the standard key config and screw it up.

      However I can type about the same speed on other keyboards too. I just prefer the natural

    2. Re:who can type and use a non natural keyboard? by Punboy · · Score: 1

      I hate natural keyboards. They hurt my wrists. I'm currently using a standard Dell QuietKey. I can type 140-170WPM on this baby, all day, with no pain. I guess it all depends on who you are, how you're built, and how you sit when you type.

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
  115. but why? by bremstrong · · Score: 1

    Who wants a keyboard that you need to look at to see what key to press?

    I'd rather keep my eyes on the screen where they belong and click options from changeable icons there.

    Cringely made the point once that if you pretend the existing technology is the new technology you can gain insight into its advantages.

    For example, new keyboard with fixed key functionality! Control your computer without ever taking your eyes off the screen! Priced at a fraction of current keyboards that required a OLED display on each key!

  116. Re:Nice idea, (when I first encountered it in 1977 by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    Did the image change when you (for example) pressed the shift key? Could you display animations on the keyboard when the terminal was locked? Randomize the key layout for typing in passowrds without somebody in the distance figuring out what you typed?

    I'm sorry, but there's a lot patentable here.... As long as they've actually managed to build one.

  117. i got this same idea loong back. by cintyram · · Score: 1

    i got this same idea loong back. , as i wanted to use a keyboard with multiple languages and key lay outs.. but i could not pursue it further as i was short of cash ; may be i should just have written a proposal and asked for funding .. ~ram

  118. enter key by eck011219 · · Score: 1

    That enter key would drive me buggy, as it seems to be one key too far to the right - other than that, though, I'd definitely want one of these if it worked reliably. I'd be interested to know if I could type comfortably on more flat-topped keys, though, too. Anyhow, I switch back and forth between Mac and Windows for lots of different uses all the time (Quark AND Adobe CS apps, not to mention editors and such for web development), and I'd love to have a visual of my keyboard shortcuts. Imagine a keyboard where the labels would dynamically change for quasimodes and so forth. That's darn cool if it can work.

    And it might be a good way to learn Dvorak without having to commit to a dual-labeled keyboard.

    And as for the pricing questions people are posting, I gotta figure if people are buying $400 digitizer tablets, there's a market for a more expensive but much more flexible keyboard.

    Now if they can build it with that IBM buckling spring click-touch feel ...

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  119. Sweet!, IF.... by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

    ..they can build one that works as well as it looks.
    ..its affordable.
    ..the software to program the keys runs on Linux.
    ..it is well built and will not die when cat hair gets in it.
    ..the user gets to pick the images on the keys.
    ..once programed the kb stores its config and doesn't need any drivers loaded to work.
    .. they have an ergonomic design as well as standard.

    If all (OK, most) of these conditions are met I'll definity buy a few when they become available. With the Gamming, programming and A/V editing that I do a keyboard like this would be great.

  120. Patents pending? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Jeez, it's not like this is a new idea. If they patent this, good for them, but I don't see a reason for it to be patented in the first place - this idea has been in the air or in some form of implementation for a long time now, just watch Minority Report.

    I am sure that the patent is not too hard to get, all they have to do is say: but we have a seperate display on every button! Not like that has never been done before, right?

    1. Re:Patents pending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you're kidding, right? Not a single one of those discloses changing a display on a keyboard key upon switching to a software application. Thank you for representing the absolute lack of intelligence when it comes to citing prior art here on /.

      "They can't get a patent. There's prior art here [link to tangentially-at-best related concept]"

      *sigh*

    2. Re:Patents pending? by base3 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the ScramblePad security keypad does look like prior art, though.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    3. Re:Patents pending? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      You are an ass. It doesn't have to be a real keyboard, it can be virtual keyboard and that will do. So the laser keyboard covers the concept of interchanging keys. Any keyboard displayed on a screen - such as a PDA or even your character map application (such as windows charmap.exe) has the ability to display different character sets or symbols on the dedicated space where the keyboard is presented.

      This particular keyboard is just more expensive to make than other ones and requires more energy to run.

  121. More than meets the eye! by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

    At first I thought it was a normal keyboard, but then I noticed that each of the keys could transform...

  122. Re:Ugh! Transformers! by damiangerous · · Score: 1

    Dinobots have been part of Transformers since the mid-80's, I had them as a kid. Perhaps your innovative robot designer should have come up with a more innovative name.

  123. I want one! by Pedrito · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine e-mailed me this link early this morning and I thought it was a damn cool idea (and I think that's all it is at this point).

    As a software developer, I can see a lot of ways this could be integrated into every day software. For example, hit the Alt key and suddenly the shortcut keys all have little labels saying what they do. Or for languages that use key combinations to do special characters, hitting the first key in the combination would then show you what keys are available for the second key.

    I could definitely find uses for it in my code if it ever became widespread. Alas, I doubt it will anytime soon.

  124. Yuck by Thaelon · · Score: 1
    Did anybody else notice they monkeyed with the enter key?

    It's gigantic and moved WAY off to the right.

    I hate when keyboard designers monkey with the goddamn key layouts. When you move keys under one hand relative to the other keys under the same hand you cause typos.

    I don't know what the hell those two extra keys are between the apostrophe and the enter key are doing there.

