This is almost the setup we use. RISing is the primary tool as it takes away anyone elses need to know how to configure things 'just right.' The only thing we do different is with firefox. We don't like that. It is easier to update the IE settings at logon. It also means that if teachers are using their notebooks at home with wireless or somesuch, the Internet Options wont effect their browsing for that interface.
As for liability, we monitor the k-7 but not 8-12. We DO NOT MONITOR STAFF. I will tell a principal how to do it, but as a contractor, will not be made to.
On the back end we actually use Windose Server making good use of Active Directories. We've also moved much of the administration into the actual schools, so they can reset student passwords and so on. We seperated the student and staff servers with a trust relationship between.
In my state in Australia k12 in the state school system is run on heterogenous windose systems. There are occassionally cock-ups with the configurations, but on the whole the system works nicely. We've NEVER had any problems security wise. We run windows versions ranging from win2000-pro-server(2000/3). We are moving more of the roles into schools (upwards of 100 000 users) and windose is THE choice as sys admins in schools are more likely to know windows.
1. Make the system heterogenous 2. Buy site liscences and include upgrades 3. Do it now, not slowly or incrementally. 4. Lock those babies up tight as a dolphins arse. 5. Screw outlook. Make all teachers (and students if you do that) acess email via a web interface. Don't have them try to dick around at home. 6. Cat 5 and optical are king, wireless sucks. 7. Internet can never have too much bandwidth. 8. Don't buy HP printers. Canon and Xerox are easiest to remote administer.
Then take his meaning. Prions are structurally similar and less complex than a virus.
If you really want to be a smart arse, you would have negated his arguement by showing that evolution does not stand up to scientific rigour. That is, a fundamental tenet of scientific process, repeatability, can not be applied to the theory of evolution.
You obviously know a bit about this, so take his understanding instead of trying to prove to the world how smart you are.
sure, if by 'another alternative' you actually mean 'crap competitors.' Why even post this advertising crap. Digg is not a search engine. If it is, it doesn't focus on searching (which would be nice in a search engine). It seems to be some sort of news site, but since I'm already at slashdot, I think I'll stay here. In the absence of me having moderator points, I hope you feel a bit repentant about wasting everyones precious seconds.
WOW - Informative and condescending. Couldn't your dig at the original post about its signature be seen in the same line - an attempt to assert your own intelligence.
Whilst it's nice to be important, being an asshole is non-constructive. I don't think personal attacks are the best way to foster an intellectual conversation.
Correct, but don't degrade
I recieved top of my state for maths, was good at sciences, and etc... I left school to go into uni - a comp sci/Math degree. After a couple of years I changed. I now study a double degree with majors in Law, History, and Politics. Whilst I still love the maths and so on, I think the stuff I have really learnt to appreciate in school was the history and politics. Whilst knowing maths is nice, and its fun, it doesn't compare to actually knowing about the world. I think teenage boys just happen to be good at math and science, and for many it turns into a life long rut. Nevertheless, I would hope my pedagogues never feel discouraged for though I never appreciated them in my day, I do now. I would never have vied my education as babysitting.
Compared to the number of windows machines out there, zOS is a rarity. So rare in fact as to merit that it not be taught at university. The market creates a demand, and if it doesn't we end up with a.com boom.
...and yet he got +3 informative for contibuting a little (sure not +5) whilst you recieved a total of -1. I guess that means you post was unimportant (true), irrelevant (true), or a troll (true). Maybe you should take a lesson out of his book. Perhaps it is you who does not understand the moderation process, have missed the point.
Part of the competition is that the individual has to be able to give any particular number, say the 753rd without listing through them. Again the poem analogy is good. Just as you remember a poem in stanzas, so are the number sets remembered in sets. A very good read on this topic is UUse your memory" by Tony Buzan, and its sequel "Master your memory. These books go into the specific systems one uses to memorise alrge numbers, as well as smaller numbers like phone numbers and dates.
Don't be a smart arse, the guy knows what he's talking about. For example, most people remember phone numbers a certain way, generally as an area code followed by a sequence of 4-5 numbers (depends where you are from). The way large numbers are remembered are to break then up into sets of five or so then remember those. The analogy is then correct. You would memorise a poem as a set of words and knowing those, provided you were a good speller, be able to then recite in order every letter in the poem.
Last time I was in a Law unit (two years ago when I was finishing my law degree) it was commonly accepted wisdom that the purpose of these payouts was recuperation and/or repairation. The contemporary tendency to apply penal damages is killing the legal system and an abuse of the law. I notice you got a 5 insightful, you should have got 5 Ambulance Chaser.
This read makes me a bit sad. Soon the days of articles like this will be gone. That it, with the change to Intel I think the market has lost something. There was a cultural richness before with Macs, Amiga, IBMs, Kangaroos(Australia only) all bringing something different to the table. I think everyone agrees that it was not the best design that won, but the most competative. I guess one of the lessons that the recent change, as has all the changes in Mac history, is that if Mac survives, it will surely be able to switch to a better architecture when the need arises with a minimum amount of fuss. Until then, I guess the discussion is dead, from memory to history.
I used Redhat from about 99 to 2003. Now I use Suse coz it just works better with my hardware (winmodem excluded). I also did an LSF but it took A LOT to get working to my liking. I am still looking for the perfect disk based distribution with seemless integration with USB drive etc.. When that comes along I'll be in heaven. I think the real problem is getting a disk based distribution to work as well as an install system.
Have you noticed how you have a BA in English and dislike the books that Doctorates recommend? Ever wonder why your reading slashdot now instead of teaching literature?
That's cool, but what if Linus Torvalds just happened to walk in and recommend a book which you'd not yet considered, or had but decided in favor of another on the same topic. What about Bill Gates (maybe not the best example)? My point is, there are some authorities who you can simply trust.
Yes, and when those snotty english types are looking for computer books to read, it would obviously to folly for them to check the book reviews to see what those knowlegable on the issue would think. Worse still would be for them to simply trust the common wisdom of the community. I would never wish Tannenbaum, or Upgrading and Repairing PCs on someone, as there may just be a better book on the subjects.
As a onetime literature student, I think you're mistaken. When you were in school, in English class, it was probably not up to you to choose the books most appropriate for your consumption. I think I would have gone Tom Clancy novels had I the choice. These people, those 'snotty english types' have spent their years studying literature. There opinion, knowlege and wisdom should be respected in these matters. Any graduate or postgraduate course does not differ greatly in content.
For example, I challange you to find a Universtiy introductory unit on 'novels' which doesn't contain at least on, maybe two of: Bronte, Austen, ar Lawrence. Find an authority who wouldn't recommend Dostoyevsky, of Tolstoy,or Moby Dick, Rhyme of the Ancient Mariner or Hitchhikers Guide (well, maybe not).
The point is, it has been long established what books reflect society or convey eloquently natural law themes. Why waste time doing the research when you could be reading.
Or to put it another way, when you're in the book store you want the best book on Perl/Flash/Solaris? Would you like, every time you were to by a book, to have to spend the evening before reading reviews of all the books available? When someone comes to your house to borrow a book on XXXX, don't you like being able to recommend a book, knowing that they will get value-for-time?
If you find this idea distasteful, then perhaps your being conceited, or ignorant, or something else. You aren't being smart though. When you're in hostpital with cancer, I pray you trust your specialists, rather than spending five years in medical school getting up to speed. Don't waste time on the unimportant stuff.
I'm suprised your not in jail. A failure to appreciate humour could lead to a lot of sticky situations. For example, if I said you are probably a computer nerd who spends too much time with the computer, and not enough around people, leading you to misinterpret humour, then you might miss the dramatic irony of the situations, and hence intrinsic. Instead of being wryly amused, you might get insulted and do something rash. But I know you can recognise humour...
You completely missed the point. The point was, whilst the sender-id issue may not solve the problem, it indicates that the market leader is actually prepared to take steps to create a more positive environment. It is not pragmatic action, but rather the gesture which is important.
Not one to get caught up in Microsoft bashing, I salute the company. It may not make the best decisions, but it is making decisions. At some point something is going o have to happen to stem the tide of crap floating round the internet.
This may not be the best secision, but maybe it will inspire other people to start making decisions. Once again Microsoft has proven itself to be a market leader, even if in bad ideas.
There is - you'll notice in the picture there is a fan within the case. Everyone knows that Apples run without a fan. I've never seen a windows box without a fan. That means when these macs eventually ship they will remove the fan, windows wont run and the machine will be maclocked.
Incorrect: should of Still incorrect: should've correct: should have
Firstly, 'right' is a moral judgement. The word you are looking for is either correct or proper. Incorrect is the opposite. Secondly, the phrase is 'should ought to have' as in, 'you should ought to have told the authorities ma'am.' As well, in correct spelling and technical writing one should never cntract spellings.
I defer in this to Janet Whitcut, senior Research Editor to the Longman Dictionary.
Slashdot Mirror
This is almost the setup we use. RISing is the primary tool as it takes away anyone elses need to know how to configure things 'just right.' The only thing we do different is with firefox. We don't like that. It is easier to update the IE settings at logon. It also means that if teachers are using their notebooks at home with wireless or somesuch, the Internet Options wont effect their browsing for that interface.
As for liability, we monitor the k-7 but not 8-12. We DO NOT MONITOR STAFF. I will tell a principal how to do it, but as a contractor, will not be made to.
On the back end we actually use Windose Server making good use of Active Directories. We've also moved much of the administration into the actual schools, so they can reset student passwords and so on. We seperated the student and staff servers with a trust relationship between.
In my state in Australia k12 in the state school system is run on heterogenous windose systems. There are occassionally cock-ups with the configurations, but on the whole the system works nicely. We've NEVER had any problems security wise. We run windows versions ranging from win2000-pro-server(2000/3). We are moving more of the roles into schools (upwards of 100 000 users) and windose is THE choice as sys admins in schools are more likely to know windows.
1. Make the system heterogenous
2. Buy site liscences and include upgrades
3. Do it now, not slowly or incrementally.
4. Lock those babies up tight as a dolphins arse.
5. Screw outlook. Make all teachers (and students if you do that) acess email via a web interface. Don't have them try to dick around at home.
6. Cat 5 and optical are king, wireless sucks.
7. Internet can never have too much bandwidth.
8. Don't buy HP printers. Canon and Xerox are easiest to remote administer.
9. THROW OUT EVERYTHING AND GO CITRIX METAFRAME>
Then take his meaning. Prions are structurally similar and less complex than a virus.
If you really want to be a smart arse, you would have negated his arguement by showing that evolution does not stand up to scientific rigour. That is, a fundamental tenet of scientific process, repeatability, can not be applied to the theory of evolution.
You obviously know a bit about this, so take his understanding instead of trying to prove to the world how smart you are.
You're probably not anyway.
The reason I haven't upgraded - I'd have to find the more recent serials.
sure, if by 'another alternative' you actually mean 'crap competitors.' Why even post this advertising crap. Digg is not a search engine. If it is, it doesn't focus on searching (which would be nice in a search engine). It seems to be some sort of news site, but since I'm already at slashdot, I think I'll stay here. In the absence of me having moderator points, I hope you feel a bit repentant about wasting everyones precious seconds.
WOW - Informative and condescending. Couldn't your dig at the original post about its signature be seen in the same line - an attempt to assert your own intelligence. Whilst it's nice to be important, being an asshole is non-constructive. I don't think personal attacks are the best way to foster an intellectual conversation. Correct, but don't degrade
I recieved top of my state for maths, was good at sciences, and etc... I left school to go into uni - a comp sci/Math degree. After a couple of years I changed. I now study a double degree with majors in Law, History, and Politics. Whilst I still love the maths and so on, I think the stuff I have really learnt to appreciate in school was the history and politics. Whilst knowing maths is nice, and its fun, it doesn't compare to actually knowing about the world. I think teenage boys just happen to be good at math and science, and for many it turns into a life long rut. Nevertheless, I would hope my pedagogues never feel discouraged for though I never appreciated them in my day, I do now. I would never have vied my education as babysitting.
Compared to the number of windows machines out there, zOS is a rarity. So rare in fact as to merit that it not be taught at university. The market creates a demand, and if it doesn't we end up with a .com boom.
What is the elize/eliza board of which you speak?
...and yet he got +3 informative for contibuting a little (sure not +5) whilst you recieved a total of -1. I guess that means you post was unimportant (true), irrelevant (true), or a troll (true). Maybe you should take a lesson out of his book. Perhaps it is you who does not understand the moderation process, have missed the point.
Part of the competition is that the individual has to be able to give any particular number, say the 753rd without listing through them. Again the poem analogy is good. Just as you remember a poem in stanzas, so are the number sets remembered in sets. A very good read on this topic is UUse your memory" by Tony Buzan, and its sequel "Master your memory. These books go into the specific systems one uses to memorise alrge numbers, as well as smaller numbers like phone numbers and dates.
Don't be a smart arse, the guy knows what he's talking about. For example, most people remember phone numbers a certain way, generally as an area code followed by a sequence of 4-5 numbers (depends where you are from). The way large numbers are remembered are to break then up into sets of five or so then remember those. The analogy is then correct. You would memorise a poem as a set of words and knowing those, provided you were a good speller, be able to then recite in order every letter in the poem.
Last time I was in a Law unit (two years ago when I was finishing my law degree) it was commonly accepted wisdom that the purpose of these payouts was recuperation and/or repairation. The contemporary tendency to apply penal damages is killing the legal system and an abuse of the law. I notice you got a 5 insightful, you should have got 5 Ambulance Chaser.
This read makes me a bit sad. Soon the days of articles like this will be gone. That it, with the change to Intel I think the market has lost something. There was a cultural richness before with Macs, Amiga, IBMs, Kangaroos(Australia only) all bringing something different to the table. I think everyone agrees that it was not the best design that won, but the most competative. I guess one of the lessons that the recent change, as has all the changes in Mac history, is that if Mac survives, it will surely be able to switch to a better architecture when the need arises with a minimum amount of fuss. Until then, I guess the discussion is dead, from memory to history.
I used Redhat from about 99 to 2003. Now I use Suse coz it just works better with my hardware (winmodem excluded). I also did an LSF but it took A LOT to get working to my liking. I am still looking for the perfect disk based distribution with seemless integration with USB drive etc.. When that comes along I'll be in heaven. I think the real problem is getting a disk based distribution to work as well as an install system.
I now present a multichoice rant.
.
It gets kudos for being better than the last installment but it will never be as good as because
I would suggest Graphics, Security, Utility, Marginalisation for reasons and OS X, Windows, Fedora, and FreeBSD for operating systems.
Have you noticed how you have a BA in English and dislike the books that Doctorates recommend? Ever wonder why your reading slashdot now instead of teaching literature?
That's cool, but what if Linus Torvalds just happened to walk in and recommend a book which you'd not yet considered, or had but decided in favor of another on the same topic. What about Bill Gates (maybe not the best example)? My point is, there are some authorities who you can simply trust.
Yes, and when those snotty english types are looking for computer books to read, it would obviously to folly for them to check the book reviews to see what those knowlegable on the issue would think. Worse still would be for them to simply trust the common wisdom of the community. I would never wish Tannenbaum, or Upgrading and Repairing PCs on someone, as there may just be a better book on the subjects.
As a onetime literature student, I think you're mistaken. When you were in school, in English class, it was probably not up to you to choose the books most appropriate for your consumption. I think I would have gone Tom Clancy novels had I the choice. These people, those 'snotty english types' have spent their years studying literature. There opinion, knowlege and wisdom should be respected in these matters. Any graduate or postgraduate course does not differ greatly in content.
For example, I challange you to find a Universtiy introductory unit on 'novels' which doesn't contain at least on, maybe two of: Bronte, Austen, ar Lawrence. Find an authority who wouldn't recommend Dostoyevsky, of Tolstoy,or Moby Dick, Rhyme of the Ancient Mariner or Hitchhikers Guide (well, maybe not).
The point is, it has been long established what books reflect society or convey eloquently natural law themes. Why waste time doing the research when you could be reading.
Or to put it another way, when you're in the book store you want the best book on Perl/Flash/Solaris? Would you like, every time you were to by a book, to have to spend the evening before reading reviews of all the books available? When someone comes to your house to borrow a book on XXXX, don't you like being able to recommend a book, knowing that they will get value-for-time?
If you find this idea distasteful, then perhaps your being conceited, or ignorant, or something else. You aren't being smart though. When you're in hostpital with cancer, I pray you trust your specialists, rather than spending five years in medical school getting up to speed. Don't waste time on the unimportant stuff.
I'm suprised your not in jail. A failure to appreciate humour could lead to a lot of sticky situations. For example, if I said you are probably a computer nerd who spends too much time with the computer, and not enough around people, leading you to misinterpret humour, then you might miss the dramatic irony of the situations, and hence intrinsic. Instead of being wryly amused, you might get insulted and do something rash. But I know you can recognise humour...
Sorry, next time I'll make sure I insert tags. I forget often I'm so bad at wit that I need to point it out.
You completely missed the point. The point was, whilst the sender-id issue may not solve the problem, it indicates that the market leader is actually prepared to take steps to create a more positive environment. It is not pragmatic action, but rather the gesture which is important.
I thought it was clear.
Not one to get caught up in Microsoft bashing, I salute the company. It may not make the best decisions, but it is making decisions. At some point something is going o have to happen to stem the tide of crap floating round the internet. This may not be the best secision, but maybe it will inspire other people to start making decisions. Once again Microsoft has proven itself to be a market leader, even if in bad ideas.
There is - you'll notice in the picture there is a fan within the case. Everyone knows that Apples run without a fan. I've never seen a windows box without a fan. That means when these macs eventually ship they will remove the fan, windows wont run and the machine will be maclocked.
Incorrect: should of
Still incorrect: should've
correct: should have
Firstly, 'right' is a moral judgement. The word you are looking for is either correct or proper. Incorrect is the opposite. Secondly, the phrase is 'should ought to have' as in, 'you should ought to have told the authorities ma'am.' As well, in correct spelling and technical writing one should never cntract spellings.
I defer in this to Janet Whitcut, senior Research Editor to the Longman Dictionary.