Slashdot Mirror


Amazon's 1,082-volume Classics Collection: $7,989

Carl Bialik from the WSJ writes "Who would buy 828 feet worth of books, for nearly $8,000, that would take 20 years to read at the rate of one title per week? And how much does it cost to ship? The Real Time columnists at the Wall Street Journal Online ponder these and other deep questions raised by Amazon's The Penguin Classics Library Complete Collection, whose sheer jaw-dropping enormity reminds them of e-tailers' wacky offers during the dot-com boom. 'We think the collection is a perfect fit for more than a few software engineers we've known -- smart, self-directed people who are eternally curious, yet abhor wasting time intellectually and can't hide their impatience with the fuzziness of liberal arts,' Jason Fry and Tim Hanrahan write. 'For them, here's a pre-selected, pretty comprehensive list of Western classics, assembled for purchase with a single mouse-click -- and available in a form that eschews frills for portability and ease of use. Think of it as Humanities In a Box. OK, a Very Big Box.'"

605 comments

  1. E-book by billieja2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ill wait for someone to rip it to an ebook i think.

    1. Re:E-book by cuzality · · Score: 5, Informative


      In the meantime, check the item out on Amazon here.

      Wait, it says "Amazon.com Exclusive!!!" You mean I can't pick one up at my local Barnes&Noble?

    2. Re:E-book by nearlygod · · Score: 0, Troll

      How much commision are you hoping to get with that link? Enough for a new graphics card, perhaps?

      --
      The Tools Of Ignorance wanna be a tool?
    3. Re:E-book by wynterx · · Score: 5, Informative

      While waiting, how about having a look at Project Gutenberg, I'm sure you'll find most of them there.

      See also: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=154018&cid=129 19344

    4. Re:E-book by Shads · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Ebooks rule, but they just don't have the *FEEL* of paper books. I like to read ebooks to get a feel for if I would like to own the book, if I enjoy the ebook I buy the real thing. It has probally saved me *almost* enough money to buy that nice little book collection :P There are *alot* of really bad sci-fi and fantasy out there.

      Hmm lets see, at the rate I read (which is about 150-300 pages an hour (depends on difficulity of the material to gain comprehension) or 3-6 pages a minute... figure the average book is ~450 pages long and there are ~1100 books roughly... a reading time of ~4 hours a day (I've maintained that for about 10 years consistantly.) That's about ~500,000 pages... at 600-1200 pages a day it would take me between ~420 and ~835 days to finish reading the entire collection. If you figure the price at $10 per day it's really not that much... pity you can't get it on a payment plan :)

      --
      Shadus
    5. Re:E-book by dhasenan · · Score: 1
      I generally don't find the time to read physical books these days. It's just too hard to multitask that way.

      These are classics, though, so they're probably a bit longer than average. And it includes Finnegan's Wake--that'll be two weeks on its own.

    6. Re:E-book by Shads · · Score: 1

      Bah, that's only 672 pages long. Finish in a day or so. I think I already read that book during college, wasn't to impressed with it.

      --
      Shadus
    7. Re:E-book by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      Will they offer the option of pre-dog-eared so that I can tell people that I read these books, not just own them? Sort of like the "pre-distressed" jeans they sell now.
      Truth is, at a used book store, you could likely, with some searching, get most of this collection in hardbound lightly used volumes for 1-3$ a book. Less if you go to the library sale...
      I am all for e-books and I read all my newspapers online- But like my dad says- until you can read an e-book in the can- count him in for hard copies... (Yes, I know you can take an ebook reader in the can, but who wants to...)
      And I wonder how this Amazon collection comes packaged- Does it show up in a shipping container?

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    8. Re:E-book by 64nDh1 · · Score: 1
      I agree that e-books don't have the same feel as printed and bound books, but you can have the portability of a book with a simple use of the split command and an iPod. Somewhat smaller than a laptop.

      To avoid duplication, previous post here.

    9. Re:E-book by bessel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ooops... I just bought it by accident using Amazon's 1-click.

    10. Re:E-book by Daengbo · · Score: 1, Troll

      At about 225 pages per hour, four hours a day for ten years (that's 3,285,000 pages or perhaps 8.2E8 words), I'd think that you would've seen consistently enough times to know how to spell it. I doubt your boasting.

    11. Re:E-book by cuzality · · Score: 2, Informative

      Go to amazon.com and paste "Penguin Classics Library Complete Collection" into the "Search: Amazon.com" box. Click on the first hit and when the page loads, note the URL.

      For those of you who won't try this, the URL you get is the one that I pasted. I have no affiliation with Amazon.

      BTW, I would be going for iPod accessories, not a graphics card.

    12. Re:E-book by PerlDudeXL · · Score: 1

      A local bookshoop here had a selection of those Penguin Classics for a bargain price for each title.

      I almost bought a few titles, but unfortunately those books had a poor quality. Brownish looking paper and a bad typeface/printing. It would be a pain to scan them without a significant loss of quality :)

    13. Re:E-book by BJH · · Score: 1, Funny

      I bet college wasn't too impressed with you, either.

    14. Re:E-book by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 1

      ah, so your old man is not poo-pooing the ebook reader then? :)

    15. Re:E-book by Febryle · · Score: 0

      I would love for their to be a Netflix-ish "subscription" service to something like this. No way would I ever buy the whole set, but what about sending you one, keeping it as long as you want, and then sending the next when you return it? If it works for "Lemony Snicket" it should work for "The Iliad..."?

    16. Re:E-book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see a lot of words on screen, but all I hear is a trumpet blowing. It sounds like your own. My penis is bigger than yours. My dad would beat your dad in a fight. Yadda yadda yadda....

    17. Re:E-book by Shads · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Spelling and reading have very little to do with each other. I have an excellent vocab in real life but on paper, I tend towards many many many mispellings.

      Shrug, I didn't learn phoenics. I can't sound words out and regardless of how many times I see it, like all humans, especially those with good reading speed, I don't read entire words letter for letter, I recognise words by partials pieces and letter sequences.

      Mind, I've re-read many books several times during that period so I wouldn't forget what was in them. I'm not boasting when I say I read that much in the least, if you go back to the beginning of that time period I prolly read closer to 8 hours a day.

      I think the books with the highest number of reads by me would probally be Ursla Le'Guin's Earthsea books... or perhaps greg Baer's Eon. I'd say on the low side i've read each earthsea book 3-4 times and Eon i've read at least 4... and more I'd guess. So it's not all unique reads

      In highschool I ran what would be considered a "disturbing" number of books to most people... I damn near failed alot of my classes because all I did was set and read... then I'd go home and read.

      I quite literally read every single sci-fi, fantasy, horror, and romance novel the branch library where I live had and at one time was through a pretty healthy chunk of the main's fiction section (bout 1/3rd).

      I just wish I had a photographic memory, then I wouldn't have the need to re-read to keep from forgetting pieces and parts of the books i love. :/

      My "home library" consists of 8 10ftX3ft 5 shelf bookshelves. It's loading to breaking and I have several cabinets besides that fully loaded and boxes stored in the basement of encyclopedias and such.

      Shrug, I love books and I love to read, I'm good at it... it's not that startling. How long a day does the average slashdotter spend on a computer? Bet it's more than 4 hours.

      --
      Shadus
    18. Re:E-book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I know you can take an ebook reader in the can, but who wants to...

      Who wants to take a book either? Some human behavior is just beyond explanation. I don't know what that is, but it is not reading. OTOH most popular books would be most useful as toilet paper. You certainly don't need to write well to get published. I am trying to imagine an author who would not be insulted by the use of his writing in that manner.

    19. Re:E-book by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      I bet college wasn't too impressed with you, either.

      Well said. Not the most accessible of texts, to be sure (to be sure ;-)) but worth putting the effort and time in.

    20. Re:E-book by Shads · · Score: 0

      eh, I did aight.

      Course, cept for english teachers and research papers, the grammer and spelling nazi's aren't very vocal.

      Besides, I was a csci major not an engrish maja ;)

      --
      Shadus
    21. Re:E-book by Shads · · Score: 0

      That would be beyond cool. I love the library but it's such a pain in the ass to go and from especially if you're reading a large volume of books. Shipping them in and out would kick much ass. Bout 5-10 books at a time would be perfect.

      --
      Shadus
    22. Re:E-book by pete_norm · · Score: 1

      Not really a problem, lower in the same page there is this :

      You could save $30 off this item when you get a new Amazon Visa® Card.

      That will make it easier to pay for!

    23. Re:E-book by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      3-6 pages a minute

      I am an intelligent pereson (people tell me this all the time..friends, teachers, boss). I read a lot (i read all day). I read complex books (beowulf in old english, socrates translated to english).

      My reading, on an average - simple book- (think Robert Jordan's Wheel of Time series) is about 1 page every 2-3 minutes. I always hear about people who read 3-6 pages per minute. How does one do this?

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    24. Re:E-book by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Hmm lets see, at the rate I read (which is about 150-300 pages an hour (depends on difficulity of the material to gain comprehension) or 3-6 pages a minute

      What the hell are you reading? "Spot goes to the Park"? Seriously though, I usually spend about a minute or so at least on each page. Do you scan it, or thoroughly read and digest it? What sort of books do you read?

    25. Re:E-book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not sure what the big deal with referral links is anyway. It doesn't cost me any extra to purchase with a non-referral link vs. with a referral link. The difference is in one case, Amazon.com, a company we're supposed to dislike because of software patents, gets a few hundred extra dollars off the sale. In the other case, Amazon.com gets less money and some fellow Slashdotter just like you gets a nice bonus instead. Yet, Slashdot group think favors the first option.

    26. Re:E-book by drsquare · · Score: 1

      They're probably not reading very involved books. Probably pulp fiction or fan-fiction, or children's books. Written by people who aren't that good at writing, so the language is very simplistic, and the dialogue largely non-consequential, so you can get by just by skimming over the main plot points. The plots are often very simple so don't take much time to consider and think about.

      6 pages a minute is a page in ten seconds. There's no way anyone can read that fast unless they're reading junk, or not paying much attention.

    27. Re:E-book by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1
      would love for their to be a Netflix-ish "subscription" service to something like this

      It would be tricky... Unlike DVDs, books are all different shapes / sizes / weights. You'd need the right size mailer with the correct postage etc. Furthermore, a lot of books cost more than DVDs, so that would have to be factored into the business model too.

    28. Re:E-book by STrinity · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem with Project Gutenberg is that it has to rely upon public domain translations, which aren't necessarily the best and rarely include substantial notes.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    29. Re:E-book by sickofthisshit · · Score: 1

      As they say about the classics:

      Their quality is no longer in question; they are no longer being tested; instead, you are.

    30. Re:E-book by tonsofpcs · · Score: 1

      But if you buy it now, you save $5,327.75 (That's 40%!!!!)

    31. Re:E-book by Kevin+DeGraaf · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sysadmins -- who know the difference between egrep, pgrep, and zgrep, but not your and you're.

      What an incredibly stupid thing to say! On what data are you basing your broad conclusion about system administrators? Was there some study establishing a negative correlation between technical aptitude and writing skills published while I was sleeping?

      You might as well say that all blacks can't use "your" and "you're" properly, or that all midgets named Tony have the same deficiency. It's ludicrous and offensive on its face.

      --
      We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked.
    32. Re:E-book by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Amazon affiliate codes look like this:

      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0147 502683/AFFILIATE_CODE

      Plus, the commission is usually about 5% (they've a scale based on how many you sell per quarter), not 15%.

      Searching for the collection and clicking on the search result gets me:

      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0147 502683/qid=1119894473/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl 14/103-4382212-2593459?v=glance&s=books&n=507846
      Clicking the poster's link gets me to:
      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0147 502683/qid=1119877918/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl 14/103-3659793-5116651?v=glance&s=books&n=507846
      Only things that change are the query ID and the session ID.

      In short, $you = "full of shit";

    33. Re:E-book by Shads · · Score: 1

      Wheel of time I hit about 4-5 / hr.

      Honestly, I'm not exactly sure how I do it. I zone out when I read, I don't really think, but I see images of what the book is talking about and hear dialog in my mind (which is a large part of why I read so much fantasy, horror, and sci-fi -- its more entertaining for me than textual documentation which comes across sorta like a monolog) When I read the first few pages I read probally hmm 1-2 pages a minute then gradually the book outline leaves, the pages leave, and I almost quit thinking except about what is happening in the book exactly. When I read I'm *completely* gone. For a fact you have to "shake me" to get me back to reality or wait for me to finish the book, I don't hear anything or see anything going on around me at all... heh, which is why i got in so much trouble reading in school.

      I'm hoping jordon doesn't die before he finishes WOT (he's gettin up there), it's not the best series or story, but I've enjoyed it quite a bit becuase of the depth of the characters and world. It's alot like zelazny's amber books in the way it reads (cept amber wasn't quite so wordy and filled with repeated imagery like the ring falling between N's breasts... over and over and over.) heh.

      What slows me down the most is use of vocabulary that I cant determine the meaning of from the usage and surrounding context or that i've never come across before. With enough of it, I actually "snap out of it" and have to go start looking things up in the dictionary. I've only had a few books do that to me ever and it becomes increasingly less as my vocabulary increases... don't recall it happening in the last few months at all.

      I read alot of everything really, good and bad, classic and modern, probally the thing i've read the least of is modern foreign lit that is translated to english.

      --
      Shadus
    34. Re:E-book by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1

      Why are you posting anonymously, Mr. Bezos?

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    35. Re:E-book by Shads · · Score: 0

      I can read history books and most classical lit and even poetry that fast and still pass tests based on the material at a 95% or better rate including dates, chronological order, etc within a few days of reading the material. Occasionally I transpose names or dates and such and thats generally what causes me to miss an item or two if im tested on the material.

      --
      Shadus
    36. Re:E-book by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Wheel of time I hit about 4-5 / hr.

      What do you mean by "hit about 4-5/hr.". 4-5 pages? Chapters? If you are stating 4-5 books an hour I am sorry, but I must cry bullshit until i see absolute evidence (which in our situation is probably impractical/impossible).

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    37. Re:E-book by MythoBeast · · Score: 1

      I'll just wait for someone to speak them into an audio track so I can listen to them on my iPod.

      --
      Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
    38. Re:E-book by ottothecow · · Score: 1

      I agree, its the same as the people who bitch about the dreamhost referral links. It doesn't cost you anything extra to go through a referral link. They do a great job and I would recommend them to anyone who asked, its just that this way I get either 10% of their bill or $100. Costs nothing extra because dreamhost simply knows that they will be able to keep customers long enough to recover that price.

      --
      Bottles.
    39. Re:E-book by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      If you have that many books, you may want to consider donating the ones you aren't planning on re-reading to the local library. I was in a similar situation before I moved- I dumped a few hundred volumes on the library. Some they kept, some they sold off to buy what they needed (my collection being heavily sci-fi and fantasy biased). I plan on offloading a few hundred more when I move again in a few months.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    40. Re:E-book by Carnildo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I read ebooks on a PDA, so 20-30 pages per minute is quite reasonable. Of course, that also means that books are between 5000 and 15,000 pages long....

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    41. Re:E-book by bn557 · · Score: 1

      apparently sysadmins lack humor as well.

      --
      Humans are slow, innaccurate, and brilliant; computers are fast, acurrate, and dumb; together they are unbeatable
    42. Re:E-book by ars · · Score: 1

      You should stop talking pages per minute, and instead mention words per minute.

      A fast reader reads at 500 words per minute.

      A glance at a nearby book shows about 10 words per line, and 40 lines per page. But this will of course vary by the book.

      --
      -Ariel
    43. Re:E-book by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I was talking about novels, not history books. With history books you can just skim over them and pick up the details. There's no such thing as a test to see how well you've read a novel. Why do people see reading as a chore that has to be rushed rather than something to enjoy?

    44. Re:E-book by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 1

      You're right.
      I was %100 wrong.

      Apologies to O.P.

    45. Re:E-book by pyrrhonist · · Score: 2, Informative
      For those of you who won't try this, the URL you get is the one that I pasted. I have no affiliation with Amazon.

      Yes, this is true. Both are just ordinary Amazon.com links.

      The problem is that many people see the, qid or ref and erroneously jump to the conclusion that it's an affiliate link. Amazon has many different types of URLs, so I can see how this is possible (i.e. look at the URL in the article).

      One thing people can do to nip this in the bud is to crop links after the product code, like this: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0147 502683

      That way, the trolls will get modded down instantly with no confusion from anyone else, because there's no way, that that link has an affiliate in it.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    46. Re:E-book by flosofl · · Score: 1

      This is a great idea. I, too, donate books that I can bear to part with. At one time I had a little over 3,000 books. I had completely filled the "extra" room in my apt with bookshelves. I finally bit the bullet and donated about 2500 of them (of course I'm up to 1500 again...). I didn't just go the library route (they are a small library - they would have been overwhelmed). I also sent some to the armed services, Salvation Army, a couple hundred to some hospices and long-term care facilities in the area.

      Of course, I give some to friends. I'd also entertain used book stores, but I don't have a lot of used bookstores around, nor the time to go to them when they're open. And throwing books away? - too sacreligious for me :)

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    47. Re:E-book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not the original complainer, but I agree with him.

      If that guy's signature had been even *slightly* humorous, you might have a point. "[Random group of people] can't grasp your/you're" is neither witty nor insightful. It's just stupid.

      If somebody said "all Chinese people lack the ability to differentiate between "their", "there", and "they're", the liberals on this site would be all over that like flies on shit...

    48. Re:E-book by uglyduckling · · Score: 1
      From the page:

      You could save $30 off this item when you get a new Amazon Visa® Card.

      Wahoo!!! They even give you a breakdown:

      Regular Price: $7,989.99
      Amazon Visa discount:- $30.00
      Your new price: $7,959.99

      That's quite a saving...

    49. Re:E-book by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Especially when the link wasn't in the summary and the poster was doing us all a service.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    50. Re:E-book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When someone finds a link for a used copy, let me know!
      -os

    51. Re:E-book by avdp · · Score: 1

      I had to look it up on Amazon. "Wheel of Time" is a book by Robert Jordan. Actually a series of books. Book 1 is 832 pages in paper back. If he read it in 4 hours then he read 3.4 pages a minute. If he is not b*shitting alltogether, then it's a Rainman-like (Autistic Savant) skill. Good for him I guess. Personally, I prefer to take my time and enjoy a good book. I've done plenty of fast reading/scanning (although probably not THAT fast) in College. But it was to pass a test or write a paper. I didn't enjoy reading those books, even those that were good books.

    52. Re:E-book by ibbey · · Score: 1

      Why would Bezos encourage you to use an affiliate link? He's the only one who actually stands to lose anything if you by through an affiliate as opposed to direct (well, him & other Amazon shareholders). But the grandparent is correct. Even if the link was an affiliate link, who cares. Especially considering that it's unlikely that many people are going to shell out $8000 for this set.

    53. Re:E-book by linzeal · · Score: 1
      I have over 100 gb of ebooks encompassing over 10k files. My collection of books and papers is almost 10x as great and I have been establishing this privately researched omnibus of mostly scientific and engineering type books for only the past 4 years. Does anyone have a similiar collection growing?

      I am thinking of burying a 200gb hard drive in a time capsule encased in a weather proofed unit with a 10 year lithium battery powered transmitter of some sort as a tactile representation I could work on with contemporary materials so I could better understand the complexities to make information last 1000x longer. The Long Now's rightfully acclaimed clock is the foundation of research into human-created information longevity.

    54. Re:E-book by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      Ill wait for someone to rip it to an ebook i think.

      I know this is a joke but the Gutenberg Project probably does have e-books of everything in this collection.

    55. Re:E-book by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      It's my sig, and it's playful. There are many people on this site who write very well, but an interesting fact is that a portion understands clearly the semantics of several scripting languages but not of fourth-grade English.

      If it truly offends you, however, I'll change it. Just tell me.

    56. Re:E-book by westlake · · Score: 1
      While waiting, how about having a look at Project Gutenberg, I'm sure you'll find most of them there

      Penquin has been publishing modern English translations for fifty years. I have no desire to return to the Victorian editions of Brittanica's Great Books.

    57. Re:E-book by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      Penquin has been publishing modern English translations for fifty years.

      Luckily for you, people have written directly in English for many years and some have become almost as famous as authors that have to be translated into English. You might want to search the Gutenberg archive for such people as Shakespeare, Twain, Defoe and Dickens for an introduction to the world of great literature originally written in English.

    58. Re:E-book by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Wait, it says "Amazon.com Exclusive!!!" You mean I can't pick one up at my local Barnes&Noble?

      From the description, it sounds like it is the Barnes & Noble (minus the building, plus a few thousand boxes).

    59. Re:E-book by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1

      Books can be heavy, and hence expensive to ship as well. I recently mailed my old copy of "From Hell" to someone, and it didn't come out that much cheaper than buying a fresh copy.

      --YLFI

      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    60. Re:E-book by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      BTW, if you like fantasy books give this one a try. It is long, in depth, and just pretty damn good. You really get to know the character. The book series did so well that at one point they released a special paperback edition of the first book for free...

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    61. Re:E-book by jommelli · · Score: 1

      The Penguin editions are only marginally more readable than e-book versions. The paper is soft, the ink smeary, the type borders on illegibility.

      E-books on the other hand, suffer from bad layout, fairly low resolution, poor portability and fragility.

      What's the alternative to someone truly interested in reading these books? If the reader insists on owning them, a peek at the library for what is considered a reliable edition - this does matter, texts are not inviolate, and good second hand bookstore. For those who don't insist on personal possession, the local library is the place to go.

      One example of the quality of edition is the Penguin translation of Don Quixote, which is borderline abyssmal.

      --
      "Against stupidity, the very gods themselves contend in vain." - Schiller. I'm not smart enough to have said it myself.
    62. Re:E-book by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      The problem with Project Gutenberg is that it has to rely upon public domain translations,

      Only for those works that weren't written in English in the first place. Furthermore, a lot of the books in Penguin's collection are public domain translations, like those books translated by Dryden, and many of those can be found in Project Gutenberg.

    63. Re:E-book by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      Honestly, from the list of top 100 authors downloaded from PG over the last 30 days (found at gutenberg.org), the top ten, excluding the nonce "Gutenberg" author, are Doyle, Twain, Shakespeare, Wells, Dickens, Verne, Poe, Burroughs, Austen and Wodehouse, and the only one of those that didn't write in English was Verne. And we have French originals from many of the Verne.

  2. Thank god... by ChrisF79 · · Score: 5, Funny

    for Amazon Prime!

    --
    Finance tutorials and more! Understandfinance
    1. Re:Thank god... by PhilipDC78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I added the massive item to my shopping cart at Amazon and went part way through the checkout, and the listed shipping price was a mere $3.99. So, why do we need Amazon Prime again? Every time I order from Amazon, I make sure my total is over $25 and get free shipping anyway.

    2. Re:Thank god... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In general, I think Amazon's "free shipping" sucks anyway. They always push orders to the back end of their shipping window. Paying for the same speed is much faster because they actually try to ship it in a reasonable amount of time.

      Seriously, I get far better service from Amazon's marketplace sellers than I ever have from Amazon itself!

    3. Re:Thank god... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Well, as someone who has tried and been burned by "free shipping" I find amazon prime a great advantage and a good marketing gimmick. With estimated shipping at 7-10 days, the actual shipping has been anywhere from 6 days to over two months (it went out of stock while I was waiting to have it shipped). Free shipping from Amazon, Buy, etc. is worth exactly what you pay for it, somtimes less.

      Its certainly good for Amazon. I usually will check Amazon's prices before I buy somewhere else, and if they're within a dollar or two (or a couple percent on bigger/more expensive tiems), I'll buy from them to get the 2nd day or overnight service.
      It's good for me, as I tend to buy a lot of books related to my job, usually one or two at a time, as I need them. A' is fantastic for this, especially when I need the book ASAP for reference. Most books I can order by 4pm and get them the next morning for $4. I don't live near a big city with a good technical bookstore, so Amazon is a good option for me.

      I do have a good library close, but I know that I will spend 2hrs to get a technical reference (travel, university parking, lookup, checkout), IF it isn't in storage. That's $200 in billable time. If Amazon has it in stock, I can usually get it ordered in under 10 minutes.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:Thank god... by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Funny

      "So, why do we need Amazon Prime again?"

      Love interest for Optimus?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:Thank god... by slyguy135 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How much was your comment in billable time then?

    6. Re:Thank god... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Free speech (even if no one listens): Priceless

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  3. "Enormity"? by nurhussein · · Score: 3, Funny

    Doesn't "enormity" mean, horrible crime? Perhaps the author meant "enormousness".

    1. Re:"Enormity"? by cdrudge · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you are both right. It can mean both very large and vast, or very wicked.

    2. Re:"Enormity"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think "enormity" has been allowed to drift to include "bigness". This is unfortunate; it would be easy enough to use "immensity" for that.

    3. Re:"Enormity"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      err, no. Language change tends to work the other way around, especially since the meaning of the word in the French it comes from has the sense used here. Frequent use in the sense of wicked/evil acts has created the divergance with enormousness - at least in American English.

      My dialect of Englush has no problem with enormity as a synonym for immensity.

    4. Re:"Enormity"? by windowpain · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly.

      Here's a usage note from Dictionary.com:

      Usage Note: Enormity is frequently used to refer simply to the property of being great in size or extent, but many would prefer that enormousness (or a synonym such as immensity) be used for this general sense and that enormity be limited to situations that demand a negative moral judgment, as in Not until the war ended and journalists were able to enter Cambodia did the world really become aware of the enormity of Pol Pot's oppression. Fifty-nine percent of the Usage Panel rejects the use of enormity as a synonym for immensity in the sentence At that point the engineers sat down to design an entirely new viaduct, apparently undaunted by the enormity of their task. This distinction between enormity and enormousness has not always existed historically, but nowadays many observe it. Writers who ignore the distinction, as in the enormity of the President's election victory or the enormity of her inheritance, may find that their words have cast unintended aspersions or evoked unexpected laughter.

