Slashdot Mirror


User: technomancerX

technomancerX's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
199
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 199

  1. Re:Sorry - Java too hard. on A Java-Based Handheld OS · · Score: 1

    Ok, and a secretary would be programming WHY?!?!? You're obviously not a programmer, so why the hell are you looking at a programming language? And you're right, 99% of computer users are not developers (drop the elite bullshit, being elite has nothing to do with being able to code...) but what the hell does that have to do with being able to use applications written in Java? It's like saying 'I don't understand C/C++ so I can't use MS Windows'

    BTW as a developer who's done C, C++, Objective-C, Pascal, Cobol, Perl, and PHP I can say that Java is one of the most straight-forward languages around...

    .technomancer

  2. Re:The Future on Non Disclosure Agreements in Interviews? · · Score: 2

    Give me a fucking break... It is NOT unreasonable
    to require an NDA if you're going to talk about
    unannounced products.... hell the company I work
    for does that an we're about as corporate as a
    circus....

    For example, no drug test, no fixed hours, we're
    small enough that the CEO is about 50' from any
    employee that wants to talk to him (and he will take time to talk to anybody)...

    People need to relax... (and BTW I would never
    work anywhere that requires drug tests or monitors
    employees.. it's just plain wrong...)

    .technomancer

  3. Re:Kinda Makes Sense... on Non Disclosure Agreements in Interviews? · · Score: 1

    The company I work for now requires an NDA at
    interviews before discussing any detailed info
    about unreleased products... it's not a big
    deal...

    And our 'prarnoia' is justified... several years
    ago we were working on a product and word got back
    to a LARGE company what it was... They immediately
    announced a new product that would play the same
    role and said they would give it away... well it
    took them two years to release something, and when
    they did it sucked, but it still destroyed any
    hope of us selling our product which was ready at
    the time of their announcement...

    .technomancer

  4. Re:Correction... on GNU/Linux On The Prowl: PocketLinux · · Score: 1

    Define 'doing rather well'. Last I heard Palm was
    still destroying CE in sales, with mostly outdated
    hardware to boot... it'll be interesting to see
    what happens when the StrongARM based Palms come
    out...

    Don't get me wrong. I love the hardware Wince has
    driven to market, but I've used it and I've used
    a Palm, and the Palm wins hands down...

    .technomancer

  5. Re:Built-in thingies on Sony Announces Transmeta Notebook · · Score: 1

    Actually, the Sony Picturebooks are small... check
    out sony's site and look at one... they're kind
    of like a Libretto on steroids...

    .technomancer

  6. Re:Hello Gnome, goodbye KDE on 'Gnome Foundation' Takes Aim at MS Office · · Score: 1

    I still love the 'noone is supporting KDE'. Nope,
    nobody supports it at all, that's why it's got the
    largest install base and is the default desktop on
    Mandrake and ships with Suse, Redhat, and pretty
    much every other linux distribution except for
    Debian...

  7. Re:GNUStep on Why Port from UNIX to OS X? · · Score: 1

    I love the IDEA of GNUStep.. however is seems to be missing a few key things... Progress on the project seems slow as hell, there are very few apps in existence or being created for it (compared to KDE/GNOME), and there is no themeability... If these things should change, I'd look at it in a heartbeat...

    Of course the response to this is "you're a developer, why don't you help"



    .technomancer
  8. Re:One Question on Why Port from UNIX to OS X? · · Score: 1

    One can hope so... Quicktime is one of the few
    things that I miss when using linux....

    .technomancer

  9. Re:Tough Call... GUI's a problem... on Why Port from UNIX to OS X? · · Score: 1

    Yup, that's correct. Basically the native OS X
    API (Cocoa) is OpenStep, while Carbon is a compatibility layer to allow older Mac apps to
    compile on OS X. If you look at the class defs/
    developer docs Cocoa is all OpenStep (in fact, all
    the class names still start with NS, which stands
    for, drumroll, NeXTStep).

    This is why I was really confused when someone started spouting off a while ago that OS X wasn't being based on NeXTStep.

    .technomancer

  10. Re:Use this to make digital VCR? on Linux Supported DVD-RW Coming Soon · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, mpeg encoder cards are insanely
    expensive... been there, looked at that, decided
    it wasn't worth it.

    .technomancer

  11. Re:Behind every Linux Geek... on MacOSX and X11 · · Score: 1

    Hey, that's bull... wait a minute, my wife uses a Mac DOAH!

    .technomancer

  12. Re:Too little too late. Macs will slowly die off. on MacOSX and X11 · · Score: 1

    I kinda' doubt it... have you looked at Apple's sales figures recently?

    .technomancer

  13. Damn! on Sen. Hatch Warns Labels: Don't Make Me Come Spank You · · Score: 1

    This is almost unbelievable... Government is
    threatening business to do something that half
    makes sense...

  14. Take a look at Freenet =) on RIAA Claims Initial Legal Win vs. Napster · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... I think you'll like this. Take a look at Freenet.

    .technomancer

  15. Re:Component architecture on Konqueror.org Launched - KDE2 Web Browser · · Score: 1

    Yes, KDE 2.0 uses a component architecture... haven't looked at nautilus much, but basically the way KDE 2.0 and Konqueror works is that pretty much everything is a component.

    This is a quote from an interview with Mosfet (one of the KDE 2.0 developers)

    "The main difference is now KDE2 is heavily component based, focusing of the browser. All of the KOffice applications (KWord, KPresenter KIllustrator, KSpread, KImageShop, KIllustrator, KChart, and KFormula) as well as many other KDE applications such as the PS/PDF viewer, mpeg and image viewers, and DVI viewers are all components now - internet transparent and embeddable in the browser. You can even embed the terminal application in the browser and change directories using the arrow buttons ;-) Pretty cool. KDE easily boasts the most extensive and complete component model support for Unix desktops."

    The interview is located here

    .technomancer

  16. Re:Wondering... on Konqueror.org Launched - KDE2 Web Browser · · Score: 1

    I've been following the KDE 2.0 development
    (which Konqueror is a part of) and from what
    I've seen I would guess 2 to 3 months.

    Note that this would put them within their
    proposed time frame of a release in second
    quarter.

    .technomancer

  17. And a FREE compiler on Get QNX For Free · · Score: 2

    And most importantly, from browsing the site for
    a few moments it appears there will finally be a
    version of gcc for QNX available for DL as well...
    QNX has been available in one form or another
    for free for awhile... Now that we can get dev
    tools without shelling out $$$ the real fun should
    begin.

    .technomancer

  18. Re:More development for QNX? on Get QNX For Free · · Score: 2
    1. HERETIC!!! ;-)
    2. It will be free to download, so it will help if you get the CD or not
    3. It will encourage more dev because they're finally releasing a FREE chain of dev tools (GNU actually, which rocks)
    4. QNX is tiny, why not just make a 50 meg partition...

      .technomancer
  19. Re:Yeah! on Get QNX For Free · · Score: 1

    Maybe as a jab at the fact that the crypt function used in their password system sucks =)
    It was broken about a week ago... slashdot story is here

    .technomancer

  20. Re:The evils of forced optimization...and other st on Mandrake 7.1 Beta Ready For Download · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think it would just have to be too
    stuborn, as you can get a pentium system for $100
    or less (I know, I just picked up 2 IBM P133
    systems to fill out some specific functions on
    my home network)

    .technomancer

  21. Re:ISO anyone? on Red Hat 6.2 Officially Released · · Score: 1

    Downloading from redhat as I type this =)

  22. Re:first copper?? on C'T visits Transmeta · · Score: 1

    IBM developed the copper interconnect technology...
    however there is currently no
    commercially available chip that uses it...
    I believe they're saying the Crusoe will be
    the first commercially available chip using
    the technology...

  23. Re:server 51 why ? on Updated Slash & Server 51 · · Score: 1

    Kind of like sourceforge does? Sorry, if they want
    to do it it's cool... and I'm sure from Andover's
    point of view anything that draws more hits is good... but it just seems like kind of a waste of time... especially if they're rolling their own tools since sourceforge open sourced theirs...

  24. Macromedia FAQs on Flash Releases on Macromedia Looking at Opening Flash Player · · Score: 3

    Ok, Macromedia actually has FAQs on their websites about this. For those that are interested:
    Macromedia FAQs