Slashdot Mirror


Apple Error Leaves iPhone Developers In the Lurch

canadacow writes "iPhone developers enrolled and active in the iPhone OS 2.0 beta program got a nasty surprise today when Apple inadvertently 'expired' the recently released version. While for a beta program this typically would not be an issue, Apple has yet to release a new deployment of the iPhone OS. So developers like myself who use their iPhone for both actual phone and iPod use are bricked. Of note, this particular expired build is just 11 days old."

379 comments

  1. In Apple's defense by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They tried to call you and apologize but you didn't answer your phone.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:In Apple's defense by hackus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It would be funny if it wasn't so tragic.

      I believe that people are getting incredibly stupid about all this EULA terms of service.

      I mean, on the Apple forums I am seeing posts "Well, they turned my $800 dollar phone into a brick, but schucks, I guess I deserve it because it is in the EULA."

      I mean people go BERZERK over Microsoft shutting down their systems after upgrades and their keys fail to match the hardware anymore so Vista doesn't boot.

      Apple users are just happy and content they spent $800 bucks it would seem for a phone and the company just turned it off, with no recourse.

      I can see it now: "Damn, stuck out in nowhere with a flat tire.....Darn...looks like my EULA is gone, so I will have to die out here in the heat. Darn, but I guess I deserve it."

      Absolutely amazing. I wonder if the EULA comes with a agreement that your IQ must be reduced to a 2 year old?

      The only person who is ever going to shut my phone or PC off is going to be me and when I and only I hit the off button.

      Mac Customers=Stupid

      -Hack

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    2. Re:In Apple's defense by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Apple users are just happy and content they spent $800 bucks it would seem for a phone and the company just turned it off, with no recourse.

      These aren't users whose phones are gone forever, they're developers (or "developers") whose platform (or phone) is down temporarily. Apple screwed up here, but "It would be funny if it wasn't so tragic" might be overstating it a bit.

    3. Re:In Apple's defense by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I can see it now: "Damn, stuck out in nowhere with a flat tire.....Darn...looks like my EULA is gone, so I will have to die out here in the heat. Darn, but I guess I deserve it." I think Jubal Early said it best: "Well, here I am."
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    4. Re:In Apple's defense by truthsearch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you missed the part where these are people choosing to explicitly install beta development software on their mobile phone. If want to be sure your phone will work, either don't install early beta software on it, or buy a second phone.

    5. Re:In Apple's defense by syzler · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would agree with you if the people you refer to used stock firmware, however we have requested and gone out of our way to use Beta firmware in order to get a head start on developing for the platform. Although I am frustrated that my phone has had bugs since I loaded the beta firmware and I am upset that my phone is not working, I recognize that I placed myself in this situation by switching to the beta software despite Apple's warnings posted in their portal about doing so. However I am mostly angry with myself for being too "cheap" to buy a test device (an iPod Touch maybe) and instead opted to use my primary phone for development.

    6. Re:In Apple's defense by poetmatt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So how do you like your ibrick? After the first brick today, or after the second brick today?

      I mean seriously, how many times has this phone been bricked lately? I could be building myself a house by now with all of the bricking. /half sarcasm, half facepalm

    7. Re:In Apple's defense by Lucas.Langa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, Apple did a poor job here but it's in fact not Mac Customers=Stupid, it's rather Beta Users Wanting Production Quality=Stupid. Usually I even go saying Version 1.0 Users Wanting Production Quality=Stupid...

      --
      Build a tool even an idiot can use and only an idiot will want to use it. -S.O.B.
    8. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hack,

      Check your maths. iPhones don't cost anywhere near $800.

      Also, iPhone users aren't Mac customers. They're iPhone customers. People who use Apple Macintosh computers are Mac customers.

      Furthermore, Apple iPhone customers are not using beta software on their phone. This error applies to developers. Apple didin't "turn off" their customers phones. You seem to have a problem with reading and comprehension.

      Before you rant about how stupid other people are, try to get your facts straight lest appear stupid yourself.

    9. Re:In Apple's defense by His+Shadow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Jesus. Drama Queen much? A piece of beta software exploded. It will be fixed in days if not hours. It's probably fixed by the time you posted your whiny rant. So dry your tears, Princess, and turn down the hyperbole a little.

      --

      Fiat Homos et Pereat Theos

    10. Re:In Apple's defense by truthsearch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I mean seriously, how many times has this phone been bricked lately? 0, if you're a regular customer who uses the device as intended. No one should be surprised to find problems when signing up for a beta program.
    11. Re:In Apple's defense by falcon5768 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      actually its never been bricked for the consumer. Its been bricked on developers (and your dumb if you are developing on your currently in use phone but thats another story) and its been bricked by people who violated their contract with AT&T.

      But bricked by Apple legitimately? Never been.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    12. Re:In Apple's defense by Auckerman · · Score: 1

      Apple didn't screw up. In order to put pre-2.0 firmware on an iPhone, you have to remove the locks that prevent it from running on the iPhone. Apple specifically states that you shouldn't put it on an iPhone. Also, anyone who puts a dev OS on their daily phone is additionally just plain stupid.

      --

      Burn Hollywood Burn
    13. Re:In Apple's defense by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apple screwed up here, but "It would be funny if it wasn't so tragic" might be overstating it a bit.

      Come on, this is Apple. They practically have a 100% market penetration among emo kids. *Everything* is tragic to them.

    14. Re:In Apple's defense by wattrlz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple users aren't (necessarily) stupid. They just have completely different expectations. When Mac people buy something they expect it to make them cool. Any other functionality is just icing on the cake.

    15. Re:In Apple's defense by toleraen · · Score: 1

      Yes, they did. This is the official beta release from Apple. No hacking needed (assuming you're an actual dev).

    16. Re:In Apple's defense by neildiamond · · Score: 1

      Apple needs Developers, Developers, Developers if they are ever going to catch up to Microsoft!

    17. Re:In Apple's defense by Otter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Also, anyone who puts a dev OS on their daily phone is additionally just plain stupid.

      To the degree that real developers are getting hit with enforced downtime (which I don't know enough about this SDK to know if that's the case) they have a legitimate gripe. But, yeah, enthusiasts who play with developer releases deserve what they get.

    18. Re:In Apple's defense by poetmatt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I seem to recall tons of issues rather recently.

      The phrase you forgot there is "legal customer" not just regular customer.

    19. Re:In Apple's defense by Timmmm · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Yes but who really expected the software to *expire*? It's not like it couldn't have just kept going if Apple weren't such control freaks.

    20. Re:In Apple's defense by Auckerman · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is no "official beta release" of the 2.0 firmware. There is a version of the pre-2.0 firmware that comes with the emulator in the SDK. In order to get that on your iPhone you need to unlock it, against Apple's say, then put it on your iPhone.

      --

      Burn Hollywood Burn
    21. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "I mean, on the Apple forums I am seeing posts "Well, they turned my $800 dollar phone into a brick, but schucks, I guess I deserve it because it is in the EULA.""
      $400 or $500, not $800. When your first point is a huge exaggeration you lose credibility.

      "I mean people go BERZERK over Microsoft shutting down their systems after upgrades and their keys fail to match the hardware anymore so Vista doesn't boot."
      Big difference in turning off a production system or say, screwing up Xbox live for a few days than there is in temporarily bricking a development phone.

      "The only person who is ever going to shut my phone or PC off is going to be me and when I and only I hit the off button."
      You are absolutely certain that no future updates from Microsoft will crash your system, ever? for the next 40, 50, 60 years? Good luck with that.

      Apple screwed up, that is a fact. They will fix it. Just like Microsoft fixed xBox live, just like Rim fixes their network when it goes down.

      The tragic thing here is you being a troll.

    22. Re:In Apple's defense by Mr.Dippy · · Score: 1

      Emo kids can't afford Apple products.

      --


      -Dipster
    23. Re:In Apple's defense by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unlocking isn't illegal.

      The phrases you missed from my post are "regular customer" and "as intended". That excludes unlocked phones ("jailbroken") and beta testers. Those articles all reference unlocked phones and those that install 3rd party software before Apple offered any.

    24. Re:In Apple's defense by Cornflake917 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You got away with a +5 insightful after calling Mac users stupid on Slashdot...

      You, sir, are a genius.

    25. Re:In Apple's defense by tyrione · · Score: 1

      Jesus. Drama Queen much? A piece of beta software exploded. It will be fixed in days if not hours. It's probably fixed by the time you posted your whiny rant. So dry your tears, Princess, and turn down the hyperbole a little. I concur with your observation. I will add that any iPhone Developer that hasn't his/her own separate iPhone for general use and an iPhone for development puts into question how serious they are about selling a product on the iPhone platform.
    26. Re:In Apple's defense by Alpha+Whisky · · Score: 0

      What's so dumb about developing on an in use phone? I'm sure lots of hobbyist developers can't justify the expense of a second iPhone just to develop on. If you are a solo developer, the easiest way to get alpha and beta test time on your software is to deploy it yourself on your own system. Any system that is so fragile that a non privileged application can do permanent damage or even just bring it down is seriously flawed. And we're not even talking about that, we're discussing a cock up whereby Apple revoked the "permission to run" for the current developer's release of firmware.

      --
      it's = it is

      its = belonging to it

    27. Re:In Apple's defense by syzler · · Score: 1

      BTW, the new Firmware has been released as of a few minutes ago. It is not available from the iPhone Development Portal.

    28. Re:In Apple's defense by Simon80 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not even a question of legality. I think the phrase you are looking for is "well-behaved customer", where good behaviour is defined by Apple. This case shows that apparently even well-behaved developers, who are worth more than customers, are still prone to getting screwed. The moral of the story, in my opinion, is stay away from locked down hardware.

    29. Re:In Apple's defense by Sentry21 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What is it with the overuse of the term 'bricked' lately? These phones are NOT bricked. They are not usable as phones right now, but they can be easily fixed by restoring older firmware, or installing newer firmware. There's even a way to keep using the current firmware without the PSOD.

      So, ignoring the fact that you can only 'brick' a device once (after which point is is worthless anyway), anyone who installs as-yet-unreleased beta firmware on their phone should be fully aware that something unpleasant could well happen. If this were foolproof, Apple would have shipped out the new firmware to *everyone*.

      To mix some metaphors, if you want to play with the big boys, you're going to get burned.

    30. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the iPhone SDK came with an iPhone emulator running the v2.0beta firmware?

      So how did this brick their actual iPhones?

      Oh, they hacked the SDK firmware onto their iPhone? Oh dear! But that wasn't intended was it? Instead of having a bricked emulator, you have a bricked device. Oops!

    31. Re:In Apple's defense by Reapman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh tell me an OS Beta from Microsoft or any major vendor that doesn't have an expirey date? I remember running Windows 98 Beta that had an expirey date.

      From everything I read it's pretty recoverable, so if your a developer worth your weight you should be able to get your iPhone functional again.

      Apple may do evil stuff, this is not one of those times however.

    32. Re:In Apple's defense by hattig · · Score: 1

      Didn't all the Windows alphas and betas and release candidates have expiration dates?

      Was this v2.0 firmware intended for use on the iPhone / iPod Touch itself, or was it intended for use within the iPhone Emulator software?

      Otherwise, yeah, beta software has flaws, that's why it is beta.

      And there's a fixed version available. What a big wailing and angst about nothing. Whhhaaaaa whaaaaaaa, I'm a Baby!

    33. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Slashdot: Where we've gone from "You're stupid if you don't buy Apple" to "You're stupid if you don't buy Apple, AND buy an extra one just in case."

      No thanks. If I wanted to gamble my money away, I can go to Vegas and at least get free drinks while I do it.

    34. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is NEVER acceptable to build code into a product to make it self destruct. You've obviously never been a large hardware company putting out a beta release of software before. Come to think of it, you've probably never been a large hardware company going outside your Mom's basement before. Come to think of it, you've probably never been a large hardware company.

    35. Re:In Apple's defense by agrippa_cash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But with OS & applications they make it expire so you can't use the beta instead of the product they are testing. With the phone, you've paid for the phone. I don't doubt that Apple is willing to charge people for phone firmware updates, but you'd think the expiration would be after the projected release date or, like Windows, set for X months after install.

    36. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I have been telling people, Mac users are gay. When they get fucked in the ass by apple they generally like it.

    37. Re:In Apple's defense by toleraen · · Score: 1

      Huh, fair enough. I thought the only hacking needed was for people who weren't actually in the beta.

    38. Re:In Apple's defense by mwlewis · · Score: 1

      No, but their parents can.

      --
      JOIN US FOR PONG!
    39. Re:In Apple's defense by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      Exactly my point was simon who replied and hit the nail on the head. I'm not saying legal legal, I understand the legality of unlocking, I'm referring to what is okay in apple's eyes to allow them to milk you further.

    40. Re:In Apple's defense by syzler · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually there is an Official 2.0 beta release of the iPhone software available for the iPhone (current build 5A240d), however you have to be a registered iPhone Developer to download it from iPhone Developer Portal. The software in the simulator is not the same Beta software which Apple makes available for the physical phone.

    41. Re:In Apple's defense by hackus · · Score: 1

      I dont care if it is Alpha.

      You leave the user with NO recourse, after all the phone belongs to the user or is at least SUPPOSE TO belong to the user after purchase.

      It is unethical to vandalize property the user rightfully owns.

      Perhaps Apple doesn't really think you own the hardware?

      Oh, it just keeps getting better doesn't it? :-)

      -Hack

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    42. Re:In Apple's defense by Speare · · Score: 1

      Apple Leaves Phone Developers in the Lurch

      Why am I imagining Steve Jobs pulling a large ornate tassle, and a tall guy walking up asking in an impossibly deep baritone voice, "You rang?"

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    43. Re:In Apple's defense by nine-times · · Score: 1

      ...they're developers (or "developers") whose platform (or phone) is down temporarily...

      Yeah, and real developers should know that you don't do testing/developing on a production system, i.e. don't install beta development builds of the iPhone OS on your actual phone.

    44. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Slashdot: Where most people used to have the sense not to run beta development code on mission-critical hardware.

    45. Re:In Apple's defense by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      What kind of moron goes $2K in the hole to AT&T just so he can have a second test device?

      I have around 30 grand in hardware, but I only own one Touch. Why would I need a second one? None of the other mobile companies have ever bricked my devices before.

    46. Re:In Apple's defense by frdmfghtr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I believe you are correct...iPhone SDK beta 3 has just been released(scroll down a bit to see it).

      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    47. Re:In Apple's defense by DECS · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, Mac users expect their stuff to work flawlessly, never have any bugs, never wear out (plastic crack, batteries die, etc) and maintain its value.

      It's other users who have zero expectations. Windows users expect things not to work, expect to spend hours futzing around, expect to replace parts frequently, and are blown away whenever anything works.

      That's why they disdainfully look down upon Mac users as "needing to be cool." I have never talked to any Mac users who were enraptured with being cool (and I've worked with lots of Mac users as a IT consultant for lots of small Mac shops). They like design, functionality, simplicity, and other things, but being cool is only an old saw dragged out by Windows Enthusiasts to account for their embarrassment in dealing with crap.

    48. Re:In Apple's defense by yabos · · Score: 1

      It's not bricked you idiot, learn what bricked actually means.

    49. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably realized they left their secret key in the build somewhere and had to scramble to revoke the public key for the entire build so nobody would find their precious.

    50. Re:In Apple's defense by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, but is Apple seriously trying to discourage all development on their platform? That's what's going to happen if they keep this up.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    51. Re:In Apple's defense by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      Apple clearly states that you shouldn't use this beta software on a phone you depend upon. What do you expect with a beta program? What does locked down hardware have to do with it? Anything in the beta OS could have broken and disabled it.

    52. Re:In Apple's defense by Reapman · · Score: 1

      And from what I'm reading you can downgrade to the "release" version of the phone's OS, that's hardly preventing anything...

    53. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not "bricked".

    54. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These phones are NOT bricked. They are not usable as phones right now. Classic apple fanboi defense - "You see, its not working, but its not same as not working."

      RDF is strong with this one.
    55. Re:In Apple's defense by T-Bone-T · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are obviously not the target market for the SDK if you can't imagine buying more than one device.

    56. Re:In Apple's defense by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      Yeah, and real developers should know that you don't do testing/developing on a production system, i.e. don't install beta development builds of the iPhone OS on your actual phone.


      On the other hand, iPhones aren't terribly cheap. Not everybody has a second $399 to spend for a separate "development iPhone". For those who are willing to take that extra risk in order to save some money, developing on their regular iPhone may be the best choice.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    57. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      your dumb sigh...
    58. Re:In Apple's defense by tiny-e · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It would be funny if it wasn't so tragic.

      I believe that people are getting incredibly stupid about all this EULA terms of service.

      I mean, on the Apple forums I am seeing posts "Well, they turned my $800 dollar phone into a brick, but schucks, I guess I deserve it because it is in the EULA."

      I mean people go BERZERK over Microsoft shutting down their systems after upgrades and their keys fail to match the hardware anymore so Vista doesn't boot.

      Apple users are just happy and content they spent $800 bucks it would seem for a phone and the company just turned it off, with no recourse.

      I can see it now: "Damn, stuck out in nowhere with a flat tire.....Darn...looks like my EULA is gone, so I will have to die out here in the heat. Darn, but I guess I deserve it."

      Absolutely amazing. I wonder if the EULA comes with a agreement that your IQ must be reduced to a 2 year old?

      The only person who is ever going to shut my phone or PC off is going to be me and when I and only I hit the off button.

      Mac Customers=Stupid

      -Hack Dude - You're a tool. Too hard for you to figure that out? Too Bad.

      I'm sure the phone can be restored to operable status by putting the official released OS back on it. You'd almost think that a person with the word "Hack" in his/her username would consider this....

      Hopefully (actually I don't really care) my flame-bait post can be modded +5 insightful as well.

    59. Re:In Apple's defense by tepples · · Score: 1

      The moral of the story, in my opinion, is stay away from locked down hardware. If I want to stay away from locked down hardware, which hardware of each of the following categories would you recommend?
      1. Video game system for four players on one TV (as opposed to buying a separate gaming PC and monitor for myself, the SO, and the kids)
      2. Handheld video game system
      3. Smart phone
    60. Re:In Apple's defense by tyrione · · Score: 1

      What kind of moron goes $2K in the hole to AT&T just so he can have a second test device? I have around 30 grand in hardware, but I only own one Touch. Why would I need a second one? None of the other mobile companies have ever bricked my devices before. You're goal is to develop and sell software across the installed base of iPhone and iPod Touch markets. If you can't see this you truly aren't a business owner.
    61. Re:In Apple's defense by CubicleView · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, very dumb developers. They should either have more money for iphones, or enough patience to wait for a stable release. Unless like just about every developer I know they have 2 or 3 old phones they can use for just such a relatively uncommon situation. I mean its not like it could help them to maybe release applications for the final version quicker or anything, thereby giving their apps a better chance of success in what will likely be a saturated market.

    62. Re:In Apple's defense by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      You've got to be kidding.

      These *developers* are in a beta SDK programme, and the new version has just been released. They are expected to upgrade, and the old beta is obsolete.

      Furthermore, the reset process is trivially simple.

      There was no self-destruct, no general user devices affected (unlike your TV and car example), no pacemaker-like danger to users (you like hyperbole, don't you?) and yes, when it comes to beta code it *is* acceptable to make it expire.

      Have you ever met a developer in a beta programme? Do you even understand how these things work?

      The real criticisms to be levelled at Apple are the restricted nature of the beta programme and perhaps the level of communication about the expiration (were any real developers taken by surprise here?) and definitely not the expiration of one version of a beta SDK.

      The story is, in short, a beat-up for people like you to have your five minutes of frothing-at-the-mouth anger even though I'd bet you're not affected personally at all. Beat-ups get the page views and sell newspapers, which is their entire point.

    63. Re:In Apple's defense by reidconti · · Score: 1

      Apple users are just happy and content they spent $800 bucks it would seem for a phone and the company just turned it off, with no recourse. ..snip..

      Mac Customers=Stupid Better buy your iPhone while the getting's good. In a year's time, idiots like you will have raised the price to $5000. $800 will seem like a bargain.
    64. Re:In Apple's defense by hackus · · Score: 1

      No I am not kidding.

      If you look at the posts in the forums the users are a bunch of sheep.

      You have become so indoctrinated that software should fail on any product you purchase, as an acceptable policy.

      I do not care if the EULA says it is going to die and you as a developer are fully aware it will.

      Building software with those sorts of goals is just plain unethical and it is wrong.

      I am sorry if you think those kinds of expectations are wrong.

      I do not.

      -Hack

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    65. Re:In Apple's defense by sbeckstead · · Score: 0

      Last I heard using development code in a production environment was a very bad idea. So any developer that got bricked deserved it and Apple may have made a mistake but the schmuck using it in his actual phone is at fault. Your post might be funny if it wasn't so far off the beam.

    66. Re:In Apple's defense by brian.gunderson · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    67. Re:In Apple's defense by HeroreV · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It's called open source, and it's taking over. Anybody can download a beta of Ubuntu 8.04 and run it forever. They don't have to worry about it expiring and Canonical cutting them off.

      This kind of stuff that Apple is pulling may still be somewhat acceptable now, but times are changing.

    68. Re:In Apple's defense by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's worth mentioning that no one else is doing this. I mean, my RAZR may suck, but I don't get bricked if I'm putting MIDlets on it. Qtopia's not bricking your antique green phone. Get it? Why is Apple doing this crap at all? Why do they have it locked down so hard? Why should they make it so hard to develop software for their phone? And why are so many Apple fanboy developers willing to put up with this kind of abuse?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    69. Re:In Apple's defense by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, anything in the Beta OS could have broken and disabled it, but it didn't. Instead, Apple disabled it unnecessarily. This is not a cautionary tale about locked hardware; this is a cautionary tale about closed platforms, period.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    70. Re:In Apple's defense by twenty3inhouse · · Score: 1

      Me too, but afterwards they're going to have to rip the computer out of my dead cold hands!

    71. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or poor. Whichever. It's all the same.

    72. Re:In Apple's defense by TrancePhreak · · Score: 2, Informative

      1. XB360 with XNA Creator's Club membership (it would be PS3 running Linux, but that doesn't support gamepads).
      2. GP32 / GP2X
      3. Unlocked HTC Tytn II

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    73. Re:In Apple's defense by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      ...but you'd think the expiration would be after the projected release date or, like Windows, set for X months after install.
      In that respect, the iPhone is much better than Windows. At the push of a button, it reboots into recovery mode to the previous version of the firmware. I'm not going to hold my breath, but it would be really sweet if Windows Vista's safe-mode automatically rebooted into Windows XP.
    74. Re:In Apple's defense by tepples · · Score: 1

      1. XB360 with XNA Creator's Club membership (it would be PS3 running Linux, but that doesn't support gamepads). I apologize for having forgotten to specify that I want to own it, not rent it. As I understand it, if I let the subscription lapse, the Xbox 360 reverts to being just as locked down as if I had never subscribed. How many years at $99 per year should I figure in when pricing out a system?

      GP32 / GP2X I want to try one of those before I buy it. Where can I do so in northeast Indiana? And where can I find professional quality games for it?
    75. Re:In Apple's defense by carpe.cervisiam · · Score: 1

      Two things.

      First, the article is talking about beta testing iPhone OS 2.0. When you work with beta versions of software it's a given that there are going to be issues.

      Second, if you look at the forum page linked to at the end of the submission, it shows that the beta 3 firmware was made available today (before this submission was even posted judging by the time stamps) and that installing that corrected the issue. It looks like the expiration date in beta 2 of the firmware was set to 04/08/2008 at 12:00 am, when it should have been set at 04/08/2008 11:59 pm or some such.

      --
      It's not paranoia when they really are out to get you.
    76. Re:In Apple's defense by carpe.cervisiam · · Score: 1

      Your RAZR uses p2k03. Have you tried using p2k05 on it? It would "brick" your phone. We're not talking about installing a java game on the iPhone. We're talking about installing a beta OS. Also the reason that beta firmware has an expiration date is to prevent developers from reporting old bugs that have been corrected in newer releases of the beta.

      --
      It's not paranoia when they really are out to get you.
    77. Re:In Apple's defense by Bob+of+Dole · · Score: 1

      "Bricked" is currently in the processing of being remapped to just mean "broken".

    78. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And hackus (159037) is even stupider if he believes that anyone takes his word that the iPhone costs $800.

      I mean, dude, if you're going to lie to try and make a point... at least try to keep your story within the Realm of Reality? .0061 seconds on Google is all it took to disprove that iPhones cost $800.

      Asshat.

    79. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think ANY Apple consumer's mental abilities are highly suspect. Who in there rights minds would buy products of very questionable quality, completely locked up and proprietary and at exorbitant prices?

    80. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why so many Apple apologists ? It is not "some beta software exploded", it is "some additional software designed to prevent use have exploded".

      If they made an honest bug and all the phones crashed, it would be ok. But it is the f*king expiration/lock/digital signature etc, etc model that adds complexity and increase failure rates. That is unacceptable.

    81. Re:In Apple's defense by Swift2001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, jeez, how long did it last? Four or five hours before the new version of iPhone 2.0 became available? My God! The humanity!

    82. Re:In Apple's defense by Swift2001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it's not illegal. But unlocking involves using a hack to get root. That's called a bug. If Apple left it, people would be justifiedly angry. When they fix it, it will break the unlocking hack. There's a simple way out of it: refuse the updates from iTunes. No problems then.

      There are very useful things called haxies on the Mac, but every other new version of the OS breaks them, because it involves putting in an interrupt that Apple warned would break often. Then you wait a few days, and the company brings out a new version. The horror!

    83. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Well, they turned my $800 dollar phone into a brick, but schucks, I guess I deserve it because it is in the EULA."

      It's the preview release of an SDK for a new type of device. Anybody who installed this on their primary phone is an idiot. Nice touch with the "$800 phone" part, too. Do you have any other moronic rants for today, or should we look for them another day?

    84. Re:In Apple's defense by Swift2001 · · Score: 1

      When you look at their program, the fact that you'll be using the same APIs that their developers use, that they'll take care of marketing your product in the absolutely perfect market, with enormous exposure. If you don't like it, it's not like the iPhone represents 90% of the cell phone market, does it? You can write software for... well, the Palm? For the linux phones. For google phones. For Nokias, I guess. Knock yourself out.

    85. Re:In Apple's defense by DavidApi · · Score: 1

      But the difference is this.... Apple make really cool stuff! Really!

      When it is working, it's absolutely a joy and fantastic. Didn't you read that the iPhone (and the iPod Touch) already have the largest market in terms of share for web browsers in mobile devices? This is because they made a device with a web browser that people want to use. It isn't some crippled crap-browser from a stupid company.

      Cut them some slack. They're doing their best to *improve* your mobile and Internet experience.

      Fortune favours the Brave. The Pioneers are the ones with arrows in their Backs. and such more...

    86. Re:In Apple's defense by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      ignoring the fact that you can only 'brick' a device once (after which point is is worthless anyway) But you can install Windows repeatedly on a PC!
      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    87. Re:In Apple's defense by njfuzzy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tag this story "idonotthinkthatmeanswhatyouthinkitmeans".

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    88. Re:In Apple's defense by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

      You do realise that your last point agrees with my point?

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    89. Re:In Apple's defense by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      Someone give this guy some mod points: Mod +1 funneh!

      Thank you sir, you've made my morning. :)

                    -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    90. Re:In Apple's defense by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      What kind of moron goes $2K in the hole to AT&T just so he can have a second test device?

      I have around 30 grand in hardware, but I only own one Touch. Why would I need a second one? None of the other mobile companies have ever bricked my devices before.


      Wow! You sound just like my old boss: Who needs separate dev, qa, staging, and production environments? We'll just install the compiler and the debugger on the production server and you're good to go.

      Though I trully hope you don't work for a financial institution as well.

              -dZ.
      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    91. Re:In Apple's defense by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      ""Bricked" is currently in the processing of being remapped to just mean "broken"."

      it's actually being remapped to mean "certain functionality has been temporarily lost. Normal service can be restored by end users with IQs that cannot be expressed by a single decimal digit".

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    92. Re:In Apple's defense by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Hush you! Do you want to blow the whole scam?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    93. Re:In Apple's defense by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      You're right, I'm not. I don't usually waste my time with less-than-alpha development tools that render useless every device they have touched. I expected Apple, with a platform shipping for nearly a year, to be a little more mature than say, Android.

      But just think - I could have had a whole collection iBricks! Wouldn't that have been fun!

    94. Re:In Apple's defense by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      Although I agree that expiring the beta before releasing an additional one was a bad move, but hearing developers complain about having their phone bricked is bullshit.

      Apple's policy is that phones used for 2.0 beta are not used for personal or business calls, outside of beta testing needs. If you were using your own phone because you were too cheap or too dumb to have a dedicated phone for beta testing, it's your own fault, and you should have expected downtime. You could allways firmware reload it with 1.1.4 and use it until the next beta is out.

      Even it it wasn't a recomendation of the program from Apple, developers should know better that to use beta code in a production environment. Downtime happens and test patforms are unavailable. During these times, you shift to code development and pause testing. Your PC that you write code on isn't down, just the test rig. Get over it, they'll have it fixed in 8-10 hours...

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    95. Re:In Apple's defense by ObiWanKenblowme · · Score: 1

      You'd almost think that a person with the word "Hack" in his/her username would consider this....

      I assume it's more in the sense of "hack writer" than "hacker"

      --
      Obvious exits are NORTH, SOUTH, and DENNIS.
    96. Re:In Apple's defense by Goaway · · Score: 1

      The word "bricking" means rendering something useless permanently (short of a trip to the shop for repairs). This is temporary. It has nothing to do with Apple, nothing to do with fanboys, and nothing to do with any RDF. It's simply a misuse of a term.

    97. Re:In Apple's defense by wattrlz · · Score: 1

      No, Mac users expect their stuff to work flawlessly, never have any bugs, never wear out (plastic crack, batteries die, etc) and maintain its value...

      From what I've heard all those problems have been reported in the wild. Examples include, but are not limited to: this release of the iPhone firmware, Leopard, G4 cube, and the first few generations of iPod, respectively. Granted, most of that is ancient history, but the point is that Apple products have broken, are breaking, and will break in the future. If all Apple people had those kinds of expectations of impeccable performance there'd have been a lawsuit about this beta expiring about five minutes after it happened.

      I can only speak from my experience. The Apple users I encounter most frequently haven't actually paid for anything other than applecare in years because they keep getting lemons that have to be replaced until they're no longer supported and are replaced with the top of the line machine to start the cycle over again. They expect and accept this, but continue to buy applecare because they value, "design" and, "simplicity".

      I'm sure in a relatively controlled environment like an IT shop these machines perform near flawlessly. Bear in mind though, that few properly configured machines don't perform flawlessly in a controlled environment. Even a Windows machine.

    98. Re:In Apple's defense by DECS · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes, and the reason you hear about Cube microcracks and palm rests on the white iBooks that discolored are because Apple slights are newsworthy.

      I managed the rollout of several dozen MacBooks at a company where we also supported Dell, HP and Sony laptops. I didn't notice hardware problems with the MBs, but the Sony Vaios all fell apart, the Dells were flimsy plastic cases that didn't hold up well, and the HP machines not only discolored, but couldn't accommodate an HD upgrade to 80 GB (they shipped with 60!).

      None of those problems are discussed. Who would care? Apple users have multiple web sites where they can moan and cry about things. I didn't say Apple's hardware was perfectly flawless, I said Mac user's expectations are unreasonable.

      Same thing with the iPod: nobody complained that other MP3 players come with batteries that wear out, or hard drives that die due to being bounced around for a couple years.

    99. Re:In Apple's defense by wattrlz · · Score: 1

      All that being said, I'm curious how you explain the complete about-face in expectations for the software we're discussing.

      To be fair: I've never seen nor heard of a hard drive issue with an mp3 player that wasn't an iPod, iPods are the only mp3 player I know of that have batteries that hard to change, iPods are the only mp3 players I know of that crash.

    100. Re:In Apple's defense by DECS · · Score: 0, Troll

      The software that expired hours before Beta 3 was released, and had a temporary, solvable solution for the issue that affected certain developers? I think you're overreaching.

      And how many HD MP3 players have you seen or heard of that weren't iPods? I've seen one Zune in the wild, and a friend had an early Creative Nomad (I think) that used a huge 2.5" drive and was super ugly. Most iPod alternatives end up in a sock drawer long before their parts have the chance to fail.

      But we're talking about a mobile hard drive unit, which is fated to live for two or three years. Saying iPods crash is ridiculous. In five years of ownership and supporting lots of users, I've seen models occasionally need a reset after a couple months of use. It's not like Windows Mobile devices that crash 3 times a day.

      I'm not gonna feed your trolling anymore, so you can say whatever you like in the last word.

    101. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You leave the user with NO recourse..."

      Right... because Apple prevents you from downgrading the firmware to production, or waiting a few BLOODY HOURS (zomg noooo hours of lost time!) for a new firmware.

      What a bunch of whiners you punk kids are, I blame Google for making people think the Beta means usable by the public.

      Go troll somewhere else fanboi.

    102. Re:In Apple's defense by wattrlz · · Score: 1
      Thank you, I like last words.

      I read that apple had remotely disabled a bunch of iphones and that nobody was reacting so I said something I thought might sound clever, but some knee-jerk apple defender (kjad) decided it was trolling. Some of my best friends use apple products. I wouldn't say anything behind their backs I couldn't say to their faces. I don't think it's overreaching to be curious that people who had their phones turned off by remote control for doing nothing wrong don't care. It sounds completely unlike the apple users you describe.

      I've had an archos pv400 for almost a decade. The battery still charges, it still plays mp3s, and it still plays movies. I have a co-worker who has one of their newer models and is quite satisfied with its performance. I've seen few non-apple mp3 players in the wild myself and mostly for the reasons you mention, but that's not the point. I never said iPods don't sell better, but from what you're saying they have (or had) reliability issues. I never compared the iPod to a windows mobile device - That's kind of like saying your mac crashes more than my cell phone, isn't it? I'm just saying that they have more issues than any other mp3 player I've ever dealt with, even before they had, like, 99.999% of the market share.

    103. Re:In Apple's defense by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Because, as we all know, a regular customer couldn't possibly be someone who wants to get, let's face it, bent over by AT&T when they have the gall to go overseas and want to use their phone, mmm, global roaming rates, and decides to buy a local SIM card - yeah, I've never heard of anyone except weird hippy hacker types that do that.

      Except wait, though, my mother, my aunt, both in their 50s... I guess "as intended" is a synonym for "willing to pay extortionate rates for global roaming because you're forced to use AT&T overseas".

    104. Re:In Apple's defense by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      And hacking is different to cracking, but for 99.98% of the populace. Your point?

    105. Re:In Apple's defense by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Dick.

      Our Lord and Master on high, The Steve, duly proclaimed, "Thou Shalt Not Useth The Beta On A Phone Upon Which You May Actually Want To Receive The Magic Words Through The Air", and as everyone else is saying, "Buy A Phone To Develop On". iPhone retail cost: $399. 2 x iPhone retail cost: $798. Nowhere near $800 at all, you're right.

      iPhone users? You mean iPhone developers, right, the ones installing the iPhone 2.0 SDK, right? The SDK that is only available on Mac, right? Yeah, I could see how that would make them nothing to do with Mac. (The point was correct, though it doesn't necessarily have relevance).

    106. Re:In Apple's defense by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      If you don't like it, don't buy the phone. No one is forcing them to use AT&T overseas. Simply buy a different phone from a different carrier and stop complaining!

      If you don't want to use the device as Apple intended, then either don't buy it or don't complain when it doesn't work. There are other vendors out there.

    107. Re:In Apple's defense by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Oh, damn, that's priceless - your solution to traveling overseas, with a phone that is compatible with those systems is "Gouging on global roaming", or "Hey, just buy another phone for the trip"... We can't have users sullying the Holy Apple Experience(TM), can we?

      What a joke, that would be close to the most pathetic defense of SIM locking I've ever heard. You're also aware that AT&T does not offer global roaming in every country, but again, who cares, "Buy another phone for THAT trip, too! Wee, phones for everybody!"

    108. Re:In Apple's defense by Swift2001 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I can't figure out this new comment system, and I found the reply button. When I find the "I agree" button, I'll press that.

    109. Re:In Apple's defense by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      since when is a mobile phone "mission critical"?

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    110. Re:In Apple's defense by Simon80 · · Score: 1

      Given your signature, I would have assumed that you already had an answer for the first question ( get a PC and hook it up to the TV). If you don't have a problem with using an emulator to play copyrighted ROMs, then such a machine is capable of replacing most consoles except for the current and previous generations. Even if you do have a problem with this, there are still a variety of free games, though PC games are (of course) far less organized compared to console games, which either have a physical presence, or are organized in some common interface for playing with downloaded games.

      As for the GP2X, which was recommended in a previous reply, the situation is more like PC than console gaming, in that there are plenty of free games, some emulators, and a smaller selection of commercial games than for the locked down consoles.

    111. Re:In Apple's defense by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      Who said buy another phone for each trip? Just don't buy an iPhone at all. If you don't like a product don't buy it! If you don't like AT&T then don't use them! What the hell is the problem with that?

    112. Re:In Apple's defense by tepples · · Score: 1
      Context: weaning oneself off locked-down hardware such as the iPhone, whose locked-down nature caused the situation of the article.

      there are still a variety of free games [designed for HTPCs] Can you provide a list of them, or even some hints on constructing a proper search engine query? Google free htpc games or free shared-screen pc games didn't help much.

      As for the GP2X, which was recommended in a previous reply, the situation is more like PC than console gaming I can walk into a Best Buy, Circuit City, or Wal-Mart with a wad of $100 bills and walk out with a PC and a receipt. I can't do so with a GP2X.

      and a smaller selection of commercial games "Smaller" horribly underestimates the problem. Are there even a dozen worthwhile commercial titles for GP2X in English other than the M-rated Payback?
    113. Re:In Apple's defense by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 1

      When I hear about a bricked iPhone, my mind translates to 'not bricked'. I think the overuse represents a mentality of users that broken things can't be fixed. I certainly have been worried that I bricked things from time to time, only to usually fix it in a different way. I doubt that the common user knows enough about fixing their electronics to use the term bricked in good faith.

      Actually, reading the forum, the users discussed the term and came up with the word werebrick for the temporary state the iPhone seems to visit frequently. So, it's just the foolish article submitters and the lax editors that keep letting the poor terminology hit the front page.

    114. Re:In Apple's defense by Simon80 · · Score: 1
      • http://libregamewiki.org/Main_Page
      • http://wiki.freegamedev.net/index.php/Complete,_non-casual_open_source_games
      • http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=427205

      The above links are from a posting on http://freegamer.blogspot.com/ - I'm not sure if there are any decent split screen games in those lists, apart from running commercial console games in emulators, but there should be a decent amount of entertainment there if you count everything else.

      As for the GP2X, if you place a higher priority on commercial games than on owning an open platform, by all means buy a DS or a PSP, since I would assume that the GP2X's useful software is mostly free ports of games from other platforms, as well as independently produced games for the GP2X and similar devices. I don't have one myself, I got a Nokia N800 instead, which isn't good for gaming, but is good for reading, listening to music, and browsing the web over 802.11g.

    115. Re:In Apple's defense by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      You have become so indoctrinated that software should fail on any product you purchase, as an acceptable policy.

      That's not what anyone is saying, and you're deliberately misrepresenting people. What I (and others I read here) are saying is that beta software can expire and that's fine. It's part of the nature of beta software - it's not ready for showtime yet and everyone knows this.

      Apple released a new SDK version yesterday to replace the expired previous version. Devs simply reset their iPhones and install the new version.

      In the *shipping* version, I would be on your side, although slightly less frothing-at-the-mouth ranty. Shipping software should absolutely not arbitrarily expire - that leads to forced upgrade paths and all sorts of stuff that would most likely result in significant and successful lawsuits against the software producers. That'd be a terrible thing.

      But we're not talking about shipping software here, we're talking about a closed beta programme. Different expectations, different rules.

      I do think your expectations are completely unreasonable in this case.

    116. Re:In Apple's defense by tepples · · Score: 1
      I'll check out the links you provided.

      As for the GP2X, if you place a higher priority on commercial games than on owning an open platform, by all means buy a DS or a PSP I place about equal priority on commercial games and games on an open platform, and I don't want to buy and carry three devices (low-end phone on prepaid plan, commercial game player, homebrew game player). So I bought a DS and unlocked it for homebrew. But I asked because Nintendo has been using the legal system off-and-on to shut down manufacturers and sellers of homebrew tools.
    117. Re:In Apple's defense by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

      Dude, I don't even like the iPhone, and don't have one. But you're a dork because iPhones are like $300, not $800.

      And think about this for a moment. I bought my cellphone from Verizon, and it is *exactly* as dangerous to hack the firmware and try to install non-authorized software on it. It's just as capable of running all sorts of neat third-party apps, but just like Apple, Verizon locks it down, under the pretense of protecting you from yourself, and guaranteeing their revenue stream from selling apps. And I've bricked phones before trying to do it.

      The iPhone is not a computer. It is a phone. Phones are sold in this country as appliances with no user-serviceable parts. This is not done to spite you. This is just how it is. If you want a computer-phone so you can write and install your own apps, you should not buy an iPhone. You should buy a PocketPC-phobe, or something fancy from Nokia that runs Symbian or Linux. Both of these, not surprisingly, cost more than an iPhone.

      If you want a fancy phone that is just a phone, then maybe you consider an iPhone.

      Yes, I do understand that the iPhone is *really* a computer underneath it all. But so is every device you've bought in the past 10 years, from your microwave to your iPod to your TiVo to your Motorola RAZR. There's no law that says that every computer has to have supported APIs. There is a law that protects your right to try to hack it in ways that it wasn't intended, and I think that's great, but that doesn't require any manufacturer to support your efforts.

      In conclusion, I think you're absolutely wrong--you think that somehow people give Apple a completely free pass where others are taken to task for similar antics. But in reality, people are holding Apple to a completely different standard than any other phone manufacturer.

    118. Re:In Apple's defense by hackus · · Score: 1

      Read my posting carefully.

      I think a majority of the people here are confused.

      The premise is that the ethics of writing a EULA which forces a person to accept terms which are plain unreasonable, combined with software that on purpose disables something you bought, and paid for is stupid.

      If you click OK, well, you ARE STUPID. Sorry if that is a strong term for most to swallow.

      I look back on half of the posts here and most of them are way off on a tangent claiming I never did this or that with EULA's, never owned or used an iPhone....etc.
      (All false by the way.)

      That really is not the point either.

      What is more stupid is buying stuff from manufacturers that can turn off your communications at will, or disable things you paid for, for example like your computer.

      Furthermore, people totally missed the point of the term "brick".

      If you are out in the desert and you do not have your sdk/computer handy to restore the iPhone, and it is disabled, it effectively is bricked. Really no difference there in the terminology, just the context. There is a cell tower nearby of course, but that won't do you much good will it?
      (A rather hungry looking set of Vultures are sitting on the tower too.....others are circling your position.....and of course, also want an iPhone and will probably get one.....

      In time of course....but Vultures are VERY patient birds and the typical iPhone user is very very easy to kill with no food or water nearby. :-)

      -Hackus

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    119. Re:In Apple's defense by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

      You didn't really address anything I said though. I get that you hate the EULA. But the point is, Apple doesn't force you to do anything with that EULA. They can't and don't want to.

      BUT...

      Bricked iPhones are almost always caused by trying to use them on the assumption that like a computer, you should be able to install and modify software on them and still expect it to work properly, and to be able to easily fix problems caused in this process.

      Apple doesn't stop people from doing this. If they really wanted to stop all iPhone hacking, homebrew, etc. in its tracks, they would probably do a better job of it than they have thus far.

      What Apple does though, is draw the line in the sand and make you a deal: IF you follow the terms of this EULA, THEN we will give you support and service to keep your phone working right. This is not a foreign or evil concept. If you are issued a company laptop, and then hack the admin and bios passwords, and then install a lot of malware on it and overclock it too much and burn up the CPU, then your IT department won't be very happy about repairing it for you.

      Now I understand that someone who bought an iPhone is free to do whatever he wants with it, up to and including hacking it. But how can you honestly expect Apple to continue supporting phones that have been modded in this way? Can you imagine how hard that would be? Suddenly Apple has to support an infinite array of third-party software.

      What exactly would you like Apple to do for you (the hypothetical you that bought an iPhone) when you mod it and due to some software update that comes along, it is bricked? Give you a new one? Fix it for you?

      And if it hasn't been hacked, they already will fix or replace it, and I think that's as fair as you could get. What else would you demand, for Steve to come to your door with a replacement wrapped in gold leaf wrapping paper?

      Once again, all this is EXACTLY the same as any other cell phone manufacturer or carrier... Except that Apple is better than a normal cell mfg. If you buy a Motorola from AT&T or Verizon, etc., and it stops working under warranty, you could try to get Moto to fix it, but that would involve mailing it in, shipping charges, etc. What 99% of people do is take it into the carrier's store, and the carrier fixes it or swaps it out. Apple doesn't make you go through AT&T, but rather they let you go into their own stores to have your phone diagnosed, fixed, or swapped out.

      But anyway, it's no worse than any other cell phone. If they find out you modded it, you're on your own because they can't spend all their time studying each hack that people might use and how they interact with the stock firmware apps. If you use it as intended, you enjoy a full warranty.

      How is this so different when it comes to Apple?

    120. Re:In Apple's defense by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      I don't think a user with an IQ of pi would have such an easy time.

      --
      -mkb
  2. I have an idea! by anss123 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's complain about BETA software!

    1. Re:I have an idea! by initdeep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let's complain about BETA software! Here's a better idea. Let's complain about DEVELOPERS having bricked devices so they cannot test out the Apps they are you know.... DEVELOPING! Tool.
    2. Re:I have an idea! by th1nk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let's read stories we're not interested in and complain about them!

    3. Re:I have an idea! by truthsearch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here's an even better idea. Let's complain about developers who use beta software for their primary mobile phone!

    4. Re:I have an idea! by fr4nk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why not just skip the reading part and complain right away?

      Oh, wait...

    5. Re:I have an idea! by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Ever tried carrying 2 iPhones in public? Or two watches? Or 2 pairs of sunglasses?

      The looks you get one wouldn't believe.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    6. Re:I have an idea! by Erpo · · Score: 1

      Now I feel so stupid. I should have thought to give each developer another few hundred dollars so they could buy extra handsets to develop their apps. After all, it's not as if it's reasonable to expect a machine to do everyday tasks AND be used as software development platform at the same time. That's why there are so few people who are able to write software these days: most people can't afford a second computer that only runs development code.

      And anyway, it would be out of the question to expect to be able to recover a device from a software error by reinitializing it. Once upon a time I mastered a DVD badly and when I stuck it in my DVD player, the thing crashed and never came back. The player was scrap, but that's not surprising since it's the way all consumer electronics devices work.

      Oh, wait. The problems these people are facing don't even have anything to do with any of the ordinary embedded software development issues. They didn't make programming errors that left their devices in a bad state and they weren't unable to reinitialize their devices with the original firmware.

      The problem is that Apple thinks it owns an iPhone even after the handset has been traded to a customer for cash, resulting in features that hurt users (like mandatory SDK expiration dates) and the hubris of code signing. Apple broke every single one of those iPhones. The developers did nothing but buy hardware from an unethical company.

    7. Re:I have an idea! by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      Can't be any worse than the looks any mobile phone development geek would normally get in public.

    8. Re:I have an idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, do you know anything about software development, especially development that touches so (relitevely) close to the metal? Good GRIEF there's a reason people run stuff like VM Ware in this day and age, when you do development, it's likely, if not guaranteed, something is going to blow up in a bad way.

      It's a beta OS, that means bugs probably exist. Just because Microsoft may give you access to a Beta OS doesn't mean your allowed to cry if it trashes your data because you installed it on a production machine.

      The phone is not broken. The phone can be recovered, so go cry elsewhere emo boy.

    9. Re:I have an idea! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Let's complain about developers who use beta software for their primary mobile phone! Do these developer phones still need to have a service contract with AT&T?

      I'd hate to have to opt for the $175 early termination fee to avoid paying $61.24/mo.(*) for each month of inaccessible service. That fee is nearly three months of service. How do you weigh the cost effectiveness of waiting it out? If you're lucky, you're within the last three months of your contract anyway.

      (*) $59.99/mo. + $1.25/mo. Regulatory Cost Recovery Charge. A contract of 24 months == $1,541.76 + $39 activation fee refundable only in the first three days, early termination fee waiveable only within 30 days. "Final month's charges are not prorated. Prices are subject to change. Prices do not include taxes."
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    10. Re:I have an idea! by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      The developers did nothing but buy hardware from an unethical company... ... and sign up for a beta testing program. Oops!

      As for cost, you can usually add a second line to a current plan for relatively little and get a free simple phone.
    11. Re:I have an idea! by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, usually I just complain without reading the stories. Thanks for the invite though.

    12. Re:I have an idea! by SlickNic · · Score: 1

      How on earth did this make it onto Slashdot? Beta software is for testing it may work it may not, if it doesn't then report the bugs to the devs thats your JOB as a beta tester! You get to use brand new stuff before anyone else in exchange for a little of your time and patience.

      --
      Saying "all faiths are equivalent" is akin to saying "all drugs are the same".
    13. Re:I have an idea! by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

      It isn't beta software, it is software included as part of an SDK, for pete's sake. No one is asking for it to be beta tested. Apple is providing it so people who want to can create "launch day" titles for the App Store. I don't recall reading anywhere that Apple said putting it on an actual in-use phone was a good idea. They simply provided the means to do so as a final test closer to launch day, or to silence those that would say they NEED the hardware to proof a demo.

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    14. Re:I have an idea! by n8_f · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now I feel so stupid. You should. If you installed the betas of 10.5 or ZFS on your primary machine and then lost data, it's your own fault. Apple explicitly told you not to do that and it is simple commonsense to follow that advice. I haven't been accepted to the iPhone Developer Program yet, so I'm stuck on the simulator, but according to TUAW Apple gave the same advice for the iPhone OS betas: "Important note: Once you install the pre-release iPhone OS on your device, such device may only be used for development and testing purposes until the final (GM) version of the iPhone OS is released. In addition, you will need to install new versions of the software from time to time throughout the beta period. Failure to install the most current version will, after a period of time, put your device in a de-activated state. Updating to the most current version will re-activate your device so that you may continue testing."

      After all, it's not as if it's reasonable to expect a machine to do everyday tasks AND be used as software development platform at the same time. It is perfectly reasonable and so are Apple's requirements. If you can't afford a separate device AND can't deal with the inconveniences of running beta software on your primary device, then simply wait for the software to be publicly released in a non-beta form. Then you can develop on your primary device AND ignore Apple's advice to not run beta software on devices on which you can't afford to have bugs.

      Apple thinks it own an iPhone... resulting in features... like mandatory SDK expiration dates Hmm, I wonder why Apple would want mandatory SDK expiration dates for their beta firmwares? Maybe because they are beta firmwares and they want developers to be developing against the latest version? Additionally, the beta firmwares aren't fully tested and could have exploits or other details Apple would prefer not to leave lying around.

      The developers did nothing but buy hardware from an unethical company. ...and install beta software that they were explicitly told could do all of the things it has done and worse. You are obviously a troll, but because this idiocy seems so rampant, I thought I'd debunk it anyway.
    15. Re:I have an idea! by DECS · · Score: 1

      Let's complain about BETA software that results in a temporary problem for developers, and which can be rolled back by pushing RESTORE and installing the original software. Then lets call it BRICKING, because that sounds so much better than a flawed dev build of a phone firmware.

    16. Re:I have an idea! by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      It's the SDK beta. I'm not sure if that fact escaped your attention before, but now you know.

      Stuff does go wrong in betas from time to time, even betas of SDKs.

    17. Re:I have an idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the problem is that the developers haven't bothered to download the latest SDK beta. The old beta expired today, and by remarkable coincidence, there is a new beta available for download.

    18. Re:I have an idea! by GaryPatterson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. You're wrong.

      To use your first example - if you're developing on a computer and your programme hangs the machine, you reboot it. You don't go out and buy a new computer.

      Back to the situation at hand - if you're on the iPhone beta SDK programme and the phone has been locked out by the expiration of this version of the SDK, you *reset* the phone and download the new version (which is out now) from Apple.

      How is this so hard for people to understand? You reset the phone, get the new SDK version and carry on. If you were in the SDK programme you probably already knew about this expiration (and if not, *that* is the thing to criticise Apple for) so you'd have planned for some downtime today. Maybe you've even lost half a day of testing time, which you'd instead spend on the simulator or reviewing your code and sharpening up your documentation.

      Now I feel so stupid
      You should feel a bit silly after your post. Maybe not stupid, but sheepish for misunderstanding what's happening.

    19. Re:I have an idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gmail's been in BETA for 4 years now... are we allowed to complain about it yet?

    20. Re:I have an idea! by ins0m · · Score: 1

      Oh, but we already are!

      --
      Never attribute to Hanlon that which can be adequately attributed to Heinlein.
    21. Re:I have an idea! by Erpo · · Score: 1

      I will agree that Apple has excellent and not entirely evil reasons to want to force people to do things the Apple way.

      However, it's wrong for Apple to manufacture and sell hardware that disobeys its owner.

      Let me be clear here. They can code up operating systems that contain date-based expiration code all they want. So can anyone else. But when they try to prevent developers from modifying the OS so that it doesn't expire or from installing a homebrew OS, that's unethical.

    22. Re:I have an idea! by n8_f · · Score: 1

      However, it's wrong for Apple to manufacture and sell hardware that disobeys its owner. I don't think Apple is alone in this. I told my Wii to rollover, but it didn't obey me, either. Sit seems to work, though.
    23. Re:I have an idea! by chartreuse · · Score: 1

      Let me be clear here. They can code up operating systems that contain date-based expiration code all they want. So can anyone else. But when they try to prevent developers from modifying the OS so that it doesn't expire or from installing a homebrew OS, that's unethical. And when have they done either of those things? Have there been assassinations? Does the iPhone give hackers electric shocks? I think we would have heard by now if that were true.

      The beta firmware expired (and was replaced by Apple even before your remarks). If you (I speak hypothetically, since your confusion makes it unlikely that you actually do any iPhone coding) want to reverse engineer and hack the firmware, go right ahead, just don't expect Apple to welcome you with candy, flowers and toppled statues of Jobs. If you brick it, you're on your own.
    24. Re:I have an idea! by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      They aren't a very good developer if they don't know about the key combination to do a full firmware restore. It's only "bricked" if you don't have access to a computer.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    25. Re:I have an idea! by Erpo · · Score: 1

      Let me be clear here. They can code up operating systems that contain date-based expiration code all they want. So can anyone else. But when they try to prevent developers from modifying the OS so that it doesn't expire or from installing a homebrew OS, that's unethical.


      And when have they done either of those things? Have there been assassinations? Does the iPhone give hackers electric shocks? I think we would have heard by now if that were true.


      From Rogue Amoeba courtesy of TUAW ( http://www.rogueamoeba.com/utm/2008/03/07/code-signing-and-you/ ):
      However, the environment is different in one important way. Apple is the gatekeeper:

              Phones will only run apps signed by Apple. It also applies FairPlay to the package.

              Twitter message from Deric Horn on March 6, 2008

      Let me repeat that: if Apple doesn't sign your iPhone app, it does not run.

      If you (I speak hypothetically, since your confusion makes it unlikely that you actually do any iPhone coding) want to reverse engineer and hack the firmware, go right ahead, just don't expect Apple to welcome you with candy, flowers and toppled statues of Jobs. If you brick it, you're on your own.


      Unless I get a digital signature from Apple, that's going to be a little bit of a problem.

      The beta firmware expired (and was replaced by Apple even before your remarks).


      The beta firmware did not expire; it is not a banana that got left out on the counter too long. It was programmed to do what it did, by Apple, on purpose. That is up to Apple. If they want, they can release beta firmware that not only refuses to run after a certain date but contains goatse or crashes every time a developer tries to run an application, or whatever. That's fine.

      The problem is that their hardware checks digital signatures on the OS before loading it. That's a close cousin of Tivoization, and it's wrong.
  3. Beta by notaspunkymonkey · · Score: 1

    This is the problem with being a beta tester of something which is seen as cool - you want to test it, and you want people to know and see that your testing it, hence when it goes wrong - you look like a bit silly.

    "Man your iphone is cool"
    "Yeah - I am a beta tester too!!"
    "Wicked can I have a go"
    "Sure"
    "hey this thing is fcuked! - you suck"

  4. Unlock... by Delwin · · Score: 1

    They did it because 2.0 was already unlocked. I honestly expect them to end the beta program and release something quite different that's only been tested internally to prevent this same thing from happening. (it'll fail, but they'll try)

  5. "Brick" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is not a brick. It's a perfectly functional device with a software problem. That is not "bricked".

    1. Re:"Brick" by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      A software problem that leave the device not functioning at all.

    2. Re:"Brick" by OrangeTide · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's only bricked if you cannot get it to work again without cracking it up and digging into some special programming connector or replacing some chips. That is, the device can serve no other purpose than to be a brick without highly technical intervention. The fact that you can update the software back to the non-expired non-beta version seems to be completely overlooked.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:"Brick" by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      If the iphone in question cannot be used as a phone and it cannot be used as an music player that would be 'bricked' to most people who got it to use as a phone and music player. Considering the support thread (linked in the summary) people are saying they have a pink screen and an unusable device, I would call that bricked.

    4. Re:"Brick" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The device functions enough that you can restore the original firmware, you know, the firmware that is stable and fully supported and not recommended for development use only.

    5. Re:"Brick" by Kolie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Brick means the only thing the device is good for, is being a brick. It means the device is irrevocably damaged, ie can NEVER be fixed. I bet a quick software update can fix this issue.

    6. Re:"Brick" by black_lbi · · Score: 1

      Parent is right.
      This things are "in the eye of the beholder".
      Once I flashed a BIOS with a version from a similar mobo (stupid, I know). Offcourse, after I restarted the pc, it was dead. I took out the eeprom and flashed it again on another motherboard (wasn't even the same manufacturer) and everything turned out okay.
      But still, I know allot of people that would have just bought another motherboard, dismissing the old one as just a paperweight.

    7. Re:"Brick" by uniquename72 · · Score: 1

      It's only bricked if ... the device can serve no other purpose than to be a brick without highly technical intervention. In that case, even a brick isn't officially "bricked" because I can use it as a window-opener or skull-crusher.
    8. Re:"Brick" by fartrader · · Score: 1

      It is not a brick. It's a perfectly functional device with a software problem. That is not "bricked". I agree, but I think we all need to recognize that its meaning has evolved to encompass anything that has been rendered non-functional, be it permanent or no.
    9. Re:"Brick" by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      It's only bricked if ... the device can serve no other purpose than to be a brick without highly technical intervention. In that case, even a brick isn't officially "bricked" because I can use it as a window-opener or skull-crusher. A bricked iPhone would do those things poorly, but it would do them better than making phone calls.
      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    10. Re:"Brick" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the spirit of Apple nomenclature, I propose the tag "!bricked" be changed to "iBricked".

    11. Re:"Brick" by Reapman · · Score: 1

      Yeah but this isn't a version for the general public, this is for DEVELOPERS. The phone can be recovered, so it's not bricked. If a developer knows enough to get this Beta OS onto their phone, they better know enough to do the recovery procedure, otherwise they can hand in their credentials at the door.

      If this was a general release OS I could see the point, but it's not, so I don't see much more then whining going on here.

    12. Re:"Brick" by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      You're being facetious. But brick can't be used as a phone. We already know real life bricks can be thrown, makes an excellent nutcracker and a decent hammer too. There are the natural properties of bricks, and I think it is generally accepted that a brick is a multipurpose object. Bricks are normally used to build houses or streets, but it's common to see them being used as weights to prevent light objects from being blown away as well. They are still bricks though, you don't call a brick something else because it's holding the rain tarp down on your old fishing boat in the back yard.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    13. Re:"Brick" by Sentry21 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I bricked my Macbook the other day, it sucked. I had to move the cursor so the screen woke up, then type in my password. Damnit Apple, why do you keep bricking this thing every five minutes? *rage*

    14. Re:"Brick" by black_lbi · · Score: 1

      From what I read, it's bricked until Apple submits a fix. There's really nothing you can do by yourself.
      So we could say it's "temporarily bricked".
      Not sure though, so please correct me if I'm wrong ...

    15. Re:"Brick" by prockcore · · Score: 1

      By your definition the only thing that can be called "bricked" are actual bricks.

      Everything is salvageable. It just depends on how much work you want to put into it.

    16. Re:"Brick" by BitZtream · · Score: 3, Informative
      Ah, but theres the problem, you can't just restore the original firmware using iTunes as the baseband has been updated by the 2.0 firmware.

      iTunes will choke at the end of the restore process if you try to 'restore' to 1.1.4 (the latest public version). When it chokes, it leaves your phone in restore mode, unusable.

      It is however, not bricked.

      The solution is relatively simple. You restore to 1.1.4 and let the process fail, which will leave you with an error 1015 at the end of the process.

      At that point you use one of the jailbreak apps to put your phone back in normal mode, which will allow the old software to work with the new baseband. I found this out the hard way myself this morning, but after being rather upset, a little googling for the 'pink screen of death' pointed me at the solution which is:
      1. 1. Put the phone into restore mode by holding the power button and the home button down until the phone shuts down.
      2. 2. Release the power button and wait for it to boot into restore mode
      3. 3. Plug the phone in and iTunes will tell you it needs to be restored, restore to the latest software iTunes will give you (1.1.4).
      4. 4. The restore will fail with Error 1015. The software was however restored, just not the baseband, and iTunes leaves the phone in DFU mode wanting to restore completely.
      5. 5. Use one of the jailbreak apps to set your phone back to normal. I used ZiPhone, worked fine first try.
      6. 6. Restart iTunes and restore your backup.
      Working phone, new baseband, but it works all the same. Am I pissed off? YES. The first thing I thought was that it expired (which Apple warns you about during the development setup process on several occasions), so I went and checked for new firmware to find that I was indeed using the latest build. Since this is my primary phone its partially my fault, but Apple certainly screwed the pooch by letting this happen when they put in such anal measures to make sure people update the software.

      If it wasn't for the fact that my company wants to port one of our products to the iPhone, at this point I would be done with iPhone development due to this mistake, there is no excuse for a company the size of Apple allowing this to happen.
      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    17. Re:"Brick" by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 1

      A "brick" is not just "a fundamental unit shaped like a box with no working electronic parts". It is a masonry unit that can resist wear and tear over many years, including water damage. If the Pyramids were made out of iPhones, I highly doubt they would have lasted nearly as long.

      iPharoah?

      --
      Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
    18. Re:"Brick" by DECS · · Score: 1

      Just like "virus" has evolved to encompass anything that can self-propagate or no?

      Just like "hacker" has evolved to encompass security cracking and theft rather than hacking together a smart, quick fix?

      The point of words is to convey an idea. Language needs to able to change and adapt, but if the words we use are all used improperly by retards, their meanings will no longer have any clear definition and they stop representing an idea that conveys anything useful.

      If five becomes an idiot shorthand for four, it makes it hard to do math with any precision.

      The point of being "bricked" clearly means being permanently broken in the sense that it would be very difficult to use it for anything other than a brick, typically that the firmware is toast and so new software can't be loaded.

      If you "evolve" that definition to mean that anything that just needs to be restored or rebooted has been "bricked," the idea of being as useless as a brick goes away. It is rather trivial to restore a phone with the flawed firmware. It's not a brick, its a fully functional $300 phone that requires a push button restore.

      If a device locks up and needs a restart or a software restore, it is not bricked. That phrase has really never been used with any other device outside of the iPhone, so its a bit of a sensationalizing bullshit to pass it around. It's also simply ignorant.

      Insisting that the world "recognize" that up is down is disingenuous.

      You also spelled "fart raider" wrong.

    19. Re:"Brick" by Kolie · · Score: 1

      Well, no, wrong, you can brick MANY things by the definition of bricking. I can brick my processor by overheating it etc. How exactly are you going to salvage an overheated processor? So no, my definition is generally what people used when the word first came into computing/hardware use. When you can revive a device by simply downloading a software fix from apple, that is NO WHERE NEAR a brick.

    20. Re:"Brick" by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      finally someone was willing to be consistently pedantic! I hate it when someone complains that a dead iphone doesn't meet their (implied) definition of a brick then never try to nail down a strict brick definition. It's just sloppy posting.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    21. Re:"Brick" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's it? You only have to go through a gazillion steps to restore it?

    22. Re:"Brick" by fonik · · Score: 2, Funny

      They're just beta testing the new iPhone feature: iStopWorkingAllOfASudden.

    23. Re:"Brick" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually from what I read, you couldn't reset your device back to its original state - if you tried to reset the device you would end up with an error :/ It's bad for Apple and leaves a bad taste in the mouths of their developers. It also wouldn't be as big a deal if they weren't really pushing these beta's, Apple wants a large development community so their phones look even better to purchase and they've done a lot more to push beta development kits than I've seen from any other company. Usually you open beta software to developers and it's all there but not up front and advertised, you have to dig for it - in this case I've seen apple pushing these dev kits on their main iPhone page as 'oh we've opened up the dev kits - now anyone can make an app for the iPhone' and there lies your problem, making development betas which f-up your device and not only making those dev kits available but well known and available to a large number of home brew developers who can't afford 2 devices and 2 contracts. this isn't some hack 'breaking' consumer devices, this is a released beta from the manufacturer...

      Another issue, these dev betas, by default, override your existing development environments, I can install and run any number of Visual Studio installs, but Apple puts all these tools together and if I want to try out the betas, I need to install over existing, stable versions of the same software - that's just idiotic. I've found their tools to be buggy and inconsistent and it's very difficult as a developer when your tools don't seem to function correctly. My first taste into the world of Apple development has been very disappointing so far...

    24. Re:"Brick" by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      That's nothing: I bricked the Internet by changing a setting in my router, and now none of my machines will connect to it. It doesn't matter what they're running: XP, Ubuntu, OS X -- all of them fail, which obviously wouldn't happen to the Mac if all those claims about "just working" weren't caused by Steve's famous Reality Distortion Field.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    25. Re:"Brick" by bagofcrap · · Score: 1

      Tag the story !bricked if you agree.

    26. Re:"Brick" by fartrader · · Score: 1

      >That phrase has really never been used with any other device outside of the iPhone, so its a bit of a sensationalizing bullshit to pass it around. It's also simply ignorant.

      I guess you've never used a PSP then - the term "brick" was used way before the iPhone to represent firmware loads that turned it into a "useless" piece of hardware.

      Then came the "unbricker" that rendered it useful again.

      and by the way the term "brick" is actually a unit of building material - look it up in the dictionary. Or do you think the meaning has disingenuously evolved?

  6. Seems easy to fix on Apple's side by CannonballHead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Couldn't they just re-release the exact same beta OS but fix the expiration date? They must know about this by now, and it doesn't seem like it'd even take that long. Maybe they are having a day off or something.

    I know this will be the theme for the whole slashdot story, but I have to say that if MS did this, I think there'd be public burnings, see-I-told-you-so's, etc.

    1. Re:Seems easy to fix on Apple's side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to disagree - if MS did this some people would jump to the ridiculous conclusion that they're intentionally screwing people over, but then someone would point out the fallacies which seem obvious once eloquently revealed. Just as it is here. The reason that there are some articles where no one defends Microsoft is because they actually intentionally and blatantly do things to screw people over.

    2. Re:Seems easy to fix on Apple's side by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      if it's anything like most Apple Beta software a hex editor can fix the expiry date in a second. I made several of the betas on 10.4 that were for release on 10.5 run for a year past their "drop dead date" by simply firing up a hex editor, finding where I needed to change the date and addin a few years to the number.

      It's beenthat way forever with them, and it's really easy to make apple betas run forever.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Seems easy to fix on Apple's side by Prometheas · · Score: 1

      Yes. And they have -- Beta 3. Where's the update on that, ed team?

    4. Re:Seems easy to fix on Apple's side by razjml · · Score: 1

      Just because a story happens to be about Apple doesn't make it automatically apropos to role out the "if they were MS" line of attack masquerading as thought experiment. Just to give it a go, however, "if MS did this," I'd imagine there'd be some early whining, immediately followed by a majority of users without any sympathy for the whiners. Seems about the same as this article.

  7. You forgot to mention by anotherone · · Score: 5, Informative
    You forgot to mention that Apple SPECIFICALLY told you NOT to put it on your phone because it was unstable- and you hacked the lockouts and did it anyway. You also didn't mention that you could simply do a restore in iTunes and get a working firmware in about 2 minutes.

    But, I guess that getting on the front page of slashdot is more important.

    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
    1. Re:You forgot to mention by wizardforce · · Score: 1, Informative

      "iPhone developers enrolled and active in the iPhone OS 2.0 beta program
      you forgot to read the first line of the summery. These aren't typical users, they are developers, they are supposed to be working with the beta.
      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    2. Re:You forgot to mention by whisper_jeff · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would be curious, with the name "canadacow", assuming he is Canadian, how the author is using the phone as his regular phone. Given that the iPhone is not yet (officially) available in Canada. Only people who've jailbroken their phones are using them north of the border.

    3. Re:You forgot to mention by iONiUM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right, so we'll just use the emulator forever, shall we? Hard to develop when we can't even test it on the fucking units. Seriously, why bother "releasing" an SDK if you didn't even put in a visual designer until last week, and still are unable to put it on actual units? Nice "release".

    4. Re:You forgot to mention by th1nk · · Score: 1

      you forgot to read the first line of the summery. These aren't typical users, they are developers, they are supposed to be working with the beta.

      ...and on top of that, they are not able to restore through itunes.

    5. Re:You forgot to mention by j_166 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "you forgot to read the first line of the summery."

      You forgot to spell summary correctly.

      I kid, I kid.

    6. Re:You forgot to mention by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Right, so we'll just use the emulator forever, shall we? Hard to develop when we can't even test it on the fucking units. Seriously, why bother "releasing" an SDK if you didn't even put in a visual designer until last week, and still are unable to put it on actual units? Nice "release".

      Last I checked, a beta is not a release.

    7. Re:You forgot to mention by e4g4 · · Score: 1

      Okay - first of all, some of us (Canadians) live here in the US, and second of all - the word you're looking for is "unlocked" not "jailbroken".

      --
      The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
    8. Re:You forgot to mention by UnanimousCoward · · Score: 1

      No, you don't have to use the emulator forever. But you shouldn't be testing it on a PROD iPhone right away. I can't think of an instance where you go from emulation to PROD--mix in a NON-PROD iPhone...

      --
      Twelve-and-three-quarter inches. Unyielding. This wand belonged to Bellatrix Lestrange.
    9. Re:You forgot to mention by cowscows · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wah wah wah! Apple released this fancy new phone but there's no SDK and nobody can develop apps for it, this sucks, Apple sucks, everyone sucks!

      *Apple releases beta SDK*

      Wah wah wah! Apple released an inital version of an SDK for their fancy new phone and it isn't perfect and doesn't do everything we ever wanted, this sucks, Apple sucks!

      All some people do is complain. Even when someone listens to what you're asking for, and tries to meet your needs. Even when they're just starting out and testing the waters in an area that is very complex. Apple released what they had because obnoxious people wouldn't shut up about how much Apple sucked for not releasing anything.

      It'll get better. Half-finished software is the price the world pays for being whiny and impatient.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    10. Re:You forgot to mention by rockmuelle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Right, so we'll just use the emulator forever, shall we?"

      Kinda like those of us still waiting for access to the beta program? We have no choice but to continue to use the emulator forever, even if we did go out and buy devices specifically for development.

      Seriously, it's annoying enough that Apple limited the beta to a lottery, but it's even worse to hear the lucky few complain that they're unable to continue development because the beta software broke their phone.

      The whole point of a beta program is to test software and procedures on users willing to put up potentially buggy software to get valuable feedback prior to a real release. Things like this should be expected. If you don't want to be a good participant in a beta program, don't sign up for one (and release space for those of us who are fine beta testing things and made proper preparations for the inevitable bugs that will turn up).

      -Chris

    11. Re:You forgot to mention by daveime · · Score: 2

      Half-finished software is the price the world pays for using open source There, fixed that for you :-)

    12. Re:You forgot to mention by cowscows · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because Apple can just download the blackberry software and just build off that. I'm sure no one would mind. Or maybe just take the old ipod OS and add a couple phone features to it, it's basically the same thing!

      They must be really lazy. Maybe Google hired away all their engineers. I don't know why they couldn't just kick this whole thing out in a weekend.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    13. Re:You forgot to mention by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Right, so we'll just use the emulator forever, shall we? Hard to develop when we can't even test it on the fucking units.

      I don't drive into the office and take a seat at one of the workstations in the QA lab every time I want to do some web browsing.

      Why would anybody use their personal mobile phone as an experimental testbed for software development when the risk of exactly this kind of thing is so prevalent?

    14. Re:You forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite the obvious trollness of the GP post, Apple HAS an SDK. They've been using it for the past X years or however long it took to develop to actually WRITE the applications that sit on it. The delay in releasing a public SDK is more about Apple wanting to release a version that cannot be used for "unauthorized tasks" and to prevent developers from writing things that would rival it's native apps in functionality or speed.

      In other words, they're being Microsoft, minus the massive marketshare.

    15. Re:You forgot to mention by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

      You mean exactly how all video game development on a console works? The games are started well before the hardware is finalized. I think in the case of the XBox 360, they basically clustered a few Apple G5s together running the most current version of the simulated hardware. I'm sure there are many similar examples, but all I mean to say is that this practice isn't unique to Apple. There will always be people who want to develop a "launch day" title for any platform, and these people should expect either hardware spec changes (in the case of new new hardware) or other problems with the version they are currently using up until they declare it final and can provide the actual hardware. This case is unique because the hardware being emulated isn't going to change, but the underlying software foundation itself may still change. The risk is the same, however.

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    16. Re:You forgot to mention by prockcore · · Score: 1

      You know how long its been since I worried about application software screwing with my OS?

      I don't even worry about it on my WM6 phone... if my application locks the thing up, I hit the reset button and sync a new version over.

      The idea that iPhone developers shouldn't be testing applications on their regular phones speaks very poorly of Apple, not iPhone developers.

    17. Re:You forgot to mention by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Uhm, there were no lock outs that prevented me from putting on my phone. I paid my $105 developers program membership fee and I was allowed to put it on my phone.

      And you can not just 'restore' with iTunes to the previous OS. The baseband was updated and iTunes will not go back to an old version ones that is done. This causes iTunes to error out, leaving the phone in DFU mode, which requires you to use a third party 'hack' to get around the lock outs (or bugs in the iTunes restore process, depending on your point of view) it to work again.

      Please to be knowing what the hell you are talking about before posting to get on the front page of slashdot, kthx

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    18. Re:You forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle

      The software from Apple was not a "Stable" release, rather quite clearly Beta software.

      Any developer who isn't a complete moron knows you should never run Beta software on mission critical systems. If you treat your primary iPhone as mission critical then you should restore it back to the "Stable" release prior to leaving the office, ie. only run the Beta software in a "test" environment.

    19. Re:You forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPhone not being available is not the problem. The OS not being available is.

    20. Re:You forgot to mention by yabos · · Score: 1

      Do you run pre release Leopard software on your primary machine? If you do you're an idiot and you should at least have a separate working partition. Apple has stated clearly that you should be using a separate iPhone for your development because the SDK software is beta and stuff might get screwed up.

    21. Re:You forgot to mention by BoChen456 · · Score: 1

      It'll get better. Half-finished software is the price the world pays for being whiny and impatient. Apple users, welcome to the world of Microsoft users.
  8. You've been Steved! by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    Consider the open source alternative, OpenMoko No worries about some sudden "change in corporate direction" screwing you over.

    1. Re:You've been Steved! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course, then you have to worry about the corporation actually selling the damned devices. How far behind is the OpenMoko project now? How long have we been waiting for the FreeRunner's release?

      In the OSS world, we have a saying: "Release Early, Release Often." Apple's been following those rules to a tee, users sometimes get a bad experience, but the software rapidly converges to a usable state, as it is now. OpenMoko on the other hand, is lagging way, way behind, to the point you now have to be curious if the phone will ship at all or just remain as vaporware.

      Support the Open Alternative alright... Shame it doesn't exist yet.

    2. Re:You've been Steved! by outZider · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just what I wanted, an operating system with no devices and no users! Can it play ogg vorbis too?

      --
      - oZ
      // i am here.
    3. Re:You've been Steved! by BigBlueOx · · Score: 1

      Just what I wanted, an operating system with no devices and no users!

      You mean NeXt? That was just a dress rehearsal.

    4. Re:You've been Steved! by Microlith · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, OpenMoko, the opensource alternative that is unavailable and doesn't even work.

      Oh it boots, but you can't make a phone call from in the UI. And while the command line dialer does work, no audio does. So you can call someone but not speak to or hear them.

      While I have every hope for OpenMoko, don't go flinging them as some open-source solution when it doesn't even do what it's supposed to.

    5. Re:You've been Steved! by Phroggy · · Score: 5, Funny


      Consider the open source alternative, OpenMoko No worries about some sudden "change in corporate direction" screwing you over.

      No worries about some sudden "phone call" either. :-D
      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    6. Re:You've been Steved! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's been following those rules to a tee You realize the iPhone was released over 9 months ago, right? Most device manufacturers release the SDK early, as in before the device is released. This is exactly Apple's mantra..."Give the customers what they want only after they get on their hands and knees"
    7. Re:You've been Steved! by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      People talk about Apple fanboys ... I'm completely impressed by OpenMoko fanboys. Your in love with a phone that you can't make a call on because no one will carry you ...

      You have no sudden worries about change in direction because the device can not possibly be any less useful as a phone. Good plan there Bucky.

      Personally, I think my old HP Palmtop from 96 makes a better cell phone than an OpenMoko capable phone, but thats just cause its much cooler to use DOS on it than Linux. I bet it gets better GSM reception too.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    8. Re:You've been Steved! by yabos · · Score: 1

      Wow that sounds so great, where can I get this revolutionary software?

    9. Re:You've been Steved! by DECS · · Score: 1

      Except that NeXT did have devices - it ran on more platforms than you could shake a stick at. It also had users. Not the Win95 crowd, but people doing real work, from Tim Berner-Lee to John Carmack, who accomplished things Windows wasn't well suited to do. And then there's Dell, the banks, the trading companies, the NSA/CIA spooks...

      NeXT had serious devices and serious users. It's just that Microsoft decided to "piss on it" because it preferred to showcase Cairo as its own copy, years later, which then never actually arrived.

      For its second act, NeXT is making NT+15 years of work look silly, while also making the last ten years of CE look absurd.

      1990-1995: Microsoft's Yellow Road to Cairo

    10. Re:You've been Steved! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perfect, it can replace my corporate blackberry.

  9. Using your actual phone for development?? by Moebius+Loop · · Score: 1

    I am an apple fanboi, it's true...so you can stop reading now if you wish...

    But I also used to develop for the Blackberry, and I bricked that thing three or four times in the first month just loading custom software onto it (bad USB chipset or something in my motherboard caused it to fail mid-transfer)....

    Apple screwed up on this one, but I think those Devs learned a valuable lesson about handheld development...

    -phil

    --
    have you been seen on slash?
    1. Re:Using your actual phone for development?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I also used to develop for the Blackberry, and I bricked that thing three or four times in the first month just loading custom software onto it (bad USB chipset or something in my motherboard caused it to fail mid-transfer)....
      That seems like a pretty serious bug on RIM's part right there... You're telling me merely installing a third party application can destroy the phone? Or was it something more sensitive, like flashing firmware or writing device drivers? Or does Blackberry simply not do protected memory? (This last possibility would be a serious offense in my mind, and makes every Blackberry application potentially devastating.)
    2. Re:Using your actual phone for development?? by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Apple screwed up on this one, but I think those Devs learned a valuable lesson about handheld development...
      What's that? Don't develop for handhelds in general because the company you are developing for will most likely screw you over?
    3. Re:Using your actual phone for development?? by Buran · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you RTFA, you'll see that at least one person tried to buy a phone to use just for testing -- and no one had any to sell. So what do you do -- not do the stuff your $99 entitles you to do?

    4. Re:Using your actual phone for development?? by Moebius+Loop · · Score: 1

      That seems like a pretty serious bug on RIM's part right there... You're telling me merely installing a third party application can destroy the phone? Or was it something more sensitive, like flashing firmware or writing device drivers? Or does Blackberry simply not do protected memory? (This last possibility would be a serious offense in my mind, and makes every Blackberry application potentially devastating.) I wish I knew the true issue. This was around 2003-2004, before quite so many people were addicted (the unit was black and white, if that gives any context).

      It's possible that this happened during a restore of a backup. This was my douchebag boss' personal phone at the time, so every time I did anything on the actual device I always backed up his data first.

      After the crash, I could no longer restore the backups I had made, or do any firmware upgrades. We had to send it back to Verizon, and he bitched at me for days saying it was my fault, (because the software crashed while I was using it, of course).

      But he got me my own unit shortly thereafter...
      --
      have you been seen on slash?
    5. Re:Using your actual phone for development?? by Moebius+Loop · · Score: 1

      What's that? Don't develop for handhelds in general because the company you are developing for will most likely screw you over? No, don't do low-level development on handheld you can't afford to "brick"...

      And come on, as I said, Apple fucked up. But it's hardly like they did this on purpose.
      --
      have you been seen on slash?
  10. Bricked? by Kindgott · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is anyone else getting tired of the sensationalist misuse of the term "bricked" around here?

    Unless it's nigh unrecoverable, your hardware isn't bricked.

    --
    If there's anything more important than my ego around here, I want it caught and shot immediately.
    1. Re:Bricked? by exultavit · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, the term has been misused a lot lately. A device can only really and truly be "bricked" if you have intimately introduced it to a significant amount of anti-matter.

      In any other situation, you can always recover the device's full functionality simply by rearranging its constituent atoms and free electrons appropriately.

    2. Re:Bricked? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1
      I'm tired of sensationalist stories that play fast and loose with the facts. This guy puts some BETA development software on his phone, and has a cow when it expires, and forgets to mention that it's stupid to run BETA development software on something you use in the real world, and that he could have rolled it back without any problems.

      The whole "story" is a NON story.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:Bricked? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      It's a shame Apple did this. Bricking your phone is the kind of thing a hacker would do!

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    4. Re:Bricked? by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      The same is true of conventional bricks such as are used to build buildings, though you might also have to rearrange some of the protons inside the atoms.

    5. Re:Bricked? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Funny

      This begs the question, if everyone uses the phrase incorrectly is it still incorrect?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Bricked? by shuufoxie · · Score: 0

      Well, even bricks are still useful. I see a brick, and I say to myself: "Hey, I can use that to build a house... Or a BBQ pit... Or a Stadium. Let me brick more things, so that I may begin construction!" No, the term "brick" just doesn't cut it. I think a new term is needed.

    7. Re:Bricked? by uncadonna · · Score: 1

      Groan. You know you and everybody else use "beg the question" wrong, don't you? You did that on purpose just to annoy me.

      --
      mt
    8. Re:Bricked? by jdinkel · · Score: 1

      How about "shuufoxie"? "I shuufoxied my iPhone while trying out my 1337 h@xx0r skillz." That conveys a better sense of complete and utter uselessness, doesn't it?

    9. Re:Bricked? by DECS · · Score: 1

      Your right, its correct. Their just worried about the affect error's will have on readers trying to under stand.

    10. Re:Bricked? by shuufoxie · · Score: 0

      You sir will be whistling a different tune when I'm enjoying my sweet BBQ pit.

    11. Re:Bricked? by Mordaximus · · Score: 1

      +1 You made my day. Wish I had mod points for you!

  11. Not Bricked by addikt10 · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Bricked" is unrecoverable.
    "Bricked" is permanent.
    "Bricked" is having absolutely no way, ever, of interacting with the object in a manner that is inconsistent with interacting with a brick.

    This, on the other hand, will be fixed by tomorrow.

    1. Re:Not Bricked by shuufoxie · · Score: 0

      "Bricked" is hardened block of clay... Get your new terra cotta iPhone today!

    2. Re:Not Bricked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Let me give you a car analogy:

      Bricked engine: your car was in front of a dynamite factory when the factory exploded. The contents of your engine have melted together into one..solid...brick.

    3. Re:Not Bricked by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      "Bricked" is unrecoverable.
      "Bricked" is permanent.
      "Bricked" is having absolutely no way, ever, of interacting with the object in a manner that is inconsistent with interacting with a brick. Or ripping it open and jacking in to the JTAG port. I think that still counts as officially 'bricked', though.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    4. Re:Not Bricked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My iPhone is dead...no, wait... it's a piece of shit...no, wait...it is a god...no, wait it can't be a metaphor or a simile or some non-standard usage of a word that everyone recognizes anyway since language evolves...

      Thank you language police. :P

      Trolling, I know, I know...

    5. Re:Not Bricked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already fixed now, as a matter of fact... 5A240d was released today. I got my update at 5:30pm... one hour after submitter posted this stupidity. Tsk tsk too quick to flame. Seems like the clue factor of submitters is dropping away every day on slashdot.

  12. That's not a brick! by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    ...that's just Apple's new, super-duper secure iPhone OS.

    But I hear that when Windows Vista CE comes out, it'll be like, way more secure. And it'll make your coffee in the morning!

    Rumor has it that there's a linux distribution that's had those features for years, but so far only Linus Torvalds has been able to figure out how to install and use it so far.

    Have I left anyone out yet? Oh yeah, BSD sucks.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    1. Re:That's not a brick! by Iceykitsune · · Score: 0

      ...that's just Apple's new, super-duper secure iPhone OS.

      But I hear that when Windows Vista CE comes out, it'll be like, way more secure. And it'll make your coffee in the morning!

      Rumor has it that there's a linux distribution that's had those features for years, but so far only Linus Torvalds has been able to figure out how to install and use it so far.

      Have I left anyone out yet? Oh yeah, BSD sucks.

      and, by proxy, OSX sucks because OSX is based on BSD, according to your logic
      --
      GENERATION 24: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
    2. Re:That's not a brick! by Miseph · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, it has all the suck of BSD, and all the hubris of Windows. Remember kids, using an OS that is easier for non-tech savvy people to use doesn't make you more tech savvy or smarter, it just means you're completely full of shit.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    3. Re:That's not a brick! by BotnetZombie · · Score: 1

      It must be either the Linux or BSD bashing that flamed you. The first two have seemed like fair targets here. Try two new bashings, and skip Linux in the first one and BSD in the second. Then we'll see which one is holy and not to be made fun of.

    4. Re:That's not a brick! by DECS · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually BSD is what serious people use. And hubris? I don't think that word means what you think it means. Also, intelligent people disagree with your argument that things have to be messed up with complications in order to be "smart."

      Leonardo da Vinci: "Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication"

      Albert Einstein: "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex and more violent. It takes a touch of genius and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction."

      Oh Snap.

    5. Re:That's not a brick! by Miseph · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I do know what hubris means; explain how I don't, please, I need a laugh.

      As for your "smart people" quotes... OSX is neither simpler or smaller than any other modern OS, nor easier to use. It just has bigger shinier buttons and elegant packaging (literally, I'm talking about the box it comes in here). Apple telling people what's easier to use aside, those of us who don't drink the Kool-Aid aren't blinded to the fact that it's all the same shit with a slightly different GUI and no actual advantage in usability.

      Frankly, I tried it, found it to be the most frustrating OS to figure out that I'd ever encountered (including several flavors of Linux and every MS OS from DOS something.something through to XP, Vista was still called Longhorn at the time), and all I ever hear from the fanbois is "you must be lying nobody who uses it for more than a few minutes finds it to be anything less than the most perfect piece of software ever conceived of." I'm not, it's not, and maybe one day when you find the right nerosurgery/proctology team you'll realize what a sap you were.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    6. Re:That's not a brick! by DECS · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well clearly you must be puzzled at why Linux has gone nowhere in desktop PCs if it offers the same ease of use as OS X. Even counting the millions of EEE PC toys that will quickly find their way to various junk drawers, Linux remains insignificant on the desktop. That's not to say that nobody uses it productively or that people shouldn't have a choice, but realistically, Linux isn't doing anything for the desktop and there's a huge reason why: usability.

      The "freedom" of having a handful of window managers and dozens of window styles isn't freedom, its a burden for anyone trying to develop desktop software that works consistently. Linux isn't growing out of the server arena where it is uniquely valuable, because it simply isn't very valuable on the desktop, even when its free. If it were, it would be selling Linux PCs and there wouldn't be Windows.

      Now look at Vista: it's so unusable that Microsoft can't even sell it as the exclusive product to its monopolized partners. That's like McDonalds having such a shitty new burger that it can't manage to sell it to its obese shit eating clients.

      Now explain to me why some shit for brains who can't even spell "neurosurgeon" with an inline spell checker... oh wait, maybe because you don't have OS X, you can't fucking spell check your insults.

      That might also explain why your myopic world view, which holds that OS X has no particular significance, is so at odds with the reality that Apple is selling Macs and iPhones using that OS so fast it can hardly keep them in stock, and is making billions of dollars doing so. At a time when Linux can't fucking ship for free in any significant way on the desktop or on mobile phones (outside of locked Chinese Motorola phones that aren't open), and at a time when Microsoft can't retail its shitty new "6 year in the making" Vista and has similarly failed spectacularly after a decade of WinCE explosions.

      Yes, it must all be explained by your incapacity to figure out the Mac after a few minutes of derisively poking at its keyboard. And yes, the only rational explanation is that Mac users are a bamboozled cult ready to commit mass suicide, rather than customers who like getting a product that actually works as they expect it to and doesn't need the constant configuration you love so much.

      You're the asshat with the ignorantly religious fervor here, denying the fucking obvious reality in the market and blaming everything you don't want to be happening upon the people paying a premium not to deal with lame shit thrown together without any regard for usability.

    7. Re:That's not a brick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now look at Vista: it's so unusable that Microsoft can't even sell it as the exclusive product to its monopolized partners. That's like McDonalds having such a shitty new burger that it can't manage to sell it to its obese shit eating clients.

      Now explain to me why some shit for brains who can't even spell "neurosurgeon" with an inline spell checker... oh wait, maybe because you don't have OS X, you can't fucking spell check your insults. You sir, are one sorry excuse for a human being.

      Slashdot should hang it's head in shame that it hasn't modded your account to post at -1 Troll for the next decade!
  13. Re:Cue Fanbois by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

    Yes it is, but some still refuse to admit it, it seems.

  14. Uh....no..... by iMouse · · Score: 5, Informative

    Beta testers were notified by e-mail of the software expiration that night. A new copy was available immediately from the AppleSeed site.

    My phone is fine and probably a lot of other beta testers who have a clue have a working phone as well.

    Maybe people who beta test software should have a good understanding that it is a BETA test and Apple highly recommended that the BETA software not be installed on personal or business-related phones that need to have 100% accessibility and reliability.

    How many beta testers in this program understand how to use a web browser to go grab the new release? If you're gonna be a n00b about it, don't sign up to be a tester.

    1. Re:Uh....no..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AppleSeed is not the same as the developer program. Assuming my experience is typical, developers with paid iPhone Developer memberships received no e-mail and Apple has not yet provided them with an updated version of the beta software.

    2. Re:Uh....no..... by syzler · · Score: 1

      Beta testers were notified by e-mail of the software expiration that night. A new copy was available immediately from the AppleSeed site.

      I actually did not receive an e-mail explaining that the software was going to expire and that I needed to download a new copy from the AppleSeed Site. On a side note, the AppleSeed program is only available to ADC members that have a Premier or Select membership which is a least an additional $500 on top of the iPhone Developer program.

      Maybe people who beta test software should have a good understanding that it is a BETA test and Apple highly recommended that the BETA software not be installed on personal or business-related phones that need to have 100% accessibility and reliability.

      True enough, however some of us do not have a lot of disposable income and cannot afford to buy two or three $400-$500 devices for testing. I am prepared to accept bugs in beta firmware, however this seems more deliberate than an unexpected bug. If you truly did receive an e-mail warning about the impending expiration, I am now outraged that the same notice was not sent to all registered iPhone developers.

      How many beta testers in this program understand how to use a web browser to go grab the new release? If you're gonna be a n00b about it, don't sign up to be a tester.

      Care to provide a link to the new release for those of us registered iPhone developers that were not lucky enough to be sent a notification?

    3. Re:Uh....no..... by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      In fairness, the article references a new version of the SDK that contains a new firmware... the SDK which, by the way, includes all of XCode, which is something like 2 GB total. Preposterously huge, and it still shows the same version on the website, so the more intelligent someone is, the more likely they're going to check the version, and the more likely they are to get screwed.

      So, for those people who got the e-mail, downloaded without checking the version to see if the 2G download was worth it, managed to get the whole thing from the ADC site (presumably it was swamped, maybe not since most people don't care like they did at release), and installed the new firmware, no problem.

      For anyone who didn't get the e-mail on time, didn't realize that the expiry was going to 'brick' (actually, temporary disable) their phone, checked the version number and discounted the download as redundant, or couldn't get it down in time, they got hosed.

      And frankly, if I got that e-mail and saw the same version as I already had, I'd say 'Oh, I have that, I'm going to be fine.'

      I'm a huge Apple fanboi, but let's face it, people kind of got hosed on this one.

    4. Re:Uh....no..... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      There wasn't a new version when I checked at noon today. While I agree with the rest of your post, I noticed the problem at 9am, still hadn't seen an updated version by noon, had to roll back using the jailbreaky tools so I could get at my phone again.

      Sending me an email when the event occurs isnt' acceptable, they should have had a new release out a week ago if it was going to expire today at the very minimum. For a release thats 11 days old to expire with no warning is absolutely ridiculous. Why is there no warning message of the impending doom? Don't tell me they can make it lock out, but they can't popup a warning a few days in advance.

      Apple deserves a flogging for this one, beta or not.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    5. Re:Uh....no..... by strange+dynamics · · Score: 1

      A number of people have jumped on the idea that people using Beta software should be prepared to have problems, and I think you're absolutely correct. I wonder, however, if people are becoming desensitized to 'beta' since so many companies, most prominently Google, but certainly dozens of other big names have perpetual 'beta' releases of software which are used by everyday users ?

    6. Re:Uh....no..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well put.

      I received the e-mail well in advance, downloaded the update, and planned on upgrading in the morning. Even though the beta release expired overnight and my iPhone appeared bricked, my wake-up alarm still went off and kept me from getting late to work. Hat's off to Apple for being considerate.

      One would hope that the same people who are crying foul might consider reading the terms of service and NDA where it explicitly stated that some updates could be timed-to-expire and leave the phone unusable.

  15. Yes by tkrotchko · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    "Is anyone else getting tired of the sensationalist misuse of the term "bricked" around here?"

    Yes, and not because I think there's a "right" and "wrong" term. It's just that I have no idea what they're talking about anymore when they say "bricked".

    I've bricked stuff before. When that happens, you throw it in the trash. If we want to use "bricked" to mean "I have to restore from backup", then somebody come up with another term for "permanently inoperable".

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      sensationalist? next you'll say 'hacked' doesn't apply to malicious intrusion of systems

  16. Now you know what Radio operators... by anss123 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now you know what Radio operators feels like when we geeks talk about "bandwidth". Perhaps it's karma ;)

    1. Re:Now you know what Radio operators... by drerwk · · Score: 1

      Thought we were talking about the same thing - bandwidth in terms of frequency tells you the rate at which you can send information. What am I missing?

    2. Re:Now you know what Radio operators... by anss123 · · Score: 1

      Bandwidth reefers to the width of a signal (Read: band - width). As it happens a wide signal can generally send more information than a narrow signal, but that does not need to be the case. (For instance - A 28K and a 32K modem signal use the same amount of bandwidth but have different data rates) The correct term for what we call bandwidth would be Channel capacity. (Not that it matters)

    3. Re:Now you know what Radio operators... by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      I'm a gamer, so I know your pain.
      Now if I could just get more bandwidth from my router to lower my ping, I'd be all set.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    4. Re:Now you know what Radio operators... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you know what Radio operators feels like when we geeks talk about "bandwidth" It would be a pretty dumb radio operator that didn't know that data rate translates directly into "bandwidth" in the traditional RF sense. Apparently, that would include you.
    5. Re:Now you know what Radio operators... by drerwk · · Score: 1

      I've a background in physics and some in ee. So I get that 4Khz BW means that you have 4KZh somewhere in the spectrum. I didn't realize 28K and 32K modem signals used the same BW. I guess my confusion is that in all my physics work, when we talked about bandwidth we meant Channel capacity, but I take from your reply that radio operator mean strictly the width of the band and not the information capacity. Thanks.

    6. Re:Now you know what Radio operators... by tradotto · · Score: 1

      Ah, well no, data rates can be different at many parts of an rf modulator.

    7. Re:Now you know what Radio operators... by mm0zct · · Score: 1

      In a radio sense bandwidth is the frequency range between the lowest and highest frequency of electromagnetic radiation used to send the signal, eg in AM the bandwidth could be a few kilohertz wide, the data rate however, relating to the sample rate of the audio on a way, is related to the carrier frequency, not the bandwidth, eg 144MHz. A high rate of modulation can often result in a large amount of bandwidth however but this isn't necessaryily the same as data rate, eg a 1GHz AM signal would have the same bandwidth as a 144MHz AM signal of the same original audio, but the 1GHz would have a much higher data rate in the sense of samples per second of the audio. Since the band we are allowed to transmit in is only a limited range of frequencies, the more bandwidth a communication method uses the less people can communicate simultaneously in that band without interfering with each other. In a computing sense typically the bandwidth is related to what is essentially the carrier frequency, how fast the data can be sent, bits per second. When it comes to the internet there's 2 main "bandwidths" the data transfer rate, eg 8mbps, and the monthly quota eg 20gb per month, they are both essentially a data rate, just over different timescales and limited by different factors. (from a computer science and physics student who is also a radio ham)

  17. beta by TheDC · · Score: 0

    And this is why you don't use Beta software in a production environment.

  18. So it's a werebrick. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Bricked" is permanent. ... This, on the other hand, will be fixed by tomorrow.

    So it's a werebrick.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  19. This is just a reminder by erroneus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not that I suspect there was any question about the matter, but Apple is in control of your destiny not only as an iPhone developer, but also as an iPhone user.

    The expectations of developers are being shifted from the norm by actions such as these... Apple has effectively halted or paused development for the iPhone.

    The expectations of end users haven't been completely altered yet, but there's strong potential for that sort of thing to happen at Apple's whim... and it's probably already in the EULA that Apple can and probably will enable, disable and remove features at their leisure with or without the end users' consent. Some of the initial shocks have already been felt, though, where battery replacement isn't a simple matter and is instead a costly and inconvenient one. Other examples are that a user can't save attachments like pictures into the phone and cannot do even the simple things like copy and paste.

    I expect to see more things coming down, but what I cannot predict is end user response. Apple devices seem to cause reactions among their users not unlike a drug that yields a minor high combined with caffeine and nicotine. I am often surprised or awed at how much nonsense today's consumers will accept and the limits are constantly being pushed to new extremes. But generally speaking, Apple users both old and new routinely accept abuses that PC users wouldn't tolerate from a vendor... so I expect there to be a lot more user abuse without backlash.

    1. Re:This is just a reminder by e4g4 · · Score: 1

      Yes - Apple is the first company ever to expire beta software, forcing you to upgrade to the *now available* new version of the beta software (if you are a legitimate, registered beta tester). Oh wait, no they're not. Disabling expired beta software, when new beta software is available, is a very useful tool in generating relevant, up to date feedback to further improve said beta software. There is nothing nefarious going on here.

      --
      The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
    2. Re:This is just a reminder by cowscows · · Score: 1

      Neither the battery replacement issue nor the copy/paste issue are examples of Apple suddenly deciding to remove functionality from your device. Your iPhone's battery is the same as it ever was, and it didn't ship to you with copy/paste. This isn't some sort of bait and switch like you make it out to be.

      Generally speaking, Windows users both old and new will accept far more malware, inconsistent behavior, and horrible interface design than Apple users would tolerate.

      Expiring beta versions of software are not unique to Apple, nor are they a new thing, nor are they even unusual. Worst case, either someone at Apple put the wrong expiry date in the software. Unfortunate, yes, but not a malicious act, and not some sort of cruel abuse directed towards their developers.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    3. Re:This is just a reminder by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Not that I suspect there was any question about the matter, but Apple is in control of your destiny not only as an iPhone developer, but also as an iPhone user.

      Geez, so are many companies. Why single out Apple? When the RIM Blackberry network went down, guess what? You were fscked if your company didn't have their own RIM server. This story is about a developer who is using beta software. A complication occurred. If he read his email that Apple sent to him before the problem occurred, he wouldn't have been in this situation.

      The expectations of developers are being shifted from the norm by actions such as these... Apple has effectively halted or paused development for the iPhone.

      In a development program, expect there to be a few hiccups with things not working or breaking. Yes, it sucks that they stall development, but this one is temporary. Again Apple addressed it, before it became an issue, if the beta developer had been paying attention. Other software gets stalled in development. Microsoft stopped development on IE for years because they won the browser wars. Years. It wasn't until Firefox presented a challenge did they start again.

      But generally speaking, Apple users both old and new routinely accept abuses that PC users wouldn't tolerate from a vendor... so I expect there to be a lot more user abuse without backlash.

      Well the original topic was about development on iPhone and not general users which this particular issue does not affect general iPhone users who are not developers. But abuses that goes both ways. I had unfortunately had to reinstall XP SP2. Thank goodness I still had my disc and certificate. But I made a change in my hardware so I had to talk to a MS person explaining why I wasn't a thief stealing their software. But generally speaking, Windows users both old and new routinely accept abuses that Apple users wouldn't tolerate from a vendor... so I expect there to be a lot more user abuse without backlash.

      All companies have their issues. You choose the heartaches you have to deal with. If it's Windows, then fine. If it's Linux, fine. If it's BSD, fine. Remember about glass houses though.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    4. Re:This is just a reminder by erroneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Neither the battery replacement issue nor the copy/paste issue are examples of Apple suddenly deciding to remove functionality from your device. Your iPhone's battery is the same as it ever was, and it didn't ship to you with copy/paste. This isn't some sort of bait and switch like you make it out to be.

      I never claimed it was changed or removed functionality. What I claim is that it goes against standard consumer expectations for similar devices. And it does! Blackberries, Palm phones and Windows phones all have cut and paste features and the ability to remove or change the battery is also very very common and expected.

      Generally speaking, Windows users both old and new will accept far more malware, inconsistent behavior, and horrible interface design than Apple users would tolerate.

      Agreed. But I'm talking about hardware vendors... which in this case, Apple is both. If Dell gave end users a hard time, the most common reaction is to stop using Dell and go to HP or Lenovo. There's not another Apple "compatible" vendor out there to fall back on when this sole, unique vendor starts showing attitude.

      Expiring beta versions of software are not unique to Apple, nor are they a new thing, nor are they even unusual. Worst case, either someone at Apple put the wrong expiry date in the software. Unfortunate, yes, but not a malicious act, and not some sort of cruel abuse directed towards their developers.

      Expiring beta versions are not unusual. But when coupled with not having a replacement or update available to developers who paid for the privilege of developing for the iPhone, I'd say that is not good business. Developers expect changes, but they don't expect the rug to be pulled out from under them.

    5. Re:This is just a reminder by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Geez, so are many companies. Why single out Apple? When the RIM Blackberry network went down, guess what? You were fscked if your company didn't have their own RIM server. This story is about a developer who is using beta software. A complication occurred. If he read his email that Apple sent to him before the problem occurred, he wouldn't have been in this situation.

      Actually, you're incorrect. You were fsck'd even and especially if you did have your own BES [RIM server]. As it happens, almost all data communications travels across RIM's network. So yes, Blackberry is a problem child too, however, as to why "Apple is being singled out?" You're joking right? To discuss anything except Apple on this occasion would be "Off Topic." It's a story ABOUT Apple.

      Well the original topic was about development on iPhone and not general users which this particular issue does not affect general iPhone users who are not developers. But abuses that goes both ways. I had unfortunately had to reinstall XP SP2. Thank goodness I still had my disc and certificate. But I made a change in my hardware so I had to talk to a MS person explaining why I wasn't a thief stealing their software. But generally speaking, Windows users both old and new routinely accept abuses that Apple users wouldn't tolerate from a vendor... so I expect there to be a lot more user abuse without backlash.

      I am reflecting on a generally unconsciously accepted fact. I'm reflecting that in the case of Apple, a singular hardware and software combination vendor to which there is no compatible alternative, that developers and users alike are more under their control and more vulnerable to Apple's whims than most non-Apple users are to their vendors. Yes, Microsoft is abusive and growing more and more so. There are alternatives to Microsoft in a great many cases and, frankly, there are even ways around most of Microsoft's measures anyway. But Microsoft doesn't control both the hardware and software side of the PC. Functionally, they only control the software. And where the hardware is concerned, no PC vendor exerts a level of control over the hardware they sell and support that even comes close to that which Apple asserts on its products.

    6. Re:This is just a reminder by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we've read about the disabling of the expired beta software... but where's this new beta software you've mentioned? AH! There isn't! That's the issue being discussed in the article! Guess you missed that part.

    7. Re:This is just a reminder by cowscows · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Well sure, it's not good business. It was most certainly a mistake, and it's in Apple's best interest not to make many mistakes. But still they'll happen, they happen to everyone and every company. A developer working with beta software should be extra aware of the good chance they'll stumble upon some of these mistakes. This particular incident is a bit more unusual than your standard programming bugs, but I see nothing that suggests disrespect from Apple towards developers.

      Your original post seemed to imply some sort of evil intent to Apple, as if they did this on purpose, trying to screw over their consumers. If that's not what you were trying to say, then I apologize for not correctly interpreting your words.

      As for your hardware vendor line of thought, again I think it's not an issue of malice or even disrespect towards their customers, but rather Apple just choosing different priorities for their platform than what others have done. If those priorities don't make sense to you, then you are free to purchase a different phone. Sure, you can't get one with Apple's OS on it, but that's Apple's choice to make as the designer of both the hardware and the software. There's trade-offs to be made in whichever direction you decide to go, but Apple has always been pretty "open" about their "closed" nature.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    8. Re:This is just a reminder by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Apologist: look it up... you might see your picture in there somewhere.

      Your conclusion paragraph clearly states what I am saying but you're missing one thing. The users and developers of the iPhone are not expecting this sort of behavior from Apple. They expect similar behaviors exhibited by other vendors. This is the snake I'm pointing out. Apple does NOT do things the way other businesses do things. Apple veterans already know this. But the iPhone is different in that just as in the case of the iPod, a whole new group of non-Apple users are being drawn by the hype and glamor of Apple and these people have expectations that are built around previous consumer and developer experiences.

    9. Re:This is just a reminder by BearRanger · · Score: 1


      "...cannot do even simple things like copy and paste."

      So tell me, how would you implement copy and paste in a multitouch environment? What gesture sequence would you use for select that hasn't already been assigned to another function? The loop tool can be used to select the paste point, but what gesture would you then use to do the paste?

      What's that? You have no idea how you would implement this without breaking the existing intuitive functionality of the interface? I didn't think so.

    10. Re:This is just a reminder by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

      So tell me, how would you implement copy and paste in a multitouch environment? What gesture sequence would you use for select that hasn't already been assigned to another function?
      Actually, I would have though of using something like a tap-and-drag, like when dragging icons using just the touchpad. I can't think of any function on my iPhone that uses this gesture.
      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    11. Re:This is just a reminder by Damvan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The common meme on Slashdot is always the delusional Apple Fanboi, who loves all things Apple, no matter what. But what I see on this site more often is the exact opposite. The raving Apple Hater, who will hate all things Apple, no matter what. The time these people spend detailing their hatred amazes me.

      If you don't like it, don't buy it. There are other alternatives out there to Apple products. Buy one of them.

      Personally, I hate dark chocolate. I think I will go on some foodie forums and post a few pages about my hatred of dark chocolate, insisting that chocolate manufacturers make dark chocolate for my taste, and insulting all those who disagree and do like dark chocolate. I am sure that will make all the difference.

    12. Re:This is just a reminder by erroneus · · Score: 1

      While I like the first responder's idea, my idea would be far more simple. The act of moving the cursor to a text area and then dragging would select text just as is done with a mouse. Following a selection being highlighted, I'd add three new buttons to the virtual keyboard for copy, cut and paste. It's quite workable.

      What I find more interesting is your complete devotion to the notion that if Apple didn't do it, it couldn't or shouldn't be done.

    13. Re:This is just a reminder by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Are you a delusional fanboi? I might assume as much since you are presuming my opinions expressed are a sign of hatred. I have no such feeling. In fact, I routinely support Apple products in my job and actually own three macs personally. But the realities I'm pointing out have nothing to do with how I feel about anything. The facts are not particularly deniable. Apple seeks to control every aspect of their products even after you own them. And the reality is, I suppose, that since part of that product is software and Apple retains all rights of ownership, Apple owners don't truly own the entirety of the product they bought so long as it still has Apple software running on it. Meanwhile, Apple retains all rights to do anything with or to that software at any time for any reason. It's in the EULA. (Prohibited where Federal, state or local law conflicts of course...)

      Microsoft is just as guilty of this sort of behavior, but since this is about Apple's (let's call it a) "mistake" the fingers are pointing at Apple.

      It's not a question of "if you don't like it, don't buy it." I'm simply pointing out what consumer and developer expectations SHOULD be of Apple versus what consumer and developer expectations actually are of Apple. The present reality is that consumers and developers expect more of Apple than they get. I expect these kinds of things from Apple, however. That's not hatred. That's experience and observation forming my expectations of Apple. They presently match.

      Do you leave your car unlocked in a bad neighborhood? Does locking your car mean you hate people in bad neighborhoods or does it mean you expect certain types of behavior?

    14. Re:This is just a reminder by BearRanger · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that gesture is indistinguishable from a swipe, which is used to scroll in some applications and to select for deletion (for instance, mail messages) in others.

      The next poster suggests moving the cursor to a text area and dragging to select. This also fails, as you have to have a way to mark the beginning position you want to select, end that gesture, and not have the succeeding drag interpreted as a swipe.

      My point is that it's non trivial to come up with an idea for this that's consistent with the existing interface. The original poster suggested that it was simple. Maybe with a stylus it is. It isn't with the existing multitouch interface. There's no devotion on my part to whether or not it couldn't, shouldn't or won't ever be done because Apple didn't do it. I have no doubt that they will, or some independent developer will soon enough. But it most likely won't be simple.

    15. Re:This is just a reminder by vought · · Score: 1

      Seriously, if this is the most important thing you guys have to debate, I just need to remind you:

      Get a fucking life.

    16. Re:This is just a reminder by e4g4 · · Score: 1

      Actually the part that *you* missed is that Apple sent out an email the night before the beta software expired telling developers to update their software before it was disabled.

      --
      The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
    17. Re:This is just a reminder by erroneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That email only announced the expiration. There was no alternative. I did not miss anything. Developers paid for the privilege, the beta expired early. Developers were at a stand-still with their development platform halted until Apple says otherwise. As far as I can see, that hasn't happened before... not even with Microsoft.

    18. Re:This is just a reminder by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that gesture is indistinguishable from a swipe, which is used to scroll in some applications and to select for deletion (for instance, mail messages) in others.
      But it's not indistinguishable from a swipe. A swipe is contact followed by the sideways motion with no release from the touchscreen until after the swipe. Tap and drag is tap-release-swipe in rapid succession.

      If it works on a notebook touchpad, why not on a touchscreen?

      Picture this: There's text on the screen you want to copy. You tap and then drag from the start of the text to the end, stopping the selection with another tap at the end. Once selected, you tap the selected text and a menu pops up: CUT or COPY as appropriate.

      You then get to the screen where you want the text to go. Once you have a cursor in the input box, you double-tap and the clipboard text is pasted.

      I can't think of any input conflict with this sequence. One would hope that Apple UI engineers tried this and found some good reason it wouldn't work, or else it would be there.
      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
  20. Um, what are people smoking? by jerkychew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't get it - My "friend's" iphone expired at midnight but guess what, there was an email from the Apple beta program in my "friend's" email telling my "friend" to update their iPhone. Update, start using the phone again.

    This is just a sensationalist article using the Dvorak Method (TM) to get more hits.

    1. Re:Um, what are people smoking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Count my "friend" in as a member of the developer program who did not get such an email. Is your "friend" in the enterprise program?

    2. Re:Um, what are people smoking? by Jutranjo · · Score: 1

      A sensationalist article on /.? Wait, did you read it?

  21. Testing? by phorm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How else are you supposed to test something thoroughly than to use it as your primary device?
    I can understand perfectly why devs would use the iPhone as their primary. It's hard to catch the bugs unless you're regularly testing your software in a real-life environment... or do you really want the bugs (usability or functionality) to show up when the customers start using the tool in a real-life way.

    1. Re:Testing? by shawnce · · Score: 1, Informative

      His point was you don't put the beta firmware onto an iPhone you need for day to day use. You put it on an iPhone(s) reserved for development work knowing that it is a beta firmware and things could go wrong.

      In general many developers don't even need to use an iPhone to test on given the simulator (granted some applications do need an iPhone to fully develop).

    2. Re:Testing? by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Informative

      Corporations who do serious mobile phone development do not have their developers use personal phones for development and testing. They purchase separate phones for them.

      Independent developers can order a separate line with a cheap phone and have their calls redirected. Then if their development platform breaks they still have a usable phone. It's the cost of being a beta tester.

    3. Re:Testing? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      How else are you supposed to test something thoroughly than to use it as your primary device?

      Sure use it as your primary, but have a fall back plan of some sort.

      When your testing a new server, first you test it in an isolated test environment, then when you are comfortable with it, you roll it out live to monitor it and give it real world testing... but you don't just trash your old server. You keep it around (whether its a separate physical box, or just a backup disk image...), so that if the new server dies you can roll back to the old one while your sort it out. Common sense.

      I can understand perfectly why devs would use the iPhone as their primary. It's hard to catch the bugs unless you're regularly testing your software in a real-life environment... or do you really want the bugs (usability or functionality) to show up when the customers start using the tool in a real-life way.

      But why not have a backup plan? If I'm going to put beta software into my phone as a developer, I'd have a backup phone handy to transfer the phone service to if the development phone became unusable. That's just common sense. Hell, the backup doesn't even need to be an iphone it can be some crappy old phone... just something that's going to work to send/receive calls.

    4. Re:Testing? by Auckerman · · Score: 1

      In the emulator that Apple provides and the firmware is locked, by default, to running in. You have to unlock the firmware so that it works on an iPhone and then install it there yourself, thus doing exactly what Apple specifically told you not to do.

      --

      Burn Hollywood Burn
    5. Re:Testing? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      How else are you supposed to test something thoroughly than to use it as your primary device?

      If something is mission critical to you, you never, ever develop on it. Otherwise, you have to be willing to accept some hiccups and downtime. Or have a backup just in case.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  22. Re:MS DID do similar thing! by wasteofspace77 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Hehe. In a similar vein, Microsoft's OS X Remote Desktop application Beta 2 expired on March 31 2008. You can still use it but you get a great nag screen to download the latest beta (whcih links you to, you guess it, beta 2).

    Oh, and that probably affected more users than the iphone beta expiration.

  23. Is it just me or... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    does anyone else also feel that companies should not be legally able to remotely alter or even disable a product once you have fully paid for it, without your express agreement each time?

    1. Re:Is it just me or... by Icarium · · Score: 1

      It's just you.

  24. Flambait as a front page article by Auckerman · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are a few things wrong.

    1. Apple specifically told you not to use it on a iPhone. You decided it didn't belong in the SDK emulator, unlocked it, and put on your iPhone. The fact that this didn't work out well for you is your problem.
    2. You can put the proper firmware for a phone, and not the one designed for development, on your iPhone at any time using iTunes.
    3. A new firmware is available. The SDK program specifically states that if you don't download the newest SDK from time to time, you will have the old one stop functioning.

    --

    Burn Hollywood Burn
    1. Re:Flambait as a front page article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. No, they didn't. No I didn't. No it's not.
      2. No, I can't... not without pwning it.
      3. No, it's not.

  25. It's a beta by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Suck it the fuck up, and use the emulator till there's a working firmware release.

  26. Re:Why do people even bother with the iPhone anywa by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

    People buy shirts for $400. People buy purses for $2000. It's a fashion statement. It's to the taste of those people who buy it, and if it makes them happy, good for them.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  27. Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's become /.'s version of "series of tubes", and perhaps should be tagged with that or 'tedstevens'. No /. editor should ever misuse it, or let it be misused as a story lead.

    canadacow claiming to be a developer yet misusing the term should have led to an instant deletion from the story queque.

  28. Maybe this is a misdirected AskSlashdot by indros13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Folks, don't tell him the phone isn't bricked, it just encourages him. Instead of going to a forum and asking "hey, what happened to my iPhone with this devkit installed?" he comes to Slashdot and hyperventilates about a bricked phone. And whaddya know, several people already gave him a solution (rollback firmware through iTunes - hey, great idea!) I propose we no longer act as Apple Technical Support for the Un-Bricked.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    1. Re:Maybe this is a misdirected AskSlashdot by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      It upsets me more that there are developers that 1) against Apple's FIRM reccomendation and EULA, used the beta on a production phone 2) don't know how to rollback firmware, and 3) don't understand they're going to get flamed for it if they complain here.

      With programmers and developers of this quality, it's no wonder that Apple has a strict software policy on the phone, why they didn't want developers from 3rd parties at all, and why they will have exclusive rights to distribute software for iPhones, free or not, via iTunes Store.

      For all of you complaining about why there's won't be iPhione software just floating around on the web for you to get like you could do for your Palm or Windows Mobile device (without hacking or unlocking it), here's a reason not to complain... Bad developers exist. Apple is offering a way to protect you from them. I wish Microsoft did this...

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    2. Re:Maybe this is a misdirected AskSlashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, tell him it's bricked! I'll take that useless piece of hardware off his hands for him and dispose of it properly...

  29. complain about BETA software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For most of us the new 5A240d software wasn't a problem.

  30. Re:Why do people even bother with the iPhone anywa by Hemogoblin · · Score: 0, Redundant

    No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

  31. Re:Why do people even bother with the iPhone anywa by bcat24 · · Score: 1

    People bother with the iPhone because it's sleek-looking, it has a great, very usable interface, and it doubles as an iPod.

  32. ziphone ftw by chiantii · · Score: 3, Informative

    This whole thing can be fixed with ziphone. I was able to restore my phone back to 1.1.4 in less than a minute. simply downgrade you bootloader and you're golden.

  33. Re:Why do people even bother with the iPhone anywa by Bemopolis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Beyond its inherent features, people (like me) bother with the iPhone because of their experiences with other phones, which have opaque manuals that attempt to explain how the phone would actually work had the carrier not installed their custom OS on it and disabled the useful features to force you into their pay-per-use services. Oh, and some people (like me) were already with the carrier in question.

    I hope that cleared that up for you.

    --
    "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
  34. But wait... by t33jster · · Score: 1

    How can we blame this on Microsoft?

    --
    Take off every 'sig' for great justice.
    1. Re:But wait... by daveime · · Score: 1

      Microsoft gave them the idea ?

      "Automatic Update locks computer"

    2. Re:But wait... by benjaminperdomo · · Score: 1

      Because Microsoft make Apple do it.

  35. Re:Why do people even bother with the iPhone anywa by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    So it's a fashion statement for people who hang out in the middle of nowhere, where they only get GSM? Or is it a fashion statement for people from ten years ago, before modern mobile phones were invented?

  36. Re:Why do people even bother with the iPhone anywa by Phroggy · · Score: 1

    My current phone doesn't have 3G either. I'm no longer under contract, but I have service through AT&T anyway, and I have no particular desire to switch. I haven't heard of Apple "just shutting them off" - this particular incident seems to involve a beta version of the new firmware that is only available to registered developers, comes with lots of warnings about how unstable it might be, and can't even be installed on an iPhone unless you hack it first.

    There are several things that I need my phone to do, that the iPhone doesn't do. But the things the iPhone does do, DAMN. The user interface on my current phone is horribly counter-intuitive (for example, if I want to view the calendar, it's under Settings). Some features, like e-mail, work so poorly that I usually don't bother. The iPhone is actually usable - everything it claims to do actually works, and works well enough that you can use it.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  37. alas, score -1 etymology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it's a werebrick.

    A "man-brick"?

    Or do you mean yet another clueless submitter crying to /. with 'omg omg my apple is briiiicked! steve you meanie!"
  38. New SDK just posted by tylersoze · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just put up on the iPhone dev site, go get it.

    1. Re:New SDK just posted by artaxerxes · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.tuaw.com/2008/04/08/third-iphone-beta-sdk-is-live/

      What he said... no details about what has changed.

      --
      man kann nicht nicht kommunizieren
  39. Developers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers..."

    I've never understood why people, dev's especially, made fun of Ballmer for that. It would be nice if other companies had the same dogma...*ahem* apple.

  40. Google has killed beta by Telvin_3d · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Part of the shock that some people are feeling comes from the fact that 'beta' doesn't carry the same weight it used to. While others have jumped on the bandwagon, Google has been the big one for devaluing the term. Beta is supposed to mean a potentially unstable build released for testing and feedback purposes. It is labelled beta precisely because it might have some show stopping bugs lurking inside.

    However, many people are now used to Google's beta software, which means a functional, polished release that happens to be missing some of the blue sky features that are planned. Oh, and it might get a UI redesign at some point.

    The two uses are very different and anyone expecting one should be quite shocked to find the other.

    1. Re:Google has killed beta by bfizzle · · Score: 1

      Very true. You never really heard anyone bitch about Google's beta service being down for a couple hours. Google also has the benefit of having a web based platform.... so if something breaks hard they fix it quickly and update the web servers under their control.

  41. Exaggerate much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to see one of these posts where they mention their $800 phone. Of course you don't have a link do you? I wonder if you come across like such a jerk in person as well.

  42. Re:Why do people even bother with the iPhone anywa by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    The iPhone is actually usable

    It doesn't have 3G. It's not usable, unless you're living in 1998.

  43. You Got What You Deserved by segedunum · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Apple doesn't do development, doesn't get development and doesn't support developers. There has been ample evidence for that for some time now, and yet, we still get some braindead twonks telling us we all should have read the EULA! Unbelievable. How much would it cost Apple to fix this for the people who are developing software so Apple can sell more iPhones? Errrrrr...............

    1. Re:You Got What You Deserved by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      How does it feel to know you missed the point entirely and just ranted about basically unrelated and untrue items?

    2. Re:You Got What You Deserved by segedunum · · Score: 1

      How does it feel to know you missed the point entirely and just ranted about basically unrelated and untrue items?
      Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. It's funny that a few rape victims, or kidnap victims, sometimes feel sympathy for the rapist or kidnapper, possibly because they have come to accept the situation they were in and be submissive. It's a similar situation here, as Apple fans try and paint over the whole thing. How does that feel? You see it, as a comment above pointed out, in all the ejits on the Apple forums saying "Oh damn, I should have read my EULA." Sad. Simply sad.

      If they're untrue you can give me some examples as to how accommodating Apple is for developers who write software for their platforms. Can't you? Oh, what's that? You can't? I fail to see how it's unrelated because this isn't helping developers supporting the iPhone, is it? You know, developers helping Apple sell more iPhones? Writing the above and modding it flamebait (I see the Apple sympathetic mods got in quick ;-)) isn't going to make it wrong sadly.

      When you develop for Apple platforms you end up getting fucked. Just face it.
  44. Stop complaining... by a.phoenicis · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...and go download the new version: http://developer.apple.com/iphone/

  45. Re:Cue Fanbois by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    Nice, I say Apple is fallible and I get modded flamebait. I've lost all faith in the Slashdot Moderation system.

  46. Re:Why do people even bother with the iPhone anywa by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

    People with cell phones have friends, and even people "in the middle of nowhere" in America see a lot of people every day. Even if there were no one else around, fashion-based decisions are about overcoming personal insecurities, and maybe seeing the iPhone every morning makes the user feel important or special in some way.

    Yes, it's a hole down which you can throw money, but so are a lot of other things, and this hole has as good a chance as any of giving a placebonic sense of fulfillment.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  47. iPhone SDK not really ready yet? by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    I was looking into the iPhone SDK and found that you cannot install any applications without a $99 certificate which they refuse to issue to companies outside of the US.
    Also, the SDK is really in beta with no OpenGL ES support on the emulator yet.
    Maybe it's better to wait?

  48. Re:Cue Fanbois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.

    I downmodded you simply because I tend to downmod anyone who uses the word "fanboy", no matter against whom the label is applied. It's a cheap rhetorical device used by people who have next to nothing intelligent to say, and I have grown extremely weary of it.

  49. New SDK Is Up by vertigoCiel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Unofficial Apple Weblog reports that the new SDK is available, which should rescue any iPhones or iPod Touches from the Pink Screen of Death.

    It's surprising to see Apple drop the ball like this. You should probably post a new SDK before the old ones expire and prevent developers from working. This is an amateur mistake.

  50. The definition of Primary implies a second by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    How else are you supposed to test something thoroughly than to use it as your primary device?

    You buy a second device? That's what I'm going to do, whenever I finally get the cert...

    Then I'll carry two phones to test. Or, a touch and an iPhone depending. I mean, how else are you going to have a stable platform for calls and other mobile uses wile also performing tests on your development mobile?

    I can understand perfectly why devs would use the iPhone as their primary. It's hard to catch the bugs unless you're regularly testing your software in a real-life environment...

    You have a great understanding of why you test software on an actual device. You have a lousy understanding of reasons why despite explicit warnings from Apple that your phone may face varying degrees of status from "buggy" to "not working at all" a person who needed the phone to work every second would not buy a second phone (or Touch) to test with.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  51. In Defense of Apple Critics by weston · · Score: 1

    Apple users aren't (necessarily) stupid. They just have completely different expectations. When Mac people buy something they expect it to make them cool. Any other functionality is just icing on the cake.

    Knee-jerk Apple critics (KJACs) aren't necessarily stupid. They just have completely different expectations. When they make up stories about "Mac people," they expect them to either not be present, or to respond in a manner that would make an inert gas envious to wild speculation about why they purchase and use products KJACs exhibit chronic misunderstandings about.

  52. Not Bricked by whoda · · Score: 1

    If it was 'bricked' it would never be able to be a phone or an ipod again.
    It's just temporarily not working.

    Huge difference.

  53. Or Android? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    Android has the backing of Google.

    Who's backing OpenMoko? Or Qtopia?

    Which one are we more likely to actually get a usable version of, anytime soon?

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  54. Math to the rescue. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    So it's a werebrick.

    A "man-brick"?


    Yes! (For sufficiently smartphone-like values of "man".)

    Time to consult the shade of Alan Turing...

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  55. iPod, iPhone, iMac, iTunes, iLife...? by FlyByPC · · Score: 0, Troll

    No thanks, Apple. iDON'T.

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
  56. Re:Cue Fanbois by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    "It's not Apple I have a problem with, it's the smug users" is a favorite quote of mine. I can't stand Apple users because they think they are better then everybody else and refuse to believe their "god" can be fallible. I was pointing out Apple's fallibility. It needs to be said because some people don't get it.

  57. It's not a bug by Serenissima · · Score: 1

    It's a feature!

    --
    Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. But light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  58. Re:Why do people even bother with the iPhone anywa by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 2, Funny

    I suppose it's possible that you are the arbiter of usability, but I'm going to go ahead and suspect that's not the case at all.

  59. Why do people keep abusing the term "bricked"? by KWTm · · Score: 4, Funny

    What is it with the overuse of the term 'bricked' lately?
    Exactly! Geez, throw me a brickin' phone!

    (with apologies to Dr. Evil)
    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
  60. This story has become MOOT by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes Beta 2 exppired today but Beta 3 was also released today. There was a gap of a few hours. This software is for DEVELOPERS and has not effect on end users.

    1. Re:This story has become MOOT by XereX · · Score: 1

      Yes Beta 2 exppired today but Beta 3 was also released today. There was a gap of a few hours. This software is for DEVELOPERS and has not effect on end users. This story was moot to begin with.... Apple openly says you should not use this beta software on your everyday device.... (I don't know who has lots of these things just laying around, but hey, whatever) I also got a "new software build notice" 2.5 hrs before this was posted....

      keeping in the spirit of most apple followers, that is about 2.4 hrs more than most need to get the latest update.
      Welcome to the developing community where sometimes.... Things DONT WORK.... its called a beta...
  61. It's HARD to brick... by RudeIota · · Score: 5, Informative
    The iPhone is hard to break... If you hose it through a firmware update or jailbreaking it - recovery mode works regardless.
    • * Turn your iPhone on
    • * While it is on, hold the lock (button on the top) and home (button on the lower front) buttons down.
    • * Continue holding both buttons until the screen goes black (just a few seconds after the apple logo appears)
    • * Let go of the top button. Continue holding the Home button for several seconds.
    • * Plug your iPhone into your computer. iTunes will detect your phone in 'Restore mode' Recover your phone using the latest firmware. If you want to use older firmware (1.1.4 works just fine with Ziphone, BTW), hold the shift key as you click on firmware update button and you can browse for a firmware file (You will have to download an older firmware manually to load onto your iPhone using this method).
    --
    Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
    1. Re:It's HARD to brick... by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Or you can use Pwnage Tool and continue to use 2.0 fw.
      And Ziphone is a major cause of 'bricked' phones. iLiberty is the safe (and honest) solution if you want a jailbroken/unlocked iPhone.

    2. Re:It's HARD to brick... by tholomyes · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the similar restore for the iPod Touch still didn't restore my non-working wifi data connection, though...

      --
      When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
  62. Donkey, you, me by tepples · · Score: 1

    I would be curious, with the name "canadacow", assuming he is Canadian When you assume "canada" always means Canada, you make a donkey out of you and me.
  63. Re:Cue Fanbois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    er, does "fanboi" count? Do you still have mod points?

  64. Beta testers != iPhone developers by CreateWindowEx · · Score: 1

    As an iPhone developer, and not an Apple beta/seed tester, I was not notified by Apple until 6 PM today that the new firmware was up. The AppleSeed site is not generally available to iPhone developers--we go through a different website. The updated firmware only appeared on the iPhone developer center at about 4 PM today. There were no notices or anything on the website this morning. I'm assuming others had the same experience. It was not at all obvious that the failure was due to expiration, especially since at that time there was nothing new on the developer site, and it was supposed to be a longer expiration period.

    Obviously in an ideal world Apple should have released the new version *before* the expiration instead of 8 hours after, but the fact that they didn't bother to tell us is what is very irksome, so likely many people like me wasted time trying to debug the problem this morning. Lame. It would have taken someone at Apple five minutes just to post a notice to the iPod developer site saying what was going on. It's also ridiculous that there are still no developer newsgroups (as far as I know) for iPhone development. Every console maker has private newsgroups (where everyone who has access is under NDA, so you can talk about the tech), and that is always a great resource, and you can avoid making the same mistakes that others did.

  65. New beta already by powermacx · · Score: 1

    Apple has just posted a new beta (beta 3)
    http://developer.apple.com/iphone/

  66. Re:Cue Fanbois by konohitowa · · Score: 1

    And that's a fine philosophy. Unfortunately, this particular incident isn't an example of it. Hence the down modding. Although I suppose off topic might have been better.

    In case you're not getting why: some devs were using their main piece of hardware as a dev platform with beta software. It had problems (that were 100% reversible with very little effort - i.e. connect to iTunes and switch back to the release firmware) and that blew up into "bricked" and other false claims.

    Unfortunately, around here there's also a problem with trying to correct people's FUD resulting in being called a "fanboi", etc.

    Cue being called a "fanboi" in 3, 2, 1...

  67. Re:Why do people even bother with the iPhone anywa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then don't buy one. There are plenty of other alternatives. Why do people bother wasting time posting messages about something they don't want?

  68. Developer, eh? by JustCallMeRich · · Score: 1

    I'm curious - given the feedback generated on this article - what, exactly, is canadacow developing?

    Or is canadacow just another kid who, like one of my cow-orkers, likes the beta versions so much they lie cheat and steal to get the bug-ware versions of apps for bragging/crashing rights.

    This can't speak well for whatever is being developed...

    --
    http://Communityville.com - A free place for new and old neighborhood webmasters to hang out.
  69. Re:Why do people even bother with the iPhone anywa by timmarhy · · Score: 1

    because of the angst that just about oozes out of the screen when anything negative about apple is posted.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  70. Where's the Slashdot I know and love? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It must be great to be Apple.

    Look at the posters in this thread. You know you're on top when you can get Slashdotters defending your bad software release that breaks developer's phones. ESPECIALLY considering that the SDK that broke it is based on a completely closed software distribution model, all DRMed to hell! Steam. Comes. Out. Of. Ears.

    I find it kind of disheartening that the laser-beam cynicism that /.ers regularly point at the world isn't on top of this one. What has happened to you guys? Where's the slashdot of yesteryear?

    Soviet Russia? Bizzaro-Slashdot? This is it.

  71. Say "Hello" To iBrick by Slur · · Score: 1

    On the bright side, it never tells the wrong time, and I receive absolutely no SPAM.

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  72. Re:MS DID do similar thing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "you can still use it" -- key phrase!

  73. 5 insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about -5, Too Lazy To RTFA. Or -5, Troll.

    What a fucking dumbass - and you too, dumbasses, who modded this dumbass up.

  74. No - google uses the term correctly. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

    I'm afraid Google uses the term beta correctly - they just have higher standards than Apple.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  75. Blame it on Rio by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    That's easy. If Microsoft had made a decent smart phone OS in the first place, the market opportunity for iPhone never would have existed, and this br1kd00d wouldn't be here spawning this absurd discussion.

    Give me a tougher one.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  76. 'Bricked' iPhone Recycling Program by Immerial · · Score: 0

    I propose we setup a slashdot iPhone 'recycling' program for all the 'bricked' iPhones. Just send them to a 'processing center' (my house) and we will make sure they are properly 'disposed'.

    Anyone else want to help me out to make sure these toxic devices don't end up in the landfill?

    ;) ;) nudge nudge

  77. Relativity by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    It's relative. What's bricked for one person might be JTAG-able or TFTP-able for another. Hence the term 'unbricking' (Results 1 - 10 of about 55,800 for unbricking. (0.17 seconds) ).

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  78. fixed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't they just fix this? There is a post on Products on this (also a cool post on the rumored iPhone 3g chip from infineon).

  79. This has been up for what, a week? by Swift2001 · · Score: 1

    And the "issue" was solved later in the day that it was posted. Oh, God, the agony! How arrogant and abusive Apple is!

  80. "Brick" "Unlock" "Jailbreak" *sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's bugging me even more than the misuse of the term 'bricked' is the people using unlock and jailbreak synonymously. These aren't the same thing, folks.

    Unlocked refers to the gsm restrictions limiting your phone to one cell network (cingular/at&t) and 'unlocking' the restrictions to allow the phone to work with other gsm networks (t mobile, for example).

    Jailbreaking simply refers to lifting the software restrictions, to allow 3rd party software to be installed. You can still have a phone locked to cingular that has been jailbroken.