Would this law help the rich few who are going to be able to increase their mental capacity and ability using genetic engineering to obtain jobs over the poor/middle class people who can't offered said enhancements?
In a liberal arts school you are more likely to take the full load of English classes (Comp, technical writing, writing...) These courses suck, for a tech minded person (at least they did for me) but they are absolutely necessary if you wish to succeed in business / real world. So this is a huge plus for a LA school.
In a technical school you are probably going to learn more by hands-on labs / assignments. Things that are closely relevant to today's tech. A LA school will probably focus more on theory. The hands-on "Go read this data sheet and make this processor work"(tech school) vs "Implement memory space in logic emulation software XYZ only using logic gates" (LA school) (Both actual examples from different schools). The Hands-on is IMHO more important then the theory. Find a school with a good balance of communication and tech. Finding a way to teach your self and a way to pass that knowledge on to others (in a coherent and meaningful way) is what is going to make or break your carrier in tech.....
So your saying that if you ever have to sue MS or Google or Apple or anything, for a valid patent violation and their heavy hitting lawyers win with some big money law magic now you have to pay for it? GLWT
I am going to school for computer engineering and I work with to Computer Science students from different schools and a computer engineering student from a different school. We all work in a shop that mixes hardware manufacturing and engineering with software engineering. The biggest grip that seems to cross university lines is that what they teach isn't always relevant to todays tech. I mean I just got down with a Computer Interfacing class that was done completely with a serial port and an ISA board. USB was mentioned as too complex to teach in one quarter(maybe, but two?), but I am pretty sure it had to do with the teacher being out of industry for 10+ years. I also was teaching a tenured professor how to solder board mount components using magical things like flux and non rosin core solder. The guys at work say the same thing. Software engineering class that don't even mention versioning (svn, cvs, whatever) software or unit test. Electrical engineering classes that are two bogged down in theory to say oh and you can buy this whole system off the shelf.
I kept rereading waiting to see this complaint and it was no where, WTF?
I mean come one sure we have room in the court system for more nonviolent crimes that could be prevented. I mean we the people can expect you the people to RTFM!
Slashdot Mirror
Alright, but what if the book store owner decides he doesn't want to sell book X so comes to your house and removes if from your bookshelf?
This opens up a market for a web company selling banned books for the kindle.
Would this law help the rich few who are going to be able to increase their mental capacity and ability using genetic engineering to obtain jobs over the poor/middle class people who can't offered said enhancements?
In a liberal arts school you are more likely to take the full load of English classes (Comp, technical writing, writing...) These courses suck, for a tech minded person (at least they did for me) but they are absolutely necessary if you wish to succeed in business / real world. So this is a huge plus for a LA school. In a technical school you are probably going to learn more by hands-on labs / assignments. Things that are closely relevant to today's tech. A LA school will probably focus more on theory. The hands-on "Go read this data sheet and make this processor work"(tech school) vs "Implement memory space in logic emulation software XYZ only using logic gates" (LA school) (Both actual examples from different schools). The Hands-on is IMHO more important then the theory. Find a school with a good balance of communication and tech. Finding a way to teach your self and a way to pass that knowledge on to others (in a coherent and meaningful way) is what is going to make or break your carrier in tech.....
Ah, well no, data rates can be different at many parts of an rf modulator.
So your saying that if you ever have to sue MS or Google or Apple or anything, for a valid patent violation and their heavy hitting lawyers win with some big money law magic now you have to pay for it? GLWT
I am going to school for computer engineering and I work with to Computer Science students from different schools and a computer engineering student from a different school. We all work in a shop that mixes hardware manufacturing and engineering with software engineering. The biggest grip that seems to cross university lines is that what they teach isn't always relevant to todays tech. I mean I just got down with a Computer Interfacing class that was done completely with a serial port and an ISA board. USB was mentioned as too complex to teach in one quarter(maybe, but two?), but I am pretty sure it had to do with the teacher being out of industry for 10+ years. I also was teaching a tenured professor how to solder board mount components using magical things like flux and non rosin core solder. The guys at work say the same thing. Software engineering class that don't even mention versioning (svn, cvs, whatever) software or unit test. Electrical engineering classes that are two bogged down in theory to say oh and you can buy this whole system off the shelf. I kept rereading waiting to see this complaint and it was no where, WTF?
I mean come one sure we have room in the court system for more nonviolent crimes that could be prevented. I mean we the people can expect you the people to RTFM!