SoftMaker Office 2008 is lean and mean, though proprietary. It has excellent MS compatibility (way better than OO.o). Costs less than $100. Doesn't have macro recorder though, which is a shame. (It has a VBA analog that's called BasicMaker)
Hmn, I wonder what you missed in comment implementation then. To me, it's still broken. You cannot assign a comment to a range of text, and comment information is butchered on roundtripping between Word and Writer.
you should try comparing apples with jet engines and oranges with elephants, it will make you a much more rounded individual who is happier about life in general.
This can be partly mitigated using the Launcher List applet aka quicklounge. That way, at least your launchers won't rearrange themselves when they feel like it (and you can lock the whole applet). As an added bonus, you can drag and drop launchers (also from the menu) with the left mouse button.
OK. Now imagine there IS truth to the words of the student. The student gets suspended for her words. As a result, the paedophile remains at the school, and the accused is conveniently removed. Do you see the problem with your argument now?
Yadda yadda yadda, she should've contacted the police if she thinks that he is a paedophile. But wait, that's exactly the point here: use the proper ways to resolve conflicts! Which, for the principal, is to file a suit if he believes a libel has taken place.
BTW, the very fact that the principal doesn't want to file a suit may cast a shadow at him: maybe he just doesn't want the whole story behind the girl's words being investigated? Why would that be? This too could be avoided if he just filed a suit (and settled for some small sum if he felt like being generous.)
Yep, it's just that I have never seen the word "adjective" used as, well, an adjective. Though I have just looked it up in a dictionary, and here it is:
adjective
ADJECTIVE: 1. Adjectival: an adjective clause. 2. Law Prescriptive; remedial: adjective law. 3. Not standing alone; derivative or dependent.
The terms of the challenge indicate that you cannot disassemble the drive.
Have you actually read the terms?
"If the challenger is an established data recovery business located in the United States of America (We would need to see Articles of Incorporation, a current business license and one other form of business identification in order to determine that they are indeed a professional, for-profit, established data recovery business) or a National government law enforcement or intelligence agency (NSA, CIA, FBI), then we will allow these type of organizations to disassemble the drive and to keep the drive for thirty (30) consecutive days. "
Until we get transparent hands, people will obscure the screen while using it
I've heard that there is experimental support for hand transparency in the current X.org git tree. The code is still very much alpha however; in particular, on some hardware, you cannot disable transparent hands after you have enabled them.
Slashdot Mirror
SoftMaker Office 2008 is lean and mean, though proprietary. It has excellent MS compatibility (way better than OO.o). Costs less than $100. Doesn't have macro recorder though, which is a shame. (It has a VBA analog that's called BasicMaker)
Just finished 600-page translation in Word 2003 SP 2 under Vista - no problems, not a single crash (!), even saves were mighty quick.
Hmn, I wonder what you missed in comment implementation then. To me, it's still broken. You cannot assign a comment to a range of text, and comment information is butchered on roundtripping between Word and Writer.
http://osnews.com/permalink?226219
http://osnews.com/permalink?226313
http://osnews.com/permalink?226315
They're old but still mostly valid.
Where I live it's routinely pronounced with "ch" as in Scottish "Loch".
I'm stealing this for my sig!!!
OK I'm not :-( Apparently this is too long a signature for the stupid Slashdot to bear.
you should try comparing apples with jet engines and oranges with elephants, it will make you a much more rounded individual who is happier about life in general.
I'm stealing this for my sig!!!
This can be partly mitigated using the Launcher List applet aka quicklounge. That way, at least your launchers won't rearrange themselves when they feel like it (and you can lock the whole applet). As an added bonus, you can drag and drop launchers (also from the menu) with the left mouse button.
OK. Now imagine there IS truth to the words of the student. The student gets suspended for her words. As a result, the paedophile remains at the school, and the accused is conveniently removed. Do you see the problem with your argument now?
Yadda yadda yadda, she should've contacted the police if she thinks that he is a paedophile. But wait, that's exactly the point here: use the proper ways to resolve conflicts! Which, for the principal, is to file a suit if he believes a libel has taken place.
BTW, the very fact that the principal doesn't want to file a suit may cast a shadow at him: maybe he just doesn't want the whole story behind the girl's words being investigated? Why would that be? This too could be avoided if he just filed a suit (and settled for some small sum if he felt like being generous.)
Wrong. Here are the relevant snippets from ther license itself.
GPL v.2, section 0: "Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not covered by this License; they are outside its scope."
GPL v.3, section 9: "You are not required to accept this License in order to receive or run a copy of the Program."
...and wrongly so, because GPL doesn't cover use, just distribution.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoPmKiDw-y0
the courts have yet to rule
You mean, they have sucked to date?
Yep, it's just that I have never seen the word "adjective" used as, well, an adjective. Though I have just looked it up in a dictionary, and here it is:
adjective
ADJECTIVE: 1. Adjectival: an adjective clause. 2. Law Prescriptive; remedial: adjective law. 3. Not standing alone; derivative or dependent.
I would start with A again, and call the new release simply Animal Adjective.
These are valid reasons to want XMPP to become more popular - not ICQ to disappear.
That's simple. I do not *intend* to, but sometimes I do unintended things.
Oh noes, this rips the phone companies of profits!
Shit, I meant Google is_more_than Yandex. Stupid slashcode.
But at least I now know a good mirror where I can download Linux distros :-)
It seems you want ICQ to disappear. Why? It works for me and for millions other people in Russia.
The terms of the challenge indicate that you cannot disassemble the drive.
Have you actually read the terms?
"If the challenger is an established data recovery business located in the United States of America (We would need to see Articles of Incorporation, a current business license and one other form of business identification in order to determine that they are indeed a professional, for-profit, established data recovery business) or a National government law enforcement or intelligence agency (NSA, CIA, FBI), then we will allow these type of organizations to disassemble the drive and to keep the drive for thirty (30) consecutive days. "
Until we get transparent hands, people will obscure the screen while using it
I've heard that there is experimental support for hand transparency in the current X.org git tree. The code is still very much alpha however; in particular, on some hardware, you cannot disable transparent hands after you have enabled them.
OK so they win this round in Bullshit Bingo.
Someone who blocks ads isn't going to click them anyway.