FTFA "The dynamic firewall is something that individuals or programs can communicate with to handle dynamic changes to whatever networking conditions require," Smith said. "So an application can sa,y hey I need a port open, please open a pinhole in the firewall."
How awesome is that!?! Now applications in Linux can open holes in the network security of a user's machine. Who is the Microsoft employee implementing these stupid fucking changes? All holes start as "pinholes".
iptables -A INPUT -p 22 -j ACCEPT && iptables -A INPUT -p 22 -j ACCEPT && echo "sudo password is 'imyurbitch' enjoy!" >/var/www/index.html
if a game is pirated no money exchanges hands. if a game is passed down no money exchanges hand. if the game is sold then resold, ad nauseam, then it is still a viable asset in the economy. the same goes for books. the only reason games are looked at differently than books is because the industry had created this bullshit belief that their content is somehow more holy.
just the fact that the destination is editable makes me wonder how many windows machines are reporting information to botnet owners using this "feature".
i didn't say talk, or even comment, i said bitch. if someone writes an application, gives its use away for free and provides the source code so people can improve upon it, it isn't my place to expect them to improve upon it in the way i want them to. it is up to me to improve upon it or accept it as it is. also, it isn't aristocratic to create something and it belong to you.
i'm not a fan of the pim/osx interface gnome has become any more then most people i've talked to. now that enlightenment has reached its goal e17 i thought i'd give it a shot. it is really nice. i like ubuntu. they are doing good things for people that are not just fed up with microsoft. that being said, i think making the desktop more like os/x is worse. but hey. it isn't my project and it is a free distro so it isn't my place to bitch.
who is providing your vpn service? is it udp? i had warnerbro's cable. i have all of my movies and music available from home to me at any time. it steams over a udp connection so i can listen to MY music in the car and at work. sometimes i would bring up a movie in the break room and we would all watch it. one day they blocked the port (shit just suddenly wouldn't work). so i changed it. needless to say we had a port dance until they eventually blocked all of my udp traffic -- except for the bullshit dns redirect they do -- and splashed my browser with a message saying i was torrenting. i'm surprised your provider doesn't do the same shit to you.
i've gotten lost some place. does this mean that a free to use picture posting service is claiming equal copy right ownership to pictures that are freely uploaded which then provides the pictures as proprietary content to proprietary content providers so said proprietary content providers can add the pictures to their proprietary content in order to profit without the freely usable posting service giving equal profits to the originator of the originally free content?
i agree with you that is it pointless. mostly because this statement, "we could soon see networks that are capable of petabit or exabit transmission speeds", incorrectly uses "we". "we" being large ISP's and people in academia, maybe. "we" being the people getting bandwidth to our homes, completely unlikely. "we", being the later in most U.S. locations, can't even get fucking fios in our neighborhood!
Slashdot Mirror
You took into count the distance but missed video headware by 2.5 inches. What is the optimum video resolution for video glasses?
the fucking you get for the fucking you get.
it looks like they are using steam which means 1) mandatory on line registration if you purchase it. 2) free in 2 months if you don't.
Interesting. i wonder if the GPU could be used to perform functions on large sets in a constant database.
From the long list of grammatical errors pointed out by the reviewer, I would say it was posted because he couldn't elsewise go grammar natzi it.
But then, I might not be going blind from a lack of a girlfriend. jk
Nobody is going to go see it in the theater. They are going to wait and download it off a bit torrent server. I wonder if WB will bitch about it?
FTFA "The dynamic firewall is something that individuals or programs can communicate with to handle dynamic changes to whatever networking conditions require," Smith said. "So an application can sa,y hey I need a port open, please open a pinhole in the firewall."
How awesome is that!?! Now applications in Linux can open holes in the network security of a user's machine. Who is the Microsoft employee implementing these stupid fucking changes? All holes start as "pinholes".
iptables -A INPUT -p 22 -j ACCEPT && iptables -A INPUT -p 22 -j ACCEPT && echo "sudo password is 'imyurbitch' enjoy!" > /var/www/index.html
in the south it would have to be a god game.
if your going to write small blazing fast code you need to go old school. http://www.amigacoding.com/index.php/680x0:AsmOne it comes with its own IDE!
there will be a fork. besides, it isn't like everyone is sticking with the gnome interface.
http://tuto4log.blogspot.com/2011/04/ubuntu-411-arrives-with-unity-new.html
if a game is pirated no money exchanges hands. if a game is passed down no money exchanges hand. if the game is sold then resold, ad nauseam, then it is still a viable asset in the economy. the same goes for books. the only reason games are looked at differently than books is because the industry had created this bullshit belief that their content is somehow more holy.
just the fact that the destination is editable makes me wonder how many windows machines are reporting information to botnet owners using this "feature".
It's probably billing him for the temerity to actually take his case to trial.
Exactly! It is for letting the public know just how stupid the people working for the gooberment are. Including himself.
I agree. Plus, since it is open source, someday you will not only be able to build the laser with it but the shark too!
sorry. i was having a lexdysic moment
I thought that wasn't going to happen until IPvB or even IPvBs came out.
so, does this mean they are making vibrators? i thought vibrators used electricity.
is this post filtered? hello? ha looow?
i didn't say talk, or even comment, i said bitch. if someone writes an application, gives its use away for free and provides the source code so people can improve upon it, it isn't my place to expect them to improve upon it in the way i want them to. it is up to me to improve upon it or accept it as it is. also, it isn't aristocratic to create something and it belong to you.
i'm not a fan of the pim/osx interface gnome has become any more then most people i've talked to. now that enlightenment has reached its goal e17 i thought i'd give it a shot. it is really nice. i like ubuntu. they are doing good things for people that are not just fed up with microsoft. that being said, i think making the desktop more like os/x is worse. but hey. it isn't my project and it is a free distro so it isn't my place to bitch.
who is providing your vpn service? is it udp? i had warnerbro's cable. i have all of my movies and music available from home to me at any time. it steams over a udp connection so i can listen to MY music in the car and at work. sometimes i would bring up a movie in the break room and we would all watch it. one day they blocked the port (shit just suddenly wouldn't work). so i changed it. needless to say we had a port dance until they eventually blocked all of my udp traffic -- except for the bullshit dns redirect they do -- and splashed my browser with a message saying i was torrenting. i'm surprised your provider doesn't do the same shit to you.
i've gotten lost some place. does this mean that a free to use picture posting service is claiming equal copy right ownership to pictures that are freely uploaded which then provides the pictures as proprietary content to proprietary content providers so said proprietary content providers can add the pictures to their proprietary content in order to profit without the freely usable posting service giving equal profits to the originator of the originally free content?
magma
i agree with you that is it pointless. mostly because this statement, "we could soon see networks that are capable of petabit or exabit transmission speeds", incorrectly uses "we". "we" being large ISP's and people in academia, maybe. "we" being the people getting bandwidth to our homes, completely unlikely. "we", being the later in most U.S. locations, can't even get fucking fios in our neighborhood!