      It's rather depressing that someone from the Wall Street Journal doesn't make the distinction.

      --
      Insert witty sig here.
    5. Re:"Enormity"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      enormity = enormousness + bad stuff

    6. Re:"Enormity"? by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Doesn't "enormity" mean, horrible crime? Perhaps the author meant "enormousness".

      Obviously the author was too impatient with the fuzziness of liberal arts.

      This sentence from the posting:


      yet abhor wasting time intellectually and can't hide their impatience with the fuzziness of liberal arts,

      was written by an idiot.

  4. Libraries by Ligur · · Score: 3, Funny

    Seems like a convenient way to get that I'm-too-rich-for-the-public-library mansion-library started for the rich and famous.

    --
    Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.
    1. Re:Libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You jest, but, I kid you not, our CEO has a habit of buying out small libraries and bookstores in search of rare books.

    2. Re:Libraries by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      I don't think a person in a mansion is going to want to fill their library with paper back books.

    3. Re:Libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could use them as toilet paper.

    4. Re:Libraries by SharkJumper · · Score: 1

      Not if they're Penguin. Penguin is generally known for economy. I always appreciated my professors who ordered Penguin books for their courses. There were some cases where I could buy the new book from the campus bookstore for under a dollar. There were a couple of lit classes where I got away very cheap. Very good news after $100+ per book engineering courses.

      SharkJumper

    5. Re:Libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Seems like a convenient way to get that I'm-too-rich-for-the-public-library mansion-library started for the rich and famous.

      Nah, they're paperbacks.

    6. Re:Libraries by value_added · · Score: 2, Funny

      True, but think of the time the rest of America will save by not having to watch Oprah decide their next selection.

    7. Re:Libraries by wynterx · · Score: 1

      From TFA in response to this very thought: "But that didn't seem right: These are paperbacks, which (thankfully) lack snob appeal to people who think of books as things to be seen instead of read."

    8. Re:Libraries by jpkunst · · Score: 1

      I don't think a person in a mansion is going to want to fill their library with paper back books.

      Not that I live in a mansion (I wish) but I almost always prefer paperbacks to hardcovers. I find them more comfortable to hold and read and they take up less shelf space. The fact that they also cost less is an added bonus.

      JP

    9. Re:Libraries by bluGill · · Score: 1

      For a first reading I agree. However if the book is really good I want a hardcover to replace the paperback.

      When I know the book is good I'm more willing to take care of it. I know I want to read it again. Unfortunately they don't publish in paperback until after the hardcover is out of print, so I can't get hardcovers when I want them.

    10. Re:Libraries by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Sure they will. Rich people don't become rich by spending money- they get rich by saving money. Unless you're going to read a book so much you'll wear it out, buy the paperback and save 15-20 bucks.

      Personally, I only buy hardcover when its a favorite author and I don't want to wait for a paperback. Of course, I have a 200-300 dollar a month book habit, and buying hardcover would put it over 1K.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  5. So how many... by cdrudge · · Score: 1, Informative

    So how many have you read on the list?

    Complete list here.

    1. Re:So how many... by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Approximately 15%. Though I am counting multiple versions to be the same.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    2. Re:So how many... by arivanov · · Score: 1

      40% or so...

      Funny bit is that this is not the first time an offer like this has been around. The Russians had a similar set published in the 1980-es. 200 volumes. It was not bad, though personally I found the selection slightly biased. And it took one wall worth of library space in an average size apartment.

      This one looks considerably better and clearly less biased. Most french classics are there. So are most of what the westerners consider for Russian classics.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    3. Re:So how many... by scovetta · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Aeneid by Virgil
      The Aeneid by Virgil
      The Aeneid by Virgil


      It's a good thing they've got three copies of the Aeneid by Virgil. I'd hate to have only read two of them and missed out on what happens in the third.

      Looks kind of like the selections of ready-made web templates you get for $30.00. 250,000 web-sites my foot.

      --
      Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
    4. Re:So how many... by scovetta · · Score: 4, Informative

      You fool! A review clearly indicates:

      A small caution is that they do have not really duplicates but different versions or translations of some works as "The Iliad" by Homer has four different books:
      ISBN: 0140445927
      ISBN: 0140275363
      ISBN: 0140444440
      ISBN: 0140447946

      --
      Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
    5. Re:So how many... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm offended. It includes "The Communist Manifesto" but not "Mein Kampf".

    6. Re:So how many... by QMO · · Score: 1

      First run through I count 69, I think.

      Some of the books in the list are surprises to me.
      I expected Alice in wonderland, but didn't expect Five Children and It.

      It's hard to tell sometimes whether what I've read equates with one of the books on the list. For example, it is not clear whether Les Miserables and Notre Dame of Paris are abridged or not? (I read the unabridged of both of those.)

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    7. Re:So how many... by Sique · · Score: 1

      Differently than for the Communist Manifesto the copyright for Mein Kampf hasn't expired yet. For the original german version the copyright is with the Free State of Bavaria, and they don't license it.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    8. Re:So how many... by dcam · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell, 53. I am not including plays I have seen, only plays I have read, or books I have started by not finished.

      I believe that may parents would have somewhere between a quarter and half the books on that list. I certainly recognise a great number of them.

      --
      meh
    9. Re:So how many... by cmpalmer · · Score: 1

      117, although I may have included a few duplicates. I also counted a few collections where I have not read every story in the collection, but have read more than two -- so I'll fudge and say about 100.

      --
      -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
    10. Re:So how many... by VoidEngineer · · Score: 1

      :-/

      i counted 153.
      gads. only 15%
      i feel like i should get cracking and start reading more of them.

      keeping things in perspective, i suppose that 153 isn't too shabby.

    11. Re:So how many... by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      So... how do book stores get new copies? I know I've seen Mein Kampf at B&N before.

      Seriously, I'm curious; how does that work?

    12. Re:So how many... by Sique · · Score: 1

      a) German original or an english translation?
      b) For the U.S. there may be a kind of eternal license, insofar as the U.S. as winner of the WW II had access to all german ressources.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    13. Re:So how many... by Fallingcow · · Score: 2, Informative

      Aha, Wikipedia to the rescue!

      "Today, the copyright of all editions of Mein Kampf except the English and the Dutch (Dutch government seized that in the same way) is owned by the state of Bavaria. The copyright will end on December 31, 2015."

      "The government of Bavaria, in agreement with the federal government of Germany, does not allow any copying or printing of the book in Germany, and opposes it also in other countries but with less success. Owning and buying the book is legal. Trading in old copies is legal as well, unless it is done in such a fashion as to promote hatred or war, which is generally illegal. Most German libraries carry heavily commented and excerpted versions of Mein Kampf."

    14. Re:So how many... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Censorship via copyright is still censorship.

    15. Re:So how many... by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      59. And no desire to increase that. I really found most of the 59 boring. The authors tend to be overly verbose and wa too cocky and sure of their intelligence.

      Really, who reads these things? Unless you're a professor of ancient Rome, you're not going to read Julius Ceaser's book on the Gaulic campaigns anytime soon. Its mainly a list of books you can use to impress snobs.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  6. Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Angry+Toad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder how long it will take for someone to put together a quick script to take the book list and put the same collection out of Gutenberg?

    1. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by joib · · Score: 1

      Your boss might be less than happy when you start printing it all, though. ;-)

    2. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Some of them are too recent to be in the public domain. Not many, but you couldn't get the complete collection.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    3. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um as an English Major I must warn you Gutenberg sucks.

      It has massive massive editing errors and it really needs a certain level of accountability, not to mention the messages at the beginnning make it really sucky to read on a palm pilot.

      They used some bizzare formatting system which breaks it on most pocket devices, they decided not to use rtf or anything else with support for graphics (Corectly assuming that those were usually patented but still) the list just goes on and on.

      It could have been an excellent service but it falls just short.

      It's catalogue falls far short.

    4. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 5, Informative

      Then go to Manybooks.net and pick a different format. They have the Gutenberg collection, but in a wide variety of formats. I personally use the iSolo format for my palm pilot (a T3 with the wide screen which means I get a full page of book text per screen), and I rarely have formatting issues. In fact, books are a pleasure to read.

    5. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by wynterx · · Score: 5, Informative

      Please....

      Gutenberg texts are formatted the way they are for lots of quite good reasons, which you have even figured out for yourself...

      As for breaking pocket devices, what are you doing with them. They are text files!!

      To make it look adequate on a Palm:
      1. Download etext
      2. Run through gut.pl (http://www.ee.ryerson.ca:8080/~elf/gut/) - followed by deleting the legal stuff if you like
      3. Convert to Plucker / iSilo or whatever you like
      4. Read

      I have read some great stuff this way and have not had trouble breaking my palm.

      Um BTW, as an English Major, and if you would like to pass, try leaving the apostrophe out of "it's" (... I was hoping to get modded karma-whore-informative but am now assuming that grammar-nazi-troll is more likely!)

    6. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by eht · · Score: 1

      As an English Major you should know it is its not it's when you said "It's catalogue falls far short."

      That said I agree with you that Gutenberg has many failings.

    7. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      I wonder how long it will take for someone to put together a quick script to take the book list and put the same collection out of Gutenberg?

      Much, much longer than paying $8k for the books.

      Think about all the time in printing, binding and putting the books on the shelves after downloading all of the text.

    8. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 4, Funny
      Um as an English Major I...


      Ok, you intelligent, eh?

      It's catalogue falls far short.


      Lets expand that, ahall we... It's = It is (contracted form)

      "It is catalog falls far short."

      Sounds like "All your base" speech. Yeah.. Engrish Mager.
      --
    9. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by dcam · · Score: 1

      To make it look adequate on a Palm:
      1. Download etext
      2. Run through gut.pl (http://www.ee.ryerson.ca:8080/~elf/gut/) - followed by deleting the legal stuff if you like
      3. Convert to Plucker / iSilo or whatever you like
      4. Read


      You missed step 3.1:
      3.1 Throw away your palm and read them one something that has a decent sized screen. I have a Tungesten E, and the screen is just not big enough to actually read anything of any size. Maybe it is because I am quite a fast reader, but still.

      --
      meh
    10. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Fizzleboink · · Score: 0

      I believe you use "it's" in a possesive form as well.

      Ex: "The cat licked it's fur".

      So I don't think the English major was too far off.

    11. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by wynterx · · Score: 1

      Each to their own I suppose.

      I have a Zire 31 (smaller screen than the T-E) and have no problems. Upgraded last year from M125 which has the same sized screen but adding the colour screen with decent lighting helped, but I still read lots on the old one...

      I can read on the palm for hours, but maybe that's just me.

    12. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by MrHanky · · Score: 0, Troll

      You're wrong.

    13. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by daenris · · Score: 1

      No, you don't.

      For most other possessives, you're right. However, "its" is possessive, "it's" is a contraction for "it is."

      And it's possessive, not "possesive."

    14. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Um as an English Major I must warn you Gutenberg sucks.

      As someone with a degree in English, and about 20 year of writing experience, I disagree.

    15. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said English "major," for all we know he's flunked all his classes and won't be heading back.

      I have met very few English majors that could write for a damn anyway.

    16. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Pemdas · · Score: 4, Funny

      As a Comp Sci major, I must warn you that your post sucks. It has massive massive editing errors (bizzare? Corectly? it's?). It could have been an excellent post, but it falls quite short. Its spelling and prose falls far short.

    17. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'I believe you use "it's" in a possesive form as well.

      Ex: "The cat licked it's fur".'

      I hope you're not a college graduate.

    18. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Ex: "The cat licked it's fur".

      I'm afraid your mistaken. No worries; that error is all to easy to make.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    19. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by mlk · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not too long.

      This really sucks, primarly as I could not be bothered to throw together a html parser, so select all in Firefox on the Collection by Title page, and paste it into a text file called test.txt
      for i in `grep by test.txt | sed "s/\ *\* \(.*\) by \(.*\)/http:\/\/www.gutenberg.org\/catalog\/world\ /results?title=\1\&author=\2/g" | sed "s\ \%20\g"` ; do wget -r -I"/etext/,/dirs/" $i; done
      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    20. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by troon · · Score: 3, Funny

      As an English major, I must warn you that your English skills suck:

      • Um as an: missing comma;
      • It has massive massive editing errors: missing comma;
      • beginnning: typo;
      • bizzare: mis-spelling;
      • Corectly: typo, I hope;
      • graphics (Corectly ... but still) the list: missing punctuation;
      • It's catalogue falls far short: possessive pronouns don't take an apostrophe.

      Also, from where are you? I find your use of the (US) term "English major" surprising juxtaposed with your (UK) spelling of the word "catalogue".

      --
      Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
    21. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As is the your != 'you are' error (:

    22. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by emilng · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm afraid your mistaken. No worries; that error is all to easy to make.

      I'm afraid you're mistaken too. ;)

    23. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      IMHO, the screen on a Palm is quite large enough to read an ebook. I ran through dozens of books on the bus in College. I found the palm screen to be very easy on the eyes and my Palm IIIe was easier to carry around than a book (plus it did so much more).

      As long as the screen isn't too puny (see: most cellphones), and your device has a convienent "page down" key (see: all palms) reading on the screen is quite nice. If you're coming home at night you can even pop on the backlight, although this mode is a bit harder on the eyes.

      I love the elegant simplicity of Weasel reader and it's semi-auto chapter marking text converter too.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    24. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fail it. You caught the first error, but didn't catch the error after the semicolon.

    25. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      I wrote yBook to display Gutenberg texts with proper paragraph formatting. You can read your ebooks in it, or you can load them and save them back out with the new 'unformatted formatting' for use on a PDA.

      It's freeware, too: yBook home page (Windows only, no nags, adware, crapware, whateverware)

      It also has a downloader for the entire Gutenberg catalogue.

    26. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, you must be _way_ smarter, I can't even find the defintion for 'ahall!' You've lost me! ):

      _Let's_ rejoice in our understanding of the English language!

    27. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by g0dsp33d · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but you probably could get them there by the time you read all the others.

      --
      lol: You see no door there!
    28. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Posting AC because I am no grammar nazi, but the gp's attitude bugs me. The parent makes good points, but let me supplement them through a quick analysis of one paragraph:
      They used some bizzare formatting system which breaks it on most pocket devices, they decided not to use rtf or anything else with support for graphics (Corectly assuming that those were usually patented but still) the list just goes on and on.
      Here we see a danglingly modifier ("Corectly assuming"), an unclear pronoun ("it" - to what does that refer?), a run-on sentence (the whole quotation), oddly capitalisation 'Corectly' (sic), and, a personal favourite of mine, using 'which' for 'that'.

      Now, whereas I agree that a careful user can in fact user 'which' for 'that', our English major does not seem to have demonstrated a facility with the language that would allow us to treat him seriously.

    29. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

      It has massive massive editing errors: missing comma.

      No comma is needed in or after that phrase.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    30. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you have two or more adjectives you use commas to separate them.

      It is a ball.
      It is a big ball.
      It is a big, red ball.
      It is a big, red, round, time-travelling ball.

    31. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Um as an English Major I must warn you Gutenberg sucks.

      Um as an English major, shouldn't you have better written English skills than you're currently exhibiting?

      The copyeditor in me wants to mark up your comment with a red pencil.

    32. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

      Ah, the pitfalls of being an anal typo bitch always come back to haunt you :D

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
    33. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by jonom · · Score: 1

      As an english major, you should be happy there is a resource that offers as many public domain works as they can, for FREE, in plain text format that can be used on any device.

    34. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Mike1024 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Lets expand that, ahall we... It's = It is (contracted form)

      So, does "The dog's ball" expand to "The dog is ball"?

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    35. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Spunk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also, from where are you? I find your use of the (US) term "English major" surprising juxtaposed with your (UK) spelling of the word "catalogue".

      He's from England, and a Major in the British Army. An English Major.

    36. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by kayumi · · Score: 0

      As an English major pain in the butt I must say
      its nice 2 c that their're still some people who defend hour grate language.

    37. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Peyna · · Score: 2, Informative

      Possessive pronouns do not use apostrophes.

      "It" is a pronoun, the possessive of "it" is a new word: "its." The confusion exists because of the contraction "it's" which is simply "it is" shortened through the use of an apostrophe.

      Other examples:

      He - His
      She - Hers
      You - Yours
      Me - Mine
      It - Its

      You wouldn't say "The cat licked he's fur." or "I liked you's fur."

      The same goes for "it."

      --
      What?
    38. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by boarder · · Score: 1

      I believe you are an idiot.

      One doesn't use "it's" in a possessive form... ever. It's one of the largest mistakes in the English language. To make "it" possessive, one just adds an "s."

      "The dog licked its balls."

      Also, possessive has a fourth "s" in it.

      I hope YOU aren't a college graduate.

      --
      IANAL, but I play one on /.
    39. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Editing errors? Hate to break it to you, but those books were for the most part edited at least a century ago. I think what you are trying to say is that there are transcription errors.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    40. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by evilpenguin · · Score: 1

      And the very model of a modern Major General.

      Couldn't resist...

    41. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by boarder · · Score: 1

      No.

      Only possessive prononouns use an "s" with no apostraphe (as far as I know). His, hers, its, ours are all examples of possessive words with no apostraphe. English is a stupid language, but the original poster mentioned he was studying it as a major; so he should be aware of such oddities.

      --
      IANAL, but I play one on /.
    42. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by rekleov · · Score: 1

      Allow a non-English major to point out that your spelling and use of punctuation both need work.

      Have a nice day.

    43. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      "Um BTW, as an English Major, and if you would like to pass, try leaving the apostrophe out of 'it's'."

      And, as an English degree holder, I can tell you that all of the 8th grade grammar and spelling rules that Slashdotters assume is INTEGRAL to the study of the English language aren't even mentioned throughout the program. Stuff like punctuation, spelling, etc. falls at the same level as arithmetic does in a math program. It needs to be there, but is offloaded to the editing process like multiplication is to a calculator. In this and countless other public forum postings, I have NO editing process. I do the same for personal emails and casual business correspondance. However, when the level of discourse and importance of the missive rises, my editing process kicks in and multiple rounds of editing are involved. At its most stringent (i.e. the papers handed in during the course of my studies in the English program or for publication), my process usually involves 3-4 times as much time spent editing and rewriting as it does initial writing. It also often involves days or weeks away from the text to gain distance and objectivity. In other words, when the assumption for time spent on a Slashdot post rises above 2 minutes to 2 hours, I'll start worrying about people's personal punctuation and grammar demons (mine happens to be WAY too many parentheticals and the spelling of at least 10-20 words that I spell incorrectly EVERY time I type them).

      Additionally, if you were to study English as a complete discipline and look into its history, you'd find that many of the things that are held so dearly as rules have really only been so for 150 years or so. Most of them were written down by the strict grammarians of the 19th century, during a rather short period where they were desperately trying to impose order on a decidedly disorderly language. Due to its mongrel heritage, English and its users have long resisted the rigid formality that many other languages impose (i.e. French). Its ability to integrate or invent entire vocabularies as necessary, a gigantic vocabulary and a grammatic structure that allows the speaker to often be understood despite large deviations from standards are simultaneously its greatest assets and liabilities.

      Besides, if you're going to start criticizing punctuation, your criticism should probably contain fewer examples of violating those errors than the document you criticize.

    44. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a neat story. However, some of us know how to get it right the first time. I'm sorry that your degree hasn't afforded you the same ability, but that's hardly our fault.

    45. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by schmink182 · · Score: 1

      Likewise.
      The first two lines of the parent's post were in quotes, as they were taken directly from its parent's post. He was criticizing the same thing you were, but he was correcting the right person.

    46. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by wynterx · · Score: 1

      Take it easy....

      Point taken that you can get punctuation wrong and still pass English.

      Unfortunately, it seems to me that as an English degree holder you seem somewhat defensive in the face of grammar nazis such as myself.

      Try reading my post again. It was mostly about Project Gutenberg texts and their benefits or lack thereof. I made a very small remark about the "terror of the unwanted apostrophe" at the end of my post and even made a joke about the fact that I did include this remark.

      It was a joke. Not even a funny one, but certainly not one that warranted the diatribe above. Perhaps you should have replied to one of the other grammar nazis who didn't find anything worthwhile to say about the subject at hand, but only about the form in which it was presented. ... In an attempt to not get modded offtopic: I would be interested to see whether any of these older versions of the books that we are actually supposed to be talking about do have the old, freestyle type grammar of when they were written or whether they have been edited, revised, translated (!) to pass the slashdot-grammar-nazi test!

    47. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Aging_Newbie · · Score: 1

      MakeDocW will neatly convert ascii to .pdb format for Palm Pilot book readers. Then CSpotRun will let you read the document with a freeware low overhead reader. I use my Palm extensively as a reader because it is light, easy to carry, and has lots of books on it at any given time.

      I have found few defects in Gutenberg documents, so I am not sure what you are finding. Of course, since they are ascii, portable to all formats, and free to all, they can't be in a temporarily useful proprietary format with pictures, etc. But, IMHO the text is what most people want anyway.

    48. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by jacobito · · Score: 1

      As an English major, I have to say that I wish I had known about Project Gutenberg when I was in college, and I wish that all books were available in electronic format. Think about it this way. While a novel or any other large work of literature is best read in book form, and I can't imagine that changing just yet, having an electronic plaintext copy of the book alongside the physical book would be an enormous boon to students and scholars. It's easier to quote from an electronic text. It's easier to search an electronic text. Hell, with a little work, you could build a concordance of your text, and then the possibilities really begin. Oh, I wish I had known about Project Gutenberg sooner.

      I'm going to skip over your embarrassingly poor writing and spelling. As an English major, I know that English in college bears little resemblance to English in grammar school, and, just as art history majors aren't necessarily all talented artists, English majors have no special claim to mastery over either writing or spelling.

    49. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      I'm not really being personally defensive. However, the grammar nazi's do bother me, particularly as the criticisms usually directly attack the writer's literacy and education and about 80% of the time violate 1 or more rules themselves. Yours was simply the first that came up as I was reading, so I responded. You consider my response unnecessary and overly critical, yet devoting nearly a third of your original post to the 3 black pixels between the "t" and the "s" of the "it's" is even more so, an irony that most grammar nazis ignore.

      In response to your on-topic question, yes, much of this stuff has been revised and standardized into the volumes typically published. For instance Shakespeare is known to have used several different spellings of his own name, not being particularly consistent. That carried over into some of the manuscripts for the text itself. While that means it mostly affected the initial writing down, it was there. Chaucer (the first major writer of post English/French blending) had different spellings for quite a few different words.

      It wasn't until the era where the first English dictionaries were compiled that the concept of a "right" way to spell something really came into popularity.

    50. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of Americans use the spelling 'catalogue', especially when referring to noncomputer catalogues. See, for examples, http://www.google.com./search?q=catalogue+site%3A. us.

    51. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but I learnt this when I was six years old. Why is this being taught on Slashdot, a forum populated largely by native English-speaking intelligent adults?

    52. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Or a Canuck...

      Oi, we have English majors, and using British spellings.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    53. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Hobobo · · Score: 1

      To make it look adequate on a Palm:
      1. Download etext
      2. Run through gut.pl (http://www.ee.ryerson.ca:8080/~elf/gut/ [ryerson.ca]) - followed by deleting the legal stuff if you like
      3. Convert to Plucker / iSilo or whatever you like
      4. Read


      Haha! I laughed out loud when I read this--I mean, what was the original poster thinking; it's so simple!

    54. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, can tell you're an English degree holder. Lots of words and nary a point made. In fact, even a contradiction in there.

      Look this word up: succint.

    55. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Non-linear+Thinker · · Score: 1

      Neither could I.......

      I am the very model of a modern Major-General,
      I've information vegetable, animal, and mineral,
      I know the kings of England, and I quote the fights historical
      From Marathon to Waterloo, in order categorical;
      I'm very well acquainted, too, with matters mathematical,
      I understand equations, both the simple and quadratical,
      About binomial theorem I'm teeming with a lot o' news -
      With many cheerful facts about the square of the hypotenuse
      I'm very good at integral and differential calculus;
      I know the scientific names of beings animalculous:
      In short, in matters vegetable, animal, and mineral,
      I am the very model of a modern Major-General.
      I know our mythic history, King Arthur's and Sir Caradoc's;
      I answer hard acrostics, I've a pretty taste for paradox,
      I quote in elegiacs all the crimes of Heliogabalus,
      In conics I can floor peculiarities parabolous;
      I can tell undoubted Raphaels from Gerard Dows and Zoffanies,
      I know the croaking chorus from the Frogs of Aristophanes!
      Then I can hum a fugue of which I've heard the music's din afore,
      And whistle all the airs from that infernal nonsense Pinafore
      Then I can write a washing bill in Babylonic cuneiform,
      And tell you every detail of Caractacus's uniform:
      In short, in matters vegetable, animal, and mineral,
      I am the very model of a modern Major-General.
      In fact, when I know what is meant by "mamelon" and "ravelin",
      When I can tell at sight a Mauser rifle from a javelin,
      When such affairs as sorties and surprises I'm more wary at,
      And when I know precisely what is meant by "commissariat",
      When I have learnt what progress has been made in modern gunnery,
      When I know more of tactics than a novice in a nunnery;
      In short, when I've a smattering of elemental strategy,
      You'll say a better Major-General has never sat a gee.
      For my military knowledge, though I'm plucky and adventury,
      Has only been brought down to the beginning of the century;
      But still, in matters vegetable, animal, and mineral,
      I am the very model of a modern Major-General....

    56. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Why is this being taught on Slashdot, a forum populated largely by native English-speaking intelligent adults?

      Slashdot might be populated largely by native English-speakers; but I have some doubt about whether they are intelligent or adults.

      --
      What?
    57. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if Congress doesn't stop extending copyright! :)

    58. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      A lot of people with degrees in English Lit tend to use Brit spellings - it's a side effect of our having read so many books published in Brit orthography.

    59. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not very intelligent, but at a very young age I knew the difference between its and it's, and you're and your. Perhaps that's what happens when people spend too much time watching TV and playing on the computer rather than learning literary skills properly.

    60. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd think as an English major you would catch the common "its/it's" mistake...

      Mod me +5 Grammar Nazi.

    61. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by boarder · · Score: 1

      Whoops, I didn't see the single quotes in his post (that's why I typically quote with double quotes or italics instead of single). I also didn't see the original, incorrect post.

      --
      IANAL, but I play one on /.
    62. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an English major and you wrote "It's catalogue falls far short"? Damn dude, you fail it.

    63. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by wgadmin · · Score: 1

      Um, I'm an English Major, too. However, at my school, they taught us how to use 'its' correctly.

    64. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      However, the grammar nazi's do bother me [...]

      *gasp*

      Three cheers for pedantry! (Yes, this is more of a joke on me than on the parent poster.)

    65. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      I've got a Zire 21 (black and white screen, no backlight), and it's quite good for ebooks. The lack of a backlight means that it gets 12-18 hours of reading off a single charge, and the black-and-white screen looks crisper than a color display. I've got an LED headlamp I use if I need extra lighting.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    66. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by grunthos · · Score: 1
      that error is all to easy to make.

      That error is all too easy to make, too.

      --

      My son's 5th grade teacher actually assigned them "write a limerick about a planet". I'm not kidding.
    67. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      I'm afraid your mistaken. No worries; that error is all to easy to make.

      For the grammar Nazis who are smugly correcting the above remark, the errors were deliberately introduced for comedic effect.

      For those who failed to note both errors, please turn in your cards at the door; your G.N. status has been revoked.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    68. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by monkease · · Score: 1

      As an English Graduate Student, I feel compelled to mark-up your comment. My corrections are in brackets.


      Um
      [,] as an English Major[,] I must warn you [that the] Gutenberg [project] sucks.

      It has massive
      [,] massive editing errors[,] and it really needs a certain level of accountability, not to mention the messages at the beginnning make it really sucky [(w/c)] to read on a palm pilot. [(This is a run-on sentence. Please revise.)]

      They used some bizzare formatting system which breaks it
      [(This "it" is very ambiguously placed, as the subject of the sentence is "They". Please revise.)] on most pocket devices, they decided not to use rtf or anything else with support for graphics (Corectly assuming that those were usually patented but still) the list just goes on and on.[(I'm not even going to start on the end of this "sentence". You're missing, at least, a couple periods and a few commas.)]

      It could have been an excellent service but it falls just short.

      It's
      [(This is a contraction of "it is"; you mean to use the possessive, "its".)] catalogue falls far short.


      This is what happens, Deliveranc3, when you wait until the last minute to start your Slashdot comments...

    69. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      And, as an English degree holder, I can tell you that all of the 8th grade grammar and spelling rules that Slashdotters assume is INTEGRAL to the study of the English language aren't even mentioned throughout the program.

      But if you're going to cop an attitude, you better get it right. Someone who brags about being a math major shouldn't be making a number of basic arithmetic mistakes in their post. Anyway, it's not that hard to get it right the first time; that post struck me as one of the less grammatical of those I've seen on Slashdot.

      you'd find that many of the things that are held so dearly as rules have really only been so for 150 years or so.

      So? It's a lot easier to read modern standard English than 17th century English, because there's a standard spelling and punctuation scheme.

    70. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by txviking · · Score: 1

      Why do you have to warn someone about Gutenberg due to being an English Major?

      With this attitude you shouldn't read any old books, in fact I would recommend not to read a lot of today's new papers that are very poorly edited.

      The books on Gutenberg are not edited, but preserved as close as possible to their original content. I find it very interesting and educating to read those books despite any mistakes or odd spellings authors and printers may have done. I find often a lot more wisdom in those "badly edited" books than in the very shallow books you find today (btw. often not better edited due to fast turn-arounds).

      But then ... that are only my 2 cents worth...

      Project Gutenberg

      Distributed Proofreaders

      Distributed Proofreaders Europe

    71. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Mike1024 · · Score: 1

      If you ask me, 'it' should behave like a pointer to the last accessed* variable. Last mentioned thing 'bob' would mean 'it's' expands to 'bob's'.

      That would be sensible.

      With english being a 'living language' and all, I ignore the "correct" way of doing it and always do it my way. Well, that and I never think to do it the right way in spite of being told many times.

      Cheers,

      Michael

      *I suspect this word should have less letters, but I can't decide which ones to remove...

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    72. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1
      Also, from where are you? I find your use of the (US) term "English major" surprising juxtaposed with your (UK) spelling of the word "catalogue".

      "Catalog" is a common neologism, but "catalogue" is correct American English, as are "analogue" and "dialogue". "Analog" and "dialog" are actually incorrect in most contexts, even in the U.S.

      Incidentally, there's nothing particularly improper about "Where are you from?" The stilted constructions resulting from the absurd and artificial rule that sentences may not end with prepositions are far worse than the disease they purport to cure. This "disease" is non-conformity with Latin grammar, which is something inherent to Germanic languages and for which correction is not necessarily to be desired. Winston Churchill once told an advisor who edited one of his speeches to eliminate an ultimate preposition, "This is just the kind of thing up with which I will not put!"

      The rule not to split infinitives is of similar provenance. You can't split infinitives at all in Latin even if you wanted to: it's unitary form there. Not so in English, where splitting them is perfectly natural. "Boldly to go where no man has gone before!" lacks a bit of rhetorical force, doesn't it?

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    73. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by bbc · · Score: 1

      "Um as an English Major I must warn you Gutenberg sucks."

      When will they teach you about logical fallacies?

      "It has massive massive editing errors"

      For those who wish to do more than whine about the errors in Project Gutenberg etexts, please report errors you come across and help improve PG's texts. You will find instructions at http://www.gutenberg.org/faq/ under R.26 - R.28.

    74. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's "apostrophe".

    75. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Well, I would'nt have jumped on him (deliveranc3) nearly has hard, but he proclaimed his fact as being an "English Major".

      Instead, he proceeds to flame Project Gutenberg and how "sucky" their proofreading is. For a free project, Distributed Proofreaders is perfectly good enough for a free archive of literary works... but not for "Mr. English Major" (bah).

      And to top off his blasting of a free project, he makes the laughable mistake of its and it's . This same mistake was on a shirt that the English dept made in my local high school. The dept tried blaming the t-shirt printer for bungling the silk screen, but after reading the originals, the dept just shut up... (It was the school joke for that year)

      --
    76. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by wynterx · · Score: 1

      Sarcasm aside, it is possible to simply cut and paste into memos or even read through a true text reader/editor on the palm.

      But as the original poster said - it looks horrible. On a palm with only a small width screen, you get line wrapping plus the hard carriage returns in the text. This is not so bad if you are reading in a desktop text editor or word processor but is bad on the palm.

      So yes, you do need to run through some hoops (unless, like another poster mentioned you go to Pluckerbooks or Manybooks or somewhere that has already done the work for the book you want), but my contention is that it is worth it!

    77. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Synbiosis · · Score: 1

      "Look this word up: succint."

      You mean succinct, right? The irony in this thread is sickening. =P

    78. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

      For Gods sake, why? Can't you just download the next one as you crossed out the previous as 'Read' on the list?

      I hope the majority of those who read that post has more sense than you. Low UID and all. Sheez, abusing the bandwidth and resources of a praiseworthy FREE project like that... I bet you a beer that you won't look at even 1% of those at all.

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
    79. Re:Quick Script + Gutenberg? by mlk · · Score: 1

      Personally, I would not (and have not) ran the script, I'd buy the books, but one at a time (most of the titles would be about £1 at the local bargain book store).
      I was answering what I took as a request/challenge. Alas I don't get to do much sh/sed in my current job, so look out for times I can fiddle with it.

      As to my UID, I think of my UID as high, and as to a UID/sense relationship, /. has declined, I might as well go down with it.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  7. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can they call it a classic collection with no Neuromancer, HTGTG, actually any Sci-Fi?

    1. Re:What? by Silicon+Jedi · · Score: 1

      Because Penguin mostly prints stuff that is out of copyright.

    2. Re:What? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Well, there are three in there by Lovecraft - it's a start. I think both of the ones you cite are too recent to be declared classics - I don't think there's anything on the list newer than late 60s.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    3. Re:What? by SharkJumper · · Score: 0

      Poe
      Burroughs
      Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
      Bram Stoker
      Lovecraft
      OK. Some of them would be fantasy or horror, nowadays, but c'mon, son, back to your roots. Back to your roots.

      SharkJumper

    4. Re:What? by slim · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because Penguin mostly prints stuff that is out of copyright.

      The Penguin Classics imprint largely consists of out of copyright works, but Penguin Books publishes a lot of contemporary literature.

      Back in the day, the had Penguin for fiction, Pelican for non-fiction and Puffin for "younger readers". I get the impression those brands have been phased out, which is a shame because I thought it was rather clever, and the logos were nice.

      Penguin is probably most famous for fighting and winning the Lady Chatterly's Lover censorship case.

    5. Re:What? by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 1

      yep, I was a member of the 'Puffin' club for kids, was not bad

    6. Re:What? by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Note, too, that while the original works are not in copyright for many of the Penguin classics, the translations ARE. And if you've ever seen a 19th century translation, you'll understand why someone would prefer the Penguin to the Gutenberg.

  8. The math is wrong by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Insightful
    1 title per week for 20 years is just over 1,000 titles - there is NO way that this comprises 828 feet of shelf space.

    My personal library is about the same size, including lots of thick computer manuals, and it takes up less than half that.

    They probably dropped a decimal point.

    1. Re:The math is wrong by adjensen · · Score: 1

      there is NO way that this comprises 828 feet of shelf space

      Yeah, that's almost a foot per book. Geez, even Atlas Shrugged is only six inches thick!

      Maybe they have a knobby book stacker who prefers putting them end to end or something.

      Of course, most, if not all, of this stuff can be found online as an eBook, which, if moved to a DVD, would take up a bit less shelf space, weigh a lot less, and, rather than $5,300 off list price, ends up about 99.9% off of list price.

      Not going to earn you any snobbish pseudo intellectual points, though.

    2. Re:The math is wrong by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      What makes this worse is that, according to TFA, these are paperbacks. Maybe 828 inches, but definitely NOT 828 feet.

      Guess we now know the new job for the guy who did the math for the Mars probes that missed.

    3. Re:The math is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably dropped a decimal point.

      You forgot to carry the Y.

    4. Re:The math is wrong by psychofox · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you read and clicked through the article....

      You would see at

      http://tinyurl.com/bfj8v

      "Approximately 700 pounds in weight, the titles would tower 828 feet if you stacked them atop each other--almost as tall as the Empire State Building."

      This means end to end, rather than back to back.

      So, the maths are correct. Your interpretation is wrong..! :-O

    5. Re:The math is wrong by telecsan · · Score: 1

      From TFA:

      the titles would tower 828 feet if you stacked them atop each other

      So, yes, they are adding the heights of the books, not the widths. Not a very useful measurement, but probably accurate, none the less.

    6. Re:The math is wrong by barzok · · Score: 1
      the titles would tower 828 feet if you stacked them atop each other--almost as tall as the Empire State Building
      With the Empire State Building coming in at 1250 feet, "almost" means "if you stacked half the collection on top again."
    7. Re:The math is wrong by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Actually, the sentence is wrong. "Stacked" means back-to-back. That's the only way to stack a book. I dare you to "stack" even two paperbacks end to end...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    8. Re:The math is wrong by UrgleHoth · · Score: 1

      Their almost must be a project almost. As in
      Boss: "How far along the gizmo project are we?"
      Peon: "We are almost done with it."

      --

      Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
    9. Re:The math is wrong by aug24 · · Score: 1
      "Approximately 700 pounds in weight, the titles would tower 828 feet if you stacked them atop each other--almost as tall as the Empire State Building."

      This means end to end, rather than back to back.

      So, the maths are correct. Your interpretation is wrong..! :-O

      Actually, I think it means top-to-bottom. Your sarcasm is ironic.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    10. Re:The math is wrong by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The Penguin Classics are only about 6" tall, so it would be about 500 or soo feet if you stacked it that way. Whenever I stack anything, I try to stack it smallest dimension vertical, largest dimension vertical is retarded, esp. for books.

      In my interpretation, it would not stack to be 100' tall, maybe 75' given that most of the Penguin classic books aren't an inch thick.

      It's not even that great of a deal either, IMO, just barely under $8 a book for stuff that's mostly or all out of copyright anyway. I can pick and choose the books I want for $8 a book. For such a huge bundle, I'd want a steep discount, $4 a book max. Amazon seems to have a tendency to have "deals" like "get this combo of two $5 items for $10!", in short no savings, just promoting two similar items for their combined price at no savings.

    11. Re:The math is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you ever seen a copy of A Tale of Two Cities? Imagine a thousand of those suckers. If they dropped a decimal point, it was in multiplication!

    12. Re:The math is wrong by Redwin · · Score: 1

      Unless it was REALLY big print or REALLY thick bindings.. ;-)

      --
      Warning, comments may not have been passed by the sanity department of my brain.
    13. Re:The math is wrong by born_to_live_forever · · Score: 1

      In fact, Amazon's ad copy makes it clear that they do mean stacked back-to-back, not end-to-end:

      "From Edwin A. Abbott to Emile Zola, the 1,082 titles in the Penguin Classics Complete Library total nearly half a million pages--laid end to end they would hit the 52-mile mark. Approximately 700 pounds in weight, the titles would tower 828 feet if you stacked them atop each other--almost as tall as the Empire State Building."

      And I completely agree with the previous poster who pointed out that there is now way that 1082 paperback volumes laid back-to-back would total 828 feet. My own personal library probably totals less than 400 feet of shelf space, and numbers over 4500 volumes, including some pretty hefty hardcover editions.

      So, any which way you slice it (or stack it), the math sucks.

      --

      - Peter Ravn Rasmussen

    14. Re:The math is wrong by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Exactly. The rows of shelved books at the library are even called "stacks".

      Heck, by the same logic, I can offer a MILE of books for the *unbelievably low price* of $2.00.

      It's just 1 paperback, passed through a paper shredder.

    15. Re:The math is wrong by Random832 · · Score: 1

      the fact that they claim that 1082 volumes end-to-end "approaches" the 52-mile mark is your first clue - that is only possible if each individual book "approaches" 250 feet.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    16. Re:The math is wrong by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      This can be done with copies of very thick paperbacks, say "IT" and "Crime and Punishment". Both are practically square from a top-down view.

    17. Re:The math is wrong by pla · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you read and clicked through the article.... You would see at

      And if you read the preceeding sentence, you would see: "laid end to end they would hit the 52-mile mark". So yes, the 828' figure means stacked cover-to-cover, aka linear feet of shelf space using the most natural way to shelve a book.

      Of course, I'll agree, the math still seems VERY off... 1082 titles end-to-end measuring 52 miles would require books 253'9" tall... I've seen some oversized art books before, but nothing like that!

      I also have a problem with the price...

      "Penguin Classics" refers to those ultra-cheap paperbacks you get for $0.99 to $2.99 on end caps at Barnes & Noble, correct? That comes out the around $3k, at most...

      Overall, I'd have to say I suspect this as a joke. Can't say I "get" it, but the description contains such wild inaccuracies, I just can't believe this represents a real product.

    18. Re:The math is wrong by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      The problem is that /. forgets how english works.

      the 1,082 titles in the Penguin Classics Complete Library total nearly half a million pages--laid end to end they would hit the 52-mile mark.

      The pronoun 'they' refers to the previous noun 'pages', not 'titles'. I imagine if you laid 500,000 pages end to end longways it might actually end up being 52 miles.

      Is the quote deceptive? Probably. Is it wrong, probably not.

    19. Re:The math is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 52 mile figure comes from laying the 500,000 pages that this collection is made of end to end, not the 1,082 whole bound books.

    20. Re:The math is wrong by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just think about it, those 1082 paperbacks would have to be an average of 9.2" wide to make the shelf that long. When was the last time you saw a paperback more than 2 or 3 inches wide? Unless this is a collection of the thickest books ever published, there is no way that figure is accurate.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    21. Re:The math is wrong by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      the 1,082 titles in the Penguin Classics Complete Library total nearly half a million pages--laid end to end they would hit the 52-mile mark.

      If you read the sentance correctly, you'd see that they are saying that ~500,000 pages laid end to end would be 52 miles, not that 1082 books laid end to end would equal that.

    22. Re:The math is wrong by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      They could stack them diagonaly, altough it would be tricky to maintain balance. This would give about 20% more height to the stack.

    23. Re:The math is wrong by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Touche.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    24. Re:The math is wrong by kjfitz · · Score: 1

      828 ft / 1082 books = appx 9.2 inches per book.

      So it is 828 feet if you stack the books end-to-end. At about an inch per book that would be closer to 69 feet of linear book space or about 5 book cases of 4 foot shelves.

      A lot but not the mountain they try to imply.

  9. Sounds dumb. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 0

    If you can't be bothered to figure out for yourself which books you "ought" to read to get a good grasp of western literature, are you going to read the books some people at Amazon think you "ought" to read if they just end up on your shelves? (While lightening your wallet of money better spent on hardware).

    I read a lot, and the idea of this is pretty distasteful to me. Sure, you'll get some of the good books, but you'll also get the awful crap that snotty english types swear is "fine literature".

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re: Sounds dumb. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > If you can't be bothered to figure out for yourself which books you "ought" to read to get a good grasp of western literature, are you going to read the books some people at Amazon think you "ought" to read if they just end up on your shelves?

      It's not really an "ought to read" list; it's a collection of everything that has been released in the Penguin "classics" line. Notice that a number of titles appear repeatedly:

      • The Aeneid by Virgil
      • The Aeneid by Virgil
      • The Aeneid by Virgil
      I don't think they're saying you should have read it three times.


      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Sounds dumb. by nomadic · · Score: 1

      If you can't be bothered to figure out for yourself which books you "ought" to read to get a good grasp of western literature, are you going to read the books some people at Amazon think you "ought" to read if they just end up on your shelves?

      Actually it's the editors of Penguin Books, not the people at Amazon.com.

      I read a lot, and the idea of this is pretty distasteful to me. Sure, you'll get some of the good books, but you'll also get the awful crap that snotty english types swear is "fine literature".

      Examples?

    3. Re:Sounds dumb. by che.kai-jei · · Score: 1

      dont forget orson scott card, and harry potter!

    4. Re:Sounds dumb. by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 1

      If you can't be bothered to figure out for yourself which books you "ought" to read to get a good grasp of western literature, are you going to read the books some people at Amazon think you "ought" to read if they just end up on your shelves?

      No, no, we already have Slashdot for that...

      Eric
      A new subspecies of lawyer?
    5. Re:Sounds dumb. by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

      Yes, and when those snotty english types are looking for computer books to read, it would obviously to folly for them to check the book reviews to see what those knowlegable on the issue would think. Worse still would be for them to simply trust the common wisdom of the community. I would never wish Tannenbaum, or Upgrading and Repairing PCs on someone, as there may just be a better book on the subjects.

      As a onetime literature student, I think you're mistaken. When you were in school, in English class, it was probably not up to you to choose the books most appropriate for your consumption. I think I would have gone Tom Clancy novels had I the choice. These people, those 'snotty english types' have spent their years studying literature. There opinion, knowlege and wisdom should be respected in these matters. Any graduate or postgraduate course does not differ greatly in content.

      For example, I challange you to find a Universtiy introductory unit on 'novels' which doesn't contain at least on, maybe two of: Bronte, Austen, ar Lawrence. Find an authority who wouldn't recommend Dostoyevsky, of Tolstoy,or Moby Dick, Rhyme of the Ancient Mariner or Hitchhikers Guide (well, maybe not).

      The point is, it has been long established what books reflect society or convey eloquently natural law themes. Why waste time doing the research when you could be reading.

      Or to put it another way, when you're in the book store you want the best book on Perl/Flash/Solaris? Would you like, every time you were to by a book, to have to spend the evening before reading reviews of all the books available? When someone comes to your house to borrow a book on XXXX, don't you like being able to recommend a book, knowing that they will get value-for-time?

      If you find this idea distasteful, then perhaps your being conceited, or ignorant, or something else. You aren't being smart though. When you're in hostpital with cancer, I pray you trust your specialists, rather than spending five years in medical school getting up to speed. Don't waste time on the unimportant stuff.

    6. Re:Sounds dumb. by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      "Or to put it another way, when you're in the book store you want the best book on Perl/Flash/Solaris? Would you like, every time you were to by a book, to have to spend the evening before reading reviews of all the books available?"

      When I'm spending $50 - $100 on a computer book then yes, I almost always spend the evening before reading reviews of different books so I can feel confident in my purchasing decision. I might ask people for recommendations so I know which books to look at... but I'd never take one person's sole opinion on a book that expensive.

      Though of course when I'm grabbing a $10 - $20 book to read for pure entertainment / leisure then I would almost always use someone's recommendation.

    7. Re:Sounds dumb. by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

      That's cool, but what if Linus Torvalds just happened to walk in and recommend a book which you'd not yet considered, or had but decided in favor of another on the same topic. What about Bill Gates (maybe not the best example)? My point is, there are some authorities who you can simply trust.

    8. Re:Sounds dumb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can agree with that. I dislike Bill Gates, as much, if not more so then most of /., but I have to admit the guy's not stupid. If he did have a list of books that he would "recommend", I'd probably read a couple.

      But then again, I'm a sucker for a good book, recommendations and the like.

      I'm not sure if I would "trust" them, but I can usually judge a book (as to if I like it) by page 50.

    9. Re:Sounds dumb. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I should mention at this point, I've got a BA in English. Just ended up with one, because I needed something to do while I wasn't studying CS. So I have a pretty good idea of what I'm talking about.

      That being said, a lot of "classics" are crap, and if I could unread some of them I would. You pick things no one disagrees with, and fail to mention things like 17 different works of Trollope, the miserable dregs of Steinbeck and Hawthorne (included because they're Steingbeck and Hawthorn) that no one would read if they knew any better, and Ulysses which routinely tops the list regardless of whether it is a "best" list or a "worst" list. 12 Books by D.H Lawrence, who should be dug up and shot for inventing the word "Demi-virge".

      Add to that hundreds of volumes of ancient commentary and philosophy from Aristotle, Plato, Cicero, et al, which, while undeniably cool, is completely inaccessable to a layman. The freaking Satyricon is on that list; it's not the kind of book you can just pick up and read.

      You get Ian Flemming, and you get E.M Forrester...And you get TEN books of Freud! TEN! Doesn't say you'll chop off your own penis after reading just five, but there you are.

      The last thing I need is an apologist who didn't even bother to get the degree, but who is oh-so respectful of the snotty english profs I grew to detest, telling me that _I_ need a more balanced perspective. The bastards pulled the Shakespeare requirment the year after I got my degree. They PULLED the SHAKESPEARE requirement FROM the ENGLISH degree.

      These are the last people who should be allowed to decide what is and isn't a classic.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    10. Re:Sounds dumb. by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

      Have you noticed how you have a BA in English and dislike the books that Doctorates recommend? Ever wonder why your reading slashdot now instead of teaching literature?

  10. Maybe if... by Willeh · · Score: 1

    The person buying it has a rather large insect/ leaf collection?

    --
    Will wank off Linus Torvalds for fame.
  11. Who reads that slowly? by argent · · Score: 0, Troll

    One title per week seems pretty leisurely to me.

    1. Re:Who reads that slowly? by Angry+Toad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I take it you don't have kids? My reading rate dropped by an order of magnitude once that happened. Now I grab whatever time I can.

    2. Re:Who reads that slowly? by ceeam · · Score: 0

      Try opening them. Or get a life.

    3. Re:Who reads that slowly? by mlk · · Score: 1

      Takes me about a month to read a book.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    4. Re:Who reads that slowly? by JanneM · · Score: 1

      One title per week seems pretty leisurely to me.

      Well, you get Finnegan's Wake and Crime and Punishment, for instance, and they'll eat up a lot of whatever time margin you can get on the more accessible titles.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    5. Re:Who reads that slowly? by argent · · Score: 1

      Yeh, I have kids. You're right, that cut my reading time dramatically... I can generally stretch a novel out 2 or 3 days now, but rarely more than that... unless I'm so exhausted I collapse it still takes up to half a paperback to get me to sleep of an evening. I've pared down my personal library to stuff that I can re-read a couple of times a year, which has really helped me cut back my Amazon/Borders/Fictionwise bill.

    6. Re:Who reads that slowly? by seti · · Score: 1
      although I loe reading books myself, I have to juggle my hobbies between:
      • work
      • housework
      • working on my recently-acquired house
      • evening classes
      • going to the gym
      • social events
      • ...

      I'm happy if i manage to read a 400-page book in 1-2 months.
      --
      Coca-Cola, sometimes War.
    7. Re:Who reads that slowly? by argent · · Score: 1

      I can't read Finnegan's Wake, or most of the other works that are more about showing how bloody clever the author is with language than telling a story, and most of the Russian novels I've read have been mostly exquisitely brilliant depictions of interestingly pathological personalities, and that's not something I'd spend any more time on (but if you can recommend something more along the lines of Chekov's short stories (but not for the love of god his plays) I'd be obliged). So they won't slow me down at all...

    8. Re:Who reads that slowly? by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Okay okay, we get it, you can read super fast, give us a break. May be you should learn the value of a "leisurely pace".
      Man, slashdot isn't the place to find humility, thats for damn sure.

      -d

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    9. Re:Who reads that slowly? by argent · · Score: 1

      Okay okay, we get it, you can read super fast

      Uh-uh. I know people who read super-fast. I'm not one of them.

    10. Re:Who reads that slowly? by farker+haiku · · Score: 1

      Not if you're reading Crime and Punishment. My god that book is terrible.

      --
      Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
    11. Re:Who reads that slowly? by falsified · · Score: 0

      Reading at home is a leisurely activity.

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
    12. Re:Who reads that slowly? by teslatug · · Score: 1

      You must read pretty short books, or you have lots of time. I can't see it done unless you spend 5-8 hours a day (at least I enjoy reading so I don't try to rush through it as if I have to take a test on it tomorrow).

    13. Re:Who reads that slowly? by Danuvius · · Score: 1
      You must read pretty short books, or you have lots of time. I can't see it done unless you spend 5-8 hours a day (at least I enjoy reading so I don't try to rush through it as if I have to take a test on it tomorrow).
      Has it occured to you that it is not his reading skills that are "fantasticalistic", but rather yours that may be subpar?
      --
      Akarsz Magyar Gentoo fórumot? Akkor
    14. Re:Who reads that slowly? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      Your reading speed depends largely on the books you read. My wife reads at a pace of four to five books a week, and that's juggling the television, Neopets, and Master's Thesis she just completed. She reads James Patterson and the like. A lot of quasi-romance, generic thrillers, etc. I can't exactly hide the tone of distaste that I have for the books she reads, mostly because I've tried to read them myself and can barely get through the terrible writing. (We listened to an audio book during a 14 hour drive and it was the most painful "reading" experience ever.)

      I, on the other hand, often take a week to read a book because I tend to read things that challenge me a bit more and have more relevance within literature. Not trying to be a snob, but I've been disappointed by most of my wife's types of novels. Also, I decided that I should try to read some more significant books. As Mark Twain said, "A classic is something that everybody wants to have read and nobody wants to read."

      It took me two weeks to read Fountainhead (Rand); three days to re-read The Stranger (Camus); I'm putting off The Brothers Karamazov (Dostoevsky) until I'm a little more conditioned to reading again because I know it will be a challenge.

      Like you, I feel that if I give up on a book (or movie, for that matter) before it's done then I've done an injustice to the author. It could redeem itself - and I can't judge a book on the first few chapters. That said, there have been a few that I've had to put down for a few years before finishing...

    15. Re:Who reads that slowly? by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 1

      Thats about how many spines I get through a week, on average. Sometimes I find one I might one to read inside the covers. Then it takes longer, on average. Mostly it depends on the size of pictures I think, on average.
      I would say I am about average.

      --
      I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
    16. Re:Who reads that slowly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get some culture, bacteria.

    17. Re:Who reads that slowly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who reads that slowly? Someone with a job, a kid, or a life.

    18. Re:Who reads that slowly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 to 8 hours is one pretty thick book. Most people I know who are good readers can finish a paperback in 2 to 3 hours. My 10 years old daughter can.

      --
      I *am* a script, you insensitive clot!

    19. Re:Who reads that slowly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some of us have those things, called jobs.

      if you read that much you lead 1: a boring life, 2: sacrificing everything else to read .

      sounds like you need to get a life.

    20. Re:Who reads that slowly? by argent · · Score: 1

      Like you, I feel that if I give up on a book (or movie, for that matter) before it's done then I've done an injustice to the author.

      I used to feel that way, but I don't any more. I let go of the idea that a book was a commitment twenty years ago, and I've been happier for it. Life's too short for bad books... particularly the particular kind of bad books that only brilliant writers can produce.

      Ayn Rand, for example: I can't say I exactly admire your commitment but I'm certainly impressed.

    21. Re:Who reads that slowly? by Danuvius · · Score: 1

      The original poster reads at the same speed I do.

      Ta ta!

      --
      Akarsz Magyar Gentoo fórumot? Akkor
    22. Re:Who reads that slowly? by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

      It's not very hard to comprehend. Some people can read through your average sized fiction novel in 3 hours. I picked up this habit in high school when the English classes were having us read a book per week but I didn't want to spend all week reading. I'd usually read through the assigned materials the night before the accompanied exam. Basically, I'd pretend as if I were watching a film. As well, in college, I found that reading the entire book the night before any discussion or exam left the entire contents of the book fresh in my mind rather than spaced out over a 3-4 day period. (although this is different for classes that progress one section at a time) YMMV ... and yes, /. is not a place for humility.

    23. Re:Who reads that slowly? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I read for 2 hours a day on the train to and from work and am getting through a book every 2 - 3 days so I would say that you can easily read anything with less than 500 pages in 8 hours.

    24. Re:Who reads that slowly? by Danuvius · · Score: 1
      Who reads that slowly? (Score:0, Troll)

      One title per week seems pretty leisurely to me
      It's true--Slashdot is US-centric.
      --
      Akarsz Magyar Gentoo fórumot? Akkor
    25. Re:Who reads that slowly? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      I really liked the Ayn Rand overall, but I'd have to cut out about 600 pages of repetitive preaching. I even agreed with a lot of her points - the ones I got in the first 100 pages but had to re-read fifteen times throughout the book.

      Short book that was nearly impossible to read: Heart of Darkness (Conrad). Long book that was really easy to read: The Stand (King). The difference? Literature "with a big 'L'" (as my favorite high school literature teacher would have said).

      I sat through some really bad movies knowing that they were only two or three hours long. I'm learning to walk away if it's that bad and I don't feel terrible if they're not classics. Even though I was bored by Lawrence of Arabia, I still sat through it. But with a book that's 800 pages long, I have to invest so much time and effort to finishing it...

    26. Re:Who reads that slowly? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I think it's fair to say that most people can read a line in way under 2 seconds. Try it, get a stopwatch and time yourself. If you can't it's probably because you are still reading out loud and using your finger.

      If you had managed to understand what I'd written you'd notice that I didn't say anything about continous stretches of reading, indeed I specifically used 2 hour segments each day as my example.

      Lastly, studies have shown that there is no benefit in reading "slowly" and in fact the faster you can scan text the better you are able to comprehend it. Clearly you'd still be in difficulties no matter how fast you learned to read since you are starting from such a low mental baseline.

    27. Re:Who reads that slowly? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      No need to apologise but thanks anyway !

      I agree, there's no correlation between reading speed and intelligence that I can see - the main factor would seem to be practice I reckon.

      Also I think there's a difference between reading for pleasure and reading to understand something like quantum mechanics, in general it's a really bad idea to study a subject like that by reading a text book from cover to cover.

      A far more effective technique ( I have found anyway ) is to scan the book first to get a rough idea of what to expect and the main points you will have to digest, then read a bit more of random sections and only then dive in and actually go through the book trying to learn the subject. By the time you do this you should already have a enough understanding of the text to fit in what you are reading to the bigger picture.

  12. Needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am an ex sotware engineer in my fifties who did exactly this. In my 20's I collected about 2000 core classics so they could always be at hand. I've read most of them too.

    I can't say whether they have "improved my life" since the substrate of my perspective now depends upon them. For example, because of them I decided that engineering is too limiting.

    But if you have faith that generating interconnections in the brain between sense, experience and imaginitive possibilities is a good thing, then this is the way to go.

    1. Re:Needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Did you read the story about Narcissus?

    2. Re:Needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like someone who "opened their mind" with psychedelic drugs. Suddenly, things like having a job and being a normal person become too limiting. Are you certain the books weren't just telling you what you wanted to hear all along?

  13. 828ft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way I usually put books in my shelfs I don't get 828 feet out of (roughly) 1000 books.

    1. Re:828ft by ThosLives · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can get 828 feet if you lay them all flat. (That'd only be about .75 feet per book, which is 9 inches - a little tall for a book but not unreasonable). I don't know why'd you do this, other than to use facts to show that you can take up lots of space with your books.

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
  14. Shipping by MaxPowerDJ · · Score: 2, Funny

    $3.99 is a great deal for shipping... but, do they ship to Puerto Rico? I'd really hate to pay that %6.6 tax for it.

    --
    --MaxPowerDJ
    1. Re:Shipping by karpenl · · Score: 1

      They'll ship it to Norway for $9. Its also nice that books are somehow exempt from VAT.

  15. tricky calculations by __aahlyu4518 · · Score: 1

    828 feet for 1082 books... so they measure them lying down, not standing up, like you will encounter books most of the time.

  16. *Whew!* by dame4jc · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hey, you can save a whole 30 dollars if you apply for an Amazon credit card!

    1. Re:*Whew!* by fracai · · Score: 1

      yeah, but you'd also earn around 22,000 points which would earn you almost $250 in Amazon credit. See, you have to look at the whole picture.

      You're really saving $280 with that credit card. You'd be crazy NOT to by it and get the card.

      Hmm, I already have the card, but maybe it'd be worth it to sign up for another ...

      --
      -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    2. Re:*Whew!* by minotaurcomputing · · Score: 1

      "Hey, you can save a whole 30 dollars if you apply for an Amazon credit card!"

      Likewise, with your new Amazon card you will earn 23,969 bonus points, thus earning yourself 9 $25 Amazon certificates.

      -m

  17. Refer Points? by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't believe the submitter didn't take the oppourtunity to link to Amazon with a refer code. *THAT* would be referer points worth getting modded down for!

  18. Sadly... by dfj225 · · Score: 1

    This item does not qualify for free shipping.

    --
    SIGFAULT
    1. Re:Sadly... by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

      When I added it to my cart, it qualified for free "super saver" shipping, or standard shipping for $7.58 or something.

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    2. Re:Sadly... by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 0

      Nevermind. I had other crap in my cart. It is too early in the morning to be posting on /. ;)

      Shipping is $3.99, but one must wonder, why bother charging that? heh

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    3. Re:Sadly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Shipping is $3.99, but one must wonder, why bother charging that? heh

      Clearly, they make up for it in volume. Oh, wait....

  19. Dont forget The Criterion Collection Gift Set! by shakey_deal · · Score: 2, Interesting
    # The Criterion Collection Holiday 2004 Gift Set consists of all of their published DVDs through October 2004 (except for the out-of-print editions): that's 241 titles on 282 discs and includes a Certificate of Authenticity

    # See individual DVDs for more details
    # Number of discs: 282

    Price: $4,999.00
    You Save: $2,501.00 (33%)

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000 6A05RM/qid=1119876469/sr=8-1/102-8399008-3450544?v =glance&s=dvd&n=507846

    What a bargain!

    1. Re:Dont forget The Criterion Collection Gift Set! by mithras+the+prophet · · Score: 1

      Plus, you can order it together with Thieves Highway (ordinarily $31.96) for a combined price of only $5030.96! Oh, wait, that's the same price. Well, still, they're clearly better together.

      --
      four nine eighteen twenty-7 thirty-nine forty-7 fiftyeight sixty-nine seventy-9 eighty-8 one-hundred-and-nine one-twenty
    2. Re:Dont forget The Criterion Collection Gift Set! by jomynow · · Score: 1
      --
      http://omgwtfmedia.blogspot.com/
    3. Re:Dont forget The Criterion Collection Gift Set! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have points otherwise I would have mod you funny :) or may be informative.

  20. Might still be a good choice for a new library by Diakoneo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OK, they're paperback which means the popular ones would wear out quickly. But if you were feeling philanthropic and wanted to give an otherwise sparse school library a boost, I could see it.
    You should probably ask them first, though. I'm picturing Monday morning at the hometown library. The UPS rep knocks on the door to get a signature, and the librarian looks up to a couple semi-loads of books starting to be unloaded in their front yard!

    --
    "Well..here I am..." - Jubal Early
    1. Re:Might still be a good choice for a new library by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1000 books are not that much really. in particular if they are paperbacks.
      You can easily carry all the books yourself in a couple of large trunks.

    2. Re:Might still be a good choice for a new library by Hast · · Score: 1

      The books I have in the Penguin collection are typically too low quality to be used for libraries. It's just not worth the effort and cost to wrap them in plastic and tag them with bar codes.

      Same reason why many (most) libraries don't accept donated books. They are just not high enough quality to be useful for them.

    3. Re:Might still be a good choice for a new library by hotspotbloc · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I was thinking the same thing. Here in New England there are tons of tiny libraries. Most of them were started in the 1800's and are run by private people that have little or no outside funding. This package could be a big boast to them and might help save a local landmark.

      As for a gift for a school, most definitely ask first. Local politics run deep in local schools.

      About school politics, I once worked for a group that provided Internet access to all k-12 schools in the state (a small western state). Our head engineer (a really smart guy) had a daughter going to a high school with lots of equipment that hadn't been setup. We're talking over 100 PCs, networking gear, Cisco routers and a T1 that was being paid for but not used (termed at the NIU) for over two years. Our group would normally charge $85 per man hour to set everything up but we (about 12 people) volunteered to go in on a Saturday and do it for free. The school district computer administrator said no and that he would do it himself. Two years later nothing had been done. Over 100 brand new, unused four year old PCs still sat in their boxes.

      --
      "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
    4. Re:Might still be a good choice for a new library by Qeyser · · Score: 1

      You make a good point: This set would be a perfect gift to a school library.

      But that being said, I think that having only paperback editions really diminishes the value of the set. If I were going to buy these books, it would be a serious long term investment, and I would want a set of books that could hold up over time -- something that I could give to my family or donate to a public library after many years. Also, I don't know what kind of stock they're printed on, but if its the typical inexpensive paperback stock, then the pages will turn yellow and become brittle after 30 years or so -- which is how long it might take you to get through all of them! = )

  21. Links to the collection. by Dtyst · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Links to the collection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, a great way for you to stick in your referral code in those links. Hoping to make some quick cash, eh?

  22. Pretty impressive... by Skater · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But I still think this is better - a quarter of a million dollars for a vinyl record (45 rpm) of every song that charted between 1950 and 1990.

    1. Re:Pretty impressive... by tgd · · Score: 1

      Wait... $250,000 for 20,000 45's?

      $12.50 each!? While some of the rarer ones might be worth that, or more, its hard to justify that cost, except in savings of time finding copies yourself. Certainly the raw aquisition cost wouldn't be nearly that.

      Thats $6.25 a song. That makes the $.99 at iTunes seem like a real steal!

    2. Re:Pretty impressive... by Skater · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, but no DRM. ;)

      I think the real idea is that they don't want to sell it. But if someone does cough up the cash, then they'll sell it and retire. :)

      It's not the acquisition cost - it's the acquisition time. There's another page on the site that says they searched for decades to finish one complete set. Sure, you can probably put one together, but it won't be easy, especially for those songs that hit #40 on the chart for 1 week in 1958 or something.

    3. Re:Pretty impressive... by CKW · · Score: 1

      .
      Not only that, but you have to remember your basic economics. They don't have an infinite number of these complete collections to sell. They probably only have ONE. Furthermore of all the people in the world considering buying this, ONE of them is probably capable and willing of spending a cool quarter million.

      Which means that they should set their price at a quarter million dollars.
      .

    4. Re:Pretty impressive... by ethan0 · · Score: 1

      a vinyl record of every song that charted between 1950 and 1990.

      Wow. That certainly is an impressive record.

    5. Re:Pretty impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone have a torrent?

      *ducks*

  23. i can by NeoX · · Score: 1

    i can reed it out

    --
    Why to waste your time to REBOOT? Use Linux!
  24. Not eligible for free shipping by Black+Art · · Score: 2, Funny

    They won't ship these set for free. I wonder why.

    My biggest problem with this is that they call it "Complete Penguin Classics" and not one book on Linux in the entire set!

    --
    "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
    1. Re:Not eligible for free shipping by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      No, they'll rip you off for an outrageous $3.99 for shipping, according to TFA.

  25. Duplicates, lots of duplicates by fatgeekuk · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are many titles listed twice. "Art of War" Twice "The Aeneid" three times "The Epic of Gilgamesh" twice lots more. Dunno if they are counted in the total, but its not very well presented...

    1. Re:Duplicates, lots of duplicates by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      Different translations.

    2. Re:Duplicates, lots of duplicates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Multiple volumes. The Aenid is often presented in three books in paperback as I recall.

      Kevin

    3. Re:Duplicates, lots of duplicates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, no, I've never seen the Aeneid presented in three books in paperback. Perhaps you're thinking of the Oresteia? Anyway, the sibling post got it right: different translations - for instance, for the Aeneid there are separate prose translations by Knight and West, a verse translation by Dryden, and *Vergil in English* (which may be out of print) which is a collection of selections by many different translators of the Aeneid and Vergil's other work.

  26. Fuzziness? by sielwolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    can't hide their impatience with the fuzziness of liberal arts

    And these same fellows expect to glide through both Gravity's Rainbow and Finnegan's Wake? I thought it was funny in the WSJ article that they mention being spared Ulysses, which is actually readable by your average man, while FW requires you to understand some self-made Gaelic language Joyce made up. Yeah... gonna polish that one off in a weekend.

    I agree that the list is a bit odd. You just get a collection of Kafka short stories without including either The Trial or The Castle. Likewise Hesse's Siddartha should probably be paired with or replaced with either Demian or Steppenwolf. In fact this set seems to betray the classic modernist view of literature: pre-colonial, predominantly Western. Though there are some interesting choices. Like The Ruba'iyat of Omar Khayyam. But Borges seems to carry the load for all of South America. And no Rushdie? Murakami? Aren't we missing a hemisphere? And everything seems to stop around Vineland. No DeLillo, Eugenides, Ellis or Eggers. Its like literature stopped with the post-modern singularity.

    But Harold Bloom would be agree: the entire body of Shakespeare's work is here. So thus goes the Western Canon. I guess if you are going to buy 900 feet of paperbacks and you're going to get them for 40% off, no need to be choosy.

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
    1. Re:Fuzziness? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the collection is billed as one of classic, western literature. Though, your other points stand.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:Fuzziness? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Well they do have Sun Tzu, Murasaki, Buddhist Scripture, and a few others.

      It is primarily a collection of English and American authors plus a few other translations that have heavily influenced western Literature such as the Greeks.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    3. Re:Fuzziness? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Likewise Hesse's Siddartha should probably be paired with or replaced with either Demian or Steppenwolf.

      Well strongly disagree with you here,I think Siddartha was brilliant and Steppenwolf so-so. Haven't read Demian.

      And everything seems to stop around Vineland. No DeLillo, Eugenides, Ellis or Eggers. Its like literature stopped with the post-modern singularity.

      That IS kind of weird. I'd assumed it was either a matter of later works being too expensive or impractical to get the rights to, or the editors not being willing to classify newer books as "classics", but the lack of Rushdie makes no sense. sense--Midnight's Children came out earlier than Vineland, and my copy's actually a Penguin book.

    4. Re:Fuzziness? by jacobito · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I agree that the list is a bit odd. You just get a collection of Kafka short stories without including either The Trial or The Castle. Likewise Hesse's Siddartha should probably be paired with or replaced with either Demian or Steppenwolf. In fact this set seems to betray the classic modernist view of literature: pre-colonial, predominantly Western. Though there are some interesting choices. Like The Ruba'iyat of Omar Khayyam. But Borges seems to carry the load for all of South America. And no Rushdie? Murakami? Aren't we missing a hemisphere? And everything seems to stop around Vineland. No DeLillo, Eugenides, Ellis or Eggers. Its like literature stopped with the post-modern singularity.

      I could add my own roster of missing authors: Ralph Ellison, James Baldwin, H.D., Ezra Pound, Flann O'Brien, Flannery O'Connor, Felipe Alfau, Samuel Beckett, and so on. The most likely answer to most of these complaints is that Penguin doesn't have the rights to many 20th-century and contemporary titles. So DeLillo, Eugenides, Ellis, Eggers, and Murakami are obviously out -- they're not published by Penguin, to my knowledge. And while I don't specifically know the copyright situation of Kafka's oeuvre, a glance at a bookstore shelf certainly gives the impression that Schocken holds the publishing rights to The Trial and The Castle while seemingly anybody can publish a translation of the short stories.

      On the other hand, I have an old Penguin collection of Sylvia Ocampo stories, and I could have sworn that Penguin had an edition of Martin Fiero, so your complaint about South America rings true. I suspect, though, that Penguin doesn't hold rights to publish that other giant of South American literature, Gabriel Garcia Marquez, and this is probably also true for Adolfo Bioy Casare, Julio Cortázar, and the many worthy South American writers that I've never heard of. And then there's the fact that South American writers in general simply aren't well-known or welll-read in the English-speaking world -- most of Borges's books aren't even in print in the United States!

      I don't know what the excuse is for Rushdie, either, except that Penguin publishes Midnight's Children, Haroun, etc. under its Penguin Contemporaries imprint, not its Penguin Classics line. But yeah, if Pynchon and Barthelme make the Penguin Classics cut, I don't see why Rushdie doesn't -- it does seem arbitrary.

      In fact this set seems to betray the classic modernist view of literature: pre-colonial, predominantly Western. Though there are some interesting choices. Like The Ruba'iyat of Omar Khayyam.

      And Li Po and Basho and Confucius and Cao Xueqin and Shen Fu and Murasaki Shikibu... but your criticism still stands. I think it's fair to say that the non-Western titles here are included because of the impact they've made upon the Western literary tradition.

    5. Re:Fuzziness? by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1
      I tried to read The Moor's Last Sigh by Rushdie. It was horrible.

      The entire book was written in one monotonous remembering tone of voice which didn't change even when the characters had fights.

      And all the men were weird, being driven to alcoholism by thier wives, being beaten by their wives (IIRC), being driven to suicide by thier wives, or running off with other men in their wives wedding dresses. I don't know what kind of world Rushdie inhabits but it's nothing like the one I know.

      I've read and enjoyed Moby Dick but only got half-way through Moor's. I suspect, unless Rushdie's other books are magnitudes above that one, that he is not on that list for a reason.

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
    6. Re:Fuzziness? by sielwolf · · Score: 1

      Midnight's Children. It is usually considered his best work (though Satanic Verses is the one that got him the fame and the fatwa). I'd read that before closing the book on Rushdie.

      --
      What is music when you despise all sound?
    7. Re:Fuzziness? by sielwolf · · Score: 1

      They seem to lack a large amount of critical writing in the 20th century. Tragically that pretty much takes out Baldwin and Ellison (save the brilliant Invisible Man. I too am baffled why it isn't there). Derrida, Baudrillard... but that's just opening up a whole other's hornet nest.

      I also thought the exclusion of Beckett might have been because of this being about literature, not dramatic theater... but then with Shakespeare in there, that isn't really valid.

      This might all be nitpicking. But even after slaving away at 20 years of books, this still would leave a very parochial view of writing.

      --
      What is music when you despise all sound?
    8. Re:Fuzziness? by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

      all the men were weird. I don't know what kind of world Rushdie inhabits but it's nothing like the one I know.


      If you are expecting strict realism, Rushdie may not be your thing.

      It was horrible.

      calling his writing objectivly bad is a different matter, and IMHO not waranted.

      unless Rushdie's other books are magnitudes above that one

      The Moor's Last Sigh may not be his best, but IMHO if you hated it, the others probably won't work for you either.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

  27. Pricing... by medgooroo · · Score: 1

    Cost: $8000 - hmm not likely ill buy that... Shipping: $3.99 - a bargain! must buy! No gift wrapping: Just lost a customer.

    --
    Brain(s): 0.0% user, 1.3% system, 0.1% nice, 98.6% idle
  28. i'm kind of a big deal by rayde · · Score: 1
    I have many leather bound books and my apartment smells of rich mahogany.

    but seriously, it'd be much more worth it if they were designed to look like old leather books. you know, like rich old people have in their study. in movies.

    barnes and noble has some classic books reprinted in some faux-leather hardcover format (example) which would be much more impressive to have filling up a room.

    1. Re:i'm kind of a big deal by kiwimate · · Score: 2, Interesting
    2. Re:i'm kind of a big deal by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      I have the B&N leatherbound Complete Works of Shakespeare. It sucks. It doesn't have line numbers, which is obnoxious if you're actually trying to use the play for anything other than just reading straight through.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    3. Re:i'm kind of a big deal by rayde · · Score: 1

      oooh now those look nice

    4. Re:i'm kind of a big deal by value_added · · Score: 1

      From a review:

      I would gloat over these Penguin Classics. I would look at them on their shelves, sorted lovingly, placed carefully. I would read their covers on short visits, read them through when temptation and time were aptly combined. I would anticipate them when I couldn't see them. Coveting them now is to caress them. Having them to read is to caress them. Tending them is to caress them. Caressing them is to thrill to opening them, reading their titles and authors; taking in their wealth of ideas and knowledge: understanding them.

      Overlooking the fact that the above comment was offered by a guy (with a predeliction for wearing light blue sweaters no doubt), there seems to be people out there who love paperbacks the same way as some of us love leather.

      I guess there's a certain je ne sais quoi about books that are printed on cheap paper and fall apart as easily as they discolour and stain that the rest of us simply don't appreciate.

  29. Cheap home decorations... by (H)elix1 · · Score: 1

    This looks targeted for those looking to give a home library that 'bling bling' factor. No one would actually read all the books, but I sure can imagine a home decorator setting up a wall of books in the study. Cost less than most leather chairs.

    1. Re:Cheap home decorations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are few things that scream poor liberal burnout more than stacks of paperbacks all over the place

  30. Wish they would do this with Movies. by torpor · · Score: 1

    I'd kill to have The Criterion Collection shipped to me in one big box.

    (Or, one small hard drive.)

    Whatever. I just want all those movies..

    Anyone know of good movie collection services that rock? I've seen a few of those "Columbia-House" style dealies, where you get one movie a month for 2 years, but that sucks .. I want them in one big package..

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:Wish they would do this with Movies. by shakey_deal · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Wish they would do this with Movies. by Cerv · · Score: 1
      --
      sig
    3. Re:Wish they would do this with Movies. by torpor · · Score: 1

      super cool. i'm gonna ask for this for christmas.

      wonder how to get the 'out of print' DVD's, though .. i guess E-Bay is the only choice.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  31. Assumption is wrong by zarathustra_slayer · · Score: 1

    It's not 828 ft of shelf space. Amazon description says, "the titles would tower 828 feet if you stacked them atop each other." They mean all of them standing vertically, one atop the other. Since those penguin classics are around 9 inches tall, that works out. Why you would measure books in this totally meaningless way? So that you can claim that they're "almost as tall as the Empire State Building" of course!

    --
    Assuming makes an ass of u and Ming.
    1. Re:Assumption is wrong by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 0

      I wonder how many lines of code that works out to.

    2. Re:Assumption is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'so that you can claim that they're "almost as tall as the Empire State Building" of course!"'
      Of course if that stack contains Salman Rushdies "The Satanic Versus" , i would be careful of any Paper airlines with Strange flight paths.

      I apologise for that joke in advance

    3. Re:Assumption is wrong by bcattwoo · · Score: 2, Funny
      So that you can claim that they're "almost as tall as the Empire State Building" of course!

      But how many footballs fields is that?

      And what does 1082 books equal measured in Libraries of Congress?

    4. Re:Assumption is wrong by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Since when are paperbacks 9 inces tall? Or are these RIAA paperbacks or something ...

    5. Re:Assumption is wrong by pizen · · Score: 1

      And what does 1082 books equal measured in Libraries of Congress?

      You know, that one almost makes sense.

    6. Re:Assumption is wrong by sir99 · · Score: 1

      1082 books would appear to be about 0.00003731 Libraries of Congress!

      --
      The ocean parts and the meteors come down
      Laid out in amber, baby.
  32. "Enormousness" is not a word by wiredog · · Score: 1

    and if it is, it shouldn't be.

  33. Do the math... by egburr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At the discount price, this is roughly $7 a book. While I may not be able to get them all at once, I sure can get them a lot cheaper other ways. That is the price of new books by well-known authors, and I have a very hard time bringing myself to pay that (I can't help but think of scrimping to save $1.50 to go buy a brand new book each week just 15 years ago). I can't imagine paying those prices for these "classics". No wonder the shipping is so cheap.

    --

    Edward Burr
    Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    1. Re:Do the math... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Well, the Complete Works of Shakespeare that's included is $40 by itself (if you buy it on Amazon, claims it's $65 elsewhere). So that makes up for a couple others that would be less than $7 elsewhere. From working in a bookstore, I know that some of the other collections (for example, The Portable 60s Reader) are the size of trade paperbacks rather than mass-markets, and go for $10-15 each. So total, it's probably not a bad price.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    2. Re:Do the math... by rhsanborn · · Score: 1

      Other than the old super printed cheap mystery type novells, or Dean Koontz/Stephen King books that have made their way from Hardcover, to large paperback, and finally to mass production, books coost 12-15 bucks now for paper backs. Many of these 'classics' collections included. Granted, I still rather pick and choose books as I go along, because I'd end up not reading half these and thus not getting my money out of it.

    3. Re:Do the math... by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      Funny, my *hardcover* "The Illustrated Stratford Shakespeare", which says "All 37 Plays, All 160 Sonnets" and comes to 1024 pages only cost me $13 at Barnes and Noble. Classics are cheap. Paying $40 for a paperback version of this would be insane.

    4. Re:Do the math... by slim · · Score: 2, Informative

      Funny, my *hardcover* "The Illustrated Stratford Shakespeare", which says "All 37 Plays, All 160 Sonnets" and comes to 1024 pages only cost me $13 at Barnes and Noble. Classics are cheap. Paying $40 for a paperback version of this would be insane.

      I'm repeating something I wrote in another thread here, but you pay extra for quality editing, introductions, explanatory notes etc.

      Over here there is a discount brand of paperbacks called "Wordsworth Classics". £1.50 each on Amazon. I used to get them for £1 each in discount bookshops. What you get is the text dumped onto paper (sometimes there are out-of-copyright illustrations too : Alice in Wonderland for example).

      What you don't get is footnotes, a few thousand words about the author and the background to the book, etc., and sometimes that's worth having.

    5. Re:Do the math... by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      Wow, set straight by a true Ancient of Slashdot!

      You're right, of course. My copy of Shakespeare lacks footnotes and such, and one with those things would have cost more.

      I doubt, however, that most of the books in this collection are worth $7 in paperback. I can't imagine that anyone with a real interest in reading any of these would buy a collection like this; better to spend less money to get better copies of individual books. There are some *very* nice used hardcovers out there.

      Then again, I still can't bring myself to pay $12 for so-called trade paperback of new novels--so-called, because the binding on these new trades are hardly better than a "plain" paperback; they're just oversized regular paperbacks! I only buy new books when I catch them in the bargain bins at B&N and Hastings, where I've managed to get a hardcover copy of "Diary" by Palahniuk for 5 or 6 bucks, among other things. I just can't justify paying $12 for a paperback of a new novel when I can get a half-dozen paperback public domain books for the same money, or two public domain books in hardcover. How do new authors get by these days? How can anyone afford to take a chance on an author they havn't heard of? Yeah, sure, the library, but A)they often don't have really, really new authors and B)the library crowd often doesn't buy books at all. How do these poor people (the new authors, not the library crowd) survive?

      Er, wow, I'm way off the original topic now. I guess I should put a "/rant" in here somewhere, eh? :)

    6. Re:Do the math... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have that version. It sucks. It has no line numbers, which makes it totally unusable for anything but just reading a play straight through. Plus, no decent editing, footnotes, intros, etc. You get what you pay for.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    7. Re:Do the math... by wfberg · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I have that version. It sucks. It has no line numbers, which makes it totally unusable for anything but just reading a play straight through. Plus, no decent editing, footnotes, intros, etc.


      Then again, that's how Shakespeare wrote it.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    8. Re:Do the math... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      Well, it's probably similar to some way that Shakespeare probably wrote it. Did they work from the First Folio? A Quarto? It doesn't include, for example, three different versions of Hamlet or two of Midsummer, so it's got to be *somebody's* interpretation of what counts as "the complete works." And did they include every one of the bard's misspellings, or did some editor decide which were probably intentional and which were not? Probably the latter.

      No cheapo Complete Works is near "how Shakespeare wrote it," probably even less so than well-edited versions. They just have far less information letting you know how these decisions were made.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    9. Re:Do the math... by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      > How do these poor people (the new authors, not the library crowd) survive
      They have a real job, or they have a partner with one.

      very few published authors could even think of living off their writing - and if they do, it's not through book sales, it's through things like giving talks at schools and offering writing workshops...

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  34. Here are some collections that they should offer by DeadSea · · Score: 1

    • 50 great paperback classics for a 7 (through 18) year old
    • 10 great hardback classics for a 7 (through 18) year old

    Now those I would buy as presents.

  35. Survey Says...59% of scholars agree with you, by caveat · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Usage Note: Enormity is frequently used to refer simply to the property of being great in size or extent, but many would prefer that enormousness (or a synonym such as immensity) be used for this general sense and that enormity be limited to situations that demand a negative moral judgment, as in Not until the war ended and journalists were able to enter Cambodia did the world really become aware of the enormity of Pol Pot's oppression. Fifty-nine percent of the Usage Panel rejects the use of enormity as a synonym for immensity in the sentence At that point the engineers sat down to design an entirely new viaduct, apparently undaunted by the enormity of their task. This distinction between enormity and enormousness has not always existed historically, but nowadays many observe it. Writers who ignore the distinction, as in the enormity of the President's election victory or the enormity of her inheritance, may find that their words have cast unintended aspersions or evoked unexpected laughter.


    ref
    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Survey Says...59% of scholars agree with you, by zoney_ie · · Score: 1

      I suspect this isn't universal - in much the same way that it's perfectly fine on this side of the Atlantic (UK/IRL) to talk of a government "scheme" without meaning it in the sense of a "cunning and devious plan".

      Certainly I wouldn't be at all perturbed by the use of "enormity" in the sense of "the enormity of the task", or the "enormity of the situation", while not referring to something of great evil. Enormousness on the otherhand sounds as made up as "burglarize".

      --
      -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
    2. Re:Survey Says...59% of scholars agree with you, by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      I think the word "enormity" goes along pretty well with the current elected president of the US ;-)

    3. Re:Survey Says...59% of scholars agree with you, by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Maybe you just need to embiggen your vocabulary

    4. Re:Survey Says...59% of scholars agree with you, by deanoaz · · Score: 1

      It seems silly to attach a negative connotation to 'enormity'. If you could use it all by itself as a prejoritive it might make some sense, but you can't.

      "Judge, I witnessed the defendant committing an enormity on the date in question!", doesn't really convey any information about what happened.

      Since you have to define the badness seperately anyway then 'enormity' should be left without prejudice to be used as a size modifer for good or evil.

      "One fifth of the people are against everything all the time." - Robert Kennedy

      --
      If 'the people' in Amendment 2 are 'the state' then Amendments 1, 2, 4, 9, and 10 benefit the state, not you.
  36. Lots of people. by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've never been a fast reader. In fact, I'd say at best I read only a page or so a minute. But I'm also a very visual person, so I appreciate reading slowly and letting my mind make up it's own movie. The more descriptive the book, the slower I go. My room mate reads probably 3x as fast as I do, but I'm fairly certain he misses a good portion of what he reads, because he doesn't really process it. When you have "book club" type discussions with people, you find out rather quickly who doesn't pay enough attention to the small details. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but I figure if I'm going to read a book, I'm going to get the most of it.

    That's besides the point that reading is a leisure activity for me, not a goal or accomplishment. There's just no need to race through it.

    --
    "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
    1. Re:Lots of people. by argent · · Score: 1

      I'm not visual at all. If you ask me what you're wearing, even if I've been sitting in the car with you for half an hour, if I don't look and see I can't answer that question.

      So if you ask me questions like that about a book, I'll blow them. I get out of a book what I want to get out of it, and that's clearly not the same kinds of things you want to get out of it. One of the things I get out of books is connections between books, between viewpoints of authors looking at the same subject. That's fun, but it's hard to get that if you don't read a LOT of books.

    2. Re:Lots of people. by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      100% agree. I was a double major History/English major...on an average week my reading workload was a prescribed 100,000 words. No way you could keep up, plus do your assignments, for a full course load. Alot of science/math types laughed at only 30 hours of class a week...except I was in the library reading for most of the rest of my waking time. Eventually I did what ever student does...make some tactical decisions as to what I'd study and what I wouldn't. So although the collected works of Jane Austen were on my reading list one year, I read none of them and focused on DH Lawrence, Faulkner, etc. Through careful assignment and exam question selection I never suffered.

      Some people read through quickly and just pick up the major plot points, characters, etc. But to appreciate the language and nuance you need to read slowly ... there's no way around it. History is a bit more forgiving in this regard, but it gets its revenge in the research department. Once you hit 3rd year you're researching essays based on primary materials (not interpretations) and sometimes yes that means soliciting translation services for essentials.

      In short, 1 book a week is a reasonable estimate for a serious consideration of a literary work. Less time is probably required for a Star Trek novel, or the movie adaptation of Batman Begins. ;)

      PS Depending upon how heavily discounted this list of essentials is, i might be inclined to purchase this as a librarian of a school or for a small town. One stop shopping to establish a collection of the classics.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    3. Re:Lots of people. by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      In actual fact the idea that you are able to comprehend more by reading slowly is incorrect, the faster you can read the quicker your brain can get a impression as to what is going on and this enables you concentrate on the meaning of the sentances and paragraphs rather than each individual word in a sentance.

      Obviously if you are just skipping through reading the first couple of words in a paragraph then you are not really reading the entire book.

    4. Re:Lots of people. by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      I reacently started ADHD medication, now it takes me twice as long to read a book, but I'm getting more than twice as much out of them.

  37. Who would buy this? by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 3, Insightful
    How about a school looking to get some new books? Or a library looking to get some new titles?

    Just sayin', it isn't unthinkable for an institution to purchase something like this.

    1. Re:Who would buy this? by jcorno · · Score: 1

      Only the lazy ones, I think. It would save them the trouble of picking out a collection, but they're too expensive. 7 bucks a pop for public domain works in paperback is unreasonable, and they'd be saddled with a lot of books that nobody would ever read. Some of those titles are a little obscure.

  38. Not to be confused with the "penguin" classics, by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny


    which can be found in /usr/src/linux

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  39. Remember katie.com? by Insightfill · · Score: 2, Informative

    After Penguin's involvement in the whole "katie.com" fiasco, I try to avoid buying anything with their name on it (Linux excepted!)

  40. Too much money! by barryfandango · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most (all?) of these titles are in the public domain, so the publisher's only cost is printing. And they're paperbacks. Penguin is making a pretty good margin on these.

    --
    In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Too much money! by alekd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Penguin is note just reprinting the originals. Many of these are new translations or new editions. Though editing a classic might seem like sacrilege, it is something that has been done to most of them and often there is no definite canonical edition. The books also include introductions and notes. I am not disputing that they might have pretty good margins on some of these, but they do have costs other than printing.

    2. Re:Too much money! by slim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most (all?) of these titles are in the public domain, so the publisher's only cost is printing. And they're paperbacks. Penguin is making a pretty good margin on these.

      Penguin adds value with excellent introductions and annotations. Only yesterday I chose a slightly more expensive Penguin Classics edition of H.P. Lovecraft short stories over the Del Rey edition, because of the 14 page introduction and the extensive explanatory notes, which help put the writing in context.

    3. Re:Too much money! by jacobito · · Score: 1

      Okay, this irks me. The Penguin Classics exist expressly to keep affordable editions of canonical works available to the general public. If the Penguin Classics weren't in print (and these books don't exactly fly off the shelves at non-university bookstores), most of these books would only be available in expensive university press editions costing twice as much, if they would be available at all.

      As for your comment about the public domain status of some of these titles, bear in mind that translations, introductions, and editing aren't free.

    4. Re:Too much money! by BJH · · Score: 1

      Would that be the Penguin The Call of Cthulhu and Other Weird Stories? I've got a copy on my shelf too. Great edition.

    5. Re:Too much money! by slim · · Score: 1

      Would that be the Penguin The Call of Cthulhu and Other Weird Stories? I've got a copy on my shelf too. Great edition.

      Why yes, yes it would.

    6. Re:Too much money! by GreenHell · · Score: 1

      The Thing On the Doorstep & Other Weird Stories has notes by the same guy. I'd recommend it as well, even though I'm not a huge fan of The Strange Case of Charles Dexter Ward (which, along with At the Mountains of Madness, takes up a major portion of the book). Out of all my various Lovecraft books (Del Ray ones, various 60s and 70s compilations, etc), the Penguin ones are my favourites just for that reason.

      (And I see that there is also a third collection with notes by S.T. Joshi: The Dreams in the Witch House & Other Weird Stories. I'll have to go looking for it. Maybe I'll finally be able to toss some of the other compilations on Book Crossing. As is, they all have one or two stories that aren't in any of my other comps.)

      Getting slightly offtopic: for anyone looking for decent vintage (ie: 30s or earlier) fantasy or weird tales compilations, I'd recommend any of the Penguin compilations editted by Joshi. I've been trying to lend the recent Dunsany one to any friend who likes that kind of stuff.

      --
      "I won't mod you down - I feel the need to call you a twit explicitly, rather than by implication."
    7. Re:Too much money! by b30w0lf · · Score: 1

      Granted, these titles are in public domain. That is, their original source is public domain; however, most of these works have been translated, and most of penguin's translations are current enough that they are not public domain.

      Now, you might say "who cares about the translation?" but, speaking from someone who has dabled in translating and has paid attention to different translators, it can make all the difference in the world. Some translations are simply innacurate (e.g. the Jowett translation of Plato's Republic, in which there are many insertions by the translator that he must have felt Plato just, you know, left out by accedent). Some do not even follow the form of their source (e.g. the Rouse translations of the Iliad and Odyssey in which he chooses to translate the epic peoms as prose instead).

      That said, this is exactly why I would *not* buy this shelf of books: penguin is hit-or-miss at best when it comes to who they have translate. Some are good, granted, and some were, of course, written in english to begin with, so translation is irrelevent. I won't attempt to throw a number out there, but a very large percentage of these books were written in Greek, Latin, French, German, etc. Further, a very large number of those, Penguin has not bothered to pay for decent translations of.

      I, for one, will not be dropping $8k on a bunch of poorly translated, poorly bound books.

    8. Re:Too much money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the UK we get Penguin Modern Classics, Penguin Classics and Penguin Popular Classics. The Popular classics are sold mostly for £1.50 (less than $3 even now). A large number of the titles your asked to pay $8 for are in the popular classics series. It doesn't look like a bargain to me.

  41. Measurement, a how to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ways to measure books:
    1. Number of Titles
    2. Number of Authors

    Ways NOT to measure books:
    1. Linear Dimension
    2. Price
    3. Average Reading Time

    Please, can we stop with the moronic units of measurement? It could only have been worse if the post broke down to fractions of the Library of Congress. :P

  42. It's like buying a gym membership by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    Somewhere in those hundreds of books are a lot of them that are worth reading, and that would surely improve one's functionality within Western Civilization. Coughing up all that money up front sort of obliges one to actually pull at least some of them off the shelf and read them.

    I'm much more likely to finally digest Gilgamesh or some dreaded Faulkner if I already own them, and can easily transport them to the bathroom. If I say, though, "Gee, it's time I finally read some Gilgamesh..." and then have to order or go out and buy a copy... it's not going to happen. Sort of like bench presses. So, it's the literary gym membership you have to use in order to justify, after-the-fact, having spent the money.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:It's like buying a gym membership by countzer0interrupt · · Score: 1
      Coughing up all that money up front sort of obliges one to actually pull at least some of them off the shelf and read them.

      Sounds like a very expensive substitute for a little self-control.

      Then again, who am I to talk? I'm posting this from work, and lunch finished hours ago...

  43. Books by the Yard by IPFreely · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Many years ago, one of my friends worked in a used book store (Half Price Books, in north Texas). They bought and sold lots of used books.

    When they would get older classical type books, the kind noone really wanted to buy used to read, but that have the nice old decorated hardback spine, they would line them in a seperate area for "decorative books". People would buy them by the yard as filler, either to fill their library with impressive looking books, or for theater props or whatever. All they really needed to do was look good filling a shelf.

    Amazons version of this sounds a bit expensive.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    1. Re:Books by the Yard by farker+haiku · · Score: 1

      Think of all the handsome, leather-bound collections that spent decades on some rich household's shelves, eventually to be unloaded, spines blissfully uncracked, in estate sales. But that didn't seem right: These are paperbacks, which (thankfully) lack snob appeal to people who think of books as things to be seen instead of read.

      If you had read the article, you'd know that these aren't decorative books. They're paperback.

      --
      Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
    2. Re:Books by the Yard by nomadic · · Score: 3, Funny

      When they would get older classical type books, the kind noone really wanted to buy used to read, but that have the nice old decorated hardback spine, they would line them in a seperate area for "decorative books". People would buy them by the yard as filler, either to fill their library with impressive looking books, or for theater props or whatever. All they really needed to do was look good filling a shelf.

      Ah, Texans.

    3. Re:Books by the Yard by IPFreely · · Score: 1
      Putting it in paperback is not going to get it read any more than the hardback edition. When you sell someone a thousand preselected books of a particular category, they are not going to read them all.

      This is just as much snob appeal as Books by the yard. If someone buys a thousand books because they are "classics", they are buying them for about the same reasons. "I have all the classics" is not the same as "I've read all the classics". It does not matter what kind of cover it has. Are they really going to read them?

      They have a nice quote about reducing snob appeal, but this is little more than reducing the price of snobism to the level where more people can enjoy it. And that nice little quote is an excelant way to let people buy it without realising it is snobism.

      If it was not specifically targetted to the snobs, it would not be a single large set. It would be broken out more by interest and genre. And why are there duplicates? Are you going to read the same book four times? This is shelf stuffing at its best.

      Those 1,082 books also contain a few duplicates: By our count, if you weed out the multiple translations, different editions and compilations ("The Iliad" is there four times), as well as the "portable" volumes for well-represented authors, you wind up with 1,031 books. Still, at a book a week (an easy pace when you're reading "This Side of Paradise," not so easy if tackling "The Brothers Karamazov"), that's nearly 20 years' worth of reading headed for your shelves.

      Sorry, no. This has snobism written all over it. They just brought the price down for the rest of us.

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    4. Re:Books by the Yard by Drathus · · Score: 2, Informative

      They still do. (pops)

      And from all of their locations. Shipped even.

    5. Re:Books by the Yard by jacobito · · Score: 1

      Why this cynicism? Can't you even consider the possibility that the collected Penguin Classics might not just appeal to insecure, contemptible snobs, but also to readers with a genuine love for books and reading?

      I'd wager that most people buy Penguin Classics books because they need them for school, or because they've retained a love for literature into their post-student lives, and appreciate the Penguin Classics' affordability and solid introductions and notes. They're not always the best paperback editions that you can find, but they're nevertheless of a consistently adequate quality. And bear in mind that these aren't showy, decorative books, either -- we're talking about relatively inexpensive, medium-quality paperbacks that are expressly geared to be accessible to the mass market through low prices and wide distribution. No snob appeal there. Furthermore, the Penguin Classics line is currently in transition to a new design, so anyone looking for a set of decorative books to satisfy their snobby needs isn't likely to appreciate the inconsistency in the collection's look and feel, either.

      While I can't think of any sane individual who would drop several grand on this collection, I can think of plenty who would fantasize about it, and it wouldn't be because they think that they can legitimize themselves with a pile of cheap paperbacks. Just because you fail to imagine a reader who could be sincerely excited about these books doesn't mean that they don't exist.

      (You're confused about "duplicates," too. Multiple translations of individual source texts are not duplicates; they are distinct works, each appreciable (or detestable) in its own right. I'd expect any reasonably serious reader to realize this. ...Then again, I'd expect a serious reader to point out that Penguin's translations aren't always the best. Once again, little snob appeal there.)

    6. Re:Books by the Yard by IPFreely · · Score: 1
      I'm not talking about the books, or classics in general. Of course there are people who will read them. Of course there are people who love these classics, and will read them over and over. My father in law has a five story house filled with books on every wall, hall, closet and open space. And he has read them all.

      But those people will buy the books they want, they will choose them, and they know what they want. And they are not the target audienace of this promotion. This promotion is for people who do not already know what classics to choose, so they need someone to choose for them. This promotion is for the people who want "the classics" but don't know what the classics are or why. So who is going to buy a thousand books, not knowing what they are, and still have the stamina to read them all? Darn few. The ones who can read that much already know what they want. The ones who need it handed to them most likely don't have the stamina to read it all.

      Books are great, and they are for everyone. This promotion specifically is for the ones who think they want something, but don't really know what that is, but believe that it will somehow improve them to have it. What does that sound like to you?

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    7. Re:Books by the Yard by jacobito · · Score: 1

      Personally, I try to take the idea of some immutable canon of classics with a grain of salt, and I'd rather selectively populate my book collection one book at a time, but the Penguin Classics lineup is not too shabby, and if I were able to purchase some subset of this series in one fell swoop (say, the Viking sagas), I'd certainly consider it.

      This promotion is for the people who want "the classics" but don't know what the classics are or why.

      My main problem with your reasoning is that you readily imagine a potential buyer who is only motivated by insecurity and ignorance, but it's impossible for you to imagine a potential buyer who could sincerely want this collection, knowing full well what's included. It's not as if the list of titles and authors isn't there for anyone to see, and while I'd be hard pressed to find somebody with an intimate knowledge of every single title, it's not unreasonable for a literate reader to have some enough familiarity with the majority of the works to know what they would be getting in to. Really, what evidence do you have that nobody but "snobs" and the ignorant could possibly be interested in this promotion? It seems that you're not advancing an argument so much as you're simply airing your prejudices.

      I should also add that this discussion is chiefly hypothetical anyhow, because I doubt that individual readers are the intended audience for this promotion.

  44. Encyclopedias - own the incomplete set. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I used to work with some people who thought encyclopedias were a neat thing. If you couldn't get a degree from Harvard or Oxford, you could at least have all the knowledge that such a degree ostensibly gave you at your fingertips. That is, if you read the damn things. They never did. They never read the contract that the encyclopedia saleman gave them either. Most never got past the letter G or H. Somebody ought to find out what the print runs by letter for these encyclopedias were. It would be interesting.

    Anything that comes out in series could be analysed this way. If the print runs drop off or are uneven, then the likelyhood of a complete set is rare and from that viewpoint would be a more valuable collector's item.

  45. Who?? by lbmouse · · Score: 1

    The same person... "Who would buy a 660 bhp Ferrari, for nearly $770,868, that can do 217.5 mph and turn in a 3.3 second 0-60 mph." They have too much money and/or not enough sense and need to impress people because they are insecure with themselves (a/k/a tiny genital disease). Now go away while I drool over this.

  46. Goat-skin by lp-habu · · Score: 1

    How much extra for the leather binding? Does that add to the shipping weight?

  47. and how many.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would be burned by the masses of christian fundamentalists descending upon the poor school library?

    1. Re:and how many.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And how many would be burned by the masses of christian fundamentalists descending upon the poor school library?

      How many christians does it take to clean a library?
      Three. Two to bring the books outside and one to tend to the fire.

      Maybe the Romans had a good idea on dealing with them ...

  48. impatience with the fuzziness of liberal arts? by infonography · · Score: 1

    I fit your general definition, however I don't confine myself to just engineering issues. Why break off one side of the subject of knowledge just because it has no 'science' in it? Curiosity encompasses all things from rockets to poetry. The so called liberal arts are the study of why people act like people.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  49. Re:Maybe more geeks would buy it... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1, Funny

    if there were only 1024 books. You know, don't want to risk overflowing my bookshelf...

    1024 *will* 'overflow' your geek 'bookshelf' if- as you're implying- the number of books it holds has to be contained within 10 bits.

    Unless, of course, you're using the class of bookshelves which can *never* be empty, and can thus hold 1-1024 books, instead of 0-1023.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  50. Instead of the whole colletion, read 1 letter by spicydragonz · · Score: 1

    I think I can get Z out of the way this summer # Zadig, L'Ingenu by Francois Voltaire # Zazie in the Metro by Raymond Queneau

  51. Must be good for people in prison.. by Sweetdelight · · Score: 1

    well, smart people/people with alot of free time on their hands.. Make the time go fast...

  52. cheap books?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it me, or is the per-book price really expensive for paperbacks? This is like 8$/book (or 13/book for original price), what do these classics in paperback form usually go for?

    1. Re:cheap books?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ones I have on my bookshelf all have a list price of between $9 (Song of Roland, Sir Gaiwan and the Green Knight, Alice in Wonderland) and $14 (the Lovecraft books, Nietzsche). I'd expect the longer books to be slightly more (The Complete Pelican Shakespeare, Les Miserables), but, knowing Penguin, none will probably be much less than $9.

      You need to remember that these aren't pocket-book sized paperbacks. They're slightly taller and wider than your standard mass-market paperback, so that's going to drive the price up a bit. That said, you could definitely get some of them for even cheaper if you were willing to start going into even lower-quality paperback releases.

  53. Not impressive... by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    For an additional $50,000, order our PC Jukebox -- all 20,000 of your 45 rpm records recorded digitally and stored on high-speed hard drives on your brand new PC Jukebox computer. Search by artist, song title, words in song titles, and many other criteria, and prepare electronic music play lists of the songs you want to hear. You will be the only person in the world to own every hit 45 rpm record in digital format! Highly cool

    Apparently they haven't been on the Internet lately!

    I've got that and more, and you can buy it [Billboard Top 100] from iTunes... feel free to fill in the gaps [copyright battle] songs using any variety of Internet protocols...

    1. Re:Not impressive... by Skater · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and the iTunes ones probably came from master tapes, while the 45s.com guys are probably just ripping off the 45s, which means there's potential noise, and you have to worry about the quality of the turntable and all that.

      If that's what they're doing, though, then it's the labor they're charging you for, not the records.

    2. Re:Not impressive... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      while the 45s.com guys are probably just ripping off the 45s

      I don't think that's the case. Many of the 45s that would make up that list would be valuable on their own, if they were original pressings. From the sounds of it, this "45s" collection is entirely re-pressed (going on the descriptions of the actual disks, e.g. no artwork sleve) and the fact that they are selling more than one collection backs this up. :-)

      If the above is correct, they will most likely be working from digital masters from the copyright owners, which they will likely have then used for the producing digital collection (otherwise you mulitply the sourcing effort by two). Despite all this, they could be 128kbps mp3s, or some horrific format like Real Audio!

      All total conjecture though! Pretty neat product for a well-off person who has always wanted a jukebox and doesn't want to do the work of buying the music, and the digital mirror is a great add-on, albeit a really expensive add-on. I can see this sort of thing being popular with the BMW types. ;-)

    3. Re:Not impressive... by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      It took me years online to create my collection you insensitive clod!

  54. Made me laugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Special Shipping Information: This item is not eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping. See details.

  55. Gutenberg doesnt have the geek classics by backslashdot · · Score: 1

    I couldnt find many books important to geeks on Gutenberg site.

    Actually .. what are the "geek classics"? ..who wants to attempt compiling a list of say top 100.

    To be a classic it has to be published before .. err.. 1927.

    I'm reckoning Euclid's Elements be in there .. and Newton's principia .. and don't forget some of the arabic texts too (of Al-Khwarizmi, Ibn Zakariya al-Razi, Al Haitham) and chinese ones etc. That is, the least doesnt have to be "western geek classics".

    1. Re:Gutenberg doesnt have the geek classics by Intron · · Score: 4, Funny

      Principia Mathematica - Russell & Whitehead
      Relativity - Einstein
      Origin of Species - Darwin
      Necronomicon - Abdul Alhazred

      OK, all but the last one.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    2. Re:Gutenberg doesnt have the geek classics by arose · · Score: 1
      Some should be here:
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    3. Re:Gutenberg doesnt have the geek classics by arose · · Score: 1
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    4. Re:Gutenberg doesnt have the geek classics by alewar · · Score: 1

      Principia Mathematica is from Isaac Newton!!

    5. Re:Gutenberg doesnt have the geek classics by cbustapeck · · Score: 1

      Actually, Gutenberg does have On The Origin Of Species.

    6. Re:Gutenberg doesnt have the geek classics by JNighthawk · · Score: 1

      Well, no duh you can't find the Necronomicon. You didn't use the author's full name, "The Mad Arab Abdul Alhazred." Geez.

      --
      Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
    7. Re:Gutenberg doesnt have the geek classics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chandrasekhar published his work on gravitational limits in 1930, so his work has fallen into the copyright "black hole". How's that for irony?

  56. Don't read bad books. by argent · · Score: 1

    Not if you're reading Crime and Punishment. My god that book is terrible.

    When I was a kid somehow I acquired the meme that it was immoral to give up on a book if you didn't like it. I read a lot of bad books, simply because I had them and thus I felt I had to read them. I was in college when I first ran into a book that was so bad that I threw it across the room rather than finish it, but that experience freed me to simply give up and go on to another book when I realised I was wasting my time. That same week I was actually able to box up some books that had been sitting unfinished on my bookshelf for months and donate them to the library. The sense of relief was amazing.

  57. Text by EinarH · · Score: 1
    "Who would buy 828 feet worth of books, for nearly $8,000,[..]
    Isn't that obvious? For small community/school libraries this is a bargain. Paperback is not perfect for libarries but hey for $8000 I think most linrarians can accept that downside.

    WSJ fails to explain (for ideological reasons?) why Penguin are so desperatly willing to sell such a collection though. Because of expiring copyright most of these titles are in the public domain and will be almost worthless to Penguin within a few years. It is as much a benefit of capitalism at it is "a marketing scheme". But since some corporation might loose money on it some years ahead becasue of their antique business idea I guess it's evil.

    --

    Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

  58. Not just Western classics by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

    There is a smattering of non-Western literature represented, such as the Bhagavad-Gita and The Art of War. Not a lot, certainly, probably only about 10-20 titles. I'm sure they could do better, but it's good that they're at least including a bit.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  59. Re:Here are some collections that they should offe by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    The feature I would really like to see is a `next book in this series' button. It is very difficult to find the next one in a series - particularly if it's still on the first edition which only lists other books by the same author that were published earlier. I generally prefer to buy an entire series at once, so I don't have to wait once I've finished one.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  60. For suburban professionals... by gUmbi · · Score: 1

    This is a great way of filling up the library in your new McMansion

  61. Walden by ari_j · · Score: 1, Funny

    I dare you to read Walden cover-to-cover in one week and come back to say that. Not only is reading Walden in one week not leisurely at all, but if you actually accomplish that feat your head will explode. It's a widely believed fact!

  62. Harvard Classics by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have a set of the Harvard Classics on my bookshelf, the "five-foot-shelf" that is a very good collection of Great Books. (http://www.bartleby.com/hc/). Biography, history, drama, literature, fiction, philosophy, science, politics, religion... it's all there. I've been working my way through it for almost twenty years. Well worth having around, as it means you will never lack for high-quality reading material.

    My alma mater, the University of Chicago (http://www.uchicago.edu/), is very much a Great Books kind of place. Here's a good list to start with (from "How to Read a Book" by Mortimer J. Adler and Charles Van Doren, 1972):

    1. Homer (9th Century B.C.?)
    Iliad
    Odyssey
    2. The Old Testament
    3. Aeschylus (c.525-456 B.C.)
    Tragedies
    4. Sophocles (c.495-406 B.C.)
    Tragedies
    5. Herodotus (c.484-425 B.C.)
    History
    6. Euripides (c.485-406 B.C.)
    Tragedies
    (esp. Medea, Hippolytus, The Bacchae)
    7. Thucydides (c.460-400 B.C.)
    History of the Peloponnesian War
    8. Hippocrates (c.460-377? B.C.)
    Medical Writings
    9. Aristophanes (c.448-380 B.C.)
    Comedies
    (esp. The Clouds, The Birds, The Frogs)
    10. Plato (c.427-347 B.C.)
    Dialogues
    (esp. The Republic, Symposium, Phaedo, Meno, Apology, Phaedrus, Protagoras, Gorgias, Sophist, Theaetetus)
    11. Aristotle (384-322 B.C.)
    Works
    (esp. Organon, Physics, Metaphysics, On the Soul, The Nicomachean Ethics, Politics, Rhetoric, Poetics)
    12. Epicurus (c.341-270 B.C.)
    Letter to Herodotus
    Letter to Menoeceus
    13. Euclid (fl.c. 300 B.C.)
    Elements
    14. Archimedes (c.287-212 B.C.)
    Works
    (esp. On the Equilibrium of Planes, On Floating Bodies, The Sand-Reckoner)
    15. Apollonius of Perga (fl.c.240 B.C.)
    Conic Sections
    16. Cicero (106-43 B.C.)
    Works
    (esp. Orations, On Friendship, On Old Age)
    17. Lucretius (c.95-55 B.C.)
    On the Nature of Things
    18. Virgil (70-19 B.C.)
    Works
    19. Horace (65-8 B.C.)
    Works
    (esp. Odes and Epodes, The Art of Poetry)
    20. Livy (59 B.C.-A.D. 17)
    History of Rome
    21. Ovid (43 B.C.-A.D. 17)
    Works
    (esp. Metamorphoses)
    22. Plutarch (c.45-120)
    Parallel Lives
    Moralia
    23. Tacitus (c.55-117)
    Histories
    Annals
    Agricola
    Germania
    24. Nicomachus of Gerasa (fl.c. 100 A.D.)
    Introduction to Arithmetic
    25. Epictetus (c.60-120)
    Discourses
    Encheiridion (Handbook)
    26. Ptolemy (c.100-170; fl. 127-151)
    Almagest
    27. Lucian (c.120-c.190)
    Works
    (esp. The True Way to Write History, The True History, The Sale of Creeds)
    28. Marcus Aurelius (121-180)
    Meditations
    29. Galen (c. 130-200)
    On the Natural Faculties
    30. The New Testament
    31. Plotinus (205-270)
    The Enneads
    32. St. Augustine (354-430)
    Works
    (esp. On the Teacher, Confessions, City of God, On Christian Doctrine)
    33. The Song of Roland (12th century?)
    34. The Nibelungenlied (13th century?)
    (Völsunga Saga is the Scandinavian version of the same legend)
    35. The Saga of Burnt Njal
    36. St. Thomas Aquinas (c.1225-1274)
    Summa Theologica
    37. Dante Alighieri (1265-1321)
    Works
    (esp. The New Life, On Monarchy, The Divine Comedy)
    38. Geoffrey Chaucer (c.1340-1400)
    Works
    (esp. Troilus and Criseyde, The Canterbury Tales)
    39. Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519)
    Notebooks
    40. Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527)
    The Prince
    Discourses on the First Ten Books of Livy
    41. Desiderius Erasmus (c.1

    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Harvard Classics by inode_buddha · · Score: 1
      Speaking of which, I grew up with the "Heritage Press" collection (mid-to-late 1960's). I'm wondering whatever happened to them and I am looking for alternatives such as The Easton Press collection.

      No, it's not in the budget at this time - more like a long-term (lifetime) project.

      --
      C|N>K
    2. Re:Harvard Classics by brummie_andy · · Score: 1

      You missed the Da Vinci Code off the list.

    3. Re:Harvard Classics by dkleinsc · · Score: 1
      As long as we are clear that this is a list of European and American classics, it's a great list. However, if we start considering other cultures, we get a whole slew of other influential and important classics, such as:

      Mohammed - The Koran

      Sun Tzu - The Art of War

      Lao Tzu - Tao Te Ching

      various Vedic literature

      Miyamoto Musashi - A Book of Five Rings
      ...
      The point is that this list, long as it is, only scratches the surface of European and American classics, and completely ignores the majority of human civilization.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:Harvard Classics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Eurocentricity of that list astounds me. Call me a PC postmodern relativist if you wish, but I'd like to see these books on there:

      The Lady Murasaki - The Tale of Genji
      Lao-Tzu - Tao Te Ching
      Siddhartha Gautama - The Dhammapada
      The Mahabharata/The Bhagavad Gita
      Omar Khayyaam - Rubaiyat
      Moses Maimonides - Guide for the Perplexed
      The 1001 Nights

      That's just the tip of the vast iceberg of non-Western literature out there. Sheesh!

    5. Re:Harvard Classics by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1

      Agreed, the Great Books approach has long suffered from the DWM slant (Dead White Male), and the canonical Harvard Classics list, developed in the early 20th century, as badly as any. With this in mind, it's important to recognize that any list of books to read can never be any more than a good place to start, as I said in the parent post.

      More current lists recognize and draw more heavily from Asian, Indian, Middle Eastern, and other cultures. For example:

      The New Lifetime Reading Plan by Clifton Fadiman and John S. Major (4th ed., 1997)

      Part One
      1. Anonymous, ca. 2000 BCE. The Epic of Gilgamesh.
      2. Homer, ca. 800 BCE. The Iliad.
      3. Homer, ca. 800 BCE. The Odyssey.
      4. Confucius, 551-479 BCE. The Analects.
      5. Aeschylus, 525-456/5 BCE. The Oresteia.
      6. Sophocles, 496-406 BCE. Oedipus Rex; Oedipus at Colonus; Antigone
      7. Euripides, 484-406 BCE. Alcestis; Medea; Hippolytus; Trojan Women; Electra; Bacchae.
      8. Herodotus, ca. 484-425 BCE. The Histories.
      9. Thucydides, 470/460-ca.400 BCE. The History of the Peloponnesian War.
      10. Sun-tzu, ca. 450-380 BCE. The Art of War.
      11. Aristophanes, 448-388 BCE. Lysistrata; The Clouds; The Birds.
      12. Plato, 428-348 BCE. Selected Works.
      13. Aristotle, 384-322 BCE. Ethics; Politics; Poetics.
      14. Mencius, ca. 400-320 BCE. The Book of Mencius.
      15. Valmiki, ca. 300 BCE. The Book of Ramayana.
      16. Vyasa, ca. 200 BCE. The Mahabharata.
      17. Anonymous, ca. 200 BCE. The Bhagavad Gita.
      18. Ssu-ma Ch'ien, 145-86 BCE. Records of the Grand Historian.
      19. Lucretius, ca. 100-ca. 50 BCE. Of the Nature of Things.
      20. Virgil, 70-19 BCE. The Aeneid.
      21. Marcus Aurelius, 121-180. Meditations.
      Part Two
      22. Saint Augustine, 354-430. The Confessions.
      23. Kalidasa, ca. 400. The Cloud Messenger; Sakuntala.
      24. Revealed to Muhammad, ca. 650. The Koran.
      25. Hui-neng, 638-713. The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch.
      26. Firdausi, ca. 940-1020. Shah Nameh.
      27. Sei Shonagon, ca. 965-1035. The Pillow Book.
      28. Lady Murasaki, ca. 976-1015. Tale of Genji.
      29. Omar Khayyam, 1048-? The Rubaiyat.
      30. Dante Alighieri, 1265-1321. The Divine Comedy.
      31. Luo Kuan-chung, ca. 1330-1400. The Romance of the Three Kingdoms.
      32. Geoffrey Chaucer, 1342-1400. The Canterbury Tales.
      33. Anonymous, ca. 1500. The Thousand and One Nights.
      34. Niccolò Macchiavelli, 1469-1527. The Prince.
      35. François Rabelais, 1483-1553. Gargantua and Pantagruel.
      36. Wu Cheng-en, 1500-1582. Journey to the West.
      37. Michel Eyquem de Montaigne, 1533-1592. Selected Essays.
      38. Miguel de Cervantes de Saavedra, 1547-1616. Don Quixote.
      Part Three
      39. William Shakespeare, 1564-1616. Complete Works.
      40. John Donne, 1573-1631. Selected Works.
      41. Anonymous, 1618. The Plum in the Golden Vase (Chin P'ing Mei)
      42. Galileo Galilei, 1574-1642. Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems.
      43. Thomas Hobbes, 1588-1679. Leviathan.
      44. René Descartes, 1596-1650. Discourse on Method.
      45. John Milton, 1608-1674. Paradise Lost; Lycidas; On the Morning of Christ's Nativity; Sonnets; Areopagitica.
      46. Molière, 1622-1673. Selected Plays.
      47. Blaise Pascal, 1623-1662. Thoughts (Pensées).
      48. John Bunyan, 1628-1688. Pilgrim's Progress.
      49. John Locke, 1632-1688. Second Treatise of Government.
      50. Matsuo Basho, 1644-1694. The Narrow Road to the Deep North.
      51. Daniel Defoe, 1660-1731. Robinson Crusoe.
      52. Jonathan Swift, 1667-1745. Gulliver's Travels.
      53. Voltaire, 1694-1778. Candide and Other Works.
      54. David Hume, 1711-1776. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.
      55. Henry Fielding, 1707-1754. Tom Jones.
      56. Ts'ao Hsüeh-ch'in, 1715-1763. The Dream of the Red Chamber (also called The Story of the Stone).
      57. Jean Jacques Rousseau, 1712-1778. Confession

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    6. Re:Harvard Classics by Apotsy · · Score: 1
      Charles Van Doren? The quiz show guy?

      Did he actually read all those books, or just the Cliff's Notes?

    7. Re:Harvard Classics by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1

      No, this is Prof. Mark Van Doren, of Columbia, Charles' father.

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    8. Re:Harvard Classics by RealAlaskan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The Eurocentricity of that list astounds me. Call me a PC postmodern relativist if you wish

      Ok, you're a PC postmodern relativist.

      I've read:
      The Lady Murasaki - The Tale of Genji
      Omar Khayyaam - Rubaiyat
      The 1001 Nights.

      I agree that they're worthwhile. I would like to read
      Moses Maimonides - Guide for the Perplexed.

      The reason that these great book lists are Eurocentric is that the Western cultures are ours. A Chinese who hasn't read some Confucious would be strangely lacking: he simply wouldn't have the background to understand the fundamentals of his own culture. I like your suggestions for further reading, but I think that any Westerner would be foolish to try to understand other cultures before he has understood his own. Reading Confucious before reading the Greek and Christian authors will make a Westerner a bad copy of a Chinese, with a false idea of the meaning and worth of both cultures. A fish needs to know water before he studies air.

      Those of us in the Western cultures need to know who Plutarch wrote about, and what he said about them, what Socrates and Plato and Aristotle had to say, who and what Peter and Paul and Luke and John wote about, and how that man they wrote about was fundamentally different in outlook than the Greeks and the Hebrews, and on and on. We need to know some Shakespeare and Conrad and Chaucer and Aquinas and Cervantes and Dante and Thucydides and Bunyan and Tacitus and what-have-you.

      Western civilization is deep and complicated, and it has an intellectual history that no other culture really parallels. What Mortimer Adler called ``the great conversation'' is a more than 2000 year-long discussion on men and gods and God, what those others should expect from us and we from them, and on the nature of reality. Other cultures have stated opinions on all of these things, of course, but so far as I know, only our literature and our culture has explored the range of ideas and opinions in the sort of depth and over the number of centuries that ours has. For example, the idea that the individual has intrinsic value, that it's not acceptable to slaughter your enemies or your peasants or even the savage tribesmen on the next continent, even if they're useless to you, is a uniquely Western idea, barely 2000 years old. The idea that slavery is intrinsically wrong is another example of this uniqueness. Slavery exists today only where Western culture hasn't yet reached.

      The great books lists are intended to let Westerners get a good grounding in our own culture, and our culture is so enormously rich and varied that that's not a small project. The lists just try to give folks a starting place: you don't stop with the great books, you start with them. So, for all the reasons I've mentioned, Eurocentricism is both wise and unavoidable.

    9. Re:Harvard Classics by schlick · · Score: 2, Informative

      Easton Press offers a version of the Harvard Classics, among other collections. Till I moved to Europe I was getting "The Masterpieces of Science Fiction Collection". Also the Harvard Classics collection was compiled in 1910 so you'll definately want to add more to it.

      I can not say enough about how awesome these books are. The are leather bound with guilded pages on acid neutral paper. These book will last generations.

      Check out their site.

      http://www.eastonpress.com/ViewProduct.asp?Sku=028 6&Back=1&sMediaCode=Q2005

      --
      "It's because they're stupid, that's why. That's why everybody does everything." -Homer Simpson
    10. Re:Harvard Classics by warrior · · Score: 1

      Why not just replace the whole list with "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance"?

      Joking aside, I'm surprised there are no Ayn Rand books in the list. Perhaps her work is just a derivative of some of these other works. I haven't even begun to make a dent in this list.

      --
      Intel transfer the difficult from Hadware to software, for get more power, programmer need more technology. -- chinaitn
    11. Re:Harvard Classics by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Funny

      These cannot be great books, since they are almost exclusively by white men.

      Only (men) wishing to extend the patriarchal phallo-centric culture would advocate a list of books such as this. We all now know that womyn and persons of color are the only ones who may speak authoritatively on any subject. At least, that's what my college lit classes were teaching.

      --
      -Styopa
    12. Re:Harvard Classics by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have Horny Housewives so it can't be that comprehensive.

    13. Re:Harvard Classics by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised there are no Ayn Rand books in the list.

      She made almost no impact on philosophy, culture or history and the quality of her work was lacking. Sorry, but you shouldn't surprised.

    14. Re:Harvard Classics by T_C_Kelly · · Score: 1
      "How to Read a Book" by Mortimer J. Adler and Charles Van Doren, 1972"

      Now that book alone is a great book - 33 years later it should be labeled a classic - that is never read by most Americans; and that's a damn shame seeing how it would open their eyes to analitical reading.

      As Jacques Barzun said of the book, "These 400 pages are packed full of high matters which no one solicitous of the future of American culture can afford to over-look."
    15. Re:Harvard Classics by msebast · · Score: 1

      Slavery continues to exist in Europe and the United States. According to the BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4534393.stm it's a $15.5 billion industry.

    16. Re:Harvard Classics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the postmodern relativist again.

      Okay, are you serious? The Indian culture goes back much farther and has covered every bit as much territory as Western civ has. When the Europeans were still crucifying Jesus, the Indians had already invented existentialism. In any case, making a blanket statement like you did is entirely unjustified when one is dealing with the history of civilizations.

      You say that, to a Westerner, it's important to read the core works of etc. But to understand and confront Western culture today, Michel Foucault and Fredric Jameson and Paul Goodman and Jacques Derrida and Hayden White are infinitely more useful than Plutarch (who is excellent, but has about as much relevance to global postmodernity* as Yehuda Halevi).

      And no, I don't think Eurocentrism is wise at all. We live in a world that, for better or worse, mainly by force, has been united by Western culture. But this is a global world. Most of the goods in your home are made thousands of miles away by people from an entirely different culture. To pretend like the culture of Europe is what you mostly need to study is like reading Hamlet and skipping all of Ophelia's lines.

      *I don't say "postmodernity" because I am a postmodernist. Postmodernity is where we live.

    17. Re:Harvard Classics by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      The Indian culture goes back much farther and has covered every bit as much territory as Western civ has.

      The Greek and Roman roots of Western Civ are only about 2500 to 3000 years old. As I recall, the Hebrew roots are close to 5000 years old. That's far enough back that claims of longer duration are specious.

      When the Europeans were still crucifying Jesus, the Indians had already invented existentialism.

      I'm not sure that they ever got beyond it. That's what I was pointing out, above: that Western Civ has had a unique, long-running, free-ranging discussion on all that jazz. I call it unique in large part because it has come up with unique, and uniquely valuable, contributions. It represents multiple streams of thoughts over many centuries.

      But to understand and confront Western culture today, Michel Foucault and Fredric Jameson and Paul Goodman and Jacques Derrida and Hayden White are infinitely more useful than Plutarch ...

      In so far as they are restating the old truths in a comfortable modern format, they're just fine. I'd suggest that C.S. Lewis has probably done a better job of that than any of your examples.

      And no, I don't think Eurocentrism is wise at all.

      If you go read what I wrote, you'll see that I pointed out that the great books lists are starting points. When I said that Eurocentrism is wise, I meant (and I thought I was saying quite clearly) that it's the only useful starting point for a Westerner. You don't stop with the great books, you start there. Then, when you have a firm grounding in your own culture, you go on. My Indian friends have a very different great books list, I'm sure, and different classical languages to study.

      Most of the goods in your home are made thousands of miles away by people from an entirely different culture.

      Is that at all relevant to the discussion?

      I don't say "postmodernity" because I am a postmodernist. Postmodernity is where we live.

      Where do you live? And what do you mean by "postmodernity"? If you mean that the fundamental underpinnings of our culture are significantly different than they were 200 years ago, you must live in some other country than the U.S. As an empirical confirmation of that, consider the 2004 U.S. general election. The winning candidates were careful to present themselves as cultural traditionalists.

    18. Re:Harvard Classics by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1

      You don't stop with the great books, you start there.

      I'll second this as an important point that many people miss. Once you've read every book in the Great Books canon, whichever list or lists you're working from, that can only be an introduction. Mortimer Adler's essay, "Why Read Great Books?" (URL:http://radicalacademy.com/adlergreatbooks1.ht m>) contains a great nugget: "Exclusive preference for either the past or the present is a foolish and wasteful form of snobbishness and provinciality. We must seek what is most worthy in the works of both the past and the present."

      "I don't waste my time on dead white males when there are so many important new thinkers." is just as narrow-minded and limiting as "If you read the great thinkers of the past, you have read everything worth reading."

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    19. Re:Harvard Classics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Mohammed - The Koran"

      The Qu'ran is penned by none other than God himself, you insensitive clod!

    20. Re:Harvard Classics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is /.

      of course it is going to be phallo-centric.

    21. Re:Harvard Classics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Greek and Roman roots of Western Civ are only about 2500 to 3000 years old. As I recall, the Hebrew roots are close to 5000 years old. That's far enough back that claims of longer duration are specious.

      The Mahabharata dates from 3000 BCE. In any case, getting into an anthropological penis-size contest is hardly worthwhile.

      I'm not sure that they ever got beyond it. That's what I was pointing out, above: that Western Civ has had a unique, long-running, free-ranging discussion on all that jazz. I call it unique in large part because it has come up with unique, and uniquely valuable, contributions. It represents multiple streams of thoughts over many centuries.

      Of course it's unique. The Hopi were unique. The Mongols were unique. Every culture has made interesting and unique philosophical insights. If you deny that the Indian civilization consists of multiple streams of thought, you haven't looked close enough. Certainly, it has been long-running. Hinduism has, arguably, had more varied offshoots even than Judaism. In any case, I am, once again, not interested in a penis-size contest. I agree that Western civ has made unique contributions. I also think that Chinese, and Islamic, and Hindu, and Japanese, and African, and Native American, and colonial cultures have made unique contributions.

      In so far as they are restating the old truths in a comfortable modern format, they're just fine. I'd suggest that C.S. Lewis has probably done a better job of that than any of your examples.

      I've read C.S. Lewis, and I love him, even though I'm an atheist (The Everlasting Man particularly). But the old line that the postmodernists are just ripping off Hume, Plato, Nietzsche, etc. is somewhat bizarre. Certainly, Foucault and Derrida wrote with a profound understanding of Plato, since they had some of the best classical educations available. But if you'd actually read, say, Of Grammatology, or The Order of Things, or Hayden White's Metahistory, it becomes fairly obvious that they bring plenty to the philosophical table. As for Paul Goodman, he was certainly not a postmodernist, and he admitted and explicitly relied on the fact that his foundational beliefs went back to Jefferson and farther.

      If you go read what I wrote, you'll see that I pointed out that the great books lists are starting points. When I said that Eurocentrism is wise, I meant (and I thought I was saying quite clearly) that it's the only useful starting point for a Westerner. You don't stop with the great books, you start there. Then, when you have a firm grounding in your own culture, you go on. My Indian friends have a very different great books list, I'm sure, and different classical languages to study.

      I agree, to some extent. My contention, however, is that the culture of 2005 is different from the culture of 1755, and today, the minimum minimorum reading list for a person that's culturally prepared for a mature understanding of contemporary society includes a much wider cultural spectrum than in 2005. You may disagree, that's fine.

      Is that at all relevant to the discussion?

      Yes. Global capitalism is the defining characteristic of contemporary culture, and if one seeks to understand it, it is necessary to understand the cultural and historical roots of the system. Nike Sweatshop #3403-C1 owes as much of its existence to Chinese isolationism in the early modern period as it does to the late-medieval blossoming of the European urban bourgeoisie.

      Where do you live? And what do you mean by "postmodernity"? If you mean that the fundamental underpinnings of our culture are significantly different than they were 200 years ago, you must live in some other country than the U.S. As an empirical confirmation of that, consider the 2004 U.S. general election. The winning candidates were careful to present themselves as cultural traditionalists.

      This is a complicated question. For a definition of postmodernity (which includes a whole lot of things, globalization, post-colonialism, decen

    22. Re:Harvard Classics by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      the idea that the individual has intrinsic value, that it's not acceptable to slaughter your enemies or your peasants or even the savage tribesmen on the next continent, even if they're useless to you, is a uniquely Western idea, barely 2000 years old.

      I fail to see it. The concept that the individual is merely a wretch underserving of anything more than being thrown in a pit of fire for all eternity seems pretty standard for Western concepts. The slaughtering of enemies and peasants and savage tribemens (and Jews) seems as standard for the west as for the east. (Well, okay, violent anti-semitism is pretty much a western idea.)

      OTOH, many forms of Buddhism are completely pacifist and have for centuries held that it's not right to kill other people, period.

      The idea that slavery is intrinsically wrong is another example of this uniqueness.

      You say that on such authority, having read all of three books for outside the west. Certainly, slavery was not a world-wide phenomenon prior to the west bringing the light. It would be very surprising if a society whose holy works fairly explicitly approve of slavery* and whose form of slavery amounted to genocide in many cases and was not known for its gentleness should be the only one that believes that slavery is intrisically wrong.

      * Paul sends a Christian slave back to his Christian master, and says nothing about giving the slave his freedom.

  63. Quoth the article: by Eric+S.+Smith · · Score: 1
    We think the collection is a perfect fit for more than a few software engineers we've known -- smart, self-directed people who are eternally curious, yet abhor wasting time intellectually and can't hide their impatience with the fuzziness of liberal arts. For them, here's a pre-selected, pretty comprehensive list of Western classics, assembled for purchase with a single mouse-click...

    "[C]an't hide their impatience with the fuzziness of liberal arts"? I don't get it. What does this de-fuzz? The selection process? Someone else has made the fuzzy choices, but there's still no Classicometer that you point at a book to decide if it's worth reading. And if you're so impatient with the arts, what are you doing reading literature -- skimming the filler in Moby Dick to get to the juicy technical details of whaling?

    Bah. The only thing that's simplified and streamlined here is the process of buying a whole bunch of stuff. Has consumerism reached such grim intensity that it's no longer more fun to browse and shop for yourself?

    1. Re:Quoth the article: by hal9000(jr) · · Score: 1

      What does this de-fuzz? The selection process? Someone else has made the fuzzy choices, but there's still no Classicometer that you point at a book to decide if it's worth reading.

      *Sigh* The subtext in that statement is that programmers want clear cut answers. They can't or don't want to handle ideas or notions that have no answer or require some thoughtful reflection.

      If your a programmer, you should be insulted.

    2. Re:Quoth the article: by Eric+S.+Smith · · Score: 1
      The subtext in that statement is that programmers want clear cut answers. They can't or don't want to handle ideas or notions that have no answer or require some thoughtful reflection.
      If your a programmer, you should be insulted .

      I agree, but I think it's even more insulting than that, really, because even reading the thing by its own internal logic (in which programmer = tiresome Boolean-loving dickhead), the only advantage to this bulk purchase is that you get to buy a lot at once. The implication is that the hardest thing about literature is picking which book to read, and that afterward you just sit down and, presumably, become cultured as a matter of course.

      The real problem being solved is "How can I buy more?", and the presumption behind the offering of such a solution is offensive in itself.

  64. Discount? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for another subsidiary of Penguin's parent company, Pearson.. I wonder if I can get a discount on that..... Of course, it would make up for my apartment having no furniture.

  65. Russian works by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that many of the Russian works (Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Pushkin) in Gutenberg are poor translations.

    1. Re:Russian works by drsquare · · Score: 1

      So what? The 'Penguin Classics' translation of 'Crime and Punishment' is just as bad a translation. It's clearly written by someone who doesn't speak English natively. At least with Gutenberg you don't have the priveledge of paying for it.

  66. Who would buy it? a Library.... by tommyleebyron · · Score: 0

    a Library that has many people with many interests...

  67. Re:So how many...all of them by WebHostingGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have read the entire list

    (of titles that is).

    --
    Quality Hosting e3 Servers
  68. OLD classics but limited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lovecraft, but no Tolkien, no Heinlein, no Azimov,
    where's Kant? Where are Gauss, Riemann, etc?
    Classics for those who imagine that somehow the modern world could be sustained for a week without science and math and all that follow from them. Baloney.

  69. Amazon = Evil? by Cobblepop · · Score: 1

    From dictionay.com: USAGE NOTE Enormity is frequently used to refer simply to the property of being great in size or extent, but many would prefer that enormousness (or a synonym such as immensity) be used for this general sense and that enormity be limited to situations that demand a negative moral judgment, as in Not until the war ended and journalists were able to enter Cambodia did the world really become aware of the enormity of Pol Pot's oppression. Fifty-nine percent of the Usage Panel rejects the use of enormity as a synonym for immensity in the sentence At that point the engineers sat down to design an entirely new viaduct, apparently undaunted by the enormity of their task. This distinction between enormity and enormousness has not always existed historically, but nowadays many observe it. Writers who ignore the distinction, as in the enormity of the President's election victory or the enormity of her inheritance, may find that their words have cast unintended aspersions or evoked unexpected laughter.

  70. not bad by indy_Muad'Dib · · Score: 1

    the shipping on that is only $3.99, not to shabby.

  71. No way! by jdavidb · · Score: 1

    19 titles by Graham Green. Sounds nice. But missing One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, by Alexander Solzhenitsyn? Incomplete.

    1. Re:No way! by dalutong · · Score: 1

      Wow. You're right. I was going to buy this. But I'm not going to buy a collection that doesn't have One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovish -- because if it doesn't have that in a collection of 1000, then it doesn't have other's I'd want.

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
  72. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The list contains:
    # Beowulf by Anonymous
    # Beowulf: A Prose Translation by Anonymous
    # Beowulf: A Verse Translation by Anonymous

    Which, as we all recognize, is a Beowulf cluster....

  73. Shipping by sprag · · Score: 1

    "Special Shipping Information: This item is not eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping. See details."

    Gee, ya think?

  74. What a deal! by mweier · · Score: 1

    at least I don't have to rummage the site looking for one more title to push it into free Super Saver shipping status...

    anyone looking to buy this should probably sign up for the A9.com dealio so they can save 1.57% (aka $125). This drops the price to a mere $7864

    --
    digital artist, 3D animator, web designer, and otherwise technological creative type....
  75. Classic "leading with statistics" technique by ianscot · · Score: 1
    This is archetypal leading math, on the level of those USA today graphs with loooong arms for Uncle Sam.

    If you want the world's population to seem unbelievably huge, too big to ever deal with, make all the people join hands in a line.

    If you want to make the defecit seem smaller, describe it as paper money in dumpsters. As a volume it won't seem nearly as daunting than it would all stacked up, let alone end to end.

    Both are correct, but they lead the reader's impression in a way that's intentional.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  76. Not Gutenberg's fault. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    The translations suck horribly because Gutenberg has to rely on public domain versions. Since translations are copyrightable, the translation must have been written pre-1923, which kinda cuts down on the available material.

    Petition your congresscritter for a saner copyright term if you want Gutenberg to have access to newer, better translations.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  77. Re:Obligatory "Princess Bride" quote by z_gringo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Unpossible

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
  78. I'll tell you who by pegasustonans · · Score: 1

    Who would buy 828 feet worth of books, for nearly $8,000, that would take 20 years to read at the rate of one title per week?

    Someone who values literature. This may be difficult for some of you to understand, but such people do exist.

    --
    And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
  79. Humanities Professor Quote by LetterJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As someone who got their degree in English and spent a lot of time hanging around Humanities professors, I always found their candid opinions of "classics" amusing. My favorite quote (which was probably quoted from someone else) was from a British literature professor I had: "The classics are the books we all pretend to have read."

    This type of thing is common in all fields, where many of the people who've ACTUALLY done the studying in depth treat the "legends" and "classics" in the field with a little less reverence than those outside the field.

  80. Religious Bigotry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not a Christian, but I find it very telling that The Koran is listed but The Bible is not.

  81. Re:Thank god... / Better Link by carnivore302 · · Score: 1

    This link doesn't sponsor the wall street journal.

    --
    Please login to access my lawn
  82. Who Buys Knowledge in Bulk? by Quirk · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't buy my books in bulk by publisher. When I choose a book it's by way of research into the author(s)' background. By way of example, many history books from the 50s and 60s that I've picked up have a strong bias as the authors were promulgating their theory as either pro marxist or antimarxist. I'd no idea that much of the soft sciences were a battle ground for Marxists ideologues. Who's to say what biases the publisher may express throughout the collection and why limit yourself to the exegencies of one publishing house in a search for knowledge.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  83. You mean that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a short copyright would NOT cause civilisation to collapse?!?!

    1. Re:You mean that by slim · · Score: 1

      Well, it means that royalties are going to an editor /note writer/introduction writer, rather than to the copyright holder for the original work, or their estate.

      So from a copyright holder's perspective, longer copyrights are good for them.

  84. Wrong, wrong, and wrong. Also, wrong. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Massive massive editing errors"? Holy shit! Can you point out one of these massive massive errors?
    Or are you possibly referring to errors which were in the original text, which the Project explicitly refuses to correct, since their stated goal is to preserve the original author's intent, even if that original author couldn't spell?

    The "bizzare [sic] formatting system" Gutenberg uses is Plain Vanilla ASCII for a reason---longetivity. They say it better than I could; read their rationale. They're more interested in making the text stable for the long term, than in compiling it for your device-of-the-week. Besides, as other users have pointed out, you can, with little to moderate effort, derive your proprietary format from the ASCII plaintext.

    Not to mention that Gutenberg provides some titles in RTF format. Or HTML, including formatting, illustration, and so on. Or that they have a whole section about reading their eBooks on PDAs.

    When was the last time you used PG? 1985? They have over 16,000 etexts, with more being added every day---how is this falling "far short"? What great and towering public-domain works does their catalog lack?

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Wrong, wrong, and wrong. Also, wrong. by jonatha · · Score: 1

      "longetivity"

      Is that like relativistic longitude?

      --
      The SCO lawsuit makes me wish my company were in Utah. We need a new building.
    2. Re:Wrong, wrong, and wrong. Also, wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "bizzare [sic] formatting system" Gutenberg uses is Plain Vanilla ASCII for a reason---longetivity.

      It would have been cool if they at least used (La)TeX escape codes for accents: you can generally still read it like normal text, but it allows tools to be written to allow more 'advanced' display on devices that support it.

  85. $8 a book isn't cheap by samsmithnz · · Score: 1

    Considering these are all 'classics' and not new releases, ~7.39 a book isn't that cheap, you'd probably pay less in Barnes and Noble. The fact that the original price was ~$12.24 a book is outrageous.

  86. Step two, avoid duplications. by argent · · Score: 1

    So although the collected works of Jane Austen were on my reading list one year, I read none of them and focused on DH Lawrence, Faulkner, etc.

    Good choice.

    I've read three Jane Austen novels. Two of them were a complete waste of time, since they were all the same story with different characters. Well, different names. Or should I say "character", since apart from the female protagonist there weren't any. I've been told that one Jane Austen or Emily Bronte novel would satisfy my lifetime requirement for that genre, and I can believe it.

  87. ahahahahaha by milimetric · · Score: 1

    This is too funny... the whole point of buying these books would be to have a list of them so I can read one that sounds interesting when I wanted to pick up a new book. But now I can just look at the list and buy as I go.

  88. "Enormity"? by refraxd · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't use it to describe the books, unless you really, really hate them.

    ENORMITY
    NOUN: Inflected forms: pl. enormities
    1. The quality of passing all moral bounds; excessive wickedness or outrageousness. 2. A monstrous offense or evil; an outrage.

  89. I can cure you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Like you, I feel that if I give up on a book (or movie, for that matter) before it's done then I've done an injustice to the author. It could redeem itself - and I can't judge a book on the first few chapters.

    Don't worry! I can cure you of that opinion!!!

    Just read _Les Miserables_, the entire, five volume, unabridged version. That will cure you of that silly "wait, it might get better" notion! You'll appreciate editors more, too!

    Highlights you'll encounter will include:
    • The author's opinions about the battle of Waterloo (he seriously thinks the only reason they lost was "bad weather")
    • After the diatribe on Napolean, the first character of the book is introduced: and immediately abandoned for an entire volume or two.
    • A practically brick by brick depiction of the house where two young lovers once met: but the lovers aren't introduced until chapters later.
    • Not one, but three entire chapters on "the nature of slang". Just 'cause
    • An entire chapter on the nature of the sewers of Paris. The tiny section of the plot where the heros are forced to venture down there is much shorter than the description of the sewers themselves.
    • Last, but certainly not least, after five volumes of self-indulgent ramblings, Hugo dares to write, during the pivotal battle scene of the whole entire book: "Let me be brief". He then sums up the action in a few paragraphs, so he can get back to more self-indulgent maunderings.


    Les Miserables had some very good writing in it, but excavating it is like digging through a tapped out gold mine. It's ultimately just not that profitable: and this from a work that is nominally "a great classic".

    After reading that thing, I say, don't worry about "doing an injustice to the author". By allowing yourself to wade through a sea of literary detrius, you're only doing an injustice to yourself.
    --
    AC
    1. Re:I can cure you! by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Moby Dick was a bit like that and ( I think ) the only book I have started and never finished.

      If you like endless ill informed speculation about whether whales are fish I'm sure it's a great book.

  90. Having - Reading - Understanding - Acting? by Peer+Janssen · · Score: 1

    The most important thing is not to HAVE all these books (althought it's fine).

    Far more important is to actually USE any of them to learn more about human functioning and to contribute more efficiently to improving oneself and the rest of humanity.

    There is certainly a very valuable treasure of human experience in such a collection -- and a lot of garbage, too (which can also be instructive -- by contrast). What I would love to see, is an HONEST and neutral compilation of human ideas. It's not necessary to read ALL this paper in order to get the most important things and start to do something.

    Of course, some will say, read the Bible then. Others will prefer the Coran, or Tao Te King, or The Revelation of Arès. Fine, these are important fundamental works indeed which should be read and acted upon. But once you know the spiritual foundation of man, knowing human ideas and history is useful, too, in order to know more and act more efficiently in this mankind for the common good.

  91. I didn't say it was Gutenberg's fault by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

    and I'm aware that translations, and "editions" (i.e. add a foreword by a well-known author of today) are copyrightable. Anyone wanting to read Gutenberg's translated works though should be aware that they're reading flawed writing.

  92. Distributed Proofreading by Potor · · Score: 1
    Hey, instead of warning off people from something you clearly do not understand, why not use your super English-major skills and help Gutenberg as a distributed proofreader?

    Go on. Join.

  93. Obligatory Angry Flower Link by DLWormwood · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm surprised the nitpicking failed to link to this...

    --
    Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
  94. Everyman's Library by mat.h · · Score: 3, Informative

    For classics, I prefer Everyman's Library. They're hardcovers and contain a usually very interesting introduction and a timeline of the author's life along with important events in literature and history. The latter alone is worth the time to pick these up a library.

  95. 'enormity' = evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GRRR. Pet bug.

    'Enormity' means huge *evil*, not just huge. (definition) 'Enormousness' may sound like a mistake but it's actually correct.

    On the other hand, possibly it *is* a horribly evil offer. When you buy it, it... eats up all of your free time! In a truly evil manner!

    ...or something.

  96. Wonder if I can add this to my student loans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man. Library Science students everywhere must be shaking like junkies desparate for fix as they read this.

  97. Flatland by emilng · · Score: 1


    Flatland (complete text) by Edwin A. Abbott
    It's a work of fiction written in 1884 about a 3-dimensional being's visit to a 2-dimensional world. It blew my mind when I first read it in high school.

  98. Liquidating the old ones? by scottsk · · Score: 1

    And this happens right when they're trying to liquidate old copies of the Penguin Classics with the old covers to clear out warehouse space? :) Reminds me of grab-bags of anything - there may be one or two good books in it, but you have to buy a whole lot of crud. I'll stick to a-la-carte. BTW, Buy.com sells Penguin Classics dirt cheap.

  99. Re:Mods... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is still trolling.

  100. Great for libraries, lousy prices by davidwr · · Score: 1

    If I wanted to start a small library, or add a humanities section to a company technical library, this is a great way to do it.

    Except...

    It's way overpriced.

    Public domain books can be had for a lot less.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  101. Geeky stuff at Gutenberg. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions. Newton's Principia Mathematica is now in PGDP in the original Latin. The Descent of Man and The Origin of Species . I'm kinda surprised that Euclid's not in there at all. Maybe a dearth of old translations?

    Too bad there's not much SF in there, either. An unfortunate consequence of it being a relatively recent genre. Stupid copyright terms.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Geeky stuff at Gutenberg. by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      I'm kinda surprised that Euclid's not in there at all. Maybe a dearth of old translations?

      It's a bitch to handle the illustrations and the math.

  102. An alternative by Winkhorst · · Score: 1

    These are paperbacks, are they not? The neat thing to do would be to assemble a collection of nicely hardbound versions of these--not firsts, but nicely bound--that would look a lot more impressive lining your library than a bunch of cheap paperbacks.

    --
    "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
  103. Spam of the week by titten · · Score: 1

    The most entertaining part (IMO) of this article was a little snippet at the end, called "SPAM OF THE WEEK":

    SPAM OF THE WEEK: We love spams that leave us with absolutely no idea what we're supposed to do. Like the one that came to the Real Time box last month from the sender Van Announcement. Its subject was "Drinks?" and the message body was "Happy hour @ 6:00 @ Jake's". And that was it -- no date, no embedded gif, no link, nothing. Was something missing? Was this some code we weren't cool enough to decipher? Perhaps it's just the grim possibility that we missed free booze, but we'd still like to know.

  104. Its not to read.... by stretch0611 · · Score: 1

    Listen, you don't buy the entire collection to read. You buy it to impress others if you are vain. You put the books on your bookshelf so that guests to your house think you are cultured and well educated. I'll bet that Amazon already has people interested in it.

    --
    Looking for a job?
    Want your resume written professionally?
    DON'T USE TUNAREZ!!!
  105. I don't have TIME for this! by kevcol · · Score: 1

    I want the Cliff's Notes for each one- *then* I'll consider it!

  106. Avalanche O' Books by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    "Who would buy 828 feet worth of books, for nearly $8,000, that would take 20 years to read at the rate of one title per week?"

    Probably not just a who, but several of them. I guess I can see one person ordering all this for his or her personal library, but I'm bettering it's probably geared more toward organizations and such.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  107. Shipping by bbrack · · Score: 1

    According to checkout info, shipping is only $3.99 (sounds like a bargain to me!)

  108. Paperback. by itomato · · Score: 1

    The paperpack factor would keep these out of just about any library except for that of a Public Elementary School. And then, a better deal could be had on better quality books.

    Would you pay as much for a Kia for a giant pile of paperbacks?

    If they did something amazing like offer some sort of quality, leather binding, special edition, hell - even a cardboard cover, then I can see dropping nearly $8000 for books at one time.

    Otherwise, I'd take my chances and perhaps miss out on 4 or 5 of those books by Anonymous and Shakespeare to bid on a few closed public library book lots. Might even get free bookshelves.

    Even at $2 per book (high estimate) you'd come out ahead, unless you're one of those people who has to have all *brand new* stuff.

    If the point is to have Emily Bronte on hand for all eternity, what's the sense of having her in a crappy airport paperback?

  109. Quantity, not quality by superdude72 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the perfect thing for rich dorks who have acquired everything that can be acquired, except for taste.

    Unfortunately all these books don't do any good if you don't read them. A prison convict with a 20-year-old paperback edition of Tolstoy has as much a chance at being well read as anyone else. That must be irritating to the millionaire who has exerted so much control over every other aspect of his life.

  110. I've got a better idea... by Simonetta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've got a better idea. Let's encode the text of these thousands of books to standard ASCII. Then we'll put the entire text of these thousands of books on a blank 39 cent DVD ROM. And distribute them to our friends or list them on P2P networks.
    Then we will have thousands of web sites where people from all over the world can talk and read about the individual titles. Were certain characters jerks, megamanics, fools, cowards, heroes, or just ordinary people caught in difficult circumstances.
    Maybe people will get out their camcorders and make 'home movies' based on chapters or incidents of the books. Imagine 21st century movies, P2P distributed zero-budget 'productions' that use different actors for different chapters or sections of a book.

    The centralized movie business from Hollywood appears to have peaked and seems to be entering a period of accelerating decline. Insanely expensive and tepid remakes of mediocre television shows specifically focused on a young audience that has little to reference its quality.

    The greatest threat facing Hollywood is not that people will endless consume its product without paying, it's that people will stop thinking of Hollywood as a source of entertainment product at all. This threat is increased by the fact that the change will be invisible to Hollywood until it has developed an unstopable momentum. Hollywood may find its product repelling people in a manner similar to identical poles of magnets pushing away from each other.
    Hollywood is about to find itself in the same position as the big four American auto makers did in the 1980s. Someone comes out of 'nowhere' and takes a big chunk of their market share. And nothing they can do will convince people to go back to their product.

    1. Re:I've got a better idea... by mankey+wanker · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Brilliant idea.

    2. Re:I've got a better idea... by daniil · · Score: 1
      I've got a better idea. Let's encode the text of these thousands of books to standard ASCII.

      What, like Project Gutenberg? Because i'd venture that most of these books (they're called classics for a reason, you know) are already in the public domain and available online.

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    3. Re:I've got a better idea... by SFEley · · Score: 1

      Penguin Classics? Hollywood? Yeesh. Pick a rant and stick with it.

      --
      ESCAPE POD - The Science Fiction Podcast Magazine
    4. Re:I've got a better idea... by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm sure folks will be racing to download the home movie version of Plato's Phaedo. Even with the inevitable directorial liberties (Socrates is a wookiee, Echecrates is actually a Sith apprentice conspiring with Socrates' Athenian captors), I somehow doubt that it's going to put much of a dent in the revenues of the latest action flick.

      Mind you, I'd buy this collection if I had the spare change -- or, more likely, the Loeb Classical Library instead -- but I'm not under any illusions about its mass appeal.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    5. Re:I've got a better idea... by cmacb · · Score: 1

      Hollywood is about to find itself in the same position as the big four American auto makers did in the 1980s. Someone comes out of 'nowhere' and takes a big chunk of their market share. And nothing they can do will convince people to go back to their product.

      I've been predicting this for a few years now (probably not an original notion with me either) and I just see more and more evidence every day (or with every film release).

      A big factor is that, even if Hollywood was doing a good job of what they do (and they are certainly not) filmmakers in many other countries now have access to the same technology that used to be only possible with the high budget Hollywood system.

      As more special effects things are done with computers and animation the only advantage Hollywood might still have is the number of servers they can hook up into a rendering farm. You still need artists and tech people with know-how, and more and more that describes India, China, Brazil and dozens of other places.

      More importantly, while other countries used to crave the American culture that could produce these things, all other aspects being equal they would probably rather have a similar product in their own language and with their own talent. That might not have been affordable to them in the past, but it is now.

      With only the mind-numbed American public to consume this Hollywood stuff guess what sort of stuff it is going to be. My Netflix queue doesn't contain anything made in the last 10 years and I doubt I'll ever see all the old movies once through. If I do, watching them again will be no big burden. As far as I'm concerned Hollywood can close up shop and go home right now. I won't miss them.

      It is a shame that they got themselves into this position though. I don't think it's fixable.

    6. Re:I've got a better idea... by westlake · · Score: 1
      The greatest threat facing Hollywood is..that people will stop thinking of Hollywood as a source of entertainment product at all.

      The reality is that world cinema is going Hollywood. Playing David to Hollywood's Goliath

    7. Re:I've got a better idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've got a better idea. Let's encode the text of these thousands of books to standard ASCII.
      Or better yet, everyone should memorize one of these books so they will be available even when reading is banned. Remember, if you read literature that makes you think, the terrorists have already won!
  111. Re: Trade paper size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are probably printed as trade paperback
    books. They're around 9 inches tall and hold
    up much better than the standard mass market
    aperback books which are around 6 inches. Don't
    have any here at work to check, but thost sizes
    are close.

  112. Don't forget the shipping. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that if you bought them all separately, you'd get free "Super Saver" shipping. It's not a very good deal at all.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  113. Not to mention!!! by itomato · · Score: 1

    "By our count, if you weed out the multiple translations, different editions and compilations ("The Iliad" is there four times), as well as the "portable" volumes for well-represented authors, you wind up with 1,031 books"

    W T F

    1,031 books after dups and "goofy editions".

  114. I just checked how much shipping costs by assantisz · · Score: 1

    Amazon is charging the usual $3.99 for the entire order. That's a bargain all by itself, no? It ships within one and three weeks and will be fulfilled by Borders.

  115. Re:Religious Bigotry? -left out bible by r_j_howell · · Score: 1

    IIRC, one of the collections of "Great Books" Ii saw, justified leaving out the bible on the premise that nearly every American hous would have one. 'Course this was a set from the 50s, I believe. It probably wasn't terribly correct then.

  116. No, it's not. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Life span.

    HTH.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:No, it's not. by quinto2000 · · Score: 1

      It may be some kind of old-fashioned jargon, but that's not an English word, I'm sorry. Your only source is the glossary attached to a syllabus for a class at the University of Central Arkansas. Why not just admit your mistake and move on?

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un post
    2. Re:No, it's not. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

      Way ahead of you. I guess that means that you fail it now?

      --
      Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  117. So.. by Knightowlz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Could this open some eyes and increase interest in alternative (Linux, Mac) offerings?

  118. Jeez-Just get a library card! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and save your 8k$

    1. Re:Jeez-Just get a library card! by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      And where do you think the libarary gets THEIR books from? I have a feeling that very few if any individuals will take advantage of this offer; it will mainly be institutions like schools and librarys.

  119. Missing by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1
    No H.G.Wells. No Jules Verne. No Plutarch's "Parallel Lives".

    Too much: Loads of stuff prized by the self-anointed intellectual elite like James Joyce.

    Good stuff: lots of true classics from ancient Rome and Greece.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  120. Customers who bought this book also bought by n3on · · Score: 0
    • A matchbox
  121. much better idea, and cheaper too by wcb4 · · Score: 1

    For this price, you could buy a very nice PDA like device or table PC, hit Gutenberg, they have many of these books, and a lot of other not in the collection. A nice little perl script to do formatting, and you have a much better collection, and a tablet PC to boot

    --
    I reject your reality ... and substitute my own.
  122. No free shipping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No free shipping? WTF? We all know they are going to send it media rate, and it'll arrive in 4 weeks water stained and beat up.

    Seriously, if you're dropping that much cash on what's almost certainly a high margin item, they could at least pop for shipping.

  123. Shipping by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    Special Shipping Information: This item is not eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping. See details.

    Well, no free shipping, forget them. I am not buying. I wish I would have known about this before I cleared out my condo...i hope I can get my couch back

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  124. Eventually true for everyone... by jpellino · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The number of books you own increases as time passes.
    The number of books you'll have time to read during the rest of your life decreases.
    At some point in your life, these two lines cross.
    Meaning there is a point in your life when after that, you won't live long enough to read all the books you have.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:Eventually true for everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... you're saying if I don't own any books I'll never die?

      Cool.

  125. This is worth it.... by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    If I was building a house (one day when I am older, and after I get married - but before i have kids) I would build a library. This would be a good way to stock your library with many titles. And it probably comes with some kind of digital list so you can sort it in your favorite database management program. Imagine that for a nice library. Honestly, I would get this if I was building a place.

    Good job for Amazon marketing.

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  126. Let's kick the Grammar Nazism up a notch by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    There is at least one Enlish possessive pronoun that use an apostrophe. In particular "one's" as in "one's grammar is shite".

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:Let's kick the Grammar Nazism up a notch by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Note that 'Enlish' isn't an example of bad grammar but of bad spelling. My grammar is still good enough for me to count as a Nazi. I may have to give up being a spelling fascist however.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    2. Re:Let's kick the Grammar Nazism up a notch by Peyna · · Score: 1

      As a general rule, whenever someone criticizes another's grammar they will make at least as many grammatical mistakes or spelling errors as the person they are criticizing.

      --
      What?
  127. NOT eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping?! by Chiisu · · Score: 2, Funny

    I mean, come on

  128. Legacy by jhines · · Score: 1

    Donating a set to a small town library, or school, would be a great way to set up a legacy.

    The "so and so" collection. If you need a tax write off, and want to be remembered, it is a way to go.

  129. Re: Editing Errors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I've only ever read two Gutenberg e-texts, but: The Gods of Pegana* is missing accents all over the place. In fact, I'm not sure if it even has a single one of the accents in it. And this isn't a case of the "author couldn't spell", unless you're suggesting that Dunsany didn't know how to spell the names he came up with.

    Their version Fifty-One Tales (by the same author) replaces a passage using the Greek alphabet with a passage using the Latin alphabet. (It may still be in Greek, however as I don't know Greek, I can't tell. However, that's not the point, as the Greek alphabet was used for thematic reasons.)

    Not massive massive, but in my opinion they're very detrimental.

    * I'm also missing an accent here, but /. doesn't allow HTML entity codes. The bastards!

  130. fantastic by Sjobeck · · Score: 0

    This is a great idea. I would do it. I dont have that jing laying around right now, but if I did, I'd get one of those amazing $1300 chairs from that Relax The Back store, or this.

  131. who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would buy 828 feet worth of books, for nearly $8,000, that would take 20 years to read at the rate of one title per week?

    Er... perhaps a library?

  132. Longevity by T.Hobbes · · Score: 1

    One definition on a geocities page is usually a hint that the word was misspelled. Try Longevity instead.

  133. It is the perfect gift.. by BobVila · · Score: 1

    for Inspector Gadget. He is the only one who would be able to read them fast enough.

  134. They are bloody paperbacks! by red5standingby · · Score: 1

    For eight grand, give me 300 hardcovers and I would be much happier. Who wants a big-ass family library of paperbacks?

    1. Re:They are bloody paperbacks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you can get 4000 paperbacks. And whats the point of hardcovers when your kid will flat break its back flat in no time. Atleast with paperback you wouldn't regret it.

  135. Slightly Disappointed by mr_rattles · · Score: 1
    They have almost 50 pieces by Shakespeare and eleven by Joseph Conrad and only one from Jules Verne?! I would have expected at least one of the following:
    • 20,000 Leagues under the Sea
    • Journey to the Center of the Earth
    • Mysterious Island
    Not to mention Invisible Man, Murder in the Rue Morgue, To Kill a Mockingbird, Roots, and more. I know they can't fit every classic into this collection but I think they could have sacrificed a few of Shakespeare's lesser known works for some more popular ones by other authors.
  136. like a sandwich with paper-mache filler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oooh, for anything non-English in origin, hundreds of feet of plodding, too-literal translations. Nothing like Don Quixote made unfunny, and Dante made unpoetic.

    (Sorry, pet Penguin peeve.)

  137. Aigh! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Holy crap, I've been living a lie. I wonder how many times I've used that word.

    Thanks; now I'm going to have to remember to kick myself whenever I start saying "longetivity" instead of "longevity". If I don't keep an eye on myself, I'll be saying "irregardless" any day now.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  138. The collection is very tempting... by Fantasy+Football · · Score: 0, Interesting

    It is a matter of economy of scale; these books are going for about two years worth of gasoline. If you read a book a day this offer will keep you going for nearly three years. If it is a book a week, then we are looking at 20 years, not taking in account any re-reading. Many people spend this amount of money and time over and over again on their library. One would not think a second time about buying a subscription to a magazine to save on individual issues; these are just books instead of magazines. In this day and age one has to think about their ROI (return on investment), and if you calculate the time that you can take to enjoy these books if is a fraction of what most entertainment costs today. I my self have quite a few Penguin Classics from back when they had the monochrome orange and white covers. I figured they may be valuable one day. Now I see the true value is in their being read. A small caution is that they do have not really duplicates but different versions or translations of some works as "The Iliad" by Homer has four different books: ISBN: 0140445927 ISBN: 0140275363 ISBN: 0140444440 ISBN: 0140447946

  139. My UPS guy... by Aslan72 · · Score: 1
    My UPS guy would hate me if I ordered this. Can you imagine the forklift that would be required to drop a 700lb package at your door?

    --pete

    1. Re:My UPS guy... by bmalia · · Score: 1

      My UPS guy would hate me if I ordered this. Can you imagine the forklift that would be required to drop a 700lb package at your door?

      Haha,, To top it off, I live in a 3rd floor apartment

      --
      There's no place like ~/
  140. Huh? by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Copyright? Do you have any idea of what the subject is? Most of what Penguin publishes as been out of copyright for longer than they have been in business. They have no worry about things falling out of copyright, as their business model is taking books that are no copyrighted, and publishing them as cheaply as they can.

  141. Only in the US? Pity. by Phrogger · · Score: 1

    Darn it! http://amazon.ca/ isn't carrying it. Ah well, I guess I'll have to live without. :-)

  142. Nothing by Asimov? by Bob3141592 · · Score: 1

    Well, with the poor representation of SF, it won't sell very well to this crowd.

    Many of these books aren't what I'd call classics anyway. But it's an interesting exercise in brute force marketing.

    --
    In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
    1. Re:Nothing by Asimov? by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 1

      If I had any mod points they would be yours right now, in the form of Insightfull. Yes, this is a comprehensive collection of 'clasics' but it isn't a good list of books that have a profound effect on my life.

      --
      We are the Borg...
  143. they're not by avdp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At best they're scanning. Might be good enough to get you an understanding of a simple book (most fiction work). But there is nothing particularly enjoyable in doing so (in my opinion) and they definetely miss the subtleties of the stories.

    Now I am probably going to get all kinds of replies saying that no, they indeed read and absorb every last word. Sorry, I don't believe it.

    1. Re:they're not by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      I think i would have to agree with you, and another poster. At 6 pages per minute, that comes to a page every 10 seconds. Any decent book should not be ready that quickly and reasonably. Even books like the Wheel Of Time require more then this...especially since the world is so large in that book series, you have to link one even to 10 other events. :)

      Thanks -- at least now I don't feel so slow ;)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    2. Re:they're not by sydb · · Score: 1

      You're not alone, I consider myself fairly well read and fluent in English. I can touch type fast enough to minute meetings (not that I do this often...) and people regularly approach me to check their spelling, grammar and sense.

      I read (fiction) fairly slowly because I want to enter the world of the author. If I'm reading it's because I am enjoying the experience. If I am enjoying an experience it deserves to be savoured.

      I like books where, as I get near the last page, I slow down because I don't want it to end.

      Reading fiction quickly seems to me to be a numbers game for the obsessively competitive.

      This doesn't mean I don't understand the concept of a "page turner". The best fiction has you wanting to find out what happens next but also revelling in the moment.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    3. Re:they're not by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      Reading fiction quickly seems to me to be a numbers game for the obsessively competitive.

      Let me guess; you read book slowly because you want to taunt the rest of us with your superiority? If not, why would you assume that our reading styles have anything to do with competition?

      I read fiction quickly because that's how I read books. I finished the Lord of the Rings in 12 hours. I guess I could retrain myself to read slowly, but that would be work. If I want to read something slowly, I'll read a math book or something else I have to slow down for.

    4. Re:they're not by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Reading fiction quickly seems to me to be a numbers game for the obsessively competitive.

      Reading is a skill, just like touch typing. If you practice it enough you'll naturally become faster at it. My "leisurely" reading pace is about 600 words per minute. I'm not bragging here. I can read that quickly because of all the time I've spent reading, not out of competitiveness.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    5. Re:they're not by avdp · · Score: 1

      If reading massive amounts is part of your job (perhaps reading manuscripts) then yes, this is a neat skill. Otherwise, the question is not as much can you read 600 words per minute but do you want to read 600 words per minute. As the poster described there is an element of fun in pacing yourself and savoring the moment. Not only do I not read as fast as I could (and I've read stuff pretty fast in college, never for fun and I've never timed myself) but I often take long breaks between chapters. It allows me to think (and dream about, etc) a little about what I read.

      It's not unlike eating slowly, or drinking a good glass of wine slowly. Sure, I can get drunk and full pretty fast, but the act of eating and drinking is fun (I don't mean at McDonalds), why do you want it to end so fast? Maybe this analogy seems appropriate to me because I am a european living in the US. We can stay at the table for hours. In the US, 30 minutes or less seems like the norm. What's the hurry?

    6. Re:they're not by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      I see your point about stopping and smelling the roses. However, when I do pleasure reading, I'm doing just that. I've practiced enough so that 600 words per minute is my natural reading pace -- any variation from that requires effort. I'll often read literature, for fun, for 8-10 hours at a stretch. I (presumably) read more in that span of time than you because I've practiced and you prefer to do your pleasure reading slowly. I can do more of what I enjoy in the same amout of time. (Don't get me started on drinking! ;-)

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    7. Re:they're not by sydb · · Score: 1

      Yes that's right I am better than you.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    8. Re:they're not by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Reading is a skill, just like touch typing. If you practice it enough you'll naturally become faster

      I must be unnatural then. I read all the time, ever since I was a little kid. I would read encyclopedias, fantasy books, comic books, magazines, newspapers (yes even as a little kid). I can read a page every 2-3 minutes. Typing...well I can type as fast as someone can speak to me (assuming normal conversation speed). That I gained from skill, but I think that was more training my fingers to respond to my brain impulses more efficiently. While reading is based on how fast you can take the data given to your eyes and process them in your brain...i must be slow ;)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  144. Encoding. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    This one, yes? I can only assume that it was produced before Gutenberg started using alternate encodings for its texts. They're still not using Unicode, I don't think, which is why Greek gets transliterated (tau-epsilon-chi becomes "tekh" or something like that, for instance). A few books use Unicode, and many HTML versions use the HTML entity equivalents. Non-english text could, alas, be better. But it's a technical restriction---this is why Gutenberg proofs texts that are all or almost all in the Latin alphabet. It's not sloppiness; it's a technical limitation. I suppose when they get Unicode support running on PGDP, they'll redo some of these. I hope.

    Slashdot does allow ISO 8859-1, though---ÿáý for àçcêñts, I suppose.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  145. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

    How many Libraries of Congress is the Classics Collection?

    --
    [o]_O
  146. Project Gutenberg started this decades ago by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Several people have referred to the Gutenberg archive of non-copyright books. Before OCR, a book-lover had to laboriously type in a volume. OCR still has errors which much corrected. Often an individual will "adopt" a favorite book like community in Fahrenheit-451.

  147. Missing the point again... by SFEley · · Score: 1
    The existence of these books in electronic form does not preclude hardcopy sales. If you can't see the convenience or the romantic value of having a thousand classic books in paper, then sure, you're probably not the target market.

    As for me, I just got back from lunch reading the Penguin Classics edition of Les Miserables. It's well-bound and the typography, while dense, is easy on the eyes. Sure, the thing's a cinderblock, but it's still more pleasant to read with a book beside my plate than my Treo. And it's a lot easier to skip ahead to the appendices, or backwards to remind myself what Valjean actually did for the gardender at the convent.

    --
    ESCAPE POD - The Science Fiction Podcast Magazine
  148. The Name Is Overloaded by Vagary · · Score: 1

    Especially because Newton's is archaically named: it's about physics. Russell and Whitehead were actually setting out to lay down the principles of mathematics.

    1. Re:The Name Is Overloaded by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 1

      To set the record stright:

      "Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica" --Issac Newton

      "Principia Mathematica" --Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
  149. According to the OED... by mako1138 · · Score: 1

    The first definition is a deviation from the norm; abnormal, irregular. The second definition is the criminal one. The third is excessive size, but the usage is considered incorrect.

    Note that "enormous" has basically the same definitions, and "enormity" (which came later) was influenced by the adjective version.

    There's an amusing variety of these words: enorm, enormance, enormand, enormification, enormious, enormitan, enormity, enormly, enormous, enormously, enormousness.

  150. 9 inch thick books? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    828 feet / 1082 volumes = just more than 9 inches for each book.

    Somthing is not right there... I usually put my books on the shelf side-by-side, not end-to-end. They take a lot less space that way.

    lol

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  151. They might toss paperbacks; call first by wsanders · · Score: 1

    A good sentiment, but depending on the size of their collection they might just toss paperbacks, they are not durable enough. And odds on they already have many of these Penguin titles, which are generally "classics", in some other form. My local library just takes donated paperbacks and puts them in their "honor system" no-checkout-required rack or sells them at the flea market fundraiser.

    I woudl call and ask - my library prefers a cash donation - libraries get deep discounts on new hardcover books, they can buy the books they have demand for, and sometiems the classics are available special beefed-up library editions.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  152. Costs too Much by Hythlodaeus · · Score: 1

    Even with the "40% discount" this collection averages over $7.30 per book. Paperbacks of public-domain classics at several local bookstores run $2-$5.

    --
    For great justice.
  153. the numbers don't add up. by davesag · · Score: 1

    something doesn't add up. 828 feet of books = $8000 of books? so say these books are all about $9.99 and so there are about 828 of them - does that mean that each book is on average a foot thick? as i look around my books I see very few books approaching 4 inches thick, let alone a full foot. there's a russian - english dictionary on the shelf that's about 25cm thick; almost a foot. so if the books are more normal penguin editions they are at most half an inch thick. that's more like 20,000 books. which is a complete bargain at $0.40 per book. and even if you don't read them all, they are a valuable resource for your descendants that will keep on entertaining when the oil is all gone.

    --
    I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
  154. Let me see if I've got this straight by Locke2005 · · Score: 1
    The Bhagavad Gita and Buddhist Scriptures> are Western Classics? Why don't they just call this collection "everything Penguin has ever published that is no longer under copyright.

    The really sad thing is not only have I not read any of these books, but most of them I've never even heard of...

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  155. uh ... what? by Apotsy · · Score: 1
    Your previous post mentions the book "How to Read a Book", by Charles Van Doren, not Mark Van Doren. Amazon confirms Charles is the author; the same man who wrote "A Brief History of Knowledge". Wikipedia and other sources name him as the quiz show guy. I do not see any mentions of Mark Van Doren in your previous post nor in any of the linked material.

    What are you smoking?

    1. Re:uh ... what? by Apotsy · · Score: 1

      Oops, there's no "Brief" in the title of the "History of Knowledge" book. Everything else is correct, though.

  156. Shipping is cheap! by ...+James+... · · Score: 1

    Might be a mistake, but...

    Amazon Prime Member
    Items: $7,989.99
    Shipping & Handling: $3.99

    Total Before Tax: $7,993.98
    Estimated Tax: $0.00

    Order Total: $7,993.98

  157. Cost to Ship: $3.99 by Gamma · · Score: 1

    Apparently it's only $3.99!

  158. misleading by a137035 · · Score: 1

    Those books often are in the public domain only because their copyright has expired; back when they were created, they were created by experts. And there is no reason why a 19th century translation, commentary, or piece of literature should not still be the definitive version.

    1. Re:misleading by Jonathan · · Score: 1

      And there is no reason why a 19th century translation, commentary, or piece of literature should not still be the definitive version

      I like Project Gutenberg too, but there is real reason why new translations get made (besides profit) -- 19th century translations into English tend to resemble 19th century English literature -- they just don't seem fresh and use lots of words that have since fallen out of use. Plus, there was the fact that the Victorians were prudes while the Greeks and Romans weren't, so 19th century translations of classical works tend to omit any parts that are a bit racy.

  159. Dover Thrifts by zentinal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, how much would it cost to get the all of the classics as Dover Thrifts???

  160. you know you spent a lot of money at amazon when.. by trainedCodeMonkey · · Score: 0
    you know you spent a lot of money at amazon, when they put this item at the top of your recommended list.

    They must think i'm rich or something.

  161. On my Amazon wish list by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    If any kind soul wants to saddle me with these books, I really wouldn't mind.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  162. Don't forget your $30 off! by amaiman · · Score: 1

    You could save $30 off this item when you get a new Amazon Visa® Card.

    That's the key. Now I can afford it!
    No, wait, still can't...

    It is a pretty neat collection of books, though. Not neat enough that I'd finance a book purchase, however.

  163. Re:Let's kick the Grammar Nazism up a notch. by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    Yes. It's annoying isn't it?

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  164. my bad by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1

    I got my Van Dorens mixed up. Easy enough to do... both Charles' father Mark Van Doren and his uncle Carl Van Doren were Pulitzer-prize winning author, and respected thinkers in their time. Charles, Mark and Carl were all graduates of, and later professors at, Columbia University.

    No smokes here, officer.

    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
  165. one book a week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have at various times of my life read at least one book per day, sometimes more. On a good day an 800 page book is just manageable between an early rise and a late bedtime.
    I have read the complete chronicles of narnia in one sitting.

  166. How much does it cost to ship? by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    That's easy...

    Free Shipping On All Orders Over $25 From Amazon.com

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  167. Someone please explain this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is the parent poster flaming himself? Is this some Slashdot trick to get double karma with a Funny mod the first time and Informative the second?

  168. Text-to-Speeched it to MP3s already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just downloaded via your favorite P2P network! :)

  169. Newton's Archaic All Over by Vagary · · Score: 1

    Ah right, it's the "natural philosophy" that's archaic, but the the "mathematical principles" makes sense in context.

  170. No it is not. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Honestly people, whay some of you do to your eyes is to beg disbelief.

    Ask your optician or ophtalmologists what do they think about this little screen of yours....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:No it is not. by bbc · · Score: 1

      " Honestly people, whay some of you do to your eyes is to beg disbelief."

      "Ask your optician or ophtalmologists what do they think about this little screen of yours...."

      "Bad for your eyes" is a phrase you will find in old wive's tales, not in the diagnoses of eye doctors.

    2. Re:No it is not. by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Reading a reflective TFT is pretty easy on the eyes. It's not like an actively lit source like a CRT, certainly no worse than a book, especially compared to printed material on glossy paper (magazines).

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  171. Wow! by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    And here I was imgining that the English system of measures was complicated and irrational!

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  172. Oh my, oh my.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    38. Miguel de Cervantes de Saavedra, 1547-1616. Don Quixote.
    Part Three
    39. William Shakespeare, 1564-1616. Complete Works.


    That tells me all what I need to know about this list.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Oh my, oh my.... by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1

      In 21st century America, "The Complete Works of William Shakespeare" is a synonym for an unclimbable mountain of words, like "War and Peace" or "Being and Nothingness". Don't let the size of the mountain scare you off... there are so many passages that are just absolutely delightful, that it really is a great read.

      For example, the scene from Henry V, in the tents of the French commanders, just before the battle (end of Act 3?), where the Dauphin is boasting of his military prowess, and everyone else is basically trash-talking him for being a coward and an idiot weakling is just priceless. Shakespeare is full of great stuff.

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain