And back in the real world humans are better. I keep seeing silly contrived examples like this with artificial tests and they don't mean much. Shoot some video, for example from a cab drivers 1 hour of journey in a busy city, then ask some hazard perception questions, wake me up when a computer can get anywhere near recognising 90% of what humans can recognise, including the ability to properly categorise objects, animals and people.
That may be so but if a computer can't tell the difference between a road and a river then it really doesn't matter that it's not distracted whilst being cognitively deficient.
It doesn't matter if a computer has perfect reaction times if it can't recognise deadly scenarios in any time frame. Computers as no-where near as good at recognising hazards as humans.
So correct me if I'm wrong but in large part the reason bitcoin requires so much processing is in part because a team of people decide to increase the 'difficulty' every so often. Why don't they simply allow bitcoin to be 'easier'.
Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin As of today, Steam will no longer support Bitcoin as a payment method on our platform due to high fees and volatility in the value of Bitcoin.
In the past few months we've seen an increase in the volatility in the value of Bitcoin and a significant increase in the fees to process transactions on the Bitcoin network. For example, transaction fees that are charged to the customer by the Bitcoin network have skyrocketed this year, topping out at close to $20 a transaction last week (compared to roughly $0.20 when we initially enabled Bitcoin). Unfortunately, Valve has no control over the amount of the fee.
And real life isn't a staged photo, it moves non-linearly in 3-dimensinal space with varying light conditions. Lets have some real tests, not carefully taken photos of cats and dogs against easy backgrounds.
It amazes me the level of hatred aimed at cheating, the level of seriousness to me is less than that of littering - a cigarette butt. It's not a crime in the UK where we don't have the god awful DMCA laws, it's just something annoying that sad people do, probably mostly kids. People need to get some perspective.
I'd argue that if you're not giving the leaflet to someone directly then it is littering. Also if it's not being dropped within the vicinity of a persons door / mailbox / front lawn. And 1 leaflet might be ok but not 100.
In the UK we don't have free speech laws AFAIK and you'd get slapped with a fine for littering pretty fast I expect (I'm not a lawyer). The newspaper on a lawn thing doesn't happen here, it rains too much and you'd risk having someone throwing it straight back at you!
It has happened in the past though and the ocean acidity has already increased a lot, so why wouldnt more co2 along with the damage humans are causing to the world's ecosystems cause large scale ocean acidity and die off? I think humans are incapable of the level of self control, integrity and intelligence needed not to vastly over-populate and destroy the world's ecosystems which is happening right now at a shocking rate.
What do think is going to happen when the permafrosts finish melting and release massive amounts of methane into the atmosphere? If not runaway global warming?
When the ocean is so acidic that ocean life dies, it rots, that releases toxic gases which would kill most land life, this isn't just Idle speculation, mass extinction(s) have happened this way before. CO2 + water = carbonic acid, the ocean is already a lot more acidic because of humans.
If users want a well funded highly capable browser then they'd understand that Moz needs to get funding. Google has paid 100's of millions literally to get their search box as 1st choice. And you can easily change it, unlike the ****ing UI or the fact that your plugins are all broken now.
Slashdot Mirror
If your eye is in your left hand whilst you are viewing porn then you really are doing it wrong.
No, the insurance company believes it can sell more insurance, that's what matters to them.
And back in the real world humans are better. I keep seeing silly contrived examples like this with artificial tests and they don't mean much. Shoot some video, for example from a cab drivers 1 hour of journey in a busy city, then ask some hazard perception questions, wake me up when a computer can get anywhere near recognising 90% of what humans can recognise, including the ability to properly categorise objects, animals and people.
That may be so but if a computer can't tell the difference between a road and a river then it really doesn't matter that it's not distracted whilst being cognitively deficient.
It doesn't matter if a computer has perfect reaction times if it can't recognise deadly scenarios in any time frame. Computers as no-where near as good at recognising hazards as humans.
So correct me if I'm wrong but in large part the reason bitcoin requires so much processing is in part because a team of people decide to increase the 'difficulty' every so often. Why don't they simply allow bitcoin to be 'easier'.
So, how does this affect the overall blockchain size? Do exchanges support this fork? Where can one view the current price of these?
In the UK you can fast transfer money with 0% charge. Bitcoin sucks in so many ways.
https://blockchain.info/charts...
https://blockchain.info/charts...
So, how is bitcoin not dead now?
http://steamcommunity.com/game...
Transaction cost: Fail
Blockchain size: Fail
Environmental cost: Massive fail
Bitcoin is lauded for being decentralised but soon the only people willing to host the blockchain will be big businesses.
Or how about this, the AI does some "hidden object puzzles", I can do those with a very high degree of accuracy, I bet AI would fail hard.
And real life isn't a staged photo, it moves non-linearly in 3-dimensinal space with varying light conditions. Lets have some real tests, not carefully taken photos of cats and dogs against easy backgrounds.
It amazes me the level of hatred aimed at cheating, the level of seriousness to me is less than that of littering - a cigarette butt. It's not a crime in the UK where we don't have the god awful DMCA laws, it's just something annoying that sad people do, probably mostly kids. People need to get some perspective.
I'd argue that if you're not giving the leaflet to someone directly then it is littering. Also if it's not being dropped within the vicinity of a persons door / mailbox / front lawn. And 1 leaflet might be ok but not 100.
In the UK we don't have free speech laws AFAIK and you'd get slapped with a fine for littering pretty fast I expect (I'm not a lawyer). The newspaper on a lawn thing doesn't happen here, it rains too much and you'd risk having someone throwing it straight back at you!
I came here to say this, it's pretty obvious really.
It has happened in the past though and the ocean acidity has already increased a lot, so why wouldnt more co2 along with the damage humans are causing to the world's ecosystems cause large scale ocean acidity and die off? I think humans are incapable of the level of self control, integrity and intelligence needed not to vastly over-populate and destroy the world's ecosystems which is happening right now at a shocking rate.
What do think is going to happen when the permafrosts finish melting and release massive amounts of methane into the atmosphere? If not runaway global warming?
When the ocean is so acidic that ocean life dies, it rots, that releases toxic gases which would kill most land life, this isn't just Idle speculation, mass extinction(s) have happened this way before. CO2 + water = carbonic acid, the ocean is already a lot more acidic because of humans.
Now it's $100 for the platinum version - the other versions are missing bits.
And if you don't pre-order then they strip out more content for you.
And another $xx for the season pass.
And DLCs not covered by the season pass.
And cosmetic loot boxes.
And pay-to-win loot boxes.
Tell WTF did your little story have to do with the guy the summary is talking about.
Other than his skin colour?
I'm not sure I want to click the 1st result, since google censors such things, the shit floats to the top.
If users want a well funded highly capable browser then they'd understand that Moz needs to get funding. Google has paid 100's of millions literally to get their search box as 1st choice. And you can easily change it, unlike the ****ing UI or the fact that your plugins are all broken now.
Walmart.
Damn, I didn't realise laptops had gotten so cheap, so what costs more, the laptop or the coffee?
"anonymous comments can no longer be considered truly anonymous"
This was always the case online.
Do you wish to be able to tell nasty lies about people with impunity, possibly damaging their reputation and sales?