    I hate that layout. IMHO that section of the keyboard should be like this*:
    [ = ][ Bksp ]
    [ [ ][ ] ][ \ ]
    [ ' ][ Enter ]
    [ / ][ Shift ]
    And don't fucking muck with it!

    Their design looks like this*:
    [ = ][ Bksp ]
    [ [ ][ ] ][ ][ ]
    [ ' ][ \][ ][ En ]
    [ / ][ ][Sft][ tr ]
    wtf is wrong with them?

    *Stupid /. font monkeyed with the layouts so they don't line up. Oh well. I'm done ranting.
    --

    Question everything

    1. Re:Yuck by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

      Did anybody else notice they monkeyed with the enter key?

      It's gigantic and moved WAY off to the right.


      The worst part of this is it's a HARDWARE problem.

      In retrospect, it's amazing the Model M layout has lasted so long. Most computer keyboards from the '60's and '70's were only 'approximations' to typewriter layouts (at least the letter keys stayed in the same place). The original IBM PC keyboard was really screwed compared to the then-standard IBM(!) Selectric typewriter. Then they 'got it right' with the AT keyboard with a large Enter key much like (size, shape and position) the Selectric's Return key. Then came the PS/2 Model M, with a smaller enter key, but the separate cursor keys and numeric keypad became a standard, even though it made for a larger, wider keyboard.

      I recall being frustrated going between the AT and Model M keyboards mostly because of the different locations of the function keys.

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
  125. Blank keyboard by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 1

    Ask and ye shall receive: Blank keyboard available from ThinkGeek! (pity it's not Bluetooth-enabled)

    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
  126. How about half the world, then? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
    So we should all have blank keyboards then?

    You're obviously attacking a straw man, but since you mentioned it: I imagine it would make no difference to the majority of keyboard users in the world if the keyboard was blank. More to the point, I doubt that many of the remainder would actually use the sort of customisation or specialist apps where this kind of thing might be useful, giving them little or no benefit over a standard set of fixed key markings.

    As I acknowledged in my original post, I'm sure there are niche markets where this doesn't apply, but I expect that's what they are: niches.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:How about half the world, then? by nooj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, your presumption is wrong. Almost everyone glances down at their keyboard to get their bearings dozens of times per hour. Yes, sometimes even when they hit something so common as ^V. This is why keyboards are printed with large capital letters in very clear type.

      Why don't you try putting little stickers over the letters on your keyboard some time and see just how often you use them as a crutch? You don't even have to cover all the letters; just do ten or fifteen--say, the entire bottom row. You will be surprised at how much you rely on them.

    2. Re:How about half the world, then? by plover · · Score: 1
      Actually, after seeing the movie Hackers I went and painted an IBM model M keyboard gloss black, several coats, followed by a clearcoat for wear, and then allowed it to cure for a month before using it. That was a long time ago. Even though the edges of the home row keys are finally wearing through, I still have never missed the actual symbols. For the years prior to my painting it, it had been in a keyboard pull-out tray pushed completely under my desktop where I never really had to look at it.

      Surprisingly, it turned out not to be a big inconvenience to the people with whom I occasionally share my computer. I enjoy their initial reactions (it's always "how can you use that thing?"), but when they realize they don't need to see the keytops either, they get a big kick out of it themselves. Funny how little things like that get people to step out of their comfort zone; they enjoy it, but then crawl right back to their crutches.

      Yeah, if this thing were a real computer keyboard, I'd be running some cool looking "keysaver" on it 24x7. Maybe a randomly shifting or rotating alphabet pattern -- now that would harm most peoples' ability to type!

      --
      John
    3. Re:How about half the world, then? by object88 · · Score: 1

      Maybe a randomly shifting or rotating alphabet pattern -- now that would harm most peoples' ability to type!

      You don't have many friends, do you?

  127. Is not OLED, is just a design by brainnolo · · Score: 1

    This keyboard is just a design and an idea, it doesn't describe technology used at all. This is the smartest idea i ever seen for a keyboard ever, very very useful for one like me who needs both italian and romanian layouts, and would love to see Photoshop keys as well.

  128. Optimus + Touchstream by Compulsion · · Score: 1

    The only other exciting piece of keyboard technology I've seen recently was from the now-defunct Fingerworks. They produced a line of ergonomic keyboards that were, in essence, a large touchpad. I understand that there was a fairly steep learning curve, though. A combination of their tech (supposedly purchased by a large, unnamed company) and some OLEDs would be amazing. It'll never happen, of course, but cool anyway.

  129. It inspired me of a "sensitive keyboard" design by bootedcat · · Score: 0

    I propose an idea for a new design of keyboard, which detects (by any feasible physical measure) which of the user's fingers are currently hovering over which key, and even the hovering height of each finger, and even how hard a finger touches/presses a key. Such feedback information can allow the computer to display the user's typing situation visually on the screen, without requiring the user to look onto the real keyboard. The on-screen typing situation map (which is a picture of a virtual keyboard plus the finger-hovering information reported from the keyboard) can tell the user if he is hovering over the right key with the right finger, and if he is trying to hit the desired key. Yao Ziyuan

  130. On-screen is better by VGR · · Score: 1

    I believe this idea first occurred to me 15 years ago, when it seemed like every IBM PS/2 in the lab had someone's WordPerfect 5.x cardboard function key reference "template" left on the keyboard. (I never used WordPerfect 5.x for DOS, as I found it atrocious and there were many superior shareware alternatives.)

    This leads me to realize that we don't need most of the keys to be visually configurable. I mean, okay, as many others have pointed out, the ability to switch languages or switch layouts could be useful, but that doesn't happen very often. The need for such flexibility would be limited to kiosks and the like.

    Where we frequently need configurable descriptions is the function keys. They're the only keys on the keyboard whose functionality is not apparent. Everything else is either alphanumeric, punctuation, or an easy guess.

    Come to think of it, can you say what will happen if you were to press any particular function key right now? (Most windowed browsers should use F1 as help and F10 as menu focus, but I've even seen those standards forsaken.)

    Regardless, there can't possibly be room for a useful description of the function keys on the keyboard itself. And ergonomically, if the user has to keep looking down at his keyboard, it's going to really screw up his productivity, as he'll keep losing his place on the screen.

    This makes me believe that desktops should provide a general API for function key descriptions, displayed in a designated area. For instance:

    void setFunctionKeyDescription(int number, String description);
    void setFunctionKeyDescriptionsShown(boolean show);

    (I would not want apps to have control over the location of it; that's for the user and only the user to decide. And users should have a "never show it udner any circumstances" preference available as well.)

    On-screen function key descriptions aren't really an innovation, of course. It was common for text-mode apps to use the bottom one or two rows of the screen for this very purpose, back in the 80s. But now 1600x1200 screens are fairly common, and a function key description area isn't going to eat into our screen real estate nearly as much as it would have 20 years ago.

    --
    The Internet is full. Go away.
    1. Re:On-screen is better by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

      I mean, okay, as many others have pointed out, the ability to switch languages or switch layouts could be useful, but that doesn't happen very often.

      This appears to be the appropriate place to mourn the passing of APL as a viable language.

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
  131. Das Keyboard by mattdm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For the cheapskates there's always Das Keyboard!!

    Well, it isn't exactly cheap, but it is actually really nice. My keyboard at work had one too many coffees spilled on it, so I asked for Das Keyboard for the replacement. I was anticipating a little adjustment period, but there really wasn't any. It takes zero extra effort to type -- my fingers apparently know where all the keys are -- and the weighting and feel of the keys is excellent. The only problem I have is when I'm working on something else and want to reach over to hit a control key combination or something -- then I have to think.

    (PS: you can get it directly from its own web site: http://www.daskeyboard.com/ for four cents cheaper than Thinkgeek, and with free shipping to North America.)

    1. Re:Das Keyboard by shadowknot · · Score: 1

      I was just saying it was cheap in comparison tho the speculated price of the Optimus ($500). Thanks for the Das Keyboard link, I've been thinking about buying one for a while now:-)

  132. OLED prices by bperkins · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Everyone thinks that this would be expensice. but does anyone out here actually know what OLED prices are for something like this?

    If it's feasible to integrate the OLED and the display driver using all organic semiconductors, maybe this isn't as expensive an idea as people think. The first screens don't necessarily have to have super fast refresh rates.

    After all, most of the tiny screens are identical, and my best guess is that OLED production costs go as the area of the screen, which isn't really that large in this case. If one manages to combine the push signal, display signal and the OLED power in two wires, the wiring wouldn't be much more complex than a standard keyboard.

    1. Re:OLED prices by DECS · · Score: 1

      So if every key were a self contained computer unit with a serial port/powersupply interfacing with a main logic board, it would be similar in complexity to a standard keyboard, which uses simple buttons to close switches?

      Right now, the computation going on in a keyboard is a unit that decodes signals across a matrix of ~100 key switches and send them out over USB. This keyboard would be a main unit interfacing, powering and providing a display signal for 100 key switches and 100 seperate displays, each of which would either need to be controlled externally (requiring really complex signaling) or have the logic to drive the screen built into each key!

      Illuminated keyboards, like the one in the newer PowerBooks, use fiber optics to spread a light source into all those keys. I'd imagine that just running a set of wires to power lamps (or LEDs) for each key would be rather expensive and complex

      The signaling needed to control and display as many little screens would be orders of magnitude more complex.

      Perhaps we could just use electroluminescent bacteria, with a single circulatory system that provided food, oxygen, waste removal and a hormone signalling system that arrange them and lit them as necessary.

      And bacteria are nearly free! Hehe

    2. Re:OLED prices by TWooster · · Score: 1

      Would it need to be nearly that complex?

      Look at the pixels on the keys -- they're large, large things. Toss in a big screen behind the whole of the keyboard, (and at those large of pixels, manufacturing defects wouldn't be that much of a concern), and fit the keys as thick plexi-glass so as to raise the image to the top of the keys.

      The hard part becomes how to detect the press of a key. Perhaps the depression mechanism could be featured at the edges of the key (so as not to obscure the image, or even better, you could use lenses to magnify a small image, or an offset image and bring it front and center, the size of the key's face.

      As for manufacturing:

      Let's just assume that magnification is the only way to go and still include a depression mechanism of some kind. This means we need screens considerably smaller than the keys themselves. Let's say we take an average computer screen LCD at 72dpi. A standard key is what, half an inch or so? Let's give each key a 20x20 pixel display. That means that the display would be roughly a quarter inch square.

      Now, if we're using 72dpi, manufacturing defects across the whole keyboard (stuck pixels, etc) become a problem. So, instead, let's assume that we have 104 20x20 pixel screens (some differences for the return/shift/etc oddly sized keys) connected as one large screen via sufficiently fine copper wiring between each screen. In this way, pixels 0-19 in any given row would refer to the first key, and pixels 20-39 would refer to the second key and so forth.

      Rows would be handled the same way, so what you'd get, essentially, is something like a 440 pixel (22 key) wide, 120 pixel (6 key) tall display that's physically broken up to align under the keys.

      I don't think costs would be too prohibitive for this type of manufacturing, but I'm not sure. Timing for signaling the "broken up" LCD might also be tricky, but it's nothing that a little math can't overcome.

      I'm using LCDs as the base idea here, because you could easily backlight the keyboard (using the same tech as normal LCD monitors use, or even some kind of fiber optics like the PowerBooks). OLEDs and pricing and lifetime is another concern, but overall, I'd certainly say this is doable.

  133. This would be great for... by nicholaides · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This would be great for Reason, or Fruity Loops, or Hydrogen, or whatever music program you use. The keys could be colored like a piano keyboard. That would alleviate the need for a bulky MIDI keyboard.

    I've had this idea before (key's w/ LCD screens) but I never thought it practical enough to work. Now that they've got a Patent pending, I'm kicking myself.

    --
    http://ablegray.com
    1. Re:This would be great for... by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm out to lunch, but I don't think the main problem with using a computer keyboard as a midi controller is the color of the keys.

      --

      ----
      All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
  134. Here's something even cooler by AutopsyReport · · Score: 1

    Check out the Embroided Musical Ball built by MIT. Very much hands-on, and very cool :)

    --

    For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

  135. Yes by cr380r · · Score: 1

    Finally, a keyboard that allows my uncle Jimmy to remain illiterate but still send email. Replacing those silly letters with images does actually sound like a neat idea though.

  136. The utlimate virus by greenhybrid · · Score: 1

    Imagine if there was a virus that completely remapped everyone's keyboards. Just randomized the hell out of them. Think of the chaos, helplessness and loss of productivity. The whole computer world would come to a standstill! Scary... Oh, nice keyboard ;)

  137. It is. by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1


    --
    Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
  138. EPaper? by jgoemat · · Score: 1

    But they won't look as good. If you want the keys to glow you would need some kind of backlight, which would use more power than OLED. The amount of power used by OLED is small enough that it's not a big deal. You can either use your 21" CRT for 5 minutes or power your OLED keyboard for 24 hours. The computer probably uses more power when turned off than would be used to light the keyboard.

  139. ergonomics? by drew · · Score: 1

    do these designers have any background at all in ergonomics or computer peripherals? Sure, it's pretty, but my god, it makes my hands hurt just looking at it....

    --
    If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    1. Re:ergonomics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My thoughts exactly. Who cares if it looks pretty?

      A) ergonomics matters!

      B) only a hunt-n-peck newbie would spend so much time staring at their keyboard anyway.

  140. This is such a non-story by goldcd · · Score: 1

    yes it's a nice idea, but so are hovercars, lightsabres and deathrays.
    It's not an original idea and it's neither in production nor even a working prototype (i.e. couldn't even be bought however deep your pockets).
    Since when did rendering your wet-dreams get you on slashdot?

  141. Here's what you're looking for by morcheeba · · Score: 1

    Your idea sounds like this -- except for the help function.

  142. "Patents pending" by llZENll · · Score: 1

    you're kidding right?

  143. Can I get drivers for vi? by Torulf · · Score: 1

    Yes! I'll finally be able to quit vi without rebooting! When can i have it?

  144. "Donkey" icon by ScottyUK · · Score: 1

    emule :)

    --
    Nice weather for penguins...
  145. Fake or not... by Black+Handle · · Score: 1

    I know I'm not the only one that was drooling.

  146. Trojan horse by kylegordon · · Score: 1

    When it comes out, I'll be waiting for the first bit of spyware that alters all the key displays and makes them link to $pornsite :-)

  147. Keyboard screensavers by ShiftlessXL · · Score: 1

    What would be really cool would be a screensaver mode. Imagine your keyboard giving a trippy display or company logo while you're away?

  148. Let's sing a little song by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Transkeyboards...
    More than meets the eye.

    Qwertybots wage their battle to destroy the evil forces of...
    The Dvorakons.

    The Transkeyboards...
    Keyboards in disguise.

    The Transkeyboards...
    More than meets the eye.

    The Transkeyboards.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    1. Re:Let's sing a little song by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Are you a Taoist? you must be with a handle like Jesus_666... in any case, great post!

      much props J_6

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    2. Re:Let's sing a little song by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I aim to please. :)

      BTW, the nickname was initially a disposable, controversial-sounding but meaningless name used for a flaming. Then I stuck with it because I thought it was kinda cool.
      The story of my life...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  149. Is my Model M obsolete yet? by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

    How soon will I need a PS/2 to USB converter?

    No doubt that keyboard needs USB just to update the key displays in a reasonably short time.

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  150. Dare I put it this way: by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    No big deal.
    Why?
    This is, of course, the only real next evolutionary step in keyboards. This is so obvious that it only was a matter of time until it went gold. I have an entire collection of PC input devices - from macro keyboards over special joysticks that cost an insane amount of money to the very first Wacom ArtPad, optical trackball and optical mouse. It has been clear to me for a very long time that this is what I'm waiting for. Glad it's there now.
    In ten years all keyboards will be like this one. That's the simple truth.
    If I had had the money, I would've come up with this piece of hardware myself. This one looks like a real good implementation of the concept. One that the concept deserves.
    I hope for them they make a fortune.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  151. Display keyboard made in Russia means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, input device is output device!

  152. Holy crap, that's cool. by base3 · · Score: 1

    I am sporting wood about this. And as jaded as I am, that says something.

    --
    One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  153. This is the future. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the future, I really mean it.

  154. Re:Useless [OFFTOPIC] by narcc · · Score: 1

    A reply to someones sig? Why is this modded 'Insightful' -- Shouldn't it be Off Topic or (given the nature of the post) Troll or Flamebait?

  155. Costly by TrueSpeed · · Score: 0

    I can only imagine what a replacement OLED key would cost.

    Also, what up with that eMule OLED key?

  156. hmm by Andrew-Unit · · Score: 1

    So, I guess you'd need a screensaver for your keyboard, too?

  157. Donkey = Windows Key? by Snoop+Donkey+Donk · · Score: 1

    Genius. They've put a donkey on the Windows Key.

  158. Hold on... Touch Screen !! by pooly7 · · Score: 1

    Hold on... there is already something like this... it is called a touch screen ! So go dual display, with an horizontal touch screen (your new keyboard, no keys, no noise, more fancy) and a vertical one (the one you already have !)

    1. Re:Hold on... Touch Screen !! by Inside_Joke · · Score: 1

      You, obviously, have never had to use a touch screen for any extended period.

      A complete lack of tactile response means if you're a touch-typist you're screwed.

      --
      I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that you're an idiot!
  159. Sun Type5 with vid keys by emptybody · · Score: 1

    I totally want one of them!!!

    (so long as I can use it on the PC's and Sun!

    --
    comment directly in my journal
  160. Layout is a classic, actually by KZigurs · · Score: 1

    Actually - have you seen the keyboards from good old unix workstation times? Or terminals? Namely Sun keyboards (a classic of their own)? It's just the same good old layot revived. And it's sure better than lately popular keyboards with all those media, mail and browser shortcuts around (the only useful feature? Calculator shortcut on microsoft internet keyboard. But even to use this you have to disable nearby sleep button first.)

    (p.s. And it's damn handy too once you get used to it.)

    P.S. Image for all the youngsters: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item =5788185735&category=20328&rd=1 (couldn't find a better image on a short notice ;))

  161. Drivers are the easy part, dude by KZigurs · · Score: 1

    Think about integrating this helluva monster with software. Gnome. KDE. Applications. Terminal.

    There is no way Linux community could get something even barely working for this, if it would get released. Those guys are just too concentrated on copying worst features from two leading operating systems into one, big and featured, bloatware. :)

    (but using such a beauty with a mac... mmmm.....)

  162. Function Keys on the left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Function Keys on the left - just like God intended!
    Where do I buy one?

  163. Everybody rips out those microsoft keys by KZigurs · · Score: 1

    Ever played a game of quake (let's say) and suddenly slipped your finger and pressed this dreaded appear_as_went_away_to_toilet_and_loose_a_few_fram es_thank_you_microsoft key between your fire and strafe keys?

    1. Re:Everybody rips out those microsoft keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fire with the mouse. Who the hell holds down a key to strafe?

  164. Compromise to passive-matrix LCD by foldgate · · Score: 2, Interesting

    E-Ink may be the only way this concept could be realized at a generally marketable price point--but only when that tech has actually made it to market itself! If this product is actually brought to market within the next 12 months, it will most likely be constructed with a monochrome LCD for each key--not as sexy, but passive-matrix LCDs are almost cheap enough now for this to be feasible.

  165. Re:Northgate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have to remember the Northgate Omnikey, the design lives on, updated as the Avant Stellar, from CVT. They're awesome, especially if you're the kind of retro-dweeb who never got over the loss of the 84-key AT layout (yes I'm a dork, I'm typing on one right now and have one on my other PC plus a spare that I've never needed, and of course I still have my Omnikey 102). They're very pricey by usual PC standards but best I can tell, they last indefinitely (close to 5 years so far on this one). And they still let you put Ctrl where it belongs (but you don't have to, it comes with keycaps for both ways). No relation just happy customer and VT100 fan etc...

  166. Some people overcomlicate things by bigberk · · Score: 1

    Why expensive, fragile, short life OLEDs? Why not something with regular LEDs. e.g. two designs on one surface, selectable by polarity switch (like those dual colour LEDs - two junctions in same package). Not nearly as pretty as the proposed optimus keyboard, but would be easier, cheaper, and last a heluvalot longer.

  167. The market for this thing is there by ICLKennyG · · Score: 1

    Obviously it's a sweet design. And given the right price, most everyone who spent more than 20 minutes at a computer would want them. I have heard that in the goal or benifit on the horizon is to be able to make OLED reel to reel (?) or something where you can sort of make it the way you make news print. I have read about the fact that they is the possibility to create clothes with OLED ala Back to the future 2 and all kinds of cool things. I think at about 150 bucks this thing becomes mass marketable.

  168. RGB Screenkeys already exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  169. Combine this idea with Ergodex DX1 by netjeff · · Score: 1

    If you combine this with the Ergodex DX1 I think you'd have the perfect input system.

  170. Finally by segfault7375 · · Score: 1

    I think I know what my first keymapping would be!

  171. Crash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine (re)installing an OS with a blank keyboard...

  172. If this was in production, I'd say by zeketp · · Score: 1

    In your face, Z-board!

    --
    Last Post!
  173. Does anyone make real keyboards any more? :-/ by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
    Thus, odd-shaped F-keys, tiny F-keys, and the ever-dreaded F-Lock, which leaves unsuspecting users wondering why F7 didn't send "Ready!" over the team channel.

    It's funny you should mention that. I was looking for a replacement for my trusty but now rather battered keyboard just the other day, and figured I'd drop into PC World - not my normal shop of choice for computer things, but useful enough for cheap and cheerful.

    Or so I thought. I could have cordless keyboards, Internet keyboards, media control keyboards, even a nice aluminium thing that would have matched my PC's case. The one thing I couldn't have was a simple, standard-issue 102- or 105-key keyboard with all the keys in the right place.

    I left without buying anything, though my (computer-literate) girlfriend couldn't understand why I thought having the arrow key block too low or needing to hit F-lock to use the function keys would be annoying. I'm glad I'm not the only one.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Does anyone make real keyboards any more? :-/ by jazman · · Score: 1

      PC World are useless for keyboards unless you want to spend a fortune, then a second fortune on replacement batteries all the time.

      It seems the only way to get a decent standard non-remote control keyboard is to buy a new computer, which is really somewhat excessive.

  174. Icons? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
    Imagine that every program would have it's commands displayed by icons on the keyboard.

    I'm imagining. And then I'm remembering that almost no class of users remembers more than a small handful of icons on a toolbar, even when they're displayed all the time a particular application is in use, so I figure the chances of that actually helping many people on the keyboard are pretty slim...

    I don't know (and neither does anyone else) how much advantage this idea could really offer until the usability testing is done. However, you can probably guess ;-) that my initial reaction is that it would be a geek toy and/or a very useful niche product, rather than something likely to give good price/performance for everyday use unless the price differential becomes almost zero relative to an everyday keyboard.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Icons? by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      "I'm imagining. And then I'm remembering that almost no class of users remembers more than a small handful of icons on a toolbar, even when they're displayed all the time a particular application is in use, so I figure the chances of that actually helping many people on the keyboard are pretty slim..."

      I think the only way to really tell would be to have a few prototypes made and tested by user groups.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  175. hmm again by Andrew-Unit · · Score: 1

    Actually, I'm not sure I'd actually be able to reach the ENTER key with my pinky without moving my hand. It looks like its not 1 key, or 2 keys, but three keys away! That would really be a stretch...

  176. Wet dream, wet dream. by eadint · · Score: 1

    I would pay any amount of money for something like this.
    i do 3D motion graphics and video work, a keyboard like this is something i have been dreamin about. the only problem is what do you do about the residue buildup that happens on all keyboards.

  177. Really? by mindpixel · · Score: 1

    How di you do that?

    1. Re:Really? by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      Few variations, all revolving around the fact that slashdot doesnt strip html before checking of a post is valid. /></b> is what I used specificly for that post, but any other random asortment of html should get past it with minor tweaking. Note the space inside the br tag so it think theres more than one word.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    2. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      forgot to mention, use plain old text.

    3. Re:Really? by mindpixel · · Score: 1

      Ah. I tried a whole bunch og and it caught that...thanks.

  178. Common in Broadcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is pretty common in broadcast studios to have control panels with a little LCD on each button. The text on the displays changes to whatever menu or level you currently use. Pictures here: http://www.bfe-systemhaus.de/Be_Text_E/Be_Text_090 10100.html

  179. power by Naito · · Score: 1

    very cool idea, but having little wires to power each key is hardly feasable, simply from a durability point of view.

    But

    Think it'd be possible to power this using the technology that powers RFID chips? have a transmitter located on the keyboard, little RFID-like chips to control each key...wonder if that'd be able to provide enough power....?

  180. Ditch the IBM and try one of these... by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    I can sympathize - I love my Northgate Omnikey keyboards. CTRL key where it should be. ALT where it should be. F-keys where they should be. Only problem is, they're not made any more. But these guys are building an acceptable, but very pricy, substitute. Uses same "clicky" Alps key switches. I'd sure like someone to buy one and tell me if it's worth it.....

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  181. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price - the paper keyboard by mikael · · Score: 1

    If a prototype e-paper watch and clock can be manufactured, then a paper keyboard shouldn't be that difficult.

    If nothing else, it would be extremely useful to have a multi-language keyboard. Instead of manufacturing different sets of keyboard keys for each country, computer makers would only need to manufacture a single keyboard.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  182. should not be patentable by cahiha · · Score: 1

    Yeah but still they can get the patent on it first then they can start thinking about production.

    Why? What exactly have they contributed? Plenty of other people have thought of this, it just happens to be the case that display technology isn't up to it yet. When it will be, why should these people get a monopoly on it?

    1. Re:should not be patentable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. One of the tests for patentability is "non-obviousness" or "inventive step" (depending on where you live). I can think of lots of people who already want to do this, and would have built it already if the technology were cheaply available:

      - everybody who's ever seen Key Caps on a Mac
      - everybody who types symbols by pressing option-[letter] on their Mac
      - everybody who types anything using a non-Latin alphabet (Greeks, Russians, Japanese, Chinese, Hebrews, Georgians, and various ancient scholars, I'm looking at you)
      - everybody who types on a Dvorak keyboard (and has friends/family who don't)
      - everybody who owns a keyboard you can toggle between two (or more) layouts with a hardware switch (like some Kinesis keyboards)
      - everybody who toggles their keyboard layout in software
      - everybody who uses keyboards for non-text entry (musicians, please stand up)
      - everybody who owns a special keyboard for one specific program (hello, Final Cut Pro users)
      - everybody who spends time customizing the keyboard controls for their favorite FPS

      If I can easily come up with more than half a dozen *classes* of people who have surely wished for this device, it ain't "non-obvious" by any stretch.

      Because so many people have wished for it, it is, of course, incredibly cool. And I'd pay good money for it, as (I'm sure) would some of the people mentioned above. But it's not patentable!

  183. Wack-A-Mole! by cheesy9999 · · Score: 1

    The frist thing I would do if I got ahold of one of these is write a Wack-A-Mole game for it!

    --
    -tom
  184. nice idea by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    This would be a nice way to make a keyboard. With a click of a mouse, you could set your keyboard up any way you want. Would be really nice for games. You could overlay your controls onto the keyboard. I'm sure this needs a TON of development though...

  185. Like Slashdot storage news by typical · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen one really recently (but my Slashdot reading has dropped recently in favor of technocrat.net), but Slashdot used to have a horrible habit of putting up news that insinuated that [huge storage device] was immediately available, whereas the numbers provided (500 GB! 3TB!) were usually the most optimistic numbers available from some storage researchers extrapolating what might be available as a product in six years based on some new chemical procedure that might theoretically be used for high-density data storage that they just managed to get working once in their laboratory. I'd say that Slashdot's accuracy rate on latest-and-greatest storage news is hovering in the single digits.

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  186. Been there, done that, got the patent (in USA) by softweyr · · Score: 1

    This was already done way back in the early 80's, in the USA at least. The B1-B bomber used a keypad where each key was a small plasma display that could be reprogrammed for new menus. I believe the design and patent were done by GTE, but I'm not sure.

  187. ^V by commrade · · Score: 1

    Who the hell commonly uses block visual?

  188. Radio Shack is entering the keyboard market? by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    So Tandy/Radio Shack is entering into the keyboard market it seems.

    I thought they only made stereo equipment.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  189. Re:Nice idea, (when I first encountered it in 1977 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it wasn't 1977 but in 1982 or so (I'll have to dig out my notes) I 'designed' a keyboard where each key was a bitmapped display and yes the images changed dynamically to reflect the state of the caps, num-lock, or for that matter any key, messages could be scrolled on the space-bar, etc. This is not a new idea.

  190. LCD Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A friend I worked with in 1997 was applying for a patent on this concept.
    I doubt that your friend's patent would have been granted.
    There's prior art going back to at least the early 1980s, where I read about a similar device in Byte Magazine.
    Each keytop was a 5x7 LCD matrix.
    There was a company actually making and selling the keyboards, but they were expensive and very fragile, and the company (or at least the product line) didn't last very long.
    Stll, it was very high-tech for the time.
  191. Must... need... towels... by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

    When I see the setup on the screen, my mouth started drooling. Finally, a keyboard that'll allow me to type in english, chinese, and have visual cue for my favorite games instead of going into the control setting to look up the control again. :-O,

    --
    In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
  192. I can imagine.. by yongjhen · · Score: 1

    there will be a Firefox Plug-In that replaces that "Big E" with Earth-hugging red fox soon.

  193. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price - the paper keyboard by KyolFrilander · · Score: 1

    Nah, you still gotta deal with random keyboard variations. I'm very specific to my model M, typing on keyboards in mexico feels highly odd because of the weird enter key and | key positions, among others. (Well, at the "internet access station" at the resort last year, anyway. Might've just been an unusual import dealiebob.)

    --
    Buddha says, "Shut your karma hole."
  194. good looking. by bronney · · Score: 1

    nice looking but not practical.

    imagine your daily illustrator shortcuts, battlefield 2, strokes have become so closed to piano playing and a user doesn't need to think when he zooms in a PDF document. I don't even look at my keyboard most of the time.

    though I must admit that this keyboard would make a nice winamp plugin, weeeeeeeee!!

  195. "Patents pending." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Site says "Patents pending." - not sure whether that's a joke.... too bad though the whole idea is obvious, which patents shan't be. And I have seen on-screen keyboards before which changed similar to this, so that may even constitute prior art.

  196. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price- But "Novel Idea"??? by davidsyes · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would argue that the overlays shown in the Star Trek USS Enterprise Bridge Blueprints (a copy of which I purchased back in Sept '82) says, "Shows Every Button of Every Station and Their Functions: Complete Set of 10 Accurate 17" x 22" Blueprints of the Primary Bridge", (these drawings were drawn by Michael McMaster) could be considered precursors to this. The first set was drawn October 76. The STTNG console, as described by Michael Okuda and Wil Wheaton are a leap of generations past "Trek Classic."

    We've already seen in the Trek Episode "Where No Man Has Gone Before" a console control station with keyboard and switches being inserted after Lee Kelso appropriated it from the Vega cracking station. Later, that console style was changed for subsequent episodes, and apparently those changes on-screen seem to import/imply multi-function/demand-assignment control buttons. They're not for typing or composing documents, but they serve the purpose of entering single or a string of command sequences.

    Now, in terms of recent Trek incarnations, it is plain and obvious that even tho Trek is fiction, it should not take a giant leap to consider that today's thin film and LCD panels *could* make it feasible to lighten up, slim down, and de-wire these control consoles and make them portable. (Even the USN today and for several years has been using Palm Pilots for crew maintenance of shipboard equipment, and their PDAs could surely use the docking cradles/keyboards...)

    Where I am going with this is that between Trek of the 60s and technology of today, and with Trek already having mentioned multifunction keyboard overlays in the 60's drawings and the STTNG blueprints reiterating such things, where the consoles bring up the functions appropriate to security clearance, work tasks, emergencies, etc., this keyboard is not SOOOO terribly unique that it would enjoy a monopoly patent. It would probably face competition just as the innumerable PDAs' makers are facing competition, as so many hammers, socks, hair combs, nit removers, and even computer keyboards and other input devices have met competition. In other words, it's not a terribly large leap or extension of logic to say that a large, heavy, box and Mil-Spec connector cabled keyboard could be reduced to a wireless, lit-key, portable (walk-about) entry station, sending and receiving information via laser, Bluetooth or IR or WI-Fi (whatever works for the compartment, based on the proximity of RFI, EMI, generators, transformers, and such, unless the freq is above or below and therefore unaffected) signals. If there is contention or threat of suits in the court, an "innovator" then could simply create sliding tracks so that all those surplus monochrome LCDs languishing at WeirdStuff Computers could be put to use and maybe reopen a LCD assembly line. LCDs would be able to send several lines

    I really do think the keyboard concept they show deserves *some* protection, but not at the preclusion or exclusion of other makers. It's not novel *enough*. It's not *non-obvious* enough. But, I would say that any investors who like the technology should at least give first round of financing and marketing assistance to these guys -- if they are truly the first to put in this much real-world effort. But, once their boards hit the streets and engineering bugs crop up, competitors waiting in the background will quickly exploit that.

    These guys had better be prepared to fix their own flaws before their competitors fix them for them and help themselves to their competition while they are at it...

    Nice board. Really. I just hope they enlist the help of Open Source developers and embed a Linux-kernel driver or module facility so that the user can assign ANY function to ANY key based on a combination of command sequence and mouse click on a feature of an app interface. It is still too hard for some people to dump the console output or even make a console tell them the hex and human string AND the command with an example. Comparing the console output needs to seamlessly and INTUITIVELY match the KDE key settings.

    If they bring this board down to $50, I'd buy one, hands down (pun IS intended...)...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  197. saw these a while ago by forty-2 · · Score: 1

    they were LCD or vacuum fluorescent actually, but self labeling keys have been on high end lighting consoles for almost 10 years. The Vari-Lite Artisan had/has them. A sweet-ass piece of hardware I've been lucky enough to work on.

    --
    never drink kool-aid from a big vat
  198. awesome by Mika24 · · Score: 1

    if that comes out under $150 i will buy it, that has to be one of the best ideas ever

    --
    http://www.npcgaming.com Dedicated Gaming Servers
  199. Keyboard-monitor, monitor-keyboard by vikks · · Score: 1
    This remainds me of rumour about one guy, who's monitor had burned. He would be able to play Diggers by only sound up to level 3.


    Now, if he had keyboard like this, he would never need monitor again!

    --
    Digital is an exercise in precision, while analog was an exercise in controlled chaos.
    [ digitalFAQ.com ]
  200. I Came up with this idea years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I came up with the idea for this several years ago. I'd been thinking about patenting it, but I've never had the money to do so (another problem with the screwed up patent system). And for those who think I'm lying, I've told several other people, so I could have my story collaborated if need be. The biggest problem is the price, and until prices come down on the components it would be too expensive to really catch on.
    The thing I'll really be pissed about is if these cheeseballs patent the thing. I wonder if I would have any recourse to deny them the patent?

    -Jason Hurdlow

  201. Angband + showoff factor by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

    I would use it for Angband if i could. Almost every key is mapped and i can't remember them all.

    And then there is the showoff factor. Who cares that *you* don't look at the keyboard. Everyone else that will, will immediately go "ooooo! must...have...that...too..." And let's face it, isn't that we we have these eye catchers? :)

  202. This is the perfect keyboard for.. by RichiH · · Score: 1

    ..emacs! Just think about the possibility of actually _knowing_ what you are doing instead of just mashing buttons until you get into shell mode to start vim..

  203. Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My thoughts exactly. Wish I didn't burn my mod points elsewhere, I would mod you up.

  204. a bit off-topic: WTF happened to Fingerworks? by Living+WTF · · Score: 1

    WTF happened to Fingerworks?

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
  205. Re:Good Idea, Bad Price - the paper keyboard by mikael · · Score: 1

    I see what you mean - on my Dell keyboard, it's an [~ #] while those keyboards have the super-large Enter key.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads