Small quantities over a long period of time of high fructose corn syrup is toxic.
If you think otherwise, please continue consuming junk food and when you die from heart disease, cancer, or any of the common illnesses then blame your ignorance.
What about radioactive water?
on
Is Sugar Toxic?
·
· Score: 0
Radioactive water is more toxic than regular water just as high fructose corn syrup is more toxic than regular sugar.
Nobody is saying natural fructose from fruit is the source of the problem. The source of the problem is sugar is not a natural substance anymore. It's as if bottled water were being contaminated with unnatural radioactive substances and being labeled "vitamin water", if this "vitamin water" were causing cancer then yes water would be toxic too.
High fructose corn syrup is slow acting poison. It
on
Is Sugar Toxic?
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
Peasants typically consume high fructose corn syrup because they cannot afford real sugar. Look in urban areas in the USA and look at what is being put in grocery stores and what they are eating. High fructose corn syrup is in everything. High fructose corn syrup is being used as a form of population control on the masses. Unlike some other substances it kills slowly over a period of decades. It is a proven slow acting poison, studies conducted on rats prove that rats fed high fructose corn syrup tend to develop heart disease become diabetic and die.
Why do they want the urban poor to die from heart disease and diabetes? It may sound like a conspiracy theory but think about it. And then think about why they also want to get rid of unions, cut people off social security, get rid of univeral healthcare, and cut spending on programs which save lives. The peasant poor in the USA are like cattle being culled, oh you expect corporations to treat human poor animals better than cattle? Look at a PETA video and see how cattle are treated.
Sugar is not only toxic but it's addictive.
on
Is Sugar Toxic?
·
· Score: 0
It is very much like other toxic substances. So I agree it should be treated as a toxic substance, at least when the form of sugar is an unnatural processed form, such as corn syrup, high fructose corn syrup, dextrose, or other.
The obsession with sweet flavor is part of a marketing campaign not unlike the Chinese use of MSG. MSG is not considered healthy now is it?
There is no reason why the human body should ever consume processed sugar. If you need sugar, get it from an organic natural substance or don't consume it at all. Sugar are empty calories and processed sugar is only added to foods to make it addictive. Sugar is a scam, a toxic substance, and high fructose sugar should be relabeled rat poison because that's what it does to rats.
Many educated people still don't have a job. Why? Because there is no shortage of educated people in the world. There is more a shortage of athletes than of educated people. This is why athletes are more valuable to the world and make more money.
Google is going to cancel one of the best video services on the internet because it doesn't have the same domain name as YouTube? There are lots of great videos which are on Google video because they are over an hour long. On Youtube they are broken up into many chunks.
What is Google going to do? Erase them all? All they have to do is transfer the goddamn videos to youtube or let us do it at the click of a button. This on top of them forcing us to give them our cellphone numbers for authentication are two reasons why Google is falling out of favor in terms of Youtube.
Either one of the numbers is wrong or his math is way off.
Not that this paints a prettier picture.
Then again: 250Gbit / 8bit/byte = 31,250,000,000
Who downloads 31Gb per month but doesn't get a dedicated line for the purposes? Well I can guess who - but even a typical blu-ray rip (not an ISO) is what.. 4GiB? That's still about 8 such movies in a month if you're into that sort of thing.
If you really need the bandwidth -and- lack of cap.. get a dedicated line. This offer seems to be for people / small business who might need a high burst rate for certain things (i.e. on the phone, need to send a 50MB file being referenced, don't want to wait 2 minutes on the phone for receipt, etc.) but wouldn't typically hit the cap.
As long as these caps are clearly advertised.. who cares?
You don't have a clue how young people use the internet. I'm guessing you've never been to the tube sites. You probably think the only way to download more than 30 gigs a month is piracy. If you watch HDTV on your computer, and each show is a few gigs, you will easily get up to 30 gigs in a month. You might even get up to 150 gigs. But you probably will not get up to 250 gigs.
As far as dedicated lines go, this service is meant to compete with FIOS and bring the USA up to speed with China, Japan and Europe.
No of course not. There are plenty of sites which make use of the speed. HDTV streams, youtube, the cloud. The faster your connection the higher the quality of stream you can use, and the more HDTV streams you can have at once. So you can stream 4 HDTV movies at once without any pauses or slowdown.
Downloads are around 10Megs per second on a good day, you can download all day for 5 days at this rate and still not max out the 250GB per month. You would would have to deliberately max your speed out all day every day for about a week before you max out the 250GB. Honestly I doubt many people would be able to do it if they were challenged to.
This is the tip of the iceberg. Political rivals can be targeted by hackers. This includes activists, union members, or the priests and pastors at churches. Nobodies dox are safe, anyone can be owned and exposed.
Whether the problem is an election, a rival corporation, or a rival nation, chances are an army of hackers can go about solving it in sophisticated or simple ways.
I think we are in the cyberwarfare era. Corporations, governments, and private individuals will be able to hire hackers for doxing services, or other more controversial services.
Uh...wha? I've smoked salvia many times and know the crazy shit it can make you see (I've seen television characters become demons in my living room, thought that all of existence was an illusion created by rapidly moving air bubbles in a universe of folded rubbery sheets,etc.), but you seem to be taking hallucinogen "revelations" a bit too seriously.
Don't get me wrong, drugs can be great for getting an alternate perspective on something, but you have to look at what you think you've discovered while high through the lens of reality before you can know if it's something worthwhile or just something you thought made sense at the time.
Also, personally I wouldn't be recommending salvia to everyone. It's effects are short-lived but incredibly potent and it certainly should not be used outside of appropriate environments. The reason it's getting banned in so many states are idiots who think they can treat it like weed and end up doing something stupid/dangerous in public.
How do we know they aren't using performance enhancing drugs? We should test all physicists for drugs when they start talking about new forces or new theories of reality.
Slashdot Mirror
And what form of sugar is most popular in America? The most toxic "high fructose corn syrup" or the lease toxic cane sugar?
Small quantities over a long period of time of high fructose corn syrup is toxic.
If you think otherwise, please continue consuming junk food and when you die from heart disease, cancer, or any of the common illnesses then blame your ignorance.
Radioactive water is more toxic than regular water just as high fructose corn syrup is more toxic than regular sugar.
Nobody is saying natural fructose from fruit is the source of the problem. The source of the problem is sugar is not a natural substance anymore. It's as if bottled water were being contaminated with unnatural radioactive substances and being labeled "vitamin water", if this "vitamin water" were causing cancer then yes water would be toxic too.
Peasants typically consume high fructose corn syrup because they cannot afford real sugar. Look in urban areas in the USA and look at what is being put in grocery stores and what they are eating. High fructose corn syrup is in everything. High fructose corn syrup is being used as a form of population control on the masses. Unlike some other substances it kills slowly over a period of decades. It is a proven slow acting poison, studies conducted on rats prove that rats fed high fructose corn syrup tend to develop heart disease become diabetic and die.
Why do they want the urban poor to die from heart disease and diabetes? It may sound like a conspiracy theory but think about it. And then think about why they also want to get rid of unions, cut people off social security, get rid of univeral healthcare, and cut spending on programs which save lives. The peasant poor in the USA are like cattle being culled, oh you expect corporations to treat human poor animals better than cattle? Look at a PETA video and see how cattle are treated.
It is very much like other toxic substances. So I agree it should be treated as a toxic substance, at least when the form of sugar is an unnatural processed form, such as corn syrup, high fructose corn syrup, dextrose, or other.
The obsession with sweet flavor is part of a marketing campaign not unlike the Chinese use of MSG. MSG is not considered healthy now is it?
There is no reason why the human body should ever consume processed sugar. If you need sugar, get it from an organic natural substance or don't consume it at all. Sugar are empty calories and processed sugar is only added to foods to make it addictive. Sugar is a scam, a toxic substance, and high fructose sugar should be relabeled rat poison because that's what it does to rats.
Many educated people still don't have a job. Why? Because there is no shortage of educated people in the world. There is more a shortage of athletes than of educated people. This is why athletes are more valuable to the world and make more money.
And getting good grades does not mean dumb. I would say chess is more accurate for determining who is smart and dumb because I'm good at chess.
What have you to say about that?
Google is going to cancel one of the best video services on the internet because it doesn't have the same domain name as YouTube? There are lots of great videos which are on Google video because they are over an hour long. On Youtube they are broken up into many chunks.
What is Google going to do? Erase them all? All they have to do is transfer the goddamn videos to youtube or let us do it at the click of a button. This on top of them forcing us to give them our cellphone numbers for authentication are two reasons why Google is falling out of favor in terms of Youtube.
We invented the technology.
250Gbit / 105Mb/s = "about five hours worth of full-bandwidth use". Since when?
250,000,000,000
105,000,000
250,000b / 105b/s ~= 2381s
2381s / 60s/m ~= 40m
Either one of the numbers is wrong or his math is way off.
Not that this paints a prettier picture.
Then again:
250Gbit / 8bit/byte = 31,250,000,000
Who downloads 31Gb per month but doesn't get a dedicated line for the purposes?
Well I can guess who - but even a typical blu-ray rip (not an ISO) is what.. 4GiB? That's still about 8 such movies in a month if you're into that sort of thing.
If you really need the bandwidth -and- lack of cap.. get a dedicated line. This offer seems to be for people / small business who might need a high burst rate for certain things (i.e. on the phone, need to send a 50MB file being referenced, don't want to wait 2 minutes on the phone for receipt, etc.) but wouldn't typically hit the cap.
As long as these caps are clearly advertised.. who cares?
You don't have a clue how young people use the internet. I'm guessing you've never been to the tube sites. You probably think the only way to download more than 30 gigs a month is piracy. If you watch HDTV on your computer, and each show is a few gigs, you will easily get up to 30 gigs in a month. You might even get up to 150 gigs. But you probably will not get up to 250 gigs.
As far as dedicated lines go, this service is meant to compete with FIOS and bring the USA up to speed with China, Japan and Europe.
No of course not. There are plenty of sites which make use of the speed. HDTV streams, youtube, the cloud.
The faster your connection the higher the quality of stream you can use, and the more HDTV streams you can have at once. So you can stream 4 HDTV movies at once without any pauses or slowdown.
How many movies do you watch a month? I do all of that stuff and I've not been able to max out past 200GB in any month.
Downloads are around 10Megs per second on a good day, you can download all day for 5 days at this rate and still not max out the 250GB per month. You would would have to deliberately max your speed out all day every day for about a week before you max out the 250GB. Honestly I doubt many people would be able to do it if they were challenged to.
It's 250 GIGs per month. Got it?
That is plenty for me.
But it isn't that bad.I haven't come close to maxing it out and I tried. I don't know, how exactly do you use more than 250GB in a month?
There is no speed cap and its the fastest internet available in my area so why not use it? It's not perfect but it beats DSL.
And the government is the victimizer.
Seems like a possibility. What then?
This is the tip of the iceberg. Political rivals can be targeted by hackers. This includes activists, union members, or the priests and pastors at churches. Nobodies dox are safe, anyone can be owned and exposed.
Whether the problem is an election, a rival corporation, or a rival nation, chances are an army of hackers can go about solving it in sophisticated or simple ways.
I think we are in the cyberwarfare era. Corporations, governments, and private individuals will be able to hire hackers for doxing services, or other more controversial services.
Even if you have notes you still have to work out the answers on your own.
Uh...wha? I've smoked salvia many times and know the crazy shit it can make you see (I've seen television characters become demons in my living room, thought that all of existence was an illusion created by rapidly moving air bubbles in a universe of folded rubbery sheets,etc.), but you seem to be taking hallucinogen "revelations" a bit too seriously.
Don't get me wrong, drugs can be great for getting an alternate perspective on something, but you have to look at what you think you've discovered while high through the lens of reality before you can know if it's something worthwhile or just something you thought made sense at the time.
Also, personally I wouldn't be recommending salvia to everyone. It's effects are short-lived but incredibly potent and it certainly should not be used outside of appropriate environments. The reason it's getting banned in so many states are idiots who think they can treat it like weed and end up doing something stupid/dangerous in public.
How do we know they aren't using performance enhancing drugs? We should test all physicists for drugs when they start talking about new forces or new theories of reality.
No, when I say salvia I mean salvia. LSD isn't nearly strong enough.
And then die in a fire, k thnx.
The only universe and only thoughts proven to exist are your own. And even these could be artificial intuition.
So if you aren't God, why believe someone else is?
I bet you trust physicists don't you?
Just like you trust priests?
And doctors?
But why? Why trust them? They could manipulate or twist the facts to promote any kind of perspective they wish.